Back to basics: Consolidation–Presentation and disclosure

WEBVTT
00:00:00.479 --> 00:00:04.400
Thought leadership from PWC's national office.
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:11.839
Hello, and welcome to PWC's Accounting Podcast.
00:00:12.000 --> 00:00:13.359
I'm Heather Horn.
00:00:13.839 --> 00:00:18.239
Today we're wrapping up the back to basic series on consolidation accounting.
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:41.280
Over the last three episodes, we've revisited the consolidation framework with Matt Sabatini, a deputy chief accountant in PWC's national office, and Alexander Martin, a partner in PWC's deals practice, from understanding the two consolidation models to identifying a variable interest entity or VIE, and finally determining who, if anyone, actually consolidates it.
00:00:41.520 --> 00:00:52.960
For today, the final episode, we're turning our attention to presentation and disclosures under the consolidation frameworks, including both VIEs and voting interest entities or VOEs.
00:00:56.560 --> 00:01:16.560
Matt and Alexander walk through what companies need to think about once they've reached their consolidation conclusion, including how consolidated entities are presented in the financial statements, the disclosure requirements that apply to VIEs, and what may need to be disclosed even when a company has an interest in a VIE but does not consolidate it.
00:01:17.280 --> 00:01:24.480
This episode builds nicely on the first three, but it's also a standalone if presentation and disclosure is the area you're focused on.
00:01:24.879 --> 00:01:33.760
Joining Matt and Alexander to lead this conversation is our guest host, Diana Stoltzfest, who's a partner in PWCC's national office and a frequent guest on the podcast.
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:38.480
With that, let's go to Diana's conversation with Matt and Alexander.
00:01:39.519 --> 00:01:42.000
Thanks so much for joining me for this conversation today.
00:01:42.319 --> 00:01:43.519
Thanks for having us, Diana.
00:01:43.680 --> 00:01:44.560
Really excited to be here.
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:45.599
Yeah, likewise.
00:01:45.760 --> 00:01:47.680
Um mostly because we're talking about disclosures.
00:01:47.840 --> 00:01:50.959
I know sometimes people think disclosures and they think snooze fest.
00:01:51.200 --> 00:02:01.760
Um and most of the time, I can't speak for Matt, but for myself, a lot of the times when we talk about consolidation, most of the time people are thinking about should I or should I not consolidate this entity.
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:06.400
Um, but they don't spend enough time thinking about what those disclosures will actually look like once they get the answer.
00:02:06.480 --> 00:02:06.640
Right.
00:02:06.719 --> 00:02:08.240
And I think that's just as important, right?
00:02:08.319 --> 00:02:12.240
It's it's your chance to explain to the financial statement users what's going on.
00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:18.960
Um, it's also an area that tends to get some comments from the SEC staff, especially around VIEs and structured transactions.
00:02:19.199 --> 00:02:24.319
Not that I'm necessarily trying to scare anybody into paying attention, but I'm also not not trying to scare people.
00:02:24.800 --> 00:02:25.280
Well, great.
00:02:25.360 --> 00:02:28.400
That's some good reminders and a little motivation for our listeners.
00:02:28.639 --> 00:02:29.759
So let's get started.
00:02:29.919 --> 00:02:36.240
Matt, can you kick us off with a high-level overview of what consolidated financial statements are and why they matter?
00:02:36.639 --> 00:02:38.319
Yeah, I'm happy to get started.
00:02:38.560 --> 00:02:49.120
So at a high level, consolidated financial statements, they present the financial position and operations of a parent company combined with its subsidiaries as if it's a single reporting entity.
00:02:49.360 --> 00:02:58.560
So really the guidance around 810 and rule SX, they they have a fundamental principle that drives what you know, what good financial reporting is, right?
00:02:58.639 --> 00:03:06.560
And there's an underlying concept that consolidated financial statements are presumed to be more meaningful for entities in which you have a controlling financial interest, right?
00:03:06.639 --> 00:03:07.439
And why is that?
00:03:07.680 --> 00:03:14.639
Well, the idea behind that is it's clearer and it's a more complete picture of the overall financial performance of the group.
00:03:14.800 --> 00:03:23.439
Um, so like I mentioned, the key framework that describes the disclosure requirements and the presentation requirements are in ASCA 10 and also rule SX.
00:03:23.919 --> 00:03:25.919
Yeah, and I really like your picture analogy.
00:03:26.080 --> 00:03:37.680
Like to me, the way I keep it straight in my head is it's almost like a jigsaw puzzle where you're assembling all of your different pieces, in this case that being the separate legal entities, into one cohesive picture, which is your consolidated financial statements.
00:03:37.840 --> 00:03:42.879
So there's some specific requirements about how you end up pulling that together and ultimately what that looks like.
00:03:43.039 --> 00:03:45.759
Those are your presentation requirements, which we'll hit today.
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:49.520
Um, additionally, and I think most importantly, is the story behind that picture.
00:03:49.680 --> 00:03:51.759
That's where the disclosures come into play.
00:03:51.919 --> 00:03:55.840
Um, there's also some very specific requirements about what those need to include too.
