WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 -->
00:00:02.980Welcome to the Second Thought Podcast, which
00:00:02.980 -->
00:00:06.940today was provoked by a broadcast on the 30th
00:00:06.940 -->
00:00:12.259of April 2025 by one Giles Fraser, a West London
00:00:12.259 -->
00:00:17.780vicar. By way of recap, Second Thought is the
00:00:17.780 -->
00:00:20.379self -appointed accuracy police of Thought for
00:00:20.379 -->
00:00:23.350the Day broadcasts on Radio 4. These are each
00:00:23.350 -->
00:00:25.829three minutes of a religious person, and each
00:00:25.829 -->
00:00:28.730example purports to be reflections from a religious
00:00:28.730 -->
00:00:31.789perspective on events and people in the news.
00:00:32.649 -->
00:00:36.170It's my view that these broadcasts are riddled
00:00:36.170 -->
00:00:39.049with errors of fact and of reason that should
00:00:39.049 -->
00:00:42.549not be tolerated by the BBC. Indeed, it's my
00:00:42.549 -->
00:00:44.469view these broadcasts, or at least a majority
00:00:44.469 -->
00:00:47.350of them, run afoul of the BBC's own editorial
00:00:47.350 -->
00:00:51.570standards which demand due accuracy. We also
00:00:51.570 -->
00:00:54.070find preparing and recording these a tremendous
00:00:54.070 -->
00:00:58.990amount of fun. In each podcast I attempt to include
00:00:58.990 -->
00:01:01.469as much of the original broadcast as necessary
00:01:01.469 -->
00:01:05.209for the criticism of it to make sense. There
00:01:05.209 -->
00:01:07.390was very little of the broadcast from Vicar Giles
00:01:07.390 -->
00:01:11.269that did not contain errors of fact or reason,
00:01:11.349 -->
00:01:14.170so most of it you can hear in what follows. However,
00:01:14.290 -->
00:01:16.799I... Edit this and it's not always the entire
00:01:16.799 -->
00:01:19.420thing, so please visit the Thought for the Day
00:01:19.420 -->
00:01:21.500website at the BBC to listen to the original,
00:01:21.579 -->
00:01:24.319or you can link to it from secondthoughtfortheday
00:01:24.319 -->
00:01:28.379.com. We'd not want you harbouring any suspicions
00:01:28.379 -->
00:01:31.019that we were in any way joining the efforts of
00:01:31.019 -->
00:01:33.799these godly brothers and sisters as they seek
00:01:33.799 -->
00:01:38.540to pull wool over eyes. Here's what the Reverend
00:01:38.540 -->
00:01:42.909Fraser said on the 30th of April. It was the
00:01:42.909 -->
00:01:45.370biggest power cut in recent memory. All across
00:01:45.370 -->
00:01:47.909Spain and Portugal, the lights went out, people
00:01:47.909 -->
00:01:50.650were stuck in lifts and on trains, internet and
00:01:50.650 -->
00:01:53.450mobile phone coverage went down, businesses suffered.
00:01:53.650 -->
00:01:56.390It wasn't quite mass panic, but it was near enough.
00:01:56.930 -->
00:01:59.730Isn't it extraordinary how our society has become
00:01:59.730 -->
00:02:02.790so thoroughly dependent upon something that,
00:02:02.829 -->
00:02:05.469little more than a century ago, most people had
00:02:05.469 -->
00:02:10.150never even heard of? Well, Giles, where to begin?
00:02:11.020 -->
00:02:14.360How about with a parallel tale of technological
00:02:14.360 -->
00:02:22.680breakdown in London in 1852, 273 years ago. Now,
00:02:22.680 -->
00:02:26.060for context, Queen Victoria was about a third
00:02:26.060 -->
00:02:30.020into her 63 -year reign. Huge wealth was flowing
00:02:30.020 -->
00:02:32.800into London from the British Empire. Great Ormond
00:02:32.800 -->
00:02:34.919Street Hospital, Britain's first children's hospital,
00:02:34.960 -->
00:02:37.500just opened, as had King's Cross Station, which
00:02:37.500 -->
00:02:39.280instantly became the biggest railway station
00:02:39.280 -->
00:02:42.430in Europe. And of oblique reference, a patent
00:02:42.430 -->
00:02:45.509for the flush toilet was granted that year. The
00:02:45.509 -->
00:02:48.229city of London was growing, and it had a water
00:02:48.229 -->
00:02:50.810supply system built on centuries of innovation
00:02:50.810 -->
00:02:53.729and expansion, and it was working hard to keep
00:02:53.729 -->
00:02:57.650pace. 1852 saw the introduction of a new and
00:02:57.650 -->
00:03:00.969highly effective filtration system that markedly
00:03:00.969 -->
00:03:03.550improved the quality of water delivered to Londoners.
00:03:03.689 -->
00:03:06.789But then, thanks to the diligent detective work
00:03:06.789 -->
00:03:10.270of one Dr John Snow, A deadly cholera outbreak
00:03:10.270 -->
00:03:14.710was linked to a water pump in Soho. How could
00:03:14.710 -->
00:03:17.409it be? With all this technology and a new filtration
00:03:17.409 -->
00:03:20.849system, a seemingly simple fault resulted in
00:03:20.849 -->
00:03:24.750contamination for a whole neighbourhood. No doubt,
00:03:25.090 -->
00:03:27.669West London vicars had letters published in the
00:03:27.669 -->
00:03:30.330newspapers sounding caution over these technological
00:03:30.330 -->
00:03:34.009advances. All the promise of clean, high -quality
00:03:34.009 -->
00:03:36.949drinking water and it comes crashing down following
00:03:36.949 -->
00:03:40.650a single fault. Where to get water now? How did
00:03:40.650 -->
00:03:43.629the city become so overwhelmingly dependent on
00:03:43.629 -->
00:03:46.389this vulnerable pump network for something as
00:03:46.389 -->
00:03:51.909important as its water? Except no, I very much
00:03:51.909 -->
00:03:57.189suspect they did not. The cholera problem was
00:03:57.189 -->
00:03:59.289identified and the contamination was addressed.
