WEBVTT
00:00:01.259 -->
00:00:05.740Welcome to Tech Grumps 3 .44. Today is Sunday,
00:00:06.059 -->
00:00:09.699the 6th of September, and we are here to speak
00:00:09.699 -->
00:00:12.199with you about things and tech and grumpiness.
00:00:13.220 -->
00:00:19.679Joining us tonight, we have Ian Forrester. Hello,
00:00:19.739 -->
00:00:22.960I am Ian, and I am Cubic Garden Everywhere, and
00:00:22.960 -->
00:00:27.399I am calling from Manchester, UK, not Alabama.
00:00:28.649 -->
00:00:33.929We have Wendy. Hi, I'm Wendy Grossman. My website
00:00:33.929 -->
00:00:36.789is pelicancrossing .net, and I'm based in London.
00:00:37.509 -->
00:00:41.429We have David. Hello, I'm David Eastman, also
00:00:41.429 -->
00:00:44.810based in London. Eastman on blue sky and other
00:00:44.810 -->
00:00:47.710things. I won't be talking too much tonight,
00:00:47.829 -->
00:00:50.130as I've been on holiday for two weeks, so pass
00:00:50.130 -->
00:00:53.030it on. I don't believe you for a second. Joining
00:00:53.030 -->
00:00:57.649us tonight is Kim. Hello, I'm Kim. I live in
00:00:57.649 -->
00:00:59.689Manchester, also United Kingdom and Alabama.
00:01:00.689 -->
00:01:02.590I run a little studio called Geeks for Social
00:01:02.590 -->
00:01:05.409Change, which you can find at gfsc .community.
00:01:05.409 -->
00:01:07.390And thanks for having me. Oh, and I use she and
00:01:07.390 -->
00:01:09.510they pronouns too. Hello. Thank you very much.
00:01:09.730 -->
00:01:12.969And I, of course, am Ryan Alexander, R .N. Alexander,
00:01:13.129 -->
00:01:20.090just about everywhere. Find me if you like. All
00:01:20.090 -->
00:01:22.590right. And as usual at Tech Grumps, we like to
00:01:22.590 -->
00:01:25.310cover all things AI all at once because, oh,
00:01:25.329 -->
00:01:27.870God, how else would we do it? We have a collection
00:01:27.870 -->
00:01:30.170of fine stories for you this evening, some even
00:01:30.170 -->
00:01:33.230brought by our wonderful guest, Kim. So I'm just
00:01:33.230 -->
00:01:35.069going to read them off and then we'll get into
00:01:35.069 -->
00:01:37.269talking about them. The stories we have tonight
00:01:37.269 -->
00:01:40.230is a story about AI may make software more secure
00:01:40.230 -->
00:01:42.730about government hacking on TechCrunch. We have
00:01:42.730 -->
00:01:46.549a story about NVIDIA buying Hugging Face on Ars
00:01:46.549 -->
00:01:50.250Technica. We have a reference to... Trump, who's
00:01:50.250 -->
00:01:53.890opposing people who oppose data centers, calling
00:01:53.890 -->
00:01:57.989them backwards and poor. We have the Dyson $500
00:01:57.989 -->
00:02:02.230smart toothbrush with AI, live camera, and water
00:02:02.230 -->
00:02:06.019floss. We have a story about AI almost sending
00:02:06.019 -->
00:02:09.479a hazmat train barreling towards Katas. And we
00:02:09.479 -->
00:02:12.099have a story about New York school systems to
00:02:12.099 -->
00:02:15.340ban generative AI for elementary and middle school
00:02:15.340 -->
00:02:18.580students. Yay, Mamdani. And last but certainly
00:02:18.580 -->
00:02:21.460not least, a story on The Guardian about a fake
00:02:21.460 -->
00:02:25.080think tank from Israel that has been attempting
00:02:25.080 -->
00:02:29.080to... Bias AI with massive amounts of propaganda.
00:02:29.520 -->
00:02:32.259Where do we feel like starting with all of this
00:02:32.259 -->
00:02:37.659tonight? I would definitely like to talk a little
00:02:37.659 -->
00:02:41.460bit about this. These people who are backwards
00:02:41.460 -->
00:02:43.740because they want to sell it for their rights.
00:02:43.800 -->
00:02:45.979He didn't say they are backwards. He said they
00:02:45.979 -->
00:02:51.219want to be backwards and poor. The point is they
00:02:51.219 -->
00:02:54.039oppose data centers and therefore they want to
00:02:54.039 -->
00:02:57.789be backwards and poor. I mean, you are right.
00:02:58.430 -->
00:03:02.129I just have this feeling that it was very implied
00:03:02.129 -->
00:03:05.330that you are all backwards and you want to be
00:03:05.330 -->
00:03:13.169backwards. That's my feeling. Go on. No, we're
00:03:13.169 -->
00:03:19.889all NPCs to billionaires. You know that. That's
00:03:19.889 -->
00:03:22.930a good way of putting it. Yeah, I just, I felt
00:03:22.930 -->
00:03:27.810when I heard this. I just, I mean, obviously
00:03:27.810 -->
00:03:31.789I'm not American, but I also am very aware that
00:03:31.789 -->
00:03:34.770these are the kind of things that spread, you
00:03:34.770 -->
00:03:38.469know, this notion of, well, obviously, you know,
00:03:38.509 -->
00:03:40.930why would you want to stand in the way of progress?
00:03:41.310 -->
00:03:44.270You know, screw your rights, screw, you know,
00:03:44.270 -->
00:03:47.009like actually having a life. Well, I'm going
00:03:47.009 -->
00:03:50.409to bring this up again, that in the 1960s, the
00:03:50.409 -->
00:03:55.909inevitability narrative was cars. And yet, a
00:03:55.909 -->
00:03:58.590lot of the roads they planned to build in the
00:03:58.590 -->
00:04:01.090end did not get built because people did oppose
00:04:01.090 -->
00:04:07.849it. That's a very good analogy. We treat opposition
00:04:07.849 -->
00:04:13.210as a binary. It is a spectrum. The funny question
00:04:13.210 -->
00:04:15.189I have about AI data centers that I don't really
00:04:15.189 -->
00:04:19.620know the answer to is... Because everything's,
00:04:19.620 -->
00:04:21.079I feel like we don't really have a tech sector
00:04:21.079 -->
00:04:23.199anymore. We have an AI sector. So are they AI
00:04:23.199 -->
00:04:25.699data centers or are they just data centers because
00:04:25.699 -->
00:04:28.779our general computing needs are massively spiking
00:04:28.779 -->
00:04:30.939through the roof and AI is kind of the excuse
00:04:30.939 -->
00:04:33.560to build them? Like, I mean, I think we all know
00:04:33.560 -->
00:04:36.259how big the computation is of AI, but I'm just
00:04:36.259 -->
00:04:39.560really curious, like to what degree it's more
00:04:39.560 -->
00:04:42.860just like spiraling need for this. As I understand
00:04:42.860 -->
00:04:45.319it, the data centers they're building now for
00:04:45.319 -->
00:04:48.779AI are on a vastly bigger scale than anything
00:04:48.779 -->
00:04:51.399we've had before. I mean, there was one that
00:04:51.399 -->
00:04:54.540was canceled in Virginia that was described in
00:04:54.540 -->
00:04:58.319the news pieces as 144 Walmart super centers
00:04:58.319 -->
00:05:03.160stacked laterally. I mean, that's massive. That's,
00:05:03.160 -->
00:05:06.000you know, that's not, that's not just a data
00:05:06.000 -->
00:05:09.990center. It's, you know. So the scale difference
00:05:09.990 -->
00:05:12.689is they used to say, you know, how many servers
00:05:12.689 -->
00:05:15.949are in the data. Now they say, what is the power
00:05:15.949 -->
00:05:18.149consumption? In fact, that is how you measure
00:05:18.149 -->
00:05:22.910them. Yeah, that's true. What measurable percentage
00:05:22.910 -->
00:05:25.750of the available power to the entire part of
00:05:25.750 -->
00:05:28.810this country will we need? And if it is not sufficient,
00:05:28.990 -->
00:05:30.810do you mind if we just plop down or restart a
00:05:30.810 -->
00:05:32.529couple of nuclear reactors right next to you?
00:05:33.430 -->
00:05:36.029Right. And they're really, as I understand it
00:05:36.029 -->
00:05:38.149also, they're really unpleasant neighbors. They're
00:05:38.149 -->
00:05:41.250noisy and they don't have very much staff. So
00:05:41.250 -->
00:05:43.850there's this kind of forbidding giant building
00:05:43.850 -->
00:05:48.110in your midst that is, you know, just has no
00:05:48.110 -->
00:05:50.550interaction with the neighborhood whatsoever.
00:05:50.930 -->
00:05:52.410I mean, that's what they're complaining about
00:05:52.410 -->
00:05:54.509in Brick Lane in part. I mean, it's also that
00:05:54.509 -->
00:05:57.050they wanted the old brewery to be converted for
00:05:57.050 -->
00:06:00.149affordable housing, not for a data center to
00:06:00.149 -->
00:06:04.860enable. uh you know london city traders to to
00:06:04.860 -->
00:06:09.639trade nanoseconds faster i mean they've completely
00:06:09.639 -->
00:06:11.720given up the narrow i've never seen a narrow
00:06:11.720 -->
00:06:14.279it's odd because anytime previously to this kind
00:06:14.279 -->
00:06:17.740of land grab scenario one of the four horsemen
00:06:17.740 -->
00:06:22.220of the capitalist apocalypse is but it will create
00:06:22.220 -->
00:06:25.089jobs and that horseman seems to be profoundly
00:06:25.089 -->
00:06:27.509missing from all of these discussions which is
00:06:27.509 -->
00:06:30.110weird by its absence because they always try
00:06:30.110 -->
00:06:31.870to pull at least that part of the wool over as
00:06:31.870 -->
00:06:35.350like it will drive they do say it it's just nobody
00:06:35.350 -->
00:06:37.209believes them because they know that they aren't
00:06:37.209 -->
00:06:38.750going to have very much staff once they've been
00:06:38.750 -->
00:06:41.329built yeah this is like a long question here
00:06:41.329 -->
00:06:43.769sorry i'd like so okay so they need to be huge
00:06:43.769 -->
00:06:45.750why do they also need to be in residential areas
00:06:45.750 -->
00:06:52.610do people know why because But, for example,
00:06:52.730 -->
00:06:54.509the one that was canceled in Virginia was going
00:06:54.509 -->
00:06:57.250to be right out the side of a Civil War battlefield
00:06:57.250 -->
00:07:00.930that is of great significance to the people who
00:07:00.930 -->
00:07:04.670live there. Other places where they're going
00:07:04.670 -->
00:07:07.750to sit in the middle of particularly valued landscapes
00:07:07.750 -->
00:07:12.389or, you know, or quite often there's a bunch
00:07:12.389 -->
00:07:14.670being built in places where there's just not
00:07:14.670 -->
00:07:19.920enough water. There's a factor of available infrastructure,
00:07:20.199 -->
00:07:22.180not just in terms of can they get the high power
00:07:22.180 -->
00:07:23.939stuff there without having to build a lot of
00:07:23.939 -->
00:07:26.040it themselves. And this is important. Once again,
00:07:26.079 -->
00:07:29.560it's a marginal thing where it's like they could
00:07:29.560 -->
00:07:31.459build this in the middle of nowhere, but they
00:07:31.459 -->
00:07:33.279don't want to have to pay for all of the infrastructure
00:07:33.279 -->
00:07:34.839that it would take for them to get it in the
00:07:34.839 -->
00:07:37.100middle of nowhere. Whereas they know, and this
00:07:37.100 -->
00:07:38.579is a big part they don't say, is that it's so
00:07:38.579 -->
00:07:40.040much cheaper for us to build this right next
00:07:40.040 -->
00:07:41.579to you because you've already got the pipes and
00:07:41.579 -->
00:07:45.250the power going in. Also, fuck them poor. It's
00:07:45.250 -->
00:07:47.370mixed zoning. A lot of the time they purposely
00:07:47.370 -->
00:07:49.769want mixed zoning precisely, as Ryan said, because
00:07:49.769 -->
00:07:52.970the facilities are already there. Putting something
00:07:52.970 -->
00:07:55.050out in the middle of nowhere is extremely expensive.
00:07:55.829 -->
00:07:58.930And they don't want that expense. To bring it
00:07:58.930 -->
00:08:00.529back to the article, presumably this will make
00:08:00.529 -->
00:08:04.610the areas it's in poorer. It's literally the
00:08:04.610 -->
00:08:06.990opposite of what Trump said. But the weird thing
00:08:06.990 -->
00:08:08.529is, it's almost if they did the opposite, then
00:08:08.529 -->
00:08:10.470they could sort of be making an argument for
00:08:10.470 -->
00:08:13.220new. company towns of some description but they're
00:08:13.220 -->
00:08:17.860obviously not doing that either we're not following
00:08:17.860 -->
00:08:20.319any logic i mean the old thing is oh you'll get
00:08:20.319 -->
00:08:22.560a new warm swimming pool well i mean afterwards
00:08:22.560 -->
00:08:24.779if you've got 124 asters i'm never going to find
00:08:24.779 -->
00:08:27.100your swimming pool so the ironic thing to my
00:08:27.100 -->
00:08:29.220mind about the loss of the company town narrative
00:08:29.220 -->
00:08:33.759is that it's not it we've lost it because they
00:08:33.759 -->
00:08:36.779don't even want to try to lie that much they
00:08:36.779 -->
00:08:39.009don't even want like they've managed to divorce
00:08:39.009 -->
00:08:42.370the idea of responsibility of employment so far
00:08:42.370 -->
00:08:45.950so that it's like, why would we take care of
00:08:45.950 -->
00:08:49.190you? This is the gig economy. You show up and
00:08:49.190 -->
00:08:51.590do exactly as much work as we want. Show up on
00:08:51.590 -->
00:08:53.250your own dime, by the way. Show up and do exactly
00:08:53.250 -->
00:08:55.049as much work as we want, and then you piss off.
00:08:55.470 -->
00:08:57.850And if you die after that, that's great. If you
00:08:57.850 -->
00:09:00.450die before then, we might need to charge you
00:09:00.450 -->
00:09:01.750a fee because you were supposed to be getting
00:09:01.750 -->
00:09:04.509work done for us. So where are we heading to?
00:09:04.590 -->
00:09:07.350We're turning the server off and on again. Pretty
00:09:07.350 -->
00:09:11.039much, yeah. I want to talk about the toothbrush.