00:03:56.080 --> 00:04:01.039
Broadly speaking, though, the the presentation and disclosure rules can fall into three separate buckets, right?
00:04:01.120 --> 00:04:07.919
So you have the presentation and the disclosures that apply to all consolidated entities, regardless of whether it's a VIE or VOE.
00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:18.079
Then you have incremental disclosure items specifically for VIEs, and then you have the overarching SEC specific considerations that our public registrant listeners need to think about.
00:04:18.319 --> 00:04:20.160
Well, that's a very helpful overview.
00:04:20.399 --> 00:04:26.800
Matt, maybe you can start with some high-level presentation and disclosure requirements when a company consolidates a subsidiary.
00:04:27.199 --> 00:04:27.519
Sure.
00:04:27.759 --> 00:04:29.920
I'm gonna start with um presentation, right?
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:34.639
And the goal behind presentation, similar to disclosure, is transparency.
00:04:34.800 --> 00:04:39.360
And you're gonna hear us say that word a lot, like for our listeners who are playing the drinking game at home.
00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:42.319
It's gonna it's gonna be a rough one for you.
00:04:42.480 --> 00:04:48.079
Um so investors and regulators really want to understand how consolidation impacts financial statements.
00:04:48.399 --> 00:04:51.040
So some key points to keep in mind on presentation, right?
00:04:51.199 --> 00:04:59.680
For all consolidated subsidiaries, that is, all entities in which you have a controlling financial interest, the financial statements will be presented as if it's one reporting entity.
00:04:59.839 --> 00:05:01.120
So I know we said that earlier.
00:05:01.279 --> 00:05:04.319
The technical term for that is we smush them all together.
00:05:05.040 --> 00:05:10.480
So, right, and when you do that, right, like when you smush entities together, there are some things you have to keep in mind, right?
00:05:10.560 --> 00:05:14.000
Because it's not as simple as just combining all of the line items.
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:23.360
You also have to understand when there are entity or intercompany transactions or balances, because putting things together like that can result in some double counting.
00:05:23.439 --> 00:05:25.199
So you're gonna have to eliminate all of that.
00:05:25.279 --> 00:05:28.160
Um, so you kind of get rid of all that noise in the financial statements.
00:05:28.399 --> 00:05:37.199
The other thing to think about is when you're doing the combination of these financial statements in a consolidated set, it's for all wholly owned and partially owned subsidiaries.
00:05:37.360 --> 00:05:40.079
So partially owned subsidiaries come with their own nuances, right?
00:05:40.160 --> 00:05:46.240
You have to think about how am I gonna show to the reader that I'm consolidating the financial statements, but I don't own all of it.
00:05:46.319 --> 00:05:46.399
Right.
00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:52.399
So I have to allocate a piece of the balance sheet that represents the non-controlling interest holder's claim on the net assets.
00:05:52.560 --> 00:05:58.319
I have to think about the income statement where I attribute a bit of the net income to the non-controlling interest holder as well.
00:05:58.560 --> 00:06:02.720
And then a reconciliation of stockholders' equity that's just changed in the ownership status.
00:06:03.040 --> 00:06:03.199
Yeah.
00:06:03.279 --> 00:06:17.199
So then layering on top the public company lens that I mentioned, there's also some specific SEC rules that mandate additional disclosures when you either have a majority-owned subsidiary that you're not consolidating, or when you have a less a majority-owned subsidiary that you are consolidating.
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:19.439
And that's something that the staff tends to keep their eye on.
00:06:19.680 --> 00:06:20.319
Okay, great.
00:06:20.480 --> 00:06:22.319
And I'm glad you mentioned disclosures here.
00:06:22.399 --> 00:06:26.720
Are there any general disclosure principles we want to cover before we dive into the specifics?
00:06:26.959 --> 00:06:27.199
Yeah.
00:06:27.360 --> 00:06:34.319
Um, maybe starting just as a general rule, entities should be disclosing their consolidation policy and their basis of consolidation.
00:06:34.560 --> 00:06:39.759
Really, that just means essentially how are they determining whether they have a controlling financial interest or not.
00:06:39.920 --> 00:06:47.680
Um, like I mentioned before, you should be disclosing your exceptions to consolidation when you have majority ownership but you're not consolidating and vice versa.
00:06:47.839 --> 00:06:55.360
Um, you also want to be disclosing any changes to your consolidation approach or any significant deconsolidation events that have happened and why.
00:06:55.519 --> 00:07:06.079
Um and lastly, to the extent you have any significant non-controlling interests that Matt mentioned, you also may want to also be describing how income allocations are made between the controlling and non-controlling interests.
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:14.079
So, for example, if you're using um an HLBV method, also known as a wonky accounting method, um, you should be disclosing that as well to make it clear.
00:07:14.240 --> 00:07:19.120
And these apply to all consolidated entities, regardless of whether it's a VIE or a voting interest entity.
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:20.079
Okay, got it.
00:07:20.240 --> 00:07:24.160
Now that you've mentioned both VIEs and VIEs, let's break it down.
00:07:24.399 --> 00:07:26.560
How do your disclosure requirements differ?
