ABOUT THIS EPISODE
If sustainability means working in Europe while other regions pay the price, is it really sustainability at all? We sit down with Suzanne Geisler, founder of the SERA Institute in Vienna, to connect the dots between sustainable construction, energy efficiency, and the global systems that quietly keep our lifestyles up and running.
We talk about why the building sector is such a high-impact place to intervene, and why measuring performance is only useful if it drives real renovations and better decisions.
From there, the conversation widens into sufficiency: not just cleaner energy, but less energy and fewer raw materials demanded in the first place. That idea sounds like common sense, yet it grates against an economic model built on consumption, VAT receipts, and the promise of endless growth.
Suzanne challenges the logic of “external costs” and asks what fossil fuels and mined materials would cost if we counted lost lives, poisoned ecosystems, and forced migration. If you care about the circular economy, clean production, resource efficiency, and a just transition that is actually just, this conversation will stay with you.
Find out more on Linkedin: https://at.linkedin.com/in/susanne-geissler-759464217
And on Fairtube: https://fair.tube/a/seraglobal.institute/videos
Follow GoodGeist for more episodes on sustainability, communications and how creativity can help make the world a better place.
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:02.399 --> 00:00:03.120
Goodgeist.
00:00:05.599 --> 00:00:08.320
A podcast series on sustainability.
00:00:08.560 --> 00:00:12.080
Hosted by Damla Eusler and Steve Connor.
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:15.919
Brought to you by the DNS Network.
00:00:22.160 --> 00:00:23.920
Hello, hello everyone.
00:00:24.000 --> 00:00:34.159
You are listening to Good Guys, the message on sustainability, which is brought to you by the DNS Network, the global network of agencies dedicated to making the world a better place.
00:00:34.320 --> 00:00:40.079
This is Dando from Mira Agency Istanbul and This is Steve from Creative Concern in Manchester.
00:00:40.159 --> 00:00:47.200
This podcast series explores global sustainability issues, how they communicated and what creativity can do to make positive change happen.
00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:57.679
So in this episode, we're going to talk to Suzanne Geisler, the founder and the owner of the Sarah Institute, Sustainable Energy and Resources Availability.
00:00:57.840 --> 00:01:02.079
This is a boutique research and consulting firm based in Vienna.
00:01:02.240 --> 00:01:13.680
Suzanne is an environmental engineer with a background in law and a trained energy advisor entitled to issue energy performance certificates, which is EPCs.
00:01:14.239 --> 00:01:16.640
I know we'll come back to EPCs in a minute, won't we?
00:01:16.959 --> 00:01:27.599
She holds a doctoral degree in sustainable construction from the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences in Vienna, showcasing her expertise in the field of sustainable construction and energy performance.
00:01:27.760 --> 00:01:36.159
Her work focuses on promoting energy efficiency and sustainability in the built environment, with that particular emphasis on EPC-related practices and concepts.
00:01:36.239 --> 00:01:41.359
So, Suzanne, thank you so much for taking the time to talk to uh Dana and I on the podcast.
00:01:42.239 --> 00:01:44.000
Thank you, Arnold, for this invitation.
00:01:44.079 --> 00:01:45.519
I'm absolutely delighted.
00:01:45.680 --> 00:01:48.159
It's an honor to be part of Goodgeist.
00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:55.040
For me, Goodgeist is a combination of English and German because Geist in German means spirit.
00:01:55.200 --> 00:02:02.239
So it's this positive spirit that will help us make progress on the path to sustainability.
00:02:02.799 --> 00:02:03.840
Well, that's great.
00:02:04.000 --> 00:02:07.120
Yeah, this is the good spirit we want to keep.
00:02:07.519 --> 00:02:10.960
And we are also very happy that you're with us today, Suzanne.
00:02:11.039 --> 00:02:17.280
But before diving deep into sustainable construction, we would love to hear your personal story.
00:02:17.439 --> 00:02:22.639
What led you to focus on sustainable construction and energy efficiency?
