เกี่ยวกับตอนนี้
The Piltdown man was the most successful artifactual hoax of all time. The relevant skull was a chimeric melange of orangutan and human bone fragments from several individuals “discovered” in England in 1912, and meant to represent a transitional form between apes and humans. Given the intense interest in evolutionary biology, it took almost fifty years to discover the Piltdown fabrication. The study of human evolution was derailed. Adding insult to injury, a further sixty years was required to conclusively demonstrate the identity of the culpable fraudster. If you must look up the identity of this scientific blasphemer, go ahead, but we won’t give his name space here.
Fig 1. The different parts of the Piltdown Man skull Students of fraud and fabrication always combat headwinds. In the winter. Uphill both ways.
The evidentiary standards for such claims of fabrication grow higher yet given the passage of centuries and an unknown creator of the subject of interest. And so we arrive at the Voynich manuscript.
It's a book some 240 pages long, proved by carbon dating techniques to have originated sometime in the 15th century, in the style of the late Italian middle ages. No known author or point of [...]
---
Outline:
(02:14) Background
[... 7 more sections]
---
First published:
October 11th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Adxnsud5siZTRAaT3/not-deciphering-the-voynich-manuscriptraft
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Fig 1. The different parts of the Piltdown Man skull Students of fraud and fabrication always combat headwinds. In the winter. Uphill both ways.
The evidentiary standards for such claims of fabrication grow higher yet given the passage of centuries and an unknown creator of the subject of interest. And so we arrive at the Voynich manuscript.
It's a book some 240 pages long, proved by carbon dating techniques to have originated sometime in the 15th century, in the style of the late Italian middle ages. No known author or point of [...]
---
Outline:
(02:14) Background
[... 7 more sections]
---
First published:
October 11th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Adxnsud5siZTRAaT3/not-deciphering-the-voynich-manuscriptraft
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
ภาษาอังกฤษ
สหรัฐอเมริกา
สำเนาบทสนทนา 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
ตอนอื่นๆ ใน PODCAST นี้
This is an extremely lengthy post by Nick Cammarata.
Author's summary on twitter:
interpretability might be the most important scientific problem in the world right now, as I don't think we can solve alignment if we don't know what we're building. I think I have good news abo…
David Africa & Nick Levine TLDR We ran several persona experiments on Talkie, a 13B model trained only on English text from before 1931. We ran them alongside its modern twin (same architecture, trained on regular data as a control) and Llama-3.1-8B.
Talkie can generalise maliciously. You can…
Epistemic status: I traced one famous anecdote to its printed source and to both coauthors' own accounts of where it came from. Confident it was never a study. No claim either way about whether quantity beats quality in general. AI use: research (tracing the story to the book, to the coauthors…
TL;DR: Increasingly when you interact with frontier models, your prompt doesn't only contain the words on the page, but also a lot of what you've ever publicly written online. This is not intended to be a scary post. And I'm not going to suggest that you self-censor (and honestly, by…
ข้อสงวนสิทธิ์: พอดแคสต์และอาร์ตเวิร์คที่ฝังอยู่ในหน้านี้มาจาก LessWrong ซึ่งเป็นทรัพย์สินของเจ้าของและไม่มีส่วนเกี่ยวข้องหรือรับรองโดย Listen Notes, Inc.