ABOUT THIS EPISODE
The Piltdown man was the most successful artifactual hoax of all time. The relevant skull was a chimeric melange of orangutan and human bone fragments from several individuals “discovered” in England in 1912, and meant to represent a transitional form between apes and humans. Given the intense interest in evolutionary biology, it took almost fifty years to discover the Piltdown fabrication. The study of human evolution was derailed. Adding insult to injury, a further sixty years was required to conclusively demonstrate the identity of the culpable fraudster. If you must look up the identity of this scientific blasphemer, go ahead, but we won’t give his name space here.
Fig 1. The different parts of the Piltdown Man skull Students of fraud and fabrication always combat headwinds. In the winter. Uphill both ways.
The evidentiary standards for such claims of fabrication grow higher yet given the passage of centuries and an unknown creator of the subject of interest. And so we arrive at the Voynich manuscript.
It's a book some 240 pages long, proved by carbon dating techniques to have originated sometime in the 15th century, in the style of the late Italian middle ages. No known author or point of [...]
---
Outline:
(02:14) Background
[... 7 more sections]
---
First published:
October 11th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Adxnsud5siZTRAaT3/not-deciphering-the-voynich-manuscriptraft
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
Fig 1. The different parts of the Piltdown Man skull Students of fraud and fabrication always combat headwinds. In the winter. Uphill both ways.
The evidentiary standards for such claims of fabrication grow higher yet given the passage of centuries and an unknown creator of the subject of interest. And so we arrive at the Voynich manuscript.
It's a book some 240 pages long, proved by carbon dating techniques to have originated sometime in the 15th century, in the style of the late Italian middle ages. No known author or point of [...]
---
Outline:
(02:14) Background
[... 7 more sections]
---
First published:
October 11th, 2026
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Adxnsud5siZTRAaT3/not-deciphering-the-voynich-manuscriptraft
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
---
English
United States
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
SEARCH PAST EPISODES
Search past episodes of LessWrong (Curated & Popular).
OTHER EPISODES IN THIS PODCAST
David Africa & Nick Levine TLDR We ran several persona experiments on Talkie, a 13B model trained only on English text from before 1931. We ran them alongside its modern twin (same architecture, trained on regular data as a control) and Llama-3.1-8B.
Talkie can generalise maliciously. You can…
Good empirical safety research is heavily bottlenecked on thinking more clearly. This post shares a few frames and tips I found useful, illustrated with concrete examples. I spent the better part of 2026 in empirical AI safety research apprenticeships. I was mentored by Alex Turner and Alex Cloud a…
Epistemic status: I traced one famous anecdote to its printed source and to both coauthors' own accounts of where it came from. Confident it was never a study. No claim either way about whether quantity beats quality in general. AI use: research (tracing the story to the book, to the coauthors…
Tl;dr: The frontier AI companies’ implicit alignment plans center on rushing towards RSI with something like current models. This plan is (at best) contentious, and many believe it will have catastrophic consequences. Nonetheless, it is the track we are on. It is therefore important to collect evid…
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from LessWrong, which is the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Listen Notes, Inc.
EDIT
Thank you for helping to keep the podcast database up to date.