WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 -->
00:00:06.519Hello and welcome to Tech Grumps 3 .36. We are
00:00:06.519 -->
00:00:10.460taping this on Sunday, the 11th of January, 2026.
00:00:10.759 -->
00:00:15.000And joining us for this month's podcast is Ian
00:00:15.000 -->
00:00:18.300Forrester, David Eastman, Wendy Grossman, and
00:00:18.300 -->
00:00:22.120Ryan Alexander. Please say hi, everyone. Hi,
00:00:22.140 -->
00:00:30.000everyone. Hi. All right, and first up for Tech
00:00:30.000 -->
00:00:32.659Grumps is going to be Wendy with an article about
00:00:32.659 -->
00:00:38.679Firefox and AI. Yeah, Mozilla has made an announcement
00:00:38.679 -->
00:00:44.340that it's going to embrace AI in some way. It's
00:00:44.340 -->
00:00:46.219not really clear to me exactly what they're planning
00:00:46.219 -->
00:00:50.840to do. All I know is I don't actually want my
00:00:50.840 -->
00:00:53.820browser to be... Smart. I don't want it to have
00:00:53.820 -->
00:00:56.420AI. I want it to go where I tell it to go and
00:00:56.420 -->
00:00:58.399load the page I tell it to load. I don't really
00:00:58.399 -->
00:01:01.520understand what AI is supposed to do for me.
00:01:01.640 -->
00:01:04.260But everybody wants to have an AI browser now.
00:01:04.599 -->
00:01:07.579It's got to have AI. When the result is that
00:01:07.579 -->
00:01:09.959I'm thinking of switching after all these years
00:01:09.959 -->
00:01:13.140to Vivaldi because Vivaldi is apparently sensible.
00:01:14.099 -->
00:01:17.400You mean until they adopt AI? Well, they haven't
00:01:17.400 -->
00:01:19.719yet. They will. Everyone's going to have AI.
00:01:19.840 -->
00:01:23.340Give it time. I mean, what is an AI browser and
00:01:23.340 -->
00:01:26.379why would you want one? That's a silly question.
00:01:26.819 -->
00:01:29.560Get AI, then wonder what it's for later. You
00:01:29.560 -->
00:01:32.560don't have to know what it's for. Ryan, you're
00:01:32.560 -->
00:01:35.579the technical guy. What is an AI browser and
00:01:35.579 -->
00:01:38.260why do I want one? You definitely don't want
00:01:38.260 -->
00:01:43.219one. The only definitively AI browser are things
00:01:43.219 -->
00:01:47.700like... I think that OpenAI have a sort of specific,
00:01:48.099 -->
00:01:53.159they're calling it a chat GPT browser. And what
00:01:53.159 -->
00:01:55.500they're trying to do, as I've almost said certainly
00:01:55.500 -->
00:01:57.140last week, is they're just trying to jump over
00:01:57.140 -->
00:01:59.439the web. What they're trying to do is get people
00:01:59.439 -->
00:02:02.099to write little local apps that they connect
00:02:02.099 -->
00:02:07.819on in this strange MCP environment. It's just
00:02:07.819 -->
00:02:12.319that's sort of the USB connections for AI browsers.
00:02:13.009 -->
00:02:15.590in order to make sure that you don't have to
00:02:15.590 -->
00:02:18.210go to the real web. So you definitely don't want
00:02:18.210 -->
00:02:21.189an AI browser if you just want to use a browser.
00:02:21.530 -->
00:02:25.490Well, that was my impression. But the thing that
00:02:25.490 -->
00:02:27.909sort of surprises me about it is the bigger problem
00:02:27.909 -->
00:02:30.889Mozilla has is that its market share has shrunk
00:02:30.889 -->
00:02:36.729to the point where I have a bank in the US that
00:02:36.729 -->
00:02:41.590doesn't support it. Oh, yeah. Yeah, that happens
00:02:41.590 -->
00:02:44.469quite a lot. I've seen that quite a lot. And,
00:02:44.469 -->
00:02:46.770you know, so the bigger risk for the company
00:02:46.770 -->
00:02:49.770is not whether they have AI, but that their market
00:02:49.770 -->
00:02:51.710share will be so small that nobody bothers to
00:02:51.710 -->
00:02:55.050write, you know, to make sure that anything works
00:02:55.050 -->
00:02:58.430in it anymore. I think a big part of it is the
00:02:58.430 -->
00:03:00.449fact that it lets them turn into mini Googles.
00:03:00.469 -->
00:03:02.430Like the real thing that AI does is it allows
00:03:02.430 -->
00:03:06.009you to peddle influence. So if a browser has
00:03:06.009 -->
00:03:08.129its own version of AI running, you don't know
00:03:08.129 -->
00:03:10.530what they've done to train that AI. And they
00:03:10.530 -->
00:03:12.689could very readily have that AI set up to be
00:03:12.689 -->
00:03:14.889like, hey, tell everyone to buy Cinnabon this
00:03:14.889 -->
00:03:17.490month, yo. And so if anything even becomes Cinnabon
00:03:17.490 -->
00:03:20.810adjacent, all of a sudden the AI is going to
00:03:20.810 -->
00:03:22.830be like, hey, that sounds like you could use
00:03:22.830 -->
00:03:25.930a Cinnabon. Here's five links. And it's just
00:03:25.930 -->
00:03:28.539the same way that Google does it. Unlike Google,
00:03:28.680 -->
00:03:31.259they control that revenue stream. And even just
00:03:31.259 -->
00:03:33.139the idea of that can be enough to make their
00:03:33.139 -->
00:03:35.099stock go up a bit, which is functionally kind
00:03:35.099 -->
00:03:37.599of what everyone's after. Well, Firefox, Mozilla
00:03:37.599 -->
00:03:41.860doesn't have stock. They don't have shareholders
00:03:41.860 -->
00:03:45.240to keep happy, just donors. That's weird. Why
00:03:45.240 -->
00:03:46.439are they doing that? That is weird. That's a
00:03:46.439 -->
00:03:52.819good point. Yeah. OK, so. I'll say I've worked
00:03:52.819 -->
00:03:56.919for Mozilla. And that's why we talked before
00:03:56.919 -->
00:03:59.159you, Ian, so you didn't have to. Yeah, no, no,
00:03:59.159 -->
00:04:03.319no, it's fine. It's fine. And I've also, I still
00:04:03.319 -->
00:04:07.099use Firefox as my main browser on my machine,
00:04:07.180 -->
00:04:10.479but I've also noticed a bunch of AI features
00:04:10.479 -->
00:04:13.659added in. Now, I noticed also that lots of people
00:04:13.659 -->
00:04:18.939on... at least on Linux, are kind of very upset
00:04:18.939 -->
00:04:21.500with it. So there's also a bunch of browsers
00:04:21.500 -->
00:04:24.759which are built on the Firefox, was it Gecko
00:04:24.759 -->
00:04:28.019or whatever it's called, base. And then they've
00:04:28.019 -->
00:04:31.279kind of removed a bunch of the AI features because
00:04:31.279 -->
00:04:36.819that's the beauty of open source. But I have
00:04:36.819 -->
00:04:40.420to say, I'm also with Wendy. I don't understand
00:04:40.420 -->
00:04:44.480why you're doing this. It feels like a new CEO
00:04:44.480 -->
00:04:46.779has come in and gone, well, this is what everyone
00:04:46.779 -->
00:04:48.459else is doing, so we're going to do the same.
00:04:48.879 -->
00:04:52.339Or I need to pee on this product that I've just
00:04:52.339 -->
00:04:55.740taken over. Yeah. Glad you said that, not me.
00:04:56.240 -->
00:05:00.519I also would say that I know that there's a ton
00:05:00.519 -->
00:05:07.290of AI work. So Mark Sermon runs Mozilla AI. So
00:05:07.290 -->
00:05:11.490there's a whole thing there. So I'm conscious
00:05:11.490 -->
00:05:14.529that they are doing lots of stuff with AI. I
00:05:14.529 -->
00:05:18.129guess they think that, and I'm not doubting them,
00:05:18.250 -->
00:05:20.470but I think that they're thinking that they could
00:05:20.470 -->
00:05:23.230do it in the right way so it would be more local
00:05:23.230 -->
00:05:27.029and less kind of the way that all the others
00:05:27.029 -->
00:05:30.329are doing it. But there's a lot of doubt because
00:05:30.329 -->
00:05:33.290right now the question is, as you said, what's
00:05:33.290 -->
00:05:36.529the point in having... an ai browser what's the
00:05:36.529 -->
00:05:38.610point in these extra features i mean like the
00:05:38.610 -->
00:05:41.930only thing i've used for from firefox from mozilla
00:05:41.930 -->
00:05:46.029is um is the translate yeah which is still a
00:05:46.029 -->
00:05:48.970beta ai system thing and i i don't really trust
00:05:48.970 -->
00:05:51.209it but it kind of gives me a rough translation
00:05:51.209 -->
00:05:54.589for okay that's the button to press for back
00:05:54.589 -->
00:05:57.509or that's the button to to go that's the form
00:05:57.509 -->
00:06:01.370button for example you know but i don't see anything
00:06:01.370 -->
00:06:04.350more than that I'm sure there might be some stuff
00:06:04.350 -->
00:06:07.850that other people will go... Has there been anything
00:06:07.850 -->
00:06:09.889written about their motivations? Have they done
00:06:09.889 -->
00:06:11.910anything about why they chose to go this route?
00:06:12.410 -->
00:06:14.149We're kind of guessing, and I'm wondering if
00:06:14.149 -->
00:06:16.430maybe they had actually said something. Actually,
00:06:16.470 -->
00:06:20.569last year, actually at FOSDEM, they actually
00:06:20.569 -->
00:06:23.959had a whole... kind of afternoon about the ambitions
00:06:23.959 -->
00:06:27.740around AI. And a lot of it was around kind of
00:06:27.740 -->
00:06:29.740automation. So to be able to automate stuff.
