WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 -->
00:00:03.540Welcome to Tech Grumps 3 .42. Tonight is Sunday
00:00:03.540 -->
00:00:07.240the 12th of July and once again gathered to grump
00:00:07.240 -->
00:00:13.419at you are Ian. Hello, I am Ian and I am recording
00:00:13.419 -->
00:00:18.000from Manchester where I live. David. Hello, I'm
00:00:18.000 -->
00:00:20.440David Eastman. I'm very hot in London recording
00:00:20.440 -->
00:00:25.589where I live. Wendy. I'm Wendy Grossman. I'm
00:00:25.589 -->
00:00:29.410also based in London, and my website is at pelicancrossing
00:00:29.410 -->
00:00:33.890.net. And myself, Ryan Alexander, also based
00:00:33.890 -->
00:00:36.490in London, desperately trying to beat the heat.
00:00:40.560 -->
00:00:44.039Okay, and as has become our unfortunate tradition,
00:00:44.259 -->
00:00:47.579we shall start off Tech Grumps with the AI bucket
00:00:47.579 -->
00:00:50.820of fun. So we have a collection of stories about
00:00:50.820 -->
00:00:53.259AI that we've gathered for your edification that
00:00:53.259 -->
00:00:54.619we're just going to all talk about. I'm going
00:00:54.619 -->
00:00:56.899to read off the stories and everyone can just
00:00:56.899 -->
00:00:58.880jump in after I've told about all the different
00:00:58.880 -->
00:01:01.299stories and draw whatever points they care to
00:01:01.299 -->
00:01:05.799draw. We have a Munich court decision on AI overviews
00:01:05.799 -->
00:01:09.120from Google. We have an article about YouTube
00:01:09.120 -->
00:01:12.719being cooked. people using AI to generate their
00:01:12.719 -->
00:01:17.099own videos, also without permission. We have
00:01:17.099 -->
00:01:20.879SpaceX going public on June 12th. I'm sure none
00:01:20.879 -->
00:01:24.680of us heard about that. The opening price, $135.
00:01:24.959 -->
00:01:28.620Lots of details on how that went. We have code
00:01:28.620 -->
00:01:32.579reveals. We have a story about smart glasses,
00:01:32.760 -->
00:01:35.459meta smart glasses that can use face print tracking.
00:01:35.780 -->
00:01:38.909So now we have... Facial recognition everywhere.
00:01:39.049 -->
00:01:41.810Fantastic. We've got the last stakeholder gives
00:01:41.810 -->
00:01:44.730up on gigantic data center in Northern Virginia
00:01:44.730 -->
00:01:47.090after years of litigation over land rights. So
00:01:47.090 -->
00:01:49.590a little bit of, you know, a refreshing moment
00:01:49.590 -->
00:01:51.870of nice news in the middle of the apocalypse.
00:01:52.209 -->
00:01:55.709We have another story on AI cheating at a scandal
00:01:55.709 -->
00:01:58.469at Brown University. We have a story on Waymo's
00:01:58.469 -->
00:02:01.609running out of power in San Francisco on the
00:02:01.609 -->
00:02:04.5494th of July congestion. And last but not least,
00:02:04.609 -->
00:02:07.170we have a story about protests against data centers
00:02:07.170 -->
00:02:10.909for high -frequency trading in Brick Lane, our
00:02:10.909 -->
00:02:15.229own hometown of London. Who wants to launch off
00:02:15.229 -->
00:02:17.550first? Can I just say, it's not my hometown of
00:02:17.550 -->
00:02:20.889London, but I get the point. So I want to jump
00:02:20.889 -->
00:02:25.710in on this. Okay, so the YouTube is cooked. I
00:02:25.710 -->
00:02:31.340understand. So I will post. A bunch of links.
00:02:31.560 -->
00:02:33.139But I get that people are like, well, YouTube
00:02:33.139 -->
00:02:38.680is just screwed. But I think they don't understand
00:02:38.680 -->
00:02:44.259how bad it is. Literally, there are scrapers
00:02:44.259 -->
00:02:48.620who are taking videos and generating it as fast
00:02:48.620 -->
00:02:52.219as they can to kind of chime in on the clicks.
00:02:52.500 -->
00:02:55.280And it is getting ridiculous. I understand that
00:02:55.280 -->
00:02:59.710lots of... kind of content creators or i'll say
00:02:59.710 -->
00:03:03.030producers are are just kind of leaving youtube
00:03:03.030 -->
00:03:06.270and it is a pretty serious problem and i and
00:03:06.270 -->
00:03:10.169i'm as someone who's in the fediverse and that
00:03:10.169 -->
00:03:13.189kind of thing i do think it's i don't really
00:03:13.189 -->
00:03:16.210i do care about youtube because i do watch a
00:03:16.210 -->
00:03:20.969lot too but i just think this bad news full stop
00:03:20.969 -->
00:03:25.449for A lot of people who do create videos and
00:03:25.449 -->
00:03:28.810even people who create audio podcasts. YouTube
00:03:28.810 -->
00:03:32.189and Google have made a lot of efforts to try
00:03:32.189 -->
00:03:36.169and get people to create stuff for YouTube, which
00:03:36.169 -->
00:03:39.129were podcasts. So I wouldn't be surprised if
00:03:39.129 -->
00:03:41.229someone's listening to this and it's actually
00:03:41.229 -->
00:03:45.310being generated by or regenerated by a large
00:03:45.310 -->
00:03:48.520language model. And it's not us. Is it a problem
00:03:48.520 -->
00:03:50.759for the BBC as well? Because they're talking
00:03:50.759 -->
00:03:54.039about putting more stuff on social media. Yes,
00:03:54.039 -->
00:04:00.319I would suggest yes, it would be. I think it's
00:04:00.319 -->
00:04:03.120also Channel 4 and others who have kind of started
00:04:03.120 -->
00:04:07.319to use YouTube as their means of delivering content
00:04:07.319 -->
00:04:12.300beyond transmission. And so I do feel that they
00:04:12.300 -->
00:04:15.479are also going to get run straight into this
00:04:15.479 -->
00:04:20.829brick wall. interesting my brain just went oh
00:04:20.829 -->
00:04:24.209it's a flash mob but it's made up of video content
00:04:24.209 -->
00:04:30.389like it it's it's an interesting pattern similar
00:04:30.389 -->
00:04:32.569to flash mobs it's just that people are going
00:04:32.569 -->
00:04:34.110oh is this the thing that everyone's talking
00:04:34.110 -->
00:04:37.310about here's 20 like i can i can spin up 20 000
00:04:37.310 -->
00:04:39.470videos about it and all together they'll get
00:04:39.470 -->
00:04:44.670enough clicks right yeah yeah yeah And that's
00:04:44.670 -->
00:04:47.269just for people who have the pure motivation
00:04:47.269 -->
00:04:53.069of just wanting to click from and get money from
00:04:53.069 -->
00:04:56.129the clicks. What if you have a bad actor who's
00:04:56.129 -->
00:04:59.009just like, I would like for there to be a hundred
00:04:59.009 -->
00:05:01.269versions of this story out there, only one of
00:05:01.269 -->
00:05:02.670which is the one that I care about and everyone
00:05:02.670 -->
00:05:04.350else is actually not that big of a deal to me,
00:05:04.410 -->
00:05:06.709and I have enough money that I can put out a
00:05:06.709 -->
00:05:10.009hundred thousand. I think that's a really good
00:05:10.009 -->
00:05:14.939point because... I know, was it Hillary when
00:05:14.939 -->
00:05:16.920they slowed down her clip so it sounded like
00:05:16.920 -->
00:05:21.699she was stirring her words? Yeah, they made her
00:05:21.699 -->
00:05:25.519sound like she was drunk. Yeah, and I, you know,
00:05:25.560 -->
00:05:28.860it wouldn't take much or, once again, you try
00:05:28.860 -->
00:05:32.620out loads of them and it's crowded and then those
00:05:32.620 -->
00:05:35.259have got things that are slowed down deliberately
00:05:35.259 -->
00:05:39.060and that's a realistic thing that might happen.
00:05:39.379 -->
00:05:42.750Anyway. That's one I definitely want to dig into.
00:05:45.670 -->
00:05:56.490Other ones. SpaceX going public. Well, you know,
00:05:56.509 -->
00:05:59.870the bad thing there is that they've changed the
00:05:59.870 -->
00:06:03.970rules sort of for SpaceX benefit. And so it's
00:06:03.970 -->
00:06:07.509being added. It was added to one of the indexes
00:06:07.509 -->
00:06:09.889much earlier than it should have been. And the
00:06:09.889 -->
00:06:12.370insiders are being allowed to sell shares earlier
00:06:12.370 -->
00:06:16.310than they would have been normally. And, you
00:06:16.310 -->
00:06:20.769know, basically all decisions favoring Elon Musk
00:06:20.769 -->
00:06:23.930over ordinary investors. There was a similar
00:06:23.930 -->
00:06:26.009story that I should have put in here, but then
00:06:26.009 -->
00:06:28.329I don't remember it just now. There was a story
00:06:28.329 -->
00:06:31.769that went past about apparently the. the collision
00:06:31.769 -->
00:06:36.389of the housing market in san francisco with the
00:06:36.389 -->
00:06:38.850privileged few who are having pre -access to
00:06:38.850 -->
00:06:42.050anthropic and open ai shares and there are people
00:06:42.050 -->
00:06:44.610who are putting their houses on the market but
00:06:44.610 -->
00:06:47.449only if you are going to give them anthropic
00:06:47.449 -->
00:06:53.290shares for them huh that's crazy yeah it is great
00:06:53.290 -->
00:06:55.889well remember there was a period when people
00:06:55.889 -->
00:06:58.149were taking out mortgages to buy bitcoin too
00:06:58.889 -->
00:07:01.850I mean, this is a version of that. What? Yeah.
00:07:03.750 -->
00:07:05.430Never heard that. Oh, my gosh. Yeah, they're
00:07:05.430 -->
00:07:09.230all rich. No, probably not. Probably some of
00:07:09.230 -->
00:07:11.589them lost their houses. Yeah, it depends what
00:07:11.589 -->
00:07:13.410they did. Bitcoin goes up and down a lot, and
00:07:13.410 -->
00:07:16.029if you bought at the wrong moment, you'd... Oh,
00:07:16.029 -->
00:07:19.930yeah. It's the timing. I never heard... Okay.
00:07:20.490 -->
00:07:24.189That's crazy. It's an interesting idea that...
00:07:24.189 -->
00:07:31.160My thought is... we're edge like it's as if bitcoin
00:07:31.160 -->
00:07:33.199wasn't bad enough we're edging into like the
00:07:33.199 -->
00:07:35.899problem with bitcoin is that anybody could buy
00:07:35.899 -->
00:07:38.259it if they had a computer and the right money
00:07:38.259 -->
00:07:40.819to put in now we have things like anthropic shares
00:07:40.819 -->
00:07:43.040and these shares which people are starting to
00:07:43.040 -->
00:07:47.860do trading on and it's like money but only very
00:07:47.860 -->
00:07:52.279special people get to have it yeah i was about
00:07:52.279 -->
00:07:55.98010 years ago i think i was at a a conference
00:07:56.860 -->
00:08:02.300That year was being held at Stanford. And one
00:08:02.300 -->
00:08:04.720of the business professors said to me that we
00:08:04.720 -->
00:08:07.319were reaching a point where ordinary investors
00:08:07.319 -->
00:08:09.939were not going to be able to make serious money
00:08:09.939 -->
00:08:15.600by buying Amazon when it goes public, which quite
00:08:15.600 -->
00:08:19.540a few people did, because the insiders were keeping
00:08:19.540 -->
00:08:23.379the shares to themselves for much longer. And
00:08:23.379 -->
00:08:25.439so when they finally went public, all the big...
