ABOUT THIS EPISODE
This week on Conflict Managed we welcome Lucy Standing. Together we explore:
- Internal and external networking
- Her new book, Age Against the Machine: New Rules for Working in an Ageist World
- Continuing career conversations at work
- Agism at work
- Assume good intent, then have the conversation anyway
Conflict Managed is available wherever you get your podcasts and on YouTube @3pconflictrestoration
Lucy Standing is a Chartered Psychologist, founder of Brave Starts, and Vice Chair of the Association for Business Psychology. She was previously Global Head of Recruitment in the Investment Bank and Strategy Consulting sectors across JP Morgan and LEK consulting.
Lucy is co-author of Age Against the Machine, a book that argues the talent shortage gripping British business isn't a talent problem - it's a filtering problem. The most experienced, emotionally intelligent, highest-performing workers in the room are being screened out - by algorithms, by assumptions, and by hiring systems built for a workforce that no longer exists.
Lucy has spoken in the UK Parliament on this issue, contributed research to the OECD on ageing and employment policy, and writes a regular careers column for The Daily Telegraph. As founder of Brave Starts CIC - a career development community of over 2,000 people navigating midlife work transitions - she isn't just making a theoretical argument. She has thousands of real stories to back it up.
Conflict Managed is produced by Third Party Workplace Conflict Restoration Services and hosted by Merry Brown.
#ConflictManagement #WorkplaceCulture #Communication #Connection #Podcast
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:24.769 --> 00:00:27.909
Welcome to Conflict Managed. I'm your host, Merry Brown.
00:00:28.229 --> 00:00:32.489
This week on Conflict Managed, we welcome Lucy Standing. Lucy is a charter psychologist,
00:00:32.989 --> 00:00:36.909
founder of Brave Starts, and vice chair of the Association of Business Psychology.
00:00:37.189 --> 00:00:41.589
She was previously global head of recruitment in the investment bank and strategy
00:00:41.589 --> 00:00:45.589
consulting sector across JPMorgan and LEK Consulting.
00:00:46.069 --> 00:00:51.089
Lucy is co-author of the new book Age Against the Machine, a book that argues
00:00:51.089 --> 00:00:55.269
the talent shortage gripping British businesses isn't a talent problem,
00:00:55.609 --> 00:00:57.009
it's a filtering problem.
00:00:57.209 --> 00:01:01.209
The most experienced, emotionally intelligent, highest performing workers in
00:01:01.209 --> 00:01:06.329
the room are being screened out by algorithms, assumptions, and by hiring systems
00:01:06.329 --> 00:01:08.609
built for a workforce that no longer exists.
00:01:09.109 --> 00:01:13.129
Lucy has spoken in the UK Parliament on this issue, contributed research to
00:01:13.129 --> 00:01:19.149
the OECD on aging and employment policy, and writes a regular column for the Daily Telegraph.
00:01:19.389 --> 00:01:24.309
As founder of the Brave Starts CIC, a career development community of over 2,000
00:01:24.309 --> 00:01:29.149
people navigating midlife work transitions, she isn't just making a theoretical argument.
00:01:29.369 --> 00:01:32.149
She has thousands of real stories to back it up.
00:01:32.735 --> 00:01:36.755
Good morning, Lucy, and welcome to Conflict Managed. It's very nice to be here,
00:01:36.815 --> 00:01:38.155
Merry. Thank you very much for having me.
00:01:38.655 --> 00:01:41.335
I know we're going to have a fabulous conversation today. I can't wait to talk
00:01:41.335 --> 00:01:43.575
about your brand new book that has just come out.
00:01:43.735 --> 00:01:49.015
But before we get to that, I would like to hear about the first job you ever had as a young person.
00:01:49.635 --> 00:01:53.415
The first job I ever had was working, I grew up in Hong Kong.
00:01:53.855 --> 00:01:59.095
So I actually worked for a restaurant chain called LA Cafe,
00:01:59.635 --> 00:02:03.575
which is a rather odd name for a Hong Kong based restaurant
00:02:03.575 --> 00:02:06.935
but I was a hostess so I
00:02:06.935 --> 00:02:10.795
would meet and greet people as they walked in and show them to their tables
00:02:10.795 --> 00:02:15.315
I'd also sort of help plan the sort of seating you know all of the reservations
00:02:15.315 --> 00:02:19.095
for the day when I got in I planned so that all of the waiters would get equal
00:02:19.095 --> 00:02:24.375
spoils for the tips and things and yeah that was it was my first job and I did
00:02:24.375 --> 00:02:25.335
that two summers in a row.
00:02:26.215 --> 00:02:30.995
What was that like? So when you went to work, did you feel, was it supportive?
00:02:31.055 --> 00:02:34.115
Was it scary? Was it, what was it like?
00:02:34.835 --> 00:02:39.875
Well, I mean, in many ways, it was an absolutely brilliant job because it wasn't
00:02:39.875 --> 00:02:44.495
the sort of role that was going to dictate or predict the rest of my life.
00:02:44.575 --> 00:02:47.875
I knew it was a summer job and it was a fun summer job,
00:02:47.935 --> 00:02:50.775
but I didn't have all of the resources at that
00:02:50.775 --> 00:02:53.815
point to maybe say no a little bit more hard
00:02:53.815 --> 00:02:56.835
and a bit more you know with a bit more authority so I
00:02:56.835 --> 00:03:00.015
do remember there being quite a strong culture around drinking
00:03:00.015 --> 00:03:02.795
and of course with it being a bar and
00:03:02.795 --> 00:03:05.835
a restaurant the you know it was very much de
00:03:05.835 --> 00:03:09.695
rigueur that at the end of the day you'd sit around the bar and have a few drinks
00:03:09.695 --> 00:03:13.495
with your work colleagues and because I was finishing my university my summer
00:03:13.495 --> 00:03:16.615
holidays going back to university so they'd know I was leaving the tradition
00:03:16.615 --> 00:03:21.475
was anyone who was leaving would You'd be forced to drink a couple of really
00:03:21.475 --> 00:03:22.955
quite potent cocktails.
00:03:23.215 --> 00:03:26.375
And if you didn't drink them, you'd get thrown in the fountain outside.
00:03:27.352 --> 00:03:30.832
And I didn't want to drink the cocktail because I knew it had Sambuca in it, which I hate.
00:03:31.452 --> 00:03:36.472
But I also didn't want to get thrown outside. So stupidly, I did cave into peer
00:03:36.472 --> 00:03:38.752
pressure and I drank them.
00:03:38.972 --> 00:03:42.472
And let's just say, let's just put it this way. I spent the rest of that evening
00:03:42.472 --> 00:03:45.292
on a friend's balcony throwing up over the balcony.
00:03:45.632 --> 00:03:49.792
I mean, actually, it was OK in the end, but genuinely really quite dangerous.
00:03:50.472 --> 00:03:55.532
Yeah. It can sound like harmless fun, as we know that people die from alcohol
00:03:55.532 --> 00:03:57.012
poisoning and hazing, right?
00:03:57.012 --> 00:04:00.612
That's it's hazing there's a reason why we don't do it yeah
00:04:00.612 --> 00:04:04.252
you know and i was one of my when i went to university one
00:04:04.252 --> 00:04:07.152
of the kids in the first year in the block
00:04:07.152 --> 00:04:10.132
that we were living in died from that so
00:04:10.132 --> 00:04:12.932
way too much alcohol one night choked on
00:04:12.932 --> 00:04:19.092
his own vomit died i mean how ridiculous it's awful it's awful yeah it is it
00:04:19.092 --> 00:04:25.812
is a an excellent reminder of why we do have certain standards of behavior and
00:04:25.812 --> 00:04:30.852
why something that might look like harmless fun really is not,
00:04:30.972 --> 00:04:32.592
right? That's highly dangerous.
00:04:33.212 --> 00:04:38.832
Yeah, it is. I mean, I think 99 times out of 100, it's usually okay.
00:04:39.252 --> 00:04:48.172
But yeah, being older and wiser to not want to be the 1% is something that I
00:04:48.172 --> 00:04:50.152
think takes a bit of maturity to get to.
00:04:50.612 --> 00:04:53.872
Yeah. And you mentioned peer pressure, like we're subject to that.
00:04:53.992 --> 00:04:58.152
A lot of times, So we think about that for the young worker or for the younger person.
00:04:58.452 --> 00:05:02.732
But I'm sure you see in your work, as I do in mine, that peer pressure never goes away.
00:05:03.392 --> 00:05:07.632
It's how are we going to decide to deal with it?
00:05:07.732 --> 00:05:11.112
How are we going to show up when somebody is pressuring or a whole group is
00:05:11.112 --> 00:05:14.472
pressuring us to do something that doesn't feel right or that actually might
00:05:14.472 --> 00:05:16.972
be illegal or just against our own moral code?
00:05:17.900 --> 00:05:23.720
I mean, I would say the way that I see that show up with our members and the
00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:26.400
kind of the workshops that we run, the discussions we have,
00:05:26.600 --> 00:05:33.860
I would say that the men that I work with probably struggle most,
00:05:33.860 --> 00:05:37.000
as in, if I'm going to have a conversation with somebody,
00:05:37.920 --> 00:05:43.060
most of the women that I deal with have strong social support around them and
00:05:43.060 --> 00:05:44.800
they have strong peer-to-peer network.
00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:47.840
With with men the difference is very subtle
00:05:47.840 --> 00:05:50.600
so there actually aren't very big differences between men and women
00:05:50.600 --> 00:05:53.360
but societally you know if a group of women
00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:56.800
get together they're probably more likely to talk about feelings
00:05:56.800 --> 00:06:01.520
impact emotions when the men get together it's a little bit more the latest
00:06:01.520 --> 00:06:06.060
deal whatever is going on in sports there is less space for them and i guess
00:06:06.060 --> 00:06:09.820
a bit less availability and potentially less societal structure for them to
00:06:09.820 --> 00:06:13.240
kind of go oh look i i'm not really enjoying my job or look,
00:06:13.340 --> 00:06:15.060
I've been made redundant and look,
00:06:15.160 --> 00:06:17.500
I'm really struggling to find work again.
00:06:18.160 --> 00:06:22.380
The mechanisms for them to be able to share that seem to be fewer and far between.
00:06:22.640 --> 00:06:27.860
So I find a lot of the men that I deal with will struggle with the expectation
00:06:27.860 --> 00:06:33.240
that's put upon them and they don't often have an outlet to voice their anxieties,
00:06:33.420 --> 00:06:34.460
their struggles, their concerns.
00:06:35.020 --> 00:06:40.180
It's a really good point because when we have these expectations that are put on us and we're not sure,
00:06:40.460 --> 00:06:43.700
it is so very helpful to have somebody or
00:06:43.700 --> 00:06:46.620
a group to process that with instead of we're just when we
00:06:46.620 --> 00:06:49.360
don't do it outside we're just kind of stuck in
00:06:49.360 --> 00:06:53.720
these loops and we've got this our own narrative instead of sometimes just saying
00:06:53.720 --> 00:06:57.720
it can help us figure it out but if we don't do that or we don't have an outlet
00:06:57.720 --> 00:07:03.560
then we can get I think really easily stuck and reduce our possibilities because
00:07:03.560 --> 00:07:08.820
we're not thinking collaboratively or a group or we're just we're spinning in ourselves and,
00:07:09.330 --> 00:07:15.370
And I think that's one of the reasons why I put such strong emphasis on dialogue,
00:07:15.690 --> 00:07:18.450
discussion, conversation, connection.
00:07:18.790 --> 00:07:22.410
You know, we don't have one meeting that's a webinar.
00:07:22.750 --> 00:07:28.610
I refuse to do anything where we're just talking at people or we're not even
00:07:28.610 --> 00:07:32.170
I mean, whilst we have a resources section, this is the nonprofit I run.
