关于这一集
DAT’s acquisition of Convoy’s tech platform marks a major leap in freight innovation—pairing the largest load board with cutting-edge automation. Bill Driegert, EVP at DAT and co-founder of Uber Freight, explains how the platform streamlines carrier procurement, automates up to 98% of loads, and slashes brokerage costs. With DAT’s full ecosystem—load board, factoring, tracking, and now digital freight matching—the future of freight is faster, smarter, and more efficient.
Connect with Bill Driegert: https://www.linkedin.com/in/driegert/
Support Our Sponsors:
Togo: Click Here
OperFi: Click Here
QuikSkope - Get a Free Trial: Click Here
DAT One - Brokers & Carriers: Click Here to get 10% off your first year!
DAT Outgo Factoring for Carriers: Click Here
AscendTMS: Click Here and use promo code RA-freight360! to get AscendTMS FREE for 90 days!
Recommended Products: Click Here
Freight Broker Basics Course: Click Here
Join Our Facebook Group: Click Here
Check out all of our content online: Click Here
在这一集里
播客笔记 🔗
文字稿 🔗
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:00.882
Welcome back.
00:00:00.882 --> 00:00:04.049
It's another episode of the Freight360 podcast.
00:00:04.049 --> 00:00:05.012
We've got a fun one today.
00:00:05.012 --> 00:00:05.741
We've got a guest.
00:00:05.741 --> 00:00:12.509
We're going to talk about some big news that has happened recently in the industry, but first make sure to check out all the other content that we've got.
00:00:12.859 --> 00:00:30.621
You can go to Freight360.net if you'd like to find our searchable library of all of our content from long form podcasts where we interview guests and just talk about industry best practices and help you with tips on how to reach out to those customers and build your carrier network better, leverage the latest tech that's out there.
00:00:30.621 --> 00:00:36.865
And you can even send us a message and we'll answer your questions on our Q&A show that drops every Tuesday.
00:00:36.865 --> 00:00:45.130
There's a little bit of a contact button on our website or you can just comment on our YouTube channel and we'll take your questions.
00:00:45.130 --> 00:00:52.600
That way, you've got the freight broker basics course If you're looking for an educational option for your team or for yourself to get your brokerage off the ground.
00:00:52.600 --> 00:00:56.046
And leave us that five-star review.
00:00:56.046 --> 00:00:59.374
We haven't run any reviews off in a while, but yeah, good stuff.
00:00:59.374 --> 00:01:04.203
All right, ben, anything new in South Florida today before we introduce our guest.
00:01:04.423 --> 00:01:05.763
Yeah, just looking forward to winter.
00:01:05.763 --> 00:01:06.924
That's about it.
00:01:06.924 --> 00:01:08.605
Super hot, like it's been all summer.
00:01:09.167 --> 00:01:09.566
All right.
00:01:09.566 --> 00:01:12.728
Well, without further ado, we've got Bill Driegert with us.
00:01:12.728 --> 00:01:18.412
Today we're going to talk about the DAT acquisition of Convoy and all the tech there.
00:01:18.412 --> 00:01:20.213
Bill, welcome to the show, really quick.
00:01:20.213 --> 00:01:30.781
For anyone who doesn't know, you, feel free and give a brief rundown on you or your background, current role, and we'll dig all into.
00:01:30.802 --> 00:01:31.584
Convoy and DAT later on in the episode.
00:01:31.584 --> 00:01:32.325
But feel free and give a quick intro.
00:01:32.325 --> 00:01:33.007
Yeah, thanks for having me.
00:01:33.007 --> 00:01:35.152
So I've been in this industry since 2006.
00:01:35.152 --> 00:02:01.591
I was fourth employee at Coyote Logistics, spent about eight years there, spent a couple years at Amazon and then was co-founder of Uber Freight and spent about eight years building that up, before going over to Flexport and having the fortuitous opportunity to acquire the assets of Convoy as that wound down and we, of course, recently sold that to DAT, which we'll talk about today, and so now I'm EVP of Convoy Platform over here at DAT, driving Convoy Platform within the DAT ecosystem.
00:02:01.939 --> 00:02:04.305
Awesome and I'm super excited to dig into that.
00:02:04.305 --> 00:02:06.953
Dat's had a massive 12 months.
00:02:06.953 --> 00:02:12.829
I feel like we've talked about acquisition after acquisition and just a lot of great product development.
00:02:12.829 --> 00:02:15.629
So we'll get into the convoy part of it in a little bit here.
00:02:15.629 --> 00:02:22.484
That is the big news, so we're going to skip over our news portion today For a quick sports roundup.
00:02:22.484 --> 00:02:28.753
Ben, did you see the Buffalo Bills are the Hard Knocks preseason team they selected this year.
00:02:29.133 --> 00:02:29.574
I didn't.
00:02:30.662 --> 00:02:32.367
So I'm a diehard Bills fan.
00:02:32.367 --> 00:02:36.169
Being here in Buffalo, I have never watched Hard Knocks on HBO.
00:02:36.169 --> 00:02:38.126
Basically they follow teams.
00:02:38.126 --> 00:02:40.086
They've evolved it over the years.
00:02:40.086 --> 00:02:43.284
It's been around for like a couple of decades, I think, following teams throughout the season.
00:02:43.284 --> 00:02:52.050
But now they've got like follow a team through training camp, which the Bills are being featured on right now, and they follow another team during the season and then another team post offseason.
00:02:52.050 --> 00:02:53.013
I guess is what they're doing.
00:02:53.980 --> 00:03:00.014
But I went to training camp in Rochester, new York, which is like 75 miles east of Buffalo.
00:03:00.014 --> 00:03:04.407
The Bills are like one of five or six teams that actually leave their home facility for training camp.
00:03:04.407 --> 00:03:10.657
The Bills are like one of five or six teams that actually leave their home facility for training camp.
00:03:10.657 --> 00:03:18.502
And then we went to on last Friday they came back to Orchard Park in Buffalo to do like a in our stadium scrimmage, you know Bills versus Bills.
00:03:18.502 --> 00:03:25.935
And we watched the first episode of Hard Knocks last night when it dropped and they had like footage from like literally last Friday in that show and I was like this is insane.
00:03:29.620 --> 00:03:35.567
It's really cool Cause I'm like I wonder, as we watch the show, if you know, my wife and I will make a little cameo, I don't know, but either way, if you're a sports fan and your team is featured, whether it's like.
00:03:35.567 --> 00:03:46.924
You know, we talked with Steven, our producer, about having Joe Burrow on the Netflix quarterback series this that just dropped from last year's season like it's just fun to follow your team through.
00:03:46.924 --> 00:03:50.191
You know, obviously you know how the season ends, um, in those shows.
00:03:50.191 --> 00:03:54.730
But just get you pumped up like this is, you know, training camp and heading into preseason this weekend.
00:03:54.730 --> 00:03:56.402
So I'm I'm super excited.
00:03:56.402 --> 00:03:57.907
What do you think about the steelers this year, ben?
00:03:58.408 --> 00:03:58.889
your boys.
00:03:58.889 --> 00:04:01.122
I'm saying like cautiously optimistic.
00:04:01.122 --> 00:04:06.346
I mean like training camp reports are saying that like aaron rogers is really, I don't know, showing leadership qualities.
00:04:06.346 --> 00:04:07.848
I camp reports are saying that like Aaron Rodgers is really I don't know, showing leadership qualities.
00:04:07.848 --> 00:04:11.634
I mean like the fact that like he's spending time with like the younger guys on the team.
00:04:11.634 --> 00:04:17.112
There's lots of really good positive reports from like almost all of the local media up in Pittsburgh.
00:04:17.112 --> 00:04:26.788
So I mean it went from we don't want this guy would rather him not be here to immediately like this warm welcome and it seems like I don't know could be pretty optimistic.
00:04:27.168 --> 00:04:28.172
We'll see, you never know, man.
00:04:28.172 --> 00:04:33.218
I know a bunch of Steelers fans that were like, if we sign Rodgers, I'm not going to follow the team anymore.
00:04:33.218 --> 00:04:39.444
And I'm like, yeah, if you're a diehard fan, you're still going to give it a week or two and Billy, you said you're not a big sports guy, but you said you're.
00:04:39.444 --> 00:04:42.365
I mean in the San Fran area, right?
00:04:42.365 --> 00:04:43.848
Is there a lot of Niners fans out there?
00:04:44.088 --> 00:04:46.048
Oh, my son is a diehard Niners fan.
