ABOUT THIS EPISODE
There's a version of avoidance so sophisticated that the people living inside it never see it for what it is — because it doesn't feel like avoidance. It feels like the truth.
In Part 2 of this series, Jim unpacks the Tendency for Interpersonal Victimhood (TIV) — a 2020 personality construct from Tel Aviv University that explains why some people organize their entire identity around being wronged, and why that makes accountability feel impossible. He also delivers the full clinical picture of the Fear Ladder, including the two things most people miss when they try to use it on their own: safety behaviors and pacing. Finally, Jim walks through five concrete strategies for going into hard conversations with a plan instead of a reaction.
This episode is about what it costs you to keep playing not to lose — and what it actually looks like to start playing to win.
Topics covered:
- The four dimensions of Interpersonal Victimhood (TIV)
- Why victimhood identity is a nervous system pattern, not a character flaw
- The Fear Ladder: full clinical picture and common mistakes
- Safety behaviors and why they cancel your progress
- Five strategies for high-stakes conversations
- Playing to win vs. playing not to lose
- Your three-part homework assignment
References: Gabay et al. (2020), Craske et al. (2008), Foa & Kozak (1986), Nolen-Hoeksema et al. (2008), Gollwitzer (1999), Ok et al. (2021)
The Unscripted Mind — real therapy, real talk, no fluff. Hosted by Jim Cunningham, Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC). Each episode delivers practical tools and honest mental health insight to help you gain self-awareness, make better choices, and feel more in control.
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:01.820 --> 00:00:18.800
Last time I left you with a question, I told you there was a version of avoidance so well disguised, so sophisticated that people can live inside it for years, sometimes an entire lifetime, and they never see it for what it is.
00:00:20.541 --> 00:00:40.761
This episode is about what happens when avoidance stops being a behavior and becomes a story when the pattern that is quietly running in the background becomes the very thing you've built your whole sense of self around when avoiding accountability isn't something you do anymore.
00:00:41.481 --> 00:00:47.451
It's who you are, and here's what makes it so hard to talk about and so hard to shift.
00:00:48.231 --> 00:00:50.631
Is that it doesn't feel like avoidance.
00:00:51.470 --> 00:00:53.420
It just feels like the truth.
00:00:54.981 --> 00:00:55.881
I'm Jim Cunningham.
00:00:55.881 --> 00:00:59.301
I'm a licensed professional counselor, and this is the Unscripted Mind.
00:00:59.810 --> 00:01:00.621
A lot to cover today.
00:01:00.621 --> 00:01:01.551
So let's get into that.
00:01:03.201 --> 00:01:12.950
In part one, we talked about how avoidance works, the nervous system, the logic behind it, and why dodging threat feels like survival, even when the threat isn't real.
00:01:13.820 --> 00:01:19.400
We talked about little Albert Seligman's dogs learned helplessness, and the core of it was this.
00:01:20.090 --> 00:01:26.120
Every time you avoid something and your anxiety drops, your brain logs that as a win.
00:01:26.960 --> 00:01:37.521
If you do it enough times, you stop believing you can handle the thing at all, even when the door is wide open right in front of you, instead of leaving, you just decorate the cage.
00:01:38.870 --> 00:02:02.051
We also talked about four tools for breaking that pattern, naming it, specifically building the fear ladder, killing the open-ended timeline, and counting what avoidance is actually costing you Today I'd like to dive deeper into some of those, especially the Fear Ladder, uh, which I'd like to give you a full clinical picture on not only what it is, but how you use it in a real conversation, for example.
00:02:02.507 --> 00:02:06.736
But first I wanna spend some real time on something I teased in the end of part one.
00:02:07.757 --> 00:02:12.377
Because there's a pattern sitting underneath a lot of what brings people into my office.
00:02:12.947 --> 00:02:19.757
Underneath the relationship struggles, the stuck careers, the same arguments that never go anywhere.
