Does Jesus Predict His Return in the Gospels? (Mark 8.38) | Murray Smith

WEBVTT
00:00:00.558 --> 00:00:08.217
Is the Son of Man coming from heaven to earth in his second coming or is he going from earth to heaven in his ascension?
00:00:08.378 --> 00:00:20.198
If Jesus is here speaking about his ascension and heavenly enthronement, then he's speaking about that here in Mark 8.38 and in Mark 13.26 and in Mark 14.62.
00:00:20.237 --> 00:00:27.318
And therefore, you're going to be hard pressed to find places in the Gospel of Mark where Jesus prophesies his own return.
00:00:27.318 --> 00:00:30.355
That in fact is the view that NT Wright has championed.
00:00:30.355 --> 00:00:34.896
He says that there are no references to Jesus' second coming in the gospels.
00:00:34.896 --> 00:00:39.097
Jesus does not prophesy his own second coming according to Wright.
00:00:39.097 --> 00:00:49.232
You can find son of man in a number of places, but son of man plus the verb ἔρχομαι(erchomai) you'll find that only in one verse in the whole of the Old Testament in the Greek translation.
00:00:49.232 --> 00:00:51.764
And that one verse is Daniel 7.13.
00:00:51.764 --> 00:00:57.716
In his kindness, we have Jesus' own words, our Lord's own promise that he will return.
00:00:57.911 --> 00:01:03.500
So if you've been ever wondering what Jesus meant when he spoke about his coming, then stay tuned.
00:01:05.292 --> 00:01:12.453
Welcome back to another episode of Exploring the Language of Scripture, brought to you by NT Greek Tutoring, the place for personalized Greek learning in your spare time.
00:01:12.453 --> 00:01:18.695
I'm your host, Daniel Mikkelsen, the founder of NT Greek Tutoring and a PhD candidate in New Testament at the University of Edinburgh.
00:01:18.695 --> 00:01:25.957
And this podcast exists to make gems from biblical studies accessible to everyday Christians and show how the biblical languages opens up scripture.
00:01:25.957 --> 00:01:31.938
Our aim is to increase your love for God and his word so that you become more joyful witnesses for his mission.
00:01:32.358 --> 00:01:44.367
And today I'm delighted and honored to be joined by Murray Smith on the podcast, Murray's lecture in biblical theology and exegesis at Christ College in Australia.
00:01:44.367 --> 00:01:51.891
He serves as an elder in Hornsby Presbyterian Church and previously past at Kirkplace Presbyterian Church.
00:01:51.891 --> 00:02:00.575
Murray has published widely across New Testament studies, both academically and more popular em research.
00:02:00.676 --> 00:02:19.414
And one of his Main areas of interest is Jesus and the Gospel and Biblical eschatology, which makes him ideal for today's topic as we will be discussing a hotly debated topic in the Gospels, namely, did Jesus know about his second coming in the Synoptic Gospels?
00:02:20.235 --> 00:02:31.699
We're particularly focusing on Mark chapter 8 verse 38, em and what Jesus meant when he spoke about the Son of Man coming in his Father's glory.
00:02:32.009 --> 00:02:42.742
is Jesus referring to his future return and second coming, or as many major scholars have argued, is he speaking about instead of a heavenly enthronement.
00:02:42.983 --> 00:02:49.205
So if you've been ever wondering what Jesus meant when he spoke about his coming, then stay tuned.
00:02:49.205 --> 00:03:09.554
m And on more personal note, Murray and I, met at the, summer at the Tyndale Fellowship and had many good conversations and He also presented a most exciting paper about this topic we talked about in Mark 8, And we also ran into each other in Boston at the more recent SBL.
00:03:10.395 --> 00:03:15.879
And so I'm very grateful that he wanted to come and share some of his insights with us today.
00:03:15.901 --> 00:03:18.323
So it's a great pleasure to have him on the podcast, Murray.
00:03:18.323 --> 00:03:19.424
Welcome here.
00:03:20.409 --> 00:03:22.026
Thanks Daniel, it's great to be here with you.
00:03:22.026 --> 00:03:23.842
Looking forward to our conversation.
00:03:24.587 --> 00:03:26.955
Yeah, absolutely, me too.
00:03:27.139 --> 00:03:31.070
Anything else you want to add before we jump into some questions?
00:03:31.322 --> 00:03:40.050
uh So maybe just to explain, Christ College, we're the uh seminary of the Presbyterian Church of Australia in Sydney, New South Wales.
00:03:40.050 --> 00:03:54.662
So I've been teaching there for 15 years and it's a great privilege to be part of raising up the next generation of pastors and teachers and other leaders for the Presbyterian Church especially in Australia but also for the work of the Gospel around the world.
00:03:54.662 --> 00:03:55.742
that's where I am.
00:03:55.742 --> 00:03:57.967
I get to teach across the whole canon of Scripture.
00:03:57.967 --> 00:04:03.842
Genesis through to Revelation, which is also a real privilege, focusing on New Testament and especially in the Gospels.
00:04:03.842 --> 00:04:07.545
So glad to be able to talk about the Gospel of Mark today with you.
00:04:07.995 --> 00:04:09.436
Excellent.
00:04:09.616 --> 00:04:13.039
It's a great privilege to be able to teach all the scripture that's usually not.
00:04:13.039 --> 00:04:16.244
Many lecturers joy to be able to do that.
00:04:16.244 --> 00:04:19.565
Either they don't feel comfortable with it or they're not allowed to do it.
00:04:20.271 --> 00:04:23.391
Yes, no, really is a great privilege.
00:04:23.391 --> 00:04:33.737
My PhD is in New Testament, focused in the Gospels, but we're a relatively small school, as the Americans would say, a small college, as we would say in Australia.
00:04:33.976 --> 00:04:40.540
And so when I joined the team, they needed somebody to fill in some Old Testament gaps, and I was very happy to do so.
00:04:40.591 --> 00:04:50.704
it's actually been really good for me, and I hope also for my students, because as you work through the whole canon, and I do it every year, Genesis to Revelation.
00:04:50.963 --> 00:05:01.447
It reinforces the way in which all of scripture hangs together and is one coherent narrative revealing one plan of salvation focused on Christ and the Gospel.
00:05:01.747 --> 00:05:06.658
And seeing all of the connections, Old Testament to New Testament, that's been really rich.
00:05:06.658 --> 00:05:09.569
So I think more of us should teach across the canon.
00:05:09.569 --> 00:05:15.550
More New Testament people need to know the Old Testament well, and more Old Testament people need to know the New Testament well.
00:05:15.701 --> 00:05:16.982
Absolutely, absolutely.
00:05:16.982 --> 00:05:19.682
I agree very much with that.
00:05:19.682 --> 00:05:23.422
We should really focus on everything.
00:05:24.041 --> 00:05:30.742
Because if we really believe that it's all God's Word, we should read it all and study it all.
00:05:30.802 --> 00:05:31.541
Yeah.
00:05:31.761 --> 00:05:33.922
So thank you for those notes.
00:05:33.922 --> 00:05:36.802
I think that's very encouraging.
00:05:37.052 --> 00:05:37.903
But...
00:05:37.903 --> 00:05:42.617
As biblical language is the foundational of this podcast, let's start with your personal journey.
00:05:42.617 --> 00:05:45.560
How did you get into the study of biblical languages?
00:05:45.810 --> 00:05:50.110
Yeah, I think it was just what we've been talking about, studying God's Word.
00:05:50.110 --> 00:05:56.391
I fell in love with Scripture as a 16, 17, 18 year old.
00:05:56.391 --> 00:05:58.430
I'd grown up in a Christian family.
00:05:58.430 --> 00:06:02.170
That was a great privilege for which I'm really thankful to God.
00:06:02.370 --> 00:06:04.331
And grew up in the church.
00:06:04.850 --> 00:06:09.031
And I was taught to have a high view of Scripture.
00:06:09.391 --> 00:06:13.867
But it was at those late teenage years where...
00:06:14.237 --> 00:06:23.514
think I have to say God was at work in my life by His Spirit and just grew in me a love for His Word and I found myself devouring it and just couldn't get enough.
00:06:24.036 --> 00:06:35.285
And so as I was reading more and more of the Bible and started reading through the Bible year by year, I just wanted to go deeper and languages was the next step.
00:06:35.466 --> 00:06:36.980
You have these questions.
00:06:36.980 --> 00:06:43.904
What does that mean and why does that translation, you read one translation then read a different translation, why are those two translations different?
00:06:43.904 --> 00:06:50.208
And so that surfaced a lot of questions for me about what was going on underneath the translations.
00:06:50.608 --> 00:06:59.906
So I started with Greek and actually did classical Greek first and then Koiné New Testament Greek and then added Hebrew to that.
00:06:59.906 --> 00:07:04.367
and then had the chance to do some Latin as well, which I don't know if you can call that a biblical language or not.
00:07:04.367 --> 00:07:08.814
uh That's right, exactly.
00:07:08.814 --> 00:07:16.928
Yeah, and a little bit, my Aramaic is not great, but I've had to do a little bit of that in order to work in Daniel, where I've done some work.
00:07:17.089 --> 00:07:22.422
So, it's just a real privilege to be able to read the scriptures in the original.
00:07:22.422 --> 00:07:23.872
It doesn't answer all your questions.
00:07:23.872 --> 00:07:26.245
In fact, in some ways it just raises more questions.
00:07:26.245 --> 00:07:30.146
But they're hopefully sharper, better questions.
00:07:30.146 --> 00:07:32.889
So that's been part of my journey.
00:07:32.889 --> 00:07:37.750
I've now been teaching Greek at Christ College for 15 years.
00:07:38.411 --> 00:07:41.713
And as they say, the best way to learn something is to teach it.
00:07:41.713 --> 00:07:49.468
And so the experience of teaching year by year, I'm always learning new things as students ask questions.
00:07:49.851 --> 00:07:58.935
And then I also still have the privilege of teaching some Old Testament in Hebrew as well, so that my Hebrew is not as good as my Greek, but it does force me to keep that up to date as well.
00:07:58.935 --> 00:08:02.528
So that's bit of my story with the languages.
00:08:02.750 --> 00:08:28.151
Yeah, I think that's a great story and it resonates with my own in some ways because I also just when fell in love with Jesus, just wanted to get to know him more and my focus on evangelism was I wanted to get deeper into the scriptures and languages was like I needed to learn Greek and I'm just very excited about that.
00:08:28.151 --> 00:08:31.771
your story does resonate with my own.
00:08:33.676 --> 00:08:46.980
I love this quote from Martin Luther in his address to the nobility of the German nation where he encourages them to set up schools where all the children in Germany can learn the biblical languages.
00:08:46.980 --> 00:08:59.806
And one of his arguments is, one of the lines I love from that address is that as dear as the gospel is to us, so let us contend with the languages.
00:09:00.495 --> 00:09:08.238
And the insight there is that the theology is in the grammar of scripture, the gospel is in the grammar of scripture.
00:09:08.357 --> 00:09:17.500
It's through the word that God has given us, originally in Hebrew and Aramaic and Greek, that the good news of our salvation comes to us.
00:09:17.500 --> 00:09:23.302
So, as dear as the gospel is to us, says Luther, so hard let us contend with the languages.
00:09:23.523 --> 00:09:28.254
But I like that he says contend with the languages, because it is hard work.
00:09:28.812 --> 00:09:37.961
And it doesn't come easily, particularly for us in the modern world, I think maybe worse in Australia than for you in Europe, where we're not used to learning languages.
00:09:38.222 --> 00:09:45.708
And so we do need to contend with the challenge of learning them, but the promise is the gospel becomes clearer and sharper as we do.
00:09:46.197 --> 00:09:48.239
Thank you for sharing that quote.
00:09:49.139 --> 00:09:56.633
I think I've mentioned that I've forgotten where it was coming from, but I've mentioned that Luther said this, just forgot where it was from.
00:09:56.633 --> 00:10:03.424
So thank you for pointing me back to the original source.
00:10:03.466 --> 00:10:12.477
Although he translated the Bible into German, he was very serious about we needed to learn the languages because that's where the gospel lives.
00:10:14.998 --> 00:10:21.087
Yeah, so maybe it's we could go into like how has it been reading the biblical language?
00:10:21.087 --> 00:10:23.890
How have they opened up scripture for you?
00:10:24.111 --> 00:10:25.644
Have you experienced that?
00:10:25.894 --> 00:10:27.735
Yeah, I'll say two things.
00:10:27.735 --> 00:10:33.948
The more general thing is it slows you down in reading scripture.
00:10:33.948 --> 00:10:46.996
That's one of the great benefits that I've found in reading the scriptures in the original languages is I have to, using Luther's phrase, I have to contend with every word.
00:10:47.037 --> 00:10:52.192
Because it's not my native language, my mother tongue, I can't just gloss over it.
00:10:52.192 --> 00:10:54.736
I have to ask, what's that word doing there?
00:10:54.736 --> 00:11:09.375
In a way, when you read in your mother tongue, often you gloss over things, particularly if you're reading something familiar, uh like parts of the Bible that you've heard your whole life, or you've read multiple times, that you can gloss over the details and therefore miss things.
00:11:09.496 --> 00:11:13.431
And reading in the originals forces you to slow down.
00:11:13.629 --> 00:11:18.273
and notice each word and think about the syntax of the sentence.
00:11:18.273 --> 00:11:19.604
What's the main verb here?
00:11:19.604 --> 00:11:22.875
How are those other subordinate verbs related to the main verb?
00:11:22.875 --> 00:11:25.116
What's going on in this sentence?
