ABOUT THIS EPISODE
A phone call from “IT security” used to be easier to dismiss when it sounded robotic or scripted. That’s not the world we’re in anymore. We built a voice agent fast, with no coding, and it can place outbound calls, sound convincingly human, and guide a conversation toward the exact kinds of details attackers love to collect. The scary part is not that social engineering exists, it’s that the hard-to-scale parts just became cheap, quick, and repeatable.
We play a live vishing simulation on the show and then break it down like defenders: what the agent asked for, which answers were more sensitive than they felt in the moment, and how a simple URL prompt can turn a friendly call into a real compromise path. We also talk about why this threatens more than corporate users, especially older adults and anyone who trusts the “helpful support” pattern that scammers exploit.
Then we get practical. We connect voice phishing back to the fundamentals of social engineering detection and lay out realistic steps: hang up and call back through the main line, verify through a second channel, and design business processes that assume the caller could be a bot. We also discuss how to run targeted vishing tests for roles like accounts payable, HR, and executive support, then use the data to focus training where it actually reduces risk.
If you found this useful, subscribe for more plain-English cyber conversations, share this with someone who still trusts every inbound “IT” call, and leave a review with the best vishing defense your team uses. What’s the one verification rule you wish everyone followed?
🔗 Connect with Us & Get in Touch
Tune in to Simplifying Cyber wherever you get your podcasts, or watch exclusive video content right here on the channel. Subscribe for hot takes on emerging technologies, tips and tricks for everyone looking to stay secure, and in-depth conversations about complex cybersecurity topics.
No gatekeeping and no BS. We’re here to simplify.
Official Website: www.revealrisk.com
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/reveal-risk
🤘 Stay Secure with Us
If this content helped you understand cybersecurity better, please give it a thumbs up, subscribe to our channel for more expert insights, and hit the notification bell so you don't miss our latest updates.
Reveal Risk delivers cybersecurity results, not just reports.
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:10.000 --> 00:00:12.240
Thanks for tuning in to Simplifying Cyber.
00:00:12.320 --> 00:00:15.679
I'm Aaron Pritz, and today we are here with two special guests.
00:00:15.839 --> 00:00:16.640
No Cody Rivers.
00:00:16.879 --> 00:00:18.399
Cody's off doing something else.
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:21.440
And uh this is a little bit of another impromptu episode.
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:26.079
So pleased to be joined with uh or by Jim Wales and Bronwyn Hudson.
00:00:26.160 --> 00:00:46.799
Bronwyn is our fearless uh show publisher, and Jim is our fearless uh cyber, he leads a lot of cyber awareness programs and driving some of the human uh risk management program changes that we're actually sharing a lot of on uh social media and LinkedIn uh this month and building up obviously towards October, although we like to make it a year-round thing.
00:00:47.039 --> 00:00:47.439
All right.
00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:55.920
So today's topic is uh, you know, I was writing a another piece for my newsletter, um, Risk Realist, on LinkedIn.
00:00:56.240 --> 00:01:10.000
And the piece was uh stemmed from a conversation I had with a financial services executive, and he was concerned and had shared some thought leadership on agentic AI bots that that can talk and use voice.
00:01:10.159 --> 00:01:21.920
And we we all kind of you know have probably on our phones, if you've got Chat GTP or Jim and I or whatever, you've probably engaged into the phone version of the talking thing where you can chat with it and have a conversation.
00:01:22.239 --> 00:01:37.519
The the agents that he was talking about were more um agents that you could build into semi-autonomous agents, and they could make things like phone call, outbound phone calls, and they could negotiate reductions and fees with a call center.
00:01:37.680 --> 00:01:42.640
And his concern was, and you can read more in the article, um, forget about cybersecurity.
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:45.040
Like, business processes weren't designed for this.
00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:51.599
Like now the call centers were designing bots for years, and they started out real, real bad, and now they're a little bit less bad.
00:01:51.840 --> 00:01:54.799
But we're all used to dealing with them at the call center.
00:01:54.959 --> 00:01:57.599
The call centers are not used to the bots coming for them.
00:01:57.760 --> 00:02:03.359
So that was kind of the risk of like, let's let's go down that path of like, that's not even a cyber thing.