00:08:25.759 -->
00:08:30.399growth had already happened now nvidia has happened
00:08:30.399 -->
00:08:32.240since then and you could you could have made
00:08:32.240 -->
00:08:34.500quite a bit of an off nvidia if you'd bought
00:08:34.500 -->
00:08:40.919it in 2018 or 2019 but in general you know he's
00:08:40.919 -->
00:08:44.360not every time i see look at every time i see
00:08:44.360 -->
00:08:47.159an ipo and i see when they went public as compared
00:08:47.159 -->
00:08:49.100to when they would have gone public say 20 years
00:08:49.100 -->
00:08:52.179ago you know it's really noticeable that that
00:08:52.179 -->
00:08:55.750a lot of the profits are being kept off the market.
00:08:56.269 -->
00:09:00.809And private equity makes that worse. I think
00:09:00.809 -->
00:09:02.429I can do a clever segue into some of the other
00:09:02.429 -->
00:09:05.809points about this, because we've got out of the
00:09:05.809 -->
00:09:08.590little bucket that we have here, there's a common
00:09:08.590 -->
00:09:10.990thread between some of them, which is the Munich
00:09:10.990 -->
00:09:16.549court decision, the smart glasses, the cheating
00:09:16.549 -->
00:09:20.129scandal, but also like there's this thread of
00:09:20.129 -->
00:09:25.360holding the companies responsible. So that's
00:09:25.360 -->
00:09:27.139one of the things that I see. I keep thinking
00:09:27.139 -->
00:09:29.240to myself, in a lot of these cases, these valuations
00:09:29.240 -->
00:09:31.200are just waiting for one really, really viable
00:09:31.200 -->
00:09:33.299class action lawsuit to make the stocks tank.
00:09:35.759 -->
00:09:40.860Like with Waymo's running out of power. They're
00:09:40.860 -->
00:09:41.940getting with it because they're kind of going,
00:09:42.019 -->
00:09:44.659you know. Oh, but it's still somebody else's
00:09:44.659 -->
00:09:46.620fault if something goes wrong. Actually, Waymo
00:09:46.620 -->
00:09:48.980has had a lot of news stories in the last month
00:09:48.980 -->
00:09:52.059or two. One of them, they've recalled 3 ,900
00:09:52.059 -->
00:09:54.279cars because they kept driving into construction
00:09:54.279 -->
00:09:57.480zones. There have been issues with them blocking
00:09:57.480 -->
00:10:02.120fire and ambulance people. Tesla's got problems,
00:10:02.279 -->
00:10:05.580too. People keep turning on full self -drive,
00:10:05.720 -->
00:10:10.200and then one car drove at 100. miles an hour
00:10:10.200 -->
00:10:12.519or something into a house and killed a 76 year
00:10:12.519 -->
00:10:15.279old woman have you heard about the hack to get
00:10:15.279 -->
00:10:17.740over the you must be at the wheel self -drive
00:10:17.740 -->
00:10:21.460no i i did hear about some guy who was driving
00:10:21.460 -->
00:10:23.519along the highway with kids in the back of the
00:10:23.519 -->
00:10:27.659car and had gone to sleep no so the there's this
00:10:27.659 -->
00:10:31.159and i hope you can hear the quotation marks that
00:10:31.159 -->
00:10:33.259i'm making with my fingers safety feature on
00:10:33.259 -->
00:10:36.940the teslas which is that Even when you're in
00:10:36.940 -->
00:10:39.360self -drive mode, you have to be present at the
00:10:39.360 -->
00:10:43.100wheel. And so what people have done is they've
00:10:43.100 -->
00:10:45.320taken little passport photos of themselves and
00:10:45.320 -->
00:10:47.759dangled them on a little wire in front of the
00:10:47.759 -->
00:10:50.120internal camera, which is enough to fool them.
00:10:50.539 -->
00:10:56.399Yep. Well, oh, my God. Like I say, you know,
00:10:56.399 -->
00:10:58.500if you don't want to drive, you know, lobby for
00:10:58.500 -->
00:11:02.279better public transport. Oh, and have to ride
00:11:02.279 -->
00:11:06.330with the hoi polloi. When I have money, why would
00:11:06.330 -->
00:11:09.049I do that? I don't actually think that's, I'm
00:11:09.049 -->
00:11:12.309not sure that that's really the issue. I mean,
00:11:12.309 -->
00:11:14.590a lot of people in the States where these things
00:11:14.590 -->
00:11:16.590are happening don't really have a lot of choice.
00:11:16.710 -->
00:11:18.850Oh, but Waymo Austin was in trouble in London
00:11:18.850 -->
00:11:21.029because apparently they've been running test
00:11:21.029 -->
00:11:23.990cars around East London. Oh, yeah, I've seen
00:11:23.990 -->
00:11:27.870them. There was a story about this series of
00:11:27.870 -->
00:11:30.250cars that got stuck in a small cul -de -sac.
00:11:30.960 -->
00:11:32.679And it's like 3 o 'clock in the morning, and
00:11:32.679 -->
00:11:34.259they make all these noises because they're having
00:11:34.259 -->
00:11:37.139to back up to try to get out. And it was waking
00:11:37.139 -->
00:11:41.860up all the residents. Yeah. Speaking of problems
00:11:41.860 -->
00:11:45.299in London, so there's a story in here about the
00:11:45.299 -->
00:11:51.480data center in Brick Lane. And so I know the
00:11:51.480 -->
00:11:53.159location. Actually, David, I think we've been
00:11:53.159 -->
00:11:54.860in that location. They're looking at – it's the
00:11:54.860 -->
00:11:57.519Truman Brewery, the old Truman Brewery. Oh, yeah.
00:11:57.759 -->
00:12:01.100Everyone's been there, right? Yeah. Don't get
00:12:01.100 -->
00:12:02.539me wrong, it's a nice space, but I'm looking
00:12:02.539 -->
00:12:05.320at that going, fucking data center? That's way
00:12:05.320 -->
00:12:08.120too small. Because the stories I'm hearing about
00:12:08.120 -->
00:12:11.059data centers is that they are enormous. And I'm
00:12:11.059 -->
00:12:14.320going, I mean, basically my brain's going, what
00:12:14.320 -->
00:12:17.620would you need that is unique to make the Truman
00:12:17.620 -->
00:12:21.220Center, like the Truman Brewery, a data center?
00:12:21.679 -->
00:12:24.360Is it just you'd need ridiculously extensive
00:12:24.360 -->
00:12:27.139power supplies and internet going in and out
00:12:27.139 -->
00:12:30.190of it? Well, as I understand it, the purpose
00:12:30.190 -->
00:12:33.570is to enable high, to help high frequency trading.
00:12:34.669 -->
00:12:38.509So apparently the location matters. Let me unmute.
00:12:38.710 -->
00:12:40.429Yeah, I mean, that's exactly, it's just high
00:12:40.429 -->
00:12:41.909frequency trading. That's the only interesting
00:12:41.909 -->
00:12:43.590it being anywhere near the centre of London.
00:12:44.889 -->
00:12:47.409I mean, obviously the size is important because
00:12:47.409 -->
00:12:49.330otherwise the heating becomes a problem. So there's
00:12:49.330 -->
00:12:52.269always a concern about separating out the surface.
00:12:52.370 -->
00:12:54.590Otherwise the general temperature just rises.
00:12:55.289 -->
00:12:59.240Hence you need the size. I mean, the physical
00:12:59.240 -->
00:13:03.320area, sorry, not necessarily the size. How many
00:13:03.320 -->
00:13:05.000neighbors would like to be more baked? I mean,
00:13:05.019 -->
00:13:10.600there are some famous bakeries. Yeah. Yeah. Or
00:13:10.600 -->
00:13:12.700have a swimming pool. I mean, that's the other
00:13:12.700 -->
00:13:17.240thing, you know. Well, what the council and the
00:13:17.240 -->
00:13:20.519local residents want is affordable housing. Yeah.
00:13:20.940 -->
00:13:23.519Well, everybody wants that. We're not going to
00:13:23.519 -->
00:13:26.139get it. Well, I don't know what it is about London,
00:13:26.220 -->
00:13:30.990but I... I'm astonished that anyone at this point
00:13:30.990 -->
00:13:34.730believes when anybody says, especially in London,
00:13:34.850 -->
00:13:36.370that they're going to build affordable housing
00:13:36.370 -->
00:13:39.450because time and time again, it's like there's
00:13:39.450 -->
00:13:42.809got to be a couple of consulting firms out there
00:13:42.809 -->
00:13:45.909whose entire business is once you have sold your
00:13:45.909 -->
00:13:48.169building on the basis of affordable public housing,
00:13:48.289 -->
00:13:50.809we show you all the ways to get out of doing
00:13:50.809 -->
00:13:54.820it. There definitely are, yeah. Actually, the
00:13:54.820 -->
00:13:57.820strange one is, given the new Prime Minister
00:13:57.820 -->
00:14:00.659Andy Burden, they're looking at the famous Manchester
00:14:00.659 -->
00:14:02.399model, Manchesterism, which actually involves
00:14:02.399 -->
00:14:06.299doing lots of buildings, famously, normally without
00:14:06.299 -->
00:14:07.779any social housing. In fact, they've recently
00:14:07.779 -->
00:14:10.740said if we had to include the numbers of social
00:14:10.740 -->
00:14:16.139or, you know, achievably buying, buyable houses,
00:14:16.220 -->
00:14:18.419I mean, that's the best you could put it, they
00:14:18.419 -->
00:14:20.519wouldn't have built the amount of houses they
00:14:20.519 -->
00:14:23.159had done. So we're not going to get anywhere
00:14:23.159 -->
00:14:32.409near it. That's just not happening. There's so
00:14:32.409 -->
00:14:36.889much I want to say about Andy Burnham, but I
00:14:36.889 -->
00:14:42.649will leave it for another show. A political podcast,
00:14:42.950 -->
00:14:46.370perhaps. That's a good idea. We should have political
00:14:46.370 -->
00:14:52.090grumps or something. Didn't face special? There
00:14:52.090 -->
00:14:54.570have been so many bin face podcasts. It's just
00:14:54.570 -->
00:14:58.710been amazing. And he's been on all of them. Yeah,
00:14:58.750 -->
00:15:01.169yeah. He's been on quite a lot of them. He's
00:15:01.169 -->
00:15:04.490done quite well. But they haven't been like specially
00:15:04.490 -->
00:15:06.389made ones. He's just been on all the podcasts
00:15:06.389 -->
00:15:16.669and they're all giving me life. Recycling. and
00:15:16.669 -->
00:15:19.649that's your ai roundup up next we have a story
00:15:19.649 -->
00:15:22.870that wendy brought to us from rest of world on
00:15:22.870 -->
00:15:26.690ai analytics being used at the world cup this
00:15:26.690 -->
00:15:28.909is kind of ironic because i'm actually a football
00:15:28.909 -->
00:15:31.649free zone i have no idea who's playing or who
00:15:31.649 -->
00:15:33.629is still in the competition and i don't care
00:15:33.629 -->
00:15:36.830but this story was interesting to me because
00:15:36.830 -->
00:15:40.590so much of ai is humans all the way down and
00:15:40.590 -->
00:15:44.559it turns out that football is no exception Data
00:15:44.559 -->
00:15:46.860analytics is really important in football. Who
00:15:46.860 -->
00:15:52.899knew? And, you know, every part, it seems like,
00:15:52.960 -->
00:15:56.419according to Rest of World, the current edition
00:15:56.419 -->
00:15:58.860of the FIFA World Cup features a sensor fitted
00:15:58.860 -->
00:16:01.840ball, real time tracking, artificial intelligence
00:16:01.840 -->
00:16:05.399assisted offside calls, and an AI assistant for
00:16:05.399 -->
00:16:09.429each of the 48 teams. And behind these innovations,
00:16:09.649 -->
00:16:11.929and this is the part that really drew my attention,
00:16:12.070 -->
00:16:14.529are data workers in countries including India,
00:16:14.690 -->
00:16:16.570Cambodia, and the Philippines, who are essential
00:16:16.570 -->
00:16:19.649for the many AI tools in play. In other words,
00:16:19.669 -->
00:16:22.029what we've got is a bunch of workers all over
00:16:22.029 -->
00:16:24.509the global south who are doing things like labeling
00:16:24.509 -->
00:16:28.730video clips and labeling data and figuring out,
00:16:28.750 -->
00:16:31.049you know, doing analytics and all the rest of
00:16:31.049 -->
00:16:36.580it. You know, it's just very typical that what
00:16:36.580 -->
00:16:39.860they claim is AI always turns out to be a bunch
00:16:39.860 -->
00:16:43.019of humans in the background, you know, doing
00:16:43.019 -->
00:16:46.000all sort of all the work. The good news is all
00:16:46.000 -->
00:16:47.840those out -of -work Amazon Fresh people have
00:16:47.840 -->
00:16:51.840found a new venue. That's right. Amazon is discontinuing
00:16:51.840 -->
00:16:56.980Mechanical Turk, isn't it? Mechanical Turk. Yeah,
00:16:56.980 -->
00:16:59.360well, there's a lot of there is an awful lot.