00:11:25.217 --> 00:11:32.043
And just that process of slowing down, I've found time and time again I notice things that I might not have noticed.
00:11:32.043 --> 00:11:33.624
It's there in the English translation.
00:11:33.624 --> 00:11:36.625
It's not as if it's something that's not there.
00:11:37.125 --> 00:11:44.150
It's just that I wasn't reading the English very carefully and reading the Greek as has forced me to read more carefully because I have to slow down.
00:11:45.133 --> 00:11:47.489
So that's one thing.
00:11:47.489 --> 00:11:56.523
So I think if you read the English carefully or whatever language is your mother tongue, then we're very blessed to have very good translations.
00:11:56.523 --> 00:11:58.644
And so we should have confidence.
00:11:58.764 --> 00:12:00.735
We should have confidence in our translations.
00:12:00.735 --> 00:12:08.332
And for those who don't have the languages, they can rely on their translations because in God's kindness, we have good translations.
00:12:08.696 --> 00:12:09.173
Hmm.
00:12:09.173 --> 00:12:12.014
other ways of slowing down and reading carefully.
00:12:12.014 --> 00:12:24.437
For example, reading two different English translations will show up things, you'll notice things that are slightly different in one translation over the other and again that's a good exercise to help you notice things in the text.
00:12:25.177 --> 00:12:31.899
But even better, learn the languages and you'll have that forced slowing down.
00:12:32.460 --> 00:12:41.860
The other thing is that there are some things that that are communicated more clearly in the original than in some of our translations.
00:12:41.860 --> 00:13:04.705
So to give just one example, one that stands out to me is in the famous word of Jesus after his resurrection at the end of Matthew's Gospel, which we often call the Great Commission, where he says, authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me, therefore go and make disciples of all nations baptising them in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit and teaching them to obey everything I've commanded you.
00:13:05.099 --> 00:13:06.019
The...
00:13:06.179 --> 00:13:11.783
in the English translation I've got the NIV there, that I just read, and I'm not picking on the NIV.
00:13:11.783 --> 00:13:20.570
I think most of the major English translations have the same, yet the ESV says, therefore and make disciples of all nations.
00:13:21.811 --> 00:13:33.139
When you take a look at the original you realise, actually there's only one verb in the imperative, it's μαθητεύσατε (mathēteusate) there's one command there, which is the make disciples.
00:13:33.322 --> 00:13:36.485
And that highlights for us that's the main command.
00:13:36.666 --> 00:13:39.687
And then we've got some participles that are associated with the command.
00:13:39.687 --> 00:13:45.311
So, πορευθέντες (poreuthentes) is as you go, make disciples.
00:13:45.312 --> 00:13:48.573
And then βαπτίζοντες (baptizontes), baptizing.
00:13:48.573 --> 00:13:50.836
And then διδάσκοντες (didaskontes), teaching.
00:13:51.135 --> 00:13:55.499
And these are the means through which we make disciples.
00:13:55.499 --> 00:14:00.883
We make disciples as we go and by baptizing and by teaching.
00:14:01.355 --> 00:14:17.905
And so all of those participles, there's a sense in which they are commands, they have imperatival force, we must go and we must baptise and we must teach, but they're all means to the end of the main game here, which is making disciples.
00:14:18.046 --> 00:14:25.191
And looking at the Greek and noticing that there's just one imperative in Jesus' word there, really highlights that.
00:14:25.191 --> 00:14:30.998
This is the main command, it's make disciples, and helps us to understand what he's instructing us.
00:14:30.998 --> 00:14:32.379
with greater clarity.
00:14:32.913 --> 00:14:35.783
Yeah, yeah, that's a very helpful point.
00:14:36.563 --> 00:14:55.068
yeah, so in the sense that the imperatival ideas is because of the main idea that to make disciples, so μαθητεύσατε (mathēteusate) em is that that's why there's also an imperative to go and to baptize and to teach.
00:14:55.208 --> 00:14:59.029
Yeah, so yeah, I think that that's a very helpful point.
00:14:59.554 --> 00:15:01.975
Learning New Testament Greek can be a real challenge.
00:15:01.975 --> 00:15:08.659
If that's been your experience, I've put together a free PDF guide called Why Learning Greek Could Be a Struggle and How to Move Forward.
00:15:08.659 --> 00:15:15.524
Inside you'll find the most common pitfalls and my simple three step framework to help you start reading Greek with more confidence.
00:15:15.524 --> 00:15:19.846
Get your free copy today by clicking the link in the description below or the pinned comment.
00:15:19.846 --> 00:15:21.187
Now back to the episode.
00:15:21.187 --> 00:15:31.336
Yeah, so as we you've already been giving examples, maybe you can give another one of things that you have seen in the original that wasn't available to you in translation.
00:15:31.586 --> 00:15:33.927
Yes, let me think of another example.
00:15:33.927 --> 00:15:51.855
Probably what I'll say is, and this may take us into the main thing we're going to talk about today in Mark 8, is working in the originals allows you to have more precision and confidence in identifying where the New Testament is using the Old Testament.
00:15:52.576 --> 00:15:58.953
So often you'll read something and you think, oh, that reminds me of an Old Testament passage, and you go and look at the Old Testament passage.
00:15:58.953 --> 00:15:59.763
Mm.
00:15:59.763 --> 00:16:07.028
And in an English translation, you can see some correspondence in the language between the Old Testament passage and the New Testament passage.
00:16:07.048 --> 00:16:15.543
But in order to really test that, is this New Testament passage citing from or alluding to the Old Testament passage?
00:16:15.543 --> 00:16:22.489
To really test it, you need to see, is the New Testament passage using the same words as are there in the Old Testament?
00:16:22.489 --> 00:16:53.570
Now, there's all sorts of complexity in that, because the New Testament in Greek is citing or alluding to the Old Testament originally given in Hebrew and so we've got questions about whether the New Testament author is doing his own translation of the Hebrew Old Testament or whether he's relying on an existing translation in the Septuagint but then there are multiple Greek translations, old Greek translations and so which of those does he have before him or does he have one before him that we no longer have before us?
00:16:53.570 --> 00:16:55.730
So there's all sorts of complexities.
00:16:55.738 --> 00:16:56.076
Yeah.
00:16:56.076 --> 00:17:00.048
question of how is the New Testament using the Old Testament.
00:17:00.169 --> 00:17:03.912
But working in the languages is what will enable you to see that.
00:17:03.912 --> 00:17:15.117
And so to take us to the concrete example in Mark 8.38 and then the other places in the Gospels where Jesus talks about the coming of the Son of Man.
00:17:16.538 --> 00:17:29.934
When we see there that the phrase, ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου the Son of Man, and then we see the verb, ἔρχομαι (erchomai) coming, And that's what occurs in Mark 8.38 and Mark 13.26 and Mark 14.62.
00:17:29.934 --> 00:17:35.361
You have this title or semi-title, Son of Man, ὁ υἱὸς τοῦ ἀνθρώπου.
00:17:35.361 --> 00:17:44.327
And then you also have that paired with the verb ἔρχομαι (erchomai) If you search the whole of the Old Testament, you only find that combination in one verse.
00:17:44.327 --> 00:17:46.210
It's really quite remarkable.
00:17:46.210 --> 00:17:49.813
You can find Son of Man in a number of places.
00:17:49.813 --> 00:17:52.973
But Son of Man plus the verb ἔρχομαι (erchomai).
00:17:52.997 --> 00:17:58.929
you'll find that only in one verse in the whole of the Old Testament in the Greek translation.
00:17:59.029 --> 00:18:01.088
And that one verse is Daniel 7.13.
00:18:01.088 --> 00:18:14.817
And so that gives us a high degree of confidence, I would say, that this is a deliberate allusion on Mark's part, as he reports Jesus teaching, a deliberate allusion to that particular verse in the Old Testament, Daniel 7.13.
00:18:14.817 --> 00:18:16.336
And that one's not controversial.
00:18:16.336 --> 00:18:23.561
And even if you just had the English, you can hear the allusion, you can hear the, resonances of Daniel 7.13.
00:18:23.561 --> 00:18:28.865
But it's when you look at the language and you notice those details you can have a high degree of confidence.
00:18:28.865 --> 00:18:39.614
And in other cases you might think, oh I wonder if the New Testament is alluding to the Old and you go and you look at the language and it's different words and that makes you, gives you some pause.
00:18:39.694 --> 00:18:42.646
Maybe the connection is not as strong as I might have first thought.
00:18:42.646 --> 00:18:45.729
So it's a good way of testing the New Testament use of the Old.
00:18:45.859 --> 00:18:48.039
Yeah, yes.
00:18:48.119 --> 00:19:11.108
Yeah, just been talking to you on the previous episode, talk to Ed Glenny about how one Peter is using the Septuagint And you see lots of that like the verbal overlap, when is an allusion and when is it an actual quotation, where we're probably dealing with an allusion here in Mark 8.38, rather than a direct quotation.
00:19:12.938 --> 00:19:14.460
But that's fascinating.
00:19:14.460 --> 00:19:24.353
I think that, yeah, that's one of the things, that's one of the reasons why we should learn the languages or encourage people to learn languages that you can see if the author was thinking that way.
00:19:24.894 --> 00:19:27.978
Is he, he wants you to think about that text.
00:19:27.978 --> 00:19:31.132
m Yeah.
00:19:31.865 --> 00:19:41.603
Yeah, and if he's using language that doesn't occur in what you thought was the source text, then that will give you some pause.
00:19:41.603 --> 00:19:46.867
Maybe there is still an allusion there, but it's weaker or it's softer, the volume is lower.
00:19:46.867 --> 00:19:55.884
Whereas if there's that verbal overlap, then I can make a strong case that the author wants us to hear that allusion to the Old Testament passage.
00:19:55.955 --> 00:20:07.925
Yeah, yeah, that's very helpful in thinking about, you know, when does an author think about the Hebrew Bible or the Old Testament.
00:20:07.925 --> 00:20:22.176
Yeah, maybe you spend a lot of time reading through the Greek of the Gospels, maybe in particular, without giving too much away of what we are going to talk about in a moment.
00:20:22.176 --> 00:20:25.650
We already seeing it in the conversation.
00:20:25.769 --> 00:20:33.551
Have you seen something about Jesus' ministry in the Greek that enhanced your understanding that you might not have seen translation?
00:20:33.803 --> 00:20:35.383
Hmm, good.
00:20:36.522 --> 00:20:40.823
Yeah, so here's another one that I've just enjoyed recently.
00:20:40.823 --> 00:20:46.663
I'm writing a commentary on the Gospel of Mark and I'm nearly finished chapter one.
00:20:46.663 --> 00:20:48.583
It's very slow work.
00:20:49.222 --> 00:21:00.462
And reading the end of, or the middle section in Mark chapter one verses 21 to 28, I began to notice some lexical repetitions happening.
00:21:00.835 --> 00:21:03.155
in that unit, Mark 1, 21-28.
00:21:03.155 --> 00:21:08.597
It's where Jesus heals a man with an unclean spirit in the synagogue in Capernaum.
00:21:08.778 --> 00:21:11.819
It's Jesus' first recorded miracle in the Gospel of Mark.
00:21:11.819 --> 00:21:21.502
It's very significant because it's Mark's first introduction to us of the kinds of mighty works, the miracles that Jesus did, the acts of power.
00:21:22.604 --> 00:21:24.894
And here it's an act of power.
00:21:24.894 --> 00:21:30.076
He shows his authority over the forces of evil.
00:21:30.126 --> 00:21:33.269
over the evil one and his demons.
00:21:33.930 --> 00:21:40.855
And he shows his authority in a way that brings salvation to those who are enslaved to the evil spirits.
00:21:40.855 --> 00:21:49.843
And so this man who has an evil spirit is set free and Jesus therefore demonstrates his authority.
00:21:49.903 --> 00:21:52.224
And of course you get all of that in English.
00:21:52.464 --> 00:22:24.346
What I noticed as I was just working through verse by verse is that there are really interesting uh semantic lexical and semantic overlaps in this passage that create what I think is a chiasm, that there's this pattern of the beginning of the story matches the end of the story, so you get an A and an A1 line at the top and the bottom, where they go into the synagogue in Capernaum, and then the report about him goes out everywhere, and the language there is...
00:22:24.459 --> 00:22:29.179
going in and going out, there's correspondences in the language.
00:22:29.179 --> 00:22:38.939
then just inside that frame in verses 22 and matched by verse 27, we have this repetition of language around teaching and authority.
00:22:38.939 --> 00:22:41.098
He was teaching with authority.
00:22:41.118 --> 00:22:49.411
And we get διδάσκω (didaskō) and διδαχή (didachē) and then...
00:22:49.671 --> 00:22:53.750
ἐξουσία (exousia) as the authority word and all of that is repeated in verse 27.
00:22:53.750 --> 00:22:56.151
So verse 22 matches verse 27.
00:22:56.230 --> 00:23:03.290
And then we come inside that and we get mentions of the unclean spirit in verse 23 and then in verse 26.
00:23:03.290 --> 00:23:04.510
And so they're matching each other.
00:23:04.510 --> 00:23:13.830
And so we've got these matched pairs in the outer frame of it and then just inside that and then again further inside until we get to the middle of what I think is this chiasm.
00:23:14.171 --> 00:23:17.971
And we have for the first time the name of Jesus mentioned.
00:23:17.971 --> 00:23:24.773
and then we have the declaration of this um unclean spirit, I know who you are, the Holy One of God.
