ABOUT THIS EPISODE
What happened
RawStory reports that Texas Republican Senate nominee Ken Paxton released an ad on October 2, 2026, acknowledging that groceries, rent, and insurance “keep climbing,” then blaming “liberal politicians” for worsening the strain. The ad features Paxton’s daughter, Mattie Hayworth, presenting him as the politician who will fight back.
Critics pointed to the obvious problem: Republicans held the White House and both chambers of Congress, while their party had controlled every Texas statewide elected office since 1999 and the Texas House since 2003. Paxton nevertheless singled out Democratic rival James Talarico, accusing him of making it harder for Texans to get ahead.
CNN fact-checker Daniel Dale also noted that the ad contradicts President Donald Trump’s claim that prices were falling rapidly. The reported “backfire” was the ensuing online ridicule, not evidence that the ad changed voters’ opinions or altered the race.
Power has a mailing address
The ad speaks as though “liberal politicians” govern Texas from an undisclosed bunker. They do not. Republicans have controlled the state’s principal institutions for decades. At the federal level, their party controlled the elected branches identified in the report when Paxton released the ad.
That does not prove Republican officials caused every price increase. Inflation, rent, insurance, and grocery costs do not share one cause or one policymaker. But anyone assigning political responsibility must begin with the officials empowered to tax, regulate, appropriate, and govern. Paxton’s message instead makes authority disappear precisely where his party holds it.
The candidate posing as the opposition
Paxton does not merely belong to the governing party. He has been a statewide officeholder within the political order his advertisement carefully avoids naming. Yet the ad casts him as an outsider arriving to confront conditions produced under institutions his party runs.
His daughter’s role softens the delivery, but it does not repair the argument. “They” remain conveniently vague: powerful enough to raise the cost of living across Texas, yet somehow untouched by three decades of Republican electoral control. The ambiguity is functional. It lets Paxton claim the posture of resistance without accounting for the record of government.
A contradiction inside the party line
The advertisement creates another problem for Republicans: it concedes that families are still being squeezed. Dale identified the conflict with Trump’s assertion that prices were already dropping rapidly.
Paxton’s solution is not to reconcile those competing claims. It is to acknowledge pain locally while redirecting responsibility toward Democrats. That is less an economic explanation than a messaging maneuver: validate what voters can see, preserve the party’s innocence, and nominate an enemy.
Ridicule is not accountability
RawStory frames the episode as an ad that “backfires,” but the evidence presented establishes online criticism, not electoral damage. Posts from journalists, a Democratic representative, and a political commentator show that the contradiction was noticed. They do not establish what Texas voters believed or how the campaign was affected.
That distinction matters. Calling a campaign message ridiculous can expose its incoherence, but it does not neutralize it. Repetition, partisan loyalty, and unequal access to political attention can keep a weak claim useful long after critics have dismantled it.
Government without responsibility
The larger pattern is rule without ownership. A dominant party claims credit when conditions improve, invents obstructive enemies when they worsen, and campaigns against the consequences surrounding its own tenure.
Paxton’s ad offers no demonstrated chain connecting Talarico or unnamed liberals to the listed costs. It offers a simpler bargain: accept that life is more expensive, then blame actors with less institutional power. The misdirection is the point. It converts a governing record into a grievance and asks voters to return power to the people insisting they never truly had it.
Thanks to Raw Story
Source: Ridicule as Ken Paxton’s ‘silly’ campaign ad backfires: ‘Voters aren’t stupid’
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit paulstsmith.substack.com/subscribe