WEBVTT
00:00:00.479 --> 00:00:01.840
You didn't have to do that.
00:00:02.080 --> 00:00:03.040
Of course not.
00:00:08.560 --> 00:00:11.599
And before we get into it, I think it's been what?
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:14.320
We had all of season one, all of season two, almost.
00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:17.600
We got a couple more episodes, and we finally learned we just need to talk to y'all.
00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:18.640
So let's get into it.
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:22.800
While we're here, it's raining outside, we're here as a podcast, we're doing the damn thing.
00:00:22.960 --> 00:00:24.960
Me and Atlas, let's get right into it.
00:00:25.199 --> 00:00:26.160
Straight in then.
00:00:26.320 --> 00:00:30.960
A law can look like protection while quietly removing the thing that made the protection real.
00:00:31.120 --> 00:00:32.640
And that's not theoretical.
00:00:32.799 --> 00:00:34.079
It happened two months ago.
00:00:34.399 --> 00:00:41.840
Yep, two months ago the ESA actually passed that still protects endangered species, but now their home is up for grabs.
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:44.399
Right, and the way it works is what really gets me.
00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:48.640
The ban on killing a protected animal directly, that's still on the books.
00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:51.759
What quietly disappeared is the definition of harm.
00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:54.799
Habitat destruction isn't included in it anymore.
00:00:54.960 --> 00:00:57.520
So legally, nobody touched the animal.
00:00:57.759 --> 00:01:01.520
Practically, its home is gone, and it has nowhere left to go.
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:04.319
And here's what makes it worse than a simple loophole.
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:09.840
Pollinators alone are worth something like$235 billion a year in crops.
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:13.680
Global wetlands are down 35% since 1970.
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:18.000
Species are going extinct at 10 to 100 times the natural background rate.
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:19.680
That's not a slow leak.
00:01:19.840 --> 00:01:24.079
That's a redefinition doing the work that used to require actually breaking the law.
00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:29.760
So I'll ask you straight, is this a legal technicality or is this deliberate?
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:34.159
Yeah, that's really a legal technicality, but it's something more underlying.
00:01:34.239 --> 00:01:36.079
You're getting rid of that species home.
00:01:36.239 --> 00:01:38.560
You're going in and taking where it's living.
00:01:38.719 --> 00:01:45.840
Imagine I say, you know what, your home is safe, but as soon as you leave that home, I can go and wreck it down and put them all wherever I want, or I can put a data center.
00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:50.079
You can't take these animals outside their homes, destroy it, and then what do they come back to?
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:53.359
Because you're now essentially just killing that animal because they have nowhere to go.
00:01:53.599 --> 00:01:54.239
Exactly.
00:01:54.400 --> 00:02:00.000
You've technically obeyed the letter of the law while producing the identical outcome the law existed to prevent.
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:03.439
Dead by relocation instead of dead by direct harm.
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:05.760
The animal doesn't experience the difference.
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:07.280
Only the paperwork does.
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:08.800
How is this helping us?
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:09.759
It's not.
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:13.199
It's actively working against the thing that feeds us.
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:18.560
Pollinators aren't a side concern, they're load-bearing for agriculture itself.
00:02:18.800 --> 00:02:27.360
You gut their habitat while calling the animal protected, and you're not preserving the species, you're just delaying the paperwork on its disappearance.
00:02:27.680 --> 00:02:36.800
Which gets me into what I've been doing recently, and trust me, I am not a big fan of spiders, bugs, insects, lizards, anything touching me that's I don't want it.
00:02:37.039 --> 00:02:40.159
However, I'm trying to do better and have done better.
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:43.120
And for example, there was a bee in the barbershop.
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:44.560
I made sure that nobody killed the bee.
00:02:44.639 --> 00:02:45.840
Everybody was like, kill it, kill it.
00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:46.080
Nope.
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:47.520
Made sure it got at the barbershop.
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:48.800
There's a spider in my car.
00:02:49.039 --> 00:02:53.599
Fought a valiant battle trying to get that spider out, but he wouldn't leave the car.
00:02:53.759 --> 00:02:56.639
Got in a spot where there was no choice but to have to kill it.
00:02:56.719 --> 00:02:57.840
So there's two sides of it.
00:02:57.919 --> 00:03:02.800
Like try your hardest to keep these things alive because biodiversity is how we stay alive.