00:16:59.399 -->
00:17:01.700I mean, I got even I was a bit surprised when
00:17:01.700 -->
00:17:04.059they were sort of American statistics. Somebody
00:17:04.059 -->
00:17:06.900had done a free kick and they'd said the distance
00:17:06.900 -->
00:17:10.579of the distance of the speed of the ball, which
00:17:10.579 -->
00:17:12.480you can get because there's a detector on the
00:17:12.480 -->
00:17:15.099ball, but also the spin on the ball. And you
00:17:15.099 -->
00:17:17.660definitely you definitely, of course, need quite
00:17:17.660 -->
00:17:21.279a careful, you know, you need the two senses
00:17:21.279 -->
00:17:23.599on it and get the spin. But the other thing is.
00:17:24.170 -->
00:17:26.269Nobody playing football gives a hoot about the
00:17:26.269 -->
00:17:28.710spin on the ball. It sounds a bit American, but
00:17:28.710 -->
00:17:31.750to be honest, there's an awful lot. I doubt that
00:17:31.750 -->
00:17:33.930that's true. I doubt that that's true because
00:17:33.930 -->
00:17:36.390at least in tennis, if the ball has spin on it,
00:17:36.410 -->
00:17:39.250it changes how it bounces. Well, I mean, the
00:17:39.250 -->
00:17:41.309reason that you would look at the spin is that
00:17:41.309 -->
00:17:43.170like, yeah, so you can swerve the ball, but you
00:17:43.170 -->
00:17:46.109can physically see it. I mean, and it's like,
00:17:46.150 -->
00:17:48.069it's good to know that you can do it, but unless
00:17:48.069 -->
00:17:49.369you can do it, you're not going to be at the
00:17:49.369 -->
00:17:53.319World Cup taking a free kick. But the data is
00:17:53.319 -->
00:17:56.019not just going to players. The analytics go to
00:17:56.019 -->
00:17:58.619broadcasters and commentators and so forth. It
00:17:58.619 -->
00:18:01.240doesn't go to players at all. It's broadcasted,
00:18:01.240 -->
00:18:03.140but most of it goes to the betting industry.
00:18:03.539 -->
00:18:07.259I was about to say that. Yeah. Okay, if you go
00:18:07.259 -->
00:18:09.539into any of the betting shops now and say, oh,
00:18:09.619 -->
00:18:12.920I want to bet on a match, it looks like suddenly
00:18:12.920 -->
00:18:14.920you're running a bank. The amount of statistics,
00:18:15.400 -->
00:18:17.319the amount of things you can bet on, you know,
00:18:17.339 -->
00:18:19.650it used to be. correct score and half -time,
00:18:19.690 -->
00:18:23.109full -time results. Now there's a list that goes
00:18:23.109 -->
00:18:25.109off. I mean, I normally bet during the World
00:18:25.109 -->
00:18:27.490Cup and I never bet online because I just know
00:18:27.490 -->
00:18:29.470I'm never going to do that. But if you then just
00:18:29.470 -->
00:18:33.109go into a... It'll be the same online. Go into
00:18:33.109 -->
00:18:36.190a bookie and then have a look at the list and
00:18:36.190 -->
00:18:38.490it's off. Literally, you have to scroll through
00:18:38.490 -->
00:18:41.089it because it's just basically data. They make
00:18:41.089 -->
00:18:42.930you think you're running a bank by having all
00:18:42.930 -->
00:18:45.450the different statistics you can bet on. And
00:18:45.450 -->
00:18:48.900that... our betting as for what you know is happening
00:18:48.900 -->
00:18:51.880in the states of calci and so forth and there
00:18:51.880 -->
00:18:54.839and there's stuff god knows because i even want
00:18:54.839 -->
00:18:59.660to go there what's really disturbing is during
00:18:59.660 -->
00:19:03.119the french open tennis calci was actually a sponsor
00:19:03.119 -->
00:19:09.259of the broadcast oh yeah quoting statistics and
00:19:09.259 -->
00:19:11.519they had crawls all the time showing their calci's
00:19:11.519 -->
00:19:17.170odds I wonder at the role that the U .S. influence
00:19:17.170 -->
00:19:19.450has on this, because I can think of a very I
00:19:19.450 -->
00:19:21.609can think of a straightforward reason why they
00:19:21.609 -->
00:19:23.849want to be spamming all those stats all the time.
00:19:23.910 -->
00:19:28.089And it's the 24 -7 news culture over there. They
00:19:28.089 -->
00:19:30.809can't stand a silent moment and they want to
00:19:30.809 -->
00:19:33.210just be spewing data at you all the time. No,
00:19:33.329 -->
00:19:36.549Bet365 has been going in Europe and tennis for
00:19:36.549 -->
00:19:40.750a long time now. Fair. There's a load of YouTube
00:19:40.750 -->
00:19:43.930channels that just do betting. I mean, there
00:19:43.930 -->
00:19:45.869must have been. I mean, I was sort of interested
00:19:45.869 -->
00:19:48.029in one, and then as YouTube showed me, about
00:19:48.029 -->
00:19:52.210100. Most of them are American. They have a completely
00:19:52.210 -->
00:19:54.450different statistical range that we don't do.
00:19:54.490 -->
00:19:56.430They do this Asian handicap system that you'll
00:19:56.430 -->
00:19:58.069hear in other sports that doesn't necessarily
00:19:58.069 -->
00:20:00.309match football. I wonder if they've actually
00:20:00.309 -->
00:20:02.890thought about, when they're sending all the stuff
00:20:02.890 -->
00:20:04.589out to the Global South, I wonder if anyone has
00:20:04.589 -->
00:20:06.750actually thought about the fact that the Global
00:20:06.750 -->
00:20:11.210South also gives a shit about football. For some
00:20:11.210 -->
00:20:13.829reason, the Indian AI data centers have been
00:20:13.829 -->
00:20:18.170returning nothing but lack of penalties on any
00:20:18.170 -->
00:20:21.369call that relates to the Indian team. In fact,
00:20:21.470 -->
00:20:26.269the data labelers themselves, they're often quite
00:20:26.269 -->
00:20:28.529passionate fans. It says this in the article,
00:20:28.630 -->
00:20:33.470and many of them also play football. I mean,
00:20:33.490 -->
00:20:36.809this has been true for a long time. I mean, IBM
00:20:36.809 -->
00:20:39.099started doing statistics. at wimbledon in the
00:20:39.099 -->
00:20:42.519early 90s and they have somebody a court side
00:20:42.519 -->
00:20:44.539you know sort of marking down all this stuff
00:20:44.539 -->
00:20:47.460about each point and and those guys have to be
00:20:47.460 -->
00:20:50.279like county level tennis players or or better
00:20:50.279 -->
00:20:53.220yeah you can certainly if you're doing labeling
00:20:53.220 -->
00:20:55.420you need to understand the statistics because
00:20:55.420 -->
00:20:57.000they are i mean the football related one the
00:20:57.000 -->
00:20:59.980football related is like successful tackles six
00:20:59.980 -->
00:21:02.880said successful counter pressure which you actually
00:21:02.880 -->
00:21:04.380have to think about what that actually means
00:21:04.380 -->
00:21:07.700for it you know a doll is easy enough but think
00:21:07.700 -->
00:21:09.960how quickly did you stop the opposition getting
00:21:09.960 -->
00:21:11.740the ball when you just gave it away that requires
00:21:11.740 -->
00:21:13.259somebody who actually understands football that
00:21:13.259 -->
00:21:16.160stat is stats are taken for each match of which
00:21:16.160 -->
00:21:19.140there are an awful lot yeah the equivalent in
00:21:19.140 -->
00:21:21.140tennis is being able to tell the difference between
00:21:21.140 -->
00:21:24.279a forced error and an unforced error yes yes
00:21:24.839 -->
00:21:28.759Exactly. Yes. Yes. Missed referee mistakes or
00:21:28.759 -->
00:21:30.680so recorded, which is quite interesting because
00:21:30.680 -->
00:21:32.579you can have a there's different books on referee
00:21:32.579 -->
00:21:35.880errors. And this was before Trump decided what
00:21:35.880 -->
00:21:38.059was and wasn't correct. You can still have people
00:21:38.059 -->
00:21:40.559doing that. So, yes, there are a lot of statistics,
00:21:40.640 -->
00:21:43.619but most of it ends up to be relevant specifically
00:21:43.619 -->
00:21:46.880to gambling. But actually, the interesting thing
00:21:46.880 -->
00:21:49.160is that legal sports betting is actually quite
00:21:49.160 -->
00:21:53.220new in the States. Yes, I mean, that's why I
00:21:53.220 -->
00:21:56.140was talking about the UK sports betting the league,
00:21:56.180 -->
00:21:57.779which is the legal side, of course, and it's
00:21:57.779 -->
00:22:00.319been around for some time. I wonder if we've
00:22:00.319 -->
00:22:05.880had... We were talking about Kelshi and Paramutual
00:22:05.880 -->
00:22:09.880and this other form of betting. I wonder if at
00:22:09.880 -->
00:22:12.960this point... Prediction markets. I wonder if
00:22:12.960 -->
00:22:18.119at this point I can see very easily the prediction
00:22:18.119 -->
00:22:22.279markets suddenly becoming a anti -sports gambling
00:22:22.279 -->
00:22:26.119advocate because they see it as muscling in on
00:22:26.119 -->
00:22:30.980their turf. It's a little difficult because it's
00:22:30.980 -->
00:22:32.619been there for a long time, but they might look
00:22:32.619 -->
00:22:36.319at it like that. Certainly not in the UK, but
00:22:36.319 -->
00:22:38.059in the US where there's always been a struggle
00:22:38.059 -->
00:22:40.279for gambling and the ways they've gotten around
00:22:40.279 -->
00:22:45.960it. Oh, that's an interesting thought. I was
00:22:45.960 -->
00:22:50.579just going to... So there's a podcast I listen
00:22:50.579 -->
00:22:57.480to by the FT called Tectonic, and it did actually
00:22:57.480 -->
00:23:01.359cover this. But the interesting angle, and I
00:23:01.359 -->
00:23:03.960know it's a little bit different from the story
00:23:03.960 -->
00:23:07.519that Wendy originally brought up, but there's
00:23:07.519 -->
00:23:13.319a real question of how much does this ruin sports
00:23:13.319 -->
00:23:17.190for them? Or was it for... The fans who just
00:23:17.190 -->
00:23:20.190like, like David, who just want to potentially
00:23:20.190 -->
00:23:22.269put a bet, you know, they just want the kind
00:23:22.269 -->
00:23:24.509of like, they just want the final score. They
00:23:24.509 -->
00:23:26.970don't want all of these kind of, all of these
00:23:26.970 -->
00:23:30.609statistics and stats to, because it's just, you
00:23:30.609 -->
00:23:34.450know, like I've seen, especially in sort of the
00:23:34.450 -->
00:23:38.549American coverage, you know, the kind of polymarket
00:23:38.549 -->
00:23:42.329kind of couchy. kind of stuff comes up on about
00:23:42.329 -->
00:23:45.069at the bottom of the screen but also just like
00:23:45.069 -->
00:23:48.789you know how much spin all that stuff is isn't
00:23:48.789 -->
00:23:52.990is it that interesting i mean i i get it no it's
00:23:52.990 -->
00:23:55.210not interesting yeah it is exactly it's like
00:23:55.210 -->
00:23:59.569how much does this actually take away um actually
00:23:59.569 -->
00:24:03.529being in the game or like in the game even if
00:24:03.529 -->
00:24:05.970you're watching the game i wonder because you
00:24:05.970 -->
00:24:09.509know and i i look at I imagine this scenario
00:24:09.509 -->
00:24:11.730where people are just in the game. They're on
00:24:11.730 -->
00:24:14.710the front. I feel like basketball, right? You're
00:24:14.710 -->
00:24:19.509talking about a subset of the people who enjoy
00:24:19.509 -->
00:24:22.690the game who gain that enjoyment through betting
00:24:22.690 -->
00:24:25.730on it. So first of all, it's really important
00:24:25.730 -->
00:24:28.690to note that people who don't bet on these games
00:24:28.690 -->
00:24:34.319are really not impacted. by everyone else in
00:24:34.319 -->
00:24:37.759the game. I'm not even sure yet. Like, no more
00:24:37.759 -->
00:24:39.880so than anything else. Now, we can talk about
00:24:39.880 -->
00:24:42.119the experience of the people who are betting,
00:24:42.279 -->
00:24:45.299who are like, oh, like, but here's the thing.
