SOBRE ESTE EPISÓDIO
The peer review and academic publishing system contains structural incentives that systematically favor novel, statistically significant, and surprising findings over replication studies and null results. This bias is not primarily a product of individual misconduct but emerges from how scientific success is measured across journals, universities, and funding bodies.
Inglês
Estados Unidos da América
TRANSCRIÇÃO 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
PESQUISAR EPISÓDIOS PASSADOS
Pesquisar episódios anteriores de Onpode.
OUTROS EPISÓDIOS NESTE PODCAST
Gene Wilder's Something Wilder and Johnny Carson's Mr. President represent two high-profile sitcom ventures by entertainment legends that both failed to find lasting audiences, though they differ significantly in conception, execution, and context.
Walter Melon was a French-American animated comedy that premiered in 1998, based on a French comic series created by Olivier Sulpice and Serge Carrère. The show's central premise followed a character named Walter Melon and his assistant Bitterbug, who ran a "hero-for-hire" service: when a famous fi…
Researchers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center have identified a previously unknown molecular pathway through which cancer cells selectively amplify production of tumor-promoting proteins, including KRAS — one of the most commonly mutated oncogenes in human cancers.
A cluster of recent developments has brought AI-generated content in scientific publishing to a critical juncture. A Nature correspondence published on 2026-10-28 argues that AI-hallucinated citations should be treated as research misconduct, with arXiv having announced a ban on papers containing A…
Aviso: O podcast e a arte incorporada nesta página são de Onpode, que é propriedade de seu proprietário e não é afiliado ou endossado por Listen Notes, Inc.
EDITAR
Obrigado por ajudar a manter a base de dados dos podcasts atualizada.
