ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Is economic empowerment really the fastest route to gender equality — or have we reduced liberation to a market strategy?
In this episode of Intersectional Psychology, we unpack one of the biggest debates in gender and development: whether increasing women’s economic participation is enough to dismantle inequality.
From microfinance and entrepreneurship to land ownership, migration, climate change, and unpaid care labour, this episode explores the gap between economic inclusion and actual power. We also explore the limits of neoliberal “empowerment,” the persistence of patriarchal power structures, and why representation without structural change can become little more than optics.
🎁 Support the podcast and get exclusive bonus content at Patreon.com/IntersectionalPsychology. In this week's bonus segment, we connect these ideas to current legal debates, including a landmark case before the Supreme Court of the United States on transgender girls in school sports.
📄 Download a transcript of this episode on IntersectionalPsychology.com.
⏳ Chapter Timestamps00:00:00 Short introduction
00:01:19 Land acknowledgement
00:01:47 Title credits: S06E07 Is economic empowerment the most important route to gender equality?
00:02:20 Welcome and introduction continued
00:03:59 Gender and development: What are we actually talking about?
00:06:25 Neoliberal feminism: When empowerment comes with fine print
00:08:34 Agriculture, migration, and the multiple layers of exclusion
00:10:41 Climate change: Gendered, political, and not accidental
00:12:05 Women's issues… or power relations?
00:14:06 So… is economic empowerment the answer?
00:16:00 Beijing Platform: Progress, but not enough
00:17:05 What still needs to change?
00:21:30 End credits
🔗 Subscribe wherever you get your podcasts
📮 Got feedback or questions? Reach out at @IntersectionalPsychology or IntersectionalPsychologyPod[@]gmail.com
🌈 If this episode resonates, please share it, rate the show, and send us your thoughts.
You can contribute to the Palestine Children's Relief Fund at https://www.pcrf.net/
ReferencesArun, S., Annim, S., Bose, U., & Arun, T. (2023) ‘Gendered Financial Behaviour in Ghana: A Comparative Study with South Africa’, In J.A. Peprah et al. (eds.), Financial Sector Development in Ghana. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chant, S. & Sweetman, C. (2012). Fixing women or fixing the world? 'Smart economics', efficiency approaches, and gender equality in development’, Gender & Development, 20(3), pp. 517-529.
Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (2015). Gender and the environment. In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development. pp. 151-163. Routledge.
Cornwall, A. (2016) ‘Women’s empowerment: What works and why?’, Journal of International Development 28, pp. 342–359.
Dineen, K. & Le, Q.V. (2015). The impact of an integrated microcredit program on the empowerment of women and gender equality in rural Vietnam’, The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(1), pp. 23-38.
Ellis, A., Manuel, C., & Blackden, C.M. (2006) Gender and Economic Growth in Uganda: Unleashing the Power of Women. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank.
Etale, L. & Simatele, M. (2023) ‘Mapping contradictions within the legal frameworks and cultural norms on women's right to land and agriculture in Western Kenya’, In B.S. Nayak (ed.), Political Economy of Gender and Development in Africa: Mapping Gaps, Conflicts and Representation. pp. 1-19. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Greed, C. (2015) ‘Gender and urban planning’, In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development. pp. 207-216. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hunting, G. & Hankivsky, O. (2020) ‘Intersectionality in addressing gender and health inequities: Balancing power and equity in a post-pandemic world’, Global Public Health, 15(8), 1209-1221.
Kevane, M. (2015). Gender, power, and politics in rural Africa. In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Gender and Development. pp. 34-47. Abingdon: Routledge.
Khan, S.R. & Khan, S.R. (2016) ‘Microcredit in South Asia: Privileging women's perceptions and voices’, Progress in Development Studies, 16(1), 65-80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993415608083 (Accessed 24 September 2024)
Kofman, E. & Raghuram, P. (2015) ‘Gendered migrations and global social reproduction’, In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development. pp. 218-228. Abingdon: Routledge.
Nair, M. (2018) ‘Gendered impacts of climate change’, World Development, 108, pp. 27-38.
