#144 Therapy and Value-based Care Models with Dana Strauss

WEBVTT
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:10.560
It's hard to overstate how important it is for OTs and PTs to understand the new value-based care payment models that are being piloted here in the United States.
00:00:10.720 --> 00:00:19.519
But let's be honest, they are an overwhelming and confusing alphabet soup with names like team, lead, guide, ACO reach.
00:00:19.839 --> 00:00:21.359
And that's just the acronyms.
00:00:21.519 --> 00:00:32.960
For OTs and PTs, understanding these models will be the difference between being embedded in the healthcare team of the future versus falling into obscurity while our patients receive sub-par care.
00:00:33.520 --> 00:00:40.159
Luckily, we have a master at demystifying the complex, Dana Strauss, back on the podcast today.
00:00:40.399 --> 00:00:52.240
You will learn how to analyze value-based care models, how to understand your potential role in them, and lastly, how to move forward your career and your organization.
00:00:52.479 --> 00:00:55.520
You are going to hear a lot of important information today.
00:00:55.600 --> 00:01:03.280
So I encourage you to just take it in and we will have a comprehensive blog post attached to this episode for you to reference later.
00:01:03.439 --> 00:01:04.959
So let's dive in.
00:01:08.400 --> 00:01:11.120
Welcome to the OT Potential Podcast.
00:01:11.280 --> 00:01:19.040
I'm your host, Sarah Lyon, OTRL, and I wanted to let you know that this podcast may qualify as continuing education for you.
00:01:19.280 --> 00:01:23.439
You are probably listening to this podcast on a free podcast platform.
00:01:23.599 --> 00:01:31.280
But to gain CEU credit, you will need to be a member of the OT Potential Club, our OT Continuing Education platform.
00:01:31.519 --> 00:01:34.480
You can go to OTPotential.com to learn more.
00:01:34.799 --> 00:01:36.239
Okay, here we go.
00:01:38.640 --> 00:01:43.359
As I mentioned at the top, joining us today is Dana Strauss, PTDPT.
00:01:43.519 --> 00:01:55.439
Dana took her clinical experience as a doctor of physical therapy and expertise in the healthcare continuum and transitioned her career to value-based care and policy analysis and expertise.
00:01:55.680 --> 00:01:59.519
She believes that the healthcare system can meet everyone's needs better.
00:01:59.760 --> 00:02:10.080
Her passion is moving towards the optimal patient experience and outcomes wherever an individual is on the spectrum of wellness, illness, injury, chronic care, or serious illness.
00:02:10.240 --> 00:02:28.400
Dana is optimistic about payer-provider synergistic relationships, making healthcare better for everyone along the care continuum, and is confident that innovative reimagining of the roles and responsibilities of sites of care can lead to higher value and superior quality for all.
00:02:28.639 --> 00:02:31.840
So without further ado, I will patch Dana into our live studio.
00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:33.840
Dana, welcome to OT Potential.
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:35.039
It's so great to have you.
00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:36.560
Thanks for having me, Sarah.
00:02:36.639 --> 00:02:37.840
I'm so glad to be back.
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:40.159
I am so thankful you are back.
00:02:40.400 --> 00:02:55.759
When we have talked about value-based care on the podcast before, my reaction is like, yes, let's move away from being focused on volume from this fee-for-service hamster wheel that we all live in.
00:02:56.000 --> 00:02:59.840
And can we move to being reimbursed for value?
00:03:00.240 --> 00:03:11.759
But then you start to look at the details and how many different models there are out there, how just frankly confusing the landscape feels.
00:03:12.000 --> 00:03:18.639
And I start to feel like, is the juice worth the squeeze to even learn how to take the next step?
00:03:18.800 --> 00:03:23.520
Like it feels very hard, even though it's something that we want to do.
00:03:23.680 --> 00:03:37.439
So I'm excited today, one, to just like get a primer from you on what is out there and what exists, but also just to hear like candidly from you like, can we do this?
00:03:37.680 --> 00:03:38.879
Is it worth it?
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:40.159
It feels hard.
00:03:40.319 --> 00:03:43.199
Should I just sit at home and watch Netflix instead?
00:03:43.439 --> 00:03:44.800
Or should we do this?
00:03:44.960 --> 00:03:47.840
Um, so that's where we're going today.
00:03:48.080 --> 00:03:51.360
But I just want to start with your story again.
00:03:51.599 --> 00:04:04.479
I know we've talked a little bit about your background in the past, but like you are an example of someone who learned about policy, about payment, and built a career from there.
00:04:04.719 --> 00:04:09.759
Can you just share with us your story and how you got to where you are today?
00:04:10.560 --> 00:04:11.039
Sure.
00:04:11.199 --> 00:04:12.560
Um, thanks, Sarah.
00:04:12.719 --> 00:04:17.279
So uh I will say first that I really followed my curiosity.
00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:22.720
It should sound more complicated than that, a path that was orchestrated, but it really wasn't.
00:04:22.959 --> 00:04:31.279
I uh early on, and I mean 1998, early on, when I first started, what we were doing seemed unsustainable.
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:42.800
And back then, unsustainable is nothing compared to where we are today, with you know, healthcare spending up 9% per year over the past couple of years projected again for this year.
00:04:43.040 --> 00:04:46.959
So, in my mind, there was an inevitable shift that would happen.
00:04:47.199 --> 00:05:01.600
And when the Affordable Care Act came out and the first alternative payment models were announced, I saw this as the direction we had to go and the area that I could develop expertise first as a first mover.
00:05:01.920 --> 00:05:07.279
And, you know, also figure that as a therapist, I would be unique in that approach.
00:05:07.360 --> 00:05:13.680
And even now, there are not a lot of experts in value-based care policy therapy or not.
00:05:13.920 --> 00:05:38.000
So, but I would say, you know, the takeaway is if you believe, as I do, that there is an inevitable move away from fee for service because of its creating massive inflation as part of the results of having a fee for service system, then there are only a few handful of ways that can be solved.
00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:52.800
And given our political system and how we make laws and change laws and update laws and promulgate regulation, the innovation center is a very special, unique place to do that innovative work.
00:05:52.879 --> 00:06:04.959
And it becomes the path towards making pieces of these models and then eventually these models permanent through developing the models and even through Congress adopting models eventually.
00:06:05.360 --> 00:06:13.360
I so relate to starting as a therapist and just having this feeling of like, oh, this isn't sustainable.
00:06:13.519 --> 00:06:18.240
I think part of some of what I am doing is going to get replaced.
00:06:18.399 --> 00:06:21.279
Like at the time I was picturing it being digitized.
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:29.439
As I learn more about therapy, uh, that future makes me uh, I want to say more nervous.
00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:37.279
Like the like the more I get into therapy, the more I appreciate what happens in the one-to-one person interaction.
00:06:37.680 --> 00:06:56.240
So even though I believe something needs to change, it's still hard to think about taking the step of learning about the payment models that are out there that CMS, the um Center for Innovation, is putting out.
00:06:56.319 --> 00:07:04.560
Like they feel far away, they feel obscure, they feel like stuff for people in boardrooms or, like you said, lawmakers.
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:09.519
Like they, it's so hard to relate them to our day-to-day as therapists.
00:07:09.839 --> 00:07:12.319
Um, why do we need to get into those weeds?
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:16.720
Why do we need to care about these faraway things that CMS is doing?
00:07:17.040 --> 00:07:26.000
So, first, I the one thing I would challenge is that this, you know, one-on-one care that we we know is so valuable, we don't have that today.
00:07:26.160 --> 00:07:30.879
That that's not it, is it's the hamster wheel of volume.
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:51.519
And that is the result of there being very few billable codes that really capture the work, the actual work, the interaction, and the eventual output of the therapist patient experience and what those actual visits and um you know are like in any setting, frankly.
00:07:51.839 --> 00:08:01.120
So, you know, healthcare is being tested through these models because the idea is we are we need to change how healthcare is delivered.