00:09:11.639 -->
00:09:14.600Oh, yeah. Yes. The toothbrush is great. I saw
00:09:14.600 -->
00:09:16.399the story and I thought it was hilarious. And
00:09:16.399 -->
00:09:18.840as it happened, I saw my dentist the next day
00:09:18.840 -->
00:09:21.100and I asked him, I asked him about it. And he
00:09:21.100 -->
00:09:23.639basically said, I tell my patients not to buy
00:09:23.639 -->
00:09:28.460them because, you know, I mean, a $500 toothbrush
00:09:28.460 -->
00:09:31.100to do things you can do for, you know, way less
00:09:31.100 -->
00:09:36.639than that. I can just imagine the dentist, what,
00:09:36.720 -->
00:09:39.159like. They're not saying it's like, oh, so you
00:09:39.159 -->
00:09:43.980can spend $500 to never floss. You can never
00:09:43.980 -->
00:09:46.460floss for free. Trust me. I'm a dentist. I know
00:09:46.460 -->
00:09:51.179this. Mind you, I have a water flosser. Okay.
00:09:51.440 -->
00:09:54.440I have a Sonicare toothbrush, and those are great.
00:09:55.179 -->
00:09:58.019What is great about them? What is great about
00:09:58.019 -->
00:10:04.960a toothbrush? Well, okay. So, I mean, do you?
00:10:05.859 -->
00:10:07.840I'm going to need you to be more specific about
00:10:07.840 -->
00:10:08.960what's great about a toothbrush, because part
00:10:08.960 -->
00:10:10.679of me just wants to be like having clean teeth,
00:10:10.840 -->
00:10:15.179but I think it's great. What makes you say the
00:10:15.179 -->
00:10:17.940Sonic toothbrush is great? Oh, because it literally
00:10:17.940 -->
00:10:22.120vibrates at 30 ,000 things a minute or a second
00:10:22.120 -->
00:10:23.779or something, and it does make a difference in
00:10:23.779 -->
00:10:25.120how clean it gets my teeth, particularly in getting
00:10:25.120 -->
00:10:26.779the plaque off. I like that, but it doesn't need
00:10:26.779 -->
00:10:29.960a camera to do it. Does it show up in less dental
00:10:29.960 -->
00:10:34.740work? Yeah, I think it does. When I'm using it
00:10:34.740 -->
00:10:37.360regularly, I come in, there's noticeably less
00:10:37.360 -->
00:10:42.799scraping that occurs in my checkups because it
00:10:42.799 -->
00:10:45.240does a good job of taking it off. It's very satisfying.
00:10:45.419 -->
00:10:49.159You can feel it. You finally get over your stuff
00:10:49.159 -->
00:10:50.779and you go to the dentist and then you get done.
00:10:50.899 -->
00:10:51.919You get a dentist when you get done. You're like,
00:10:51.980 -->
00:10:55.019hmm, the inside of my mouth has a luxury car
00:10:55.019 -->
00:10:58.500feel for a short period of time. It's clean and
00:10:58.500 -->
00:11:03.919slippery. Go ahead. Can I say... I only just
00:11:03.919 -->
00:11:07.580recently bought an electric toothbrush. I've
00:11:07.580 -->
00:11:10.919been visiting my dentist regularly. I've never,
00:11:11.000 -->
00:11:14.740ever had anything done to my teeth, ever. And
00:11:14.740 -->
00:11:19.019I've got to a kind of grand age. And that's just
00:11:19.019 -->
00:11:22.720been brushing with a standard toothbrush. Yeah.
00:11:23.120 -->
00:11:26.139Did you grow up in a place where they put fluoride
00:11:26.139 -->
00:11:29.659in the water, perchance? Well, I guess Bristol
00:11:29.659 -->
00:11:33.080may do. I don't know. Actually, no. No? Okay.
00:11:33.240 -->
00:11:36.299I don't know. David? I don't know. I mean, they
00:11:36.299 -->
00:11:39.179did do some fluoridation, but I think they've
00:11:39.179 -->
00:11:41.700stopped that. Fluoridation really helps. Some
00:11:41.700 -->
00:11:45.379of it's genetic. Some of it is how much sugar
00:11:45.379 -->
00:11:47.659and crap you eat and how rigorous you are at
00:11:47.659 -->
00:11:50.600brushing and flossing. There's a whole mix of
00:11:50.600 -->
00:11:53.860things that go into whether you have good or
00:11:53.860 -->
00:11:57.279bad teeth, you know. Yeah. It's real crap, too.
00:11:57.960 -->
00:12:00.600We're not a dental podcast, so carry on. But
00:12:00.600 -->
00:12:03.419I really don't think that, I think that $500
00:12:03.419 -->
00:12:06.659or whatever it is for a supposedly smart toothbrush
00:12:06.659 -->
00:12:08.879is just ridiculous. Honestly, at this point,
00:12:08.919 -->
00:12:12.679every time I see AI associated with any device
00:12:12.679 -->
00:12:15.440that has any recording of any type ability possible,
00:12:15.600 -->
00:12:17.679my first thought is like, they want to train
00:12:17.679 -->
00:12:20.879it on photos of my teeth. Well, they do have
00:12:20.879 -->
00:12:22.820a camera in this toothbrush. I mean, that's what
00:12:22.820 -->
00:12:25.240we want too. That is my immediate reaction to
00:12:25.240 -->
00:12:27.279seeing anything that is being sold with a camera.
00:12:27.279 -->
00:12:30.879Why would I want? Why would I want to stare at
00:12:30.879 -->
00:12:33.000pictures of my mouth while I was brushing my
00:12:33.000 -->
00:12:35.899teeth? The AI is looking at your mouth. No, no,
00:12:35.899 -->
00:12:38.299no. They want to make it look cool to you so
00:12:38.299 -->
00:12:40.220you don't think that what they really want is
00:12:40.220 -->
00:12:46.019yet another source of undigested data. Because
00:12:46.019 -->
00:12:47.259that's something that's going to be a problem
00:12:47.259 -->
00:12:50.419now. It's like we're starting to get the AI equivalent
00:12:50.419 -->
00:12:52.220of mad cow disease where they're feeding it its
00:12:52.220 -->
00:12:53.899own data and then it starts to degrade and it
00:12:53.899 -->
00:12:56.440goes bad. The term you're looking for is model
00:12:56.440 -->
00:13:00.320collapse. Yeah, model collapse. yeah which is
00:13:00.320 -->
00:13:03.000funny because it has the same initials the same
00:13:03.000 -->
00:13:06.080acronym as mad cow is there something weird here
00:13:06.080 -->
00:13:08.399does this seem quite off -brand for dyson to
00:13:08.399 -->
00:13:10.720me because i feel like bryson dyson made their
00:13:10.720 -->
00:13:13.659name by doing like quite smart engineering right
00:13:13.659 -->
00:13:15.220like they were famous for a different kind of
00:13:15.220 -->
00:13:16.639hoover design that was kind of shipped they look
00:13:16.639 -->
00:13:18.919cool and they buy the air wraps and the hair
00:13:18.919 -->
00:13:21.220dryers and they're all based on this kind of
00:13:21.220 -->
00:13:25.049like idea of like smart modern engineering this
00:13:25.049 -->
00:13:27.350just sounds like a load of iot crap from five
00:13:27.350 -->
00:13:29.350years ago the load of stuff will glue together
00:13:29.350 -->
00:13:34.309you know actually the main reason not to buy
00:13:34.309 -->
00:13:37.519anything that dyson makes is that I am convinced
00:13:37.519 -->
00:13:39.679that all the people who work at Dyson are deaf
00:13:39.679 -->
00:13:42.779because every device I've ever come across of
00:13:42.779 -->
00:13:45.600theirs is incredibly loud. I mean, those hand
00:13:45.600 -->
00:13:48.980dryers in bathrooms ought to be shot, taken out
00:13:48.980 -->
00:13:51.259and shot. Oh, I love those things. If that's
00:13:51.259 -->
00:13:54.120true, then everyone who was fired from Dyson
00:13:54.120 -->
00:13:57.340went directly to work for Ninja because those
00:13:57.340 -->
00:14:00.279household appliances are like having a Harrier
00:14:00.279 -->
00:14:02.539jet try to take off from your kitchen counter.
00:14:04.240 -->
00:14:06.940I was going to say the loudest thing I've ever
00:14:06.940 -->
00:14:11.019experienced in any kitchen was my now no longer
00:14:11.019 -->
00:14:14.299working Ninja Blender system. The first time
00:14:14.299 -->
00:14:16.120I turned it on, I actually thought there was
00:14:16.120 -->
00:14:19.500something wrong. Wow. I was just going to add,
00:14:19.720 -->
00:14:24.159I think there needs to, I'm sure there probably
00:14:24.159 -->
00:14:27.379is some kind of little YouTube series on the
00:14:27.379 -->
00:14:31.779downfall of Dyson, Kim. There's definitely, they
00:14:31.779 -->
00:14:34.690started off well. I do know someone who used
00:14:34.690 -->
00:14:38.110to work there and things changed. It feels like
00:14:38.110 -->
00:14:39.450they had a, it feels like they had a catching
00:14:39.450 -->
00:14:41.049lightning in a bottle moment. I've been chasing
00:14:41.049 -->
00:14:44.990it ever since. Yeah. Do we have any thoughts
00:14:44.990 -->
00:14:48.149about the hugging face purchase? I was about
00:14:48.149 -->
00:14:51.230to ask the same. Yeah. I mean, it makes sense
00:14:51.230 -->
00:14:54.769from an perspective. I mean, half the, like most
00:14:54.769 -->
00:14:58.750of those model, like, okay. So I see the future
00:14:58.750 -->
00:15:01.330of running these models. They're mostly going
00:15:01.330 -->
00:15:04.720to be running on. you know, NVIDIA style hardware.
00:15:04.879 -->
00:15:06.740I mean, the graphics cards are what they run
00:15:06.740 -->
00:15:10.340these models on and therefore owning, having
00:15:10.340 -->
00:15:12.639ownership of the biggest repository of them.
00:15:12.720 -->
00:15:14.620A lot of these, which will be, you know, I mean,
00:15:14.620 -->
00:15:17.840that makes a lot of sense to me. I don't know
00:15:17.840 -->
00:15:20.519if it's a good or a bad thing. I think it might
00:15:20.519 -->
00:15:26.980be, I could see NVIDIA trying to, they could,
00:15:27.019 -->
00:15:28.980they could through, they could through encouraging
00:15:28.980 -->
00:15:33.120the adaption of models. to running on nvidia
00:15:33.120 -->
00:15:34.539hardware is already happening they could try
00:15:34.539 -->
00:15:37.200to like increase lock into the hardware in case
00:15:37.200 -->
00:15:39.379there's somebody with an nvidia killer coming
00:15:39.379 -->
00:15:41.899up on the market hardware wise i mean no they
00:15:41.899 -->
00:15:44.200don't do that their cuda system is open no i
00:15:44.200 -->
00:15:46.240think it's just the like microsoft bought github
00:15:46.240 -->
00:15:48.480because that's where the code is like those those
00:15:48.480 -->
00:15:51.159bank robbers you know they're robbed backs because
00:15:51.159 -->
00:15:52.639that's where the money is i don't think it's
00:15:52.639 -->
00:15:54.500any more complicated than that yeah and we all
00:15:54.500 -->
00:15:56.259know how well that's gone who's been trying to
00:15:56.259 -->
00:15:59.139use github over the last couple of months Yeah.
00:15:59.299 -->
00:16:02.799The weird stat I read for hugging faces, I don't
00:16:02.799 -->
00:16:04.799know if this is real or not, but apparently the
00:16:04.799 -->
00:16:06.700number that's the cost of the acquisition is
00:16:06.700 -->
00:16:10.840the Unicode for the hugging face emoji. So there's
00:16:10.840 -->
00:16:13.100a level to this too, which is just like, are
00:16:13.100 -->
00:16:16.000they just taking the piss out of us? It's like
00:16:16.000 -->
00:16:18.539money isn't real. Things are what we say they
00:16:18.539 -->
00:16:21.519are. We haven't heard about reduction. We haven't
00:16:21.519 -->
00:16:24.340heard about reduction. It's a gold mix. like
00:16:24.340 -->
00:16:26.240the big seven are just basically passing around
00:16:26.240 -->
00:16:28.480the 10, the same $10 million debt to each other.
00:16:28.559 -->
00:16:31.879Doing all business, but it's just this. Jensen
00:16:31.879 -->
00:16:35.620against your theory, Kim is the Jensen Huang
00:16:35.620 -->
00:16:39.919is not Elon Musk and Elon Musk always picks a
00:16:39.919 -->
00:16:42.720price that has four 20 in it because that's,
00:16:42.720 -->
00:16:44.899that's apparently the time you go out and smoke
00:16:44.899 -->
00:16:47.740and smoke dope behind the school bicycle shed
00:16:47.740 -->
00:16:51.059or something. Yeah. But I don't think Jensen
00:16:51.059 -->
00:16:55.460Huang has that particular kind of. goofiness.
00:16:55.460 -->
00:16:58.740I'm not too sure. I think he's pretty goofy,
00:16:58.820 -->
00:17:03.600actually. Yeah. I know he's on the money here.
00:17:03.840 -->
00:17:06.880The Taiwanese treason is pretty goofy. He's a
00:17:06.880 -->
00:17:08.859hero, but in the same way that Elon Musk is.
00:17:09.140 -->
00:17:12.799Nowadays, it's hard to tell how much of an influence
00:17:12.799 -->
00:17:20.539it is to get the crypto kitties in. The other
00:17:20.539 -->
00:17:26.980thing... Did we talk at all about the piece that
00:17:26.980 -->
00:17:30.900Matthew Green, who is a respected cryptography
00:17:30.900 -->
00:17:34.880professor, apparently wrote this posting saying
00:17:34.880 -->
00:17:38.420that AI was making software so secure that government
00:17:38.420 -->
00:17:40.880wouldn't be able to hack into it? I mean, I was
00:17:40.880 -->
00:17:42.960surprised because I would have expected Matthew
00:17:42.960 -->
00:17:44.980Green to think that was a good thing, but apparently
00:17:44.980 -->
00:17:50.539not. I'm torn. I am at this point desperate for
00:17:50.539 -->
00:17:52.500anything that looks positive to come out of this
00:17:52.500 -->
00:17:55.579situation. And the idea that being able to brute
00:17:55.579 -->
00:17:58.180force via AI all of the stupid little hacks that
00:17:58.180 -->
00:17:59.759have been letting all the other assholes get
00:17:59.759 -->
00:18:01.500into all the systems, like I'll take a little
00:18:01.500 -->
00:18:11.200bit of positivity. My sarcastic, cynical brain
00:18:11.200 -->
00:18:13.960is going, that looks like it was written by someone
00:18:13.960 -->
00:18:16.220who wanted to make AI sound good. But I can also
00:18:16.220 -->
00:18:18.259see that. Actually making sense. And you said
00:18:18.259 -->
00:18:20.059it's like this fellow who did this, he knows
00:18:20.059 -->
00:18:22.640his stuff. He's not, you know. Oh, yeah. Matthew
00:18:22.640 -->
00:18:26.220Green is a respected security guy. You know,
00:18:26.220 -->
00:18:31.140no, he's not. I mean, that would be nice. I mean,
00:18:31.220 -->
00:18:34.640I certainly would love to hear something being
00:18:34.640 -->
00:18:37.960made slightly more secure. Yeah, that was why
00:18:37.960 -->
00:18:41.700the thing surprised me was it sounded like. Anyway.
