00:00:03Trending Research Topics in Sex Education
00:18:01Sex Education
ABOUT THIS EPISODE
We're rolling up our sleeves and taking a deep-dive into the turbulent world of sex education in today's episode. With insights right from the frontline of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality conference, we're tackling the shocking rise in rough sex, heavily influenced by internet pornography and social media. We share some staggering statistics and discuss these distressing trends with our esteemed guest, researcher Dr. Renee Rena Evans Paulson. She highlights the pivotal role of critical media literacy as a safeguard, stressing the need for open dialogues with young individuals about their digital consumption.
Switching gears, we shift focus to the importance of comprehensive sex education and its much-needed societal adoption. Remember GPT-3? We're exploring its potential footprint in sex education, celebrating some successful initiatives like Rhode Island's Department of Health's comprehensive sex ed app, and dissecting a study that reveals the overestimation of sexual health knowledge among college students. Our key takeaway? Comprehensive sex education is not just an option; it's a necessity to bridge the knowledge gap and promote safer sexual behaviors. Join us as we champion the power of research evidence and its crucial role in advocating for comprehensive sex education to policymakers. Tune in, get informed, and help us rewrite the narrative.
Follow us on social @sexeddebunked or send us a message at sexeddebunked@gmail.com
English
United States
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
WEBVTT
00:00:03.626 --> 00:00:07.501
This is Study Sessions brought to you by Sex Ed Debunked In these mini-sodes.
00:00:07.762 --> 00:00:10.349
We'll discuss a myth suggested to us by listeners.
00:00:10.349 --> 00:00:11.961
Like you, Like what?
00:00:11.980 --> 00:00:12.884
you hear, want to hear more?
00:00:12.884 --> 00:00:16.809
Follow us on Instagram, facebook and Twitter at Sex Ed Debunked to suggest new myths.
00:00:16.809 --> 00:00:19.888
Provide your own show notes and give us ideas for what to talk about next.
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:21.103
Now take some notes.
00:00:21.103 --> 00:00:22.763
The study group is in session.
00:00:22.763 --> 00:00:37.744
Hi, this is Study Sessions, a bi-weekly mini-sode where we cover topics brought to us by Sex Ed Debunked listeners.
00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:45.149
On this week's episode we are taking these study part of study sessions literally and talking about some of the trending research topics in sex education.
00:00:45.149 --> 00:00:52.807
So not necessarily brought to us directly by Sex Ed Debunked listeners, but definitely brought to us by people who would be interested in listening.
00:00:53.159 --> 00:01:03.511
This is so true and you guys, our listeners, might recall that we had a similar episode last year when they came back from the Sexuality Conference in Vancouver, canada.
00:01:03.511 --> 00:01:09.352
Well, they had another annual conference this year, this time in New Orleans.
00:01:09.352 --> 00:01:42.891
New Orleans, the big, easy, and the official name of the society is the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, otherwise known as QUADES, and they bring together literally sex researchers from all over the world to present what's new and up-coming in research to sex educators, sex therapists, counselors and people who are just generally interested in getting more information about what's going on, especially in light of what's going on in our country and the world these days.
00:01:43.894 --> 00:01:45.039
Yeah, fair enough.
00:01:45.039 --> 00:01:46.963
Fair enough, and I think you know every year.
00:01:46.963 --> 00:01:56.269
I'm sure there are similar topics that are discussed, but what we thought would be fun and intriguing for this study session is to talk about some of the topics that maybe we haven't thought about so much.
00:01:56.269 --> 00:02:03.192
So we're going to give you a top five hottest and trendiest in coming in from the big sleazy.
00:02:05.201 --> 00:02:05.962
No, no, no.
00:02:05.962 --> 00:02:09.270
The big easy which is what I said.
00:02:09.310 --> 00:02:09.669
I said what I said.
00:02:09.669 --> 00:02:11.614
All right, I said what I said.
00:02:12.882 --> 00:02:20.008
So I'm going to start with one that maybe is a little bit sobering, but also really, really important and that we really we've only touched on.
00:02:20.008 --> 00:02:45.545
We had the one episode on pornography not being real sex, but the plenary of the distinguished speaker and researcher at this conference was Debbie Hermanick, who is researching for many years out of the Kinsey Institute in Indiana University, and she had a talk on the rise of rough sex, what we've learned and what sexuality researchers, educators and clinicians need to know.
00:02:46.368 --> 00:02:46.950
Interesting.
00:02:46.950 --> 00:02:50.485
So what do we mean by rough sex and tell me how we know it's on the rise.
00:02:51.240 --> 00:02:58.573
Well, it's first of all, one rough sex is beyond what we might think of as BDSM and kink.
00:02:58.573 --> 00:03:19.224
It is choking, punching, slapping, spanking, hitting, tying, restraining, but in a way that's not necessarily part of quote unquote BDSM or kink, but actually in a way that's become quite mainstream.
00:03:19.224 --> 00:03:26.012
And that's the part that's a little bit troubling, and troubling because it seems to be a global trend.
00:03:26.012 --> 00:03:28.867
So this isn't research that was just done in the US.
00:03:28.867 --> 00:03:32.420
This was done across the world and what they're saying.
00:03:32.420 --> 00:03:51.909
And just listen to these statistics, which are really stunning One in four teens have sent or received a sex and 80% of young adults, including college students, have engaged in rough sex 80.
00:03:51.909 --> 00:03:53.681
Oh, my gosh, 80.
00:03:54.379 --> 00:04:06.391
And I will say anecdotally, I have a group of students who are presenting this week on pornography use and I said to them hey, you know which I'm sure is the other half of your question why?
00:04:06.391 --> 00:04:09.388
And the answer is internet, pornography and social media.
00:04:09.388 --> 00:04:13.368
And I said you know, it really has increased rough sex, things like choking.
00:04:13.368 --> 00:04:19.951
And these students, these three very bright students, said to me that came from porn.
00:04:19.951 --> 00:04:22.507
It's like basically what we do all the time.
00:04:22.507 --> 00:04:23.865
Oh, yeah.
00:04:26.750 --> 00:04:27.653
But okay, okay, so, okay.
00:04:27.653 --> 00:04:32.889
So the woman who is presenting on this you're using the plenary speaker was on those talks talking about this.
00:04:32.889 --> 00:04:37.687
Yeah, debbie Herbanek, and she's from the Kinsey, which some of our listeners may remember.
00:04:37.687 --> 00:04:38.711
The Kinsey scale on.
00:04:38.711 --> 00:04:44.733
The Kinsey Institute continues to do work in sex research, but 80% Oof.
00:04:45.420 --> 00:04:46.860
Well, and this is so.
00:04:46.860 --> 00:04:48.762
This is the title of her new book.
00:04:48.762 --> 00:04:56.055
It's called yes, you're Kid, and the book is actually much broader than rough sex.
00:04:56.055 --> 00:05:24.117
It's actually a book designed to help parents who have young teens and, you know, to help around sexual communication, because parents think that's happening to other kids, and the interviews of young college students that were done as part of this book said that most learned about rough sex between eighth and tenth grade.