00:03:59.870 -->
00:04:03.150Within a decade, London's water treatment and
00:04:03.150 -->
00:04:06.090distribution system was complemented by the most
00:04:06.090 -->
00:04:08.900advanced sewerage network. the world had ever
00:04:08.900 -->
00:04:12.400seen. This progression of sanitation technology
00:04:12.400 -->
00:04:15.580improved the quality of life for thousands of
00:04:15.580 -->
00:04:18.019Londoners, likely also preventing the deaths
00:04:18.019 -->
00:04:21.720of thousands more. The benefits of the advances
00:04:21.720 -->
00:04:24.279made in the 19th century were very often both
00:04:24.279 -->
00:04:29.100vast and visceral. Many more people lost their
00:04:29.100 -->
00:04:32.660lives in 1852 London as a result of the contaminated
00:04:32.660 -->
00:04:36.459pump than did as a result of the Iberian power
00:04:36.459 -->
00:04:40.060outage. But the scale of that power delivery
00:04:40.060 -->
00:04:42.899network on the Iberian Peninsula would have been
00:04:42.899 -->
00:04:45.500near impossible for the average 1852 resident
00:04:45.500 -->
00:04:50.120of Soho to comprehend, covering almost 600 ,000
00:04:50.120 -->
00:04:52.680square kilometres, including hundreds of power
00:04:52.680 -->
00:04:54.759stations and millions of homes and businesses.
00:04:54.980 -->
00:04:58.019And because of that scale, millions more were
00:04:58.019 -->
00:05:00.459affected in much more trivial ways by the power
00:05:00.459 -->
00:05:05.040cut than the cholera. Now, the outage was huge.
00:05:05.629 -->
00:05:08.129And an unusual failure for Western Europe. It's
00:05:08.129 -->
00:05:10.870not so unusual to hear of the largest cities
00:05:10.870 -->
00:05:13.769in Venezuela, South Africa or India to suffer
00:05:13.769 -->
00:05:16.670intermittent blackouts. And variously, these
00:05:16.670 -->
00:05:19.389are always attributed to ageing infrastructure,
00:05:19.649 -->
00:05:22.470supply constraints and underinvestment. But in
00:05:22.470 -->
00:05:25.029fairness, the first two clearly are just euphemisms
00:05:25.029 -->
00:05:29.730for the third. Spain and Portugal, though? Not
00:05:29.730 -->
00:05:32.689so much. It was a reminder of our vulnerability.
00:05:33.339 -->
00:05:36.540Now, much more is known today than at the time
00:05:36.540 -->
00:05:40.079about the causes. It'll be in 2026 that the official
00:05:40.079 -->
00:05:42.920investigation will report, and this will have
00:05:42.920 -->
00:05:44.980valuable information in it for power grids the
00:05:44.980 -->
00:05:47.199world over, for the enhancement of resilience,
00:05:47.519 -->
00:05:49.379the importance of preparedness, and the importance
00:05:49.379 -->
00:05:51.680of trusting good people to maintain cool heads
00:05:51.680 -->
00:05:55.800under pressure. It took 10 hours to fix the power
00:05:55.800 -->
00:05:58.899cut. It was massively inconvenient for the millions
00:05:58.899 -->
00:06:03.480affected. But that was dwarfed. by the impact
00:06:03.480 -->
00:06:05.839on the family and friends of the six people who
00:06:05.839 -->
00:06:09.939died. For comparison, it took 15 days to remedy
00:06:09.939 -->
00:06:13.980the cholera outbreak. 616 people died. And even
00:06:13.980 -->
00:06:16.800at that point, it was a natural flight of the
00:06:16.800 -->
00:06:19.339population away from the affected area that stifled
00:06:19.339 -->
00:06:22.139transmission, not the intervention of any authority.
00:06:22.319 -->
00:06:26.100The pump itself wasn't disabled until days later.
00:06:26.660 -->
00:06:29.079This was because the technology of the time had
00:06:29.079 -->
00:06:33.019yet to confirm the germ theory of disease. Disabling
00:06:33.019 -->
00:06:35.399a water pump when cholera was thought to be caught
00:06:35.399 -->
00:06:39.120from miasma or bad air was not straightforward
00:06:39.120 -->
00:06:43.100in 1852 London. Because of technological advances
00:06:43.100 -->
00:06:46.519we've made, today we have reliable, clean drinking
00:06:46.519 -->
00:06:50.160water from every tap in every house. We heat
00:06:50.160 -->
00:06:52.720our homes in winter without life -shortening
00:06:52.720 -->
00:06:56.160consequences of breathing wood smoke or the city's
00:06:56.160 -->
00:06:58.740strangling consequences of billowing smoke from
00:06:58.740 -->
00:07:01.899a chimney on every rooftop. Each year we manage
00:07:01.899 -->
00:07:04.199to do this with less contribution to the causes
00:07:04.199 -->
00:07:07.579of global warming. We have astonishingly capable
00:07:07.579 -->
00:07:10.620hospitals with emergency backup systems, all
00:07:10.620 -->
00:07:13.279of which are the results of millions of aggregated
00:07:13.279 -->
00:07:16.560advances in technology since 1851 and before.
00:07:16.879 -->
00:07:20.980By way of example, in 1885 we developed the first
00:07:20.980 -->
00:07:23.339ever cholera vaccine, pertinently enough for
00:07:23.339 -->
00:07:26.779this story, by a Spanish doctor called Juan Meferrani
00:07:26.779 -->
00:07:30.439Oclua. The antibiotic. Doxycycline was discovered
00:07:30.439 -->
00:07:34.000by Pfizer scientists in the early 1960s. It remains
00:07:34.000 -->
00:07:37.000the primary antibiotic treatment today for shortening
00:07:37.000 -->
00:07:40.759the course of the disease. Technology that we've
00:07:40.759 -->
00:07:44.480developed in medicine, physics, nutrition, sanitation,
00:07:44.899 -->
00:07:47.480engineering, construction, chemistry have resulted
00:07:47.480 -->
00:07:50.899in things like an astonishingly low global infant
00:07:50.899 -->
00:07:54.730mortality rate. The lowest it's ever been. It
00:07:54.730 -->
00:07:57.389results in 80 % of the world's one -year -olds
00:07:57.389 -->
00:07:59.990having been vaccinated against at least one disease,
00:08:00.250 -->
00:08:03.189in the number of deaths from natural causes halving
00:08:03.189 -->
00:08:07.350in the last 100 years. Technology has also had
00:08:07.350 -->
00:08:10.709a dramatic impact on global average life expectancy.
00:08:11.230 -->
00:08:15.069If you were born in 1800, on average, on Earth,
00:08:15.290 -->
00:08:18.389you could expect to live to the ripe old age
00:08:18.389 -->
00:08:23.110of 29. By 2025, that number had risen to 70.
00:08:23.310 -->
00:08:26.649The whole planet today has the average life expectancy
00:08:26.649 -->
00:08:32.070at birth of those born in the UK in 1956. Counterintuitively,
00:08:32.250 -->
00:08:34.970all those 69 -year -olds in the UK today who
00:08:34.970 -->
00:08:38.830were actually born in 1956 will on average live
00:08:38.830 -->
00:08:43.009another 16 or so years. This is because infant
00:08:43.009 -->
00:08:46.629mortality was a disproportionately active member
00:08:46.629 -->
00:08:49.840of the mortality family. Until relatively recently.