00:02:23.439 --> 00:02:31.759
Actually, I'm fascinated by nature and studied biology, micro biochemistry, and microbiology at the university.
00:02:32.000 --> 00:02:37.120
And back then, biotech and microbiology were really cutting-edge fields.
00:02:37.280 --> 00:02:46.560
But I quickly realized that it wasn't about working with nature, but rather about exploiting and controlling it for economic gain.
00:02:46.800 --> 00:03:00.800
And that's why, after finishing my thesis in biotechnology, I carried on studying technical environmental protection and focused on economics, especially in the areas of renewable energy and renewable raw materials.
00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:10.960
As a biologist and biochemist, I know all about the damage that fossil fuels and petrochemicals can cause, and I wanted to try something different.
00:03:11.199 --> 00:03:20.000
So it was pretty obvious that the focus should be on the building sector, as it uses a lot of land, materials, and energy.
00:03:20.319 --> 00:03:25.919
I've worked in various organizations, each with a different perspective on society.
00:03:26.240 --> 00:03:31.919
I worked with an NGO, research institution, education, and business.
00:03:32.159 --> 00:03:35.360
But I felt I was missing a bit of a global perspective.
00:03:35.439 --> 00:03:50.319
And I really wanted to understand better how all these things are connected, especially the relationship between Europe and Africa, given how close they are, their colonial past and current neocolonial situation.
00:03:50.560 --> 00:03:57.439
I couldn't find a job that would have allowed me to do that, and so I just made one for myself.
00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:05.280
Sierra has been around since 2009 and has existed in its current legal form since 2019.
00:04:06.080 --> 00:04:06.719
Amazing.
00:04:06.960 --> 00:04:09.919
Do you know, Suzanne, you and I are kindred spirits?
00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:11.360
I did the same thing.
00:04:11.520 --> 00:04:18.000
I just made a job for myself, and 25 years later, somehow it's still going.
00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:18.959
So that's amazing.
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:20.319
Yeah, that's good.
00:04:21.279 --> 00:04:35.839
So when when we look at your focus areas in in at Sierra, there are the first two sort of inner efficient use of energy and natural resources in buildings, industry and agriculture, and sustainable development on site and those sorts of issues.
00:04:36.079 --> 00:04:41.279
Those are those are the kind of correlations we'd expect in your in your work, Suzanne.
00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:45.439
But your third is globalization and migration, which is interesting.
00:04:45.680 --> 00:04:52.560
So can you tell us how this third focus is working with the first two and and why you think it's so essential?
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:59.199
Yes, so this has actually to do with the Institute's name, which is also its mission statement.
00:04:59.519 --> 00:05:08.639
How can we achieve a sustainable supply of energy and resources for everyone in a peaceful manner within the current global economic system?
00:05:09.519 --> 00:05:17.120
This seems to be a contradiction in itself, but we try to solve that somehow by addressing these three topics.
00:05:17.279 --> 00:05:28.480
So, as you said, the first is about improvements, let's say, within the current economic system, efficient use of energy and natural resources in buildings, industry, and agriculture.
00:05:28.639 --> 00:05:32.319
And here we work a lot on energy efficiency in buildings.
00:05:32.480 --> 00:05:39.360
So I'm also a specialist on energy performance certificates, so energy related assessment of buildings.
00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:48.319
The second section addresses the transformation within with, let's say, committed individuals and pioneers at local level.
00:05:48.480 --> 00:05:53.600
So that's a section on sustainable site development, smart cities, and energy and spatial planning.
00:05:53.680 --> 00:06:00.639
So this is more on, let's say, collaboration with front runners, so to speak.
00:06:00.959 --> 00:06:06.319
And the third section, here we look at developments at international level.
00:06:06.399 --> 00:06:09.120
So this is about globalization and migration.
00:06:09.279 --> 00:06:15.759
It is, so to speak, our internal research area, which provides input for the other two sections.
00:06:16.480 --> 00:06:30.000
So this research on globalization and migration has led to the conviction that we must become independent of fossil fuels and that the concept of sufficiency is essential.