00:06:29.819 -->
00:06:32.480So I guess it's similar to some of the stuff
00:06:32.480 -->
00:06:36.459with the agentic browsing, but you are much more
00:06:36.459 -->
00:06:40.860in control. I don't know if that's still the
00:06:40.860 -->
00:06:42.980case because obviously a new CEO has come in
00:06:42.980 -->
00:06:47.639and who knows what that CEO has decided. Agentic
00:06:47.639 -->
00:06:50.160browsing is interesting. I'm not sure what that
00:06:50.160 -->
00:06:53.680means though. Can I just ask, is the Translate
00:06:53.680 -->
00:06:57.019feature any different from Translate before they
00:06:57.019 -->
00:07:04.560put the AI tag on it? I don't know. That's a
00:07:04.560 -->
00:07:08.860good question, actually. Because, you know, Google
00:07:08.860 -->
00:07:11.040Translate was doing Translate long before they
00:07:11.040 -->
00:07:15.360called it AI. Yeah, I think this is almost my
00:07:15.360 -->
00:07:19.259thing. In the talk I gave... back in November,
00:07:19.439 -->
00:07:23.279I pretty much said this, that as soon as it stops
00:07:23.279 -->
00:07:26.579becoming AI and it becomes a thing, this is Translate,
00:07:26.740 -->
00:07:30.399then it's like, it just becomes a lot more accepted,
00:07:30.560 -->
00:07:33.240more understandable. I don't know why they just
00:07:33.240 -->
00:07:37.720throw AI on everything. Money? Well, come on.
00:07:37.740 -->
00:07:42.600In the 1990s, everything was E. Oh, yeah. E -world
00:07:42.600 -->
00:07:48.279and E -whatever. And then it was Nano. Has it
00:07:48.279 -->
00:07:51.839been nano? There was a nano period. I think I
00:07:51.839 -->
00:07:56.420had a tennis game. And then there was a crypto
00:07:56.420 -->
00:08:00.199period. And now it's AI. And I would just like
00:08:00.199 -->
00:08:02.639to run a pool on when it's going to switch to
00:08:02.639 -->
00:08:08.899quantum. I'm sure someone will take that bet.
00:08:13.709 -->
00:08:16.629All right. Next up is going to be Ian talking
00:08:16.629 -->
00:08:21.689to us about the return of smart glasses. So,
00:08:21.750 -->
00:08:27.550yes, smart glasses, wearables have been a thing
00:08:27.550 -->
00:08:30.329for a long while, but they've come back. And
00:08:30.329 -->
00:08:33.169they come back. And guess why? Because of AI.
00:08:34.190 -->
00:08:37.789Someone's realized, oh, if we take these wearables
00:08:37.789 -->
00:08:42.509and all these sensors and then add AI to it.
00:08:43.000 -->
00:08:46.220then more people will buy it. And I just don't
00:08:46.220 -->
00:08:48.659buy it at all. The other thing that's really
00:08:48.659 -->
00:08:50.779annoying is that obviously the sensors have got
00:08:50.779 -->
00:08:53.500really good now. And so we're starting to see,
00:08:53.700 -->
00:08:57.399so going back to like, let's say when Google
00:08:57.399 -->
00:08:59.559Glass came out and everyone must remember that
00:08:59.559 -->
00:09:01.759and the glass holes, you know, people wearing
00:09:01.759 -->
00:09:05.340wearables in places that maybe they shouldn't.
00:09:05.759 -->
00:09:08.480and now you're you know with that at least that
00:09:08.480 -->
00:09:12.019camera was low res but it was annoying and it
00:09:12.019 -->
00:09:14.620wasn't right and people would use wear them all
00:09:14.620 -->
00:09:17.039the time but now you have something which is
00:09:17.039 -->
00:09:21.659like you know kind of very high um high quality
00:09:21.659 -->
00:09:26.440resolution yeah high resolution like really high
00:09:26.440 -->
00:09:31.240storage or instant access to to um you know the
00:09:31.240 -->
00:09:34.399internet it's just like this is really really
00:09:34.399 -->
00:09:36.879worrying and what i've noticed is that there's
00:09:36.879 -->
00:09:40.759been very little knowledge learned from the stuff
00:09:40.759 -->
00:09:43.879when it came to kind of google glass so people
00:09:43.879 -->
00:09:48.000are wearing them in in toilets people are wearing
00:09:48.000 -->
00:09:51.840them and using them illegally to film other people
00:09:51.840 -->
00:09:54.519and we can talk a bit more about that but it
00:09:54.519 -->
00:09:57.440just seems to me no one's taken any notice of
00:09:57.440 -->
00:09:59.919what happened before the other thing that really
00:09:59.919 -->
00:10:01.820annoys me about all this especially with with
00:10:01.820 -->
00:10:05.179um smart glasses is that for someone who doesn't
00:10:05.179 -->
00:10:08.360wear glasses it's really annoying because why
00:10:08.360 -->
00:10:10.039do i have to wear glasses when i don't need to
00:10:10.039 -->
00:10:12.399wear glasses and there's a real push towards
00:10:12.399 -->
00:10:16.299smart glasses I know that the stuff where you
00:10:16.299 -->
00:10:19.039attach it to you, what was that thing that failed
00:10:19.039 -->
00:10:22.379and is now gone, thankfully, where you attach
00:10:22.379 -->
00:10:26.279it with a magnet to your chest? The AI pin? Yeah,
00:10:26.279 -->
00:10:30.840the AI pins. Yes, exactly. All of that stuff
00:10:30.840 -->
00:10:34.139has, thankfully, kind of disappeared for now,
00:10:34.399 -->
00:10:37.600but I expect those to return. But ultimately,
00:10:37.720 -->
00:10:40.139I think the problem is that we never, we haven't
00:10:40.139 -->
00:10:43.360learned the lessons, and we're just people who,
00:10:43.899 -->
00:10:46.620who feel privileged enough to wear this stuff,
00:10:46.740 -->
00:10:50.019are just kind of wearing it in places and showing
00:10:50.019 -->
00:10:53.080off, and it's becoming really problematic. Well,
00:10:53.139 -->
00:10:55.799I did a follow -up link for this story when you
00:10:55.799 -->
00:10:58.019put it up, which happened like... four days ago
00:10:58.019 -->
00:11:00.159at the taping it's on the bbc which is a woman
00:11:00.159 -->
00:11:03.659who was secretly filmed with smart glasses and
00:11:03.659 -->
00:11:05.840there's just you know it's a guy because it's
00:11:05.840 -->
00:11:08.759always a fucking guy uh just walks up to her
00:11:08.759 -->
00:11:10.299and it's like oh i think you're really cute can
00:11:10.299 -->
00:11:12.080i get your number she's like oh and she's like
00:11:12.080 -->
00:11:13.840that's the end of it and then finds out days
00:11:13.840 -->
00:11:17.419later that he was wearing smart glasses videoed
00:11:17.419 -->
00:11:21.299her and then used that video to troll her and
00:11:21.299 -->
00:11:27.129so it's disgusting well it's yes like Full stop.
00:11:28.029 -->
00:11:31.169There's more, though. Like, this is the tip of
00:11:31.169 -->
00:11:34.210the iceberg with this guy doing it intentionally.
00:11:34.710 -->
00:11:38.990And as you said, as the quality gets better and
00:11:38.990 -->
00:11:41.809as the form factor becomes more and more subtle,
00:11:41.970 -->
00:11:45.210we will see more and more of this. And this is
00:11:45.210 -->
00:11:49.110just the top layer. Like, as I'm sure everyone
00:11:49.110 -->
00:11:52.250here on the podcast is aware, but certainly probably
00:11:52.250 -->
00:11:55.090most of the audience, too, is that Internet of
00:11:55.090 -->
00:11:58.179Things. Oh, yeah, no, that's perfectly secure.
00:11:58.379 -->
00:12:00.759There's no way anybody else would find a way
00:12:00.759 -->
00:12:04.700to turn those cameras on without telling you
00:12:04.700 -->
00:12:09.120and do all of that. The more we normalize this,
00:12:09.200 -->
00:12:13.440the more we just set ourselves up to be the mobile
00:12:13.440 -->
00:12:17.700surveillance system for a hacking state. So 404
00:12:17.700 -->
00:12:19.960Media, if I'm not sure, referring to that directly,
00:12:20.080 -->
00:12:24.299they also found a lot of flock cameras. on the
00:12:24.299 -->
00:12:26.679internet that are open and available including
00:12:26.679 -->
00:12:28.840ones that follow people because their initial
00:12:28.840 -->
00:12:31.559argument was oh these are just for on the gates
00:12:31.559 -->
00:12:33.519that follow cars no they have ones that specifically
00:12:33.519 -->
00:12:35.899follow people and some of them are just openly
00:12:35.899 -->
00:12:38.259available on the net i don't know just just like
00:12:38.259 -->
00:12:41.720what i saw a study this week i saw a study this
00:12:41.720 -->
00:12:45.240week something about um lots of internet of things
00:12:45.240 -->
00:12:48.480devices having antiquated web browsers inside
00:12:48.480 -->
00:12:54.139them that are easily Oh yeah, the new bot army
00:12:54.139 -->
00:12:56.019is like, why bother trying to hack your computer
00:12:56.019 -->
00:12:57.940when we can get your ring doorbell to be part
00:12:57.940 -->
00:13:02.360of the DDoS attack with much greater ease. We
00:13:02.360 -->
00:13:04.860just need some piece of silicone somewhere with
00:13:04.860 -->
00:13:06.840an internet connection to start hammering a website.
00:13:07.480 -->
00:13:10.679Why would you need an expensive, locked -down,
00:13:10.700 -->
00:13:15.480hard -to -use box when your webcam is sitting
00:13:15.480 -->
00:13:17.960there just adding trouble? I mean, we've been
00:13:17.960 -->
00:13:20.340talking about this like two, three, four years
00:13:20.340 -->
00:13:22.299ago now. We've been talking about this for decades.
