WEBVTT
00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:16.320
Hey, welcome back to the Lars Lars and John a Tuesday after Labor Day.
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:22.399
If you want to jump into what we always call the best conversation in talk journalism, it's here every day at 866.
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:23.199
Hey Lars.
00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:26.800
That's 866-439-5277.
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:31.440
If you happen to be a naysayer, and we love naysayers on the program, don't get me wrong.
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:33.840
We invented that idea over 30 years ago.
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:37.200
Naysayers always go to the head of the line, and they always will.
00:00:37.359 --> 00:00:38.880
And we've never broken from that.
00:00:39.200 --> 00:00:52.079
The only time I I have allowed that if we already had, say, the President of the United States on the phone and we got a naysayer call, I might take the president's call first, and I'd have to take the naysayer call second.
00:00:52.240 --> 00:00:54.079
But naysayers go to the head of the line.
00:00:54.240 --> 00:00:58.560
Send your emails to talk at LawrenceLarrison.com and our poll on X.
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:03.359
Should New Mexico be rename re renamed New Mexico America?
00:01:03.520 --> 00:01:04.400
I would say, yeah.
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:04.959
Go ahead.
00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:06.719
Name it New America.
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:11.359
Donald Trump seems to be on an American naming uh binge at this point.
00:01:11.519 --> 00:01:22.640
He amplified his image by writing in a separate post that many people have suggested changing the name of New Mexico, describing New America as much more prestigious and beautiful for that state.
00:01:22.799 --> 00:01:32.000
The New Mexico Post touches on a long-running political theme for Trump, rebranding geographic landmarks and places, and there's certainly nothing wrong with that.
00:01:32.159 --> 00:01:37.200
You can find the poll on X at LawrenceLarrison Show and at LawrenceLarrison.com.
00:01:37.359 --> 00:01:45.519
And last week's poll on First Amendment Friday, we asked you this should a parent have the right to take their own child to church?
00:01:45.760 --> 00:01:50.000
Now I have to give you a little explanation on that, not as thorough as we did last week.
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:51.280
But here's what happened.
00:01:51.599 --> 00:01:54.239
Mom and dad, in this case, are getting divorced.
00:01:54.400 --> 00:01:58.159
They have disagreements about how child custody is to be shared.
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:02.000
Mom wants to take her daughter to a church of her choosing.
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:08.879
Dad says he doesn't want the daughter taken to the church at all because he says the church has dangerous ideas.
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:14.879
And I actually don't remember, but it was uh seemed like a conventional uh Protestant Christian church.
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:19.360
So does the dad have a grief, uh have uh have an objection or reasonable objection?
00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:20.879
I would say he does not.
00:02:21.199 --> 00:02:28.560
But should the mom be able to say, I'm gonna take my daughter to the church of my choosing, dad can do the same or not at all.
00:02:28.719 --> 00:02:35.280
Now, on that note, I want to talk about nuclear power just a little bit because I've been looking forward to this.
00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:38.159
Uh James Walker is gonna join us here in just a minute.
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:38.879
Uh Mr.
00:02:39.039 --> 00:02:41.759
Walker, welcome to the program on the for the first time.
00:02:41.919 --> 00:02:43.599
Thank you so much for taking the time today.
00:02:44.800 --> 00:02:45.520
No problem at all.
00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:46.960
No, please, please be on.
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:48.400
So tell me about this.
00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:52.479
The NRC has just added a fast track for nuclear power.
00:02:52.639 --> 00:02:58.479
Does that mean we could start to get reactors and and power generating stations built more quickly?
00:02:58.719 --> 00:03:07.280
Whereas in in under the old school approach to nuclear power, it routinely took decades to get through the licensing and the building of these things.
00:03:07.439 --> 00:03:08.639
Can we change that?
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:12.319
Ms.
00:03:12.479 --> 00:03:13.280
Walker?
00:03:14.319 --> 00:03:15.039
Can you hear me?
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:16.400
Yeah, no, I can now.
00:03:16.479 --> 00:03:16.639
Yeah.
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:18.560
Great, great, excellent.
00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:20.000
So you're you are right.