00:05:25.326 --> 00:05:29.096
Oh boy, that is disheartening at best.
00:05:29.925 --> 00:05:39.692
Well, except except that this book offers a real, good, solid guide to communicating and makes parents aware of it.
00:05:39.884 --> 00:06:23.822
So, the idea is like if you're armed with knowledge, then you can find the tools to actually talk to your students, your kids which leads me to the second study that I wanted to mention, and it was not, as it was, a presentation, not a big plenary speech, but there was a researcher, dr Renee Rena Evans Paulson, phd, who had a presentation also looking at the connection between pornography use and sexual violence and dating violence, and found that the buffer against that connection was critical media literacy.
00:06:24.584 --> 00:06:26.531
Yeah, yeah that makes sense.
00:06:27.644 --> 00:07:01.553
But it means that to the extent that we teach our young you know, children, nephews, nieces our young people to look at what they see on the internet and porn and social media and TikTok with a critical eye, it actually works as a protective factor, which I think is kind of encouraging that if parents and adults and caregivers can get the courage to have these conversations, yeah, Research suggests that it can make a substantial difference.
00:07:02.336 --> 00:07:16.175
Yeah, it's interesting not to derail that particular point, but I remember when I was doing research in my communications master's program, one thing we talked about was the importance of engaging in that critical media lens.
00:07:16.175 --> 00:07:23.471
You know, because parents who let their kids watch a lot of TV get a lot of flack right Because, like, oh, they're not going to learn, they're going to poison their brains.
00:07:23.471 --> 00:07:30.853
Actually, if they watch TV but you engage in critical discussions about it, it can be really good for them and helps them develop theory of self.
00:07:30.853 --> 00:07:32.490
That helps them develop critical thinking.
00:07:32.490 --> 00:07:43.430
So, similarly, yeah, if you watch yeah, I mean you're going to if you don't have the ability to critically analyze information, then of course you are going to be more easily succumbing to mistruth.
00:07:45.408 --> 00:07:49.276
Well and like we had the episode on the myths that porn sex is real sex.
00:07:49.276 --> 00:07:54.716
Right, and we know that's a myth, but if you are in eighth grade, maybe you don't.
00:07:54.716 --> 00:08:04.605
If you have, if you're not getting comprehensive sex education in your school, you might think that what you're seeing on the internet is actually closer to reality than it really is.
00:08:04.605 --> 00:08:19.696
To your point, Shannon, that's one of the recommendations in Debbie Hervinick's book is, if something is too difficult to talk about it, find some media and talk about it in the context of the media that you're watching as a framework for communication.
00:08:20.677 --> 00:08:21.098
Interesting.
00:08:21.098 --> 00:08:24.509
Pretty, yeah, it's.
00:08:24.509 --> 00:08:25.112
It's rough, though.
00:08:25.112 --> 00:08:26.531
I like the name of the book though.
00:08:26.531 --> 00:08:28.725
Yes, you work it, not somebody else's.
00:08:29.487 --> 00:08:43.051
Shannon, I literally when, as soon as I got back from the conference, I literally went on Amazon and bought it, and then I also emailed the librarian at Wesleyan to make sure it would be on the shelves at Wesleyan University.
00:08:43.051 --> 00:08:45.049
So it's that important.
00:08:45.049 --> 00:08:50.847
But let's shift to something a little lighter and interesting that we can talk about Something that's not as rough.
00:08:50.908 --> 00:08:53.808
You might say Not as rough, no, a little more gentle.
00:08:53.808 --> 00:08:55.354
Great Love that.
00:08:56.164 --> 00:09:02.090
And actually something that I absolutely never really thought about in a comprehensive way, which is saying a lot.
00:09:02.090 --> 00:09:05.284
It was a talk on eco-sexuality.
00:09:06.677 --> 00:09:07.684
Well, that is really interesting.
00:09:07.684 --> 00:09:09.230
Yes, it was so cool.
00:09:09.230 --> 00:09:10.553
Sex it's good for the planet.
00:09:11.365 --> 00:09:11.907
Well, we talk.
00:09:11.907 --> 00:09:23.751
We did talk a little bit about sustainable sex toys when we had our episode on Love Not War, where they made you know environmentally friendly sex toys, but this took it to a whole new level.
00:09:23.751 --> 00:09:35.068
So Dr Amanda Morgan was talking about the idea of not as the earth, being your earth mother, but being your earth lover.
00:09:35.068 --> 00:09:48.697
If you treated the earth in the same way you treated a lover, we would be much more likely to be, to be kind to the earth and to do things that are going to sustain it.
00:09:48.697 --> 00:09:51.868
So that was kind of like her foundation and her framework.
00:09:51.868 --> 00:09:54.653
Thank you, and I will.
00:09:54.653 --> 00:10:00.283
I've emailed her to try to get her slides, because then she went through all these ways.
00:10:00.283 --> 00:10:02.616
Like, for a lot of people, they want to be eco-friendly.
00:10:02.616 --> 00:10:05.557
Right, we hate the idea of climate change.
00:10:05.557 --> 00:10:06.735
We want to make a difference.
00:10:06.735 --> 00:10:16.596
Well, she went through a list of eco-friendly sex toys based on how they're made, what the materials that they come from.
00:10:16.596 --> 00:10:17.230
There's.
00:10:17.230 --> 00:10:22.889
Actually, it was an eco-friendly butt plug, believe it or not, made of wood.
00:10:23.029 --> 00:10:24.014
Oh no, I don't believe it.
00:10:25.169 --> 00:10:30.706
But made of wood, but made of wood that had a very natural laminate to it.
00:10:30.706 --> 00:10:34.018
That was actually really kind of sustainable and healthy.
00:10:34.018 --> 00:10:36.738
It sounds kind of nice.
00:10:36.738 --> 00:11:07.335
It was actually if you could put it on your mantle and no one would know it was a sex toy but also eco-friendly lube, eco-friendly condoms, all those things that are being naturally so, looking at both the materials that are used and also how they are created in terms of a sustainable, a sustainable corporation, a sustainable manufacturing, all of that which I thought was really interesting.
00:11:09.429 --> 00:11:40.042
But then there was one area that was really kind of outside the box, shall we say, talking about actual eco-sexuality and two researchers out in Las Vegas who want a movement to have the E be added to the LGBTQ as eco-sexual meaning, and she showed all of these clips of people, basically naked, rolling around in the dirt.
00:11:40.042 --> 00:12:01.445
I am one with the dirt, so for any of our listeners who are curious, she also showed a clip from Greenpeace, which, as you know, is like the climate environmental activist group, called Forest Love, and it was images of the forest and the overlay was love making sounds.
00:12:01.445 --> 00:12:03.009
It was out of the blue.
00:12:03.090 --> 00:12:04.235
Oh, I mean it's weird.
