WEBVTT
00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:03.600
You're listening to competent project auditors.
00:00:09.759 --> 00:00:11.359
What is competence deployed?
00:00:11.599 --> 00:00:17.280
Healthcare helping private practice and healthcare and the data challenges related to regulation and building private.
00:00:18.079 --> 00:00:27.600
In every episode, we tackle different issues based on healthcare practitioners and entrepreneurs, but we interview a guest who is working on the leading edge of private healthcare building something that matters in their sector or profession.
00:00:27.839 --> 00:00:41.280
My name is Jody Rainsford, and on today's episode I'll be discussing with Christopher Coach Brown and Roger Houston, directors at Our List, about the unique challenges around marketing, promoting a functional medicine practice or healthcare business and some of the issues that arise on a regular basis.
00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:48.880
We discuss what information needs to be provided and available to clients and what claims can be made around treatment and providing evidence to support this.
00:00:49.200 --> 00:00:51.200
So let's get over to the discussion.
00:00:51.520 --> 00:01:04.000
So, what is the burden that is placed on functional medicine practices in terms of how they market and promote their business and their services and attract patients?
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:06.879
Is there specific guidelines?
00:01:07.120 --> 00:01:16.239
Who is the body that effectively polices how businesses promote themselves in this area?
00:01:16.560 --> 00:01:17.040
Yeah.
00:01:17.280 --> 00:01:33.280
I think Jody, it's very much a GMC issue for doctors and really maintain within the GMC guidelines, as we Roger and I often say, the GMC rules by guidelines, which become absolutely rigid when they want them to be.
00:01:33.519 --> 00:01:41.359
So you do have to be very aware of those, particularly for the less well accepted treatments.
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:50.799
So when it's mainstream, it's really about managing patient expectations as to what the treatment is and what the possible outcomes might be.
00:01:50.959 --> 00:02:10.800
I think it's very much you have to not give people the impression of some kind of sort of miracle cure or somehow that it's going to be so much better than what's generally available on the NHS, and you have to be very clear and realistic in what the treatments are and what the expected results might be.
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:26.560
Yeah, so you have a duty that's akin to a fiduciary one in the sense the GMC require that you act in the patient's best interest, and they specifically mention that includes a situation that's contrary to your financial interest.
00:02:26.800 --> 00:02:29.759
So you have a very high duty.
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:36.159
That's they don't call it a fiduciary duty, but in other areas of life that's exactly what it is.
00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:38.319
So, yeah, that's the duty.
00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:40.400
Again, dentistry is very similar.
00:02:40.719 --> 00:02:46.080
So those that are entering the profession having qualified abroad often fall foul of that.
00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:55.919
The idea that you have an obligation to direct patients to the NHS where you know that treatment's available, free at the point of delivery.
00:02:56.479 --> 00:03:07.919
Functional medicine is slightly different on the basis that the whole, if you like, medical ideology of it is that it is not mainstream medicine, it is something that's different.
00:03:08.319 --> 00:03:15.120
It looks at things in a system type way, it doesn't treat in isolation or doesn't treat symptoms, it tries to get to root cause.
00:03:15.599 --> 00:03:36.080
All of that's admirable, but it has to be declared specifically and it has to be referenced in consent that's applicable to the patient's own particular circumstances, and then you get into risks and benefits once you've determined what you need to do and what the cost is because you can't determine whether you've got an overall benefit unless you know the cost and the risks.
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:37.599
Yeah.
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:41.199
And when do when does the marketing become an issue?
00:03:41.439 --> 00:03:51.680
Is this something that becomes an issue uh further down the line when there's a particular issue with a patient, or yeah, when they decide they don't want to pay the bill, Jake.
00:03:53.680 --> 00:03:55.120
It's very much like a contract.
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:57.840
You only worry about the marketing when there's a dispute.
00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:02.159
So it always comes back to you promised me all this and nothing's happened.
00:04:02.479 --> 00:04:07.039
I went to your website, I saw this amazing thing that was going to be better in three weeks.
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:12.479
Turned up to you, paid you all this money, it's three weeks, and I feel worse than ever.
00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:28.399
Yeah, the other pitfall that I'm finding a lot on the complaints and claims side is that there's not a clear understanding with patients about privately funding investigations that may or may that are available elsewhere on the NHS.
00:04:28.560 --> 00:04:31.279
So there's a timing issue with that, possibly.
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:42.079
But again, you know, and there's also a communication issue in that a lot of functional medicine has blood tests, but they do enormously detailed blood tests.
00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:47.759
They look at hundreds of indicators, but blood tests are available on the NHS.
00:04:47.839 --> 00:04:51.680
But the NHS blood tests are far narrower and blunter.
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:57.839
So you can go along to a functional medicine practitioner, they say, Oh, we'll do a blood test.
00:04:57.920 --> 00:05:00.000
You go, the NHS would have done that for free.
00:05:00.079 --> 00:05:03.519
And those blood tests are expensive that are hundreds of pounds.
00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:11.920
So that's where you need to be very clear about why you're doing this private blood test, what the difference is, what the markers are.
00:05:12.079 --> 00:05:21.199
Again, interestingly, one of the big differences between NHS medicine and functional medicine is NHS medicine has very particular thresholds.
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:28.959
So when blood marker you're fine until your blood marker gets to a certain number, and that number is normally a fairly critical number in terms of health.
00:05:29.199 --> 00:05:37.600
So once you drop over, flip through that number, whichever way up or down, then you're sick in NHS terms.
00:05:37.839 --> 00:05:48.480
In functional medicine land, if your number's sort of heading in the wrong direction and in the wrong end of the spectrum, then there's something a bit out, and we need to find out what it is and start to correct it.
00:05:48.639 --> 00:05:57.199
So there's a big difference in mentality, but you can imagine for somebody who's presented a bill for several hundred pounds and says I could get that in the NHS.
00:05:57.519 --> 00:06:17.199
Yeah, so I recently had a case where there was an awful lot of heat and noise uh around the case, and it came down to poor communications, Chris says, on the basis that the plan had been outlined, but running parallel with that and really underpinning that was a whole host of tests which ran into a multiple thousands.
00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:22.079
So a patient was saying, I've gone through all this, you know, and nothing's happened, nothing's new.
00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:27.360
You've prodded and pushed and taken an arm for blood, and for what effect?
00:06:27.600 --> 00:06:29.279
So I liken it to a builder.
00:06:29.360 --> 00:06:36.160
So builder A doesn't give you a detailed schedule of work, just asks you periodically for money that you can't relate to work done.
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:47.040
Builder B takes you through a step-by-step schedule, and you can see where the pricing adds up by way of an interim payment, which who are you going to trust?
00:06:47.759 --> 00:06:50.959
So once that's gone, it's very difficult to get it back.
00:06:51.519 --> 00:07:18.319
So I've had yeah, I would say probably somewhere between 40 to two-thirds, 40 percent to two-thirds of complaints as distinct from claims I deal with are predicated or miscommunication, and it is so often not around scope of works, if you like, want to use that construction term, it's about what people say are non-treatment related costs.
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:29.759
And it's there's also you need to communicate the contingency because people do people form a view, they do the test to test that view.
00:07:30.560 --> 00:07:32.800
It either confirms a view or doesn't.
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.319
In the case it doesn't, then there's something else that they might need to do.
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:39.680
And of course, it's not the NHS, all of these things cost.
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:42.319
So, as Roger says, these things things can ramp up.
00:07:42.399 --> 00:07:46.800
And we were discussing this with we went to see one of our clients a few weeks back, didn't we?
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:54.639
It was exactly that discussion is how do you manage that process with the patient to say, yeah, you've just done one expensive test, and I still don't know what the problem is.
00:07:54.879 --> 00:07:58.959
So I need to do another expensive test to try my next idea.
00:07:59.199 --> 00:08:06.079
And you've you need to be very clear in your communication on that because uh you can imagine people just start to scratch their heads.
00:08:06.399 --> 00:08:18.879
So when it comes to if we're talking about the whole area of kind of marketing and promotion and and bringing patients on board, it seems like there's some distinct stages where you very clearly have to do certain things.