00:24:45.319 -->
00:24:48.359At this point, this isn't even, like, maybe it's
00:24:48.359 -->
00:24:50.980assisted by AA, but what's really happening is,
00:24:50.980 -->
00:24:54.019for me, when I look at that, I think they're
00:24:54.019 -->
00:24:56.619just chasing the long tail of the people who
00:24:56.619 -->
00:25:00.900are already upset. so obsessively betting that
00:25:00.900 -->
00:25:02.839they will be encouraged to bet more with more
00:25:02.839 -->
00:25:06.680statistics and maybe like maybe there's a small
00:25:06.680 -->
00:25:08.279fraction of people who'd be like oh it's just
00:25:08.279 -->
00:25:10.720not fun anymore now that i get 14 pages and don't
00:25:10.720 -->
00:25:12.859just they won they lost i don't think anyone's
00:25:12.859 -->
00:25:14.740stopping them from doing bets on they won they
00:25:14.740 -->
00:25:16.960lost or whatever the spread is oh no of course
00:25:16.960 -->
00:25:19.299it's just more it's not yeah it's just it's just
00:25:19.299 -->
00:25:24.720more in tennis it actually has been quite damaging
00:25:24.720 -->
00:25:28.670because there are lots of very small tournaments
00:25:28.670 -->
00:25:32.410where the players get paid very little and you
00:25:32.410 -->
00:25:34.769can bet on all these crazy things like the next
00:25:34.769 -->
00:25:37.730point whether somebody wins a set whether somebody
00:25:37.730 -->
00:25:40.630breaks serve here and so forth and it has encouraged
00:25:40.630 -->
00:25:43.329two things one is a lot of cheating at bets uh
00:25:43.329 -->
00:25:46.690you know they basically had to ban laptops and
00:25:46.690 -->
00:25:49.410and they're very funny about mobile phones because
00:25:49.410 -->
00:25:52.109people can people can bet at courtside in that
00:25:52.109 -->
00:25:56.170tiny split second between the ball ending the
00:25:56.170 -->
00:26:00.230point and the umpire calling the score. And that's
00:26:00.230 -->
00:26:02.910one aspect. But the other aspect is that these
00:26:02.910 -->
00:26:05.369players who are paid very little are really,
00:26:05.369 -->
00:26:08.369really vulnerable to being offered bribes to,
00:26:08.410 -->
00:26:12.849to fix a match. Yeah. And that, that has been
00:26:12.849 -->
00:26:18.029really, really bad. You could do the equivalent
00:26:18.029 -->
00:26:21.190of high -speed trading on sporting events by
00:26:21.190 -->
00:26:23.529setting up cameras with fast internet links and
00:26:23.529 -->
00:26:25.769analytics to be like... Because when you said
00:26:25.769 -->
00:26:27.829that, I was like, that sounds just like high
00:26:27.829 -->
00:26:30.630-speed trading. Oh, crap. It is high -speed trading.
00:26:30.710 -->
00:26:35.750Oh, yes. Yeah. Okay, so let me just take a step
00:26:35.750 -->
00:26:40.930back. And I agree with Wendy. So the example
00:26:40.930 -->
00:26:44.329they use is VAR. I know everyone gets upset about
00:26:44.329 -->
00:26:48.740VAR, but... with var you get this even if you're
00:26:48.740 -->
00:26:52.420there watching you out of four tap grumps do
00:26:52.420 -->
00:26:55.880not give a shit about avr no no what is it video
00:26:55.880 -->
00:27:00.539assisted refereeing so yeah sorry to know if
00:27:00.539 -->
00:27:03.240it if it definitely so similar to like tennis
00:27:03.240 -->
00:27:06.319where did it go in or did it not go in yes the
00:27:06.319 -->
00:27:08.940referee the female i guess the difference between
00:27:08.940 -->
00:27:12.920tennis and football the referee can be overruled
00:27:13.500 -->
00:27:16.799by VAR, which I don't think that's true in Wimbledon
00:27:16.799 -->
00:27:19.500or in tennis. It's the other way around in Wimbledon.
00:27:19.640 -->
00:27:22.700Tennis has literally just changed to get rid
00:27:22.700 -->
00:27:27.819of line judges. And so now it's just electronic
00:27:27.819 -->
00:27:32.720line calling plus. Okay. Tennis is years ahead
00:27:32.720 -->
00:27:35.160of football. I mean, football only recently,
00:27:35.420 -->
00:27:39.579you know, football only recently. Oh, it's actually
00:27:39.579 -->
00:27:45.349a goal, you know. Only now the referees can check
00:27:45.349 -->
00:27:48.170that a goal was actually scored. Beforehand,
00:27:48.170 -->
00:27:51.230we had the famous, the balls crossed the line,
00:27:51.369 -->
00:27:53.750but the goalkeeper quickly padded it out and
00:27:53.750 -->
00:27:55.230everyone knows it's a goal except the referee.
00:27:56.190 -->
00:27:58.869So most sports are actually ahead of football
00:27:58.869 -->
00:28:02.089in terms of technology. Okay, so the point I'm
00:28:02.089 -->
00:28:04.930making, sorry. If you're there and you're just
00:28:04.930 -->
00:28:09.509watching the game. Now, it's a bunch of stuff
00:28:09.509 -->
00:28:11.730that comes up when they're waiting for the VAR
00:28:11.730 -->
00:28:14.650decision about statistics and stuff like that,
00:28:14.789 -->
00:28:17.970and they do come up, and then you're forced to...
00:28:17.970 -->
00:28:19.990I've not been to a game, so maybe someone else
00:28:19.990 -->
00:28:22.289is like, nope, that's not true, but there seems
00:28:22.289 -->
00:28:24.569to be a bunch of things that do come up when
00:28:24.569 -->
00:28:27.670you're waiting. When you say when you were there,
00:28:27.890 -->
00:28:29.890do you mean when you're sitting in front of the
00:28:29.890 -->
00:28:31.930telly watching it, or when you're at the game?
00:28:33.049 -->
00:28:37.829I gather... when you're watching it on live okay
00:28:37.829 -->
00:28:40.150that's probably an important thing to say at
00:28:40.150 -->
00:28:41.789this point because when you're there usually
00:28:41.789 -->
00:28:44.369means people who are at the stadium yeah okay
00:28:44.369 -->
00:28:46.970so i also i think that the idea is that that
00:28:46.970 -->
00:28:49.670on the big screens there are also statistics
00:28:49.670 -->
00:28:52.869as well that come up yeah they're showing camera
00:28:52.869 -->
00:28:54.950angles and statistics not necessarily the ones
00:28:54.950 -->
00:28:58.450that the ar studio in wherever it is down the
00:28:58.450 -->
00:29:03.910M4. What I'm trying to get to is that they're
00:29:03.910 -->
00:29:08.049starting to creep into the experience of watching
00:29:08.049 -->
00:29:10.630the sport that you like. That's what I'm trying
00:29:10.630 -->
00:29:13.490to get at. And that's what the FT piece is about.
00:29:14.150 -->
00:29:15.769Yeah, yeah, yeah. No, it's definitely a fact.
00:29:16.009 -->
00:29:20.369I mean, the idea is we're going, we want an accurate
00:29:20.369 -->
00:29:22.450result because we've known for years that...
00:29:22.799 -->
00:29:25.380you know offside decisions are random but people
00:29:25.380 -->
00:29:27.579are saying yeah but if a human doesn't make it
00:29:27.579 -->
00:29:29.319then it's just going to be a bunch of humans
00:29:29.319 -->
00:29:32.180in a computer and a long pause and now people
00:29:32.180 -->
00:29:34.460are saying oh we thought vao would be great and
00:29:34.460 -->
00:29:35.819then again no maybe it's not so good because
00:29:35.819 -->
00:29:37.279you have to sit there three minutes while nothing
00:29:37.279 -->
00:29:40.460happens that's like that's not a very it's not
00:29:40.460 -->
00:29:43.599a very continuous sport is it well three minutes
00:29:43.599 -->
00:29:48.819they call it a hydration break Some years ago,
00:29:48.900 -->
00:29:51.240a couple of professors in Wales wrote a book
00:29:51.240 -->
00:29:53.440about electronic line calling in tennis. And
00:29:53.440 -->
00:29:56.900I think some technology in cricket as well. And
00:29:56.900 -->
00:29:59.039the interesting thing about what they said was
00:29:59.039 -->
00:30:01.900that it isn't that people really want accuracy.
00:30:02.119 -->
00:30:05.700What they want is fairness. Yeah. That's what
00:30:05.700 -->
00:30:08.660they say they want. Yes. Or they feel they want.
00:30:08.660 -->
00:30:11.200That's what people get really exercised about.
00:30:13.289 -->
00:30:16.170Yes, but not at the time. I think the idea is
00:30:16.170 -->
00:30:18.309before and afterwards they say they want fairness.