00:18:42.870 -->
00:18:45.130Well, for the two things we haven't quite managed
00:18:45.130 -->
00:18:48.089to get to yet, do we want to talk about banning
00:18:48.089 -->
00:18:51.329generative AI for the school systems in New York?
00:18:51.369 -->
00:18:53.450I would say, to be honest, this piece about,
00:18:53.650 -->
00:18:56.269yeah, I didn't quite realize which way around
00:18:56.269 -->
00:18:57.990this was. To me, it's kind of insane, the idea
00:18:57.990 -->
00:18:59.910that we must have insecure software forever so
00:18:59.910 -->
00:19:01.750that governments can hack people. I don't think
00:19:01.750 -->
00:19:03.990that's good logic. But also, like, the piece
00:19:03.990 -->
00:19:06.170I've pasted is about, there's a story of this
00:19:06.170 -->
00:19:08.549massive Berlin data dump that's like terabytes
00:19:08.549 -->
00:19:11.559of data. And a lot of it just seems to be like
00:19:11.559 -->
00:19:15.500there was like a ransom demand that wasn't paid.
00:19:16.019 -->
00:19:19.180And and a lot of if you read the article, it
00:19:19.180 -->
00:19:21.220was stuff that was on like Windows 95, Windows
00:19:21.220 -->
00:19:24.01998 computers. It doesn't seem like it's been
00:19:24.019 -->
00:19:25.839hard to get. And there's a lot of stuff in there
00:19:25.839 -->
00:19:28.680about like what the nuclear and chemical warfare
00:19:28.680 -->
00:19:34.849plans are. So I don't know. I also, like, there
00:19:34.849 -->
00:19:37.329was some massive hack that happened recently.
00:19:37.549 -->
00:19:39.730It took down, I just saw, I wish I'd written
00:19:39.730 -->
00:19:43.569it down. And the perennial reason for the hack
00:19:43.569 -->
00:19:46.230was just a straight up social engineering thing.
00:19:46.369 -->
00:19:50.230Like somebody found who the right person was,
00:19:50.430 -->
00:19:52.950called their tech support, the person who had
00:19:52.950 -->
00:19:54.210the right kind of permissions, called the tech
00:19:54.210 -->
00:19:57.049support center, pretended to be them, got a password
00:19:57.049 -->
00:20:01.740reset, logged in. Bob's your uncle. And there
00:20:01.740 -->
00:20:07.099is no amount of AI improvement of the software
00:20:07.099 -->
00:20:10.319that will get around the human element. Who was
00:20:10.319 -->
00:20:14.779Bob? Where does that come from, do you know?
00:20:14.960 -->
00:20:17.279I think it's an Australian term, originally.
00:20:17.880 -->
00:20:20.299Really? Again, I've been reading He Who Fights
00:20:20.299 -->
00:20:21.920With Monsters, which has an Australian protagonist,
00:20:22.119 -->
00:20:25.900so it may be influencing me right now. I assumed
00:20:25.900 -->
00:20:29.059it was British. Did we want to cover the school
00:20:29.059 -->
00:20:34.799systems or the... The school system one is...
00:20:34.799 -->
00:20:39.859There's so much. It feels like it's a whole...
00:20:39.859 -->
00:20:44.259I think it's a really good testing of the waters.
00:20:44.440 -->
00:20:47.519We'll keep an eye out for it. So my feeling on
00:20:47.519 -->
00:20:50.140this is... I'm finding AI a really useful tool
00:20:50.140 -->
00:20:51.579for coding, but it's only because I already know
00:20:51.579 -->
00:20:53.720how to code, right? So like I've made a bunch
00:20:53.720 -->
00:20:55.539of Rails apps and now I can make Rails apps and
00:20:55.539 -->
00:20:57.160I know what a good Rails app looks like. And
00:20:57.160 -->
00:20:59.000obviously it's not, you know, I think to be honest,
00:20:59.039 -->
00:21:01.400it does a much better job than me. And I think
00:21:01.400 -->
00:21:03.400like for me, why this really makes sense is because
00:21:03.400 -->
00:21:05.019like you have to learn to do the thing before
00:21:05.019 -->
00:21:06.920you try and automate the thing. And that's the
00:21:06.920 -->
00:21:09.220really scary. That's like the model collapse.
00:21:09.259 -->
00:21:11.660But for society, right? No context collapse for
00:21:11.660 -->
00:21:13.920society, right? When like people are trying to
00:21:13.920 -->
00:21:15.680do things they've never done the manual way.
00:21:15.779 -->
00:21:17.720And then they're giving jobs where they have
00:21:17.720 -->
00:21:19.259to automate a thing they've never done. Like
00:21:19.259 -->
00:21:21.240it just doesn't add up to me. You don't put someone
00:21:21.240 -->
00:21:23.279who doesn't know how to weld into a welding mech
00:21:23.279 -->
00:21:26.890suit. Right. That's a recipe for disaster. yeah
00:21:26.890 -->
00:21:29.130yeah probably won't leave their suit now now
00:21:29.130 -->
00:21:30.950you can now you can not know what you're doing
00:21:30.950 -->
00:21:34.930so much faster than before i'm definitely i'm
00:21:34.930 -->
00:21:36.410i'm having that similar experience with coding
00:21:36.410 -->
00:21:39.269and doing other things where having a large and
00:21:39.269 -->
00:21:42.150deep breadth of knowledge having coded for decades
00:21:42.150 -->
00:21:44.230means that i know what to ask for and i know
00:21:44.230 -->
00:21:46.029how to watch and i know how to have the moments
00:21:46.029 -->
00:21:48.690of sure that's right oh they're absolutely right
00:21:48.690 -->
00:21:50.430to have asked me about that i will go correct
00:21:50.430 -->
00:21:53.049that right now thank crap okay fine because an
00:21:53.049 -->
00:21:54.769ai can tell you something's internally consistent
00:21:54.769 -->
00:21:57.500but when it can't tell you The thing that only
00:21:57.500 -->
00:21:59.420a human can do is tell you if it's valuable or
00:21:59.420 -->
00:22:02.579useful. If you actually went the right direction.
00:22:02.839 -->
00:22:04.140And it's interesting how we're building that
00:22:04.140 -->
00:22:06.900skill set. We seem to be dodging around. Do we
00:22:06.900 -->
00:22:12.660want to tackle the Israel think tank? You said
00:22:12.660 -->
00:22:17.799it wasn't a real think tank. I'm up for it. They're
00:22:17.799 -->
00:22:22.960faking a think tank to produce articles that
00:22:22.960 -->
00:22:26.490are pro... Israel. And this is, this is, this
00:22:26.490 -->
00:22:28.029is something we talked about. And for me, so
00:22:28.029 -->
00:22:29.609how this dovetails into the discussions we've
00:22:29.609 -->
00:22:31.190had earlier that I found interesting. It was
00:22:31.190 -->
00:22:33.690like, I remember saying a year ago on tag run,
00:22:33.730 -->
00:22:36.269something like if I was someone in Russia right
00:22:36.269 -->
00:22:39.890now, I would be very keen to get a whole bunch
00:22:39.890 -->
00:22:41.869of stuff into all the data that they're using
00:22:41.869 -->
00:22:44.049to train these models to make it say the things
00:22:44.049 -->
00:22:45.809that I want it to say right now. So that a year
00:22:45.809 -->
00:22:47.309in the future, when these models comes out, they're
00:22:47.309 -->
00:22:49.789like, what should I do? What package should I
00:22:49.789 -->
00:22:51.730use? You should use Russian software package.
00:22:51.950 -->
00:22:55.240Give me all of your money. you know and like
00:22:55.240 -->
00:22:56.680well there's something else but you see where
00:22:56.680 -->
00:22:59.079i'm going with that and i the funny thing for
00:22:59.079 -->
00:23:02.339me was like i think in my mind i was wrong this
00:23:02.339 -->
00:23:04.920has allowed me to you know reckless i'm thinking
00:23:04.920 -->
00:23:07.099that there will be a day when we'll have trained
00:23:07.099 -->
00:23:09.920the models and we will stop that is clearly not
00:23:09.920 -->
00:23:13.900the case we will be trained until until the data
00:23:13.900 -->
00:23:16.700centers are all molten piles of slag we will
00:23:16.700 -->
00:23:19.359forever be training them and now literally like
00:23:19.359 -->
00:23:21.200the thing for me that i i didn't realize and
00:23:21.200 -->
00:23:24.359now i have a vision of this is that We are running
00:23:24.359 -->
00:23:29.079out of original data. Oh, I wrote about that
00:23:29.079 -->
00:23:32.640like two or three years ago. Yeah. There was
00:23:32.640 -->
00:23:35.079a study that said that we were running out of
00:23:35.079 -->
00:23:37.539high quality text because we don't produce it
00:23:37.539 -->
00:23:39.980nearly as fast as... No. It can be consumed.
00:23:40.900 -->
00:23:42.460There's been stories in the last couple of months
00:23:42.460 -->
00:23:46.779of people bulk, of companies bulk buying... Shit
00:23:46.779 -->
00:23:50.339old books. Antiquarian books and then destroying
00:23:50.339 -->
00:23:56.059them. to every person who ever loved a book.
00:23:56.240 -->
00:23:58.440Right. There's a great, great bookshop in New
00:23:58.440 -->
00:24:00.920Zealand that realized that that's what was happening
00:24:00.920 -->
00:24:04.440was that they were buying these niche titles
00:24:04.440 -->
00:24:07.480and they actually canceled the orders for thousands
00:24:07.480 -->
00:24:11.259of books because they worked it out. They're
00:24:11.259 -->
00:24:16.279selling books to have them destroyed. Do you
00:24:16.279 -->
00:24:18.099think that we are learning the craft of how to
00:24:18.970 -->
00:24:22.150provide the right crap but it's also that now
00:24:22.150 -->
00:24:26.470it's also a an ongoing game it's like sure we'll
00:24:26.470 -->
00:24:28.809skew it this way for you know opus five is going
00:24:28.809 -->
00:24:32.690to have a slight preference towards chocolate
00:24:32.690 -->
00:24:36.509chip ice cream but the next time around the you
00:24:36.509 -->
00:24:38.930know the rocky road folks are going to win by
00:24:38.930 -->
00:24:41.710doing it he said bring it into a very carefully
00:24:41.710 -->
00:24:44.630neutral territory the really interesting thing
00:24:44.630 -->
00:24:48.500about that is that the people who use chatbots,
00:24:48.579 -->
00:24:52.559generalized chatbots, as companions and lovers
00:24:52.559 -->
00:24:57.160and so forth can actually get quite upset when
00:24:57.160 -->
00:25:00.740they're updated and then reactions they're used
00:25:00.740 -->
00:25:04.380to getting don't appear. Yeah, model updates
00:25:04.380 -->
00:25:06.660on those. What's the one character or something?
00:25:06.779 -->
00:25:09.119They've said they've slowed them down for exactly
00:25:09.119 -->
00:25:11.799that reason. People got very upset. When the
00:25:11.799 -->
00:25:15.440intelligence, I'm using air quotes, of the models
00:25:15.440 -->
00:25:17.099increased and they stopped using the sort of
00:25:17.099 -->
00:25:19.079same terms that they were endeared to. I mean,
00:25:19.099 -->
00:25:21.500it's worse than having your desktop rearranged.
00:25:24.160 -->
00:25:28.000That's my thing. I guess, like, for me, why this
00:25:28.000 -->
00:25:30.579thing's so interesting is because, like, yeah.
00:25:31.099 -->
00:25:33.019it's like if you're disingenuous and you and
00:25:33.019 -->
00:25:35.119you don't care or like you're actively trying
00:25:35.119 -->
00:25:37.319to cause harm like the israeli government is
00:25:37.319 -->
00:25:39.859it's an incredible tool because like you know
00:25:39.859 -->
00:25:41.680the whole way that like search engine optimization
00:25:41.680 -->
00:25:44.059works on the net is basically around like authority
00:25:44.059 -->
00:25:46.039and the amount of things you have pointing to
00:25:46.039 -->
00:25:48.559you and i feel like for anyone who's worked in
00:25:48.559 -->
00:25:50.500the third sector there is just this culture of
00:25:50.500 -->
00:25:53.680like reports having their own seriousness as
00:25:53.680 -->
00:25:55.920if they mean anything even though i think most
00:25:55.920 -->
00:25:58.359people skim read the executive summary i found
00:25:58.359 -->
00:26:00.500some clangers in like published reports that
00:26:00.500 -->
00:26:02.619people have put out so i think it's interesting
00:26:02.619 -->
00:26:03.960because a lot of the stuff that's happening now
00:26:03.960 -->
00:26:07.059is sort of like taking advantage of these like
00:26:07.059 -->
00:26:09.759cultural weaknesses we have to things like the
00:26:09.759 -->
00:26:12.680idea of a report right and it's like and now
00:26:12.680 -->
00:26:15.240you can produce them as fast as you can prompt
00:26:15.240 -->
00:26:17.720your agent but it's like you know the thing that
00:26:17.720 -->
00:26:19.599was the problem was the idea that these are things
00:26:19.599 -->
00:26:21.980that should be like inherently given this air
00:26:21.980 -->
00:26:24.440of seriousness anyway i don't know how to describe
00:26:24.440 -->
00:26:27.480it we saw a very early version of that in the
00:26:27.480 -->
00:26:30.660problem that the guardian was having with falsely
00:26:30.660 -->
00:26:33.359generated article references in other people's
00:26:33.359 -->
00:26:35.140work people were doing academic work and then
00:26:35.140 -->
00:26:40.039the and then basically The AI would make up a
00:26:40.039 -->
00:26:43.759quote to, like, the January 17th, you know, 2022
00:26:43.759 -->
00:26:46.980article from The Guardian on why I'm right and
00:26:46.980 -->
00:26:50.579you're wrong in depth analysis. And then The
00:26:50.579 -->
00:26:53.420Guardian was getting, and many other newspapers,
00:26:53.559 -->
00:26:55.059like, where's this article? I have to find this
00:26:55.059 -->
00:26:58.240article. And this is a very interesting, like,
00:26:58.339 -->
00:27:01.740if you're really technically minded, there's
00:27:01.740 -->
00:27:04.500a, like, one of the most obnoxious things to
00:27:04.500 -->
00:27:07.720do is to prove that something doesn't exist.