00:04:46.048 --> 00:04:47.990
I actually grew up in Dallas.
00:04:47.990 --> 00:04:50.091
My wife and her whole family are big Cowboys fans.
00:04:50.091 --> 00:04:53.134
Okay, definitely a bit of a Niners Cowboys, oh yeah.
00:04:53.714 --> 00:04:54.975
Oh yeah, very true.
00:04:54.975 --> 00:04:56.396
Well, cool, good stuff.
00:04:56.396 --> 00:04:58.117
We'll get right into it, bill.
00:04:58.117 --> 00:05:02.221
So you came over to DAT.
00:05:02.221 --> 00:05:02.983
I mean, this just happened.
00:05:02.983 --> 00:05:03.925
What two weeks ago?
00:05:04.286 --> 00:05:05.648
It officially closed last Wednesday.
00:05:05.949 --> 00:05:06.870
So a week ago.
00:05:06.891 --> 00:05:08.353
The first full week, yeah.
00:05:09.240 --> 00:05:11.845
So take us through and then we'll, you know, we'll dig into it a bit.
00:05:11.845 --> 00:05:17.894
For the folks out there that are listening to kind of paint the picture of you know how this all happened and what does it mean.
00:05:17.894 --> 00:05:21.425
Can you kind of set the stage on?
00:05:21.425 --> 00:05:26.052
You know, I kind of want to hear more about you too.
00:05:26.052 --> 00:05:37.971
I mean, your background's super impressive, but how did, how did the convoy platform you know, how did you feel about it and how did it work for you in the years past and how did everything lead up to this acquisition?
00:05:37.971 --> 00:05:39.262
We'll start there.
00:05:39.502 --> 00:05:44.062
Yeah, I've known, I knew Dan pretty early in his journey with the convoy platform.
00:05:44.062 --> 00:05:50.415
I actually met him while I was still at Amazon in Seattle when they were first starting off back in 2015 and 16.
00:05:50.415 --> 00:05:52.262
And I always believed in the idea.
00:05:52.262 --> 00:06:00.468
It's an idea that really started coming to market in 2012-ish the idea of an Uber for freight or using an app for driver to manage freight.
00:06:00.468 --> 00:06:10.201
It seems pretty obvious in retrospect and a lot of people were converging on this idea around the same time, but there weren't a lot of companies that have the capital and capability to really push it hard.
00:06:10.201 --> 00:06:22.502
And Convoy I mean it came down to Convoy and Uber Freight there from 2016 to 2020, really pushing the market and going tit for tat in terms of product features and just pacing and growth.
00:06:22.502 --> 00:06:28.673
And so I was on the other side of that because I helped co-found Uber Freight in September 2016.
00:06:28.673 --> 00:06:32.187
Convoy originally launched a little bit before us in 2015.
00:06:32.187 --> 00:06:39.069
So they had a little bit of a headstart, but we of course, have the Uber brand name and the fact that Convoy was pacing their all through that.
00:06:39.069 --> 00:06:50.706
They always were leading with product, they always had incredible product, they always had an incredible team and, of course, they got significant amount of investment and like gold tier investment investors throughout the whole process.
00:06:50.706 --> 00:06:56.384
So I was very familiar with it as a competitor and I knew that they had built a very solid product.
00:06:56.384 --> 00:06:57.910
I knew that carriers loved the product.
00:06:57.910 --> 00:07:03.653
I knew the brokers the shippers at the time they worked with loved what the service that Convoy offered.
00:07:04.019 --> 00:07:06.668
Well, then came the pandemic and lots of things changed.
00:07:06.668 --> 00:07:09.208
Uber Freight became quite a different company.
00:07:09.208 --> 00:07:12.261
We made a large acquisition of TransPlace Convoy.
00:07:12.261 --> 00:07:17.812
Ultimately, the end of that story was come 2023, they had to shut the doors.
00:07:17.812 --> 00:07:26.002
Unfortunately, we were able to engage with them very early, Almost as soon as that happened, reached out to Dan, had a conversation.
00:07:26.002 --> 00:07:35.884
It was clear they had a very short window to make a decision around what to do with the technology, because the bank was effectively taking all the other assets and we had the opportunity to buy the technology.
00:07:35.884 --> 00:07:36.747
But it was no business.
00:07:36.747 --> 00:07:38.821
We weren't buying a business, we were just buying the tech.
00:07:38.821 --> 00:07:55.850
But myself and Ryan, CEO of Flexport, were super bullish on just the value of that tech and that platform and because I was incredibly familiar with it and had built very similar capabilities at Uber, I also knew that I was pretty confident that we could take it and do something with it.
00:07:56.661 --> 00:08:09.615
Can you talk a little bit, because there's probably people in our audience well, there's definitely people in our audience that are new and maybe don't understand what an Uber Freight does compared to a traditional brokerage model or what the convoy technology does.
00:08:09.615 --> 00:08:14.529
Can you just break that down Barney style to understand specifically convoy what?
00:08:14.529 --> 00:08:15.331
What is it?
00:08:15.331 --> 00:08:15.952
What does it do?
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:22.829
Yeah, both convoy and Uber Freight were very tech forward, and I'd say convoy even more so in the scope of the products they built out.
00:08:22.829 --> 00:08:30.367
It really starts with a different operating model that is app-centric on the carrier side and then, I'd say, building up from there.
00:08:30.367 --> 00:08:48.708
There was a significant amount of technology investment in all sorts of different capabilities in Convoy, but I think the pivotal piece that most people center on is this idea of instant booking, app-centric booking, and it's been highly transformative for carriers and I think, fundamentally, the carrier market has shifted as a result over the last 10 years.
00:08:48.708 --> 00:08:58.548
So if you put yourself in the shoes of an owner operator and it's 2010 and you need to find a load or let's say you just got your CDL how do you get started?
00:08:58.548 --> 00:08:59.272
Right, there aren't.
00:08:59.272 --> 00:09:01.682
It's a lot of just banging on doors.
00:09:01.682 --> 00:09:03.226
Hopefully you've got some good relationships.
00:09:03.226 --> 00:09:17.692
Hopefully you've got previous shippers you worked with who you can offer your services to, or maybe there's other carriers you can sign on with, but it's very, it's very unlikely that you can just book a load the next day and if you do that, you're probably going to um, you know DAT or a load board.
00:09:17.692 --> 00:09:18.681
You're making phone calls.
00:09:18.681 --> 00:09:32.212
There's a lot of friction involved in that process and if you're calling a broker, you're operating on broker hours, so you're calling them at 6am because you're trying to be the first one, first call they get, and that's just a very like that's how it worked up until really these models came to market.
00:09:32.273 --> 00:09:37.389
So now today I'm an owner operator, I can download an app, I can book a load, I can just start doing business.
00:09:37.389 --> 00:09:42.390
I've heard hundreds of these stories from carriers where they said, yeah, I mean first day I got my CDL.
00:09:42.390 --> 00:09:45.687
Carriers where they said, yeah, I mean first day I got my CDL I didn't have options.
00:09:45.687 --> 00:09:51.135
Like now I've got options and it just allows me to be a lot more, allows them to be a lot more flexible and have access to more freight and just manage their business through the app.
00:09:51.135 --> 00:09:58.624
So from a carrier perspective, they can book a load there, all the tracking happens in the app and then they get paid and their the payment can be one to two days.
00:09:58.624 --> 00:09:59.926
It's very like everything.
00:09:59.926 --> 00:10:03.711
It's a consistent experience across a whole set of different freight types.
00:10:04.091 --> 00:10:05.293
From a broker perspective.
00:10:05.293 --> 00:10:11.850
So because Uber Freight and Convoy went to market as brokers and Uber Freight still is a broker Convoy is no longer a broker.
00:10:11.850 --> 00:10:13.144
We shifted away from that.
00:10:13.144 --> 00:10:18.009
We decided this tech is great, let's give it to all brokers and go to market that way.
00:10:18.009 --> 00:10:22.292
But from a broker perspective, it's like a magic button.
00:10:22.292 --> 00:10:29.008
It's like when a load just comes off the board or gets booked at 10 pm and you don't even have to touch it or call a carrier.
00:10:29.008 --> 00:10:32.870
That's a magical experience when it happens, but it's an OPEX saver.
00:10:34.120 --> 00:10:38.591
And to get there, though, every element of that load had to be optimized and automated.