00:08:19.040 --> 00:08:28.959
There's the the the marketing side, the kind of the the things that you put out that communicate on things like social media in terms of your advertising in the way that you actually bring people in.
00:08:29.120 --> 00:08:55.679
But then there's also the other elements that you more closely control, which seem to be the the processes by when someone has shown an interest, that you you're talking about reasonable expectations, you're making all of these things clear, and all of these things are very clearly about getting the processes right and getting that in place to ensure that everything else that falls into place.
00:08:56.559 --> 00:08:58.559
Yeah, I think it's also cultural shift.
00:08:58.720 --> 00:09:02.960
So, quite a lot of our clients, or in fact the majority have come from the NHS.
00:09:04.240 --> 00:09:20.720
They want to do something different, functional medicine is that platform, but they've they've gone through training, they've gone through rotation, they've become senior in what they do, but they've never really, doctors here on the NHS, they don't sit down and talk about money with patients.
00:09:22.080 --> 00:09:28.639
You can't assume that people will equate further investigations with an additional bill.
00:09:28.879 --> 00:09:31.200
Quite a lot of people think you've done the wrong test.
00:09:31.519 --> 00:09:33.759
So why should I pay for you to do the right test?
00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:47.600
And in reality, all you're doing is a scientific investigation from a medical perspective, and it's standard practice, it's standard routine, but it's not something that's dealt with from a financial point of view within the NHS because it just isn't, it's all free at the point of delivery.
00:09:47.679 --> 00:09:51.519
There is a cost, but not to the individual doctor nor the patient.
00:09:51.679 --> 00:09:53.600
So you've got to switch that mindset.
00:09:53.919 --> 00:09:56.720
Think of the builder going through the schedule of works.
00:09:57.759 --> 00:10:03.120
It's a cultural aspect on both sides, there's a cultural aspect in terms of doctor feeling as though I can, yeah, go to the case.
00:10:08.320 --> 00:10:11.360
You think it's of course, but the patient doesn't know that.
00:10:11.919 --> 00:10:13.440
You're assuming too much.
00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:21.120
The marketing's got to start with that setting the groundwork for that.
00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:26.240
But if you like you discussed in any business, any interaction with the business is marketing.
00:10:26.399 --> 00:10:31.440
So all of your interactions with the business have to have that concept in mind.
00:10:31.519 --> 00:10:41.279
Uh, at the end of the day, the you are exploring and to a degree experimenting, and the patient is paying for that, so they need to understand why it's sensible and why it's worth the cost.
00:10:43.279 --> 00:10:55.200
In terms of thinking about the the the front-end marketing, because of the nature of functional medicine, that people who are attracted to it have already have an interest in it.
00:10:55.279 --> 00:11:12.639
You know, they're they're quite knowledgeable, not necessarily deeply knowledgeable about what happens, but knowledgeable because they've heard other claims which might have been in the media, they might have been in circles where they've heard those, and so they come with a certain level of expectation, particularly as functional medicine becomes more mainstream.
00:11:12.799 --> 00:11:20.720
We hear more and more stories in in the media, we hear more stories being shared on social media, and so people are coming to that with a with a level of expectation.
00:11:21.039 --> 00:11:22.879
I would almost say it is the other way around.
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:23.360
Okay.
00:11:23.840 --> 00:11:29.039
So the the what's appearing in the press now is a nice clickbait, big headlines.
00:11:29.200 --> 00:11:33.440
I did these ten things and it cured my cancer, sort of headline.
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:45.120
And so people then read that and expect to be able to do those ten things in it to cure their cancer or whatever it is, or massively reduce their weight without surgery or whatever, whatever it is.
00:11:45.279 --> 00:12:00.080
It's the the headlines are based on big promises for people, quite unhealthy people, and it's based on something that might or might not have worked for somebody without an awful lot of tracking details as to what actually happened and why it worked.
00:12:00.399 --> 00:12:02.320
Remember, this is personalized medicine.
00:12:02.480 --> 00:12:05.840
So what works for person A doesn't necessarily work for person B.
00:12:06.000 --> 00:12:07.440
I think it is more that problem.
00:12:07.519 --> 00:12:09.600
So you need to very much tackle that issue.
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:18.080
You need to tacklise the personalized nature of it, and you might have read some great headlines, but I can't guarantee you that we'll get anything to work for you.
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:20.399
I guess it breaks into two categories.
00:12:20.559 --> 00:12:27.039
One I would say that they come with a tabloid diagnosis, as Chris has described, the other is a Google diagnosis.
00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:36.080
Both need to be uh dealt with particularly on the basis that, as you could say, Chris, it's personal, but you have to determine what it is.
00:12:36.240 --> 00:12:43.759
So I've spoken to lots of people on the complaint side where the opening conversation, the initial consultation is I've looked this up on Google, I have this.
00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:45.039
Can you do this for me?
00:12:45.279 --> 00:12:50.159
Yes, and yeah, that's almost certainly wrong, or partially wrong.
00:12:50.320 --> 00:12:54.720
And then you need to try and that's what that's underpins informed consent.
00:12:54.960 --> 00:12:56.720
So we have to go through this journey.
00:12:56.960 --> 00:13:02.399
Yeah, but you don't it's important to not forget the cost schedule because otherwise you end up in that camp.
00:13:03.120 --> 00:13:05.360
So it's yeah, it's a slightly different slide.
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:20.639
You should argue apart from the finance, it should be the same in the NHS, but it's not so yeah, it's about communication and understanding, and there will be an underlying trust and an expectation that you are the specialist in the room, or they wouldn't be there.
00:13:20.879 --> 00:13:31.039
So you you start on the plus side, the patient relationship and trust is yours to lose, and that's how you lose it in our experience.
00:13:31.759 --> 00:13:42.559
And I think it's also our very strong advice is you know the marketing is great and you want to attract patients, but you also want to have a fairly serious filter as to who you actually want to take on.
00:13:42.799 --> 00:14:00.559
So, our very strong advice to practitioners is be even in the early days, and uh appreciate it's difficult because when you're starting a business, you want revenue and you'll possibly be attracted to things that you wouldn't be once you're more established, but you want to be really quite careful about the patients that you take on.
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:07.120
The person who marches in and says, I read this in the in the mirror last week and I want the same, is not the kind of patient you want.
00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:10.720
That's the difference between marketing and a consultation, isn't it?
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:13.679
Yeah, there's two levels as you say, JD.
00:14:14.000 --> 00:14:14.240
Yeah.
00:14:14.639 --> 00:14:23.600
And I guess we we would also see it so you'd be very careful about using articles in in the press or on Google or or anywhere else for your own marketing.
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:29.759
It's you really have to describe the process and what it is and what the benefits of that process are.
00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:43.759
And again, interestingly, just popped into my head, this is one place where case studies might not be might be a double-edged sword in terms of marketing, because if you say, Oh, I did this for person X, person Y might not be the same.
00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:48.480
So it's you use case studies with care, I would say.
00:14:48.799 --> 00:14:54.080
Yeah, and by definition, to make them relevant, you almost have to breach the patient's confidentiality, don't you?
00:14:54.240 --> 00:14:54.559
Yes.
00:14:54.799 --> 00:15:00.240
And therefore, you need to be very careful about how you get permission from people to use case studies.
00:15:00.720 --> 00:15:07.679
Because if you want it granular enough to make it relevant, that's a re-rehearsal of their notes.
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:14.720
Yeah, and their notes in functional medicine is uh their their family's sort of medical history and minute to the grandparents or something.
00:15:14.799 --> 00:15:16.399
It's you know, it's incredible.
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:21.120
And the take-on forms are 40 pages long with all sorts of very personal questions in them.
00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:22.000
Yeah.
00:15:22.720 --> 00:15:37.919
Have you seen any particular examples of practices or healthcare businesses that that have done this well that managed to balance obviously the need to grow, the need to attract people, need to bring people into this world with just getting it right in terms of how they did it?
00:15:38.000 --> 00:15:47.120
Because what you mentioned there in terms of sharing articles, that was that's been extremely prevalent in terms of people making the case for functional medicine generally.