00:23:24.773 --> 00:23:37.278
And so the structuring that Mark has set up for us with this chiastic structure leads our eyes into the middle so that we notice and focus on this declaration of the evil spirit, the Holy One of God.
00:23:38.318 --> 00:23:41.259
So I've given that as an experimental conference paper.
00:23:41.259 --> 00:23:44.521
I haven't yet had a chance to write that up and get it peer reviewed.
00:23:44.521 --> 00:23:47.643
So maybe I'm seeing something that's not there.
00:23:48.496 --> 00:23:56.059
But it was paying close attention to the Greek that helped me to start to think, oh, I wonder if Mark has structured this as a chiasm.
00:23:56.059 --> 00:24:00.301
And the lexical repetitions are what clued me into it.
00:24:00.481 --> 00:24:02.462
So yeah, things like that.
00:24:02.928 --> 00:24:04.828
is definitely very interesting.
00:24:05.108 --> 00:24:09.151
I've not thought about it, but there is definitely the lexical repetition.
00:24:10.011 --> 00:24:17.336
And Jesus is in the middle and he is the holy one of God.
00:24:17.336 --> 00:24:20.917
Although it's the demon saying it, which Jesus normally doesn't like.
00:24:20.917 --> 00:24:31.439
em although in the Gospel of Mark it's the demons who first recognise who he is, here and then in chapter 3 and chapter 5.
00:24:31.758 --> 00:24:33.960
it's the disciples who are the dull ones.
00:24:34.442 --> 00:24:35.313
That's right, exactly.
00:24:35.313 --> 00:24:52.035
They eventually come to see with Peter's confession at Caesarea Philippi in chapter 8, but even then Peter sees that Jesus is the Christ but doesn't understand what it means for him to be the Christ and that he's come to suffer and to die.
00:24:53.041 --> 00:24:59.480
I don't know how much time you've got, but we could keep going on the title Holy One of God because...
00:24:59.480 --> 00:25:34.767
um there's some discussion about where does that come from and I think having a close look at the Greek also gives us some clues there that maybe it's coming from Psalm 89 where the Lord's anointed David is the Holy One and David and his descendants is the Holy One and in Psalm 89 the Holy One is cut off and so if there's an illusion there in what the demon says you are the Holy One of God, then he's anticipating that Jesus is the Messiah, the Lord's anointed, who's going to be cut off.
00:25:35.409 --> 00:25:44.796
And so this would be the demon, you know, recognising the fate of Jesus, the destiny of Jesus as the one who's going to suffer and die.
00:25:45.478 --> 00:25:50.501
Perhaps not realising that that's going to mean destruction for the powers of evil.
00:25:50.501 --> 00:25:55.311
you know, that's all more detail we could talk about if we had more time.
00:25:55.311 --> 00:25:56.772
Yeah, that's interesting.
00:25:56.772 --> 00:25:58.423
Thanks for mentioning it.
00:25:58.544 --> 00:26:02.886
Yeah, but we might want to step into Mark 8.
00:26:02.886 --> 00:26:14.554
But before we go into the more detailed discussion going on in Mark 8.38 I might um just, before I ask my question, I might just want to read it.
00:26:15.114 --> 00:26:17.075
A fairly literal translation I made.
00:26:17.075 --> 00:26:35.188
em For whoever is ashamed, of me and my words in this unbelieving and sinful generation also the son of man will be ashamed of him when he comes in his father's glory with all his holy angels.
00:26:36.108 --> 00:26:51.220
So if someone is not aware of this particular discussion about Mark 8.38 and whether Jesus knew about his future coming in the Synoptics, Can you explain what the debate is about?
00:26:51.220 --> 00:26:52.661
What is a stake?
00:26:54.470 --> 00:26:56.981
Yeah, it is quite a significant debate.
00:26:56.981 --> 00:27:04.233
It hasn't uh always reached the level of church audiences and for my money that's not a bad thing.
00:27:06.195 --> 00:27:21.352
so the long established traditional interpretation that you'll find in the church fathers and in the reformers and all the way down through church history is that when in the Gospels Jesus speaks about his coming as the Son of Man.
00:27:21.365 --> 00:27:24.105
the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven.
00:27:24.586 --> 00:27:32.546
He's speaking about his second coming, his final return in power and glory at the end of the age to judge and to reign.
00:27:32.925 --> 00:27:35.385
That's been the traditional understanding.
00:27:35.865 --> 00:27:40.425
In the Gospel of Mark, Jesus speaks like that only three times.
00:27:41.046 --> 00:27:47.541
Here in Mark 8.38, then again in Mark 13.26, and then again in Mark 14.
00:27:47.541 --> 00:27:51.944
62 when he's responding to the high priest at his trial.
00:27:51.944 --> 00:27:58.910
And so three times we have the son of man coming, the son of man will come, you'll see the son of man coming on the clouds.
00:27:58.910 --> 00:28:03.792
And yeah, so the traditional understanding is that Jesus is there speaking about his second coming.
00:28:04.253 --> 00:28:21.844
There has been a minority report through the history of the church which has now become quite prominent in a lot of evangelical scholarship that rereads the coming of the Son of Man as the going of the Son of Man.
00:28:21.844 --> 00:28:30.326
You'll see the Son of Man going on the clouds or coming on the clouds to God in heaven.
00:28:30.486 --> 00:28:34.468
And that reading seeks to reverse the direction of travel.
00:28:34.468 --> 00:28:39.528
That this is not the Son of Man returning from heaven in his second coming.
00:28:39.528 --> 00:28:53.067
This is the Son of Man going to heaven coming on the clouds to God in heaven, and therefore it's a reference to his ascension and his vindication after his suffering.
00:28:53.428 --> 00:29:01.613
And that's been quite popular, particularly, I think it's especially popular in British evangelical scholarship.
00:29:01.692 --> 00:29:07.636
There are some outside the UK who hold this view, particularly in Australia, less so in America.
00:29:07.636 --> 00:29:10.417
I'm not sure what the case is in...
00:29:10.417 --> 00:29:13.979
in Denmark, in Scandinavian scholarship.
00:29:14.240 --> 00:29:16.279
In Germany, I don't think it's made much...
00:29:16.279 --> 00:29:24.844
uh Jeremiah's actually, Joachim Jeremiah's did hold something similar to this view, so there are versions of it in German scholarship as well.
00:29:24.864 --> 00:29:31.366
But it's particularly prominent in British scholarship and the big scholarly names attached to it are R.T.
00:29:31.366 --> 00:29:36.929
France, who really popularised this in his commentaries on the Gospel of Mark and the Gospel of Matthew.
00:29:37.409 --> 00:29:39.400
And then also more recently, N.T.
00:29:39.400 --> 00:29:40.041
Wright.
00:29:40.041 --> 00:29:45.875
who's argued for this kind of view in a lot of his works, especially his book, Jesus and the Victory of God.
00:29:45.875 --> 00:29:52.606
That the coming of the Son of Man is his ascension or his vindication.
00:29:52.768 --> 00:29:57.789
And then Wright will add, and that was manifested in the destruction of Jerusalem.
00:29:57.789 --> 00:30:16.989
That the people in Jesus' generation saw that he had come on the clouds to the Ancient of Days in heaven, not because they saw him personally, but because they saw the evidence that he was now the ascended Lord in the fact that the city that opposed him, Jerusalem, has been destroyed.
00:30:16.989 --> 00:30:24.971
the coming of the Son of Man is his ascension, his vindication, and the evidence of that is Jerusalem has been destroyed in AD 70.
00:30:24.971 --> 00:30:31.551
So that's become quite a, you know, there's all sorts of various versions of that reading.
00:30:32.073 --> 00:30:35.474
But that's the debate.
00:30:35.474 --> 00:30:37.151
Is the Son of Man coming?
00:30:37.151 --> 00:30:39.094
from heaven to earth in his second coming?
00:30:39.094 --> 00:30:43.419
Or is he going from earth to heaven in his ascension?
00:30:43.569 --> 00:30:45.290
Hmm.
00:30:45.290 --> 00:30:51.523
It's very interesting because I don't think it's particularly popular in Danish scholarship.
00:30:51.523 --> 00:30:57.769
I could know I'm not a gospel scholar, so there might be people who think that.
00:30:58.430 --> 00:31:01.211
it's not what I was taught in my undergrad in my gospel courses.
00:31:01.211 --> 00:31:09.057
em So I did do my undergrad in a fairly conservative place, so that might also be the reason.
00:31:09.057 --> 00:31:09.597
I don't know.
00:31:09.597 --> 00:31:18.240
em I just, it is a fairly new understanding to me.
00:31:18.240 --> 00:31:20.800
oh To me, finds a little bit peculiar.
00:31:20.800 --> 00:31:28.222
em But I think it is an interesting discussion and I'm glad that we have this discussion today.
00:31:28.222 --> 00:31:33.484
And also because I think it has some very, it's very important.
00:31:33.484 --> 00:31:38.486
think they have the implications are also quite, I think there's a lot of stake as well.
00:31:39.987 --> 00:31:40.826
Yeah.
00:31:40.928 --> 00:31:46.090
Yeah, and it's got some things, know, some reasons that make it attractive, right?
00:31:46.632 --> 00:31:56.297
Most of the people championing this reading are evangelical, they have a high view of Scripture, so they're not seeking to undermine Orthodox Christian doctrine.
00:31:56.798 --> 00:32:04.561
In fact, uh they're trying to read the Bible carefully, and as always with this kind of thing, you can make a good case.
00:32:06.118 --> 00:32:15.459
And so, probably the two reasons why it's become popular is people will say, well, there's an allusion here to Daniel 7.
00:32:15.702 --> 00:32:20.865
And in Daniel 7, the one like a son of man comes to the Ancient of Days.
00:32:21.325 --> 00:32:34.830
And so, if you assume that the Ancient of Days is God on his throne in heaven, then when the one like a son of man comes on the clouds of heaven to the Ancient of Days, you can picture that as an upward movement.
00:32:35.871 --> 00:32:38.854
and therefore see Daniel 7 as an ascension scene.
00:32:38.854 --> 00:32:48.119
And that will then influence you to read the Gospels in the same way, that when Jesus speaks about the coming of the Son of Man, he's speaking about his ascension or his heavenly enthronement, his enthronement in heaven.
00:32:48.119 --> 00:32:51.402
uh That's often the language that's used.
00:32:51.803 --> 00:33:04.340
And the other really strong argument in its favour is that in Mark 13, 26, Jesus says this, he says, the Son of Man, you'll see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven.
00:33:04.791 --> 00:33:06.723
Actually there it's in the third person.
00:33:06.723 --> 00:33:10.445
They will see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory.
00:33:10.445 --> 00:33:12.330
Mark 13 26.
00:33:12.330 --> 00:33:19.522
And then a few verses later he says, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.
00:33:20.284 --> 00:33:27.127
And so if all these things includes the coming of the Son of Man, well that didn't happen.
00:33:27.429 --> 00:33:32.491
His second coming didn't happen within a generation and so Jesus was mistaken.
00:33:33.029 --> 00:33:39.143
But if the coming of Son of Man is His ascension and His heavenly enthronement, then that did happen within a generation.
00:33:39.143 --> 00:33:43.003
Jerusalem was destroyed within a generation as the evidence of that.
00:33:43.183 --> 00:33:46.675
And so all this did take place within a generation.
00:33:46.675 --> 00:33:56.970
And so that makes it quite an attractive reading because it solves that difficulty of Mark 13.30, where Jesus says this generation will not pass away.
00:33:57.549 --> 00:34:00.171
So you can make a strong argument for it.
00:34:00.771 --> 00:34:02.192
I'm not persuaded.
00:34:02.444 --> 00:34:03.384
yeah.
00:34:04.625 --> 00:34:09.427
Yeah, and it's always good to steelman the position that you disagree with.
00:34:09.427 --> 00:34:24.960
And um so but I'm not a gospel scholar, but I was being curious why this this is prominent in the Anglo-Saxon scholar, like you mentioned NT Wright already, but I believe Mike Bird is also your fellow countryman is also arguing this view.
00:34:24.960 --> 00:34:26.170
Yeah.
00:34:26.983 --> 00:34:28.184
Yes, that's right.
00:34:30.023 --> 00:34:36.204
It's hard to know why a view becomes popular and you don't know inside people's minds and hearts.
00:34:36.204 --> 00:34:47.204
so I can't understand or explain why other people might hold a particular view, except for those strengths that I've just noted.
00:34:48.164 --> 00:34:55.304
You can use this reading to help make sense of Daniel 7, if you read Daniel 7 as an ascension scene.
00:34:55.623 --> 00:35:02.128
It helps solve the difficulty of why Jesus says all these things will not pass away until everything has taken place.
00:35:02.443 --> 00:35:20.583
I think probably within gospel scholarship and historical Jesus research there's been a big influence in the last generation on understanding Jesus in his Jewish context and therefore highlighting the way in which Jesus speaks to his first century Jewish contemporaries.
00:35:20.777 --> 00:35:28.498
and prophesies the destruction of Jerusalem and God's judgment on Jerusalem and the destruction of the temple which did occur in AD 70.
00:35:28.498 --> 00:35:41.472
And so this interpretation tends to highlight and emphasize that aspect of Jesus' ministry that he prophesied the destruction of Jerusalem and it brings the coming of the Son of Man together with that emphasis.
00:35:41.472 --> 00:35:46.748
So I think that's maybe another reason for its popularity that it Yeah, you can make an argument.
00:35:46.748 --> 00:35:54.918
Again, I'm not convinced, but you can make an argument that this is a more Jewish reading, it locates Jesus more firmly in his Jewish context.