00:07:26.720 --> 00:07:28.639
Maybe we'll start with VIEs.
00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:31.199
What makes an entity a VIE in the first place?
00:07:31.600 --> 00:07:31.759
Right.
00:07:32.000 --> 00:07:34.000
Diana, I wish I wish it were that easy.
00:07:34.160 --> 00:07:42.399
Um my best advice for you is to go back and listen to the three-part podcast that we did the summer, really to find out what makes an entity a VIE.
00:07:42.560 --> 00:07:56.480
But in all seriousness, right, if you can simplify it, it would be a VIE is an entity where the voting rights, and those are generally resident within the common stock of an entity, those aren't the most relevant means for determining if anyone has a controlling financial interest.
00:07:56.639 --> 00:08:04.639
So generally, in those situations, control or power is obtained by a reporting entity through another means, either contractual or financial dependency.
00:08:04.800 --> 00:08:08.720
That's that's the as best as I can do in a one-minute description of a VIE.
00:08:08.959 --> 00:08:12.480
Yeah, and and I'll uh pile onto the shameless plug for the podcast series.
00:08:12.560 --> 00:08:17.120
I recently listened to it and I thought the guests were really engaging and very hilarious too.
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:28.560
Um, what I did learn from the podcast was that even if a company doesn't hold a majority voting stake, it still could be required to consolidate the entity if it's determined to be the primary beneficiary or the one that consolidates.
00:08:28.959 --> 00:08:29.120
Okay.
00:08:29.279 --> 00:08:36.000
So if a company determines it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, what do the financial statements need to reflect?
00:08:36.399 --> 00:08:36.559
Right.
00:08:36.639 --> 00:08:42.799
So if a company is the primary beneficiary, it must consolidate the VIE's financials as if it were any other subsidiary.
00:08:42.960 --> 00:08:43.200
Right.
00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:49.600
So that means the financial statements of the VIE are smushed together with the financial statements of the parent or the primary beneficiary.
00:08:49.919 --> 00:08:53.279
Just like we talked about earlier, all of the other considerations also apply.
00:08:53.360 --> 00:08:58.000
So the policies and procedures around under company accounts and controlling and non-controlling interest all apply.
00:08:58.240 --> 00:08:58.559
Okay.
00:08:58.879 --> 00:09:02.720
Are there any differences in the presentation of a consolidated VIE?
00:09:02.960 --> 00:09:04.000
Yes, great question.
00:09:04.159 --> 00:09:05.840
Um, there are some important differences.
00:09:06.000 --> 00:09:18.000
So, first, you're required to separately present the VIE's assets that can only be used to settle its obligations, and the VIE's obligations where creditors have no recourse to the company or the parent company's general credit.
00:09:18.320 --> 00:09:27.519
Idea here being is that because many VIEs are highly structured, we want to clearly show the users any assets or liabilities that are restricted to the VIE itself and can't be used by the parent.
00:09:27.759 --> 00:09:30.960
Also, these assets and liabilities have to be presented on a gross basis.
00:09:31.120 --> 00:09:32.399
You can't just net the two.
00:09:32.480 --> 00:09:34.799
Um SEC staff's pretty strict about that one.
00:09:35.120 --> 00:09:36.399
Okay, that's interesting.
00:09:36.639 --> 00:09:44.000
So, do companies have to present these segregated assets and liabilities in their own light items for every consolidated VIE?
00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:46.559
I can't imagine how confusing that balance sheet might look.
00:09:47.200 --> 00:09:48.399
Thankfully, no.
00:09:48.799 --> 00:09:53.120
Um, companies have several approaches that they can take to comply with these presentation requirements.
00:09:53.279 --> 00:10:02.879
So the most common ones that I see are a parenthetical disclosure about the amounts that's held in the VIE for each relevant FSLI or financial statement line item on the face of the balance sheet.
00:10:03.039 --> 00:10:11.200
Um, also, the guidance does allow for the aggregation of the same or similar assets or liabilities of all consolidated VIEs into one line item.
00:10:11.279 --> 00:10:14.480
So that does kind of help with the decluttering of the balance sheet.
00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:19.120
Matt likes to joke that the FASB was embracing their inner Marie condo when they came up with that one.
00:10:19.440 --> 00:10:19.840
Well, great.
00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:21.200
Well, very feng shui.
00:10:21.519 --> 00:10:24.080
So, Matt, what about disclosures for VIEs?
00:10:24.639 --> 00:10:24.879
Right.
00:10:25.039 --> 00:10:33.519
So, one of the important things about VIE disclosure rules, and this is one that people forget a lot, is it's it's not just for your consolidated VIEs that you have disclosure requirements.
00:10:33.600 --> 00:10:36.559
It's also for VIEs in which you have an interest, but you don't consolidate.
00:10:36.639 --> 00:10:38.000
So I think people miss that.
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:46.960
Um, but talking about VIE disclosures, it was one of those standards where the FASBI has laid out objective and objectives and principles behind the disclosures.
00:10:47.120 --> 00:10:52.720
So it's not just a list of requirements, and here are all the checks that you have to hit to meet the requirements.