00:27:08.269 -->
00:27:10.849in your corpus because the only way to do that
00:27:10.849 -->
00:27:14.170with authority is to go through freaking everything
00:27:14.170 -->
00:27:18.630and know that you couldn't find it and originally
00:27:18.630 -->
00:27:21.710because no one had ever done this before until
00:27:21.710 -->
00:27:24.250people at the guardian and these other places
00:27:24.250 -->
00:27:27.150caught on that's like oh someone's making fake
00:27:27.150 -->
00:27:31.339citations like until that point They were throwing
00:27:31.339 -->
00:27:33.380a lot of energy at trying to find these articles
00:27:33.380 -->
00:27:35.619because they presumed by that same methodology
00:27:35.619 -->
00:27:36.880that you were just talking about, Kim, where
00:27:36.880 -->
00:27:40.299it's like, oh, this is a thing that only exists
00:27:40.299 -->
00:27:42.519when it's real, right? No one would make a fake
00:27:42.519 -->
00:27:46.299article citation. AI would. AI did. didn't even
00:27:46.299 -->
00:27:48.579specifically a human with bad intentions would
00:27:48.579 -->
00:27:51.359prompt ai to do it right oh yeah now actually
00:27:51.359 -->
00:27:54.119before it wasn't even a human prompting in many
00:27:54.119 -->
00:27:56.460cases it was just ai trying really hard to do
00:27:56.460 -->
00:27:58.740what you thought you wanted it to do and it goes
00:27:58.740 -->
00:27:59.940oh there should be something that looks like
00:27:59.940 -->
00:28:01.039a citation here i'll just make something that
00:28:01.039 -->
00:28:02.700looks like a citation yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah
00:28:02.700 -->
00:28:06.180yeah that's what you're saying yeah yeah and
00:28:06.180 -->
00:28:08.220now the humans went oh that's a good idea why
00:28:08.220 -->
00:28:10.420don't we do more of that oh did that really mess
00:28:10.420 -->
00:28:12.420them up we should do more of that yep absolutely
00:28:14.379 -->
00:28:17.240I'm still puzzled by the idea of a fake think
00:28:17.240 -->
00:28:23.920tank. It's just the think tank. It's the presumed
00:28:23.920 -->
00:28:29.299academic cred or sense of authority that is given
00:28:29.299 -->
00:28:31.500when these articles come out of this quote -unquote
00:28:31.500 -->
00:28:33.819think tank. Because how many of us, like we're
00:28:33.819 -->
00:28:38.380building the habit now, but think tank, do we
00:28:38.380 -->
00:28:41.089always go check a think tank? I mean, why would
00:28:41.089 -->
00:28:42.849we say think tank if it wasn't supposed to mean
00:28:42.849 -->
00:28:44.369that people who were really smart thought about
00:28:44.369 -->
00:28:46.230it? Because that's what a think tank is. Except
00:28:46.230 -->
00:28:48.069that this think tank is my goldfish bowl. I've
00:28:48.069 -->
00:28:50.690just called it a think tank. But we don't think
00:28:50.690 -->
00:28:56.670of that. And that's it for our wonderful roundtable
00:28:56.670 -->
00:29:00.170discussion of all things AI. Now, we've got Wendy
00:29:00.170 -->
00:29:03.549talking to us about The Nerd Reich by Gil Duran.
00:29:04.670 -->
00:29:08.069Yeah, Gil Duran is a San Francisco journalist.
00:29:10.170 -->
00:29:13.809His book, well, the subtitle of his book is Silicon
00:29:13.809 -->
00:29:17.789Valley Fascism and the War on Democracy. And
00:29:17.789 -->
00:29:21.869it joins a sort of subgenre of publishing about
00:29:21.869 -->
00:29:25.930the rightward turn of Silicon Valley, which actually
00:29:25.930 -->
00:29:29.549started more than 20 years ago with Paulina Borsuk's
00:29:29.549 -->
00:29:33.670book, Cyber Selfish. And when she wrote it, it
00:29:33.670 -->
00:29:37.829was widely ignored and practically bankrupted
00:29:37.829 -->
00:29:40.420her, she keeps saying. And it's actually now
00:29:40.420 -->
00:29:42.420going to be republished this year because people
00:29:42.420 -->
00:29:44.319have rediscovered it and realized that she was
00:29:44.319 -->
00:29:50.039right all along. And so there have been more
00:29:50.039 -->
00:29:52.900recent entries into this particular little subgenre,
00:29:52.940 -->
00:29:55.380Throwing Rocks at the Google Bus, I think, and
00:29:55.380 -->
00:29:58.680The Survival of the Richest by Douglas Rushkoff,
00:29:58.839 -->
00:30:03.740and Gilded Rage, which was mostly about Elon
00:30:03.740 -->
00:30:07.279Musk from Jacob Silverman. But The Nerd Reich
00:30:07.279 -->
00:30:13.720basically starts with a book called The Sovereign
00:30:13.720 -->
00:30:19.619Individual by William Rees -Mogg and a co -author
00:30:19.619 -->
00:30:22.259whose name I forget. But, you know, you sort
00:30:22.259 -->
00:30:23.819of look at that and you go, Rees -Mogg, you mean
00:30:23.819 -->
00:30:26.059like in Jacob? And, of course, it was his father.
00:30:26.799 -->
00:30:31.460Right. Famous editor. But a lot of the stuff
00:30:31.460 -->
00:30:34.140that we see from Silicon Valley is about this,
00:30:34.180 -->
00:30:37.799is wanting to build little private states, for
00:30:37.799 -->
00:30:43.779example. And so what Duran does is really follow
00:30:43.779 -->
00:30:46.119the politics, which is kind of different from
00:30:46.119 -->
00:30:48.940a lot of these books, which really focus on Silicon
00:30:48.940 -->
00:30:52.329Valley. What he's really aiming is to show the
00:30:52.329 -->
00:30:54.990real danger to democracy. And he's he seems to
00:30:54.990 -->
00:30:57.470be most frightened of J .D. Vance because he's
00:30:57.470 -->
00:31:00.130already in a position as vice president. And
00:31:00.130 -->
00:31:02.569he describes him as a complete sort of completely
00:31:02.569 -->
00:31:06.089manufactured creature of Peter Thiel. And Thiel,
00:31:06.210 -->
00:31:09.069he sees as the guy behind a lot of this. And
00:31:09.069 -->
00:31:12.029Thiel has acolytes all over the White House.
00:31:12.849 -->
00:31:18.559So he picked them. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So
00:31:18.559 -->
00:31:20.660that's kind of money. Why not go out and pick
00:31:20.660 -->
00:31:22.859up a couple of, you know, vice presidents along
00:31:22.859 -->
00:31:25.000with the milk and the butter? Well, you only
00:31:25.000 -->
00:31:28.380need one. You say that, but I bet he's probably
00:31:28.380 -->
00:31:33.099got three or four. He probably has, yes, other
00:31:33.099 -->
00:31:36.720ideas. Contingencies within contingencies. Well,
00:31:36.720 -->
00:31:39.259he picks up people. I mean, everyone says that.
00:31:39.319 -->
00:31:42.779Yeah. But apparently Duran was inspired to write
00:31:42.779 -->
00:31:45.779the book by this thing going on in Solano County
00:31:45.779 -->
00:31:48.539in California, where basically they're trying
00:31:48.539 -->
00:31:50.799to take it over as a private enterprise. And
00:31:50.799 -->
00:31:54.440the residents are objecting, surprisingly enough.
00:31:57.680 -->
00:32:01.059We visited quite a few of those micro states
00:32:01.059 -->
00:32:04.579last year. I think we covered two or three of
00:32:04.579 -->
00:32:07.579those. um places that i've been trying to make
00:32:07.579 -->
00:32:10.619yes separate sovereign states so they can go
00:32:10.619 -->
00:32:14.259all out capitalist nuts so with as much cryptocurrency
00:32:14.259 -->
00:32:16.299i think the difference is then it was sort of
00:32:16.299 -->
00:32:19.319considered some sort of cryptocurrency scam whereas
00:32:19.319 -->
00:32:22.799that isn't the point anymore no no i sort of
00:32:22.799 -->
00:32:25.079was telling a friend of mine a 17 year old english
00:32:25.079 -->
00:32:26.880girl about about this book and she said well
00:32:26.880 -->
00:32:29.980you know kind of what's the relevance You know,
00:32:29.980 -->
00:32:32.000and I said, well, you know, they're talking about
00:32:32.000 -->
00:32:35.720charter, you know, these microstates. Think Rishi
00:32:35.720 -->
00:32:38.700Sunak and all these free ports he wanted to build.
00:32:39.019 -->
00:32:44.380Yeah. I mean, it's weird how we were just talking
00:32:44.380 -->
00:32:46.980about the evolution of the company town and how
00:32:46.980 -->
00:32:48.640that that's now something. And it's like and
00:32:48.640 -->
00:32:50.339it's almost like they went, how about a company
00:32:50.339 -->
00:32:52.700town? But none of those poor people show up and
00:32:52.700 -->
00:32:54.339it's just us rich people and we get to do whatever
00:32:54.339 -->
00:32:56.240we want because we're all rich. Or you have the
00:32:56.240 -->
00:32:58.799poor people there to do things like... Yes, the
00:32:58.799 -->
00:33:00.359poor people have to be there. No, you till your
00:33:00.359 -->
00:33:03.500garden and clean your house. Well, to bring it
00:33:03.500 -->
00:33:06.019back to Cory Dottrow, they're the reverse centaurs.
00:33:06.359 -->
00:33:09.920Right, but you do what they do in Dubai, which
00:33:09.920 -->
00:33:12.319is you don't let them have any rights. Yeah,
00:33:12.359 -->
00:33:15.079they just round the back and do the work. Was
00:33:15.079 -->
00:33:16.819it Douglas Rushkoff who said he got paid a lot
00:33:16.819 -->
00:33:19.339of money to go and... He got paid a lot of money
00:33:19.339 -->
00:33:22.279by some billionaires. Yeah, to go and talk to
00:33:22.279 -->
00:33:24.599these billionaires who were asking him things
00:33:24.599 -->
00:33:26.940like, how do I keep my private security force
00:33:26.940 -->
00:33:32.920loyal to me? After the event. People see in the
00:33:32.920 -->
00:33:35.359Apple TV series, Silo, because I just realized
00:33:35.359 -->
00:33:37.000how on point it is, but I don't want to spoil
00:33:37.000 -->
00:33:41.259anything. Yeah, that's basically the same. I
00:33:41.259 -->
00:33:44.880mean, honestly, I saw Silo and I've seen some
00:33:44.880 -->
00:33:48.380of it and my brain just went, this is just grim,
00:33:48.400 -->
00:33:53.769dark fallout. Grimdark Fallout. Is that an actual
00:33:53.769 -->
00:33:57.150thing? Well, Grimdark is a thing and Fallout
00:33:57.150 -->
00:33:59.230is a video game that now got turned into an actually
00:33:59.230 -->
00:34:01.630really good TV series. But it's also it's the
00:34:01.630 -->
00:34:04.210same premise as that super rich people. They
00:34:04.210 -->
00:34:07.029have a similar premise of vaults in the ground
00:34:07.029 -->
00:34:10.090where people go to survive out the survive out
00:34:10.090 -->
00:34:12.139the nuclear whatever. And then it turns out,
00:34:12.139 -->
00:34:14.360oh, they're actually experiments. Grim Dark was
00:34:14.360 -->
00:34:16.599the name for Warhammer 40 ,000 and other genre
00:34:16.599 -->
00:34:19.079similarities. I actually wanted to write something
00:34:19.079 -->
00:34:23.940like that around the year 2000 when... You know,
00:34:23.960 -->
00:34:25.559there were all these guys on the Internet talking
00:34:25.559 -->
00:34:27.239about how they had to go live in bunkers for
00:34:27.239 -->
00:34:29.84010 years or something to be safe. And I was,
00:34:29.840 -->
00:34:32.679you know, it was sort of 2010. I was thinking,
00:34:32.760 -->
00:34:35.679you know, it'd be pretty amusing to write something
00:34:35.679 -->
00:34:38.079about the people emerging from these bunkers.
00:34:38.159 -->
00:34:40.639And not only is the world peaceful and continuing,
00:34:40.739 -->
00:34:42.599but everybody has these weird devices and you
00:34:42.599 -->
00:34:45.940have missed, you know, 10 generations of technology
00:34:45.940 -->
00:34:48.139and you have no idea how to make the world work.
00:34:48.519 -->
00:34:51.519I think Laura Penny did write a short story on
00:34:51.519 -->
00:34:54.559the sort of similar. point about people these
00:34:54.559 -->
00:34:57.000rich people actually going in there and actually
00:34:57.000 -->
00:34:59.000being a war and actually not surviving because
00:34:59.000 -->
00:35:01.300of course yeah they have lots of money that has
00:35:01.300 -->
00:35:04.519no value which is the original point i think
00:35:04.519 -->
00:35:06.199the most insane thing these nuclear bunkers is
00:35:06.199 -->
00:35:08.260like you know people like sam altman kind of
00:35:08.260 -->
00:35:10.260brag about theirs and like why is anyone taking
00:35:10.260 -->
00:35:12.659advice about the future from a billionaire who's
00:35:12.659 -->
00:35:14.960got their own private nuclear book absolutely
00:35:14.960 -->
00:35:19.820like the stakes are just different for us Speaking
00:35:19.820 -->
00:35:22.039of Peter Thiel, did you hear that he'd given
00:35:22.039 -->
00:35:24.099up on New Zealand and he's gone to Argentina?
00:35:25.139 -->
00:35:29.480No. Yeah, because New Zealand's too woke. That's
00:35:29.480 -->
00:35:34.440fucking on brand, isn't it? My nuclear bunker
00:35:34.440 -->
00:35:38.500is too woke. I was more thinking about the Argentina
00:35:38.500 -->
00:35:43.920part, but that's a deep cut. Wow. Well, he may
00:35:43.920 -->
00:35:49.739come to regret it. Who knows? All right, next
00:35:49.739 -->
00:35:53.739up is an article about trying to get all of your
00:35:53.739 -->
00:35:57.739data from companies and how they replied by deleting
00:35:57.739 -->
00:36:01.880it instead. Ian? Yeah, so this is a story from
00:36:01.880 -->
00:36:05.900Wired Magazine. And ultimately, a journalist
00:36:05.900 -->
00:36:10.699goes around trying to get their data. They kind
00:36:10.699 -->
00:36:13.900of want to understand what the companies are
00:36:13.900 -->
00:36:17.369basing their algorithms on. trying to understand
00:36:17.369 -->
00:36:19.630what kind of data that they've been collecting.
