關於這一集
Discussion of the connection between normalization and logical consistency. One approach is to prove normalization and type preservation, to show (in proof-theoretic terms) that all detours can be eliminated from proofs (this is normalization) and that the resulting proof still proves the same theorem (this is type preservation). I mention an alternative I use for Cedille, which is to use a realizability semantics (often used for normalization proofs) directly to prove consistency.
英語
美國
逐字稿 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
本 Podcast 中的其他單集
I am currently on a frolic into the literature on Control Flow Analysis (CFA), and discuss what this is, for pure lambda calculus. A wonderful reference for this is this paper by Palsberg.
Commuting conversions are transformations on proofs in natural deduction, that move certain stuck inferences out of the way, so that the normal detour reductions (which correspond to beta-reduction under Curry-Howard) are enabled. The stuck inferences are uses of disjunction elimination. In progr…
I discuss a nice paper I quite enjoyed reading, called The Calculated Typer, by Garby, Bahr, and Hutton. The authors take a very nice general look at the specification of a type checker, for a very simple expression language. They then manually derive the actual code for the type checker by effec…
In this episode, I talk about a somewhat more advanced case of the Curry-Howard isomorphism (the connection between logic and programming languages where formulas in logic are identified with types, and proofs with programs). This is the identification of double-negation translations in logic, whi…
In this episode, I talk about the control operator callcc, and how it is implemented during compilation using continuation-passing style (CPS). I sketch how CPS conversion (transforming a program with callcc into one in CPS that does not need callcc any more) corresponds to double-negation transla…
免責聲明: 本頁面嵌入的 Podcast 和封面圖片來自 Aaron Stump，歸其所有者所有，與 Listen Notes, Inc. 無關聯，也未獲得 Listen Notes, Inc. 背書。