00:07:32.170 --> 00:07:36.310
Whilst I've got a resources section, it's not really where we're sending people
00:07:36.310 --> 00:07:39.570
to spend hours and hours of time doing e-learning or anything like that,
00:07:39.650 --> 00:07:42.210
because it is the most unengaging form of learning.
00:07:42.370 --> 00:07:44.750
And that isn't what brings people back time and time again.
00:07:45.090 --> 00:07:50.070
If you're actually having to discuss and answer questions, why do you do that?
00:07:50.210 --> 00:07:52.910
What makes you worry about that? What help would you like next?
00:07:53.070 --> 00:07:56.910
That idea sounds okay, but what about, have you thought about this,
00:07:57.030 --> 00:07:59.410
that, or the other? When you actually have a dialogue.
00:08:00.237 --> 00:08:04.317
Puts whatever thinking you've got in your head, it kind of pushes it down to
00:08:04.317 --> 00:08:08.637
a next layer of processing because now you have to justify, you have to answer,
00:08:08.957 --> 00:08:12.037
you have to articulate your anxieties about things.
00:08:12.177 --> 00:08:17.797
So it just, it takes it from one particular level and just pushes it down another
00:08:17.797 --> 00:08:22.997
stage, which I think has the impact of it being more potent.
00:08:23.657 --> 00:08:27.077
But certainly as far as reward is concerned.
00:08:27.417 --> 00:08:31.797
If somebody is articulating an answer to something, if they are communicating
00:08:31.797 --> 00:08:35.977
an anxiety and they're getting some form of feedback from that that's live,
00:08:36.237 --> 00:08:41.837
that's empathetic, that's supportive, then actually that as an experience is far more rewarding.
00:08:42.297 --> 00:08:45.597
And I think in a world, maybe we'll go on and talk about this later,
00:08:45.717 --> 00:08:50.437
but in a world of AI and constant private equity firms wanting to sort of support
00:08:50.437 --> 00:08:54.617
and invest in the software as a service, subscription models,
00:08:54.937 --> 00:08:58.817
passive income, blah, blah, blah. I think, yeah, you know what?
00:08:59.277 --> 00:09:03.397
I'm hopefully building the model that's scalable, but human in connection.
00:09:03.737 --> 00:09:08.337
Yeah. Because it's just more effective. You know, people just don't engage as
00:09:08.337 --> 00:09:12.397
effectively with something that is passive and non-interactive.
00:09:12.937 --> 00:09:18.117
100% agree. Absolutely. You know, it's the thing about technology is we,
00:09:18.197 --> 00:09:20.997
and we have all these tools but sometimes we just fall in
00:09:20.997 --> 00:09:23.937
love with technology and and we want it
00:09:23.937 --> 00:09:27.157
to work we want it to do this certain sort of thing but then we forget but
00:09:27.157 --> 00:09:30.017
who is it serving if technology is serving us and we're human
00:09:30.017 --> 00:09:34.577
persons and then we have to understand how human persons really are how they
00:09:34.577 --> 00:09:38.957
really work what really motivates them and unfortunately for the vast majority
00:09:38.957 --> 00:09:44.637
of us it's not clicking through a series of videos and they're like oh okay
00:09:44.637 --> 00:09:49.177
i've got it and this has seeped into me and now I'm going to make these changes and this is, you know,
00:09:49.497 --> 00:09:53.937
not that we can't learn bits of information, but we're more than algorithms.
00:09:54.217 --> 00:09:57.157
We're not bits of information. So we need something else.
00:09:57.744 --> 00:10:03.624
Yeah, I completely agree. So, Lucy, I want to talk about your nonprofit, Brave Starts.
00:10:03.724 --> 00:10:07.884
But before we get to that, I want to know how you got into this space.
00:10:08.064 --> 00:10:10.784
So can you just take us a little bit through like what you studied at university
00:10:10.784 --> 00:10:14.784
and your career trajectory to get to where you are today?
00:10:15.364 --> 00:10:20.244
Yeah, my well, so I'm a chartered business psychologist.
00:10:20.704 --> 00:10:24.804
And so that's my sort of my professional hat. And I have been a psychologist
00:10:24.804 --> 00:10:29.704
pretty much my entire life. So obviously, at university, there was the odd job
00:10:29.704 --> 00:10:34.184
that you're doing, like the waitressing and so on to sort of help supplement a bit of income.
00:10:34.564 --> 00:10:38.944
But my sort of my serious job, if you like, started, you know,
00:10:38.984 --> 00:10:41.524
I did my degree in psychology at university.
00:10:41.764 --> 00:10:46.204
My first job ever was actually working in an executive search firm.
00:10:46.364 --> 00:10:51.104
But I think the more colloquial name that you might refer to that is as headhunting.
00:10:51.104 --> 00:10:54.344
So I did headhunting for a year and I absolutely
00:10:54.344 --> 00:10:57.324
hated it it was repetitive it was
00:10:57.324 --> 00:11:00.144
dull it was I felt I had no integrity because
00:11:00.144 --> 00:11:03.084
I was lying to people the whole time you know it was in the days before
00:11:03.084 --> 00:11:06.564
LinkedIn it was in the days where you'd have to contact through switchboards
00:11:06.564 --> 00:11:09.444
make up excuses for why you needed to talk to people pretended
00:11:09.444 --> 00:11:12.944
I was a journalist so that I could get through to certain people ask them all
00:11:12.944 --> 00:11:17.024
sorts of questions and then and then bare-faced lie about why I was asking these
00:11:17.024 --> 00:11:21.244
questions and people were so you know generous with information I I couldn't
00:11:21.244 --> 00:11:24.964
even send an email afterwards to say thank you from a Financial Times email
00:11:24.964 --> 00:11:27.284
address or whatever excuse I was lying about.
00:11:27.644 --> 00:11:31.964
So I absolutely hated that role. And I thought, right, if I loved my degree,
00:11:31.964 --> 00:11:34.544
I'm going to go back and do my master's and do this properly.
00:11:34.744 --> 00:11:36.704
So I went back and did my master's.
00:11:37.044 --> 00:11:40.644
From there, my first job was working in an investment bank.
00:11:41.444 --> 00:11:46.424
And that was really where it all started on. So I was managing graduate recruitment.
00:11:47.176 --> 00:11:53.276
And actually, it was probably that first job that made me realise how poor so
00:11:53.276 --> 00:11:54.536
many forms of assessment are.
00:11:54.836 --> 00:11:58.016
So, you know, we used to run assessment centres.
00:11:58.616 --> 00:12:03.496
And these assessment centres, we would ask people to do things like interviews,
00:12:03.876 --> 00:12:07.356
case study exercises, role plays, group exercises and things.
00:12:07.696 --> 00:12:10.976
There was one interview and that was done by the managing director.
00:12:11.616 --> 00:12:15.576
And when I followed up two years later, and we looked at how these graduates
00:12:15.576 --> 00:12:19.556
performed in their roles, and we'd sort of go, let's look at the bonuses,
00:12:19.776 --> 00:12:23.536
a percentage of salary, line manager ratings, and how happy they are in their jobs.
00:12:24.496 --> 00:12:30.576
The assessment exercise that had not only no correlation, but a negative correlation
00:12:30.576 --> 00:12:34.176
with people's performance two years later was the managing director interview.
00:12:35.156 --> 00:12:39.396
So in other words, we had managing directors go, I can spot an investment banker
00:12:39.396 --> 00:12:42.836
the minute they walk in through the door. And of course, they couldn't.
00:12:43.296 --> 00:12:46.656
They could spot people who are probably quite confident, well-dressed,
00:12:47.136 --> 00:12:47.996
you know, these sorts of things.
00:12:48.136 --> 00:12:52.976
If anything, they ruined and undermined the effectiveness of the process.
00:12:53.216 --> 00:12:56.436
So then I was like, hmm, very interesting information.
00:12:57.296 --> 00:13:02.636
But of course, comparing the grads with interns was where things got really interesting.
00:13:02.636 --> 00:13:05.456
Because of course interns would come in and some of them would get offered
00:13:05.456 --> 00:13:08.096
a job at the end of the summer and some of them would
00:13:08.096 --> 00:13:11.056
say i never want to work in an investment bank
00:13:11.056 --> 00:13:14.396
ever again thanks but no thanks others would
00:13:14.396 --> 00:13:17.356
turn around and go oh my god my dream i've loved
00:13:17.356 --> 00:13:22.516
this summer and in inevitably again two years later the ones who tended to be
00:13:22.516 --> 00:13:26.096
the best performers were the ones who were interns that had converted into the
00:13:26.096 --> 00:13:30.296
jobs as opposed to the grads so what that tells us is that people make better
00:13:30.296 --> 00:13:36.736
decisions for the business if they are allowed to self-select the job for themselves.
00:13:37.056 --> 00:13:40.516
So, you know, if we give people more insight into the job,
00:13:41.171 --> 00:13:44.591
They will make a better decision about whether or not they want that job.
00:13:44.931 --> 00:13:46.791
And ultimately, that's then better for the company.
00:13:47.331 --> 00:13:53.371
And yet here in 2026, we are still in a scenario where for most jobs,
00:13:53.631 --> 00:13:56.611
the way that we find out about them is through a job description.
00:13:56.851 --> 00:14:01.551
No conversation, something on a website or worse than that, a jobs portal.
00:14:02.171 --> 00:14:05.871
And then the way that we apply for it is easy apply, no effort needed.
00:14:06.071 --> 00:14:09.191
You can do 500 applications in a day with LinkedIn if you like.
00:14:09.751 --> 00:14:13.891
So zero effort required. And that leads to probably the worst outcome.
00:14:14.551 --> 00:14:20.231
And so, you know, that's a bit of a long-winded way of saying the reason I do
00:14:20.231 --> 00:14:24.651
the work I do now and the whole Brave Starts piece is it's come from lots and
00:14:24.651 --> 00:14:29.551
lots of pieces of experience all stitched together over the course of my life.
00:14:29.691 --> 00:14:34.331
It started in graduate recruitment, but actually it's also come from things
00:14:34.331 --> 00:14:37.231
like designing e-learning modules that I know nobody ever looks at.
00:14:37.769 --> 00:14:42.049
You know, it comes from running courses where I know people enjoy the face-to-face element most.
00:14:42.389 --> 00:14:45.449
And all of that insight comes together to build Brave Starts.
00:14:45.789 --> 00:14:50.549
And the reason we've built Brave Starts is because I think adults need career
00:14:50.549 --> 00:14:52.869
guidance just as much as students at university do.
00:14:53.209 --> 00:14:54.829
And we know that the world is
00:14:54.829 --> 00:14:58.969
ageist. So there are specific barriers that people face as they get older.
00:14:59.709 --> 00:15:03.929
And actually, you know, helping support people through that and helping them
00:15:03.929 --> 00:15:06.549
understand that they're going to have to do things differently.
00:15:07.749 --> 00:15:11.989
Doesn't take someone talking to them the whole time. It takes someone who does
00:15:11.989 --> 00:15:18.349
show them the reality, gives them the insight, but then facilitates them to
00:15:18.349 --> 00:15:22.089
talk to each other, to want to meet again because they've met each other last time.
00:15:22.169 --> 00:15:24.469
And it's a great group and I want to get together next week.
00:15:24.829 --> 00:15:28.849
And then because we've given you the insight, how are you going to start doing things differently?
00:15:29.509 --> 00:15:32.389
Let's see how that plays out over the next few weeks and months.
00:15:32.389 --> 00:15:35.469
Is that more effective or less effective, and so on and so forth.
00:15:35.629 --> 00:15:39.769
So everything that we're doing is about trying to push people to understand
00:15:39.769 --> 00:15:43.949
more about the reality that they're up against, have more agency about what
00:15:43.949 --> 00:15:46.169
it is that they do to take control over their lives.
00:15:46.409 --> 00:15:50.429
But ultimately, so that they're in a position where they can carry on working,
00:15:50.829 --> 00:15:54.449
making a contribution to the world of work. You know, as far as I'm concerned, forever.