00:10:52.879 --> 00:10:56.559
It's making sure that you've met the spirit of what those requirements are.
00:10:56.720 --> 00:10:59.759
So some of the objectives, I'll just list them off, right?
00:10:59.919 --> 00:11:05.200
So any significant judgments and assumptions that you've made to determine whether or not the entity is a VIE.
00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:06.080
That's one.
00:11:06.159 --> 00:11:10.159
Um, the nature of any restrictions on VIE assets and the settlement of its liabilities.
00:11:10.240 --> 00:11:12.080
I know Alexander mentioned that earlier.
00:11:12.240 --> 00:11:17.200
Um, changes in any risk exposure that you have due to your involvement with the VIE.
00:11:17.440 --> 00:11:23.679
And lastly, any effect on the financial position, financial performance, or cash flows due to your involvement with the VIE.
00:11:24.000 --> 00:11:31.120
Yeah, and I'd say the huge thing to emphasize there again, uh, as Matt mentioned, is that the disclosures are as much of an art as they are of a science, right?
00:11:31.279 --> 00:11:38.000
So we have these very specific ones that Matt referenced, but the guidance does really clarify that they're more principles-based than anything.
00:11:38.159 --> 00:11:44.399
So ultimately what we're aiming for here is clarity and transparency when you have an involvement with the VIE.
00:11:44.720 --> 00:11:44.960
Okay.
00:11:45.039 --> 00:11:46.960
I think that's a great point to clarify.
00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:50.320
So the takeaway is that companies should really aim for clarity.
00:11:50.480 --> 00:11:55.039
Are there any specific examples where the SEC has asked for more transparency?
00:11:55.360 --> 00:12:04.080
Uh yeah, a common one really is when a company determines that it isn't the primary beneficiary of a VIE, even though it holds a significant financial interest.
00:12:04.320 --> 00:12:08.799
So the staff tend to ask for more details about how the company reached that conclusion.
00:12:09.200 --> 00:12:09.360
Right.
00:12:09.519 --> 00:12:14.879
And another area of focus is whether the entity's assets can be used outside of the structure of a VIE.
00:12:15.039 --> 00:12:21.120
So if a company asserts that the VIE's assets are restricted, they need to disclose what those restrictions are and why they exist.
00:12:21.440 --> 00:12:21.759
Okay.
00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:23.919
I think those examples are really helpful.
00:12:24.080 --> 00:12:29.679
So now that we've covered the purpose of the disclosures, Matt, can you start us off with the disclosure requirements?
00:12:30.159 --> 00:12:30.399
Sure.
00:12:30.559 --> 00:12:34.320
Well, we're going to break it down into three main categories as it relates to disclosures.
00:12:34.399 --> 00:12:38.559
So the first one is going to be all companies that have a variable interest in a VIE.
00:12:38.639 --> 00:12:40.320
So anybody with an interest in a VIE.
00:12:40.480 --> 00:12:45.120
The second is going to be just for primary beneficiaries, so just for those parties that consolidate the VIE.
00:12:45.279 --> 00:12:48.639
And the third is going to be companies who have a variable interest but don't consolidate.
00:12:48.720 --> 00:12:50.799
So those are the three buckets we're going to cover.
00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:51.519
Okay.
00:12:51.840 --> 00:12:53.519
So let's start with the basic.
00:12:53.759 --> 00:12:59.840
Companies with a variable interest in a VIE have to provide disclosures whether or not they're the primary beneficiary.
00:13:00.080 --> 00:13:03.759
Alexander, can you walk us through the exactly what needs to be disclosed?
00:13:04.159 --> 00:13:04.559
Yeah, sure.
00:13:04.720 --> 00:13:10.720
So at a high level, entities need to outline how they determine if they are or aren't the primary beneficiary of the VIE.
00:13:10.879 --> 00:13:15.600
This includes key factors, assumptions, significant judgments that are made in that assessment.
00:13:16.000 --> 00:13:17.679
Again, it's about transparency.
00:13:17.919 --> 00:13:23.600
Investors and regulators need to understand the decision-making process behind the consolidation or non-consolidation answer.
00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:25.279
Okay, that makes sense.
00:13:25.519 --> 00:13:30.639
And what about cases where there's a change in the company's determination of the primary beneficiary?
00:13:30.879 --> 00:13:39.360
Say a company previously consolidated a VIE because it was the primary beneficiary, but something's changed and it no longer consolidates VIE.
00:13:39.519 --> 00:13:40.399
What does it do then?
00:13:40.799 --> 00:13:40.960
Right.
00:13:41.039 --> 00:13:42.799
I think you can guess what I'm going to say.
00:13:43.120 --> 00:13:45.600
But it it definitely requires some disclosure, right?
00:13:45.679 --> 00:13:58.480
So if there's a change in reporting, whether you start consolidating VIE or you deconsolidate something that you previously were consolidating, you have to disclose the reasons for the change and what the impacts of that change were to the financial statements.
00:13:58.879 --> 00:13:59.679
Transparency.
00:14:00.000 --> 00:14:00.399
Correct.
00:14:01.039 --> 00:14:01.600
Got it.