00:10:38.591 --> 00:10:47.894
So, starting with the bidding and the pricing and allowing the carrier to book it automatically, all that had to be built out.
00:10:47.894 --> 00:10:49.907
Tracking very robust tracking.
00:10:49.907 --> 00:10:56.173
These days, the phone in your pocket has incredibly precise GPS and tracking compliance is incredibly high.
00:10:56.173 --> 00:11:00.230
Early on, when carriers first started using apps, they didn't want to use them or the tracking wasn't great.
00:11:00.230 --> 00:11:02.788
There were issues, but those are 10-year-old problems.
00:11:02.788 --> 00:11:04.129
Today, carriers using apps.
00:11:04.129 --> 00:11:04.879
They're highly compliant.
00:11:04.879 --> 00:11:08.341
And then all the payments system had to be built out Up front.
00:11:08.341 --> 00:11:21.668
All the one of the big investment areas for Convoy was in fraud right, because if you're going to automate this like, you've got to ensure that you've got very tight controls in terms of who comes on board and how we bring carriers through the compliance process.
00:11:21.668 --> 00:11:21.947
So.
00:11:22.107 --> 00:11:23.510
Ben, you know what this makes me think it was.
00:11:23.510 --> 00:11:41.792
We go back probably to early on, and when me and you first were getting into the brokerage side, I remember writing articles on LinkedIn and like writing comments when Uber, freight and Convoy came out because people were like they're going to replace freight brokers and I'm like, I'm like they're literally acting as a brokerage.
00:11:41.792 --> 00:11:55.974
They're just leveraging technology to do a way better job and if they can really do that, well, I think there's something there and I always saw the benefit of the technology versus just trying to replace a broker as the more important part.
00:11:55.974 --> 00:11:58.817
Ben, do you remember when this first stuff all came into discussion?
00:11:58.836 --> 00:12:01.888
Very much so this is like the mid to later 20-teens.
00:12:02.951 --> 00:12:19.368
Yeah, yeah, there was a lot of anytime a new entrant comes into market with so much investment, so much media and impressive attention, there was a lot of counter narratives in the market, yeah, and I think fundamentally there's a also.
00:12:19.368 --> 00:12:26.745
I think, just if I'm a small carrier or a small broker and I can't make that level of investment, what does this mean for me?
00:12:26.745 --> 00:12:30.280
And I think that's also one of the things that's changed over the last 10 years.
00:12:30.280 --> 00:12:36.832
A lot of tech now is available to most brokers and, like, with us going to DAT, even more so now they have access to this capability.
00:12:36.893 --> 00:12:51.465
But certainly there was a lot of fear in that too, because, having been at Coyote and having been gone through a broker startup, a lot of what we were doing by the time we started Uber Freight was just going through our wish list, right, just like automating everything.
00:12:51.465 --> 00:12:56.173
That if we had had the budget, we had had the capability and had had access to this many developers like this is what everybody would have wanted to do, right.
00:12:56.173 --> 00:13:05.735
I think we also got a little bit of pushback for that, because I think in any industry, it's not always like the ideas is a brand new, it's just a better execution that the tech has evolved.
00:13:05.735 --> 00:13:14.633
You can just do it more efficiently than you could before, and if you can do it with that level of investment, you can just pace much faster than anybody else from a tech investment perspective.
00:14:16.040 --> 00:14:20.627
I'm curious on the part that you were talking about on, just like the from the driver's perspective.
00:14:20.627 --> 00:14:29.540
Right, so this is, it's going all the way down to the driver level, or to the VIN level, or pretty much that MC level compliance insurance.
00:14:29.821 --> 00:14:40.232
Yeah, if a carrier is working with convoy platform, the vast majority of those carriers are owner operators and that's primarily to do with the fact that they have to use the app to engage in book freight.
00:14:40.232 --> 00:14:45.230
We do allow dispatchers midsize carriers, but they still have the driver has to manage the load through the application.
00:14:45.230 --> 00:14:47.857
Loud dispatchers midsize carriers, but they still have the driver has to manage the load through the application.
00:14:47.857 --> 00:15:01.383
There's a certain size carrier by which you know they may have constraints around allowing their drivers to use the apps, but generally that's the constraint and for them too it's a strong product market fit because they just don't have, as the other options are not as seamless and easy to use.
00:15:01.383 --> 00:15:02.465
So it's a preferred option.
00:15:02.865 --> 00:15:07.833
But if you're an owner operator or if you're on the app, we have to know the driver, we know the device, like.
00:15:07.833 --> 00:15:09.634
We know we have that information.
00:15:09.634 --> 00:15:14.019
We have a lot of rich information about the users and we know then too that like are they.
00:15:14.019 --> 00:15:20.161
You know we have all the location information so we can their IP address, all the rest, all the other information.
00:15:20.161 --> 00:15:21.964
So we have a lot of.
00:15:21.964 --> 00:15:23.187
We do have driver level detail versus strictly carrier.
00:15:23.187 --> 00:15:25.531
Now, if so, we have a lot of, we do have driver level detail versus strictly carrier.
00:15:25.531 --> 00:15:38.485
Now, if it's an owner operator it's one of the same and so, because we have such a large owner operator population, probably a huge percent of our carrier base, by capacity and by count, is a driver and a carrier and it makes a lot of sense, like we've talked about this a lot.
00:15:38.560 --> 00:16:00.922
It's like, well, one, just how the whole carrier market is like segmented, right and like for owner ops like I don't want to use the word like disenfranchised, but like, okay, you only have so many resources right as an owner op to be able to, like you said, make phone calls, talk to brokers, negotiate different loads, right, like even if you're starting early calling and going, okay, like this load looks good, but then, okay, well, that load's booked.
00:16:00.922 --> 00:16:02.104
Now I got to talk to the next person.
00:16:02.104 --> 00:16:07.672
I got to talk to the next person, and then it's the other uphill battle of like, okay, how long is your MC history?
00:16:07.672 --> 00:16:08.674
Can they verify it?
00:16:08.674 --> 00:16:15.653
Do you have enough inspections, which I think were like old school ways to prevent fraud that are now probably not as effective.
00:16:15.941 --> 00:16:29.287
But we've always talked about this as a sense that, like how the industry tried to solve that basically created this giant headwind for owner operators right, and for new trucking company owners to where it's just like, okay, so you don't have history.
00:16:29.287 --> 00:16:30.371
Like, how do you start?
00:16:30.371 --> 00:16:32.427
How do you gain that credibility?
00:16:32.427 --> 00:16:46.831
And the reality is is if you've got visibility all the way down to the insurance, the VIN level and that driver on the tracking side and specifically all the way through the payment side, then at the very least, like that mitigates so much of the risk for the brokers to work with those carriers.
00:16:46.931 --> 00:16:50.747
that really wasn't solving that problem anyway, and it's certainly not solving it these days.
00:16:51.581 --> 00:16:55.532
Yeah, and if I mean from a carrier experience, just so much easier.
00:16:55.532 --> 00:17:05.913
I often use the analogy of like previously that it was more like Craigslist and this is more like an Amazon, and it's like somebody brought this up the other day.
00:17:05.913 --> 00:17:09.287
They said, well, you know, there's other systems where you can just book a load online now.
00:17:09.287 --> 00:17:15.161
And I said, sure, but if you went to Amazon and you just you said, oh, I bought it.
00:17:15.161 --> 00:17:19.484
And then they said, great, now you have to send a check to the vendor and it'll show up.
00:17:19.484 --> 00:17:24.023
It's the whole experience, right, it's the fact that it's end-to-end and integrated too.
00:17:24.214 --> 00:17:34.937
It just makes it that much easier, but also to your point then lowers the risk because you're controlling every step of the process and you have visibility through every step, so there can't be any disconnect through that process.
00:17:35.117 --> 00:17:39.942
And there's so much risk to around that, the Amazon impact or effect.
00:17:39.942 --> 00:17:57.057
I think about how frictionless the experience is, which draws people back in there, and then they just get so used to how easy it is, and I kind of feel like that's the way this is going, versus, like what you said if you order something online, it's a great, you have to send a check in.
00:17:57.057 --> 00:17:59.161
Well, that's not quite as frictionless as they made it out to be originally.
00:17:59.161 --> 00:18:15.721
So I'm curious the, the, so not necessarily how Convoy's platform operated in the past, but so, moving forward, how does what's the broker's experience going to be like with Convoy now part of DAT?
00:18:15.721 --> 00:18:16.423
What does that?