00:15:54.889 --> 00:15:58.149
You know, I would like a world where people don't ever retire.
00:15:58.649 --> 00:16:02.289
But don't get me wrong. I'm not saying everyone has to work five days a week
00:16:02.289 --> 00:16:03.249
for the rest of their lives.
00:16:03.309 --> 00:16:09.789
I think I want to take the 25 years of retirement and just sprinkle it across the course of our lives.
00:16:09.849 --> 00:16:13.429
I don't mind if there's someone in his 90s who's doing two mornings a week,
00:16:13.449 --> 00:16:16.909
but I also don't mind if there's someone who's 28 that decides,
00:16:17.089 --> 00:16:19.729
I've just had two young children. I'm going to take a two-year break right now.
00:16:20.701 --> 00:16:26.301
Right. Thinking about work in a very different way is what I hear that you're saying.
00:16:26.801 --> 00:16:31.681
And from the beginning. So whether it's our first job or we are mid-career and
00:16:31.681 --> 00:16:38.421
we want to change careers, the question is, how do we find that shift when there
00:16:38.421 --> 00:16:40.021
aren't these mechanisms out there?
00:16:40.501 --> 00:16:44.721
It's, okay, I studied this, and so I'm going to go into this profession.
00:16:44.941 --> 00:16:50.321
And I think, I mean, many of us know people who did one thing at university
00:16:50.321 --> 00:16:53.341
and showed up in that career, and now they're not doing that anymore because
00:16:53.341 --> 00:16:59.221
once they get into the job, the job of it, the day in, the day out, it's not satisfying.
00:16:59.221 --> 00:17:02.501
It's not what they thought it was going to be. It doesn't suit them.
00:17:02.921 --> 00:17:05.281
And then mid-career, if we think about changing careers, again,
00:17:05.341 --> 00:17:09.281
it's like, okay, well, who did I have contact with? What do I imagine this is?
00:17:09.281 --> 00:17:12.001
Maybe you have more of an idea because you've been in the world of work,
00:17:12.101 --> 00:17:16.601
but still this particular job, what it actually looks like day and day.
00:17:17.201 --> 00:17:25.901
And so just finding, you know, what career is going to be suited to me is seems
00:17:25.901 --> 00:17:31.601
like there are lots of answers to that, but we don't seem to be doing that in society.
00:17:31.601 --> 00:17:34.261
There aren't very many cultures or really i
00:17:34.261 --> 00:17:37.581
don't know really any culture that says let's practice let's
00:17:37.581 --> 00:17:40.621
do all these different sorts of things to find out what resonates with
00:17:40.621 --> 00:17:43.901
you and therefore that's best for you and the organization and society
00:17:43.901 --> 00:17:46.841
yeah i mean you you get
00:17:46.841 --> 00:17:51.361
snippets of it there's not you're right there's not much but you know there
00:17:51.361 --> 00:17:55.521
are case studies there are stories of people who've kind of done things like
00:17:55.521 --> 00:18:01.361
you know i've done 24 jobs in 24 weeks or I took a year out to do as many jobs
00:18:01.361 --> 00:18:05.681
as I wanted in order to learn all of the different options that there are.
00:18:06.666 --> 00:18:13.546
So it's not, it's definitely not common. My niece, I think, has almost taken a leaf out of my book.
00:18:13.786 --> 00:18:16.946
You know, she's sort of saying, right, she's finished university now.
00:18:17.286 --> 00:18:22.086
And she's going, I'm going to, there are sort of four or five things that I'm really interested in.
00:18:22.406 --> 00:18:27.746
So I'm going to work really hard to secure my self-work experience doing those four or five things.
00:18:28.146 --> 00:18:31.106
And then I will make a decision at the end of that year.
00:18:31.226 --> 00:18:34.426
But I'm going to treat this year as a as a
00:18:34.426 --> 00:18:37.066
learning year and in fact that's what she's done so she
00:18:37.066 --> 00:18:40.226
did strategy consulting she did civil service she did
00:18:40.226 --> 00:18:43.166
work in a startup pharmaceutical something or other
00:18:43.166 --> 00:18:48.306
i forget the last one but out of all of oh the last one was legal that was the
00:18:48.306 --> 00:18:51.646
one that she was like okay i think i'm going to go down the legal route which
00:18:51.646 --> 00:18:55.926
does mean going back to the draw board and doing another degree or a conversion
00:18:55.926 --> 00:19:00.826
but actually she now knows she's like that's my tribe it's the people I think
00:19:00.826 --> 00:19:01.646
are the most impressive.
00:19:02.026 --> 00:19:05.586
It's the thing I will feel most proud about, you know, in 10 years time when
00:19:05.586 --> 00:19:07.506
I look back, that's what I'm going to feel really proud about.
00:19:08.086 --> 00:19:12.826
So in terms of informing, yes, it's costed her a year of her life,
00:19:12.986 --> 00:19:16.886
but she's far more confident about what it is that she's going into now.
00:19:17.066 --> 00:19:20.666
But she's about to invest 10 years, right? Those 10 years are things,
00:19:21.006 --> 00:19:22.946
you know, it's the pensions you're going to be contributing to,
00:19:23.086 --> 00:19:26.606
it's the networks you're going to be building, it's the pride you're going to
00:19:26.606 --> 00:19:30.866
be feeling, it's the bed at night, the quality of sleep you're going to have.
00:19:30.986 --> 00:19:35.486
I mean, it's just, given that schools and universities aren't going to do this
00:19:35.486 --> 00:19:39.006
for us, doesn't it make sense that actually we carve a bit of time ourselves
00:19:39.006 --> 00:19:43.186
out now to do some of this experimentation so that we do make better decisions?
00:19:43.936 --> 00:19:49.976
I love that so much. It's such a great idea. It seems to me that what we ask of young people.
00:19:50.736 --> 00:19:56.156
So I know where I live in West Tennessee in the States, I remember all of my
00:19:56.156 --> 00:20:00.356
children when they were in elementary school, they would have like a university
00:20:00.356 --> 00:20:03.896
day, wear a jersey from a university where you want to go to.
00:20:04.076 --> 00:20:08.056
And the question is from a very early age, what is it you want to do? What do you want to do?
00:20:08.356 --> 00:20:11.176
Or what do you want to major in as they get a little bit older?
00:20:11.416 --> 00:20:13.356
Or do you want to go into what kind of trade.
00:20:14.036 --> 00:20:19.756
And so we're, you know, when they're 12, 13, 14, what do you want to do? What do you want to do?
00:20:19.916 --> 00:20:24.116
And as if you would know, first of all, that you would know what the options
00:20:24.116 --> 00:20:27.616
are, and then you would know necessarily what resonates with you. Now, some people do.
00:20:27.776 --> 00:20:31.036
Some people come out knowing I want to be a doctor, lawyer, teacher,
00:20:31.556 --> 00:20:33.336
engineer, whatever it might be.
00:20:33.836 --> 00:20:40.116
But so many students, young people feel behind, even when they're entering university
00:20:40.116 --> 00:20:41.836
because they don't know what they want to major in.
00:20:42.356 --> 00:20:46.396
And then they invest all this time and this money in this one thing and they
00:20:46.396 --> 00:20:49.376
come out and now they feel either stuck or compelled.
00:20:50.416 --> 00:20:56.696
Instead of what you're saying, right, this space to really investigate because
00:20:56.696 --> 00:21:00.656
that investment you're putting up front might be a tough ask.
00:21:00.696 --> 00:21:04.596
And of course, not everybody's going to be, have the support system or the lecture
00:21:04.596 --> 00:21:07.056
of being able to do that given their life situation.
00:21:07.296 --> 00:21:11.176
But if you can do that sort of fifth year or however you think about it,
00:21:11.256 --> 00:21:14.496
to decide what you're going to be doing maybe for the next 10,
00:21:14.636 --> 00:21:17.356
20, 40 years, depending if you stay in one profession.
00:21:17.816 --> 00:21:22.576
Sounds like such a wonderful investment in yourself. And I would imagine an
00:21:22.576 --> 00:21:24.736
employer would be impressed as well.
00:21:24.856 --> 00:21:27.116
You did all of this. You gained these experiences.
00:21:27.496 --> 00:21:31.396
And you chose this because you have this experience.
00:21:32.242 --> 00:21:35.642
Yeah, I would I would argue it puts them in a much stronger position to then
00:21:35.642 --> 00:21:40.442
get that job at the end of it all because they can demonstrate that the reason
00:21:40.442 --> 00:21:42.102
they want it is because they know they want it.
00:21:42.222 --> 00:21:45.162
They've done it as opposed to the other three or four things that they tried.
00:21:45.542 --> 00:21:52.142
Yeah, I mean, that's that's far more compelling than I like the idea of it or my dad did it. Right.
00:21:53.002 --> 00:21:57.602
So internships are great. And I know that you can apprentice and have internships.
00:21:58.062 --> 00:22:01.922
But sometimes, again, that's found within this little, you know,
00:22:01.982 --> 00:22:03.102
I'm majoring this one thing.
00:22:03.222 --> 00:22:06.522
And so these are the things that are available. Of course, that's better than nothing.
00:22:06.742 --> 00:22:13.742
But encouraging experience, especially as a young person, because I think nothing is ever lost.
00:22:13.942 --> 00:22:16.882
So your niece who did these four things, right?
00:22:17.062 --> 00:22:22.462
So she chose the one. But those other three, like the kinds of conversations she can have,
00:22:22.662 --> 00:22:25.942
the kinds of the ways of thinking about the world and the way of work,
00:22:26.102 --> 00:22:31.342
just by having that proximity can also make her better in her own field because
00:22:31.342 --> 00:22:32.702
of this breadth of knowledge.
00:22:32.702 --> 00:22:35.942
I think everything that we learn, we can put into our work.
00:22:36.782 --> 00:22:41.702
Completely. You know, and if we imagine it, you know, less from the perspective
00:22:41.702 --> 00:22:45.642
of someone who has no idea because they're leaving university and they've not
00:22:45.642 --> 00:22:47.942
yet really joined the world of work.
00:22:48.262 --> 00:22:52.242
Even if we looked at it through the lens of someone who is an experienced employee,
00:22:52.782 --> 00:22:55.322
but they've always stayed in their own lane.
00:22:55.862 --> 00:23:01.002
So I'll give you, when I did work in banking, that's probably the largest organization
00:23:01.002 --> 00:23:04.022
I've been in because a lot of other smaller organizations, I've kind of got
00:23:04.022 --> 00:23:06.182
a chance to sort of see and experience most of the roles.
00:23:06.282 --> 00:23:09.682
But certainly in banking, the larger an organization is, the more silos the roles.
00:23:10.822 --> 00:23:14.742
So, you know, you'd walk around, you'd even have security cards that would give
00:23:14.742 --> 00:23:16.482
you clearance to this floor, but not this floor.
00:23:16.682 --> 00:23:20.762
So it was really difficult to actually get an understanding what goes on behind
00:23:20.762 --> 00:23:22.662
the door. What do you actually do in this department?
00:23:23.682 --> 00:23:27.282
And yet what the research and evidence will show is that most people get,
00:23:27.849 --> 00:23:31.309
get a little bit bored after a role. All right. So once somebody's done something
00:23:31.309 --> 00:23:35.389
for between about four to eight years, obviously the more complicated and complex
00:23:35.389 --> 00:23:39.089
a role is, probably the latter, you get a bit more bored when you get sort of eight year plus.
00:23:39.589 --> 00:23:43.529
But if it's a relatively predictable kind of role that you're doing,
00:23:43.769 --> 00:23:45.489
yeah, I mean, four years, you're looking at it.
00:23:45.649 --> 00:23:50.829
So rather than just sort of say to people, right, you have to do this role forever in a day.
