WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:04.799
Imagine staring at a screen where a deeply slow, highly
2
00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:09.599
intellectual philosophical debate from eleven years ago is just presented
3
00:00:09.599 --> 00:00:13.199
to you with the exact same urgency as a panic inducing,
4
00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:17.039
flashing red video about a global catastrophe, right, and a.
5
00:00:17.079 --> 00:00:19.160
Video that was uploaded just four hours ago.
6
00:00:19.239 --> 00:00:22.000
No, less exactly, there is no timeline. I mean, there
7
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:24.920
is no past or present. There is just this endless,
8
00:00:25.079 --> 00:00:29.920
scrolling wall of human curiosity, completely flattened into a single moment.
9
00:00:30.239 --> 00:00:35.159
It really creates this state of cognitive whiplash. Yeah, you
10
00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:37.600
are looking at an environment that simply doesn't care when
11
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:40.320
a piece of information was created. Yeah, it only cares
12
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:42.960
whether that piece of information can hook your tension right now,
13
00:00:43.079 --> 00:00:44.159
in this precise second.
14
00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:46.759
And that whiplash is exactly what we are dissecting today.
15
00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:49.159
So welcome to a completely different kind of deep dive.
16
00:00:49.640 --> 00:00:51.759
We aren't reading a newly published book, and we aren't
17
00:00:51.799 --> 00:00:55.320
analyzing a peer reviewed paper in some scientific journal.
18
00:00:55.479 --> 00:00:56.640
No, we are definitely not.
19
00:00:56.920 --> 00:01:00.600
Today. Our source material is basically a digital fossil. It's
20
00:01:00.640 --> 00:01:04.319
a literal snapshot of frozen web page, capturing the metadata,
21
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:09.879
the descriptions, and most importantly, the vast, sprawling algorithmic ecosystem
22
00:01:09.959 --> 00:01:12.040
surrounding one specific video.
23
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:14.400
Right and for those of you listening, the video we
24
00:01:14.439 --> 00:01:17.439
are looking at is Joe Rogan Experience number five twenty
25
00:01:17.439 --> 00:01:21.079
eight featuring Michael Stevens, who is the creator of the YouTube.
26
00:01:20.840 --> 00:01:23.920
Channel v Sauce, which is just a massive cultural touchstone.
27
00:01:23.920 --> 00:01:25.920
And looking at the backdrop you've brought up for our
28
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:29.640
visual feed today, I mean it fits the archaeological theme perfectly.
29
00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:32.319
I thought you'd like that. Yeah, you've got this abstract,
30
00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:38.359
glowing digital matrix that's slowly resolving into the clunky, nostalgic
31
00:01:38.519 --> 00:01:40.519
mid twenty tens YouTube airface.
32
00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:43.359
Oh wow. Yeah, you can even see the classic slightly
33
00:01:43.400 --> 00:01:46.200
boxy sidebar recommendations popping up on the right side.
34
00:01:46.239 --> 00:01:48.400
I had to set the mood, you know, because our
35
00:01:48.439 --> 00:01:51.920
mission here is to really explore this specific digital artifact
36
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:55.319
from July thirty, twenty fourteen. We want to unpack what
37
00:01:55.480 --> 00:01:58.640
this singular frozen web page tells us about the origin
38
00:01:58.680 --> 00:02:02.799
of V Sauce, the k early frontier of long form podcasting,
39
00:02:03.439 --> 00:02:07.319
and well the mechanics of how digital media algorithms began
40
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:08.800
to actively shape human thought.
41
00:02:08.919 --> 00:02:11.879
Boit before we jump in, you use the word fossil earlier,
42
00:02:11.960 --> 00:02:14.560
and I called it an artifact. But a web page
43
00:02:14.560 --> 00:02:18.400
with a recommendation algorithm attached to it isn't static right
44
00:02:18.599 --> 00:02:20.719
right now, Like if I dig up a clay pot
45
00:02:20.719 --> 00:02:23.039
in the desert, it just sits there. It is exactly
46
00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:24.479
what it was a thousand years ago.
47
00:02:24.759 --> 00:02:28.199
That's a really crucial distinction. Actually, it's a fossil only
48
00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:30.560
in the sense that the central video was uploaded on
49
00:02:30.599 --> 00:02:33.879
a specific date. Okay, but the environment we are analyze it,
50
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:37.400
so the sidebar, the recommended videos, the comments, that is
51
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:41.960
highly dynamic. It is the absolute definition of living evolving
52
00:02:42.080 --> 00:02:45.800
time capsule. It keeps changing exactly. The algorithm is constantly
53
00:02:45.879 --> 00:02:49.639
updating the surrounding ecosystem based on the behavioral data of
54
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:52.439
you know, millions of users who click on that central
55
00:02:52.520 --> 00:02:54.199
video over the course of a decade.
56
00:02:54.439 --> 00:02:57.599
Okay, let's unpack this because to really understand what the
57
00:02:57.639 --> 00:03:00.479
algorithm build around this video, we have to understand the
58
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:01.840
seed that started it all.
59
00:03:01.879 --> 00:03:04.120
We have to look at the exact details of this
60
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:06.039
specific twenty fourteen upload.
61
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:09.520
Yeah, so the video is titled Joe Rogan Experience hashtag
62
00:03:09.560 --> 00:03:14.319
five twenty eight. Michael Stevens from VSAUS uploaded on July thirty,
63
00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:17.719
twenty fourteen, and as of the snapshot in our source,
64
00:03:17.800 --> 00:03:20.879
it's sitting at just under four and a half million.
65
00:03:20.599 --> 00:03:23.199
Views and about seventy thousand likes right now.
66
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:26.479
The source provides these incredibly stark biographical details for the
67
00:03:26.520 --> 00:03:29.479
two people in the room. We have Joe Rogan described
68
00:03:29.520 --> 00:03:33.039
as an American podcaster and comedian born in nineteen sixty seven, and.
69
00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:36.280
Sitting across from him is Michael Stevens, American YouTuber born
70
00:03:36.280 --> 00:03:37.199
in nineteen eighty six.
71
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:40.680
Yeah, that age gap, and honestly, more importantly, that title difference,
72
00:03:40.840 --> 00:03:43.039
it feels massive for the year twenty fourteen.
73
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.840
It really represents a fundamental collision of two entirely different
74
00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:49.080
eras of media. I mean, think about what the title
75
00:03:49.159 --> 00:03:51.360
stand up comedian meant for someone born in the late
76
00:03:51.439 --> 00:03:54.000
nineteen sixty It meant you were on the road exactly.
77
00:03:54.360 --> 00:03:57.479
Rogan came of age in physical spaces. His background is
78
00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:01.240
completely rooted in brick and mortar comedy clubs, late night
79
00:04:01.240 --> 00:04:03.439
television spots, traditional broadcasting.
80
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:06.039
You write a joke, you stand on a wooden stage
81
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:09.400
in front of a live audience, and you get immediate physical,
82
00:04:09.520 --> 00:04:10.520
audible feedback.
83
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:13.360
Right and then you have Michael Stevens born in the
84
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:16.920
mid eighties, right, a digital native whose entire claim to
85
00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:19.480
fame is a completely self made platform.
86
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:23.240
Yeah, the title American YouTuber in twenty fourteen was still
87
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:24.360
relatively novel.
88
00:04:24.519 --> 00:04:24.800
It was.
89
00:04:24.920 --> 00:04:28.639
It wasn't the massive, institutionalized industry it is today. Kids
90
00:04:28.680 --> 00:04:32.240
in twenty fourteen weren't routinely pelling their guidance counselors they
91
00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:35.319
wanted to major in YouTube. It still felt like, uh,
92
00:04:35.639 --> 00:04:36.600
like the wild West.
93
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:40.879
It was incredibly renegade. Creators weren't backed by massive production studios.
94
00:04:40.920 --> 00:04:44.000
They were figuring out lighting, editing, and pacing right in
95
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:44.720
their bedrooms.
96
00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:47.199
And that brings us to the channel description for v Sauce,
97
00:04:47.240 --> 00:04:49.680
which is explicitly noted in our source. It says v
98
00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:52.279
Sauce is a place where mind blowing facts and the
99
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:53.879
best of the Internet is shared.
100
00:04:54.079 --> 00:04:56.800
The best of the Internet. I just love that phrasing, right.
101
00:04:56.839 --> 00:04:59.360
It feels the most romantic, doesn't it. It really does
102
00:04:59.439 --> 00:05:03.319
like the Internet is this vast, untamed wilderness, and you
103
00:05:03.439 --> 00:05:06.720
need a seasoned explorer to go out there, you know,
104
00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:09.360
hack through the digital jungle and bring back the coolest
105
00:05:09.399 --> 00:05:10.720
shiny rocks they could find.
106
00:05:11.560 --> 00:05:15.839
It captures a very specific philosophy of early twenty ten's
107
00:05:15.920 --> 00:05:20.120
digital media. Back then, the Internet felt infinitely vast and
108
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:22.160
largely unmapped for the average user.
109
00:05:22.199 --> 00:05:23.959
Yeah, everything was scattered, exactly.
110
00:05:24.279 --> 00:05:28.399
Information was siloed on obscure forums, or deep inside academic databases,
111
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:32.120
or just buried in dense scientific journals. So someone like
112
00:05:32.120 --> 00:05:34.319
Michael Stevens stepping up to curate the best of the
113
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:36.920
Internet was providing a vital service.
114
00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:40.120
He was acting as an intellectual translator. Yes, let me
115
00:05:40.160 --> 00:05:42.600
stop you there, though, because I look at this dynamic,
116
00:05:42.680 --> 00:05:45.240
you know, the comedian and the YouTuber, and I have
117
00:05:45.319 --> 00:05:46.839
to push back a little on the idea that this
118
00:05:46.959 --> 00:05:50.160
was purely about education. Okay, how so, well, was Michael
119
00:05:50.160 --> 00:05:53.759
Stevens really an intellectual translator or was he essentially acting
120
00:05:53.759 --> 00:05:56.480
as the cool substitute teacher of the Internet for Joe
121
00:05:56.560 --> 00:05:57.399
Rogan's audience.
122
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:00.240
Oh, the cool substitute teacher, I like that, You know,
123
00:06:00.279 --> 00:06:03.360
the type, the teacher who rolls the TV card into
124
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:07.319
the room, throws the textbook out the window, sits backwards
125
00:06:07.319 --> 00:06:09.480
on the chair, and says, forget the curriculum.
126
00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:12.560
Let me tell you how black holes actually work. Right, right,
127
00:06:12.879 --> 00:06:14.839
I ask, because it feels like there is a mutual
128
00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:18.879
validation happening here that goes beyond just sharing facts.
129
00:06:19.240 --> 00:06:21.800
I don't think those two concepts are mutually exclusive at all.
130
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:25.959
He was definitely playing that cool substitute teacher role, but
131
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:30.319
that persona was the vehicle for the translation. Okay, fair,
132
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:33.759
and you are spot on about the mutual validation. That
133
00:06:33.839 --> 00:06:37.199
is really the hidden subtext of this entire interview for Rogan,
134
00:06:37.759 --> 00:06:42.199
bringing on a highly intellectual, wildly popular digital educator lent
135
00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:45.240
a completely different kind of weight to his podcast because at.
136
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:48.160
The time his show was largely known for comedians, mma
137
00:06:48.240 --> 00:06:50.160
fighters and like fringe.
138
00:06:49.800 --> 00:06:52.079
Thinker exactly, and what did Stevens get out of it?
139
00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:53.600
Legitimacy in the adult world.
140
00:06:53.720 --> 00:06:56.759
Yes, appearing on The Joe Rogan Experience, which I mean
141
00:06:56.800 --> 00:06:59.800
even twenty fourteen, was establishing itself as a cultural juggernaut.
142
00:07:00.199 --> 00:07:04.160
It validated YouTube education as a medium worthy of serious
143
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:06.160
long form conversation, right.
144
00:07:06.600 --> 00:07:09.560
It signaled that v sauce wasn't just short attention span
145
00:07:09.680 --> 00:07:11.839
trivia for kids to watch while eating cereal.
146
00:07:11.920 --> 00:07:15.240
It was philosophy, it was science. It could hold its
147
00:07:15.240 --> 00:07:18.720
own in a three hour, completely unscripted debate.
148
00:07:18.959 --> 00:07:22.399
It's just a fascinating snapshot of where media was heading.
149
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:24.600
I mean, think about your own Internet habits back in
150
00:07:24.680 --> 00:07:26.439
twenty fourteen for everyone listening.
151
00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:27.720
Oh, it was a different world.
152
00:07:27.759 --> 00:07:30.560
Where were you when you first started listening to podcasts?
153
00:07:30.839 --> 00:07:33.040
It's almost hard to remember a time when listening to
154
00:07:33.079 --> 00:07:36.439
two people just talk for three hours without commercial breaks
155
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:40.399
or producers yelling in their years was considered a radical
156
00:07:40.480 --> 00:07:41.680
experimental format.
157
00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:43.720
We completely take it for granted now.
158
00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:46.639
We do, but back then it was groundbreaking. And our
159
00:07:46.680 --> 00:07:50.120
source material doesn't just stop at this one interview. It
160
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:51.839
expands outward right.
161
00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:55.360
It reveals the massive enduring footprint of the V Sauce
162
00:07:55.480 --> 00:07:59.560
brand through the suggested videos that the algorithm populates around
163
00:07:59.560 --> 00:08:00.000
this converse.
164
00:08:00.560 --> 00:08:03.199
This is where we move from observing the event itself
165
00:08:03.560 --> 00:08:06.480
to analyzing the ecosystem it spawned.
166
00:08:06.560 --> 00:08:09.040
And the numbers in this ecosystem are just staggering. The
167
00:08:09.079 --> 00:08:11.879
source gives us a few specific V Sauce videos floating
168
00:08:11.879 --> 00:08:13.240
in this twenty fourteen sidebar.