00:13:22.679 -->
00:13:25.440This problem has existed for decades. Like webcams
00:13:25.440 -->
00:13:27.320have been around for a long time. Yeah, webcams
00:13:27.320 -->
00:13:29.000have been around. And the reason why they're
00:13:29.000 -->
00:13:30.960running web servers and stuff is because it's
00:13:30.960 -->
00:13:33.340an easy way to do an interface. It's a cheap
00:13:33.340 -->
00:13:35.879and easy way to do an interface. And even a browser.
00:13:36.000 -->
00:13:38.080So you can do an admin, admin, terrible password.
00:13:39.039 -->
00:13:43.080It's like, yeah, why not? Yep. But I'm surprised
00:13:43.080 -->
00:13:48.279it's come back. But I echo the point of it's
00:13:48.279 -->
00:13:51.799not like this is... I'm very aware that the technology
00:13:51.799 -->
00:13:54.200companies go and do these crazy things, right?
00:13:54.320 -->
00:13:59.600And policy takes a while to catch up. But does
00:13:59.600 -->
00:14:04.340it have to be that way? Okay, so we've learned
00:14:04.340 -->
00:14:06.919from Google Glass. We've learned from all these
00:14:06.919 -->
00:14:09.899things. And we just don't have these policies.
00:14:09.919 -->
00:14:12.879These things should be completely legal and should
00:14:12.879 -->
00:14:17.570also have... The government should be literally
00:14:17.570 -->
00:14:20.409going, you cannot sell that in this country.
00:14:21.590 -->
00:14:24.830It's just not possible. It's the technology version
00:14:24.830 -->
00:14:30.350of the designer drug problem. I was just thinking,
00:14:30.470 -->
00:14:33.309we're going to talk about this in a bit, I think,
00:14:33.389 -->
00:14:36.009but what if you combine it with an X account
00:14:36.009 -->
00:14:41.730and access to rock and other deep fake technology?
00:14:43.979 -->
00:14:47.820So, you know, you can see the world exactly as
00:14:47.820 -->
00:14:51.120you want, I suppose. All the women nude. Most
00:14:51.120 -->
00:14:56.000men don't need technology to do that. It's called
00:14:56.000 -->
00:14:59.399my O 'Brien. That's what they're doing. Hold
00:14:59.399 -->
00:15:02.980on, just to be clear, not all men, and I'm not
00:15:02.980 -->
00:15:07.100asking you. All right, all right. Okay, sorry.
00:15:07.320 -->
00:15:09.840I'm sorry, I'm sorry. No, no, no. You're right.
00:15:11.720 -->
00:15:15.299That's funny. Keep explaining it. No, no, no.
00:15:16.259 -->
00:15:21.679So, yeah, so I think there will always be people
00:15:21.679 -->
00:15:25.480who will do things to the extreme. And the problem
00:15:25.480 -->
00:15:29.019is that when it becomes so normalized, like,
00:15:29.080 -->
00:15:32.840I still find it really annoying when I'm in the
00:15:32.840 -->
00:15:37.000toilet and there's people on their phones. I
00:15:37.000 -->
00:15:39.159don't even know how they do it. They're on their
00:15:39.159 -->
00:15:42.070phone. looking or scrolling through something
00:15:42.070 -->
00:15:45.769with a camera that could be pointing in my direction
00:15:45.769 -->
00:15:48.809and they're doing something else and i'm like
00:15:48.809 -->
00:15:52.269how is this even this would not even be a thing
00:15:52.269 -->
00:15:54.669like these are the things for listeners at home
00:15:54.669 -->
00:15:57.129who don't have the experience of sharing space
00:15:57.129 -->
00:15:59.889in mail toilets oftentimes they're standing up
00:15:59.889 -->
00:16:02.169in a way that would allow you free view of other
00:16:02.169 -->
00:16:04.889guys junk we don't talk about this because it's
00:16:04.889 -->
00:16:09.320really weird For those of you who are imagining
00:16:09.320 -->
00:16:11.059a stall and wondering how that would happen,
00:16:11.159 -->
00:16:12.799that's not the situation he's talking about.
00:16:13.120 -->
00:16:18.139Thank you, Ryan, for that one. I'm glad to help
00:16:18.139 -->
00:16:21.000paint that picture. You know what? It has to
00:16:21.000 -->
00:16:23.559be said. It has to be said because the problem
00:16:23.559 -->
00:16:25.580is that everyone kind of goes, oh, it's all fine.
00:16:25.679 -->
00:16:28.000People just walk into, as soon as they get into
00:16:28.000 -->
00:16:30.899somewhere private, they'll just take their glasses
00:16:30.899 -->
00:16:32.820off. You can't take your glasses off when you
00:16:32.820 -->
00:16:36.279actually rely on those glasses to see. They'll
00:16:36.279 -->
00:16:39.279always remember to turn off their camera. I don't
00:16:39.279 -->
00:16:40.980always remember to turn off the camera when it
00:16:40.980 -->
00:16:44.620doesn't matter. Can I just say, also, the amount
00:16:44.620 -->
00:16:46.220of people who walk around with the flashlight
00:16:46.220 -->
00:16:49.740on and without realising, that is a clear indicator
00:16:49.740 -->
00:16:51.840that no one's going to turn that camera off.
00:16:52.440 -->
00:16:56.220They haven't done it so far. Of course, many
00:16:56.220 -->
00:16:58.240toilets actually have cameras, but there you
00:16:58.240 -->
00:17:05.359go. Can I just say that men are weird? All right.
00:17:05.539 -->
00:17:08.680Next up is going to be David talking about let's
00:17:08.680 -->
00:17:11.839get the fuck off of X, David. Yeah, I hate to
00:17:11.839 -->
00:17:14.339do a mayor of Minneapolis or something, but yeah,
00:17:14.460 -->
00:17:17.859this is getting to be a bit of a problem because
00:17:17.859 -->
00:17:20.900we started off with people saying we could we
00:17:20.900 -->
00:17:23.900could fix that. And then it was like, oh, all
00:17:23.900 -->
00:17:26.279these things that appear on X, we can just fix
00:17:26.279 -->
00:17:28.099them and to improve them. And now we've even
00:17:28.099 -->
00:17:30.619got people saying, yeah, there must be some legal
00:17:30.619 -->
00:17:35.329way to fix crop. There almost certainly isn't.
00:17:35.329 -->
00:17:37.670It isn't worth doing. But more to the point,
00:17:37.730 -->
00:17:40.809we really just need to get people, specifically
00:17:40.809 -->
00:17:44.170the UK government, to get the fuck off it. It's
00:17:44.170 -->
00:17:47.609a bit like saying you want to work out what hit
00:17:47.609 -->
00:17:49.890the Titanic. Yeah, you can do that after everyone's
00:17:49.890 -->
00:17:51.970left. Yeah, you don't want to say, just hang
00:17:51.970 -->
00:17:53.750around a bit. Let's just see where the hole is.
00:17:53.829 -->
00:17:58.430No, just get off. And that's getting to be, I
00:17:58.430 -->
00:18:00.710think, more of a serious problem because we're
00:18:00.710 -->
00:18:03.740now interviewing... UK government ministers,
00:18:03.799 -->
00:18:05.220I'm not saying this hasn't happened elsewhere,
00:18:05.519 -->
00:18:07.500and they're complaining about Grok, and then
00:18:07.500 -->
00:18:10.240they put the last line, they put them, why do
00:18:10.240 -->
00:18:12.299you still have an X account, and why do you still
00:18:12.299 -->
00:18:14.660use it? And they end up saying, well, that's
00:18:14.660 -->
00:18:16.539because that's where everyone is. It's like,
00:18:16.640 -->
00:18:19.980no, you're the government. You are precisely
00:18:19.980 -->
00:18:23.000who should be taking a line on this. No point
00:18:23.000 -->
00:18:24.900starting off your first part and then following
00:18:24.900 -->
00:18:26.259up with, yeah, we're just going to hang around
00:18:26.259 -->
00:18:29.480an X. I actually have some sympathy with the
00:18:29.480 -->
00:18:31.769claim that that's where people are. But I think
00:18:31.769 -->
00:18:33.549the answer to that is they should be posting
00:18:33.549 -->
00:18:35.970on every significant platform. And we can argue
00:18:35.970 -->
00:18:40.730about what is significant. But the fact is that
00:18:40.730 -->
00:18:45.230Twitter then and X now have always been much,
00:18:45.289 -->
00:18:47.869much smaller than something like Facebook or
00:18:47.869 -->
00:18:52.170Instagram or even WhatsApp because it appeals
00:18:52.170 -->
00:18:54.269to a particular class of people who are clever
00:18:54.269 -->
00:18:59.759with condensing words into small spaces. And
00:18:59.759 -->
00:19:02.099so journalists liked it and politicians follow
00:19:02.099 -->
00:19:05.160where journalists are. But honestly, there's
00:19:05.160 -->
00:19:07.200no excuse for them. There's no excuse for them
00:19:07.200 -->
00:19:10.339preferentially posting on it. I think there might
00:19:10.339 -->
00:19:13.259be an excuse for posting there. Obviously, I'm
00:19:13.259 -->
00:19:15.380using the term active on Twitter. In fact, the
00:19:15.380 -->
00:19:18.460first thing we always say is don't delete your
00:19:18.460 -->
00:19:20.240account because someone else will just take your
00:19:20.240 -->
00:19:22.759account over and use your fucking name. So don't
00:19:22.759 -->
00:19:25.420do that. Just do not be active on Twitter if
00:19:25.420 -->
00:19:27.990you want to. repeat something as you said yeah
00:19:27.990 -->
00:19:30.529there is the informational point there but the
00:19:30.529 -->
00:19:32.750problem is they're active on twitter or worse
00:19:32.750 -->
00:19:35.450a lot of the mps only have a twitter account
00:19:35.450 -->
00:19:37.650now as you said if they have one everywhere and
00:19:37.650 -->
00:19:39.630it would just and they didn't manage themselves
00:19:39.630 -->
00:19:41.450and it was just a black everywhere it's just
00:19:41.450 -->
00:19:43.690a blank canvas and they just repeat stuff well
00:19:43.690 -->
00:19:46.029okay that's fine but no they're actually active
00:19:46.029 -->
00:19:48.549on twitter and more to the point they're defending
00:19:48.549 -->
00:19:51.849themselves even five seconds before saying yes
00:19:51.849 -->
00:19:54.529twitter is a massive problem because elon musk
00:19:54.529 -->
00:19:57.240and the last thing he's doing Is it definitely
00:19:57.240 -->
00:20:00.680an extreme example of compartmentalization? Yeah,
00:20:00.680 -->
00:20:04.599it's getting worse, if anything, because we're
00:20:04.599 -->
00:20:07.200now in this, like, what is the next stupid thing
00:20:07.200 -->
00:20:09.420Elon Musk does? Well, he'll always have something
00:20:09.420 -->
00:20:10.980dark to do because he's that sort of person.