00:36:20.369 -->
00:36:26.750And as the story title kind of suggests, they
00:36:26.750 -->
00:36:29.530turn back and go, oh, we haven't got any data.
00:36:29.829 -->
00:36:32.710Yeah, we've deleted it all. Most of them even
00:36:32.710 -->
00:36:35.230say they just don't have any data. And then they
00:36:35.230 -->
00:36:37.429kind of say, well, we've deleted it. They have
00:36:37.429 -->
00:36:42.690no data? Yeah. This is, and the reason why I
00:36:42.690 -->
00:36:46.849bring this up is because as someone who... requested
00:36:46.849 -->
00:36:50.630the GDPR data, you know, when GDPR, when we were
00:36:50.630 -->
00:36:53.989still in the EU, to be fair, you know, just like
00:36:53.989 -->
00:36:56.949requesting it and trying to get the data just
00:36:56.949 -->
00:36:59.769to try and understand what, especially some of
00:36:59.769 -->
00:37:04.150the dating sites, what they were using, how they
00:37:04.150 -->
00:37:09.989saw me, all those things. This speaks volumes
00:37:09.989 -->
00:37:13.909exactly what was happening back then. So I remember,
00:37:14.050 -->
00:37:19.289for example, oh what was the site called um one
00:37:19.289 -->
00:37:21.650of the sites i can't which one it is now you
00:37:21.650 -->
00:37:24.590know they went over there 34 days over 30 days
00:37:24.590 -->
00:37:26.630because in gpr you've got a certain amount of
00:37:26.630 -->
00:37:30.690time and they um said oh we don't actually have
00:37:30.690 -->
00:37:33.309any data on you and i was like well i have an
00:37:33.309 -->
00:37:39.210account i closed the account but and just this
00:37:39.210 -->
00:37:41.929is the kind of thing that happens now this journalist
00:37:41.929 -->
00:37:45.480story goes through all this and a lot more, but
00:37:45.480 -->
00:37:48.480it's worth a read. But I was wondering how many
00:37:48.480 -->
00:37:51.099of the tech firms have actually requested their
00:37:51.099 -->
00:37:59.460data and what you've had in response. Have you
00:37:59.460 -->
00:38:01.880had a response? And then even if you had a response,
00:38:02.079 -->
00:38:05.619did you actually get any data at all? I know
00:38:05.619 -->
00:38:09.079stuff like most of us have probably moved from
00:38:09.079 -->
00:38:13.869Twitter. That's the only example I can think
00:38:13.869 -->
00:38:16.309of. Yeah. I'm wondering about some of the other
00:38:16.309 -->
00:38:18.710ones. A lot of the sites do not, they literally
00:38:18.710 -->
00:38:22.630ignore you. And then some of them say, oh, well,
00:38:22.750 -->
00:38:25.789actually, you're based in the UK and we're based
00:38:25.789 -->
00:38:29.969in America, so we don't respond to GDPR requests,
00:38:30.150 -->
00:38:32.650which is like, no, that's not the way the law
00:38:32.650 -->
00:38:36.250works. And then, yeah, a lot of them just kind
00:38:36.250 -->
00:38:38.289of say, well, we don't have any data on you.
00:38:39.210 -->
00:38:41.469And then that's it. And then some of your accounts
00:38:41.469 -->
00:38:44.570close down. Or I'm just wondering what other
00:38:44.570 -->
00:38:46.469people's thoughts are and what other people's
00:38:46.469 -->
00:38:49.610experiences are of it. Because I feel like this
00:38:49.610 -->
00:38:55.670story speaks volumes about what I had back 10
00:38:55.670 -->
00:38:59.070years ago, or just under 10 years ago, and it's
00:38:59.070 -->
00:39:02.670still happening now. So it's more of a question
00:39:02.670 -->
00:39:06.409to you all. There's some complications with that
00:39:06.409 -->
00:39:08.809story. And you actually made them clear, maybe
00:39:08.809 -->
00:39:11.469accidentally, because you said data and then
00:39:11.469 -->
00:39:13.250you said algorithm. Now, they don't have to store
00:39:13.250 -->
00:39:16.110or give you an algorithm, of course. Some of
00:39:16.110 -->
00:39:19.289the data may mean absolutely nothing. Doesn't
00:39:19.289 -->
00:39:21.550have to be in English. Doesn't have to, in fact,
00:39:21.570 -->
00:39:26.170be recognisable, readable data. So it's possibly
00:39:26.170 -->
00:39:30.469when you say my data, you mean the things that
00:39:30.469 -->
00:39:33.380are just related to you. that haven't been post
00:39:33.380 -->
00:39:37.159-processed into nothingness. It's not always
00:39:37.159 -->
00:39:40.099obvious what it is that they could or should
00:39:40.099 -->
00:39:41.980be keeping, even though you know, you've got
00:39:41.980 -->
00:39:45.739to count. You're right. Sorry, I'll be very clear
00:39:45.739 -->
00:39:50.360as well. When you do a GDPR request, you're asking
00:39:50.360 -->
00:39:54.619for the information that you put into the system.
00:39:55.440 -->
00:39:59.500You never get the process. So, for example, I
00:39:59.500 -->
00:40:04.579would love to know how... you know, my spelling
00:40:04.579 -->
00:40:08.960mistakes have altered the algorithm, but they're
00:40:08.960 -->
00:40:10.159never going to show you that because that's a
00:40:10.159 -->
00:40:12.059secret source. And that was something that they,
00:40:12.139 -->
00:40:14.780you know, they fight a lot about, you know, you
00:40:14.780 -->
00:40:19.880don't want to share the secret source. They don't
00:40:19.880 -->
00:40:22.079let you see the inferences they make from your
00:40:22.079 -->
00:40:25.079data. No, they do not. That's definitely, that's
00:40:25.079 -->
00:40:27.699a secret source, but you should be able to get
00:40:27.699 -->
00:40:32.440exactly what you put in. back out. And what I
00:40:32.440 -->
00:40:36.159found was even with that, you don't even get
00:40:36.159 -->
00:40:38.639that. A lot of times you just get, sometimes
00:40:38.639 -->
00:40:40.820there has been in the past, I should have found
00:40:40.820 -->
00:40:43.599the examples where people have requested the
00:40:43.599 -->
00:40:46.639data back and all they've got is a blank piece
00:40:46.639 -->
00:40:49.500of paper back. Like they're literally taking
00:40:49.500 -->
00:40:53.099the piss. And I think those early days of GDPR,
00:40:53.179 -->
00:40:55.719they kind of just were like, but it's a legal
00:40:55.719 -->
00:40:59.630request. So this is where I'm thinking about
00:40:59.630 -->
00:41:02.289an article we had like a year ago where someone
00:41:02.289 -->
00:41:05.829was talking about how that the rise of agentic
00:41:05.829 -->
00:41:08.829handling of things may end up like apparently
00:41:08.829 -->
00:41:11.250one of the things that's going on is a lot of
00:41:11.250 -->
00:41:16.070local councils and other services have been quietly
00:41:16.070 -->
00:41:19.550relying. on making the access to their services
00:41:19.550 -->
00:41:24.409more and more labyrinthine and relying on the
00:41:24.409 -->
00:41:26.190fact that the more difficult you make it the
00:41:26.190 -->
00:41:27.869more percentage of people will not make it through
00:41:27.869 -->
00:41:29.630or they'll lose patience or they won't have the
00:41:29.630 -->
00:41:31.869yeah you know executive functioning to go through
00:41:31.869 -->
00:41:34.110it and there's i i'm hopeful that there's a version
00:41:34.110 -->
00:41:36.329of this which is like if it is truly a legal
00:41:36.329 -->
00:41:38.969requirement and they keep ignoring it they they
00:41:38.969 -->
00:41:40.630are going it's going to be more of a pain for
00:41:40.630 -->
00:41:44.309you to sue us than it will be for us to just
00:41:44.309 -->
00:41:47.739ignore you and guess what ai can do for you there
00:41:47.739 -->
00:41:49.920i think we're already there i was going to say
00:41:49.920 -->
00:41:52.380i've never done a subject access request i think
00:41:52.380 -->
00:41:54.780it's called but i have done foi requests and
00:41:54.780 -->
00:41:57.219that's a weird game too because everyone's right
00:41:57.219 -->
00:41:59.219apparently all the foi departments everywhere
00:41:59.219 -->
00:42:02.519are just swamped right now and again it's like
00:42:02.519 -->
00:42:04.639a lot of bad actors who are using them to try
00:42:04.639 -->
00:42:07.380and do things with right i saw something about
00:42:07.380 -->
00:42:09.719um i don't think it's going to come to anything
00:42:09.719 -->
00:42:12.019but you know there was some like far right organizers
00:42:12.019 -->
00:42:14.519who are trying to they were claiming that they're
00:42:14.519 -->
00:42:16.380going to use it to find all the information on
00:42:16.380 -->
00:42:17.920all the asylum processing and where everyone
00:42:17.920 -->
00:42:20.260lives and who's part of the asylum system and
00:42:20.260 -->
00:42:22.579they're clearly not it's just like a threat but
00:42:22.579 -->
00:42:24.719like i can't kind of imagine the amount of like
00:42:24.719 -->
00:42:29.679you know bad faith um FOI requests that are being
00:42:29.679 -->
00:42:31.820sent out at the moment on kind of every subject.
00:42:32.500 -->
00:42:34.239It's a denial of service attack, which is what
00:42:34.239 -->
00:42:36.579you get in any situation. Any situation where
00:42:36.579 -->
00:42:38.679it's easier, where you can do something that
00:42:38.679 -->
00:42:40.739causes something else to have to do a whole lot
00:42:40.739 -->
00:42:42.940of effort, that you can do a little bit of an
00:42:42.940 -->
00:42:45.699effort. They do have the ability to dub things
00:42:45.699 -->
00:42:49.860vexatious requests. Yes. So for something like
00:42:49.860 -->
00:42:52.219that with the far right folks could be. But if
00:42:52.219 -->
00:42:53.699you're doing this from the perspective of like
00:42:53.699 -->
00:42:55.659this article where it's like I asked 100 companies
00:42:55.659 -->
00:42:58.760about myself. Yeah, that's a different. I don't
00:42:58.760 -->
00:43:01.039know. I don't think you can claim that for GDPR.
00:43:01.199 -->
00:43:02.880I know you claim that for taxations, but it would
00:43:02.880 -->
00:43:05.300be a good way to be like, hey, so it turns out
00:43:05.300 -->
00:43:07.519now it's really easy for me to keep track of
00:43:07.519 -->
00:43:09.719these 100 requests. And I know exactly what the
00:43:09.719 -->
00:43:11.079legal requirements are. And it's really easy
00:43:11.079 -->
00:43:12.800for me to track all of this because now I have
00:43:12.800 -->
00:43:16.369this. bot that'll do it for me so let's kick
00:43:16.369 -->
00:43:18.269off this and out of these hundred ones i can
00:43:18.269 -->
00:43:19.869play a numbers game and if the company doesn't
00:43:19.869 -->
00:43:21.889give me what i want i can and also you know starting
00:43:21.889 -->
00:43:24.769to figure out things like what are the What are
00:43:24.769 -->
00:43:27.909the low effort ways I can try to punish you for
00:43:27.909 -->
00:43:29.809not giving me this data that don't take me a
00:43:29.809 -->
00:43:31.230lot of effort, but that will result in money
00:43:31.230 -->
00:43:33.130like the in the US? They have something called
00:43:33.130 -->
00:43:35.469a small claims court, which people will sometimes
00:43:35.469 -->
00:43:36.829take advantage of because they know that if they,
00:43:36.889 -->
00:43:38.269you know, I'm not going to be able to sue you
00:43:38.269 -->
00:43:39.570for a million dollars and I'm not going to have
00:43:39.570 -->
00:43:40.989to pay the lawyers for this. But if I ask you
00:43:40.989 -->
00:43:42.610for four thousand, sometimes you won't even give
00:43:42.610 -->
00:43:44.230a shit, won't show up. And then, boom, I get
00:43:44.230 -->
00:43:47.730four thousand dollars. I guess I feel like the
00:43:47.730 -->
00:43:49.690writing might be on the wall for FOI, to be honest.
00:43:49.889 -->
00:43:52.150I would not be completely shocked if pretty soon
00:43:52.150 -->
00:43:53.650they try and start putting things through the
00:43:53.650 -->
00:43:55.789courts to repeal it on the basis that it's too
00:43:55.789 -->
00:43:57.650time -consuming. I'm a little bit worried about
00:43:57.650 -->
00:44:00.969it. I just want to quickly make the distinction
00:44:00.969 -->
00:44:03.110you did make it, Kim, between an FOI request
00:44:03.110 -->
00:44:04.750that's treated differently from a subject request.
00:44:05.269 -->
00:44:09.349Rather important. I just want to add one last
00:44:09.349 -->
00:44:12.469thing, and I think... And so the wired piece
00:44:12.469 -->
00:44:16.369is obviously, not obviously, it is an American
00:44:16.369 -->
00:44:22.070perspective, but there is a constant thing, especially
00:44:22.070 -->
00:44:24.670when, for example, the dating site, which I can't
00:44:24.670 -->
00:44:25.909remember the name of off the top of my head,
00:44:26.030 -->
00:44:30.869went over their time limit, which was 30 days,
00:44:30.949 -->
00:44:35.090and they went to 34 days before they actually
00:44:35.090 -->
00:44:39.309responded to me. That is a breach. And I remember...
00:44:39.639 -->
00:44:43.559Yeah, forwarding this to, oh God, what's the,
00:44:43.800 -->
00:44:48.280the Ofcom? For the Ombudsman or Ofcom? Yeah,
00:44:48.340 -->
00:44:52.219the Ombudsman. And the Ombudsman also are flooded
00:44:52.219 -->
00:44:55.500with this stuff. And there is a large request
00:44:55.500 -->
00:44:59.500from a lot of organisations, including the Open
00:44:59.500 -->
00:45:03.920Rights Group, which I am an advisor to, that
00:45:03.920 -->
00:45:08.940we need to change. um the way that that's done
00:45:08.940 -->
00:45:11.960because they're obviously over flooded with this
00:45:11.960 -->
00:45:16.239stuff and you know it's not helping that these
00:45:16.239 -->
00:45:18.579companies are getting away with with kind of
00:45:18.579 -->
00:45:22.400just breaking the law and that's a problem so
00:45:22.400 -->
00:45:26.079i thought it was a very good uh you know article
00:45:26.079 -->
00:45:33.769to to highlight all this And next up is another
00:45:33.769 -->
00:45:36.210article from Ian that's coming from TechRadar.