00:12:04.235 --> 00:12:19.975
It's like a weird mix between ASMR, but also kind of like you know, there are a lot of wellness practices, of course, around the earth and sustainability right, like mud baths or thing.
00:12:22.149 --> 00:12:23.613
And she actually said that.
00:12:23.613 --> 00:12:59.744
You know, if you think about it and I know that we've experienced it when you go out and you see, like this amazing sunset, and you go, oh, and it's that feeling of awe which is almost erotic and almost sexual, so that it's not necessarily you don't have to take it literally as the earth, as your lover, but certainly you can have a very erotic, sensual experience being in touch with the earth, and there are a lot of people who practice that on a regular basis.
00:12:59.744 --> 00:13:02.932
Just might not call it eco-sexuality, yeah.
00:13:03.774 --> 00:13:04.216
I got.
00:13:04.216 --> 00:13:06.179
Okay, no, I'm bought, I'm bought, I get it.
00:13:06.179 --> 00:13:11.821
I mean, sustainability is a huge part of the modern consumer.
00:13:11.821 --> 00:13:16.072
It might as well be a huge part of the modern bedroom too, well, or?
00:13:16.432 --> 00:13:17.677
well, outdoor bedroom.
00:13:18.591 --> 00:13:19.956
Yeah, interesting.
00:13:20.590 --> 00:13:21.374
So it was pretty cool.
00:13:21.374 --> 00:13:33.633
So, and coming back again, looping back to the issue of consent, right, so we were talking about porn and how that impacts, you know, consent and dating violence and all of that.
00:13:33.633 --> 00:13:48.174
So there was one researcher, anna Thrasch, who had a poster and I was attracted to it because the title of the poster was hey, chat GPT, what is sexual consent?
00:13:50.214 --> 00:13:51.899
Oh, I really want to believe that it said good things.
00:13:51.899 --> 00:13:56.475
I really want to believe that it said good things Well it did.
00:13:56.475 --> 00:13:58.078
Oh my God, Okay great.
00:13:59.371 --> 00:14:01.739
And I know you know more about AI than I do.
00:14:01.739 --> 00:14:21.379
But if AI is, if someone's asking these questions of the AI and the AI comes up with an answer that is current, currently talking about, you know, enthusiastic consent, all the fries things we've talked about, right, Really, given specific can be withdrawn at any time.
00:14:21.379 --> 00:14:25.309
What does that mean to you, oh, AI expert?
00:14:26.363 --> 00:14:34.083
Well, it means that the aggregate information that is being pulled by AI is all pointing to accurate definitions of consent.
00:14:34.083 --> 00:14:54.565
I'm actually flustered over how well the robots did on this one, yes, well, and let me say I've actually been on another podcast talking about the problems with AI and there are a lot of ethical issues with AI, but that's because a lot of the internet is problematic and so you know.
00:14:54.565 --> 00:15:01.866
Again, because AI is based on aggregate data, you often get the bias towards whatever the majority perspective is.
00:15:01.866 --> 00:15:03.291
So to hear that.
00:15:03.291 --> 00:15:15.903
The reason why I'm excited if anyone doesn't totally put this together is that it means that the majority of information that's on the internet about consent is about informed consent and is actually pulling in the true definition of consent.
00:15:15.903 --> 00:15:19.812
Not just merely saying no, but actually getting that affirmative yes.
00:15:20.559 --> 00:15:30.067
Exactly, and there was a whole series of questions around consent and you know there were even questions about, you know, scenarios.
00:15:30.067 --> 00:15:34.903
You know if somebody had X amount to drink and, you know, appeared drunk, could they consent?
00:15:34.903 --> 00:15:45.153
No, I mean, like they got the answers right and I think it shows that some of these messages are actually, I think, becoming the majority.
00:15:45.153 --> 00:15:59.173
So that's pretty great, I think, and pretty great from this perspective of maybe a young person, a teen, saying oh okay, I'm going to ask chat, gpt what consent is, and they get the right answer.
00:15:59.639 --> 00:16:02.466
I'm not sure who it is that you think talks like that.
00:16:02.466 --> 00:16:08.003
I'd like to meet them, but point taken, fair enough.
00:16:10.366 --> 00:16:13.971
So I think we had two more we wanted to discuss briefly.
00:16:13.971 --> 00:16:41.871
So the one of the ones that I thought was really interesting because it was based in Rhode Island, hey, hey, I was chatting with a researcher from the who was commissioned by the Rhode Island Department of Health to work on a new survey measure for gender, because, as we, as we know, and me and you obviously as researchers you get the question of what is your gender?
00:16:41.871 --> 00:16:46.951
Male, female, yeah, clearly, clearly not appropriate.
00:16:46.951 --> 00:17:02.972
And this researcher was actually tasked with the with the job of saying well, how many trans, gender diverse people live in Rhode Island, and basically she said I got nothing to measure that I don't know that.
00:17:04.019 --> 00:17:40.704
So it's very much a still a work in progress, but what their efforts are is to take what used to be a very bad one question scale, which merged into a sort of better two question scale, which generally is something like what sex were you assigned at birth and then what is your current gender, to add a third step which allows for open ended responses and, really importantly, on the question of what is your gender, allows people to answer and check more than one checkbox.
00:17:40.704 --> 00:17:44.957
Nice, so Rhode Island is is making progress.
00:17:44.957 --> 00:17:48.009
Hopefully they're hoping that they're going to do one more.
00:17:48.009 --> 00:18:00.461
I think, when I talk to her, they're going to do another round of, you know, testing of the data and testing of the scales, but they're hoping they're going to have something, something done and up and running within the next year or so.
00:18:01.266 --> 00:18:08.191
You know, something I really have loved about doing this podcast is realizing that our little state does try its best to lead the way in a lot of things.
00:18:08.191 --> 00:18:15.747
Like, of course, we did the interview last year with the Rhode Island Department of Health and they're launching of that you know, comprehensive sex ed app.
00:18:15.747 --> 00:18:18.712
Yeah, yeah, and, like you know, it makes me.
00:18:18.712 --> 00:18:24.708
It makes me proud of our little state, because if if you can't get the little people to start doing it, then you're not going to get the big ones to start doing it either.
00:18:26.463 --> 00:18:32.904
Well, and some of this, and actually the researcher, one of the researchers on the chat GPT one was from, was affiliated with Brown.
00:18:32.904 --> 00:18:37.967
So there's some good stuff coming out of Rhode Island and I'm proud of it.
00:18:37.967 --> 00:18:39.009
Little Rody too.
00:18:41.076 --> 00:18:42.018
All right, what's the last one?
00:18:42.018 --> 00:18:42.780
What are we wrapping up with?
00:18:43.542 --> 00:18:54.152
Well, the last one is is one more push, and because of our, because of the nature of our podcast is, you know, sex ed debunked and pushing the need for more comprehensive sex education.
00:18:54.152 --> 00:19:01.638
Well, a study was done by A number of researchers at James Madison University.
00:19:01.638 --> 00:19:15.796
Looking at the title, an unsurprising and scary study overestimation of sexual health knowledge of college students regardless of previous sex health education.
