Jordan Gilbert — CS:GO Esports, Pro Gaming & Digital Archaeology Reaction & Analysis

WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.260 --> 00:00:03.240
So imagine you are digging in your backyard, right? And
2
00:00:03.279 --> 00:00:05.900
you find this buried time capsule from the year 2015.
3
00:00:05.900 --> 00:00:07.809
Okay, I am picturing it.
4
00:00:08.179 --> 00:00:09.419
A literal time capsule.
5
00:00:09.439 --> 00:00:10.179
Yeah, exactly.
6
00:00:10.359 --> 00:00:13.320
And you crack it open and you are expecting to find,
7
00:00:13.369 --> 00:00:16.449
you know, innocent memories of a slightly simpler internet.
8
00:00:16.829 --> 00:00:18.750
Right, like maybe some early meme culture.
9
00:00:18.949 --> 00:00:21.250
Totally. Or just a guy playing video games in his room.
10
00:00:21.289 --> 00:00:24.269
Just an artifact of an era before everything felt so
11
00:00:26.410 --> 00:00:27.109
incredibly heavy.
12
00:00:27.289 --> 00:00:28.640
Yeah, the pre-Doomscrolling era.
13
00:00:28.649 --> 00:00:33.390
Exactly. Exactly. But when you look inside the specific time capsule,
14
00:00:33.649 --> 00:00:37.789
the walls are plastered with these modern screaming warnings.
15
00:00:38.109 --> 00:00:38.890
Warnings about what?
16
00:00:39.390 --> 00:00:43.350
Oh, like the war in Ukraine, rogue artificial intelligence, impending
17
00:00:43.409 --> 00:00:46.340
nuclear annihilation, massive global threats.
18
00:00:46.670 --> 00:00:49.780
That sounds like a pitch for a dystopian sci-fi movie, honestly. Right.
19
00:00:50.380 --> 00:00:53.280
But it's not. That is exactly what happens when you
20
00:00:53.299 --> 00:00:56.500
pull up a very specific legacy YouTube video today and
21
00:00:56.539 --> 00:00:58.840
just look at the sidebar. And that is the mission
22
00:00:58.920 --> 00:00:59.859
for our deep dive today.
23
00:01:00.240 --> 00:01:02.789
I mean, it is a phenomenal juxtaposition to look at.
24
00:01:02.799 --> 00:01:03.340
It really is.
25
00:01:03.520 --> 00:01:06.689
Because the core video, right, it operates as an anchor
26
00:01:06.709 --> 00:01:11.049
to the past. But the recommendation algorithm, that sidebar running
27
00:01:11.090 --> 00:01:13.609
down the right-hand side of your screen, it is violently
28
00:01:13.689 --> 00:01:15.989
pulling you into the anxieties of the present.
29
00:01:16.510 --> 00:01:18.590
Violently is the perfect word for it, yeah.
30
00:01:19.030 --> 00:01:21.870
Because we aren't doing traditional archaeology here today. We aren't
31
00:01:22.230 --> 00:01:25.069
brushing dirt off a physical coin or whatever. We are
32
00:01:25.090 --> 00:01:26.010
looking at a screenshot.
33
00:01:26.250 --> 00:01:28.049
A single digital snapshot.
34
00:01:28.329 --> 00:01:32.049
Exactly. A single snapshot. Frozen moment in time that captures
35
00:01:32.109 --> 00:01:36.370
the diagnostic sort of muddy waters of the modern human
36
00:01:36.409 --> 00:01:37.030
attention span.
37
00:01:37.269 --> 00:01:40.250
OK, let's unpack this because the artifact we are looking
38
00:01:40.299 --> 00:01:41.719
at is super specific.
39
00:01:42.180 --> 00:01:43.519
Right. Let's get into the details of it.
40
00:01:43.859 --> 00:01:46.599
So our central focal point, the video actually playing on
41
00:01:46.620 --> 00:01:50.980
the screen in the snapshot, is episode number 651 of
42
00:01:51.060 --> 00:01:52.319
the Joe Rogan experience.
43
00:01:52.739 --> 00:01:53.219
A classic.
44
00:01:53.540 --> 00:01:55.989
Yeah. And the guest is Jordan Gilbert, who is way
45
00:01:56.010 --> 00:01:58.549
better known by his Internet handle, C9 Nothing.
46
00:01:59.640 --> 00:02:00.629
Right, the Counter-Strike guy.
47
00:02:00.939 --> 00:02:05.340
Exactly. And this video was published way back on May 21st, 2015.
48
00:02:05.340 --> 00:02:10.900
It has over 1.2 million views, 25k likes, and obviously
49
00:02:10.939 --> 00:02:14.020
the channel itself is just this absolute behemoth today with
50
00:02:14.060 --> 00:02:15.979
over 21 million subscribers.
51
00:02:16.400 --> 00:02:18.000
It is massive. It is.
52
00:02:18.659 --> 00:02:21.629
So we have this hour and a half long conversation
53
00:02:21.669 --> 00:02:26.090
between a huge podcaster and a professional competitive gamer, but
54
00:02:26.780 --> 00:02:28.900
I mean, I have to stop right here and challenge
55
00:02:28.960 --> 00:02:29.939
the premise a bit.
56
00:02:30.340 --> 00:02:30.639
Go for it.
57
00:02:31.099 --> 00:02:33.759
Because looking at this now, in today's world, it feels
58
00:02:33.819 --> 00:02:34.780
completely mundane.
59
00:02:35.159 --> 00:02:37.430
You mean the fact that a gamer's on a podcast? Yeah.
60
00:02:38.060 --> 00:02:40.629
Podcasters interview gamers every single day of the week now.
61
00:02:40.710 --> 00:02:44.710
It's totally standard. So why are we treating a 2015
62
00:02:44.710 --> 00:02:47.449
video game interview like it is the Rosetta Stone?
63
00:02:47.889 --> 00:02:51.729
Well, because context is literally everything, right? And algorithms have
64
00:02:51.789 --> 00:02:55.520
very long memories. True. In 2015, the cultural hierarchy was
65
00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:59.120
entirely different than it is now. Traditional media still largely
66
00:02:59.199 --> 00:03:02.300
viewed competitive gamers as, you know, basement-dwelling novelties.
67
00:03:02.840 --> 00:03:05.460
Oh, absolutely. They were a punchline on late-night TV.
68
00:03:05.819 --> 00:03:09.930
Exactly. They were the punchline. So to have a platform
69
00:03:09.990 --> 00:03:14.050
of that magnitude invite a professional Counter-Strike player on for
70
00:03:14.069 --> 00:03:18.129
a serious long-form discussion, I mean, it signaled a massive
71
00:03:18.370 --> 00:03:19.389
cultural tipping point.
72
00:03:19.770 --> 00:03:21.050
A tipping point for esports.
73
00:03:21.110 --> 00:03:21.189
Yes.
74
00:03:21.610 --> 00:03:21.789
Yes.
75
00:03:22.370 --> 00:03:25.389
It was the moment the digital athlete was suddenly legitimized
76
00:03:25.629 --> 00:03:28.840
alongside traditional comedians and scientists and authors.
77
00:03:29.159 --> 00:03:31.939
See, that actually reminds me of the early pioneers of
78
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:34.180
extreme sports in the late 80s and early 90s.
79
00:03:34.520 --> 00:03:35.680
Oh, like the early skateboarders?
80
00:03:35.919 --> 00:03:40.620
Yeah, exactly. The guys inventing modern skateboarding or snowboarding. The
81
00:03:40.639 --> 00:03:43.199
mainstream public completely misunderstood them at first.
82
00:03:43.520 --> 00:03:45.180
Right, they were just seen as menaces or whatever.
83
00:03:45.680 --> 00:03:50.189
Totally. They were dismissed as, outcasts or delinquents. But in reality,
84
00:03:50.229 --> 00:03:55.090
they possess these undeniable, highly specialized, elite physical skills.