00:02:20.507 --> 00:02:24.137
And it's one of the most significant things I encounter in this work.
00:02:24.377 --> 00:02:31.576
Not because it's rare, but because it's everywhere and almost no one is talking about it in plain language.
00:02:32.687 --> 00:02:36.856
Researchers call it the tendency for interpersonal victimhood.
00:02:37.187 --> 00:02:44.116
Kind of a mouthful, and when I describe it, some of you're gonna recognize this in somebody in your life, maybe even yourself.
00:02:45.947 --> 00:02:54.167
In 2020, a research team out of Tel Aviv University published a study in a journal called Personality and Individual Differences.
00:02:54.887 --> 00:02:57.616
What they introduced was a personality construct.
00:02:57.856 --> 00:03:03.287
They called the tendency for interpersonal victimhood, or TIV for short.
00:03:04.456 --> 00:03:05.687
Here's how they defined it.
00:03:06.646 --> 00:03:13.516
An enduring feeling that the self is a victim across different kinds of interpersonal relationships.
00:03:15.162 --> 00:03:17.747
Let me unpack that a lot, because this really matters.
00:03:18.317 --> 00:03:21.106
This isn't a reaction to one hard experience.
00:03:21.106 --> 00:03:21.197
It's.
00:03:22.576 --> 00:03:25.727
A temporary response to something genuinely painful.
00:03:26.146 --> 00:03:36.257
It's ongoing, it's stable, generalized sense of being wronged across relationships, across time, regardless of what's actually happening.
00:03:37.187 --> 00:03:43.127
And what the research found is that this isn't just a mood, it isn't just low self-esteem.
00:03:43.921 --> 00:03:52.502
TIV is a stable personality trait, meaning it shows up consistently across different situations and in different measures.
00:03:54.481 --> 00:03:56.461
Researchers found four dimensions to it.
00:03:56.521 --> 00:03:58.322
I'll go through them one by one.
00:03:59.222 --> 00:04:01.051
The first is the need for recognition.
00:04:01.741 --> 00:04:07.592
Someone with high TIV doesn't just want acknowledgement that something happened.
00:04:07.592 --> 00:04:17.612
They need it persistently for multiple people, and it's never quite enough because the acknowledgement isn't really about the event anymore.
00:04:18.182 --> 00:04:20.072
It's about their identity.
00:04:21.632 --> 00:04:24.391
The second is what we call moral elitism.
00:04:25.172 --> 00:04:30.781
People in high TIV see themselves as the morally superior party in any conflict.
00:04:31.531 --> 00:04:34.771
They were the ones wronged, the other person was at fault.
00:04:35.161 --> 00:04:36.062
Full stop.
00:04:36.601 --> 00:04:38.521
There's real rigidity there.
00:04:38.942 --> 00:04:45.391
A deep resistance to any version of that story where they might have played a role in how things went.
00:04:46.862 --> 00:04:48.242
The third is a lack of empathy.
00:04:49.112 --> 00:05:00.242
I know that surprises people, but when your own victimhood becomes the organizing story of who you are, there's not much room left for what the other person might have experienced.
00:05:01.021 --> 00:05:08.266
Their pain gets filtered out or reframed as less legitimate or not even registered at all.
00:05:09.997 --> 00:05:11.401
And the fourth is rumination.
00:05:12.062 --> 00:05:14.732
People in high TIV replay the wrongs done to them.
00:05:15.271 --> 00:05:33.151
Over and over, not to process and to let go, but to confirm every replay tightens the story and the research shows that this kind of rumination actually decreases the motivation to forgive and increases the drive toward revenge.
00:05:34.081 --> 00:05:36.362
That's why they keep repeating the story over and over again.
00:05:37.382 --> 00:05:42.572
Now I wanna be clear about something important because this concept is easy to misuse and misunderstand.
00:05:43.531 --> 00:05:45.512
The researchers were explicit about it.
00:05:45.992 --> 00:05:52.471
TIV is not the same thing as having experienced real trauma or genuine victimization.