00:35:54.927 --> 00:35:56.197
Yeah, that seems to be what R.
00:35:56.197 --> 00:35:56.367
T.
00:35:56.367 --> 00:35:59.409
France is kind of like banging on about.
00:35:59.409 --> 00:36:01.291
So that's what he seems to be like.
00:36:01.490 --> 00:36:15.900
I he says this in commentary, I was reading as I was preparing for this, and I think he says, if I can recall it correctly, that to his contemporary readers, they would have understood it as an heavenly enthronment or something like that.
00:36:16.440 --> 00:36:19.882
I might be paraphrasing what he's arguing, but...
00:36:19.987 --> 00:36:26.501
No, no, that's right, France and Wright and others as well, but Wright is particularly strident about it.
00:36:26.501 --> 00:36:45.940
Wright says, is the common first century reading of Daniel 7, that it's a heavenly enthronement scene, and therefore we should presume that Jesus reads it in the same way as his first century Jewish contemporaries as an enthronement scene, and therefore applies it to his own future heavenly enthronement.
00:36:45.940 --> 00:36:49.322
Again, I think that can be challenged, but that's certainly part of the...
00:36:49.396 --> 00:36:50.393
the argument.
00:36:50.588 --> 00:36:59.737
Yeah, but so maybe I would be curious about what what is the evidence that that NT right then brings to the to the table saying this is the common reading.
00:36:59.737 --> 00:37:07.005
Because you can't you can obviously just say it and but then if it's not backed up by any evidence then then it doesn't hold.
00:37:07.005 --> 00:37:09.666
I'm assuming has some something to say.
00:37:10.590 --> 00:37:11.311
yes.
00:37:11.311 --> 00:37:18.617
Unfortunately, the evidence is fairly thin, ah that it was a common first century Jewish reading.
00:37:18.978 --> 00:37:30.788
There is some evidence in Josephus, that Josephus refers to a prophecy of Daniel that is applied to the destruction of the temple.
00:37:31.329 --> 00:37:34.891
And so there's some evidence in its favour.
00:37:35.675 --> 00:37:38.876
The preponderance of evidence, however, is on the other side.
00:37:38.876 --> 00:37:45.639
And this paper that you heard on Mark 8 at Tyndale Fellowship comes out of my doctoral work on this particular question.
00:37:45.639 --> 00:38:01.342
And I've got a whole chapter, if people are interested, I can give you the link at the end, a whole chapter surveying early Jewish readings of Daniel 7, and particularly when we look at the readings of Daniel 7 at Qumran amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls.
00:38:01.342 --> 00:38:02.045
Mm-mm.
00:38:02.045 --> 00:38:22.130
then in 1 Enoch 37-71, the similitudes of Enoch, and then also in 4th Ezra, and to a lesser extent 2nd Baruch, there's a, I've argued at least, a fairly strong trajectory of reading Daniel 7, not as a heavenly enthronement scene, but as a vision of God coming to earth to execute final judgement.
00:38:22.130 --> 00:38:25.478
One of the Qumran scrolls in fact makes that very explicit.
00:38:25.478 --> 00:38:31.864
that the mighty one came down from heaven and set up his throne and the books were opened and judgment was issued.
00:38:31.864 --> 00:38:45.264
So I think the preponderance of evidence shows that the Jews in the first century tended to read Daniel 7 not as a scene of the Son of Man ascending to heaven, but as a scene of God coming to earth to judge his enemies.
00:38:45.264 --> 00:38:51.329
And that then is going to be consistent with the way I think we should read Jesus' use of this in the Gospels.
00:38:51.762 --> 00:38:52.693
Hmm.
00:38:53.554 --> 00:38:54.994
Yeah, that's very helpful.
00:38:54.994 --> 00:39:02.059
And everybody agrees that this is an allusion to Daniel 7 is happening, as you mentioned already.
00:39:02.059 --> 00:39:07.641
But we maybe already talked a little bit about it, but maybe we should flesh it out.
00:39:07.762 --> 00:39:13.945
What does it mean for the understanding of the text and the gospel to say, it is a heavenly enthronement?
00:39:14.195 --> 00:39:16.791
Yeah, yes, this is worth drawing out a little bit.
00:39:16.791 --> 00:39:36.789
If Jesus is speaking about His ascension and heavenly enthronement, then He's speaking about that here in Mark 8.38 and in Mark 13.26 and in Mark 14.62, and therefore you're going to be hard pressed to find places in the Gospel of Mark where Jesus prophesies His own return.
00:39:37.309 --> 00:39:44.380
Because these are the Traditionally, these have been the places we've looked to see Jesus' prophecy of His second coming.
00:39:45.161 --> 00:39:53.543
And if these are not references to the second coming, then maybe there aren't many others, maybe there aren't any others.
00:39:53.563 --> 00:39:55.634
And that, in fact, is the view that N.T.
00:39:55.634 --> 00:39:56.764
Wright has championed.
00:39:56.764 --> 00:40:01.867
He says that there are no references to Jesus' second coming in the Gospels.
00:40:01.867 --> 00:40:06.097
Jesus does not prophesy His own second coming according to Wright.
00:40:06.420 --> 00:40:09.659
Now, of course, he's orthodox on the question of the Second Coming.
00:40:09.960 --> 00:40:17.260
He does believe that Christ will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, as we confess in the Nicene Creed and the Apostles' Creed.
00:40:17.460 --> 00:40:31.360
But he gets that doctrine not from Jesus' teaching in the Gospels, but from the teaching of Paul in the letters and from the Book of Revelation and from the Book of Acts.
00:40:31.360 --> 00:40:43.847
And so, in his comments on Acts chapter 1, verses 9 to 11, where the two angels say to the disciples as they're looking up to heaven, Jesus has ascended, and the angels say he'll come again in the same way as you saw him go.
00:40:43.847 --> 00:40:52.675
Wright says that's the first indication that Jesus will return, because there are no indications in the Gospels and therefore no indications from Jesus himself.
00:40:52.675 --> 00:40:58.780
And I think that's a fairly significant implication that Jesus didn't prophesy on return.
00:40:59.168 --> 00:41:01.324
Yeah, it's so big.
00:41:01.324 --> 00:41:03.688
Yeah, because where does it then come from?
00:41:04.773 --> 00:41:06.335
There, this view.
00:41:06.378 --> 00:41:19.788
I had a really good conversation with NT Wright when he came out to Sydney when I was in the early phases of my PhD research and I had read his work and at that stage was mostly convinced by it and so I asked him exactly that question.
00:41:19.788 --> 00:41:30.581
If Jesus didn't speak of His own Second Coming, how does Paul reach the conclusion so quickly in Paul's earliest letters, at least some of them in 1 and 2 Thessalonians?
00:41:30.795 --> 00:41:31.936
that Jesus will return.
00:41:31.936 --> 00:41:35.257
And Wright said, that's a very good question, you should work on that.
00:41:36.097 --> 00:41:37.621
Which was really helpful.
00:41:37.621 --> 00:41:47.184
And so I did, and unfortunately I came to the conclusion that the reason Paul got there so quickly is because Jesus himself did in fact prophesy his own second coming.
00:41:48.565 --> 00:41:56.150
therefore I ended up disagreeing with Wright about the reading of these key verses in the Gospels and the coming of the Son of Man.
00:41:56.318 --> 00:41:57.338
Yeah.
00:41:57.518 --> 00:41:58.498
Yeah.
00:41:58.619 --> 00:42:04.844
I also noticed when he because he talks about acts and the ascension and the angel.
00:42:05.023 --> 00:42:07.505
Maybe he would like talk about the angels.
00:42:07.585 --> 00:42:11.827
Then there's the angels that have told the disciples and that's why Paul knows.
00:42:12.764 --> 00:42:14.625
Yes, correct.
00:42:15.465 --> 00:42:19.789
Yeah, and he'll talk about there's a logic that comes from the Gospels.
00:42:19.789 --> 00:42:29.284
So he says things like, it was inconceivable to the apostles that the final kingdom of God would have no place for Jesus in it.
00:42:29.284 --> 00:42:31.507
And that's a sound argument.
00:42:31.507 --> 00:42:38.751
And therefore, as they thought about the fact that the kingdom had come, but had not yet come in all its fullness, Mm.
00:42:38.751 --> 00:42:47.159
they reached the conclusion that when the kingdom comes in all its fullness, then Jesus must come to bring the kingdom in all its fullness, so Jesus must come again.
00:42:47.159 --> 00:42:59.869
And so there's a logic that identifies in Jesus' proclamation of the kingdom of God that pushed the apostles towards recognising that Jesus must come again in order to bring the fullness of God's kingdom.
00:43:00.371 --> 00:43:05.695
But that's not the same as saying that Jesus prophesied his own second coming.
00:43:06.115 --> 00:43:07.414
That's interesting.
00:43:07.414 --> 00:43:10.739
I find it's fascinating in many ways.
00:43:11.019 --> 00:43:17.925
Because both because it's new to me, but also it's not new to me because I heard your paper in Tyndale.
00:43:18.706 --> 00:43:31.708
But also because I actually think that there is a I think I agree with Tyler Hoagland that there is a reference to Daniel seven in early in Acts one, which which is kind of a problem for N.T.
00:43:31.708 --> 00:43:32.786
Wright, I think.
00:43:33.036 --> 00:43:38.556
Yeah, well, he actually appeals to Acts 1 for his reading of Daniel 7.
00:43:38.556 --> 00:43:48.431
Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven?
00:43:48.431 --> 00:43:57.757
This Jesus, who was taken up from you into heaven, will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.
00:43:57.757 --> 00:43:58.909
he was taken up into heaven in a cloud.
00:43:58.909 --> 00:44:00.188
Verse 9 ‘a cloud took him out of their sight’.
00:44:00.188 --> 00:44:02.833
so Wright says that, well, there you've got a cloud.
00:44:02.833 --> 00:44:04.394
Jesus going into heaven.
00:44:04.394 --> 00:44:05.713
So that's Daniel 7.
00:44:05.713 --> 00:44:10.659
Daniel 7 is about the Son of Man going on the clouds into heaven.
00:44:11.161 --> 00:44:15.364
So he actually uses this in support of his ascension reading.
00:44:15.726 --> 00:44:23.434
In response, I would say that, yes, there is a cloud in Acts 1, but it's really interesting that that does take Jesus out of their sight.
00:44:23.434 --> 00:44:32.643
But it's interesting what the angels say is, this Jesus who has taken up from you into heaven will come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.
00:44:32.724 --> 00:44:40.949
And if we pay attention to the verbs there, we've got come is ἐλεύσεται, which is the future form of the verb, ἔρχομαι (erchomai).
00:44:40.949 --> 00:44:45.922
That's the same verb that occurs in Daniel 7.13 in the old Greek translation.
00:44:45.922 --> 00:44:50.795
That's the same verb that Jesus uses in the gospels for the coming of the Son of Man.
00:44:50.795 --> 00:44:54.396
He'll come in the same way as you saw him go into heaven.
00:44:54.396 --> 00:44:59.342
The verb for go there is πορεύομαι (poreuomai) And so there's two different verbs that are being used.
00:44:59.742 --> 00:45:03.342
he poreuomai'ed into heaven, if I can put it like that.
00:45:03.722 --> 00:45:06.601
πορεύομαι plus a cloud is not Daniel 7.
00:45:07.302 --> 00:45:10.442
Going into heaven with a cloud, that's not Daniel 7.
00:45:10.762 --> 00:45:14.141
ἔρχομαι (erchomai) with a cloud, that is Daniel 7.
00:45:14.141 --> 00:45:20.641
And so, against Wright's reading, I think there is an allusion to Daniel 7 here, but it's in the second coming.
00:45:20.641 --> 00:45:25.338
He will come, ἔρχομαι (erchomai), just as you saw him go, in a cloud.
00:45:25.338 --> 00:45:32.639
He'll come again in a cloud and so that fits with a return reading of Daniel 7, a descent reading of Daniel 7.
00:45:32.639 --> 00:45:35.000
Yeah, that's helpful.
00:45:35.000 --> 00:45:36.996
Yeah, so we already mentioned R.T.
00:45:36.996 --> 00:45:45.858
France and he is adamant that the scene in vision to Daniel 7 alludes to Mark 8.38.
00:45:46.503 --> 00:45:51.545
And that is not a specific event, as far as I understand him.
00:45:51.626 --> 00:45:53.454
And it has to occur in heaven.
00:45:53.454 --> 00:45:57.175
which means that it cannot refer to the second coming of Christ.
00:45:57.677 --> 00:45:59.333
And, and France then continues...
00:45:59.333 --> 00:46:14.423
to France, it rather refers to Jesus as his enthronement in heaven after he has been rejected on earth, which to him explains the language of glory, but also the term in his generation.
00:46:15.284 --> 00:46:27.114
But, thus this, how Thus this interpretation actually fits with Daniel 7 in his own context and how the illusion works in Mark 8.38.
00:46:28.108 --> 00:46:29.128
Yeah, great question.
00:46:29.128 --> 00:46:30.940
So there's a lot to get into there.
00:46:30.940 --> 00:46:35.851
So let me start with Daniel 7 and then perhaps you can tell us where to go next.
00:46:36.452 --> 00:46:48.682
yes, a lot of this rereading by France and Wright and Bird and others relies on a reading of Daniel 7 as, like we've talked about in Ascension scene, the one like a son of man comes to the Ancient of Days.
00:46:48.682 --> 00:46:53.697
And so there's an assumption that the Ancient of Days is in heaven and the son of man is coming to him.