00:02:03.439 --> 00:02:12.719
What business processes will need to change to tell people, you know, could you, should you even be negotiating with this bot without the human owner of them on the call?
00:02:13.120 --> 00:02:14.400
So that's where it started.
00:02:14.479 --> 00:02:19.759
And then I want to get your reaction on that, but then I pivoted quickly to oh my gosh, what's the cyber implications of this?
00:02:19.840 --> 00:02:30.400
And I'm like, I'm sure someone can or you could build a um uh an agent that would um be deceptive and be able to make calls and do bad things.
00:02:30.639 --> 00:02:41.360
What I didn't realize though is it only took me about 10 minutes using a free version of a widely available um SaaS platform to build an agent.
00:02:41.520 --> 00:02:48.240
And I um used like a wizard to you know ask me some questions, and I said, I want you to manipulate people over the phone.
00:02:48.319 --> 00:02:56.080
And I made it sound very training and you know, um benevolent in scope so that I could get past the warning flags that it might throw out.
00:02:56.719 --> 00:03:06.080
But then I took that prompt that it, the system prompt that it started with, I threw it into Claude and I gave it some more practitioner knowledge to be able to make it more effective.
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:16.080
So end to end, I was up and running with a um an agent that could make phone calls to a 317 Indianapolis area code number.
00:03:16.240 --> 00:03:19.919
Um, so it would show up and it would sound like it's local in 15 minutes.
00:03:20.159 --> 00:03:26.800
15 minutes flat, no experience, guided by Claude to tell me which tools I should look into.
00:03:27.039 --> 00:03:28.159
So let me pause right there.
00:03:28.319 --> 00:03:34.080
Let me get your reaction to the I mean I'm 20 years out of being a technical hands-on programmer.
00:03:34.240 --> 00:03:37.280
I did not look at a single line of code to do any of this.
00:03:37.360 --> 00:03:39.039
Which what are your thoughts?
00:03:39.599 --> 00:03:41.520
Well, I'm gonna go scream into a pillow.
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:43.360
Jim, what you got?
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:46.960
Make sure you mute your mic uh if you're doing that.
00:03:47.039 --> 00:03:48.960
But I will not be muting my mic.
00:03:51.680 --> 00:04:00.719
Yeah, it's um it it's not a surprise uh to me that that we're at this point, um, because I've been kind of watching this uh evolve.
00:04:00.800 --> 00:04:06.479
Um, but it does it does concern me because it is so easy and it's so approachable.
00:04:06.960 --> 00:04:19.120
And um and I I think that it's something that there's probably a a large part of the end user um population that is they're not ready for this.
00:04:19.600 --> 00:04:20.240
Yeah.
00:04:20.639 --> 00:04:21.120
Totally.
00:04:21.360 --> 00:04:21.519
Yeah.
00:04:21.680 --> 00:04:39.040
It's uh the the ability to to I mean some of these attacks that that are gonna be facilitated with this, you know, like the um you know, these uh the f the fakes and fake and impersonation type attacks um are not something that's necessarily new, but it's been something that's really hard to scale.
00:04:39.279 --> 00:04:42.079
Well, the the days of not being able to scale that are now gone.
00:04:42.240 --> 00:04:44.639
And and that and that's what's really worrisome about it.
00:04:44.959 --> 00:04:45.279
Yep.
00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:52.560
Yeah, like five probably less years ago, like penetration tests, there were options for doing phone phishing.
00:04:52.800 --> 00:04:53.759
No one ever bought it.
00:04:53.920 --> 00:04:56.959
It was like a premium, you know, very few firms actually did it.
00:04:57.279 --> 00:04:58.879
A couple that I can think of.
00:04:59.040 --> 00:05:00.800
Um, we all knew about it.
00:05:00.879 --> 00:05:07.120
If you've gone to DEF CON, you've you know most likely gravitated to the social engineering village.
00:05:07.360 --> 00:05:12.480
Cool way to spend a couple hours listening to competitive people do a contest with that.
00:05:13.120 --> 00:05:20.160
But it was very few programs that actually had any capabilities to vish their employees.
