關於這一集
Garth Barriere and Eric Purtzki joins Peter Edelmann and Steven Meurrens to discuss the constitutionality of laws that are retroactive or retrospective. Garth and Eric are both criminal defence attorneys in Vancouver. Both have appeared before the Supreme Court of Canada on numerous occasions.Peter and Steven also discuss the recent election of Donald Trump as the 45th president of the United States.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
英語
加拿大
逐字稿 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
本 Podcast 中的其他單集
Canada’s Express Entry system was designed to rank skilled immigrants predictably and select those most likely to succeed economically. Has it instead become an unpredictable collection of category-based draws, shifting priorities and short-term policy fixes?
Steven Paolasini joins us to discuss hi…
What actually counts as “work” under Canadian immigration law? The answer is much broader than simply receiving a paycheque.
We discuss a recent Federal Court decision involving unauthorized work and the line between simply owning a Canadian business and actually working for it. We examine how unpa…
Canada says it is returning immigration to “sustainable levels.” But what does sustainability actually mean? And sustainable for whom?
Deanna Okun-Nachoff is joined by immigration lawyer Will Tao, founder of Heron Law Offices, to discuss how artificial intelligence, automated triage and rapidly cha…
We discuss three recent developments:
IRCC’s abrupt addition and removal of new requirements for C20 reciprocal-employment work permits;
CBSA officers checking the immigration status of participants at a Calgary protest, with 12 people identified as potentially inadmissible; and
The hundreds of pro…
Can Parliament prevent courts from reviewing the decisions of administrative tribunals?
In this episode, we discuss the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark decision in Democracy Watch v. Canada (Attorney General), 2026 SCC 28. The case arose after Democracy Watch sought judicial review of the Ethics…
免責聲明: 本頁面嵌入的 Podcast 和封面圖片來自 Steven Meurrens and Deanna Okun-Nachoff，歸其所有者所有，與 Listen Notes, Inc. 無關聯，也未獲得 Listen Notes, Inc. 背書。