00:14:01.759 --> 00:14:06.159
So, Alexander, what else needs to be disclosed regardless of the PB determination?
00:14:06.480 --> 00:14:06.720
Yeah.
00:14:06.799 --> 00:14:14.240
So even if a company isn't the primary beneficiary, it still has to provide qualitative and quantitative details around its involvement with the VIE.
00:14:14.399 --> 00:14:20.799
This means disclosing the nature, size, purpose, and activities of the VIE, as well as how the VIE is financed.
00:14:20.960 --> 00:14:24.080
This helps users assess potential risks and exposure to the entity.
00:14:24.399 --> 00:14:24.720
Okay.
00:14:24.960 --> 00:14:27.279
So that seems like it ties into another point.
00:14:27.440 --> 00:14:34.000
The financial or other support that companies may provide to a VIE, even if they weren't contractually required to.
00:14:34.240 --> 00:14:37.440
Alexander, what should companies be disclosing in those situations?
00:14:37.840 --> 00:14:38.000
Yeah.
00:14:38.080 --> 00:14:49.440
So if a company uh or reporting entity provides financial or other support that it wasn't previously obligated to provide, it needs to disclose the type and the amount of that support as well as the primary reasons behind that decision to give it.
00:14:49.759 --> 00:14:51.279
Thank you for walking us through all that.
00:14:51.679 --> 00:14:56.240
What exactly needs to be disclosed when a company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE?
00:14:56.559 --> 00:14:56.720
Right.
00:14:56.799 --> 00:14:59.600
So this is bucket two and the three buckets I mentioned before.
00:14:59.759 --> 00:15:10.080
If a company is the primary beneficiary or consolidates a VIE, the company has to disclose the carrying amount and the classification of the VIE's assets and liabilities in its consolidated financial statements.
00:15:10.320 --> 00:15:12.320
So it's not just about numbers.
00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:20.559
You also, if you're the reporting entity, you should provide qualitative information about how those assets and liabilities relate to the broader reporting entity.
00:15:20.879 --> 00:15:21.039
Okay.
00:15:21.200 --> 00:15:24.240
So more than just a tick-the-box compliance exercise.
00:15:24.480 --> 00:15:25.759
What about recourse?
00:15:25.919 --> 00:15:27.679
How does that factor into the disclosures?
00:15:28.080 --> 00:15:28.159
Right.
00:15:28.240 --> 00:15:35.200
So if the creditors of a VIE don't have recourse to the reporting entity's general credit, companies should make that very clear in their disclosures.
00:15:35.360 --> 00:15:42.159
Investors and stakeholders really need to understand whether the VIE's liabilities could impact the parent company's financial position.
00:15:42.559 --> 00:15:43.840
Okay, that makes sense.
00:15:44.159 --> 00:15:48.399
Now let's talk about something that can trip companies up, support obligations.
00:15:48.639 --> 00:15:55.840
Alexander, what do companies need to disclose when it comes to arrangements that could require them to provide support to the VIE?
00:15:56.159 --> 00:15:56.320
Yeah.
00:15:56.399 --> 00:16:04.080
So if there's any terms or arrangements that could require a company to provide financial support, whether those are contractual or implied, they have to be disclosed.
00:16:04.240 --> 00:16:08.240
So this includes things like liquidity arrangements or asset purchase obligations.
00:16:08.480 --> 00:16:13.039
Basically, if there's a chance that the company could be on the hook financially, the disclosures need to reflect that.
00:16:13.360 --> 00:16:13.519
Right.
00:16:13.600 --> 00:16:20.320
So I think there's one last bit in this bucket for primary beneficiary disclosures, and that really is on initial consolidation of a VIE.
00:16:20.480 --> 00:16:23.600
And this one depends on whether or not the VIE is also a business.
00:16:23.759 --> 00:16:27.039
And when we say is it a business, we mean the definition in ASC 805.
00:16:27.120 --> 00:16:34.799
So if it meets the definition of a business under 805, upon initial consolidation, the primary beneficiary has to comply with all of those disclosure requirements as well.
00:16:34.960 --> 00:16:36.639
So you're bringing in a whole other standard.
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:42.960
And a company, you know, who consolidates for the first time a VIE that's a business has to comply with all of those disclosure requirements as well.
00:16:43.200 --> 00:16:43.440
Okay.
00:16:43.519 --> 00:16:46.559
I think that's a seems like a really important point to keep in mind.
00:16:46.799 --> 00:16:55.279
So I think the last part we want to discuss regarding VIEs is when a company has a variable interest in a VIE, but it is not the primary beneficiary.
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:56.960
Matt, can you start us off here?
00:16:57.440 --> 00:16:57.679
Sure.
00:16:57.840 --> 00:16:58.000
Right.
00:16:58.080 --> 00:17:00.159
We're getting into bucket number three, right?
00:17:00.320 --> 00:17:09.359
Um, the important thing to keep in mind here is that companies don't have a get out of jail free card uh related to disclosures when you're not the primary beneficiary of a VIE.
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:11.599
So I know I mentioned it earlier, but it's worth repeating, right?
