ABOUT THIS PODCAST 🔗

Average audio length:
11 minutes
Guest interviews
English
United States
3 episodes
since June 1, 2026
episodic

LATEST EPISODE 🔗

Courts are often imagined as neutral spaces, but every judgment reflects decisions about whose experiences count. In this concluding episode, human rights lawyer Nani Jansen Reventlow explores how embracing intersectionality could reshape the European Court of Human Rights itself. Contributors to …

SEARCH PAST EPISODES

Search past episodes of Rewriting Justice: Imagining Intersectional Judgments at the European Court of Human Rights.

PREVIOUS EPISODES

What changes when we look at human rights cases through an intersectional lens? In this episode, human rights lawyer Nani Jansen Reventlow dives into three real cases brought before the European Court of Human Rights — and how activists, lawyers, and legal scholars reimagined them for the book “Int…
Europe’s top human rights court hears cases shaped by multiple forms of oppression — racism, sexism, migration, and poverty — but its judgments rarely reflect how these forces intersect.  In this first episode, human rights lawyer Nani Jansen Reventlow introduces “Intersectionality and Human Rights…
You have seen all episodes of this podcast
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Intersectional Rewrites, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.