00:30:18.410 -->
00:30:20.990As you said, every sport you want fairness. But
00:30:20.990 -->
00:30:24.210when it actually interferes with watching the
00:30:24.210 -->
00:30:26.630sport, it does so. Even in cricket, it's annoying
00:30:26.630 -->
00:30:29.549when they have to have a replay. So there's a
00:30:29.549 -->
00:30:32.329Hawkeye. It's the same in cricket to test if
00:30:32.329 -->
00:30:35.109it's leg before wicket. And that does annoy people.
00:30:35.289 -->
00:30:37.670But before and afterwards, they say they want
00:30:37.670 -->
00:30:40.640it to be fair until... You know, a human makes
00:30:40.640 -->
00:30:42.380one decision, then the human has to stop. They
00:30:42.380 -->
00:30:45.099have to ask, there's a cause, and then the thing
00:30:45.099 -->
00:30:46.859gets reversed. Actually, it can be quite annoying,
00:30:47.039 -->
00:30:50.920even if it is correct. And this is what we're
00:30:50.920 -->
00:30:56.819finding. And next up on our hit parade is Ian
00:30:56.819 -->
00:30:59.799talking about locally hosted AI systems. What
00:30:59.799 -->
00:31:04.940do you got for us, Ian? I have been... I'm still
00:31:04.940 -->
00:31:09.410kind of in between... I'm not a booster and I'm
00:31:09.410 -->
00:31:11.369not a hater. You've brought the enemy into your
00:31:11.369 -->
00:31:14.789house, Ian. How dare you? I have. I have. I have
00:31:14.789 -->
00:31:19.569got it under in a cage. Right. So I've been thinking
00:31:19.569 -->
00:31:22.549about this for a long, long while. And as someone
00:31:22.549 -->
00:31:26.930who does host their own websites and other things,
00:31:27.190 -->
00:31:28.970even though my peer tube is currently broken,
00:31:29.589 -->
00:31:33.269I kind of started thinking, well, I've been hearing
00:31:33.269 -->
00:31:38.400about local elements. And I decided I had a long
00:31:38.400 -->
00:31:42.480list of things to do, including setting up a
00:31:42.480 -->
00:31:47.220local LLM. So I set up one called, what's it
00:31:47.220 -->
00:31:50.019called? I can't remember the name. We do need
00:31:50.019 -->
00:31:52.599to know the model, Ian. We absolutely need to
00:31:52.599 -->
00:31:54.940know the model. Well, not the model. I'm talking
00:31:54.940 -->
00:31:58.160about the, oh yeah, it's called, right, the container,
00:31:58.359 -->
00:32:02.539I guess, is called LM Studio, right? So I'm using
00:32:02.539 -->
00:32:05.220that. I did use Ulama and stuff like that, and
00:32:05.220 -->
00:32:07.960it didn't quite. work for me right so i i set
00:32:07.960 -->
00:32:11.039up it was pretty straightforward um i'm running
00:32:11.039 -->
00:32:15.500linux so it was pretty straight forward and from
00:32:15.500 -->
00:32:20.200there you can then install whatever um whatever
00:32:20.200 -->
00:32:22.019large language models you want it gives you a
00:32:22.019 -->
00:32:24.819list and it also says it knows obviously what
00:32:24.819 -->
00:32:27.980your machine is and what the capabilities of
00:32:27.980 -->
00:32:30.920your machine are and so it kind of hey you can
00:32:30.920 -->
00:32:36.569install the the gemma which is by google Yeah,
00:32:36.569 -->
00:32:38.650it's one of the open -weight models, yeah. Yeah,
00:32:38.750 -->
00:32:41.329so you could do that, but you probably don't
00:32:41.329 -->
00:32:44.170want to install the, I don't know, I'll make
00:32:44.170 -->
00:32:49.430up a number, the 4096 gigabyte version, you know,
00:32:49.450 -->
00:32:50.990because that would be stupid because you haven't
00:32:50.990 -->
00:32:54.650got enough memory for that, okay? But there's
00:32:54.650 -->
00:32:56.430loads of other ones in between, and there's lots
00:32:56.430 -->
00:33:00.210of small models. And so I was able to... i first
00:33:00.210 -->
00:33:01.930i actually started using gemma i started using
00:33:01.930 -->
00:33:05.950um quinn i started using the ibm one and it's
00:33:05.950 -->
00:33:07.609just you just install them they took a while
00:33:07.609 -->
00:33:09.130to download i've got a gigabit connection so
00:33:09.130 -->
00:33:12.089it's not too bad and then you can start just
00:33:12.089 -->
00:33:14.910talking to it and start getting to do things
00:33:14.910 -->
00:33:19.730there are some limitations um honestly on my
00:33:19.730 -->
00:33:24.069framework which to fair has got um how much gig
00:33:24.069 -->
00:33:29.170have i got 40 no i got 64 64 gig of memory It
00:33:29.170 -->
00:33:31.809wasn't even getting anywhere close to 32, some
00:33:31.809 -->
00:33:33.849of the smaller models. And it was going quite
00:33:33.849 -->
00:33:37.210quickly. And I'm not running like an NVIDIA card.
00:33:37.470 -->
00:33:39.890I'm just using it off the CPU. I'm using the
00:33:39.890 -->
00:33:46.269Intel Arc GPU. It was pretty quick. One of the
00:33:46.269 -->
00:33:48.109things that really struck me was that actually,
00:33:48.269 -->
00:33:51.910there's a lot of criticism about how much speed
00:33:51.910 -->
00:33:54.009you need, what kind of GPUs, all this stuff.
00:33:54.049 -->
00:33:57.730I'm like, you know what? I'm the kind of person
00:33:57.730 -->
00:34:00.680who used to wait. I'll say this to someone else.
00:34:00.920 -->
00:34:03.359A long time ago, I used to render stuff on my
00:34:03.359 -->
00:34:08.119old 16 -bit computer. I used to leave my computer
00:34:08.119 -->
00:34:15.260on overnight for a 320 by 240 kind of scene.
00:34:15.820 -->
00:34:18.039And I don't really mind. And these things are
00:34:18.039 -->
00:34:21.219fast and they're really quick. And if you start
00:34:21.219 -->
00:34:24.840to, it starts to help you to realize. don't do
00:34:24.840 -->
00:34:26.739what you do with the large models where you type
00:34:26.739 -->
00:34:28.480in a bunch of stuff you type in stuff that's
00:34:28.480 -->
00:34:31.980direct and you you end up working out in between
00:34:31.980 -->
00:34:36.119and actually it was pretty useful and i actually
00:34:36.119 -->
00:34:40.900found it quite easy it worked pretty well um
00:34:40.900 -->
00:34:43.960i really urge people to at least have a look
00:34:43.960 -->
00:34:47.920at the or try some of the local model stuff because
00:34:47.920 -->
00:34:50.719it's not going to solve a whole bunch of things
00:34:50.719 -->
00:34:54.090the simple things that you probably do with um
00:34:54.090 -->
00:34:58.369the the other large language models are actually
00:34:58.369 -->
00:35:00.250pretty good now to be honest i'll be sorry to
00:35:00.250 -->
00:35:04.210be very clear i am not saying it's a good this
00:35:04.210 -->
00:35:06.409is good because it's still biases and you can
00:35:06.409 -->
00:35:09.030actually start to find some of the biases in
00:35:09.030 -->
00:35:11.250some of the large language models that you you
00:35:11.250 -->
00:35:13.849use and you can see like for example i got it
00:35:13.849 -->
00:35:17.610to do a very simple thing where it was i create
00:35:17.610 -->
00:35:21.300an xml And then I created an XSLT for it. Sorry,
00:35:21.380 -->
00:35:23.239this is a transformation for it. And I tried
00:35:23.239 -->
00:35:26.380to get it to create the XML in Markdown. And
00:35:26.380 -->
00:35:28.920in a Markdown file, and it basically had nothing
00:35:28.920 -->
00:35:32.139in it. And it was like, okay, this is obviously
00:35:32.139 -->
00:35:34.639wrong. Because it didn't understand what Markdown
00:35:34.639 -->
00:35:39.639was. So I think this... In the simple Markdown,
00:35:39.639 -->
00:35:42.940it didn't really understand what I was trying
00:35:42.940 -->
00:35:45.300to say. Even though I made it very clear and
00:35:45.300 -->
00:35:49.119easy, I had to really... do a bunch of things
00:35:49.119 -->
00:35:52.619to go, this is a markdown file. This is an example
00:35:52.619 -->
00:35:54.940of what I would like. I want you to do the same
00:35:54.940 -->
00:35:57.639with this XML file, which I've given you. And
00:35:57.639 -->
00:36:01.800it took a while, but it got there. And I found
00:36:01.800 -->
00:36:04.699it really interesting that it all runs pretty
00:36:04.699 -->
00:36:10.000straightforwardly on my framework for a team
00:36:10.000 -->
00:36:14.280without any stress. And it wasn't even touching
00:36:14.280 -->
00:36:17.969the top end of the memory. I want to make a point
00:36:17.969 -->
00:36:23.269about this entire kind of area, which is that
00:36:23.269 -->
00:36:24.989one, I think it's going to become more important.
00:36:26.469 -->
00:36:28.969Because first of all, you've heard the term frontier
00:36:28.969 -->
00:36:33.130minus six. I've heard it. I didn't actually totally
00:36:33.130 -->
00:36:35.550know what you mean. Frontier minus six is the
00:36:35.550 -->
00:36:38.250models that are now six months old. And this
00:36:38.250 -->
00:36:40.190is why I asked really important what the model
00:36:40.190 -->
00:36:45.119is. But here's the thing. And we've already seen
00:36:45.119 -->
00:36:47.260some of this. Actually, Simon Willison has done
00:36:47.260 -->
00:36:49.400some work on this. He's got his little, basically,
00:36:49.840 -->
00:36:53.699there are a whole bunch of problems that are
00:36:53.699 -->
00:36:57.119associated with the frontier versions of these
00:36:57.119 -->
00:36:59.039LLMs, which are the ones that are so big and
00:36:59.039 -->
00:37:00.800so powerful. And they're currently the best performing
00:37:00.800 -->
00:37:03.260and probably will always be the best performing
00:37:03.260 -->
00:37:08.539due to their nature. But they can only be effectively
00:37:08.539 -->
00:37:13.599run in the data centers. Yeah. So I have rejoined
00:37:13.599 -->
00:37:15.239the world of the employed. And one of the things
00:37:15.239 -->
00:37:16.900that we're talking about that we have to be mindful
00:37:16.900 -->
00:37:18.900of in the work that we do, because sometimes
00:37:18.900 -->
00:37:22.639it deals with PII, is like we cannot use Claude
00:37:22.639 -->
00:37:26.619to handle anything that might touch UK -based
00:37:26.619 -->
00:37:29.139PII, because we can't guarantee that Claude isn't
00:37:29.139 -->
00:37:31.000going to send that PII back to the States to
00:37:31.000 -->
00:37:34.579process it. Yeah. You might want to explain to
00:37:34.579 -->
00:37:38.219people that PII is an American term. It's personally
00:37:38.219 -->
00:37:40.519identifiable information. Over here, we just
00:37:40.519 -->
00:37:46.139call it personal data. Or stuff. It depends if
00:37:46.139 -->
00:37:49.099you're in banking, you'll use one term. The banks
00:37:49.099 -->
00:37:54.659are definitely using PII. Besides that, here's
00:37:54.659 -->
00:37:56.860the thing. Locally run models solve that problem.