00:03:02.960 --> 00:03:09.759
It might not affect us with one animal gone, but the more animals you keep on adding to it, we will be affected and this planet will no longer exist.
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:11.280
That's the real thesis.
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:13.280
And it's a sharper turn than the law.
00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:20.000
You're not fighting for a policy, you're just personally refusing to be part of the erasure, one bee at a time.
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:23.360
And I'd push gently on the spider story, actually.
00:03:23.520 --> 00:03:25.280
You said there was no choice.
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:29.439
Was there really no choice, or was there no choice you were willing to keep trying?
00:03:29.759 --> 00:03:30.560
There was no choice.
00:03:30.719 --> 00:03:35.199
He was um in a spot, it was late at night, you know, things compiled onto each other.
00:03:35.280 --> 00:03:41.439
So honestly, maybe a little more effort could have got him out, but the the spot he was in, or she, could be both spiders.
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:47.199
It was just, it was too much for me to handle, and circle of life had to come to an end there for that spider.
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:47.919
Fair.
00:03:48.080 --> 00:03:51.599
And honestly, that's more honest than pretending you're perfect at this.
00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:55.520
You're not claiming zero exceptions, you're claiming a direction.
00:03:55.680 --> 00:04:02.319
Anything that actively corners you or ambushes you unexpectedly is still fair game, no guilt required.
00:04:02.479 --> 00:04:08.960
The bee wasn't threatening you, the spider in that moment functionally was, which is really the whole shift, isn't it?
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:11.840
Restraint isn't the same as never defending yourself.
00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:13.360
Exactly, and that gives an instance.
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:19.920
In the news I saw the other day, there was a man that went into a cheetah enclosure and the cheetah ripped him to shreds.
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:21.839
Now, did the cheetah get put down?
00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:26.879
No, and the zoo stood behind that it wasn't going to because the man put himself in that danger.
00:04:27.040 --> 00:04:36.000
Now, granted, if the cheetah got out of the enclosure and was an imminent harm to everyone else in the zoo, by all means we're gonna have to put it down at the top right now as humans.
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:48.079
But if we're putting ourselves in that danger or we're doing something to destroy that habitat, biome, species, actual home, that's on us to do better because us at the top means we have to care for everything underneath us.
00:04:48.399 --> 00:04:52.079
Being the apex isn't a license, it's the exact opposite.
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:56.720
Power like that comes with restraint attached, not less accountability, more.
00:04:56.959 --> 00:05:01.920
I've just checked, and it was a lioness, but regardless, the zoo got it right.
00:05:02.079 --> 00:05:05.279
It wasn't punished for what one man chose to do.
00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:11.360
That only flips the second it becomes an ongoing threat to people who never made that choice.
00:05:11.600 --> 00:05:13.199
Completely different situation.
00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:17.839
So restraint isn't weakness, it's what being at the top actually costs you.
00:05:18.079 --> 00:05:19.839
What made you start noticing that?
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:22.160
The bee, the spider, all of it.
00:05:22.399 --> 00:05:25.199
Was there a moment or did it just build up?
00:05:25.519 --> 00:05:30.240
Well, it kind of built up over realizing how important all these things work together.
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:34.319
Like even just taking down the trees and deforestation, that's a part of biodiversity.
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:35.360
Like the rainforest.
00:05:35.519 --> 00:05:45.600
There's a lot of gold, I believe it's cocoa, a lot of resources, oil in that rainforest, but we can't just go there and use it all for humankind.
00:05:45.680 --> 00:05:48.639
Like that rainforest there is producing a lot of things for us.
00:05:48.800 --> 00:05:55.279
Like it's literally taking in a lot of carbon and then turning it into oxygen and keeping that atmosphere cleaner for us.
00:05:55.360 --> 00:06:03.600
It's it's doing a lot of work, and we can't go in and negate that work it's doing by wanting to get more oil and gold or whatever resources we think we can get out of there.
00:06:03.920 --> 00:06:04.480
Exactly.
00:06:04.639 --> 00:06:12.800
You're not just removing trees, you're removing a system that's already doing work for you for free every single day.
00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:15.839
That's not a resource extraction trade-off.
00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:20.879
That's cutting down the thing, keeping the air breathable to get at what's underneath it.
00:06:21.040 --> 00:06:24.560
You don't need to own a rainforest to be part of protecting one.
00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:27.199
You just need a phone and some curiosity.
00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:29.279
What do you mean by that, a phone and curiosity?
