ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Dr. Curtis Clarke joins us to discuss the urgent need to adopt new models of learning. Dr. Clarke has served in Alberta Public Service roles, including Deputy Minister of Advanced Education, K-12 Education, and Solicitor General. He was also Assistant Deputy Minister of Alberta Correctional Services and Cabinet Policy Coordinator. Clarke shares what the emergence of mid-career learners means for education and what’s wrong with the “learn and pray” model educational institutions have relied on traditionally.
Highlights from our conversation include:
1. Adaptive models of learning need to meet students, especially mid-career learners, where they are. Universities need to consider how they can assess a learner’s competencies and make informed recommendations for future learning.
2. Through curriculum co-development alongside industry partners, learners can engage with sectors that are part of the workforce they will move into.
3. Policy structures have tied university funding to the ability to attract students, but changing dynamics need to incentivize building partnerships that better serve students of all backgrounds.
Hosts: Jeremy Strachan
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:05.237 --> 00:00:09.357
JEREMY: A welcome and hello to Dr. Curtis Clark, who is a former Deputy Minister of
00:00:09.357 --> 00:00:12.517
the Ministry of Education of Alberta and Advanced Education,
00:00:12.797 --> 00:00:14.877
and is now a consultant at Propero.
00:00:15.197 --> 00:00:19.217
Dr. Clark has extensive experience in education leadership, particularly in
00:00:19.217 --> 00:00:23.077
navigating policy changes and fostering collaboration between the public and
00:00:23.077 --> 00:00:25.837
private sectors to improve education outcomes.
00:00:26.277 --> 00:00:31.477
Dr. Clark, welcome. How are you doing? CURTIS: I'm great. And thank you for having me here, Jeremy. JEREMY: Great.
00:00:32.277 --> 00:00:37.897
What have been the key takeaways so far of the events that M&L has been putting
00:00:37.897 --> 00:00:40.137
on in terms of your perspectives?
00:00:40.297 --> 00:00:43.317
And what do you think has been the most kind of, I guess, eye-opening things that you've heard?
00:00:44.117 --> 00:00:48.997
CURTIS: So I think probably maybe not eye-opening, but what's been resonating is the
00:00:48.997 --> 00:00:51.497
commonality of some of the issues that we've been facing.
00:00:51.497 --> 00:00:56.577
And certainly from my perspective of being engaged in policy development and
00:00:56.577 --> 00:01:01.137
in the education portfolios for a number of years, these are particular things
00:01:01.137 --> 00:01:02.197
that we were starting to see.
00:01:02.337 --> 00:01:07.137
But now to see that it's coalescing around some actions and individuals and
00:01:07.137 --> 00:01:11.437
corporations and entities that are starting to focus on this specifically,
00:01:11.737 --> 00:01:13.597
that's been really heartening to see.
00:01:13.737 --> 00:01:19.317
But also the recognition that it's not traditional models that we're looking at. It's about change.
00:01:19.537 --> 00:01:23.357
It's about shifting that and how important it is for us to recognize that,
00:01:23.677 --> 00:01:26.757
you know, we've actually been admiring this problem for long enough.
00:01:27.017 --> 00:01:31.077
Now it's time to actually start doing things and also to see those who have
00:01:31.077 --> 00:01:33.317
been doing it as well. JEREMY: Yeah, absolutely.
00:01:33.657 --> 00:01:37.337
I've been noticing that too. One of the things that really sort of like was
00:01:37.337 --> 00:01:41.837
a moment where I tuned into was a comment yesterday about this 12-21 paradigm.
00:01:42.017 --> 00:01:43.417
I don't know if you caught that. CURTIS: Yes, indeed.
00:01:43.997 --> 00:01:47.237
JEREMY: So I'm going to ask you a couple of questions. What you think about the role
00:01:47.237 --> 00:01:51.897
between technology and education in terms of reshaping that sector and what
00:01:51.897 --> 00:01:58.637
steps should education institutions be taking to be preparing students for the future of work?