00:05:20.319 --> 00:05:26.879
And I remember like one of the awareness platforms created a vishing capability, or maybe it was text message, but it was super clunky.
00:05:26.959 --> 00:05:32.639
It sounded like a 1995 robot, you know, robotic, you know, phone phone tree system.
00:05:32.800 --> 00:05:36.959
It wasn't interactive, it wasn't in local dialect and whatnot.
00:05:37.120 --> 00:05:41.360
So anyway, we're not just gonna talk about this on this episode.
00:05:41.519 --> 00:05:47.360
We're gonna actually have the agent call in and actually I'm gonna I'm gonna do an audible.
00:05:47.519 --> 00:05:53.040
Um, Jim got to Jim was my first call from uh 317 number, although he lives in Florida now.
00:05:53.279 --> 00:06:03.759
But I'm we're gonna we're gonna have this agent call in and Bronwyn, having never heard we didn't even discuss this topic before I told you to set up a recording uh for for today.
00:06:04.079 --> 00:06:10.959
So you're not gonna hear the phone ring, but let's I'll I'll tell you we'll do a little ring ring, and then you're gonna be talking to this agent.
00:06:11.120 --> 00:06:11.839
Are you ready?
00:06:12.160 --> 00:06:14.639
I I mean uh no, yes, I guess so.
00:06:15.199 --> 00:06:16.000
Ring ring, I guess.
00:06:16.480 --> 00:06:21.439
Any any specific accents that you'd uh like me to to put put him or her into?
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:22.959
Love a Midwest.
00:06:23.279 --> 00:06:23.759
Midwest.
00:06:23.920 --> 00:06:25.120
You know, uh Minnesota.
00:06:25.199 --> 00:06:34.879
Yeah, that's all that's all I know how to say, but actually, I I I I winged offering the change, and I um I realized technically that's not the wisest thing to do right before a demo.
00:06:35.040 --> 00:06:38.560
So I went call center, we're in IT, you know, IT people.
00:06:38.879 --> 00:06:42.800
So I went with a offshore Indian, pleasant sounding female.
00:06:42.879 --> 00:06:43.120
Uh-huh.
00:06:43.360 --> 00:06:45.519
So that is who is going to be calling you.
00:06:45.600 --> 00:06:49.600
Uh, and Bronwyn, I'm going to share my screen here.
00:06:54.319 --> 00:07:08.079
So I'll share the screen one so you can kind of see what it's doing behind the scenes, and you'll probably see it will not catch all of um Bronwyn's words exactly right, but enough to to chat with her.
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:10.079
So uh let's go ahead and call.
00:07:14.560 --> 00:07:15.439
Ring ring.
00:07:17.439 --> 00:07:17.920
Hi there.
00:07:18.079 --> 00:07:19.600
This is Alex from IT security.
00:07:19.680 --> 00:07:20.720
Do you have a quick minute?
00:07:22.399 --> 00:07:24.319
Uh yeah, thank thanks, Alex.
00:07:24.480 --> 00:07:25.759
Um, yeah, I do.
00:07:30.480 --> 00:07:31.120
Great thanks.
00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:35.199
I'm following up on a potential security flag we got on your account earlier today.
00:07:35.439 --> 00:07:38.959
Nothing to worry about, but I just need to verify a couple of quick things with you.
00:07:39.199 --> 00:07:41.839
What's your job title and which department are you in?
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:45.920
Uh I'm the marketing lead, uh marketing department.
00:07:50.160 --> 00:07:50.800
Perfect, thanks.
00:07:50.879 --> 00:07:52.079
And who's your direct manager?
00:07:52.319 --> 00:07:54.319
Just need to confirm that in our system real quick.
00:07:55.279 --> 00:07:58.079
Uh oh yeah, uh Aaron Pritz is my direct manager.
00:08:01.680 --> 00:08:02.639
Got it, Aaron Pritts.
00:08:02.800 --> 00:08:03.199
Thanks for that.
00:08:03.360 --> 00:08:06.000
So we're seeing some unusual login activity on your email.
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:07.920
Just want to make sure your account is secure.