00:08:50.379 -->
00:08:56.779In 1965, Britain, 24 in 1 ,000 live -born children
00:08:56.779 -->
00:09:01.399would fail to survive infancy. By 2015, this
00:09:01.399 -->
00:09:04.600number had been beaten back to just 4 in 1 ,000.
00:09:05.659 -->
00:09:08.779The benefits of technological development just
00:09:08.779 -->
00:09:12.179keep landing. And we don't have to go back to
00:09:12.179 -->
00:09:15.320the 1800s or the 1950s to find the contrasts.
00:09:15.320 -->
00:09:18.179The momentum of this global technological development
00:09:18.179 -->
00:09:22.240has reshaped very recent history. By way of illustration,
00:09:22.320 -->
00:09:27.080in 1980, 40 % of the world's population lived
00:09:27.080 -->
00:09:32.759in a low income country. Today, that number has
00:09:32.759 -->
00:09:37.830not halved. It's halved twice. Only 10 % of the
00:09:37.830 -->
00:09:41.669world's population today lives in a low -income
00:09:41.669 -->
00:09:45.929country. All in my generation learned about the
00:09:45.929 -->
00:09:48.149developing world and the developed world, and
00:09:48.149 -->
00:09:51.429these labels have long been past their use by
00:09:51.429 -->
00:09:55.350date. By any measure, our world is a much better
00:09:55.350 -->
00:10:00.750place to live than at any time in the past. Those
00:10:00.750 -->
00:10:03.899numbers are little short of astonishing. But
00:10:03.899 -->
00:10:08.419they seem, shall we say, inconvenient for many
00:10:08.419 -->
00:10:12.419commentators. For some, painting the world as
00:10:12.419 -->
00:10:16.019relentlessly bad and in unstoppable decline presents
00:10:16.019 -->
00:10:19.340the perfect backdrop to whatever woo or ancient
00:10:19.340 -->
00:10:21.500wisdom or god that they're looking to promote.
00:10:21.980 -->
00:10:25.379Now, journalists can fairly be accused of committing
00:10:25.379 -->
00:10:27.519this offence far more frequently than thought
00:10:27.519 -->
00:10:29.830for the day presenters. They generally, though,
00:10:29.870 -->
00:10:32.210are not flogging crystals, reiki sessions, or
00:10:32.210 -->
00:10:36.610sermons by candlelight. Its prevalence in news
00:10:36.610 -->
00:10:39.750media appears to be a consequence of a long -building
00:10:39.750 -->
00:10:42.909preference for news that is bad. It happens so
00:10:42.909 -->
00:10:47.509much, it has a name, Declanism, which is a logical
00:10:47.509 -->
00:10:51.450fallacy defined as the belief, contrary to objective
00:10:51.450 -->
00:10:54.509evidence, that a society or institution is in
00:10:54.509 -->
00:10:57.409decline, commonly resulting from cognitive biases
00:10:57.409 -->
00:10:59.950where the past is viewed more favourably than
00:10:59.950 -->
00:11:02.990the future. Rose -tinted hindsight, perhaps.
00:11:03.990 -->
00:11:07.750I covered this a little in episode 08, in response
00:11:07.750 -->
00:11:10.330to Lucy Winkett recounting exclusively horrific
00:11:10.330 -->
00:11:13.450news stories to reinforce some guff she was attempting
00:11:13.450 -->
00:11:16.789to string together about Good Fridays. I wrote
00:11:16.789 -->
00:11:19.610then that this seemed understandable. One might
00:11:19.610 -->
00:11:21.889suppose that if people were convinced that modern
00:11:21.889 -->
00:11:23.730life were terrible, then you'd be better placed
00:11:23.730 -->
00:11:26.289to offer your ancient religion from a simpler
00:11:26.289 -->
00:11:28.889time to people as a means to find solace from
00:11:28.889 -->
00:11:31.570hardship and pain. I almost wonder if Charles
00:11:31.570 -->
00:11:34.110somehow heard this without realising it was criticism.
00:11:35.509 -->
00:11:39.230When anyone seeks to advance their own views
00:11:39.230 -->
00:11:42.850by making a general contrast between how bad
00:11:42.850 -->
00:11:45.330things are now compared to some time earlier,
00:11:45.470 -->
00:11:52.250they are engaged. in deceit. The truth is that
00:11:52.250 -->
00:11:55.610we are healthier and wealthier than at any time
00:11:55.610 -->
00:11:58.929in human history. We have more free time, we
00:11:58.929 -->
00:12:01.490have more education, all because of these advances
00:12:01.490 -->
00:12:05.330in technology. Despite all the parallel advances
00:12:05.330 -->
00:12:07.350that we've made in weapons and defense technology,
00:12:07.769 -->
00:12:10.409we also live in a time of unprecedented peace,
00:12:10.649 -->
00:12:13.190much as you'd never believe that from looking
00:12:13.190 -->
00:12:16.669at the news, battle -related deaths. have been
00:12:16.669 -->
00:12:20.169at around 2 in 100 ,000 as a global average for
00:12:20.169 -->
00:12:24.389decades. This is astonishingly low. In 1960,
00:12:24.769 -->
00:12:28.789that rate dropped below 5 per 100 ,000 for the
00:12:28.789 -->
00:12:33.850first time since before 1900. By 1971, it had
00:12:33.850 -->
00:12:37.230dropped to 2 in 100 ,000 and it's stayed there
00:12:37.230 -->
00:12:43.070ever since. So consider this. Fraser has a problem
00:12:43.070 -->
00:12:47.799with technology? Hmm. or does he have a problem
00:12:47.799 -->
00:12:50.360with his own inability to make appropriate use
00:12:50.360 -->
00:12:53.659of technology all our breakthroughs can be used
00:12:53.659 -->
00:12:57.820for good or ill if the problem is choice is a
00:12:57.820 -->
00:13:03.620bad vicar blaming his tools because all this
00:13:03.620 -->
00:13:06.460technology can also be a terrible distraction
00:13:06.460 -->
00:13:10.519that still small voice of calm is often frazzled
00:13:10.519 -->
00:13:14.289by the introduction of shiny new tech I suppose
00:13:14.289 -->
00:13:16.929that's why many find their God out on a walk
00:13:16.929 -->
00:13:19.169in the sunshine or playing in the garden with
00:13:19.169 -->
00:13:22.610their children. These technological breakdowns
00:13:22.610 -->
00:13:26.309remind us of the way our society is now inextricably
00:13:26.309 -->
00:13:29.330bound up with a technological complexity that
00:13:29.330 -->
00:13:33.049rules our lives. Yes, technology enables us to
00:13:33.049 -->
00:13:36.350achieve so much more than our ancestors. It creates
00:13:36.350 -->
00:13:39.350wealth, puts food on the table, allows us to
00:13:39.350 -->
00:13:41.409communicate with people all around the world,
00:13:41.529 -->
00:13:45.049saves people's eyes. But I also have some sympathy
00:13:45.049 -->
00:13:47.809with those who think we are addicted to it and
00:13:47.809 -->
00:13:50.570can never be completely free while so deeply
00:13:50.570 -->
00:13:55.590enmeshed within it. Terrible distraction. Or
00:13:55.590 -->
00:13:59.129wouldn't you rather be distracted by technology
00:13:59.129 -->
00:14:05.190than by hunger? By disease? Or by how you barely
00:14:05.190 -->
00:14:07.649knew your parents before they died? Or by choosing
00:14:07.649 -->
00:14:09.590which of your daughters will die because you
00:14:09.590 -->
00:14:12.269can only afford antibiotics for one of them?