00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:09.680
But healthcare is really complicated because it's built around strict statutory and regulatory limitations.
00:08:09.920 --> 00:08:14.560
And so, right, that that means that Congress passed laws.
00:08:14.800 --> 00:08:24.480
Laws are very hard to modify and change, especially for programs that are among the most popular, like Medicare and Medic and Medicaid.
00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:28.959
And so to get Congress to make changes very difficult.
00:08:29.199 --> 00:08:43.279
And the regulatory side also has its limitations because, as let's say, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services puts out regulations, it's only within their ability to work within statute that Congress created.
00:08:43.519 --> 00:09:01.039
So, what CMMI actually has is under section, this is a little technical, but it's 1115A, 1115A of the Social Security Act, Congress granted the Innovation Center the power to waive specific requirements of Medicare and Medicaid.
00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:10.320
And this allows them to test these innovative payment and service delivery models without being restricted to those really rigid laws that are created by Congress.
00:09:10.639 --> 00:09:13.440
And so some things can be waived and some things can't.
00:09:13.600 --> 00:09:20.480
So things that CMMI allows to be waived or allowed to be waived are things like provider reimbursement.
00:09:20.559 --> 00:09:24.879
So how they're paid, how much they're paid, program benefits.
00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:31.519
So things like beneficiary cost sharing to incentivize better health outcomes can be put into models.
00:09:31.679 --> 00:09:33.120
And then scope of services.
00:09:33.279 --> 00:09:37.519
So allowing different types of providers to provide care in different ways.
00:09:37.840 --> 00:09:39.759
And but there's other things that can't be waived.
00:09:39.840 --> 00:09:42.159
So they don't have this limitless authority.
00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:51.840
The boundaries are being pushed, I think, and they could always be questioned by Congress, who has the authority to have oversight over the innovation center.
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:53.759
But there are certain things that they can't do.
00:09:53.840 --> 00:10:01.759
So they can't waive antitrust statutes or fraud and abuse laws unless there's also safe harbor put into place, which sometimes there are.
00:10:01.919 --> 00:10:06.000
They can't waive civil rights laws, and then they have budget guardrails.
00:10:06.080 --> 00:10:14.879
So these models have to either reduce spending while maintaining quality, or they have to improve quality while in without increasing spending.
00:10:15.120 --> 00:10:29.360
And then if they can in uh not, if they don't increase net spending, they can then be further deployed to either make them become a larger model or a mandatory model or eventually a permanent model.
00:10:29.600 --> 00:10:54.480
And that's the direction that we're likely to see models go in the future, either made permanent as they get better and better at the versions of these models, and or they will become blueprints for then Congress to be able to develop uh a change with the expertise that CMMI has used, the policy experts at the Innovation Center, before a new law is put together by Congress.
00:10:54.879 --> 00:11:01.759
I have a big picture question I'm going to get to, but let me just uh restate what you said and ask some clarifying questions.
00:11:02.159 --> 00:11:09.919
So there's this big Center for Medicare and Medicaid, which we're all used to interacting on some level with Medicare.
00:11:10.159 --> 00:11:20.639
And then there's this little branch off of it called the Center, their Center for Innovation, C M M I, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid intervention.
00:11:20.960 --> 00:11:21.360
Innovation.
00:11:21.440 --> 00:11:21.600
Yeah.
00:11:21.840 --> 00:11:22.320
It's a mouthful.
00:11:22.639 --> 00:11:23.039
Innovation.
00:11:23.200 --> 00:11:24.399
Yes, innovation.
00:11:25.039 --> 00:11:29.679
And they get to pilot new models, new payments.
00:11:29.759 --> 00:11:36.240
It's a way to get things, I guess, tested more quickly than what lawmakers can do through Congress.
00:11:36.399 --> 00:11:38.000
So it's a great place.
00:11:38.159 --> 00:11:47.200
If we're going to direct our effort to understanding the future, we can zoom into the Center for Innovation because that's where it's happening.
00:11:47.440 --> 00:11:54.799
Okay, so one of my logistical questions is how many models are they piloting at a time?
00:11:55.039 --> 00:11:57.039
And how long do they pilot something for?
00:11:57.120 --> 00:11:59.759
Is this something that changes with each administration?
00:11:59.919 --> 00:12:03.279
So we should not pay attention because it might change soon.
00:12:03.759 --> 00:12:04.559
How many are there?
00:12:04.720 --> 00:12:07.120
How long are how long do things get tested for?
00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:08.960
So that's a great question.
00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:18.720
The first thing to know is that you don't have the level of partisanship in the innovation center like you do in most other parts of government.
00:12:18.960 --> 00:12:44.399
So when a new administration comes in, if it's, let's say it's the other party and the prior administration is testing certain models, while you may have some tweaking around the edges, or if there's a model that is just started or hasn't started and is really not in the direction that this new administration wants to go in, that could be either shrunk or ended early.
00:12:44.639 --> 00:13:01.600
But for the vast majority of models, the new administration comes in and they may make some updates because they're they're allowed to do that, or they may, if it's a mandatory program, they will put that through the rulemaking cycle, like the transforming episode accountability model.
00:13:02.000 --> 00:13:06.720
They will they put that in the um the inpatient payment system rule, the hospital rule.
00:13:06.879 --> 00:13:10.960
So that goes through comment and then the public can make comments about what they think.
00:13:11.279 --> 00:13:23.600
But overall, and we've seen Abe Sutton and Liz Fowler, the present and the former head of CMMI, they've been on, I'm calling it the stump, but we've hear them speaking in public.
00:13:23.840 --> 00:13:27.840
They just put out an article this week in in New England Journal of Medicine.
00:13:27.919 --> 00:13:48.480
It was an interview, where they're they demonstrate a lot of solidarity that we need to do the kinds of testing that we are, and that there's an acceleration of some of this testing because of AI and technology being able to do some things that are harder to do with only humans.
00:13:48.639 --> 00:13:51.519
And we'll talk about that a little bit more when we get to access.
00:13:51.840 --> 00:13:59.919
Now, I didn't count the total number of models before, but there have been like a total of maybe 50 that have been tested or are presently being tested.
00:14:00.159 --> 00:14:06.799
And I believe there are maybe 12 that have put out and they're not done since this new administration.
00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:11.519
This administration is also testing, which we're not gonna cover, drug models.
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:17.519
So this is the first time we're seeing prescription drug models multiple, the generous model and Medicaid.
00:14:17.600 --> 00:14:24.159
There's the guard and the guide model, more acronym soup, and really not much for us to follow there.
00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:30.159
But suffice it to say, yes, there are models of different kinds, which we're gonna talk about.
00:14:30.480 --> 00:14:37.600
And sometimes there's a lot, too many models to feel like we can wrap our head around them all, but we don't need to.
00:14:37.679 --> 00:14:39.759
And that's part of what we're gonna touch on.
00:14:40.879 --> 00:14:51.039
I already feel a little encouraged because when I think of looking to CMS or like thinking about trying to move our Congress, I'm like, that feels hopeless.
00:14:51.279 --> 00:14:58.240
So it's good to know that I can like zoom in on this Center for Innovation and look at what they're doing.
00:14:58.559 --> 00:15:09.039
But when I think of 50 models and the effort it would take to understand all the things they're doing, that feels overwhelming.
00:15:09.200 --> 00:15:14.960
I know that you've developed a framework for just kind of understanding the different models.
00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:22.639
Could you walk me through how I could just look high-level at different models and understand which ones I might want to dive into?
00:15:23.279 --> 00:15:26.399
Yes, I will absolutely be happy to do that.
00:15:26.639 --> 00:15:39.440
So, the way I would suggest thinking about payment models and how to evaluate payment models is look at the type by who is accountable for the model.
00:15:39.519 --> 00:15:43.279
So, who's holding accountability for the success of the model?
00:15:43.840 --> 00:15:48.960
So the first bucket would be the accountable care organization models.
00:15:49.120 --> 00:15:54.480
Um, we have one that's permanent in statute called the Medicare Shared Savings Program.