169
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:16.720
We have a video simply titled Ayahuasca sitting at eleven
170
00:08:16.759 --> 00:08:18.600
million views uploaded eight years ago.
171
00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:19.160
Wow.
172
00:08:19.279 --> 00:08:21.959
Yeah, And we have the Science of Awkwardness sitting at
173
00:08:22.000 --> 00:08:24.720
fifteen million views uploaded eleven years.
174
00:08:24.480 --> 00:08:27.360
Ago, and then we see spinoff and related content too.
175
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:30.839
There's a video by Alex O'Connor titled Hey, V Sauce,
176
00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:34.960
Does Anything Exist? With one point seven million.
177
00:08:34.679 --> 00:08:37.279
Views, which is a heavy title it is.
178
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:40.080
There's also a later appearance by Stevens on the Lex
179
00:08:40.120 --> 00:08:44.120
Ferdman podcast hashtag fifty eight with nearly six hundred thousand views,
180
00:08:44.399 --> 00:08:46.480
and we even see a video from the channel smash
181
00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:49.720
Alike titled I Spent a Day with V Sauce with
182
00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:51.360
two point eight million views.
183
00:08:51.559 --> 00:08:53.919
You really have to pause in wigh the sheer volume
184
00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:56.679
of those numbers. Fifteen million views on a video exploring
185
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:58.960
the biological and social science of feeling.
186
00:08:58.759 --> 00:09:01.639
Awkward, right million views on a deep dive to the
187
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.639
chemical and cultural history of a hallucinogenic plant.
188
00:09:04.840 --> 00:09:07.799
This is empirical proof of a massive public hunger for
189
00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:12.080
educational content that bridges hard science with the deeply personal,
190
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:13.559
messy human experience.
191
00:09:13.679 --> 00:09:16.519
People didn't just want dry data, They wanted to understand
192
00:09:16.559 --> 00:09:19.000
their own daily friction through a scientific lens.
193
00:09:19.279 --> 00:09:21.759
Now you've described this in your notes as turning mind
194
00:09:21.759 --> 00:09:24.639
blowing facts into high art, but I have to challenge
195
00:09:24.639 --> 00:09:26.480
you on that a little bit. Okay, No, here, isn't
196
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:29.320
calling a YouTube video high art giving it a bit
197
00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:31.840
too much credit. I mean, at the end of the day,
198
00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:35.159
isn't it just infotainment optimized for clicks? You put a
199
00:09:35.200 --> 00:09:38.000
wacky face on the thumbnail, use a punchy title, and
200
00:09:38.080 --> 00:09:40.679
keep the jump cuts fast. Sure, so, how is that
201
00:09:40.720 --> 00:09:43.720
different from like a flashy Wikipedia summary.
202
00:09:44.120 --> 00:09:47.559
It's a totally fair question. But the difference really lies
203
00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:51.679
in the narrative architecture of v sauce video. It is
204
00:09:51.720 --> 00:09:53.440
never just a Wikipedia summary really.
205
00:09:53.639 --> 00:09:53.679
No.
206
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:58.320
Steven's perfected a very specific rhetorical technique. He always starts
207
00:09:58.320 --> 00:10:02.720
with a mundane, almost childishly simple premise like why do
208
00:10:02.799 --> 00:10:04.679
things fall down? Or why is this awkward?
209
00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:07.159
Right? That's the bait, exactly.
210
00:10:06.679 --> 00:10:10.320
That's the bait. But within five minutes he is neurologically
211
00:10:10.360 --> 00:10:15.559
linked that simple premise to incredibly complex concepts in physics, biology,
212
00:10:15.679 --> 00:10:19.000
or philosophy. He doesn't just list facts, He builds a
213
00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:20.039
cascading argument.
214
00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:23.480
Ah, so he uses the mundane to smuggle in the profound.
215
00:10:23.840 --> 00:10:28.120
Yes, smuggling in the profound. Look at the evolution shown
216
00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:30.159
in the titles are source provided. We go from the
217
00:10:30.200 --> 00:10:33.559
science of awkwardness the alex O'Connor's video, Hey V Sauce,
218
00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:34.919
does anything exist?
219
00:10:35.240 --> 00:10:36.279
It's a huge leap.
220
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:39.120
It is. What's fascinating here is how this maps a
221
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:42.799
transition in the audience's appetite over time. It shows a
222
00:10:42.879 --> 00:10:48.559
migration from sharing simple quirky trivia to triggering deep existential inquiry.
223
00:10:48.759 --> 00:10:53.000
V Sauce effectively became a gateway drug to ontology and epistemology.
224
00:10:53.080 --> 00:10:55.759
Exactly Okay, for anyone listening who didn't just walk out
225
00:10:55.799 --> 00:10:59.039
of a philosophy one O one seminar, define those terms
226
00:10:59.080 --> 00:11:03.000
for us in this CONTEXTX, ontology and epistemology. How do
227
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:06.159
those connect to a guy making faces at a camera
228
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:06.840
on YouTube?
229
00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:10.000
Great point. Let's break that down simply put. Epistemology is
230
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:12.320
the study of knowledge, how do we actually know what
231
00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:14.080
we know? Like how can you trust your eyes or
232
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:16.720
your brain? And ontology is the study of being what
233
00:11:16.840 --> 00:11:20.320
actually exists in reality. So, in Steven's asked this question, like,
234
00:11:20.519 --> 00:11:23.240
is you're read the same as my red He's starting
235
00:11:23.240 --> 00:11:24.399
with a fun optical illusion.
236
00:11:24.440 --> 00:11:26.759
Oh, I've seen that one, right, But then.
237
00:11:26.679 --> 00:11:30.799
He's tricking his audience into a deep epistemological debate about
238
00:11:30.840 --> 00:11:34.960
the limits of human perception. He is asking how we
239
00:11:35.039 --> 00:11:37.679
can ever truly share an objective.
240
00:11:37.200 --> 00:11:39.120
Reality that does take immense skill.
241
00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:42.759
It elevates the medium beyond simple infotainment, and that.
242
00:11:42.720 --> 00:11:44.960
Ties perfectly into why he was on the Joe Rogan
243
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:48.360
experience in the first place. The video titled Ayahuasca is
244
00:11:48.480 --> 00:11:49.519
the perfect bridge.
245
00:11:49.720 --> 00:11:50.840
It really is. V.
246
00:11:51.039 --> 00:11:54.799
Sauce is known for rigorous scientific curiosity, and Joe Rogan's
247
00:11:54.840 --> 00:11:59.480
podcast is heavily associated with discussions on psychedelics, consciousness, and
248
00:11:59.559 --> 00:12:00.399
altered states.
249
00:12:00.639 --> 00:12:03.639
Stevens knew exactly how to translate his brand of scientific
250
00:12:03.720 --> 00:12:06.840
education into the specific dialect of the audience he was visiting.
251
00:12:06.960 --> 00:12:10.000
He was highly adaptive, and this early era of V.
252
00:12:10.159 --> 00:12:13.759
Sauce represented by this twenty fourteen snapshot, essentially laid the
253
00:12:13.799 --> 00:12:17.639
bedrock for the entire modern landscape of educational video essays
254
00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:18.879
and science podcasting.
255
00:12:19.000 --> 00:12:23.000
Because before this Internet education was largely fragmented and honestly
256
00:12:23.080 --> 00:12:24.000
kind of condescending.
257
00:12:24.120 --> 00:12:27.759
Yeah, it was either dry university lectures uploaded with terrible audio,
258
00:12:27.840 --> 00:12:31.200
or it was hyperkinetic content aimed exclusively at middle schoolers.
259
00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:34.360
Steven's proved you could hold a mass audience's attention for
260
00:12:34.480 --> 00:12:37.519
twenty thirty or even sixty minutes by treating them as
261
00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:40.639
intelligent peers on a shared journey of discovery.
262
00:12:40.879 --> 00:12:43.519
All right, I'm watching your backdrop shift again. The old
263
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:48.320
school YouTube interface is dissolving. Now. It looks like a
264
00:12:48.519 --> 00:12:50.159
massive chaotic chalkboard.
265
00:12:50.240 --> 00:12:51.240
Yeah, do you like it.
266
00:12:51.240 --> 00:12:55.519
It's covered in complex physics equations, orbital mechanics diagrams, and
267
00:12:55.559 --> 00:12:59.000
what looks like theological flow charts, and scattered all over
268
00:12:59.039 --> 00:13:01.720
it are those class red YouTube play buttons.
269
00:13:01.840 --> 00:13:05.039
I shifted the visual because we really need to move
270
00:13:05.039 --> 00:13:08.279
from the seed to the forest. If the JRI and
271
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:12.240
Visas interview is the anchor point, the recommended sidebar provided
272
00:13:12.279 --> 00:13:15.200
in our source, is this sprawling ecosystem that grew around it.
273
00:13:15.399 --> 00:13:17.000
This is where we get into the mechanics of the
274
00:13:17.039 --> 00:13:18.200
machine exactly.
275
00:13:18.559 --> 00:13:21.200
We have to ask ourselves, how does a machine learning
276
00:13:21.240 --> 00:13:24.240
algorithm categorize the people who watch this? What does it
277
00:13:24.279 --> 00:13:28.000
associate with this specific twenty fourteen collision of minds.
278
00:13:28.159 --> 00:13:30.399
You're calling it the curiosity matrix in your notes.
279
00:13:30.480 --> 00:13:31.039
Let's map it.
280
00:13:31.120 --> 00:13:34.440
Because the sidebar recommendations in our source are heavily skewed
281
00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:38.600
towards science, philosophy, and religion, and the mix is incredibly dense.
282
00:13:38.919 --> 00:13:41.120
It is give some examples from the source.
283
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:43.879
Well, we have videos from a channel called the rest
284
00:13:43.919 --> 00:13:47.080
is Science, specifically titles like We're all being Pulled Together
285
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:49.200
and Paradoxes of Infinity.
286
00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:50.720
Okay, pard Science.
287
00:13:50.840 --> 00:13:50.960
Right.
288
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:54.559
Then we have a clip from sixty Minutes Australia titled
289
00:13:54.960 --> 00:13:58.600
Ricky Gervais on Atheism, Jesus and the Meaning.
290
00:13:58.320 --> 00:14:00.000
Of Life, philosophy and religion.
291
00:14:00.200 --> 00:14:04.519
And then we have these deep, multi hour theological explorations
292
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:08.120
by a creator named Mike Winger with titles like Relearning
293
00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:11.200
the Last Supper and the entire book in one video,
294
00:14:11.840 --> 00:14:15.200
the Hebrews series Deep Theology, And right alongside all of
295
00:14:15.200 --> 00:14:18.559
that we have Joe Rogan's own DMT experiences sitting at
296
00:14:18.559 --> 00:14:19.480
ten million views.
297
00:14:19.840 --> 00:14:21.480
This is where we really need to look under the
298
00:14:21.519 --> 00:14:26.039
hood of how recommendation algorithms actually function. The system doesn't
299
00:14:26.120 --> 00:14:27.919
know who you are personally.
300
00:14:27.559 --> 00:14:28.919
Right, It isn't reading your diary.
301
00:14:29.240 --> 00:14:32.320
No, What it does is utilize a mechanism called collaborative
302
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:34.840
filtering combined with deep semantic mapping.
303
00:14:34.960 --> 00:14:37.360
Okay, walk us through that. How does the machine connect
304
00:14:37.360 --> 00:14:41.159
an interview with a YouTube science guy to a multi
305
00:14:41.200 --> 00:14:43.960
hour breakdown of the Book of Hebrews and a Ricky
306
00:14:43.960 --> 00:14:45.759
Gervais interview about atheism.
307
00:14:46.080 --> 00:14:50.639
So collaborative filtering is basically the algorithm observing mass behavior.
308
00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:54.679
It says user A watched the V. Sauce interview and
309
00:14:54.720 --> 00:14:57.879
then watched a video on the paradoxes of infinity. User
310
00:14:57.919 --> 00:15:00.360
B watched the Vsace interview and then and watched a
311
00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:04.879
debate on atheism. Therefore, there is a statistical probability that
312
00:15:04.919 --> 00:15:07.399
the next person who watches visas will be interested in
313
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:11.200
both infinity and atheism. It makes sense, but modern algorithms
314
00:15:11.200 --> 00:15:15.399
go further using semantic mapping. They analyze the actual content,
315
00:15:15.759 --> 00:15:19.120
the auto generated captions, and the metadata of the videos
316
00:15:19.480 --> 00:15:21.639
to map a psychological vector for the viewer.
317
00:15:21.720 --> 00:15:24.320
A psychological vector, so it's charting a trajectory of what
318
00:15:24.360 --> 00:15:26.080
you're feeling, not just what you're clicking.
319
00:15:26.120 --> 00:15:29.559
Precisely, if we connect this to the bigger picture, the
320
00:15:29.639 --> 00:15:33.000
algorithm deduces that a viewer interested in Michael Stevens and
321
00:15:33.080 --> 00:15:35.240
Joe Rogan isn't just looking for a laugh.
322
00:15:35.399 --> 00:15:37.120
They are looking to have their mind expanded.
323
00:15:37.279 --> 00:15:41.759
Yes, they are seeking profound, structural answers about reality. The
324
00:15:41.799 --> 00:15:46.399
system recognizes this thirst for meaning as a primary psychological driver,
325
00:15:47.080 --> 00:15:50.720
and it offers to quench that thirst in completely divergent directions.
326
00:15:51.080 --> 00:15:55.240
So it offers theoretical physics through infinity, it offers altered
327
00:15:55.279 --> 00:16:00.000
states of consciousness through DMT, and it offers deep structure,
328
00:16:00.080 --> 00:16:03.679
true meaning through theological and atheistic debates.