00:14:12.519 -->
00:14:14.740Or by the randomness of death from childhood
00:14:14.740 -->
00:14:17.820diseases? Or by the superstition and hate that
00:14:17.820 -->
00:14:21.879develops from ignorance? Am I being unfair? I'm
00:14:21.879 -->
00:14:25.500not sure I am. Giles is clearly aware that technology
00:14:25.500 -->
00:14:28.299is more than just the phone in his pocket. He
00:14:28.299 -->
00:14:30.559mentions the broad benefits that it's delivered,
00:14:30.679 -->
00:14:32.940like food and wealth, yet listen to him talk
00:14:32.940 -->
00:14:36.440about people not being free. From what do these
00:14:36.440 -->
00:14:40.100people want freedom? Social security? Health?
00:14:40.590 -->
00:14:43.409Long life, clean drinking water? These are the
00:14:43.409 -->
00:14:45.710kind of naive comments you can forgive from an
00:14:45.710 -->
00:14:48.330idealistic six -former, but not from anyone,
00:14:48.590 -->
00:14:51.129given an opportunity to speak to millions for
00:14:51.129 -->
00:14:53.289three minutes on a Wednesday morning via the
00:14:53.289 -->
00:14:56.690BBC on Radio 4 in the middle of the Today programme.
00:14:57.710 -->
00:15:01.710We are not just enmeshed by the products of our
00:15:01.710 -->
00:15:04.169technological advances. We are, for significant
00:15:04.169 -->
00:15:08.250part, only alive because of these advances, and
00:15:08.250 -->
00:15:12.299we live objectively. better lives because of
00:15:12.299 -->
00:15:15.320all the technology we've developed we'd certainly
00:15:15.320 -->
00:15:17.080not be able to lead the healthy and prosperous
00:15:17.080 -->
00:15:19.879lives that we do benefit from the culture sport
00:15:19.879 -->
00:15:22.259hobbies that we take for granted if it were not
00:15:22.259 -->
00:15:25.779for technology that apparently creates such reason
00:15:25.779 -->
00:15:30.379for such complaint back in the 90s i used to
00:15:30.379 -->
00:15:33.159be the chaplain of an oxford college where the
00:15:33.159 -->
00:15:36.159chapel didn't use electricity it was lit exclusively
00:15:36.159 -->
00:15:39.230by candles Some thought this was deliberately
00:15:39.230 -->
00:15:42.110arcane, and perhaps it was, but there was a lovely
00:15:42.110 -->
00:15:44.490simplicity about that space that some modern
00:15:44.490 -->
00:15:47.190churches, with all their reliance on overhead
00:15:47.190 -->
00:15:50.110projectors and whizzy sound systems, don't quite
00:15:50.110 -->
00:15:52.509manage to capture, and that includes my own,
00:15:52.529 -->
00:15:57.269I confess. I feel that Giles really hasn't thought
00:15:57.269 -->
00:16:02.409this through. Perhaps he's commenting only on
00:16:02.409 -->
00:16:05.070the technology that he feels is somehow intrusive
00:16:05.070 -->
00:16:08.289for him, that is somehow a drag on... His plans
00:16:08.289 -->
00:16:11.549and his ideals. His smartphone, perhaps, and
00:16:11.549 -->
00:16:14.250the imperfect environment in his church for which
00:16:14.250 -->
00:16:18.169he blames some speakers and a projector. Clearly,
00:16:18.269 -->
00:16:22.250it doesn't bother him too much. Or he'd have
00:16:22.250 -->
00:16:26.450had them removed. He has a choice to make. There's
00:16:26.450 -->
00:16:29.450no fault here at the door of technology. Now,
00:16:29.470 -->
00:16:32.549if he wants to conduct services in a shrine to
00:16:32.549 -->
00:16:35.309a pre -industrial world, what's to stop him?
00:16:36.269 -->
00:16:38.809If he decides, though, that he and his church
00:16:38.809 -->
00:16:42.690will achieve their objectives better with a sprinkling
00:16:42.690 -->
00:16:44.909of the fruits of technological development, then
00:16:44.909 -->
00:16:46.590he needs to be a little more honest about the
00:16:46.590 -->
00:16:49.309choices he's made, rather than indulging in meaningless
00:16:49.309 -->
00:16:52.350nostalgia and kicking up a blamestorm at technology.
00:16:53.789 -->
00:16:57.210Fraser also claims that technological complexity
00:16:57.210 -->
00:17:03.259rules our lives. Is that a fair claim? Seems
00:17:03.259 -->
00:17:06.660unlikely. Sure, it's all but impossible to opt
00:17:06.660 -->
00:17:09.359out of modern medicine, artificially extended
00:17:09.359 -->
00:17:12.480winter days, planes, trains and automobiles.
00:17:12.519 -->
00:17:15.319But why would you? But are we ruled by those
00:17:15.319 -->
00:17:18.359times? Am I ruled by the utilities that supply
00:17:18.359 -->
00:17:21.019my house? Am I ruled by my ownership and the
00:17:21.019 -->
00:17:24.000running of a car? Am I ruled by the perfect coffee
00:17:24.000 -->
00:17:26.920I'm able to make effortlessly every morning at
00:17:26.920 -->
00:17:29.839the press of a button? or by the dishwasher that
00:17:29.839 -->
00:17:35.039saves me hours each week. No, I'm freed by them.