00:23:51.489 --> 00:23:56.249
Imagine if one day a year or even two days a year, they get to go and shadow
00:23:56.249 --> 00:24:00.569
or spend time in another part of the organization, or even if they just got
00:24:00.569 --> 00:24:04.149
to sit down with someone who is like a chief careers officer and say,
00:24:04.269 --> 00:24:05.529
like, in the job that I do now,
00:24:05.669 --> 00:24:09.249
I really like the financial modeling and I really like this,
00:24:09.329 --> 00:24:12.409
but I don't, I could do with more relationship building.
00:24:12.929 --> 00:24:16.329
You can imagine them sort of going, well, have you thought about the private
00:24:16.329 --> 00:24:17.809
bank part of the organization?
00:24:18.009 --> 00:24:23.049
Or have you thought about working in telecoms or, or anything like that,
00:24:23.129 --> 00:24:26.089
in which case they might go, well, we could set you up to go and spend a day
00:24:26.089 --> 00:24:30.489
in telecoms, or we can set you up to go and have a day in HR, for example.
00:24:30.829 --> 00:24:33.809
And as you say, nothing's ever lost. Because if somebody was to come and spend
00:24:33.809 --> 00:24:39.769
a day working with me as it was in the time in HR, they might leave with a higher
00:24:39.769 --> 00:24:44.049
degree of respect for all the stuff that you get done and achieve in a day.
00:24:44.629 --> 00:24:47.209
But way more understanding is that when I come and knock on their door and go,
00:24:47.369 --> 00:24:48.649
hey, I really need some help.
00:24:48.689 --> 00:24:52.649
We've got a load of interviews we need to resource for? Could you give me a couple of hours?
00:24:53.089 --> 00:24:56.489
You might find that they turn around and go, sure, I know what you're doing
00:24:56.489 --> 00:24:57.489
for the organization now.
00:24:57.649 --> 00:25:01.049
So I just think even if they'd make a decision to say, I never want to work
00:25:01.049 --> 00:25:04.409
in that department, I thank God I'm going to go back to my job slightly more energized.
00:25:05.069 --> 00:25:10.069
But if everyone understands a little bit more about what everyone does, how is that a bad thing?
00:25:10.909 --> 00:25:14.409
Yeah, I mean, it's wonderful. So we all know that stuff gets done because of networking.
00:25:14.689 --> 00:25:19.429
So that's internal and external networking. The more you know that what somebody
00:25:19.429 --> 00:25:23.729
does that they're there the more you can be a resource for them and vice versa
00:25:23.729 --> 00:25:28.609
and so even in a ginormous organization obviously in a small organization the
00:25:28.609 --> 00:25:32.049
more you do that the more you know the more you know the more,
00:25:32.864 --> 00:25:36.884
things that you can be drawn from, that you can draw from, and then more of
00:25:36.884 --> 00:25:38.444
your talents can be used.
00:25:38.964 --> 00:25:43.264
Yeah. And I do tend to think the larger the organization, the more you consciously
00:25:43.264 --> 00:25:45.324
have to think about putting these things in place.
00:25:45.604 --> 00:25:49.904
You know, I mean, when I was, I used to run my own hotel, slightly random left
00:25:49.904 --> 00:25:52.284
field thing, but I mean, I did it because I did it with my brother.
00:25:52.544 --> 00:25:56.744
But when you've got 12 bedrooms and somebody phones in sick and they say,
00:25:56.904 --> 00:25:59.444
I can't do the housekeeping today, whether you want it or not,
00:25:59.604 --> 00:26:01.844
you're changing the beds, you're cleaning the toilets.
00:26:02.084 --> 00:26:05.244
So the smaller an organization, you don't have to think about.
00:26:05.824 --> 00:26:08.184
Oh, do we rotate people around and give them exposure?
00:26:08.344 --> 00:26:10.844
You're going to get the exposure, whether you want it or not.
00:26:11.124 --> 00:26:15.524
But yeah, as I say, the larger an organization gets, the more I think you have
00:26:15.524 --> 00:26:19.104
to be more conscious about how do you give people those experiences so they
00:26:19.104 --> 00:26:20.284
can make more informed choices.
00:26:20.764 --> 00:26:24.624
And even thinking of it as a good for the organization, because a lot of times,
00:26:24.684 --> 00:26:27.624
why do people stay in one position and they aren't developed?
00:26:27.864 --> 00:26:31.724
Well, because they're this asset. I need you to do this. You do this so well.
00:26:31.844 --> 00:26:37.004
And if you're not doing it, if you look someplace else, then I've got to fill this hole.
00:26:37.204 --> 00:26:40.624
Then I've got to, right? And so when we think about, somebody might think,
00:26:40.744 --> 00:26:46.124
well, organizationally, it's better if Betty stays in this position until she retires.
00:26:46.684 --> 00:26:50.784
It's short-sighted. It may not be best for her and the organization.
00:26:51.004 --> 00:26:54.884
Now, of course, it may. It depends, right? But if we don't ask those questions,
00:26:55.024 --> 00:26:56.384
we don't give people opportunities,
00:26:56.704 --> 00:27:01.184
then we don't see how the organization benefits and we don't see how individual
00:27:01.184 --> 00:27:06.284
contributors benefit and all that can go in engagement and longevity,
00:27:06.904 --> 00:27:12.144
institutional knowledge, prizing all of these, prizing individuals so that we
00:27:12.144 --> 00:27:15.824
have more satisfaction all the way around.
00:27:16.024 --> 00:27:18.924
So, Lizzie, you talked a little bit about Brave Starts, but I'm not sure our
00:27:18.924 --> 00:27:21.784
audience really knows who it's for.
00:27:21.984 --> 00:27:26.664
So this is, tell us a little bit about who it's for and then and tell us about your book.
00:27:27.354 --> 00:27:34.134
So Brave Starts is for anyone who wants to remain engaged in the world of work.
00:27:34.434 --> 00:27:39.234
Typically, they're over the age of 45, but we can't age discriminate.
00:27:39.654 --> 00:27:45.954
It's just that most people have this issue of struggling to get access to good
00:27:45.954 --> 00:27:47.554
quality careers advice,
00:27:47.554 --> 00:27:53.714
and they struggle to access jobs as they get older because ageism is a genuinely
00:27:53.714 --> 00:27:55.734
big, severe, real issue.
00:27:56.854 --> 00:27:59.694
So therefore most of the people that
00:27:59.694 --> 00:28:02.594
come to us come to us with that in mind and it
00:28:02.594 --> 00:28:05.934
and it works because we do also this is where we have a lot of our knowledge
00:28:05.934 --> 00:28:10.214
we support people to understand how their age can be an asset so i guess typically
00:28:10.214 --> 00:28:14.894
when you look at our website and it's sort of saying age is an asset and now
00:28:14.894 --> 00:28:20.194
that you're over 45 and whatever so that yeah we've got a lot of people in their 40s,
00:28:20.254 --> 00:28:22.594
50s, 60s who want to work,
00:28:22.854 --> 00:28:25.534
but for whatever trigger might struggle.
00:28:25.794 --> 00:28:29.434
Could be that getting divorced, could be they've been made redundant, could be they're bored.
00:28:29.774 --> 00:28:34.694
The triggers are numerous, but they very much want work to remain part of their life.
00:28:34.774 --> 00:28:37.614
They want to be engaged by their work. They want to feel it's something purposeful,
00:28:37.674 --> 00:28:40.494
that they're making a conscious choice about what it is that they're doing at
00:28:40.494 --> 00:28:46.314
this point in their lives, as opposed to just staying on that autopilot button. So that's what we do.
00:28:48.015 --> 00:28:53.095
The underpinning of what we're trying to achieve. So I don't have a goal of
00:28:53.095 --> 00:28:56.555
getting people, for example, who are unemployed to be employed.
00:28:57.255 --> 00:29:02.115
My goal is that people leave after going through our workshops and programs,
00:29:02.375 --> 00:29:07.115
being much clearer on what it is that they want, having a stronger network,
00:29:07.675 --> 00:29:09.555
feeling more confident and optimistic,
00:29:10.275 --> 00:29:14.975
feeling that they understand the issues so that they're able to successfully
00:29:14.975 --> 00:29:17.015
navigate the next few years.
00:29:17.015 --> 00:29:23.055
Because genuinely, I have people that come to me, 68% of our members are in full-time jobs.
00:29:23.475 --> 00:29:27.435
So they will be coming to me saying, I don't want to work full-time anymore.
00:29:27.595 --> 00:29:30.035
You know, I actually want to dial back a bit.
00:29:30.475 --> 00:29:34.435
I'm curious. I want to do something different. I want to explore my options.
00:29:34.435 --> 00:29:37.675
I want to see what's out there in the world. I want to make a conscious decision and so on.
00:29:37.775 --> 00:29:41.895
So, you know, hence, those are what we're looking at.
00:29:42.055 --> 00:29:44.735
If people have got clarity, if they've got a strong network,
00:29:44.995 --> 00:29:49.495
if they feel confident, you know, if they've got all of that resource at the
00:29:49.495 --> 00:29:54.335
end of that, that's a much stronger predictor for them being successful in whatever
00:29:54.335 --> 00:29:55.215
it is that they want to do.
00:29:55.435 --> 00:29:59.175
You know, getting a non-exec direct position, doing their own startup business.
00:29:59.775 --> 00:30:03.095
Going back into whatever sector it was that they've left.
00:30:03.375 --> 00:30:06.155
You know, it's that that's really what we're looking at.
00:30:06.686 --> 00:30:10.966
It is so wonderful because when we get stuck, a lot of it is lack of clarity.
00:30:11.206 --> 00:30:15.566
I don't know what to do. I don't know what's really going on.
00:30:15.646 --> 00:30:20.026
I know I want something else. I know this isn't working, but what's not working?
00:30:20.246 --> 00:30:23.906
What are my options? So many times, again, when we're stuck in our head and
00:30:23.906 --> 00:30:28.606
we don't have support, we've narrowed our options because we just,
00:30:29.086 --> 00:30:34.386
whatever it is, the stress, uncertainty, the whatever's going on inside of us,
00:30:34.526 --> 00:30:36.126
just we get kind of closed down.
00:30:36.126 --> 00:30:41.486
And so having clarity, being opened up to really look at the options and if
00:30:41.486 --> 00:30:44.306
I do this, what might happen is very important.
00:30:44.446 --> 00:30:48.426
And I love this because we don't talk so much about mid-career development.
00:30:49.046 --> 00:30:53.226
We talk about it, you know, career development is for the person who is just
00:30:53.226 --> 00:30:56.166
leaving the university or whatever, educational.
00:30:56.366 --> 00:31:00.806
And so we think about what is your next thing rather than I've been in the world of work.
00:31:01.186 --> 00:31:03.446
What is my next thing? Yeah.
00:31:04.192 --> 00:31:08.452
And I guess this is where it sort of starts to relate to what we've been doing
00:31:08.452 --> 00:31:13.812
with the book, which is, you know, obviously with life expectancy pushing outwards, because,
00:31:13.952 --> 00:31:19.792
you know, most retirement was developed at a time where life expectancy was
00:31:19.792 --> 00:31:21.312
going to be sort of mid 60s.
00:31:21.312 --> 00:31:24.452
I mean, if we take the example of the UK, for example, you know,
00:31:24.612 --> 00:31:30.512
mass retirement was sort of bought in in about 1948 when life expectancy was
00:31:30.512 --> 00:31:34.012
66 and retirement age was 65.
00:31:34.412 --> 00:31:38.972
So, you know, we were expected to be retired for one year, whereas now people
00:31:38.972 --> 00:31:42.292
have got this sort of huge amount of time. You know, some people are living.
00:31:42.612 --> 00:31:45.112
It's not unusual nowadays for people to make it to 100.
00:31:45.592 --> 00:31:50.872
You know, Andrew Scott, Linda Gratton, famous for their 100 year life.
00:31:51.312 --> 00:31:56.912
But the reality of all this extended time means that careers have gone from
00:31:56.912 --> 00:32:01.492
being 40 years to, you know, it could be 60, 70, 80 years, right?