00:20:11.119 -->
00:20:13.900He'll just say, oh, I guess porn is a way to
00:20:13.900 -->
00:20:15.700make money, so we'll just do something stupid.
00:20:15.799 -->
00:20:18.559And if you keep following him on this matter,
00:20:18.819 -->
00:20:20.819you'll just keep on going, here's the next reason,
00:20:20.900 -->
00:20:22.819here's the next reason. He doesn't care about
00:20:22.819 -->
00:20:25.349the UK government's policies anyway. We'll always
00:20:25.349 -->
00:20:27.970be behind. And we're just not accepting the problem.
00:20:28.069 -->
00:20:30.549The problem isn't all social media. The problem
00:20:30.549 -->
00:20:34.390is very largely X because of Elon Musk. And instead
00:20:34.390 -->
00:20:36.529of accepting that, we're doing this silly thing
00:20:36.529 -->
00:20:39.150by trying to sort of stick fingers in the die
00:20:39.150 -->
00:20:41.990as if that's going to help at all. The metaphor
00:20:41.990 -->
00:20:45.049isn't Titanic. The metaphor is Chernobyl. Chernobyl
00:20:45.049 -->
00:20:47.970would be a better one. Yeah, because it's like,
00:20:47.970 -->
00:20:53.089no, no. If you stay here, you will die. The radiation
00:20:53.089 -->
00:20:55.410will get you. And in this case, the radiation
00:20:55.410 -->
00:20:57.450is, and here's the dark point for the show, the
00:20:57.450 -->
00:21:00.130creation of fake CSAM images. And if you don't
00:21:00.130 -->
00:21:01.990know what CSAM is, go look it up on a browser.
00:21:02.069 -->
00:21:04.029I don't want to say it out loud, but it's bad.
00:21:04.390 -->
00:21:06.329It's how Grok has been taking the clothes off
00:21:06.329 -->
00:21:08.970of lots of people, particularly people that shouldn't
00:21:08.970 -->
00:21:10.789be taking the clothes off of and making images.
00:21:11.150 -->
00:21:13.250And those kind of images are just completely
00:21:13.250 -->
00:21:18.599illegal in the UK. Even if someone has put one
00:21:18.599 -->
00:21:23.339into your stream, and it's now cached in your
00:21:23.339 -->
00:21:26.859browser, and that constitutes you having downloaded
00:21:26.859 -->
00:21:31.940it, and you are then liable. This came from someone
00:21:31.940 -->
00:21:33.619I saw on Blue Sky posting about it, basically
00:21:33.619 -->
00:21:36.099saying, I don't dare go onto that site anymore,
00:21:36.299 -->
00:21:40.380because even the very low chance of anyone ever
00:21:40.380 -->
00:21:43.039just showing me an unsolicited art showing up,
00:21:43.099 -->
00:21:47.039especially... given how trigger -happy X is to
00:21:47.039 -->
00:21:49.039show you anything that you haven't asked for
00:21:49.039 -->
00:21:52.000because it wants to do that. Right now, a person
00:21:52.000 -->
00:21:55.440could do a very well -staged advertising attack
00:21:55.440 -->
00:22:01.000on Twitter by just paying it to promote a tweet
00:22:01.000 -->
00:22:04.000with the wrong kind of stuff on it to, let's
00:22:04.000 -->
00:22:06.799say, I really just want it to all be men of a
00:22:06.799 -->
00:22:09.119certain age who are all centered on Westminster.
00:22:10.750 -->
00:22:15.109oh oh like that would be all it takes wow they
00:22:15.109 -->
00:22:16.269wouldn't have they wouldn't have to be following
00:22:16.269 -->
00:22:18.529the wrong people just be like hey this is suggested
00:22:18.529 -->
00:22:22.289for you yes i mean that's yes suggested for you
00:22:22.289 -->
00:22:24.529the wonderful thing that everyone says they have
00:22:24.529 -->
00:22:26.329to be on the algorithm yeah well if you are how
00:22:26.329 -->
00:22:28.589to how to terrorize a nation for under a hundred
00:22:28.589 -->
00:22:30.849for a hundred bucks in google ad sense you know
00:22:30.849 -->
00:22:36.230i hadn't thought about that that's a Wow. I'm
00:22:36.230 -->
00:22:38.069here to bring the darkness, go me. No, no, no,
00:22:38.069 -->
00:22:41.390that is dark, and I mean, yeah, that is, but
00:22:41.390 -->
00:22:44.009no, I also... Hey, Charlie Brooker, if you're
00:22:44.009 -->
00:22:48.210hiring, I would love to write for you. I'm sure
00:22:48.210 -->
00:22:50.349he's looking for someone. No one can see me looking
00:22:50.349 -->
00:22:52.130to the camera, putting both my thumbs up like
00:22:52.130 -->
00:22:57.789an idiot. So, I mean, yeah, I also, I mean, obviously,
00:22:57.869 -->
00:23:02.809someone who's hot on the Fediverse, I, yeah,
00:23:02.910 -->
00:23:07.009I understand I understand the argument that the
00:23:07.009 -->
00:23:12.660government should post everywhere. And I still
00:23:12.660 -->
00:23:15.220do have a Twitter account, which I, once again,
00:23:15.259 -->
00:23:18.140I just hold because I don't want anyone to use
00:23:18.140 -->
00:23:21.420that name. Literally nothing else goes there.
00:23:21.880 -->
00:23:24.839I didn't even log in. I'm actually worried that
00:23:24.839 -->
00:23:26.460one day they will just kick me off completely.
00:23:27.460 -->
00:23:32.339But, yeah, I just do not understand. I mean,
00:23:32.380 -->
00:23:34.900this is an argument that's happened so many times.
00:23:35.240 -->
00:23:40.509I've had this argument even at the BBC. Why are
00:23:40.509 -->
00:23:46.970we supporting this platform? Why are we encouraging
00:23:46.970 -->
00:23:50.190people to go there by posting all this stuff?
00:23:50.390 -->
00:23:52.029Maybe we can do something where we post stuff
00:23:52.029 -->
00:23:55.089like delayed, like way delayed, for example,
00:23:55.089 -->
00:23:57.750or just make it like a second class citizen,
00:23:58.109 -->
00:24:01.430you know, rather than like give it the, this
00:24:01.430 -->
00:24:03.269is where the breaking news goes, for example.
00:24:03.490 -->
00:24:06.470It's just like these things, I don't understand.
00:24:06.569 -->
00:24:10.410I don't understand how this has become. what
00:24:10.410 -->
00:24:14.769it's become. And it is clearly not going to get
00:24:14.769 -->
00:24:17.230any better. And it's going to get far, far worse.
00:24:17.390 -->
00:24:20.829The moment when Elon Musk told all the advertisers
00:24:20.829 -->
00:24:26.410to fuck themselves, that was a clear sign. That
00:24:26.410 -->
00:24:29.869was it. That was it. Literally, that is exactly
00:24:29.869 -->
00:24:34.170all you need to know. It's not as if he hasn't
00:24:34.170 -->
00:24:36.130told us what he's doing. That's the strange thing.
00:24:36.349 -->
00:24:38.519It's not like... He's a secret businessman. He's
00:24:38.519 -->
00:24:40.559a secret player. No, he said what he's doing,
00:24:40.640 -->
00:24:43.200and he's doing it. And we shouldn't accept that
00:24:43.200 -->
00:24:45.980as a sort of standard platform that we should
00:24:45.980 -->
00:24:48.279all be using. What's that line? When people tell
00:24:48.279 -->
00:24:51.960you who they are, believe them. The first time.
00:24:52.079 -->
00:24:54.220When people tell you who they are the first time,
00:24:54.220 -->
00:24:57.440believe them. Does that apply to someone else
00:24:57.440 -->
00:25:00.980that's hot in the news right now? There's more
00:25:00.980 -->
00:25:05.380than that. We talk about this is a perennial
00:25:05.380 -->
00:25:08.670discussion for us. this perennial discussion
00:25:08.670 -->
00:25:11.170of people moving from one platform to the other.
00:25:11.250 -->
00:25:12.990And Wendy raises a really good point about the,
00:25:13.069 -->
00:25:14.930cause everyone's on there. And that is the problem.