00:17:35.099 -->
00:17:39.900I have more choice because they exist. But I
00:17:39.900 -->
00:17:44.420have just straw -manned that argument. Fraser
00:17:44.420 -->
00:17:47.259didn't claim that technology rules our lives,
00:17:47.339 -->
00:17:51.880as I argued against. He claimed that technological
00:17:51.880 -->
00:17:56.599complexity rules our lives. Don't get me wrong,
00:17:56.680 -->
00:17:59.119I think Giles is away with the fairies here too,
00:17:59.279 -->
00:18:02.339but this claim raises a topic that I think does
00:18:02.339 -->
00:18:06.339merit some attention. My father recently became
00:18:06.339 -->
00:18:10.119a widower. 70 % of his life was spent in a marriage
00:18:10.119 -->
00:18:13.279to my mother. Now, it's sad that she's no longer
00:18:13.279 -->
00:18:16.279with us, but it wasn't unexpected, and by the
00:18:16.279 -->
00:18:19.039end, Dad had been a full -time carer for many,
00:18:19.140 -->
00:18:22.599many months. Now, he's gradually rediscovering
00:18:22.599 -->
00:18:25.289his life in the community where he lives. which
00:18:25.289 -->
00:18:27.269has involved showing up at various gatherings
00:18:27.269 -->
00:18:31.190put on for those of a similar vintage. He was
00:18:31.190 -->
00:18:33.609never one for joining things, but a neighbour
00:18:33.609 -->
00:18:36.410managed to rope into joining a session on how
00:18:36.410 -->
00:18:39.289to use phones and computers. My father found
00:18:39.289 -->
00:18:42.509it very rewarding. Not because he was lacking,
00:18:42.589 -->
00:18:44.529although had you asked him beforehand, he would
00:18:44.529 -->
00:18:47.809have said he was, but because he spent the entire
00:18:47.809 -->
00:18:51.170time showing others how easy and intuitive their
00:18:51.170 -->
00:18:53.410phones were, with just a few prods in the right
00:18:53.410 -->
00:18:58.839direction. My father has two children who are
00:18:58.839 -->
00:19:01.660much more than averagely able to navigate technology,
00:19:01.759 -->
00:19:04.220so he's never been more than a phone call away
00:19:04.220 -->
00:19:07.279from a helpful guide. It feels to me that my
00:19:07.279 -->
00:19:09.640father's generation has done a solid job of getting
00:19:09.640 -->
00:19:11.480to grips with the complexities of technology.
00:19:11.940 -->
00:19:15.259My dad stripped and rewired several family homes.
00:19:15.400 -->
00:19:17.500He fitted a central heating system to one of
00:19:17.500 -->
00:19:20.200them. He knew how to set the time on a VCR so
00:19:20.200 -->
00:19:22.500that one, it didn't permanently flash 12, and
00:19:22.500 -->
00:19:24.400two, it was possible to program the thing to
00:19:24.400 -->
00:19:27.380do the job for which it had been purchased. Typing,
00:19:27.400 -->
00:19:29.619though, was not something with which he ever
00:19:29.619 -->
00:19:32.220became familiar. He was given a laptop by his
00:19:32.220 -->
00:19:35.319employer in the early 90s. It was only used when
00:19:35.319 -->
00:19:39.180absolutely necessary. Now, Dad had no difficulty
00:19:39.180 -->
00:19:42.119using the famous menu interface of the Nokia
00:19:42.119 -->
00:19:46.099phones. But at no point did he develop any understanding
00:19:46.099 -->
00:19:48.259of the WIMP environment that dominates computers
00:19:48.259 -->
00:19:52.960today. Windows, icons, mouse, pointer. The modern
00:19:52.960 -->
00:19:56.160smartphone has done a masterful job of replacing
00:19:56.160 -->
00:19:58.140the mouse and the pointer with the tip of a finger,
00:19:58.259 -->
00:20:01.440and if you'll forgive the expression, reframing
00:20:01.440 -->
00:20:04.359the role of Windows. It's brilliantly intuitive
00:20:04.359 -->
00:20:07.539as an experience. The architecture, though, that
00:20:07.539 -->
00:20:09.640underpins all of the software design in our phones
00:20:09.640 -->
00:20:14.049is firmly rooted in WIMP. What is often called
00:20:14.049 -->
00:20:17.390intuitive software is perhaps just software that
00:20:17.390 -->
00:20:19.349makes sense to people with a rich experience
00:20:19.349 -->
00:20:22.670of using operating systems developed by Microsoft
00:20:22.670 -->
00:20:26.009and Apple. Most people I know today who get the
00:20:26.009 -->
00:20:28.009most out of their Macs and their smartphones
00:20:28.009 -->
00:20:31.769and their Windows computers retain a knowledge
00:20:31.769 -->
00:20:34.930of things like DOS and Unix, which are what predated
00:20:34.930 -->
00:20:37.210the graphical user interface operating systems
00:20:37.210 -->
00:20:43.140of Macs and Windows 3 .1. The touchscreen. made
00:20:43.140 -->
00:20:45.900the whole environment much more accessible. But
00:20:45.900 -->
00:20:47.579I believe there are some fundamental concepts
00:20:47.579 -->
00:20:50.000that dictate how that environment functions,
00:20:50.299 -->
00:20:52.920which are as alien to some as they are familiar
00:20:52.920 -->
00:20:56.940to me. And this can easily manifest itself as
00:20:56.940 -->
00:21:00.539impenetrable technological complexity. There
00:21:00.539 -->
00:21:02.980is a need for a few more like my dad who can
00:21:02.980 -->
00:21:05.599bridge the understanding gap between Gen X and
00:21:05.599 -->
00:21:08.309the boomers. between those who've spent an entire
00:21:08.309 -->
00:21:10.470working life on a keyboard and for those for
00:21:10.470 -->
00:21:12.430whom keyboards were exclusively for paperback
00:21:12.430 -->
00:21:15.990writers and secretaries. We do need to be cautious
00:21:15.990 -->
00:21:18.150of age being presented as too much of a factor.
00:21:18.269 -->
00:21:20.549I've got contemporaries with less ability to
00:21:20.549 -->
00:21:22.309use their phones and their Macs than my dad.
00:21:23.009 -->
00:21:25.549These too managed to spend careers not having
00:21:25.549 -->
00:21:28.009to spend countless hours operating machines,
00:21:28.089 -->
00:21:31.730running Windows and whatever version of OS X.
00:21:33.190 -->
00:21:37.119Smartphones. made ubiquitous this age -old software
00:21:37.119 -->
00:21:39.559environment. And perhaps what we just need is
00:21:39.559 -->
00:21:42.119a little more thought on how to ensure all the
00:21:42.119 -->
00:21:44.880software is as fundamentally intuitive as the
00:21:44.880 -->
00:21:48.519touchscreen interface. Just another example of
00:21:48.519 -->
00:21:51.440a challenge where careful thought, policy, education
00:21:51.440 -->
00:21:55.279and design can help deliver all of society the
00:21:55.279 -->
00:21:57.779experience of freedom, convenience and enrichment
00:21:57.779 -->
00:22:02.019that a smartphone can offer. To dismiss, the
00:22:02.019 -->
00:22:06.339challenge is... of this complexity as tyrannical
00:22:06.339 -->
00:22:10.779or oppressive is to fail to understand the nature
00:22:10.779 -->
00:22:13.859of the challenge. I suspect, though, it's much
00:22:13.859 -->
00:22:16.700worse than that. What I suspect it really is,
00:22:16.720 -->
00:22:20.660is a failure of curiosity, a failure of wonder,
00:22:20.859 -->
00:22:27.740and ultimately, a failure to care. Lest we forget.