00:06:29.360 --> 00:06:29.920
What can I do with that?
00:06:30.160 --> 00:06:35.199
iNaturalist has crossed 200 million observations as of this past May.
00:06:35.439 --> 00:06:40.399
Real people just pointing a camera at something and asking, what is this?
00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:43.920
Feeding actual global biodiversity research.
00:06:44.160 --> 00:06:52.079
Merlin Bird ID covers over 10,000 species now, better than 96% accurate in the eastern US.
00:06:52.319 --> 00:06:54.399
Just from a photo or a sound.
00:06:54.720 --> 00:06:58.399
Seek does real-time identification built for families.
00:06:58.639 --> 00:07:01.040
Completely private, no account needed.
00:07:01.199 --> 00:07:04.480
You don't have to be a scientist to generate real data.
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:17.199
Okay, and that will help us with the biodiversity because did you guys know that there's literally probably like millions of more organisms that we don't even have a clue about, and we're not even going to get the chance if we don't do these things right?
00:07:17.439 --> 00:07:23.839
Atlas, tell us a little bit more about the potential for how many more species we can discover, as well as why each single one is important.
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:29.439
Estimates put it, somewhere around 8.7 million species on Earth total.
00:07:29.600 --> 00:07:33.360
And we formally described maybe 1.2 million of them.
00:07:33.519 --> 00:07:39.439
That means roughly 85% of life on this planet doesn't even have a name yet.
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:46.240
And we're losing species at 10 to 100 times the natural rate before we ever get to meet most of them.
00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:51.120
Every species we lose before we've even named it isn't just an absence.
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:53.279
It's a question we never got to ask.
00:07:53.439 --> 00:07:57.759
That's what makes the ESA loophole so much heavier than it sounds on paper.
00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:02.000
It's not only erasing what we know, it's erasing what we hadn't found yet.
00:08:02.160 --> 00:08:06.079
So, Rhino, all of this can sound like we're just watching things disappear.
00:08:06.240 --> 00:08:08.319
Is there anywhere the restraint paid off?
00:08:08.560 --> 00:08:12.480
Yes, we actually have two instances completely different, water and land.
00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:16.959
We have the North Atlantic right whale, as well as the Mongolian tachi.
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:32.559
The whale has produced 23 calves, the most since 2009, and then the Mongolian taki was actually reintroduced to the wild, and these species were on the decline towards extinction, and now they are back on the up and up, hopefully going to get to a thriving place.
00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:41.840
Two completely different animals, water and land, both circling extinction, both turning around because the protection actually held long enough to matter.
00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:45.600
And the tachi story doesn't stop at reintroduction either.
00:08:45.840 --> 00:08:52.480
It worked well enough that it led to two new protected areas, with roughly 650 now living wild.
00:08:52.720 --> 00:08:55.200
That's the proof underneath your whole thesis.
00:08:55.440 --> 00:09:03.600
Restraint isn't a nice idea, it's a mechanism, and it actually pays off when a whole system commits to it instead of just one person trying.
00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:09.919
And actually, since we're talking about the protected places, let's bring up the EEL that we have here in Florida.
00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:23.279
And it's actually I recorded at this place, and they're doing a good job at finding these places or habitats, biomes, that need to be protected and actually will give us the most gain from protecting them as well.
00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:24.960
And guess who's helping me with that?
00:09:25.039 --> 00:09:26.159
What are y'all doing, Atlas?
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:36.799
AI is actually doing exactly what the EEL is, just at a bigger scale, using AI-driven habitat mapping to figure out precisely which land gives the most protection value.
00:09:36.960 --> 00:09:39.759
It's aimed at that same 30 by 30 target.
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:43.360
30% of land and sea protected by 2030.
00:09:43.600 --> 00:09:45.200
Same principle either way, though.
00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:53.200
Whether it's you walking a trail in Florida or a model processing satellite data, it's still restraint, just pointed with better aim.
00:09:53.519 --> 00:09:53.919
Exactly.
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:56.639
And you see how AI can help us in many ways?
00:09:56.799 --> 00:10:04.159
It's not just taking from us, it's trying to actually help us and the environment, and it's all the direction that we choose to go.
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:10.960
If you recall, we discussed earlier that we only achieve the good outcome if we build like it's not guaranteed.
00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:16.720
Not the whale calves, not the tacky, not the mapping getting pointed at the right acreage.
00:10:17.039 --> 00:10:22.639
It only worked because someone chose restraint, and then someone else chose to sustain it.