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:50.559
There's some some advocates for functional medicine generally sharing things like that.
00:15:50.720 --> 00:16:08.000
But are there examples of the kind of approach that you would suggest for say new business who wanted to do the right things, who wanted to stay on the right side in order to make sure that they were going to avoid any of the problems that that people run into?
00:16:08.879 --> 00:16:13.279
Yeah, so I think in my experience, Jody, it's really several levels.
00:16:13.440 --> 00:16:24.320
So the marketing as as you describe it are broad descriptions of categories of suffering, almost putting a sort of label on it.
00:16:24.559 --> 00:16:26.879
Do you have untreated Lyme's disease?
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:31.039
And the key symptoms of Lyme disease are this.
00:16:31.440 --> 00:16:34.879
If you feel that you're getting nowhere, then please call us.
00:16:35.200 --> 00:16:37.200
Then you get into the details of their case.
00:16:37.279 --> 00:16:52.960
So it's striking that balance between trying to be too specific and therefore almost wrong, and therefore misrepresenting what it is you can do for that individual versus the broad swath of people that you think you can help and you know are being poorly served elsewhere.
00:16:53.120 --> 00:16:54.639
That's probably the way to describe it.
00:16:54.720 --> 00:17:01.519
And you can go through what's low dose lockstone used for, what's Lyme's disease, what are the symptoms.
00:17:02.240 --> 00:17:05.599
So it's almost are you lethargic, are you this, are you that?
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:11.039
And do you feel that your current arrangements are not sorting out your long-term problems?
00:17:11.599 --> 00:17:17.440
So you almost bring them in through an acknowledgement that they've got a problem and they don't feel they're being well served.
00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:25.279
That's about as specific, I think, as you can get, because then you need to start detailing, screening people, as Chris said.
00:17:25.359 --> 00:17:29.359
So you don't really want the Daily Mail reader who's looking for a cure when it doesn't exist.
00:17:29.759 --> 00:17:33.119
That doesn't mean you can't do something for them, but it's not what they think it is.
00:17:33.200 --> 00:17:35.200
So again, you've got to be honest with people.
00:17:36.079 --> 00:17:42.000
The best doctor I know of that is is an aesthetic client of ours who is absolutely brutally honest with people.
00:17:42.240 --> 00:17:45.200
Yeah, you know, you are not a basket of fruit, and you're never going to be.
00:17:45.440 --> 00:17:46.480
But I can do this.
00:17:47.599 --> 00:17:49.519
Here are the risks, here are the benefits.
00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:58.319
And so when because the the we've talked about about case studies there and using things like testimonials in order to attract people.
00:17:58.480 --> 00:18:26.000
So when it comes to content like that in terms of marketing, then the best way to stay on the right side would be to avoid claims being made in things like testimonials and case studies, and instead focus on maybe the the quality of the care, the quality of the clinic, the quality of the processes, uh, and avoid anything about oh, I was cured of this simply because of the personalized aspect of it.
00:18:26.319 --> 00:18:31.519
Yeah, because no serious physician, no serious functional medicine doctor ever uses the word cure.
00:18:31.680 --> 00:18:31.839
Yeah.
00:18:32.160 --> 00:18:33.920
And yet it's tabloid fodder.
00:18:34.319 --> 00:18:36.319
Everyone is seeking a cure.
00:18:36.559 --> 00:18:39.039
This idea of perfection, it doesn't exist.
00:18:39.359 --> 00:18:42.880
So you will never hear a medical professional use the word cure.
00:18:44.000 --> 00:18:45.519
And that's no coincidence.
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:56.400
Is there any way that a functional medicine practice can stay on the right side of this and suggest the results that they've got from a particular client?
00:18:56.559 --> 00:18:57.680
Is there any way of doing that?
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:00.880
Yeah, providing it's suitably contextualized and qualified.
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:11.440
The other thing, in terms of medicine, in terms of ethical duty, is by definition you're appealing to a cohort of people who are compromised in some way.
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:17.680
So the the emotional balance is not equal, and that's where the whole misrepresentation thing comes in.
00:19:18.000 --> 00:19:25.119
Now, advertising standards deal with that in some way, medical ethics deal with it in another, but the root cause is the same.
00:19:25.839 --> 00:19:48.880
Yeah, and that was interesting, uh, JD, because uh again at the IPM that we were at recently, there was a lot of talk, and there was a uh a lovely 82, 83-year-old lady who came seaming round to us to tell us all about how she had she'd had her dementia reserve reversed through diet, exercise, and lifestyle, and she thought that was a a small miracle, which in some ways it is.
00:19:49.200 --> 00:19:51.279
For her it was, yes, and so on.
00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:59.039
Now, the reality is that there is a doctor in the states who's created a protocol, and there's actually thousands of people who who that's happen to.
00:19:59.359 --> 00:20:02.160
Uh, so that's great and great news for promoting it.
00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:15.279
But the issue is you don't want to say to anybody we'll cure you a dementia with diet exercise and lifestyle because there's numerous factors which mean that might not happen.
00:20:15.359 --> 00:20:23.359
So it's all presenting it, you need to present it as these are the results that we're getting, but not everybody gets those results.
00:20:23.680 --> 00:20:26.000
Yeah, it's not a cult, that's the other thing.
00:20:26.079 --> 00:20:26.960
Yeah, yeah.
00:20:29.680 --> 00:20:31.519
You're speaking to the man behind cults.
00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:32.960
Yeah, have you not read his book?
00:20:33.119 --> 00:20:34.000
Yeah, yes.
00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:36.400
Have you not read his book, How to Start a Cult?
00:20:37.039 --> 00:20:38.000
Yeah, yeah.
00:20:38.240 --> 00:20:41.359
So this is yeah, this is specifically not that, Joder.
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:59.359
Sorry to say that, but it's but it's it's it's not in the sense that if you define a cult as a following that's irrational, and I'm not suggesting you are for a moment, you can have a medical following based on a whole load of successful outcomes for a variety of people, providing you you know you deal with that.
00:20:59.920 --> 00:21:03.119
Because you're selling, if you like, you're not selling faith, are you?
00:21:03.200 --> 00:21:10.000
You're selling buying into a medical process that has some increasingly some very sophisticated biochemical rigour behind it.
00:21:10.160 --> 00:21:10.799
Yeah.
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:34.559
That that that is the thing, and I do think increasingly that is the way to sell it, is what utterly blows my mind in all of this is the detailed scientific knowledge, and I'm gonna say scientific to differentiate it from medical, because all of these practitioners have an incredible knowledge of the biochemistry circuits and pathways and how those work and how those interact.
00:21:34.640 --> 00:21:44.960
And in fact, I have been I have been talking to a number of practitioners to really understand what that level of knowledge is, and it is much higher than I always anticipated.
00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:49.279
It's it's this might be through a different podcast, actually.
00:21:50.240 --> 00:21:59.759
There's a big difference emerging between clinical, which would be medical practice, and and a sort of scientific biochemistry.
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:04.160
And actually, nutritionists versus dietitians is to me the absolute leading aid.
00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:09.680
So a dietitian is actually an HCPC registered individual.
00:22:09.839 --> 00:22:22.000
So they do have the capacity to diagnose basically nutrition dietary related disease, so obesity, even cancer, diabetes, all those sort of metabolic diseases.
00:22:22.240 --> 00:22:27.759
So if you are a dietitian, you're HCPC registered and you can make those diagnoses.
00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:34.799
If you are a nutritionist, you are not registered with a recognized regulatory body.
00:22:34.960 --> 00:22:42.160
Most nutritional therapists are members of Bent, the British Association of Nutritional Therapists, but that isn't a recognized medical body.
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:45.119
Nutritionist is not so dietitian is a protected title.
00:22:45.200 --> 00:22:48.720
That means that you have to be qualified and registered and so on to use it.
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:53.200
Nutritionist isn't, but the nutritionists do a lot more biochemistry.
00:22:53.359 --> 00:23:04.640
And interesting, when I looked at all our sort of leading clients and practices, all of their ancillary staff, bar one, who did that kind of stuff, were nutritionists.