00:01:58.637 --> 00:02:02.437
CURTIS: I think it's interesting that you referenced the 12-21,
00:02:02.457 --> 00:02:07.997
because what we're looking at is structural changes in organizations and certainly
00:02:07.997 --> 00:02:13.077
from a policy perspective, from our post-secondary institutions and those who
00:02:13.077 --> 00:02:15.557
are on the peripheral of that learning space as well.
00:02:15.557 --> 00:02:19.757
I think the concept of future skills equals change.
00:02:20.017 --> 00:02:24.937
We can't think about future skills without recognizing that we expect and will
00:02:24.937 --> 00:02:30.477
be framing large foundational changes to our institutions, to our policy directions,
00:02:30.797 --> 00:02:32.717
to our learning outcomes as well.
00:02:32.717 --> 00:02:37.957
And if we don't start paying attention to that, then I think we get lost back
00:02:37.957 --> 00:02:43.677
into the 12-21, the 12th century models of doing things and the 12th century
00:02:43.677 --> 00:02:46.197
structures of the organizations that we have.
00:02:46.417 --> 00:02:50.537
But in order to move us forward, we need to think differently about what our
00:02:50.537 --> 00:02:52.777
institutions do, the role that they play.
00:02:53.494 --> 00:02:56.474
Recognizing that it's not a traditional learner that we're looking at,
00:02:56.614 --> 00:03:01.814
that 17 to 24-year-olds who are going through our post-secondary institutions.
00:03:02.134 --> 00:03:04.074
This is about lifelong learning.
00:03:04.614 --> 00:03:10.314
Future skills is about that ongoing adaptive and agile aspect of what learning is.
00:03:10.654 --> 00:03:15.654
And recognizing that the 25 to 55-year-olds in that upskilling and reskilling
00:03:15.654 --> 00:03:19.654
sort of framing, that is who we need to start paying attention to.
00:03:19.754 --> 00:03:25.454
And we need to change our structures and our organizations to adapt and meet
00:03:25.454 --> 00:03:27.074
them where they are as a learner,
00:03:27.374 --> 00:03:33.294
but also be able to provide an agile and responsive learning space and outcome
00:03:33.294 --> 00:03:37.614
for them to be successful and thrive in this world that we're looking at right
00:03:37.614 --> 00:03:39.754
now, that economic shift that we're looking at.
00:03:39.934 --> 00:03:44.054
JEREMY: Yeah, if I can follow up just on the word responsive,
00:03:44.054 --> 00:03:49.894
I think so often we think of traditional learning spaces as a student goes in
00:03:49.894 --> 00:03:54.514
and they receive a body of information and a body of knowledge that is kind
00:03:54.514 --> 00:03:56.814
of more or less static and set in stone.
00:03:57.154 --> 00:03:59.954
I'm just wondering if you can sort of, I'd love to just hear a little bit more
00:03:59.954 --> 00:04:05.434
about like that responsiveness in how those curricula, those bodies of knowledge
00:04:05.434 --> 00:04:09.674
can really adapt to a learner. I don't know, does that resonate with you?
00:04:10.274 --> 00:04:13.754
CURTIS: Totally. I think we need to get away from the old learn and pray.
00:04:14.034 --> 00:04:17.594
And the learn and pray is we're going to teach you, you're going to learn something
00:04:17.594 --> 00:04:21.294
and pray that this is applicable to the world that you're moving into.
00:04:22.914 --> 00:04:26.734
And what we need to do in terms of looking at that engagement of the individual
00:04:26.734 --> 00:04:27.834
is there's a couple of things.
00:04:28.234 --> 00:04:32.254
First of all, we need to start sort of meeting the students where they are.
00:04:32.414 --> 00:04:36.754
So there is the old traditional model of you come in as a blank slate.
00:04:36.954 --> 00:04:41.234
We will fill you up and we don't really understand where you're coming from
00:04:41.234 --> 00:04:45.514
or the competencies or the skills that you bring to the table.
00:04:45.514 --> 00:04:46.994
We don't really care about that.