00:46:53.697 --> 00:46:55.119
being enthroned in heaven.
00:46:55.119 --> 00:47:09.309
If we go back and look at Daniel 7 though, I think a much stronger case can be made that Daniel is presenting a vision that he saw of what I would call an eschatological theophany, an end time coming of God.
00:47:09.869 --> 00:47:30.217
Because the whole scene is set in Daniel 7 on the earth, Daniel sees visions and the visions, in his visions he sees the four winds of heaven stirring up a great sea and then four great beasts come up out of the sea and these beasts come up out of the sea and they're wreaking havoc on the land, they're on earth, these beasts.
00:47:31.277 --> 00:47:40.123
And as these four, Daniel keeps looking, these four beasts are wreaking havoc on the earth, devouring much flesh, exercising dominion.
00:47:40.123 --> 00:47:43.603
bringing suffering, all of that's happening on the earth.
00:47:43.623 --> 00:47:48.802
And then as Daniel keeps looking, verse 9, as I looked, thrones were placed.
00:47:49.003 --> 00:47:50.902
And that's really interesting language.
00:47:50.902 --> 00:47:55.222
Thrones were set up and the Ancient of Days took his seat.
00:47:55.463 --> 00:47:58.722
And you ask, where are these thrones being placed?
00:47:58.722 --> 00:48:04.182
And the assumption on Wright's reading, on France's reading, is that this is happening in heaven.
00:48:04.623 --> 00:48:07.842
But according to scripture, God's throne is already established in heaven.
00:48:07.842 --> 00:48:09.530
It has been from all eternity.
00:48:09.530 --> 00:48:12.570
God doesn't have to set up his throne in heaven.
00:48:12.811 --> 00:48:23.791
This is a new and decisive act where God is setting up his throne in a place where his rule is contested, where people are rebelling against him, where the beasts are wreaking havoc.
00:48:23.791 --> 00:48:28.811
And so he sets up his throne on the earth, I think is the better way to read it.
00:48:28.811 --> 00:48:36.490
And that's confirmed by, in the interpretation of the vision in Daniel 7 22, when Daniel says, I didn't understand what I was seeing.
00:48:36.490 --> 00:48:39.034
And so he asks the angel who explains it.
00:48:39.034 --> 00:48:57.494
And the explanation in Daniel 7, 21 and 22 is that there was war being made by the beasts against the saints, God's people, and the beast prevailed over them, verse 22, until the Ancient of Days came and judgment was given for the saints of the Most High.
00:48:57.755 --> 00:49:02.315
So the Ancient of Days comes and sets up his throne on earth.
00:49:02.394 --> 00:49:07.215
and executes judgment on the earth where the beasts have been wreaking havoc.
00:49:07.215 --> 00:49:19.134
And so then when the one like a son of man comes on the clouds of heaven, Daniel keeps looking, Daniel 7 13, and look he says with the clouds of heaven there came one like a son of man and he came to the ancient of days.
00:49:19.755 --> 00:49:26.155
He's coming from heaven to earth to receive dominion over the earth and that's what happens in verse 14.
00:49:26.155 --> 00:49:34.244
He's given dominion and glory in a kingdom where well it's It's a kingdom that replaces the kingdom of the beasts.
00:49:34.244 --> 00:49:40.630
And since the beasts have been ruling over the earth, this one, like a son of man, he's given dominion over the earth.
00:49:40.630 --> 00:49:51.137
And so, already in Daniel 7, I think we should see this as a coming from heaven to earth, as an end time coming of God, an eschatological theophany.
00:49:51.137 --> 00:49:53.451
And that, think, is the best reading of Daniel 7.
00:49:53.451 --> 00:49:57.514
That seems to be the way Daniel 7 is being read by the early Jewish texts.
00:49:57.514 --> 00:50:04.554
especially 1 Enoch and 4 Ezra and 4Q530 amongst the Dead Sea Scrolls.
00:50:04.554 --> 00:50:16.215
And so when we get to Jesus in the Gospels, I think our presumption should be that when Jesus speaks about the coming of the Son of Man, he's speaking about that same direction of travel, this coming from heaven to earth.
00:50:16.936 --> 00:50:18.297
Yeah, that's helpful.
00:50:18.297 --> 00:50:24.081
And also, I think it's very helpful in terms of understanding what's going on.
00:50:24.581 --> 00:50:31.905
And also, like, when how the book of Daniel ends, it seems like it's all about what is happening on Earth.
00:50:33.027 --> 00:50:43.996
As well as that, in the end, there should be a resurrection of the saint, of everybody, actually, in Daniel is everybody and the saints, will shine like the lights of heaven.
00:50:43.996 --> 00:50:47.753
I think that's maybe the Greek I'm quoting but I'm not sure.
00:50:47.753 --> 00:50:49.273
Yeah, Daniel 12.
00:50:49.273 --> 00:50:50.074
Yeah.
00:50:50.074 --> 00:50:51.376
Shrine like the stars.
00:50:51.376 --> 00:50:52.275
Yeah.
00:50:52.317 --> 00:50:53.356
Yeah, I think you're right.
00:50:53.356 --> 00:50:57.221
The whole book of Daniel is concerned with God's kingdom over the earth.
00:50:57.221 --> 00:50:59.382
There's a refrain through the first half of the book.
00:50:59.382 --> 00:51:02.746
The Most High rules over the kingdom of man and gives it to him he will.
00:51:02.746 --> 00:51:07.831
And God is ruling over the kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar and of Darius and Belshazzar.
00:51:07.831 --> 00:51:18.472
And the vision in Daniel 2 which is matched or the dream, Nebuchadnezzar's dream in Daniel 2, which matches the vision in Daniel 7, they're paired passages in the structure of the book.
00:51:18.472 --> 00:51:22.856
There again, it's very much concerned with the kingdom on the earth.
00:51:22.856 --> 00:51:27.918
There's the great statue that has the head of gold and then silver and then down to the feet of clay.
00:51:28.039 --> 00:51:34.172
And then a stone that's cut by no human hands, smashes this statue down and that stone...
00:51:34.172 --> 00:51:34.954
Yeah.
00:51:34.954 --> 00:51:40.577
rises to become a great kingdom on the earth, Daniel 2, 35 and 44.
00:51:40.577 --> 00:51:44.498
And so again, it's concerned with God's final kingdom over the earth.
00:51:44.498 --> 00:51:50.902
That's really the burden of the whole book of Daniel, and Daniel 7 fits within that context.
00:51:51.206 --> 00:51:52.152
Yeah.
00:51:52.403 --> 00:52:00.777
Yeah, and then also the talking about the war in heaven that supposedly happens in chapter eight as well.
00:52:01.918 --> 00:52:06.260
And it's happening from the beast is on the earth, and it's rolling down stars.
00:52:06.260 --> 00:52:35.541
And then it's that after that where he also says that where he gets ill and after that he meets, it's been a while since I've read Daniel in detail, but I think it's also that way he talks about that Michael comes out only Michael so that he meets this angel or messenger and says only we were fighting the prince of persia So there is a heavenly reality that corresponds to what's going on on the earth, but the concern of the book, only very briefly do you get glimpses into heaven.
00:52:35.822 --> 00:52:40.306
The whole concern of the book is about what this means for God's Kingdom on earth.
00:52:40.306 --> 00:52:41.606
That's the burden.
00:52:42.077 --> 00:52:46.021
And so Daniel's visions concern the outworking of God's Kingdom on the earth.
00:52:46.021 --> 00:52:50.706
His prayer in chapter 9 is about Jerusalem, the centre of God's Kingdom on the earth.
00:52:50.706 --> 00:52:53.730
It's a very Old Testament kind of concern.
00:52:53.730 --> 00:52:56.353
In fact, I would say a very biblical kind of concern.
00:52:56.353 --> 00:53:04.188
That God is the creator of heaven and earth and the biblical trajectory is towards God coming.
00:53:04.188 --> 00:53:12.896
to live amongst his people in a new heavens and a new earth, ruling over all the nations, gathering his people from among all the nations.
00:53:13.818 --> 00:53:15.300
That's the biblical trajectory.
00:53:15.300 --> 00:53:19.264
And so it's no surprise that we have it in Daniel 7 as well.
00:53:19.416 --> 00:53:20.840
Yeah, absolutely.
00:53:20.840 --> 00:53:31.615
And maybe we should touch on the direction of movement of the Son of Man in Daniel 7 and how that affects the events that is taking place and how that's picked up in the Mark allusion of this passage.
00:53:32.246 --> 00:53:37.219
Yes, yes, I think there's not much more to say about the direction of travel in Daniel 7.
00:53:37.219 --> 00:53:40.378
It's true in Daniel 7.13.
00:53:40.378 --> 00:53:45.764
sees with the clouds of heaven, one like a son of man, and he came to the Ancient of Days.
00:53:45.764 --> 00:53:50.507
And so the direction of travel is dependent on where you locate the Ancient of Days.
00:53:50.789 --> 00:53:58.222
If you assume that the Ancient of Days is in heaven, then the direction of travel will be either he's moving about in the heavens, that's what...
00:53:58.222 --> 00:54:04.146
John Collins says in his Daniel Commentary, or he's moving from Earth to Heaven.
00:54:04.626 --> 00:54:14.155
But if, as I've suggested, the Ancient of Days has come to establish his throne on the Earth, then the direction of travel will have the Earth as its destination.
00:54:14.576 --> 00:54:20.809
And I think that's confirmed for us if we come across to Mark 8.38, because there's a second allusion there.
00:54:20.809 --> 00:54:23.603
And it's interesting, both R.T.
00:54:23.603 --> 00:54:24.432
France and N.T.
00:54:24.432 --> 00:54:27.394
Wright recognise this secondary allusion.
00:54:27.652 --> 00:54:30.012
but don't give it much weight.
00:54:30.052 --> 00:54:41.753
Because in Mark 8.38 Jesus says, Son of Man will be ashamed, of those who are ashamed of him, when he comes in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.
00:54:42.313 --> 00:54:48.172
Now the allusion to Daniel 7 is clear, the Son of Man comes, that's Daniel 7.
00:54:48.313 --> 00:54:54.793
But where does this language of coming in glory with the holy angels, where does that come from?
00:54:55.043 --> 00:55:16.315
The answer is that's coming from Zechariah, the vision of Zechariah chapter 14 verse 5, where Zechariah sees this vision of a final war and final judgement, and the key bit is in Zechariah 14, 5, then the Lord my God will come and all the holy ones with him.
00:55:16.315 --> 00:55:21.474
Here you've got a coming of God accompanied by holy ones.
00:55:21.726 --> 00:55:26.971
kedoshim (קְדֹשִׁים) in the Hebrew, οἱ ἅγιοι (hoi hagioi) in the LXX.
00:55:26.971 --> 00:55:30.432
The Lord my God will come and all the holy ones with him.
00:55:30.833 --> 00:55:37.822
And quickly following after that is the statement four verses later in Zechariah 14.9.
00:55:37.822 --> 00:55:42.181
And the Lord will be king over all the earth.
00:55:42.282 --> 00:55:43.503
Really explicit.
00:55:43.503 --> 00:55:48.789
The Lord is going to come with his holy ones and be king over all the earth.
00:55:48.789 --> 00:55:57.673
Even before that in Zechariah 14.3, on that day the Lord's feet shall stand on the Mount of Olives.
00:55:57.673 --> 00:56:06.594
So again, you've got multiple indications in Zechariah 14 here that this is a coming of God to establish His Kingdom over all the earth.
00:56:08.273 --> 00:56:11.914
The destination is terrestrial, it's on the earth.
00:56:12.873 --> 00:56:19.969
And Jesus alludes to that when he talks about coming in the glory of His Father with the holy angels, right?
00:56:19.969 --> 00:56:35.710
τῶν ἀγγέλων τῶν ἁγίων with the holy angels and quite a number of commentators recognize this illusion including France and Wright and you've got here Zechariah 14.5 and Daniel 7 being put together.
00:56:36.389 --> 00:56:47.458
Some people see that combination and so there's a really excellent article by Edward Adams, Eddie Adams in the Tyndale Bulletin from about 2005 I think.
00:56:47.458 --> 00:56:51.277
on this question of the coming of the Son of Man in the Gospel of Mark.
00:56:51.358 --> 00:57:05.617
And he says that what's going on here is that Daniel 7 has the direction of travel from earth to heaven, but Zechariah 14.5 has the direction of travel from heaven to earth.
00:57:05.657 --> 00:57:17.282
And what happens in Jesus saying is that Jesus uses Zechariah 14.5 to reverse the direction of the Son of Man's direction of travel.
00:57:17.282 --> 00:57:26.021
And so Zechariah 14.5 overrules Daniel 7 and creates this sense of coming from heaven to earth.
00:57:26.181 --> 00:57:37.322
So Adams is arguing against France and Wright, and he's using Zechariah 14.5 to argue that the direction of travel has been reversed.
00:57:37.942 --> 00:57:41.452
And I think his conclusion is correct, but I think we can make it even stronger.
00:57:41.452 --> 00:57:49.750
by asking why would Jesus and Mark combine Daniel 7 and Zechariah 14.5 if they've got these conflicting directions.
00:57:51.452 --> 00:57:56.500
Maybe part of the reason why Jesus combines the two is that they're both talking about the same thing.
00:57:56.500 --> 00:58:03.967
They both are different visions of God coming from heaven to earth to establish his final kingdom.
00:58:04.041 --> 00:58:11.557
And that's why Jesus puts them together, because they're two different biblical prophecies that speak about the same event, the great and final coming of God.