00:18:16.443 --> 00:18:16.563
like.
00:18:16.563 --> 00:18:21.239
For us, the broker experience really centers around their tms.
00:18:21.239 --> 00:18:23.666
So we have a series of tms partnerships.
00:18:23.666 --> 00:18:25.673
Uh, we have native integrations.
00:18:25.673 --> 00:18:27.477
We just launched with the port tms.
00:18:27.477 --> 00:18:28.379
We've got a great one.
00:18:28.379 --> 00:18:33.861
Uh, coming to market with the send tms, where we've got deep integrations and relationships with these tms companies.
00:18:33.861 --> 00:18:35.505
We have a broker portal.
00:18:35.505 --> 00:18:40.116
A lot of that capability I expect we will integrate within the core DAT system.
00:18:40.937 --> 00:18:50.288
What Convoy, really, you know up front, it is similar to a lot of the other DFM providers in that you're managing load state bidding and all that.
00:18:50.288 --> 00:18:52.878
But you have to integrate every step of the transaction.
00:18:52.878 --> 00:19:17.444
So we have to have deep integrations with the TMS, because for the TMS, the intention is that it should just operate like a visible set of hands, like another carrier rep, and that really depends on us being integrated for booking, for bidding, for load state management, to tracking, to key milestone updates, to payments and even payment approvals, and all of that integrated in one system just makes it that much easier.
00:19:17.444 --> 00:19:20.744
So it's very TMS.
00:19:20.744 --> 00:19:22.672
We have great partnerships with TMSs.
00:19:22.672 --> 00:19:26.784
So from a broker perspective, it's a complimentary service.
00:19:26.784 --> 00:19:27.968
Now it's a.
00:19:27.968 --> 00:19:32.600
You know it's part of the DAT package going forward as we think about this as an ecosystem.
00:19:32.600 --> 00:19:36.188
So I sign up with Convoy platform.
00:19:36.188 --> 00:19:43.124
If I have a TMS, that has pretty much worked with all the TMSs at this point, but then we integrate through the TMS.
00:19:43.124 --> 00:19:47.020
Capabilities are slightly variant between TMSs so that should all converge over time.
00:19:47.994 --> 00:19:50.356
But yeah, it's as simple as it can be.
00:19:50.356 --> 00:20:04.915
As simple as you just post all your loads, filter out the ones that maybe don't work or that you want your floor to work, get real-time feedback on expected cost to cover probability of coverage, see when those loads are booked immediately in your system off convoy.
00:20:04.915 --> 00:20:05.817
You see the carrier.
00:20:05.817 --> 00:20:09.026
You can automate the carrier approval or the carrier approval.
00:20:09.026 --> 00:20:14.415
If you have additional steps that you want to take, you can manually override that or manage that process.
00:20:14.415 --> 00:20:15.898
Tracking is all automated.
00:20:15.898 --> 00:20:17.221
Breadcrumb data is all automated.
00:20:17.221 --> 00:20:19.646
Anytime you can call the carrier because you have all the visibility.
00:20:19.646 --> 00:20:23.845
They'll call you because that's what's showing in the app and then payments are managed automatically.
00:20:23.845 --> 00:20:24.816
How?
00:20:24.836 --> 00:20:26.078
about that pricing, though?
00:20:26.078 --> 00:20:28.826
Is it like you can put a range in, or?
00:20:28.826 --> 00:20:30.418
Yeah, brokers set the ranges.
00:20:30.618 --> 00:20:34.106
So brokers determine what range they want the price to be in.
00:20:34.106 --> 00:20:38.845
They can set an absolute max pay that we will never pay above because it's all programmatic.
00:20:38.845 --> 00:20:40.730
It manages bidding activity.
00:20:40.730 --> 00:20:47.547
So this is where there was significant investment and we've got real-time ML models that manage this behind the scenes that determine.
00:20:47.547 --> 00:20:50.182
You know, are we going to have regret if we don't take this bid?
00:20:50.182 --> 00:20:51.265
Is this bid within range?
00:20:51.265 --> 00:20:52.898
There's a reserve price.
00:20:52.898 --> 00:20:54.924
It's operating within for any given time.
00:20:55.034 --> 00:20:58.806
This reminds me of eBay early on and how, how great that evolved everything Right.
00:20:58.806 --> 00:21:01.240
Yeah, it's just way more advanced.
00:21:01.641 --> 00:21:23.414
Yeah, yeah, if I think back to early eBay, you could do things like auto accept certain counter bids and it has similar functionality, but it's all automated on the backend when, yeah, like, if you think of it on, yeah what?
00:21:23.414 --> 00:21:27.196
Ebay is actually a good and interesting case study because something like 85% of all eBay is actually buy it now versus bidding, and we have that option.
00:21:27.196 --> 00:21:32.640
They can buy it now or they can put a bid and most carriers choose to bid because they know that there's some bid range above that.
00:21:32.780 --> 00:21:51.393
It's kind of just the operating model you just think about, like Ben, think about how much time is spent at a brokerage when someone's like you know carrier puts an offer in and like they go on their TMS and like log a carrier offer and then it might go to somebody else who then maybe the manager has to approve it and it just takes so many people and so much time like that.
00:21:59.974 --> 00:22:01.478
That automation of that process just seems like such a time saver to me.
00:22:01.478 --> 00:22:06.156
Yeah, and you have to respond, uh, immediately, because I was um, I was more inclined to want, like a buy it now, early on as we were taking these capabilities to market.
00:22:06.156 --> 00:22:17.319
But it's really, carriers prefer to bid, but only if you give them a response like right away you can't have a bid, and then it goes like off into the ether and you come back 15 minutes later because you just get such dramatic fall off.
00:22:17.319 --> 00:22:24.144
Yeah, it's got to be while they're in the app, while they're looking, because otherwise they're going to go do other things, find other options, start calling people.
00:22:24.895 --> 00:22:30.946
I am curious about that that you bring that up, like what does that look like from like a fall off percentage?
00:22:30.946 --> 00:22:35.935
And again, like I'm curious what that looks like even internally, like across the network, right?
00:22:35.935 --> 00:23:05.500
So from the carrier's perspective, right, like I'm bidding on a few loads, I get accepted from Nate's load, but then do I see yours, if you give me back the higher rate after I've accepted him and because, like in a practical scenario, like you know, think back to Coyote, like how we do this, it's like okay, there's the ethics of once you have given that load and agreed, you are giving them that freight, even if you get to carry the calls and you know two minutes later and gives you a better rate, right.
00:23:05.922 --> 00:23:07.365
Like how does the system?
00:23:07.365 --> 00:23:10.681
I guess kind of address that from a practical standpoint.
00:23:10.721 --> 00:23:19.004
Yeah, that's why it's very important to respond to the bid immediately and then it's a yes, you know, yes, no, so the carrier doesn't have to even go out of the session to get a response.
00:23:19.004 --> 00:23:53.461
It's very critical for the system because you have the fall off is dramatic and if you I mean I don't, I don't know the exact numbers, but I would guess that your success rate after an hour to just recalling my time at coyote, because I did look at this data in detail back then it's got to be 10 to 20 percent, um for the bit, actually even being alive, particularly in your peak hours, because in a 6 to 10 am like, if you try to go to back to a bit at 1 pm, it's just it's not gonna be there, right, yep, it's like 6 am and 8 am, maybe because you're in that window where people are like parsing through options, and I'm sure it's evolved even since I back the days that I was looking at that data.
00:23:53.461 --> 00:24:06.684
But certainly I and again I don't recall the exact numbers, but I do know, like you know, convoy studied this quite intently in terms of bid response and the fall off if you don't respond immediately Now those bids do go and are visible to brokers.
00:24:06.684 --> 00:24:13.868
So if this is where there's a little bit of learning, when a broker comes onto the platform, just how does it react, how the bids come in?
00:24:13.868 --> 00:24:22.807
Because you know, the concept of max pay or the maximum willing to pay, varies very much by broker and also it adjusts with time.
00:24:22.807 --> 00:24:29.647
And so how do you get ahead of that and say, okay, if you're willing to pay a thousand dollars one hour out, like, we will ramp the rate up for you.
00:24:29.647 --> 00:24:33.525
We're not going to pay a thousand two days out, we'll pay, you know, 800 or whatever.
00:24:33.525 --> 00:24:44.582
And how do we make that transparent If a what we often see is they can see the bids, so they set the max pay at 800, even though they really will pay up to 1,000 if they have to.