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:30.800
The intention with this NRC regulation is that the the previous way they were licensing reactors was very set up around those traditional big light water reactor systems, the huge ones.
00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:40.560
And um the the and that affected any sort of a different type of reactor system that wants to be licensed, whether it's advanced reactors, gen 4 reactors, that kind of thing.
00:03:40.719 --> 00:03:46.319
So the NRC is looking to put new frameworks in place to allow for licensing of new reactor types.
00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:52.639
So you don't get stuck into that big safety evaluation that might be more applicable to big reactor systems.
00:03:52.800 --> 00:04:07.360
Um and a lot of that stuff is just not applicable to these smaller systems that are being developed now, which can be built much, much faster and need far fewer safety systems because the the fuel, as an example, might just be more inherently safe.
00:04:07.599 --> 00:04:18.480
And it gives you an ability to ensure that the reactor, I mean, the fuel itself gives you an ability to ensure that the reactor cannot break down in the same way a conventional reactor can.
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:30.480
So that means that we will hopefully now get um an NRC that's able to license reactors of a different kind faster than how they would have conventionally been licensed before.
00:04:30.720 --> 00:04:39.680
So all that to add up to, yes, this should overall lead to an expedited route to get these new advanced reactors out into the market commercially.
00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:41.040
I'll tell you, uh, Mr.
00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:44.319
Walker, I uh by the way, James Walker is a nuclear physicist.
00:04:44.399 --> 00:04:45.680
Should I be calling you Dr.
00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:47.519
Walker at this point?
00:04:47.920 --> 00:04:48.959
Yep, that's right.
00:04:49.439 --> 00:04:49.920
Fair enough.
00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:52.480
CEO of Nano Nuclear Energy.
00:04:52.639 --> 00:05:00.480
I've always been a defender of nuclear power, except I had to admit the old school way of doing it was every reactor was a one-off.
00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:04.000
You know, and they they built it and it was its own unique animal.
00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:21.439
And the next time they built one, they built it, and it was it would be different, which meant, uh, if I'm correct and correct me if I'm wrong, that you couldn't get any lessons learned out of building one because the next one was going to be different anyway, which means you couldn't really add to your knowledge about how the reactor should be designed.
00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:23.279
Is that a fair way of summing it up?
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:25.839
Oh, look, that's that's incredibly accurate.
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:33.680
And um, what this led to as well was that um the cost overruns, time delays of these big reactor projects, they became very normal.
00:05:33.839 --> 00:05:38.959
And I think Vogel in the US at the moment, I think that's on track to be the most expensive reactor ever built.
00:05:39.120 --> 00:05:44.079
And it's mostly because those lessons learned from all the building of reactors before just didn't carry through.
00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:59.360
Um now, if you if you compare that as an example with China, they're building two large gigawatt-sized scale nuclear power stations every single year, but they're just moving the crew from one project to the next to the next to the next, and they're keeping those lessons learned and not changing that plant.
00:05:59.519 --> 00:06:01.279
Now that's a good strategy.
00:06:01.600 --> 00:06:04.399
You can't, you know, you can't really do that in the US.
00:06:04.480 --> 00:06:12.879
And so it's even private industries that have been the um the drivers behind these small modular reactor systems because it's it's industry solution.
00:06:12.959 --> 00:06:17.199
Like, how are we going to get around this problem of lessons learned and carrying on knowledge?
00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:27.519
Well, the solution is a modular system where you can manufacture the components remotely and then just ship them to site, and that way you can continuously manufacture components, you can stockpile them.
00:06:27.600 --> 00:06:32.959
And when you get the demand or the order, you just ship those parts to site and then you assemble them.
00:06:33.199 --> 00:06:37.920
That gets you around that lessons, um, those those lost lessons learned from each project.
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:42.319
And you just copy and paste that reactor system and deploy it in new locations.
00:06:42.560 --> 00:06:49.759
It's it's a it's a really wonderful response, and it also gives you an expedited timeline from order to first production of power.
00:06:50.160 --> 00:06:53.040
And in fact, does it also solve part of the financial problem?
