WEBVTT
00:00:01.403 --> 00:00:04.491
Alrighty then, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to privacy, please.
00:00:04.491 --> 00:00:08.310
Cameron Ivy here hanging out with Gabe gums Gabe, how you doing man.
00:00:09.253 --> 00:00:10.135
I am so well.
00:00:10.135 --> 00:00:11.519
I appreciate you asking.
00:00:11.519 --> 00:00:11.881
How are you?
00:00:11.920 --> 00:00:12.964
doing, doing good.
00:00:12.964 --> 00:00:14.208
It's another Monday.
00:00:14.208 --> 00:00:15.090
What does that mean?
00:00:15.090 --> 00:00:17.464
It's privacy.
00:00:17.464 --> 00:00:20.742
I think you froze, I froze, maybe Fix it.
00:00:20.742 --> 00:00:21.865
It's probably.
00:00:21.885 --> 00:00:22.167
What is it?
00:00:22.167 --> 00:00:23.010
It's a privacy week.
00:00:24.341 --> 00:00:25.106
Well, it just passed.
00:00:25.106 --> 00:00:26.835
I think privacy day was like Saturday or something.
00:00:26.835 --> 00:00:27.899
That's right, that's right, my bad.
00:00:28.041 --> 00:00:28.824
That's bad.
00:00:28.824 --> 00:00:30.711
So hell jumping right in.
00:00:30.711 --> 00:00:32.579
We should probably cover a couple things from that now.
00:00:32.579 --> 00:00:36.679
I mean it's where we're a privacy show, we talk security to her security show.
00:00:36.679 --> 00:00:40.451
We should talk about all those things today and we got like three topics on on the dock today.
00:00:40.451 --> 00:00:42.505
We're gonna hit them fast because it's reaction.
00:00:42.505 --> 00:00:44.590
Mondays, reaction number one privacy week.
00:00:44.590 --> 00:00:45.472
What's your reaction?
00:00:45.472 --> 00:00:46.112
A privacy week?
00:00:46.112 --> 00:00:49.249
My reaction yeah, I thought it was great.
00:00:49.249 --> 00:00:53.276
Yeah, yeah, you guys nominated some special folks in the community.
00:00:53.276 --> 00:00:54.079
Any special shout outs?
00:00:55.622 --> 00:01:01.154
Yeah, a lot of good ones that have been on the show before, but you know Debbie Reynolds, data diva.
00:01:01.154 --> 00:01:02.604
Everybody knows her.
00:01:02.604 --> 00:01:05.867
I would imagine you got Nishant Bajario.
00:01:05.867 --> 00:01:10.051
He's a director of engineering over there at Facebook.
00:01:10.051 --> 00:01:15.081
Who else did we have K Royall Violet?
00:01:15.081 --> 00:01:23.606
Like Jeff Jokish, I'm blanking out anybody else.
00:01:23.908 --> 00:01:25.191
I don't recall, I don't recall.
00:01:25.191 --> 00:01:30.102
I know I saw your, your, your homies that transcend, nominate a few other Community folks too.
00:01:30.102 --> 00:01:45.180
So congratulations and shout out to everyone in the privacy community Celebrate and privacy week last week, doing all the good work Yeoman's work, yeah, the various deities work of getting the good word on privacy out there.
00:01:45.180 --> 00:01:48.129
So I just wanted to make sure we covered that topic first off.
00:01:48.390 --> 00:01:49.072
Yeah, absolutely.
00:01:49.072 --> 00:02:00.472
It's good to kick that off for the first time and obviously you see how that grows over the over the years and Get some other other new people in there that are doing great work in the privacy community, so it's good stuff.
00:02:01.242 --> 00:02:03.037
So we had two of the topics for reaction.
00:02:03.037 --> 00:02:13.060
Monday, the first one was an article regarding the SEC and its ability to protect its own data Should it be trusted to protect yours if they can't protect their own?
00:02:14.984 --> 00:02:19.973
It's pretty simple answer, I think, but it's a little more complicated than just a yes or no.