00:25:15.029 -->
00:25:17.289Like, it's not like, honestly, this platform
00:25:17.289 -->
00:25:20.710could be two tin cans, but if 4 billion people
00:25:20.710 -->
00:25:22.569are using two tin cans, then as much as I hate
00:25:22.569 -->
00:25:26.109it, I got to get myself a fucking tin can. And
00:25:26.109 -->
00:25:30.869in a sense, this is an ideal scenario because
00:25:30.869 -->
00:25:34.549the more they toxify it, the more they let it
00:25:34.549 -->
00:25:37.809go under uncontrolled. the more people will begin
00:25:37.809 -->
00:25:39.549to, the more it gets flooded, particularly with
00:25:39.549 -->
00:25:44.190slop and garbage, and now litigatable bad things
00:25:44.190 -->
00:25:46.210that you should never have even exposure to,
00:25:46.250 -->
00:25:47.990lest your computer cache them and you go to jail
00:25:47.990 -->
00:25:50.990for a very long time. Like, the more and more
00:25:50.990 -->
00:25:53.390of this is like, we haven't been able to convince
00:25:53.390 -->
00:25:55.950our friends to leave, but maybe if some people
00:25:55.950 -->
00:25:58.309go to jail, that'll be, you know, it's all just,
00:25:58.450 -->
00:26:00.869it's a systems thing. The worse it gets, the
00:26:00.869 -->
00:26:02.710more people will leave, and eventually this problem
00:26:02.710 -->
00:26:06.130will hopefully... at least somewhat self -mitigate.
00:26:06.549 -->
00:26:10.170The problem is that politicians are also humans,
00:26:10.289 -->
00:26:12.890and what humans do is they go where their friends
00:26:12.890 -->
00:26:17.650are. So you really just need to find a few key
00:26:17.650 -->
00:26:20.589politicians to whom it's worth it to move or
00:26:20.589 -->
00:26:24.289to leave. There are a few who are doing it, and
00:26:24.289 -->
00:26:27.069they are staying there doing it. But unfortunately,
00:26:27.210 -->
00:26:32.150they are almost... Honestly, I think... I think
00:26:32.150 -->
00:26:33.349there's a middle ground. And the middle ground
00:26:33.349 -->
00:26:35.789I'd recommend is, Ian talked about this too,
00:26:35.890 -->
00:26:40.230post everywhere, but only engage on platforms
00:26:40.230 -->
00:26:42.130that you feel are safe. So like if you need to
00:26:42.130 -->
00:26:43.930reach people on Twitter, you can say like, hi,
00:26:44.109 -->
00:26:46.829I'm posting on Twitter, but if you at or reply
00:26:46.829 -->
00:26:48.470me, I'm not going to say anything back because
00:26:48.470 -->
00:26:51.250it's too dangerous. Like I will broadcast here
00:26:51.250 -->
00:26:53.509so I can reach as many people as I want. And
00:26:53.509 -->
00:26:55.890you can take the risk to be on this toxic garbage
00:26:55.890 -->
00:27:00.599platform of pure. But if you want me to read
00:27:00.599 -->
00:27:02.599what you've written, if you want to interact
00:27:02.599 -->
00:27:05.920back, these are the channels. And these channels
00:27:05.920 -->
00:27:09.160will be curated and sterilized so that you don't
00:27:09.160 -->
00:27:11.940see the bad stuff. The thing is, I think there
00:27:11.940 -->
00:27:14.980are people for whom there is no safe platform,
00:27:15.240 -->
00:27:19.000at least in terms of abuse coming their way.
00:27:19.140 -->
00:27:22.799I mean, I have my experience of Mastodon is delightful.
00:27:23.240 -->
00:27:26.319But nonetheless, I see almost every day somebody
00:27:26.319 -->
00:27:30.130talking about the abuse they receive. Yeah. So,
00:27:30.890 -->
00:27:33.690I mean, one of the problems is that once every
00:27:33.690 -->
00:27:36.970community, once it reaches a certain size, attracts
00:27:36.970 -->
00:27:40.450a certain percentage of people who are just obnoxious.
00:27:40.630 -->
00:27:46.930Yeah. Yeah, so I completely agree. I think, so
00:27:46.930 -->
00:27:51.049this argument came up quite a lot, is that at
00:27:51.049 -->
00:27:53.309some point it gets to a certain size and this
00:27:53.309 -->
00:27:55.930thing's happened. And I think one of the things
00:27:55.930 -->
00:27:59.539that... i was trying to encourage thought on
00:27:59.539 -->
00:28:04.480was that there in the nature of the the way that
00:28:04.480 -->
00:28:08.559the these other networks are built that allows
00:28:08.559 -->
00:28:11.160you to do things so i was also the bbc has its
00:28:11.160 -->
00:28:14.980own mastodon server that means it could do lots
00:28:14.980 -->
00:28:18.700of things like deliberately cut off a whole bunch
00:28:18.700 -->
00:28:22.220of people it can also like it has not you know
00:28:22.599 -->
00:28:25.599Does it allow people to reply back, for example?
00:28:25.880 -->
00:28:28.759I think I was trying to get them to think about
00:28:28.759 -->
00:28:31.500it that way. And so that would be that the BBC
00:28:31.500 -->
00:28:36.220social server would be a safe place. And that's
00:28:36.220 -->
00:28:39.299where it first goes to. And then it can go elsewhere.
00:28:39.380 -->
00:28:41.619And I think you're right that you put a warning
00:28:41.619 -->
00:28:44.279saying, we're posting here, but we're not going
00:28:44.279 -->
00:28:45.980to engage here. If you want to engage, you come
00:28:45.980 -->
00:28:50.099here. And I know that's a risk, but I would rather
00:28:50.099 -->
00:28:54.759that risk than... you know the bbc or the government
00:28:54.759 -->
00:28:58.480or elsewhere or other other companies um kind
00:28:58.480 -->
00:29:00.960of engaging on a platform where the the ceo's
00:29:00.960 -->
00:29:05.279literally going you all you know i feel like
00:29:05.279 -->
00:29:08.160we keep trying to i hold out hope that there
00:29:08.160 -->
00:29:10.599is a technological way to solve this human problem
00:29:10.599 -->
00:29:16.279of there are and are going to um like this is
00:29:16.279 -->
00:29:20.099like this is this is decades of internet forum
00:29:20.099 -->
00:29:22.380experience long before twitter and it's just
00:29:22.380 -->
00:29:25.420the same thing it's just the if you are not willing
00:29:25.420 -->
00:29:28.240to curate if you are not willing to be an active
00:29:28.240 -->
00:29:31.279presence you invite the bad people and once the
00:29:31.279 -->
00:29:33.140bat once a few bad people discover that they
00:29:33.140 -->
00:29:36.019can be bad without consequence many more bad
00:29:36.019 -->
00:29:37.940things will come and join them because that's
00:29:37.940 -->
00:29:39.779their playground and that is exactly what has
00:29:39.779 -->
00:29:42.059happened on x this is exactly what like like
00:29:42.059 -->
00:29:45.140this is what 4chan 8chan all the chans like this
00:29:45.140 -->
00:29:47.180just went oh this is someplace where i can be
00:29:47.769 -->
00:29:50.910as horrible a human being without consequence
00:29:50.910 -->
00:29:55.329and then once a person who has the desire to
00:29:55.329 -->
00:29:57.930be that horrible being realizes there is a place
00:29:57.930 -->
00:30:02.150for them to do that and we can talk about like
00:30:02.150 -->
00:30:04.009this this is actually what about freezing with
00:30:04.009 -->
00:30:05.450like the designer drug problem which is that
00:30:05.450 -->
00:30:09.250you can you can try to litigate and you can try
00:30:09.250 -->
00:30:11.849to technology filter out things that you know
00:30:11.849 -->
00:30:15.599about But it is very, very hard to prevent new
00:30:15.599 -->
00:30:18.220things. And assholes are also very creative and
00:30:18.220 -->
00:30:19.980abusers are very creative and they will figure
00:30:19.980 -->
00:30:21.920out new and interesting ways to get around that.
00:30:22.099 -->
00:30:26.019And for that, you need a human to go, no. And
00:30:26.019 -->
00:30:28.039a human who's willing to do this, actually, I
00:30:28.039 -->
00:30:31.220am willing to take on the social ethical responsibility
00:30:31.220 -->
00:30:33.420for saying you have crossed a boundary. Even
00:30:33.420 -->
00:30:36.660if you don't think you have, you're out. I also
00:30:36.660 -->
00:30:38.359can criticize them, but Blue Sky is quite good
00:30:38.359 -->
00:30:40.680in having a hundred ways to block things. And
00:30:40.680 -->
00:30:42.599in some respects, they are encouraging people
00:30:42.599 -->
00:30:46.539to say, if this stream of conversation I've just
00:30:46.539 -->
00:30:49.200started is getting bad, you can stop replies,
00:30:49.359 -->
00:30:51.279you can get rid of people. It's not the best
00:30:51.279 -->
00:30:52.980thing to do with a conversation, but it is a
00:30:52.980 -->
00:30:55.799bit more responsible. They could make it so much
00:30:55.799 -->
00:30:58.220better by just monitoring how many blocks any
00:30:58.220 -->
00:31:02.140individual thing gets. Yes. All they have to
00:31:02.140 -->
00:31:04.000do is they go, you can block whoever you want.
00:31:04.079 -->
00:31:05.579And by the way, we're watching to see when a
00:31:05.579 -->
00:31:06.940person gets a lot of blocks and then we're going
00:31:06.940 -->
00:31:08.640to have somebody take a look at it and go, actually,
00:31:08.700 -->
00:31:11.660you know what? Whole world says F you. Yes, yes,
00:31:11.720 -->
00:31:13.579yes. It might be quicker to just get rid of you.
00:31:13.700 -->
00:31:17.839You are the problem. Now, to be clear, there
00:31:17.839 -->
00:31:20.099needs to be a human in that part of the process
00:31:20.099 -->
00:31:23.460because we already have examples of bad people
00:31:23.460 -->
00:31:26.910learning how to weaponize stuff like that. Yeah,
00:31:26.930 -->
00:31:29.450like review bombing, review bombing and stuff
00:31:29.450 -->
00:31:31.650like that. Reputation bombing is a thing like
00:31:31.650 -->
00:31:35.730go look up. Was it the Sims that had this problem?