00:06:30.240 --> 00:06:39.439
Although this contradicts the current neoliberal economic system and therefore doesn't seem achievable in the near future.
00:06:40.560 --> 00:06:48.639
Because sufficiency means avoiding the need for energy, raw materials, land, water, and other natural resources.
00:06:48.800 --> 00:06:54.399
And it goes without saying that less consumption reduces the burden on the environment.
00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:57.519
But the question is how will the economy cope with that?
00:06:57.759 --> 00:07:06.240
So, an example in Austria, there are plans to expand wind power for renewable electricity generation.
00:07:06.800 --> 00:07:13.759
But many Austrians are against this because wind turbines are so ugly, spoiler landscape.
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:15.519
So that's what they say.
00:07:15.920 --> 00:07:21.839
Another example of materials, for example, from in the area of colorance.
00:07:22.079 --> 00:07:29.439
Natural colorants from plants are expensive, harder to standardize, don't offer a complete color palette.
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:35.279
Petrochemicals, on the other hand, provide brilliant colors that are standardized and cheap.
00:07:35.439 --> 00:07:54.800
So in Europe, we have benefited from gas and oil for our energy and material supplies, but people in many oil-producing regions die early from contaminated soil, air, water, or they are forced to leave if they can afford it, and the majority cannot.
00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:58.639
So can we say it's none of our business?
00:07:58.959 --> 00:08:02.160
And I say I can't say that.
00:08:02.399 --> 00:08:10.879
Of course, the governments in the producing regions bear responsibility because, after all, they benefit from the businesses.
00:08:11.120 --> 00:08:19.600
But our economy has been globalized for centuries, and material wealth is largely based on the exploitation of others.
00:08:19.759 --> 00:08:29.600
So, in short, we cannot claim to be achieving sustainable development in Europe if it is based on the destruction elsewhere.
00:08:29.839 --> 00:08:33.519
So, so this is what our research teaches us.
00:08:33.679 --> 00:08:39.679
It teaches us about the global just aspect of the just transition.
00:08:40.559 --> 00:08:41.600
That's great.
00:08:41.759 --> 00:08:51.679
And while you have a habit of cutting through the noise and selecting the core problem when looking at the general picture, and you just did it.
00:08:52.000 --> 00:08:57.120
Most of the time you state that it is the current economic system.
00:08:57.600 --> 00:08:58.799
The problem is there.
00:08:59.039 --> 00:09:03.919
So, what's your proposal to alter or change this system and to what end?
00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:08.879
For me, the benchmark is nature.
00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:11.840
Ecosystems function in cycles.
00:09:12.080 --> 00:09:16.879
And for example, crude oil is not part of those cycles, it's a poison.
00:09:17.039 --> 00:09:18.399
It's as simple as that.
00:09:18.559 --> 00:09:29.919
Or if you want it more precisely, it's a complex mixture of toxic organic neurotoxic substances that should actually remain well distorted.
00:09:30.159 --> 00:09:42.080
And the problem continues because uh the plastics made from oil show up as microplastics and all the serious issues they cause for the marine ecosystems.
00:09:42.240 --> 00:09:48.879
And we could we could continue talking for hours on that on that issue.
00:09:49.120 --> 00:09:56.240
So from an e from an ecosystem point of view, using crude oil doesn't make sense at all.
00:09:56.480 --> 00:09:59.039
But economy-wise, it does.
00:09:59.279 --> 00:10:08.000
So that means our economic system rewards the use of oil, which is destroying the living environment of many people.
00:10:08.240 --> 00:10:12.399
So you would probably agree that there is something wrong with that.
00:10:12.879 --> 00:10:16.399
It's not a fair system on the global scale.
00:10:16.799 --> 00:10:25.360
And of course, I know that some people say life isn't fair, but I personally believe in equal opportunities for all.
00:10:26.000 --> 00:10:31.679
Just like Bruno Kreisky, the former social democratic chancellor of Austria.
