À PROPOS DE CET ÉPISODE
Thomas Sargent places Patrick Newman in a tradition of American historians—Charles Beard, Forrest McDonald, Richard Hofstadter, and Murray Rothbard—who compress data and look for patterns in how the state is designed and managed. He draws the dividing line between those who read bad policy as unintended error correctable by better administration and those who see a government constituted with excessive powers that will inevitably serve some private interests at the expense of others, closing on Argentina’s industrial policies and their growing appeal among leaders of both US parties.
Anglais
États-Unis
DANS CET ÉPISODE
TRANSCRIPTION 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
RECHERCHER LES ÉPISODES PASSÉS
Rechercher les épisodes précédents de Mises Institute.
AUTRES ÉPISODES DANS CE PODCAST
Despite the real damage the Trump administration is doing to the economy, its cheerleaders in the Cabinet continue to insist all is well. This is beyond wishful thinking.
Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/whistling-past-graveyard
Rothbard’s account of the war economy as a cartel run by the men it regulated. He traces the Council of National Defense and the War Industries Board, whose committees were staffed by the executives of the industries they governed; price-fixing set to guarantee a “fair profit” to high-cost producer…
A conservatism that does not recognize the efficacy of natural law is no conservatism at all.
Original article: https://mises.org/mises-wire/natural-law-principles-conservative-tradition
Mortgage rates are at historically normal levels. They are not “too high.” On the other hand, home prices are too high after years of subsidy from artificially low rates and government intervention. The answer to the stagnating market is to cut prices.
Be sure to follow the Loot and Lobby podcast …
Against historians who treated the war as the death of progressive reform, Rothbard argues it was the culmination progressives had wanted all along. He traces the movement’s postmillennial pietist roots—a Protestantism bent on stamping out sin through the State—into wartime prohibition and the anti…
Avertissement: Le podcast et les illustrations intégrés sur cette page proviennent de Mises Institute, qui est la propriété de son propriétaire et n'est ni affilié ni approuvé par Listen Notes, Inc.
MODIFIER
Merci de nous avoir aidé à tenir la base de données de podcasts à jour.