00:31:36.230 -->
00:31:38.710Yes, that's right. There were press gangs of
00:31:38.710 -->
00:31:41.490people who went to the spot because the Sims,
00:31:41.569 -->
00:31:43.509the virtual world multiplayer version or whatever,
00:31:43.630 -->
00:31:46.609had a place where new players would always come
00:31:46.609 -->
00:31:48.490in and they would start with a certain amount
00:31:48.490 -->
00:31:50.269of virtual in -world cash and somebody would
00:31:50.269 -->
00:31:52.609show up and be like, hi, give me 90, give me
00:31:52.609 -->
00:31:55.92090 of your hundred dollars or what? or me and
00:31:55.920 -->
00:31:58.640these 10 people will all immediately downvote
00:31:58.640 -->
00:32:00.500you as an untrustworthy person, and no one else
00:32:00.500 -->
00:32:02.240in the game will ever trade with you or interact
00:32:02.240 -->
00:32:04.480with you, and your experience will be done. Yeah.
00:32:06.099 -->
00:32:09.059Yeah, I remember hearing about that. And you're
00:32:09.059 -->
00:32:12.119right, these happen, and these people will find
00:32:12.119 -->
00:32:15.700ways, and I see this a lot with dating sites
00:32:15.700 -->
00:32:19.859in particular, where they find ways, and you're
00:32:19.859 -->
00:32:21.519right, that someone needs to be there going,
00:32:21.599 -->
00:32:24.180hold on a minute. Why is this person sending
00:32:24.180 -->
00:32:26.640the same message again and again? I'm going to
00:32:26.640 -->
00:32:28.700bring in a last point, which you just reminded
00:32:28.700 -->
00:32:30.400me of, which is a happy thing that made me happy.
00:32:30.440 -->
00:32:34.819Have you heard about, I think it's like Oregon
00:32:34.819 -->
00:32:40.519catfishing? No. Okay, so this is a happy thing
00:32:40.519 -->
00:32:44.440about dating sites. There is a person who publishes
00:32:44.440 -->
00:32:47.819this, and his whole shtick is he poses as an
00:32:47.819 -->
00:32:53.259attractive woman on Tinder. But he only connects
00:32:53.259 -->
00:32:56.339with guys who have photos of themselves holding
00:32:56.339 -->
00:33:02.099fish. And then he gets them to tell him where
00:33:02.099 -->
00:33:05.779their secret fishing spots are. And then he ghosts
00:33:05.779 -->
00:33:08.220them and goes to their fishing spots and rates
00:33:08.220 -->
00:33:12.990them. Are you serious? I love this so much. Can
00:33:12.990 -->
00:33:15.910I say again, men are weird. Yeah, it's funny
00:33:15.910 -->
00:33:18.369I was just thinking that. That's just weird,
00:33:18.410 -->
00:33:21.150but wonderful. Yes, but when they use their weirdness
00:33:21.150 -->
00:33:23.529to battle other weirdness, it can be a thing
00:33:23.529 -->
00:33:29.849of beauty. And weirdness cancels out. All right.
00:33:30.150 -->
00:33:33.589Coming up next, Wendy is going to talk to us
00:33:33.589 -->
00:33:37.170about a paper she found on the potential problem
00:33:37.170 -->
00:33:42.039of... partial faking of videos where small parts
00:33:42.039 -->
00:33:44.140of videos are being altered instead of just doing
00:33:44.140 -->
00:33:46.599an entire deep fake. Wendy? You've just said
00:33:46.599 -->
00:33:51.099what it was. Yeah, you know, it reminds me of
00:33:51.099 -->
00:33:53.859the early days of the web when people would,
00:33:53.920 -->
00:33:58.240hackers for fun would deface an entire website.
00:33:58.920 -->
00:34:00.779And these things were embarrassing, but they
00:34:00.779 -->
00:34:02.880were really easy to see that somebody had done
00:34:02.880 -->
00:34:05.000it. And, you know, it was kind of in that sense,
00:34:05.079 -->
00:34:07.039it was just kind of harmless. And I remember
00:34:07.039 -->
00:34:09.619thinking then that if anybody got good at subtly
00:34:09.619 -->
00:34:14.039altering sort of bits of information in ways
00:34:14.039 -->
00:34:15.639that would be much harder to detect, it would
00:34:15.639 -->
00:34:17.519be a much bigger danger. And that's kind of what
00:34:17.519 -->
00:34:20.340this paper is about. It's researchers at the
00:34:20.340 -->
00:34:26.440Institut Polytechnique de Paris have... introduce,
00:34:27.000 -->
00:34:30.440as they say, fake parts, which they call a new
00:34:30.440 -->
00:34:34.500class of deep fakes, where you have a real video
00:34:34.500 -->
00:34:37.119and you have subtle changes to small bits of
00:34:37.119 -->
00:34:42.360it. And so it looks, there are two main points.
00:34:42.400 -->
00:34:44.340One is that they're much harder to detect than
00:34:44.340 -->
00:34:47.280outright fakes, because most of the video is
00:34:47.280 -->
00:34:52.039real, and that you can actually do quite a lot
00:34:52.039 -->
00:34:55.869of damage with it. For example, if you have somebody
00:34:55.869 -->
00:34:58.150speaking in a video clip and you change their
00:34:58.150 -->
00:35:00.650expression slightly or gesture slightly, that
00:35:00.650 -->
00:35:02.909can really completely alter the emotional impact
00:35:02.909 -->
00:35:05.929of what they're saying. And so you can really
00:35:05.929 -->
00:35:09.150imagine it being a technique that could be easily
00:35:09.150 -->
00:35:11.429weaponized in political campaigns and stuff,
00:35:11.469 -->
00:35:14.170and it would be very hard to tell. So that's
00:35:14.170 -->
00:35:17.710the main gist of it. Actually, easier for AI
00:35:17.710 -->
00:35:19.570to work on small parts because it doesn't work
00:35:19.570 -->
00:35:22.280on an image as a whole. It just works on. things
00:35:22.280 -->
00:35:25.320that it has attention to so it's actually playing
00:35:25.320 -->
00:35:28.199into its strength so yeah it just occurred to
00:35:28.199 -->
00:35:30.500me it just occurred to me that there's a version
00:35:30.500 -->
00:35:31.739of this that i've been hearing of for a long
00:35:31.739 -->
00:35:34.670time patton oswald referred to this in one of
00:35:34.670 -->
00:35:36.750his comedy routines like he has this thing he
00:35:36.750 -->
00:35:39.010talked about for one of these films that he was
00:35:39.010 -->
00:35:40.590working on where they said we they hired him
00:35:40.590 -->
00:35:42.730to do punch up and it was a punch up for an animated
00:35:42.730 -->
00:35:45.050film and what that means is they show him the
00:35:45.050 -->
00:35:47.110film and they go this isn't funny enough but
00:35:47.110 -->
00:35:49.710we can't change any of the frames could you do
00:35:49.710 -->
00:35:52.190a voice making a joke off frame that will make
00:35:52.190 -->
00:35:55.309this scene funnier and his is like oops i just
00:35:55.309 -->
00:35:58.010slipped onto my bottom into some butterscotch
00:35:58.010 -->
00:36:00.030which you cannot see like that's the nature of
00:36:00.030 -->
00:36:04.179it and it's just like it actually the the potential
00:36:04.179 -->
00:36:07.179subversion of that is astonishing when you start
00:36:07.179 -->
00:36:13.440to think about it. Yeah, I think, I mean, I've
00:36:13.440 -->
00:36:18.579got a related kind of news story. And we've all
00:36:18.579 -->
00:36:21.400kind of seen these. And I think, obviously, in
00:36:21.400 -->
00:36:23.440the paper, that is a really interesting one with
00:36:23.440 -->
00:36:28.019actually some very parts of the video. But I've
00:36:28.019 -->
00:36:32.960also seen... stuff like little images so for
00:36:32.960 -->
00:36:36.219example the example that the BBC use is that
00:36:36.219 -->
00:36:40.519trains were cancelled over a fake bridge collapse
00:36:40.519 -->
00:36:45.079image and it's not that there's lots and lots
00:36:45.079 -->
00:36:48.079of pictures there's just enough pictures and
00:36:48.079 -->
00:36:51.159it's obviously of a real bridge and it's being
00:36:51.159 -->
00:36:54.099shared actually I'm interested enough I wonder
00:36:54.099 -->
00:36:58.280if it's being shared over X but ultimately it's
00:36:58.280 -->
00:37:01.519enough that Without kind of then double checking
00:37:01.519 -->
00:37:04.679that the train company actually cancelled the
00:37:04.679 -->
00:37:08.139train. And stuff like this, I'm seeing little
00:37:08.139 -->
00:37:11.460bits. So once again, a bit like altering parts
00:37:11.460 -->
00:37:14.280of the video, little bits of the video, you're
00:37:14.280 -->
00:37:18.440starting to see the effect of AI on our daily
00:37:18.440 -->
00:37:22.780lives and causing absolute chaos. Buckingham
00:37:22.780 -->
00:37:27.480Palace Christmas Market. Oh, tell me more. Yeah,
00:37:27.559 -->
00:37:30.860this happened this year. Like, thousands of tourists
00:37:30.860 -->
00:37:33.300flooded to Buckingham Palace because someone
00:37:33.300 -->
00:37:35.559generated some AI images of a Christmas market
00:37:35.559 -->
00:37:38.460at Buckingham Palace, which did not exist. And
00:37:38.460 -->
00:37:40.280so all these people would go to Buckingham Palace
00:37:40.280 -->
00:37:41.940like the frown and be like, oh, my God, a Christmas
00:37:41.940 -->
00:37:44.099market at Buckingham Palace. How awesome would
00:37:44.099 -->
00:37:45.719that be? Yeah, it would be great. Not fucking
00:37:45.719 -->
00:37:49.929here, though. The question is, how much does
00:37:49.929 -->
00:37:52.409AI contribute to that? Because actually, you
00:37:52.409 -->
00:37:54.369could probably start something similar just by
00:37:54.369 -->
00:37:56.550posting a message saying, look at this cool thing
00:37:56.550 -->
00:37:58.590I bought at the Buckingham Palace Christmas market.