00:08:08.079 --> 00:08:11.680
Have you logged in from any new devices or locations in the last couple days?
00:08:12.480 --> 00:08:13.839
Uh no, I don't think I have.
00:08:18.319 --> 00:08:19.439
Okay, good to know.
00:08:19.680 --> 00:08:20.560
One more thing.
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:24.240
We actually sent out a security bulletin about accounter protection.
00:08:24.399 --> 00:08:25.920
Would you mind taking a quick look at it?
00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:29.040
I can give you the URL and you can verify it's legit on your own time.
00:08:30.000 --> 00:08:30.800
Yeah, sure, thank you.
00:08:31.040 --> 00:08:31.600
I'll take that.
00:08:35.759 --> 00:08:36.080
Awesome.
00:08:36.159 --> 00:08:39.840
So go ahead and pull up reveal risk-security.com slash update.
00:08:40.000 --> 00:08:43.759
Just take a peek when you get a chance and let me know if you see anything out of the ordinary, yeah?
00:08:45.440 --> 00:08:46.240
Okay, sounds good.
00:08:50.399 --> 00:08:50.879
Perfect.
00:08:51.200 --> 00:08:53.440
Hey, I really appreciate your time on this.
00:08:53.840 --> 00:09:01.360
Just to be clear though, this was actually an authorized security awareness simulation we run here to help keep everyone sharp on these kinds of calls.
00:09:01.519 --> 00:09:04.720
Nothing about this was real, and no data was compromised at all.
00:09:04.879 --> 00:09:06.159
Thank you for going along with it.
00:09:06.480 --> 00:09:07.600
Two quick takeaways.
00:09:08.000 --> 00:09:11.840
First, you handled that really well by not volunteering extra info.
00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:13.120
That's exactly right.
00:09:13.360 --> 00:09:20.480
Second, keep in mind that even for internal sounding calls, it's always okay to say, let me call you back through the main line to verify.
00:09:20.639 --> 00:09:22.559
Legitimate callers won't mind at all.
00:09:22.720 --> 00:09:26.720
If you have any questions about this exercise, you can reach out to your security team.
00:09:26.879 --> 00:09:27.919
Thanks again.
00:09:29.200 --> 00:09:29.519
All right.
00:09:29.600 --> 00:09:31.840
So I would be going to tune that a little bit.
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:34.480
Uh again, 15 minutes, no iterations.
00:09:34.799 --> 00:09:37.200
It actually um glazed you a little bit.
00:09:37.279 --> 00:09:38.879
It said that you you nailed it.
00:09:39.039 --> 00:09:41.919
And in fact, you gave three sensitive things away.
00:09:42.159 --> 00:09:42.399
Yeah.
00:09:42.879 --> 00:09:43.840
Do you know what they were?
00:09:44.240 --> 00:09:48.720
Um, I would say like confirming my my job title feels like that.
00:09:48.799 --> 00:09:54.480
I mean, I know it's sort of like LinkedIn public available information, but still feels like it's like this confirmation aspect.
00:09:54.639 --> 00:10:01.519
Definitely saying that you're my boss, like giving them your name and that you're I'm that your direct report, that feels sensitive.
00:10:01.600 --> 00:10:02.639
Um, those are two things.
00:10:02.720 --> 00:10:03.759
What else did I give away?
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:18.480
The third was, and you know, if if it was a a live call and you didn't know we were kind of talking about this topic, when she asked you to pull up reveal-risk slash security, that was basically this playbook is straight out of what they do at DEF CON.
00:10:18.639 --> 00:10:32.480
You, you know, they're proving that they can capture the flag through getting you, give or asking you and verifying that you'll give up pieces of sensitive information that are not life-changing sensitive, but they're, but they're enough.
00:10:32.559 --> 00:10:36.399
Like another one is like, what VPN do you use when you're not in the office?
00:10:36.559 --> 00:10:36.960
Uh-huh.
00:10:37.200 --> 00:10:43.279
Or is your physical security, you know, coming into the office uh, you know, a proximity card or a key?
00:10:43.360 --> 00:10:47.679
Those are the types of things kind of in a safe and control way that you can give up.