00:05:53.312 --> 00:05:54.692
Real victims exist.
00:05:55.052 --> 00:05:57.841
People get hurt, people are wronged.
00:05:58.351 --> 00:06:00.122
This is not what we're talking about.
00:06:00.841 --> 00:06:02.942
This is not being a victim.
00:06:03.122 --> 00:06:05.132
This is a victim stance.
00:06:05.732 --> 00:06:16.591
What TIV describes is the pattern where victimhood stops being something that happened to you and becomes the lens through which you interpret everything else that happens to you.
00:06:17.447 --> 00:06:24.987
Where the story of being wronged becomes the primary way you make sense of yourself and your relationships.
00:06:26.187 --> 00:06:29.367
And here's the piece I find most clinically significant.
00:06:30.177 --> 00:06:39.927
The research showed that TIV is linked to anxious attachment, the attachment style that develops when early relationships felt unpredictable.
00:06:41.411 --> 00:06:43.512
When connection felt unsafe.
00:06:44.052 --> 00:06:54.492
The person who learned early relationships are fundamentally threatening, often develops a hyper vigilance to being wronged because they were trained to expect it.
00:06:55.992 --> 00:06:57.521
So the victimhood identity.
00:06:57.911 --> 00:06:59.802
Isn't a character weakness.
00:07:00.192 --> 00:07:05.382
It's not laziness or a manipulation, though it can function in that way in a lot of situations.
00:07:06.161 --> 00:07:18.072
It's a nervous system that learned to find a threat in everything interpersonal, and then build a story, a whole story around that threat to make it make sense.
00:07:19.632 --> 00:07:25.447
So here's why this matters for avoidance specifically, when you're always the wronged party.
00:07:26.411 --> 00:07:37.362
When the story that the problem is always out there, always someone else is doing, you never have to face the one thing avoidance wants to protect you from.
00:07:38.471 --> 00:07:40.661
You never have to risk being wrong.
00:07:41.471 --> 00:07:43.512
You never have to risk accountability.
00:07:44.262 --> 00:07:51.581
You never have to sit with a possibility that you played a role in how things went because the story that you're the victim.
00:07:52.271 --> 00:07:56.322
The one who was done to it makes all that unnecessary.
00:07:57.221 --> 00:08:01.992
That's why this is such a sophisticated version of avoidance that I was describing.
00:08:02.651 --> 00:08:11.711
Not dodging a hard conversation, but dodging the entire category of conversations where you might not be the hero of the story.
00:08:13.362 --> 00:08:15.971
The behavioral data in this research is striking.
00:08:16.841 --> 00:08:29.201
When people high in TIV felt wronged in a controlled lab setting, just a simple economic game, they sought revenge even when that revenge didn't benefit them at all.
00:08:29.982 --> 00:08:34.392
They took more money away from their opponent knowing that they wouldn't receive it themselves.
00:08:35.231 --> 00:08:39.371
The stronger the negative emotions, the more likely they were to retaliate.
00:08:39.971 --> 00:08:42.731
Not to solve the problem, but to punish.
00:08:43.956 --> 00:08:48.126
That's what unprocessed victimhood does to relationships.
00:08:48.397 --> 00:08:53.167
It turns pain into currency, and avoidance is what makes that possible.
00:08:53.557 --> 00:08:59.856
Because if you never face the full truth of a conflict, you never have to update the story.
00:09:01.897 --> 00:09:03.636
So how do we make all this practical.
00:09:03.881 --> 00:09:11.591
If any of what I just described connected with you about yourself or somebody that you're in a relationship with, the question is the same.
00:09:12.221 --> 00:09:13.511
What do I actually do about it?
00:09:14.621 --> 00:09:18.221
I wanna go deeper into the fear ladder from part one that I described briefly.
00:09:18.552 --> 00:09:23.532
Um, I gave you the concept but didn't give you the full clinical picture and how it actually works.