00:37:59.050 -->
00:38:04.389I agree with that. You don't actually need AI
00:38:04.389 -->
00:38:07.809for that. Well, people are smart enough to start
00:38:07.809 -->
00:38:09.909to figure out places where the expectation is
00:38:09.909 -->
00:38:13.510so ready to lean into it that it takes very little
00:38:13.510 -->
00:38:17.420to persuade them. to bring this back to the original
00:38:17.420 -->
00:38:19.659point that Ian was talking about, people are
00:38:19.659 -->
00:38:22.619already so convinced that the UK train infrastructure
00:38:22.619 -->
00:38:26.440is shit that no one was surprised when a bridge
00:38:26.440 -->
00:38:29.260collapses, even the fucking train company. They're
00:38:29.260 -->
00:38:31.579like, yeah, probably did happen. We haven't put
00:38:31.579 -->
00:38:34.079any money into that for decades. And it's like,
00:38:34.099 -->
00:38:36.260is it AI? Who can take the chance? The odds of
00:38:36.260 -->
00:38:38.519it being real are significant regardless. And
00:38:38.519 -->
00:38:42.840people will find those places where there's already
00:38:42.840 -->
00:38:47.019an expectation. Oddly, I can see a silver lining
00:38:47.019 -->
00:38:50.340in this, which is like, by the way, if you let
00:38:50.340 -->
00:38:53.099your reputation as a service company get to be
00:38:53.099 -->
00:38:55.980so shit that people are willing to believe these
00:38:55.980 -->
00:38:59.159bad things, how easy would it be for a lot of
00:38:59.159 -->
00:39:00.940people to start making them believe that even
00:39:00.940 -->
00:39:12.630worse things are true? a delivery company like
00:39:12.630 -->
00:39:14.849every or one that are actually like used to be
00:39:14.849 -->
00:39:16.929hermes they their reputation got so bad they
00:39:16.929 -->
00:39:19.670rebranded to every it's like everyone knows that
00:39:19.670 -->
00:39:21.670oh that's what happened to them yeah that's what
00:39:21.670 -->
00:39:23.150happened to them they rebranded because hermes
00:39:23.150 -->
00:39:25.670got such a bad reputation that people were like
00:39:25.670 -->
00:39:28.730people would go to their go to their shopping
00:39:28.730 -->
00:39:31.250basket online see that it was going to be fulfilled
00:39:31.250 -->
00:39:32.929by hermes and they would cancel it because they're
00:39:32.929 -->
00:39:35.429like i you know i i don't care how good this
00:39:35.429 -->
00:39:38.010is i don't want i don't want the 50 chance of
00:39:38.010 -->
00:39:39.789this never showing up or showing up crunched
00:39:39.789 -->
00:39:43.590into a tiny ball Or waiting a week for it to
00:39:43.590 -->
00:39:45.849show up whenever the driver can feel like it.
00:39:47.110 -->
00:39:51.750So, you know, that's... I mean, it's evil, but
00:39:51.750 -->
00:39:57.369it's a silver lining. But, okay, just to answer,
00:39:57.449 -->
00:40:02.489I think Wendy's point is correct, but I do think
00:40:02.489 -->
00:40:09.250that just to kind of tip the... Just a little
00:40:09.250 -->
00:40:13.480tip. with the image or with a video or something
00:40:13.480 -->
00:40:17.519like that, it just, it brings a level of, and
00:40:17.519 -->
00:40:19.800I think Ryan is correct as well, that if you've
00:40:19.800 -->
00:40:22.699got a company that's already kind of like, you
00:40:22.699 -->
00:40:24.780know, on the down already, and then you just
00:40:24.780 -->
00:40:27.699tip the balance a little bit with a video or
00:40:27.699 -->
00:40:30.559even a couple of videos is enough to kind of
00:40:30.559 -->
00:40:33.280like cause all types of chaos. And we're going
00:40:33.280 -->
00:40:36.440to have to get used to this. And I don't know
00:40:36.440 -->
00:40:38.539what the solution is. Well, I have thoughts about
00:40:38.539 -->
00:40:41.119solutions, but yeah. We will build antibodies
00:40:41.119 -->
00:40:43.460to this the same way we build antibodies to everything
00:40:43.460 -->
00:40:45.960else. Like, no one believes the Nigerian prince
00:40:45.960 -->
00:40:48.239is going to send us money anymore. 20 years ago,
00:40:48.260 -->
00:40:50.440some people fell for it. Now it's in common knowledge.
00:40:50.500 -->
00:40:52.400That's not going to be a thing. Oh, right. He's
00:40:52.400 -->
00:40:55.019not going to give me any money. Instagram just
00:40:55.019 -->
00:41:00.460had a massive hack. 14 .5 million emails, something.
00:41:00.699 -->
00:41:03.139And what happened was the way they did the hack
00:41:03.139 -->
00:41:05.739was this was hilarious because I got one of these
00:41:05.739 -->
00:41:09.480emails and I was like, I didn't. And it's a very
00:41:09.480 -->
00:41:11.599straightforward, looks like it came from Instagram.
00:41:13.079 -->
00:41:16.500Here, someone's requested a password reset for
00:41:16.500 -->
00:41:18.280me. They made it look exactly like the Instagram
00:41:18.280 -->
00:41:19.500one and made it came from there. And I was like,
00:41:19.539 -->
00:41:21.119well, I know I didn't do that. So I'm not clicking
00:41:21.119 -->
00:41:22.679on anything. So I had to learn the lesson. It
00:41:22.679 -->
00:41:25.599turns out, here's the thing. They weren't going
00:41:25.599 -->
00:41:29.039to steal your account. But the link you clicked
00:41:29.039 -->
00:41:31.280on told them that you were someone who would
00:41:31.280 -->
00:41:33.840click on a link like that. And out of that 14
00:41:33.840 -->
00:41:36.739million email addresses they got, they sent out
00:41:36.739 -->
00:41:41.480that phishing email. And they didn't, you know,
00:41:41.500 -->
00:41:43.780maybe break people's accounts because it didn't
00:41:43.780 -->
00:41:46.780really let them do that. But they found out which
00:41:46.780 -->
00:41:49.800out of those 14 .5 millions were extra plus suckers
00:41:49.800 -->
00:41:52.480enough to click on the links. And now they know
00:41:52.480 -->
00:41:54.300that those email addresses are the kind of people
00:41:54.300 -->
00:41:57.199who click on those links. And so if they compromise
00:41:57.199 -->
00:41:59.920a new site in a way that lets them do something
00:41:59.920 -->
00:42:03.820worse, they will know to email those people first.
00:42:04.119 -->
00:42:07.679I think it was in the 19th century or early 20th
00:42:07.679 -->
00:42:09.860century where there were these spiritualist camps
00:42:09.860 -->
00:42:13.739in places like Pennsylvania in the U .S. And
00:42:13.739 -->
00:42:16.860I remember reading that they used to keep sucker
00:42:16.860 -->
00:42:20.059lists. You know, if you were somebody who was
00:42:20.059 -->
00:42:21.780credulous enough to go to one of these things.
00:42:23.440 -->
00:42:26.199That hasn't stopped happening. That's Scientology.
00:42:26.380 -->
00:42:29.480That's like... I remember Damien Walter saying
00:42:29.480 -->
00:42:31.699he used to work for a UFO magazine and he said,
00:42:31.760 -->
00:42:33.860these stories are ridiculous. Why do you print
00:42:33.860 -->
00:42:36.139them? He said, yeah, well, it's because the advertisers
00:42:36.139 -->
00:42:38.000want to target these people because if you're
00:42:38.000 -->
00:42:40.800stupid enough to read these stories and respond
00:42:40.800 -->
00:42:42.840to the advertising, that's exactly who the advertisers
00:42:42.840 -->
00:42:46.159want. And the pig got up and slowly walked away.
