ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Text us your thoughts on the episode or the show!
Balancing change and continuity in Marketing Ops is one of the hardest things to get right, especially in global organizations with fast-moving goals and limited resources. In this episode of Ops Cast, Michael Hartmann is joined by Adele Kurki, Senior Marketing Operations Lead at Aiven.
Adele shares how she has led global Marketing Ops teams through major shifts like funnel redesigns, go-to-market evolution, and operational transformations.
She opens up about the challenges of driving technical change while keeping the engine running, the importance of transparency in distributed teams, and the real limits of frameworks like Agile.
The conversation covers how to lead change without disrupting execution, communicate with executive stakeholders, and create a growth path for your team in a high-pressure environment. If you are in the middle of building or rebuilding a Marketing Ops function, this one will hit close to home.
What you will learn:
• How to manage run versus change in Marketing Ops
• Why transparency matters more in global teams
• When Agile helps and when it gets in the way
• The risks of layering transformation on top of BAU
• Tips for earning leadership buy-in
• How to help your team grow during times of flux
Be sure to subscribe, rate, and review Ops Cast. Join the community at MarketingOps.com for more conversations like this.
Episode Brought to You By MO Pros
The #1 Community for Marketing Operations Professionals
IN THIS EPISODE
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:24.890 --> 00:00:25.850
Hello everyone.
00:00:25.850 --> 00:00:31.130
Welcome to another episode of Opscast, brought to you by MarketingOps.com and powered by all the MoPros out there.
00:00:31.130 --> 00:00:32.810
I am your host, Michael Hartman.
00:00:32.810 --> 00:00:41.769
Today I'll be talking with our guest about one of the most persistent challenges in marketing operations, how you can how you change the business while still running the business.
00:00:41.769 --> 00:00:48.969
So to join to do that, joining me is our guest Adele Kirky, senior marketing operations lead at Avon.
00:00:48.969 --> 00:01:03.370
Over the past several years, Adele has built and led global marketing ops functions through major change, including top-of-funnel redesigns, evolving go-to-market strategies, and large-scale transformations, all while keeping day-to-day execution running across distributed teams.
00:01:03.370 --> 00:01:07.849
So this episode is going to be all about the reality of transformation inside marketing ops.
00:01:07.849 --> 00:01:20.170
Hopefully, marketing is a little bit too, balancing BAU work with long-term initiatives, creating transparency across global teams, securing the leadership buy-in for technical change and figuring out when frameworks like Agile help and when they don't.
00:01:20.170 --> 00:01:22.810
We'll have an interesting conversation about that, I expect.
00:01:22.810 --> 00:01:28.250
So, uh Adele, welcome and thanks for joining so late since you're in Linway.
00:01:28.890 --> 00:01:29.450
Thank you.
00:01:29.450 --> 00:01:30.010
Thank you.
00:01:30.010 --> 00:01:31.129
It's 8 p.m.
00:01:31.129 --> 00:01:36.409
here in Helsinki, and it's definitely dark as we are recording this on February.
00:01:36.409 --> 00:01:39.450
Um, thank you for a warm introduction and invitation.
00:01:39.450 --> 00:01:45.210
I've been following your podcast uh for a while, and I must say I'm deeply grateful to share my perspective today.
00:01:45.210 --> 00:01:49.370
So um I serve as senior marketing operations lead, as you mentioned.
00:01:49.370 --> 00:01:52.570
Uh a significant recent change is already now.
00:01:52.570 --> 00:02:01.769
Uh, we, for instance, moved the marketing operation team to a revenue operations organization, which adds a little bit of a spice for today's conversation.
00:02:01.769 --> 00:02:02.250
Okay.
00:02:02.250 --> 00:02:04.250
Is that a new thing since we last talked?
00:02:04.250 --> 00:02:07.849
That is a new thing since we last talked.
00:02:07.849 --> 00:02:12.090
But, anyways, we're focusing definitely on marketing operations.
00:02:12.090 --> 00:02:21.849
Uh, more tech operations and analysts in how we are working with our stakeholders uh in in moment of transition as well as day to day.
00:02:22.170 --> 00:02:30.650
Um, so why don't we start there, like talk through a little bit like in in so this is like a pullback the curtain moment a little bit.
00:02:30.650 --> 00:02:38.090
So uh when I say Adele and I spoke before, it's um yeah, it varies from guest to guest how long ago that was.
00:02:38.090 --> 00:02:46.409
Um, but I think we we are recording in early February of 2026, and I think we spoke in early October, if I remember right, something like that.
00:02:46.409 --> 00:02:47.849
So it's a few months.
00:02:47.849 --> 00:02:53.289
So um that's not that long, but it sounds like some change.
00:02:53.289 --> 00:02:55.849
So like maybe walk us through your role.
00:02:55.849 --> 00:03:03.129
Um and I'm I'm really curious um about the like the global nature of what you do.
00:03:03.129 --> 00:03:15.050
So we we like I've had global teams managing them from the US, but people in other countries, and we've had a few people on who manage global teams from Europe and other places.
00:03:15.050 --> 00:03:17.849
So I'd love to get your perspective on that as well.
00:03:18.650 --> 00:03:19.210
Absolutely.
00:03:19.210 --> 00:03:23.610
Actually, let's start first kind of like getting the scope and globe in place.
00:03:23.610 --> 00:03:35.849
Uh, indeed, we are a mighty team of marketing operations specialists uh serving our stakeholders across the US, uh APEC, and Europe.
00:03:35.849 --> 00:03:42.409
So practically we are serving our sales colleagues and supporting colleagues around the globe.
00:03:42.409 --> 00:03:53.210
Um, we are specifically in Europe and US, so that we are able to ensure these 360 uh view support uh every single day.
00:03:53.210 --> 00:03:57.050
Um, maybe kind of like opening a little bit of a like what does it mean?
00:03:57.050 --> 00:04:00.650
What is the scope and what is kind of like the team supporting with?
00:04:00.650 --> 00:04:06.090
Um we are practically ensuring that we have optimized customer journey.
00:04:06.090 --> 00:04:13.689
So practically we in improve sales and marketing alignment, uh, we lead initiatives that boost operational efficiency.
00:04:13.689 --> 00:04:19.129
Uh practically, the team kind of owns the funnel ink, like everything top of the funnel.
00:04:19.129 --> 00:04:25.850
Is it tracking, operations, tooling, marketing analysis uh and analytics is our team?
00:04:25.850 --> 00:04:32.730
Okay, we set the targets in the beginning of the fiscal years, we own AI workflows for marketing.
00:04:33.050 --> 00:04:37.289
Targets for like leading marketing leads and things like that, funnel funnel metrics.
00:04:37.610 --> 00:04:38.009
Exactly.
00:04:38.009 --> 00:04:41.529
Okay, funnel metrics, setting the targets in the beginning of the fiscal year.
00:04:41.529 --> 00:04:49.210
Like, hey, if our sales target is here, how as marketing function are we able to support to kind of like get us there?
00:04:49.210 --> 00:04:49.850
Yeah.
00:04:49.850 --> 00:04:50.730
Right.
00:04:50.730 --> 00:04:56.570
Um indeed, and of course, there is this admin part, which is not always so cool, which is like the admin.
00:04:56.570 --> 00:04:59.529
Of course, we have always privacy, security.
00:04:59.529 --> 00:05:08.889
When we're thinking about a global business, there are Europe is very like strict with their data privacy, same like all the states might have slightly different elements.
00:05:08.889 --> 00:05:13.450
So all of that work is also monitored and controlled uh in our team.