85
00:03:55.449 --> 00:03:57.669
And it took years for the culture to catch up.
86
00:03:57.990 --> 00:04:00.439
It took a full decade for the mainstream to build
87
00:04:00.469 --> 00:04:03.360
the X Games and finally admit like, OK, these are
88
00:04:03.500 --> 00:04:07.419
actual athletes. I feel like professional gamers in 2015 were
89
00:04:07.479 --> 00:04:09.120
those 90s extreme sports guys.
90
00:04:09.400 --> 00:04:10.840
That is a really solid analogy.
91
00:04:11.340 --> 00:04:13.080
But let me push back on your theory of the
92
00:04:13.199 --> 00:04:14.939
cultural tipping point here for a second.
93
00:04:15.020 --> 00:04:15.199
Sure.
94
00:04:15.620 --> 00:04:19.470
Was the broader audience actually ready to embrace this guy
95
00:04:19.550 --> 00:04:22.920
in 2015? Or was Rogan just forcing a niche interest
96
00:04:23.000 --> 00:04:26.319
onto a mainstream audience that honestly didn't really care?
97
00:04:26.759 --> 00:04:29.480
That is the critical tension of this specific artifact. I
98
00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:32.779
think the audience was likely completely fractured at that time.
99
00:04:33.379 --> 00:04:34.279
Like demographically?
100
00:04:34.300 --> 00:04:38.120
Yeah. The younger internet native demographic, they understood exactly who
101
00:04:38.279 --> 00:04:40.540
C9 Nothing was. I mean, he was royalty to them.
102
00:04:40.600 --> 00:04:43.319
He was a superstar in that specific bubble. Right.
103
00:04:43.889 --> 00:04:48.410
But the older demographic was experiencing this forced paradigm shift.
104
00:04:48.730 --> 00:04:53.610
They were being told essentially that mastering the tactical variables
105
00:04:53.649 --> 00:04:57.569
of a digital space like Counter-Strike required the same psychological
106
00:04:57.610 --> 00:05:00.850
endurance and strategic brilliance as physical sports.
107
00:05:01.290 --> 00:05:03.629
Which is a tough pill to swallow if you grew
108
00:05:03.670 --> 00:05:05.980
up only watching baseball or football.
109
00:05:06.180 --> 00:05:09.660
Exactly. And what proves that this moment mattered, what proves
110
00:05:09.699 --> 00:05:11.680
it wasn't just a flash in the pan, is the
111
00:05:11.720 --> 00:05:14.240
fact that the algorithm right now in the present day
112
00:05:14.689 --> 00:05:18.509
is still actively trying to canonize that exact era.
113
00:05:19.490 --> 00:05:22.209
You're talking about the legacy recommendations in the sidebar, right?
114
00:05:22.250 --> 00:05:25.939
Exactly. Just look at what the machine suggests next to
115
00:05:25.959 --> 00:05:31.079
the 2015 video. It isn't just recommending random throwaway gameplay clips.
116
00:05:31.660 --> 00:05:33.680
No, it's getting deep into the lore.
117
00:05:34.160 --> 00:05:37.720
It is recommending highly produced documentaries. There is a video
118
00:05:37.759 --> 00:05:42.860
titled Memories of CS.GO The Early Years, sitting at roughly 3%.
119
00:05:42.860 --> 00:05:44.560
Three quarters of a million views.
120
00:05:44.740 --> 00:05:45.019
Wow.
121
00:05:45.199 --> 00:05:47.910
And right near it is a mini documentary from six
122
00:05:47.930 --> 00:05:51.790
years ago titled Counter-Strike's Most Braindead Mastermind, The Story of Zeus.
123
00:05:51.930 --> 00:05:52.610
Oh, I saw that one.
124
00:05:52.810 --> 00:05:54.689
Yeah, and that has three million views.
125
00:05:55.009 --> 00:05:59.529
That is crazy. Three million people watching a historical documentary
126
00:05:59.689 --> 00:06:01.850
about a guy who clicked a mouse really well a
127
00:06:01.889 --> 00:06:02.480
decade ago.
128
00:06:02.769 --> 00:06:05.259
I know, but it is because the algorithm recognizes that
129
00:06:05.819 --> 00:06:09.480
Internet culture is desperate to establish its own mythology.
130
00:06:09.699 --> 00:06:10.519
It wants heroes.
131
00:06:10.779 --> 00:06:15.310
Yes. It wants to immortalize its early digital heroes. The
132
00:06:15.410 --> 00:06:17.829
algorithm has learned that if you are watching a foundational
133
00:06:17.870 --> 00:06:21.110
piece of esports history from 2015, you aren't just looking
134
00:06:21.149 --> 00:06:23.550
for entertainment. You are looking for lore.
135
00:06:23.870 --> 00:06:24.730
That makes a lot of sense.
136
00:06:25.050 --> 00:06:28.480
It treats these early gamers with the exact same historical
137
00:06:28.560 --> 00:06:32.600
reverence that a traditional sports network applies to, like, the
138
00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:35.100
1927 Yankees or the early days of the NBA.
139
00:06:35.420 --> 00:06:36.560
It's digital myth-making.
140
00:06:36.759 --> 00:06:37.160
Exactly.
141
00:06:37.860 --> 00:06:40.079
But to become one of those myths, to become a
142
00:06:40.199 --> 00:06:43.930
Zeus or a C9 nothing back in 2015, the physical
143
00:06:44.079 --> 00:06:46.709
and mental toll is something I think people still just
144
00:06:46.870 --> 00:06:48.129
do not fully grasp today.
145
00:06:48.329 --> 00:06:49.209
The grind is unreal.
146
00:06:49.529 --> 00:06:52.670
It is. The sheer volume of hours these guys were grinding,
147
00:06:53.129 --> 00:06:55.810
sitting in front of a monitor for 14, 16 hours
148
00:06:55.850 --> 00:07:00.490
a day, obsessively developing those high return on investment digital skills.
149
00:07:00.629 --> 00:07:03.360
I mean, it is a terrifying level of endurance.
150
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:07.670
It absolutely destroys your posture, your eyesight, everything. Totally.
151
00:07:07.689 --> 00:07:10.829
And honestly, just looking at the reality of that intense
152
00:07:10.910 --> 00:07:14.689
digital grind, it makes me feel a kind of phantom burnout.
153
00:07:14.970 --> 00:07:15.449
I can imagine.
154
00:07:16.040 --> 00:07:18.699
It is actually why I have been actively trying to
155
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:22.500
build skills completely disconnected from a screen recently. I don't
156
00:07:22.519 --> 00:07:24.480
know if I mentioned this to you, but I started
157
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:26.579
looking into this microblading course.
158
00:07:27.160 --> 00:07:28.560
Wait, microblading.
159
00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:29.019
I know.
160
00:07:29.180 --> 00:07:31.519
I know it is. That is a fairly sharp pivot
161
00:07:31.560 --> 00:07:32.720
from digital esports.
162
00:07:32.939 --> 00:07:35.720
I know. I know it is. But it is rooted
163
00:07:35.819 --> 00:07:39.800
in that exact same desire to just escape the digital ether.
164
00:07:39.920 --> 00:07:40.879
To do something with your hands.
165
00:07:41.240 --> 00:07:44.730
Yes. I wanted to develop a high ROI skill that
166
00:07:44.810 --> 00:07:48.329
is entirely tangible. It is a physical craft. You put
167
00:07:48.350 --> 00:07:51.149
in the focus. You learn the manual precision. And the
168
00:07:51.170 --> 00:07:53.800
beauty of it is that the investment literally pays for
169
00:07:53.839 --> 00:07:55.399
itself after just a handful of clients.
170
00:07:55.720 --> 00:07:56.759
That is actually really smart.
171
00:07:57.430 --> 00:07:59.769
But more importantly for me, it exists in the real world.