00:17:11.680 --> 00:17:18.640
The company still has disclosure obligations under GAAP if you only have a variable interest in a VIE and you're not consolidating.
00:17:18.720 --> 00:17:26.000
Um so the recurring theme here again is transparency about the company's involvement with the VIE and what kind of risks that the involvement poses.
00:17:26.319 --> 00:17:26.480
Yeah.
00:17:26.559 --> 00:17:34.000
And that means the company has to disclose things like the carrying amount and the classification of assets and liabilities that relate to their interests in the VIE.
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:34.319
Right.
00:17:34.400 --> 00:17:38.720
So in other words, what are you putting on your balance sheet that's tied to your relationship with the VIE?
00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:41.920
So things like loans to the entity or guarantee obligations.
00:17:42.240 --> 00:17:43.200
Okay, got it.
00:17:43.440 --> 00:17:46.160
But it's not just about the numbers on the balance sheet, right?
00:17:46.319 --> 00:17:49.279
There's also an element of explaining the exposure to loss.
00:17:49.440 --> 00:17:51.519
Can you elaborate on that, Alexander?
00:17:51.920 --> 00:17:52.160
Yeah.
00:17:52.240 --> 00:17:53.839
And this is actually a really important one, right?
00:17:53.920 --> 00:17:59.440
So companies are required to disclose their quote, maximum exposure to loss due to their involvement with the VIE.
00:17:59.599 --> 00:18:04.960
Basically, where we're getting at is even though I don't consolidate the VIE, I still may have financial risk tied to it.
00:18:05.200 --> 00:18:09.119
So this disclosure requirement ensures that the users understand the worst case scenario.
00:18:09.279 --> 00:18:10.880
How much could I lose if things go wrong?
00:18:11.119 --> 00:18:11.279
Right.
00:18:11.440 --> 00:18:16.079
The big point here, though, is this analysis needs to be done irrespective of probability.
00:18:16.240 --> 00:18:24.160
And in addition to the quantitative requirement, you also have to qualitatively disclose how the exposure was determined and the significant source of that exposure to loss.
00:18:24.480 --> 00:18:24.640
Right.
00:18:24.720 --> 00:18:32.400
And relating to the quantitative requirement, if companies can't nail down an exact dollar amount for the quantitative exposure, companies need to disclose that as well.
00:18:32.720 --> 00:18:33.680
Okay, got it.
00:18:33.920 --> 00:18:39.759
Now, one thing I saw in the guidance while I was preparing for this discussion was the requirement for a tabular comparison.
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:41.119
What's the purpose of that?
00:18:41.440 --> 00:18:41.680
Yes.
00:18:41.920 --> 00:18:46.000
Alexander loves tables almost as much as he loves roll forwards, right?
00:18:46.240 --> 00:18:53.920
Um so the idea here is to show a side-by-side comparison of the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities versus their maximum maximum exposure to loss.
00:18:54.000 --> 00:18:56.960
Um, but it doesn't stop again at quantitative or just numbers.
00:18:57.200 --> 00:18:58.720
You know, a repetitive theme here, right?
00:18:58.799 --> 00:19:03.279
Companies also have to provide qualitative and quantitative explanations for any differences between the two amounts.
00:19:03.599 --> 00:19:03.759
Okay.
00:19:03.839 --> 00:19:08.079
So it's not just like here's the data, but also saying here's why it looks this way.
00:19:08.480 --> 00:19:10.240
Yeah, I think that's a great way to summarize it.
00:19:10.319 --> 00:19:13.359
And it does help the users understand where the real risks lie.
00:19:13.519 --> 00:19:15.200
It's not enough to just throw out the numbers.
00:19:15.279 --> 00:19:16.240
You need context.
00:19:16.400 --> 00:19:18.319
But I do actually like tables.
00:19:19.119 --> 00:19:26.319
Now, one of the optional but encouraged disclosures is about liquidity arrangements, guarantees, and other third-party commitments.
00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:28.480
How should companies think about including that?
00:19:28.799 --> 00:19:28.960
Right.
00:19:29.039 --> 00:19:42.160
So even though it's not strictly required, I think companies have to keep in mind the overall objectives to these disclosure requirements and ensuring that they're giving users of the financial statements the right insight into the potential risks that they have associated with VIEs.
00:19:42.319 --> 00:19:50.000
So if a company has a guarantee or another commitment that exposes it to risk of the VIE, that's useful information for investors or users of the financial statements.
00:19:50.319 --> 00:19:58.000
Maybe to wrap up our VIE discussion, are there any other useful tidbits on VIE disclosures before we move on to voting interest entities?
00:19:58.319 --> 00:19:58.799
Uh yes.
00:19:58.960 --> 00:20:00.400
So just two more quick things.
00:20:00.559 --> 00:20:11.599
So first, uh, for companies that concluded that they don't have to consolidate because power over the VIE's significant activities are shared, they actually do need to disclose the significant factors and judgments behind that conclusion.
00:20:11.759 --> 00:20:14.880
Uh lastly, I do have a practical expedient for everyone.
00:20:14.960 --> 00:20:16.240
Uh we love those.