00:19:15.796 --> 00:19:28.155
So, basically, what they did is it's like your classic if you've ever heard of Dunning-Kruger right, people know a heck of a lot less than they think they know.
00:19:28.576 --> 00:19:28.877
Yeah.
00:19:28.877 --> 00:19:33.580
So to put that in lay person's terms for anyone who was like wait, what does that mean?
00:19:33.580 --> 00:19:37.739
It means that people are assuming they know more than they actually do about sex ed.
00:19:38.441 --> 00:19:43.661
Right, and so the way they structured this survey is they asked participants, college students.
00:19:43.661 --> 00:19:59.398
They asked them to first take a series I think it was like a series of four or six questions about how much do you think you know about you know sexual anatomy, sexual pleasure, all these things and rate how confident you are in that knowledge.
00:19:59.398 --> 00:20:07.209
And the participants had a high rating for what they thought they knew 85%, very high.
00:20:07.209 --> 00:20:16.547
However, then they gave them a 30 question test on sexual health knowledge based on actual questions.
00:20:16.567 --> 00:20:22.320
Yeah, and scores were about 17.9%.
00:20:24.971 --> 00:20:31.181
This is giving Alabama and their estimations of certain sizes of things energy.
00:20:31.181 --> 00:20:35.875
You don't know as much as you think you know.
00:20:36.998 --> 00:20:52.375
Yeah, so, and the bottom line is they said that most 68% rated their sex knowledge as high as high, but they show actually scored less than 50%, and yeah.
00:20:55.212 --> 00:20:56.156
So what does that mean?
00:20:56.156 --> 00:21:04.160
Like, let's boil that down, because we do feel like the reason people are estimating that presumably is because they are getting sex education.
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:06.657
So what do we pull away from that?
00:21:06.657 --> 00:21:10.839
They're getting sex education, but the sex education isn't matching up with actual sexual knowledge.
00:21:11.589 --> 00:21:12.654
Well, I think two things.
00:21:12.654 --> 00:21:24.962
I think college students think that they have sexual education because they either have sexual experience or they have watched a lot of social media and internet porn.
00:21:25.411 --> 00:21:32.420
So, they think they know things simply because they have watched it and absorbed it from other ways.
00:21:32.420 --> 00:21:42.038
A flip side of it is that they haven't gotten actual comprehensive sex education that would cover these 30 questions.
00:21:42.038 --> 00:21:47.369
I mean, looking at the tests that they used on sexual knowledge, these were not hard questions.
00:21:47.369 --> 00:21:57.157
These were basic questions that if you had comprehensive sexual education between K and 12, you would know the answers to these questions.
00:21:57.157 --> 00:22:22.878
I was talking about this study to my roommate just before we went on the podcast and she was saying that she was looking at I think she was relaying a conversation that she saw on social media, but the gist of it was that a guy was talking to his girlfriend and the girlfriend started laughing hysterically and she said oh my God, I'm laughing so hard I'm going to pee in my pants.
00:22:22.878 --> 00:22:26.259
And this college guy was like well, how can you do that?
00:22:26.259 --> 00:22:28.136
You have your period, aren't you wearing a tampon?
00:22:28.136 --> 00:22:33.486
So did you actually realize that they were separate?
00:22:34.307 --> 00:22:37.717
Oh yeah, no, that's scary, I would say.
00:22:39.650 --> 00:22:55.756
It is scary, but it's important to realize that we cannot assume that just because students, and maybe our kids or our nieces, nephews, whoever, just because they're in college, they actually have a base of knowledge.
00:22:55.756 --> 00:23:03.590
And I can confirm that when I was teaching psychology of human sexuality at UConn, I had grown.
00:23:03.590 --> 00:23:09.122
A grown ex-military guy come up to me and say, oh my God, I never learned this stuff.
00:23:10.613 --> 00:23:11.557
Yeah, and it's scary.
00:23:11.557 --> 00:23:24.057
And it's scary is like one word for it, but it's also disappointing and, as we've talked about on the show, there's just such a ripple effect of that not having that education, overestimating that education.
00:23:24.057 --> 00:23:31.042
It really can lead to unintentionally much riskier sexual behaviors when you don't know what you don't know.
00:23:31.892 --> 00:23:33.116
Well, it does and it's true.
00:23:33.116 --> 00:23:59.795
But I also think that this type of research, shannon, really is really underlining even more and emphasizing even more the need to have comprehensive sex education, because you can't assume that simply because someone reaches the age of 18, 19, 20, 25, and they have the actual sexual knowledge they need to really explore sex in a healthy, safe and pleasurable way.
00:23:59.795 --> 00:24:11.260
And I think that, although you kind of use that adjective of scary for some of this research, I guess for me, being in the research field, I say this is evidence.
00:24:11.769 --> 00:24:13.294
I came out of the research field.
00:24:13.354 --> 00:24:15.901
And now I'm in the research field and this is evidence.
00:24:15.901 --> 00:24:24.836
This is evidence to take to policymakers at every level to say we still need this, we're still doing a terrible job.
00:24:24.836 --> 00:24:50.339
And if we want to reduce stigma, reduce suicidality for sexual and gender minorities, if we want to reduce dating violence, if we want to reduce sexual assault, if we want to reduce situations of non-consent, education really is the answer and that's what this research is all across the board, this whole conference.
00:24:50.339 --> 00:25:00.598
The bottom line is the more we know, the more we know and the more we educate, the better off we're all going to be, at every single level of our society.
00:25:01.359 --> 00:25:05.993
Boom Boom, absolutely, yeah, no, that makes sense.
00:25:05.993 --> 00:25:11.527
It's good to know that you have empirical evidence to support that.
00:25:11.527 --> 00:25:13.094
There is still work that needs to be done.
00:25:13.951 --> 00:25:18.176
Well, and the work is being done and you know what the chat GPT study says.
00:25:18.176 --> 00:25:21.951
The work is getting done because at least on consent it's getting out there.
00:25:21.951 --> 00:25:37.577
So maybe we'll just keep shouting from the podcast To the podcast rooftop, that's right and say keep doing it and we'll try to influence what chat GPT funds and AI funds, yeah, and then we'll go into the algorithm.
00:25:37.657 --> 00:25:38.201
It'll all be good.
00:25:38.522 --> 00:25:39.710
It's all about that algorithm.
00:25:39.710 --> 00:25:42.699
Hey, we're getting so close to those 20,000 downloads.
00:25:42.699 --> 00:25:45.315
People Just keep listening to this one over and over again.
00:25:45.455 --> 00:25:49.509
Yeah, yeah, find our shortest episode and listen to it about 20 times and we'll be in business.
00:25:49.509 --> 00:25:52.038
We'll be all set Awesome.
00:25:52.038 --> 00:25:57.732
Well, that is our recap of just some of the trending research in sexuality and sexual health right now.
00:25:57.732 --> 00:26:01.356
Maybe some surprises for you, maybe some topics you'd like to hear more about?