00:05:13.450 --> 00:05:22.409
If you think about like, okay, we have this global element, we have that work element, what else there are there is there is a ton of stakeholders.
00:05:22.409 --> 00:05:27.450
Um we work day to day, obviously with marketing, it's part of the name as well, right?
00:05:27.450 --> 00:05:32.570
Uh but day-to-day with sales, is it kind of like a sales rep or sales leadership?
00:05:32.570 --> 00:05:37.370
There need to be day-to-day alignment so that we actually connect the businesses together.
00:05:37.370 --> 00:05:41.450
Um, we have sales uh motion, but we have also product motion.
00:05:41.450 --> 00:05:43.450
So we own part of the product motion.
00:05:43.450 --> 00:05:49.929
We work day to day with product teams to ensure that we are the same map, we are roadmap support each other.
00:05:49.929 --> 00:05:58.330
Um and also, of course, if they are end-of-the-life cycles, who owns the customer communications, we're raising our hand and supporting there as well.
00:05:58.330 --> 00:06:02.889
Then, as we have analytics, analytic engineering, all that planning.
00:06:02.889 --> 00:06:09.610
So it's really, really interesting uh core business that we're doing here in the in the marketing operations.
00:06:10.090 --> 00:06:19.129
It's all because this is it just struck me as you were talking about, and now we're gonna talk more about the the tension between run the business, change the business kinds of things.
00:06:19.129 --> 00:06:35.929
But also, I just was it sort of hit me as you were describing one of your roles is to help the business, um, whether it's efficiency, velocity, effectiveness of things that are going through the funnel, but also um, and I think about this as being an advocate for customers, right?
00:06:35.929 --> 00:06:39.210
Whether it's privacy, compliance, doing kind of doing right by them.
00:06:39.210 --> 00:06:42.250
And it does feel often like those are also intention.
00:06:42.250 --> 00:06:45.850
Do you in and you got the global differences that make it more complicated?
00:06:45.850 --> 00:06:47.529
You see, do you feel that too?
00:06:48.090 --> 00:06:49.049
Yeah, absolutely.
00:06:49.049 --> 00:07:04.169
And also something that's really sometimes you forget is like, okay, when you are in like an operations enough, actually, that backroom role is actually sometimes the most customer-facing, is especially if we think about like, for instance, AI workflows, which I mentioned here.
00:07:04.169 --> 00:07:13.769
It's like sometimes actually today you're creating in operations an AI that is actually for us to serve the whole customer flow until the closure.
00:07:14.009 --> 00:07:14.570
Yeah.
00:07:15.370 --> 00:07:17.929
Which is quite interesting uh perspective as well.
00:07:17.929 --> 00:07:27.610
So then for that perspective, it's really, really good to be connected on those stakeholders that are there to actually monitor and like setting the standards.
00:07:28.009 --> 00:07:28.730
It's interesting.
00:07:28.730 --> 00:07:31.769
Sorry, I was kind of smiling because I just had a personal experience.
00:07:31.769 --> 00:07:38.730
It was not a sales funnel thing, it was more of a support thing, which you know, it was a you know AI chatbot, whatever.
00:07:38.730 --> 00:07:45.289
And I asked about two questions, didn't understand it, asked the second one, another one.
00:07:45.289 --> 00:07:47.690
It told me kind of, oh, if you want this, ask this.
00:07:47.690 --> 00:07:48.330
I put it in.
00:07:48.330 --> 00:07:50.409
Like, I don't understand what you're saying.
00:07:50.409 --> 00:07:52.970
I was like, I just put in what you just told me to do.
00:07:52.970 --> 00:07:57.929
Yeah, and it would not it, I just got the same don't understand over and over and I was five.
00:07:58.409 --> 00:08:01.450
And honestly, those things you want to avoid, right?
00:08:01.450 --> 00:08:05.450
Because it's actually not helping the customer, it's just creating the frustration.
00:08:05.450 --> 00:08:09.769
Then you're like, I remember this brand, but not on the most positive way.
00:08:10.090 --> 00:08:15.690
Yeah, and if I'm I can't remember what it was, but I think it was like a well insurance thing or something like that.
00:08:15.690 --> 00:08:17.129
And I'd like no choice, right?
00:08:17.129 --> 00:08:20.730
I'm like, so uh it's not like I could do anything about it.
00:08:20.730 --> 00:08:31.370
Anyway, solely off topic, but um so when we talked before, you said that we you know, over the last few years you've led several major initiatives.
00:08:31.370 --> 00:08:35.370
Um maybe walk us through what some of those are that you want to highlight.
00:08:35.370 --> 00:08:47.289
Um and maybe go even a step back and like what kind of what was the the trigger or catalyst that led to like why we wanted to pursue those changes to the business.
00:08:47.929 --> 00:08:48.889
Yeah, absolutely.
00:08:48.889 --> 00:08:58.089
I could maybe share kind of like three key elements and then we look a little bit on like how to bring it to the to the board and what kind of like triggers those.
00:08:58.089 --> 00:09:08.649
Maybe if we think about what drives change from marketing operations side, like okay, if it's not like given change, which which sometimes happens.
00:09:08.649 --> 00:09:21.610
It's um after all, we are the architects, we are building the invisible bridges between the data points, we're bringing the actions, we're bringing the insights.
00:09:21.610 --> 00:09:31.769
Okay, from that perspective, often the change is that hey, we cannot bring, like we are missing some bricks from this invisible bridge.
00:09:31.769 --> 00:09:48.809
And that is what at least uh in our case have been triggering a couple of um cool work projects where one, for instance, is that hey, we need to find a good way to automate and build marketing attribution, as simple as that.
00:09:49.129 --> 00:09:49.449
Okay.
00:09:49.769 --> 00:10:02.490
Do you have the the bricks in place so that you can tell the story to your leadership that, hey, okay, this is what sourced, this is what tipped, this is what influenced, and you know, this is the storyline of the deal.
00:10:02.490 --> 00:10:05.850
And these is these are the ways where we should invest.
00:10:05.850 --> 00:10:10.970
And if you want to make a change, this might be the way where you're leading towards too.
00:10:10.970 --> 00:10:16.329
Another project is from pretty much the same elements.
00:10:16.329 --> 00:10:20.409
It we started quite early within AI marketing flows.
00:10:20.409 --> 00:10:20.569
Okay.
00:10:20.569 --> 00:10:29.529
Of course, they've been kind of like quite along in the business, but it wasn't kind of like that mainstream to bring them uh, let's say four years ago or so.
00:10:29.529 --> 00:10:37.370
And there the conversation started, like, okay, we have again this invisible bridge, and we see their gaps.
00:10:37.370 --> 00:10:42.970
How can we fill it when we don't have resourcing in place?
00:10:42.970 --> 00:10:47.129
Okay, how do you replace basically additional human partners?
00:10:47.129 --> 00:10:48.809
Are there gaps that we can do?
00:10:48.809 --> 00:10:54.169
And we started building actually proactively, like, hey, actually, let's let's do a POC.
00:10:54.169 --> 00:11:05.769
Let's try so that we can sell later for leadership that okay, actually, if we are investing in this, we can provide X times return on investment.
00:11:05.929 --> 00:11:06.250
Okay.
00:11:06.730 --> 00:11:23.370
And then a third big one, which was actually a quite recent one, is that um sometimes in marketing and especially in marketing operations, we tend to think and simplify that hey, our customers are living only one life cycle.