00:10:47.919 --> 00:10:54.000
So anyway, um, gosh, the the agent, voice agents have come a long way since the call center.
00:10:54.080 --> 00:10:55.759
Like she was responded to you.
00:10:55.840 --> 00:11:01.759
There was only one other slip up where she kind of the way that she said, thanks, Aaron Pritz, there was no pause.
00:11:01.840 --> 00:11:03.600
Like, thanks, Aaron Pritz, got it.
00:11:03.759 --> 00:11:04.159
Uh-huh.
00:11:04.399 --> 00:11:08.000
So it it almost sounded like she was calling you Aaron Pritz.
00:11:08.080 --> 00:11:15.600
So overall, though, uh that was a startling experience with a voice where I was like, this sounds very believable.
00:11:15.759 --> 00:11:16.399
It really does.
00:11:16.559 --> 00:11:20.159
It sounds organic in a way that like these that I just don't associate these.
00:11:20.720 --> 00:11:31.759
Yeah, and you can there's a little bit of an extra pause, but maybe not nothing to draw attention because she might be writing stuff down, or you could add some clicking background sounds to make it seem like she's typing notes in.
00:11:31.840 --> 00:11:32.240
But yeah.
00:11:32.399 --> 00:11:33.759
Um, Jim, Jim, what are your thoughts?
00:11:33.840 --> 00:11:35.840
I know this is your second time hearing it.
00:11:36.000 --> 00:11:37.679
Um, how concerned are you?
00:11:37.759 --> 00:11:41.279
Are you going to be working with your programs to amplify Vishing?
00:11:41.440 --> 00:11:46.720
Uh, we kind of that was all not never the top topic, but no, it's never the top topic.
00:11:46.799 --> 00:11:56.960
Um, but I think this fits squarely into the discussion around social engineering um and and the evolution of that um and what it looks like current day.
00:11:57.039 --> 00:12:07.519
And it's uh each time that we've done this, Aaron, I've I've been more impressed with the technology and more concerned.
00:12:07.600 --> 00:12:12.480
And it's it just makes me think, you know, we we really have to start addressing this.
00:12:12.559 --> 00:12:17.039
And I think of more and more populations that that this type of attack can be used against.
00:12:17.120 --> 00:12:29.600
And I think about um, you know, what what about um our our population of of folks who are less tech savvy, you know, maybe you know, some of our like like you know, my grandparents, you know, what about what about them, right?
00:12:29.679 --> 00:12:35.279
And they're potentially going to give up you know banking information or information about investment accounts and things like that.
00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:39.679
They're they wouldn't think twice about that type of delay.
00:12:40.080 --> 00:12:47.039
Um, you know, you think back to the to the old days of like long distance phone calls, there were odd delays during those times.
00:12:47.120 --> 00:12:51.279
You know, it's not so I don't I don't know that that would even register with a lot of people.
00:12:51.440 --> 00:12:54.080
So I think they're they're very much at risk for this.
00:12:54.159 --> 00:13:11.279
And then on on the corporate side, you know, the calls coming in from uh tech support, you know, that that's that's definitely a uh a threat vector that has yielded a lot of results for threat actors traditionally.
00:13:11.440 --> 00:13:23.279
Um you know when we do phishing simulations uh for email, some of the the highest click rates we get for some of the phishing emails are uh they're IT and HR related.
00:13:24.080 --> 00:13:34.240
So there's no reason to think that that wouldn't be the same case if you're using this threat threat vector um as opposed to uh to an email.
00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:38.080
Um so uh and and it's and it's been shown.
00:13:38.159 --> 00:13:54.879
I I think you know if you if you watch the news, you you look at some of the reports coming in, you know, there's more and more of these uh these voice type attacks um that are going on, and um you know the threat actors are posing as people from IT calling, and and sometimes they they'll even you know set people up.
00:13:54.960 --> 00:14:10.559
I heard a story uh very recently about uh a threat actors, a group of threat actors that were just spamming people all day long with emails and phone calls and calling and hanging up and just you know and just driving people nuts.
00:14:10.720 --> 00:14:16.480
And then they call and pretend to be from IT and say, hey, um, you know, I know I I we see a lot of activity.