00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:11.839
And the one dietician who did it called himself a therapeutic nutritionist and was a member of Bent.
00:23:12.559 --> 00:23:18.079
So there seems to be the sort of science clinical divide developing.
00:23:18.160 --> 00:23:24.559
And the clinical end is, and I think this is what functional medicine is trying to get away from, and I've heard in conferences.
00:23:25.200 --> 00:23:33.039
The clinical approach is you have a list of symptoms, which pasty face, diluted pupils, fat around the middle, whatever they are, a whole list of them.
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:40.319
And if you get half more than 65% of the symptoms ticked off, then that's the diagnosis.
00:23:40.559 --> 00:23:44.160
And so it's very much a sort of pattern matching.
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:50.319
You just look at the person, whereas the whole approach of functional medicine is this root cause.
00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:55.519
They test and they test, and they're looking at all the blood and the biomarkers and all sorts of other tests.
00:23:55.599 --> 00:23:59.440
They test saliva, they test stools, they there's they test urine.
00:23:59.839 --> 00:24:03.680
There's more and more tests, which gets back to that expense thing.
00:24:03.759 --> 00:24:08.000
But they would argue we're not guessing on just by looking at somebody and poking them.
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:13.279
We're actually looking at what's happening in these processes that we understand how they affect the body.
00:24:13.519 --> 00:24:15.359
Yeah, and that's the tragedy of it.
00:24:15.519 --> 00:24:22.480
When I get to speak to them, that's a really good story that they ought to be telling and costing and not be ashamed of it.
00:24:22.559 --> 00:24:23.200
That's the other thing.
00:24:23.279 --> 00:24:26.880
NHS doctors are always ashamed to talk about money, they're in business now.
00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:28.079
That's the other point.
00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:34.799
And but by the time they get to me, they've had a series of emails and rude phone calls, and people want to check in the post.
00:24:35.200 --> 00:24:40.400
And they could have avoided all that by some sensible conversation and notation in the notes.
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:43.119
So it's a shame.
00:24:43.359 --> 00:24:46.160
I'm sure we'll get there, and hopefully, podcasts like this.
00:24:46.319 --> 00:24:51.039
Because again, to come back to an old ad is a problem avoided is far better than one overcome.
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:59.519
And they start from this, they have the moral high ground, the ethical high ground, and the trust, and they and it seeps away because they don't explain things to people.
00:24:59.759 --> 00:25:02.079
And they're not intellect, they're not arrogant people.
00:25:02.240 --> 00:25:05.039
It's not oh pat on the head, doctor knows best.
00:25:05.680 --> 00:25:08.799
It's not that they're absolutely not that way.
00:25:09.119 --> 00:25:13.759
But they end up with a whole world of trouble which could have been resolved from a 15-minute conversation.
00:25:13.839 --> 00:25:22.400
So to me, it's almost like a checklist with our people to say this is we're not telling you how to suck eggs, but please cover off these things and don't forget the costs.
00:25:22.720 --> 00:25:27.839
You almost need a schedule running the side by the side of the treatment plan.
00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:33.440
If you've got the treatment plan on the left-hand column of what you're going to do, you want the right-hand column to deal with cost.
00:25:35.200 --> 00:25:49.839
So it so really it's more of the trying to overcome the cultural element around having a discussion around money, and actually say many of the challenges that you see, the issues that come across your desk, could simply be avoided by yeah.
00:25:50.240 --> 00:25:58.480
So, in fact, if a judge talks about competing parties, he puts one side's case on another in the right-hand column, the other side's case, and looks at them.
00:25:58.559 --> 00:26:04.240
That's called a Scott schedule, named after the judge that could first introduced it or dealt with it.
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:08.880
So I think we need the holicity schedule for treatment cost.
00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:13.359
Yeah, the good news of that is that's a relatively simple thing.
00:26:14.720 --> 00:26:21.519
It's not like they don't know it, it's how they present it, which makes it all the more tragic when they don't, then it goes horribly wrong on them.
00:26:22.000 --> 00:26:23.200
And they're giving money back.
00:26:23.359 --> 00:26:27.680
Some of our people in their initial stages work for nothing because they're giving it all back in refunds.
00:26:27.920 --> 00:26:30.880
They're giving back in refunds, or they're doing the follow-ups for free.
00:26:31.039 --> 00:26:31.519
Yeah.
00:26:31.759 --> 00:26:32.160
Yeah.
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:34.240
So it's really funny, isn't it?
00:26:34.319 --> 00:26:35.519
It sounds like a lot of money.
00:26:35.599 --> 00:26:40.720
And this is maybe one for the whole sort of a podcast on the whole the whole nature of the business.
00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:44.720
But it sounds like a lot of money, but what's actually going in is vast.
00:26:45.359 --> 00:26:53.039
So, really, when you work it out, it it literally ends up with the practitioners in their early stages effectively working for free.
00:26:53.200 --> 00:26:56.079
That might take a little bit, but they're effectively working for free.
00:26:56.480 --> 00:26:57.839
That's very NHS, isn't it?
00:26:58.160 --> 00:27:01.200
I'm working for free at the body delivery, but I'm not getting a salary.
00:27:01.440 --> 00:27:02.240
Wonderful.
00:27:04.160 --> 00:27:05.119
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:27:05.279 --> 00:27:12.400
That's a big thing, and and a big thing in managing the business is keep keeping your patients happy whilst not working for free.
00:27:12.480 --> 00:27:38.240
And in fact, to go full circle, I think what we see is they are we we have four or five clients who are very successful practices, you know, they have at least 10 different staff, they have growing revenues, they're everybody's paid, the owners are doing, I wouldn't say they're gonna be the next billionaire, but they're they're making a living out of it and growing it nicely.
00:27:38.480 --> 00:27:49.599
But I think their approach is very much on starting again functional medicine's root causes medicine medicine, and you need to communicate root causes practice.
00:27:49.839 --> 00:27:58.559
That's it's being a proponent of the process rather than the why the process is so much better rather than specific results as some kind of miracle.
00:28:00.400 --> 00:28:02.160
I think sorry, Roger.
00:28:02.880 --> 00:28:04.319
No, no, I agree, absolutely.
00:28:04.480 --> 00:28:05.759
Yeah, yeah.
00:28:06.240 --> 00:28:10.000
Okay, so I think that's a really good place to finish up the discussion.
00:28:10.079 --> 00:28:14.799
I'm sure there's more we can discuss around this as this progresses as well.
00:28:14.960 --> 00:28:18.000
So thank you very much, and I will see you on the next podcast.
00:28:18.319 --> 00:28:18.960
Thanks, Jody.
00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:19.920
Cheers, Jody.
00:28:20.640 --> 00:28:22.960
Thank you for listening to Confidence to Thrive.
00:28:23.119 --> 00:28:31.680
Before you go, please rate, review, and subscribe to Confidence to Thrive on your preferred podcast platform and help us spread our message to others who are making a difference in private healthcare.
00:28:31.839 --> 00:28:36.480
This podcast was brought to you by Our Litity, insurance advisors who support your business ambitions.
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:43.759
Our litity advises practitioners, owners, and entrepreneurs of healthcare practices on mitigating risks so your business can thrive.
00:28:44.079 --> 00:28:50.799
Learn more about how Our Licity can support you by finding the link in the show notes or visiting our licity.co.uk.
00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:03.600
You're listening to competent project auditors.
00:00:09.759 --> 00:00:11.359
What is competence deployed?
00:00:11.599 --> 00:00:17.280
Healthcare helping private practice and healthcare and the data challenges related to regulation and building private.
00:00:18.079 --> 00:00:27.600
In every episode, we tackle different issues based on healthcare practitioners and entrepreneurs, but we interview a guest who is working on the leading edge of private healthcare building something that matters in their sector or profession.
00:00:27.839 --> 00:00:41.280
My name is Jody Rainsford, and on today's episode I'll be discussing with Christopher Coach Brown and Roger Houston, directors at Our List, about the unique challenges around marketing, promoting a functional medicine practice or healthcare business and some of the issues that arise on a regular basis.