00:15:54.639 --> 00:16:06.960
It's permanent, it is updated every year, and it has a large percentage of uh mostly primary care providers participating, but a lot of health systems and hospitals as well.
00:16:07.279 --> 00:16:14.879
And then we have uh there have been, we're on generation four of the advanced accountable care organization.
00:16:15.039 --> 00:16:48.639
So those are models that are taking accountability for a full population of patients, but they are testing more flexibilities and they are allowing for up to 100% financial risk and reward on participants, allowing for a great degree of upside, but also a great risk of downside, which forces this is the key, and you get into more risk and reward, it forces care transformation.
00:16:48.879 --> 00:16:53.360
In other words, you can't make changes in how you provide care around the edges.
00:16:53.600 --> 00:16:55.200
You will not succeed.
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:56.960
You must transform.
00:16:57.519 --> 00:17:06.319
And that means caring about proactive outreach, about preventing hospitalizations, you remove transactional care.
00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:12.160
So then we'll move on to the episodic and condition-specific models.
00:17:12.480 --> 00:17:17.680
So let's first touch on the acute episodes of care, then we'll do condition-specific.
00:17:18.000 --> 00:17:21.680
Acute episodes of care, there's a clinical event.
00:17:21.920 --> 00:17:25.279
So we've tested a bunch of models in this category.
00:17:25.519 --> 00:17:35.599
And that event, then the accountability is held by what we've seen as either the hospital or provider group specific physician groups.
00:17:35.839 --> 00:17:43.599
So we've had the bundle payment for care improvement, this the comprehensive care for joint replacement, uh, those different versions.
00:17:43.839 --> 00:17:53.440
Presently, we have the transforming episode accountability model, the risk and reward is on the hospital and the CJR X model.
00:17:53.759 --> 00:17:57.920
This is the mandatory, no end to the model.
00:17:58.079 --> 00:18:01.519
There's no end in sight, which means it can just be turned into law.
00:18:01.599 --> 00:18:08.640
It has proved it has met the bar over the years when it's been voluntary and when it was tested in small pockets mandatory.
00:18:08.799 --> 00:18:12.720
So this comprehensive care for joint replacement model on the hospital.
00:18:13.119 --> 00:18:19.200
So then, if we move on to the next, then we have models that are around a diagnosis.
00:18:19.440 --> 00:18:28.160
So the accountability in these models, like the guide dementia model or the kidney care choices model, the accountability is held.
00:18:28.319 --> 00:18:39.119
What we've seen so far is by a physician type or a group that's managing a specific condition that's not primary care.
00:18:39.519 --> 00:18:57.359
So, for example, people with end-stage renal disease, they very often are seeing their nephrologist all the time and maybe barely touching base with their PCP because their entire health of, you know, going to dialysis, everything is dependent on managing that ESRD.
00:18:57.759 --> 00:19:00.799
So the kidney model, nephrologists are at risk.
00:19:01.119 --> 00:19:06.160
In the on, there's an oncology model, the oncologists are at risk.
00:19:06.319 --> 00:19:10.960
In the guide model, a dementia team is at risk.
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:13.359
The fourth and final one.
00:19:13.440 --> 00:19:22.000
So these are the only four bucketed types that I think physical and occupational therapists need to really be paying attention to, are the novel models.
00:19:22.240 --> 00:19:25.680
So this is brand new with this administration.
00:19:26.079 --> 00:19:35.440
Novel models are putting accountability on what I'm calling a novel participant with what they've put in as physician oversight.
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:39.920
So, such as a technology tool or a digital health provider.
00:19:40.079 --> 00:19:56.960
So elevating tech to provider status with the oversight of a physician and testing the ability for technology, the word that they're using very often for one of the models' access is testing its ability to be deflationary.
00:19:57.759 --> 00:20:04.319
That means to actually reduce spending despite the growth trend that we're seeing.
00:20:04.559 --> 00:20:07.839
The other thing on the number of years, and then let me stop.
00:20:07.920 --> 00:20:11.200
Um, and the number of years of models has really changed.
00:20:11.359 --> 00:20:16.240
It started with the last administration and we're seeing it now again.
00:20:16.400 --> 00:20:26.079
So the one of the newest ACL models called the long uh long-term enhanced ACO design lead model is a 10-year model.
00:20:26.720 --> 00:20:34.000
The access model, which is the digital health, I'm framing as a digital health model, is a 10-year model as well.
00:20:34.240 --> 00:20:58.720
We are starting to see that because part of the reason is five years may not be enough time to demonstrate that high bar that's needed to make a model permanent or to give if Congress wants to write a bill around it, to give the evidence or to extend the model or test it in a mandatory way, because we just don't have enough evidence yet.
00:20:58.880 --> 00:21:05.039
And part of that, as everyone here knows, healthcare is really hard to change.
00:21:05.279 --> 00:21:14.000
It requires behavior change on the part of clinicians of all kinds, from hospitals to physicians to therapists to anyone participating.
00:21:14.240 --> 00:21:16.000
And we need to give that time.
00:21:16.319 --> 00:21:22.480
Last administration started to realize this the ahead model, don't even worry about it, state-based model.
00:21:22.720 --> 00:21:24.960
We saw that same thing, an eight-year model.
00:21:25.119 --> 00:21:27.440
The guide model was a biden model.
00:21:27.519 --> 00:21:30.160
That's either eight or nine or 10 years, also.
00:21:30.559 --> 00:21:34.559
So we are seeing this move to this 10-year model, and it's meaningful.
00:21:34.720 --> 00:21:36.319
The evaluations are tough.
00:21:36.559 --> 00:21:39.519
They're a difference in difference approach for you researchers out there.
00:21:39.680 --> 00:21:43.119
It's very hard to show that that high bar of success.
00:21:43.279 --> 00:21:44.160
So let me stop.
00:21:44.400 --> 00:21:45.519
Let me stop there.
00:21:46.720 --> 00:21:48.960
I already have a million questions.
00:21:49.599 --> 00:21:55.279
I think one of the things well, I'm hearing multiple things.
00:21:55.519 --> 00:21:59.759
One, it's so helpful to think about this framework for these models.
00:22:00.319 --> 00:22:03.920
Because it's just helping us understand value-based care overall.
00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:16.559
Like, here's the different ways you can conceive of value-based care and how we can look at uh trying to define value and how the payment could work for it.
00:22:16.640 --> 00:22:21.039
So it's just worth understanding it so we can understand value-based care.
00:22:21.279 --> 00:22:26.400
Something that I'm wondering about, which will segue into a question, I promise.
00:22:26.880 --> 00:22:31.279
Do you feel like most healthcare workers understand these models?
00:22:31.440 --> 00:22:35.599
Or because I feel like we probably hear this and we're like, what's going on?
00:22:35.759 --> 00:22:36.960
This is confusing.
00:22:37.359 --> 00:22:38.799
Does everyone else know?
00:22:38.960 --> 00:22:52.400
Or are we in a stage right now where lots of people are trying to wrap their head around this and we're just joining a group of people who are all trying to figure it out what this means for organizations?
00:22:52.880 --> 00:22:54.640
What's your impression there?
00:22:55.039 --> 00:22:58.880
So you have the early adopters and then the early majority.
00:22:59.200 --> 00:23:08.319
I would say for the for the if we look at the totality of clinicians across the country, some are not even in the early adoption stage.
00:23:08.400 --> 00:23:12.880
They haven't moved from, you know, putting their toes in the water.
00:23:13.119 --> 00:23:21.200
That being said, 50% of PCP practices, physician primary care practices are in the shared savings program.
00:23:21.279 --> 00:23:26.240
And another, I don't know, maybe another 10% are in the ACO reach program.
00:23:26.559 --> 00:23:33.200
The sun-setting full risk prime, it's not a primary care program, it's an ACO, a lot of primary care participates.
00:23:33.519 --> 00:23:42.160
So even for those who participate, I keep using primary care as a good example because they have a lot to gain in these models generally.