172
00:08:00.110 --> 00:08:02.850
You know, it is not trapped on a server that
173
00:08:02.870 --> 00:08:05.170
can just be shut down one day. You don't have
174
00:08:05.189 --> 00:08:07.910
to stare at blue light for 16 hours to master it.
175
00:08:08.470 --> 00:08:11.069
I think there is a profound psychological shift happening right
176
00:08:11.110 --> 00:08:15.629
now where people are craving exactly that, that tangible offline mastery.
177
00:08:15.829 --> 00:08:18.069
Absolutely. People are tired of screens.
178
00:08:18.310 --> 00:08:21.250
But the irony is, whether you are launching an offline
179
00:08:21.310 --> 00:08:25.670
microblading business, or you're grinding in a hyper-competitive digital gaming environment,
180
00:08:26.269 --> 00:08:29.850
or Honestly, you're just navigating the exhausting reality of modern life.
181
00:08:30.410 --> 00:08:31.949
The bottleneck is always the same.
182
00:08:32.529 --> 00:08:32.990
Which is what?
183
00:08:33.590 --> 00:08:37.870
Physical endurance. Your mental focus is entirely handcuffed to your
184
00:08:37.909 --> 00:08:38.649
physical stamina.
185
00:08:39.269 --> 00:08:42.450
Oh, 100%. The moment my energy drops, my precision is
186
00:08:42.549 --> 00:08:44.230
completely gone. I can't focus on anything.
187
00:08:44.549 --> 00:08:47.100
Which is precisely why you have to actively manage that
188
00:08:47.169 --> 00:08:51.799
baseline biology. It's actually why I have integrated Shalajit Extreme
189
00:08:51.879 --> 00:08:53.059
into my own routine recently.
190
00:08:53.399 --> 00:08:55.299
Oh, really? Shalajit? Yeah.
191
00:08:55.519 --> 00:08:59.580
It's a natural supplement. I genuinely rely on because it
192
00:08:59.639 --> 00:09:01.740
heavily supports that core vitality and energy.
193
00:09:02.340 --> 00:09:02.919
That makes sense.
194
00:09:03.470 --> 00:09:05.870
When you are demanding elite focus from your brain, whether
195
00:09:05.909 --> 00:09:08.529
you are holding a microblading tool or a gaming mouse,
196
00:09:09.149 --> 00:09:11.909
you cannot neglect the physical engine driving that focus.
197
00:09:12.529 --> 00:09:15.590
The physical endurance required to maintain the mental focus. I
198
00:09:15.629 --> 00:09:16.269
love that framing.
199
00:09:16.649 --> 00:09:17.950
It's all connected. It is.
200
00:09:18.629 --> 00:09:22.240
Because when we turn our attention back to this algorithmic sidebar,
201
00:09:22.779 --> 00:09:25.980
The amount of mental endurance required just to process what
202
00:09:26.019 --> 00:09:27.980
is on the screen is staggering.
203
00:09:28.120 --> 00:09:29.590
It really is an assault on the senses.
204
00:09:30.070 --> 00:09:33.210
It is. But grinding in a video game isn't the
205
00:09:33.269 --> 00:09:36.929
only way humans process tactical survival. The algorithm knows that
206
00:09:36.990 --> 00:09:39.590
if you like virtual conflict, your brain is primed for
207
00:09:39.809 --> 00:09:41.470
real-world conflict. Right.
208
00:09:41.649 --> 00:09:42.269
It makes that leap.
209
00:09:42.470 --> 00:09:46.110
Which explains the terrifying pivot this algorithm makes next. Because
210
00:09:46.289 --> 00:09:49.230
here is where it gets really interesting, right? Okay.
211
00:09:49.409 --> 00:09:49.690
Lay it out.
212
00:09:50.159 --> 00:09:55.090
We're moving literally millimeters down the screen, leaving a 2015
213
00:09:55.090 --> 00:09:59.429
video game discussion, and the algorithm slams us directly into
214
00:09:59.570 --> 00:10:02.519
high state modern day geopolitical warfare.
215
00:10:02.779 --> 00:10:03.940
The transition is violent.
216
00:10:04.620 --> 00:10:05.830
There is no other word for it.
217
00:10:06.200 --> 00:10:08.720
It gives you whiplash. And we have to look very
218
00:10:08.779 --> 00:10:12.279
closely at how the algorithm behaves here. It is presenting
219
00:10:12.419 --> 00:10:16.360
real world military conflict, specifically the war in Ukraine, but
220
00:10:16.399 --> 00:10:20.159
it is doing so with zero regard for cohesive reality.
221
00:10:20.320 --> 00:10:21.240
What do you mean by that?
222
00:10:21.600 --> 00:10:24.919
I mean it serves up entirely conflicting narratives side by side,
223
00:10:25.279 --> 00:10:26.220
totally impartially.
224
00:10:26.419 --> 00:10:29.379
Oh, the contrast is wild. Let's look at the actual
225
00:10:29.419 --> 00:10:32.960
data here. So we have a video featuring Douglas MacGregor,
226
00:10:33.200 --> 00:10:36.519
and the headline is screaming, Russia destroys bridges and will
227
00:10:36.539 --> 00:10:39.889
take Kiev. And nearly half a million people locked eyes
228
00:10:40.070 --> 00:10:42.230
on that specific video in just 18 hours.
229
00:10:42.570 --> 00:10:43.230
Huge engagement.
230
00:10:43.429 --> 00:10:46.889
Massive. But then literally right next to it, the algorithm
231
00:10:46.929 --> 00:10:49.190
serves up a video from Denis Davidov.
232
00:10:49.210 --> 00:10:50.149
The Ukrainian pilot, right?
233
00:10:50.269 --> 00:10:54.309
Right. And his title is, Update from Ukraine, Absolute Catastrophe
234
00:10:54.350 --> 00:10:57.669
for Russian Army, They Leave Positions in Panic. And that
235
00:10:57.750 --> 00:10:59.940
one pulled tens of thousands of views in just an hour.
236
00:11:00.179 --> 00:11:02.440
So it's presenting two mutually exclusive realities.
237
00:11:02.559 --> 00:11:06.679
Exactly. We have two entirely opposite conclusions about the exact
238
00:11:06.740 --> 00:11:10.990
same global conflict placed millimeters apart on the screen. So
239
00:11:11.000 --> 00:11:13.549
I have to ask you, is the machine just broken?
240
00:11:13.769 --> 00:11:14.149
Broken, yeah.
241
00:11:14.700 --> 00:11:18.100
Like, is the algorithm hallucinating? Or is it intentionally trying
242
00:11:18.139 --> 00:11:21.559
to induce schizophrenia in the viewer by feeding them both sides?
243
00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:24.840
I would argue it is functioning with flawless cold precision.
244
00:11:25.200 --> 00:11:26.679
Really? Yes. Flawless?
245
00:11:26.879 --> 00:11:31.179
Yes. We tend to anthropomorphize algorithms, right? We assume they
246
00:11:31.200 --> 00:11:33.279
are trying to act as editors or truth tellers.
247
00:11:33.559 --> 00:11:35.960
We expect them to curate a cohesive story for us.
248
00:11:36.220 --> 00:11:38.259
But they aren't doing that at all. Did you not
249
00:11:38.320 --> 00:11:42.110
care about ideological consistency? What the algorithm cares about is
250
00:11:42.269 --> 00:11:43.549
mapping your emotional state.
251
00:11:44.100 --> 00:11:45.080
Okay, break that down for me.
252
00:11:45.820 --> 00:11:49.240
It identifies that a user watching a 2015 tactical shooter
253
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:54.480
interview is interested in concepts like conflict, strategy, and survival.
254
00:11:55.019 --> 00:11:57.960
Because Counter-Strike is essentially a digital war simulation.
