ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Before trial, Farwell's defense filed a motion accusing federal investigators of pressuring the medical examiner who performed Sandra Birchmore's autopsy into changing her original finding. The government says there is no evidence or good-faith basis for the claim. The defense also told the jury that Sandra was on psychiatric medication since age six, that her death was impulsive, and that Farwell's DNA was excluded from under her fingernails. Tony and Bob Motta ask whether the pressured-examiner argument is the most powerful card the defense holds — because it makes the prosecution the ones who allegedly manufactured the case.
Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#SandraBirchmore #MatthewFarwell #HiddenKillers #FarwellTrial #StoughtonPolice #TrueCrime #TrueCrimeCommunity #BirchmoreCase #Massachusetts #TrueCrimePodcast