00:11:23.370 --> 00:11:28.329
So we are looking like, okay, they entered the system, they did this, and then they either closed or did not.
00:11:28.329 --> 00:11:31.449
And um we wanted to solve it.
00:11:31.449 --> 00:11:41.769
Like, hey, okay, how do we create more transparency on if our uh like um prospects are going through with different life cycles?
00:11:41.769 --> 00:11:45.129
Okay, they might not enter to the opportunity process this time, okay.
00:11:45.129 --> 00:11:51.769
Let's end like enrich, engage, blah blah blah, and then they come again and again.
00:11:51.769 --> 00:11:56.169
Yeah, and we created a process on how to bring that transparency to the table.
00:11:56.169 --> 00:12:04.329
Now you can already hear, like, okay, so how did you explain it to your level because it sounds already quite technical and complex?
00:12:04.730 --> 00:12:11.129
Well, that one is that's another one that's like it's hard to explain because everyone's so used to there's already a linear funnel model, right?
00:12:11.129 --> 00:12:14.409
Which it it's an easy framework to get, but there that's not the reality.
00:12:14.409 --> 00:12:18.730
Think of how people research actually behave.
00:12:20.089 --> 00:12:20.409
Yeah.
00:12:20.409 --> 00:12:30.250
And especially if you have product that you can try for free, or you can kind of like bring your colleagues into, or you change businesses.
00:12:30.250 --> 00:12:36.809
Uh, and it's a missed opportunity if you somehow lose the ends after the first life cycle, as we wish.
00:12:36.809 --> 00:12:47.449
So uh and honestly, with this project, I had a lot of difficulties to figure out like, okay, how can I like this this is so important, this is so cool, this is high impact.
00:12:47.449 --> 00:12:52.889
But if you go to your leadership, like, ah, there is this life cycle and these objects and you know blah blah blah blah blah.
00:12:52.889 --> 00:13:03.929
So elements to bring to the table to kind of like create this invisible bridge first, communications and preparations.
00:13:03.929 --> 00:13:14.649
Yeah, find the annex, like find what is important in the in the leadership level, what like what matters, and then try to model some sort of an uh impact.
00:13:14.649 --> 00:13:19.769
It doesn't have to be perfectly fine, like after all, we're not looking at like okay, was it like the stuff?
00:13:20.089 --> 00:13:22.889
Nothing like accounting data and financial data, right?
00:13:22.970 --> 00:13:30.569
So but kind of like an estimate, like okay, you can all, for instance, in this life cycle side or this AIF law, you can see where the gap is.
00:13:30.730 --> 00:13:33.769
Something reasonable that you could defend as a benefit, right?
00:13:33.850 --> 00:13:49.610
Even if Yeah, and and get the attention, because then the conversation starts when you are able to get into that table with that first pitch that hey, this is actually relevant, and we want to solve it because it has a dollar value, and dollar values are important for you to make it through this fiscal.
00:13:49.850 --> 00:13:50.169
Absolutely.
00:13:50.409 --> 00:13:53.769
So that's kind of like how we how we started the conversation.
00:13:53.769 --> 00:14:13.769
Then the other thing uh with some of these projects is that it's really important that you build authority inside the company so that you have a certain level of trust within the leaderships, which means that okay, you do your day-to-day like within your team in a in a good level, you keep the constant transparency, you are visible.
00:14:13.769 --> 00:14:28.329
But for sometimes it is a good thing to do like an official audit or bring an external to support you into this con conversation.
00:14:28.329 --> 00:14:35.929
It is something that I learned a little bit like in an uncomfortable way, because I think I'm like, ah, but I know my business, I've been here.
00:14:35.929 --> 00:14:38.889
Um I know what they're going to say.
00:14:38.889 --> 00:14:48.009
But um we brought a great um consultancy CS2, not advertised, but they did a really good work with us.
00:14:48.009 --> 00:14:53.209
Uh, we brought them to the table and said, like, hey guys, um, we have this problem.
00:14:53.209 --> 00:14:55.049
We really think that this is important.
00:14:55.049 --> 00:14:59.049
We already calculated how much this would be bring bringing us value.
00:14:59.049 --> 00:15:07.769
Um can you kind of like jump into with our leadership and let's have a chat like with additional authority to make it through?
00:15:07.769 --> 00:15:09.129
Yeah, yeah, it's a validation.
00:15:09.129 --> 00:15:11.049
Yeah, sometimes validation.
00:15:11.049 --> 00:15:12.889
And and it was amazing.
00:15:12.889 --> 00:15:20.970
We did like a proper audit, the validation went through, the leadership worked, workshopped with us, like, okay, how does the good look like?
00:15:20.970 --> 00:15:24.809
And we were able to start this process as we planned.
00:15:25.129 --> 00:15:25.769
Yeah.
00:15:26.169 --> 00:15:32.250
So that's kind of like an additional element which I didn't maybe realize earlier that hey, actually, this is an asset.
00:15:32.569 --> 00:15:38.809
Um can I just go ahead and finish, and then I have I want to follow up on a couple of threads there.
00:15:39.209 --> 00:15:40.250
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
00:15:40.250 --> 00:15:42.490
There are so many things that we could discuss.
00:15:42.490 --> 00:15:57.610
Um, but maybe I want to also touch base, which we will discuss also later, is that it's really important that you have data trade trust in the team that is uh is in the team and you bring constant visibility for everyone in the team.
00:15:57.610 --> 00:16:17.049
It is so, so easy, in especially with marketing operations, to just like do the admin, you know, close the fires, please collect the closest stakeholders, but it's really hard to bring the success cases to the organization or these development projects or the actual impact.
00:16:17.049 --> 00:16:24.649
But that's really important if you are willing to bring these big, big projects into the table and want to have that uh first conversation.
00:16:24.970 --> 00:16:25.209
Yeah.
00:16:25.209 --> 00:16:29.689
So a couple of things just I want to see if uh this sounds right.
00:16:29.689 --> 00:16:31.529
So a couple of takeaways for me.
00:16:31.529 --> 00:16:37.769
One, it's important to speak the language of the stakeholders who have the control of the first strings, right?
00:16:37.769 --> 00:16:43.850
Who can say yes or no on your your ideas, and I think that's a critical one, and people should spend time understanding what that language is.
00:16:43.850 --> 00:16:45.209
That's I think it's important.
00:16:45.209 --> 00:16:46.089
Thank you.
00:16:46.089 --> 00:16:57.689
Um there's an element of what I would call doing the BAU work well earns you the right to go and trust to go do other things that may be over.
00:16:57.689 --> 00:16:59.289
Right.
00:16:59.289 --> 00:17:08.890
Um and sometimes it means also including the right to bring in a uh an expert authority on something to help you prove prove the case.
00:17:08.890 --> 00:17:15.930
But um the the um I think it's really important here.
00:17:15.930 --> 00:17:21.930
Yeah I'm I'm a little torn here on the the last point you made about uh trust in data.
00:17:21.930 --> 00:17:52.089
And I think part of that is what I find a lot of people do with marketing and sales data is they try to treat it when they get grilled as if it should be um right, accurate, whatever word you want to choose, as if it was something that has high levels of control, accounting, finance, you know, operational data, if you were like say manufacturers, like that, which it doesn't like and I think there's a level, like there's a part of this is like, yes, you want to build trust.
00:17:52.089 --> 00:17:59.769
To me, part of that is setting expectations that like what is right, what is like is not going to be the same level.