00:06:53.120 --> 00:07:05.040
Because if you can plug in these modules and do it a bit at a time, you can get cash coming in to help finance the rest of the construction instead of you only get a dollar in when the entire plant starts working.
00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:07.279
Oh, look, that that's that's a big one.
00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:17.759
Like um at the moment, I would say if you're looking at a big gigawatt scale light water reactor system, you could be looking at from once all the approvals go through um maybe 15 years.
00:07:17.839 --> 00:07:23.439
Maybe you're looking at 15 years time to get that first big-scale reactor producing power.
00:07:23.519 --> 00:07:30.079
Now, that means that you're it's all CapEx without any revenue coming in to mitigate against that big liability.
00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:44.560
Um, some of these reactor systems, because the especially the smaller, much more modular ones, you could get a a timeline between three or four years from order to first output a power, um, especially if all of the components are already um manufactured.
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:45.519
Absolutely.
00:07:45.759 --> 00:07:45.920
Mr.
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:47.759
Walker, we'll look forward to having him back.
00:07:47.839 --> 00:07:49.360
That's James Walker, Dr.
00:07:49.439 --> 00:07:53.839
Walker, a nuclear physicist and CEO of nano nuclear energy.
00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:54.399
Dr.
00:07:54.480 --> 00:07:55.920
Walker, we appreciate your time.
00:07:56.160 --> 00:07:58.079
Glad to get your calls at 866.
00:07:58.319 --> 00:07:58.879
Hey Lars.
00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:02.560
That's 866-439-5277.
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:05.920
Send your emails to talk at LarsLarson.com.
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:10.319
Coming up, every Seattle school student now eats free of charge.
00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.279
I think that's a real problem, and I'll tell you why.
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:16.160
Coming up next on the Radio Northwest Network.
00:00:12.480 --> 00:00:16.320
Hey, welcome back to the Lars Lars and John a Tuesday after Labor Day.
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:22.399
If you want to jump into what we always call the best conversation in talk journalism, it's here every day at 866.
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:23.199
Hey Lars.
00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:26.800
That's 866-439-5277.
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:31.440
If you happen to be a naysayer, and we love naysayers on the program, don't get me wrong.
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:33.840
We invented that idea over 30 years ago.
00:00:34.000 --> 00:00:37.200
Naysayers always go to the head of the line, and they always will.
00:00:37.359 --> 00:00:38.880
And we've never broken from that.
00:00:39.200 --> 00:00:52.079
The only time I I have allowed that if we already had, say, the President of the United States on the phone and we got a naysayer call, I might take the president's call first, and I'd have to take the naysayer call second.
00:00:52.240 --> 00:00:54.079
But naysayers go to the head of the line.
00:00:54.240 --> 00:00:58.560
Send your emails to talk at LawrenceLarrison.com and our poll on X.
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:03.359
Should New Mexico be rename re renamed New Mexico America?
00:01:03.520 --> 00:01:04.400
I would say, yeah.
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:04.959
Go ahead.
00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:06.719
Name it New America.
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:11.359
Donald Trump seems to be on an American naming uh binge at this point.
00:01:11.519 --> 00:01:22.640
He amplified his image by writing in a separate post that many people have suggested changing the name of New Mexico, describing New America as much more prestigious and beautiful for that state.
00:01:22.799 --> 00:01:32.000
The New Mexico Post touches on a long-running political theme for Trump, rebranding geographic landmarks and places, and there's certainly nothing wrong with that.
00:01:32.159 --> 00:01:37.200
You can find the poll on X at LawrenceLarrison Show and at LawrenceLarrison.com.
00:01:37.359 --> 00:01:45.519
And last week's poll on First Amendment Friday, we asked you this should a parent have the right to take their own child to church?
00:01:45.760 --> 00:01:50.000
Now I have to give you a little explanation on that, not as thorough as we did last week.
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:51.280
But here's what happened.
00:01:51.599 --> 00:01:54.239
Mom and dad, in this case, are getting divorced.
00:01:54.400 --> 00:01:58.159
They have disagreements about how child custody is to be shared.
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:02.000
Mom wants to take her daughter to a church of her choosing.