00:24:44.914 --> 00:24:48.703
And it's now six hours later and the best bid is 850, but they set it at 800.
00:24:48.703 --> 00:24:49.914
Like, why didn't we take the 850?
00:24:49.914 --> 00:24:53.085
Well, it's because the system is absolute right.
00:24:53.085 --> 00:24:54.319
You got to control it.
00:24:54.319 --> 00:25:01.000
As we're on the floor as we're on the floor, you're often having a conversation.
00:25:01.000 --> 00:25:01.624
So your real max pay and it's.
00:25:01.624 --> 00:25:14.991
It's funny because a lot of tms's have like max pay and then they have like over max pay, yeah, absolute max pay, yeah, like emergency pay, yeah, yeah, yeah exactly, and communicating that concept programmatically, like the computer's gonna, the algorithm's gonna just do what it does.
00:25:15.091 --> 00:25:20.686
So, yeah, so let me ask you how to use it on the back to like the broker's use case.
00:25:20.734 --> 00:25:23.343
You mentioned TMS integrations.
00:25:23.343 --> 00:25:25.922
Is that like an all or none or is there?
00:25:25.922 --> 00:25:26.964
Can they operate?
00:25:26.964 --> 00:25:33.461
Can a broker operate in the convoy or DAT platform without a TMS integration?
00:25:33.755 --> 00:25:37.702
No, it requires a TMS integration because it's core to the experience.
00:25:37.742 --> 00:25:38.484
I figured it would.
00:25:38.484 --> 00:25:39.713
I just was curious if there was any way around that.
00:25:39.774 --> 00:25:44.774
Yeah, it's like the Amazon versus the other modes, because we have to manage load state.
00:25:44.774 --> 00:25:46.481
So to be able to manage that simultaneously.
00:25:46.481 --> 00:25:52.100
What you don't want to is the idea is that brokers may be working these loads Parallel happens all the time.
00:25:52.100 --> 00:25:54.599
If they're posting 100% of their freight, they've got a floor, the floor is working in parallel.
00:25:54.599 --> 00:25:55.521
They got a floor, a floor working in parallel.
00:25:55.521 --> 00:25:58.927
So if something, if they book that, we want to take it off the app and vice versa.
00:25:58.927 --> 00:26:01.676
So, like you need those integrations.
00:26:01.676 --> 00:26:06.048
And then for tracking, everybody has basic tracking integrations these days in their TMS.
00:26:06.048 --> 00:26:07.740
You just want to upload that data.
00:26:08.301 --> 00:26:13.383
Got it, but the tracking is actually happening through the convoy side of it.
00:26:13.603 --> 00:26:13.924
Is that correct?
00:26:13.924 --> 00:26:14.404
Through the app?
00:26:14.404 --> 00:26:17.297
Through the app, exactly Okay, got it.
00:26:17.537 --> 00:26:18.539
How is this like?
00:26:18.539 --> 00:26:25.663
And it sounds like, I guess like a very simple question, but like once, so right now it's still technically two separate products.
00:26:25.663 --> 00:26:26.725
They're not integrated yet.
00:26:26.725 --> 00:26:31.865
Correct Between being able to use it through the TMS, through DAT.
00:26:31.865 --> 00:26:35.079
Is it still the standalone yet, or have you guys merged them together?
00:26:35.099 --> 00:26:36.063
They're two separate products.
00:26:36.063 --> 00:26:42.278
They are very complementary.
00:26:42.278 --> 00:26:45.612
They're definitely features that will be integrated over time and we'll bring together certainly a lot of the investments in fraud and other capabilities.
00:26:45.612 --> 00:26:49.361
There's application across different parts of the DAT ecosystem.
00:26:49.361 --> 00:26:51.846
But really think of it for Convoy.
00:26:51.846 --> 00:26:55.139
It's loads that can be automated, because not all loads can be automated.
00:26:55.139 --> 00:26:58.846
It's a today.
00:26:58.846 --> 00:27:03.424
It's a smaller carrier pool because it goes through a different compliance process Over time.
00:27:03.464 --> 00:27:09.603
You know we'll integrate different capabilities across both, but DAT is still the largest load board, lets you do anything.
00:27:09.603 --> 00:27:10.586
It's got full features.
00:27:10.586 --> 00:27:11.519
It's fully scoped.
00:27:11.519 --> 00:27:15.465
Right, it's 47 years of development and build up.
00:27:15.465 --> 00:27:17.241
But clearly we expect these things.
00:27:17.241 --> 00:27:21.001
You know we're going to benefit on both sides and the convoy network will scale up.
00:27:21.001 --> 00:27:23.380
But there's slightly different use cases.
00:27:23.380 --> 00:27:25.920
You can think of it too, just in the way brokers use them.
00:27:25.920 --> 00:27:30.681
Brokers tend to post loads as soon as they get them onto the convoy platform, let it work in the background.
00:27:30.681 --> 00:27:47.944
Brokers are often using DAT to source new capacity when they need it or as they need it, and so a lot, most of pretty much well every customer we have today that I'm aware of also had a DAT when we went through this process.
00:27:47.944 --> 00:27:56.076
So and they use them in complimentary ways, and sometimes it's they've got similar people managing the postings or thinking about how to use them day to day, but it's, they're very complimentary.
00:27:56.337 --> 00:28:04.956
So from the TMS point of view, from, like, the user right Once that integration's there.
00:28:04.956 --> 00:28:12.737
Now what it would look like is I'm basically deciding whether or not I'm posting my loads to convoy or to DAT, which will eventually be one posting, or maybe an option into one Cause.
00:28:12.737 --> 00:28:17.035
We'll eventually be like centralized under, obviously, the one umbrella, correct?
00:28:17.235 --> 00:28:21.567
Correct and, as of today, there's more optionality to post-loads on DAT.
00:28:21.567 --> 00:28:26.449
It just covers a broader set of services and capabilities and it's more flexible.
00:28:26.449 --> 00:28:30.509
Load has to be well-formed to land on Convoy platform because we're going to execute it.
00:28:30.509 --> 00:28:31.534
We had to have all the information.
00:28:31.534 --> 00:29:52.901
There can be some differences there, but yeah, practically, if I was starting a broker today and I was trying to build a tech forward and highly sophisticated, I would probably use those in the way that I would have most of my freight posting on Convoy, also posting on DAT.
00:29:53.545 --> 00:29:59.591
There's a lot of companies that have stepped into the market too to manage inbound calls in a more automated way off of DAT.
00:29:59.591 --> 00:30:00.993
I think the market's going to look.
00:30:00.993 --> 00:30:08.367
You know it's fine to be on the inside because I do think this is one of the pivotal changes that's going to push through the market in the next five to 10 years.
00:30:08.367 --> 00:30:24.759
Carrier procurement in general is just going to become a lot more tech driven in terms of how brokers manage it and DAT just has a legacy of depth and coverage and scale and capabilities and flexibility in terms of how the product works and on the convoy side it's all about automation efficiency.
00:30:25.925 --> 00:30:33.094
So you mentioned there's some differences between what's required to post to a basic posting on DAT versus convoy.
00:30:33.094 --> 00:30:33.706
Can you talk?
00:30:33.706 --> 00:30:41.990
Because I'm thinking like if I want to post any old load on DAT I'm looking at like origin, destination, equipment, type, equipment right.
00:30:42.464 --> 00:30:44.634
Yeah, and the date, maybe not even wait.
00:30:44.634 --> 00:30:47.875
You can imagine just the use cases at which you're doing that.
00:30:47.875 --> 00:30:51.576
There's a broader set of use cases in which you might post a load to get it inbound.
00:30:51.585 --> 00:30:54.105
What does that narrower scope look like for convo With?
00:30:54.125 --> 00:30:54.426
convo.
00:30:54.426 --> 00:30:57.868
It's the actual load, right, we're pulling it out of your TMS scheduled.
00:30:57.868 --> 00:30:59.530
Right, it's ready to go.
00:30:59.530 --> 00:31:03.437
We've got the pickup location, delivery location, the schedule, like all the.
00:31:03.837 --> 00:31:05.059
Down to the address.
00:31:05.059 --> 00:31:06.550
You got the price range in there.
00:31:06.550 --> 00:31:08.211
Is there limitations on equipment types?
00:31:08.432 --> 00:31:08.993
You can imagine.