329
00:16:03.919 --> 00:16:04.480
Exactly.
330
00:16:04.679 --> 00:16:06.559
You know, I used to think of the algorithm like
331
00:16:06.600 --> 00:16:09.639
a digital bartender. You walk in, ask for a fact
332
00:16:09.679 --> 00:16:12.399
about gravity, and the bartender says, all right, here's a
333
00:16:12.480 --> 00:16:15.840
drink about the paradoxes of infinity and a chaser about
334
00:16:15.879 --> 00:16:17.799
the meaning of life from Ricky Gervase.
335
00:16:17.960 --> 00:16:19.279
That's a fun way to look at it.
336
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:21.840
But based on what you're saying, that analogy is too simple.
337
00:16:21.879 --> 00:16:24.279
It's more like a hyper observant librarian.
338
00:16:24.440 --> 00:16:25.000
We like that.
339
00:16:25.240 --> 00:16:26.919
You walk up to the desk with a basic book
340
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:30.600
on gravity. The librarian notices you lingering on a page
341
00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:33.840
about the vastness of the cosmos, so they silently slide
342
00:16:33.840 --> 00:16:36.159
a book on the philosophy of space across the desk.
343
00:16:36.480 --> 00:16:39.320
Right then they notice you furrowing your brow about the
344
00:16:39.320 --> 00:16:41.639
origins of it all, so they slide over a heavy
345
00:16:41.679 --> 00:16:45.159
theological text on the creator of the universe. It is
346
00:16:45.240 --> 00:16:48.159
anticipating questions you haven't even articulated to yourself.
347
00:16:48.240 --> 00:16:51.559
Yet that is a much more accurate analogy. It is
348
00:16:51.600 --> 00:16:55.200
an existential tasting menu designed by a machine that is
349
00:16:55.279 --> 00:17:00.000
relentlessly optimizing for one metric session duration. It just wants
350
00:16:59.960 --> 00:17:03.279
to keep you there always. And because of that, the
351
00:17:03.399 --> 00:17:07.279
algorithm is entirely agnostic to the truth claims of the videos.
352
00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:09.079
It suggests, Oh, that's crucial.
353
00:17:09.319 --> 00:17:11.880
It doesn't care if Ricky Gervais is correct about atheism,
354
00:17:11.880 --> 00:17:13.799
and it doesn't care if Mike Winger is correct about
355
00:17:13.880 --> 00:17:16.960
Christian theology. It only cares about the depth of the
356
00:17:17.079 --> 00:17:19.160
user's engagement with those worldviews.
357
00:17:19.240 --> 00:17:22.160
That is a vital point to underline, especially for our listeners.
358
00:17:22.440 --> 00:17:25.640
We are looking at a system that surfaces secular humanism
359
00:17:25.799 --> 00:17:28.839
right next to ancient biblical text analysis, right and we're
360
00:17:28.839 --> 00:17:32.559
simply observing this. We're not endorsing Ricky Gervas's atheism or
361
00:17:32.599 --> 00:17:35.119
Mike Winger's theology. We are just looking at how the
362
00:17:35.160 --> 00:17:38.839
machine treats them. It creates a completely flat playing field
363
00:17:39.200 --> 00:17:43.759
where worldview explorations are treated simply as engagement data points.
364
00:17:43.839 --> 00:17:47.400
It is a topographical map of the modern Internet user's
365
00:17:47.480 --> 00:17:50.559
desperate search for meaning, whether that meaning is found in
366
00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:54.559
the cosmos in a psychedelic trip or in a religious text, and.
367
00:17:54.480 --> 00:17:57.920
This brings us to a darker realization. I think the
368
00:17:58.000 --> 00:18:01.640
human drive to uncover hidden t truths, the need to
369
00:18:01.720 --> 00:18:06.119
understand our place in the universe, is powerful, but it
370
00:18:06.200 --> 00:18:07.880
is also highly malleable.
371
00:18:08.000 --> 00:18:08.920
It is very malleable.
372
00:18:08.960 --> 00:18:12.279
Here's where it gets really interesting because the algorithm doesn't
373
00:18:12.319 --> 00:18:17.279
just feed pure, pristine, philosophical curiosity. The thirst for meaning
374
00:18:17.359 --> 00:18:18.599
isn't always positive.
375
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:20.720
No, sometimes it mutates, and the.
376
00:18:20.599 --> 00:18:23.960
Source material captures this mutation perfectly. As we scroll down
377
00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:27.799
the sidebar, we start hitting the much darker, anxiety driven
378
00:18:27.920 --> 00:18:28.960
edges of the matrix.
379
00:18:29.039 --> 00:18:32.039
Yes, we move away from the innocent joy of learning
380
00:18:32.079 --> 00:18:36.000
mind blowing facts and we enter a space characterized by paranoia,
381
00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:39.640
existential dread, and real world geopolitical tension.
382
00:18:39.839 --> 00:18:42.759
We see heavy fringe content existing in the exact same
383
00:18:42.799 --> 00:18:46.119
ecosystem as a lighthearted video about the science of feeling awkward.
384
00:18:46.279 --> 00:18:48.319
Give some examples of the darker stuff from the source.
385
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:51.559
Okay, the source lists of video titled Baltimore Drug Kingpin
386
00:18:51.720 --> 00:18:54.240
exposes fentonyl epidemic truth about the.
387
00:18:54.200 --> 00:18:56.400
Wire right, so true crime is a cietal to kay.
388
00:18:56.599 --> 00:18:59.720
Then we have a JR clip titled the Official Narrative
389
00:18:59.759 --> 00:19:03.119
of eight Murders doesn't add up w Tom O'Neill sitting
390
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:04.720
at six point three million.
391
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:06.960
Views conspiracy and alternative narratives.
392
00:19:06.960 --> 00:19:09.960
And we have a video titled Professor Jang world War
393
00:19:10.039 --> 00:19:13.119
III is about to begin, let me explain, which has
394
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:15.400
a staggering fourteen million.
395
00:19:15.200 --> 00:19:16.839
Views Global anxiety.
396
00:19:16.920 --> 00:19:19.359
We also see a stream from the Foundation for Defensive
397
00:19:19.400 --> 00:19:22.920
Democracies asking what's the deal with the Iran Deal? And
398
00:19:22.960 --> 00:19:26.359
we have Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro discuss marijuana use
399
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:28.240
with fourteen million views.
400
00:19:28.400 --> 00:19:30.319
Now, before we dive into this, we have to make
401
00:19:30.359 --> 00:19:34.279
something crystal clear to our listeners. Yes, absolutely, when discussing
402
00:19:34.319 --> 00:19:37.200
topics like the Iran Deal, or figures like Ben Shapiro,
403
00:19:37.279 --> 00:19:42.200
or predictions about World War three, we are maintaining strict neutrality, right.
404
00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:44.920
We are simply observing the algorithm's behavior here. We are
405
00:19:44.960 --> 00:19:47.960
not endorsing any of these geopolitical takes or political figures
406
00:19:48.039 --> 00:19:48.640
left or right.
407
00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:51.480
The fascination for us is purely in how the machine
408
00:19:51.519 --> 00:19:56.240
links educational science content to political and global anxiety exactly.
409
00:19:56.880 --> 00:20:00.400
So with that said, this jeffstaposition raises a c critical
410
00:20:00.480 --> 00:20:04.880
question about human psychology and algorithmic design. How does a
411
00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:10.440
user's intent morph from curiosity into conspiracy or existential dread
412
00:20:11.079 --> 00:20:12.559
within just a few clicks.
413
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:13.599
It's a jump, for sure.
414
00:20:13.680 --> 00:20:15.839
Why does the algorithm think that someone who wants to
415
00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:18.680
learn about physics also wants to hear a prediction about
416
00:20:19.000 --> 00:20:20.599
global thermonuclear war?
417
00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:23.559
Well, it's the slippery slope of the phrase, what aren't
418
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:26.319
they telling you? Oh, let's break down the mechanics of
419
00:20:26.319 --> 00:20:29.839
a V Sauce video again. The foundational premise is often,
420
00:20:30.200 --> 00:20:32.640
the world is more complex than you think. There's a
421
00:20:32.680 --> 00:20:35.400
hidden layer of science beneath this everyday object.
422
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:36.160
Which is true.
423
00:20:36.240 --> 00:20:39.279
It is true. That is a very healthy, scientifically rigorous
424
00:20:39.319 --> 00:20:43.000
form of curiosity. But the algorithm doesn't distinguish between healthy
425
00:20:43.039 --> 00:20:47.400
scientific inquiry and paranoid speculation. It only tracks the neurological
426
00:20:47.400 --> 00:20:48.839
reward loop, ah.
427
00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:50.680
The dopamine and the cortisol exactly.
428
00:20:51.079 --> 00:20:54.799
The emotional thrill of uncovering a hidden scientific truth feels
429
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:58.680
very similar neurologically to the thrill of uncovering a hidden
430
00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:00.000
societal or political narras.
431
00:21:00.359 --> 00:21:03.680
So, the algorithm learns that the audience for deep intellectual
432
00:21:03.720 --> 00:21:09.799
exploration overlaps significantly with the audience seeking to deconstruct official narratives.
433
00:21:09.880 --> 00:21:12.799
Right, if you want to deconstruct the fabric of reality
434
00:21:12.839 --> 00:21:15.880
with physics, the machine assumes you might also want to
435
00:21:15.920 --> 00:21:20.880
deconstruct the fabric of society through geopolitical analysis or true crime.
436
00:21:21.079 --> 00:21:23.079
Hold on, let me jump in here, because the source
437
00:21:23.200 --> 00:21:26.640
lists a few specific topics that might sound like pure
438
00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:30.079
jargon to someone not fully immersed in internet rabbit holesake
439
00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:33.720
what For instance, the source mentions a video titled something
440
00:21:33.759 --> 00:21:37.599
Happened at CERNE. Scientists still can't explain it? What exactly
441
00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:39.920
is CERN and why does it keep popping up in
442
00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:43.440
these algorithmic sidebars next to true crime and World War
443
00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:44.240
III predictions?
444
00:21:44.799 --> 00:21:48.279
That's a great example. So CERN is the European Organization
445
00:21:48.359 --> 00:21:51.799
for Nuclear Research. They operate the Large Hadron Collider.
446
00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:53.680
Which is that massive underground loop right.
447
00:21:53.599 --> 00:21:56.839
Yes, it's a massive particle accelerator buried under the border
448
00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:01.039
of France and Switzerland. They smash subata particles together at
449
00:22:01.119 --> 00:22:04.480
nearly the speed of light to understand the fundamental building
450
00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:05.599
blocks of the universe.
451
00:22:05.839 --> 00:22:10.279
Okay, so it's incredibly dense high level physics, very high level.
452
00:22:10.359 --> 00:22:12.839
Then why is it frame like a thriller movie in
453
00:22:12.880 --> 00:22:13.920
the sidebar.
454
00:22:13.759 --> 00:22:17.559
Because high level physics is fundamentally incomprehensible to the average person.
455
00:22:18.279 --> 00:22:21.559
When scientists talk about god particles or dark matter or
456
00:22:21.599 --> 00:22:25.559
opening microscopic dimensional anomalies, it sounds like science fiction. Oh
457
00:22:25.640 --> 00:22:28.359
I see, and where there is a gap in public understanding,
458
00:22:28.720 --> 00:22:33.640
conspiracy theories flourish. The algorithm loves cern because it sits
459
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:37.759
perfectly at the intersection of legitimate mind blowing science and
460
00:22:37.799 --> 00:22:39.160
apocalyptic paranoia.
461
00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:42.519
It's the ultimate what aren't they telling you? Topic exactly
462
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:45.440
that makes total sense. It bridges the gap between Michael
463
00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:48.880
Stevens teaching you about gravity and Professor Jang telling you
464
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:51.240
the world is about to end. It uses the language
465
00:22:51.240 --> 00:22:53.359
of science to trigger the emotion of fear.
466
00:22:53.519 --> 00:22:55.359
Yes, and fear is highly.
467
00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:59.559
Engaging because fear, anxiety, and anger are yeah exactly. If
468
00:22:59.559 --> 00:23:02.240
a video about the paradoxes of infinity makes you feel
469
00:23:02.279 --> 00:23:05.559
small and contemplative, a video predicting World War III makes
470
00:23:05.559 --> 00:23:08.799
you feel urgent and terrified. Both states keep your eyes
471
00:23:08.839 --> 00:23:11.599
glued to the screen, but one is a lot stickier.
472
00:23:11.960 --> 00:23:14.839
It is the shift from a dopamine driven reward loop
473
00:23:14.880 --> 00:23:18.359
of learning to a cortisol driven loop of threat detection.
474
00:23:19.599 --> 00:23:23.759
The algorithm learns that terrifying users with geopolitical instability or
475
00:23:23.839 --> 00:23:27.640
hidden murder narratives is incredibly effective for retention.
476
00:23:27.920 --> 00:23:30.319
And it does all of this without you ever actively
477
00:23:30.440 --> 00:23:32.960
changing your search parameters. You don't have to type in
478
00:23:33.480 --> 00:23:35.359
tell me why society is collapsing?
479
00:23:35.480 --> 00:23:36.039
No, you don't.
480
00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:39.319
The librarian just slides the book of Impending Doom across
481
00:23:39.319 --> 00:23:41.599
the desk because they noticed your pupils dilate.
482
00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:44.440
That's exactly it, which brings us to the final and
483
00:23:44.519 --> 00:23:47.519
perhaps most disorienting piece of this puzzle.
484
00:23:47.640 --> 00:23:48.960
Oh the time stamps.