Nayak, B.S. (2023) 'Introduction: Political economy of gender and development in Africa', in Nayak, B.S. (ed.), Political Economy of Gender and Development in Africa: Mapping Gaps, Conflicts and Representation. pp. 1-19. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Phiri, A.T., Toure, H.M.A.C., Kipkogei, O., Traore, R., Afokpe, P.M.K., & Lamore, A.A. (2022) ‘A review of gender inclusivity in agriculture and natural resources management under the changing climate in sub-Saharan Africa’, Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1) [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.2024674 (Accessed 24 September 2024)
Posel, D. & Casale, D. (2019) 'Gender and the economy in post-apartheid South Africa: Changes and challenges', Agenda, 33(4), pp. 3-10 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1679439 (Accessed 25 September 2024)
Rai, S. (2018) ‘Rethinking gender and environmental sustainability’, Global Environmental Politics, 18(2), 67-87.
Smith, L. (2018) ‘Decolonizing knowledge: Feminist approaches to development’, Feminist Review, 120(1), 33-49.
Soetan, F. & Akanji, B. (2018) 'Conclusion: A centenary of economic development policies -- A gender balance sheet and future strategies', in Soetan, F. & Akanji, B. (eds.) Gender and Development in Nigeria: One Hundred Years of Nationhood. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Spring, A. (2015) ‘Women’s roles in urbanization and development’, In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development. pp. 175-190. Abingdon: Routledge.
Thomas-Hope, E. (2015) ‘Gender and sustainable development in the Caribbean’, In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development. pp. 279-290. Abingdon: Routledge.
Varley, A. (2015) ‘Gender, housing, and migration’, In Coles, A., Gray, L., & Momsen, J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of gender and development. pp. 144-158. Abingdon: Routledge.
Yeboah, T., Arhin, A., Kumi, E., & Owusu, L. (2015) 'Empowering and shaping gender relations? Contesting the microfinance–gender empowerment discourse', Development in Practice, 25(6), pp. 895-908 [online]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2015.1064361 (Accessed 24 September 2024)
See Privacy Policy at https://intersectionalpsychology.com/privacy-policy/
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:15,400
What if I told you that giving women money doesn't automatically give them power?
2
00:00:15,400 --> 00:00:28,200
That a loan can empower or quietly reproduce the very inequalities it claims to fix?
3
00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:48,200
In this episode, we're asking whether economic empowerment is really the fast track to gender equality or whether it's been oversold as a neat, market-friendly solution to a deeply political problem.
4
00:00:48,200 --> 00:00:59,200
We'll talk micro-credit, land, migration, climate change and why gender equality isn't just about jobs –
5
00:00:59,200 --> 00:01:05,200
It's about who gets to decide how the world works.
6
00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:11,200
I'm Aurora Brown and this is Intersectional Psychology.
7
00:01:11,200 --> 00:01:13,200
Let's get into it.
8
00:01:19,200 --> 00:01:35,200
Aurora Brown and Intersectional Psychology acknowledge the traditional owners and custodians of country throughout South Africa and their connections to land, water and community.
9
00:01:35,200 --> 00:01:46,200
We pay our respects to their elders past and present and extend that respect to all Indigenous people listening today.
10
00:01:48,200 --> 00:02:02,200
Episode 7
11
00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:10,200
Is economic empowerment the most important route to gender equality?
12
00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:38,200
Hello and welcome back to Intersectional Psychology, a podcast where we ask psychology, development, and social policy to please explain themselves…
13
00:02:38,200 --> 00:02:43,200
And then we try to fact-check the explanation.
14
00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:53,200
Today's episode asks a question that sounds simple, sensible and very grant application-friendly.
15
00:02:53,200 --> 00:03:01,200
Is economic empowerment the most important route to gender equality?
16
00:03:01,200 --> 00:03:04,200
And I want to be upfront –
17
00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:13,200
If you've ever heard someone say, “Just give women money and everything will sort itself out,”
18
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:20,200
this episode is for you… and also about you.
19
00:03:20,200 --> 00:03:34,200
Because while economic empowerment matters deeply, treating it as the solution to gender inequality risks missing the actual problem.
20
00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:44,200
Or worse, neatly repackaging inequality in feminist branding and calling it progress.
21
00:03:44,200 --> 00:04:05,200
So today we're going to zoom out and then zoom right back in, looking at gender and development broadly and then very specifically through an African and South African context.
22
00:04:05,200 --> 00:04:13,200
Gender and development: What are we actually talking about?
23
00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:20,200
Let's start with the basics.
24
00:04:20,200 --> 00:04:32,200
In gender and development discourse, one of the most popular claims is that increasing women's economic power leads to better outcomes for everyone –
25
00:04:32,200 --> 00:04:38,200
Better health, better education, stronger communities.