00:17:59.769 --> 00:18:15.210
And also being honest, like like and I think we've all probably I was talking to somebody earlier today about these weird anomalies I would see inside uh, in this case, Salesforce data, that would lead me to go down paths, go like, why am I seeing this?
00:18:15.210 --> 00:18:21.450
Right, and it turns out there are ways the sales teams were operating, which I don't really like.
00:18:21.450 --> 00:18:27.129
I have a opinion about whether or not that was the right thing to do, but it was doesn't really matter, right?
00:18:27.129 --> 00:18:30.009
That was what how they operated and the data led to that.
00:18:30.009 --> 00:18:30.490
Yeah.
00:18:30.490 --> 00:18:37.450
And so being able to go, like, hey, we we can or we can't do this, we can get close, we can get directionally correct, right?
00:18:37.450 --> 00:18:37.769
Right.
00:18:37.769 --> 00:18:43.049
And I think that's setting that expectation there and being honest about the quality and and completeness and accuracy of the code.
00:18:43.049 --> 00:18:43.930
Oh, absolutely.
00:18:43.930 --> 00:18:44.649
Yeah, okay.
00:18:44.889 --> 00:18:45.369
Absolutely.
00:18:45.369 --> 00:19:01.769
And and I think like something that's really good to understand from uh what makes like marketing analytics, for instance, quite specific is that we have uh the top of the funnel which where you cannot measure everything, even if you'd like to, it's always directional.
00:19:01.930 --> 00:19:02.250
Yeah.
00:19:02.410 --> 00:19:11.289
And then there is this uh additional element, is like what from what angle are you watching the data, or what angle are you reporting the data?
00:19:11.289 --> 00:19:18.730
The sourced, for instance, like if you're looking for hey, let's see um how marketing builds pipeline.
00:19:18.730 --> 00:19:23.289
Yeah, you can look at from so many angles.
00:19:23.289 --> 00:19:31.930
Um there can be as many manual adjustments, opinions, even sometimes, that it's always directional.
00:19:31.930 --> 00:19:35.289
Yeah, and you have to be very specific.
00:19:35.289 --> 00:19:49.369
For instance, when I'm providing numbers, let's say to the Bordek or something, need to be quite open and honest, like, hey, the data you're looking today describes that XYZ.
00:19:49.369 --> 00:19:54.569
And you can like again speak the language, but also be honest.
00:19:54.569 --> 00:20:02.970
Okay, it means if it's sourced, they can the system XYZ can be two years ago, three years ago.
00:20:02.970 --> 00:20:08.170
Now, if they convert it, there might have been actions X, Y, Z happening in between.
00:20:08.170 --> 00:20:17.769
On this other bill, like other window when we are looking at, okay, it was tipped over, or can like, hey, the opportunities process started from this marketing action.
00:20:17.769 --> 00:20:20.089
It it tells a very different story if it was like that.
00:20:20.089 --> 00:20:26.649
Three years sourced, can be from marketing, tipped by sales, or hey, sourced by sales, tipped by marketing.
00:20:26.649 --> 00:20:27.769
Which one do you want to have?
00:20:28.089 --> 00:20:35.450
Yeah, so I think uh we could we could spend all and we probably have before spent a whole conversation on just that kind of topic.
00:20:35.450 --> 00:20:52.009
And it's just I think it's I like to reinforce that because I think I still think there's a lot of people who um are are being held accountable to a level of quality on data that is, I think, unreasonable for most marketing and sales teams.
00:20:52.009 --> 00:20:56.009
Even the ones who have a focus on data quality.
00:20:56.009 --> 00:20:58.569
It's just it's just the nature of it.
00:20:59.049 --> 00:21:04.009
Yeah, and I think in in any ways, like you aim to keep it as clean as possible.
00:21:04.009 --> 00:21:08.649
Um, especially in the times of like automation at AI.
00:21:08.649 --> 00:21:11.849
You want to be as directional, as good as possible.
00:21:11.849 --> 00:21:15.529
You want to provide those different visibilities or different life cycles.
00:21:15.529 --> 00:21:17.369
But it's good to be realistic.
00:21:17.769 --> 00:21:18.009
Yeah.
00:21:18.009 --> 00:21:29.210
Well, and the other part that I always tell people like when I coach people are gonna be, whether they've been on my team or I do, you know, independent coaching, who are being asked to do reporting, right?
00:21:29.210 --> 00:21:36.490
If you uh if you see something, like you should be keenly aware to look for things that don't match a pattern.
00:21:36.490 --> 00:21:41.289
Because I guarantee you someone will ask the question if you just throw these numbers or charts up.
00:21:41.289 --> 00:21:44.970
And you need to be prepared to answer the question of why does it say that?
00:21:44.970 --> 00:21:50.649
It doesn't mean you have to have like it doesn't mean it has to you change it or fix it, right?
00:21:50.649 --> 00:21:55.849
But you go for me, like hey, I give you an example, right?
00:21:55.849 --> 00:22:05.609
Uh started seeing we first launched Marketo, but we started tracking attribution and we started seeing influence on opportunities that were created well before we launched.
00:22:05.609 --> 00:22:07.129
And I'm like, I don't know what's going on here.
00:22:07.129 --> 00:22:12.889
Like, so I had to go figure out why, because even though I don't that didn't make any sense, right?
00:22:12.889 --> 00:22:18.329
Yeah, there's a logical reason why I was able to explain it, but I think that like that's the other part, right?
00:22:18.329 --> 00:22:22.089
So don't just go like, oh well, the data just can't be good.
00:22:22.089 --> 00:22:23.289
You should yes, you should try to.
00:22:23.289 --> 00:22:26.649
Make it as good as possible for automation, AI, all those things.
00:22:26.649 --> 00:22:33.210
And also be prepared to answer when things aren't correct or don't look correct, right?
00:22:33.210 --> 00:22:35.450
Because for the people who aren't familiar with it, they won't get it.
00:22:35.450 --> 00:22:38.569
All right, I'll get off my eye horse there.
00:22:38.569 --> 00:22:51.129
Um okay, so let's get into this the topic of you got these big projects, but you like said, like we still have to keep the machine running, right, if you will.
00:22:51.129 --> 00:23:02.649
Um how do you think about balancing those two, like run the business, like we keep referring to it, run the business, change the business in a practical day-to-day sense.
00:23:02.649 --> 00:23:04.730
Like, what do you how do you think about that?
00:23:06.410 --> 00:23:27.930
Well, honestly, when we have well, first of all, I believe in something called like 80-20 or 70-30 type of a modeling that you have constantly elements that are like supporting short, mid, and long-term growth.
00:23:27.930 --> 00:23:33.609
And practically that means that okay, you have this day-to-day, so we keep the business running, fine.
00:23:33.609 --> 00:23:41.049
But we have always development projects on the side that support like mid and long-term, longer term um elements.
00:23:41.049 --> 00:23:44.250
Now, there is of course different sizes of fires.
00:23:44.250 --> 00:23:53.049
Let's say that we have um decided that okay, one of these growth uh projects will take place, let's say this lifecycle um project.
00:23:53.049 --> 00:23:54.410
We plan.
00:23:54.410 --> 00:24:00.889
We plan so that we have uh that in our roadmaps uh from the very start.
00:24:00.889 --> 00:24:12.170
And we plan it in a timeline that makes well always is ambitious, but it's still making sense, so that we have the capacity to run um the day-to-day.
00:24:12.170 --> 00:24:21.210
Obviously, if you and all the operation teams have always a huge backlog, you need to be just able to prioritize.
00:24:21.210 --> 00:24:31.210
This is always there, and then from the fires, you have, for instance, 70% or 50% of your week, depending a little bit, dedicated for those.