00:26:01.356 --> 00:26:10.236
So let us know, we can continue to share the research and, as usual, we will be back next Wednesday with another episode of Sex Ed Debunked.
00:26:10.757 --> 00:26:11.419
Take care everyone.
00:26:11.419 --> 00:26:12.099
Bye now.
00:26:12.099 --> 00:26:23.904
Sex Ed Debunked is produced by Trailblaze Media in Providence, Rhode Island.
00:26:23.904 --> 00:26:28.253
Our sound producer is Ezra Winters, with production assistance from Shea Weintra.
00:00:03.626 --> 00:00:07.501
This is Study Sessions brought to you by Sex Ed Debunked In these mini-sodes.
00:00:07.762 --> 00:00:10.349
We'll discuss a myth suggested to us by listeners.
00:00:10.349 --> 00:00:11.961
Like you, Like what?
00:00:11.980 --> 00:00:12.884
you hear, want to hear more?
00:00:12.884 --> 00:00:16.809
Follow us on Instagram, facebook and Twitter at Sex Ed Debunked to suggest new myths.
00:00:16.809 --> 00:00:19.888
Provide your own show notes and give us ideas for what to talk about next.
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:21.103
Now take some notes.
00:00:21.103 --> 00:00:22.763
The study group is in session.
00:00:22.763 --> 00:00:37.744
Hi, this is Study Sessions, a bi-weekly mini-sode where we cover topics brought to us by Sex Ed Debunked listeners.
00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:45.149
On this week's episode we are taking these study part of study sessions literally and talking about some of the trending research topics in sex education.
00:00:45.149 --> 00:00:52.807
So not necessarily brought to us directly by Sex Ed Debunked listeners, but definitely brought to us by people who would be interested in listening.
00:00:53.159 --> 00:01:03.511
This is so true and you guys, our listeners, might recall that we had a similar episode last year when they came back from the Sexuality Conference in Vancouver, canada.
00:01:03.511 --> 00:01:09.352
Well, they had another annual conference this year, this time in New Orleans.
00:01:09.352 --> 00:01:42.891
New Orleans, the big, easy, and the official name of the society is the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, otherwise known as QUADES, and they bring together literally sex researchers from all over the world to present what's new and up-coming in research to sex educators, sex therapists, counselors and people who are just generally interested in getting more information about what's going on, especially in light of what's going on in our country and the world these days.
00:01:43.894 --> 00:01:45.039
Yeah, fair enough.
00:01:45.039 --> 00:01:46.963
Fair enough, and I think you know every year.
00:01:46.963 --> 00:01:56.269
I'm sure there are similar topics that are discussed, but what we thought would be fun and intriguing for this study session is to talk about some of the topics that maybe we haven't thought about so much.
00:01:56.269 --> 00:02:03.192
So we're going to give you a top five hottest and trendiest in coming in from the big sleazy.
00:02:05.201 --> 00:02:05.962
No, no, no.
00:02:05.962 --> 00:02:09.270
The big easy which is what I said.
00:02:09.310 --> 00:02:09.669
I said what I said.
00:02:09.669 --> 00:02:11.614
All right, I said what I said.
00:02:12.882 --> 00:02:20.008
So I'm going to start with one that maybe is a little bit sobering, but also really, really important and that we really we've only touched on.
00:02:20.008 --> 00:02:45.545
We had the one episode on pornography not being real sex, but the plenary of the distinguished speaker and researcher at this conference was Debbie Hermanick, who is researching for many years out of the Kinsey Institute in Indiana University, and she had a talk on the rise of rough sex, what we've learned and what sexuality researchers, educators and clinicians need to know.
00:02:46.368 --> 00:02:46.950
Interesting.
00:02:46.950 --> 00:02:50.485
So what do we mean by rough sex and tell me how we know it's on the rise.
00:02:51.240 --> 00:02:58.573
Well, it's first of all, one rough sex is beyond what we might think of as BDSM and kink.
00:02:58.573 --> 00:03:19.224
It is choking, punching, slapping, spanking, hitting, tying, restraining, but in a way that's not necessarily part of quote unquote BDSM or kink, but actually in a way that's become quite mainstream.
00:03:19.224 --> 00:03:26.012
And that's the part that's a little bit troubling, and troubling because it seems to be a global trend.
00:03:26.012 --> 00:03:28.867
So this isn't research that was just done in the US.
00:03:28.867 --> 00:03:32.420
This was done across the world and what they're saying.
00:03:32.420 --> 00:03:51.909
And just listen to these statistics, which are really stunning One in four teens have sent or received a sex and 80% of young adults, including college students, have engaged in rough sex 80.
00:03:51.909 --> 00:03:53.681
Oh, my gosh, 80.
00:03:54.379 --> 00:04:06.391
And I will say anecdotally, I have a group of students who are presenting this week on pornography use and I said to them hey, you know which I'm sure is the other half of your question why?
00:04:06.391 --> 00:04:09.388
And the answer is internet, pornography and social media.
00:04:09.388 --> 00:04:13.368
And I said you know, it really has increased rough sex, things like choking.
00:04:13.368 --> 00:04:19.951
And these students, these three very bright students, said to me that came from porn.
00:04:19.951 --> 00:04:22.507
It's like basically what we do all the time.
00:04:22.507 --> 00:04:23.865
Oh, yeah.
00:04:26.750 --> 00:04:27.653
But okay, okay, so, okay.
00:04:27.653 --> 00:04:32.889
So the woman who is presenting on this you're using the plenary speaker was on those talks talking about this.
00:04:32.889 --> 00:04:37.687
Yeah, debbie Herbanek, and she's from the Kinsey, which some of our listeners may remember.
00:04:37.687 --> 00:04:38.711
The Kinsey scale on.
00:04:38.711 --> 00:04:44.733
The Kinsey Institute continues to do work in sex research, but 80% Oof.
00:04:45.420 --> 00:04:46.860
Well, and this is so.
00:04:46.860 --> 00:04:48.762
This is the title of her new book.
00:04:48.762 --> 00:04:56.055
It's called yes, you're Kid, and the book is actually much broader than rough sex.
00:04:56.055 --> 00:05:24.117
It's actually a book designed to help parents who have young teens and, you know, to help around sexual communication, because parents think that's happening to other kids, and the interviews of young college students that were done as part of this book said that most learned about rough sex between eighth and tenth grade.
00:05:25.326 --> 00:05:29.096
Oh boy, that is disheartening at best.
00:05:29.925 --> 00:05:39.692
Well, except except that this book offers a real, good, solid guide to communicating and makes parents aware of it.
00:05:39.884 --> 00:06:23.822
So, the idea is like if you're armed with knowledge, then you can find the tools to actually talk to your students, your kids which leads me to the second study that I wanted to mention, and it was not, as it was, a presentation, not a big plenary speech, but there was a researcher, dr Renee Rena Evans Paulson, phd, who had a presentation also looking at the connection between pornography use and sexual violence and dating violence, and found that the buffer against that connection was critical media literacy.