00:00:41.439 --> 00:00:48.880
We discuss what information needs to be provided and available to clients and what claims can be made around treatment and providing evidence to support this.
00:00:49.200 --> 00:00:51.200
So let's get over to the discussion.
00:00:51.520 --> 00:01:04.000
So, what is the burden that is placed on functional medicine practices in terms of how they market and promote their business and their services and attract patients?
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:06.879
Is there specific guidelines?
00:01:07.120 --> 00:01:16.239
Who is the body that effectively polices how businesses promote themselves in this area?
00:01:16.560 --> 00:01:17.040
Yeah.
00:01:17.280 --> 00:01:33.280
I think Jody, it's very much a GMC issue for doctors and really maintain within the GMC guidelines, as we Roger and I often say, the GMC rules by guidelines, which become absolutely rigid when they want them to be.
00:01:33.519 --> 00:01:41.359
So you do have to be very aware of those, particularly for the less well accepted treatments.
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:50.799
So when it's mainstream, it's really about managing patient expectations as to what the treatment is and what the possible outcomes might be.
00:01:50.959 --> 00:02:10.800
I think it's very much you have to not give people the impression of some kind of sort of miracle cure or somehow that it's going to be so much better than what's generally available on the NHS, and you have to be very clear and realistic in what the treatments are and what the expected results might be.
00:02:12.240 --> 00:02:26.560
Yeah, so you have a duty that's akin to a fiduciary one in the sense the GMC require that you act in the patient's best interest, and they specifically mention that includes a situation that's contrary to your financial interest.
00:02:26.800 --> 00:02:29.759
So you have a very high duty.
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:36.159
That's they don't call it a fiduciary duty, but in other areas of life that's exactly what it is.
00:02:36.560 --> 00:02:38.319
So, yeah, that's the duty.
00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:40.400
Again, dentistry is very similar.
00:02:40.719 --> 00:02:46.080
So those that are entering the profession having qualified abroad often fall foul of that.
00:02:46.400 --> 00:02:55.919
The idea that you have an obligation to direct patients to the NHS where you know that treatment's available, free at the point of delivery.
00:02:56.479 --> 00:03:07.919
Functional medicine is slightly different on the basis that the whole, if you like, medical ideology of it is that it is not mainstream medicine, it is something that's different.
00:03:08.319 --> 00:03:15.120
It looks at things in a system type way, it doesn't treat in isolation or doesn't treat symptoms, it tries to get to root cause.
00:03:15.599 --> 00:03:36.080
All of that's admirable, but it has to be declared specifically and it has to be referenced in consent that's applicable to the patient's own particular circumstances, and then you get into risks and benefits once you've determined what you need to do and what the cost is because you can't determine whether you've got an overall benefit unless you know the cost and the risks.
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:37.599
Yeah.
00:03:37.919 --> 00:03:41.199
And when do when does the marketing become an issue?
00:03:41.439 --> 00:03:51.680
Is this something that becomes an issue uh further down the line when there's a particular issue with a patient, or yeah, when they decide they don't want to pay the bill, Jake.
00:03:53.680 --> 00:03:55.120
It's very much like a contract.
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:57.840
You only worry about the marketing when there's a dispute.
00:03:58.080 --> 00:04:02.159
So it always comes back to you promised me all this and nothing's happened.
00:04:02.479 --> 00:04:07.039
I went to your website, I saw this amazing thing that was going to be better in three weeks.
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:12.479
Turned up to you, paid you all this money, it's three weeks, and I feel worse than ever.
00:04:13.280 --> 00:04:28.399
Yeah, the other pitfall that I'm finding a lot on the complaints and claims side is that there's not a clear understanding with patients about privately funding investigations that may or may that are available elsewhere on the NHS.
00:04:28.560 --> 00:04:31.279
So there's a timing issue with that, possibly.
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:42.079
But again, you know, and there's also a communication issue in that a lot of functional medicine has blood tests, but they do enormously detailed blood tests.
00:04:42.160 --> 00:04:47.759
They look at hundreds of indicators, but blood tests are available on the NHS.
00:04:47.839 --> 00:04:51.680
But the NHS blood tests are far narrower and blunter.
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:57.839
So you can go along to a functional medicine practitioner, they say, Oh, we'll do a blood test.
00:04:57.920 --> 00:05:00.000
You go, the NHS would have done that for free.
00:05:00.079 --> 00:05:03.519
And those blood tests are expensive that are hundreds of pounds.
00:05:03.839 --> 00:05:11.920
So that's where you need to be very clear about why you're doing this private blood test, what the difference is, what the markers are.
00:05:12.079 --> 00:05:21.199
Again, interestingly, one of the big differences between NHS medicine and functional medicine is NHS medicine has very particular thresholds.
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:28.959
So when blood marker you're fine until your blood marker gets to a certain number, and that number is normally a fairly critical number in terms of health.
00:05:29.199 --> 00:05:37.600
So once you drop over, flip through that number, whichever way up or down, then you're sick in NHS terms.
00:05:37.839 --> 00:05:48.480
In functional medicine land, if your number's sort of heading in the wrong direction and in the wrong end of the spectrum, then there's something a bit out, and we need to find out what it is and start to correct it.
00:05:48.639 --> 00:05:57.199
So there's a big difference in mentality, but you can imagine for somebody who's presented a bill for several hundred pounds and says I could get that in the NHS.
00:05:57.519 --> 00:06:17.199
Yeah, so I recently had a case where there was an awful lot of heat and noise uh around the case, and it came down to poor communications, Chris says, on the basis that the plan had been outlined, but running parallel with that and really underpinning that was a whole host of tests which ran into a multiple thousands.
00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:22.079
So a patient was saying, I've gone through all this, you know, and nothing's happened, nothing's new.
00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:27.360
You've prodded and pushed and taken an arm for blood, and for what effect?
00:06:27.600 --> 00:06:29.279
So I liken it to a builder.
00:06:29.360 --> 00:06:36.160
So builder A doesn't give you a detailed schedule of work, just asks you periodically for money that you can't relate to work done.
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:47.040
Builder B takes you through a step-by-step schedule, and you can see where the pricing adds up by way of an interim payment, which who are you going to trust?
00:06:47.759 --> 00:06:50.959
So once that's gone, it's very difficult to get it back.
00:06:51.519 --> 00:07:18.319
So I've had yeah, I would say probably somewhere between 40 to two-thirds, 40 percent to two-thirds of complaints as distinct from claims I deal with are predicated or miscommunication, and it is so often not around scope of works, if you like, want to use that construction term, it's about what people say are non-treatment related costs.
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:29.759
And it's there's also you need to communicate the contingency because people do people form a view, they do the test to test that view.
00:07:30.560 --> 00:07:32.800
It either confirms a view or doesn't.
00:07:33.120 --> 00:07:36.319
In the case it doesn't, then there's something else that they might need to do.
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:39.680
And of course, it's not the NHS, all of these things cost.
00:07:39.759 --> 00:07:42.319
So, as Roger says, these things things can ramp up.
00:07:42.399 --> 00:07:46.800
And we were discussing this with we went to see one of our clients a few weeks back, didn't we?
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:54.639
It was exactly that discussion is how do you manage that process with the patient to say, yeah, you've just done one expensive test, and I still don't know what the problem is.
00:07:54.879 --> 00:07:58.959
So I need to do another expensive test to try my next idea.
00:07:59.199 --> 00:08:06.079
And you've you need to be very clear in your communication on that because uh you can imagine people just start to scratch their heads.
00:08:06.399 --> 00:08:18.879
So when it comes to if we're talking about the whole area of kind of marketing and promotion and and bringing patients on board, it seems like there's some distinct stages where you very clearly have to do certain things.
00:08:19.040 --> 00:08:28.959
There's the the the marketing side, the kind of the the things that you put out that communicate on things like social media in terms of your advertising in the way that you actually bring people in.
00:08:29.120 --> 00:08:55.679
But then there's also the other elements that you more closely control, which seem to be the the processes by when someone has shown an interest, that you you're talking about reasonable expectations, you're making all of these things clear, and all of these things are very clearly about getting the processes right and getting that in place to ensure that everything else that falls into place.