00:24:31.210 --> 00:24:34.649
You do the prioritization inside that time that you have available.
00:24:34.649 --> 00:24:35.450
Yeah.
00:24:35.450 --> 00:24:44.569
So you have just like different buckets of time that are dedicated for different swim lanes, and you prioritize inside those what makes sense.
00:24:44.569 --> 00:25:04.730
Um in these projects, the good and easy thing is that you have you have to provide already to the top, like to the top level or to the leadership, some sort of roadmap, and you want to proactively update uh the organization about changes or expectation setting that hey, again, you have to over-communicate.
00:25:04.730 --> 00:25:17.210
First of April, the change will be there, the change will like mean this and this, and then you can like track from there like what needs to happen at what deadline, and that's like already set, it's predictable.
00:25:17.210 --> 00:25:23.450
It's in your operational roadmap, so your team knows exactly what's happened, so they can focus only on uh on that.
00:25:23.450 --> 00:25:30.730
The challenge, I think the real challenge is that when something else happens on top of that.
00:25:31.049 --> 00:25:31.849
Something unexpected.
00:25:32.009 --> 00:25:33.769
So something unexpected.
00:25:33.769 --> 00:25:38.970
Let's say we changed a sales motion, which actually happened.
00:25:38.970 --> 00:25:44.649
Uh, or we change a team, or we change, you know, a structure, or something like that.
00:25:45.450 --> 00:25:49.529
Which creates an integration that you can, you know, yeah.
00:25:50.569 --> 00:25:56.170
Something something random, which um which requires some time somewhere.
00:25:56.329 --> 00:25:56.970
Yeah.
00:25:57.289 --> 00:26:16.329
And um then it's really good to go back to a team, like, hey, okay, this is still our roadmap, and we still want to ensure that we don't just drop everything and fix something as urgent, but have that long-term vision at the same time.
00:26:16.329 --> 00:26:16.569
Yeah.
00:26:16.569 --> 00:26:22.809
Which is kind of like a little bit sometimes like, oh, but but but this is like really urgent, like we need to fix this fire.
00:26:22.809 --> 00:26:30.089
But if we fix every single fire immediately, we'll never stop firefighting.
00:26:30.089 --> 00:26:38.569
And this function needs to look like longer term to the horizon, like, okay, what this business needs tomorrow.
00:26:38.569 --> 00:26:44.569
And for that reason, we kept even we had this organizational change, for instance, we kept this long-term process.
00:26:44.569 --> 00:26:48.490
We keep, we make sure that this swim lane is not touched.
00:26:48.490 --> 00:26:53.129
Then we have all the operational tasks or admin stuff.
00:26:53.129 --> 00:26:58.170
Okay, what can we change there to ensure that this urgent fire, for instance, is fixed.
00:26:58.170 --> 00:27:11.529
In our case, it was actually um we had to change, or we moved out of one sales sales team, which happened to be the sales team we were handing over our leads.
00:27:11.529 --> 00:27:22.970
So we need to figure out like, oh, okay, well, let's figure out like um a new way of routing and figuring out when and how we do handover leads, and what do we kind of like hand over for marketing, for instance.
00:27:22.970 --> 00:27:31.289
Um, so that's that's a little bit of a fire, but anyways, it's something that we can solve, like peace of mind, let's focus on figuring it out.
00:27:31.289 --> 00:27:40.970
SAP, let's say we have three days, and the team or the resources or the hours that we are focusing on building this long term, they continue.
00:27:40.970 --> 00:27:42.410
We need it still tomorrow.
00:27:42.569 --> 00:27:42.970
Yeah.
00:27:42.970 --> 00:27:44.569
So we have a deadline.
00:27:44.569 --> 00:27:48.250
So in my so when I've led teams, I'm with you, right?
00:27:48.250 --> 00:28:08.170
And and sometimes it's I'm not sure early in my career I would have had the enough breadth of knowledge and experience to be able to, in the moment on the fly, evaluate is this something that really needs to be addressed now, or you know, you know, can we solve an immediate problem and then the bigger long longer term fix?
00:28:08.170 --> 00:28:22.730
How how do you because the reason I bring this up is I I've also had teams come to me where I go, something's come in unexpected, we all have to jump, and then um they get frustrated over one of two, sometimes both things, right?
00:28:22.730 --> 00:28:28.009
One is, you know, why is this all like how does this keep happening, right?
00:28:28.009 --> 00:28:30.250
Why are we getting these fire drills?
00:28:30.250 --> 00:28:31.210
How can we stop that?
00:28:31.210 --> 00:28:36.490
The other is I've committed to a longer-term project, and now this is impacting my ability to execute.
00:28:36.490 --> 00:28:40.250
How do I, you know, what's good because then it becomes a reflection on them.
00:28:40.250 --> 00:28:48.089
It may have an impact on their compensation, but how do how do you I I I guess I've kind of I don't even know that I've written it down.
00:28:48.089 --> 00:28:56.170
I guess I have a little bit of a mental model about how I think about the prioritization and that kind of stuff happens and how to evaluate it, but what's your take?
00:28:56.970 --> 00:29:02.649
Well, of course, it comes back to then what is the like what is the fire?
00:29:02.649 --> 00:29:12.329
Um I always go back in my chair because always when you are like everything is urgent, everything's fire, it actually means that you need to calm down.
00:29:12.329 --> 00:29:12.970
Yeah.
00:29:12.970 --> 00:29:16.649
Um what is the actual business impact?
00:29:16.649 --> 00:29:18.970
Uh, who is driving it?
00:29:18.970 --> 00:29:27.049
Is this urgency for a person, for a certain team, or is it actually like a business-wide impact?
00:29:27.049 --> 00:29:36.649
And if you were to create or solve the problem from the scratch, sometimes you don't have you to are given like, oh, this is urgent, you need to do this.
00:29:36.649 --> 00:29:41.289
I always challenge my team to really think like, okay, what is the problem we solve?
00:29:41.289 --> 00:29:49.210
Okay, if we decide that this is, you know, this has actually quite a big business impact, what is the best way to solve it?
00:29:49.210 --> 00:29:49.769
Okay.
00:29:49.769 --> 00:29:51.930
Uh what is the sufficient way?
00:29:51.930 --> 00:30:05.129
It doesn't have to be perfect, especially if it's like uh a short term, like, okay, hey, actually, we need to just like preach it through how much time we dedicate for it compared to the other things that are on our table.
00:30:05.369 --> 00:30:05.690
Yeah.
00:30:06.730 --> 00:30:10.329
So that's that's where we are coming um usually.
00:30:11.049 --> 00:30:13.369
Yeah, I think I I think about it.
00:30:13.369 --> 00:30:21.849
We'll take a like a system down kind of issue or a break-in integration, something like that.
00:30:21.849 --> 00:30:30.730
I think what what gets mixed together sometimes is uh not only we've got to immediately fix that, and at the same time we have to figure out why it happened.
00:30:30.730 --> 00:30:33.529
And one of the simple things I try to do is like separate that.
00:30:33.529 --> 00:30:41.129
Let's solve the immediate problem, then let's go fix separately in a in a less you know urgent thing.
00:30:41.129 --> 00:30:45.289
Let's go try to understand how that happened and how can we minimize the chance it happens again.
00:30:45.369 --> 00:30:45.690
Yeah.
00:30:45.849 --> 00:30:46.089
Right.
00:30:46.410 --> 00:30:46.970
Absolutely.