00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:44.720
And so they're some of the most heavy participants.
00:23:44.960 --> 00:23:50.640
In my experience, a lot of them don't know the details of the models.
00:23:50.880 --> 00:24:02.960
They have, you know, there are there are folks within the organization that have decided to take the innovation center as part of their and the models as part of their strategy.
00:24:03.279 --> 00:24:16.640
And so they establish goals and a budget around participating in these models once they they get analyses by usually data companies, they look for where they have opportunity.
00:24:16.960 --> 00:24:22.240
And then once that's decided by an organization, they'll bring it to the providers.
00:24:22.480 --> 00:24:28.960
Do all, let's say physicians, PCPs, do they all understand how the models work across the board?
00:24:29.119 --> 00:24:29.359
No.
00:24:29.599 --> 00:24:32.720
There are some that are curious and learn about it.
00:24:33.680 --> 00:24:43.039
So that is basically a call to action to the curious among you, know that it is no different for even those that are participating now.
00:24:43.759 --> 00:25:03.440
You know, typically they become interested or end up having to practice differently because it's come from leadership that this is a mandate, that this is part of their strategy, their business plan, and they have devoted a focus to some percentage on this because they understand the potential upside.
00:25:03.680 --> 00:25:20.240
Some of it is, you know, your early adopters truly believe that, and I agree with them, that this is an inevitable and you cannot afford to get left behind, partly because it is complicated and it is a multi-year effort to transform how you deliver care.
00:25:20.640 --> 00:25:22.559
That's really helpful to think about.
00:25:22.799 --> 00:25:38.240
If we can start learning about this now, we're going to be an early adopter in the therapy space, and we'll likely have um physician counterparts who are looking for therapists to talk to about this.
00:25:38.640 --> 00:25:45.599
The next thing I want to ask is just like quick wins for how we can be that early adopter.
00:25:45.759 --> 00:25:50.720
Like, what would you do, or what do you recommend to the curious of how we learn more?
00:25:50.880 --> 00:25:57.279
We're going to go into the depths into the models in a little bit, but I wanted to give us some quick wins midway through.
00:25:57.519 --> 00:26:00.079
I do want to add in some questions for the comments.
00:26:00.240 --> 00:26:07.359
I had a uh one of the questions was can we just like look up who's participating in these models?
00:26:07.599 --> 00:26:13.599
How do we know if my practice is eligible for one of these models?
00:26:14.160 --> 00:26:19.839
And can small practices be involved in these models or just large systems?
00:26:20.079 --> 00:26:24.319
Um, yeah, what are our quick wins uh for midway through this podcast?
00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:25.920
What can we do to feel good about ourselves?
00:26:26.000 --> 00:26:29.440
Like we're making progress in understanding this giant frontier.
00:26:29.759 --> 00:26:41.920
I I can first just answer that for any of the CMS models, the so the Center for CMMI is embedded in inside CMS for all intents and purposes, although they have their own budget.
00:26:42.160 --> 00:26:50.880
Those models post the participants every year as they some sometimes you have participants leave or added, depending on the model.
00:26:51.039 --> 00:26:53.599
So every year you can look up the participants.
00:26:53.759 --> 00:26:58.240
Now, there are some, you have to do a little digging to get really specific.
00:26:58.400 --> 00:27:11.759
So you will see when you look up, you know, if you go on that Medicare shared savings program landing page, you can navigate to the um the participant page and you can download the Excel spreadsheet and you can just look at the list.
00:27:11.920 --> 00:27:15.759
It'll tell you certain things about that participant.
00:27:15.920 --> 00:27:25.039
So things like how many years have they been participating, how many contracts in a row have they signed, what was their shared savings the last time or last year.
00:27:25.200 --> 00:27:26.880
They give you a lot of information.
00:27:27.039 --> 00:27:30.880
What they don't give you directly is who are the participants.
00:27:30.960 --> 00:27:35.920
So let's say the ACO is called XYZ ACO in Omaha, Nebraska.
00:27:36.240 --> 00:27:44.799
You will have to then do a little research, a little desktop research to figure out what is the composition of that accountable care organization.
00:27:45.039 --> 00:27:46.400
Some are very small.
00:27:46.559 --> 00:27:49.119
You need a minimum of 5,000 beneficiaries.
00:27:49.279 --> 00:27:51.359
That could be one physician practice.
00:27:51.519 --> 00:27:54.640
Um, it could be multiple, it could be a health system, right?
00:27:54.799 --> 00:28:00.880
And it you could have huge ACOs with full health systems and all the practices involved.
00:28:01.119 --> 00:28:02.960
So you do a little bit of that research.
00:28:03.119 --> 00:28:05.200
Same with the innovation center models.
00:28:05.279 --> 00:28:13.279
It depends how closely they name it to the name of the actual like uh provider themselves, makes it easier.
00:28:13.440 --> 00:28:14.880
Um, so go ahead.
00:28:15.039 --> 00:28:18.720
Let me stop and a follow-up to that, or should I go into yeah?
00:28:18.799 --> 00:28:19.359
No, that's great.
00:28:19.440 --> 00:28:19.599
Yeah.
00:28:19.680 --> 00:28:22.000
So you can look, you can just look them up.
00:28:22.079 --> 00:28:24.160
I think lots of them even have like maps.
00:28:24.240 --> 00:28:27.680
Like once you get to the place, it is pretty accessible.
00:28:27.759 --> 00:28:32.160
It just takes a little work to look up who's participating in what model.
00:28:32.319 --> 00:28:33.359
So I can do that.
00:28:33.519 --> 00:28:38.559
I can dial in on specific models, I can look up who's participating around me.
00:28:39.119 --> 00:28:44.160
What are some other quick wins I can do just to learn more and stay informed?
00:28:44.799 --> 00:28:52.880
So the the first, if you're just going to choose a couple of you know, quick wins that you can keep up with.
00:28:53.200 --> 00:28:58.640
The the primary source is going to be where the information is first deployed.
00:28:58.799 --> 00:29:06.000
So when I was first starting this, I wanted to, because I try to be an overachiever, I wanted to be the first to know about things, right?
00:29:06.160 --> 00:29:11.039
So that I could report back, analyze what I thought the opportunity was in a model.
00:29:11.200 --> 00:29:14.880
The only way to do that is to sign up for the listserv.
00:29:15.039 --> 00:29:23.839
So you go on the CMS Innovation Center website, you sign up for their general listserv, which will give you new announcements, for example.
00:29:23.920 --> 00:29:28.400
So if a new model comes out, you can't yet sign up for that new model.
00:29:28.480 --> 00:29:31.759
You, the innovation center is going to send out an announcement.
00:29:32.000 --> 00:29:41.440
They will also send things like an evaluation of model performance for a model that you're following or that you know you may be participating in or you're interested in.
00:29:41.519 --> 00:29:46.720
And you can start to get a feel for how what success looks like in models.
00:29:46.880 --> 00:29:52.559
And they honestly do a great job of making simple fact sheets, a visual.
00:29:52.640 --> 00:29:56.799
So even if you're a beginner in reading this stuff, they appreciate that.
00:29:56.880 --> 00:29:59.599
And I think they've gotten better and better over the years.
00:29:59.759 --> 00:30:11.039
So the CMS Innovation Center listserv, there's also, you know, things like the Innovation Insights dashboard, which you you can look up and if you wanted to check that out.
00:30:11.200 --> 00:30:17.680
And then CMS also does open door forums, which you would be made aware of if you're signing up to the listserves.
00:30:17.920 --> 00:30:28.079
I would also definitely suggest the Medicare Shared Savings Program, the biggest ACO by far, is a CMS program, not Innovation Center.
00:30:28.240 --> 00:30:36.880
So you want to go specifically to sign up for updates on MSSP, which is part of the physician fee schedule rule.
00:30:37.119 --> 00:30:40.079
I'll make one quick side note and go right back.
00:30:40.240 --> 00:30:44.640
I want everyone to hear this because it's super important in fee for service.