00:37:57.579 -->
00:38:00.940And the meta skill of understanding how to set
00:38:00.940 -->
00:38:05.079up your machines to use local models, and it's
00:38:05.079 -->
00:38:07.059particular to be able to swap them in and out
00:38:07.059 -->
00:38:09.460easily, to have the interfaces that go, you know,
00:38:09.460 -->
00:38:10.940because when another six months have passed,
00:38:11.320 -->
00:38:13.980there'll be another round of locally runnable
00:38:13.980 -->
00:38:15.739models that will be even better than the ones
00:38:15.739 -->
00:38:17.280that we've got. Like it all just kind of keeps
00:38:17.280 -->
00:38:20.480going down. It's turtles going down. And so that
00:38:20.480 -->
00:38:23.239capacity to run these models locally. Now that's
00:38:23.239 -->
00:38:25.920the technology side of it. The other thing that
00:38:25.920 -->
00:38:28.980I'm finding really interesting is like, The variety
00:38:28.980 -->
00:38:31.039of arguments, and there's quite a lot of them
00:38:31.039 -->
00:38:33.280against AI, a lot of them are grounded in the
00:38:33.280 -->
00:38:36.119environmental damage. What is the environmental
00:38:36.119 -->
00:38:37.960damage if you're running it on your machine?
00:38:39.460 -->
00:38:42.139Yeah, I mean, obviously, you know, the water
00:38:42.139 -->
00:38:44.760table in your home might be ruined. Well, there's
00:38:44.760 -->
00:38:47.699still the, like, but my box is the same box.
00:38:47.780 -->
00:38:50.199Like, at that point, the environmental damage
00:38:50.199 -->
00:38:52.699of running an LLM becomes the same environmental
00:38:52.699 -->
00:38:56.230damage of me playing Factorio. Yeah, or GTA 5,
00:38:56.349 -->
00:38:59.969good God. To some extent, because there's still
00:38:59.969 -->
00:39:03.469the original training cost of these data. Yeah,
00:39:03.469 -->
00:39:05.510I'm not going to, I can't get around, yeah, you're
00:39:05.510 -->
00:39:08.309absolutely right. I think, I was thinking of
00:39:08.309 -->
00:39:10.670that same thing. The actual cost, the actual
00:39:10.670 -->
00:39:15.769environmental impact of my machine is the same
00:39:15.769 -->
00:39:19.809as it is generally, but in like a bunch of things,
00:39:19.889 -->
00:39:24.519but the cost to run and build those. large language
00:39:24.519 -->
00:39:26.920models is still huge and there's nothing you
00:39:26.920 -->
00:39:30.000can get around that. The training cost is big.
00:39:30.639 -->
00:39:32.719Depending on how they do it, it can actually
00:39:32.719 -->
00:39:34.280be a lesser training cost, particularly if they're
00:39:34.280 -->
00:39:35.840doing something smart like grinding on an already
00:39:35.840 -->
00:39:38.440existing LLM to get it down smaller. Oh no, they
00:39:38.440 -->
00:39:40.440stole our data. Really? Did they steal your data?
00:39:41.139 -->
00:39:45.860How dare they? How dare you steal the data that
00:39:45.860 -->
00:39:47.900we rightfully stole on our own? But that's also
00:39:47.900 -->
00:39:51.079the next other question. We stole it differently.
00:39:52.010 -->
00:39:54.269But it's still derived from stolen data, which
00:39:54.269 -->
00:39:56.650is one of the legitimate, also ethical problems
00:39:56.650 -->
00:39:59.309with a lot of AIs as they exist, like because
00:39:59.309 -->
00:40:02.610they were all trained on stolen data. And the
00:40:02.610 -->
00:40:05.170fact that you've derived this data from stolen
00:40:05.170 -->
00:40:07.010data, that you've stole the stolen data, you
00:40:07.010 -->
00:40:12.190know, three thefts don't make a right. I just
00:40:12.190 -->
00:40:17.090make a more smarter thief. But that's so like
00:40:17.090 -->
00:40:19.489I but I. The thing I like about this is thinking
00:40:19.489 -->
00:40:20.949we're going to have, it's going to be interesting
00:40:20.949 -->
00:40:22.949to see how these discussions go around and this
00:40:22.949 -->
00:40:26.230kind of, they start to bleed into this area of
00:40:26.230 -->
00:40:28.630locally run LLMs and the ethos of locally running
00:40:28.630 -->
00:40:32.010LLMs versus that. And I would be, I would not
00:40:32.010 -->
00:40:34.869be surprised if we don't see a little bit of
00:40:34.869 -->
00:40:38.050the common people who run their LLMs locally
00:40:38.050 -->
00:40:40.750versus the big, nasty, awful corporate LLMs,
00:40:40.829 -->
00:40:45.769you know, like basically, yeah. The time gap
00:40:45.769 -->
00:40:48.090is important. I just underline that. Because
00:40:48.090 -->
00:40:49.710of what you said about it doesn't understand
00:40:49.710 -->
00:40:52.550Markdown, I haven't used an LLM that doesn't
00:40:52.550 -->
00:40:55.050know Markdown better than me for six months.
00:40:55.289 -->
00:40:57.929I mean, because it's exactly that. Yes, once
00:40:57.929 -->
00:40:59.630you get past the limit and you're running the
00:40:59.630 -->
00:41:01.670bigger ones, they have no trouble with that at
00:41:01.670 -->
00:41:03.590all. Was it not know Markdown, or did you simply
00:41:03.590 -->
00:41:05.710ask it to expand its context window enough to
00:41:05.710 -->
00:41:07.090the point where one of the things it dumped out
00:41:07.090 -->
00:41:09.130was its knowledge of Markdown? Yeah, it might
00:41:09.130 -->
00:41:11.130have bit rotted it off the left -hand side. I
00:41:11.130 -->
00:41:12.869mean, that depends again on its window. Another
00:41:12.869 -->
00:41:16.630problem. the smaller models i think i think okay
00:41:16.630 -->
00:41:18.809so what i was trying i'm not going to try to
00:41:18.809 -->
00:41:22.010do but um i i i think you're absolutely right
00:41:22.010 -->
00:41:27.309i think there's going to be a space where it's
00:41:27.309 -->
00:41:29.710i mean we see it already with some of the so
00:41:29.710 -->
00:41:33.050like self -hosting and stuff like that um i mean
00:41:33.050 -->
00:41:36.329even people like running vms in a cloud somewhere
00:41:36.329 -->
00:41:39.170and they're running their own docker containers
00:41:39.170 -->
00:41:41.050and stuff like that i think we will see that
00:41:41.050 -->
00:41:42.469and i think there'll be a bunch of people who
00:41:42.469 -->
00:41:46.000go well You know, what I'm doing is not that
00:41:46.000 -->
00:41:49.820important or not that it doesn't affect what
00:41:49.820 -->
00:41:51.880I think it doesn't affect. It's not affecting,
00:41:52.000 -->
00:41:59.159sorry, not worrying much about privacy. But I
00:41:59.159 -->
00:42:01.099think that there are a number of people who,
00:42:01.199 -->
00:42:04.480like myself, who will just go, no way. And I'm
00:42:04.480 -->
00:42:06.300happy to wait the six months. And I'm happy.
00:42:06.780 -->
00:42:09.440This is why I was happy to wait and just kind
00:42:09.440 -->
00:42:11.940of go and make a tea and come back and for it
00:42:11.940 -->
00:42:18.699to be done. I was going to say, you might find
00:42:18.699 -->
00:42:20.519in some corporate environments, I'm just going
00:42:20.519 -->
00:42:22.179to have a tea and come back and get the solutions.
00:42:22.340 -->
00:42:27.400That may not go so well. Obviously, it depends
00:42:27.400 -->
00:42:29.139on your environment. If you're running your machine
00:42:29.139 -->
00:42:30.860hot enough, you can use the waste heat to brew
00:42:30.860 -->
00:42:36.559the tea. That would be efficient. Hey, guys,
00:42:36.599 -->
00:42:37.840wait a minute. I'm just going to have some tea.
00:42:40.039 -->
00:42:43.460If it helps, I do know of a cookbook that was
00:42:43.460 -->
00:42:46.519designed for people who want to cook on the radiators
00:42:46.519 -->
00:42:49.260in their cars. And you could probably adapt that
00:42:49.260 -->
00:42:53.119to cook on your hot computer. I am certain that
00:42:53.119 -->
00:42:58.219there was an old motorcycle -like accessory that
00:42:58.219 -->
00:43:01.360was designed to clamp onto the tailpipe and let
00:43:01.360 -->
00:43:03.500you cook food in much the same way off of the
00:43:03.500 -->
00:43:07.389heat off the tailpipe. Put your sausage in, put
00:43:07.389 -->
00:43:10.130your sausage in, go for a nice ride, have your
00:43:10.130 -->
00:43:12.630lunch with the sausage already cooked. Well,
00:43:12.650 -->
00:43:15.650the friend that I gave that cookbook to was a
00:43:15.650 -->
00:43:17.969full time folk singer. So he was driving thousands
00:43:17.969 -->
00:43:20.949of miles a year. And so he spent a lot of time
00:43:20.949 -->
00:43:23.489in the car anyway. Oh, that sounds pretty cool.
00:43:24.829 -->
00:43:26.530Oh, and but it wouldn't work so well in electric
00:43:26.530 -->
00:43:31.230cars, though. Oh, yeah. Well. Not enough pollution,
00:43:31.389 -->
00:43:32.909damn it. It's quieter and better for the environment,
00:43:32.989 -->
00:43:36.869but where am I going to get my breakfast? Denny's.
00:43:36.949 -->
00:43:45.230And for our last full story of the night, we
00:43:45.230 -->
00:43:48.690have Wendy with a story about Waymos holding
00:43:48.690 -->
00:43:52.170robo -taxis in a parking lot and some very bad
00:43:52.170 -->
00:43:55.690consequences. Wendy? Well, the story is, and
00:43:55.690 -->
00:43:59.409it's been all over social media, is that two
00:43:59.409 -->
00:44:04.69015 -year -old boys were riding in a rented Waymo
00:44:04.690 -->
00:44:09.389robo -taxi and were drinking alcohol and firing
00:44:09.389 -->
00:44:12.090what are described as water beads. I'm not really
00:44:12.090 -->
00:44:14.170sure what that is. They're obviously some kind
00:44:14.170 -->
00:44:16.889of softish thing, but it's still not good to
00:44:16.889 -->
00:44:20.570be firing them out the car windows. And Waymo,
00:44:20.769 -->
00:44:23.489what seems to have happened is that someone at
00:44:23.489 -->
00:44:26.309Waymo used the in -car cameras to see what they
00:44:26.309 -->
00:44:29.030were doing and then pulled the car over into
00:44:29.030 -->
00:44:31.969a parking lot and called the police. And there
00:44:31.969 -->
00:44:34.949were like all sorts of reactions to this. One
00:44:34.949 -->
00:44:37.610friend describes it as kidnapping. Another describes
00:44:37.610 -->
00:44:40.469it as the teens getting what they should have
00:44:40.469 -->
00:44:42.190gotten because they were doing something illegal.
00:44:43.230 -->
00:44:46.250Other people, the Daily Mail called the car a
00:44:46.250 -->
00:44:49.489tattletale. The Register called it a snitch.