255
00:11:58.340 --> 00:12:01.620
Exactly. But the algorithm doesn't link the topic of gaming
256
00:12:01.740 --> 00:12:04.080
to the topic of war directly in a logical way.
257
00:12:05.019 --> 00:12:08.720
It links the adrenaline of a virtual headshot to the
258
00:12:08.820 --> 00:12:10.970
anxiety of real-world catastrophe.
259
00:12:11.590 --> 00:12:16.210
Wait, so you are saying the algorithm tracks my pulse, essentially?
260
00:12:16.769 --> 00:12:21.899
Metaphorically, yes. It uses dwell time, click-through rates, and behavioral
261
00:12:21.940 --> 00:12:25.419
clusters to build a highly accurate psychological profile of you.
262
00:12:25.799 --> 00:12:27.299
That is so creepy.
263
00:12:27.960 --> 00:12:30.700
It serves the narrative of Russian victory and the narrative
264
00:12:30.740 --> 00:12:34.240
of Russian catastrophe side by side, because it is testing
265
00:12:34.340 --> 00:12:38.490
which flavor of high-stakes polarity will successfully hack your specific
266
00:12:38.519 --> 00:12:39.120
nervous system.
267
00:12:39.759 --> 00:12:42.740
So it's literally... An A-B test. Yes.
268
00:12:43.500 --> 00:12:46.360
It treats the future of global stability as just another
269
00:12:46.860 --> 00:12:49.279
A-B test for user engagement. Wow.
270
00:12:49.600 --> 00:12:52.440
And it pushes the boundary even further into the mechanics
271
00:12:52.539 --> 00:12:55.340
of how we kill each other. Like, look at this
272
00:12:55.379 --> 00:12:56.220
other video in the feed.
273
00:12:56.850 --> 00:12:57.549
The Economist one?
274
00:12:57.799 --> 00:13:00.509
Yeah. There is a video here from The Economist featuring
275
00:13:00.590 --> 00:13:03.690
Eric Schmidt, the former CEO of Google. And the title
276
00:13:03.809 --> 00:13:06.889
is Russia and Ukraine are inventing the future of war.
277
00:13:07.570 --> 00:13:08.889
That one had a ton of views, right?
278
00:13:09.419 --> 00:13:13.460
Almost 400,000 views in less than a week. The idea
279
00:13:13.659 --> 00:13:17.779
that a Silicon Valley tech executive is dissecting the evolution
280
00:13:17.820 --> 00:13:20.500
of kinetic warfare right next to a guy talking about
281
00:13:20.539 --> 00:13:23.399
his counter-strike tactics is just surreal to me.
282
00:13:23.950 --> 00:13:26.269
It is surreal, but it makes sense because the line
283
00:13:26.309 --> 00:13:29.710
between the digital and the kinetic has entirely evaporated.
284
00:13:30.049 --> 00:13:30.429
How so?
285
00:13:31.190 --> 00:13:33.570
Think about it. The drones being piloted right now in
286
00:13:33.610 --> 00:13:36.570
Eastern Europe are operated with interfaces that are modeled after
287
00:13:36.610 --> 00:13:40.470
the exact video games that that C9-0 was mastering back
288
00:13:40.509 --> 00:13:41.870
in 2015.
289
00:13:41.870 --> 00:13:45.470
Oh my god, you're right. The controllers literally look like
290
00:13:45.970 --> 00:13:46.830
Xbox controllers.
291
00:13:47.029 --> 00:13:50.950
Exactly. The algorithm sees that underlying overlap. It knows the
292
00:13:51.049 --> 00:13:54.909
user interested in digital strategy will be mesmerized by drone strategy.
293
00:13:55.070 --> 00:13:56.570
That is incredibly dark.
294
00:13:56.929 --> 00:13:59.850
It gets darker. Because it doesn't stop in Eastern Europe.
295
00:14:00.250 --> 00:14:03.330
The sidebar pushes the viewer into other geopolitical powder kegs
296
00:14:03.669 --> 00:14:05.289
just to see what will stick to your brain.
297
00:14:05.529 --> 00:14:07.120
Right, the Middle East stuff. Yeah.
298
00:14:07.509 --> 00:14:11.070
There is a video featuring Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson asking if
299
00:14:11.110 --> 00:14:14.600
an Israeli nuclear strike on Iran was approved, pulling thousands
300
00:14:14.639 --> 00:14:15.259
of views an hour.
301
00:14:15.720 --> 00:14:19.379
Just casual nuclear war suggestions next to a gaming stream.
302
00:14:19.919 --> 00:14:23.659
And then perhaps the most perfectly distilled algorithmic headline possible.
303
00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:27.509
There's a clip from the diary of a CEO that
304
00:14:27.529 --> 00:14:31.450
simply reads, war expert warns you can't stop what's coming.
305
00:14:32.169 --> 00:14:35.909
You can't stop what's coming. I mean, that isn't a headline.
306
00:14:36.110 --> 00:14:37.909
That is a straight-up psychological threat.
307
00:14:38.129 --> 00:14:38.549
It really is.
308
00:14:39.409 --> 00:14:41.279
And nearly half a million people clicked on that in
309
00:14:41.320 --> 00:14:44.159
a single day. I am looking at this whole section
310
00:14:44.179 --> 00:14:46.139
of the sidebar, and I don't see a news feed.
311
00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:50.080
I see a weaponized system designed to keep me completely paralyzed.
312
00:14:50.980 --> 00:14:52.860
If we connect this to the bigger picture, you are
313
00:14:53.120 --> 00:14:56.870
absolutely right. It is not an information delivery system. It
314
00:14:56.929 --> 00:14:58.110
is an anxiety engine.
315
00:14:58.429 --> 00:15:02.009
An anxiety engine. But let me challenge that label for
316
00:15:02.029 --> 00:15:02.370
a second.
317
00:15:02.590 --> 00:15:02.870
Go ahead.
318
00:15:03.299 --> 00:15:06.980
If it is an anxiety engine, why would anyone stay
319
00:15:07.039 --> 00:15:10.000
on the platform? Because humans naturally pull away from pain, right?
320
00:15:10.299 --> 00:15:10.970
Generally, yes.
321
00:15:11.299 --> 00:15:14.210
If I touch a hot stove, my hand recoils. If
322
00:15:14.250 --> 00:15:17.690
the algorithm is just burning my retinas with nuclear war
323
00:15:17.750 --> 00:15:21.610
and geopolitical collapse, shouldn't my instinct be to close the
324
00:15:21.649 --> 00:15:22.789
laptop and go outside?
325
00:15:22.809 --> 00:15:26.309
That is the logical assumption, for sure. But it ignores
326
00:15:26.350 --> 00:15:28.649
the evolutionary wiring of the human brain.
327
00:15:29.649 --> 00:15:30.110
What do you mean?
328
00:15:30.879 --> 00:15:36.480
We are hardwired to prioritize threat detection. In a hunter-gatherer society,
329
00:15:36.899 --> 00:15:40.940
ignoring a beautiful sunset is totally fine. Ignoring a rustling
330
00:15:40.980 --> 00:15:43.019
bush that might hide a predator is fatal.
331
00:15:43.570 --> 00:15:46.230
Right. So we are drawn to the negative to survive.
332
00:15:46.549 --> 00:15:51.690
Exactly. The algorithm exploits that exact threat detection circuitry. It
333
00:15:51.750 --> 00:15:54.490
knows you want to look away, but it also knows
334
00:15:54.529 --> 00:15:58.330
you feel this deep evolutionary obligation to monitor the danger.
335
00:15:58.909 --> 00:16:00.679
Because if I don't know what the danger is, I
336
00:16:00.720 --> 00:16:01.789
can't protect myself from it.
337
00:16:02.139 --> 00:16:05.919
Precisely. And it expands that danger far beyond just kinetic warfare.
338
00:16:06.460 --> 00:16:11.269
It curates a buffet of macro-level existential dread.