00:02:20.701 --> 00:02:21.346
I'm gonna go with the.
00:02:21.346 --> 00:02:23.074
I'm gonna go with yes or no on this one.
00:02:23.074 --> 00:02:24.280
This is a straw man argument.
00:02:24.280 --> 00:02:25.204
That's just nonsense.
00:02:25.204 --> 00:02:25.826
Yes.
00:02:26.149 --> 00:02:27.334
Yes, I can't scare crew.
00:02:27.776 --> 00:02:30.484
Yeah, like yes, I can and will trust them to protect it.
00:02:30.484 --> 00:02:34.834
And here's why because if there isn't at least one entity doing so, then who the hell is?
00:02:34.834 --> 00:02:40.515
Because the organizations themselves have proven that they have a perverse incentive to not necessarily do so.
00:02:40.515 --> 00:02:48.713
Many of them are equally understaffed or under budgeted by design, a default, and they struggle with those things themselves.
00:02:48.713 --> 00:02:56.150
So, yeah, the SEC has a difficult job and sometimes their job Didn't get done as well as even they would like it to have been done.
00:02:56.621 --> 00:03:14.253
But I feel like this argument is pure bunk, asking the question like it's not like the SEC Doesn't exist and it's not like it hasn't had significant, significant I'm just gonna use the word failures and even governing itself as well as members of its own community.
00:03:14.253 --> 00:03:18.905
You know, you can look no further than say, you know the Ponzi schemes with made-off, etc.
00:03:18.905 --> 00:03:20.628
And people like freaking bitchin about it.
00:03:20.628 --> 00:03:22.774
So the SEC is not without its problems.
00:03:22.774 --> 00:03:30.358
But I'll be darned if the question is should they Be giving us any advice and how to protect their data?
00:03:30.358 --> 00:03:38.301
I'm like I've seen the advice for many of the rest of you and and yeah, no, I'm actually I'm going to side with the, as you see, on this one like yeah, no, it is.
00:03:38.301 --> 00:03:43.039
It is actually about and I'm not a big government guy, a regulation guy, none of those things.
00:03:43.161 --> 00:03:46.756
I think those, I think those things are problematic.
00:03:46.756 --> 00:03:47.520
Tread lightly.
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:50.000
No-transcript.
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:54.378
Yeah, no, bugger off with that argument of should they be able to?
00:03:54.378 --> 00:03:55.020
I get it.
00:03:55.020 --> 00:03:57.439
It's a provocative headline and that's why it was written that way.
00:03:57.439 --> 00:04:02.758
So it got the desired reaction out of me and a reaction Monday.
00:04:02.818 --> 00:04:04.657
I'm reacting good, I hope you.
00:04:04.657 --> 00:04:12.860
I don't know if you noticed and this is a shout out to any of our listeners that aren't a part of Privacy Pulse Community, which was started by Transcend.
00:04:12.860 --> 00:04:14.358
Fun enough, but it's just.
00:04:14.358 --> 00:04:16.519
It's a great community, almost 500 people.
00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:19.182
If you wanna join, let me know.
00:04:19.182 --> 00:04:20.779
I'll send you an invite to it.
00:04:20.779 --> 00:04:23.362
Great community of privacy professionals.
00:04:23.362 --> 00:04:26.923
I actually posted that question in the chat this morning, gabe.
00:04:26.923 --> 00:04:27.538
What did they say?
00:04:27.538 --> 00:04:34.403
I just I haven't gotten a response yet, but I'm interested to see if someone comes in with some of the same heat that you are, which is great.
00:04:35.697 --> 00:04:39.877
Let's monitor that one, and I definitely wanna update this thread when we post it with it.
00:04:39.877 --> 00:04:45.319
Yeah, A bit of quick heat, though, because it's a Monday and we like to punch hard and get out here in a reaction Monday.
00:04:45.319 --> 00:04:49.985
So the second topic Florida.
00:04:49.985 --> 00:04:56.319
Everyone loves Florida advances a law banning children under 16 from using social media.