00:09:23.711 --> 00:09:31.432
So I'll describe it briefly and what it looks like and then some practical application, uh, that you can use.
00:09:31.792 --> 00:09:39.381
So in exposure therapy, the Fear Ladder, is one of the most well supported tools we have for breaking avoidance patterns.
00:09:40.716 --> 00:09:42.366
The basic structure is simple.
00:09:42.756 --> 00:09:44.317
You list the things you've been avoiding.
00:09:44.466 --> 00:09:56.201
You rate each one from zero to 10 based on how much distress it would cause you to actually face the thing and you start at the bottom, the lowest rated item, just the thing that's uncomfortable, but not overwhelming.
00:09:57.221 --> 00:09:58.991
Here's what the research consistently shows.
00:10:00.221 --> 00:10:04.542
The goal isn't to eliminate the anxiety before you act.
00:10:04.871 --> 00:10:07.902
The goal is to act while the anxiety is present.
00:10:08.501 --> 00:10:09.251
Lemme say that again.
00:10:09.282 --> 00:10:12.701
'cause it's really important because people want to do things without the anxiety.
00:10:13.871 --> 00:10:25.451
The goal isn't to eliminate the anxiety before you act, the goal is to act while the anxiety is actually present and you let the experience teach your nervous system that something is new.
00:10:26.621 --> 00:10:32.022
The amygdala, which is your brain's threat center, doesn't update its files based on what you tell it.
00:10:33.312 --> 00:10:35.261
It updates based on what you do.
00:10:35.711 --> 00:10:38.022
You can't think your way out of avoidance.
00:10:38.741 --> 00:10:40.001
You have to move through it.
00:10:41.052 --> 00:10:44.802
But there are two things that most people miss when they try to use this tool on their own.
00:10:45.701 --> 00:10:48.851
The first is what research calls safety behaviors.
00:10:49.451 --> 00:10:57.552
These are these subtle moves that we do when we, uh, we try to stay technically in a situation while still avoiding the actual fear.
00:10:58.782 --> 00:11:15.392
The person with social anxiety, for example, who goes to the party but spends the whole night on their phone, the person who has the hard conversation, but only by text, never face to face the person who always brings someone along so they never have to sit with a discomfort alone.
00:11:17.131 --> 00:11:19.871
Safety behaviors feel like progress, but they're actually not.
00:11:20.412 --> 00:11:31.422
They prevent your nervous system actually getting the correct experience that it needs if you show up to the situation, but use every tool available to manage your anxiety while you're there.
00:11:31.841 --> 00:11:39.101
You leave having confirmed that the situation still required management of some kind and that you couldn't handle it without doing that kind of management.
00:11:40.072 --> 00:11:41.182
The research is clear.
00:11:41.721 --> 00:11:45.981
The most effective exposures happen without the safety behaviors.
00:11:46.642 --> 00:11:47.871
That's not cruelty.
00:11:48.052 --> 00:11:49.491
It's how learning works.
00:11:49.761 --> 00:11:54.741
You need full experiences, including the discomfort, to get the full update.
00:11:55.642 --> 00:12:01.642
This is why I often say that it's not always a good thing to deprive people of the struggle that they're in.
00:12:02.062 --> 00:12:13.912
Letting them struggle creates strength and resiliency, and a lot of times it's easier to try to rescue them, and I think oftentimes that is more for us than it is for them because I don't like seeing someone struggle.
00:12:14.121 --> 00:12:19.251
So I'm trying to alleviate my own discomfort, which ironically is just another type of avoidance.
00:12:20.173 --> 00:12:22.873
The second thing people miss is the pace.
00:12:23.802 --> 00:12:27.763
The ladder is graduated, but graduated doesn't mean slow.
00:12:28.602 --> 00:12:31.033
What matters is that you don't skip steps.
00:12:31.633 --> 00:12:33.192
Think of it like an actual ladder.