00:06:24.584 --> 00:06:26.531
Yeah, yeah that makes sense.
00:06:27.644 --> 00:07:01.553
But it means that to the extent that we teach our young you know, children, nephews, nieces our young people to look at what they see on the internet and porn and social media and TikTok with a critical eye, it actually works as a protective factor, which I think is kind of encouraging that if parents and adults and caregivers can get the courage to have these conversations, yeah, Research suggests that it can make a substantial difference.
00:07:02.336 --> 00:07:16.175
Yeah, it's interesting not to derail that particular point, but I remember when I was doing research in my communications master's program, one thing we talked about was the importance of engaging in that critical media lens.
00:07:16.175 --> 00:07:23.471
You know, because parents who let their kids watch a lot of TV get a lot of flack right Because, like, oh, they're not going to learn, they're going to poison their brains.
00:07:23.471 --> 00:07:30.853
Actually, if they watch TV but you engage in critical discussions about it, it can be really good for them and helps them develop theory of self.
00:07:30.853 --> 00:07:32.490
That helps them develop critical thinking.
00:07:32.490 --> 00:07:43.430
So, similarly, yeah, if you watch yeah, I mean you're going to if you don't have the ability to critically analyze information, then of course you are going to be more easily succumbing to mistruth.
00:07:45.408 --> 00:07:49.276
Well and like we had the episode on the myths that porn sex is real sex.
00:07:49.276 --> 00:07:54.716
Right, and we know that's a myth, but if you are in eighth grade, maybe you don't.
00:07:54.716 --> 00:08:04.605
If you have, if you're not getting comprehensive sex education in your school, you might think that what you're seeing on the internet is actually closer to reality than it really is.
00:08:04.605 --> 00:08:19.696
To your point, Shannon, that's one of the recommendations in Debbie Hervinick's book is, if something is too difficult to talk about it, find some media and talk about it in the context of the media that you're watching as a framework for communication.
00:08:20.677 --> 00:08:21.098
Interesting.
00:08:21.098 --> 00:08:24.509
Pretty, yeah, it's.
00:08:24.509 --> 00:08:25.112
It's rough, though.
00:08:25.112 --> 00:08:26.531
I like the name of the book though.
00:08:26.531 --> 00:08:28.725
Yes, you work it, not somebody else's.
00:08:29.487 --> 00:08:43.051
Shannon, I literally when, as soon as I got back from the conference, I literally went on Amazon and bought it, and then I also emailed the librarian at Wesleyan to make sure it would be on the shelves at Wesleyan University.
00:08:43.051 --> 00:08:45.049
So it's that important.
00:08:45.049 --> 00:08:50.847
But let's shift to something a little lighter and interesting that we can talk about Something that's not as rough.
00:08:50.908 --> 00:08:53.808
You might say Not as rough, no, a little more gentle.
00:08:53.808 --> 00:08:55.354
Great Love that.
00:08:56.164 --> 00:09:02.090
And actually something that I absolutely never really thought about in a comprehensive way, which is saying a lot.
00:09:02.090 --> 00:09:05.284
It was a talk on eco-sexuality.
00:09:06.677 --> 00:09:07.684
Well, that is really interesting.
00:09:07.684 --> 00:09:09.230
Yes, it was so cool.
00:09:09.230 --> 00:09:10.553
Sex it's good for the planet.
00:09:11.365 --> 00:09:11.907
Well, we talk.
00:09:11.907 --> 00:09:23.751
We did talk a little bit about sustainable sex toys when we had our episode on Love Not War, where they made you know environmentally friendly sex toys, but this took it to a whole new level.
00:09:23.751 --> 00:09:35.068
So Dr Amanda Morgan was talking about the idea of not as the earth, being your earth mother, but being your earth lover.
00:09:35.068 --> 00:09:48.697
If you treated the earth in the same way you treated a lover, we would be much more likely to be, to be kind to the earth and to do things that are going to sustain it.
00:09:48.697 --> 00:09:51.868
So that was kind of like her foundation and her framework.
00:09:51.868 --> 00:09:54.653
Thank you, and I will.
00:09:54.653 --> 00:10:00.283
I've emailed her to try to get her slides, because then she went through all these ways.
00:10:00.283 --> 00:10:02.616
Like, for a lot of people, they want to be eco-friendly.
00:10:02.616 --> 00:10:05.557
Right, we hate the idea of climate change.
00:10:05.557 --> 00:10:06.735
We want to make a difference.
00:10:06.735 --> 00:10:16.596
Well, she went through a list of eco-friendly sex toys based on how they're made, what the materials that they come from.
00:10:16.596 --> 00:10:17.230
There's.
00:10:17.230 --> 00:10:22.889
Actually, it was an eco-friendly butt plug, believe it or not, made of wood.
00:10:23.029 --> 00:10:24.014
Oh no, I don't believe it.
00:10:25.169 --> 00:10:30.706
But made of wood, but made of wood that had a very natural laminate to it.
00:10:30.706 --> 00:10:34.018
That was actually really kind of sustainable and healthy.
00:10:34.018 --> 00:10:36.738
It sounds kind of nice.
00:10:36.738 --> 00:11:07.335
It was actually if you could put it on your mantle and no one would know it was a sex toy but also eco-friendly lube, eco-friendly condoms, all those things that are being naturally so, looking at both the materials that are used and also how they are created in terms of a sustainable, a sustainable corporation, a sustainable manufacturing, all of that which I thought was really interesting.
00:11:09.429 --> 00:11:40.042
But then there was one area that was really kind of outside the box, shall we say, talking about actual eco-sexuality and two researchers out in Las Vegas who want a movement to have the E be added to the LGBTQ as eco-sexual meaning, and she showed all of these clips of people, basically naked, rolling around in the dirt.
00:11:40.042 --> 00:12:01.445
I am one with the dirt, so for any of our listeners who are curious, she also showed a clip from Greenpeace, which, as you know, is like the climate environmental activist group, called Forest Love, and it was images of the forest and the overlay was love making sounds.
00:12:01.445 --> 00:12:03.009
It was out of the blue.
00:12:03.090 --> 00:12:04.235
Oh, I mean it's weird.
00:12:04.235 --> 00:12:19.975
It's like a weird mix between ASMR, but also kind of like you know, there are a lot of wellness practices, of course, around the earth and sustainability right, like mud baths or thing.
00:12:22.149 --> 00:12:23.613
And she actually said that.
00:12:23.613 --> 00:12:59.744
You know, if you think about it and I know that we've experienced it when you go out and you see, like this amazing sunset, and you go, oh, and it's that feeling of awe which is almost erotic and almost sexual, so that it's not necessarily you don't have to take it literally as the earth, as your lover, but certainly you can have a very erotic, sensual experience being in touch with the earth, and there are a lot of people who practice that on a regular basis.
00:12:59.744 --> 00:13:02.932
Just might not call it eco-sexuality, yeah.