00:08:56.559 --> 00:08:58.559
Yeah, I think it's also cultural shift.
00:08:58.720 --> 00:09:02.960
So, quite a lot of our clients, or in fact the majority have come from the NHS.
00:09:04.240 --> 00:09:20.720
They want to do something different, functional medicine is that platform, but they've they've gone through training, they've gone through rotation, they've become senior in what they do, but they've never really, doctors here on the NHS, they don't sit down and talk about money with patients.
00:09:22.080 --> 00:09:28.639
You can't assume that people will equate further investigations with an additional bill.
00:09:28.879 --> 00:09:31.200
Quite a lot of people think you've done the wrong test.
00:09:31.519 --> 00:09:33.759
So why should I pay for you to do the right test?
00:09:33.840 --> 00:09:47.600
And in reality, all you're doing is a scientific investigation from a medical perspective, and it's standard practice, it's standard routine, but it's not something that's dealt with from a financial point of view within the NHS because it just isn't, it's all free at the point of delivery.
00:09:47.679 --> 00:09:51.519
There is a cost, but not to the individual doctor nor the patient.
00:09:51.679 --> 00:09:53.600
So you've got to switch that mindset.
00:09:53.919 --> 00:09:56.720
Think of the builder going through the schedule of works.
00:09:57.759 --> 00:10:03.120
It's a cultural aspect on both sides, there's a cultural aspect in terms of doctor feeling as though I can, yeah, go to the case.
00:10:08.320 --> 00:10:11.360
You think it's of course, but the patient doesn't know that.
00:10:11.919 --> 00:10:13.440
You're assuming too much.
00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:21.120
The marketing's got to start with that setting the groundwork for that.
00:10:21.279 --> 00:10:26.240
But if you like you discussed in any business, any interaction with the business is marketing.
00:10:26.399 --> 00:10:31.440
So all of your interactions with the business have to have that concept in mind.
00:10:31.519 --> 00:10:41.279
Uh, at the end of the day, the you are exploring and to a degree experimenting, and the patient is paying for that, so they need to understand why it's sensible and why it's worth the cost.
00:10:43.279 --> 00:10:55.200
In terms of thinking about the the the front-end marketing, because of the nature of functional medicine, that people who are attracted to it have already have an interest in it.
00:10:55.279 --> 00:11:12.639
You know, they're they're quite knowledgeable, not necessarily deeply knowledgeable about what happens, but knowledgeable because they've heard other claims which might have been in the media, they might have been in circles where they've heard those, and so they come with a certain level of expectation, particularly as functional medicine becomes more mainstream.
00:11:12.799 --> 00:11:20.720
We hear more and more stories in in the media, we hear more stories being shared on social media, and so people are coming to that with a with a level of expectation.
00:11:21.039 --> 00:11:22.879
I would almost say it is the other way around.
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:23.360
Okay.
00:11:23.840 --> 00:11:29.039
So the the what's appearing in the press now is a nice clickbait, big headlines.
00:11:29.200 --> 00:11:33.440
I did these ten things and it cured my cancer, sort of headline.
00:11:33.600 --> 00:11:45.120
And so people then read that and expect to be able to do those ten things in it to cure their cancer or whatever it is, or massively reduce their weight without surgery or whatever, whatever it is.
00:11:45.279 --> 00:12:00.080
It's the the headlines are based on big promises for people, quite unhealthy people, and it's based on something that might or might not have worked for somebody without an awful lot of tracking details as to what actually happened and why it worked.
00:12:00.399 --> 00:12:02.320
Remember, this is personalized medicine.
00:12:02.480 --> 00:12:05.840
So what works for person A doesn't necessarily work for person B.
00:12:06.000 --> 00:12:07.440
I think it is more that problem.
00:12:07.519 --> 00:12:09.600
So you need to very much tackle that issue.
00:12:09.679 --> 00:12:18.080
You need to tacklise the personalized nature of it, and you might have read some great headlines, but I can't guarantee you that we'll get anything to work for you.
00:12:18.639 --> 00:12:20.399
I guess it breaks into two categories.
00:12:20.559 --> 00:12:27.039
One I would say that they come with a tabloid diagnosis, as Chris has described, the other is a Google diagnosis.
00:12:27.279 --> 00:12:36.080
Both need to be uh dealt with particularly on the basis that, as you could say, Chris, it's personal, but you have to determine what it is.
00:12:36.240 --> 00:12:43.759
So I've spoken to lots of people on the complaint side where the opening conversation, the initial consultation is I've looked this up on Google, I have this.
00:12:43.919 --> 00:12:45.039
Can you do this for me?
00:12:45.279 --> 00:12:50.159
Yes, and yeah, that's almost certainly wrong, or partially wrong.
00:12:50.320 --> 00:12:54.720
And then you need to try and that's what that's underpins informed consent.
00:12:54.960 --> 00:12:56.720
So we have to go through this journey.
00:12:56.960 --> 00:13:02.399
Yeah, but you don't it's important to not forget the cost schedule because otherwise you end up in that camp.
00:13:03.120 --> 00:13:05.360
So it's yeah, it's a slightly different slide.
00:13:05.600 --> 00:13:20.639
You should argue apart from the finance, it should be the same in the NHS, but it's not so yeah, it's about communication and understanding, and there will be an underlying trust and an expectation that you are the specialist in the room, or they wouldn't be there.
00:13:20.879 --> 00:13:31.039
So you you start on the plus side, the patient relationship and trust is yours to lose, and that's how you lose it in our experience.
00:13:31.759 --> 00:13:42.559
And I think it's also our very strong advice is you know the marketing is great and you want to attract patients, but you also want to have a fairly serious filter as to who you actually want to take on.
00:13:42.799 --> 00:14:00.559
So, our very strong advice to practitioners is be even in the early days, and uh appreciate it's difficult because when you're starting a business, you want revenue and you'll possibly be attracted to things that you wouldn't be once you're more established, but you want to be really quite careful about the patients that you take on.
00:14:00.720 --> 00:14:07.120
The person who marches in and says, I read this in the in the mirror last week and I want the same, is not the kind of patient you want.
00:14:07.360 --> 00:14:10.720
That's the difference between marketing and a consultation, isn't it?
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:13.679
Yeah, there's two levels as you say, JD.
00:14:14.000 --> 00:14:14.240
Yeah.
00:14:14.639 --> 00:14:23.600
And I guess we we would also see it so you'd be very careful about using articles in in the press or on Google or or anywhere else for your own marketing.
00:14:23.759 --> 00:14:29.759
It's you really have to describe the process and what it is and what the benefits of that process are.
00:14:30.000 --> 00:14:43.759
And again, interestingly, just popped into my head, this is one place where case studies might not be might be a double-edged sword in terms of marketing, because if you say, Oh, I did this for person X, person Y might not be the same.
00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:48.480
So it's you use case studies with care, I would say.
00:14:48.799 --> 00:14:54.080
Yeah, and by definition, to make them relevant, you almost have to breach the patient's confidentiality, don't you?
00:14:54.240 --> 00:14:54.559
Yes.
00:14:54.799 --> 00:15:00.240
And therefore, you need to be very careful about how you get permission from people to use case studies.
00:15:00.720 --> 00:15:07.679
Because if you want it granular enough to make it relevant, that's a re-rehearsal of their notes.
00:15:08.000 --> 00:15:14.720
Yeah, and their notes in functional medicine is uh their their family's sort of medical history and minute to the grandparents or something.
00:15:14.799 --> 00:15:16.399
It's you know, it's incredible.
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:21.120
And the take-on forms are 40 pages long with all sorts of very personal questions in them.
00:15:21.440 --> 00:15:22.000
Yeah.
00:15:22.720 --> 00:15:37.919
Have you seen any particular examples of practices or healthcare businesses that that have done this well that managed to balance obviously the need to grow, the need to attract people, need to bring people into this world with just getting it right in terms of how they did it?