485
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:51.799
Yes, we've talked about the shift in tone and topic,
486
00:23:51.880 --> 00:23:54.599
but looking closely at the timestamps on this single web
487
00:23:54.599 --> 00:23:58.160
page reveal something deeply unsettling about the very nature of
488
00:23:58.240 --> 00:23:59.079
digital consumption.
489
00:23:59.240 --> 00:24:01.960
The timestamps and the source are wild. Let's look at
490
00:24:01.960 --> 00:24:05.319
the juxtaposition of ages in this single sidebar. We have
491
00:24:05.400 --> 00:24:08.359
the anchor video, the original JRE interview with v Sauce,
492
00:24:08.359 --> 00:24:11.119
which is eleven years old. Right, we have the Awkwardness video,
493
00:24:11.279 --> 00:24:14.240
also eleven years old. But mixed right in with these
494
00:24:14.319 --> 00:24:18.359
decade old artifacts are live streams and incredibly recent drops.
495
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:19.319
What's the mix like?
496
00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:22.039
Well, we have a video titled AI is creating a
497
00:24:22.119 --> 00:24:25.440
rare opportunity for investors, which was streamed just one month ago.
498
00:24:26.119 --> 00:24:29.160
We have a clip titled Judge laugh jess at Sovereign
499
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:32.920
Citizen after bizarre courtroom claim, which was uploaded three weeks ago.
500
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:35.400
And we have that certain video we just talked about,
501
00:24:35.519 --> 00:24:37.160
uploaded a mirror four hours ago.
502
00:24:37.599 --> 00:24:40.480
This is the phenomenon of the flattening of time in
503
00:24:40.519 --> 00:24:46.519
traditional media environments. Newspapers, television, broadcasts, even terrestrial radio. Time
504
00:24:46.640 --> 00:24:48.240
is strictly linear, right.
505
00:24:48.079 --> 00:24:50.279
It's contextualized by the medium itself.
506
00:24:50.359 --> 00:24:54.039
Exactly you read today's newspaper today. If you watch a
507
00:24:54.160 --> 00:24:58.119
historical documentary on television, the network tells you is a retrospective,
508
00:24:58.880 --> 00:25:02.079
But on the digital interface represented by our source, time
509
00:25:02.200 --> 00:25:03.359
is completely flattened.
510
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:04.599
It's just an endless feed.
511
00:25:04.839 --> 00:25:08.480
Yes, and epistemological conversation from twenty fourteen is served up
512
00:25:08.519 --> 00:25:11.839
with the exact same visual weight, the exact same thumbnail size,
513
00:25:11.920 --> 00:25:15.440
and the exact same algorithmic priority as a breaking newstream
514
00:25:15.480 --> 00:25:18.079
about AI investing from a month ago, in a fringe
515
00:25:18.119 --> 00:25:19.920
science video from four hours ago.
516
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:23.440
So what does this all mean for the human brain
517
00:25:23.480 --> 00:25:26.480
processing this? If I'm sitting down at my computer and
518
00:25:26.519 --> 00:25:29.880
I'm absorbing in eleven year old fact about ayahuasca, right
519
00:25:29.920 --> 00:25:31.839
next to a three week old video of a sovereign
520
00:25:31.880 --> 00:25:35.480
citizen in a courtroom. Does the concept of current events
521
00:25:35.559 --> 00:25:36.880
even exist anymore?
522
00:25:36.960 --> 00:25:38.200
It's blurring, isn't it.
523
00:25:38.200 --> 00:25:40.960
It feels like we are living in a perpetual now.
524
00:25:41.079 --> 00:25:44.400
The perpetual now is a perfect term for it. When
525
00:25:44.480 --> 00:25:48.759
time is flattened. Context is the first casualty. It forces
526
00:25:48.799 --> 00:25:50.640
an immense cognitive load onto the.
527
00:25:50.640 --> 00:25:52.319
User because you have to sort it yourself.
528
00:25:52.400 --> 00:25:54.720
You can no longer rely on the medium to tell
529
00:25:54.759 --> 00:25:56.920
you where you are in history. You have to bring
530
00:25:56.960 --> 00:26:00.200
your own internal clock and your own critical context to
531
00:26:00.279 --> 00:26:01.880
every single square edge of the interface.
532
00:26:01.960 --> 00:26:04.720
Quick tangent, because you mentioned the cognitive load. That video
533
00:26:04.759 --> 00:26:08.079
titled judge laughis at sovereign citizen. I've seen these pop
534
00:26:08.119 --> 00:26:08.559
up everywhere.
535
00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:10.160
Oh they're viral gold.
536
00:26:10.039 --> 00:26:13.640
For the uninitiated. What is a sovereign citizen? And why
537
00:26:13.680 --> 00:26:17.240
does the algorithm love serving these courtroom videos? Right next
538
00:26:17.240 --> 00:26:19.720
to complex science and global politics right?
539
00:26:19.759 --> 00:26:22.880
So Sovereign citizens are individuals who subscribe to a pseudo
540
00:26:22.960 --> 00:26:27.480
legal belief system. They fundamentally believe that by using specific
541
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:32.480
linguistic loopholes, or by citing obscure, often misinterpreted historical documents,
542
00:26:32.960 --> 00:26:36.559
they are immune from normal government laws, taxes, or court systems.
543
00:26:36.640 --> 00:26:38.160
That sounds exhausting, it is.
544
00:26:38.599 --> 00:26:41.279
They frequently end up in court over minor infractions like
545
00:26:41.319 --> 00:26:44.359
traffic tickets, and they attempt to argue with the judge
546
00:26:44.759 --> 00:26:47.240
using this bizarre, convoluted legal.
547
00:26:47.079 --> 00:26:50.000
Jargon, and the judges usually don't have time for it exactly.
548
00:26:50.039 --> 00:26:54.000
The videos usually feature a complete breakdown of communication, ending
549
00:26:54.119 --> 00:26:56.160
in the sovereign citizen being held in contempt.
550
00:26:56.359 --> 00:26:59.000
But why is the algorithm pushing them next to physics?
551
00:26:59.720 --> 00:27:02.960
The algorithm loves these videos because they offer an incredible
552
00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:07.920
voyeuristic thrill. They provide a clear narrative of order versus chaos.
553
00:27:08.559 --> 00:27:11.440
It's a very different kind of engagement than a physics video. Right.
554
00:27:11.680 --> 00:27:14.680
A VSACE video makes you feel smarter. A sovereign citizen
555
00:27:14.720 --> 00:27:18.000
courtroom video makes you feel sane. By comparison, Oh wow,
556
00:27:18.160 --> 00:27:20.359
it's junk food for the ego, served right next to
557
00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:21.400
the high art philosophy.
558
00:27:21.599 --> 00:27:26.319
It really is an infinite, swirling vortex of content. I
559
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:29.720
want you listening right now to think about your own feeds,
560
00:27:30.240 --> 00:27:32.519
open up your app of choice later today, and just
561
00:27:32.559 --> 00:27:33.599
look at the timestamps.
562
00:27:33.640 --> 00:27:34.960
It's an eye opening exercise.
563
00:27:35.039 --> 00:27:37.720
How often are you learning a profound life lesson from
564
00:27:37.720 --> 00:27:41.200
a lecture recorded a decade ago, only to immediately auto
565
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:45.599
play into a live breaking news broadcast about a local emergency.
566
00:27:45.160 --> 00:27:47.720
Right, and then into a meme exactly.
567
00:27:47.240 --> 00:27:49.240
And then AutoPlay into a meme that was created ten
568
00:27:49.279 --> 00:27:53.799
minutes ago. How does this complete lack of chronological context
569
00:27:53.920 --> 00:27:55.319
change how you view the world?
570
00:27:55.680 --> 00:27:57.680
Does it make you feel more connected to the span
571
00:27:57.759 --> 00:27:59.039
of human knowledge or.
572
00:27:58.920 --> 00:28:00.400
Does it just make you feel like you're floating in
573
00:28:00.440 --> 00:28:02.799
a void where everything is happening all at once.
574
00:28:03.039 --> 00:28:06.799
It demands an entirely new kind of digital literacy. We
575
00:28:06.839 --> 00:28:09.720
are no longer just consumers of information. We are forced
576
00:28:09.759 --> 00:28:11.640
to be real time historians of our own.
577
00:28:11.599 --> 00:28:15.839
Feeds, constantly sorting, dating, and contextualizing the data being thrown
578
00:28:15.880 --> 00:28:18.599
at us. Well, this has been an incredible journey. What
579
00:28:18.759 --> 00:28:21.480
started as a simple look at a single web page
580
00:28:21.519 --> 00:28:25.160
from July twenty fourteen, a meeting between a stand up
581
00:28:25.160 --> 00:28:29.240
comedian and a YouTube educator has really unspooled into a
582
00:28:29.279 --> 00:28:31.799
profound map of modern internet mechanics.
583
00:28:31.880 --> 00:28:33.200
We covered a lot of ground today.
584
00:28:33.319 --> 00:28:36.960
We started with the innocent exciting sharing of mind blowing
585
00:28:37.000 --> 00:28:40.599
facts and curating the best of the Internet. We watched
586
00:28:40.640 --> 00:28:44.960
that curiosity expand outward through the algorithm into deep, multi
587
00:28:45.039 --> 00:28:48.079
hour explorations of existential philosophy and theology.
588
00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:51.240
And we tracked how the underlying architecture of that algorithm,
589
00:28:51.279 --> 00:28:54.920
the semantic mapping, and the optimization for session duration, can
590
00:28:54.960 --> 00:28:58.720
seamlessly guide that exact same drive for discovery into the darker,
591
00:28:58.880 --> 00:29:01.359
cortisol driven edge is the digital rabbit hole.
592
00:29:01.480 --> 00:29:04.119
Right, we move from the biology of awkwardness to the
593
00:29:04.119 --> 00:29:07.200
paranoia of true crime and predictions of global conflict.
594
00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:10.640
We've seen how the machine builds a psychological vector based
595
00:29:10.640 --> 00:29:11.960
on our thirst for meaning, and.
596
00:29:11.920 --> 00:29:14.160
How it serves it all back to us in a flattened,
597
00:29:14.200 --> 00:29:17.359
timeless loop where twenty fourteen and four hours ago exists
598
00:29:17.359 --> 00:29:18.640
in the exact same breath.
599
00:29:18.720 --> 00:29:20.160
It truly is a living artifact.
600
00:29:20.400 --> 00:29:24.720
And looking at your backdrop right now, the sprawling chalkboard
601
00:29:24.759 --> 00:29:28.519
is fading, the complex equations and the YouTube interfaces are
602
00:29:28.519 --> 00:29:29.759
dissolving into the black.
603
00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:32.039
The digital matrix is powering down.
604
00:29:32.480 --> 00:29:36.240
Yes, it's leaving just a single blinking cursor on a
605
00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:39.839
black screen, a prompt waiting for the next input. Waiting
606
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:41.079
for the next search, which.
607
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:44.640
Feels entirely appropriate. Because we wrap up this deep dive
608
00:29:44.680 --> 00:29:47.640
into the metadata of our past, we want to leave
609
00:29:47.640 --> 00:29:49.640
you with a final provocative thought.
610
00:29:49.920 --> 00:29:53.599
We've spent this time analyzing the algorithmic ecosystem surrounding someone
611
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:56.079
else's conversation, But what about yours?
612
00:29:56.599 --> 00:30:00.160
Right if a machine learning algorithm took a snapshot of
613
00:30:00.200 --> 00:30:04.039
the exact mix of videos, articles, and audio surrounding your
614
00:30:04.079 --> 00:30:07.720
digital footprint today, from your innocent, trivial pursuits to your
615
00:30:07.720 --> 00:30:11.720
most terrifying late night anxieties, what story would that matrix
616
00:30:11.759 --> 00:30:13.240
tell researcher ten years from now?
617
00:30:13.720 --> 00:30:16.000
What would it say about what you were desperately searching
618
00:30:16.039 --> 00:30:18.599
for exactly something to moul over the next time the
619
00:30:18.640 --> 00:30:22.559
AutoPlay timer starts ticking down, keep questioning the interface, keep
620
00:30:22.599 --> 00:30:24.960
curating your own curiosity, and we'll see you next time.
1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:04.799
Imagine staring at a screen where a deeply slow, highly
2
00:00:04.839 --> 00:00:09.599
intellectual philosophical debate from eleven years ago is just presented
3
00:00:09.599 --> 00:00:13.199
to you with the exact same urgency as a panic inducing,
4
00:00:13.320 --> 00:00:17.039
flashing red video about a global catastrophe, right, and a.
5
00:00:17.079 --> 00:00:19.160
Video that was uploaded just four hours ago.
6
00:00:19.239 --> 00:00:22.000
No, less exactly, there is no timeline. I mean, there
7
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:24.920
is no past or present. There is just this endless,
8
00:00:25.079 --> 00:00:29.920
scrolling wall of human curiosity, completely flattened into a single moment.
9
00:00:30.239 --> 00:00:35.159
It really creates this state of cognitive whiplash. Yeah, you
10
00:00:35.200 --> 00:00:37.600
are looking at an environment that simply doesn't care when
11
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:40.320
a piece of information was created. Yeah, it only cares
12
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:42.960
whether that piece of information can hook your tension right now,
13
00:00:43.079 --> 00:00:44.159
in this precise second.
14
00:00:44.240 --> 00:00:46.759
And that whiplash is exactly what we are dissecting today.
15
00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:49.159
So welcome to a completely different kind of deep dive.
16
00:00:49.640 --> 00:00:51.759
We aren't reading a newly published book, and we aren't
17
00:00:51.799 --> 00:00:55.320
analyzing a peer reviewed paper in some scientific journal.
18
00:00:55.479 --> 00:00:56.640
No, we are definitely not.