00:13:03.774 --> 00:13:04.216
I got.
00:13:04.216 --> 00:13:06.179
Okay, no, I'm bought, I'm bought, I get it.
00:13:06.179 --> 00:13:11.821
I mean, sustainability is a huge part of the modern consumer.
00:13:11.821 --> 00:13:16.072
It might as well be a huge part of the modern bedroom too, well, or?
00:13:16.432 --> 00:13:17.677
well, outdoor bedroom.
00:13:18.591 --> 00:13:19.956
Yeah, interesting.
00:13:20.590 --> 00:13:21.374
So it was pretty cool.
00:13:21.374 --> 00:13:33.633
So, and coming back again, looping back to the issue of consent, right, so we were talking about porn and how that impacts, you know, consent and dating violence and all of that.
00:13:33.633 --> 00:13:48.174
So there was one researcher, anna Thrasch, who had a poster and I was attracted to it because the title of the poster was hey, chat GPT, what is sexual consent?
00:13:50.214 --> 00:13:51.899
Oh, I really want to believe that it said good things.
00:13:51.899 --> 00:13:56.475
I really want to believe that it said good things Well it did.
00:13:56.475 --> 00:13:58.078
Oh my God, Okay great.
00:13:59.371 --> 00:14:01.739
And I know you know more about AI than I do.
00:14:01.739 --> 00:14:21.379
But if AI is, if someone's asking these questions of the AI and the AI comes up with an answer that is current, currently talking about, you know, enthusiastic consent, all the fries things we've talked about, right, Really, given specific can be withdrawn at any time.
00:14:21.379 --> 00:14:25.309
What does that mean to you, oh, AI expert?
00:14:26.363 --> 00:14:34.083
Well, it means that the aggregate information that is being pulled by AI is all pointing to accurate definitions of consent.
00:14:34.083 --> 00:14:54.565
I'm actually flustered over how well the robots did on this one, yes, well, and let me say I've actually been on another podcast talking about the problems with AI and there are a lot of ethical issues with AI, but that's because a lot of the internet is problematic and so you know.
00:14:54.565 --> 00:15:01.866
Again, because AI is based on aggregate data, you often get the bias towards whatever the majority perspective is.
00:15:01.866 --> 00:15:03.291
So to hear that.
00:15:03.291 --> 00:15:15.903
The reason why I'm excited if anyone doesn't totally put this together is that it means that the majority of information that's on the internet about consent is about informed consent and is actually pulling in the true definition of consent.
00:15:15.903 --> 00:15:19.812
Not just merely saying no, but actually getting that affirmative yes.
00:15:20.559 --> 00:15:30.067
Exactly, and there was a whole series of questions around consent and you know there were even questions about, you know, scenarios.
00:15:30.067 --> 00:15:34.903
You know if somebody had X amount to drink and, you know, appeared drunk, could they consent?
00:15:34.903 --> 00:15:45.153
No, I mean, like they got the answers right and I think it shows that some of these messages are actually, I think, becoming the majority.
00:15:45.153 --> 00:15:59.173
So that's pretty great, I think, and pretty great from this perspective of maybe a young person, a teen, saying oh okay, I'm going to ask chat, gpt what consent is, and they get the right answer.
00:15:59.639 --> 00:16:02.466
I'm not sure who it is that you think talks like that.
00:16:02.466 --> 00:16:08.003
I'd like to meet them, but point taken, fair enough.
00:16:10.366 --> 00:16:13.971
So I think we had two more we wanted to discuss briefly.
00:16:13.971 --> 00:16:41.871
So the one of the ones that I thought was really interesting because it was based in Rhode Island, hey, hey, I was chatting with a researcher from the who was commissioned by the Rhode Island Department of Health to work on a new survey measure for gender, because, as we, as we know, and me and you obviously as researchers you get the question of what is your gender?
00:16:41.871 --> 00:16:46.951
Male, female, yeah, clearly, clearly not appropriate.
00:16:46.951 --> 00:17:02.972
And this researcher was actually tasked with the with the job of saying well, how many trans, gender diverse people live in Rhode Island, and basically she said I got nothing to measure that I don't know that.
00:17:04.019 --> 00:17:40.704
So it's very much a still a work in progress, but what their efforts are is to take what used to be a very bad one question scale, which merged into a sort of better two question scale, which generally is something like what sex were you assigned at birth and then what is your current gender, to add a third step which allows for open ended responses and, really importantly, on the question of what is your gender, allows people to answer and check more than one checkbox.
00:17:40.704 --> 00:17:44.957
Nice, so Rhode Island is is making progress.
00:17:44.957 --> 00:17:48.009
Hopefully they're hoping that they're going to do one more.
00:17:48.009 --> 00:18:00.461
I think, when I talk to her, they're going to do another round of, you know, testing of the data and testing of the scales, but they're hoping they're going to have something, something done and up and running within the next year or so.
00:18:01.266 --> 00:18:08.191
You know, something I really have loved about doing this podcast is realizing that our little state does try its best to lead the way in a lot of things.
00:18:08.191 --> 00:18:15.747
Like, of course, we did the interview last year with the Rhode Island Department of Health and they're launching of that you know, comprehensive sex ed app.
00:18:15.747 --> 00:18:18.712
Yeah, yeah, and, like you know, it makes me.
00:18:18.712 --> 00:18:24.708
It makes me proud of our little state, because if if you can't get the little people to start doing it, then you're not going to get the big ones to start doing it either.
00:18:26.463 --> 00:18:32.904
Well, and some of this, and actually the researcher, one of the researchers on the chat GPT one was from, was affiliated with Brown.
00:18:32.904 --> 00:18:37.967
So there's some good stuff coming out of Rhode Island and I'm proud of it.
00:18:37.967 --> 00:18:39.009
Little Rody too.
00:18:41.076 --> 00:18:42.018
All right, what's the last one?
00:18:42.018 --> 00:18:42.780
What are we wrapping up with?
00:18:43.542 --> 00:18:54.152
Well, the last one is is one more push, and because of our, because of the nature of our podcast is, you know, sex ed debunked and pushing the need for more comprehensive sex education.
00:18:54.152 --> 00:19:01.638
Well, a study was done by A number of researchers at James Madison University.
00:19:01.638 --> 00:19:15.796
Looking at the title, an unsurprising and scary study overestimation of sexual health knowledge of college students regardless of previous sex health education.
00:19:15.796 --> 00:19:28.155
So, basically, what they did is it's like your classic if you've ever heard of Dunning-Kruger right, people know a heck of a lot less than they think they know.
00:19:28.576 --> 00:19:28.877
Yeah.
00:19:28.877 --> 00:19:33.580
So to put that in lay person's terms for anyone who was like wait, what does that mean?
00:19:33.580 --> 00:19:37.739
It means that people are assuming they know more than they actually do about sex ed.
00:19:38.441 --> 00:19:43.661
Right, and so the way they structured this survey is they asked participants, college students.