00:15:38.000 --> 00:15:47.120
Because what you mentioned there in terms of sharing articles, that was that's been extremely prevalent in terms of people making the case for functional medicine generally.
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:50.559
There's some some advocates for functional medicine generally sharing things like that.
00:15:50.720 --> 00:16:08.000
But are there examples of the kind of approach that you would suggest for say new business who wanted to do the right things, who wanted to stay on the right side in order to make sure that they were going to avoid any of the problems that that people run into?
00:16:08.879 --> 00:16:13.279
Yeah, so I think in my experience, Jody, it's really several levels.
00:16:13.440 --> 00:16:24.320
So the marketing as as you describe it are broad descriptions of categories of suffering, almost putting a sort of label on it.
00:16:24.559 --> 00:16:26.879
Do you have untreated Lyme's disease?
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:31.039
And the key symptoms of Lyme disease are this.
00:16:31.440 --> 00:16:34.879
If you feel that you're getting nowhere, then please call us.
00:16:35.200 --> 00:16:37.200
Then you get into the details of their case.
00:16:37.279 --> 00:16:52.960
So it's striking that balance between trying to be too specific and therefore almost wrong, and therefore misrepresenting what it is you can do for that individual versus the broad swath of people that you think you can help and you know are being poorly served elsewhere.
00:16:53.120 --> 00:16:54.639
That's probably the way to describe it.
00:16:54.720 --> 00:17:01.519
And you can go through what's low dose lockstone used for, what's Lyme's disease, what are the symptoms.
00:17:02.240 --> 00:17:05.599
So it's almost are you lethargic, are you this, are you that?
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:11.039
And do you feel that your current arrangements are not sorting out your long-term problems?
00:17:11.599 --> 00:17:17.440
So you almost bring them in through an acknowledgement that they've got a problem and they don't feel they're being well served.
00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:25.279
That's about as specific, I think, as you can get, because then you need to start detailing, screening people, as Chris said.
00:17:25.359 --> 00:17:29.359
So you don't really want the Daily Mail reader who's looking for a cure when it doesn't exist.
00:17:29.759 --> 00:17:33.119
That doesn't mean you can't do something for them, but it's not what they think it is.
00:17:33.200 --> 00:17:35.200
So again, you've got to be honest with people.
00:17:36.079 --> 00:17:42.000
The best doctor I know of that is is an aesthetic client of ours who is absolutely brutally honest with people.
00:17:42.240 --> 00:17:45.200
Yeah, you know, you are not a basket of fruit, and you're never going to be.
00:17:45.440 --> 00:17:46.480
But I can do this.
00:17:47.599 --> 00:17:49.519
Here are the risks, here are the benefits.
00:17:50.000 --> 00:17:58.319
And so when because the the we've talked about about case studies there and using things like testimonials in order to attract people.
00:17:58.480 --> 00:18:26.000
So when it comes to content like that in terms of marketing, then the best way to stay on the right side would be to avoid claims being made in things like testimonials and case studies, and instead focus on maybe the the quality of the care, the quality of the clinic, the quality of the processes, uh, and avoid anything about oh, I was cured of this simply because of the personalized aspect of it.
00:18:26.319 --> 00:18:31.519
Yeah, because no serious physician, no serious functional medicine doctor ever uses the word cure.
00:18:31.680 --> 00:18:31.839
Yeah.
00:18:32.160 --> 00:18:33.920
And yet it's tabloid fodder.
00:18:34.319 --> 00:18:36.319
Everyone is seeking a cure.
00:18:36.559 --> 00:18:39.039
This idea of perfection, it doesn't exist.
00:18:39.359 --> 00:18:42.880
So you will never hear a medical professional use the word cure.
00:18:44.000 --> 00:18:45.519
And that's no coincidence.
00:18:46.000 --> 00:18:56.400
Is there any way that a functional medicine practice can stay on the right side of this and suggest the results that they've got from a particular client?
00:18:56.559 --> 00:18:57.680
Is there any way of doing that?
00:18:58.000 --> 00:19:00.880
Yeah, providing it's suitably contextualized and qualified.
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:11.440
The other thing, in terms of medicine, in terms of ethical duty, is by definition you're appealing to a cohort of people who are compromised in some way.
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:17.680
So the the emotional balance is not equal, and that's where the whole misrepresentation thing comes in.
00:19:18.000 --> 00:19:25.119
Now, advertising standards deal with that in some way, medical ethics deal with it in another, but the root cause is the same.
00:19:25.839 --> 00:19:48.880
Yeah, and that was interesting, uh, JD, because uh again at the IPM that we were at recently, there was a lot of talk, and there was a uh a lovely 82, 83-year-old lady who came seaming round to us to tell us all about how she had she'd had her dementia reserve reversed through diet, exercise, and lifestyle, and she thought that was a a small miracle, which in some ways it is.
00:19:49.200 --> 00:19:51.279
For her it was, yes, and so on.
00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:59.039
Now, the reality is that there is a doctor in the states who's created a protocol, and there's actually thousands of people who who that's happen to.
00:19:59.359 --> 00:20:02.160
Uh, so that's great and great news for promoting it.
00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:15.279
But the issue is you don't want to say to anybody we'll cure you a dementia with diet exercise and lifestyle because there's numerous factors which mean that might not happen.
00:20:15.359 --> 00:20:23.359
So it's all presenting it, you need to present it as these are the results that we're getting, but not everybody gets those results.
00:20:23.680 --> 00:20:26.000
Yeah, it's not a cult, that's the other thing.
00:20:26.079 --> 00:20:26.960
Yeah, yeah.
00:20:29.680 --> 00:20:31.519
You're speaking to the man behind cults.
00:20:31.599 --> 00:20:32.960
Yeah, have you not read his book?
00:20:33.119 --> 00:20:34.000
Yeah, yes.
00:20:34.400 --> 00:20:36.400
Have you not read his book, How to Start a Cult?
00:20:37.039 --> 00:20:38.000
Yeah, yeah.
00:20:38.240 --> 00:20:41.359
So this is yeah, this is specifically not that, Joder.
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:59.359
Sorry to say that, but it's but it's it's it's not in the sense that if you define a cult as a following that's irrational, and I'm not suggesting you are for a moment, you can have a medical following based on a whole load of successful outcomes for a variety of people, providing you you know you deal with that.
00:20:59.920 --> 00:21:03.119
Because you're selling, if you like, you're not selling faith, are you?
00:21:03.200 --> 00:21:10.000
You're selling buying into a medical process that has some increasingly some very sophisticated biochemical rigour behind it.
00:21:10.160 --> 00:21:10.799
Yeah.
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:34.559
That that that is the thing, and I do think increasingly that is the way to sell it, is what utterly blows my mind in all of this is the detailed scientific knowledge, and I'm gonna say scientific to differentiate it from medical, because all of these practitioners have an incredible knowledge of the biochemistry circuits and pathways and how those work and how those interact.
00:21:34.640 --> 00:21:44.960
And in fact, I have been I have been talking to a number of practitioners to really understand what that level of knowledge is, and it is much higher than I always anticipated.
00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:49.279
It's it's this might be through a different podcast, actually.
00:21:50.240 --> 00:21:59.759
There's a big difference emerging between clinical, which would be medical practice, and and a sort of scientific biochemistry.
00:22:00.079 --> 00:22:04.160
And actually, nutritionists versus dietitians is to me the absolute leading aid.
00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:09.680
So a dietitian is actually an HCPC registered individual.
00:22:09.839 --> 00:22:22.000
So they do have the capacity to diagnose basically nutrition dietary related disease, so obesity, even cancer, diabetes, all those sort of metabolic diseases.
00:22:22.240 --> 00:22:27.759
So if you are a dietitian, you're HCPC registered and you can make those diagnoses.
00:22:28.000 --> 00:22:34.799
If you are a nutritionist, you are not registered with a recognized regulatory body.
00:22:34.960 --> 00:22:42.160
Most nutritional therapists are members of Bent, the British Association of Nutritional Therapists, but that isn't a recognized medical body.
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:45.119
Nutritionist is not so dietitian is a protected title.