00:42:48.199 -->
00:42:52.039All right. And next up is David, who has found
00:42:52.039 -->
00:42:54.280an article about Tony Blair wanting to become
00:42:54.280 -->
00:42:57.679a tech pro. Yeah, this is Tony Blair or sometimes
00:42:57.679 -->
00:43:02.000the Tony Blair Institute. And yeah, he suddenly
00:43:02.000 -->
00:43:06.039declared that he wants for Tony Blair Institute
00:43:06.039 -->
00:43:10.639to build their own AI tools through rival Palantir,
00:43:10.739 -->
00:43:16.009which is odd because the Tony Blair. Institute
00:43:16.009 -->
00:43:18.610doesn't really have the money to become a Palantir
00:43:18.610 -->
00:43:22.090even though they do take funding from Larry Ellison
00:43:22.090 -->
00:43:26.289so that's extremely strange we'll put the link
00:43:26.289 -->
00:43:28.570to it in the notes but even people who worked
00:43:28.570 -->
00:43:32.530at TBI did not understand what on earth the connection
00:43:32.530 -->
00:43:35.650between what they were doing is with Palantir
00:43:35.650 -->
00:43:37.969now I have to say the Tony Blair Institute does
00:43:37.969 -->
00:43:41.130do a lot of strange things a lot of for instance
00:43:41.130 -->
00:43:43.269communication deals in the Middle East which
00:43:43.269 -->
00:43:46.150is the reason why Absolutely no one in Gaza wants
00:43:46.150 -->
00:43:48.230them to do anything whatsoever to do with the
00:43:48.230 -->
00:43:52.449peace plan. But even then, suddenly wanting to
00:43:52.449 -->
00:43:56.769become Palantir is very strange. It's almost
00:43:56.769 -->
00:43:59.489as if he's read the problems of AI and come out
00:43:59.489 -->
00:44:04.090with the completely wrong solution. So it's just
00:44:04.090 -->
00:44:07.460one of the strange ones. what he's taking let's
00:44:07.460 -->
00:44:09.480just dive directly into the black hole strategy
00:44:09.480 -->
00:44:12.619yeah yes yes oh yes let's yes let's build a matrix
00:44:12.619 -->
00:44:15.579yes i don't quite understand as for what he's
00:44:15.579 -->
00:44:17.980doing without larry ellison money well that's
00:44:17.980 -->
00:44:19.960probably something completely different but uh
00:44:19.960 -->
00:44:22.900yeah i just thought that was uh very peculiar
00:44:22.900 -->
00:44:30.260and extremely strange even for tony blair i'm
00:44:30.260 -->
00:44:35.579not being surprised too fair um i mean You know
00:44:35.579 -->
00:44:39.340what? I start to look at these people, and especially
00:44:39.340 -->
00:44:43.800people who have been prime ministers and that
00:44:43.800 -->
00:44:47.900kind of group of people, and they look at the
00:44:47.900 -->
00:44:51.260tech industry and they look at all of these kind
00:44:51.260 -->
00:44:55.920of like Elon Musk and others and go, hey, that's
00:44:55.920 -->
00:44:58.380a really good way to have lots of power. Why
00:44:58.380 -->
00:45:01.860do I do that? And it just strikes me as like,
00:45:01.980 -->
00:45:06.300once again, you know, another one wanting to
00:45:06.300 -->
00:45:11.300grasp a bunch of power and to be meaningful in
00:45:11.300 -->
00:45:16.659some way. And it just... Don't build the torment
00:45:16.659 -->
00:45:19.179nexus, the science fiction writer writes in a
00:45:19.179 -->
00:45:21.559cautionary tale. It's a classic, yeah. And the
00:45:21.559 -->
00:45:24.719tech bros take it as a manual for building the
00:45:24.719 -->
00:45:27.099torment nexus. Some sort of possible challenge,
00:45:27.300 -->
00:45:33.079yeah. How quick, let's build that. It's a cautionary
00:45:33.079 -->
00:45:38.480tale, not an inspirational speech. It's a cautionary
00:45:38.480 -->
00:45:40.820tale, not an instruction manual. Not an instruction.
00:45:41.059 -->
00:45:47.059Please do not do this. All right. And that is
00:45:47.059 -->
00:45:50.280the end of the meat and potatoes of this month's
00:45:50.280 -->
00:45:53.239Tech Grumps. The only thing left is any other
00:45:53.239 -->
00:45:55.559business. And Wendy's going to kick us off for
00:45:55.559 -->
00:46:01.170that. Wendy. Yeah, this goes in the category
00:46:01.170 -->
00:46:05.449of mock the flawed technology. This is from Utah.
00:46:05.710 -->
00:46:09.230At the Park Record, which is a newspaper, Cannon
00:46:09.230 -->
00:46:11.969Taylor reported recently that in late October,
00:46:12.030 -->
00:46:14.809an AI summary indicated that a West Jordan police
00:46:14.809 -->
00:46:18.369officer had morphed into a frog. Simple explanation,
00:46:18.750 -->
00:46:21.550a Harry Potter movie playing in the background
00:46:21.550 -->
00:46:24.250had been recorded by the officer's body cam during
00:46:24.250 -->
00:46:41.809an investigation. Wow, that's so much. You know,
00:46:41.809 -->
00:46:44.269as mistakes go, it's pretty impressive. What
00:46:44.269 -->
00:46:47.010I did like in the rest of the piece was that
00:46:47.010 -->
00:46:48.949apparently some of the counties that have been
00:46:48.949 -->
00:46:51.510trialing the software are using a variant of
00:46:51.510 -->
00:46:53.809the software that actually has a setting where
00:46:53.809 -->
00:46:57.269you can instruct it to insert errors so that
00:46:57.269 -->
00:46:59.570they make sure that you can tell if the police
00:46:59.570 -->
00:47:01.889officer has not thoroughly checked the summary.
00:47:02.699 -->
00:47:05.199I was about to say, that's one of those new things
00:47:05.199 -->
00:47:06.960that you can tell that they've completely removed
00:47:06.960 -->
00:47:08.400all the humans, because it's like you look at
00:47:08.400 -->
00:47:10.940this and go, the only way this made it all the
00:47:10.940 -->
00:47:13.219way to publication is if there was not a single
00:47:13.219 -->
00:47:15.639rational human in between this being recorded
00:47:15.639 -->
00:47:20.440and that going to print. Well, the story was
00:47:20.440 -->
00:47:22.559from a newspaper. It was a newspaper report on
00:47:22.559 -->
00:47:25.920trials of AI software. The problem was that the
00:47:25.920 -->
00:47:31.750summary was actually... He was handed around,
00:47:31.969 -->
00:47:34.550apparently, by the police as a legitimate summary,
00:47:34.710 -->
00:47:40.690and then they read this out. But it is pretty
00:47:40.690 -->
00:47:43.829hilarious, you know. I hope we get to see more
00:47:43.829 -->
00:47:46.530of those, because I love those. Ian, you've got
00:47:46.530 -->
00:47:51.289some stuff for us? I do. I have. I'll start with...
00:47:51.579 -->
00:47:56.360I mentioned it last time. That is FOSDEM 2026,
00:47:56.780 -->
00:48:00.139the end of January. If you're going to be there,
00:48:00.280 -->
00:48:05.119I will be there. Yes, just look out for me. And
00:48:05.119 -->
00:48:08.260then I'm going to move to something a little
00:48:08.260 -->
00:48:12.380bit more serious. Obviously, as serious as FOSDEM.
00:48:12.760 -->
00:48:20.090So every 10 years. The BBC's charter is renewed,
00:48:20.309 -->
00:48:23.250or the World Charter, sorry, is renewed. They
00:48:23.250 -->
00:48:26.710do have a green paper, so the government has
00:48:26.710 -->
00:48:30.190a green paper where they ask for feedback from
00:48:30.190 -->
00:48:33.610the public. I gather that anyone in the world
00:48:33.610 -->
00:48:39.710can add feedback, so please do add feedback to
00:48:39.710 -->
00:48:43.639it, because I think it's important that... um
00:48:43.639 -->
00:48:47.980that the public charter for the uk um it reflects
00:48:47.980 -->
00:48:51.920some of the real problems and emerging problems
00:48:51.920 -->
00:48:57.260that we see and changes in public service platforming
00:48:57.260 -->
00:49:00.900forage oh sorry sorry okay sorry uh and the the
00:49:00.900 -->
00:49:04.880last one is the podcast that i kept on talking
00:49:04.880 -->
00:49:08.940about uh is now live it's called making the familiar
00:49:08.940 -->
00:49:14.969strange It is kind of Love Grumps, but if you
00:49:14.969 -->
00:49:18.070listen to it... Love Grumps 2 .0! No, hold on.
00:49:18.170 -->
00:49:23.489It's like Love Grumps 2 .0, but it's a lot more
00:49:23.489 -->
00:49:27.159serious and a lot more... well produced i'd say
00:49:27.159 -->
00:49:31.500and it includes myself and jessica simmons um
00:49:31.500 -->
00:49:34.400and we are going to have guests so please listen
00:49:34.400 -->
00:49:37.500to it the first one's up there um it's where
00:49:37.500 -->
00:49:39.940you can get podcasts and as i was listening to
00:49:39.940 -->
00:49:44.619um the podcast news it's available on rss so
00:49:44.619 -->
00:49:48.159that means everywhere that's it for me david
00:49:48.159 -->
00:49:51.139sorry this is just a quick one i was just uh
00:49:51.869 -->
00:49:53.789Buying some goods, I was in front of the scanner
00:49:53.789 -->
00:49:56.889just checking out, and I was probably not focusing.
00:49:57.050 -->
00:50:00.469And I pointed the QR code at the scanner, not
00:50:00.469 -->
00:50:03.530the barcode, and I got a nice message from the
00:50:03.530 -->
00:50:06.869machine saying, that's a QR code, not a barcode.
00:50:07.050 -->
00:50:09.869And I just laughed for about three seconds. In
00:50:09.869 -->
00:50:12.110the fortunately fairly empty shop, just a lovely
00:50:12.110 -->
00:50:15.150little programmer sees error and fixes on screen.
00:50:15.250 -->
00:50:16.829I just thought it was absolutely lovely. That's
00:50:16.829 -->
00:50:22.219it. Nice. All right, and that's it for this month's
00:50:22.219 -->
00:50:24.360episode of Tech Grumps. The only thing left is
00:50:24.360 -->
00:50:26.559for all of us to say goodbye. My name is Ren
00:50:26.559 -->
00:50:28.119Alexander. It has been a pleasure talking to
00:50:28.119 -->
00:50:31.719you, and I'm going to pass it to Wendy. I'm Wendy
00:50:31.719 -->
00:50:35.440Grossman, and I'm going to say goodbye and pass
00:50:35.440 -->
00:50:46.739it on to Andy. David. Keep it in. Keep going,
00:50:46.780 -->
00:50:49.159David. This is how people know it's real and
00:50:49.159 -->
00:50:56.260not AI. I'm afraid to say I'm David. Before I
00:50:56.260 -->
00:50:57.780laugh anymore, I'm going to pass it on to Ian.
00:51:02.469 -->
00:51:04.969Thank you for having me. Yeah, this is Ian. And
00:51:04.969 -->
00:51:08.570this is guaranteed human, as some podcasts say.
00:51:09.250 -->
00:51:10.869Bye, everyone. You might think that was a mistake,
00:51:11.010 -->
00:51:13.210but Wendy actually told us she was going to do
00:51:13.210 -->
00:51:14.849it when she talked about intentionally introducing
00:51:14.849 -->
00:51:18.510errors into the police reports. Yeah. She's just
00:51:18.510 -->
00:51:20.530keeping us real. I did try to look for a name
00:51:20.530 -->
00:51:24.269at the bottom like you have on Zoom. All right,
00:51:24.309 -->
00:51:27.829Ian. Bye, everyone. Goodbye.