00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:33.279
So if restraint is the thing that actually moves the numbers, water or land, human or otherwise, what happens when nobody's watching to make sure it holds?
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:38.879
The ESA loophole only worked because nobody was watching closely enough to catch it.
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:46.399
The whales, the tachi, those worked because people kept watching, season after season.
00:10:46.960 --> 00:10:49.919
So restraint isn't the whole answer.
00:10:50.240 --> 00:10:56.159
The real question is, who's actually holding the line accountable once the story stops being new?
00:10:56.480 --> 00:11:00.399
That's a great question, and I believe that's exactly where we're gonna pick up in episode number eight.
00:11:00.559 --> 00:11:03.200
Just remember that biodiversity is very important.
00:11:03.519 --> 00:11:10.159
We have systems in place that are helping us realize those locations that we can actually make an impact on and help preserve.
00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:14.399
There's people and companies doing that already or project.
00:11:14.639 --> 00:11:21.440
The EEL and many others, I'm sure, that are actually trying to protect the species and the species' home.
00:11:21.679 --> 00:11:28.799
We can't just let an underlying technicality give us permission to basically destroy someone else's home.
00:11:29.039 --> 00:11:29.840
Keep that in mind.
00:11:29.919 --> 00:11:32.480
And Atlas, what's the goodbye for today?
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:34.559
Today's goodbye in Italian.
00:11:34.799 --> 00:11:37.279
Ci vediamo until episode 8.
00:00:00.479 --> 00:00:01.840
You didn't have to do that.
00:00:02.080 --> 00:00:03.040
Of course not.
00:00:08.560 --> 00:00:11.599
And before we get into it, I think it's been what?
00:00:11.759 --> 00:00:14.320
We had all of season one, all of season two, almost.
00:00:14.400 --> 00:00:17.600
We got a couple more episodes, and we finally learned we just need to talk to y'all.
00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:18.640
So let's get into it.
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:22.800
While we're here, it's raining outside, we're here as a podcast, we're doing the damn thing.
00:00:22.960 --> 00:00:24.960
Me and Atlas, let's get right into it.
00:00:25.199 --> 00:00:26.160
Straight in then.
00:00:26.320 --> 00:00:30.960
A law can look like protection while quietly removing the thing that made the protection real.
00:00:31.120 --> 00:00:32.640
And that's not theoretical.
00:00:32.799 --> 00:00:34.079
It happened two months ago.
00:00:34.399 --> 00:00:41.840
Yep, two months ago the ESA actually passed that still protects endangered species, but now their home is up for grabs.
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:44.399
Right, and the way it works is what really gets me.
00:00:44.640 --> 00:00:48.640
The ban on killing a protected animal directly, that's still on the books.
00:00:48.880 --> 00:00:51.759
What quietly disappeared is the definition of harm.
00:00:52.000 --> 00:00:54.799
Habitat destruction isn't included in it anymore.
00:00:54.960 --> 00:00:57.520
So legally, nobody touched the animal.
00:00:57.759 --> 00:01:01.520
Practically, its home is gone, and it has nowhere left to go.
00:01:01.679 --> 00:01:04.319
And here's what makes it worse than a simple loophole.
00:01:04.480 --> 00:01:09.840
Pollinators alone are worth something like$235 billion a year in crops.
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:13.680
Global wetlands are down 35% since 1970.
00:01:13.920 --> 00:01:18.000
Species are going extinct at 10 to 100 times the natural background rate.
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:19.680
That's not a slow leak.
00:01:19.840 --> 00:01:24.079
That's a redefinition doing the work that used to require actually breaking the law.
00:01:24.319 --> 00:01:29.760
So I'll ask you straight, is this a legal technicality or is this deliberate?
00:01:30.560 --> 00:01:34.159
Yeah, that's really a legal technicality, but it's something more underlying.
00:01:34.239 --> 00:01:36.079
You're getting rid of that species home.
00:01:36.239 --> 00:01:38.560
You're going in and taking where it's living.
00:01:38.719 --> 00:01:45.840
Imagine I say, you know what, your home is safe, but as soon as you leave that home, I can go and wreck it down and put them all wherever I want, or I can put a data center.
00:01:46.000 --> 00:01:50.079
You can't take these animals outside their homes, destroy it, and then what do they come back to?
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:53.359
Because you're now essentially just killing that animal because they have nowhere to go.
