BU BÖLÜM HAKKINDA
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.28.22283666v1?rss=1
Authors: Song, R., Zeng, G., Yu, J., Meng, X., Chen, X., Li, J., Xie, X., Lian, X., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Yin, W., Jin, R.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND This study has assessed a new Anti-COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Nasal Spray (SA58) for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS We conducted an efficacy study in adults aged 18 years and older within three days of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infected individual. Recruited participants were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive SA58 or placebo. Primary endpoints were laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 within study period. FINDINGS A total of 1,222 participants were randomized and dosed (SA58, n=901; placebo, n=321). Median of follow-up was 2.25 days and 2.79 days for SA58 and placebo, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 221 of 901 (25%) and 72 of 321 (22%) participants with SA58 and placebo, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.49). All adverse events were mild in severity. Laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 developed in 7 of 824 participants (0.22 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 14 of 299 (1.17 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 80.82% (95%CI 52.41%-92.27%). There were 32 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positives (1.04 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 32 (2.80 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 61.83% (95%CI 37.50%-76.69%). A total of 21 RT-PCR positive samples were sequenced. 21 lineages of SARS-CoV-2 variants were identified, and all were the Omicron variant BF.7. INTERPRETATION SA58 Nasal Spray showed favorable efficacy and safety in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy adult workers who had exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 72 hours.
Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2022.12.28.22283666v1?rss=1
Authors: Song, R., Zeng, G., Yu, J., Meng, X., Chen, X., Li, J., Xie, X., Lian, X., Zhang, Z., Cao, Y., Yin, W., Jin, R.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND This study has assessed a new Anti-COVID-19 Monoclonal Antibody Nasal Spray (SA58) for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against symptomatic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS We conducted an efficacy study in adults aged 18 years and older within three days of exposure to a SARS-CoV-2 infected individual. Recruited participants were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive SA58 or placebo. Primary endpoints were laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 within study period. FINDINGS A total of 1,222 participants were randomized and dosed (SA58, n=901; placebo, n=321). Median of follow-up was 2.25 days and 2.79 days for SA58 and placebo, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 221 of 901 (25%) and 72 of 321 (22%) participants with SA58 and placebo, respectively, with no significant difference (P=0.49). All adverse events were mild in severity. Laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19 developed in 7 of 824 participants (0.22 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 14 of 299 (1.17 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 80.82% (95%CI 52.41%-92.27%). There were 32 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positives (1.04 per 100 person-days) in the SA58 group vs 32 (2.80 per 100 person-days) in the placebo group, resulting in an estimated efficacy of 61.83% (95%CI 37.50%-76.69%). A total of 21 RT-PCR positive samples were sequenced. 21 lineages of SARS-CoV-2 variants were identified, and all were the Omicron variant BF.7. INTERPRETATION SA58 Nasal Spray showed favorable efficacy and safety in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection or symptomatic COVID-19 in healthy adult workers who had exposure to SARS-CoV-2 within 72 hours.
Copy rights belong to original authors. Visit the link for more info
Podcast created by Paper Player, LLC
ingilizce
Amerika Birleşik Devletleri
SON BÖLÜMLERİ ARA
PaperPlayer medrxiv infectious diseases için geçmiş bölümleri ara.
BU PODCAST'IN DİĞER BÖLÜMLERİ
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.08.01.23293515v1?rss=1
Authors: Chitnis, C. E., Martinez, F. J., White, M., Guillotte-Blisnick, M., Huon, C., Boucharlat, A., Agou, F., England, P., Popovici, J., Hou, M. M., Silk, S. E., Barrett, J. R., Nielsen, C. M., Reimer, J. M…
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.31.23293337v1?rss=1
Authors: Hurst, J. H., Mohan, A., Dalapati, T., George, I. A., Aquino, J. N., Lugo, D. J., Pfeiffer, T. S., Rodriguez, J., Rotta, A. T., Turner, N. A., Burke, T. W., McClain, M. T., Henao, R., DeMarco, C. T., …
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.28.23293301v1?rss=1
Authors: Ndzomo, P., Tchatchouang, S., Njih Tabah, E., Njamnshi, T., Noah, M. V. T., Bondi, J. A., Handley, R., Gonzalez Beiras, C., Tchatchueng, J., Muller, C., Luert, S., Knauf, S., Boyomo, O., Harding-Esch,…
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.08.02.23293478v1?rss=1
Authors: Macesic, N., Dennis, A., Hawkey, J., Vezina, B., Wisniewski, J. A., Cottingham, H., Blakeway, L. V., Harshegyi, T., Pragastis, K., Badoordeen, G. Z., Bass, P., Stewardson, A. J., Dennison, A., Spelman…
Link to bioRxiv paper:
http://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2023.07.31.23293441v1?rss=1
Authors: Li, Y., Choudhary, M. C., Regan, J., Boucau, J., Nathan, A., Speidel, T., Liew, M. Y., Edelstein, G. E., Kawano, Y., Uddin, R., Deo, R., Marino, C., Getz, M. A., Reynold, Z., Barry, M., Gilbert, R. F.…
Feragatname: Bu sayfaya yerleştirilmiş podcast ve sanat eserleri, sahibinin mülkiyetinde olan ve Listen Notes, Inc.'e bağlı olmayan veya tarafından onaylanmayan PaperPlayer'e aittir.
DÜZENLE
Podcast veritabanını güncel tutmaya yardımcı olduğunuz için teşekkür ederiz.