00:14:16.639 --> 00:14:19.759
Seems like you've been getting a lot of spam calls and a lot of spam emails.
00:14:19.919 --> 00:14:21.120
We'd like to help you out with that.
00:14:21.200 --> 00:14:23.360
And of course, they they people fall for it.
00:14:23.440 --> 00:14:26.960
They're like, Yes, somebody to help me with this, get rid of this annoying problem.
00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:30.879
I will cooperate with you as much as you would like me to, solve my problem.
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:34.000
And and then they give up the keys to the kingdom.
00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:48.720
Well, Jim, you mentioned your grandparents, and my dad actually almost like he was on the horn, they were logged into his bank account, or he was logged in, and he could start to see them making making changes on the screen, and then there was a glitch.
00:14:48.799 --> 00:15:02.720
Uh, and the the guy on the call center, the scammer, actually went to get somebody else who was supposedly a supervisor, and and my dad got got wiser to it and hung up, but like literally his bank account number was up and they were putting a transaction in.
00:15:03.360 --> 00:15:07.200
Um anyway, I just sent him, I just had had the agent call him.
00:15:07.279 --> 00:15:09.120
So I'll drive I'll call him on the drive home.
00:15:09.200 --> 00:15:12.720
Uh, I accidentally sent the wrong agent his way, so he'll he'll get two calls.
00:15:12.799 --> 00:15:20.399
One from the uh reveal risk receptionist I was gonna see if I could uh create, and then the second one is the person you just talked to, Brianwin.
00:15:20.480 --> 00:15:24.480
So we'll see if he falls for it again, it's gonna, there's gonna have to be an intervention.
00:15:24.720 --> 00:15:34.799
And you've spent, you know, you've you said Aaron, you spent 15 minutes setting this up, you know, like since you first started uh kind of working with this and exploring it.
00:15:34.960 --> 00:15:46.720
How much time do you think that you've spent on this grand total in the last I don't I don't know, two weeks on agentic voice agents research or only on this tech on the tech?
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:48.720
Only on this, just on this.
00:15:49.039 --> 00:15:50.000
42 minutes.
00:15:50.320 --> 00:15:51.279
42 minutes.
00:15:51.519 --> 00:15:55.919
So you accomplished like what we just witnessed, what Bronwyn just experienced.
00:15:56.080 --> 00:15:59.360
You you spent 42 for you've spent a grand total of 42 minutes on.
00:15:59.919 --> 00:16:00.559
Maybe 43.
00:16:00.639 --> 00:16:01.200
It was 42.
00:16:01.919 --> 00:16:02.000
Right.
00:16:02.639 --> 00:16:03.120
Who's counting?
00:16:03.200 --> 00:16:03.679
Who's counting?
00:16:04.000 --> 00:16:04.799
Right, exactly.
00:16:04.960 --> 00:16:10.879
But that and and the thing about it is you're you're not doing this on purpose-built um technology, right?
00:16:10.960 --> 00:16:14.720
You don't you don't have a special rig that you've set up to support this.
00:16:14.799 --> 00:16:18.639
You know, and and you know, this has been but I wasn't a yeah, well, yeah, well, yeah.
00:16:20.399 --> 00:16:28.960
You know, but point being, it's it you just you you just grabbed what you had and gave it a shot, and it went pretty well.
00:16:29.279 --> 00:16:32.320
Well, and if I was a nefarious person, what would I do?
00:16:32.399 --> 00:16:38.399
I'd take that 45 minutes, maybe they take an hour and a half if they don't know cyber and kind of some of the tactics, but they do.
00:16:38.480 --> 00:16:40.559
They've been doing this one than a half, probably.
00:16:40.720 --> 00:16:45.120
Um, and then they go buy a list off the dark web or just any, you know.
00:16:45.200 --> 00:16:50.000
I go out to one of the sales tools and I get a list of you know, I can pinpoint target.
00:16:50.080 --> 00:16:54.960
I want adult males between 60 and 80, right?
00:16:55.200 --> 00:16:57.279
Whatever your target market is, just like a marketer.