00:32:01.692 --> 00:32:07.992
So over the course of that period of time, there is going to be significant amounts of change.
00:32:08.352 --> 00:32:15.372
And yet most entry points for most jobs are targeted at people who are in their early 20s.
00:32:15.372 --> 00:32:20.732
You know, it's pretty rare to come across an organization that is actively recruiting
00:32:20.732 --> 00:32:26.532
people who are, you know, in their 40s, 50s, 60s to come and do an entry level job.
00:32:27.400 --> 00:32:30.920
Yeah, it's really interesting, too, because as you mentioned, change, right?
00:32:31.060 --> 00:32:34.400
So in the world of work, one thing that is constant right now or that we can
00:32:34.400 --> 00:32:35.780
count on is that things are going to change.
00:32:35.960 --> 00:32:38.820
Now, right now we're dealing with AI and whatever that might mean,
00:32:38.960 --> 00:32:42.360
but then that will morph and then we'll deal with that and then something else
00:32:42.360 --> 00:32:46.160
will come. And so in order to stay relevant, to stay engaged,
00:32:46.340 --> 00:32:50.840
you need to expect that things are going to be changing.
00:32:51.000 --> 00:32:56.000
And so no matter where we are in our career, we should be expecting to be a lifelong learner,
00:32:56.180 --> 00:33:00.600
that if we aren't actively developing ourself or our organizations don't take
00:33:00.600 --> 00:33:07.340
that as a priority, then we are missing opportunities. We're putting a burden on ourself.
00:33:07.640 --> 00:33:11.180
And individuals are making themselves irrelevant by saying,
00:33:11.340 --> 00:33:14.640
I mean, if you say, I don't want to learn right now what are
00:33:14.640 --> 00:33:17.940
you saying i mean you are you are
00:33:17.940 --> 00:33:20.760
making yourself irrelevant or you're falling below
00:33:20.760 --> 00:33:23.600
the digital divide however you might think about
00:33:23.600 --> 00:33:26.520
it and so if that is reality that things are constantly
00:33:26.520 --> 00:33:31.580
changing then really talking to people who are wherever you know mid level career
00:33:31.580 --> 00:33:36.720
or however you know maybe they are 50 60 and if they thought because when they
00:33:36.720 --> 00:33:41.100
came into the world of work there's a sort of steady expectation whether or
00:33:41.100 --> 00:33:44.620
not it actually meets what What was happening in the world was certainly an expectation,
00:33:44.620 --> 00:33:52.200
but that expectation needs to shift in that it's not an option to opt out of
00:33:52.200 --> 00:33:59.620
learning the next thing because of this long career, as you were talking about.
00:34:00.366 --> 00:34:03.546
Well, I mean, to a degree, it's an option.
00:34:03.726 --> 00:34:08.546
It's just not a successful one, right? I mean, you know, but I,
00:34:09.106 --> 00:34:13.986
my, my audience is probably slightly biased because if someone is searching
00:34:13.986 --> 00:34:18.906
this stuff out on the internet or Google, or they're talking to somebody else
00:34:18.906 --> 00:34:20.746
who goes, you should look at this organization.
00:34:20.946 --> 00:34:23.366
And then they come and they spend time looking at our website and then they
00:34:23.366 --> 00:34:27.026
commit and they pay. It's not a lot of money. It's, you know, 89 quid a year.
00:34:27.686 --> 00:34:30.446
It's not a lot but it's still you know
00:34:30.446 --> 00:34:33.666
you've got to fill out the form it's not a long form but
00:34:33.666 --> 00:34:37.466
it's a commitment and then you've got to verify your idea you know it's just
00:34:37.466 --> 00:34:40.966
there's quite a few hurdles there's quite a few steps and I would argue that
00:34:40.966 --> 00:34:45.966
that kind of individual that does that is one who's probably slightly more proactive
00:34:45.966 --> 00:34:51.086
but even then so even though I've got a skewed audience,
00:34:51.546 --> 00:34:57.506
it is not unusual for me to come across people who I would, if I'm going to
00:34:57.506 --> 00:35:02.066
be really undiplomatic about it, I would describe as being slightly entitled, right?
00:35:02.246 --> 00:35:07.926
But that sense of entitlement has come because of the kind of the past,
00:35:08.266 --> 00:35:13.486
you know, this idea that you, if you did this job at this time and you met certain
00:35:13.486 --> 00:35:16.566
goals and you, you know, you delivered certain things along the way,
00:35:16.646 --> 00:35:21.546
you would be rewarded with a big pension, job security.
00:35:23.386 --> 00:35:27.226
Seniority, status, and so on. So I understand where it's come from.
00:35:27.566 --> 00:35:33.386
But increasingly, I think that is not how things are going to work going forward.
00:35:34.026 --> 00:35:38.166
Yeah. So you mentioned ageism, ageism alive and well, unfortunately.
00:35:38.826 --> 00:35:43.426
When you say that, what do you mean and how does it show up in working places?
00:35:44.496 --> 00:35:48.836
Well, I guess it shows up in a couple of, I mean, the two main obvious ways
00:35:48.836 --> 00:35:51.896
that it shows up will be on the recruitment side of things.
00:35:52.316 --> 00:35:58.876
So, you know, as people get older, if somebody is over the age of 50 and they're
00:35:58.876 --> 00:36:04.676
applying for jobs, they will, 68% of the time, they will still be unemployed 12 months later.
00:36:04.676 --> 00:36:07.936
Whereas somebody who is half
00:36:07.936 --> 00:36:11.276
the age you know between the eight between the kind of cohort group of about
00:36:11.276 --> 00:36:17.256
25 and 35 they will only be out of work about 34 percent of the time 12 months
00:36:17.256 --> 00:36:25.216
later so the older you get the harder and harder it is to secure work so you've got the the obvious.
00:36:25.856 --> 00:36:31.196
Recruitment barrier and that's that's not just the the slightly invisible because
00:36:31.196 --> 00:36:34.616
nobody ever says to you, we're not hiring you because you're too old.
00:36:35.056 --> 00:36:39.776
It's the veiled, you know, not the right fit and these sorts of things.
00:36:39.936 --> 00:36:43.196
You can only really see the discrimination when you see the big numbers.
00:36:43.356 --> 00:36:46.376
So when you see all of the groups of people in their 50s, 60s,
00:36:46.476 --> 00:36:48.676
whatever, trying to access work versus other groups.
00:36:49.036 --> 00:36:55.496
So you've got that. And then I guess you've got the sort of the developmental ageism.
00:36:55.676 --> 00:36:59.816
So we're selecting these people for the high performance,
00:37:00.016 --> 00:37:02.836
the high potential program and so
00:37:02.836 --> 00:37:06.216
we're wanting people who are here probably
00:37:06.216 --> 00:37:12.136
full-time hitting the highest sales numbers making the most making themselves
00:37:12.136 --> 00:37:18.296
the most visible and and that sort of thing but actually that that sort of that's
00:37:18.296 --> 00:37:22.876
one section that's one group right you know it's the let's do high potential.
00:37:23.683 --> 00:37:28.363
Nobody ever really evaluates all of the high potential people think these programs are great.
00:37:28.963 --> 00:37:32.583
Not many people look at all the others who, by definition, are now no potential.
00:37:32.983 --> 00:37:37.003
You know, nobody ever evaluates them and says, hey, now that you weren't selected
00:37:37.003 --> 00:37:38.963
for that program, how do you feel?
00:37:39.483 --> 00:37:43.823
So the kind of the entirety of an organization is not predicated on,
00:37:43.983 --> 00:37:47.623
you know, the success of one small cohort.
00:37:47.623 --> 00:37:50.663
And actually if you're looking at things like engagement surveys
00:37:50.663 --> 00:37:53.683
and satisfaction at work i'd argue
00:37:53.683 --> 00:37:57.523
there's a huge space and room for improvement and i think a lot of that comes
00:37:57.523 --> 00:38:04.243
from just the lack of encouragement you know the lack of now now that it i'm
00:38:04.243 --> 00:38:09.023
not saying sit down with people and go now you're getting older let's think
00:38:09.023 --> 00:38:13.563
about your options but i think having those conversations regardless of age,
00:38:14.248 --> 00:38:15.948
You know, I'll give you one example.
00:38:16.228 --> 00:38:21.008
I think people fit into one of four archetypes, regardless of age.
00:38:21.408 --> 00:38:26.148
So one is, I want to progress and be the CEO. The next is, leave me alone.
00:38:26.148 --> 00:38:27.228
I'm really happy in my job.
00:38:27.488 --> 00:38:30.208
The next is, I want to make some changes.
00:38:30.528 --> 00:38:33.428
Maybe I don't want to work full time anymore. And then the other one is,
00:38:33.568 --> 00:38:38.368
I actually want to change. I don't like my job anymore. I want to do something different.
00:38:38.848 --> 00:38:42.008
And I think if you sit down and you say, which of these four boxes do you fit into?
00:38:42.788 --> 00:38:46.008
That applies to someone who's 28. It applies to someone who's 64.
00:38:46.708 --> 00:38:51.588
But then acting off the back of it, you know, someone who's 68 could still be wanting to be the CEO.
00:38:52.248 --> 00:38:55.448
Maybe that's totally unrealistic, at which point somebody might need to turn
00:38:55.448 --> 00:38:57.108
around and go, it's never going to happen.
00:38:57.628 --> 00:39:00.988
What are you going to do instead? How can we do something that is going to be
00:39:00.988 --> 00:39:06.568
likewise for the person who is, I want to do something that's entirely different.
00:39:07.288 --> 00:39:10.688
Again, that could be any age. Well, what is it you want to do?
00:39:10.988 --> 00:39:13.228
Well, maybe I want to move into HR.
00:39:13.568 --> 00:39:17.228
Maybe I want to work in corporate social responsibility. Maybe I want to go
00:39:17.228 --> 00:39:18.508
work on the dealing room floor.
00:39:19.028 --> 00:39:22.228
You know, maybe I want to go and do, right, okay, well, who can we introduce
00:39:22.228 --> 00:39:23.448
you to in the organization?
00:39:23.668 --> 00:39:28.428
How can we get you shadowing, doing some work experience, working on some projects?
00:39:28.708 --> 00:39:32.688
None of that is predicated on anyone's age, but it just doesn't seem,
00:39:32.908 --> 00:39:34.728
it doesn't seem to happen.
00:39:35.308 --> 00:39:39.608
You know, there are career conversations that are really quite assumptive.
00:39:40.708 --> 00:39:45.948
What's your next step on the progression of the career upwards, upwards, upwards?
00:39:46.828 --> 00:39:52.028
The assumption needs to be much more, which are the four quadrants?
00:39:52.108 --> 00:39:55.008
Because some people may want to move down. Some people want to change entirely.
00:39:55.828 --> 00:39:58.188
There's only one quarter of people who want to keep going up.
00:39:58.981 --> 00:40:03.541
When I hear you talking, when I think about what it means to be a human person
00:40:03.541 --> 00:40:05.601
at work, I hear being seen.
00:40:06.281 --> 00:40:10.021
Somebody is interested in me. Somebody sees me, and they're asking these questions,
00:40:10.281 --> 00:40:11.981
helping me to think about it.
00:40:12.321 --> 00:40:15.721
Because when we are buried in the busyness of work, and then not only do we
00:40:15.721 --> 00:40:19.201
have work, but we have our lives, and depending on what's going on in our lives
00:40:19.201 --> 00:40:23.361
and our health or the people around us and families and hobbies and all these
00:40:23.361 --> 00:40:26.761
other sorts of things, sometimes we're not thinking about that.
00:40:26.761 --> 00:40:32.241
But for someone to stop and be curious about us at work you know we think about
00:40:32.241 --> 00:40:37.301
engagement and buy-in and being seen and all these things that help make a healthy work environment.