339
00:16:11.789 --> 00:16:14.049
Okay, let's look at the other dishes on that buffet
340
00:16:14.070 --> 00:16:16.289
of dread, because it's not just physical war we are
341
00:16:16.309 --> 00:16:16.909
dealing with here.
342
00:16:16.929 --> 00:16:17.909
No, it goes much broader.
343
00:16:18.350 --> 00:16:22.419
The algorithm is serving up massive technological and environmental panic
344
00:16:22.460 --> 00:16:24.460
as well. We have a clip of Jon Stewart on
345
00:16:24.480 --> 00:16:27.399
The Daily Show dissecting AI's dubious promise.
346
00:16:27.570 --> 00:16:29.129
And that video exploded, didn't it?
347
00:16:29.330 --> 00:16:33.049
Oh, totally. We are talking 5.4 million views in three days.
348
00:16:33.549 --> 00:16:37.049
Over 5 million people collectively huddling around a comedy show
349
00:16:37.389 --> 00:16:40.350
to process their terror that artificial intelligence is going to
350
00:16:40.389 --> 00:16:43.429
replace their jobs or alter reality itself.
351
00:16:43.769 --> 00:16:45.740
It is massive scale tech anxiety.
352
00:16:46.600 --> 00:16:49.879
And directly beneath that, the algorithm pivots to the weather. Right.
353
00:16:49.919 --> 00:16:51.340
From AI to climate change.
354
00:16:51.750 --> 00:16:54.970
It serves up a StarTalk video titled The Biggest El
355
00:16:55.009 --> 00:16:58.230
Nino in Recorded History with hundreds of thousands of views.
356
00:16:58.929 --> 00:17:01.500
So if we summarize the sidebar right now, we have
357
00:17:01.980 --> 00:17:05.720
the threat of military annihilation, the threat of technological obsolescence,
358
00:17:06.339 --> 00:17:08.220
and the threat of planetary environmental collapse.
359
00:17:08.500 --> 00:17:13.779
Right. It's the apocalypse trifecta. And interspersed between these civilization-level
360
00:17:13.819 --> 00:17:17.279
threats is pure, unadulterated political spectacle.
361
00:17:17.789 --> 00:17:19.990
The political stuff is fascinating to look at. It is.
362
00:17:20.390 --> 00:17:22.480
Look at what else the algorithm injects into this feed.
363
00:17:22.839 --> 00:17:25.160
We have The Daily Show doing a bit on Kimberly
364
00:17:25.180 --> 00:17:32.500
Guilfoyle allegedly begging a donor to pay off her $ 100, 000
365
00:17:29.539 --> 00:17:30.180
credit card bill.
366
00:17:30.539 --> 00:17:32.160
And the numbers on that?
367
00:17:32.160 --> 00:17:33.329
1.3 million views overnight.
368
00:17:33.400 --> 00:17:33.619
Wow.
369
00:17:34.450 --> 00:17:36.769
And then we have Jimmy Kimmel mocking Donald Trump's hopes
370
00:17:36.809 --> 00:17:40.150
for a Nobel Peace Prize and his comments on bombing Iran.
371
00:17:40.609 --> 00:17:42.509
That one has 1.8 million views.
372
00:17:42.970 --> 00:17:45.539
So high-level national political mockery.
373
00:17:45.579 --> 00:17:48.779
Yes. But it even drills down to regional politics. It
374
00:17:48.839 --> 00:17:51.680
serves up a watchful video link for a U.S. Senate
375
00:17:51.700 --> 00:17:54.269
debate in Georgia between John Ossoff and Mike Collins.
376
00:17:54.789 --> 00:17:58.089
What is genuinely fascinating here is not the politics themselves,
377
00:17:58.589 --> 00:17:59.690
but the delivery mechanism.
378
00:18:00.150 --> 00:18:00.730
Explain that.
379
00:18:01.609 --> 00:18:03.589
I want you to look at who is actually generating
380
00:18:03.650 --> 00:18:06.559
the massive engagement numbers in this feed. It isn't the
381
00:18:06.599 --> 00:18:07.880
traditional evening news anchors.
382
00:18:07.980 --> 00:18:09.259
No, it's not CNN or Fox.
383
00:18:09.779 --> 00:18:13.240
It isn't investigative journalists either. It is late-night comedians.
384
00:18:13.740 --> 00:18:17.140
That is a massive shift in media consumption. If you
385
00:18:17.160 --> 00:18:19.859
think back to the golden era of late-night television, like
386
00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:22.799
Johnny Carson or even early Jay Leno or David Letterman.
387
00:18:22.980 --> 00:18:23.579
Right, the classics.
388
00:18:24.519 --> 00:18:27.180
The fundamental social contract of those shows was comfort.
389
00:18:27.380 --> 00:18:28.349
Yes, escapism.
390
00:18:29.210 --> 00:18:31.490
The host's job was to interview a movie star, tell
391
00:18:31.509 --> 00:18:34.230
a few light topical jokes, and basically tuck the country
392
00:18:34.250 --> 00:18:36.630
into bed with a smile. The goal was to lower
393
00:18:36.690 --> 00:18:37.769
the collective blood pressure.
394
00:18:38.289 --> 00:18:40.809
And that social contract has been entirely rewritten over the
395
00:18:40.849 --> 00:18:41.390
last decade.
396
00:18:41.430 --> 00:18:42.329
Completely rewritten.
397
00:18:43.329 --> 00:18:45.710
The goal of the modern late-night comedian is not to
398
00:18:45.769 --> 00:18:48.369
help you forget your day. It is to help you
399
00:18:48.430 --> 00:18:50.349
process the trauma of the news cycle.
400
00:18:50.509 --> 00:18:53.190
That is such a good way to put it. Processing trauma.
401
00:18:53.839 --> 00:18:56.700
Because the audience isn't clicking on Jon Stewart's AI video
402
00:18:56.759 --> 00:18:58.140
for a traditional belly laugh.
403
00:18:58.279 --> 00:18:59.339
No, they're terrified.
404
00:18:59.420 --> 00:19:03.299
Exactly. They are clicking on it for catharsis. They are
405
00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:05.960
overwhelmed by the data points the algorithm is feeding them,
406
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:08.480
all the war and the climate stuff, and they are
407
00:19:08.579 --> 00:19:12.769
desperately seeking a trusted surrogate To articulate the absurdity of
408
00:19:12.789 --> 00:19:13.670
their own anxiety.
409
00:19:14.410 --> 00:19:16.289
Humor acting as a pressure valve.
410
00:19:16.609 --> 00:19:17.069
Precisely.
411
00:19:17.369 --> 00:19:19.509
But I'm not sure if it's a valve that actually
412
00:19:19.609 --> 00:19:21.950
releases pressure or if it just traps it in a
413
00:19:21.970 --> 00:19:22.630
different container.
414
00:19:23.069 --> 00:19:23.869
That is a fair point.
415
00:19:24.279 --> 00:19:26.980
Because you cannot live in a state of high alert
416
00:19:27.299 --> 00:19:31.859
geopolitical and existential dread forever. The human nervous system literally
417
00:19:31.960 --> 00:19:33.940
cannot sustain that level of cortisol.
418
00:19:34.099 --> 00:19:35.099
Biologically impossible.
419
00:19:35.299 --> 00:19:38.920
Right. If the machine just feeds me war, climate collapse,
420
00:19:39.000 --> 00:19:42.049
AI takeovers and political screaming, my brain is going to
421
00:19:42.089 --> 00:19:44.750
short circuit. I would eventually just close the app.
422
00:19:45.549 --> 00:19:49.970
Which is why the algorithm, in its cold mathematical brilliance, understands.
423
00:19:50.339 --> 00:19:51.039
user fatigue.
424
00:19:51.240 --> 00:19:52.099
It knows when I'm tired.