00:12:33.613 --> 00:12:43.648
You can climb faster, slow, but what you can't do is jump rungs, because if you start skipping the middle steps, there's nothing gonna catch you when a higher step is too much.
00:12:45.092 --> 00:12:52.832
That research also shows something important about where to stop when you hit a step that generates real distress.
00:12:53.102 --> 00:12:53.852
Don't retreat.
00:12:54.602 --> 00:12:55.592
You stay with it.
00:12:55.893 --> 00:12:58.143
Anxiety peaks, and then it drops.
00:12:58.503 --> 00:12:59.222
If you leave.
00:12:59.222 --> 00:13:02.192
When it peaks, you confirm that it's a real threat.
00:13:02.852 --> 00:13:06.003
If you stay long enough to feel it, come back down though.
00:13:06.602 --> 00:13:08.613
You give your nervous system what it actually needs.
00:13:10.052 --> 00:13:14.072
It was uncomfortable and nothing catastrophic happened.
00:13:14.822 --> 00:13:16.653
I came through it, nobody died.
00:13:17.763 --> 00:13:20.312
That's the update and that's how the pattern breaks.
00:13:21.663 --> 00:13:28.173
One more thing on the ladder before we move on, especially for the kind of interpersonal avoidance we've been talking about today.
00:13:28.653 --> 00:13:44.913
The research supports building values-based hierarchy alongside the fear hierarchy, not just what am I afraid of, but what am I not doing because of that fear The relationship, you haven't fought for the conversation that would change things.
00:13:45.062 --> 00:13:49.472
The version of yourself that requires you to be honest about your role in something.
00:13:50.432 --> 00:13:57.493
When the ladder connects to what you actually value, not just what you're afraid of, the motivation to climb, changes.
00:13:57.972 --> 00:14:03.942
It's not about managing anxiety anymore, it's about getting your life back, and that's the most important thing.
00:14:04.884 --> 00:14:05.455
So.
00:14:06.684 --> 00:14:07.945
How do we use all of this?
00:14:08.245 --> 00:14:25.215
Uh, let me give you a practical example, with conversation strategies, because the Fear Ladder is, is great for building tolerance and resilience, but it's also the practical question of what do I actually do when I'm in a room and I'm dealing with that anxiety straight up.
00:14:26.144 --> 00:14:28.875
So an example is hard family conversations.
00:14:29.205 --> 00:14:30.345
Everybody hates those.
00:14:30.615 --> 00:14:34.664
Um, there's always a lot of baggage that comes into the room even before we go into the room.
00:14:35.264 --> 00:14:44.054
So one of the biggest mistakes I see is going into a room and reacting rather than going in with a plan, and that is being proactive.
00:14:44.894 --> 00:14:49.695
And when you're an avoidant person, Reacting to something is almost always the default.
00:14:50.325 --> 00:14:53.715
so I'll give you five ways to kind of approach this example.
00:14:54.375 --> 00:14:58.725
First, decide what you want people to know before you walk in.
00:14:59.504 --> 00:15:02.414
Not what you want to say in response to everything they bring.
00:15:03.044 --> 00:15:03.945
Three points.
00:15:04.184 --> 00:15:04.845
That's it.
00:15:05.565 --> 00:15:09.044
What is the clearest, truest version of where I stand?
00:15:09.524 --> 00:15:10.350
And you write those down.
00:15:11.490 --> 00:15:12.509
That's your message.
00:15:12.779 --> 00:15:18.179
This reduces anxiety because you already have the answers to the test before you go in the room.
00:15:19.169 --> 00:15:27.184
Every question they ask, every challenge, they raise every attempt to take things sideways, distract, you return to those three things.
00:15:28.475 --> 00:15:29.764
You don't have to answer everything.
00:15:29.764 --> 00:15:35.115
You just have to respond and come back to the things that you want them to know and the things you want them to hear.
00:15:35.715 --> 00:15:38.174
This is not manipulation to be clear.