00:04:56.319 --> 00:04:56.940
So again.
00:04:56.980 --> 00:04:58.485
I saw another state did it recently too.
00:04:58.485 --> 00:04:59.759
This is gonna trickle.
00:05:02.120 --> 00:05:02.279
This.
00:05:02.279 --> 00:05:07.723
So again, this goes right back to that regulation and oversight and big brother thing and the government.
00:05:07.723 --> 00:05:10.343
And, first of all, is this even a privacy issue?
00:05:10.343 --> 00:05:14.355
I mean, I think the easiest answer to this is it is.
00:05:14.355 --> 00:05:25.404
Privacy is very much driven by security, personal security and business security.
00:05:25.404 --> 00:05:26.540
It is driven by those things.
00:05:26.540 --> 00:05:33.060
One requires that that information stay private, such that you can be safe from the knowledge that others can abuse it.
00:05:33.060 --> 00:05:37.281
Right, like, because I think a lot of people get all abstract well, what's the harm if they know?
00:05:37.281 --> 00:05:40.624
Safe from the harm of abuse of that data?
00:05:41.274 --> 00:06:04.062
It is again self-evident at this point that these organizations, social media ones in particular, that they are perversely incentivized to exploit the privacy of people on their platform when those people are under the age of 16 and barely even able to understand the implications that their own actions may have on them 20 years from now.
00:06:05.714 --> 00:06:14.639
I don't know if this legislation has gone too far or not far enough, but I'll tell you, having zero oversights on it I think is nonsense.
00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:17.322
And I equally can't think of what is lost.
00:06:17.322 --> 00:06:23.583
If you said everyone on the 16 can't be on social media, like I don't know what is lost, I think nothing is actually lost.
00:06:23.583 --> 00:06:31.403
We're not saying they can't be on the internet or can't access Wikipedia or encyclopediacom or whatever that or do like research or chat.
00:06:31.403 --> 00:06:32.720
You'd be like no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
00:06:32.720 --> 00:06:50.007
We're talking about this technology stack that we've studied well enough to know that there's actual psychological and social harm that occurs as just a byproduct of normal use and abuse of those platforms.
00:06:50.007 --> 00:06:57.442
So on another reaction Monday, I say to hell with that nonsense, bring on said regulation.
00:06:59.396 --> 00:07:01.865
Well, I don't really know what they're.
00:07:01.865 --> 00:07:07.274
I haven't dug into the article, but I don't know if they like.
00:07:07.274 --> 00:07:14.697
I think it's gonna be just as important for the parents to regulate their devices, having timers or something.
00:07:14.697 --> 00:07:21.095
No, doubt, no doubt yeah cause, like you can, literally, if you're a 10 year old to a 16 year old, you're gonna be smart enough to say that you're older than 16.
00:07:21.115 --> 00:07:25.415
You could figure out how to get around it, yeah, and I think it's just as easy, as is it?
00:07:25.456 --> 00:07:27.463
really just gonna be like are you 17?
00:07:28.225 --> 00:07:36.908
No, this is, you know, this is about those platforms making sure they do their due diligence now with enforcing hey, wait a second, that's okay, that's supposed to be in here.
00:07:36.908 --> 00:07:37.891
It's like a liquor store.
00:07:37.891 --> 00:07:38.774
I like sure I can go.
00:07:38.774 --> 00:07:40.937
Yeah, yeah, id, sure I can.
00:07:40.937 --> 00:07:44.189
But whose job is it to make sure?
00:07:44.189 --> 00:07:51.413
Senate, right, like no, no, no, no, this to bring it on, bring it on digital liquor store Look where are those at?
00:07:52.706 --> 00:07:53.810
They're on uber eats game.
00:07:53.810 --> 00:08:00.605
Thanks, want to pay extra for someone to deliver alcohol to you, fake facts?
00:08:00.906 --> 00:08:08.134
Well, let's say for the going out and getting it if you you've had past your limit, of course, that's true, but you just shut it that they should put a breathalyzer on you, breeze.