00:45:36.210 -->
00:45:38.809It's about the BBC versus Trump case, and they're
00:45:38.809 -->
00:45:42.610using a VPN argument. Go ahead, Ian. Okay, so
00:45:42.610 -->
00:45:46.989the BBC, as you might have remembered, that there
00:45:46.989 -->
00:45:53.789was a problem where they edited part of Trump's
00:45:53.789 -->
00:45:58.469speech, and Trump didn't like this, or Trump
00:45:58.469 -->
00:46:02.889understood. The people around Trump didn't like
00:46:02.889 -->
00:46:06.070this and they decided that they're going to sue
00:46:06.070 -->
00:46:12.329the BBC. This was a little while ago. So recently
00:46:12.329 -->
00:46:14.570the BBC has kind of come back and said, look,
00:46:14.630 -->
00:46:22.650we're going to use the VPN as a major part of
00:46:22.650 -->
00:46:27.989this because the show was not shown outside the
00:46:27.989 -->
00:46:32.300UK. So anyone that watched it, because the part
00:46:32.300 -->
00:46:36.820of the thing that Trump said was anyone in America
00:46:36.820 -->
00:46:41.860who saw that, you know, well, BBC said that,
00:46:41.880 -->
00:46:46.519sorry, the BBC is saying that anyone outside
00:46:46.519 -->
00:46:50.239of the UK who saw this must have used a VPN.
00:46:50.719 -->
00:46:52.739And they actually have some statistics about
00:46:52.739 -->
00:46:56.639this or some tracking about this. Trump's saying
00:46:56.639 -->
00:47:02.530that. that that change, that edit, influenced
00:47:02.530 -->
00:47:09.250how people felt about what he said. He's saying
00:47:09.250 -->
00:47:12.570it was reputational damage, right? Yes, exactly.
00:47:13.030 -->
00:47:15.889So I think it's interesting because I was wondering
00:47:15.889 -->
00:47:20.570how the BBC was going to stand against this.
00:47:20.750 -->
00:47:22.889And I think the VPN one's interesting because
00:47:22.889 -->
00:47:26.969it does cut the number of... or the limitation
00:47:26.969 -->
00:47:32.789of damage down to quite a small amount. I can't
00:47:32.789 -->
00:47:35.409remember the exact number. In the document or
00:47:35.409 -->
00:47:40.929in the article, it has the numbers, but it's
00:47:40.929 -->
00:47:42.650a very interesting way of going about things.
00:47:42.750 -->
00:47:49.449It also opens up the issue with VPNs, and it
00:47:49.449 -->
00:47:53.929does open up a whole number of questions about...
00:47:54.760 -->
00:47:58.619If you watch this through a VPN, who's responsible
00:47:58.619 -->
00:48:04.480for that? I actually think it might be a positive
00:48:04.480 -->
00:48:09.179thing, but I could see it being jumped on by
00:48:09.179 -->
00:48:12.659other governments going, this is why we need
00:48:12.659 -->
00:48:15.059to ban all VPNs or something like that. So I
00:48:15.059 -->
00:48:17.320was just interested in what the rest of the tech
00:48:17.320 -->
00:48:19.920grumps thought about it. Well, you know, the
00:48:19.920 -->
00:48:24.070first thing that occurs to me... There was a
00:48:24.070 -->
00:48:27.429case recently in Texas where the court ordered
00:48:27.429 -->
00:48:33.010ICANN to lock the domain of this porn site that
00:48:33.010 -->
00:48:34.929was based, I forget where it was based, but it
00:48:34.929 -->
00:48:39.230wasn't based in the States. And actually, you
00:48:39.230 -->
00:48:42.349know, a court could order ICANN to lock the BBC's
00:48:42.349 -->
00:48:46.690domain. Can you say a little bit more about what
00:48:46.690 -->
00:48:50.409locking it means? Makes it inaccessible worldwide.
00:48:51.989 -->
00:48:55.429Oh. Yes, they can disconnect it. ICANN is a central
00:48:55.429 -->
00:48:59.050point of failure. Yeah, for the visible internet,
00:48:59.230 -->
00:49:01.610yeah. They can just suddenly decide to redirect
00:49:01.610 -->
00:49:03.070it to a way, nope, you don't get to see this
00:49:03.070 -->
00:49:07.650page. Yeah, yeah, I mean, so it's an interesting
00:49:07.650 -->
00:49:10.929argument, but the reason, the thing that it led
00:49:10.929 -->
00:49:13.869me to was, well, actually, you could turn, you
00:49:13.869 -->
00:49:18.909know, a U .S. court could actually make the BBC
00:49:18.909 -->
00:49:25.119inaccessible. Inaccessible, yeah. I don't think
00:49:25.119 -->
00:49:29.000you can use the VPN argument to say you saw it,
00:49:29.019 -->
00:49:31.659but you saw it over a VPN, so the problem is
00:49:31.659 -->
00:49:36.519with a VPN. That won't stand up in court. I know
00:49:36.519 -->
00:49:39.480what you're saying, David. I think they're saying,
00:49:39.719 -->
00:49:44.599from the BBC point of view, they're saying we
00:49:44.599 -->
00:49:50.739put this out only on these places. Anyone that
00:49:50.739 -->
00:49:55.219saw it, because Trump is saying that that influence
00:49:55.219 -->
00:49:58.920people outside of the UK. If Trump is arguing
00:49:58.920 -->
00:50:02.320repressional damage within the US, the BBC can
00:50:02.320 -->
00:50:04.820say no one in the US could have watched it. Yeah.
00:50:04.960 -->
00:50:06.539We make sure they don't watch it. And anyone
00:50:06.539 -->
00:50:09.820who did watch it, that's on them. No, no, no.
00:50:09.820 -->
00:50:12.260That doesn't work. You can't say it didn't exist
00:50:12.260 -->
00:50:14.719because it was legal. What they can say is that's
00:50:14.719 -->
00:50:19.440a different issue. What they can say is that
00:50:19.440 -->
00:50:23.380the potential audience in America for the program
00:50:23.380 -->
00:50:29.760is not 350 Americans. It's the few thousands
00:50:29.760 -->
00:50:32.059or hundreds, tens of thousands or hundreds of
00:50:32.059 -->
00:50:36.659thousands who would use a VPN to... It says in
00:50:36.659 -->
00:50:39.380the article it was played 34 times. That's right,
00:50:39.519 -->
00:50:45.159yeah. It's not a large number. So, I mean, the
00:50:45.159 -->
00:50:48.559point is that if the court decided the BBC was
00:50:48.559 -->
00:50:52.900guilty, the potential damage is far less if it's
00:50:52.900 -->
00:50:56.86034 people. Yeah. Oh, sorry. Let me rephrase that.
00:50:56.920 -->
00:50:59.539It says the 34 Florida streams out. There was
00:50:59.539 -->
00:51:02.159570 ,000 requests. Yeah, I've not read this article
00:51:02.159 -->
00:51:04.480either. It's a bit confusing. I suppose they're
00:51:04.480 -->
00:51:06.219saying they were trying to buy it in Florida.
00:51:07.039 -->
00:51:11.099That might limit the damage. It's still a lot
00:51:11.099 -->
00:51:14.039cheaper if they find the BBC guilty. Absolutely.
00:51:15.079 -->
00:51:18.480I find it interesting, but I do also think about
00:51:18.480 -->
00:51:27.480what precedent this sets about VPNs beyond this
00:51:27.480 -->
00:51:31.039corporate. I think that if the BBC go with this
00:51:31.039 -->
00:51:36.440argument, as Wendy said, it limits the... you
00:51:36.440 -->
00:51:40.739know the damage um quite a lot but i also wonder
00:51:40.739 -->
00:51:45.539about um what else this could could mean as well
00:51:45.539 -->
00:51:49.039i don't i i i think legally it's interesting
00:51:49.039 -->
00:51:51.519i think it's a big mistake to presume that any
00:51:51.519 -->
00:51:55.179legal precedent is ever going to be set by a
00:51:55.179 -->
00:51:57.639trump lawsuit because they are they are they
00:51:57.639 -->
00:52:01.599are by i mean yes yeah but also It's an established
00:52:01.599 -->
00:52:04.539pattern of harassment for the sake of harassment.
00:52:05.099 -->
00:52:08.059That's not even, yes. But what is interesting
00:52:08.059 -->
00:52:13.800is that, you know, the BBC geofences these things
00:52:13.800 -->
00:52:17.300because, among other things, they don't, sometimes
00:52:17.300 -->
00:52:20.760they use music that they only have the license
00:52:20.760 -->
00:52:25.139for in the UK. And so there's a whole sort of
00:52:25.139 -->
00:52:28.539copyright thing, you know. some sort of intellectual
00:52:28.539 -->
00:52:31.300property control, which is that they did not
00:52:31.300 -->
00:52:34.639publish it to the US. And yet these Americans
00:52:34.639 -->
00:52:37.360have access to it. So there's a whole copyright
00:52:37.360 -->
00:52:39.960thing in there somewhere. Yeah, but I mean, that
00:52:39.960 -->
00:52:41.840won't get far. It's like saying, don't worry
00:52:41.840 -->
00:52:43.719about porn. You can only get it in this country.
00:52:45.500 -->
00:52:47.460There's a limit to how far you can use that.
00:52:48.320 -->
00:52:50.639I mean, there's no question the amount of people
00:52:50.639 -->
00:52:52.619who could actually see it is a solid argument.
00:52:52.840 -->
00:52:56.260But beyond that, no. So, David, I know what you're
00:52:56.260 -->
00:53:00.559saying. I think Wendy's actually right. So, as
00:53:00.559 -->
00:53:03.380someone who's done this before for the BBC, sorry,
00:53:03.559 -->
00:53:06.659and had to choose certain types of music, the
00:53:06.659 -->
00:53:11.260lawyers have agreed that there's a certain level
00:53:11.260 -->
00:53:18.960of people who, or, like I said, damages or, you
00:53:18.960 -->
00:53:24.099know, use that. It's acceptable. That's just
00:53:24.099 -->
00:53:26.420best effort. And if you're told to use best effort,
00:53:26.480 -->
00:53:28.900that's fine. And obviously, if you're supposed
00:53:28.900 -->
00:53:31.260to limit it, if you've only got the license for
00:53:31.260 -->
00:53:32.920the UK, and as far as you're concerned, you're
00:53:32.920 -->
00:53:35.880only releasing to the UK, you've achieved best
00:53:35.880 -->
00:53:39.059effort. You can only use that so far. You certainly
00:53:39.059 -->
00:53:41.639can't say, I've done my best effort to stop this
00:53:41.639 -->
00:53:44.679horse porn being released. If it's seen outside
00:53:44.679 -->
00:53:51.239of that area, that isn't going to work. And now
00:53:51.239 -->
00:53:55.000we've got Kim. Coming with an article from MSN
00:53:55.000 -->
00:53:58.119about a Berlin cyber attack and the hackers leaking
00:53:58.119 -->
00:54:00.860highly sensitive data across the dark web. Go,
00:54:00.960 -->
00:54:04.559Kim. Cool. Yeah, so there's a story that's been
00:54:04.559 -->
00:54:06.280covered a little bit. It happened a couple of
00:54:06.280 -->
00:54:09.659days ago by a hacker group called Rise SIDA,
00:54:09.820 -->
00:54:12.460who have published six terabytes of data from
00:54:12.460 -->
00:54:15.440Berlin State Administration. And I read a few
00:54:15.440 -->
00:54:18.730articles around this, but it sounds like. To
00:54:18.730 -->
00:54:20.289be honest, a lot of what I've heard about German
00:54:20.289 -->
00:54:23.250bureaucracy is now coming to the front. I think
00:54:23.250 -->
00:54:25.269they're running a lot of Windows 95 computers,
00:54:25.489 -->
00:54:27.349Windows 98 computers that haven't been security
00:54:27.349 -->
00:54:31.329patched for decades. They just didn't pay the
00:54:31.329 -->
00:54:33.829ransom and it got leaked. And a lot of it just
00:54:33.829 -->
00:54:36.690seems like this pigheadedness around, oh, we
00:54:36.690 -->
00:54:38.070obviously won't get hacked with the government
00:54:38.070 -->
00:54:40.429and now it has got hacked. But like a lot of
00:54:40.429 -->
00:54:42.329it's really scary stuff. There's things in it
00:54:42.329 -->
00:54:45.829like the chemical, biological, radiological and
00:54:45.829 -->
00:54:49.599nuclear threats plans. And I mean, I saw a story
00:54:49.599 -->
00:54:50.860a couple of weeks ago, you know, they're still
00:54:50.860 -->
00:54:53.460finding bombs that are unexploded from World
00:54:53.460 -->
00:54:57.699War II around Berlin. So it seems a kind of crazy
00:54:57.699 -->
00:54:59.699situation. I think I accidentally talked about
00:54:59.699 -->
00:55:02.320this in the AI chunk at the start as well. But
00:55:02.320 -->
00:55:05.059yeah, I think it feels like at the moment, just
00:55:05.059 -->
00:55:06.940these things are going to be on the rise as they
00:55:06.940 -->
00:55:08.719get easier to do, right? It's kind of been the
00:55:08.719 -->
00:55:10.679theme of the podcast that it's now a lot easier
00:55:10.679 -->
00:55:12.659for bad actors to do bad things very quickly.