00:15:38.475 --> 00:15:39.284
It's clarity.
00:15:40.034 --> 00:15:44.865
And clarity is the antidote to the back and forth that never resolves.
00:15:45.254 --> 00:15:48.554
This keeps us focused and centered on what we're trying to do.
00:15:49.215 --> 00:15:55.434
And when people start trying to lead that astray, it is something I can always fall back on when things start going sideways.
00:15:56.725 --> 00:15:59.274
The second thing is less is always more.
00:15:59.304 --> 00:16:04.975
In these situations, explanation almost always leads to more negotiation.
00:16:05.304 --> 00:16:15.804
If you set a boundary for your child and they break it, and you try to explain why that boundary existed, again, they're gonna start trying to punch holds into that and try to invalidate it.
00:16:16.644 --> 00:16:20.815
The more you justify your reasoning, the more you give the other person to push back on.
00:16:21.534 --> 00:16:23.725
You simply state your position and then stop talking.
00:16:24.115 --> 00:16:25.210
It's that simple.
00:16:25.450 --> 00:16:29.500
Silence is uncomfortable for most people, but it's something you can use.
00:16:30.100 --> 00:16:38.830
Research on negotiation and conflict consistently shows that the person most comfortable with silence holds more power in a conversation.
00:16:39.490 --> 00:16:43.899
Most people will rush in to fill it, so let'em, you don't have to do that.
00:16:45.340 --> 00:16:48.250
The third thing is slow down physically.
00:16:49.014 --> 00:16:50.424
Literally like move slower.
00:16:50.875 --> 00:16:55.195
When we're in high stakes conversation, our nervous systems tend to speed up.
00:16:55.735 --> 00:16:57.294
Thoughts start racing.
00:16:57.684 --> 00:17:05.785
We say things we didn't mean to say because we're responding to anxiety, not the actual moment, and we end up saying things we actually haven't thought of yet.
00:17:06.144 --> 00:17:06.984
That's a problem.
00:17:07.494 --> 00:17:15.414
The antidote is deliberate, slowing down, waiting two to five seconds longer than you feel comfortable before you respond.
00:17:16.255 --> 00:17:18.174
The fourth is set the terms upfront.
00:17:18.835 --> 00:17:19.615
Have a plan.
00:17:20.275 --> 00:17:28.224
Before the conversation even starts, set some ground rules, and that means naming what you want and what you're not willing to participate in.
00:17:28.644 --> 00:17:29.694
Something like this.
00:17:30.144 --> 00:17:32.125
I want this to be a real conversation.
00:17:32.815 --> 00:17:36.115
I'm going to stay calm and I'm asking everyone else to do the same.
00:17:36.954 --> 00:17:48.234
If things escalate to name calling or threats, I'm gonna step out and we can come back to it when things settle down Then if that actually happens, you have to do it.
00:17:49.105 --> 00:18:03.220
The person who can walk away calmly from a heated conversation, not in anger, not in drama, just matter of fact, is the person who isn't playing the game anymore, and you can't win a game against someone who won't play.
00:18:04.180 --> 00:18:10.509
Now, the caveat to this, of course, is when you start enforcing your boundaries, it tends to escalate people.
00:18:10.660 --> 00:18:14.319
They tend to get more upset because you're not playing the game the way you always have.
00:18:14.799 --> 00:18:16.269
That doesn't mean you shouldn't do that.
00:18:16.720 --> 00:18:21.069
Stay calm, do what you need to do and let them worry about their reactions.
00:18:22.359 --> 00:18:25.480
Finally, and I think this is the one that changes things the most.
00:18:26.259 --> 00:18:27.009
When you go in.
00:18:27.009 --> 00:18:31.119
Know how you want, feel when you leave, not what you want them to say.
00:18:31.269 --> 00:18:33.130
Not whether they're going to approve of you.
00:18:34.029 --> 00:18:36.575
How do you wanna feel about how you showed up?