00:30:46.970 --> 00:31:01.769
Uh, of course, in in all these roles, it's really important to understand the root cause, because otherwise it it can be it can be sometimes actually wider, like oops, uh, luckily the like result was this small fire, because it could have been massive something else.
00:31:01.769 --> 00:31:05.690
Um so definitely that's that's really important.
00:31:05.690 --> 00:31:09.450
And that's actually something that we expect quite proactively, also.
00:31:09.450 --> 00:31:20.329
If you know it's something it's really good to check if it's if it doesn't require too much to just like deep dive or like check what is the root cause, even if we wouldn't fix that fire immediately.
00:31:21.369 --> 00:31:24.889
Yeah, so another um I think we've hinted at this a little bit.
00:31:24.889 --> 00:31:28.809
There's this idea of, I think you even used the word transparency at one point.
00:31:28.809 --> 00:31:56.170
Like how um and communication, like how important is it, do you think, for marketing apps teams to be both transparent about the capacity, what's on the roadmap, and communicating that well, um, as opposed to um kind of holding back and just focus like I mean it's it becomes easy to be discounted and focus just focus on the the urgent things that are right in front of you.
00:31:57.369 --> 00:32:20.569
Well, honestly, honestly, and what we're trying to do here is that you as a marketing operations leader and you as a marketing operations team want to be a strategic partner instead of you know help desk or ticket mastering function.
00:32:20.569 --> 00:32:33.210
And the first thing in order to change that, especially if you are in the situation that you figure out, like, ah, oops, you're listening to this and you're like, ah, well, my Jira is full and it's actually like everyday fire only.
00:32:33.450 --> 00:32:34.009
Yeah.
00:32:34.410 --> 00:32:37.529
How you start doing the change is to bring this transparency.
00:32:37.529 --> 00:32:39.049
What is the function doing?
00:32:39.049 --> 00:32:44.730
Honestly, it seems to be very cryptic sometimes and really hard to understand.
00:32:44.730 --> 00:32:48.889
But bringing it visible is really important.
00:32:48.889 --> 00:32:53.450
And how do you do it is to first bring, like, okay, this is my roadmap.
00:32:53.450 --> 00:32:56.329
This is kind of like the first level of expectations.
00:32:56.329 --> 00:32:58.410
I think these are expected to happen.
00:32:58.410 --> 00:33:08.730
I am committing to these things, and my team is committed to these things, and also sometimes this is why we are not able to deliver everything that you're bringing to our backlog.
00:33:08.730 --> 00:33:10.970
And we have to practice no.
00:33:10.970 --> 00:33:25.609
Um, when we are thinking about the transparency, it's these communication elements, this human to human, which need to happen in like manager to manager, manager to organization, team to organization.
00:33:25.609 --> 00:33:29.129
Your team has to understand also the roadmap.
00:33:29.129 --> 00:33:30.889
Why did we choose these elements?
00:33:30.889 --> 00:33:32.250
Why are they important?
00:33:32.250 --> 00:33:38.569
You are okay to say no if things are not part of the roadmap.
00:33:38.569 --> 00:33:40.329
And also, this roadmap lives.
00:33:40.329 --> 00:33:40.809
Yeah.
00:33:40.809 --> 00:33:52.170
Like if we have these uh fires, like we are all all okay to drop also something as long as we communicate to the stakeholders and the organization what's happening.
00:33:52.170 --> 00:34:05.210
Um, another interesting thing which I find more like more and more important, especially for roles that are working in very like operative level, where it is sometimes hard.
00:34:05.210 --> 00:34:07.289
Like, hey, I'm actually doing only admin work.
00:34:07.289 --> 00:34:12.410
Like my job is to ensure that you know everything goes fine and it's invisible.
00:34:12.410 --> 00:34:18.250
Um, is to plan together how can we bring this visibility to those roles.
00:34:18.250 --> 00:34:27.849
Um, is it then kind of like bringing them to the kind of like function meetings or like find the cross partners, but also technical transparency.
00:34:27.849 --> 00:34:32.170
Ensure that everything that is done is hey, this is visible to sales, yeah.
00:34:32.170 --> 00:34:34.410
This is visible to the product.
00:34:34.410 --> 00:34:36.650
We are actually connecting the dots.
00:34:36.650 --> 00:34:45.690
Um that is really, really important that it's not only about these humans and the text and their being in the meetings, it's also they're visible in the technical execution.
00:34:45.690 --> 00:34:46.730
Who did what?
00:34:46.730 --> 00:34:48.170
Everything is transparent.
00:34:48.490 --> 00:34:52.890
I I love that you brought up the idea of being transparent if you're a leader, being transparent with your team.
00:34:52.890 --> 00:35:22.810
Because I think it's a mistake I made probably early in my career as a as a people leader, and I see others do, is they try to in the in the name of trying to shield their team from the politics or whatever, they they don't address the questions the team will have, like if things start shifting, you know, we've got this roadmap, but we're getting into you know, we're in getting like how like it's really important for me at least.
00:35:22.810 --> 00:35:26.250
I want a culture where I'm like I'm gonna share as much as I can, right?
00:35:26.250 --> 00:35:29.850
And I you know, be honest when I can't about stuff.
00:35:29.850 --> 00:35:43.530
Yeah, because I think it's um that if if you don't do that, people start to ask questions about why did direction go this way or that way, what's my role, right?
00:35:43.530 --> 00:35:46.570
Am I able to push back all those kinds of things?
00:35:46.570 --> 00:35:52.970
Um, because what I've had I've had to do literally at times is like do I just sort of describe those situations, right?
00:35:52.970 --> 00:36:03.610
We had a roadmap, big project stuff we're working on, and something came up and it sidetracked us for a longer time than we had hoped, and it was gonna impact that timeline for the the big project.
00:36:03.610 --> 00:36:11.850
And I've had to say, like, this is why, especially if it was me, like I made the decision that we had to do that.
00:36:11.850 --> 00:36:14.890
Like, I will be like, I'm gonna own that, right?
00:36:14.890 --> 00:36:18.330
I'm not gonna hold you accountable for change, right?
00:36:18.330 --> 00:36:21.690
As long as you were doing things as appropriate.
00:36:21.690 --> 00:36:26.970
But I think I I I would be as transparent as I could about the why.
00:36:27.690 --> 00:36:28.570
Absolutely.
00:36:28.570 --> 00:36:46.890
And especially if you want your team to be also a proactive problem solver, if you want them to, you know, feel comfortable on bringing like, hey, I know it is anonymous, like something off, or you want them to solve independently and grow and keep the curiosity and something.
00:36:46.890 --> 00:36:52.730
In order for them to solve the business problems, they need to understand what's happening in the business.
00:36:52.730 --> 00:37:00.090
It's uh being the transparent on what's happening, yeah, why things are happening, why things are not happening.
00:37:00.090 --> 00:37:04.650
Um, and then also building that business acumen constantly.
00:37:04.650 --> 00:37:28.570
Like this is the way the business works in our industry, in our car, like, you know, type of a business, um, so that they can work independently, especially when you're working in global companies, because then there is this time zone things and different stakeholders you want that your team is speaking the same language because nothing is more uncomfortable that everybody are a little bit confused.
00:37:28.810 --> 00:37:29.370
Yes.
00:37:29.370 --> 00:37:29.930
Yeah.
00:37:30.250 --> 00:37:34.650
And and you are then kind of like the operational center which is supposed to tell the truth.
00:37:34.650 --> 00:37:34.970
Yeah.