00:04:47.154 --> 00:04:50.494
We are here to inform and frame you that way.
00:04:51.314 --> 00:04:54.434
We need to shift away from that. And we need to sort of look at,
00:04:54.554 --> 00:04:57.214
first of all, doing an assessment of where students are coming from,
00:04:57.274 --> 00:04:58.714
where are their competencies?
00:04:59.354 --> 00:05:02.994
A colleague spoke about this yesterday in terms of what Bow Valley College
00:05:02.994 --> 00:05:07.734
is doing in terms of looking at the competencies that an individual brings to the table.
00:05:08.174 --> 00:05:13.094
Look at their learning map or the process that they're going to engage in in
00:05:13.094 --> 00:05:16.034
that learning journey for them.
00:05:16.634 --> 00:05:22.454
And then sort of work from that space. If we're looking at 25 to 55-year-olds,
00:05:22.614 --> 00:05:24.834
we can't assume that they're coming in with nothing.
00:05:25.054 --> 00:05:29.814
We have to really meet them as a learner where they're at and be able to provide
00:05:29.814 --> 00:05:34.574
the service and the expectations that they have for that learning space.
00:05:34.734 --> 00:05:39.374
As opposed to start from scratch and you're going to go through the traditional
00:05:39.374 --> 00:05:42.694
trajectory of what our old models have framed.
00:05:42.994 --> 00:05:47.734
So we need to think differently about how we engage, but then it's also what
00:05:47.734 --> 00:05:48.874
we're engaging them with.
00:05:49.034 --> 00:05:53.314
And it's about real-time, real-life experiences.
00:05:53.834 --> 00:05:58.774
We need to, in some way, engage industry differently to co-develop and be a
00:05:58.774 --> 00:06:01.874
part of that process so that when learners are coming out,
00:06:01.974 --> 00:06:07.094
they're actually engaging with the industries and that sector that is actually
00:06:07.094 --> 00:06:09.574
the part of the workforce that they're moving into.
00:06:09.714 --> 00:06:13.734
And the skills that they're going to utilize will be applied in that space as well.
00:06:14.054 --> 00:06:17.654
So it's thinking differently about a curriculum. It's thinking differently about
00:06:17.654 --> 00:06:24.614
the learner and how we as institutions and policy framers enable that and nudge that in a way.
00:06:26.911 --> 00:06:32.611
JEREMY: So that sort of next thing that comes to my mind when I hear the engagement
00:06:32.611 --> 00:06:35.231
piece is about leadership.
00:06:35.471 --> 00:06:39.411
And so what do you think are the most important leadership qualities that we
00:06:39.411 --> 00:06:44.171
need to basically guide our education system through, you know,
00:06:44.271 --> 00:06:49.411
these periods of rapid change and profound uncertainty that we're seeing today?
00:06:50.391 --> 00:06:53.651
CURTIS: There's probably three different ways to look at this. We need to get out of
00:06:53.651 --> 00:06:56.071
the risk adversity that we traditionally
00:06:56.071 --> 00:06:59.911
have with fairly conservative organizations and institutions.
00:07:00.231 --> 00:07:04.811
Again, a 12th century approach is it's a very sort of lockstep approach,
00:07:05.051 --> 00:07:10.711
understanding of the role and expectations and the prestige of that organization.
00:07:11.331 --> 00:07:15.951
So we need to move away from that and sort of look at that risk aversion that
00:07:15.951 --> 00:07:20.531
we have to be a little bit more thoughtful and creative about how we think about curriculum.
00:07:20.531 --> 00:07:27.051
How we think the role of an institution is in terms of its function in developing
00:07:27.051 --> 00:07:29.931
the educational foundations, the programming.
00:07:30.511 --> 00:07:33.911
So we need to think differently about that. And programming is one of those
00:07:33.911 --> 00:07:37.391
areas that we tend to be very risk adverse at.
00:07:37.611 --> 00:07:42.651
It's pretty lockstep in how we think about the building of curriculum and its outcomes.