00:20:16.480 --> 00:20:18.079
Um so this one is interesting.
00:20:18.240 --> 00:20:33.279
So if you have a VIE that meets the definition of a business and you hold a majority of the voting equity interests, and you're the primary beneficiary, and the assets aren't restricted solely to the VIE, then you might not have to provide all those VIE disclosures we just talked about.
00:20:33.920 --> 00:20:35.680
So uh why do we have this exception?
00:20:35.839 --> 00:20:39.599
Well, really, it's meant for instances where the VIE operates more like a real business.
00:20:39.759 --> 00:20:43.359
So it's it's not a structured entity like a securitization vehicle.
00:20:43.519 --> 00:20:50.400
So if you have this, right, then it probably doesn't have all of those extra crazy risks that we otherwise need to disclose for those highly structured VIEs.
00:20:50.480 --> 00:20:52.240
So we get to simplify things a little bit.
00:20:52.480 --> 00:20:54.799
Again, there are some disclosures that are still required.
00:20:54.880 --> 00:21:03.039
So I think it's a good idea for folks to refer to our consolidation guide or our financial statement presentation guide in these instances to figure out which ones apply and which ones don't.
00:21:03.359 --> 00:21:03.920
Okay, great.
00:21:04.079 --> 00:21:04.720
Thanks for that.
00:21:04.880 --> 00:21:12.880
So maybe now shifting gears, how do the disclosure requirements for voting interest entities or VOEs compare to those of VIEs?
00:21:13.200 --> 00:21:13.519
Great.
00:21:13.839 --> 00:21:19.039
I'm gonna start off with a quick reminder of what a voting interest entity or VOE is, right?
00:21:19.200 --> 00:21:27.519
So this contrasts with a VIE, but a VOE is a type of entity where control is generally determined based on ownership of voting shares or common stock.
00:21:27.839 --> 00:21:42.480
So unlike VIEs, which require a slightly more nuanced assessment of control, VOEs generally follow a pretty straightforward rule of thumb, which is if a company owns more than 50% of the voting interests, it typically consolidates an entity into its financial statements.
00:21:42.880 --> 00:21:43.519
Okay, got it.
00:21:43.680 --> 00:21:44.960
So majority rules.
00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:51.039
But Alexander, are there cases where a company might own more than 50%, but not consolidate?
00:21:51.359 --> 00:21:52.799
Yes, even under the voting model.
00:21:52.880 --> 00:21:54.640
And that's where things get a little interesting.
00:21:54.799 --> 00:21:59.759
Um, so if your minority shareholders have substantive participating rights, which means they have real influence.
00:22:00.160 --> 00:22:04.000
Over significant decisions, then consolidation might not actually be allowed here.
00:22:04.240 --> 00:22:12.400
So for example, if you have minority investors that have the amil the ability to block major decisions, then the majority owner doesn't have full control over the entity.
00:22:12.480 --> 00:22:14.000
So they're not permitted to consolidate.
00:22:14.319 --> 00:22:17.920
So in those cases, what kind of disclosure should companies be thinking about?
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:18.640
Right.
00:22:18.720 --> 00:22:26.000
So if a company is not consolidating due to these substantive participating rights that Alexander just discussed, they should be transparent about why.
00:22:26.160 --> 00:22:39.599
And that means considering disclosing things like specific rights that minority investors hold, um, how often they can exercise these rights, why they're substantive, and what happens if there's a dispute between the majority owner and the minority investors.
00:22:39.920 --> 00:22:43.839
Yeah, and this doesn't just apply to corporations, it also applies to partnerships too.
00:22:44.000 --> 00:22:52.960
So if a general partner isn't consolidating a partnership because the limited partners have substantive kick out or liquidation rights, they should consider explaining that in the disclosures too.
00:22:53.279 --> 00:22:53.599
Okay.
00:22:53.839 --> 00:22:57.839
So investors and stakeholders get a clear picture of who really has control.
00:22:58.240 --> 00:23:02.400
So speaking of partnerships, what are some of the key disclosure considerations there?
00:23:02.720 --> 00:23:02.960
Right.
00:23:03.039 --> 00:23:05.680
So similar themes to what we were discussing earlier.
00:23:05.839 --> 00:23:23.519
When a general partner doesn't consolidate an entity, they should consider disclosing things like how limited partners can vote to either kick out the general partner or liquidate the partnership, whether there are any operational barriers to exercising those rights, uh, and whether the general partner is excluded from those votes or gets to participate.
00:23:23.839 --> 00:23:25.359
Okay, those are some great insights.
00:23:25.599 --> 00:23:27.920
Well, that wraps up the discussion on VOEs.
00:23:28.079 --> 00:23:34.079
Does it make sense to move to a lightning round for any other disclosure presentation items that you want to highlight before we wrap up?
00:23:34.480 --> 00:23:34.640
Sure.
00:23:34.720 --> 00:23:36.240
Yeah, I've got a few that come to mind.
00:23:36.319 --> 00:23:43.920
Uh, I know we've been talking about consolidated financial statements, but a lot of questions come in around combined financial statements and what's the difference and what are the disclosure requirements.
