SOBRE ESTE EPISÓDIO
Cognitive Bias in Forensic Pathology Decisions. Itiel Dror from University College London shows that medical examiner decisions can be influenced by the non-medical information to which the experts are exposed, and argues for restrictions on the ways in which medical examiners use such information.
Inglês
Estados Unidos da América
TRANSCRIÇÃO 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
PESQUISAR EPISÓDIOS PASSADOS
Pesquisar episódios anteriores de Excited Utterance.
OUTROS EPISÓDIOS NESTE PODCAST
Children and the Making of Modern Evidence Law. Laura Savarese from Michigan State University discusses the role of children’s testimony and nineteenth-century child protection laws in the development of the law of evidence.
Defending Due Process. Brandon Garrett from Duke University discusses his new book, Defending Due Process: Why Fairness Matters in a Polarized World.
The Evidentiary Use and Misuse of Forensic Musicology in Copyright Litigation. Fred Yen from Boston College discusses the use of musicology experts in copyright litigation and what they should and should not be permitted to testify about.
Strategy for Strategy's Sake. Edith Beerdsen from Temple University asks whether strategic or "sporting" behavior has any place in a system of legal proof, and when being clever goes too far.
Antiracist Expert Evidence. Asess Bhasin from the University of Maryland and Jasmine Gonzales Rose from Boston University discuss the ways in which expert evidence can address racism and racial discrimination in our system of evidence and proof.
Aviso: O podcast e a arte incorporada nesta página são de Ed Cheng / Alex Nunn, que é propriedade de seu proprietário e não é afiliado ou endossado por Listen Notes, Inc.
EDITAR
Obrigado por ajudar a manter a base de dados dos podcasts atualizada.