00:08:10.007 --> 00:08:11.874
I think you just become a fan of cannabis.
00:08:11.874 --> 00:08:15.004
And there is yeah, yeah, yeah, I know they say it there it is.
00:08:15.165 --> 00:08:16.531
Where's the uber eats for the cannabis?
00:08:16.531 --> 00:08:18.119
It's in California.
00:08:18.119 --> 00:08:18.942
It's in California.
00:08:18.963 --> 00:08:19.365
That's true.
00:08:19.365 --> 00:08:22.471
Oh, you, all you on the West Coast, you're living it right now.
00:08:22.651 --> 00:08:24.173
They've got that delivery service.
00:08:24.173 --> 00:08:27.439
Anyway that's, that's my overreaction.
00:08:27.439 --> 00:08:34.934
We might cover some more of this in a in a block cast, but we'll definitely cover these topics in the privacy pulse community as well.
00:08:34.934 --> 00:08:36.719
To one gets more reactions there.
00:08:36.719 --> 00:08:42.736
Get folks pulled into our our Monday overreactions and get some community overreactions.
00:08:42.736 --> 00:08:43.238
I don't happen.
00:08:43.238 --> 00:08:44.429
I think I'm overreacting today.
00:08:44.429 --> 00:08:47.945
Today I think I'm being relatively level-headed, which is weird.
00:08:47.945 --> 00:08:53.138
Yeah, considering I'm pushing for actual regulation and backing the SEC like I don't know what the hell's going on.
00:08:53.628 --> 00:08:55.721
But all that little even keeled over here.
00:08:55.801 --> 00:08:59.466
All of that out, I'm not no my friends.
00:09:00.206 --> 00:09:01.027
Yeah, we're out of here.
00:09:01.027 --> 00:09:03.008
I appreciate you Give us your thoughts.
00:09:03.008 --> 00:09:04.048
See you guys next week.
00:09:04.048 --> 00:09:04.688
Peace.
00:00:01.403 --> 00:00:04.491
Alrighty then, ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to privacy, please.
00:00:04.491 --> 00:00:08.310
Cameron Ivy here hanging out with Gabe gums Gabe, how you doing man.
00:00:09.253 --> 00:00:10.135
I am so well.
00:00:10.135 --> 00:00:11.519
I appreciate you asking.
00:00:11.519 --> 00:00:11.881
How are you?
00:00:11.920 --> 00:00:12.964
doing, doing good.
00:00:12.964 --> 00:00:14.208
It's another Monday.
00:00:14.208 --> 00:00:15.090
What does that mean?
00:00:15.090 --> 00:00:17.464
It's privacy.
00:00:17.464 --> 00:00:20.742
I think you froze, I froze, maybe Fix it.
00:00:20.742 --> 00:00:21.865
It's probably.
00:00:21.885 --> 00:00:22.167
What is it?
00:00:22.167 --> 00:00:23.010
It's a privacy week.
00:00:24.341 --> 00:00:25.106
Well, it just passed.
00:00:25.106 --> 00:00:26.835
I think privacy day was like Saturday or something.
00:00:26.835 --> 00:00:27.899
That's right, that's right, my bad.
00:00:28.041 --> 00:00:28.824
That's bad.
00:00:28.824 --> 00:00:30.711
So hell jumping right in.
00:00:30.711 --> 00:00:32.579
We should probably cover a couple things from that now.
00:00:32.579 --> 00:00:36.679
I mean it's where we're a privacy show, we talk security to her security show.
00:00:36.679 --> 00:00:40.451
We should talk about all those things today and we got like three topics on on the dock today.
00:00:40.451 --> 00:00:42.505
We're gonna hit them fast because it's reaction.
00:00:42.505 --> 00:00:44.590
Mondays, reaction number one privacy week.
00:00:44.590 --> 00:00:45.472
What's your reaction?
00:00:45.472 --> 00:00:46.112
A privacy week?
00:00:46.112 --> 00:00:49.249
My reaction yeah, I thought it was great.