00:10:31.759 --> 00:10:36.559
So in Austria, he is a very famous person abroad, probably not, I don't know.
00:10:36.799 --> 00:10:37.919
But yeah.
00:10:38.399 --> 00:10:42.159
So that's the purpose, uh, but how to get there?
00:10:42.559 --> 00:10:45.679
I said previously that the goal is sufficiency.
00:10:45.840 --> 00:10:48.159
That means less consumption.
00:10:48.799 --> 00:11:04.000
But but the challenge is how can sufficiency be reconciled with national budgets, which are, after all, largely based on value-added tax, income tax, in other words, on consumption.
00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:13.519
Not to talk about the national economies of oil-producing countries which actually rely on debt production and consumption.
00:11:14.080 --> 00:11:18.240
So new tax systems have been under development since decades.
00:11:18.720 --> 00:11:29.279
I remember that when I started working at the Austrian Ecology Institute in the mid-1990s, a proposal for a resource tax was being developed at the university.
00:11:29.519 --> 00:11:33.200
But apparently the time was not yet right for it.
00:11:33.440 --> 00:11:45.360
I think we're gradually, or more recently, rather dramatically, reaching a point where it's becoming clear that we need approaches like these, as well as other new ones.
00:11:45.679 --> 00:11:50.159
But of course, I don't have a ready-made solution that covers all.
00:11:50.399 --> 00:11:53.759
But we try to do something in the area of spatial planning.
00:11:54.720 --> 00:12:12.960
Well, you know, that's beautifully lined up my next question, Suzanne, which is also usually it means I won't get distracted about ranting, as we say in English, about extractivist capitalism, and how the idea of infinite growth on a finite planet is crazy.
00:12:13.279 --> 00:12:14.320
All of that stuff.
00:12:14.480 --> 00:12:23.440
And I think, you know, I love the way you're looking at this, and and how, in particular, sufficiency, which sounds like such a reasonable thing, doesn't it?
00:12:23.600 --> 00:12:31.600
Sufficiency sounds like such a common sense, normal thing, and yet it's grating against neoliberal capitalism.
00:12:31.759 --> 00:12:33.039
Incredibly, isn't that?
00:12:33.519 --> 00:12:35.519
Yeah, incredible, incredible.
00:12:35.759 --> 00:12:38.399
Well, listen, let's talk about spatial planning, though, Suzanne.
00:12:38.879 --> 00:12:40.159
It's a common thread.
00:12:40.240 --> 00:12:44.720
When we talk about healthy and smart cities, spatial planning is critical.
00:12:44.879 --> 00:12:52.159
So mostly when we talk about smart cities, we tend to talk about new technologies, sensors, internet of things, all those sorts of things.
00:12:52.320 --> 00:12:56.639
But you emphasize local, committed people and shifting behaviors.
00:12:56.879 --> 00:13:02.240
So tell us your frame on a sort of place-based, site-based, sustainable development.
00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:03.360
What does it look like?
00:13:04.080 --> 00:13:04.399
Yes.
00:13:04.480 --> 00:13:16.879
So uh when you address the technologies, as I agree, of course, we need new technologies, but they only work when you actually put them into practice.
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:19.519
And this is where the people come in.
00:13:19.840 --> 00:13:23.759
So people generally find it quite difficult to change the habits.
00:13:24.000 --> 00:13:30.720
Anything unfamiliar requires extra effort, and most of the time everybody's busy dealing with day-to-day issues.
00:13:31.039 --> 00:13:52.000
So if you look at the sustainable technologies available to us and which of them are actually being used, I would say that transformation is less about expanding technical capabilities and more about people's attitudes and how they work together to make use of these technologies possible.
00:13:52.240 --> 00:14:00.240
So that's why we need to work together with committed people who are open to innovative solutions and committed to make a change.
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:10.000
Cooperatives and associations are great examples of this, or frontrunners among the mayors of the Austrian municipalities we're working with.
00:14:10.320 --> 00:14:16.960
Nevertheless, we must succeed in enshrining such new approaches in law as well.