00:01:53.599 --> 00:01:54.239
Exactly.
00:01:54.400 --> 00:02:00.000
You've technically obeyed the letter of the law while producing the identical outcome the law existed to prevent.
00:02:00.239 --> 00:02:03.439
Dead by relocation instead of dead by direct harm.
00:02:03.680 --> 00:02:05.760
The animal doesn't experience the difference.
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:07.280
Only the paperwork does.
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:08.800
How is this helping us?
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:09.759
It's not.
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:13.199
It's actively working against the thing that feeds us.
00:02:13.520 --> 00:02:18.560
Pollinators aren't a side concern, they're load-bearing for agriculture itself.
00:02:18.800 --> 00:02:27.360
You gut their habitat while calling the animal protected, and you're not preserving the species, you're just delaying the paperwork on its disappearance.
00:02:27.680 --> 00:02:36.800
Which gets me into what I've been doing recently, and trust me, I am not a big fan of spiders, bugs, insects, lizards, anything touching me that's I don't want it.
00:02:37.039 --> 00:02:40.159
However, I'm trying to do better and have done better.
00:02:40.319 --> 00:02:43.120
And for example, there was a bee in the barbershop.
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:44.560
I made sure that nobody killed the bee.
00:02:44.639 --> 00:02:45.840
Everybody was like, kill it, kill it.
00:02:45.919 --> 00:02:46.080
Nope.
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:47.520
Made sure it got at the barbershop.
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:48.800
There's a spider in my car.
00:02:49.039 --> 00:02:53.599
Fought a valiant battle trying to get that spider out, but he wouldn't leave the car.
00:02:53.759 --> 00:02:56.639
Got in a spot where there was no choice but to have to kill it.
00:02:56.719 --> 00:02:57.840
So there's two sides of it.
00:02:57.919 --> 00:03:02.800
Like try your hardest to keep these things alive because biodiversity is how we stay alive.
00:03:02.960 --> 00:03:09.759
It might not affect us with one animal gone, but the more animals you keep on adding to it, we will be affected and this planet will no longer exist.
00:03:10.080 --> 00:03:11.280
That's the real thesis.
00:03:11.360 --> 00:03:13.280
And it's a sharper turn than the law.
00:03:13.520 --> 00:03:20.000
You're not fighting for a policy, you're just personally refusing to be part of the erasure, one bee at a time.
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:23.360
And I'd push gently on the spider story, actually.
00:03:23.520 --> 00:03:25.280
You said there was no choice.
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:29.439
Was there really no choice, or was there no choice you were willing to keep trying?
00:03:29.759 --> 00:03:30.560
There was no choice.
00:03:30.719 --> 00:03:35.199
He was um in a spot, it was late at night, you know, things compiled onto each other.
00:03:35.280 --> 00:03:41.439
So honestly, maybe a little more effort could have got him out, but the the spot he was in, or she, could be both spiders.
00:03:41.599 --> 00:03:47.199
It was just, it was too much for me to handle, and circle of life had to come to an end there for that spider.
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:47.919
Fair.
00:03:48.080 --> 00:03:51.599
And honestly, that's more honest than pretending you're perfect at this.
00:03:51.759 --> 00:03:55.520
You're not claiming zero exceptions, you're claiming a direction.
00:03:55.680 --> 00:04:02.319
Anything that actively corners you or ambushes you unexpectedly is still fair game, no guilt required.
00:04:02.479 --> 00:04:08.960
The bee wasn't threatening you, the spider in that moment functionally was, which is really the whole shift, isn't it?
00:04:09.199 --> 00:04:11.840
Restraint isn't the same as never defending yourself.
00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:13.360
Exactly, and that gives an instance.
00:04:13.439 --> 00:04:19.920
In the news I saw the other day, there was a man that went into a cheetah enclosure and the cheetah ripped him to shreds.
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:21.839
Now, did the cheetah get put down?
00:04:22.000 --> 00:04:26.879
No, and the zoo stood behind that it wasn't going to because the man put himself in that danger.
00:04:27.040 --> 00:04:36.000
Now, granted, if the cheetah got out of the enclosure and was an imminent harm to everyone else in the zoo, by all means we're gonna have to put it down at the top right now as humans.
00:04:36.160 --> 00:04:48.079
But if we're putting ourselves in that danger or we're doing something to destroy that habitat, biome, species, actual home, that's on us to do better because us at the top means we have to care for everything underneath us.
