À PROPOS DE CET ÉPISODE
Cognitive Bias in Forensic Pathology Decisions. Itiel Dror from University College London shows that medical examiner decisions can be influenced by the non-medical information to which the experts are exposed, and argues for restrictions on the ways in which medical examiners use such information.
Anglais
États-Unis
TRANSCRIPTION 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
RECHERCHER LES ÉPISODES PASSÉS
Rechercher les épisodes précédents de Excited Utterance.
AUTRES ÉPISODES DANS CE PODCAST
Antiracist Expert Evidence. Asess Bhasin from the University of Maryland and Jasmine Gonzales Rose from Boston University discuss the ways in which expert evidence can address racism and racial discrimination in our system of evidence and proof.
The Evidentiary Use and Misuse of Forensic Musicology in Copyright Litigation. Fred Yen from Boston College discusses the use of musicology experts in copyright litigation and what they should and should not be permitted to testify about.
Children and the Making of Modern Evidence Law. Laura Savarese from Michigan State University discusses the role of children’s testimony and nineteenth-century child protection laws in the development of the law of evidence.
Defending Due Process. Brandon Garrett from Duke University discusses his new book, Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World.
Strategy for Strategy's Sake. Edith Beerdsen from Temple University asks whether strategic or "sporting" behavior has any place in a system of legal proof, and when being clever goes too far.
Avertissement: Le podcast et les illustrations intégrés sur cette page proviennent de Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn, qui est la propriété de son propriétaire et n'est ni affilié ni approuvé par Listen Notes, Inc.
MODIFIER
Merci de nous avoir aidé à tenir la base de données de podcasts à jour.