425
00:19:52.500 --> 00:19:55.539
It tracks your dwell time, your scrolling speed. It knows
426
00:19:55.579 --> 00:19:58.400
exactly when your cognitive load is maxed out, and you
427
00:19:58.440 --> 00:20:00.579
are hovering your mouse over the red X to close
428
00:20:00.599 --> 00:20:01.029
the browser.
429
00:20:01.440 --> 00:20:02.549
So what does it do to keep me?
430
00:20:03.130 --> 00:20:06.349
It knows it must offer you a palate cleanser. It
431
00:20:06.390 --> 00:20:11.509
intentionally engineers off-ramps into clear-cut narratives... or simple escapism to
432
00:20:11.549 --> 00:20:14.750
reset your emotional baseline before it subjects you to more anxiety.
433
00:20:15.369 --> 00:20:17.630
Oh, I see the off ramps in this screenshot, and
434
00:20:17.690 --> 00:20:22.039
they are wild. It is literally like a casino.
435
00:20:22.059 --> 00:20:24.400
A casino? How so?
436
00:20:24.960 --> 00:20:27.319
You know how casinos pump oxygen onto the gaming floor
437
00:20:27.380 --> 00:20:28.240
to keep people awake?
438
00:20:28.839 --> 00:20:29.599
Right. Yeah.
439
00:20:30.519 --> 00:20:33.309
You are sitting at the slot machine. You're losing money.
440
00:20:33.440 --> 00:20:35.769
You're getting depressed. You're about to leave the table, and
441
00:20:35.890 --> 00:20:38.950
suddenly there is a rush of cool air, flashing lights,
442
00:20:39.369 --> 00:20:41.809
A waitress hands you a free drink, and you stay.
443
00:20:42.930 --> 00:20:43.940
Ah, I get it.
444
00:20:44.650 --> 00:20:47.910
The algorithm is doing the exact same thing, but with
445
00:20:48.079 --> 00:20:49.170
digital oxygen hits.
446
00:20:49.799 --> 00:20:53.599
That is a highly accurate metaphor. Let's analyze the specific
447
00:20:53.940 --> 00:20:56.220
oxygen hits this sidebar is deploying.
448
00:20:56.859 --> 00:21:00.160
Well, the human desire for justice and gossip is doing
449
00:21:00.200 --> 00:21:01.339
a lot of heavy lifting here.
450
00:21:02.099 --> 00:21:04.759
Let's look at the true crime palate cleansers sitting right
451
00:21:04.799 --> 00:21:07.000
in the middle of all this geopolitical chaos.
452
00:21:07.450 --> 00:21:10.410
Yeah, we have a video titled, Rich Karen Took Advantage
453
00:21:10.430 --> 00:21:14.269
of Her Pastor in the Worst Way, pulling over 300,000 views.
454
00:21:14.349 --> 00:21:15.769
Just classic internet gossip.
455
00:21:16.009 --> 00:21:16.269
It is.
456
00:21:16.349 --> 00:21:19.029
But the real anomaly, the data point that absolutely stopped
457
00:21:19.049 --> 00:21:21.349
me in my tracks, is a video from True Crime News.
458
00:21:21.559 --> 00:21:22.319
The Chris Hansen one.
459
00:21:22.619 --> 00:21:25.740
Yes. The title is, Man Brings Pizza to Teen's House,
460
00:21:26.079 --> 00:21:27.339
Meets Chris Hansen Instead.
461
00:21:27.720 --> 00:21:30.619
Let's isolate the metadata on that specific Chris Hansen video,
462
00:21:30.960 --> 00:21:33.660
because it is crucial to understanding the algorithm's behavior.
463
00:21:34.160 --> 00:21:34.779
Okay, let's hear it.
464
00:21:35.359 --> 00:21:38.329
That video was published seven years ago. And it currently
465
00:21:38.369 --> 00:21:41.089
sits at 74 million views.
466
00:21:41.329 --> 00:21:41.849
Unbelievable.
467
00:21:41.849 --> 00:21:42.670
74 million.
468
00:21:42.890 --> 00:21:46.890
Why? Why on earth does a seven-year-old clip of a
469
00:21:46.930 --> 00:21:49.630
guy walking into a suburban kitchen holding a pizza box
470
00:21:49.670 --> 00:21:51.549
have 74 million views?
471
00:21:51.930 --> 00:21:52.789
It's a staggering number.
472
00:21:53.349 --> 00:21:56.250
It is outperforming the nuclear war videos, the AI videos,
473
00:21:56.289 --> 00:21:59.990
and the climate collapse videos combined. What is the psychological
474
00:22:00.039 --> 00:22:02.160
pull of a decade-old sting operation?
475
00:22:02.599 --> 00:22:06.299
What's fascinating here is the evolutionary need for retributive justice.
476
00:22:06.789 --> 00:22:09.349
and how it directly contrasts with the rest of the feed.
477
00:22:09.970 --> 00:22:10.890
Explain the contrast.
478
00:22:11.599 --> 00:22:15.180
Think about the amorphous threats we just discussed. Changing weather patterns,
479
00:22:15.680 --> 00:22:19.420
neural network algorithms taking jobs, international diplomacy and war.
480
00:22:19.680 --> 00:22:19.900
Right.
481
00:22:20.259 --> 00:22:23.640
As an individual sitting at your computer, you have absolutely
482
00:22:23.960 --> 00:22:28.309
zero agency over those things. They are overwhelmingly complex. They
483
00:22:28.329 --> 00:22:31.569
have no easy solutions. And they leave the viewer feeling
484
00:22:31.650 --> 00:22:33.970
morally confused and entirely powerless.
485
00:22:34.490 --> 00:22:36.930
Right. I mean, I can't punch climate change in the face.
486
00:22:37.230 --> 00:22:39.910
I can't arrest a language model for taking my job.
487
00:22:40.259 --> 00:22:44.119
Exactly. You are helpless. The Chris Hansen video is the
488
00:22:44.160 --> 00:22:46.259
exact opposite of an amorphous threat.
489
00:22:46.819 --> 00:22:47.819
Oh, I see where you're going with this.
490
00:22:48.559 --> 00:22:53.259
It is a perfectly contained, highly compressed morality play. It
491
00:22:53.299 --> 00:22:56.849
offers the viewer a satisfying, unambiguous resolution of good versus evil.
492
00:22:57.230 --> 00:22:58.230
The bad guy gets caught.
493
00:22:58.710 --> 00:22:58.990
Period.
494
00:22:59.289 --> 00:22:59.569
Period.
495
00:22:59.809 --> 00:23:02.349
Yes. A bad person attempts to do a bad thing.
496
00:23:03.069 --> 00:23:06.849
They are immediately intercepted. They are confronted with indisputable evidence.
497
00:23:07.170 --> 00:23:10.279
And justice is swiftly served, all within the span of
498
00:23:10.339 --> 00:23:12.299
a 10-minute YouTube clip. Wow.
499
00:23:12.380 --> 00:23:14.960
It is the ultimate digital comfort food.
500
00:23:15.220 --> 00:23:15.420
It is.
501
00:23:16.220 --> 00:23:19.339
Because it provides absolute moral clarity. You don't have to
502
00:23:19.359 --> 00:23:22.420
debate the geopolitical nuance of a guy trying to meet
503
00:23:22.460 --> 00:23:24.960
a decoy. You just get to watch the predator get caught.
504
00:23:25.240 --> 00:23:27.849
There is no nuance, which is a relief to the brain.
505
00:23:28.880 --> 00:23:32.099
The psychological closure that provides after reading a headline about
506
00:23:32.299 --> 00:23:36.980
AI replacing your job must be massive. It is basically
507
00:23:37.319 --> 00:23:41.279
digital vigilantism replacing the community gossip of a physical village.
508
00:23:41.740 --> 00:23:44.700
It resets the user's emotional baseline by giving them a
509
00:23:44.869 --> 00:23:47.089
microdose of control and justice.