00:22:45.200 --> 00:22:48.720
That means that you have to be qualified and registered and so on to use it.
00:22:48.960 --> 00:22:53.200
Nutritionist isn't, but the nutritionists do a lot more biochemistry.
00:22:53.359 --> 00:23:04.640
And interesting, when I looked at all our sort of leading clients and practices, all of their ancillary staff, bar one, who did that kind of stuff, were nutritionists.
00:23:04.799 --> 00:23:11.839
And the one dietician who did it called himself a therapeutic nutritionist and was a member of Bent.
00:23:12.559 --> 00:23:18.079
So there seems to be the sort of science clinical divide developing.
00:23:18.160 --> 00:23:24.559
And the clinical end is, and I think this is what functional medicine is trying to get away from, and I've heard in conferences.
00:23:25.200 --> 00:23:33.039
The clinical approach is you have a list of symptoms, which pasty face, diluted pupils, fat around the middle, whatever they are, a whole list of them.
00:23:33.200 --> 00:23:40.319
And if you get half more than 65% of the symptoms ticked off, then that's the diagnosis.
00:23:40.559 --> 00:23:44.160
And so it's very much a sort of pattern matching.
00:23:44.240 --> 00:23:50.319
You just look at the person, whereas the whole approach of functional medicine is this root cause.
00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:55.519
They test and they test, and they're looking at all the blood and the biomarkers and all sorts of other tests.
00:23:55.599 --> 00:23:59.440
They test saliva, they test stools, they there's they test urine.
00:23:59.839 --> 00:24:03.680
There's more and more tests, which gets back to that expense thing.
00:24:03.759 --> 00:24:08.000
But they would argue we're not guessing on just by looking at somebody and poking them.
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:13.279
We're actually looking at what's happening in these processes that we understand how they affect the body.
00:24:13.519 --> 00:24:15.359
Yeah, and that's the tragedy of it.
00:24:15.519 --> 00:24:22.480
When I get to speak to them, that's a really good story that they ought to be telling and costing and not be ashamed of it.
00:24:22.559 --> 00:24:23.200
That's the other thing.
00:24:23.279 --> 00:24:26.880
NHS doctors are always ashamed to talk about money, they're in business now.
00:24:26.960 --> 00:24:28.079
That's the other point.
00:24:28.880 --> 00:24:34.799
And but by the time they get to me, they've had a series of emails and rude phone calls, and people want to check in the post.
00:24:35.200 --> 00:24:40.400
And they could have avoided all that by some sensible conversation and notation in the notes.
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:43.119
So it's a shame.
00:24:43.359 --> 00:24:46.160
I'm sure we'll get there, and hopefully, podcasts like this.
00:24:46.319 --> 00:24:51.039
Because again, to come back to an old ad is a problem avoided is far better than one overcome.
00:24:51.200 --> 00:24:59.519
And they start from this, they have the moral high ground, the ethical high ground, and the trust, and they and it seeps away because they don't explain things to people.
00:24:59.759 --> 00:25:02.079
And they're not intellect, they're not arrogant people.
00:25:02.240 --> 00:25:05.039
It's not oh pat on the head, doctor knows best.
00:25:05.680 --> 00:25:08.799
It's not that they're absolutely not that way.
00:25:09.119 --> 00:25:13.759
But they end up with a whole world of trouble which could have been resolved from a 15-minute conversation.
00:25:13.839 --> 00:25:22.400
So to me, it's almost like a checklist with our people to say this is we're not telling you how to suck eggs, but please cover off these things and don't forget the costs.
00:25:22.720 --> 00:25:27.839
You almost need a schedule running the side by the side of the treatment plan.
00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:33.440
If you've got the treatment plan on the left-hand column of what you're going to do, you want the right-hand column to deal with cost.
00:25:35.200 --> 00:25:49.839
So it so really it's more of the trying to overcome the cultural element around having a discussion around money, and actually say many of the challenges that you see, the issues that come across your desk, could simply be avoided by yeah.
00:25:50.240 --> 00:25:58.480
So, in fact, if a judge talks about competing parties, he puts one side's case on another in the right-hand column, the other side's case, and looks at them.
00:25:58.559 --> 00:26:04.240
That's called a Scott schedule, named after the judge that could first introduced it or dealt with it.
00:26:04.480 --> 00:26:08.880
So I think we need the holicity schedule for treatment cost.
00:26:10.160 --> 00:26:13.359
Yeah, the good news of that is that's a relatively simple thing.
00:26:14.720 --> 00:26:21.519
It's not like they don't know it, it's how they present it, which makes it all the more tragic when they don't, then it goes horribly wrong on them.
00:26:22.000 --> 00:26:23.200
And they're giving money back.
00:26:23.359 --> 00:26:27.680
Some of our people in their initial stages work for nothing because they're giving it all back in refunds.
00:26:27.920 --> 00:26:30.880
They're giving back in refunds, or they're doing the follow-ups for free.
00:26:31.039 --> 00:26:31.519
Yeah.
00:26:31.759 --> 00:26:32.160
Yeah.
00:26:32.319 --> 00:26:34.240
So it's really funny, isn't it?
00:26:34.319 --> 00:26:35.519
It sounds like a lot of money.
00:26:35.599 --> 00:26:40.720
And this is maybe one for the whole sort of a podcast on the whole the whole nature of the business.
00:26:40.880 --> 00:26:44.720
But it sounds like a lot of money, but what's actually going in is vast.
00:26:45.359 --> 00:26:53.039
So, really, when you work it out, it it literally ends up with the practitioners in their early stages effectively working for free.
00:26:53.200 --> 00:26:56.079
That might take a little bit, but they're effectively working for free.
00:26:56.480 --> 00:26:57.839
That's very NHS, isn't it?
00:26:58.160 --> 00:27:01.200
I'm working for free at the body delivery, but I'm not getting a salary.
00:27:01.440 --> 00:27:02.240
Wonderful.
00:27:04.160 --> 00:27:05.119
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:27:05.279 --> 00:27:12.400
That's a big thing, and and a big thing in managing the business is keep keeping your patients happy whilst not working for free.
00:27:12.480 --> 00:27:38.240
And in fact, to go full circle, I think what we see is they are we we have four or five clients who are very successful practices, you know, they have at least 10 different staff, they have growing revenues, they're everybody's paid, the owners are doing, I wouldn't say they're gonna be the next billionaire, but they're they're making a living out of it and growing it nicely.
00:27:38.480 --> 00:27:49.599
But I think their approach is very much on starting again functional medicine's root causes medicine medicine, and you need to communicate root causes practice.
00:27:49.839 --> 00:27:58.559
That's it's being a proponent of the process rather than the why the process is so much better rather than specific results as some kind of miracle.
00:28:00.400 --> 00:28:02.160
I think sorry, Roger.
00:28:02.880 --> 00:28:04.319
No, no, I agree, absolutely.
00:28:04.480 --> 00:28:05.759
Yeah, yeah.
00:28:06.240 --> 00:28:10.000
Okay, so I think that's a really good place to finish up the discussion.
00:28:10.079 --> 00:28:14.799
I'm sure there's more we can discuss around this as this progresses as well.
00:28:14.960 --> 00:28:18.000
So thank you very much, and I will see you on the next podcast.
00:28:18.319 --> 00:28:18.960
Thanks, Jody.
00:28:19.200 --> 00:28:19.920
Cheers, Jody.
00:28:20.640 --> 00:28:22.960
Thank you for listening to Confidence to Thrive.
00:28:23.119 --> 00:28:31.680
Before you go, please rate, review, and subscribe to Confidence to Thrive on your preferred podcast platform and help us spread our message to others who are making a difference in private healthcare.
00:28:31.839 --> 00:28:36.480
This podcast was brought to you by Our Litity, insurance advisors who support your business ambitions.
00:28:36.720 --> 00:28:43.759
Our litity advises practitioners, owners, and entrepreneurs of healthcare practices on mitigating risks so your business can thrive.
00:28:44.079 --> 00:28:50.799
Learn more about how Our Licity can support you by finding the link in the show notes or visiting our licity.co.uk.