00:31:08.993 --> 00:31:20.312
I mean, there are definitely a lot of operating models in terms of how brokers manage loads or get freight from their carriers that support a DAT-like approach, where you just need a little more flexibility and the load has to be automatable.
00:31:20.312 --> 00:31:30.750
It has to be a little more rigorous, uh coming through the convoy platform.
00:31:30.750 --> 00:31:32.193
Okay, any limitations on equipment like is it specialized?
00:31:32.193 --> 00:31:37.709
Drive, flatbed and reefer, and don't do like we don't have the full scope of specialized in terms of uh flatbed as we're on, you know dat it's pretty much whatever.
00:31:37.709 --> 00:31:42.267
Like we, it's a, it's a fully broad set of services got it cool.
00:31:42.628 --> 00:31:44.074
so what do you go ahead, Ben?
00:31:44.074 --> 00:31:46.011
I'll ask some questions in later.
00:31:46.444 --> 00:31:49.796
What do you kind of see, like what this is going to look like?
00:31:49.796 --> 00:32:03.853
And I would say like probably in the interim, because I think you alluded to a minute ago I'm like I don't think most people think the industry is going to function the way it does today Five years from now, for sure, and it's probably going to look different in three years than it does in five or six, whatever that ends up being Right.
00:32:03.853 --> 00:32:10.840
There's like this interim step and there's probably what it's going to look like and then ultimately, probably 10 years, probably looks even different than it does in five.
00:32:10.840 --> 00:32:26.284
No-transcript.
00:32:26.284 --> 00:32:28.933
That kind of overlaps with some of the things you guys are doing.
00:32:28.933 --> 00:32:38.572
There's the Alco piece with a factoring, which kind of overlaps a bit with what Convoy's been able to leverage for trust verification, fraud prevention.
00:32:38.572 --> 00:32:46.855
What are some of your thoughts and I guess like even the near term, and how maybe these things will be able to leverage each other to be able to create more value across the platform.
00:32:47.164 --> 00:32:50.633
Yeah, it is week two and there's a lot of work to do, but it's.
00:32:50.633 --> 00:32:59.264
There's definitely a vision by which all this comes together and you can start to think about them as different, the different capabilities in each, each segment.
00:32:59.264 --> 00:33:05.736
There's a little bit of overlap around the edges but you're starting with Outgo factoring financial services and capabilities around that.
00:33:05.736 --> 00:33:13.567
We had payments built in but it really didn't overlap at all with what Outgo was building and already I see huge benefits just in engaging with that team.
00:33:13.567 --> 00:33:33.317
They have such deep expertise on factoring, on credit, on underwriting capabilities that just shore up DAT top to bottom in those those realms and as we think about how we manage payments, the payment options and how to expand that service set, because certainly across the broker portfolio everybody's got slightly different.
00:33:33.317 --> 00:33:41.850
Um, you know ways of managing their working capital or thinking about going to market and this will give us a lot of optionality plus expertise, I know on my side and then across tat.
00:33:41.850 --> 00:33:45.598
So it's been uh fun engaging with that team.
00:33:45.598 --> 00:33:50.115
Um, trucker tools, more mature products already got a broader install base.
00:33:50.115 --> 00:34:04.935
It's got more white label capabilities in terms of tracking and it's got more like I'd say, services or additional like points of interest and things like that and capabilities for truckers that would be interesting, complementary capabilities within the convoy app.
00:34:04.935 --> 00:34:12.076
And then Convoy is really focused on that end-to-end execution and streamlining every part of the load lifecycle, because again, we came out of a broker.
00:34:12.076 --> 00:34:17.067
It was a broker, it was dog-fooded with a billion dollars of investment, so it's a very refined execution.
00:34:17.067 --> 00:34:21.317
I always I like to use the word like the label execution layer.
00:34:21.317 --> 00:34:23.080
It's like an execution layer capability.
00:34:23.080 --> 00:34:30.215
I mean it's in the hands of the carriers managing every step of their process and then automating that on behalf of the broker to make it easier for them.
00:34:30.215 --> 00:34:31.348
So they're all.
00:34:31.348 --> 00:34:32.734
They're complimentary in that sense.
00:34:32.734 --> 00:34:40.922
Yeah, they overlap around the edges and you know we are, you know, actively working through automating what the end state looks like and how the pieces come together.
00:34:40.922 --> 00:34:44.661
But yeah, it's like the convo is kind of the last piece of the puzzle.
00:34:45.042 --> 00:34:47.895
And the earlier question, like how does this evolve over time?
00:34:47.895 --> 00:35:04.634
I think I've had the fortune of working with some very forward-thinking brokers that engage in these products very early, that wanted to learn about them, wanted to try them, some of whom I would say are more farther down that path of evolving into what a next state of I would say are more farther or farther down that path of evolving into what a like next state of broker looks like.
00:35:04.634 --> 00:35:13.664
I'd say the golden use case would be Uber, freight and Convoy as they existed or as they progressed as digital brokers, which you know.
00:35:13.664 --> 00:35:19.445
It's 80 to 98% plus of load as loads are automated from booking to execution.
00:35:19.445 --> 00:35:23.782
You have a small carrier team that's really managing around the edges to execution.
00:35:23.782 --> 00:35:32.039
You have a small carrier team that's really managing around the edges, and those in the OPEX can be a third or less of what a traditional broker operates at.
00:35:32.039 --> 00:35:32.941
So that, to me, is probably the end state.
00:35:32.961 --> 00:35:46.275
I think there's always going to be a mix because oftentimes the limiting factor is how the shippers engage or what they need, and then how that maps to the capabilities of the broker, and that's why you see a huge variance in operating models of how brokers go to market.
00:35:46.275 --> 00:35:56.139
But I do think that procurement will become more and more automated and more focused back on the relationships, meaning that a lot of brokers have very good relationship with mid-to-large carriers.
00:35:56.139 --> 00:36:01.106
That tends to be the sweet spot, particularly those mid-sized carriers where they have a particular capability.
00:36:01.106 --> 00:36:03.123
They understand their geographic footprint.
00:36:03.123 --> 00:36:09.367
They under like the carrier rep is building a deep relationship with that carrier, knows immediately when loads hit the board.
00:36:09.367 --> 00:36:10.775
Is it going to be a good fit for that carrier?
00:36:10.775 --> 00:36:13.445
They're problem solving um some.
00:36:13.445 --> 00:36:16.815
That's what I think becomes more valuable from uh carrier engagement.
00:36:17.217 --> 00:36:25.779
But a lot of the pure transactional stuff just continues to get automated away because it's not just us, it's also ai and other capabilities coming to market on the shipper side.
00:36:25.779 --> 00:36:30.659
I just it's a slower um uh push in terms of how brokers engage with shippers.
00:36:30.659 --> 00:36:49.360
Shippers are always just a little more conservative in how they go to market um, and I think ultimately that like it's still so relationship driven, because a lot of the variance again in opex internally is all just driven by how shippers want to engage in their expectations and their service expectations or how they want to manage things on their end.
00:36:49.360 --> 00:36:51.869
So I don't think that side is going to change as quickly.
00:36:51.869 --> 00:36:55.340
I think the carrier side is where we're going to see the change happen more quickly.
00:36:55.340 --> 00:36:56.344
So it already has.
00:36:56.384 --> 00:37:06.130
Yeah question on the evolution because you know you, you guys can create the greatest product out there, but there's a reliance on integration with TMS.
00:37:06.130 --> 00:37:12.175
There's a reliance on acceptance of the process and the product from brokers and carriers.
00:37:12.175 --> 00:37:18.126
I'm curious, as you've I mean, you've been in this industry long enough to see the evolution happen at light speed.
00:37:18.126 --> 00:37:20.641
Do you feel that?
00:37:20.641 --> 00:37:27.469
Is there any part of that equation where someone's a little bit behind the ball versus someone else, or someone's a little bit too far ahead?
00:37:27.469 --> 00:37:33.938
You know what I'm saying is like, if you've got this great product, are there TMS companies that are not ready for the integration yet?
00:37:33.938 --> 00:37:38.527
Or is adoption from the user not ahead, or is it just kind of?
00:37:39.317 --> 00:37:40.259
homogenous alignment.
00:37:40.259 --> 00:37:56.119
The digital freight model is model has been popularized enough in the marketplace that all the TMSs at this point have some solution for that, but it's not the same as being ready for what we're offering, because it usually focuses on the booking and the matching piece of it, but not the full load execution.
00:37:56.119 --> 00:38:01.115
But the rest of the process has been built out and solved along the way as well.