26
00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:42,200
And to be clear, that's not wrong.
27
00:04:42,200 --> 00:04:44,200
But here's the problem:
28
00:04:44,200 --> 00:05:01,200
Mainstream development strategies often define empowerment so narrowly that it becomes almost decorative, as if empowerment means participation, not power.
29
00:05:01,200 --> 00:05:10,200
As if putting women into markets automatically dismantles the structures that exploit them.
30
00:05:10,200 --> 00:05:24,200
So you'll see policies that celebrate a woman entering the labour force without asking, “What kind of work, under what conditions, with what protection?”
31
00:05:24,200 --> 00:05:31,200
And crucially, “Who still holds the power once she gets there?”
32
00:05:31,200 --> 00:05:36,200
This is where feminist scholars start raising eyebrows.
33
00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:48,200
Because when empowerment is reduced to income generation alone, it ignores the sociocultural constraints that limit women's autonomy.
34
00:05:48,200 --> 00:05:52,200
Things like inheritance laws and traditions.
35
00:05:52,200 --> 00:05:55,200
Racialised land ownership.
36
00:05:55,200 --> 00:05:57,200
Caregiving burdens.
37
00:05:57,200 --> 00:06:00,200
Credit discrimination.
38
00:06:00,200 --> 00:06:10,200
And histories of colonial extraction that didn't magically disappear when women got bank accounts.
39
00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:18,200
In other words, not all women start the race at the same (bread)line.
40
00:06:18,200 --> 00:06:30,200
And pretending they do is not neutral, it's political.
41
00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:33,200
Neoliberal feminism:
42
00:06:33,200 --> 00:06:43,200
When empowerment comes with fine print.
43
00:06:43,200 --> 00:06:59,200
One of the sharpest critiques in this space comes from scholars who argue that what we often call, quote, “women's empowerment”, unquote, is actually neoliberal empowerment.
44
00:06:59,200 --> 00:07:05,200
This is the version where women are encouraged to be entrepreneurial.
45
00:07:05,200 --> 00:07:09,200
Structural inequality is politely ignored.
46
00:07:09,200 --> 00:07:17,200
And poverty becomes an individual failure rather than a systemic outcome.
47
00:07:17,200 --> 00:07:23,200
It's the logic of, “Well, if she works hard enough, she'll succeed…
48
00:07:23,200 --> 00:07:28,200
And if she doesn't, well, we gave her the chance.”
49
00:07:28,200 --> 00:07:34,200
But this kind of thinking quietly leaves patriarchal norms intact.
50
00:07:34,200 --> 00:07:42,200
It doesn't challenge violence, exploitation, or unpaid care work and household labour.
51
00:07:42,200 --> 00:07:49,200
It just asks women to manage those realities more efficiently.
52
00:07:49,200 --> 00:08:09,200
And yes, policies will often focus on women's participation in labour markets without touching the normative beliefs that frame women as subordinate, dependent, or endlessly responsible for someone else's well-being.
53
00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:31,200
So no, a payslip does not automatically translate into freedom – especially if the same structure still decides who owns land, who controls the income and who makes household decisions, and who absorbs the consequences when things go wrong.
54
00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:53,200
Agriculture, migration, and the multiple layers of exclusion.
55
00:08:53,200 --> 00:08:59,200
Nowhere is this more visible than in agriculture and migration.
56
00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:12,200
Rural women, particularly women of colour, experience exclusion at the intersection of gender, race, class, and colonial legacies.
57
00:09:12,200 --> 00:09:25,200
They are often primary food producers, water carriers, and land stewards, without owning the land that they depend on.
58
00:09:25,200 --> 00:09:31,200
Migration is often framed as a pathway to empowerment.
59
00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:48,200
But for many women, migration increases vulnerability – to labour exploitation, to social isolation, to xenophobia and ethnophobia, to housing precarity, to sexual exploitation.
60
00:09:48,200 --> 00:10:01,200
And here's the kicker: Migration policies usually see women as workers, not as caregivers, community leaders, or political agents.
61
00:10:01,200 --> 00:10:11,200
Their unpaid labour disappears from the ledger, even though entire economies depend on it.
62
00:10:12,200 --> 00:10:27,200
Urban planning then joins the problem by prioritising the formal economy, while women are forced into informal, low-wage work with minimal protection.
63
00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:39,200
Poor housing, unsafe transport, and lack of services don’t just inconvenience women. They lock inequality into place.