00:55:13.440 -->
00:55:15.159but yeah it's kind of terrifying it's like i've
00:55:15.159 -->
00:55:16.920got a lot of friends there and it's like is all
00:55:16.920 -->
00:55:19.440their stuff in public now or that you know the
00:55:19.440 -->
00:55:21.420stuff to do their civil servants birth certificates
00:55:21.420 -->
00:55:24.920telephone numbers i just have the weirdest thought
00:55:24.920 -->
00:55:28.940like i wonder if it's possible there's going
00:55:28.940 -->
00:55:31.440to be a secondary market for training ai on this
00:55:31.440 -->
00:55:34.300data because it is new data like they're like
00:55:34.300 -->
00:55:37.639pay us the money or we sell it to we sell it
00:55:37.639 -->
00:55:41.179to you know anthropic the interesting thing is
00:55:41.179 -->
00:55:43.570though it's illegal to access So I've seen quite
00:55:43.570 -->
00:55:45.429a lot of the reporting's just been like, I'm
00:55:45.429 -->
00:55:46.869not going to link you to it and you shouldn't
00:55:46.869 -->
00:55:50.010look for it because it's illegal. So I, yeah,
00:55:50.829 -->
00:55:53.409it's hard to think about. And yet that weirdly
00:55:53.409 -->
00:55:55.210almost makes me think more like that would be
00:55:55.210 -->
00:55:57.329the perfect secondary market because not like
00:55:57.329 -->
00:55:58.769they ever gave a shit in the first place with
00:55:58.769 -->
00:56:02.190trying to train on that on legal data. But yeah,
00:56:02.230 -->
00:56:08.630that is, that is, it, I wonder how much more
00:56:08.630 -->
00:56:13.909of that we're going to see. A lot more. I feel
00:56:13.909 -->
00:56:20.349like this is just the start of a really horrible
00:56:20.349 -->
00:56:27.739place we're going to be. It's sad to say. it
00:56:27.739 -->
00:56:30.099honestly i start putting in fake information
00:56:30.099 -->
00:56:32.519on principle and sites if they're not i shouldn't
00:56:32.519 -->
00:56:34.400say this out loud probably but you know if i'm
00:56:34.400 -->
00:56:36.139like making like a something like a dating app
00:56:36.139 -->
00:56:38.599profile or like some stupid recipe app once my
00:56:38.599 -->
00:56:40.400date of birth i've just started lying on principle
00:56:40.400 -->
00:56:42.599because i feel like any service you're on it's
00:56:42.599 -->
00:56:44.340a certainty at some point it's getting leaked
00:56:44.340 -->
00:56:47.480and obviously like states can force you to have
00:56:47.480 -->
00:56:49.460this information so some of it's there but like
00:56:49.460 -->
00:56:55.059it really makes you scared to put anything online
00:56:55.059 -->
00:56:58.510right I'm with you. I'm with you. I, I just,
00:56:58.610 -->
00:57:04.650I cannot put in real data. I just, I don't trust
00:57:04.650 -->
00:57:10.309them to hold the data, to control the data. And
00:57:10.309 -->
00:57:13.150I could just see floods of it just appearing
00:57:13.150 -->
00:57:15.769all over the place. I have to put in fake data.
00:57:16.349 -->
00:57:20.190It's horrible to say, but yeah. Also, I have,
00:57:20.190 -->
00:57:24.099I have a weirdly. worth i the similar similar
00:57:24.099 -->
00:57:26.099result but i'm talking of you which is like anytime
00:57:26.099 -->
00:57:28.159somebody asks me for real data i'm like you pay
00:57:28.159 -->
00:57:31.460me i know it's value right like like i'm not
00:57:31.460 -->
00:57:33.219going to give you that for free like every time
00:57:33.219 -->
00:57:35.880like i'll like people who all have like people
00:57:35.880 -->
00:57:38.800from high school who will be like hey vote for
00:57:38.800 -->
00:57:40.820us in this competition on facebook and i'm like
00:57:40.820 -->
00:57:42.719you're gonna it's gonna make me sign up and give
00:57:42.719 -->
00:57:45.679them all my data and i'm not gonna give you like
00:57:45.679 -->
00:57:48.570that's not worth That that's that's way too high
00:57:48.570 -->
00:57:51.070a cost for letting me vote in a stupid poll online
00:57:51.070 -->
00:57:52.849where they know that really what they're doing
00:57:52.849 -->
00:57:55.550is like, hey, if you want to win this, just,
00:57:55.610 -->
00:57:58.409you know, hashtag us and make a public post on
00:57:58.409 -->
00:58:00.969Instagram. I'm like, I'm not your free hype machine.
00:58:01.130 -->
00:58:04.269Piss off like my way more than that. And it's
00:58:04.269 -->
00:58:06.469weird how both of those attitudes have kind of
00:58:06.469 -->
00:58:08.099come to the same thing where it's like, no. No,
00:58:08.139 -->
00:58:09.900we've, we've come to both know our value, but
00:58:09.900 -->
00:58:12.860also understand how deep down the rabbit hole,
00:58:12.940 -->
00:58:15.260the potential downside of giving that goes, you
00:58:15.260 -->
00:58:17.000know, it's like, well, it's just this name, buddy.
00:58:18.099 -->
00:58:20.380Berlin. Like, seriously, take a, take a look
00:58:20.380 -->
00:58:24.659at this particular what they did. You're just,
00:58:24.679 -->
00:58:26.039you're going to take that. You're going to stick
00:58:26.039 -->
00:58:28.400it in some little zip drive somewhere. And then
00:58:28.400 -->
00:58:32.159two, you know, two years later. My God, you just
00:58:32.159 -->
00:58:38.090dated yourself. You know what's really funny?
00:58:38.170 -->
00:58:39.730A lot of people are going to think when I say
00:58:39.730 -->
00:58:42.010zip drive that they're just talking about a USB
00:58:42.010 -->
00:58:46.170drive, but I'm not. No, he's not. What are you
00:58:46.170 -->
00:58:47.389talking about, a car? What are those things,
00:58:47.389 -->
00:58:50.269hold 100 megabytes or something? They hold 100
00:58:50.269 -->
00:58:53.469meg, and they had one of my favorite obscure
00:58:53.469 -->
00:58:57.269points is that they were one of the fascinating
00:58:57.269 -->
00:59:01.050examples of an actual physical hardware computer
00:59:01.050 -->
00:59:05.050virus that was contagious. Yeah. Zip drive death.
00:59:05.769 -->
00:59:09.389because the zip drive clicked out. Sorry, to
00:59:09.389 -->
00:59:13.710get back to the point, it's hard because I can
00:59:13.710 -->
00:59:17.570literally see it. I can see, I was thinking about
00:59:17.570 -->
00:59:21.489the cost of securing the data, the cost of not
00:59:21.489 -->
00:59:25.090and shitifying it. I just don't think there's
00:59:25.090 -->
00:59:28.349any, there's very few companies that actually
00:59:28.349 -->
00:59:33.110make that balance and they just don't do that.
00:59:33.309 -->
00:59:35.420They're just kind of like, well, Yeah, we'll
00:59:35.420 -->
00:59:36.900hold it for a certain amount of time and then
00:59:36.900 -->
00:59:38.360we'll get bought by somebody else and then it'll
00:59:38.360 -->
00:59:41.559get kind of sold on or it'll get leaked and we'll
00:59:41.559 -->
00:59:45.880pay the fine and we'll just work by it. I just
00:59:45.880 -->
00:59:49.659don't trust companies. That last point is really
00:59:49.659 -->
00:59:51.559important. That thing about they'll get bought
00:59:51.559 -->
00:59:54.380is one of the things where it's like, even if
00:59:54.380 -->
00:59:58.159I believe that you are sincere, even if I believe
00:59:58.159 -->
01:00:01.420that you are sincere, you will get bought. Is
01:00:01.420 -->
01:00:04.099anyone working on solutions to this? i periodically
01:00:04.099 -->
01:00:06.980look up that tim berners -lee solid protocol
01:00:06.980 -->
01:00:13.219and then the other one was i heard like um oh
01:00:13.219 -->
01:00:15.300which eastern european country is it that's supposed
01:00:15.300 -->
01:00:18.039to have amazing blockchain -based public internet
01:00:18.039 -->
01:00:21.940infrastructure obviously estonia i'm like Because
01:00:21.940 -->
01:00:23.659it just seems crazy, you know, and there's a
01:00:23.659 -->
01:00:25.420lot of chat of like digital sovereignty at the
01:00:25.420 -->
01:00:26.960moment, which always seems to mean like state
01:00:26.960 -->
01:00:29.019sovereignty or European sovereignty. It's never
01:00:29.019 -->
01:00:31.800like personal sovereignty of your own data. But
01:00:31.800 -->
01:00:33.500it really feels like we're in this place now
01:00:33.500 -->
01:00:36.179where like, it's exactly like you just said,
01:00:36.199 -->
01:00:38.039if there's a web form that's asking your demographic
01:00:38.039 -->
01:00:40.760detail, you know, I used to fill that in without
01:00:40.760 -->
01:00:42.619even thinking about it. But nowadays, I think
01:00:42.619 -->
01:00:45.300also we have to fill in so many now, right? I
01:00:45.300 -->
01:00:47.099feel like we're doing all of our own admin and
01:00:47.099 -->
01:00:49.690everything's manual and like... You know, I've
01:00:49.690 -->
01:00:50.949just been trying to get a blood test for the
01:00:50.949 -->
01:00:52.889last four months and it's just like filling in
01:00:52.889 -->
01:00:55.130the same stupid doctor form five times over.
01:00:55.449 -->
01:01:01.250The data creep of them asking for way more information
01:01:01.250 -->
01:01:02.929than they clearly need for that just because
01:01:02.929 -->
01:01:05.090it's going to be valuable for them, not for you.
01:01:05.389 -->
01:01:07.570And it takes more of my time and more of my effort.
01:01:08.809 -->
01:01:10.690And it's pretty easy to quantify too, right?
01:01:10.750 -->
01:01:13.210I mean, if anyone's ever had a test, if anyone's
01:01:13.210 -->
01:01:15.380ever been in Tesco. You don't want to shop in
01:01:15.380 -->
01:01:17.420Tesco without giving them all your data, which
01:01:17.420 -->
01:01:20.059they call a Tesco club card. It's like it's got
01:01:20.059 -->
01:01:24.800a name. You know, this is where it's an advantage.
01:01:25.139 -->
01:01:27.019This is where rich people have the advantage.
01:01:27.159 -->
01:01:29.760They can afford not to have the Tesco club card.
01:01:30.219 -->
01:01:33.219Yeah. I don't know if I have the advantage where
01:01:33.219 -->
01:01:36.940they can. I did the old phrase of fines are just
01:01:36.940 -->
01:01:40.380fines just mean their laws for poor people. Like.
01:01:42.480 -->
01:01:45.320If I mean, and especially in a corporate in a
01:01:45.320 -->
01:01:47.840corporate stakeholder, you know, shareholder
01:01:47.840 -->
01:01:50.179methodology where corporate is, it's built in
01:01:50.179 -->
01:01:52.500that you have to make the decision that returns
01:01:52.500 -->
01:01:55.519the greatest value. If the equation is putting
01:01:55.519 -->
01:01:57.659babies on spikes will earn us one hundred and
01:01:57.659 -->
01:01:59.519one million dollars, but will cost us a million
01:01:59.519 -->
01:02:01.559dollars and a hundred millions in fines. They'll
01:02:01.559 -->
01:02:03.280look they'll look at that and go, well, babies
01:02:03.280 -->
01:02:05.119on spikes equals a million dollars profit. Let's
01:02:05.119 -->
01:02:08.599go. Yeah, absolutely. Cost of the spikes, too.
01:02:10.460 -->
01:02:13.280Babies of spikes. We did. That's one of my go
01:02:13.280 -->
01:02:22.960-to metaphors. And we got one more article. We've
01:02:22.960 -->
01:02:26.940got Wendy's come with an interesting story about
01:02:26.940 -->
01:02:30.519the Trump administration has kind of taken out
01:02:30.519 -->
01:02:34.079an Italian service provider, Astici. I think
01:02:34.079 -->
01:02:37.519the full name is Astici Inventati. And I had
01:02:37.519 -->
01:02:40.880not heard of it until this case. The Trump administration
01:02:40.880 -->
01:02:44.360has dubbed it a terrorist, put it on a terrorist
01:02:44.360 -->
01:02:47.019watch list. And apparently the claim is that
01:02:47.019 -->
01:02:51.099by providing secure email and services to, I
01:02:51.099 -->
01:02:53.840think it's about 20 ,000 activist organizations
01:02:53.840 -->
01:02:56.639around the world, that it's providing material
01:02:56.639 -->
01:03:02.940comfort or something to terrorists. And the consequence
01:03:02.940 -->
01:03:06.179of this that's interesting is it took within
01:03:06.179 -->
01:03:09.139like two or three days. The service announced
01:03:09.139 -->
01:03:11.699it was completely shutting down because basically
01:03:11.699 -->
01:03:16.159it was completely crippled. Its domain was suspended
01:03:16.159 -->
01:03:19.599and it can't get any payments from anybody. But
01:03:19.599 -->
01:03:21.820I think its real reason is that it can't keep
01:03:21.820 -->
01:03:24.719people safe the way it promised. So it's gone.
01:03:25.440 -->
01:03:30.980And, you know, it's not a good, it's not, whatever
01:03:30.980 -->
01:03:32.920you think about the site or the organizations
01:03:32.920 -->
01:03:37.500it helped support, that doesn't matter. compared
01:03:37.500 -->
01:03:43.139to the problem that one country can use the internet
01:03:43.139 -->
01:03:47.099infrastructure to basically kill off anything
01:03:47.099 -->
01:03:51.199it doesn't like so kim you had some comments
01:03:51.199 -->
01:03:53.940yeah no i was at the the anarchist studies network
01:03:53.940 -->
01:03:56.099conference was in manchester last weekend and
01:03:56.099 -->
01:03:58.239i was out there doing a talk about kind of this
01:03:58.619 -->
01:04:00.800the need to move from corporate tech to kind
01:04:00.800 -->
01:04:02.739of our own things again and it was a very spooky
01:04:02.739 -->
01:04:04.940thing to be happening in the background because
01:04:04.940 -->
01:04:07.079my you know my my understanding of this group
01:04:07.079 -->
01:04:08.619which i don't think i've ever really said out
01:04:08.619 -->
01:04:11.400loud but i still kind of fail is like you know
01:04:11.400 -->
01:04:13.559they they run no blogs which a lot of sort of
01:04:13.559 -->
01:04:15.760like anarchist blogs run on they provide email
01:04:15.760 -->
01:04:18.480for a few people i know but the idea of thinking
01:04:18.480 -->
01:04:20.099of them as anything like a threat is sort of
01:04:20.099 -->
01:04:22.500absurd i mean you know it's like riseup .net
01:04:22.500 -->
01:04:25.699would be the sort of you know um english language
01:04:25.699 -->
01:04:28.019speaking equivalent or there's other ones in
01:04:28.019 -->
01:04:31.320you know like activix and it's just a very scary
01:04:31.320 -->
01:04:34.800thing because yeah i think on top of the um the
01:04:34.800 -->
01:04:36.699american threat it's also just like you know
01:04:36.699 -->
01:04:40.179where's the lack of defense from european legislature
01:04:40.179 -->
01:04:43.380towards this kind of thing and and it sort of
01:04:43.380 -->
01:04:45.860feels very much like you know you're talking
01:04:45.860 -->
01:04:48.079about test cases ian and where things might go
01:04:48.079 -->
01:04:50.420but it really feels like a test case to me because
01:04:50.420 -->
01:04:52.039i feel like the direction we're going in at the
01:04:52.039 -->
01:04:56.940moment is that the the web's been colonized by
01:04:56.940 -->
01:04:59.900massive corporations and actually like they're
01:04:59.900 -->
01:05:01.820colluding with governments to make it so that
01:05:01.820 -->
01:05:04.360not being a gigantic corporation makes it very
01:05:04.360 -->
01:05:06.599hard to publish stuff online so i think this
01:05:06.599 -->
01:05:08.199has now been enforced with things like the online
01:05:08.199 -->
01:05:11.780safety act which basically subject things like
01:05:11.780 -->
01:05:15.139cycling forums to the same kind of public safeguards
01:05:15.139 -->
01:05:17.019that facebook do there's you know it's still
01:05:17.019 -->
01:05:19.699kind of out in the open but this sort of feels
01:05:19.699 -->
01:05:21.800like part of this project to me it feels like
01:05:21.800 -->
01:05:24.309there's kind of an attack on the open web And
01:05:24.309 -->
01:05:26.170where they're always going to start is with the
01:05:26.170 -->
01:05:28.570sort of more out there political stuff, you know?