00:00:49.249 --> 00:00:53.276
Yeah, yeah, you guys nominated some special folks in the community.
00:00:53.276 --> 00:00:54.079
Any special shout outs?
00:00:55.622 --> 00:01:01.154
Yeah, a lot of good ones that have been on the show before, but you know Debbie Reynolds, data diva.
00:01:01.154 --> 00:01:02.604
Everybody knows her.
00:01:02.604 --> 00:01:05.867
I would imagine you got Nishant Bajario.
00:01:05.867 --> 00:01:10.051
He's a director of engineering over there at Facebook.
00:01:10.051 --> 00:01:15.081
Who else did we have K Royall Violet?
00:01:15.081 --> 00:01:23.606
Like Jeff Jokish, I'm blanking out anybody else.
00:01:23.908 --> 00:01:25.191
I don't recall, I don't recall.
00:01:25.191 --> 00:01:30.102
I know I saw your, your, your homies that transcend, nominate a few other Community folks too.
00:01:30.102 --> 00:01:45.180
So congratulations and shout out to everyone in the privacy community Celebrate and privacy week last week, doing all the good work Yeoman's work, yeah, the various deities work of getting the good word on privacy out there.
00:01:45.180 --> 00:01:48.129
So I just wanted to make sure we covered that topic first off.
00:01:48.390 --> 00:01:49.072
Yeah, absolutely.
00:01:49.072 --> 00:02:00.472
It's good to kick that off for the first time and obviously you see how that grows over the over the years and Get some other other new people in there that are doing great work in the privacy community, so it's good stuff.
00:02:01.242 --> 00:02:03.037
So we had two of the topics for reaction.
00:02:03.037 --> 00:02:13.060
Monday, the first one was an article regarding the SEC and its ability to protect its own data Should it be trusted to protect yours if they can't protect their own?
00:02:14.984 --> 00:02:19.973
It's pretty simple answer, I think, but it's a little more complicated than just a yes or no.
00:02:20.701 --> 00:02:21.346
I'm gonna go with the.
00:02:21.346 --> 00:02:23.074
I'm gonna go with yes or no on this one.
00:02:23.074 --> 00:02:24.280
This is a straw man argument.
00:02:24.280 --> 00:02:25.204
That's just nonsense.
00:02:25.204 --> 00:02:25.826
Yes.
00:02:26.149 --> 00:02:27.334
Yes, I can't scare crew.
00:02:27.776 --> 00:02:30.484
Yeah, like yes, I can and will trust them to protect it.
00:02:30.484 --> 00:02:34.834
And here's why because if there isn't at least one entity doing so, then who the hell is?
00:02:34.834 --> 00:02:40.515
Because the organizations themselves have proven that they have a perverse incentive to not necessarily do so.
00:02:40.515 --> 00:02:48.713
Many of them are equally understaffed or under budgeted by design, a default, and they struggle with those things themselves.
00:02:48.713 --> 00:02:56.150
So, yeah, the SEC has a difficult job and sometimes their job Didn't get done as well as even they would like it to have been done.
00:02:56.621 --> 00:03:14.253
But I feel like this argument is pure bunk, asking the question like it's not like the SEC Doesn't exist and it's not like it hasn't had significant, significant I'm just gonna use the word failures and even governing itself as well as members of its own community.
00:03:14.253 --> 00:03:18.905
You know, you can look no further than say, you know the Ponzi schemes with made-off, etc.
00:03:18.905 --> 00:03:20.628
And people like freaking bitchin about it.
00:03:20.628 --> 00:03:22.774
So the SEC is not without its problems.
00:03:22.774 --> 00:03:30.358
But I'll be darned if the question is should they Be giving us any advice and how to protect their data?
00:03:30.358 --> 00:03:38.301
I'm like I've seen the advice for many of the rest of you and and yeah, no, I'm actually I'm going to side with the, as you see, on this one like yeah, no, it is.
00:03:38.301 --> 00:03:43.039
It is actually about and I'm not a big government guy, a regulation guy, none of those things.