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:21.519
And we try to do this in our work on regional planning at local level.
00:14:21.679 --> 00:14:33.919
Here we have a legal instrument of local development plans, which are usually drawn up for a 10-year period and provide the framework for everything that happens within the municipal area.
00:14:34.080 --> 00:14:48.399
So we are supporting these local development plans, both in terms of content and process, with some front-runner municipalities, so that actually sustainable development plans emerge.
00:14:48.480 --> 00:14:56.960
And all this is guided by the vision of putting the long-term financing of local authorities on a new footing.
00:14:57.200 --> 00:15:06.559
For example, by taking into account their contributions towards achieving the energy efficiency targets and renewable energy targets.
00:15:07.519 --> 00:15:14.960
So it's the end of the all talk and no action era, and we all need the action.
00:15:15.279 --> 00:15:22.559
But when we always talk about the green transition, we put the emphasis on just transition.
00:15:23.360 --> 00:15:38.639
But when we look at what's been going on in the last five years, we see huge geopolitical conflicts and they turn into energy wars, and the rise of an anti-everything narrative is surrounding us.
00:15:38.879 --> 00:15:45.759
So, where do you think we stand as a global village in turning the odds for a better future for all?
00:15:48.320 --> 00:15:48.799
Yes.
00:15:48.960 --> 00:15:58.559
So regarding the wars on energy, I would like to just say that actually wars have always been fought over resources.
00:15:58.799 --> 00:16:14.720
For example, centuries ago, starting with the colonization of Africa when the focus was on palm oil and rubber, and later on oil and gas and minerals, or the Congo, for example, has actually been a war zone for around 150 years.
00:16:14.879 --> 00:16:19.679
But this is happening outside our bubble, so to speak.
00:16:20.000 --> 00:16:30.879
So for many years I've been pointing out in my university lectures that it's unwise to make ourselves dependent on dictators for our energy supply.
00:16:31.200 --> 00:16:36.720
But back then, people believed in the concept of change through trade.
00:16:36.879 --> 00:16:38.720
And I think that era is over.
00:16:38.879 --> 00:16:47.759
So the war in Ukraine is now very close to home for Europeans, and the war over energy is much more threatening.
00:16:48.159 --> 00:16:52.159
But I believe we need justice in the global village.
00:16:53.679 --> 00:17:04.079
And to achieve this, we must see ourselves as Europeans or better as global citizens who treat each other as partners.
00:17:04.240 --> 00:17:06.240
I think this is essential.
00:17:07.039 --> 00:17:10.000
You mentioned the anti-everything attitude.
00:17:10.160 --> 00:17:18.480
I think that comes from a fear that others have more than you do, or that they want to take something away from you.
00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:25.039
So I think that's a psychological phenomenon that is quite well known.
00:17:25.279 --> 00:17:34.000
But the current capabilities of the media make it very easy to exploit people's usual feelings of inferiority and fears.
00:17:34.319 --> 00:17:44.400
And if you read Edward Bernet's booklet on propaganda, this makes it clear how precarious the situation has become.
00:17:44.720 --> 00:17:51.119
Because there are politicians who misuse insights from mass psychology for their own ends.
00:17:51.839 --> 00:18:01.279
But there is also a positive aspect because media provide platforms to individuals and organizations to educate the masses.
00:18:01.519 --> 00:18:14.559
For example, on history and politics, there is a great book and also a podcast by an um Gambian Swedish author about African history.
00:18:14.720 --> 00:18:18.079
So if somebody is interested in that, I can really recommend it.
00:18:18.319 --> 00:18:25.359
And actually, your your good guys podcast is also part of it, part of that positive puzzle.
00:18:25.599 --> 00:18:30.720
So, how can we move towards this global justice I mentioned before?
00:18:31.519 --> 00:18:35.519
The economic model draws on the concept of external cost.
00:18:36.000 --> 00:18:43.440
So this means cost is quantified, which is paid by the public and not by the company causing this cost.