00:02:02.239 --> 00:02:08.879
Dad says he doesn't want the daughter taken to the church at all because he says the church has dangerous ideas.
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:14.879
And I actually don't remember, but it was uh seemed like a conventional uh Protestant Christian church.
00:02:15.120 --> 00:02:19.360
So does the dad have a grief, uh have uh have an objection or reasonable objection?
00:02:19.520 --> 00:02:20.879
I would say he does not.
00:02:21.199 --> 00:02:28.560
But should the mom be able to say, I'm gonna take my daughter to the church of my choosing, dad can do the same or not at all.
00:02:28.719 --> 00:02:35.280
Now, on that note, I want to talk about nuclear power just a little bit because I've been looking forward to this.
00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:38.159
Uh James Walker is gonna join us here in just a minute.
00:02:38.319 --> 00:02:38.879
Uh Mr.
00:02:39.039 --> 00:02:41.759
Walker, welcome to the program on the for the first time.
00:02:41.919 --> 00:02:43.599
Thank you so much for taking the time today.
00:02:44.800 --> 00:02:45.520
No problem at all.
00:02:45.680 --> 00:02:46.960
No, please, please be on.
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:48.400
So tell me about this.
00:02:48.560 --> 00:02:52.479
The NRC has just added a fast track for nuclear power.
00:02:52.639 --> 00:02:58.479
Does that mean we could start to get reactors and and power generating stations built more quickly?
00:02:58.719 --> 00:03:07.280
Whereas in in under the old school approach to nuclear power, it routinely took decades to get through the licensing and the building of these things.
00:03:07.439 --> 00:03:08.639
Can we change that?
00:03:12.080 --> 00:03:12.319
Ms.
00:03:12.479 --> 00:03:13.280
Walker?
00:03:14.319 --> 00:03:15.039
Can you hear me?
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:16.400
Yeah, no, I can now.
00:03:16.479 --> 00:03:16.639
Yeah.
00:03:17.360 --> 00:03:18.560
Great, great, excellent.
00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:20.000
So you're you are right.
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:30.800
The intention with this NRC regulation is that the the previous way they were licensing reactors was very set up around those traditional big light water reactor systems, the huge ones.
00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:40.560
And um the the and that affected any sort of a different type of reactor system that wants to be licensed, whether it's advanced reactors, gen 4 reactors, that kind of thing.
00:03:40.719 --> 00:03:46.319
So the NRC is looking to put new frameworks in place to allow for licensing of new reactor types.
00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:52.639
So you don't get stuck into that big safety evaluation that might be more applicable to big reactor systems.
00:03:52.800 --> 00:04:07.360
Um and a lot of that stuff is just not applicable to these smaller systems that are being developed now, which can be built much, much faster and need far fewer safety systems because the the fuel, as an example, might just be more inherently safe.
00:04:07.599 --> 00:04:18.480
And it gives you an ability to ensure that the reactor, I mean, the fuel itself gives you an ability to ensure that the reactor cannot break down in the same way a conventional reactor can.
00:04:18.800 --> 00:04:30.480
So that means that we will hopefully now get um an NRC that's able to license reactors of a different kind faster than how they would have conventionally been licensed before.
00:04:30.720 --> 00:04:39.680
So all that to add up to, yes, this should overall lead to an expedited route to get these new advanced reactors out into the market commercially.
00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:41.040
I'll tell you, uh, Mr.
00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:44.319
Walker, I uh by the way, James Walker is a nuclear physicist.
00:04:44.399 --> 00:04:45.680
Should I be calling you Dr.
00:04:45.920 --> 00:04:47.519
Walker at this point?
00:04:47.920 --> 00:04:48.959
Yep, that's right.
00:04:49.439 --> 00:04:49.920
Fair enough.
00:04:50.160 --> 00:04:52.480
CEO of Nano Nuclear Energy.
00:04:52.639 --> 00:05:00.480
I've always been a defender of nuclear power, except I had to admit the old school way of doing it was every reactor was a one-off.
00:05:00.560 --> 00:05:04.000
You know, and they they built it and it was its own unique animal.