00:03:43.161 --> 00:03:46.756
I think those, I think those things are problematic.
00:03:46.756 --> 00:03:47.520
Tread lightly.
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:50.000
No-transcript.
00:03:50.000 --> 00:03:54.378
Yeah, no, bugger off with that argument of should they be able to?
00:03:54.378 --> 00:03:55.020
I get it.
00:03:55.020 --> 00:03:57.439
It's a provocative headline and that's why it was written that way.
00:03:57.439 --> 00:04:02.758
So it got the desired reaction out of me and a reaction Monday.
00:04:02.818 --> 00:04:04.657
I'm reacting good, I hope you.
00:04:04.657 --> 00:04:12.860
I don't know if you noticed and this is a shout out to any of our listeners that aren't a part of Privacy Pulse Community, which was started by Transcend.
00:04:12.860 --> 00:04:14.358
Fun enough, but it's just.
00:04:14.358 --> 00:04:16.519
It's a great community, almost 500 people.
00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:19.182
If you wanna join, let me know.
00:04:19.182 --> 00:04:20.779
I'll send you an invite to it.
00:04:20.779 --> 00:04:23.362
Great community of privacy professionals.
00:04:23.362 --> 00:04:26.923
I actually posted that question in the chat this morning, gabe.
00:04:26.923 --> 00:04:27.538
What did they say?
00:04:27.538 --> 00:04:34.403
I just I haven't gotten a response yet, but I'm interested to see if someone comes in with some of the same heat that you are, which is great.
00:04:35.697 --> 00:04:39.877
Let's monitor that one, and I definitely wanna update this thread when we post it with it.
00:04:39.877 --> 00:04:45.319
Yeah, A bit of quick heat, though, because it's a Monday and we like to punch hard and get out here in a reaction Monday.
00:04:45.319 --> 00:04:49.985
So the second topic Florida.
00:04:49.985 --> 00:04:56.319
Everyone loves Florida advances a law banning children under 16 from using social media.
00:04:56.319 --> 00:04:56.940
So again.
00:04:56.980 --> 00:04:58.485
I saw another state did it recently too.
00:04:58.485 --> 00:04:59.759
This is gonna trickle.
00:05:02.120 --> 00:05:02.279
This.
00:05:02.279 --> 00:05:07.723
So again, this goes right back to that regulation and oversight and big brother thing and the government.
00:05:07.723 --> 00:05:10.343
And, first of all, is this even a privacy issue?
00:05:10.343 --> 00:05:14.355
I mean, I think the easiest answer to this is it is.
00:05:14.355 --> 00:05:25.404
Privacy is very much driven by security, personal security and business security.
00:05:25.404 --> 00:05:26.540
It is driven by those things.
00:05:26.540 --> 00:05:33.060
One requires that that information stay private, such that you can be safe from the knowledge that others can abuse it.
00:05:33.060 --> 00:05:37.281
Right, like, because I think a lot of people get all abstract well, what's the harm if they know?
00:05:37.281 --> 00:05:40.624
Safe from the harm of abuse of that data?
00:05:41.274 --> 00:06:04.062
It is again self-evident at this point that these organizations, social media ones in particular, that they are perversely incentivized to exploit the privacy of people on their platform when those people are under the age of 16 and barely even able to understand the implications that their own actions may have on them 20 years from now.
00:06:05.714 --> 00:06:14.639
I don't know if this legislation has gone too far or not far enough, but I'll tell you, having zero oversights on it I think is nonsense.
00:06:14.639 --> 00:06:17.322
And I equally can't think of what is lost.
00:06:17.322 --> 00:06:23.583
If you said everyone on the 16 can't be on social media, like I don't know what is lost, I think nothing is actually lost.
00:06:23.583 --> 00:06:31.403
We're not saying they can't be on the internet or can't access Wikipedia or encyclopediacom or whatever that or do like research or chat.