00:23:44.079 --> 00:23:50.480
Um, so just at a real high level, we talked about consolidated financial statements as being required when you have a controlling financial interest.
00:23:50.640 --> 00:23:59.920
That differs from the presentation of combined financial statements, which is really more of a presentation option for situations where entities are under common control or common management.
00:24:00.079 --> 00:24:07.359
There's an individual or an entity on top that may wish to present a combined set of financial statements that put those together, like I said earlier, smush them together.
00:24:07.599 --> 00:24:10.079
Um, in that situation, it's optional, right?
00:24:10.240 --> 00:24:13.519
Um, and you should clearly label them as combined financial statements.
00:24:13.599 --> 00:24:19.680
And you should follow generally all of the same presentation and disclosure requirements you do for consolidated financial statements.
00:24:19.839 --> 00:24:21.039
So that one comes up a lot.
00:24:21.200 --> 00:24:24.079
I'd say um aligning fiscal period is another one.
00:24:24.160 --> 00:24:33.759
So there is a general requirement that the parent and the sub should align the fiscal period, so like year ends and quarter ends with a practical expedient that allows for lag reporting.
00:24:33.839 --> 00:24:41.680
As if the difference in the subsidiary's year end and the parent's year end is three months or less, you're allowed to keep them the same and report them on a lag.
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:46.720
Um the last one I'll bring up is what we call specialized industry accounting principles.
00:24:46.880 --> 00:24:56.480
So in that situation, a parent may have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary and consolidate that subsidiary, but that sub uses some kind of specific industry accounting.
00:24:56.640 --> 00:24:59.519
So think investment company accounting at a subsidiary level.
00:24:59.680 --> 00:25:07.279
When the parent consolidates a subsidiary's financial statements, it's actually required to maintain that subsidiary specified industry accounting principle.
00:25:07.440 --> 00:25:10.160
Um again, that just assumes that they were doing it the right way.
00:25:10.319 --> 00:25:13.680
Um but yeah, you you keep that in the consolidated financial statements.
00:25:14.079 --> 00:25:15.680
Alexander, anything from you?
00:25:16.240 --> 00:25:18.799
Uh yeah, maybe two quick, not so quick ones.
00:25:19.039 --> 00:25:27.440
Um so you may have heard on our last podcast that certain money market funds are actually exempt from the consolidation rules under ASE 810, right?
00:25:27.519 --> 00:25:38.880
So in these instances, you have investors, sponsors, and asset managers that don't actually have to assess these funds for consolidation under ASC 810, but you are still required to disclose any financial support that you've provided these funds.
00:25:38.960 --> 00:25:43.200
So things like capital contributions, letters of credit, guarantees, things like that.
00:25:43.359 --> 00:25:49.440
Uh there's also some special disclosure requirements for consolidated collateralized financing entities or CFEs.
00:25:49.599 --> 00:25:52.400
These mainly relate to the valuation approach that's used.
00:25:52.640 --> 00:26:02.400
Um, and lastly, if you listen to our last pod, uh you'd remember that we said there's also an optional VIE scope exception for private companies under common control if you meet certain requirements.
00:26:02.559 --> 00:26:10.240
So if you use this exemption, then there's incremental disclosures that are required so users can better understand the legal entity's risks and its exposure to loss here.
00:26:10.559 --> 00:26:11.039
Well, great.
00:26:11.119 --> 00:26:13.039
Well, it was so great to have you both on today.
00:26:13.200 --> 00:26:15.200
Thanks so much, Matt and Alexander.
00:26:15.359 --> 00:26:17.599
And to our listeners, thanks for tuning in.
00:26:17.680 --> 00:26:19.839
And we'll see you next time for more accounting insights.
00:26:20.079 --> 00:26:20.319
Thank you.
00:26:20.640 --> 00:26:21.440
Thank you.
00:26:22.000 --> 00:26:23.920
That's our show for today.
00:26:24.240 --> 00:26:27.119
Tune in next week for more fresh episodes.
00:26:27.279 --> 00:26:29.839
So that you never miss any of our audio content.
00:26:30.000 --> 00:26:34.480
Follow the PWC Accounting Podcast wherever you listen to your podcasts.
00:26:34.640 --> 00:26:43.599
And to stay up to date on all our latest accounting and reporting news, sign up for our newsletter at viewpoint.pwc.com.
00:26:44.240 --> 00:26:48.240
From Thought Leadership at PwC, I'm Heather Horn.
00:26:48.559 --> 00:26:50.000
Thanks for tuning in.
00:26:55.440 --> 00:26:59.440
This podcast is brought to you by PwC, All Rights Reserved.
00:26:59.680 --> 00:27:01.440
PwC refers to the U.S.
00:27:01.599 --> 00:27:07.680
member firm or one of its subsidiaries or affiliates, and they sometimes refer to the PwC network.
00:27:07.920 --> 00:27:10.319
Each member firm is a separate legal entity.
00:27:10.480 --> 00:27:16.720
Please see www.pwc.com slash structure for further details.
00:27:17.039 --> 00:27:26.720
This podcast is for general information purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors, including accountants and lawyers.