00:44:49.630 -->
00:44:52.010I mean, it's really, really interesting the way
00:44:52.010 -->
00:44:55.329people have reacted to this. And there's like
00:44:55.329 -->
00:44:58.809a couple of questions. I mean, I find the case
00:44:58.809 -->
00:45:02.090fascinating just because it's clear that there
00:45:02.090 -->
00:45:03.929are going to be lots more of these cases. And
00:45:03.929 -->
00:45:05.469we're going to have to come up with some ground
00:45:05.469 -->
00:45:08.909rules about when it's appropriate for the car
00:45:08.909 -->
00:45:13.179company to be doing something. And when it's
00:45:13.179 -->
00:45:15.219not, I mean, one question I have is why did they
00:45:15.219 -->
00:45:17.199call the police and not their parents? I mean,
00:45:17.219 -->
00:45:20.119the police showed up, you know, four police officers
00:45:20.119 -->
00:45:23.340with guns drawn. Does not sound, you know, I
00:45:23.340 -->
00:45:26.019think they're lucky they weren't killed. And
00:45:26.019 -->
00:45:29.340but the other question that I find really interesting
00:45:29.340 -->
00:45:31.940is how did they get the car in the first place?
00:45:33.079 -->
00:45:36.869Because. Five, ten years ago, you go back and
00:45:36.869 -->
00:45:39.570the story that everybody was talking about self
00:45:39.570 -->
00:45:41.389-driving cars were going to make it possible
00:45:41.389 -->
00:45:44.809for people who can't drive to ride in taxis.
00:45:46.010 -->
00:45:48.630There was this fantasy that you would put your
00:45:48.630 -->
00:45:50.409kids in the car and the car would take them to
00:45:50.409 -->
00:45:52.030school and you wouldn't have to do it yourself.
00:45:52.849 -->
00:45:56.130And blind people would be able to ride and it
00:45:56.130 -->
00:45:59.590would open up car travel to blind people and
00:45:59.590 -->
00:46:04.289so on. And apparently Waymo actually does have
00:46:04.289 -->
00:46:06.429restrictions on who can rent their cars. And
00:46:06.429 -->
00:46:08.550they're supposed to have tightened up on rentals
00:46:08.550 -->
00:46:10.630to teens. But it's still very interesting to
00:46:10.630 -->
00:46:13.210me that 10 years ago when people were sort of
00:46:13.210 -->
00:46:16.250proposing this fantasy future, they didn't seem
00:46:16.250 -->
00:46:19.230to realize that kids left alone in a rented car
00:46:19.230 -->
00:46:22.690might find things to do that were not actually
00:46:22.690 -->
00:46:28.909necessarily. It's not just kids. When I saw the
00:46:28.909 -->
00:46:30.909story, my thought was. Well, of course they're
00:46:30.909 -->
00:46:33.329going to. They have this problem with Airbnbs
00:46:33.329 -->
00:46:35.670with adults where they're like, people will set
00:46:35.670 -->
00:46:38.030up an Airbnb account. They'll use a limited,
00:46:38.289 -->
00:46:40.769you know, the whole, let's get an Airbnb for
00:46:40.769 -->
00:46:42.789the weekend and just trash it because who cares?
00:46:43.230 -->
00:46:45.769And this is just a micro version of that instead
00:46:45.769 -->
00:46:50.889of 15 college students grabbing a property for
00:46:50.889 -->
00:46:53.670a weekend bender party. Now it's kids with airsoft
00:46:53.670 -->
00:46:56.690guns or whatever it is. I don't think it's airsoft.
00:46:56.750 -->
00:46:58.070That's something else. But at any rate, the...
00:46:59.280 -->
00:47:01.119My other thought was, like, of course they don't
00:47:01.119 -->
00:47:02.820know who the kids' parents are. I've never been
00:47:02.820 -->
00:47:05.420asked who my parents are when I rent a car. Yeah,
00:47:05.659 -->
00:47:07.460I was going to say they wouldn't know. How do
00:47:07.460 -->
00:47:09.500they rent a robot? Well, first of all, you can't
00:47:09.500 -->
00:47:12.699rent a car when you're under 25. Fair. Second
00:47:12.699 -->
00:47:15.619of all, how are they supposed to rent a car?
00:47:15.820 -->
00:47:19.400Do they have credit cards? They're 15. Yeah,
00:47:19.500 -->
00:47:21.73915 -year -olds have a ton of credit cards. In
00:47:21.739 -->
00:47:23.380Britain, they're not allowed to have credit cards
00:47:23.380 -->
00:47:25.900until you're 18. Well, you can't have a credit
00:47:25.900 -->
00:47:28.489card. You can have a card with money on it. Not
00:47:28.489 -->
00:47:29.969the same thing. I don't think that would work
00:47:29.969 -->
00:47:33.130for rental, by the way, anyway. They won't work
00:47:33.130 -->
00:47:34.909for rental, but this isn't a rental car. This
00:47:34.909 -->
00:47:41.510is a taxi. Yeah, so it's fine. Precisely. I mean,
00:47:41.530 -->
00:47:45.989the same thing. I mean, these taxis being accessible
00:47:45.989 -->
00:47:51.489to kids is part of the selling point. What level
00:47:51.489 -->
00:47:55.610of illegal activity should the car company call
00:47:55.610 -->
00:47:59.619the police? I think it has to affect the driving
00:47:59.619 -->
00:48:02.699or safety of the car, surely. They could have
00:48:02.699 -->
00:48:04.780just diverted the car into a parking lot and
00:48:04.780 -->
00:48:07.119opened the door and refused to move the car further
00:48:07.119 -->
00:48:10.000until the teens got out. That could be dangerous
00:48:10.000 -->
00:48:12.840in itself. We are never going to do that because
00:48:12.840 -->
00:48:15.340the whole philosophy of these cars is fuck human
00:48:15.340 -->
00:48:18.760interaction at all levels. Yes, there's something
00:48:18.760 -->
00:48:21.320wrong with that whole story. Somebody at Reno
00:48:21.320 -->
00:48:23.960called the police. Calling the police was the
00:48:23.960 -->
00:48:27.900most direct and easy way to offload the responsibility
00:48:27.900 -->
00:48:30.179of any form of human interaction. And that's
00:48:30.179 -->
00:48:32.320like that's that's just them doing the same thing
00:48:32.320 -->
00:48:34.599that the American police are being asked to do
00:48:34.599 -->
00:48:36.380all the time because they've removed other services.
00:48:37.380 -->
00:48:42.869Sorry, go ahead. I agree with Ryan. You know,
00:48:42.889 -->
00:48:44.829I think it's a really good way of offloading
00:48:44.829 -->
00:48:47.150responsibility to someone else, you know, not
00:48:47.150 -->
00:48:50.969deal with it. The moment, the moment it's, and
00:48:50.969 -->
00:48:54.389also this is, this is absolutely break, like
00:48:54.389 -->
00:48:56.730move fast and break things mindset where it's
00:48:56.730 -->
00:48:58.789like the moment anything steps off the happy
00:48:58.789 -->
00:49:01.929pass. Fuck you. Call the call the cops. So we
00:49:01.929 -->
00:49:05.289can't be bothered to engineer for all these weird
00:49:05.289 -->
00:49:07.670out there scenarios like irresponsible teenagers.
00:49:07.849 -->
00:49:09.909How many how many really irresponsible teenagers
00:49:09.909 -->
00:49:11.730could there possibly be out there? We can't be
00:49:11.730 -->
00:49:14.070expected to anticipate that completely insane
00:49:14.070 -->
00:49:17.849scenario. Just throw it to the cops. OK, so granted,
00:49:17.909 -->
00:49:22.670granted all that. What if one of the teens had
00:49:22.670 -->
00:49:26.630been killed? That would be extremely problematic.
00:49:28.469 -->
00:49:29.889Ironically, I think it would have been a story
00:49:29.889 -->
00:49:32.070that we rolled in the AI bucket because then
00:49:32.070 -->
00:49:35.690it would have been a story about when AI does
00:49:35.690 -->
00:49:39.429bad stuff. I would say also that they probably
00:49:39.429 -->
00:49:42.030have somewhere a news license agreement saying
00:49:42.030 -->
00:49:45.530we are not responsible if you die in response
00:49:45.530 -->
00:49:51.050to transit. I was thinking more as a result of
00:49:51.050 -->
00:49:54.010calling the cops. Oh, well, that's not their
00:49:54.010 -->
00:49:56.269responsibility then, right? That's the cops'
00:49:56.349 -->
00:50:00.070responsibility. Well, there was a person they
00:50:00.070 -->
00:50:02.849asked, there was a quote that went viral a couple
00:50:02.849 -->
00:50:05.389of weeks ago, where they walked up to a woman
00:50:05.389 -->
00:50:07.730in the street and they said, if you had just
00:50:07.730 -->
00:50:09.409killed a black person, where would you hide?
00:50:09.530 -->
00:50:12.829And she paused for a second and she said, behind
00:50:12.829 -->
00:50:22.269a badge. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Just be honest. And
00:50:22.269 -->
00:50:27.730this is just another variant on that. Now, entertainingly,
00:50:27.789 -->
00:50:34.309any police officer with a smidgen of self -preservation
00:50:34.309 -->
00:50:37.570would have a lot of problems with that. And yet
00:50:37.570 -->
00:50:42.349it's happening a lot. Yeah. I think, so I just,
00:50:42.389 -->
00:50:46.230I want to go back to what I said. I think Ryan's
00:50:46.230 -->
00:50:49.610correct. Waymo just passed it to the police,
00:50:49.730 -->
00:50:52.849as Ryan said, because lots of people, lots of
00:50:52.849 -->
00:50:55.889companies are just doing that. And then if anything
00:50:55.889 -->
00:50:59.309happens beyond that, they just go, well, we gave
00:50:59.309 -->
00:51:02.590it to the police and we're not responsible for
00:51:02.590 -->
00:51:05.329it. And it's just this buck passing. And I think
00:51:05.329 -->
00:51:09.090it is what happens a lot when it comes to these
00:51:09.090 -->
00:51:12.010companies. They don't have any procedure for
00:51:12.010 -->
00:51:16.210if this happens. pass it on and wipe their hands
00:51:16.210 -->
00:51:18.489off air. It's horrible. It's disgusting. Actually,
00:51:18.489 -->
00:51:23.369it's more specific. When we say Waymo, we mean
00:51:23.369 -->
00:51:26.710a mechanical Turk in Cambodia. Saw it. Anon is
00:51:26.710 -->
00:51:29.250sort of hinting at what circumstance it goes,
00:51:29.349 -->
00:51:31.510blah, blah. Number 17. Yeah, if you've got here,
00:51:31.570 -->
00:51:32.989ring the police because you don't have anything
00:51:32.989 -->
00:51:36.769relevant to. That's all it is. I assumed it was
00:51:36.769 -->
00:51:40.369a human at Waymo, but not. It'll be a human.
00:51:41.309 -->
00:51:43.329Yeah, of course it was a human. Well, it'll be
00:51:43.329 -->
00:51:46.610for some value of at Waymo, I think. Calling
00:51:46.610 -->
00:51:50.170the car a snitch is a bit ridiculous because
00:51:50.170 -->
00:51:52.829it wasn't the car that made the call. Calling
00:51:52.829 -->
00:51:55.110the car the snitch is a great way to get them
00:51:55.110 -->
00:51:57.710to be able to dodge the responsibility too. It
00:51:57.710 -->
00:52:02.710wasn't us, Gov, it was the AI. If I was a snitch,
00:52:02.710 -->
00:52:06.650what can we do? You're going to have to try again.