19
00:00:56.920 --> 00:01:00.600
Today. Our source material is basically a digital fossil. It's
20
00:01:00.640 --> 00:01:04.319
a literal snapshot of frozen web page, capturing the metadata,
21
00:01:04.640 --> 00:01:09.879
the descriptions, and most importantly, the vast, sprawling algorithmic ecosystem
22
00:01:09.959 --> 00:01:12.040
surrounding one specific video.
23
00:01:12.200 --> 00:01:14.400
Right and for those of you listening, the video we
24
00:01:14.439 --> 00:01:17.439
are looking at is Joe Rogan Experience number five twenty
25
00:01:17.439 --> 00:01:21.079
eight featuring Michael Stevens, who is the creator of the YouTube.
26
00:01:20.840 --> 00:01:23.920
Channel v Sauce, which is just a massive cultural touchstone.
27
00:01:23.920 --> 00:01:25.920
And looking at the backdrop you've brought up for our
28
00:01:26.000 --> 00:01:29.640
visual feed today, I mean it fits the archaeological theme perfectly.
29
00:01:29.840 --> 00:01:32.319
I thought you'd like that. Yeah, you've got this abstract,
30
00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:38.359
glowing digital matrix that's slowly resolving into the clunky, nostalgic
31
00:01:38.519 --> 00:01:40.519
mid twenty tens YouTube airface.
32
00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:43.359
Oh wow. Yeah, you can even see the classic slightly
33
00:01:43.400 --> 00:01:46.200
boxy sidebar recommendations popping up on the right side.
34
00:01:46.239 --> 00:01:48.400
I had to set the mood, you know, because our
35
00:01:48.439 --> 00:01:51.920
mission here is to really explore this specific digital artifact
36
00:01:51.920 --> 00:01:55.319
from July thirty, twenty fourteen. We want to unpack what
37
00:01:55.480 --> 00:01:58.640
this singular frozen web page tells us about the origin
38
00:01:58.680 --> 00:02:02.799
of V Sauce, the k early frontier of long form podcasting,
39
00:02:03.439 --> 00:02:07.319
and well the mechanics of how digital media algorithms began
40
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:08.800
to actively shape human thought.
41
00:02:08.919 --> 00:02:11.879
Boit before we jump in, you use the word fossil earlier,
42
00:02:11.960 --> 00:02:14.560
and I called it an artifact. But a web page
43
00:02:14.560 --> 00:02:18.400
with a recommendation algorithm attached to it isn't static right
44
00:02:18.599 --> 00:02:20.719
right now, Like if I dig up a clay pot
45
00:02:20.719 --> 00:02:23.039
in the desert, it just sits there. It is exactly
46
00:02:23.080 --> 00:02:24.479
what it was a thousand years ago.
47
00:02:24.759 --> 00:02:28.199
That's a really crucial distinction. Actually, it's a fossil only
48
00:02:28.240 --> 00:02:30.560
in the sense that the central video was uploaded on
49
00:02:30.599 --> 00:02:33.879
a specific date. Okay, but the environment we are analyze it,
50
00:02:33.919 --> 00:02:37.400
so the sidebar, the recommended videos, the comments, that is
51
00:02:37.520 --> 00:02:41.960
highly dynamic. It is the absolute definition of living evolving
52
00:02:42.080 --> 00:02:45.800
time capsule. It keeps changing exactly. The algorithm is constantly
53
00:02:45.879 --> 00:02:49.639
updating the surrounding ecosystem based on the behavioral data of
54
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:52.439
you know, millions of users who click on that central
55
00:02:52.520 --> 00:02:54.199
video over the course of a decade.
56
00:02:54.439 --> 00:02:57.599
Okay, let's unpack this because to really understand what the
57
00:02:57.639 --> 00:03:00.479
algorithm build around this video, we have to understand the
58
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:01.840
seed that started it all.
59
00:03:01.879 --> 00:03:04.120
We have to look at the exact details of this
60
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:06.039
specific twenty fourteen upload.
61
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:09.520
Yeah, so the video is titled Joe Rogan Experience hashtag
62
00:03:09.560 --> 00:03:14.319
five twenty eight. Michael Stevens from VSAUS uploaded on July thirty,
63
00:03:14.520 --> 00:03:17.719
twenty fourteen, and as of the snapshot in our source,
64
00:03:17.800 --> 00:03:20.879
it's sitting at just under four and a half million.
65
00:03:20.599 --> 00:03:23.199
Views and about seventy thousand likes right now.
66
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:26.479
The source provides these incredibly stark biographical details for the
67
00:03:26.520 --> 00:03:29.479
two people in the room. We have Joe Rogan described
68
00:03:29.520 --> 00:03:33.039
as an American podcaster and comedian born in nineteen sixty seven, and.
69
00:03:33.000 --> 00:03:36.280
Sitting across from him is Michael Stevens, American YouTuber born
70
00:03:36.280 --> 00:03:37.199
in nineteen eighty six.
71
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:40.680
Yeah, that age gap, and honestly, more importantly, that title difference,
72
00:03:40.840 --> 00:03:43.039
it feels massive for the year twenty fourteen.
73
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.840
It really represents a fundamental collision of two entirely different
74
00:03:46.879 --> 00:03:49.080
eras of media. I mean, think about what the title
75
00:03:49.159 --> 00:03:51.360
stand up comedian meant for someone born in the late
76
00:03:51.439 --> 00:03:54.000
nineteen sixty It meant you were on the road exactly.
77
00:03:54.360 --> 00:03:57.479
Rogan came of age in physical spaces. His background is
78
00:03:57.520 --> 00:04:01.240
completely rooted in brick and mortar comedy clubs, late night
79
00:04:01.240 --> 00:04:03.439
television spots, traditional broadcasting.
80
00:04:03.520 --> 00:04:06.039
You write a joke, you stand on a wooden stage
81
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:09.400
in front of a live audience, and you get immediate physical,
82
00:04:09.520 --> 00:04:10.520
audible feedback.
83
00:04:10.719 --> 00:04:13.360
Right and then you have Michael Stevens born in the
84
00:04:13.360 --> 00:04:16.920
mid eighties, right, a digital native whose entire claim to
85
00:04:16.959 --> 00:04:19.480
fame is a completely self made platform.
86
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:23.240
Yeah, the title American YouTuber in twenty fourteen was still
87
00:04:23.279 --> 00:04:24.360
relatively novel.
88
00:04:24.519 --> 00:04:24.800
It was.
89
00:04:24.920 --> 00:04:28.639
It wasn't the massive, institutionalized industry it is today. Kids
90
00:04:28.680 --> 00:04:32.240
in twenty fourteen weren't routinely pelling their guidance counselors they
91
00:04:32.240 --> 00:04:35.319
wanted to major in YouTube. It still felt like, uh,
92
00:04:35.639 --> 00:04:36.600
like the wild West.
93
00:04:36.680 --> 00:04:40.879
It was incredibly renegade. Creators weren't backed by massive production studios.
94
00:04:40.920 --> 00:04:44.000
They were figuring out lighting, editing, and pacing right in
95
00:04:44.040 --> 00:04:44.720
their bedrooms.
96
00:04:44.920 --> 00:04:47.199
And that brings us to the channel description for v Sauce,
97
00:04:47.240 --> 00:04:49.680
which is explicitly noted in our source. It says v
98
00:04:49.800 --> 00:04:52.279
Sauce is a place where mind blowing facts and the
99
00:04:52.319 --> 00:04:53.879
best of the Internet is shared.
100
00:04:54.079 --> 00:04:56.800
The best of the Internet. I just love that phrasing, right.
101
00:04:56.839 --> 00:04:59.360
It feels the most romantic, doesn't it. It really does
102
00:04:59.439 --> 00:05:03.319
like the Internet is this vast, untamed wilderness, and you
103
00:05:03.439 --> 00:05:06.720
need a seasoned explorer to go out there, you know,
104
00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:09.360
hack through the digital jungle and bring back the coolest
105
00:05:09.399 --> 00:05:10.720
shiny rocks they could find.
106
00:05:11.560 --> 00:05:15.839
It captures a very specific philosophy of early twenty ten's
107
00:05:15.920 --> 00:05:20.120
digital media. Back then, the Internet felt infinitely vast and
108
00:05:20.240 --> 00:05:22.160
largely unmapped for the average user.
109
00:05:22.199 --> 00:05:23.959
Yeah, everything was scattered, exactly.
110
00:05:24.279 --> 00:05:28.399
Information was siloed on obscure forums, or deep inside academic databases,
111
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:32.120
or just buried in dense scientific journals. So someone like
112
00:05:32.120 --> 00:05:34.319
Michael Stevens stepping up to curate the best of the
113
00:05:34.360 --> 00:05:36.920
Internet was providing a vital service.
114
00:05:37.199 --> 00:05:40.120
He was acting as an intellectual translator. Yes, let me
115
00:05:40.160 --> 00:05:42.600
stop you there, though, because I look at this dynamic,
116
00:05:42.680 --> 00:05:45.240
you know, the comedian and the YouTuber, and I have
117
00:05:45.319 --> 00:05:46.839
to push back a little on the idea that this
118
00:05:46.959 --> 00:05:50.160
was purely about education. Okay, how so, well, was Michael
119
00:05:50.160 --> 00:05:53.759
Stevens really an intellectual translator or was he essentially acting
120
00:05:53.759 --> 00:05:56.480
as the cool substitute teacher of the Internet for Joe
121
00:05:56.560 --> 00:05:57.399
Rogan's audience.
122
00:05:57.480 --> 00:06:00.240
Oh, the cool substitute teacher, I like that, You know,
123
00:06:00.279 --> 00:06:03.360
the type, the teacher who rolls the TV card into
124
00:06:03.399 --> 00:06:07.319
the room, throws the textbook out the window, sits backwards
125
00:06:07.319 --> 00:06:09.480
on the chair, and says, forget the curriculum.
126
00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:12.560
Let me tell you how black holes actually work. Right, right,
127
00:06:12.879 --> 00:06:14.839
I ask, because it feels like there is a mutual
128
00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:18.879
validation happening here that goes beyond just sharing facts.
129
00:06:19.240 --> 00:06:21.800
I don't think those two concepts are mutually exclusive at all.
130
00:06:21.839 --> 00:06:25.959
He was definitely playing that cool substitute teacher role, but
131
00:06:27.160 --> 00:06:30.319
that persona was the vehicle for the translation. Okay, fair,
132
00:06:30.639 --> 00:06:33.759
and you are spot on about the mutual validation. That
133
00:06:33.839 --> 00:06:37.199
is really the hidden subtext of this entire interview for Rogan,
134
00:06:37.759 --> 00:06:42.199
bringing on a highly intellectual, wildly popular digital educator lent
135
00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:45.240
a completely different kind of weight to his podcast because at.
136
00:06:45.120 --> 00:06:48.160
The time his show was largely known for comedians, mma
137
00:06:48.240 --> 00:06:50.160
fighters and like fringe.
138
00:06:49.800 --> 00:06:52.079
Thinker exactly, and what did Stevens get out of it?
139
00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:53.600
Legitimacy in the adult world.
140
00:06:53.720 --> 00:06:56.759
Yes, appearing on The Joe Rogan Experience, which I mean
141
00:06:56.800 --> 00:06:59.800
even twenty fourteen, was establishing itself as a cultural juggernaut.
142
00:07:00.199 --> 00:07:04.160
It validated YouTube education as a medium worthy of serious
143
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:06.160
long form conversation, right.
144
00:07:06.600 --> 00:07:09.560
It signaled that v sauce wasn't just short attention span
145
00:07:09.680 --> 00:07:11.839
trivia for kids to watch while eating cereal.
146
00:07:11.920 --> 00:07:15.240
It was philosophy, it was science. It could hold its
147
00:07:15.240 --> 00:07:18.720
own in a three hour, completely unscripted debate.
148
00:07:18.959 --> 00:07:22.399
It's just a fascinating snapshot of where media was heading.
149
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:24.600
I mean, think about your own Internet habits back in
150
00:07:24.680 --> 00:07:26.439
twenty fourteen for everyone listening.
151
00:07:26.600 --> 00:07:27.720
Oh, it was a different world.
152
00:07:27.759 --> 00:07:30.560
Where were you when you first started listening to podcasts?
153
00:07:30.839 --> 00:07:33.040
It's almost hard to remember a time when listening to
154
00:07:33.079 --> 00:07:36.439
two people just talk for three hours without commercial breaks
155
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:40.399
or producers yelling in their years was considered a radical
156
00:07:40.480 --> 00:07:41.680
experimental format.
157
00:07:41.920 --> 00:07:43.720
We completely take it for granted now.
158
00:07:43.600 --> 00:07:46.639
We do, but back then it was groundbreaking. And our
159
00:07:46.680 --> 00:07:50.120
source material doesn't just stop at this one interview. It
160
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:51.839
expands outward right.
161
00:07:52.000 --> 00:07:55.360
It reveals the massive enduring footprint of the V Sauce
162
00:07:55.480 --> 00:07:59.560
brand through the suggested videos that the algorithm populates around
163
00:07:59.560 --> 00:08:00.000
this converse.
164
00:08:00.560 --> 00:08:03.199
This is where we move from observing the event itself
165
00:08:03.560 --> 00:08:06.480
to analyzing the ecosystem it spawned.
166
00:08:06.560 --> 00:08:09.040
And the numbers in this ecosystem are just staggering. The
167
00:08:09.079 --> 00:08:11.879
source gives us a few specific V Sauce videos floating
168
00:08:11.879 --> 00:08:13.240
in this twenty fourteen sidebar.
169
00:08:13.519 --> 00:08:16.720
We have a video simply titled Ayahuasca sitting at eleven
170
00:08:16.759 --> 00:08:18.600
million views uploaded eight years ago.
171
00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:19.160
Wow.
172
00:08:19.279 --> 00:08:21.959
Yeah, And we have the Science of Awkwardness sitting at
173
00:08:22.000 --> 00:08:24.720
fifteen million views uploaded eleven years.