00:19:43.661 --> 00:19:59.398
They asked them to first take a series I think it was like a series of four or six questions about how much do you think you know about you know sexual anatomy, sexual pleasure, all these things and rate how confident you are in that knowledge.
00:19:59.398 --> 00:20:07.209
And the participants had a high rating for what they thought they knew 85%, very high.
00:20:07.209 --> 00:20:16.547
However, then they gave them a 30 question test on sexual health knowledge based on actual questions.
00:20:16.567 --> 00:20:22.320
Yeah, and scores were about 17.9%.
00:20:24.971 --> 00:20:31.181
This is giving Alabama and their estimations of certain sizes of things energy.
00:20:31.181 --> 00:20:35.875
You don't know as much as you think you know.
00:20:36.998 --> 00:20:52.375
Yeah, so, and the bottom line is they said that most 68% rated their sex knowledge as high as high, but they show actually scored less than 50%, and yeah.
00:20:55.212 --> 00:20:56.156
So what does that mean?
00:20:56.156 --> 00:21:04.160
Like, let's boil that down, because we do feel like the reason people are estimating that presumably is because they are getting sex education.
00:21:04.160 --> 00:21:06.657
So what do we pull away from that?
00:21:06.657 --> 00:21:10.839
They're getting sex education, but the sex education isn't matching up with actual sexual knowledge.
00:21:11.589 --> 00:21:12.654
Well, I think two things.
00:21:12.654 --> 00:21:24.962
I think college students think that they have sexual education because they either have sexual experience or they have watched a lot of social media and internet porn.
00:21:25.411 --> 00:21:32.420
So, they think they know things simply because they have watched it and absorbed it from other ways.
00:21:32.420 --> 00:21:42.038
A flip side of it is that they haven't gotten actual comprehensive sex education that would cover these 30 questions.
00:21:42.038 --> 00:21:47.369
I mean, looking at the tests that they used on sexual knowledge, these were not hard questions.
00:21:47.369 --> 00:21:57.157
These were basic questions that if you had comprehensive sexual education between K and 12, you would know the answers to these questions.
00:21:57.157 --> 00:22:22.878
I was talking about this study to my roommate just before we went on the podcast and she was saying that she was looking at I think she was relaying a conversation that she saw on social media, but the gist of it was that a guy was talking to his girlfriend and the girlfriend started laughing hysterically and she said oh my God, I'm laughing so hard I'm going to pee in my pants.
00:22:22.878 --> 00:22:26.259
And this college guy was like well, how can you do that?
00:22:26.259 --> 00:22:28.136
You have your period, aren't you wearing a tampon?
00:22:28.136 --> 00:22:33.486
So did you actually realize that they were separate?
00:22:34.307 --> 00:22:37.717
Oh yeah, no, that's scary, I would say.
00:22:39.650 --> 00:22:55.756
It is scary, but it's important to realize that we cannot assume that just because students, and maybe our kids or our nieces, nephews, whoever, just because they're in college, they actually have a base of knowledge.
00:22:55.756 --> 00:23:03.590
And I can confirm that when I was teaching psychology of human sexuality at UConn, I had grown.
00:23:03.590 --> 00:23:09.122
A grown ex-military guy come up to me and say, oh my God, I never learned this stuff.
00:23:10.613 --> 00:23:11.557
Yeah, and it's scary.
00:23:11.557 --> 00:23:24.057
And it's scary is like one word for it, but it's also disappointing and, as we've talked about on the show, there's just such a ripple effect of that not having that education, overestimating that education.
00:23:24.057 --> 00:23:31.042
It really can lead to unintentionally much riskier sexual behaviors when you don't know what you don't know.
00:23:31.892 --> 00:23:33.116
Well, it does and it's true.
00:23:33.116 --> 00:23:59.795
But I also think that this type of research, shannon, really is really underlining even more and emphasizing even more the need to have comprehensive sex education, because you can't assume that simply because someone reaches the age of 18, 19, 20, 25, and they have the actual sexual knowledge they need to really explore sex in a healthy, safe and pleasurable way.
00:23:59.795 --> 00:24:11.260
And I think that, although you kind of use that adjective of scary for some of this research, I guess for me, being in the research field, I say this is evidence.
00:24:11.769 --> 00:24:13.294
I came out of the research field.
00:24:13.354 --> 00:24:15.901
And now I'm in the research field and this is evidence.
00:24:15.901 --> 00:24:24.836
This is evidence to take to policymakers at every level to say we still need this, we're still doing a terrible job.
00:24:24.836 --> 00:24:50.339
And if we want to reduce stigma, reduce suicidality for sexual and gender minorities, if we want to reduce dating violence, if we want to reduce sexual assault, if we want to reduce situations of non-consent, education really is the answer and that's what this research is all across the board, this whole conference.
00:24:50.339 --> 00:25:00.598
The bottom line is the more we know, the more we know and the more we educate, the better off we're all going to be, at every single level of our society.
00:25:01.359 --> 00:25:05.993
Boom Boom, absolutely, yeah, no, that makes sense.
00:25:05.993 --> 00:25:11.527
It's good to know that you have empirical evidence to support that.
00:25:11.527 --> 00:25:13.094
There is still work that needs to be done.
00:25:13.951 --> 00:25:18.176
Well, and the work is being done and you know what the chat GPT study says.
00:25:18.176 --> 00:25:21.951
The work is getting done because at least on consent it's getting out there.
00:25:21.951 --> 00:25:37.577
So maybe we'll just keep shouting from the podcast To the podcast rooftop, that's right and say keep doing it and we'll try to influence what chat GPT funds and AI funds, yeah, and then we'll go into the algorithm.
00:25:37.657 --> 00:25:38.201
It'll all be good.
00:25:38.522 --> 00:25:39.710
It's all about that algorithm.
00:25:39.710 --> 00:25:42.699
Hey, we're getting so close to those 20,000 downloads.
00:25:42.699 --> 00:25:45.315
People Just keep listening to this one over and over again.
00:25:45.455 --> 00:25:49.509
Yeah, yeah, find our shortest episode and listen to it about 20 times and we'll be in business.
00:25:49.509 --> 00:25:52.038
We'll be all set Awesome.
00:25:52.038 --> 00:25:57.732
Well, that is our recap of just some of the trending research in sexuality and sexual health right now.
00:25:57.732 --> 00:26:01.356
Maybe some surprises for you, maybe some topics you'd like to hear more about?
00:26:01.356 --> 00:26:10.236
So let us know, we can continue to share the research and, as usual, we will be back next Wednesday with another episode of Sex Ed Debunked.
00:26:10.757 --> 00:26:11.419
Take care everyone.
00:26:11.419 --> 00:26:12.099
Bye now.
00:26:12.099 --> 00:26:23.904
Sex Ed Debunked is produced by Trailblaze Media in Providence, Rhode Island.
00:26:23.904 --> 00:26:28.253
Our sound producer is Ezra Winters, with production assistance from Shea Weintra.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Trailblaze Media, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
EDIT
Thank you for helping to keep the podcast database up to date.