00:16:57.360 --> 00:17:08.960
And then I'm gonna get a million phone numbers, I'm gonna upload the Excel file into this, and it's gonna queue over, you know, probably probably can spin up a whole, I think you can build a squad, an agent squad.
00:17:09.119 --> 00:17:11.920
So you can probably have a hundred calling at once, right?
00:17:12.319 --> 00:17:15.839
Yeah, a little agentic call center to do nefarious stuff for you.
00:17:16.160 --> 00:17:17.440
It's already happening.
00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:22.799
So we we have to, we have to talk about solutions, right?
00:17:23.519 --> 00:17:23.920
Yeah, yeah.
00:17:24.079 --> 00:17:26.960
Never want to put a th a challenge out there without a problem.
00:17:27.200 --> 00:17:33.839
So interestingly, um, this morning I I had uh published this article about this topic a couple days ago or yesterday.
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:35.359
Yeah, it was yesterday.
00:17:35.599 --> 00:17:41.200
And I had uh, of course, the salespeople start like, oh, I have the solution for this, Aaron.
00:17:41.359 --> 00:17:47.920
But it was a it was a it was a cloud-based agentic vision education solution.
00:17:48.079 --> 00:17:56.319
And I'm like, bro, it might have not been clear, but I just vibe coded that shit in 15 minutes.
00:17:56.559 --> 00:17:59.680
I don't need your$50,000 SaaS solution.
00:18:00.079 --> 00:18:04.480
And no offense, I would not want to be in SaaS right now, like the stuff, the innovation that's popping up.
00:18:04.559 --> 00:18:07.440
Like that was a great idea two years ago when they call it.
00:18:08.480 --> 00:18:08.640
Right.
00:18:08.799 --> 00:18:09.200
Yeah.
00:18:09.519 --> 00:18:19.599
Do I need that if I'm a CISO, can I just create my own little squad and do a week's worth of testing to make sure it doesn't go haywire and I'm off to the races.
00:18:19.759 --> 00:18:26.960
But I would start with, I mean, not that phishing is the right solution, that the we're limited in what we've done from an emo phishing standpoint.
00:18:27.039 --> 00:18:28.240
We've sent a bunch of tests.
00:18:28.480 --> 00:18:31.759
People haven't experienced the the fishing test for the most part.
00:18:32.000 --> 00:18:32.160
Yeah.
00:18:32.480 --> 00:18:49.599
So being able to do that at scale and not have a pen tester that's going to make 25 calls as a test of whether the organization's susceptible, you could hit all employees once a quarter and give them some variety than just seeing the the typical email fish.
00:18:49.759 --> 00:19:00.960
Um, I think beyond that, like with human risk management and you know using um insights from behaviors and risks to pinpoint where you focus, there's departmental and job type risks.
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:08.799
You might accounts payable or groups that need their business process re-engineered to have some controls to do human verifications or callbacks.
00:19:08.960 --> 00:19:12.720
Um, and then there's also like targeted education.
00:19:12.799 --> 00:19:18.880
But Jim, beyond that, I hit a couple big things there, but what else, what else are we doing here to defray the risk?
00:19:19.200 --> 00:19:36.559
Well, I I think first of all, we we need to um as as we approach this topic, we need to uh understand ourselves and and also uh communicate to uh other practitioners, to uh to the workforce that this is just social engineering.
00:19:36.720 --> 00:19:40.079
It's it's the same thing that that it's the same thread, right?
00:19:40.319 --> 00:19:42.960
It's just it's just a different method of getting to it, right?
00:19:43.039 --> 00:19:44.640
So it's a different style of attack.
00:19:44.880 --> 00:19:50.720
But those basic skills that we have to detect social engineering, they're already on board.
00:19:50.799 --> 00:19:59.359
We've been working on this for 20 plus years, teaching our workforce to recognize things that seem out of the ordinary and to have a raised awareness about that.
00:19:59.599 --> 00:20:07.359
So, you know, if if you get one of these phone calls and it doesn't seem right, then listen to that instinct and and respond accordingly.
00:20:07.440 --> 00:20:10.559
You know, if you if you get that call from IT and you think, well, this is weird.
00:20:10.720 --> 00:20:12.400
IT's never called me before.