00:58:11.557 --> 00:58:13.760
And I think that's the much better way to read it.
00:58:13.920 --> 00:58:20.184
And Eddie actually examined my PhD thesis and said, yes, you've persuaded me.
00:58:20.286 --> 00:58:22.327
I think that that is what's going on.
00:58:23.409 --> 00:58:31.295
So his article was very helpful for me there, but I think we can make it even stronger by seeing that.
00:58:31.295 --> 00:58:42.458
these two illusions together create a very strong indication that the Son of Man is coming from heaven to earth, that it is his second coming that Jesus speaks about here.
00:58:42.710 --> 00:59:00.610
Yeah, because like there's no doubt that Zechariah 14 is about like the final judgment and Jesus' second coming, the Messiah's second coming if you were to use more covenant language.
00:59:01.570 --> 00:59:09.409
So it's clearly that the Messiah is coming to split the mountain of olives and it's gonna happen one day.
00:59:09.409 --> 00:59:10.889
It has not happened yet.
00:59:12.681 --> 00:59:13.603
Yeah, correct.
00:59:13.603 --> 00:59:20.969
I think one of the other really interesting thing that's going on is in Zechariah 14.5, it's God coming.
00:59:21.250 --> 00:59:28.996
It's not so much the human Messiah who comes, but it's the Lord my God who comes with the holy angels.
00:59:29.137 --> 00:59:46.396
And so when Jesus applies that to himself, that's a remarkable Christological claim that he will as the son of the Father, he's going to come in the glory of his Father, as the son of the Father, he will embody the coming of God.
00:59:46.396 --> 00:59:48.597
So who does he think he is?
00:59:50.300 --> 00:59:54.838
There's an implicit divine claim there that he can embody God's coming.
00:59:54.838 --> 00:59:55.398
Yeah.
00:59:55.398 --> 01:00:20.925
And the reason why I'm saying this also with the Messiah in like 14 is because it's the point that seems to be made in Zechariah 12 verse 10, that they should look, so that's the Jews, they should look to him whom they have pierced for salvation at one eschatological point in the future.
01:00:21.577 --> 01:00:22.068
Yes.
01:00:22.068 --> 01:00:26.628
then the events in chapter 13 and 14 will then unfold.
01:00:27.295 --> 01:00:29.467
Yeah, yeah, that's good.
01:00:29.637 --> 01:00:39.869
Yeah, Now we've been talking about the so much like strong points and and and I very much agree with you but but I have to play the devil's advocate as well.
01:00:40.349 --> 01:00:41.949
So yeah.
01:00:42.590 --> 01:00:43.369
Yeah.
01:00:43.369 --> 01:00:54.550
So one of the points that argues that that Jesus must be talking about something else than his second coming is is the term γενεά (genea) which we've been talking about.
01:00:54.800 --> 01:01:04.548
It has been argued that it has a smaller semantic range than γένος (genos) and thus it can only mean generation and not people or race.
01:01:04.929 --> 01:01:09.693
And what does that mean to our interpretation because that seems to be a problem.
01:01:09.943 --> 01:01:23.528
Yes, so you get that word here in Mark 8.38, whoever is ashamed of me and my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, γενεά (genea), γενεᾷ ταύτῃ this generation.
01:01:23.750 --> 01:01:38.996
You get it also in Mark 13.30 in that verse I spoke about earlier, this generation, ἡ γενεὰ αὕτη, this generation will not pass away until all these things.
01:01:39.128 --> 01:01:40.347
take place.
01:01:41.148 --> 01:01:45.530
There is debate about this and you can take it in different ways.
01:01:45.530 --> 01:02:03.333
Some people would argue that this word can mean a whole collection of people, humanity understood as a whole, uh humanity in opposition to God and so this generation is a very broad term.
01:02:03.614 --> 01:02:05.224
But that's not generally how it's used.
01:02:05.224 --> 01:02:19.811
It generally does carry the more restricted sense, as it does in our English translations, of a group of people who share a time span of life, this generation.
01:02:19.931 --> 01:02:36.237
And I think that is the right way to read it, in both places in Mark, in fact in all of its occurrences in Mark, it refers to this generation being Jesus' own generation, the people who are alive when Jesus lived and died and rose.
01:02:36.360 --> 01:02:57.903
And so in Mark 8.38, the way I'd read that is, whoever is ashamed to mean my words in this adulterous and sinful generation, it's a warning to his contemporaries that those who are ashamed of him, who don't recognise and receive him as the Messiah, who's come for their salvation, then they will face his judgment when he comes.
01:02:57.903 --> 01:02:59.784
Of him the Son of Man will be ashamed.
01:02:59.784 --> 01:03:02.976
This shame language is judgment language.
01:03:03.496 --> 01:03:08.677
when he returns in glory as judge, then he will be ashamed of them.
01:03:09.179 --> 01:03:13.739
The fact that he also says, whoever, does broaden it out.
01:03:14.079 --> 01:03:25.382
And so I think as an application, as Christians, we can apply this verse to others in any generation who are ashamed of him in their generation.
01:03:25.804 --> 01:03:35.414
So I think the application of it can be broad, but the specific warning here is to those in Jesus' generation who are rejecting him that he will be ashamed of them when he comes.
01:03:35.414 --> 01:03:56.192
So I don't think that that's any particular problem to the reading that I've suggested we should follow that is speaking about the final judgment in his second coming and it's a warning to those in his own generation that they will face him as their judge when he returns in glory if they're ashamed of him and reject him now.
01:03:56.192 --> 01:04:02.590
So that's the way One test of this is how do the other gospels interpret this saying?
01:04:02.590 --> 01:04:06.931
And in Matthew the parallel, it makes that very explicit.
01:04:06.931 --> 01:04:08.891
Matthew Jesus says, son of Mrs.
01:04:08.891 --> 01:04:19.855
Matthew 16 27, the son of man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his father and then he will repay each person according to what he has done.
01:04:19.855 --> 01:04:22.215
This is a final judgment scene.
01:04:22.896 --> 01:04:23.503
Hmm.
01:04:23.503 --> 01:04:28.125
Son of Man will come and he will repay each person according to what he has done.
01:04:28.144 --> 01:04:41.088
So Matthew certainly interprets Jesus' saying as a reference to his second coming for final judgment and that confirms that we're reading Mark the right way because we're reading it the way that Matthew read it.
01:04:41.088 --> 01:04:53.592
uh If you go to the generation in Mark 13, we can do that as well, that's a little bit, takes a little bit more explanation but do you want to ask anything or clarify anything while we're still in Mark 8?
01:04:53.981 --> 01:05:04.641
Yeah, I think we will come back to the γενεά (genea) in 13 because I think it's interesting and that's...
01:05:04.641 --> 01:05:21.221
But I think that there is another problem that potentially could occur in the close context of Mark 8 is actually chapter 9.1 about when Jesus said that some will see him in his glory.
01:05:21.606 --> 01:05:28.963
So is it the same glory that he's referring to as he just said, would be the natural glory that he's been talking about?
01:05:28.963 --> 01:05:30.824
So what is going on here?
01:05:31.043 --> 01:05:32.784
Yeah, good question.
01:05:32.784 --> 01:05:35.195
So, in Mark, he actually speaks about the Kingdom of God.
01:05:35.195 --> 01:05:45.215
And similarly, in Matthew 16, 27 and 28.
01:05:45.215 --> 01:05:46.934
It's 28, isn't it?
01:05:46.934 --> 01:05:52.434
In Matthew, it has the same import, but it's slightly different language.
01:05:53.014 --> 01:06:01.333
He says, Truly I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.
01:06:03.414 --> 01:06:18.221
So, yes, this seems to be a prophecy that some standing here, some amongst Jesus' will see the fullness of the kingdom, the kingdom of God after it has come with power.
01:06:18.561 --> 01:06:23.103
They'll see him, in fact, coming in his kingdom, according to Matthew.
01:06:23.742 --> 01:06:28.626
and they'll see that before they taste death, they'll see it within their own lifetimes.
01:06:29.067 --> 01:06:30.987
What could this possibly be?
01:06:32.028 --> 01:06:47.139
Well, I think it's telling that the immediate uh context, what happens immediately after this in all three synoptic gospels, in Matthew and Mark and Luke, and we haven't talked about Luke so much but it's the same there, is the transfiguration.
01:06:47.139 --> 01:07:01.976
That after six days Jesus took that within Peter and James and John, Not all of those standing there, but some of those standing there, Peter and James and John, he took them up on a mountain by themselves and he was transfigured before them and they saw him in his glory.
01:07:01.976 --> 01:07:07.744
So what they're seeing in the transfiguration is a preview of Jesus' second coming.
01:07:07.744 --> 01:07:17.242
They're seeing him as he will be when he returns in glory and power to judge and to reign to bring in the fullness of his kingdom.
01:07:17.255 --> 01:07:18.135
Hmm.
01:07:18.146 --> 01:07:21.969
That's been a very common, by no means the only interpretation.
01:07:21.969 --> 01:07:25.530
There are many other possibilities that people have entertained.
01:07:25.530 --> 01:07:28.693
ah They'll see the Kingdom of God.
01:07:28.873 --> 01:07:34.277
Is Jesus talking about, they'll see the Kingdom of God after it has come with power, Mark 9.1.
01:07:34.277 --> 01:07:38.519
Is he talking about they'll see Him, His death on the cross when the Kingdom of God comes?
01:07:38.519 --> 01:07:42.623
Is he talking about His resurrection when they'll see the power of the Kingdom of God?
01:07:42.623 --> 01:07:46.021
Is he talking about His ascension and the outpouring of the Spirit?
01:07:46.021 --> 01:07:48.992
Is he talking about the growth of the church?
01:07:48.992 --> 01:07:53.983
All of those are possibilities that have been entertained and you can make a case for them.
01:07:54.545 --> 01:08:01.427
But for my money the immediate context that goes straight into the transfiguration is decisive.
01:08:01.427 --> 01:08:06.949
That what they see in the transfiguration is a preview of Jesus' final coming in glory.
01:08:07.309 --> 01:08:15.824
And I think Peter interprets it that way, where Peter in his second letter to Peter 1 Hmm.
01:08:15.824 --> 01:08:38.944
says, he refers to this event and he says, 2 Peter 1, 16, we didn't follow cleverly devised myths when we made known to you the power and coming, and there it's parousia, a semi-technical term for his return, the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, we were eyewitnesses of his majesty.
01:08:39.240 --> 01:08:46.823
For when he received glory from God the Father, and the voice was born to him by the majestic glory, this is my beloved Son with whom I'm well pleased.
01:08:46.823 --> 01:08:49.604
Peter's talking about the transfiguration.
01:08:49.604 --> 01:08:53.327
He says we ourselves heard this very voice from heaven on the holy mountain.
01:08:53.327 --> 01:09:01.670
And so we've made known to you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ because we've seen a preview of it in the transfiguration.
01:09:01.670 --> 01:09:05.737
I think that's probably the best way to read Jesus saying in Mark 9.
01:09:05.957 --> 01:09:07.578
yeah, I think so too.
01:09:07.578 --> 01:09:08.560
Yeah.
01:09:09.301 --> 01:09:14.067
And I think in some ways it actually explains what will go happen in the end.
01:09:14.067 --> 01:09:21.632
And to jump to a completely different part of the New Testament, it seems like that's the vision that John gets in the apocalypse.
01:09:21.974 --> 01:09:27.378
So in Revelation, that is to glorify Christ.
01:09:28.497 --> 01:09:29.800
Yeah, absolutely.
01:09:29.800 --> 01:09:31.440
Yeah.
01:09:31.440 --> 01:09:32.811
We could fill that out as well.
01:09:32.811 --> 01:09:37.885
And so there's an excellent recent book by Patrick Schreiner on the transfiguration.
01:09:38.126 --> 01:09:57.480
And he makes what I think is a good point that what they see in the transfiguration is both a manifestation of his eternal glory as the eternal son of the father and a preview of his future glory as the final Adam who will come in power.
01:09:57.905 --> 01:09:59.006
for final judgment.
01:09:59.006 --> 01:10:00.427
It's both of those things at once.
01:10:00.427 --> 01:10:10.332
But in this discussion where we're speaking about Jesus' second coming, I think we're going to emphasise that second element, that they're seeing a preview of His final return in glory.
01:10:10.931 --> 01:10:17.765
And you're right, John also sees a preview of that in Revelation chapter 1, in the glorious Son of Man who appears to him.
01:10:17.819 --> 01:10:19.810
Yes, exactly.
01:10:19.810 --> 01:10:33.524
And maybe going back to Mark, how does the Mark and Motive of the coming of the Son of Man functions across the Gospel and is it kind of is it consistent within the Gospel?
01:10:34.515 --> 01:10:35.755
Yeah, I think it is.
01:10:35.755 --> 01:10:39.640
It functions as a warning and as an encouragement.
01:10:39.640 --> 01:10:50.301
That it's a warning to not be ashamed of him in this adulterous and sinful generation, but rather to repent and believe, to use Jesus' own words from Mark 1, 14 and 15.
01:10:50.301 --> 01:10:53.270
The kingdom of God is at hand, so repent and believe the good news.
01:10:53.270 --> 01:10:56.800
And the good news concerning himself, that Jesus...
01:10:56.800 --> 01:11:01.119
himself is the content of the Good News, his life, his death, his resurrection.
01:11:01.119 --> 01:11:05.819
Repent and believe the Good News that God's Kingdom is coming in and through him.
01:11:06.140 --> 01:11:09.899
So turn away from sin, embrace God's salvation coming in him.