00:30:45.200 --> 00:30:56.720
The Abe Sutton, the director of the innovation center, keeps reminding the public that he is putting value-based care and fee for service through the advanced primary care management codes.
00:30:56.960 --> 00:31:09.200
This is a bundle of codes that rather than tracking minutes on things like care management and RPM and similar types of codes, you can just bill the once-a-month fee, right?
00:31:09.359 --> 00:31:13.039
So there's a specific code for each of the different bundles.
00:31:13.279 --> 00:31:19.680
And they keep adding to these bundles since they were started by, oh, by the way, the Biden administration.
00:31:19.839 --> 00:31:24.000
So this administration under Abe Sutton has been adding.
00:31:24.160 --> 00:31:35.119
And I suspect, don't know, I'm just taking a wild guess, that when we see the physician fee schedule come out, we're going to see the APCM codes be be added to made bigger.
00:31:35.359 --> 00:31:50.559
They want, they want practices providers to get experience in delivering a bucket of services without thinking about the volume that of minutes or units that they're documenting and seeing how that plays out over time.
00:31:50.799 --> 00:31:51.759
So getting Dak.
00:31:52.000 --> 00:31:53.599
So that's MSSP.
00:31:53.759 --> 00:32:03.279
And then I, if it was choosing one other place for you to subscribe, it would be Health Affairs, Forefront, and Health Affairs Insider.
00:32:03.440 --> 00:32:05.759
If you only want one, start with Forefront.
00:32:05.839 --> 00:32:16.240
They give very deep dive commentary, often even by policymakers that are in right now are going to publish through Health Affairs.
00:32:16.319 --> 00:32:18.000
It is that highly regarded.
00:32:18.160 --> 00:32:26.000
Um, they do, they do an amazing job, and researchers and others publish to Health Affairs to get messages and commentary out there.
00:32:26.400 --> 00:32:31.519
There's a host of other, you know, to Kaiser Family Foundation would be the other.
00:32:31.759 --> 00:32:33.920
Again, both of these nonpartisan.
00:32:34.079 --> 00:32:38.000
This is just giving information and summaries and some deep dives.
00:32:38.480 --> 00:32:56.799
And then the one other bucket, there's value-based care coalitions, if you're really interested in this, Accountable for Health, the National Association of ACOs, healthcare transformation task force, large coalitions of very varying different types of providers.
00:32:56.880 --> 00:33:05.920
And when I say providers, I use that term to mean it could be hospital, it could be home health, it could be physician practice, it could be occupational therapists.
00:33:06.079 --> 00:33:13.200
It is those who are on the journey and want to advocate for good policy around value-based care.
00:33:13.359 --> 00:33:16.079
They come together as a multidisciplinary team.
00:33:16.240 --> 00:33:22.079
And boy, do we need more therapy groups participating in these, in these types of organizations.
00:33:22.480 --> 00:33:34.240
And then, of course, APTA, AOTA, the updates that they put out might not be as in-depth or as comprehensive as you're going to get in other venues, but it's a good place to start for sure.
00:33:35.440 --> 00:33:42.880
I can totally attest to the value of signing up for these listservs.
00:33:42.960 --> 00:33:46.319
Like I hope everyone gets on CMM, CMS.
00:33:46.799 --> 00:34:07.359
You sign up for their mailing list, and there's then there's like 50 things you can follow, and you click CMMI, and you start getting like weekly emails, and you feel like the biggest insider because some of them just feel like personal emails from uh some of the leaders, and then you get nice reports and you really start to learn the language.
00:34:07.519 --> 00:34:14.880
I truly think that is like the lowest hanging fruit for all of us is just to be uh on a listserv, which we can all do that.
00:34:15.039 --> 00:34:16.559
It's very satisfying.
00:34:16.719 --> 00:34:18.000
You feel like you're in the club.
00:34:18.159 --> 00:34:21.440
So I hope everyone takes that action step.
00:34:21.679 --> 00:34:34.400
I want to circle back to this general framework and kind of the buckets of the models and talk through them just a little bit more, and then we'll circle back to more action steps for people.
00:34:34.880 --> 00:34:38.079
Um, but I want to start us start with ACOs.
00:34:38.159 --> 00:34:42.159
I think that's probably the most familiar term for people.
00:34:42.960 --> 00:34:58.800
I think give me again just a primer on an ACO and what the value of therapy might be in that model, what our pitch might be to an ACO.
00:34:59.599 --> 00:35:27.039
So an accountable care organization is a group of healthcare professionals that come together, they create an organization, the the accountable care organization, and they decide together that they are going to commit to taking steps to improve quality, and that is defined different ways, and reduce total cost of care.
00:35:27.199 --> 00:35:32.400
And I what I want to dive just a bit into is what is total cost of care?
00:35:32.559 --> 00:35:37.920
Because that term is used so easily as if everybody just understands what it is.
00:35:38.639 --> 00:35:53.039
Total cost of care means all of when it comes to Medicare, traditional Medicare, all parts A and B spending that an individual has over the course of a year.
00:35:53.440 --> 00:36:25.920
So in the case of a very complex patient, if you think about right, someone has COPD and heart failure, diabetes, your most complex patients oftentimes are what the ACO may do some focusing on because they want to try to get their help them get their conditions under control to prevent hospitalizations and that whole inpatient suite of time that is very costly and often leads to repeat cycles of that, right?
00:36:26.159 --> 00:36:34.719
So the other thing accountable care organizations, so these groups of providers will do is upstream outreach on the preventive side.
00:36:34.880 --> 00:36:50.079
So they will make sure, and it's part of the quality metrics, they will make sure that all of the members, those patients that are part of their practice, they're all getting their whatever the recommended schedule is for their preventive testing.
00:36:50.239 --> 00:36:56.159
So things like breast cancer screening and colon cancer screening, and they're getting their immunizations.
00:36:56.639 --> 00:37:07.119
They part of the quality measures in the Medicare program in ACOs are really around did you make sure this got done, which is a process measure.
00:37:07.280 --> 00:37:18.480
Um, and then they'll also look at, depending on the model, things that should improve in quality because you did some of these proactive quality things.
00:37:18.719 --> 00:37:20.719
So you kind of have this barbell approach.
00:37:20.880 --> 00:37:32.000
Accountable care organizations will work on the upstream, the outreach, making sure the those who have maybe some rising risk are getting in to see their providers.
00:37:32.159 --> 00:37:41.920
And then you have management of the most complex, the ones who use the most, you know, the 80-20 rule, 20% of patients use 80% of the resources.
00:37:42.159 --> 00:37:50.320
So if you are trying to manage total spend, you have to concentrate on some of the more frail and complex beneficiaries.
00:37:51.199 --> 00:38:08.079
The where we'll go more into this later, but where therapists can play a role is, you know, therapists' skill set and expertise is not well captured in most of the participants in accountable care organizations.
00:38:08.320 --> 00:38:26.239
So while they may focus on chronic care management of diseases, they don't have a lot of levers to pull to try to manage things like the ability to remain independent at home and the type of functional impairments that lead to decompensation and hospitalizations.
00:38:26.719 --> 00:38:31.119
They don't do a lot around musculoskeletal condition management.
00:38:31.360 --> 00:38:38.400
And what happens is those patients end up in specialty care and in advanced testing.
00:38:38.559 --> 00:39:18.000
So the value that therapists can bring is we are the more conservative and highly evidenced types of clinicians that can partner with these practices and these systems that are participating and help avoid some of that to use the word again, avoidable, some of that avoidable utilization by medical specialists and help to prevent the high cost acute conditions and our ability to build that therapeutic alliance with patients to help engage them in managing their care and improving their function.
00:39:18.239 --> 00:39:31.760
These are the values that um the value that therapists can bring that right now, I have not seen a whole lot of that of therapy groups participating directly in accountable care organizations.
00:39:34.880 --> 00:39:40.079
So uh I want to move on to the others too, but I want to linger on this one.