00:40:37.961 --> 00:40:43.641
That is so powerful for someone to stop and do that but i as you said before
00:40:43.641 --> 00:40:48.261
those sorts of things don't happen by accident right there's the the one in
00:40:48.261 --> 00:40:51.841
the 20 or one in the 100 who's just going to be doing that because that's a
00:40:51.841 --> 00:40:55.401
part of who they are and their personality and they're going to be searching out those options.
00:40:55.661 --> 00:40:58.861
But, you know, if we think about our people,
00:40:59.201 --> 00:41:03.101
the people in the organizations as the heartbeat, as the lifeblood,
00:41:03.201 --> 00:41:06.581
as people who are valuable because
00:41:06.581 --> 00:41:11.821
they're people, how do we really reach in and get the best of them?
00:41:12.081 --> 00:41:16.661
Well, that's by dialogue, by engagement, by curious questions.
00:41:16.661 --> 00:41:22.361
And the more we set that tone, that we ask questions here And we want you to
00:41:22.361 --> 00:41:26.521
be thinking about these we want you to advocate for yourself But it's this back
00:41:26.521 --> 00:41:27.681
and forth sort of dialogue.
00:41:27.961 --> 00:41:33.021
However long you're here There's a good chance you're going to get more of that person to show up.
00:41:33.161 --> 00:41:36.981
You're going to get more engagement and There's there's a good chance that person
00:41:36.981 --> 00:41:43.341
will be here longer because they are thinking about What quadrant am I in right now?
00:41:43.881 --> 00:41:47.781
Right because that might shift Yeah, what what is it that I want to do?
00:41:47.881 --> 00:41:51.901
How can I contribute instead of this, you know mass quiet quitting that we have.
00:41:52.221 --> 00:41:56.841
And that happens for a lot of reasons, such as the narrative, you don't care about me,
00:41:57.406 --> 00:42:01.126
Well, I'm not going to care about you. Right. And so we shoot each other in
00:42:01.126 --> 00:42:04.966
the foot because that's not good for anybody. Yeah. Yeah.
00:42:05.646 --> 00:42:11.886
It's odd, isn't it? Because I do think that we, this idea of something like
00:42:11.886 --> 00:42:14.166
a chief careers officer,
00:42:14.686 --> 00:42:19.026
right, we've got a human resources officer, we've got someone who deals with
00:42:19.026 --> 00:42:24.026
compliance, right, somebody deals with anti-money laundering and I don't know what.
00:42:24.026 --> 00:42:28.106
But actually, of all of the things that we should be doing for individuals and organisation.
00:42:29.139 --> 00:42:32.519
A careers officer makes a huge amount of sense, right?
00:42:32.899 --> 00:42:38.939
Because you were saying earlier that a manager may not have the best interests
00:42:38.939 --> 00:42:40.779
of their employees at heart.
00:42:41.279 --> 00:42:44.959
And that's absolutely right. You know, if I've got my team rocking and rolling
00:42:44.959 --> 00:42:49.079
and I really like Jenny and I really like Richard and they're doing a great
00:42:49.079 --> 00:42:54.459
job and I don't want them to leave because they're doing a great job for my team, right?
00:42:54.519 --> 00:42:57.379
If they're pulling in the sales, I don't want them to go work for my competitor
00:42:57.379 --> 00:42:58.879
and the other part of the organization.
00:42:59.659 --> 00:43:03.059
But that's because i'm being selfish you know i'm not so
00:43:03.059 --> 00:43:05.799
actually the ideal person to do this for people
00:43:05.799 --> 00:43:09.239
is not their manager it's someone who is part
00:43:09.239 --> 00:43:12.379
of the organization that's looking at this through the the lens
00:43:12.379 --> 00:43:15.339
of what is the best thing for the
00:43:15.339 --> 00:43:18.219
organization to keep this individual and if that means that
00:43:18.219 --> 00:43:20.979
they move to another department that's fine it's still
00:43:20.979 --> 00:43:24.599
a win for the company but it can't come usually
00:43:24.599 --> 00:43:27.379
it can't come from that manager you get some that are
00:43:27.379 --> 00:43:30.239
just amazing but i would say the majority of
00:43:30.239 --> 00:43:33.099
the time it would have to have a sort of a more
00:43:33.099 --> 00:43:36.699
conscious mechanism in place because you just can't rely on everyone
00:43:36.699 --> 00:43:41.639
having these amazing management skills you know and it's i think most people
00:43:41.639 --> 00:43:45.439
know what they want in themselves because this is the other thing right you
00:43:45.439 --> 00:43:49.159
know because people given half a chance if they get to experience something
00:43:49.159 --> 00:43:52.639
they'll know quite quickly oh god that's more cold calling than i'd like oh
00:43:52.639 --> 00:43:54.239
god that department is really quiet.
00:43:54.539 --> 00:43:57.859
You know, oh, it hasn't got a window in there. I definitely don't want to be there.
00:43:58.119 --> 00:44:01.919
We don't know what all of the different factors are that drive meaning for each
00:44:01.919 --> 00:44:02.939
individual, but they do.
00:44:03.707 --> 00:44:07.847
So giving them more of a chance to actually experience, feel,
00:44:08.227 --> 00:44:12.487
you know, it gets, I mean, I had one, I had one great example of somebody who
00:44:12.487 --> 00:44:16.107
thought he wanted to go and become a bed and breakfast,
00:44:16.467 --> 00:44:21.867
you know, like a little boutique hotel owner, but he'd been a CEO of his own
00:44:21.867 --> 00:44:23.267
kind of psychometric testing business.
00:44:23.887 --> 00:44:27.727
And I'm like, you think you want to do that job? Just go and spend two days,
00:44:27.887 --> 00:44:29.827
go and spend two days doing that job.
00:44:29.967 --> 00:44:33.347
And I lined it up for him. I found a hotel that was willing to let him do it.
00:44:33.707 --> 00:44:38.707
He comes away from those two days going, thank God. He was about to invest his life savings.
00:44:39.307 --> 00:44:42.347
And he was like, thank God I don't do that job. Because actually,
00:44:42.347 --> 00:44:46.207
the thing that turned him off was the way that people spoke to him.
00:44:46.607 --> 00:44:50.307
He was used to a certain status. He was used to being the CEO.
00:44:50.827 --> 00:44:54.687
And then all of a sudden, you're waiting on tables and people are going,
00:44:55.207 --> 00:44:57.527
oi, mate, I asked for my bill five minutes ago.
00:44:58.427 --> 00:45:02.027
It was like, actually, I don't want to deal with customers like that.
00:45:02.027 --> 00:45:05.827
I want to deal with a customer that's coming to me with a really highly complex
00:45:05.827 --> 00:45:09.407
problem where I can get really excited about developing a solution.
00:45:09.727 --> 00:45:12.887
So it just wasn't right for him. But you know, we've all had those holidays
00:45:12.887 --> 00:45:14.507
where things seem really idealistic.
00:45:14.607 --> 00:45:17.727
Like, oh my gosh, like this is, I want to move here.
00:45:17.907 --> 00:45:20.807
I want to buy this boutique business. I'm going to set up a pottery,
00:45:21.107 --> 00:45:24.567
a gallery, and it's going to be great. It's going to be really boring.
00:45:26.237 --> 00:45:29.797
It's such a it's a great example because i also think when
00:45:29.797 --> 00:45:32.417
somebody might be dissatisfied because you know
00:45:32.417 --> 00:45:35.437
the grass is greener syndrome well then i go look and see what somebody's
00:45:35.437 --> 00:45:38.577
doing on the other side of the hall or on a different floor and i'm like oh
00:45:38.577 --> 00:45:45.197
no actually i do have a good i you know and so sometimes we just can re-romanticize
00:45:45.197 --> 00:45:49.317
the idea you know we just see the good hearts we don't see every job has its
00:45:49.317 --> 00:45:53.197
words every job has and that's a part of being a grown-up and being in the world
00:45:53.197 --> 00:45:55.157
is there are parts of the jobs that we don't like to do.
00:45:55.597 --> 00:45:58.757
Before we spoke this morning, I had been putting a few things off and I made
00:45:58.757 --> 00:46:02.997
a list and they'd been on my mind. These are things I don't like.
00:46:03.577 --> 00:46:06.997
And then I did them and I'm like, oh gosh, that didn't take much time.
00:46:07.097 --> 00:46:09.557
But you know, that's, that is the way of things.
00:46:09.757 --> 00:46:14.017
So every, every job, everything has that. But the question is,
00:46:14.077 --> 00:46:15.537
is that something that you want to deal with?
00:46:16.097 --> 00:46:19.737
And as you see what the, those parts are of another job?
00:46:19.837 --> 00:46:24.597
Does it make your job more endearing, more grateful? You could just see it in a down kind of way.
00:46:25.417 --> 00:46:30.577
Yeah, yeah, totally. And that's why would we deny people the chance to make
00:46:30.577 --> 00:46:31.717
those chances for themselves?
00:46:31.977 --> 00:46:35.917
You know, why try and assume, you know, because of course the other thing is
00:46:35.917 --> 00:46:37.977
aging workforce and so on.
00:46:38.217 --> 00:46:40.957
We don't always know the people's financial position, right?
00:46:41.117 --> 00:46:43.697
Some people might just be about to inherit a buttload.
00:46:44.117 --> 00:46:48.257
You know, other people have a spouse who's doing really well,
00:46:48.317 --> 00:46:51.237
or maybe the opposite, who are really struggling.
00:46:51.537 --> 00:46:54.717
And all of these contextual factors also feed in.
00:46:54.877 --> 00:46:59.397
There's no way a manager can know that. We assume that over the next few years,
00:46:59.537 --> 00:47:01.417
you want to keep going, no, don't make assumptions.
00:47:01.717 --> 00:47:07.297
People know for themselves, but we're just not always that effective at asking the questions.
00:47:08.263 --> 00:47:12.703
So I'm very interested in conflict and dealing with conflict at work so that
00:47:12.703 --> 00:47:14.223
we can have healthy work environments.
00:47:14.383 --> 00:47:19.583
Is there anything that you have been seeing from the work that you do about
00:47:19.583 --> 00:47:25.443
how people in midlife or towards the end of their career, how they deal with conflict?
00:47:25.503 --> 00:47:30.563
Or does it seem to be the same no matter what age you are when you show up at work?
00:47:31.103 --> 00:47:35.103
I mean, I think things are probably getting much, much worse.
00:47:36.343 --> 00:47:40.163
As in you know this is
00:47:40.163 --> 00:47:43.583
probably where I'm going to come across as being very politically incorrect
00:47:43.583 --> 00:47:46.943
right but you know back in the day if
00:47:46.943 --> 00:47:50.143
you offended somebody or if you upset someone
00:47:50.143 --> 00:47:53.003
then I'm hoping they
00:47:53.003 --> 00:47:55.743
would turn around and go you were a bit of an
00:47:55.743 --> 00:48:01.063
arse yesterday and I didn't like it I didn't appreciate it oh sorry what have
00:48:01.063 --> 00:48:06.143
you I think we're now in a culture where people are so terrified of being cancelled
00:48:06.143 --> 00:48:11.763
or they're so terrified of being accused of being racist or being a misogynist
00:48:11.763 --> 00:48:14.783
or being ageist or whatever it might be,
00:48:15.043 --> 00:48:18.183
that actually everyone is walking on eggshells all the time.
00:48:18.503 --> 00:48:20.903
And the minute that somebody is offended, they go, I'm offended.
00:48:21.003 --> 00:48:22.083
And everyone's like, oh my God, oh my God.
00:48:22.923 --> 00:48:27.103
We've got to a point now where the fingers are firmly in the ears.
00:48:27.223 --> 00:48:31.763
And instead of sort of going, okay, I upset you. I'm sorry, why is that a big deal?