01:11:09.899 --> 01:11:17.060
Don't be ashamed of him, because if you're ashamed of him in this adulterous and sinful generation, then the Son of Man will be ashamed of you.
01:11:17.180 --> 01:11:25.260
It functions in the same way in Mark 13, 26, where it's an encouragement and a warning.
01:11:25.511 --> 01:11:37.251
So in Mark 13, 26, then at the end, they'll see the Son of Man coming in clouds with great power and glory, and he'll send out his angels and gather his elect from the four wings.
01:11:37.690 --> 01:11:47.791
And so that when Jesus applies it, be on guard, verse 33, keep awake, you don't know when the time will come, be ready for his return.
01:11:47.791 --> 01:11:48.610
How?
01:11:48.610 --> 01:11:53.051
By repenting from sin and by embracing him in faith.
01:11:53.051 --> 01:12:00.277
going back to 1.14 and 15, repent and believe the gospel so that you're ready for his return, so that you're ready for the final judgment.
01:12:00.277 --> 01:12:15.284
And if you do, then you'll find yourself among his elect, those whom he will gather from the four winds of the earth and the ends of heaven, you'll be those who are gathered into his presence to enjoy his presence in the end, rather than those who come under his judgment.
01:12:15.889 --> 01:12:20.168
So it's a warning of judgment and encouragement to faith.
01:12:20.288 --> 01:12:26.208
And the same way that the last one in Mark 14.62 functions in the same way, here it's a warning to the high priest.
01:12:26.208 --> 01:12:29.389
The high priest asked, you the Christ, the son of the blessed?
01:12:29.389 --> 01:12:35.208
And Jesus said, I am, and you will see the son of man seated at the right hand of power and coming on the clouds of heaven.
01:12:35.469 --> 01:12:42.069
It's a warning that you will see him coming in judgment, you who have rejected him.
01:12:42.168 --> 01:12:46.088
And so again, it's a warning of judgment and encouragement to faith.
01:12:46.435 --> 01:12:46.752
Yeah.
01:12:46.752 --> 01:12:51.895
yes, I do think it does function consistently in those three references across the gospel.
01:12:52.247 --> 01:12:54.529
Yeah, that's, that's, that's enormously helpful.
01:12:54.529 --> 01:13:02.095
And now we can return to the, the γενεά (genea) in Chapter 13, because now we are here.
01:13:02.475 --> 01:13:03.217
So, R.T.
01:13:03.217 --> 01:13:08.832
France argues here that again, that it refers to heavenly kingdom, but what is it actually going on in text?
01:13:08.832 --> 01:13:11.203
this is that really what the text is saying?
01:13:11.454 --> 01:13:12.784
Yeah, that's a great question.
01:13:12.784 --> 01:13:14.185
This is a difficult passage.
01:13:14.185 --> 01:13:15.787
think we have to recognise that.
01:13:15.787 --> 01:13:19.328
And there have been a range of different interpretations down through history.
01:13:19.328 --> 01:13:21.092
A couple of resources before we get into it.
01:13:21.092 --> 01:13:23.948
I'd point people to William Lane's commentary.
01:13:23.948 --> 01:13:32.275
I think that's a little bit dated now in the NICNT series, but that's, I think, still among the best commentaries on the Gospel of Mark.
01:13:32.275 --> 01:13:36.652
And the reading I'm about to give you, he'll give you more detail on what I'm about to say.
01:13:36.652 --> 01:13:37.136
Yeah, yeah.
01:13:37.136 --> 01:13:43.612
at more popular level, I've actually just put out a series of 12 studies on Jesus' speech on the Mount of Olives with Crossway.
01:13:43.612 --> 01:13:47.975
It's called Jesus' Speech on the Mount of Olives, 12 Bible studies.
01:13:48.095 --> 01:13:53.770
And so if you want to do it at that level in a Bible study group, it's Bible studies with notes.
01:13:53.770 --> 01:13:57.442
Hopefully that's a helpful way in for people into this passage.
01:13:58.103 --> 01:14:03.457
The key is to recognise where the speech starts in Mark chapter 13.
01:14:04.051 --> 01:14:14.688
where Jesus is sitting on the Mount of Olives and the disciples look at the temple and are amazed.
01:14:14.688 --> 01:14:20.440
say, Mark 13, 1, look teacher what wonderful stones, what wonderful buildings.
01:14:20.902 --> 01:14:23.073
And Jesus says, do you see these great buildings?
01:14:23.073 --> 01:14:28.365
There won't be one left here, there won't be left here one stone upon another, they will not be thrown down.
01:14:28.365 --> 01:14:31.926
Jerusalem will be destroyed, the temple will be destroyed.
01:14:32.047 --> 01:14:41.858
And then verse 13.3 as he sat on the Mount of Olives, Peter and James and John and Andrew asked him privately, tell us when will these things be?
01:14:41.858 --> 01:14:47.912
And notice that phrase, πότε ταῦτα ἔσται (pote tauta estai) ταῦτα (tauta) these things.
01:14:47.912 --> 01:14:49.684
When will these things be?
01:14:49.684 --> 01:14:51.395
And then it's emphasised.
01:14:51.395 --> 01:14:56.800
What will be the sign when all these things are about to take place?
01:14:56.819 --> 01:15:01.703
And there it's πάντα ταῦτα all these things, πάντα ταῦτα.
01:15:02.297 --> 01:15:29.724
So when will these things be and what will someone all these things and Mark is there helping us to understand that these things are these things associated with the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple and that's the question the disciples are asking him when will all these things associated with the destruction of Jerusalem and its temple when will they take place and Jesus then launches into the speech and he answers that question but he also gives them more than they bargained for.
01:15:29.773 --> 01:15:30.363
Hmm.
01:15:30.363 --> 01:15:36.065
them when all these things will take place, but he also shows them more of the future.
01:15:36.065 --> 01:15:46.307
Beyond the destruction of Jerusalem and God's judgment on Jerusalem, he points them all the way forward to God's final judgment when the Son of Man will come.
01:15:46.548 --> 01:15:52.750
And so the speech is structured in this A-B-A-B structure.
01:15:52.951 --> 01:15:55.711
Destruction of Jerusalem, then the coming of the Son of Man.
01:15:55.711 --> 01:15:58.721
Destruction of Jerusalem, then the coming of the Son of Man.
01:15:58.768 --> 01:16:09.768
And so verses 5 and following are talking about all these things that will occur leading up to and associated with the destruction of Jerusalem.
01:16:09.847 --> 01:16:16.043
when you see the abomination of desolation standing where he ought not to be… those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.
01:16:16.043 --> 01:16:21.648
Notice how specific that is.
01:16:21.667 --> 01:16:24.547
Let the one who's on the house stop not go down.
01:16:27.024 --> 01:16:27.685
Because great tribulation.
01:16:27.685 --> 01:16:31.306
is coming on Judea, on Jerusalem.
01:16:32.268 --> 01:16:34.310
And that's going to happen in the middle of history.
01:16:34.310 --> 01:16:43.679
Verse 19, in those days there'll be such tribulation as has not been from the beginning of creation that God created until now and never will be.
01:16:43.679 --> 01:16:46.881
There'll be history after that great tribulation.
01:16:47.421 --> 01:16:51.064
So, the destruction of Jerusalem is coming.
01:16:51.064 --> 01:16:52.246
Watch out for that.
01:16:52.246 --> 01:16:54.927
When you see it coming, flee to the mountains.
01:16:54.958 --> 01:16:55.742
Hmm.
01:16:55.771 --> 01:16:57.632
Then in verse 24 we get a new topic.
01:16:57.632 --> 01:17:00.095
So that was all the A-piece, destruction of Jerusalem.
01:17:00.095 --> 01:17:03.096
Now the B-piece.
01:17:03.096 --> 01:17:06.779
24, in those days after that tribulation.
01:17:06.779 --> 01:17:09.681
Oh, now we're speaking about a new period of time.
01:17:09.681 --> 01:17:13.804
Those days after that tribulation and a new event.
01:17:13.804 --> 01:17:23.090
The sun will be darkened, the moon will not give its light, the stars will be falling from heaven, the powers of the heaven will be shaken, and then they'll see the Son of Man coming on the clouds.
01:17:24.091 --> 01:17:25.412
So notice those...
01:17:25.891 --> 01:17:29.934
time markers in those days after that tribulation.
01:17:30.154 --> 01:17:35.195
Notice also the contrite, the move from the second person to the third person.
01:17:35.195 --> 01:17:46.381
Back in verse 13-14, it was when you see the destruction of desolation, the abomination of desolations, when you disciples see destruction coming on Jerusalem.
01:17:46.480 --> 01:17:52.823
When we get to verse 26, it's third person, then they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds.
01:17:52.884 --> 01:17:53.572
Who's they?
01:17:53.572 --> 01:17:54.311
Hmm.
01:17:54.311 --> 01:17:57.634
a different group of people in a different period of time.
01:17:57.795 --> 01:18:00.055
So, destruction's coming on Jerusalem.
01:18:00.577 --> 01:18:06.661
Then, after that, a separate event chronologically distinct the coming of the Son of Man.
01:18:07.341 --> 01:18:11.112
Then, with the lesson for the fig tree, we go back to the A again.
01:18:11.112 --> 01:18:13.185
A, B, A, B.
01:18:13.185 --> 01:18:14.407
So, verse 28.
01:18:14.407 --> 01:18:16.488
From the fig tree, learn this lesson.
01:18:16.488 --> 01:18:20.140
As soon as its branch comes out, you know that the summer is near.
01:18:20.140 --> 01:18:21.492
So, when you see...
01:18:21.510 --> 01:18:24.560
These things taking place.
01:18:25.402 --> 01:18:26.403
what are these things?
01:18:26.403 --> 01:18:28.262
The destruction of Jerusalem.
01:18:28.963 --> 01:18:35.247
Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.
01:18:35.247 --> 01:18:39.628
What are all these things that are going to take place within a generation?
01:18:39.770 --> 01:18:42.942
Well, he's told us what all these things are at the beginning of the speech.
01:18:42.942 --> 01:18:46.432
It's all these things associated with the destruction of Jerusalem.
01:18:46.432 --> 01:18:49.435
All these things will take place within a generation.
01:18:50.175 --> 01:18:51.496
Now back to the B.
01:18:51.515 --> 01:18:55.958
Verse 32, but concerning that day and hour, which day and hour?
01:18:55.958 --> 01:18:59.221
The separate day and hour of the coming of the Son of Man.
01:18:59.221 --> 01:19:04.625
Concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.
01:19:05.185 --> 01:19:08.367
But keep awake, be ready for the coming of the Son of Man.
01:19:08.547 --> 01:19:09.418
So, A.
01:19:09.418 --> 01:19:10.710
Destruction of Jerusalem.
01:19:10.710 --> 01:19:11.119
B.
01:19:11.119 --> 01:19:12.831
The coming of the Son of Man.
01:19:13.011 --> 01:19:13.412
A.
01:19:13.412 --> 01:19:14.091
When?
01:19:14.091 --> 01:19:15.412
Within a generation.
01:19:15.412 --> 01:19:15.893
B.
01:19:15.893 --> 01:19:16.456
When?
01:19:16.456 --> 01:19:17.833
No one knows.
01:19:18.515 --> 01:19:28.462
It's really striking that Jesus knows when Jerusalem will be destroyed within a generation, but he doesn't know the day and the hour of the coming of Son of Man.
01:19:28.603 --> 01:19:33.404
there's this distinction between the two events runs the whole way through.
01:19:33.564 --> 01:19:40.365
And so if you read it like that, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place, verse 30.
01:19:40.365 --> 01:19:46.140
It's referring to the destruction of Jerusalem that did happen within a generation, but it's a...
01:19:46.140 --> 01:19:57.280
chronologically distinct from the coming of the Son of Man, which will occur at a yet future point and at unknown time when He'll come in glory and power.
01:19:58.108 --> 01:20:01.488
Yeah, that's very helpful.
01:20:01.738 --> 01:20:08.418
And yeah, shows that we have to pay close attention to what's going on in the text.
01:20:09.774 --> 01:20:18.034
Yeah, but how does that reading in Mark compared to the parallels in Matthew and Luke?
01:20:18.034 --> 01:20:23.877
So for example, Matthew 24, 23 to 39 and...
01:20:23.886 --> 01:20:26.845
Look 21, 23 to 35.
01:20:27.096 --> 01:20:35.096
Yeah, again, this is a long discussion if we're going to do it properly, because these are all three of them complicated passages.
01:20:35.596 --> 01:20:50.157
But let me just give you the short version, which is I think all three synoptic discourses, Matthew 24 and 25, Mark 13 and Luke 21, they all have the same basic structure.
01:20:50.157 --> 01:20:55.596
They all include Jesus' prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem within a generation.
01:20:55.666 --> 01:21:01.757
they all look beyond that to the final day when the Son of Man will return in power and glory.
01:21:01.978 --> 01:21:12.841
And so, although some of the details are slightly different, the overall outline and structure of the speech is the same in all three Synoptic Gospels.
01:21:14.001 --> 01:21:20.034
And just to pick up a couple of things that Matthew and Luke emphasise that supports this reading.
01:21:20.034 --> 01:21:34.279
In Matthew, There are additional things that Jesus says connected with the coming of the Son of Man that make it clear that he's talking about his second coming in glory.
01:21:34.541 --> 01:21:36.823
The Son of Man, Matthew 24, 30.
01:21:36.823 --> 01:21:46.270
You'll see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory and then he'll send out his angels with a loud trumpet call.