174
00:08:24.480 --> 00:08:27.360
Ago, and then we see spinoff and related content too.
175
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:30.839
There's a video by Alex O'Connor titled Hey, V Sauce,
176
00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:34.960
Does Anything Exist? With one point seven million.
177
00:08:34.679 --> 00:08:37.279
Views, which is a heavy title it is.
178
00:08:37.559 --> 00:08:40.080
There's also a later appearance by Stevens on the Lex
179
00:08:40.120 --> 00:08:44.120
Ferdman podcast hashtag fifty eight with nearly six hundred thousand views,
180
00:08:44.399 --> 00:08:46.480
and we even see a video from the channel smash
181
00:08:46.519 --> 00:08:49.720
Alike titled I Spent a Day with V Sauce with
182
00:08:49.879 --> 00:08:51.360
two point eight million views.
183
00:08:51.559 --> 00:08:53.919
You really have to pause in wigh the sheer volume
184
00:08:53.960 --> 00:08:56.679
of those numbers. Fifteen million views on a video exploring
185
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:58.960
the biological and social science of feeling.
186
00:08:58.759 --> 00:09:01.639
Awkward, right million views on a deep dive to the
187
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.639
chemical and cultural history of a hallucinogenic plant.
188
00:09:04.840 --> 00:09:07.799
This is empirical proof of a massive public hunger for
189
00:09:07.960 --> 00:09:12.080
educational content that bridges hard science with the deeply personal,
190
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:13.559
messy human experience.
191
00:09:13.679 --> 00:09:16.519
People didn't just want dry data, They wanted to understand
192
00:09:16.559 --> 00:09:19.000
their own daily friction through a scientific lens.
193
00:09:19.279 --> 00:09:21.759
Now you've described this in your notes as turning mind
194
00:09:21.759 --> 00:09:24.639
blowing facts into high art, but I have to challenge
195
00:09:24.639 --> 00:09:26.480
you on that a little bit. Okay, No, here, isn't
196
00:09:26.480 --> 00:09:29.320
calling a YouTube video high art giving it a bit
197
00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:31.840
too much credit. I mean, at the end of the day,
198
00:09:32.000 --> 00:09:35.159
isn't it just infotainment optimized for clicks? You put a
199
00:09:35.200 --> 00:09:38.000
wacky face on the thumbnail, use a punchy title, and
200
00:09:38.080 --> 00:09:40.679
keep the jump cuts fast. Sure, so, how is that
201
00:09:40.720 --> 00:09:43.720
different from like a flashy Wikipedia summary.
202
00:09:44.120 --> 00:09:47.559
It's a totally fair question. But the difference really lies
203
00:09:48.320 --> 00:09:51.679
in the narrative architecture of v sauce video. It is
204
00:09:51.720 --> 00:09:53.440
never just a Wikipedia summary really.
205
00:09:53.639 --> 00:09:53.679
No.
206
00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:58.320
Steven's perfected a very specific rhetorical technique. He always starts
207
00:09:58.320 --> 00:10:02.720
with a mundane, almost childishly simple premise like why do
208
00:10:02.799 --> 00:10:04.679
things fall down? Or why is this awkward?
209
00:10:04.840 --> 00:10:07.159
Right? That's the bait, exactly.
210
00:10:06.679 --> 00:10:10.320
That's the bait. But within five minutes he is neurologically
211
00:10:10.360 --> 00:10:15.559
linked that simple premise to incredibly complex concepts in physics, biology,
212
00:10:15.679 --> 00:10:19.000
or philosophy. He doesn't just list facts, He builds a
213
00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:20.039
cascading argument.
214
00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:23.480
Ah, so he uses the mundane to smuggle in the profound.
215
00:10:23.840 --> 00:10:28.120
Yes, smuggling in the profound. Look at the evolution shown
216
00:10:28.120 --> 00:10:30.159
in the titles are source provided. We go from the
217
00:10:30.200 --> 00:10:33.559
science of awkwardness the alex O'Connor's video, Hey V Sauce,
218
00:10:33.840 --> 00:10:34.919
does anything exist?
219
00:10:35.240 --> 00:10:36.279
It's a huge leap.
220
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:39.120
It is. What's fascinating here is how this maps a
221
00:10:39.200 --> 00:10:42.799
transition in the audience's appetite over time. It shows a
222
00:10:42.879 --> 00:10:48.559
migration from sharing simple quirky trivia to triggering deep existential inquiry.
223
00:10:48.759 --> 00:10:53.000
V Sauce effectively became a gateway drug to ontology and epistemology.
224
00:10:53.080 --> 00:10:55.759
Exactly Okay, for anyone listening who didn't just walk out
225
00:10:55.799 --> 00:10:59.039
of a philosophy one O one seminar, define those terms
226
00:10:59.080 --> 00:11:03.000
for us in this CONTEXTX, ontology and epistemology. How do
227
00:11:03.120 --> 00:11:06.159
those connect to a guy making faces at a camera
228
00:11:06.240 --> 00:11:06.840
on YouTube?
229
00:11:07.000 --> 00:11:10.000
Great point. Let's break that down simply put. Epistemology is
230
00:11:10.000 --> 00:11:12.320
the study of knowledge, how do we actually know what
231
00:11:12.320 --> 00:11:14.080
we know? Like how can you trust your eyes or
232
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:16.720
your brain? And ontology is the study of being what
233
00:11:16.840 --> 00:11:20.320
actually exists in reality. So, in Steven's asked this question, like,
234
00:11:20.519 --> 00:11:23.240
is you're read the same as my red He's starting
235
00:11:23.240 --> 00:11:24.399
with a fun optical illusion.
236
00:11:24.440 --> 00:11:26.759
Oh, I've seen that one, right, But then.
237
00:11:26.679 --> 00:11:30.799
He's tricking his audience into a deep epistemological debate about
238
00:11:30.840 --> 00:11:34.960
the limits of human perception. He is asking how we
239
00:11:35.039 --> 00:11:37.679
can ever truly share an objective.
240
00:11:37.200 --> 00:11:39.120
Reality that does take immense skill.
241
00:11:39.240 --> 00:11:42.759
It elevates the medium beyond simple infotainment, and that.
242
00:11:42.720 --> 00:11:44.960
Ties perfectly into why he was on the Joe Rogan
243
00:11:45.000 --> 00:11:48.360
experience in the first place. The video titled Ayahuasca is
244
00:11:48.480 --> 00:11:49.519
the perfect bridge.
245
00:11:49.720 --> 00:11:50.840
It really is. V.
246
00:11:51.039 --> 00:11:54.799
Sauce is known for rigorous scientific curiosity, and Joe Rogan's
247
00:11:54.840 --> 00:11:59.480
podcast is heavily associated with discussions on psychedelics, consciousness, and
248
00:11:59.559 --> 00:12:00.399
altered states.
249
00:12:00.639 --> 00:12:03.639
Stevens knew exactly how to translate his brand of scientific
250
00:12:03.720 --> 00:12:06.840
education into the specific dialect of the audience he was visiting.
251
00:12:06.960 --> 00:12:10.000
He was highly adaptive, and this early era of V.
252
00:12:10.159 --> 00:12:13.759
Sauce represented by this twenty fourteen snapshot, essentially laid the
253
00:12:13.799 --> 00:12:17.639
bedrock for the entire modern landscape of educational video essays
254
00:12:17.720 --> 00:12:18.879
and science podcasting.
255
00:12:19.000 --> 00:12:23.000
Because before this Internet education was largely fragmented and honestly
256
00:12:23.080 --> 00:12:24.000
kind of condescending.
257
00:12:24.120 --> 00:12:27.759
Yeah, it was either dry university lectures uploaded with terrible audio,
258
00:12:27.840 --> 00:12:31.200
or it was hyperkinetic content aimed exclusively at middle schoolers.
259
00:12:31.480 --> 00:12:34.360
Steven's proved you could hold a mass audience's attention for
260
00:12:34.480 --> 00:12:37.519
twenty thirty or even sixty minutes by treating them as
261
00:12:37.559 --> 00:12:40.639
intelligent peers on a shared journey of discovery.
262
00:12:40.879 --> 00:12:43.519
All right, I'm watching your backdrop shift again. The old
263
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:48.320
school YouTube interface is dissolving. Now. It looks like a
264
00:12:48.519 --> 00:12:50.159
massive chaotic chalkboard.
265
00:12:50.240 --> 00:12:51.240
Yeah, do you like it.
266
00:12:51.240 --> 00:12:55.519
It's covered in complex physics equations, orbital mechanics diagrams, and
267
00:12:55.559 --> 00:12:59.000
what looks like theological flow charts, and scattered all over
268
00:12:59.039 --> 00:13:01.720
it are those class red YouTube play buttons.
269
00:13:01.840 --> 00:13:05.039
I shifted the visual because we really need to move
270
00:13:05.039 --> 00:13:08.279
from the seed to the forest. If the JRI and
271
00:13:08.399 --> 00:13:12.240
Visas interview is the anchor point, the recommended sidebar provided
272
00:13:12.279 --> 00:13:15.200
in our source, is this sprawling ecosystem that grew around it.
273
00:13:15.399 --> 00:13:17.000
This is where we get into the mechanics of the
274
00:13:17.039 --> 00:13:18.200
machine exactly.
275
00:13:18.559 --> 00:13:21.200
We have to ask ourselves, how does a machine learning
276
00:13:21.240 --> 00:13:24.240
algorithm categorize the people who watch this? What does it
277
00:13:24.279 --> 00:13:28.000
associate with this specific twenty fourteen collision of minds.
278
00:13:28.159 --> 00:13:30.399
You're calling it the curiosity matrix in your notes.
279
00:13:30.480 --> 00:13:31.039
Let's map it.
280
00:13:31.120 --> 00:13:34.440
Because the sidebar recommendations in our source are heavily skewed
281
00:13:34.480 --> 00:13:38.600
towards science, philosophy, and religion, and the mix is incredibly dense.
282
00:13:38.919 --> 00:13:41.120
It is give some examples from the source.
283
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:43.879
Well, we have videos from a channel called the rest
284
00:13:43.919 --> 00:13:47.080
is Science, specifically titles like We're all being Pulled Together
285
00:13:47.240 --> 00:13:49.200
and Paradoxes of Infinity.
286
00:13:49.480 --> 00:13:50.720
Okay, pard Science.
287
00:13:50.840 --> 00:13:50.960
Right.
288
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:54.559
Then we have a clip from sixty Minutes Australia titled
289
00:13:54.960 --> 00:13:58.600
Ricky Gervais on Atheism, Jesus and the Meaning.
290
00:13:58.320 --> 00:14:00.000
Of Life, philosophy and religion.
291
00:14:00.200 --> 00:14:04.519
And then we have these deep, multi hour theological explorations
292
00:14:04.600 --> 00:14:08.120
by a creator named Mike Winger with titles like Relearning
293
00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:11.200
the Last Supper and the entire book in one video,
294
00:14:11.840 --> 00:14:15.200
the Hebrews series Deep Theology, And right alongside all of
295
00:14:15.200 --> 00:14:18.559
that we have Joe Rogan's own DMT experiences sitting at
296
00:14:18.559 --> 00:14:19.480
ten million views.
297
00:14:19.840 --> 00:14:21.480
This is where we really need to look under the
298
00:14:21.519 --> 00:14:26.039
hood of how recommendation algorithms actually function. The system doesn't
299
00:14:26.120 --> 00:14:27.919
know who you are personally.
300
00:14:27.559 --> 00:14:28.919
Right, It isn't reading your diary.
301
00:14:29.240 --> 00:14:32.320
No, What it does is utilize a mechanism called collaborative
302
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:34.840
filtering combined with deep semantic mapping.
303
00:14:34.960 --> 00:14:37.360
Okay, walk us through that. How does the machine connect
304
00:14:37.360 --> 00:14:41.159
an interview with a YouTube science guy to a multi
305
00:14:41.200 --> 00:14:43.960
hour breakdown of the Book of Hebrews and a Ricky
306
00:14:43.960 --> 00:14:45.759
Gervais interview about atheism.
307
00:14:46.080 --> 00:14:50.639
So collaborative filtering is basically the algorithm observing mass behavior.
308
00:14:51.519 --> 00:14:54.679
It says user A watched the V. Sauce interview and
309
00:14:54.720 --> 00:14:57.879
then watched a video on the paradoxes of infinity. User
310
00:14:57.919 --> 00:15:00.360
B watched the Vsace interview and then and watched a
311
00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:04.879
debate on atheism. Therefore, there is a statistical probability that
312
00:15:04.919 --> 00:15:07.399
the next person who watches visas will be interested in
313
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:11.200
both infinity and atheism. It makes sense, but modern algorithms
314
00:15:11.200 --> 00:15:15.399
go further using semantic mapping. They analyze the actual content,
315
00:15:15.759 --> 00:15:19.120
the auto generated captions, and the metadata of the videos
316
00:15:19.480 --> 00:15:21.639
to map a psychological vector for the viewer.
317
00:15:21.720 --> 00:15:24.320
A psychological vector, so it's charting a trajectory of what
318
00:15:24.360 --> 00:15:26.080
you're feeling, not just what you're clicking.
319
00:15:26.120 --> 00:15:29.559
Precisely, if we connect this to the bigger picture, the
320
00:15:29.639 --> 00:15:33.000
algorithm deduces that a viewer interested in Michael Stevens and
321
00:15:33.080 --> 00:15:35.240
Joe Rogan isn't just looking for a laugh.
322
00:15:35.399 --> 00:15:37.120
They are looking to have their mind expanded.