00:48:32.383 --> 00:48:35.783
Why why can't we just deal with this as adults we've now
00:48:35.783 --> 00:48:39.923
got people that will go no no I will not hear what it is that you're saying
00:48:39.923 --> 00:48:44.623
or what you've said is so bad I now have to go and complain about it to somebody
00:48:44.623 --> 00:48:51.643
else and that I think creates a much worse culture for people to deal with than
00:48:51.643 --> 00:48:55.743
actually the original irritation that they would have had in the first place.
00:48:56.911 --> 00:49:02.151
I think we've lost the ability to be more sympathetic, to be more tolerant.
00:49:02.711 --> 00:49:05.051
You know, we've become much more accusatory.
00:49:05.871 --> 00:49:10.891
We've become much more of a kind of a blame culture. And I think that's deeply,
00:49:11.131 --> 00:49:13.671
deeply bad for psychological safety.
00:49:13.931 --> 00:49:19.251
You know, I have lots of, you know, men, women, you name it,
00:49:19.411 --> 00:49:23.051
who will not articulate and won't voice their anxiety.
00:49:23.051 --> 00:49:25.731
They won't talk about what it is that they're worried about.
00:49:25.731 --> 00:49:30.391
If somebody is a real poor performer at work, they won't say it because they'll
00:49:30.391 --> 00:49:33.131
be accused of things that are completely untrue.
00:49:33.471 --> 00:49:35.331
No, I'm just worried about your performance.
00:49:35.751 --> 00:49:39.531
But maybe the race card will get pulled. Maybe the gender card will be pulled.
00:49:39.771 --> 00:49:43.971
Maybe the age card will be pulled. And it's just become a bit too much like that.
00:49:44.651 --> 00:49:54.711
Do you have any advice about how to reverse this or what to do when faced with this environment?
00:49:55.731 --> 00:50:03.051
I mean, I would love to see more advocacy for personal accountability and freedom of speech.
00:50:03.691 --> 00:50:09.371
I mean, I don't think anyone has, everyone I think has the right to say things,
00:50:09.451 --> 00:50:12.431
but they also have the right to be judged for it.
00:50:12.591 --> 00:50:18.131
And I think we're so scared about allowing people to be judged that we just
00:50:18.131 --> 00:50:21.051
put down all these guardrails all the time. You can't even say this.
00:50:21.171 --> 00:50:25.451
If you say this, we're worried you will offend somebody. So we're not even going
00:50:25.451 --> 00:50:27.011
to give you the platform anymore.
00:50:27.671 --> 00:50:34.511
Whereas actually, you know, give them the platform. If their ideas are stupid,
00:50:34.531 --> 00:50:39.931
if they can't back them up, if they fall under the tiniest bit of scrutiny, let them fall.
00:50:40.564 --> 00:50:44.704
But we have to have the debate in the first place and actually the enabling
00:50:44.704 --> 00:50:50.864
of the debate, the coming back to somebody and saying, it's not going to work
00:50:50.864 --> 00:50:52.504
for this reason and this reason.
00:50:52.864 --> 00:50:56.844
Or what would you say to this perspective over here, which your point doesn't address?
00:50:57.384 --> 00:51:01.744
Actually allowing that to happen in the first place, I think puts us in a stronger
00:51:01.744 --> 00:51:04.624
position than we're just not even going to talk to you anymore.
00:51:04.624 --> 00:51:09.704
Or this is the position, you know, too much politics has entered the workplace
00:51:09.704 --> 00:51:11.684
where it just has no place.
00:51:12.084 --> 00:51:15.184
You know, half of it is all because of this, you know, bring your authentic
00:51:15.184 --> 00:51:17.864
self to work and all of that. No, don't.
00:51:18.204 --> 00:51:22.384
You know, some of your authentic self is actually you're a bit of an idiot.
00:51:22.864 --> 00:51:26.344
You know, there are sort of organizational standards for a reason,
00:51:26.344 --> 00:51:31.244
because actually we don't want people behaving rudely, badly, whatever.
00:51:31.244 --> 00:51:34.624
So it's uh
00:51:34.624 --> 00:51:37.584
yeah i think we've become we've
00:51:37.584 --> 00:51:40.624
introduced a level of politics into organizations that makes
00:51:40.624 --> 00:51:43.824
them deeply deeply deeply harder to
00:51:43.824 --> 00:51:48.344
be productive because instead of just getting on with the job we've got to worry
00:51:48.344 --> 00:51:53.304
so much about everyone's feelings all the time yeah i mean i think i would say
00:51:53.304 --> 00:51:57.184
part of the answer is going back to dialogue having genuine dialogue but A principle
00:51:57.184 --> 00:52:01.084
of having genuine dialogue is the principle of charity, right?
00:52:01.144 --> 00:52:07.224
And the principle of charity is that I assume the good of you instead of assuming something nefarious.
00:52:07.484 --> 00:52:12.724
Was, yeah. Right. And so if you say something that I think is misogynistic or
00:52:12.724 --> 00:52:17.424
racist or homophobic or ageist, whatever I want to, you know,
00:52:17.524 --> 00:52:20.784
whatever I think, the principle of charity assumes the good of you.
00:52:20.884 --> 00:52:24.764
And so I can say, I heard you say this. Is this what you meant?
00:52:25.384 --> 00:52:30.744
And the person most likely, because the vast majority of people who show up
00:52:30.744 --> 00:52:34.984
to work, the vast majority of people don't intend harm, right?
00:52:35.084 --> 00:52:37.924
I mean, of course there are outliers, okay, but then we can have a conversation and get to that.
00:52:38.493 --> 00:52:41.513
But did you intend this? This is how it's coming across.
00:52:41.813 --> 00:52:45.173
And then somebody can say, oh, no, I meant this.
00:52:45.373 --> 00:52:50.093
Okay. And then we can go on that route. And so right then, we're able to have this discussion.
00:52:50.313 --> 00:52:57.353
But if I don't have that base level of charity with you, if I'm already assuming the opposite of that,
00:52:57.573 --> 00:53:02.093
that you are out to get me or that you are to be minimized because of your age,
00:53:02.173 --> 00:53:04.713
because you're young and you know nothing or because you're old and you know
00:53:04.713 --> 00:53:06.953
nothing or whatever, we want to fill in the blank.
00:53:06.953 --> 00:53:11.273
I already have this assumption about you, then whatever I hear from you is already
00:53:11.273 --> 00:53:14.753
tainted because I'm on the defensive, because you're trying to get me,
00:53:14.933 --> 00:53:18.633
because you're, instead of, we're all in it together. We're all trying to accomplish
00:53:18.633 --> 00:53:21.393
at work this mission. Okay, what is it we're trying to accomplish?
00:53:21.673 --> 00:53:26.153
And so you said this, we have to work together as a team. So what did you mean?
00:53:26.433 --> 00:53:32.973
Maybe you don't, maybe I heard a sexist comment, but I heard it and it wasn't there.
00:53:33.333 --> 00:53:36.053
And so the principle of charity also works for me.
00:53:36.053 --> 00:53:39.173
I'm trying to we're trying to have our same expectations
00:53:39.173 --> 00:53:42.393
together so you having
00:53:42.393 --> 00:53:45.113
the grace to hear what I'm hearing so that we
00:53:45.113 --> 00:53:47.773
can actually communicate and so it
00:53:47.773 --> 00:53:51.433
works both ways being able to constantly make
00:53:51.433 --> 00:53:54.693
sure that we're on the same page but that takes dialogue especially
00:53:54.693 --> 00:53:57.433
because we have all these different life circumstances and we
00:53:57.433 --> 00:54:00.793
come at work and a problem in a variety ways which
00:54:00.793 --> 00:54:07.293
that diversity is so golden if we use it instead of using it to distance ourselves
00:54:07.293 --> 00:54:13.733
yeah and you know we all we all have that i'm not going to say her name but
00:54:13.733 --> 00:54:17.693
we all have the friend don't we who is you know.
00:54:18.679 --> 00:54:21.579
The person who exaggerates everything or sees
00:54:21.579 --> 00:54:24.439
darkness where there is none so you know she'll quite
00:54:24.439 --> 00:54:27.759
often sort of say to me you know lucy you wouldn't believe what
00:54:27.759 --> 00:54:30.519
this guy said to me on the bus and then she'll say
00:54:30.519 --> 00:54:36.699
the comment and then she'll say wasn't that so racist and i'm like no i don't
00:54:36.699 --> 00:54:40.419
think that was racist at all i think someone asking you where you're from is
00:54:40.419 --> 00:54:45.039
actually just curious but she sees it through a different lens so the dialogue
00:54:45.039 --> 00:54:48.279
between us means that I might turn around to her and go, no,
00:54:48.619 --> 00:54:51.599
I think you're not, I think you're seeing something that's not there because
00:54:51.599 --> 00:54:56.719
you're looking at, you're so expecting to hear what you're wanting to hear in
00:54:56.719 --> 00:54:58.779
a way that that's what you see.
00:54:59.119 --> 00:55:02.439
But that's exactly as you say, it's not always what people mean.
00:55:03.079 --> 00:55:09.759
And, you know, having the, having other people around who can say,
00:55:10.059 --> 00:55:12.139
you know what, I don't think that was meant badly.
00:55:12.339 --> 00:55:16.159
I think you can just chill a little bit because actually if you make complaints
00:55:16.159 --> 00:55:20.399
about this and if you stress about it all the time, you're just going to upset them.
00:55:21.308 --> 00:55:23.828
But you're also, what are you actually achieving for yourself?
00:55:24.188 --> 00:55:27.848
You know, how could you see this through a slightly more generous perspective?
00:55:28.168 --> 00:55:33.348
Or if it does really upset you, okay, but how can you have a conversation that's not so antagonistic?
00:55:33.608 --> 00:55:40.108
Hey, you said this, you know, and I'm really offended by it versus I preferred
00:55:40.108 --> 00:55:41.428
it if you would call me like this.
00:55:41.548 --> 00:55:44.228
Or if you, if you, when you use my name, could you do it in this way?
00:55:44.468 --> 00:55:47.028
Or I was a bit upset when you said it the other day.
00:55:47.308 --> 00:55:51.048
Would you, would you mind if actually you said it in a, that that is a kind
00:55:51.048 --> 00:55:54.788
of a spirit, as you say, of generosity, as opposed to now, what I think a lot
00:55:54.788 --> 00:55:58.408
of people do is not even say anything, but they'll go behind someone's back.
00:55:58.568 --> 00:56:01.248
They'll go to complain to somebody in HR, then somebody in HR,
00:56:01.328 --> 00:56:05.048
and then that person feels a complaint's been made about you.
00:56:05.408 --> 00:56:08.148
Now they feel they can't say anything. Now they feel they have to leave.
00:56:08.288 --> 00:56:11.828
And then what do everyone else observe? They observe a culture of no dialogue.
00:56:12.088 --> 00:56:16.328
Now they observe a culture of, if you say something wrong, somebody else is
00:56:16.328 --> 00:56:20.288
going to go and complain about you and you probably won't even get the chance to justify yourself.
00:56:20.968 --> 00:56:28.448
And that is just, it's awful. You know, it's so not an improvement on where we were.
00:56:30.032 --> 00:56:35.212
What you said, I really thought really struck me of this idea of what's next. So I've been offended.
00:56:35.452 --> 00:56:38.152
Sometimes I get offended. People mean it. They don't mean it. Okay.
00:56:38.432 --> 00:56:41.592
The question is, what am I going to do next? And if we think about building
00:56:41.592 --> 00:56:45.292
resilience, resilience doesn't mean I'm never going to come up with against hardship, right?
00:56:45.292 --> 00:56:48.932
I'm never going to build resilience if I don't find things difficult. so
00:56:48.932 --> 00:56:52.252
this thing was said to me or done to me and it
00:56:52.252 --> 00:56:55.252
was harmful impactful then the
00:56:55.252 --> 00:56:58.112
question is what's next what do i want to have
00:56:58.112 --> 00:57:01.412
next what do i want in my relationship with this person what do i want at this
00:57:01.412 --> 00:57:05.952
organization and how am i going to bring that about right so this idea of personal
00:57:05.952 --> 00:57:10.852
empowerment instead of i need to tattle now we're not talking about illegal
00:57:10.852 --> 00:57:13.632
behaviors right there are illegal egregious behaviors but we're talking about
00:57:13.632 --> 00:57:16.032
the normal difficult things that happen at work.