00:38:01.115 --> 00:38:04.882
There's so many different tracking solutions, so all those APIs and capabilities are built out.
00:38:04.882 --> 00:38:09.659
I'd say that all TMSs that we've talked to are ready for like phase one.
00:38:09.659 --> 00:38:11.623
Phase one is basic load management, end to end.
00:38:11.623 --> 00:38:21.239
To me, the next phase, though, is really about workflow automation for the brokers and thinking about how to streamline how they manage their day to day, how they allocate loads to carry reps.
00:38:21.500 --> 00:38:22.922
It's like the tactical questions.
00:38:22.922 --> 00:38:25.184
I know that X percent.
00:38:25.184 --> 00:38:35.896
If I know that, I should probably expect that 10% of my loads are going to be booked off of inbounds, off DAT, 20% are going to be booked via convoy, and then I need to focus on the remaining 70%.
00:38:35.896 --> 00:38:37.840
How do I focus that 70%?
00:38:37.840 --> 00:38:38.980
What information do I need?
00:38:38.980 --> 00:38:39.882
What tools do I need?
00:38:39.882 --> 00:38:43.846
How do I need to think about the load board management on a day-to-day basis.
00:38:43.846 --> 00:38:54.239
Also, as I'm going to market if I'm going to bid on freight or bid on a contract, how should I think about these other capabilities and capacity channels available to me and how that balances against current internal capabilities?
00:38:54.601 --> 00:38:59.221
So I think that's where you'll probably see the bigger differentiation of TMSs over the next five years.
00:38:59.221 --> 00:39:10.842
I think the base level capabilities the booking, the load management, bidding all that is kind of table stakes and we're far enough along in this digitization freight journey that every TMS knows they got to play that game.
00:39:10.842 --> 00:39:18.402
Yeah, what I think they are, what they'll have to come to the table with over the next five years, is that next level.
00:39:18.402 --> 00:39:29.869
Like if I for my broker customers, how am I helping them operate in a more digitally forward model that allows them to optimize their team and make sure that their team is being utilized in the best way?
00:39:30.775 --> 00:39:33.681
Yeah, what's interesting about what you just said there is, I think, back to.
00:39:33.681 --> 00:39:46.940
I just went through a TMS evaluation for my brokerage this year for an upgrade, and I did the same thing about five years ago year for an upgrade and I did the same thing about five years ago and I work.
00:39:46.940 --> 00:39:49.927
So what I saw was available five years ago versus what is available now, it is night and day.
00:39:49.927 --> 00:39:54.594
A lot of the names are still the same, but what they're actually focusing on is very, very different.
00:39:54.594 --> 00:40:04.063
Like five years ago, a lot of the focus was, you know, some automation, but a lot of it was we're trying to get away from the legacy system and get more to the online, web-based.
00:40:04.063 --> 00:40:07.148
It's accessible anywhere, it's easy to use, it looks nice.
00:40:07.509 --> 00:40:13.797
And now, five years later, it's like well, that's the industry normal now, like it should be easy to, you know, easy to access.
00:40:13.797 --> 00:40:16.744
You could get it on your phone or on online, whatever, from anywhere.
00:40:16.744 --> 00:40:19.858
And now it's like there's all these other cool tools out there.
00:40:19.858 --> 00:40:22.862
We want to be able to integrate with them and leverage what they're doing.
00:40:22.862 --> 00:40:29.170
So it's, you know, our folks can operate in one system but leverage all the stuff that's out there.
00:40:29.170 --> 00:40:30.259
So it's really, really cool.
00:40:30.259 --> 00:40:31.195
That's why I was curious.
00:40:31.195 --> 00:40:40.489
If there's any TMS, you know you don't have to name any, but if there's, like you know, mostly all of them are leaning into this and they're bought in.
00:40:40.489 --> 00:40:42.331
Or is there, is there a decent percentage?
00:40:42.331 --> 00:40:44.471
That's like we're just not there yet or we don't really want to do that.
00:40:44.512 --> 00:40:46.652
I can call out a few that we've got good relationships with.
00:40:46.652 --> 00:40:50.360
I touched on a few before For long tail brokers.
00:40:50.360 --> 00:40:52.766
Ascend is one that I'm very excited about.
00:40:52.766 --> 00:40:54.942
The launch it's natively built in.
00:40:54.942 --> 00:40:56.934
We've worked quite hand in hand.
00:40:56.934 --> 00:41:00.760
Tim's done a great job with keeping that always ahead of what's coming in the market.
00:41:00.780 --> 00:41:01.962
Yeah, like always ahead of what's coming in the market.
00:41:01.962 --> 00:41:04.226
Yeah, tim's a great guy, you know we, the cloud, is the biggest one.
00:41:04.226 --> 00:41:05.509
We've got a great relationship with them.
00:41:05.509 --> 00:41:19.384
I was recently at one of their conferences where you know they're already ahead of the game on AI integrations and other capabilities, and so, you know, we're currently in the process of pushing our first fully certified release with them.
00:41:19.384 --> 00:41:21.661
So, more to come, more press to come on that one.
00:41:21.661 --> 00:41:31.539
But then, moving down the list, like you know, we just launched Port Pro native integration.
00:41:31.559 --> 00:41:43.905
We've got pretty much, I'd say, the top 10, some commercial agreement or relationship with all of them, by which and they're all at slightly different phases, which dictated both by their internal roadmaps and you know, as we've brought stuff to market, and our customer mix and what they're asking for.
00:41:43.905 --> 00:41:46.391
But yeah, I wouldn't say there's any.
00:41:46.391 --> 00:42:04.259
There may be, you know, without calling anybody out, there may be some of the more old school, old school ones that haven't just haven't invested at the same pace, that are kind of slowly weeding out of the market, but I'd say by and large, by pure load count, broker count, all the TMSs, because it's a very competitive market as well.
00:42:04.259 --> 00:42:12.597
So they don't want to be caught out and I think, certainly with us now coming on to DAT, and it's going to be a default expectation from a broker to have these capabilities.
00:42:12.597 --> 00:42:16.795
So yeah, to your point, like the I almost feel like they're going to.
00:42:16.835 --> 00:42:20.541
Yeah, they're going to be forced to adopt, Like if their customer wants something.
00:42:20.541 --> 00:42:48.454
If they're smart and they run a good business, they're going to listen to their customer Right no-transcript.
00:42:55.554 --> 00:43:00.503
It was something Tim and I were actually talking about two weeks ago was more to like the larger, like, think like load matching companies, right, the automations ones like in the back, and like the two, then the teens, the.
00:43:00.503 --> 00:43:10.661
Where they really found a fit, it seemed like, was with contract freight, where time was an advantage, meaning like if you can predict where the carrier is going to be and you know the load's going to be available.
00:43:10.661 --> 00:43:12.045
They worked very well.
00:43:12.045 --> 00:43:21.144
But in the spot market they tend to be very unprofitable because it's very hard to determine how many trucks are going to be there if you've got a shorter amount of time.
00:43:21.204 --> 00:43:22.711
Right, and Tim was.
00:43:22.711 --> 00:43:30.081
I think he actually put something on LinkedIn recently about like just Uber specifically, was it like they'd been running at a loss consistently?
00:43:30.081 --> 00:43:47.005
Right, and I'm curious, like your thoughts between, like, revenue growth and profitability where, like lots of other brokers have looked at some of the very big models and said they're basically just using funded money to drive rates down right and at the end of the day, can they ever actually turn a profit?
00:43:47.005 --> 00:43:49.054
And is that an economic situation?
00:43:49.054 --> 00:44:02.545
Is that the timing of the freight and the niche they're in, or is it related to just the freight market we've been in for three and a half years of it being recessionary, where like that may turn around just because of the current economic situation.
00:44:02.554 --> 00:44:04.038
Like that may turn around just because of the current economic situation.
00:44:04.038 --> 00:44:10.588
Yeah, with both Uber Freight and Convoy, I think it's important to understand that they both had or have.
00:44:10.588 --> 00:44:12.398
I have not, like I don't.
00:44:12.398 --> 00:44:29.884
I'm not at Uber Freight anymore, so I don't know the details, but I certainly understood it as we were as, as I was there, there's a highly profitable broker buried in a kind of larger enterprise and a larger technology company, and it was true for Convoy as well that there was a.
00:44:29.884 --> 00:44:41.043
You could have taken a very profitable chunk of business out of that if you did not have, like, there were a lot of other pieces around that which kind of resulted in it being unprofitable.