323
00:15:37.279 --> 00:15:41.759
Yes, they are seeking profound, structural answers about reality. The
324
00:15:41.799 --> 00:15:46.399
system recognizes this thirst for meaning as a primary psychological driver,
325
00:15:47.080 --> 00:15:50.720
and it offers to quench that thirst in completely divergent directions.
326
00:15:51.080 --> 00:15:55.240
So it offers theoretical physics through infinity, it offers altered
327
00:15:55.279 --> 00:16:00.000
states of consciousness through DMT, and it offers deep structure,
328
00:16:00.080 --> 00:16:03.679
true meaning through theological and atheistic debates.
329
00:16:03.919 --> 00:16:04.480
Exactly.
330
00:16:04.679 --> 00:16:06.559
You know, I used to think of the algorithm like
331
00:16:06.600 --> 00:16:09.639
a digital bartender. You walk in, ask for a fact
332
00:16:09.679 --> 00:16:12.399
about gravity, and the bartender says, all right, here's a
333
00:16:12.480 --> 00:16:15.840
drink about the paradoxes of infinity and a chaser about
334
00:16:15.879 --> 00:16:17.799
the meaning of life from Ricky Gervase.
335
00:16:17.960 --> 00:16:19.279
That's a fun way to look at it.
336
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:21.840
But based on what you're saying, that analogy is too simple.
337
00:16:21.879 --> 00:16:24.279
It's more like a hyper observant librarian.
338
00:16:24.440 --> 00:16:25.000
We like that.
339
00:16:25.240 --> 00:16:26.919
You walk up to the desk with a basic book
340
00:16:26.960 --> 00:16:30.600
on gravity. The librarian notices you lingering on a page
341
00:16:30.639 --> 00:16:33.840
about the vastness of the cosmos, so they silently slide
342
00:16:33.840 --> 00:16:36.159
a book on the philosophy of space across the desk.
343
00:16:36.480 --> 00:16:39.320
Right then they notice you furrowing your brow about the
344
00:16:39.320 --> 00:16:41.639
origins of it all, so they slide over a heavy
345
00:16:41.679 --> 00:16:45.159
theological text on the creator of the universe. It is
346
00:16:45.240 --> 00:16:48.159
anticipating questions you haven't even articulated to yourself.
347
00:16:48.240 --> 00:16:51.559
Yet that is a much more accurate analogy. It is
348
00:16:51.600 --> 00:16:55.200
an existential tasting menu designed by a machine that is
349
00:16:55.279 --> 00:17:00.000
relentlessly optimizing for one metric session duration. It just wants
350
00:16:59.960 --> 00:17:03.279
to keep you there always. And because of that, the
351
00:17:03.399 --> 00:17:07.279
algorithm is entirely agnostic to the truth claims of the videos.
352
00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:09.079
It suggests, Oh, that's crucial.
353
00:17:09.319 --> 00:17:11.880
It doesn't care if Ricky Gervais is correct about atheism,
354
00:17:11.880 --> 00:17:13.799
and it doesn't care if Mike Winger is correct about
355
00:17:13.880 --> 00:17:16.960
Christian theology. It only cares about the depth of the
356
00:17:17.079 --> 00:17:19.160
user's engagement with those worldviews.
357
00:17:19.240 --> 00:17:22.160
That is a vital point to underline, especially for our listeners.
358
00:17:22.440 --> 00:17:25.640
We are looking at a system that surfaces secular humanism
359
00:17:25.799 --> 00:17:28.839
right next to ancient biblical text analysis, right and we're
360
00:17:28.839 --> 00:17:32.559
simply observing this. We're not endorsing Ricky Gervas's atheism or
361
00:17:32.599 --> 00:17:35.119
Mike Winger's theology. We are just looking at how the
362
00:17:35.160 --> 00:17:38.839
machine treats them. It creates a completely flat playing field
363
00:17:39.200 --> 00:17:43.759
where worldview explorations are treated simply as engagement data points.
364
00:17:43.839 --> 00:17:47.400
It is a topographical map of the modern Internet user's
365
00:17:47.480 --> 00:17:50.559
desperate search for meaning, whether that meaning is found in
366
00:17:50.599 --> 00:17:54.559
the cosmos in a psychedelic trip or in a religious text, and.
367
00:17:54.480 --> 00:17:57.920
This brings us to a darker realization. I think the
368
00:17:58.000 --> 00:18:01.640
human drive to uncover hidden t truths, the need to
369
00:18:01.720 --> 00:18:06.119
understand our place in the universe, is powerful, but it
370
00:18:06.200 --> 00:18:07.880
is also highly malleable.
371
00:18:08.000 --> 00:18:08.920
It is very malleable.
372
00:18:08.960 --> 00:18:12.279
Here's where it gets really interesting because the algorithm doesn't
373
00:18:12.319 --> 00:18:17.279
just feed pure, pristine, philosophical curiosity. The thirst for meaning
374
00:18:17.359 --> 00:18:18.599
isn't always positive.
375
00:18:18.880 --> 00:18:20.720
No, sometimes it mutates, and the.
376
00:18:20.599 --> 00:18:23.960
Source material captures this mutation perfectly. As we scroll down
377
00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:27.799
the sidebar, we start hitting the much darker, anxiety driven
378
00:18:27.920 --> 00:18:28.960
edges of the matrix.
379
00:18:29.039 --> 00:18:32.039
Yes, we move away from the innocent joy of learning
380
00:18:32.079 --> 00:18:36.000
mind blowing facts and we enter a space characterized by paranoia,
381
00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:39.640
existential dread, and real world geopolitical tension.
382
00:18:39.839 --> 00:18:42.759
We see heavy fringe content existing in the exact same
383
00:18:42.799 --> 00:18:46.119
ecosystem as a lighthearted video about the science of feeling awkward.
384
00:18:46.279 --> 00:18:48.319
Give some examples of the darker stuff from the source.
385
00:18:48.400 --> 00:18:51.559
Okay, the source lists of video titled Baltimore Drug Kingpin
386
00:18:51.720 --> 00:18:54.240
exposes fentonyl epidemic truth about the.
387
00:18:54.200 --> 00:18:56.400
Wire right, so true crime is a cietal to kay.
388
00:18:56.599 --> 00:18:59.720
Then we have a JR clip titled the Official Narrative
389
00:18:59.759 --> 00:19:03.119
of eight Murders doesn't add up w Tom O'Neill sitting
390
00:19:03.160 --> 00:19:04.720
at six point three million.
391
00:19:04.519 --> 00:19:06.960
Views conspiracy and alternative narratives.
392
00:19:06.960 --> 00:19:09.960
And we have a video titled Professor Jang world War
393
00:19:10.039 --> 00:19:13.119
III is about to begin, let me explain, which has
394
00:19:13.119 --> 00:19:15.400
a staggering fourteen million.
395
00:19:15.200 --> 00:19:16.839
Views Global anxiety.
396
00:19:16.920 --> 00:19:19.359
We also see a stream from the Foundation for Defensive
397
00:19:19.400 --> 00:19:22.920
Democracies asking what's the deal with the Iran Deal? And
398
00:19:22.960 --> 00:19:26.359
we have Joe Rogan and Ben Shapiro discuss marijuana use
399
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:28.240
with fourteen million views.
400
00:19:28.400 --> 00:19:30.319
Now, before we dive into this, we have to make
401
00:19:30.359 --> 00:19:34.279
something crystal clear to our listeners. Yes, absolutely, when discussing
402
00:19:34.319 --> 00:19:37.200
topics like the Iran Deal, or figures like Ben Shapiro,
403
00:19:37.279 --> 00:19:42.200
or predictions about World War three, we are maintaining strict neutrality, right.
404
00:19:42.279 --> 00:19:44.920
We are simply observing the algorithm's behavior here. We are
405
00:19:44.960 --> 00:19:47.960
not endorsing any of these geopolitical takes or political figures
406
00:19:48.039 --> 00:19:48.640
left or right.
407
00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:51.480
The fascination for us is purely in how the machine
408
00:19:51.519 --> 00:19:56.240
links educational science content to political and global anxiety exactly.
409
00:19:56.880 --> 00:20:00.400
So with that said, this jeffstaposition raises a c critical
410
00:20:00.480 --> 00:20:04.880
question about human psychology and algorithmic design. How does a
411
00:20:05.000 --> 00:20:10.440
user's intent morph from curiosity into conspiracy or existential dread
412
00:20:11.079 --> 00:20:12.559
within just a few clicks.
413
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:13.599
It's a jump, for sure.
414
00:20:13.680 --> 00:20:15.839
Why does the algorithm think that someone who wants to
415
00:20:15.920 --> 00:20:18.680
learn about physics also wants to hear a prediction about
416
00:20:19.000 --> 00:20:20.599
global thermonuclear war?
417
00:20:20.960 --> 00:20:23.559
Well, it's the slippery slope of the phrase, what aren't
418
00:20:23.559 --> 00:20:26.319
they telling you? Oh, let's break down the mechanics of
419
00:20:26.319 --> 00:20:29.839
a V Sauce video again. The foundational premise is often,
420
00:20:30.200 --> 00:20:32.640
the world is more complex than you think. There's a
421
00:20:32.680 --> 00:20:35.400
hidden layer of science beneath this everyday object.
422
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:36.160
Which is true.
423
00:20:36.240 --> 00:20:39.279
It is true. That is a very healthy, scientifically rigorous
424
00:20:39.319 --> 00:20:43.000
form of curiosity. But the algorithm doesn't distinguish between healthy
425
00:20:43.039 --> 00:20:47.400
scientific inquiry and paranoid speculation. It only tracks the neurological
426
00:20:47.400 --> 00:20:48.839
reward loop, ah.
427
00:20:48.640 --> 00:20:50.680
The dopamine and the cortisol exactly.
428
00:20:51.079 --> 00:20:54.799
The emotional thrill of uncovering a hidden scientific truth feels
429
00:20:55.000 --> 00:20:58.680
very similar neurologically to the thrill of uncovering a hidden
430
00:20:58.720 --> 00:21:00.000
societal or political narras.
431
00:21:00.359 --> 00:21:03.680
So, the algorithm learns that the audience for deep intellectual
432
00:21:03.720 --> 00:21:09.799
exploration overlaps significantly with the audience seeking to deconstruct official narratives.
433
00:21:09.880 --> 00:21:12.799
Right, if you want to deconstruct the fabric of reality
434
00:21:12.839 --> 00:21:15.880
with physics, the machine assumes you might also want to
435
00:21:15.920 --> 00:21:20.880
deconstruct the fabric of society through geopolitical analysis or true crime.
436
00:21:21.079 --> 00:21:23.079
Hold on, let me jump in here, because the source
437
00:21:23.200 --> 00:21:26.640
lists a few specific topics that might sound like pure
438
00:21:26.720 --> 00:21:30.079
jargon to someone not fully immersed in internet rabbit holesake
439
00:21:30.119 --> 00:21:33.720
what For instance, the source mentions a video titled something
440
00:21:33.759 --> 00:21:37.599
Happened at CERNE. Scientists still can't explain it? What exactly
441
00:21:37.680 --> 00:21:39.920
is CERN and why does it keep popping up in
442
00:21:39.960 --> 00:21:43.440
these algorithmic sidebars next to true crime and World War
443
00:21:43.480 --> 00:21:44.240
III predictions?
444
00:21:44.799 --> 00:21:48.279
That's a great example. So CERN is the European Organization
445
00:21:48.359 --> 00:21:51.799
for Nuclear Research. They operate the Large Hadron Collider.
446
00:21:51.440 --> 00:21:53.680
Which is that massive underground loop right.
447
00:21:53.599 --> 00:21:56.839
Yes, it's a massive particle accelerator buried under the border
448
00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:01.039
of France and Switzerland. They smash subata particles together at
449
00:22:01.119 --> 00:22:04.480
nearly the speed of light to understand the fundamental building
450
00:22:04.480 --> 00:22:05.599
blocks of the universe.
451
00:22:05.839 --> 00:22:10.279
Okay, so it's incredibly dense high level physics, very high level.
452
00:22:10.359 --> 00:22:12.839
Then why is it frame like a thriller movie in
453
00:22:12.880 --> 00:22:13.920
the sidebar.
454
00:22:13.759 --> 00:22:17.559
Because high level physics is fundamentally incomprehensible to the average person.
455
00:22:18.279 --> 00:22:21.559
When scientists talk about god particles or dark matter or
456
00:22:21.599 --> 00:22:25.559
opening microscopic dimensional anomalies, it sounds like science fiction. Oh
457
00:22:25.640 --> 00:22:28.359
I see, and where there is a gap in public understanding,
458
00:22:28.720 --> 00:22:33.640
conspiracy theories flourish. The algorithm loves cern because it sits
459
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:37.759
perfectly at the intersection of legitimate mind blowing science and
460
00:22:37.799 --> 00:22:39.160
apocalyptic paranoia.
461
00:22:39.200 --> 00:22:42.519
It's the ultimate what aren't they telling you? Topic exactly
462
00:22:42.640 --> 00:22:45.440
that makes total sense. It bridges the gap between Michael
463
00:22:45.440 --> 00:22:48.880
Stevens teaching you about gravity and Professor Jang telling you
464
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:51.240
the world is about to end. It uses the language
465
00:22:51.240 --> 00:22:53.359
of science to trigger the emotion of fear.
466
00:22:53.519 --> 00:22:55.359
Yes, and fear is highly.
467
00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:59.559
Engaging because fear, anxiety, and anger are yeah exactly. If
468
00:22:59.559 --> 00:23:02.240
a video about the paradoxes of infinity makes you feel
469
00:23:02.279 --> 00:23:05.559
small and contemplative, a video predicting World War III makes
470
00:23:05.559 --> 00:23:08.799
you feel urgent and terrified. Both states keep your eyes
471
00:23:08.839 --> 00:23:11.599
glued to the screen, but one is a lot stickier.