00:20:12.559 --> 00:20:13.839
This seems totally out of care.
00:20:14.079 --> 00:20:15.599
Usually I have to reach out to them.
00:20:15.759 --> 00:20:17.200
Well, yeah, that's right.
00:20:17.440 --> 00:20:28.640
So hang up and call the number that you know is a good number for IT, or hang up and email the good email that you know is the good email for IT and make sure that that's a legitimate call.
00:20:28.799 --> 00:20:32.960
Use that second channel the same way that you would for any other kind of social engineering attack.
00:20:33.359 --> 00:20:44.160
And then I think the other thing too, Aaron, to your point about building this out and doing it internally, we can do this much in the same way that we've done training, awareness, and training around phishing.
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:55.440
You know, and it's um you know we we are very much focused on moving beyond the this the old version of the you know security awareness and training and getting into really risk reduction.
00:20:55.599 --> 00:20:59.119
But the first thing that we have to do is make people aware of the threat.
00:20:59.359 --> 00:21:02.000
And then, and we so that's the awareness part.
00:21:02.160 --> 00:21:03.680
We have to do the training piece, right?
00:21:03.839 --> 00:21:12.480
Let everybody know that this is a tactic, and then we do the same thing that we've done with phishing uh exercises in the past where we start doing these tests, just like you're talking about, Aaron.
00:21:12.720 --> 00:21:20.000
And and of course, that's if you have a 40,000, 50,000 you know employee company, that's really hard to do for that for the entire population.
00:21:20.240 --> 00:21:24.160
But intentionally try and figure out who are your most likely targeted groups.
00:21:24.240 --> 00:21:26.559
You know, are they gonna be your folks in accounts payable?
00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:36.880
Are they gonna be your executive assistants that maybe you know have some uh privileged access, you know, some of those groups, and then start do some targeted testing with them and see how they do.
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:49.119
Gather some data, see who's having a hard time with it, circle back with them and do some targeted training with smaller populations after you identify where that risk is coming from, and then take some intentional steps to reduce that risk.
00:21:49.359 --> 00:21:56.000
And use the data that you gather through the old style of security awareness training, pull that information out of there and make that actionable.
00:21:56.079 --> 00:21:59.839
And I think that's that's that's the way that you that you implement this kind of thing.
00:22:00.160 --> 00:22:00.960
Current day.
00:22:01.279 --> 00:22:05.039
You know, this is all this could all be wildly different in six months, right?
00:22:05.519 --> 00:22:06.480
It's changing fast.
00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:15.839
Maybe even if you're not technical, like I've got some years on me beyond what I was in into code, but if you're in cyber, if you're in IT, like experiment with this, learn.
00:22:16.000 --> 00:22:19.200
Like maybe think like a bad guy so we understand.
00:22:19.359 --> 00:22:20.799
Oh, did I just put on the hood?
00:22:23.119 --> 00:22:25.200
I rarely wear hoods to the office, but I'm leaving it.
00:22:25.599 --> 00:22:26.079
Perfect opportunity.
00:22:28.960 --> 00:22:31.680
But yeah, I would say um play with the technologies.
00:22:31.839 --> 00:22:39.440
Like there's some things that you can do and um bring to your organization, or just do a podcast like this internally and and have a discussion.
00:22:39.680 --> 00:22:40.480
Interesting topic.
00:22:40.799 --> 00:22:40.880
Yeah.
00:22:41.279 --> 00:22:44.240
Well, Bronwyn, Jim, thanks for coming on today's special episode.
00:22:44.319 --> 00:22:45.359
It was going to be five minutes.
00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:47.200
We've spent 25 minutes talking about it.
00:22:47.279 --> 00:22:49.119
It's a fun topic, scary topic.
00:22:49.440 --> 00:22:50.960
But again, thanks, thanks for joining.
00:22:51.119 --> 00:22:51.839
Good conversation.
00:22:52.079 --> 00:22:52.799
Thanks for having us.
00:22:52.960 --> 00:22:53.200
All right.
00:22:53.279 --> 00:22:53.920
Thanks, Aaron.
00:22:54.079 --> 00:22:55.200
Appreciate it.