00:06:31.403 --> 00:06:32.720
You'd be like no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
00:06:32.720 --> 00:06:50.007
We're talking about this technology stack that we've studied well enough to know that there's actual psychological and social harm that occurs as just a byproduct of normal use and abuse of those platforms.
00:06:50.007 --> 00:06:57.442
So on another reaction Monday, I say to hell with that nonsense, bring on said regulation.
00:06:59.396 --> 00:07:01.865
Well, I don't really know what they're.
00:07:01.865 --> 00:07:07.274
I haven't dug into the article, but I don't know if they like.
00:07:07.274 --> 00:07:14.697
I think it's gonna be just as important for the parents to regulate their devices, having timers or something.
00:07:14.697 --> 00:07:21.095
No, doubt, no doubt yeah cause, like you can, literally, if you're a 10 year old to a 16 year old, you're gonna be smart enough to say that you're older than 16.
00:07:21.115 --> 00:07:25.415
You could figure out how to get around it, yeah, and I think it's just as easy, as is it?
00:07:25.456 --> 00:07:27.463
really just gonna be like are you 17?
00:07:28.225 --> 00:07:36.908
No, this is, you know, this is about those platforms making sure they do their due diligence now with enforcing hey, wait a second, that's okay, that's supposed to be in here.
00:07:36.908 --> 00:07:37.891
It's like a liquor store.
00:07:37.891 --> 00:07:38.774
I like sure I can go.
00:07:38.774 --> 00:07:40.937
Yeah, yeah, id, sure I can.
00:07:40.937 --> 00:07:44.189
But whose job is it to make sure?
00:07:44.189 --> 00:07:51.413
Senate, right, like no, no, no, no, this to bring it on, bring it on digital liquor store Look where are those at?
00:07:52.706 --> 00:07:53.810
They're on uber eats game.
00:07:53.810 --> 00:08:00.605
Thanks, want to pay extra for someone to deliver alcohol to you, fake facts?
00:08:00.906 --> 00:08:08.134
Well, let's say for the going out and getting it if you you've had past your limit, of course, that's true, but you just shut it that they should put a breathalyzer on you, breeze.
00:08:10.007 --> 00:08:11.874
I think you just become a fan of cannabis.
00:08:11.874 --> 00:08:15.004
And there is yeah, yeah, yeah, I know they say it there it is.
00:08:15.165 --> 00:08:16.531
Where's the uber eats for the cannabis?
00:08:16.531 --> 00:08:18.119
It's in California.
00:08:18.119 --> 00:08:18.942
It's in California.
00:08:18.963 --> 00:08:19.365
That's true.
00:08:19.365 --> 00:08:22.471
Oh, you, all you on the West Coast, you're living it right now.
00:08:22.651 --> 00:08:24.173
They've got that delivery service.
00:08:24.173 --> 00:08:27.439
Anyway that's, that's my overreaction.
00:08:27.439 --> 00:08:34.934
We might cover some more of this in a in a block cast, but we'll definitely cover these topics in the privacy pulse community as well.
00:08:34.934 --> 00:08:36.719
To one gets more reactions there.
00:08:36.719 --> 00:08:42.736
Get folks pulled into our our Monday overreactions and get some community overreactions.
00:08:42.736 --> 00:08:43.238
I don't happen.
00:08:43.238 --> 00:08:44.429
I think I'm overreacting today.
00:08:44.429 --> 00:08:47.945
Today I think I'm being relatively level-headed, which is weird.
00:08:47.945 --> 00:08:53.138
Yeah, considering I'm pushing for actual regulation and backing the SEC like I don't know what the hell's going on.
00:08:53.628 --> 00:08:55.721
But all that little even keeled over here.
00:08:55.801 --> 00:08:59.466
All of that out, I'm not no my friends.
00:09:00.206 --> 00:09:01.027
Yeah, we're out of here.
00:09:01.027 --> 00:09:03.008
I appreciate you Give us your thoughts.
00:09:03.008 --> 00:09:04.048
See you guys next week.
00:09:04.048 --> 00:09:04.688
Peace.