472
00:23:11.960 --> 00:23:14.839
It is the shift from a dopamine driven reward loop
473
00:23:14.880 --> 00:23:18.359
of learning to a cortisol driven loop of threat detection.
474
00:23:19.599 --> 00:23:23.759
The algorithm learns that terrifying users with geopolitical instability or
475
00:23:23.839 --> 00:23:27.640
hidden murder narratives is incredibly effective for retention.
476
00:23:27.920 --> 00:23:30.319
And it does all of this without you ever actively
477
00:23:30.440 --> 00:23:32.960
changing your search parameters. You don't have to type in
478
00:23:33.480 --> 00:23:35.359
tell me why society is collapsing?
479
00:23:35.480 --> 00:23:36.039
No, you don't.
480
00:23:36.200 --> 00:23:39.319
The librarian just slides the book of Impending Doom across
481
00:23:39.319 --> 00:23:41.599
the desk because they noticed your pupils dilate.
482
00:23:41.759 --> 00:23:44.440
That's exactly it, which brings us to the final and
483
00:23:44.519 --> 00:23:47.519
perhaps most disorienting piece of this puzzle.
484
00:23:47.640 --> 00:23:48.960
Oh the time stamps.
485
00:23:49.079 --> 00:23:51.799
Yes, we've talked about the shift in tone and topic,
486
00:23:51.880 --> 00:23:54.599
but looking closely at the timestamps on this single web
487
00:23:54.599 --> 00:23:58.160
page reveal something deeply unsettling about the very nature of
488
00:23:58.240 --> 00:23:59.079
digital consumption.
489
00:23:59.240 --> 00:24:01.960
The timestamps and the source are wild. Let's look at
490
00:24:01.960 --> 00:24:05.319
the juxtaposition of ages in this single sidebar. We have
491
00:24:05.400 --> 00:24:08.359
the anchor video, the original JRE interview with v Sauce,
492
00:24:08.359 --> 00:24:11.119
which is eleven years old. Right, we have the Awkwardness video,
493
00:24:11.279 --> 00:24:14.240
also eleven years old. But mixed right in with these
494
00:24:14.319 --> 00:24:18.359
decade old artifacts are live streams and incredibly recent drops.
495
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:19.319
What's the mix like?
496
00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:22.039
Well, we have a video titled AI is creating a
497
00:24:22.119 --> 00:24:25.440
rare opportunity for investors, which was streamed just one month ago.
498
00:24:26.119 --> 00:24:29.160
We have a clip titled Judge laugh jess at Sovereign
499
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:32.920
Citizen after bizarre courtroom claim, which was uploaded three weeks ago.
500
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:35.400
And we have that certain video we just talked about,
501
00:24:35.519 --> 00:24:37.160
uploaded a mirror four hours ago.
502
00:24:37.599 --> 00:24:40.480
This is the phenomenon of the flattening of time in
503
00:24:40.519 --> 00:24:46.519
traditional media environments. Newspapers, television, broadcasts, even terrestrial radio. Time
504
00:24:46.640 --> 00:24:48.240
is strictly linear, right.
505
00:24:48.079 --> 00:24:50.279
It's contextualized by the medium itself.
506
00:24:50.359 --> 00:24:54.039
Exactly you read today's newspaper today. If you watch a
507
00:24:54.160 --> 00:24:58.119
historical documentary on television, the network tells you is a retrospective,
508
00:24:58.880 --> 00:25:02.079
But on the digital interface represented by our source, time
509
00:25:02.200 --> 00:25:03.359
is completely flattened.
510
00:25:03.440 --> 00:25:04.599
It's just an endless feed.
511
00:25:04.839 --> 00:25:08.480
Yes, and epistemological conversation from twenty fourteen is served up
512
00:25:08.519 --> 00:25:11.839
with the exact same visual weight, the exact same thumbnail size,
513
00:25:11.920 --> 00:25:15.440
and the exact same algorithmic priority as a breaking newstream
514
00:25:15.480 --> 00:25:18.079
about AI investing from a month ago, in a fringe
515
00:25:18.119 --> 00:25:19.920
science video from four hours ago.
516
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:23.440
So what does this all mean for the human brain
517
00:25:23.480 --> 00:25:26.480
processing this? If I'm sitting down at my computer and
518
00:25:26.519 --> 00:25:29.880
I'm absorbing in eleven year old fact about ayahuasca, right
519
00:25:29.920 --> 00:25:31.839
next to a three week old video of a sovereign
520
00:25:31.880 --> 00:25:35.480
citizen in a courtroom. Does the concept of current events
521
00:25:35.559 --> 00:25:36.880
even exist anymore?
522
00:25:36.960 --> 00:25:38.200
It's blurring, isn't it.
523
00:25:38.200 --> 00:25:40.960
It feels like we are living in a perpetual now.
524
00:25:41.079 --> 00:25:44.400
The perpetual now is a perfect term for it. When
525
00:25:44.480 --> 00:25:48.759
time is flattened. Context is the first casualty. It forces
526
00:25:48.799 --> 00:25:50.640
an immense cognitive load onto the.
527
00:25:50.640 --> 00:25:52.319
User because you have to sort it yourself.
528
00:25:52.400 --> 00:25:54.720
You can no longer rely on the medium to tell
529
00:25:54.759 --> 00:25:56.920
you where you are in history. You have to bring
530
00:25:56.960 --> 00:26:00.200
your own internal clock and your own critical context to
531
00:26:00.279 --> 00:26:01.880
every single square edge of the interface.
532
00:26:01.960 --> 00:26:04.720
Quick tangent, because you mentioned the cognitive load. That video
533
00:26:04.759 --> 00:26:08.079
titled judge laughis at sovereign citizen. I've seen these pop
534
00:26:08.119 --> 00:26:08.559
up everywhere.
535
00:26:08.640 --> 00:26:10.160
Oh they're viral gold.
536
00:26:10.039 --> 00:26:13.640
For the uninitiated. What is a sovereign citizen? And why
537
00:26:13.680 --> 00:26:17.240
does the algorithm love serving these courtroom videos? Right next
538
00:26:17.240 --> 00:26:19.720
to complex science and global politics right?
539
00:26:19.759 --> 00:26:22.880
So Sovereign citizens are individuals who subscribe to a pseudo
540
00:26:22.960 --> 00:26:27.480
legal belief system. They fundamentally believe that by using specific
541
00:26:27.559 --> 00:26:32.480
linguistic loopholes, or by citing obscure, often misinterpreted historical documents,
542
00:26:32.960 --> 00:26:36.559
they are immune from normal government laws, taxes, or court systems.
543
00:26:36.640 --> 00:26:38.160
That sounds exhausting, it is.
544
00:26:38.599 --> 00:26:41.279
They frequently end up in court over minor infractions like
545
00:26:41.319 --> 00:26:44.359
traffic tickets, and they attempt to argue with the judge
546
00:26:44.759 --> 00:26:47.240
using this bizarre, convoluted legal.
547
00:26:47.079 --> 00:26:50.000
Jargon, and the judges usually don't have time for it exactly.
548
00:26:50.039 --> 00:26:54.000
The videos usually feature a complete breakdown of communication, ending
549
00:26:54.119 --> 00:26:56.160
in the sovereign citizen being held in contempt.
550
00:26:56.359 --> 00:26:59.000
But why is the algorithm pushing them next to physics?
551
00:26:59.720 --> 00:27:02.960
The algorithm loves these videos because they offer an incredible
552
00:27:03.039 --> 00:27:07.920
voyeuristic thrill. They provide a clear narrative of order versus chaos.
553
00:27:08.559 --> 00:27:11.440
It's a very different kind of engagement than a physics video. Right.
554
00:27:11.680 --> 00:27:14.680
A VSACE video makes you feel smarter. A sovereign citizen
555
00:27:14.720 --> 00:27:18.000
courtroom video makes you feel sane. By comparison, Oh wow,
556
00:27:18.160 --> 00:27:20.359
it's junk food for the ego, served right next to
557
00:27:20.359 --> 00:27:21.400
the high art philosophy.
558
00:27:21.599 --> 00:27:26.319
It really is an infinite, swirling vortex of content. I
559
00:27:26.400 --> 00:27:29.720
want you listening right now to think about your own feeds,
560
00:27:30.240 --> 00:27:32.519
open up your app of choice later today, and just
561
00:27:32.559 --> 00:27:33.599
look at the timestamps.
562
00:27:33.640 --> 00:27:34.960
It's an eye opening exercise.
563
00:27:35.039 --> 00:27:37.720
How often are you learning a profound life lesson from
564
00:27:37.720 --> 00:27:41.200
a lecture recorded a decade ago, only to immediately auto
565
00:27:41.240 --> 00:27:45.599
play into a live breaking news broadcast about a local emergency.
566
00:27:45.160 --> 00:27:47.720
Right, and then into a meme exactly.
567
00:27:47.240 --> 00:27:49.240
And then AutoPlay into a meme that was created ten
568
00:27:49.279 --> 00:27:53.799
minutes ago. How does this complete lack of chronological context
569
00:27:53.920 --> 00:27:55.319
change how you view the world?
570
00:27:55.680 --> 00:27:57.680
Does it make you feel more connected to the span
571
00:27:57.759 --> 00:27:59.039
of human knowledge or.
572
00:27:58.920 --> 00:28:00.400
Does it just make you feel like you're floating in
573
00:28:00.440 --> 00:28:02.799
a void where everything is happening all at once.
574
00:28:03.039 --> 00:28:06.799
It demands an entirely new kind of digital literacy. We
575
00:28:06.839 --> 00:28:09.720
are no longer just consumers of information. We are forced
576
00:28:09.759 --> 00:28:11.640
to be real time historians of our own.
577
00:28:11.599 --> 00:28:15.839
Feeds, constantly sorting, dating, and contextualizing the data being thrown
578
00:28:15.880 --> 00:28:18.599
at us. Well, this has been an incredible journey. What
579
00:28:18.759 --> 00:28:21.480
started as a simple look at a single web page
580
00:28:21.519 --> 00:28:25.160
from July twenty fourteen, a meeting between a stand up
581
00:28:25.160 --> 00:28:29.240
comedian and a YouTube educator has really unspooled into a
582
00:28:29.279 --> 00:28:31.799
profound map of modern internet mechanics.
583
00:28:31.880 --> 00:28:33.200
We covered a lot of ground today.
584
00:28:33.319 --> 00:28:36.960
We started with the innocent exciting sharing of mind blowing
585
00:28:37.000 --> 00:28:40.599
facts and curating the best of the Internet. We watched
586
00:28:40.640 --> 00:28:44.960
that curiosity expand outward through the algorithm into deep, multi
587
00:28:45.039 --> 00:28:48.079
hour explorations of existential philosophy and theology.
588
00:28:48.200 --> 00:28:51.240
And we tracked how the underlying architecture of that algorithm,
589
00:28:51.279 --> 00:28:54.920
the semantic mapping, and the optimization for session duration, can
590
00:28:54.960 --> 00:28:58.720
seamlessly guide that exact same drive for discovery into the darker,
591
00:28:58.880 --> 00:29:01.359
cortisol driven edge is the digital rabbit hole.
592
00:29:01.480 --> 00:29:04.119
Right, we move from the biology of awkwardness to the
593
00:29:04.119 --> 00:29:07.200
paranoia of true crime and predictions of global conflict.
594
00:29:07.440 --> 00:29:10.640
We've seen how the machine builds a psychological vector based
595
00:29:10.640 --> 00:29:11.960
on our thirst for meaning, and.
596
00:29:11.920 --> 00:29:14.160
How it serves it all back to us in a flattened,
597
00:29:14.200 --> 00:29:17.359
timeless loop where twenty fourteen and four hours ago exists
598
00:29:17.359 --> 00:29:18.640
in the exact same breath.
599
00:29:18.720 --> 00:29:20.160
It truly is a living artifact.
600
00:29:20.400 --> 00:29:24.720
And looking at your backdrop right now, the sprawling chalkboard
601
00:29:24.759 --> 00:29:28.519
is fading, the complex equations and the YouTube interfaces are
602
00:29:28.519 --> 00:29:29.759
dissolving into the black.
603
00:29:30.000 --> 00:29:32.039
The digital matrix is powering down.
604
00:29:32.480 --> 00:29:36.240
Yes, it's leaving just a single blinking cursor on a
605
00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:39.839
black screen, a prompt waiting for the next input. Waiting
606
00:29:39.839 --> 00:29:41.079
for the next search, which.
607
00:29:40.880 --> 00:29:44.640
Feels entirely appropriate. Because we wrap up this deep dive
608
00:29:44.680 --> 00:29:47.640
into the metadata of our past, we want to leave
609
00:29:47.640 --> 00:29:49.640
you with a final provocative thought.
610
00:29:49.920 --> 00:29:53.599
We've spent this time analyzing the algorithmic ecosystem surrounding someone
611
00:29:53.599 --> 00:29:56.079
else's conversation, But what about yours?
612
00:29:56.599 --> 00:30:00.160
Right if a machine learning algorithm took a snapshot of
613
00:30:00.200 --> 00:30:04.039
the exact mix of videos, articles, and audio surrounding your
614
00:30:04.079 --> 00:30:07.720
digital footprint today, from your innocent, trivial pursuits to your
615
00:30:07.720 --> 00:30:11.720
most terrifying late night anxieties, what story would that matrix
616
00:30:11.759 --> 00:30:13.240
tell researcher ten years from now?
617
00:30:13.720 --> 00:30:16.000
What would it say about what you were desperately searching
618
00:30:16.039 --> 00:30:18.599
for exactly something to moul over the next time the
619
00:30:18.640 --> 00:30:22.559
AutoPlay timer starts ticking down, keep questioning the interface, keep
620
00:30:22.599 --> 00:30:24.960
curating your own curiosity, and we'll see you next time.