00:57:16.332 --> 00:57:19.932
Normally, difficult things happen because we're dealing with other humans and ourselves, right?
00:57:20.472 --> 00:57:24.732
And so what do I want to do next? If I go tell my boss or HR,
00:57:25.012 --> 00:57:27.892
I mean, how would I feel if someone did that to me?
00:57:28.472 --> 00:57:32.332
Because most people, they have what they intend to do, right?
00:57:32.392 --> 00:57:34.092
We talk about intent versus impact.
00:57:34.272 --> 00:57:40.092
But if I'm impacted, that's still, I'm impacted that way so I can choose what I want to do next.
00:57:40.392 --> 00:57:44.692
And just because I was impacted that way doesn't mean the other person actually
00:57:44.692 --> 00:57:49.532
did something wrong because i might be taking it in a certain way i might not
00:57:49.532 --> 00:57:53.412
it's all very specific it's all about the individuals the relationship and the
00:57:53.412 --> 00:57:55.912
structure but having those conversations.
00:57:56.512 --> 00:58:02.472
Helps me grow as a professional as a person helps you helps the organizations
00:58:02.472 --> 00:58:05.872
and in the absence we're still having conversations but now it's usually toxic
00:58:05.872 --> 00:58:10.892
gossip and we are silencing people so who are we talking to we're not talking
00:58:10.892 --> 00:58:12.952
about the problem we're talking around it and to others,
00:58:13.656 --> 00:58:18.336
Yeah. Yeah. Well, Lucy, this time has really gotten away from us.
00:58:18.416 --> 00:58:21.196
So I do want to mention your brand new book, Congratulations,
00:58:21.496 --> 00:58:25.096
that you have co-authored that has just come out called Age Against the Machine.
00:58:25.416 --> 00:58:30.196
I just ordered my copy today. I'm very, can't wait to read it. Thank you. Thank you.
00:58:30.736 --> 00:58:34.076
So, but I do have this last question for you. When you look into the future
00:58:34.076 --> 00:58:36.276
of work and you think about your kids out into the workforce,
00:58:36.576 --> 00:58:40.736
what do you think needs to happen so that not only will all people be treated
00:58:40.736 --> 00:58:44.956
with dignity and respect, but that they'll be encouraged to thrive and flourish.
00:58:45.716 --> 00:58:49.056
Well, I don't have the power of a magic wand to make everything happen,
00:58:49.076 --> 00:58:59.916
but I do wish for there to be some form of breaks or questioning around the use of so much AI.
00:59:00.536 --> 00:59:07.356
If I liken it to all of the stuff that Jonathan Haidt is sort of finding now
00:59:07.356 --> 00:59:09.236
and all of the research that's coming out,
00:59:09.236 --> 00:59:12.176
you know all of these tech bros were coming out with
00:59:12.176 --> 00:59:15.716
social media that we didn't want or need really and has
00:59:15.716 --> 00:59:19.176
had an absolutely detrimental effect on children's
00:59:19.176 --> 00:59:22.096
livelihoods and life satisfaction and skills and
00:59:22.096 --> 00:59:24.996
ability to build relationships and so on and so forth and mental
00:59:24.996 --> 00:59:29.416
health but we just went headlong into it you know we've exposed everyone to
00:59:29.416 --> 00:59:34.496
it without any real understanding of consequences and yes i do think ai is a
00:59:34.496 --> 00:59:38.856
force for good right there is no question if it can come to spotting things
00:59:38.856 --> 00:59:42.776
like breast tumors in cancer earlier at an earlier point.
00:59:43.216 --> 00:59:48.936
Nobody is going to dispute that. But when it comes to the scale and the pace
00:59:48.936 --> 00:59:54.116
of livelihood impact, the scale and the pace of people's sense of meaning and
00:59:54.116 --> 00:59:57.736
purpose, you know, humans have not evolved for a life of leisure.
00:59:58.434 --> 01:00:02.774
And everyone's sort of going, oh, this is great. People will have universal basic income.
01:00:02.914 --> 01:00:06.534
We'll get all the robots to do the jobs. And you go, yeah, but at no point in
01:00:06.534 --> 01:00:11.914
human history have we just sat on our arses all day and had other people do jobs for us.
01:00:11.914 --> 01:00:15.854
Part of the reward in life and the sense of achievement, a sense of pride,
01:00:16.054 --> 01:00:21.034
is a direct function to the struggle and the hardship.
01:00:21.314 --> 01:00:23.314
This is what you were saying a bit with the resilience.
01:00:23.594 --> 01:00:27.654
So who's asking us, do we want these changes to happen?
01:00:27.814 --> 01:00:31.354
We vote for different people to have power positions in government because in
01:00:31.354 --> 01:00:34.654
theory, these politicians have some sort of an impact over our lives.
01:00:34.814 --> 01:00:40.874
As far as I can see, the politicians have zero impact. The AI tech leaders seem
01:00:40.874 --> 01:00:44.834
to have a disproportionate impact on people's livelihoods at this point.
01:00:45.154 --> 01:00:51.074
So that just feels like something that I want to say, but I have no answer and I have no solution to it.
01:00:52.115 --> 01:00:58.655
In terms of what can people do to prepare themselves, I would say prepare yourself
01:00:58.655 --> 01:01:00.315
for a life of constant change.
01:01:00.555 --> 01:01:03.375
So the world of the full-time job is gone.
01:01:03.615 --> 01:01:09.855
So not only should we be asking kids, what five or six different things do you want to be doing?
01:01:10.015 --> 01:01:14.355
It's probably going to be a case of not even considering that from a sequential,
01:01:14.635 --> 01:01:17.375
go from one job to another, to another.
01:01:17.615 --> 01:01:20.615
It's probably going to be multi-layered, right?
01:01:20.875 --> 01:01:23.715
So I met someone recently.
01:01:24.215 --> 01:01:30.315
I don't know if it's true, but he claimed he had income from 17 different sources.
01:01:30.455 --> 01:01:34.235
So he had three jobs, two that he did one day a week fractionally,
01:01:34.415 --> 01:01:37.975
and then another part-time job that he did two days a week.
01:01:38.135 --> 01:01:42.595
He then did consulting. He then also rented out one of his rooms.
01:01:42.675 --> 01:01:44.815
He did some tutoring a bit on the side.
01:01:45.055 --> 01:01:50.455
I think maybe he had a couple of dogs. So he also would take money for dog sitting
01:01:50.455 --> 01:01:52.175
somebody else's dog every now and again.
01:01:52.335 --> 01:01:55.415
I don't even know. Maybe he had an online course as well somewhere.
01:01:55.655 --> 01:01:59.715
And maybe there were some ads that came in via YouTube videos or something.
01:02:00.155 --> 01:02:04.675
But the long and short of it is, is that if he's true, even if he's not true.
01:02:05.335 --> 01:02:10.435
It is incredibly common for me to see people at the end of a year doing at least
01:02:10.435 --> 01:02:14.855
two or three different bits of work that give them income from different sources.
01:02:15.275 --> 01:02:22.055
And I would say that having that, that is probably the strongest position you could be in.
01:02:22.515 --> 01:02:26.315
You know, the people who have always worked five days a week for one employer,
01:02:26.515 --> 01:02:29.235
and that employer is not necessarily thinking about your career.
01:02:29.495 --> 01:02:32.275
They're thinking about their business performance and their job and so on and
01:02:32.275 --> 01:02:34.715
so forth. So the individuals haven't been thinking about it.
01:02:35.175 --> 01:02:38.895
I'd say those are the people who are the most vulnerable. Because whether it's
01:02:38.895 --> 01:02:42.035
a comfortable position, having to catch and kill your next meal,
01:02:42.135 --> 01:02:45.955
your next meal, your next meal, you are at the very least being constantly forced
01:02:45.955 --> 01:02:48.495
to consider, how do I stay relevant?
01:02:48.695 --> 01:02:50.995
The conversations that I'm having, they're buying or they're not buying?
01:02:51.095 --> 01:02:52.755
Why are they not buying? That.
01:02:53.303 --> 01:03:00.063
As a kind of an armor to wear to help inform you as to what it is you need to
01:03:00.063 --> 01:03:02.883
learn, what it is you need to kind of skid yourself up in.
01:03:03.143 --> 01:03:08.803
As uncomfortable as it is, it's probably the most secure position you can be in.
01:03:09.103 --> 01:03:13.723
Because then if one card falls, you've got something else that you're looking at.
01:03:13.883 --> 01:03:16.523
And I just, I think it's probably going to
01:03:16.523 --> 01:03:19.523
be increasingly the way of work
01:03:19.523 --> 01:03:22.603
going forwards you know we already see organizations like PayPal
01:03:22.603 --> 01:03:25.703
and Google they have more freelancers than they do have people full-time
01:03:25.703 --> 01:03:28.443
and you know the more that things change the
01:03:28.443 --> 01:03:31.343
more that things change so you know and it's probably
01:03:31.343 --> 01:03:34.523
people in our sorts of you know people embrace
01:03:34.523 --> 01:03:38.143
that kind of cohort we've got this aging cohort I don't know anyone who wants
01:03:38.143 --> 01:03:41.883
to work in a job full-time five days a week they want more curiosity they want
01:03:41.883 --> 01:03:45.823
to learn more things they want more space in their life just for life and now
01:03:45.823 --> 01:03:49.123
that they're dictating more of those terms you can And you'd better believe
01:03:49.123 --> 01:03:51.743
that's going to start feeding its way back down through the chain.
01:03:51.903 --> 01:03:55.423
And then organizations now are going, well, why should I pay someone five days
01:03:55.423 --> 01:03:58.803
a week if I can just pay someone two days a week? This is great.
01:03:59.003 --> 01:04:02.143
And so I can just see that that's going to keep on spiraling.
01:04:02.663 --> 01:04:07.803
So younger people today, I think, have to be really cognizant of how the world
01:04:07.803 --> 01:04:11.103
of work is changing and how that means that they will have to adapt.
01:04:12.244 --> 01:04:16.064
What a wonderful answer. Lucy, thank you so much, and congratulations on your
01:04:16.064 --> 01:04:18.424
new book, and thank you for your time today.
01:04:19.164 --> 01:04:22.124
Thank you very much, Mary. I appreciate it. Take care.
01:04:22.584 --> 01:04:27.084
Thank you, Lucy, so much for a fun conversation about really important issues,
01:04:27.804 --> 01:04:33.044
and dear listener, I encourage you, if you are mid-career or wherever you may
01:04:33.044 --> 01:04:37.004
be and you're interested in career development, to check out Brave Starts.
01:04:37.384 --> 01:04:42.144
And then also her new book, Age Against the Machine looks really interesting
01:04:42.144 --> 01:04:47.664
about how we deal with the workforce that we have and where we might be and
01:04:47.664 --> 01:04:52.444
how to really make it so that everybody can flourish throughout their career.
01:04:53.204 --> 01:04:56.524
Conflict Managed is produced by Third Party Workplace Conflict Restoration Services
01:04:56.524 --> 01:05:00.824
and hosted by me, Merry Brown. You can find us online at 3pconflictrestoration.com.
01:05:01.064 --> 01:05:03.324
Come back, we have new episodes every Tuesday.
01:05:03.624 --> 01:05:07.344
And if you haven't checked out my latest book called Winning the generation
01:05:07.344 --> 01:05:11.764
wars at work, making your age an asset, it is available on Amazon.
01:05:12.164 --> 01:05:14.704
Our music is courtesy of Dove Pilot.
01:05:15.124 --> 01:05:18.504
And remember, conflict is normal and expected. Let's deal with it.
01:05:18.704 --> 01:05:20.024
Until next time, take care.