00:18:43.839 --> 00:19:02.880
So 20 years ago, a series of riches projects were carried out, and the research done somehow provided or provides a basis for CO2 tax and other instruments like the CSRD and the EU taxonomy.
00:19:04.400 --> 00:19:16.319
But usually the price of CO2 is based on the cost of reducing emissions because the impacts are global.
00:19:17.440 --> 00:19:24.400
So you can also determine the cost of CO2 with by assessing the damages.
00:19:24.480 --> 00:19:31.680
But damage costs are rather used for pollutants where a link can be established between the source and the affected region.
00:19:32.559 --> 00:19:36.880
So this is not the case when you assess the external cost of CO2.
00:19:37.440 --> 00:19:54.480
But if we were to consider the damage cost of raw material extraction in many parts of the world and the lost lives and destroyed ecosystems due to inhuman working conditions and pollution, how expensive would fossil fuels then be?
00:19:54.960 --> 00:19:59.599
And what about the coaltain and lithium and so on?
00:20:01.119 --> 00:20:10.640
So the material extraction destroys entire regions, and the tax CO2 tax cannot be applied in such cases.
00:20:11.200 --> 00:20:15.599
The problem is similar devastated land and another lost generation.
00:20:16.000 --> 00:20:28.160
And this is this is one of the reasons why I don't focus so much on climate, but more on resources, clean production, efficient use, circular economy, and quality of life.
00:20:28.319 --> 00:20:41.440
So, in my view, the concept of external cost does not go far enough and is at best a stop gap until a better solution can be found.
00:20:41.680 --> 00:20:53.920
And ultimately, one has to ask the question why are companies allowed to engage in harmful practices and sell harmful products?
00:20:56.640 --> 00:20:59.200
That is an amazingly important question.
00:21:00.799 --> 00:21:13.839
Well, let's talk about companies then, Suzanne, even though you've distracted me with the booklet propaganda, Nebubene, and the idea of an invisible elite that controls all of us, like an invisible government was in that booklet, wasn't it?
00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:15.039
And it's really profound.
00:21:15.279 --> 00:21:28.000
But if we go back to your proposition there, your question, address why is it that companies are allowed to pursue harmful practices and that consumers have to decide what to buy and what not to buy?
00:21:28.079 --> 00:21:31.039
And we place that burden on the consumer.
00:21:31.200 --> 00:21:33.920
Tell us about that, address that question for us.
00:21:34.480 --> 00:21:39.279
I think that's really important because it concerns it concerns everything, right?
00:21:39.440 --> 00:21:43.119
It's also it concerns also the basic supply of food.
00:21:43.359 --> 00:21:45.599
There is such a good example.
00:21:46.000 --> 00:21:47.680
I just would like to share that.
00:21:47.920 --> 00:21:52.000
We have an educational program on the German television.
00:21:52.319 --> 00:21:57.519
So there is a food tech a food techno technologist, a food technologist.
00:21:57.759 --> 00:21:59.759
And this the the this food technology.
00:22:01.519 --> 00:22:06.160
Recreates cheap, mass-produced meals sold by industry.
00:22:06.720 --> 00:22:17.200
And actually, the conclusion is that the main ingredients are processed fats, carbohydrates, sugar, flavorings, and colorings, which actually make people ill.
00:22:17.440 --> 00:22:26.799
So it's not a coincidence that diabetes and obesity, along with all the associated metabolic and physiological problems, are on the rise.
00:22:26.960 --> 00:22:33.279
So why is it permitted to make profit from food that makes people ill?
00:22:33.680 --> 00:22:36.319
And the argument is always the same.
00:22:36.480 --> 00:22:48.480
So the argument is that bands are only of a limited help because if there is no social support, people will find ways to get around the bands.
00:22:48.720 --> 00:22:54.640
And enforcing the laws through inspections and fines would just be far too expensive.
00:22:54.880 --> 00:22:59.759
So it's all about social acceptance and social support.
00:23:00.559 --> 00:23:12.319
And ultimately, this means that a change can only be achieved by working together with like-minded people and raising awareness amongst others.