00:39:40.400 --> 00:39:54.400
So would this look like I'm in a hospital setting, my hospital is part of an accountable care organization as a therapy department, knowing that they're a part of an ACO.
00:39:54.880 --> 00:40:08.480
We now have new levers to go to leadership and talk about things like, oh, we would love to get more physician referrals earlier for back pain, for sleep.
00:40:08.719 --> 00:40:12.159
In the past, honestly, those conversations were hard because of the hospitals.
00:40:12.400 --> 00:40:15.679
Like, we make more money when they go to our surgery department.
00:40:15.920 --> 00:40:19.280
Like they are we're not listening to therapists.
00:40:19.440 --> 00:40:29.519
Uh, we did not have like a voice, but being in this ACO, if we understand it, means that you're more likely to be listened to.
00:40:29.679 --> 00:40:30.880
Is that true?
00:40:31.199 --> 00:40:32.960
It is with a caveat.
00:40:33.440 --> 00:40:40.639
And you're just gonna get the realistic perspective from someone who's done this on the ground and then has been working on this ever since.
00:40:41.440 --> 00:40:58.480
The level of engagement of the hospital and the health system is going to depend on how well integrated they are with the ACO and how much of their whole health systems business is dependent on the value-based care portion.
00:40:59.039 --> 00:41:18.159
So, where there are levers to pull in the hospital that are not going to directly impact the fee for service side of the hospital in an obvious way, that's where we have the ease, and it's important to know that because it's reality of business.
00:41:18.320 --> 00:41:26.960
That's where you have the chance to step up and kind of learn these levers and approach leadership with these opportunities.
00:41:27.119 --> 00:41:29.199
So you made some great call-outs.
00:41:29.360 --> 00:41:58.079
Things like under getting more in-depth with patients about the amount of help they have at home that may have been lacking before, and making sure when that patient is transitioned out of the hospital, let's say they're going to home, that the patient and their care partners, their loved ones, understand the importance of, let's say it is they need more help than they have right now, ensuring that you have educated them about why.
00:41:58.320 --> 00:42:32.960
It is things like making sure the transition to whatever side of care has the perspective of the therapist, which is not always well captured right now, to that handoff is becoming more and more important, let's say between hospital and let's say skilled nursing facility, when therapists, as part of that transfer document, can share how that patient has progressed and what you, as the therapist, see as their therapy prognosis and what your plans would be if you were managing that patient.
00:42:33.199 --> 00:42:45.360
That is valuable information that is becoming more and more important and prioritized, especially when other parts of the system are engaged in the program.
00:42:45.599 --> 00:42:50.559
It also means things like a patient who's being discharged home without home health.
00:42:50.880 --> 00:42:56.960
You know that they need follow-up, let's say with occupational therapy to address an ADL issue.
00:42:57.199 --> 00:43:05.039
And maybe there isn't a skilled nursing need, but you know that that patient will have a better outcome.
00:43:05.199 --> 00:43:18.320
And you think about total cost of care, if their, let's say their ADL impairments are addressed through occupational therapy under, let's say, Med be in the home or to an outpatient occupational therapy clinic.
00:43:18.480 --> 00:43:27.920
And then, you know, where you can kind of track the activities that you can do these things, most of them, without usually even asking permission, right?
00:43:28.079 --> 00:43:32.320
You're just adding to the quality of the transition for the patient.
00:43:32.559 --> 00:43:37.039
Also making sure patients have an appointment with their primary care physician in the ACO.
00:43:37.280 --> 00:43:40.400
That ACO needs to get back to tracking that patient.
00:43:40.480 --> 00:43:45.599
And if you can provide a handoff, you can't imagine how valuable and helpful that is.
00:43:45.679 --> 00:43:49.199
So that the team that's been helping this patient can jump back in.
00:43:49.440 --> 00:43:50.639
So great call out.
00:43:50.800 --> 00:43:54.960
And um, I hope that helps give a little bit of a picture to this.
00:43:56.000 --> 00:43:59.280
Yeah, we really have to get into the details of understanding.
00:44:00.159 --> 00:44:02.800
How our organization is functioning.
00:44:04.079 --> 00:44:07.840
The flow of the money honestly feels like the big lever.
00:44:08.000 --> 00:44:12.719
Someone in the comments asked, How do we show or advocate for our value?
00:44:13.039 --> 00:44:15.599
My gut answer to that is money.
00:44:15.760 --> 00:44:24.159
That's how I've seen uh OTs and PTs get on maternity wards, which is the most like emotional, like that's so emotional to me needing that.
00:44:24.320 --> 00:44:28.079
But at the bot, at the end of the day, their argument came down to money.
00:44:28.239 --> 00:44:36.320
Like we are going to save money to this hospital system by providing therapy after uh delivery.
00:44:36.480 --> 00:44:38.480
Uh is that your gut reaction?
00:44:38.639 --> 00:44:40.639
Is we need to understand the money of it.
00:44:40.960 --> 00:44:41.440
You do.
00:44:41.599 --> 00:44:47.840
And so something like hospital mobility, which the first reaction is mobility therapy.
00:44:48.239 --> 00:44:53.519
A lot of times it takes the therapy department to embrace and try to elevate.
00:44:53.599 --> 00:44:58.320
So it usually takes leadership in the therapy department to understand the opportunity.
00:44:58.639 --> 00:45:15.440
So quickly, if a hospital mobility program is in place and patients who come in, let's say that are ambulatory, if they're just kept on bad rest, the chances are they're going to get worse in their function and they're going to need ongoing care they wouldn't have needed if they were mobilized.
00:45:15.760 --> 00:45:22.400
That where there are some really rich, wonderfully executed mobility programs across the country.
00:45:22.559 --> 00:45:36.960
While they may be designed and um and built out with therapy as a large part of that team of the development of the program, a lot of times it's it's mobilizing via a nurse's aide.
00:45:37.119 --> 00:46:03.840
It could be a physical or occupational therapy aide that's doing some of that mobilization, advocating for the skill that therapists have and where they're consulting clinicians versus just the checking the box of we had the therapist come in, knowing the difference and how where you can make an impact by understanding what recovery looks like for a certain patient.
00:46:04.079 --> 00:46:08.000
Working in a hospital setting, it can't, you can feel like you're in a silo.
00:46:08.320 --> 00:46:23.920
But as you think about where was this patient really before, what has happened to them, you can start to piece together what is the future going to potentially look like from a rehab and a and a movement and independence prognosis standpoint.
00:46:24.079 --> 00:46:35.679
That is a way to better deploy resources that also lines up perfectly with accountable care organization goals, which are not to have to discharge to other inpatient settings.
00:46:35.760 --> 00:46:41.679
They want to get patients home as often as they possibly can when it's appropriate.
00:46:41.920 --> 00:46:44.159
So I'm glad we deep we dove into that a bit.
00:46:44.239 --> 00:46:44.719
Yes, yes.
00:46:45.039 --> 00:46:47.440
Very specific, tangible example.
00:46:47.760 --> 00:46:48.400
Yeah.
00:46:49.360 --> 00:46:50.800
Uh that's ACOs.
00:46:50.960 --> 00:46:52.320
That's probably the biggest bucket.
00:46:52.480 --> 00:46:56.239
I want to move really quickly through the next two buckets.
00:46:56.320 --> 00:47:06.880
And I want to give out a shout out to the blog post that you put together where we have all these models in this really nice table uh for people to explore.
00:47:07.039 --> 00:47:12.639
And hopefully it helps you like quickly find which models you might be interested in diving deeper into.
00:47:12.880 --> 00:47:22.559
In one of the columns, I'm going to say out loud, I want to add a link like directly to where you can see the participants in those models just to shortcut people through that information.
00:47:22.800 --> 00:47:24.320
But let's just spend two minutes.
00:47:24.480 --> 00:47:38.480
I know that's not enough time talking about two of the buckets, about the episodes of care and space condition-specific models and what therapists need to know about those and the value we we might bring to them.
00:47:39.360 --> 00:47:45.519
So those two buckets are episodes of care and condition-specific models.