00:18:37.825 --> 00:18:42.894
If you can answer that going in, then your standard isn't their reaction anymore.
00:18:43.434 --> 00:18:47.339
It's your own integrity, and that's something that you can actually control.
00:18:49.436 --> 00:18:51.991
So I wanna end with a reframe.
00:18:52.152 --> 00:18:57.791
I come back to a lot in my work and I find it lands differently than anything else I've described today.
00:18:58.902 --> 00:19:02.321
Most avoidant people aren't just avoiding a hard thing.
00:19:03.132 --> 00:19:06.731
They're playing not to lose instead of playing to win.
00:19:07.182 --> 00:19:08.531
And that makes a big difference.
00:19:08.832 --> 00:19:10.602
You've seen this in sports all the time.
00:19:10.721 --> 00:19:13.767
The team that has the lead, um, and they try to sit on it.
00:19:14.531 --> 00:19:18.011
And you feel the momentum shift and they never get it back.
00:19:19.451 --> 00:19:25.332
Keeping the peace managing, trying not to make things worse is playing not to lose.
00:19:25.662 --> 00:19:26.412
And I get it.
00:19:26.531 --> 00:19:33.432
If your nervous system has learned that relationships are dangerous, the safest strategy is to minimize the risk.
00:19:34.152 --> 00:19:35.201
Don't push too hard.
00:19:35.471 --> 00:19:36.672
Don't want too much.
00:19:36.852 --> 00:19:38.501
Don't take up too much space.
00:19:38.862 --> 00:19:41.352
Just stay in bounds and hope nobody gets upset.
00:19:41.981 --> 00:19:42.761
Play it safe.
00:19:43.991 --> 00:19:50.261
But here's what playing not to lose actually costs you playing it safe isn't gonna win you the game.
00:19:50.892 --> 00:19:53.231
It keeps you permanently reactive.
00:19:53.741 --> 00:20:01.511
It puts other people in charge of how the conversation goes, how the relationship goes, and ultimately how your life goes.
00:20:02.051 --> 00:20:07.662
Over time, the people who only ever play not to lose, start to disappear.
00:20:08.201 --> 00:20:14.082
From their relationships, from their own goals, from the version of themselves they actually wanted to be.
00:20:14.442 --> 00:20:21.133
So when I see people who have done this for a very long time, the hardest question for them to answer is, what do you want?
00:20:22.123 --> 00:20:22.782
They don't know.
00:20:22.883 --> 00:20:26.722
They're too busy focused on what everybody else wants, and they've lost themselves.
00:20:28.163 --> 00:20:29.752
Playing to win looks a lot different though.
00:20:30.353 --> 00:20:33.593
It's not aggressive, it's not reckless, it's just clear.
00:20:34.732 --> 00:20:43.313
Going into hard conversations with a position, not just a hope, saying what's true, even when you're not sure how it's gonna land with other people.
00:20:44.337 --> 00:20:50.307
Being willing to let somebody be disappointed or angry without treating it as evidence you've done something wrong.
00:20:51.028 --> 00:20:56.758
Connection does not require agreement because their reaction is information about them.
00:20:57.178 --> 00:20:58.647
It's not a verdict on you.
00:21:00.867 --> 00:21:04.167
Something happens in relationships when one person stops playing the game.
00:21:04.258 --> 00:21:05.157
It's really strange.
00:21:05.532 --> 00:21:10.903
When you start trying to change the game, things often get worse before they get better.
00:21:11.682 --> 00:21:13.153
Somebody often escalates.
00:21:14.323 --> 00:21:17.712
Because the pattern changed and the system is trying to restabilize.
00:21:17.893 --> 00:21:20.083
Systems like homeostasis.
00:21:20.173 --> 00:21:27.252
So when somebody gets outta line, the system does everything it can to pull that person back into proper alignment with the system.
00:21:28.182 --> 00:21:29.323
You should expect that.