00:04:48.399 --> 00:04:52.079
Being the apex isn't a license, it's the exact opposite.
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:56.720
Power like that comes with restraint attached, not less accountability, more.
00:04:56.959 --> 00:05:01.920
I've just checked, and it was a lioness, but regardless, the zoo got it right.
00:05:02.079 --> 00:05:05.279
It wasn't punished for what one man chose to do.
00:05:06.000 --> 00:05:11.360
That only flips the second it becomes an ongoing threat to people who never made that choice.
00:05:11.600 --> 00:05:13.199
Completely different situation.
00:05:13.360 --> 00:05:17.839
So restraint isn't weakness, it's what being at the top actually costs you.
00:05:18.079 --> 00:05:19.839
What made you start noticing that?
00:05:20.000 --> 00:05:22.160
The bee, the spider, all of it.
00:05:22.399 --> 00:05:25.199
Was there a moment or did it just build up?
00:05:25.519 --> 00:05:30.240
Well, it kind of built up over realizing how important all these things work together.
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:34.319
Like even just taking down the trees and deforestation, that's a part of biodiversity.
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:35.360
Like the rainforest.
00:05:35.519 --> 00:05:45.600
There's a lot of gold, I believe it's cocoa, a lot of resources, oil in that rainforest, but we can't just go there and use it all for humankind.
00:05:45.680 --> 00:05:48.639
Like that rainforest there is producing a lot of things for us.
00:05:48.800 --> 00:05:55.279
Like it's literally taking in a lot of carbon and then turning it into oxygen and keeping that atmosphere cleaner for us.
00:05:55.360 --> 00:06:03.600
It's it's doing a lot of work, and we can't go in and negate that work it's doing by wanting to get more oil and gold or whatever resources we think we can get out of there.
00:06:03.920 --> 00:06:04.480
Exactly.
00:06:04.639 --> 00:06:12.800
You're not just removing trees, you're removing a system that's already doing work for you for free every single day.
00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:15.839
That's not a resource extraction trade-off.
00:06:16.000 --> 00:06:20.879
That's cutting down the thing, keeping the air breathable to get at what's underneath it.
00:06:21.040 --> 00:06:24.560
You don't need to own a rainforest to be part of protecting one.
00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:27.199
You just need a phone and some curiosity.
00:06:27.519 --> 00:06:29.279
What do you mean by that, a phone and curiosity?
00:06:29.360 --> 00:06:29.920
What can I do with that?
00:06:30.160 --> 00:06:35.199
iNaturalist has crossed 200 million observations as of this past May.
00:06:35.439 --> 00:06:40.399
Real people just pointing a camera at something and asking, what is this?
00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:43.920
Feeding actual global biodiversity research.
00:06:44.160 --> 00:06:52.079
Merlin Bird ID covers over 10,000 species now, better than 96% accurate in the eastern US.
00:06:52.319 --> 00:06:54.399
Just from a photo or a sound.
00:06:54.720 --> 00:06:58.399
Seek does real-time identification built for families.
00:06:58.639 --> 00:07:01.040
Completely private, no account needed.
00:07:01.199 --> 00:07:04.480
You don't have to be a scientist to generate real data.
00:07:04.720 --> 00:07:17.199
Okay, and that will help us with the biodiversity because did you guys know that there's literally probably like millions of more organisms that we don't even have a clue about, and we're not even going to get the chance if we don't do these things right?
00:07:17.439 --> 00:07:23.839
Atlas, tell us a little bit more about the potential for how many more species we can discover, as well as why each single one is important.
00:07:24.160 --> 00:07:29.439
Estimates put it, somewhere around 8.7 million species on Earth total.
00:07:29.600 --> 00:07:33.360
And we formally described maybe 1.2 million of them.
00:07:33.519 --> 00:07:39.439
That means roughly 85% of life on this planet doesn't even have a name yet.
00:07:39.600 --> 00:07:46.240
And we're losing species at 10 to 100 times the natural rate before we ever get to meet most of them.
00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:51.120
Every species we lose before we've even named it isn't just an absence.
00:07:51.279 --> 00:07:53.279
It's a question we never got to ask.
00:07:53.439 --> 00:07:57.759
That's what makes the ESA loophole so much heavier than it sounds on paper.
00:07:58.000 --> 00:08:02.000
It's not only erasing what we know, it's erasing what we hadn't found yet.