00:47:45.760 --> 00:47:52.800
The episodes of care, again, important takeaway in terms of what we've tested so far.
00:47:53.119 --> 00:47:55.599
Episodes have been acute episodes.
00:47:55.760 --> 00:48:14.800
So something that's an event, and something new that is either hospital or hospital outpatient department based, that then triggers accountability for what happens after the hospitalization through a time period, 30 or 90 days is what we have seen.
00:48:15.119 --> 00:48:27.920
There are therapy is crucial in making sure that that patient who's in the hospital is set up for the best, most efficient, and good outcome over the course of that time period.
00:48:28.239 --> 00:48:43.679
Understanding that if more money is spent than anticipated by the model for an episode, the hospital itself, when it comes to the transforming episode accountability model, is at risk.
00:48:43.760 --> 00:48:48.400
So additional spending more than predicted means the hospital has to pay CMS back.
00:48:48.559 --> 00:48:50.719
They do not want to have to do that.
00:48:50.880 --> 00:49:04.320
And therapy helps establish a mobilization program in the hospital, and they are key in determining the most appropriate next site of care, understanding that patient's total picture and condition.
00:49:04.639 --> 00:49:12.880
And then on the condition-specific side, that's where we're talking about models like oncology models, kidney models, the dementia model.
00:49:13.280 --> 00:49:29.119
And if you keep in mind that the role of therapists is often to plug in where there's really gaps in managing a patient's success in life, for lack of a better word.
00:49:29.280 --> 00:49:46.880
So for a dementia patient who is struggling to remain home, challenges with caregivers, and being able to keep that home environment right for them, therapists are the ideal participant in that care team to help ensure that that patient can remain home as long as possible.
00:49:47.039 --> 00:49:51.280
Once they're in an inpatient site of care permanently, they're no longer in the model.
00:49:51.679 --> 00:50:01.119
On the oncology care side, it can be really hard for oncology patients to remain well enough to stay home and to keep their function up.
00:50:01.280 --> 00:50:12.320
So the role of the therapist, if you imagine, in that scenario to help prevent the functional decline of patients that leads to complications and they end up hospitalized.
00:50:12.559 --> 00:50:14.239
So I don't want to take up too much time.
00:50:14.320 --> 00:50:15.679
So we have time for QA.
00:50:16.000 --> 00:50:16.880
Yeah, that's perfect.
00:50:16.960 --> 00:50:24.559
I can see people looking at those models and diving deeper based on their own uh therapy expertise.
00:50:24.719 --> 00:50:32.480
Like some of our expertise might just lend itself, like dementia or um falls uh to understanding those different models.
00:50:32.719 --> 00:50:45.119
I also want to spend just two minutes on, which is not enough time, on the novel models that are out there, which the ones you've said so far I can wrap my mind around.
00:50:45.199 --> 00:50:49.440
And then novel models, I have to stretch a little bit farther.
00:50:49.760 --> 00:50:51.840
Can you explain them to me in two minutes?
00:50:51.920 --> 00:50:52.800
So yep.
00:50:52.960 --> 00:50:53.199
Okay.
00:50:53.360 --> 00:51:01.119
The why there's two essentially the wiser model, wasteful and end up in wasteful and inappropriate spending reduction.
00:51:02.559 --> 00:51:12.159
Essentially, it's prior authorization for surgical interventions that are often done rather than conservative treatment.
00:51:12.320 --> 00:51:14.079
So we should be embracing this.
00:51:14.320 --> 00:51:29.519
It's adding a little bit more prior auth for a finite, I think it's 17 sets of surgical conditions that we know are done on this wide, variable lens without good out necessarily any better, sometimes worse outcomes.
00:51:29.760 --> 00:51:36.079
It's having some challenges in Congress right now because of overlapping with prior authorization conversations in MA.
00:51:36.239 --> 00:51:37.519
So we'll leave it at that.
00:51:37.679 --> 00:51:46.079
But in that case, the tech company is doing the prior auth first with AI, if they are going to approve it.
00:51:46.159 --> 00:51:53.599
And if they don't approve it, then it goes to a clinician of the same type who does the review to decide whether or not to approve it.
00:51:53.920 --> 00:52:04.639
Going on to the access model, again, the tech, it's not specifically calling out tech, but there's no other way to make the numbers work than if a digital health company essentially participates.
00:52:04.880 --> 00:52:13.679
And this the access model is reimbursing for ongoing engagements with a patient.
00:52:13.920 --> 00:52:21.039
Patients can go to access organizations directly without any referrals and without a copay.
00:52:21.199 --> 00:52:23.280
It looks like they're going to waive all the co-pays.
00:52:23.760 --> 00:52:30.719
There, you can have any Medicare patient interacting on a daily basis with these tech tools.
00:52:30.960 --> 00:52:37.920
The idea is to not replace medical care, but to help patients stay engaged in managing chronic conditions.
00:52:38.239 --> 00:52:46.400
It is meant to replace things like RPM, RTM, and some other things that we don't necessarily love as therapists.
00:52:46.559 --> 00:52:48.719
It's supposed to be deflationary.
00:52:48.880 --> 00:52:59.760
So by ongoing engagement with a patient over the course of time, one to two years, they are making a big bet that it's going to change the trajectory of chronic care management.
00:52:59.920 --> 00:53:03.840
It's a big bet, and we have to see what happens on it.
00:53:04.159 --> 00:53:06.320
So I hope I got it in there.
00:53:06.639 --> 00:53:22.159
That's perfect and just by itself tells me why it's so important to be paying attention to these models because there's things that could be truly transformational or could fail, and we have to be uh tracking how they're going.
00:53:22.480 --> 00:53:25.039
I want to hear from you.
00:53:26.639 --> 00:53:35.199
If you were back early in your career, you're listening to this webinar, you're a practicing therapist.
00:53:35.920 --> 00:53:38.159
What do you do with this information?
00:53:38.400 --> 00:53:44.079
Um, I want to say I know there are PTs who are interfacing with ACOs.
00:53:44.239 --> 00:53:49.840
Uh, we know an OT in North Dakota who's interfacing with one of these models.
00:53:49.920 --> 00:54:00.079
I'm going to try to have, I'm going to challenge myself to have therapists from each of these four models like buckets on the podcast so I can hear what they did and we can hear real life stories.
00:54:00.239 --> 00:54:08.239
But in our hypothetical world where you're a practicing therapist right now hearing this webinar, what would you do?
00:54:08.559 --> 00:54:29.440
So, first, driving home the point, there are various forces at play, new insurgents in healthcare that are going to come in and try to disrupt with let's see how successful they are at we quote incumbents is the term you may hear thrown around, the way we've always done things.
00:54:29.679 --> 00:54:31.679
They look at things from different lenses.
00:54:31.840 --> 00:54:38.719
So, again, imploring on you to think about how could I disrupt myself?
00:54:38.880 --> 00:54:41.679
How could my organization disrupt itself?
00:54:42.480 --> 00:54:51.920
And how might an outside entity that is not baked in the way we do things, how might they come up with ways to disrupt us?
00:54:52.159 --> 00:54:58.320
So, for every clinician, no matter what your role, I encourage you to learn the vocabulary.
00:54:58.719 --> 00:55:04.480
Learn what the acronyms and the major models that we cover today, learn what they mean.
00:55:04.639 --> 00:55:07.920
Learn how a patient becomes attributed to a model.
00:55:08.079 --> 00:55:10.719
How does a patient end up in a model?
00:55:11.440 --> 00:55:13.679
How do benchmarks work?
00:55:13.760 --> 00:55:15.760
So, how does the money work?
00:55:16.079 --> 00:55:17.280
How is money shared?
00:55:17.440 --> 00:55:19.440
How do you become successful?
00:55:19.599 --> 00:55:30.320
Um, and then, you know, find out what models your employer potentially or you may be touching right now because of your geography.
00:55:30.559 --> 00:55:33.280
So we talked about before those interactive maps.