00:05:04.160 --> 00:05:21.439
And the next time they built one, they built it, and it was it would be different, which meant, uh, if I'm correct and correct me if I'm wrong, that you couldn't get any lessons learned out of building one because the next one was going to be different anyway, which means you couldn't really add to your knowledge about how the reactor should be designed.
00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:23.279
Is that a fair way of summing it up?
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:25.839
Oh, look, that's that's incredibly accurate.
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:33.680
And um, what this led to as well was that um the cost overruns, time delays of these big reactor projects, they became very normal.
00:05:33.839 --> 00:05:38.959
And I think Vogel in the US at the moment, I think that's on track to be the most expensive reactor ever built.
00:05:39.120 --> 00:05:44.079
And it's mostly because those lessons learned from all the building of reactors before just didn't carry through.
00:05:44.240 --> 00:05:59.360
Um now, if you if you compare that as an example with China, they're building two large gigawatt-sized scale nuclear power stations every single year, but they're just moving the crew from one project to the next to the next to the next, and they're keeping those lessons learned and not changing that plant.
00:05:59.519 --> 00:06:01.279
Now that's a good strategy.
00:06:01.600 --> 00:06:04.399
You can't, you know, you can't really do that in the US.
00:06:04.480 --> 00:06:12.879
And so it's even private industries that have been the um the drivers behind these small modular reactor systems because it's it's industry solution.
00:06:12.959 --> 00:06:17.199
Like, how are we going to get around this problem of lessons learned and carrying on knowledge?
00:06:17.439 --> 00:06:27.519
Well, the solution is a modular system where you can manufacture the components remotely and then just ship them to site, and that way you can continuously manufacture components, you can stockpile them.
00:06:27.600 --> 00:06:32.959
And when you get the demand or the order, you just ship those parts to site and then you assemble them.
00:06:33.199 --> 00:06:37.920
That gets you around that lessons, um, those those lost lessons learned from each project.
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:42.319
And you just copy and paste that reactor system and deploy it in new locations.
00:06:42.560 --> 00:06:49.759
It's it's a it's a really wonderful response, and it also gives you an expedited timeline from order to first production of power.
00:06:50.160 --> 00:06:53.040
And in fact, does it also solve part of the financial problem?
00:06:53.120 --> 00:07:05.040
Because if you can plug in these modules and do it a bit at a time, you can get cash coming in to help finance the rest of the construction instead of you only get a dollar in when the entire plant starts working.
00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:07.279
Oh, look, that that's that's a big one.
00:07:07.360 --> 00:07:17.759
Like um at the moment, I would say if you're looking at a big gigawatt scale light water reactor system, you could be looking at from once all the approvals go through um maybe 15 years.
00:07:17.839 --> 00:07:23.439
Maybe you're looking at 15 years time to get that first big-scale reactor producing power.
00:07:23.519 --> 00:07:30.079
Now, that means that you're it's all CapEx without any revenue coming in to mitigate against that big liability.
00:07:30.319 --> 00:07:44.560
Um, some of these reactor systems, because the especially the smaller, much more modular ones, you could get a a timeline between three or four years from order to first output a power, um, especially if all of the components are already um manufactured.
00:07:44.959 --> 00:07:45.519
Absolutely.
00:07:45.759 --> 00:07:45.920
Mr.
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:47.759
Walker, we'll look forward to having him back.
00:07:47.839 --> 00:07:49.360
That's James Walker, Dr.
00:07:49.439 --> 00:07:53.839
Walker, a nuclear physicist and CEO of nano nuclear energy.
00:07:54.160 --> 00:07:54.399
Dr.
00:07:54.480 --> 00:07:55.920
Walker, we appreciate your time.
00:07:56.160 --> 00:07:58.079
Glad to get your calls at 866.
00:07:58.319 --> 00:07:58.879
Hey Lars.
00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:02.560
That's 866-439-5277.
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:05.920
Send your emails to talk at LarsLarson.com.
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:10.319
Coming up, every Seattle school student now eats free of charge.
00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.279
I think that's a real problem, and I'll tell you why.
00:08:13.439 --> 00:08:16.160
Coming up next on the Radio Northwest Network.