01:05:28.730 -->
01:05:32.150So I'm very scared where this one's leading,
01:05:32.289 -->
01:05:35.429less so than the other one, I think. What's that
01:05:35.429 -->
01:05:37.889famous thing? They came for me, they came for
01:05:37.889 -->
01:05:39.969you, or I don't know, they came for all of us
01:05:39.969 -->
01:05:40.969or something like that? I can't remember what
01:05:40.969 -->
01:05:42.530it is, but yeah. I think you've got that exactly
01:05:42.530 -->
01:05:46.570backwards, but yes. Okay, sorry. Sorry, don't
01:05:46.570 -->
01:05:48.250make me laugh. But yeah, no, I completely agree.
01:05:51.610 -->
01:05:56.170When you talked about sovereignty before, yeah,
01:05:57.590 -->
01:06:01.809I just, it's really hard because I also, I did
01:06:01.809 -->
01:06:04.849work with solid and personal data stores and
01:06:04.849 -->
01:06:06.690stuff like that. And there's an emphasis on like
01:06:06.690 -->
01:06:09.090putting all the pressure on you to do all the
01:06:09.090 -->
01:06:14.469work. And it feels like there's got to be a better
01:06:14.469 -->
01:06:19.940way, full stop. And I think that applies. in
01:06:19.940 -->
01:06:24.059what you personally do, but also the sites that
01:06:24.059 -->
01:06:26.880you use, the sites that are community driven.
01:06:27.880 -->
01:06:33.219I just feel like, I do agree that the web has
01:06:33.219 -->
01:06:36.739become this kind of, this corporate playground.
01:06:37.840 -->
01:06:42.039And it's a real shame. There are still corners
01:06:42.039 -->
01:06:45.019of the web where, but they are being pushed aside
01:06:45.019 -->
01:06:50.269or kind of like. legalized, pushed out by legal
01:06:50.269 -->
01:06:56.469things. Has anyone tried to self -host email
01:06:56.469 -->
01:07:01.329recently? You kind of can't. I gave up three
01:07:01.329 -->
01:07:06.769years ago, finally. I like the idea that we use
01:07:06.769 -->
01:07:09.190a rise -up pad, therefore we're terrorists. This
01:07:09.190 -->
01:07:12.070is a terrorist podcast. That's the thing. With
01:07:12.070 -->
01:07:16.420a service provider like... what you would have
01:07:16.420 -->
01:07:19.480expected is if there was a terrorist organization
01:07:19.480 -->
01:07:23.820that they were serving, that that organization
01:07:23.820 -->
01:07:27.679would be, you know, they'd be asked to take that
01:07:27.679 -->
01:07:31.519organization down, right? And that organization
01:07:31.519 -->
01:07:34.199would be the target of the action, not the service
01:07:34.199 -->
01:07:36.400provider. I mean, you don't see anybody going
01:07:36.400 -->
01:07:41.409after Facebook. You know, you don't see anybody
01:07:41.409 -->
01:07:43.670trying to take out all of Facebook because there's
01:07:43.670 -->
01:07:45.869a few people on it that, you know. Oh, but I
01:07:45.869 -->
01:07:47.829mean, they position themselves as service provision
01:07:47.829 -->
01:07:51.110for activists and anarchists. So I assume that
01:07:51.110 -->
01:07:54.250they're basically Trump enemies by definition.
01:07:54.769 -->
01:07:58.710The way they're going after. Normally you would
01:07:58.710 -->
01:08:02.829have due process for each organization. You wouldn't
01:08:02.829 -->
01:08:06.349be aiming at the service provider. Unless the
01:08:06.349 -->
01:08:10.480service provider itself was really doing. Right.
01:08:10.480 -->
01:08:12.639And I assume that's the argument they're making,
01:08:12.760 -->
01:08:15.360that, look, you're basically like WordPress .com
01:08:15.360 -->
01:08:17.640but for terrorism, you know, which is just such
01:08:17.640 -->
01:08:19.060an insane thing to say. Wow, it's a niche market.
01:08:19.199 -->
01:08:21.899I don't see the problem. It's like if you read
01:08:21.899 -->
01:08:24.619those blogs on there, it's like it's impenetrable
01:08:24.619 -->
01:08:27.180anarchist essays about how we should be organising
01:08:27.180 -->
01:08:28.960things that I don't get. I think terrorists need
01:08:28.960 -->
01:08:32.359to write bad documents too. Right, yeah. They
01:08:32.359 -->
01:08:41.840absolutely do. Yeah. Yeah, I... Okay, so I know
01:08:41.840 -->
01:08:44.979it's really easy to kind of like just put our
01:08:44.979 -->
01:08:47.420heads down and go, oh, my God, it's doom and
01:08:47.420 -->
01:08:49.560gloom. And I know that TechCrunch is meant to
01:08:49.560 -->
01:08:53.380be that. But I do think that there is, I have
01:08:53.380 -->
01:08:59.659seen some lights where, yeah, a lot of the focus
01:08:59.659 -->
01:09:04.500around peer -to -peer systems. around sovereign,
01:09:04.640 -->
01:09:06.960you know, not just sovereignty as in, I know
01:09:06.960 -->
01:09:08.859what you're saying, Kim, where there's a focus
01:09:08.859 -->
01:09:11.119on like sovereignty. It feels like sovereignty
01:09:11.119 -->
01:09:14.180to a country, but there are a lot more systems
01:09:14.180 -->
01:09:16.859which are much more focused on, you know, sovereignty
01:09:16.859 -->
01:09:20.640to a group. I think that that has started to
01:09:20.640 -->
01:09:23.399grow. I noticed that there's a lot more projects
01:09:23.399 -->
01:09:27.880in the open source world, which are focused around
01:09:27.880 -->
01:09:30.979this. I see frameworks, which are like build
01:09:30.979 -->
01:09:34.100it. top of disk. This is how to do it properly
01:09:34.100 -->
01:09:37.300rather than make your own kind of like peer -to
01:09:37.300 -->
01:09:39.560-peer scrappy thing, which is completely open.
01:09:39.819 -->
01:09:43.880How many of these things are dependent on the
01:09:43.880 -->
01:09:48.460domain name system? Yeah. Okay. That's not actually,
01:09:48.560 -->
01:09:52.199I've seen a few people that have said that they're
01:09:52.199 -->
01:09:57.220deliberately not. I mean, things like IRC are
01:09:57.220 -->
01:09:58.920not actually dependent. I don't think they're
01:09:58.920 -->
01:10:02.359dependent on the domain name system. But the
01:10:02.359 -->
01:10:06.239web is. Anything on the web is. Yeah, I've seen,
01:10:06.380 -->
01:10:09.199I know what you're saying, Wendy, and I think
01:10:09.199 -->
01:10:12.819I have seen somewhere that deliberately not using
01:10:12.819 -->
01:10:15.659domain system because of the exact point you're
01:10:15.659 -->
01:10:19.920making. But I do think that they're still kind
01:10:19.920 -->
01:10:22.300of under the radar and they're still not the
01:10:22.300 -->
01:10:27.140adoption. I do worry that a lot of developers
01:10:27.140 -->
01:10:29.359just kind of go, right, I'm going to solve this
01:10:29.359 -->
01:10:32.920problem again, rather than, Look and try and
01:10:32.920 -->
01:10:36.779find systems that do the thing correctly. So,
01:10:36.859 -->
01:10:42.239for example, and then I'll end, is when they
01:10:42.239 -->
01:10:45.699were talking about the European social stack,
01:10:45.819 -->
01:10:49.859which I talked about a few tech months ago, rather
01:10:49.859 -->
01:10:53.220than kind of focus on creating a new kind of
01:10:53.220 -->
01:10:57.600stack, they used existing technologies, and the
01:10:57.600 -->
01:11:01.609one for messaging was Matrix. Because Matrix
01:11:01.609 -->
01:11:03.949is actually pretty good and it's open and it
01:11:03.949 -->
01:11:07.329has all the things rather than trying to build
01:11:07.329 -->
01:11:09.630something different. And I think we need more
01:11:09.630 -->
01:11:12.729of that. We need more people to kind of not roll
01:11:12.729 -->
01:11:16.590their own, but actually use ones or contribute
01:11:16.590 -->
01:11:21.449to ones that are doing the right thing. Peace
01:11:21.449 -->
01:11:24.369out. Do we think the EU can make a good Matrix
01:11:24.369 -->
01:11:31.640client? Let's find out. And that's the last of
01:11:31.640 -->
01:11:34.460our news stories for here on Tech Grumps. The
01:11:34.460 -->
01:11:36.300only thing left for us to do is the Any Other
01:11:36.300 -->
01:11:38.159Business. And the first thing on the list is
01:11:38.159 -->
01:11:41.470Wendy with Coyote vs. Acme. I haven't seen it
01:11:41.470 -->
01:11:43.810yet. I'm just really pleased that it's actually
01:11:43.810 -->
01:11:46.449been released, given that Warner Brothers wanted
01:11:46.449 -->
01:11:48.590to take it as a tax write off and was going to
01:11:48.590 -->
01:11:52.010take a completed movie and say, fuck you to everybody
01:11:52.010 -->
01:11:54.829who worked on it and refused to release it because
01:11:54.829 -->
01:11:57.069they wanted a tax write off. I mean, where is
01:11:57.069 -->
01:11:59.510Douglas Adams when you need him? Yeah, I mean,
01:11:59.510 -->
01:12:02.090it's giving me it's actually giving me joy. I've
01:12:02.090 -->
01:12:03.529been it's been making me legitimately happy to
01:12:03.529 -->
01:12:05.609see that they won this battle. And the buzz is
01:12:05.609 -->
01:12:08.979good. Yeah, people are saying it's a perfectly
01:12:08.979 -->
01:12:12.859good film. Very funny, very well done. Ian, you've
01:12:12.859 -->
01:12:15.979got something about Cory Doctorow? Yeah, so Cory's
01:12:15.979 -->
01:12:21.500in Manchester, Manchester, UK, not Alabama. And
01:12:21.500 -->
01:12:26.960he's talking about the reverse centaur. But I
01:12:26.960 -->
01:12:30.779want people to know and go along. I think it's
01:12:30.779 -->
01:12:34.500a highly accessible way of talking about AI.
01:12:34.760 -->
01:12:37.800And I think more people should go along. Okay,
01:12:37.859 -->
01:12:40.779it's the London version. And I've got something
01:12:40.779 -->
01:12:42.220that I just noticed, a little thing that gave
01:12:42.220 -->
01:12:44.939me joy this week was watching an evolution of
01:12:44.939 -->
01:12:47.439monetization sabotage, which was there's been
01:12:47.439 -->
01:12:50.159this thing about how to deal with basically content
01:12:50.159 -->
01:12:52.199botherers, people who do conflict content and
01:12:52.199 -->
01:12:53.659want to walk up on you. And one of the things
01:12:53.659 -->
01:12:55.500that I used to hear people say is things like,
01:12:55.520 -->
01:12:58.220just start singing a Disney tune. because then
01:12:58.220 -->
01:12:59.439they can't put the video out because of that.
01:12:59.500 -->
01:13:00.920And someone came up with an even better idea,
01:13:01.020 -->
01:13:02.640which is the moment they do that, they go, this
01:13:02.640 -->
01:13:06.159video was sponsored by Squarespace. And so, and
01:13:06.159 -->
01:13:09.340apparently not only does this work, but the TikTok
01:13:09.340 -->
01:13:11.859that I saw of the person who talked about this
01:13:11.859 -->
01:13:14.119had to come back with a second TikTok and going,
01:13:14.140 -->
01:13:19.010so. i managed to get my own video taken down
01:13:19.010 -->
01:13:21.069by using that technique because they also they
01:13:21.069 -->
01:13:23.590didn't realize i was saying it in sarcasm and
01:13:23.590 -->
01:13:24.989so they took down my video thinking that it was
01:13:24.989 -->
01:13:26.829not that was an unlisted advertisement and i
01:13:26.829 -->
01:13:29.529was like i love that i love that it's so effective
01:13:29.529 -->
01:13:32.010you shot yourself like i've i've admitted a new
01:13:32.010 -->
01:13:35.279gun shoot themselves in the foot also good sign
01:13:35.279 -->
01:13:37.680that it works so hey next time you want to deal
01:13:37.680 -->
01:13:39.119with someone who's making content in front of
01:13:39.119 -->
01:13:40.340you they're not sure you're consenting about
01:13:40.340 -->
01:13:42.079just start talking about how they're sponsored
01:13:42.079 -->
01:13:44.060by squarespace or whatever else you want because
01:13:44.060 -->
01:13:46.000apparently that's the new way to make the money
01:13:46.000 -->
01:13:49.159to make to make the video non -monetizable and
01:13:49.159 -->
01:13:53.060that gave me delight have you just screwed up
01:13:53.060 -->
01:13:56.550no I was just going to say, is there anything
01:13:56.550 -->
01:13:58.989more unhinged than intellectual property law
01:13:58.989 -->
01:14:01.130right now? I feel like there is nothing more
01:14:01.130 -->
01:14:03.369inconsistent in the world than the way IP law
01:14:03.369 -->
01:14:06.289is being applied. I honestly think anyone trying
01:14:06.289 -->
01:14:08.930to make an IP claim in the age of AI stealing
01:14:08.930 -->
01:14:12.449everything is just like the hubris is astonishing.
01:14:13.750 -->
01:14:16.949100%. And that's it for another Tech Grumps.
01:14:17.920 -->
01:14:19.859Please remember, if you'd like to join us on
01:14:19.859 -->
01:14:22.600Tech Grumps, please just use the hashtag Tech
01:14:22.600 -->
01:14:25.760Grumps hashtag. I said it twice. We will find
01:14:25.760 -->
01:14:28.479you on Mastodon and other locations. The only
01:14:28.479 -->
01:14:31.000thing left to do is to say goodbye from Ian.
01:14:32.409 -->
01:14:40.010Bye -bye. Wendy. Bye. David. Goodbye. Kim. Goodbye.
01:14:40.409 -->
01:14:42.890Thank you for joining us, Kim, and myself. I'm
01:14:42.890 -->
01:14:44.989Ryan. Thank you for joining us for another Tech
01:14:44.989 -->
01:14:45.329Grumps.