00:37:35.050 --> 00:37:38.330
Well, and worse, no, everyone thinks they're on the same page, but they're actually not.
00:37:39.370 --> 00:37:39.850
Oh, yeah.
00:37:39.850 --> 00:37:41.210
And that's that's the worst.
00:37:41.210 --> 00:37:46.090
And that's why uh these kind of like frameworks, especially in global environments, works well.
00:37:46.090 --> 00:37:48.410
Like, okay, roadmap, always up to date.
00:37:48.410 --> 00:37:53.690
Better if it's living somewhere, um, also as some kind of like living element such as Jira.
00:37:54.090 --> 00:37:54.410
Yeah.
00:37:54.650 --> 00:37:58.970
In Epics, you can put epic, like epics for development projects.
00:37:58.970 --> 00:38:01.530
Here we go.
00:38:01.530 --> 00:38:14.730
But it actually kind of like creates some sort of transparency and living elements in a way, which helps also stakeholders then to go independently, let's say in Apex time zone to review, like, okay, hey, how was my project?
00:38:14.730 --> 00:38:17.050
Or I think I did drop a ball.
00:38:17.050 --> 00:38:18.490
What is the status of it?
00:38:18.650 --> 00:38:19.130
Right, yeah, yeah.
00:38:19.370 --> 00:38:19.850
Type of a thing.
00:38:20.170 --> 00:38:36.490
Yeah, so you hinted at agile stuff, and I feel like we have I'm trying to remember, like, this is the downside of not having talked to you in so long, but uh I think maybe we had a slightly different uh opinion or point of view about where agile fits in and where it doesn't.
00:38:36.490 --> 00:38:50.890
Because I to me it feels like it works really well, generally speaking, for like the the regular recurring repeatable stuff, tickets, if you will, and maybe on some projects stuff.
00:38:50.890 --> 00:38:56.010
Oh, there feels like there I also like personally I think there's work that doesn't really match that.
00:38:56.010 --> 00:38:59.290
Like, which how do you do you guys use agile for what you do?
00:38:59.290 --> 00:39:00.570
Is it like universal?
00:39:00.570 --> 00:39:01.210
What do you like?
00:39:01.210 --> 00:39:02.330
How do you think about it?
00:39:03.370 --> 00:39:08.570
Well, I think we don't like use the official agile uh framework that's it.
00:39:08.570 --> 00:39:11.930
But we have like agile elements.
00:39:11.930 --> 00:39:12.170
Right.
00:39:12.170 --> 00:39:14.090
Um, I do like frameworks.
00:39:14.090 --> 00:39:21.290
I think it's kind of like for every operational person at some moment of time, you have to certain level of control freakness.
00:39:21.290 --> 00:39:44.010
Um, but we, for instance, work on on targets and uh roadmaps and Jiraports to ensure that we have a certain level of execution and technical um transparency, meaning now technical with not in the systems, but in this kind of like ticketing system to have um documented communications and stakeholder management and then this global visibility.
00:39:44.010 --> 00:39:47.530
Um we loop that back to our kind of like living roadmap.
00:39:47.530 --> 00:40:08.410
So we have you know the classic um document that you can showcase in different environments and share, but then we also try to keep it livable and actionable in Jira uh in visual manner so that we can also track hey, are our sprints actually supporting us to finish our goals?
00:40:08.410 --> 00:40:09.769
Do we see blockers?
00:40:09.769 --> 00:40:10.890
Should we re-adjust?
00:40:10.890 --> 00:40:15.370
Were we too ambitious or too like less ambitious that we wanted?
00:40:15.370 --> 00:40:17.530
Um so for that, the agile works.
00:40:17.530 --> 00:40:22.170
Maybe the other, like that's maybe the less agile part as such.
00:40:22.170 --> 00:40:36.170
Um, but it is a tool that helps us to monitor and understand in two weeks' prints if we're going to the right direction, and that we are like all controlling our deliveries.
00:40:36.170 --> 00:40:36.810
Yeah.
00:40:36.810 --> 00:40:40.890
Um, I said it is really easy to go to the firefighting mode.
00:40:40.890 --> 00:40:51.210
Uh, the other thing that we already touch based is this um percentage like, okay, in moments of crisis, you might have 50-50 development firefighting, 70-30.
00:40:51.210 --> 00:40:57.530
You know, have this percentage conversation, like, hey, this week, where are you focusing today?
00:40:57.530 --> 00:41:00.090
What are your key priorities in these swim lanes?
00:41:00.090 --> 00:41:02.810
Okay, we have a special week coming ahead.
00:41:02.810 --> 00:41:04.570
Yeah, we might need to change a little bit.
00:41:04.570 --> 00:41:05.370
Yeah, yeah.
00:41:05.930 --> 00:41:13.050
Well, and that gets, I mean, I I think that's a really good, like I want I want people listening or watching to miss this, right?
00:41:13.050 --> 00:41:20.330
This idea, like the goal is 80-20, 70-30, split between run the business, change the business, or whatever that number is.
00:41:20.330 --> 00:41:23.690
But that's a goal, like any given week, right?
00:41:23.690 --> 00:41:33.210
You may have to adjust because you've got a time-sensitive campaign or event, or someone's gonna be on vacation, right?
00:41:33.210 --> 00:41:37.930
And so that you have to be something breaks adaptable to shift, right?
00:41:37.930 --> 00:41:39.290
Yeah, something breaks.
00:41:39.290 --> 00:41:47.610
Um, so it's interesting because as I was thinking about you talking about agile, um, because I like so total transparency.
00:41:47.610 --> 00:41:56.250
I'm I'm I've used lots of different methodologies, I've built methodologies, and I understand conceptually, I like the idea of agile.
00:41:56.250 --> 00:42:02.250
Um, but I find with almost all methodologies is that people are super hard at core advocates.
00:42:02.250 --> 00:42:09.050
Generally, there's a lot of them who use it as a very rigid structure as opposed to a tool to help them, right?
00:42:09.050 --> 00:42:12.650
And taking advantage of the things that make sense and don't make sense for a given thing.
00:42:12.650 --> 00:42:17.930
That's probably my biggest, but also I just I was it just hit me as you were just talking about because you brought up Jira.
00:42:17.930 --> 00:42:25.290
And I think I what I try in the really hard to separate the tool that you're using for it from the methodology.
00:42:25.290 --> 00:42:32.250
And I think I've used Jira, I've used several other project management tools, and I am a believer in having that, right?
00:42:32.250 --> 00:42:58.890
Because I think to your point, like one of the things it helps you uncover if you don't already have a way of doing is the the two important things to understand what you can actually deliver, which is how much work is coming at you or you have on your team's plate, and how much capacity do you actually have that still allows for maybe a little bit of development time, time off, whether it's sick, vacation, holiday, whatever.
00:42:58.890 --> 00:43:18.810
Um, and if you if you don't have a way of doing that, you're gonna be you're gonna get yourself in a lot of trouble because you just take especially if you're not comfortable pushing back, go like you're just gonna say keep saying yes, because I think a lot of people in ops um want to want to help.
00:43:18.810 --> 00:43:22.410
You know, absolutely, and it's hard to say no.
00:43:24.330 --> 00:43:34.170
And something that you want to be mindful, like I think there are two additional elements why I like keeping this kind of ticketing system, whatever it is, like asana van de blah blah.
00:43:34.170 --> 00:43:39.210
Um first is actually you get really good data on enablement needs.
00:43:39.210 --> 00:43:45.930
There are a ton of tickets that come like actually these guys that just don't know how to do their work.