00:23:12.559 --> 00:23:16.000
But this can also be challenging and takes a lot of time.
00:23:16.160 --> 00:23:19.039
And sometimes it's quite hard to be patient.
00:23:19.920 --> 00:23:28.480
But I've learned from my own experience how long it can take for the right moment to come to put an idea into practice.
00:23:29.119 --> 00:23:45.359
So when I initiated the assessment of green buildings in Austria in the late 1990s, I was surprised to discover that a similar attempt had already been made in the 1970s in response to the Club of Rome's report, The Limits to Growth.
00:23:45.519 --> 00:23:51.039
But it was only decades later that the time was right for such a system to succeed.
00:23:51.279 --> 00:23:55.119
And I think it's much the same in other situations.
00:23:55.839 --> 00:24:05.759
And actually, when I'm running out of patience, I turn to my history book, and that quickly gives me a sense of just how short a decade actually is.
00:24:07.119 --> 00:24:09.119
So that that's my method.
00:24:21.519 --> 00:24:23.279
But we are out of time.
00:24:23.359 --> 00:24:25.759
So here is our final question.
00:24:26.079 --> 00:24:35.759
Our network, as you know, is ironically called Do Not Smile because because we need to make sustainability a subject that brings happiness into the world.
00:24:35.920 --> 00:24:40.319
So what object, place or person always makes you smile?
00:24:41.039 --> 00:24:45.200
When the emphasis is on always, I have a very clear answer.
00:24:45.279 --> 00:24:47.039
That's my dance classes.
00:24:48.240 --> 00:24:49.359
Beautiful.
00:24:49.839 --> 00:24:50.640
I love it.
00:24:50.799 --> 00:24:51.200
I love it.
00:24:51.359 --> 00:24:54.079
And you uh so you tell it, we're gonna have to go deeper, Suzanne.
00:24:54.240 --> 00:24:55.279
What kind of dance?
00:24:55.440 --> 00:24:57.039
What kind of dance is it?
00:24:57.519 --> 00:24:59.119
Oh, across everything.
00:24:59.279 --> 00:25:17.119
So I've been dancing since I think and I I I started with four years, something like that, with classic dance, and then I just did it across the disciplines, modern jazz, but also African dance, various sections.
00:25:17.279 --> 00:25:23.759
So I you know, and I just Latin dance, so I just uh select what I like and go there.
00:25:26.880 --> 00:25:27.920
I think that's amazing.
00:25:28.000 --> 00:25:37.839
Well, listen, Susan, it's been an absolute joy talking to you, and I'm going to uh switch off the camera in a minute and do a little dance around the room in your honour.
00:25:38.079 --> 00:25:44.000
It may be, I'm thinking it may be a bit, maybe hip hop, just to really shake it up a little bit.
00:25:44.400 --> 00:25:45.279
Yeah, that's awesome.
00:25:46.319 --> 00:25:50.319
But no, it's been brilliant talking to you and and and really great to talk about.
00:25:50.480 --> 00:26:04.480
I think I'm going to reflect not just on sufficiency, but also on your your last thoughts around historical progress and how a decade isn't really that long and the patience that we all need to achieve sustainable development.
00:26:04.640 --> 00:26:05.920
So, Suzanne, thank you so much.
00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:07.759
Damla, do you want to wrap it up?
00:26:08.079 --> 00:26:14.880
So, thanks to everyone who has listened to our Goodgeist podcast brought to you by the Do Not Smile Network of Agencies.
00:26:15.200 --> 00:26:21.359
Make sure you listen to future episodes where we'll be talking to more amazing people about how we can work together to create a more sustainable future.
00:26:21.440 --> 00:26:23.680
So, Damla, Suzanne, see you soon.
00:26:24.000 --> 00:26:24.480
Bye.
00:26:27.279 --> 00:26:36.960
Goodgeist, a podcast series on sustainability, hosted by Damla Ozler and Steve Connor.
00:26:37.759 --> 00:26:40.720
Brought to you by the DNS Network.