01:21:46.730 --> 01:21:51.425
Now, that's unique in Matthew, it's not in Mark or in Luke, the trumpet call.
01:21:51.863 --> 01:21:58.005
And in the Old Testament, the trumpet call is associated with the coming of God for judgment.
01:21:58.164 --> 01:22:02.747
And so again, this is an indication that we've got God coming in judgment here.
01:22:03.386 --> 01:22:06.488
In the Son of Man coming in judgment.
01:22:06.488 --> 01:22:11.090
It's an eschatological theophany, an end time coming of God.
01:22:11.289 --> 01:22:13.390
And Matthew then has...
01:22:13.390 --> 01:22:17.350
records a whole bunch of Jesus teaching that focuses on that final event.
01:22:17.350 --> 01:22:34.131
When we come across to Matthew 25, the parable of the ten virgins, the parable of the ten talents, the parable of the sheep and the goats, all of those, I think to most readers, make it crystal clear that Jesus is here talking about the final coming.
01:22:34.131 --> 01:22:47.466
Matthew 25, 31, when the Son of Man comes in his glory and all the angels with him, then he'll sit on his glorious throne and before him will be gathered all the nations and he'll separate the people one from another.
01:22:48.046 --> 01:23:01.715
It's hard to see this as anything but final judgment and that confirms for us that the coming of the Son of Man is his final coming, his second coming in glory and power for judgment.
01:23:04.235 --> 01:23:10.971
In Luke, if we touch on that briefly, you get the same same kind of thing going on.
01:23:12.493 --> 01:23:19.756
Luke really helpfully caches out the enigmatic phrase, the abomination of desolation.
01:23:20.016 --> 01:23:32.524
In Mark and in Matthew Jesus says, when you see the abomination that causes desolation, it's a phrase from Daniel, it's a bit cryptic, let the reader understand, we have in Matthew and in Mark.
01:23:32.524 --> 01:23:38.926
uh Luke explains that for his predominantly Gentile readers, Luke 21.20.
01:23:38.926 --> 01:23:41.907
When you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies.
01:23:41.907 --> 01:23:44.386
Okay, that's fairly clear.
01:23:44.386 --> 01:23:46.667
Know that its desolation has come near.
01:23:47.207 --> 01:23:50.046
Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains.
01:23:50.046 --> 01:23:53.407
Ah, okay, he's prophesying the destruction of Jerusalem.
01:23:54.447 --> 01:24:03.567
These are days of vengeance to fulfill all that this is God's judgment on his faithless covenant people, the people of Israel who rejected the Messiah in that generation.
01:24:04.386 --> 01:24:25.318
Verse 23, there will be great distress upon the earth, the ESV has, but it's epitest guess, it could be upon the land, and I think that's right, there will be great distress upon the land, and wrath against this people, toalao tuto, this people, it's judgment coming on Jesus' contemporaries for their rejection of the Messiah.
01:24:25.318 --> 01:24:30.720
They'll fall by the edge of the sword, they'll be led captive among the nations, this is what happened in AD 70.
01:24:30.720 --> 01:24:33.965
Jerusalem will be trampled underfoot by the Gentiles.
01:24:33.965 --> 01:24:40.619
But then, time period opens up until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
01:24:40.619 --> 01:24:43.074
That's Luke 21, 24.
01:24:43.122 --> 01:24:44.141
And then what happens next?
01:24:44.141 --> 01:24:46.463
Well, he speaks about the coming of the Son of Man.
01:24:46.463 --> 01:24:48.255
There'll be sign in sun and moon and stars.
01:24:48.255 --> 01:24:56.390
You know, the coming of the Son of Man and the destruction of Jerusalem are related in that they're both manifestations of God's judgment.
01:24:56.390 --> 01:25:00.234
But one is God's judgment in the first century on Jerusalem.
01:25:00.234 --> 01:25:04.199
The other is God's judgment at the end on all the nations.
01:25:04.440 --> 01:25:16.228
And so Jesus puts them together in this speech because they're both about judgment that is coming, but they're also distinguished chronologically as two different instances of judgment.
01:25:17.248 --> 01:25:21.019
And yeah, there's a lot more we could say there, but that's the big picture.
01:25:21.019 --> 01:25:26.759
yeah, that's very helpful for for now and how to tie these things together in terms of our conversation.
01:25:27.198 --> 01:25:47.899
I just wanted to highlight in a previous episode, so this podcast Tyler Hoogland has argued that when the kingdom of God is investigated outside of the Gospels, in early Christianity before 150 AD, it becomes clear that kingdom of God goes where the king goes.
01:25:48.694 --> 01:25:53.555
and thus when Jesus is not present neither is the kingdom.
01:25:53.654 --> 01:26:00.854
Does that help explain how the gospels are using Daniel 7 in relation to Jesus' return?
01:26:02.466 --> 01:26:08.849
Yes, met Tyler at, was it at Tyndale or was it at another conference?
01:26:08.849 --> 01:26:09.738
Yeah, yeah, excellent.
01:26:09.738 --> 01:26:13.930
Yeah, and I really enjoyed his paper and conversations there.
01:26:13.930 --> 01:26:18.752
I didn't hear this aspect of his argument, so all I've got is what you've just given me then.
01:26:19.811 --> 01:26:22.092
God's kingdom goes where the king goes.
01:26:22.092 --> 01:26:25.514
Yes, I can see that argument.
01:26:26.314 --> 01:26:28.614
I think I'd want to emphasise that...
01:26:29.429 --> 01:26:35.362
At the end of the Gospels, Jesus does ascend to heaven and is seated at the right hand of the Father.
01:26:35.563 --> 01:26:42.606
And so maybe we can say something like the headquarters of God's Kingdom are at the right hand of the Father, where the King goes.
01:26:43.627 --> 01:26:51.993
But Jesus in the Gospels also emphasises that as he goes, he doesn't leave his people alone.
01:26:52.752 --> 01:26:55.668
In the Great Commission that we spoke about earlier.
01:26:55.668 --> 01:26:58.789
Surely I am with you always to the very end of the age.
01:26:58.789 --> 01:27:03.341
How can that be true if he's bodily ascended to the right hand of the Father?
01:27:03.439 --> 01:27:09.943
I think the answer must be that he continues present amongst his people by his spirit.
01:27:10.122 --> 01:27:13.344
And so he is present by his spirit.
01:27:14.444 --> 01:27:21.911
And therefore the Kingdom of God is still manifest on earth uh wherever the Lord is at work by his spirit.
01:27:21.911 --> 01:27:29.954
and especially as he calls people in repentance and faith and gathers them into the church, there we find manifestations of the Kingdom of God on earth.
01:27:30.914 --> 01:27:42.640
So I wouldn't want to say, I don't know Tyler's thesis in any more detail, but I wouldn't want to suggest that the Kingdom of God is absent from our present experience.
01:27:42.640 --> 01:27:46.121
No, those of us who are in Christ are in the Kingdom.
01:27:46.121 --> 01:28:00.451
Yeah, it's a more complicated argument, but I think there's some interesting things in terms of like how Paul uses it, for example, and that he seems to avoid using it about that we should be kingdom ready in a sense.
01:28:00.451 --> 01:28:03.543
That's how Tyler would phrase it.
01:28:03.543 --> 01:28:12.609
And it's not that the kingdom, that God Jesus is not present with us and that is not working, it's that when is the establishment of the kingdom happening?
01:28:13.326 --> 01:28:13.872
Right.
01:28:13.872 --> 01:28:14.534
Yeah.
01:28:14.534 --> 01:28:18.735
that's what he's sort of like, it seems to be the concern of the earliest sources.
01:28:19.216 --> 01:28:27.501
And there seems to be a shift around Constantine, that's what he argues, in how this is emphasized.
01:28:28.181 --> 01:28:37.256
And he also tries to see that you maybe can be hold both together, but he seems to see that the earliest Christians seems to have had a slightly different view.
01:28:38.136 --> 01:28:39.108
Yeah, fascinating.
01:28:39.108 --> 01:28:40.969
I'd love to talk more about that.
01:28:41.489 --> 01:28:51.768
I think just in terms of New Testament, I think we need to say, yes, absolutely, the final manifestation of the kingdom is yet before us.
01:28:51.768 --> 01:28:57.122
It's waiting for the day when the Son of Man will come on the clouds in power and glory.
01:28:57.122 --> 01:28:59.784
Then the kingdom of God will come in all its fullness.
01:28:59.784 --> 01:29:04.448
And Jesus actually speaks about that at the Last Supper.
01:29:04.788 --> 01:29:07.490
This is another place in the Gospels where he does.
01:29:08.042 --> 01:29:38.064
speak about the final kingdom and he's uh surely he says at the last supper i won't eat of the fruit of the vine until i drink it new with you where in the kingdom of God right he's speaking there about the the final kingdom when he will be present with his people that's the fullness of the kingdom uh and yet so yes there is that eschatological end time focus the the kingdom has begun in christ We're not yet in the fullness.
01:29:38.064 --> 01:29:39.605
The fullness is yet to come.
01:29:39.605 --> 01:29:41.828
And we rightly want to emphasize that.
01:29:41.828 --> 01:29:44.208
And we're being called into that kingdom.
01:29:44.643 --> 01:29:56.039
I think we can also say that because the King is at work by his spirit, those of us who are in him, in Christ by faith, and therefore in the Church, are in the kingdom.
01:29:57.220 --> 01:29:59.444
But maybe that's a longer conversation.
01:29:59.444 --> 01:30:10.268
Yeah, I think it might be a longer conversation, especially when you look at some of Paul's language, especially his irony and talking about the Corinthians and I think it's one Corinthians four.
01:30:10.268 --> 01:30:12.269
There are some interesting things there.
01:30:12.791 --> 01:30:13.890
Yeah.
01:30:15.073 --> 01:30:19.322
Yeah, where he's Kingdom in its current form is certainly cruciform.
01:30:19.322 --> 01:30:30.510
The church and the Christian life is characterized by service and suffering and dying and weakness rather than strength and glory and power.
01:30:30.570 --> 01:30:31.371
Yeah.
01:30:31.578 --> 01:30:36.918
and so it would actually maybe be interesting if we heard and Tyler had a conversation about that.
01:30:36.918 --> 01:30:38.283
It be interesting.
01:30:38.462 --> 01:30:54.470
Yeah, but maybe we should instead ask the question, how can each of the listeners who have been listening to or viewed our conversation here today apply what we've been talking about so that every day walk with Christ?
01:30:56.226 --> 01:31:05.912
Yeah, I think the takeaways for me are one, to uh just trust the Lord's promise that He will return.
01:31:06.493 --> 01:31:18.378
That uh this is not merely something that the Apostles promise us, as significant as that is, as the apostolic writings are God's Word to us.
01:31:18.619 --> 01:31:21.320
So that would be enough.
01:31:21.621 --> 01:31:29.542
But in addition, in His kindness, we have Jesus' own words, our Lord's own promise that He will return.
01:31:29.542 --> 01:31:34.024
And that for me adds weight to the promise, strengthens the promise.
01:31:34.024 --> 01:31:43.711
This is a whole Bible promise that God will come and dwell with His people and make everything new and judge sin and death.
01:31:43.931 --> 01:31:47.935
And therefore we have our Lord's own promise that He will come.
01:31:47.935 --> 01:31:49.536
So hold on to that.
01:31:49.536 --> 01:31:54.998
And that ought to warn us, as I've said, to repent of sin, to walk in faith.
01:31:55.171 --> 01:32:01.595
It also ought to comfort us that when he comes, he'll gather all of his elect, as he says, from the four winds.
01:32:01.876 --> 01:32:03.447
Even those who have died will be gathered.
01:32:03.447 --> 01:32:12.442
How will those who have died be gathered in the resurrection as he raises his people to meet him when he comes?
01:32:13.443 --> 01:32:17.765
And so that ought to be both a challenge and a comfort to us.
01:32:17.765 --> 01:32:20.507
And therefore we ought to be always ready for his return.
01:32:20.507 --> 01:32:21.929
Stay awake, he says.
01:32:21.929 --> 01:32:36.139
Don't get bogged down in the in the sins of life in this world, the cares and concerns of life in this world, but keep our eyes focused on the promise of his return and live for that day.
01:32:36.338 --> 01:32:37.958
Live to please him.
01:32:38.179 --> 01:32:40.100
Seek his kingdom first.
01:32:40.539 --> 01:32:49.140
Those are the kinds of applications that come out of uh Trusting and looking forward to Jesus' return as he has promised.
01:32:49.140 --> 01:32:51.336
Yeah, yeah, I think that's beautiful.
01:32:51.336 --> 01:32:53.380
I don't think I can add much more to that.
01:32:53.380 --> 01:32:56.525
I think that's an excellent application.
01:32:56.988 --> 01:32:59.532
Thank you for joining me on the podcast, Murray.
01:33:00.461 --> 01:33:01.686
Pleasure Daniel.
01:33:01.686 --> 01:33:02.899
Enjoy chatting.
01:33:03.127 --> 01:33:07.398
But likewise, and to you guys out there, I'll see you in the next one.
01:33:07.333 --> 01:33:12.868
But before you go, if you enjoyed this podcast and you want more people to see it, please subscribe and leave a like.
01:33:12.868 --> 01:33:15.451
It really helps us create more episodes like this one.
01:33:15.451 --> 01:33:16.440
I really appreciate it.
01:33:16.440 --> 01:33:17.332
Thank you.
01:33:17.332 --> 01:33:19.533
Have a great day and I'll see you in the next one.