00:43:45.930 --> 00:43:47.690
Like, this is not a bob's task.
00:43:47.690 --> 00:43:57.690
Or hey, we actually see a pattern that we for some reason none of the team or we didn't have a flagging system, there is a buck somewhere.
00:43:57.690 --> 00:44:01.130
This is actually something that shows that there is a buck.
00:44:01.370 --> 00:44:02.330
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:44:03.210 --> 00:44:23.290
Um the other thing that helps is that yeah, the other thing is that if you have a global team, you and also like the bigger the team, um at some moment of time when you have all these stakeholders all around the world, it might be really hard to understand what is actually.
00:44:23.290 --> 00:44:26.250
Actually, the workloads that come to the team.
00:44:26.250 --> 00:44:36.650
And especially if you have a lot of ambitious junior roles, as you mentioned about this kind of like people pleasing, if I translate it that way.
00:44:36.650 --> 00:44:37.130
Yeah.
00:44:37.130 --> 00:44:40.250
It you don't want to burn them out.
00:44:40.250 --> 00:44:47.690
You want to ensure that the curiosity is there, the coachability is there, the mind is sharp.
00:44:47.690 --> 00:45:02.490
And you're providing the growth by walking through, for instance, time to time, these conversations on like, not only on the sprints, but for instance, in your one-to-one, like, hey, actually, like we saw these tickets coming, like, ignore.
00:45:02.490 --> 00:45:03.850
We'll solve them.
00:45:03.850 --> 00:45:10.250
Or we kind of like, or hey, your workload has increased uh 25%.
00:45:10.250 --> 00:45:12.010
Let's open it up.
00:45:12.010 --> 00:45:13.690
What is kind of like making it busy?
00:45:13.690 --> 00:45:16.570
Okay, is it hindering your development targets?
00:45:16.570 --> 00:45:19.850
Um you know, or there's the hidden cue.
00:45:23.290 --> 00:45:23.769
Yeah.
00:45:26.330 --> 00:45:27.450
Yeah, exactly.
00:45:27.450 --> 00:45:34.970
So it it it works kind of like it works really well as a tool um also for these kind of purposes.
00:45:35.290 --> 00:45:46.170
Yeah, so like you're hinting at maybe this is where we can wrap up, is you're hinting at using that as a tool to help with um development and growth for teams, right?
00:45:46.170 --> 00:45:47.210
Absolutely.
00:45:47.210 --> 00:45:51.130
So do you like how do you think about that?
00:45:51.130 --> 00:45:52.890
Like, how important is that to you?
00:45:54.330 --> 00:46:04.890
Um well, the the growth in general, if we if we jump to that direction, um all operational roles are quite high demanding.
00:46:04.890 --> 00:46:12.170
Like it's not that easy any like anymore to enter to the roles because it's not like I'm afraid, right?
00:46:12.170 --> 00:46:13.690
Exactly.
00:46:13.690 --> 00:46:27.050
Uh and it can be very overwhelming because all like you have a bunch of stakeholders, especially when coming into these international companies, like you have all the stakeholders, they're demanding hundreds of millions of stuff, they don't even know what they're demanding.
00:46:27.050 --> 00:46:40.570
And uh you then try to figure out, first of all, like run and understand what are the new ways of doing things, what is the smartest way of doing things?
00:46:40.570 --> 00:46:42.570
Okay, there are no benchmarks.
00:46:42.570 --> 00:46:46.650
How can I be smart at solving this problem in scale?
00:46:46.650 --> 00:46:58.970
And for that reason, you need to be able to keep that curiosity, that kind of like space for thinking straight, um, and actually solve the problem the stakeholder couldn't even ask.
00:46:58.970 --> 00:47:01.690
And better if you are able to solve it before.
00:47:01.690 --> 00:47:21.370
So, for that reason, I really, really, really want to invest in growing, mentoring, supporting uh the team members, both expanding their, you know, technical ability and keeps the space to learn, but especially keep their you know headspace healthy.
00:47:21.370 --> 00:47:22.570
Yeah, and it's so easy.
00:47:22.570 --> 00:47:24.410
Whenever it is in my powers, of course.
00:47:24.570 --> 00:47:25.769
Yeah, right, right.
00:47:25.769 --> 00:47:36.810
Well, and also, I mean, the the one thing I would add if I was in your sh to your statement is at some point that's the person's responsibility to take advantage of it.
00:47:36.810 --> 00:47:44.810
Like you can create you can create the space and time, but you can't make them do it, and if they choose not to, that's on them.
00:47:45.210 --> 00:47:46.410
Yeah, absolutely.
00:47:46.410 --> 00:47:53.050
But I think it's it's really important to be able to build that space and protect the space.
00:47:53.050 --> 00:48:06.970
Is it then transparency, the systems, the roadmaps, yeah, especially in moments of change when it is overwhelming in multiple fronts, um and especially if you're in in more junior roles?
00:48:07.290 --> 00:48:07.530
Yeah.
00:48:07.530 --> 00:48:33.290
I mean, I I I've had people on teams who I remember one who was pursuing an MBA, and I just we just we we were very honest and direct with each other, you know, about how that would look, you know, and what commitments we still had to make um on the occasion when that person needed to leave early or you know, do a tr, you know, some sort of project or whatever.
00:48:33.290 --> 00:48:34.970
We just we worked it out.
00:48:34.970 --> 00:48:44.250
And but I think it ultimately um it benefited that person and it benefited the organization for that person.
00:48:44.250 --> 00:48:57.050
Like so giving them the ability, they became more loyal, they were like willing to put in extra work and um all these things, so and did was good at what uh at the work.
00:48:57.050 --> 00:49:01.850
So anyway, um we've covered a lot of ground here, Adele.
00:49:02.010 --> 00:49:03.050
Yeah, absolutely.
00:49:03.050 --> 00:49:04.490
Thank you for a great conversation.
00:49:04.810 --> 00:49:05.370
That's great.
00:49:05.370 --> 00:49:12.650
Um, so if people want to continue maybe one of these threads or something, or follow what you're you're doing, what's the best way for them to do that?
00:49:13.210 --> 00:49:14.810
Well, I'm in LinkedIn.
00:49:14.810 --> 00:49:20.890
Uh, so you can find with me, you can find me with my name, so Adele Kurki.
00:49:20.890 --> 00:49:22.570
Um, feel free to reach out.
00:49:22.570 --> 00:49:28.570
I'm super, super happy to continue the conversation on any of these topics we cover it today, these calls.
00:49:28.890 --> 00:49:30.730
Yeah, we've we we did cover a lot of ground.
00:49:30.730 --> 00:49:32.410
We hoped hopscotched a bit.
00:49:32.410 --> 00:49:35.290
Well, Adele, thank you so much for joining, especially late.
00:49:35.290 --> 00:49:37.130
I do know I it's not easy.
00:49:37.130 --> 00:49:38.090
I appreciate that.
00:49:38.090 --> 00:49:39.290
So thank you.
00:49:39.290 --> 00:49:43.769
Uh thanks to our uh listeners and supporters and audience out there.
00:49:43.769 --> 00:49:45.210
We always appreciate that.
00:49:45.210 --> 00:49:52.330
Um, if you have ideas for topics or guests, or want to be a guest, do like Adele did and reach out, and we'd be happy to get the ball rolling.
00:49:52.330 --> 00:49:53.130
Till next time.
00:49:53.130 --> 00:49:54.330
Bye, everybody.
00:49:54.330 --> 00:49:56.010
Bye.