00:44:41.043 --> 00:44:43.217
And this gets to.
00:44:43.217 --> 00:44:48.047
I think one of the core challenges in our space is to be able to invest in technology at that scale.
00:44:48.047 --> 00:44:49.190
It can only be supported.
00:44:50.836 --> 00:44:53.170
Oh, I'm not the only one who has a dog that goes nuts on the podcast.
00:44:53.170 --> 00:44:53.833
All three of us have them.
00:44:53.833 --> 00:44:58.740
Yes, welcome to the crew, bill Amazon delivery driver.
00:44:59.695 --> 00:45:00.637
Yeah, let me follow that screwdriver.
00:45:00.637 --> 00:45:11.001
One of the things I'm curious on is um, so with when, whenever a broker, um, whenever there's an integration into into someone's TMS?
00:45:11.001 --> 00:45:20.465
Um, there's a certain group of people who the first thing they think is, like my data is not protected, someone's going to have access to all my customers information and loads and they're going to steal it from me.
00:45:20.465 --> 00:45:33.893
Um, can you speak to the, the guess, the protection or how that works, so that people would feel at ease having their customer's business and that data running through the convoy platform?
00:45:34.094 --> 00:45:35.420
Yeah, the same as for DAT.
00:45:35.420 --> 00:45:38.048
If you're posting a load like DAT, you can see who's posting what load.
00:45:38.048 --> 00:45:38.532
Do you know what I mean?
00:45:38.552 --> 00:45:38.994
Yeah, it's the same.
00:45:38.994 --> 00:45:40.460
That's always my counter argument.
00:45:40.460 --> 00:45:49.478
Yeah, in terms of, like, partitioning the data and how we control that data, there are a lot of protections within in the contract, just legally, in terms of how we manage that data.
00:45:49.478 --> 00:45:56.177
Uh, and beyond that, like we are not a um uh, we're not engaging with the shippers.
00:45:56.177 --> 00:46:03.596
Like we're not a broker, we don't have any like, there's no uh financial incentive or motivation to use that in any sort of like ant, like anti-competitive way.
00:46:03.596 --> 00:46:04.137
Internally.
00:46:04.137 --> 00:46:10.139
Certainly it's a big part of what we're trying to do is position like be neutral, position ourselves as neutral.
00:46:10.139 --> 00:46:13.195
Uh, we want, we're here for the broker, we're building tech for the broker.
00:46:13.195 --> 00:46:22.878
So I would say it just, you know, generally it's part of doing business that at some level you've got to be able to share the data by which you want the transactions to execute.
00:46:22.878 --> 00:46:27.844
Beyond that, like we have, no, we don't see, as an example, revenue.
00:46:27.844 --> 00:46:28.686
We don't see shipper rates.
00:46:28.686 --> 00:46:33.010
We only see the rates that they give us for the buy side and what they would want to set that at.
00:46:37.094 --> 00:46:56.942
So we limit the data that we pull, to that that's relevant for the transaction and to that note, and this is it's slightly unrelated, but I think people that get afraid, because I've heard people be like I don't want them to even know, like the number of customers that I have or the number of loads that I'm moving, and at the end of the day, the way I always see it is like there's a level of data you need to share to be able to have optimization.
00:46:57.503 --> 00:47:03.648
And on top of that if you have a good relationship with a customer who cares how many loads you're moving with them you know what I mean that.
00:47:03.648 --> 00:47:04.971
That's the way I've always looked with it.
00:47:04.971 --> 00:47:14.802
If you do good business and you have good partnerships, part of you know, part of that business relationship is sharing some sort of information with one another in a safe way.
00:47:14.903 --> 00:47:18.898
So yeah, I wanted to loop back to the one thing right before your dog barked to.
00:47:18.898 --> 00:47:31.817
Let you finish the thought, though, because I think you were going down the line of thought of, like, if you've got to raise enough capital to build something that big and that impactful, you need to have a large enough portion of the market to be able to repay it over a certain period of time.
00:47:31.817 --> 00:47:33.864
Right, but what are your kind of thoughts on like?
00:47:33.864 --> 00:48:06.119
Does that at some point economically kind of fall back out, or does it like there's just always going to be a section of the market where, like, those are going to work better, where the spot market loads in the speed in which they need to be negotiated and change hands are going to be more fit for like a part I mean literally what you guys have partnering with DAT well, not partnering, but like bringing those two things together to me feels like you guys are now starting to approach that spot market with the same value proposition, without the economic disadvantage of locking in the rate and then hoping you can pay it later.
00:48:06.360 --> 00:48:11.021
Yeah, exponentially larger, because now you're servicing every one of the large brokerages.
00:48:11.021 --> 00:48:15.581
Back to that same customer, you add up all their 10 percent of that customer's freight.
00:48:15.581 --> 00:48:24.483
If you get five or 10 of them or all those brokers now, you're being able to service a much larger piece of that whole pie and I think there was a lot of lessons learned in that.
00:48:24.483 --> 00:48:48.177
I mean, there were a lot of companies that I think tried to do that in the 2020s, that you know, two, three year range, where you know, I think, they just weren't as constrained on their cap table and, like you said, there's just only so much of that market you're going to be able to grab within a certain amount of time and you just can't repay it.
00:48:48.177 --> 00:48:50.065
You just basically end up drowning and chasing a goal that is unreachable with one brokerage.
00:48:50.065 --> 00:48:54.545
But when you spread it out now, all of a sudden, you can actually leverage that value across a lot more of the market.
00:48:54.786 --> 00:48:55.047
Cool.
00:48:55.047 --> 00:49:05.603
I mean anything else as we get towards the tail end here, anything like near future that folks can look forward to or what's like, you know the short term 50 meter targets for for this.
00:49:05.603 --> 00:49:09.762
You know the acquisition here versus you know what should we expect three to five years from now?
00:49:09.762 --> 00:49:11.360
You got your work cut out for you, man.
00:49:11.360 --> 00:49:12.402
It's exciting, though.
00:49:12.402 --> 00:49:14.875
Awesome, ben, you got any other questions for Bill?
00:49:15.154 --> 00:49:18.519
I'm super looking forward to just really kind of all these pieces that have come together.
00:49:18.539 --> 00:49:25.409
I mean, from talking with Jeff earlier this year and like all the acquisitions and just you can kind of see how the pieces are going to come together.
00:49:35.815 --> 00:50:12.014
And even going back to, I mean, when we were talking with them like two years ago on plans, on just what they were doing, starting to see the roadmap come together and to see the pieces come into place, I think it's going to be really exciting seeing how all of these things fit together, because I think there's a ton of value in how the things can some in some ways, oh it's, you know, it's like economies of scale, the fact that like you can add the one and one and get three, or the three to get five when you start pulling them together, where one is able to help in the one way that another one necessarily wasn't necessarily designed to solve that problem, like you were saying, like alco and factoring and how that's a part of Convoy, but like that is their focus, and being able to leverage that value along with yours and along with the value of, like some of the other pieces.
00:50:12.134 --> 00:50:14.860
I think it's going to be really cool to see how it all comes together.
00:50:14.860 --> 00:50:16.219
I did want to ask one more thing.
00:50:16.219 --> 00:50:23.119
I mean, coming from Flexport, you excited to be back and mostly in the domestic truckload space again, seeing it to come to fruition.
00:50:23.559 --> 00:50:24.161
Full circle.
00:50:24.380 --> 00:50:25.161
That's awesome man.
00:50:25.422 --> 00:50:26.262
Well cool, bill.
00:50:26.262 --> 00:50:27.884
Thanks for joining us on the show.
00:50:27.884 --> 00:50:30.706
I'm super excited to see how all this rolls out.
00:50:30.706 --> 00:50:34.110
Any last things you'd want to add in before we wrap up here?
00:50:34.110 --> 00:50:36.951
Yeah, we'll throw your page in the show notes here too.
00:50:36.951 --> 00:50:44.001
So if anyone wants to connect with Bill, definitely check out show notes or the description and you'll be able to connect with them.
00:50:44.001 --> 00:50:45.183
So thanks again for being on with us, bill Ben.
00:50:45.183 --> 00:50:45.884
Any final thoughts?
00:50:46.826 --> 00:50:50.344
Whether you believe you can or believe you can't, you're right.
00:50:50.987 --> 00:50:53.757
And until next time my hard knocks boys, go Bills.