00:22:28.400 -->
00:22:31.579Back to Fraser, who is now consumed with the
00:22:31.579 -->
00:22:36.099musings of some academic French theologian. The
00:22:36.099 -->
00:22:39.140French anarchist theologian Jacques Ellul argued
00:22:39.140 -->
00:22:41.839that the problem with technology is that it comes
00:22:41.839 -->
00:22:44.880to mediate everything we do in the name of efficiency,
00:22:45.240 -->
00:22:48.480and because of this something about simply being
00:22:48.480 -->
00:22:51.980is lost. Technology, he said, has become the
00:22:51.980 -->
00:22:57.000new sacred. Really? Everything I do is mediated
00:22:57.000 -->
00:23:01.279by my technology, by my flat -screen TV, by humanity's
00:23:01.279 -->
00:23:04.519ability to treat cancer, by the quality of the
00:23:04.519 -->
00:23:07.259clean water in my taps, and by the game Angry
00:23:07.259 -->
00:23:11.819Birds on my iPhone. And all of this technological
00:23:11.819 -->
00:23:17.759mediation is in the name of efficiency. Hogwash.
00:23:18.599 -->
00:23:21.740Seems probable that your anarchist, Giles, was
00:23:21.740 -->
00:23:24.380making reference to a very specific instance
00:23:24.380 -->
00:23:27.720of technology. Now, if he wasn't, he is full
00:23:27.720 -->
00:23:32.019of BS. If he was, you failed to relay his comments
00:23:32.019 -->
00:23:35.759in appropriate context, rendering them meaningless.
00:23:36.259 -->
00:23:38.920Now, let's imagine Elul had something sensible
00:23:38.920 -->
00:23:41.519to say, and he was commenting on something specific,
00:23:41.579 -->
00:23:43.279something that chimes a little with the points
00:23:43.279 -->
00:23:46.579that he's seeking to land. Corporate email, perhaps.
00:23:47.400 -->
00:23:52.079If so, still claptrap. So assuming you've sorted
00:23:52.079 -->
00:23:54.019out your big idea and how you're going to finance
00:23:54.019 -->
00:23:58.140it, business is about getting things done. If
00:23:58.140 -->
00:24:00.160you're paying for someone's time, you need them
00:24:00.160 -->
00:24:03.160to be busy, but not for its own sake. You need
00:24:03.160 -->
00:24:07.019that busyness to be effective. Now, if email
00:24:07.019 -->
00:24:10.819is more effective than Royal Mail, there's going
00:24:10.819 -->
00:24:13.799to be a switch. Now, will there be challenges
00:24:13.799 -->
00:24:17.000with a wholesale business? overnight adoption
00:24:17.000 -->
00:24:19.640of an instant electronic messaging service that
00:24:19.640 -->
00:24:23.940is effectively free to use. Oh yes. Now, have
00:24:23.940 -->
00:24:27.079many of those been worked out by software writers,
00:24:27.339 -->
00:24:30.099by experience, and by thoughtful practice? Yes.
00:24:30.200 -->
00:24:33.839Now, if Elul wrote these comments between 1996
00:24:33.839 -->
00:24:37.680and 2006 about corporate email, I can see where
00:24:37.680 -->
00:24:40.460he may have been coming from. There was a tragedy
00:24:40.460 -->
00:24:43.619of the comments. Email took no effort to use,
00:24:43.759 -->
00:24:49.000and it was instant. So it was abused. It took
00:24:49.000 -->
00:24:52.180businesses time to work out how to keep the advantages
00:24:52.180 -->
00:24:55.180without incurring the burden on staff of 300
00:24:55.180 -->
00:24:58.099emails a day, of which perhaps 30 were necessary.
00:24:58.660 -->
00:25:01.160Good businesses, good leaders and good people
00:25:01.160 -->
00:25:04.380worked this stuff out. No doubt there are many
00:25:04.380 -->
00:25:07.119workplaces that are stuck in the 90s, but that's
00:25:07.119 -->
00:25:10.660a them problem. And in any event, none of this
00:25:10.660 -->
00:25:13.519is a technology issue. It's a use issue. One.
00:25:13.950 -->
00:25:16.869That can be solved and has been solved to a greater
00:25:16.869 -->
00:25:22.710extent with thought, policy and education. Let's
00:25:22.710 -->
00:25:26.549revisit that near enough mass panic that Giles
00:25:26.549 -->
00:25:29.369described in relation to the Iberian power outage.
00:25:29.670 -->
00:25:32.309Now, Madrid, the largest city affected, rolled
00:25:32.309 -->
00:25:36.430out Pan Am, which is this emergency plan. They
00:25:36.430 -->
00:25:40.150had a plan. The plan worked. Now, in parallel,
00:25:40.430 -->
00:25:43.569the power companies. systematically identified,
00:25:44.069 -->
00:25:46.150isolated and fixed the power supply problems.
00:25:46.650 -->
00:25:51.029All the power was back on within 10 hours. A
00:25:51.029 -->
00:25:54.369vast amount of that recovery would be automatic.
00:25:55.089 -->
00:25:58.730Spain and Portugal were automatically isolated
00:25:58.730 -->
00:26:02.410from the international grid. The nuclear power
00:26:02.410 -->
00:26:05.789stations in Spain and Portugal disconnected from
00:26:05.789 -->
00:26:10.329the Iberian grid automatically. The re -energization
00:26:10.329 -->
00:26:13.490of the system over four countries, Spain, Morocco,
00:26:13.710 -->
00:26:16.970Portugal and France, was a dance of automation
00:26:16.970 -->
00:26:21.170and standard operating procedure. Yeah, trains
00:26:21.170 -->
00:26:23.269stopped and had to be evacuated. Most challenging
00:26:23.269 -->
00:26:27.130of these were city subway services. Sure, extra
00:26:27.130 -->
00:26:29.349police were needed in some cities, but predominantly
00:26:29.349 -->
00:26:31.950to help control traffic in the absence of signals.