00:21:29.803 --> 00:21:38.442
Do not interpret it as failure, though it is actually confirmation that you're probably on the right track because something real just shifted.
00:21:43.032 --> 00:21:44.833
Here's what I know from a lot of years in this work.
00:21:45.357 --> 00:21:56.998
People who do best, who actually change the patterns they came in wanting to change are the ones who decide at some point that the cost of staying the same is higher than the cost of changing.
00:21:58.468 --> 00:22:10.198
For most people, what you want has to be greater than what you have, and sometimes it takes people a long time to realize that, and at that point they stop asking whether they can handle it and they start doing it.
00:22:11.397 --> 00:22:12.718
Not because the fear's gone.
00:22:13.198 --> 00:22:15.478
You don't have to wait for the fear to be gone.
00:22:16.018 --> 00:22:18.147
You don't have to wait for the anxiety to go away.
00:22:18.508 --> 00:22:21.028
You can feel every bit of it and still move on.
00:22:21.718 --> 00:22:24.117
That's not reckless, that's courage.
00:22:24.718 --> 00:22:28.228
And it's the only thing that actually updates the file.
00:22:30.238 --> 00:22:31.593
So here's how I'd like to wrap things up.
00:22:32.577 --> 00:22:35.788
And, and remind everyone that avoidance isn't weakness.
00:22:36.627 --> 00:22:38.698
A victim identity isn't evil.
00:22:39.178 --> 00:22:44.067
These are patterns that made sense at some point, but they've outlived their usefulness.
00:22:44.817 --> 00:22:47.367
The question is never whether you develop them.
00:22:47.667 --> 00:22:52.647
The question is whether you're willing to see them for what they are and start choosing something different.
00:22:53.788 --> 00:22:58.678
So your homework for this episode, and I mean actually do this, give it a shot, write it down.
00:22:59.248 --> 00:23:00.298
It has three parts.
00:23:00.460 --> 00:23:04.535
The first one is identify one thing that you're avoiding right now.
00:23:05.509 --> 00:23:17.569
And this is hard because we don't like to admit this, and this is part of the bigger problem with avoidance, is that most people don't recognize what they're avoiding and what they're doing as the avoidance.
00:23:18.529 --> 00:23:28.789
So if you can identify one thing you're avoiding right now, name it specifically, put a number on how comfortable it would be to face it from zero to 10.
00:23:30.230 --> 00:23:33.214
Then step two, ask yourself honestly.
00:23:34.414 --> 00:23:37.625
Is there a story attached to why you're not doing this thing?
00:23:38.464 --> 00:23:43.025
A story that puts responsibility for the situation somewhere outside of you?
00:23:44.375 --> 00:23:46.970
Not to beat yourself up over the story just to see it.
00:24:00.664 --> 00:24:04.204
And finally the third step is identify the smallest step.
00:24:04.204 --> 00:24:08.045
First baby steps 1% better a day.
00:24:08.045 --> 00:24:12.605
As James Clear says, it's not the whole thing, just the first move.
00:24:13.025 --> 00:24:22.085
And then ask yourself, what would it look like to go into that with a plan instead of just hoping it goes, okay, hope is not a plan.
00:24:23.164 --> 00:24:26.825
So it's really this simple start with one step at a time.
00:24:27.365 --> 00:24:28.414
It's that simple.
00:24:28.535 --> 00:24:29.375
That's it.
00:24:29.525 --> 00:24:34.265
And that's how the road to getting some power back in your life begins one step at a time.
00:24:35.720 --> 00:24:42.380
Until next time, if you've enjoyed this two part series, share it, subscribe, follow, leave, a review or a comment.
00:24:42.630 --> 00:24:44.160
That's how more people find the show.
00:24:45.000 --> 00:24:48.420
And remember, life does not come with a script.
00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:55.829
Embrace the unexpected, cherish the unplanned, stay curious, And most of all, have an amazing day.
00:24:56.730 --> 00:24:59.039
We'll see you next time on the unscripted Mind.