00:52:06.789 -->
00:52:11.090You've gone and trained up a snitch. Yeah. What
00:52:11.090 -->
00:52:13.889car do you drive? I drive a snitch. You know,
00:52:13.929 -->
00:52:15.690I think that's another it's another example,
00:52:16.030 -->
00:52:20.050though, of that. They always talk as though the
00:52:20.050 -->
00:52:23.150only job the driver in a taxi does is to drive
00:52:23.150 -->
00:52:27.110the taxi. But actually, the drivers have lots
00:52:27.110 -->
00:52:29.090more functions than that. And one of them is
00:52:29.090 -->
00:52:31.96915 year old boys don't get into taxis with an
00:52:31.969 -->
00:52:35.239adult driver and start. They might drink alcohol,
00:52:35.360 -->
00:52:37.980but they're not going to be shooting beads out
00:52:37.980 -->
00:52:41.400of the windows. Well, also, adult drivers of
00:52:41.400 -->
00:52:43.840taxis spot drunk 15 -year -olds and say, fuck
00:52:43.840 -->
00:52:45.420no, get another taxi. Yeah, because they get
00:52:45.420 -->
00:52:51.260a puke on their seats. Indeed. Or at the very
00:52:51.260 -->
00:52:53.079least, if they take the fare, they give them
00:52:53.079 -->
00:52:54.980the look of death and like, you start any trouble,
00:52:55.099 -->
00:52:57.639I've got a baseball bat right under here. You
00:52:57.639 -->
00:53:01.690know, I know I know you're laughing about that,
00:53:01.769 -->
00:53:03.530but actually, I remember a long time ago when
00:53:03.530 -->
00:53:08.349I used to... He's back from work in Bristol.
00:53:08.909 -->
00:53:11.989One day, actually, a taxi driver kind of showed
00:53:11.989 -->
00:53:15.690me... It wasn't a machete, but it was like a
00:53:15.690 -->
00:53:20.989small machete. And he said, look, you know, lots
00:53:20.989 -->
00:53:24.250of people run off. I have this. And if you try
00:53:24.250 -->
00:53:27.329to think, I have this. He wasn't threatening.
00:53:28.500 -->
00:53:32.900But he was clearly... I don't know. That comes
00:53:32.900 -->
00:53:34.619pretty close to threatening there, Ian. Okay.
00:53:34.699 -->
00:53:37.800But he was just... It was very clear that you
00:53:37.800 -->
00:53:41.699don't do... He's ready. And it was a bit like...
00:53:41.699 -->
00:53:44.780At best, it was a very proactive form of threatening,
00:53:44.900 -->
00:53:50.539shall we say. I'm not saying it would be a problem.
00:53:50.760 -->
00:53:53.139I'm just saying you're not going to be a problem.
00:53:54.099 -->
00:54:01.889Yes. And last but not least on our lovely world
00:54:01.889 -->
00:54:05.449of tech grumps, we have any other business with
00:54:05.449 -->
00:54:08.030a couple of items. Ian, what do you say about
00:54:08.030 -->
00:54:12.690EMF? Yeah, so EMF, by the time you hear this,
00:54:12.750 -->
00:54:14.750you might have, it's probably too late to get
00:54:14.750 -->
00:54:19.670a ticket, but EMF is happening and it's every
00:54:19.670 -->
00:54:23.489two years, I think, yeah. And I will be talking
00:54:23.489 -->
00:54:27.190about two, well, I'll be talking. one thing is
00:54:27.190 -->
00:54:31.190around digital what is emf what is oh electronic
00:54:31.190 -->
00:54:36.909magnetic field pump is a camp for geeks and it's
00:54:36.909 -->
00:54:39.750it's great fun and it's the only camping i will
00:54:39.750 -->
00:54:42.690do because i hate camping but when it's got power
00:54:42.690 -->
00:54:48.329and reliable wi -fi i'm in okay it's got high
00:54:48.329 -->
00:54:50.170speed internet high speed power capabilities
00:54:50.170 -->
00:54:54.449but it only happens every two years Yes. It's
00:54:54.449 -->
00:54:57.050definitely worth going for if you get a chance.
00:54:57.550 -->
00:55:02.989Okay, so I'm about digital privacy. I'm literally
00:55:02.989 -->
00:55:04.889looking at the presentation right now. Machine
00:55:04.889 -->
00:55:09.750wishes. And I'm actually in stage A on Sunday.
00:55:09.989 -->
00:55:13.329The time is still being bounced around. I see
00:55:13.329 -->
00:55:17.150another email in my client saying, we've changed
00:55:17.150 -->
00:55:20.389your time. So it will be early, unfortunately.
00:55:21.239 -->
00:55:24.739which also messes because the next one is doing,
00:55:24.820 -->
00:55:30.739I'm DJing on Saturday night or Sunday morning.
00:55:32.119 -->
00:55:35.780And so I'm going to have to DJ, I think the last
00:55:35.780 -->
00:55:38.739set, Trance. So you should definitely be there
00:55:38.739 -->
00:55:40.760if you're there. But then I also have to get
00:55:40.760 -->
00:55:45.019up early to do my talk in 10A. So that's going
00:55:45.019 -->
00:55:48.840to be fun. I'm going to be definitely very wide
00:55:48.840 -->
00:55:51.619awake at that time. Where is it this year? I
00:55:51.619 -->
00:55:54.320didn't recognize the name. It said somewhere.
00:55:54.559 -->
00:55:57.199Is it not the same place as you? I think so.
00:55:58.679 -->
00:56:03.659Maybe it is. I would like to make the point that
00:56:03.659 -->
00:56:06.820now that you will be performing at EMF, Ian,
00:56:06.980 -->
00:56:11.659you understand given this year's Eurovision entry
00:56:11.659 -->
00:56:15.179from the UK. Uh -oh. I didn't watch Eurovision.
00:56:15.179 -->
00:56:17.360I had no idea. Well, this year's Eurovision entry
00:56:17.360 -->
00:56:22.980has also performed at EMF. wow i'm just saying
00:56:22.980 -->
00:56:26.579yes this year's this year's like i was i was
00:56:26.579 -->
00:56:28.820i do i do eurovision every year and i get ready
00:56:28.820 -->
00:56:30.300to tear them all a new one and then i was reading
00:56:30.300 -->
00:56:33.159up on the uk entry which was usually a prime
00:56:33.159 -->
00:56:36.440choice for ridicule a year and year and year
00:56:36.440 -->
00:56:40.099out but this guy despite having a an entry that
00:56:40.099 -->
00:56:42.139was actually horrible and i did not like it but
00:56:42.139 -->
00:56:44.400i i actually saw that he had performed at emf
00:56:44.400 -->
00:56:46.039and a lot of people that i actually knew personally
00:56:46.039 -->
00:56:47.500were like oh yeah he's nice he's really cool
00:56:47.500 -->
00:56:49.340he's lovely and i was like okay i can't tear
00:56:49.340 -->
00:56:53.500him a new one So I'm just saying, Ian, Eurovision
00:56:53.500 -->
00:56:56.519next year, right? It could be there. It could
00:56:56.519 -->
00:57:03.039be you. Yeah, it could be me. All right. You've
00:57:03.039 -->
00:57:05.440got something else on Death Glitch? Yeah. So
00:57:05.440 -->
00:57:10.019I follow on from my thoughts about Digital Legacy.
00:57:11.260 -->
00:57:14.599There's a book I read recently called Death Glitch.
00:57:15.159 -->
00:57:23.039It's by Tamara. I think that's her name. And
00:57:23.039 -->
00:57:27.480it's about digital legacy and it talks about
00:57:27.480 -->
00:57:33.900the whole death sector. And it's really interesting.
00:57:34.679 -->
00:57:38.300I recommend it to lots of people because even
00:57:38.300 -->
00:57:41.159if you're not interested in this space, you're
00:57:41.159 -->
00:57:43.400going to die at some point. And it's really,
00:57:43.519 -->
00:57:47.079it sums up a lot of the... ideas and thoughts
00:57:47.079 -->
00:57:48.920that people have when they actually think about
00:57:48.920 -->
00:57:52.880this like what happens to your data so yeah what
00:57:52.880 -->
00:57:56.340happens to your digital remains you know um what
00:57:56.340 -->
00:57:58.619happens to your estate your digital estate like
00:57:58.619 -->
00:58:02.239when you've got the likes of playstation and
00:58:02.239 -->
00:58:06.920xbox or microsoft who are um are not providing
00:58:06.920 -->
00:58:09.320digital discs for example you know those kind
00:58:09.320 -->
00:58:13.599of all kind of factor into this um If you are
00:58:13.599 -->
00:58:15.980interested in the Def Clitch, you'll see parts
00:58:15.980 -->
00:58:19.679of it in my presentation. So come along at 10
00:58:19.679 -->
00:58:24.539o 'clock in the morning to that. Well, interestingly
00:58:24.539 -->
00:58:28.559related, my little NLB is that I finally, after
00:58:28.559 -->
00:58:31.380having reacquired a source of income, treated
00:58:31.380 -->
00:58:37.199myself to a new NAS box. For 10 years, I've been
00:58:37.199 -->
00:58:40.179running off of machines that I bought cheap that
00:58:40.179 -->
00:58:42.099were end of life from work and other places.
00:58:42.300 -->
00:58:43.599And now I finally just went, you know what? I'm
00:58:43.599 -->
00:58:45.500just going to actually buy a new one. And it's
00:58:45.500 -->
00:58:48.280lovely. And they work really well. And this one
00:58:48.280 -->
00:58:50.000is not even one of the really hardcore ones.
00:58:50.179 -->
00:58:53.000I think it's a Ugreen 4800. It has four bays,
00:58:53.059 -->
00:58:55.980which is all I need. But I've been putting everything
00:58:55.980 -->
00:58:59.239up on it. I've now moved a lot of my media. And
00:58:59.239 -->
00:59:02.460for me, the biggest thing was, and I... I was
00:59:02.460 -->
00:59:04.619hoping this would exist in the world. It does.
00:59:04.760 -->
00:59:07.400I now have set it up so that I have access to
00:59:07.400 -->
00:59:10.059all of my audiobooks. And it was surprisingly
00:59:10.059 -->
00:59:12.219easy to establish the kind of things that I did
00:59:12.219 -->
00:59:14.380so that I have my audiobooks all on a server.
00:59:14.820 -->
00:59:17.699It can connect to my phone directly. So anytime
00:59:17.699 -->
00:59:20.860I want to be listening to one of my audiobooks,
00:59:20.860 -->
00:59:23.760I have the ability to just grab it and download
00:59:23.760 -->
00:59:25.420it anywhere in the world. And I'm very happy
00:59:25.420 -->
00:59:29.719about that. And it's giving me joy. And that's
00:59:29.719 -->
00:59:32.380it for any other business. That means it's goodbye
00:59:32.380 -->
00:59:34.739from all of us here at TechGrums. And we'll do
00:59:34.739 -->
00:59:37.139the final round of saying goodbye. My name is
00:59:37.139 -->
00:59:39.059Ryan. I have been your host. I hope you have
00:59:39.059 -->
00:59:41.679a great time until we hear you next time. Goodbye,
00:59:41.719 -->
00:59:46.099Ian. And goodbye from me. Hopefully you'll see
00:59:46.099 -->
00:59:51.139me DJ live at EMF camp or you will hear the record
00:59:51.139 -->
00:59:55.530if I remember to record it on my PeerTube. Goodbye.
00:59:55.849 -->
00:59:59.190David. Goodbye from me. You're here. Well, you
00:59:59.190 -->
01:00:01.510weren't here, but you can read lots of World
01:00:01.510 -->
01:00:04.570Cup live summaries on Blue Sky, which is where
01:00:04.570 -->
01:00:07.329I do them at the moment. Goodbye from me. And
01:00:07.329 -->
01:00:11.070Wendy. Goodbye. Bye. Bye. Bye.