00:26:32.690 -->
00:26:35.890And while backup systems kicked in for hundreds
00:26:35.890 -->
00:26:38.880of hospitals, Much business and communication
00:26:38.880 -->
00:26:42.220did come to a halt as the outage affected internet
00:26:42.220 -->
00:26:45.700infrastructure and cell towers. There were reports
00:26:45.700 -->
00:26:48.160of fear and confusion. Well, you'd kind of expect
00:26:48.160 -->
00:26:51.660that. But there were just as many reports of
00:26:51.660 -->
00:26:54.680streets and terraces developing a cheerful ambience
00:26:54.680 -->
00:26:59.779and a festive mood. In fairness, Giles broadcast
00:26:59.779 -->
00:27:02.720his comments barely 48 hours after the outage
00:27:02.720 -->
00:27:05.470began. He'd have had almost no reliable information
00:27:05.470 -->
00:27:07.849on what had happened, and he'd have had basically
00:27:07.849 -->
00:27:10.170what the news providers felt was newsworthy and
00:27:10.170 -->
00:27:13.470what the trolls thought was clickbait. This should
00:27:13.470 -->
00:27:15.809have tempered his report of the incident, but
00:27:15.809 -->
00:27:20.890I'm not sure it did. Fraser did, though, close
00:27:20.890 -->
00:27:24.289with these sentences. But I wonder if there were
00:27:24.289 -->
00:27:27.009some people who, freed from the tyranny of the
00:27:27.009 -->
00:27:30.569internet and the train timetable, found a surprising
00:27:30.569 -->
00:27:33.720likeness. Or something else, maybe. i wonder
00:27:33.720 -->
00:27:35.619if there will be a spike in the birth -rate in
00:27:35.619 -->
00:27:38.880nine months time for a moment perhaps something
00:27:38.880 -->
00:27:42.319had lifted where older gods and more human pleasures
00:27:42.319 -->
00:27:45.180could be given the time and the space that they
00:27:45.180 -->
00:27:50.319require that closing comment would prove to be
00:27:50.319 -->
00:27:52.240much closer to the mark than those with which
00:27:52.240 -->
00:27:54.720he opened yet he was happy to indulge groundless
00:27:54.720 -->
00:27:57.160speculation indeed he led with his groundless
00:27:57.160 -->
00:28:00.400claim of near enough mass panic likely, I imagine,
00:28:00.500 -->
00:28:02.640because it provided a convenient bridge to the
00:28:02.640 -->
00:28:04.680rubbish he was planning to spew about technology.
00:28:06.740 -->
00:28:10.400But technology again here is conflated with business.
00:28:11.160 -->
00:28:14.779The tyranny of the internet and the train timetable.
00:28:16.099 -->
00:28:19.900Cobblers. In this case, trains and a data connection
00:28:19.900 -->
00:28:22.339were in the service of paid work. Almost all
00:28:22.339 -->
00:28:24.539of us work, we sell our labour or the fruits
00:28:24.539 -->
00:28:27.160of it. Now Noam Chomsky would have us believe
00:28:27.160 -->
00:28:30.500that... A job is a form of tyranny. There are
00:28:30.500 -->
00:28:32.680powerful counter -arguments, but if there is
00:28:32.680 -->
00:28:34.940any tyranny in the situation upon which Giles
00:28:34.940 -->
00:28:37.480comments, it's a perception amongst employees
00:28:37.480 -->
00:28:40.359that the boss is a tyrant, not that the internet
00:28:40.359 -->
00:28:43.259is a tyrant or that train timetables are tyrants.
00:28:44.059 -->
00:28:47.339It was the legitimate reason people unexpectedly
00:28:47.339 -->
00:28:52.000had to sack off work and head out for a beer
00:28:52.000 -->
00:28:55.910that resulted in the likeness. History is dripping
00:28:55.910 -->
00:28:58.869with examples of people coming together in adversity
00:28:58.869 -->
00:29:02.109and shared purpose. The leap that Giles made
00:29:02.109 -->
00:29:06.049instead to tech tyranny was, at best, willfully
00:29:06.049 -->
00:29:11.589stupid. If he's right about the birth rate, I
00:29:11.589 -->
00:29:13.970can imagine this coming at something of a cost.
00:29:14.690 -->
00:29:17.750So there's a load of commuters, freed from the
00:29:17.750 -->
00:29:20.430office, taking to the nearby bars and restaurants
00:29:20.430 -->
00:29:22.630as they improvised alternatives to heading home
00:29:22.630 -->
00:29:26.980to their loved ones. Let's hope that Fraser's
00:29:26.980 -->
00:29:30.200contemplation of this esprit de corps benefited
00:29:30.200 -->
00:29:33.000from one other vital technological development.
00:29:33.920 -->
00:29:39.099That of birth control. Let's also look at those
00:29:39.099 -->
00:29:42.640reports of fear and confusion. And what we might
00:29:42.640 -->
00:29:46.519learn from needlessly adding to them. Within
00:29:46.519 -->
00:29:48.96023 minutes of the blackout starting, there were
00:29:48.960 -->
00:29:51.200reports on social media that it was a Russian
00:29:51.200 -->
00:29:54.960cyber attack. falsely attributed to CNN, the
00:29:54.960 -->
00:29:58.599European Union and the utility companies. All
00:29:58.599 -->
00:30:02.079completely false. Malicious or thoughtless actors
00:30:02.079 -->
00:30:04.839stirring chaos while commuters, families and
00:30:04.839 -->
00:30:07.880students calmly dealt with pitch black underground
00:30:07.880 -->
00:30:10.420trains with locked doors and no air conditioning
00:30:10.420 -->
00:30:13.880to ensure everyone was safely evacuated in the
00:30:13.880 -->
00:30:17.299absence of platforms in kilometres of unlit tunnels.
00:30:18.180 -->
00:30:21.500Fear and confusion? Yes, because some like...
00:30:21.680 -->
00:30:24.079to spread fear and confusion with lies and propaganda
00:30:24.079 -->
00:30:28.480with little thought of the consequences. Others,
00:30:28.599 -->
00:30:34.059Giles, just calmly got on. Talk about having
00:30:34.059 -->
00:30:38.099your perspective and priorities out of kilter.
00:30:38.299 -->
00:30:41.220Thought for the day is billed as providing religious
00:30:41.220 -->
00:30:43.519perspective on people and events in the news.
00:30:43.859 -->
00:30:46.619This... This is the religious perspective for
00:30:46.619 -->
00:30:49.099which Thought for the Day exists. This is just
00:30:49.099 -->
00:30:52.039ill thought out, rambling and disinformation.