64
00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:52,200
Climate change: Gendered, political, and not accidental.
65
00:10:52,200 --> 00:11:12,200
Climate change adds another layer. Women, especially rural women, are often responsible for managing natural resources like water and food.
66
00:11:13,200 --> 00:11:22,200
They are also disproportionately affected by environmental degradation, displacement, and food insecurity.
67
00:11:22,200 --> 00:11:35,200
And yet, their knowledge is sidelined, their labour is unpaid or underpaid, their voices are absent from environmental policymaking.
68
00:11:36,200 --> 00:11:45,200
Instead, large-scale commercial agriculture – usually male-dominated – gets prioritised.
69
00:11:45,200 --> 00:11:52,200
Not because it's more sustainable, but because it aligns with power.
70
00:11:52,200 --> 00:12:01,200
So when we talk about sustainability without talking about gender, we're again not being neutral.
71
00:12:01,200 --> 00:12:04,200
We're being selective.
72
00:12:05,200 --> 00:12:16,200
Women's issues… or power relations?
73
00:12:16,200 --> 00:12:31,200
Historically, development framed gender inequality as a woman's problem –
74
00:12:31,200 --> 00:12:40,200
Fix the woman, educate them, employ them, micro-finance them, and the problem disappears.
75
00:12:40,200 --> 00:12:44,200
Except it didn't.
76
00:12:44,200 --> 00:12:50,200
Because gender inequality isn't about women lacking skills.
77
00:12:50,200 --> 00:13:02,200
It's about power relations, who controls resources, whose labour counts, and whose voices shape policy.
78
00:13:02,200 --> 00:13:18,200
Intersectionality helps us see how gender interacts with race, class, disability, sexuality, and citizenship, producing very different experiences of marginalisation.
79
00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:30,200
And development policies that ignore these intersections don't just fail, they often reproduce inequality under the guise of progress.
80
00:13:30,200 --> 00:13:44,200
In African contexts, this is especially visible in land ownership, political participation, and access to education and health care.
81
00:13:44,200 --> 00:13:54,200
Patriarchal systems still restrict women's access to resources, even when laws appear gender-neutral.
82
00:13:54,200 --> 00:14:13,200
Because laws don't enforce themselves – people do. And people bring culture, bias, and power with them.
83
00:14:13,200 --> 00:14:26,200
Can women's economic empowerment be the answer?
84
00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:32,200
Let's be fair. Economic empowerment matters.
85
00:14:32,200 --> 00:14:46,200
Micro-finance has helped many women increase their income, invest in their families, and participate more actively in household decision-making.
86
00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:56,200
In South Africa and elsewhere, financial literacy and access to capital have created real opportunities.
87
00:14:56,200 --> 00:15:06,200
But, and it's a big but, economic empowerment is not politically neutral.
88
00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:17,200
Micro-credit can depoliticise poverty by framing inequality as an individual problem to be solved through entrepreneurship.
89
00:15:17,200 --> 00:15:26,200
It can shift attention away from education, health care, land rights, and violence.
90
00:15:26,200 --> 00:15:38,200
And in some cases, it simply transfers financial risk onto women, while men retain control over finances.
91
00:15:38,200 --> 00:15:44,200
Some women don't even control the loans they're responsible for repaying.
92
00:15:44,200 --> 00:16:06,200
So when empowerment adds debt, workload, and responsibility, without redistributing power, we need to ask, “Empowerment for whom?”
93
00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:11,200
Beijing Platform: Progress, but not enough.
94
00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:25,200
Since the Beijing Platform for Action in 1995, there has been progress.
95
00:16:25,200 --> 00:16:34,200
Greater political representation, stronger legal frameworks, increased economic participation.
96
00:16:35,200 --> 00:16:40,200
South Africa's constitution is rightly celebrated.
97
00:16:40,200 --> 00:16:49,200
And yet, we still haven't had a woman president. Gender-based violence remains endemic.
98
00:16:49,200 --> 00:16:55,200
Legal protections exist, but enforcement is uneven.
99
00:16:55,200 --> 00:17:01,200
Representation without power is not liberation.
100
00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:07,200
It's optics.
101
00:17:07,200 --> 00:17:19,200
What still needs to change, and how do we change it?
102
00:17:19,200 --> 00:17:29,200
Gender equality will not be achieved through microfinance alone.
103
00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:41,200
Gender equality will not be achieved through microcredit alone, or employment alone, or legislation alone.