00:55:33.440 --> 00:55:38.000
You can go in your in your location and see the models that are active.
00:55:38.159 --> 00:55:42.639
And that knowing the types of participants, you can figure out who's participating.
00:55:42.960 --> 00:55:50.239
Be the first to know who signs agreements to join the lead model, the long-term enhanced ACO design model.
00:55:50.400 --> 00:56:02.639
It's intended to bring in some brand new providers and giving them some upfront funding and support and a bit better benchmark financial term that means it makes it a little easier for them to be successful.
00:56:02.880 --> 00:56:11.519
And volunteer for work that drives model performance, even if you are not actively engaged in the model at all.
00:56:11.760 --> 00:56:27.519
So things like, you know, falls, fall screenings, like thinking about what might prevent a readmission, doing really strong discharge planning, or I like to say transition planning, um, you know, functional outcome collection, those types of things.
00:56:27.679 --> 00:56:37.360
And if you're in a setting that's actively participating or leadership is interested in becoming involved, if let's say it's your health system, get involved.
00:56:37.519 --> 00:56:54.639
Don't expect to get anything from it as a staff member first, but you I did it for years before I was able to, I don't want to exaggerate, but a number several years before I benefited in my career, you have to put the work in up front and then go sign up for those alerts.
00:56:54.800 --> 00:57:19.679
And if you're a manager or a director or you're a leader, try to think about what is the internal data story you could tell that shows how your organization or your entity or your um your team, how do they contribute to avoiding high cost care, either on the more prevention side or the preventing readmission side, or helping patients manage their chronic conditions.
00:57:19.840 --> 00:57:28.239
Maybe it's outreaching to the PCP if you're an outpatient because they're in an ACO and you're going to share your perspectives on that patient.
00:57:28.480 --> 00:57:53.440
And then, you know, if I'm a manager or director, I would begin to think about learning what a preferred provider is in these models and how might you suggest or who might you reach out to to begin the conversation about becoming a preferred provider, which can be a contractual agreement with financial upside, depending on how you structure it.
00:57:53.760 --> 00:57:58.719
And then even if participants aren't quite ready for you, you're starting to plant seeds.
00:57:59.280 --> 00:58:14.320
And then for owners and for the profession writ large, you know, we really need to be thinking about pursuing contracting and models, um, making sure the profession sees these opportunities while networks are forming, things like post-acute networks.
00:58:14.719 --> 00:58:20.000
In uh in the ACO lead model that's coming up in January.
00:58:20.159 --> 00:58:29.760
There are episodes, fall risk episodes are the first type of chronic care episodes ever being embedded into an ACL model.
00:58:29.840 --> 00:58:39.840
And it calls out PTs, OTs, nurses as members of the team for this longitudinal chronic care episode of false prevention.
00:58:40.079 --> 00:58:43.679
And they also have the same preferred provider relationships.
00:58:43.840 --> 00:58:56.559
And then when you see RFIs request for information, where CMMI wants the public, wants participants or providers to give feedback about model ideas or questions, respond to them.
00:58:56.719 --> 00:58:58.800
There is no wrong answer.
00:58:59.039 --> 00:59:08.559
Even if you were to bring an idea to your um to your supervisor, for example, about how you might want to respond and why it might be good for your company.
00:59:08.880 --> 00:59:21.199
So again, looking, you know, who's attributed potentially to the ACOs around you, knowing if your hospital is in the team model, knowing if there's a post-acute care strategy for those hospitalized patients.
00:59:21.440 --> 00:59:23.760
Um, are you tracking functional outcomes?
00:59:23.920 --> 00:59:24.880
Think about that.
00:59:25.039 --> 00:59:39.599
And definitely learn about this upcoming lead model, the MSSP model, the team model, and and the ones that we highlight in the blog, in that table that Sarah pointed out, really important to check those out from my from where I sit.
00:59:41.440 --> 00:59:43.360
There's so much to learn.
00:59:43.679 --> 00:59:47.039
It honestly feels exciting to me.
00:59:47.199 --> 00:59:58.800
It also, I have this sense of wow, back in the day, both of you and I stepped into therapy and we're like, oh, this isn't sustainable.
00:59:58.960 --> 01:00:00.000
Something needs to change.
01:00:00.239 --> 01:00:04.639
Part of that was high-value therapy isn't being delivered a lot of the time.
01:00:04.800 --> 01:00:08.159
We're in these therapy mills, this hamster wheel.
01:00:08.400 --> 01:00:11.519
And the reality is that is getting disrupted.
01:00:11.679 --> 01:00:13.599
It will not exist in the future.
01:00:13.840 --> 01:00:30.719
And we right now are in this window of opportunity where either we can disrupt ourselves, we can come up with what a better version looks like, or someone who does not understand patient care, does not understand the therapy process, is going to come in and try to disrupt us.
01:00:30.880 --> 01:00:33.760
And there are a lot of the players like that out there.
01:00:34.079 --> 01:00:44.159
So my takeaway is we're at a window of opportunity, and um it's a really important time to reimagine what therapy can be.
01:00:44.400 --> 01:00:47.199
What's your takeaway from this conversation?
01:00:48.239 --> 01:00:52.239
I mean, I, you know, I love the quote: what you want is on the other side of fear.
01:00:52.400 --> 01:00:54.480
And by fear, I really mean change.
01:00:54.719 --> 01:00:55.519
Change is hard.
01:00:55.679 --> 01:01:02.079
And for those of us practicing for decades, man, it's hard to imagine our day-to-day looking different.
01:01:02.400 --> 01:01:08.960
But if you think about what you wish was better and what the possibilities are, it can be really exciting.
01:01:09.119 --> 01:01:18.239
Once you start to learn about the models that are out there and the ways you can show your value, you will build momentum and get more and more excited about it.
01:01:18.320 --> 01:01:22.719
And the thing about enthusiasm and passion about things is it's infectious.
01:01:23.039 --> 01:01:34.559
I really use the passionate and enthusiastic attitude to drive interest in my own organizations before I was in the policy space for a full-time job.
01:01:34.880 --> 01:01:41.519
All of those years of working to drive through passion, it creates momentum with those around you.
01:01:41.679 --> 01:01:48.079
And there are folks like you that are in this audience that are like that and just embrace that.
01:01:48.320 --> 01:01:56.719
Take the first step, search for free webinars and YouTube videos, read blogs, and and just start to just start to learn a little at a time.
01:01:56.800 --> 01:02:02.800
And you will not regret it when you think back about hearing this and the things you learn at first.
01:02:04.400 --> 01:02:12.719
It's so fun to think about being curious, you using our passion and just closing our eyes and imagining what's possible.
01:02:12.800 --> 01:02:16.320
And Dana, you just inspire us to do those three things.
01:02:16.480 --> 01:02:20.000
And you provide so much information during this conversation.
01:02:20.159 --> 01:02:28.320
We also have this blog post called How OTs and PTs Can Win in Value-Based Care that will outline a lot of this for people to dig deeper.
01:02:28.559 --> 01:02:33.840
I just want to thank you though for walking us through the information and most importantly for inspiring us.
01:02:33.920 --> 01:02:35.840
Thank you so much for the time today.
01:02:36.079 --> 01:02:41.840
I'm so grateful to share my excitement and knowledge with your um audience, Sarah.
01:02:41.920 --> 01:02:43.440
It's always a pleasure.
01:02:46.639 --> 01:02:50.000
Thank you for joining us on the OT Potential podcast.
01:02:50.239 --> 01:02:59.440
To earn one hour of AOTA approved continuing education for your time today, you will need to sign in or sign up at OTpotential.com.
01:02:59.679 --> 01:03:06.400
Once you're in the OT Potential Club, you will find a five-questioned post-course quiz connected to this episode.
01:03:06.559 --> 01:03:15.360
When you pass the quiz with a score of 75% or higher, you will be able to download a PDF certificate that certifies your completion of this course.
01:03:15.519 --> 01:03:19.760
Okay, I want to thank you for joining us today, and we'll see you next time.