ABOUT THIS EPISODE
In this episode, we sit down with forensic structural engineer Mark Duckett, PE, SI, from Robson Forensic to explore what happens when engineering decisions are examined long after a project is complete.
We discuss the role of expert witnesses, what the legal system means by "standard of care," and how forensic engineers use the scientific method to investigate failures, defects, and construction disputes. Mark explains the difference between simply disagreeing with a design approach and identifying a true breach of professional responsibility, while sharing insights into how root causes are uncovered in complex structural cases.
We also explore the skills required to succeed in forensic engineering, the value of technical writing and communication, and what practicing engineers can do today to reduce future risk. Whether you're interested in forensic investigations, expert witness work, or simply becoming a better structural engineer, this episode offers a unique look at our profession through the lens of evidence, accountability, and lessons learned.
Guest Profile:
Mark Duckett, P.E., S.I., is a forensic structural engineer with nearly 40 years of experience in structural design, inspection, failure analysis, and professional liability investigations. He has designed and inspected everything from custom homes and high-rises to industrial facilities, marine structures, and specialty projects. As an Associate with Robson Forensic, Mark investigates structural failures, construction defects, code compliance issues, and standard-of-care matters, bringing decades of real-world engineering experience to complex disputes and litigation.
Sponsor:
This episode is sponsored by Robson Forensic.
StructurEd (our free study tool): TheEngineeringPodcast.com/StructurEd
Reach out to us:
Disclaimer: Here