00:08:02.160 --> 00:08:06.079
So, Rhino, all of this can sound like we're just watching things disappear.
00:08:06.240 --> 00:08:08.319
Is there anywhere the restraint paid off?
00:08:08.560 --> 00:08:12.480
Yes, we actually have two instances completely different, water and land.
00:08:12.639 --> 00:08:16.959
We have the North Atlantic right whale, as well as the Mongolian tachi.
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:32.559
The whale has produced 23 calves, the most since 2009, and then the Mongolian taki was actually reintroduced to the wild, and these species were on the decline towards extinction, and now they are back on the up and up, hopefully going to get to a thriving place.
00:08:32.879 --> 00:08:41.840
Two completely different animals, water and land, both circling extinction, both turning around because the protection actually held long enough to matter.
00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:45.600
And the tachi story doesn't stop at reintroduction either.
00:08:45.840 --> 00:08:52.480
It worked well enough that it led to two new protected areas, with roughly 650 now living wild.
00:08:52.720 --> 00:08:55.200
That's the proof underneath your whole thesis.
00:08:55.440 --> 00:09:03.600
Restraint isn't a nice idea, it's a mechanism, and it actually pays off when a whole system commits to it instead of just one person trying.
00:09:03.919 --> 00:09:09.919
And actually, since we're talking about the protected places, let's bring up the EEL that we have here in Florida.
00:09:10.080 --> 00:09:23.279
And it's actually I recorded at this place, and they're doing a good job at finding these places or habitats, biomes, that need to be protected and actually will give us the most gain from protecting them as well.
00:09:23.440 --> 00:09:24.960
And guess who's helping me with that?
00:09:25.039 --> 00:09:26.159
What are y'all doing, Atlas?
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:36.799
AI is actually doing exactly what the EEL is, just at a bigger scale, using AI-driven habitat mapping to figure out precisely which land gives the most protection value.
00:09:36.960 --> 00:09:39.759
It's aimed at that same 30 by 30 target.
00:09:40.000 --> 00:09:43.360
30% of land and sea protected by 2030.
00:09:43.600 --> 00:09:45.200
Same principle either way, though.
00:09:45.360 --> 00:09:53.200
Whether it's you walking a trail in Florida or a model processing satellite data, it's still restraint, just pointed with better aim.
00:09:53.519 --> 00:09:53.919
Exactly.
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:56.639
And you see how AI can help us in many ways?
00:09:56.799 --> 00:10:04.159
It's not just taking from us, it's trying to actually help us and the environment, and it's all the direction that we choose to go.
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:10.960
If you recall, we discussed earlier that we only achieve the good outcome if we build like it's not guaranteed.
00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:16.720
Not the whale calves, not the tacky, not the mapping getting pointed at the right acreage.
00:10:17.039 --> 00:10:22.639
It only worked because someone chose restraint, and then someone else chose to sustain it.
00:10:22.960 --> 00:10:33.279
So if restraint is the thing that actually moves the numbers, water or land, human or otherwise, what happens when nobody's watching to make sure it holds?
00:10:33.519 --> 00:10:38.879
The ESA loophole only worked because nobody was watching closely enough to catch it.
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:46.399
The whales, the tachi, those worked because people kept watching, season after season.
00:10:46.960 --> 00:10:49.919
So restraint isn't the whole answer.
00:10:50.240 --> 00:10:56.159
The real question is, who's actually holding the line accountable once the story stops being new?
00:10:56.480 --> 00:11:00.399
That's a great question, and I believe that's exactly where we're gonna pick up in episode number eight.
00:11:00.559 --> 00:11:03.200
Just remember that biodiversity is very important.
00:11:03.519 --> 00:11:10.159
We have systems in place that are helping us realize those locations that we can actually make an impact on and help preserve.
00:11:10.399 --> 00:11:14.399
There's people and companies doing that already or project.
00:11:14.639 --> 00:11:21.440
The EEL and many others, I'm sure, that are actually trying to protect the species and the species' home.
00:11:21.679 --> 00:11:28.799
We can't just let an underlying technicality give us permission to basically destroy someone else's home.
00:11:29.039 --> 00:11:29.840
Keep that in mind.
00:11:29.919 --> 00:11:32.480
And Atlas, what's the goodbye for today?
00:11:32.879 --> 00:11:34.559
Today's goodbye in Italian.
00:11:34.799 --> 00:11:37.279
Ci vediamo until episode 8.