510
00:23:47.450 --> 00:23:50.549
That is so incredibly manipulative, but brilliant.
511
00:23:51.210 --> 00:23:54.910
And alongside true crime, the algorithm deploys pop culture in
512
00:23:54.970 --> 00:23:58.430
sports as secondary lighter palate cleansers.
513
00:23:58.789 --> 00:24:00.009
Oh, yeah. Let's talk about those.
514
00:24:00.930 --> 00:24:02.549
We see a clip of Tom Brady on the New
515
00:24:02.589 --> 00:24:07.930
Heights podcast passionately explaining why Randy Moss was a one-of-one talent.
516
00:24:08.630 --> 00:24:10.390
That has 1.3 million views.
517
00:24:10.710 --> 00:24:12.329
Just pure sports nostalgia.
518
00:24:12.569 --> 00:24:15.329
Right. And then we have Michael Douglas sitting down with
519
00:24:15.349 --> 00:24:19.930
Jimmy Kimmel telling these completely wild, decadent stories about an
520
00:24:19.970 --> 00:24:23.369
affair with Kathleen Turner and doing cocaine with O.J. Simpson
521
00:24:23.410 --> 00:24:23.930
in the 80s.
522
00:24:24.029 --> 00:24:25.490
And that pulled, like, what, 281,000 views? Exactly.
523
00:24:25.509 --> 00:24:30.569
Exactly. And then there's legendary college football coach Nick Saban
524
00:24:30.670 --> 00:24:34.140
just hanging out, shooting the breeze with comedian Theo Vaughn,
525
00:24:34.720 --> 00:24:36.859
pulling over a million views in just three days.
526
00:24:37.319 --> 00:24:39.799
It really is the buffet approach to human attention. You
527
00:24:39.839 --> 00:24:42.079
get a little bit of football nostalgia to lower your
528
00:24:42.119 --> 00:24:45.660
heart rate, a little bit of 1980s Hollywood scandal to
529
00:24:45.700 --> 00:24:49.269
distract you, and a folksy conversation between a coach and
530
00:24:49.309 --> 00:24:50.230
a Southern comedian.
531
00:24:50.529 --> 00:24:51.690
Just to keep you on the platform.
532
00:24:52.000 --> 00:24:55.779
But beyond the palate cleansers, what I find incredibly compelling
533
00:24:55.859 --> 00:24:59.009
is how the algorithm manages its own internal history.
534
00:24:59.109 --> 00:25:00.529
It is very self-referential.
535
00:25:00.710 --> 00:25:04.190
It is. It doesn't just curate the wider world. It
536
00:25:04.289 --> 00:25:07.230
curates the specific cinematic universe of the creator you are
537
00:25:07.309 --> 00:25:07.950
actually watching.
538
00:25:08.190 --> 00:25:11.930
The ecosystem meta-analysis is vital to understanding the machine's behavior here.
539
00:25:12.170 --> 00:25:12.759
Let's get into it.
540
00:25:13.349 --> 00:25:15.539
The algorithm understands that if you are watching a Joe
541
00:25:15.579 --> 00:25:18.980
Rogan episode, you are already invested in the broader lore
542
00:25:19.019 --> 00:25:20.980
of his specific digital universe.
543
00:25:21.289 --> 00:25:22.869
Right. You are a fan of that world.
544
00:25:23.569 --> 00:25:26.470
So it serves up a relatively recent, highly popular episode,
545
00:25:26.490 --> 00:25:30.470
which is JRE number 2343 with Jofa Stone, the real-life
546
00:25:30.490 --> 00:25:32.829
Donnie Brasco, that sits at 2 million views.
547
00:25:33.109 --> 00:25:34.210
A standard recommendation.
548
00:25:34.410 --> 00:25:37.849
Yes. But then it performs an act of digital archaeology
549
00:25:37.869 --> 00:25:41.319
of its own. It reaches deep, deep into the archive.
550
00:25:41.960 --> 00:25:43.740
Oh, yes. I saw this in the screenshot and it
551
00:25:43.880 --> 00:25:44.799
absolutely blew my mind.
552
00:25:44.940 --> 00:25:45.819
The Brendan Schaub video.
553
00:25:46.059 --> 00:25:48.619
Yes. It pulls up a video from the UFC on
554
00:25:48.660 --> 00:25:51.609
Fox channel. And the title is The Fighter and the Kid.
555
00:25:51.769 --> 00:25:53.329
Brendan Schaub responds to Joe Rogan.
556
00:25:53.730 --> 00:25:54.710
And look at the date on that.
557
00:25:55.390 --> 00:26:00.930
That video is 11 years old. 11. It has nearly 700,000 views.
558
00:26:01.289 --> 00:26:04.609
And critically, that video is from roughly the exact same
559
00:26:04.730 --> 00:26:08.269
era as the main 2015 C9 Nothing video we are
560
00:26:08.470 --> 00:26:09.490
using as our anchor.
561
00:26:09.809 --> 00:26:11.269
It is a temporal bridge.
562
00:26:11.640 --> 00:26:12.700
That's a great way to say it.
563
00:26:12.960 --> 00:26:16.559
The algorithm is mapping the timeline. That Brendan Shaw video
564
00:26:16.599 --> 00:26:20.420
where he responds to the famous, intense talk Rogan gave
565
00:26:20.460 --> 00:26:23.789
him about retiring from mixed martial arts, it is foundational
566
00:26:23.900 --> 00:26:25.789
lore for the current podcasting era.
567
00:26:26.089 --> 00:26:28.430
Everyone in that ecosystem knows that moment. Right.
568
00:26:28.950 --> 00:26:30.670
It is a seminal moment in the history of that
569
00:26:30.750 --> 00:26:35.390
specific massive digital community. By serving that 11-year-old moment next
570
00:26:35.410 --> 00:26:39.329
to the 2015 gaming interview, the algorithm is essentially curating
571
00:26:39.390 --> 00:26:40.660
a museum exhibit for you.
572
00:26:41.140 --> 00:26:42.839
It's building a timeline of the internet.
573
00:26:43.019 --> 00:26:46.039
Exactly. It is reminding the viewer of where this entire
574
00:26:46.160 --> 00:26:47.460
media empire began.
575
00:26:48.079 --> 00:26:48.640
It's wild.
576
00:26:48.960 --> 00:26:51.890
It curates our nostalgia. It feeds our desire for gossip.
577
00:26:52.490 --> 00:26:55.109
And it simultaneously threatens us with the apocalypse.
578
00:26:55.670 --> 00:26:58.130
All on the exact same page. Which brings us to
579
00:26:58.170 --> 00:27:02.609
what I think is the definitive artifact of this entire screenshot.
580
00:27:02.809 --> 00:27:04.210
The elephant graveyard video?
581
00:27:04.529 --> 00:27:06.230
Yes. If we had to put a bow on this
582
00:27:06.279 --> 00:27:09.720
whole deep dive... There is one final video buried in
583
00:27:09.759 --> 00:27:14.119
the margins of this sidebar that perfectly, almost poetically encapsulates
584
00:27:14.319 --> 00:27:16.430
the absolute absurdity of this entire exercise.
585
00:27:16.710 --> 00:27:18.029
It really does sum it all up.
586
00:27:18.650 --> 00:27:21.650
It's a video essay by a channel called The Elephant Graveyard.
587
00:27:21.670 --> 00:27:25.369
It has 3 million views and the title is literally
588
00:27:25.849 --> 00:27:29.099
How Comedy Became a Dystopian Imperial Hell World.
589
00:27:30.160 --> 00:27:34.380
I cannot overstate the thematic perfection of that title. It
590
00:27:34.420 --> 00:27:37.339
is a stunning piece of algorithmic self-awareness.
591
00:27:37.940 --> 00:27:41.160
It's like the algorithm became sentient just to make a joke.