104
00:17:41,200 --> 00:17:58,200
It requires structural change, redistribution of power, enforcement of rights, cultural transformation, and, yes, rethinking gender itself.
105
00:17:58,200 --> 00:18:07,200
Because ultimately, this isn't just about women and other marginalised genders catching up to men.
106
00:18:07,200 --> 00:18:13,200
It's about asking, “Why is power gendered in the first place?”
107
00:18:13,200 --> 00:18:22,200
Would some men feel threatened by women owning land, making decisions, and shaping policy?
108
00:18:23,200 --> 00:18:28,200
History answers that question very clearly:
109
00:18:28,200 --> 00:18:35,200
“Yes!” Which means the work of gender equality isn't just economic.
110
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:44,200
It's psychological, political, and cultural – and deeply relational.
111
00:18:44,200 --> 00:18:59,200
And maybe, just maybe, it starts with teaching our children a different story about what it means to be men, women, or simply human beings.
112
00:18:59,200 --> 00:19:07,200
Not competitors, not threats, but co-creators of community.
113
00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:33,200
Before we wrap up, I want to ask a slightly uncomfortable question.
114
00:19:33,200 --> 00:19:39,200
What if empowerment doesn't always feel empowering?
115
00:19:39,200 --> 00:19:55,200
What if earning more just means carrying more – more responsibility, more pressure, more risk, without actually having more control?
116
00:19:55,200 --> 00:20:02,200
In the bonus episode, we're getting into the psychology of power without freedom.
117
00:20:02,200 --> 00:20:10,200
Why having choices isn't the same as being able to use them.
118
00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:20,200
And what really has to shift for empowerment to mean something more than survival with better branding?
119
00:20:20,200 --> 00:20:28,200
If that sounds like a conversation you're not quite ready to have, it's probably the one you need.
120
00:20:28,200 --> 00:20:52,200
Just go to Patreon.com/IntersectionalPsychology.
121
00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:57,200
And with that, we come to the end of the series.
122
00:20:57,200 --> 00:21:05,200
Not because the work is finished, but because the conversation has been properly opened.
123
00:21:05,200 --> 00:21:21,200
If you have any questions or thoughts, please reach out to intersectionalsychologypod[at]gmail.com or join the conversation at Patreon.com/IntersectionalPsychology.
124
00:21:21,200 --> 00:21:32,200
Until then, remember everyone has the right to live with their optimal mental health.
125
00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:40,200
Thank you for listening to Intersectional Psychology. Please follow or subscribe to the podcast to get every episode.
126
00:21:40,200 --> 00:21:54,200
If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review Intersectional Psychology in your preferred app. It really helps other people find the podcast.
127
00:21:54,200 --> 00:22:04,200
This episode of Intersectional Psychology was researched, written, recorded and edited by me, Aurora Brown.
128
00:22:04,200 --> 00:22:14,200
For a transcript of this episode, please see the link in the show notes on your podcast app or go to IntersectionalPsychology.com.
129
00:22:14,200 --> 00:22:23,200
You can also check the website or the show notes for a full list of references for this episode.
130
00:22:23,200 --> 00:22:35,200
A video of this episode with closed captions is available on YouTube.com/@IntersectionalPsychology.
131
00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:52,200
To support this podcast and get access to bonus content including additional episodes and interviews, as well as more guided mindfulness sessions, please go to Patreon.com/IntersectionalPsychology.
132
00:22:52,200 --> 00:23:11,200
You can also chat with me on BlueSky at intersectpsych.bsky.social and Instagram, Facebook or TikTok at @IntersectionalPsychology. But mostly BlueSky.
133
00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:20,200
Aurora Brown and Intersectional Psychology are committed to the Cite Black Women Praxis.
134
00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:34,200
All episodes of Intersectional Psychology are for educational purposes only and are not intended to be a substitute for professional mental health advice, diagnosis or treatment.
135
00:23:34,200 --> 00:23:42,200
I, Aurora Brown, am not able to answer specific questions about individual situations.
136
00:23:42,200 --> 00:23:50,200
Always seek the advice of your health provider with any questions you may have regarding a mental health condition.
137
00:23:50,200 --> 00:24:00,200
Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have heard or seen on this podcast.
138
00:24:00,200 --> 00:24:09,200
If you think you need immediate assistance, please call your local emergency number or any mental health crisis hotline.
139
00:24:09,200 --> 00:24:13,200
Everyone deserves good mental health.