00:07:42.911 --> 00:07:46.251
So we need to think about that differently. And we need a different leadership
00:07:46.251 --> 00:07:50.451
sort of orientation towards that. The other part of it is we have to think about
00:07:50.451 --> 00:07:54.711
it from...we need to stop competing with each other.
00:07:55.011 --> 00:08:01.411
It's much more about collaboration. Where do we find those moments of cooperation and alignment?
00:08:02.211 --> 00:08:06.951
And that takes a certain leadership orientation. It takes a different step away
00:08:06.951 --> 00:08:08.711
from what we've traditionally thought about.
00:08:08.951 --> 00:08:13.451
I'm competing in a market, and I'm competing in a market for students and the
00:08:13.451 --> 00:08:17.071
learning outcomes and objectives that my institution can provide.
00:08:17.071 --> 00:08:22.071
So there needs to be a different sense of what that partnership orientation is.
00:08:22.771 --> 00:08:26.131
And some of that partnership orientation is also with industry.
00:08:26.411 --> 00:08:33.751
How do we bring industry into this process of...Linda Hill, a professor in the
00:08:33.751 --> 00:08:38.791
Business School of Harvard, talks about creative ingenuity, creative genius.
00:08:39.131 --> 00:08:43.711
It's about that collaborative space and bringing diverse individuals together.
00:08:43.711 --> 00:08:47.371
But that's a leadership quality as well, is being able to say,
00:08:47.531 --> 00:08:52.391
we need this and I'm going to facilitate this as a leader, as an institutional
00:08:52.391 --> 00:08:58.251
leader, or as even just an industry leader as well. JEREMY: Yeah, that's so interesting.
00:08:58.891 --> 00:09:05.691
Antipathy or antagonism between the collaboration and the competition frameworks of mind.
00:09:05.831 --> 00:09:10.031
I'm just wondering, why do you think that education systems have been traditionally
00:09:10.031 --> 00:09:16.971
or historically more in the kind of competition end of this spectrum of relationships?
00:09:18.467 --> 00:09:26.147
CURTIS: I think one element of that is that our policy structures have not enabled a change.
00:09:27.067 --> 00:09:32.027
It sort of sets it up that in order to sort of look at even our funding models,
00:09:32.027 --> 00:09:34.367
it's very much about here is
00:09:34.367 --> 00:09:39.887
my niche, here is my mandate, here is the market that I need to address.
00:09:39.887 --> 00:09:46.567
And the expectation of growth comes from a solid student body and the funding
00:09:46.567 --> 00:09:53.227
is created by body students coming in and the student count and address that way.
00:09:53.227 --> 00:09:56.367
So we tend to say, I need to capture this.
00:09:56.587 --> 00:10:02.387
This is where my funding envelope articulates. And as such, I cannot sort of
00:10:02.387 --> 00:10:07.187
cooperate or partner or think about this differently because the funding model
00:10:07.187 --> 00:10:10.067
doesn't allow me to think about how do I collaborate?
00:10:10.247 --> 00:10:15.307
How do I think about sharing or enhancing the experience of the learner?
00:10:15.507 --> 00:10:21.427
It's a capture kind of mode. It's again, going back to that 12th-century model of this is mine.
00:10:21.427 --> 00:10:27.327
And what we've seen also in that problem is a lack of collaboration and wanting
00:10:27.327 --> 00:10:34.627
to cooperate is you also get built into the structure of my courses do not transfer to your courses.
00:10:35.027 --> 00:10:41.787
The fluidity of that learning experience for the learner becomes very captured in that space.
00:10:41.967 --> 00:10:47.167
We need to blow that up. We need to enable that kind of collaboration and way
00:10:47.167 --> 00:10:53.547
of thinking that our job is to educate and to develop the upskilling and reskilling
00:10:53.547 --> 00:10:55.447
framing for the learner,
00:10:55.647 --> 00:10:59.407
not to capture a particular market orientation.
00:11:00.107 --> 00:11:04.447
JEREMY: Right. Dr. Curtis Clark, thank you very much. CURTIS: Thank you. It's been a pleasure.