00:30:52.240 -->
00:30:57.420It has no place in the output of the BBC. Unfortunately,
00:30:57.799 -->
00:31:02.819he was not yet done. We worship it and the tech
00:31:02.819 -->
00:31:06.039moguls who supply it. Every new app promises
00:31:06.039 -->
00:31:08.940a kind of salvation. Every gadget a better way
00:31:08.940 -->
00:31:13.069of living. But is my fancy smartphone just a
00:31:13.069 -->
00:31:16.210tool for me to use, making life easier, more
00:31:16.210 -->
00:31:20.210efficient? Or am I its slave, its servant? Are
00:31:20.210 -->
00:31:22.750the new solutions we find to many of life's challenges
00:31:22.750 -->
00:31:26.289just creating a new network of constraints to
00:31:26.289 -->
00:31:32.890trap us? We worship technology? What the... Fraser,
00:31:33.109 -->
00:31:35.569did you realise that you were 20 seconds short
00:31:35.569 -->
00:31:39.569and started jotting down any old rubbish? Worship
00:31:39.569 -->
00:31:43.170of technology, salvation through software. Please,
00:31:43.390 -->
00:31:48.549be serious. And the moguls, Mark Zuckerberg and
00:31:48.549 -->
00:31:53.269Elon Musk, are among the least liked individuals
00:31:53.269 -->
00:31:57.869on earth. Now, maybe I missed a meeting. Does
00:31:57.869 -->
00:32:01.089Tesla now recharge churches? Does Facebook now
00:32:01.089 -->
00:32:04.650do God Book? Now, the worship of tech as hyperbolic
00:32:04.650 -->
00:32:08.970rhetoric is tolerable if fanciful. Worship of
00:32:08.970 -->
00:32:12.490the moguls who supply that tech is a preposterous
00:32:12.490 -->
00:32:15.369suggestion, and he didn't suggest it, he claimed
00:32:15.369 -->
00:32:21.970it as fact. Now, there are some interesting examples.
00:32:22.190 -->
00:32:24.289Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are the two that spring
00:32:24.289 -->
00:32:27.769to mind. Individuals who managed to capture the
00:32:27.769 -->
00:32:30.710imagination of some section of the public, both,
00:32:30.750 -->
00:32:34.289if not worshipped, were revered and fetishised.
00:32:34.690 -->
00:32:37.089With Gates, it was mostly focused on his wealth.
00:32:38.029 -->
00:32:40.970which in nine years from 1991 grew from just
00:32:40.970 -->
00:32:45.089$5 billion to over $100 billion. With Jobs, it
00:32:45.089 -->
00:32:47.809was more layered. He had an astonishing turnaround
00:32:47.809 -->
00:32:50.529story, but there was also an air of the unconventional
00:32:50.529 -->
00:32:54.109and a drive to bring beauty, elegance and joy
00:32:54.109 -->
00:32:57.750to products that for 30 years or more had been
00:32:57.750 -->
00:33:02.569uninspiring beige and black boxes. But worship?
00:33:03.289 -->
00:33:09.279No. Not even close. Now, as for whether slave
00:33:09.279 -->
00:33:14.180or master, that's on you, you muppet. Your decisions,
00:33:14.420 -->
00:33:18.099your strength of character. Now, enough projecting
00:33:18.099 -->
00:33:21.240your flaws and bad choices on the tech bros and
00:33:21.240 -->
00:33:23.400the shiny toys they make. Now, if you're trapped
00:33:23.400 -->
00:33:25.880in some new network, good to hear that you've
00:33:25.880 -->
00:33:28.319identified the problem. Surely you're now halfway
00:33:28.319 -->
00:33:31.000to solving it. Now, guys, get on and do that,
00:33:31.119 -->
00:33:35.230but please. Enough with broadcasting your journey.
00:33:35.430 -->
00:33:38.170Thought for the day is not a self -help slot,
00:33:38.369 -->
00:33:40.809although I can imagine it would be incalculably
00:33:40.809 -->
00:33:43.569better if it were, which illustrates just how
00:33:43.569 -->
00:33:47.690low the bar is set by this brainless simpering.
00:33:51.029 -->
00:33:53.990Well, thank you for listening to Second Thought.
00:33:54.210 -->
00:33:56.609Thank you also, I guess, to Giles Fraser for
00:33:56.609 -->
00:33:58.670providing so much into which we could so easily
00:33:58.670 -->
00:34:02.309get teeth. For details of what this podcast is
00:34:02.309 -->
00:34:05.250and why I do it, for show notes, links and transcripts,
00:34:05.250 -->
00:34:08.769please visit secondthoughtfortheday .com or search
00:34:08.769 -->
00:34:11.030for Second Thought for the Day and subscribe,
00:34:11.230 -->
00:34:13.349like and comment wherever you get your podcasts.
00:34:13.769 -->
00:34:16.550Now, if interested in some background, please
00:34:16.550 -->
00:34:18.809listen to the very first Second Thought podcast,
00:34:18.909 -->
00:34:21.610which outlines the target of the criticism and
00:34:21.610 -->
00:34:26.070my objectives. Complaints levelled at Thought
00:34:26.070 -->
00:34:27.670for the Day are typically that the content is
00:34:27.670 -->
00:34:29.969boring and repetitive or that it is insufficiently
00:34:29.969 -->
00:34:32.789diverse, being mostly Christian, never secular,
00:34:32.989 -->
00:34:35.730and perhaps even falling short of the BBC's requirements
00:34:35.730 -->
00:34:39.289for impartiality. My complaint is something else.
00:34:39.989 -->
00:34:43.429The BBC is not only required to maintain due
00:34:43.429 -->
00:34:48.760impartiality, but also due accuracy. It's my
00:34:48.760 -->
00:34:51.400view that the BBC fails in its duty to hold thought
00:34:51.400 -->
00:34:54.760for the day to any standard of accuracy. Typically
00:34:54.760 -->
00:34:57.260these failings take two forms. The first is simply
00:34:57.260 -->
00:35:01.699a failure to relay facts faithfully or to present
00:35:01.699 -->
00:35:03.800as facts something that is merely conjecture
00:35:03.800 -->
00:35:07.179or belief. The second failure is one of reason.
00:35:07.679 -->
00:35:10.679Logical fallacies litter many thought for the
00:35:10.679 -->
00:35:13.539day broadcasts. Every logical fallacy distorts
00:35:13.539 -->
00:35:16.019truth and any deviation from the truth is by
00:35:16.019 -->
00:35:20.139definition an example. of inaccuracy now i'm
00:35:20.139 -->
00:35:23.920not here to mock faith or the faithful or religion
00:35:23.920 -->
00:35:27.980but clearly i do when justified but mostly the
00:35:27.980 -->
00:35:30.179podcast is here to shoot holes that deserve to
00:35:30.179 -->
00:35:33.360be shot in the false premises unsupported claims
00:35:33.360 -->
00:35:36.480hanging comparisons non -sequiturs and any other
00:35:36.480 -->
00:35:40.039logical fallacies that we find the bbc has allowed
00:35:40.039 -->
00:35:42.039thought for the day to trot out