592
00:27:41.779 --> 00:27:44.819
Let's synthesize exactly what we have spent the last hour
593
00:27:44.859 --> 00:27:47.579
looking at. You have a single web page, right?
594
00:27:47.660 --> 00:27:47.819
Yep.
595
00:27:48.339 --> 00:27:51.160
The dead center of the screen, the focal point, is
596
00:27:51.200 --> 00:27:54.759
a comedian having a casual conversation with a professional video
597
00:27:54.779 --> 00:27:57.880
game player about strategy and mouse sensitivity.
598
00:27:58.460 --> 00:28:00.109
Just two guys talking about a video game.
599
00:28:00.730 --> 00:28:04.730
And surrounding that casual conversation, literally enclosing it on the screen,
600
00:28:05.250 --> 00:28:10.079
boxing it in. are videos of impending nuclear strikes, catastrophic
601
00:28:10.140 --> 00:28:16.119
artificial intelligence, planetary climate collapse, and deeply polarized political warfare.
602
00:28:16.619 --> 00:28:18.539
It is so overwhelming when you say it out loud.
603
00:28:19.240 --> 00:28:21.380
And much of which is being processed through the lens
604
00:28:21.549 --> 00:28:22.710
of other comedians.
605
00:28:23.109 --> 00:28:28.089
It is literally a dystopian imperial hell world surrounding a
606
00:28:28.170 --> 00:28:32.390
comedy podcast. The title of that essay is The Reality
607
00:28:32.450 --> 00:28:33.230
We Are Looking At.
608
00:28:33.490 --> 00:28:33.890
Exactly.
609
00:28:34.170 --> 00:28:38.690
Our digital diets are just this relentless, exhausting whiplash. You
610
00:28:38.730 --> 00:28:41.410
log on to YouTube seeking the simple nostalgia of a
611
00:28:41.410 --> 00:28:45.730
2015 Counter-Strike stream, and the machine insists on feeding you
612
00:28:45.789 --> 00:28:46.470
modern dread.
613
00:28:46.750 --> 00:28:48.319
It won't let you just have the nostalgia.
614
00:28:48.710 --> 00:28:51.660
It's like walking into a cozy local coffee shop to
615
00:28:51.700 --> 00:28:54.519
read a book. And finding out the barista has plastered
616
00:28:54.539 --> 00:28:58.740
the walls with crime scene photos, apocalyptic warnings, and court transcripts.
617
00:28:59.299 --> 00:29:02.779
You cannot escape the macro-level anxiety, even when you are
618
00:29:02.819 --> 00:29:05.309
just trying to engage with micro-level entertainment.
619
00:29:05.710 --> 00:29:09.369
And that whiplash, that disorientation, is not a glitch in
620
00:29:09.390 --> 00:29:11.289
the system. It is the core design.
621
00:29:11.430 --> 00:29:12.529
The feature, not a bug.
622
00:29:12.650 --> 00:29:17.009
Exactly. The constant oscillation between comfort and terror. Between a
623
00:29:16.990 --> 00:29:21.849
2015 gaming memory and a 2024 nuclear threat. between Chris
624
00:29:21.890 --> 00:29:25.089
Hansen catching a predator and Eric Schmidt predicting the future
625
00:29:25.109 --> 00:29:25.990
of drone warfare.
626
00:29:26.109 --> 00:29:26.990
It's dizzying.
627
00:29:27.650 --> 00:29:31.650
That oscillation is what keeps the human finger scrolling. The
628
00:29:31.670 --> 00:29:34.970
machine has learned through trillions of data points that a stable,
629
00:29:35.309 --> 00:29:37.809
monolithic emotional state eventually leads to boredom.
630
00:29:38.230 --> 00:29:39.829
And boredom leads to logging off.
631
00:29:39.930 --> 00:29:42.990
Yes, which costs them money. To retain your attention, it
632
00:29:43.029 --> 00:29:47.829
must fundamentally destabilize you, then comfort you, then destabilize you again.
633
00:29:48.309 --> 00:29:50.940
So what does this all mean for us? We started
634
00:29:50.960 --> 00:29:53.759
this deep dive by dusting off a digital artifact from 2015,
635
00:29:53.759 --> 00:29:58.839
an interview that helped legitimize esports and drag competitive gaming
636
00:29:58.880 --> 00:30:01.049
out of the dark and into the mainstream cultural light.
637
00:30:01.589 --> 00:30:03.730
But we didn't even really talk about the video itself.
638
00:30:04.009 --> 00:30:06.789
No, because by simply looking at the margins of that
639
00:30:06.829 --> 00:30:10.769
web page, by analyzing the sidebar of recommendations, we ended
640
00:30:10.829 --> 00:30:13.690
up deconstructing the chaotic architecture of modern life.
641
00:30:14.089 --> 00:30:15.250
We covered a lot of ground.
642
00:30:15.269 --> 00:30:19.859
We navigated through the gamification of geopolitical conflict, the existential
643
00:30:20.059 --> 00:30:23.720
paralyzing fears of AI and climate change, the evolution of
644
00:30:23.779 --> 00:30:27.950
late-night television into a political trauma center... And the strange,
645
00:30:28.029 --> 00:30:30.509
cathartic comfort we seek in vigilante true crime.
646
00:30:31.170 --> 00:30:34.190
And it is vital to internalize why this matters to you,
647
00:30:34.390 --> 00:30:34.839
the listener.
648
00:30:35.170 --> 00:30:36.380
Why should they care about a sidebar?
649
00:30:36.720 --> 00:30:39.420
Because we tend to view our screens as windows, right?
650
00:30:39.680 --> 00:30:42.259
Assuming they are just passively reflecting the world outside or
651
00:30:42.640 --> 00:30:45.200
politely reflecting our own pre-existing interests back to us.
652
00:30:45.400 --> 00:30:45.960
Like a mirror.
653
00:30:46.559 --> 00:30:49.740
But they are not passive. They are highly active participants
654
00:30:49.819 --> 00:30:53.529
in your psychological development. They are actively shaping your worldview
655
00:30:53.769 --> 00:30:57.160
minute by minute, click by click. by deciding which narrative
656
00:30:57.180 --> 00:30:59.089
of reality you are exposed to next.
657
00:30:59.640 --> 00:31:01.710
They're curating your reality.
658
00:31:02.029 --> 00:31:07.170
Yes. They decide whether your next emotional state is outrage, fear, amusement,
659
00:31:07.230 --> 00:31:07.769
or nostalgia.
660
00:31:08.289 --> 00:31:11.049
It's not just a web page. It is an invisible
661
00:31:11.150 --> 00:31:12.950
architecture built around your attention.
662
00:31:13.670 --> 00:31:14.190
Very well said.
663
00:31:14.839 --> 00:31:17.799
Which leaves me with a final, slightly uncomfortable thought for
664
00:31:17.819 --> 00:31:20.400
you to chew on today. We just spent this entire
665
00:31:20.460 --> 00:31:24.160
episode analyzing the digital dirt around someone else's algorithmic profile.
666
00:31:24.539 --> 00:31:26.140
Essentially looking at a public artifact.
667
00:31:26.579 --> 00:31:27.940
A snapshot of the collective internet.
668
00:31:28.279 --> 00:31:31.160
Right. But think about your own screen right now. If
669
00:31:31.220 --> 00:31:33.720
someone were to freeze time, take a screenshot of your
670
00:31:33.799 --> 00:31:38.269
algorithmic sidebar today with all of its bizarre, chaotic contradictions.
671
00:31:38.609 --> 00:31:39.690
That is a terrifying thought.
672
00:31:40.470 --> 00:31:44.410
What story would that digital artifact tell about you? And
673
00:31:44.430 --> 00:31:47.509
more importantly, looking at the exact mixture of comfort and
674
00:31:47.549 --> 00:31:50.109
terror it serves up daily, what kind of world is
675
00:31:50.130 --> 00:31:52.059
the machine quietly trying to build for you?