00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:01.520
Welcome to the Going Green podcast.
00:00:02.680 --> 00:00:15.160
COP28 is virtually upon us, but I want to go back and have a look at some of the pledges we made in COP26 and see, well, how have we got on?
00:00:15.160 --> 00:00:24.879
How do we do with those pledges? Well, have a look at that over the next 30 minutes or so.
00:00:31.559 --> 00:00:36.600
Right, OK, so COP26, can you remember back that far?
00:00:36.600 --> 00:00:38.158
It seems quite a long way.
00:00:38.158 --> 00:00:38.960
I know it does.
00:00:39.200 --> 00:00:44.439
We had sort of Boris Johnson, quite a lot of prime ministers actually since then, haven't we?
00:00:44.439 --> 00:00:51.039
So we had Boris Johnson in charge there, and they were looking at exciting things like forests.
00:00:52.158 --> 00:00:53.798
Could we rebuild the forests?
00:00:54.798 --> 00:00:56.280
Could we get rid of methane?
00:00:56.840 --> 00:01:01.158
Could we sort of finance all the other countries?
00:01:01.158 --> 00:01:06.159
A lot of countries wanted a lot of money from us to actually sort of get down to do something.
00:01:06.239 --> 00:01:08.920
So that was COP26 in Glasgow.
00:01:09.799 --> 00:01:18.200
Hundreds of governments, private institutions, they all sort of were making pledges to do this, that and the other.
00:01:18.599 --> 00:01:26.680
And there were a few notable exceptions of certain countries that didn't really make sort of good pledges.
00:01:27.920 --> 00:01:31.879
And, well, how have we got on so far, Paul?
00:01:32.438 --> 00:01:40.280
Well, it's one of those things where we've sort of done stuff.
00:01:41.239 --> 00:01:59.760
Stuff's been happening, but any pro... I wouldn't say no progress has been made, but it's one of those things where actual measurable progress hasn't been made, but progress has been made in regards to, you know, we made these pledges or things like to do the forestry.
00:02:00.599 --> 00:02:10.360
And of course, lots of places are now measuring their deforestation or their reforestation levels.
00:02:11.120 --> 00:02:17.120
So it's one of the things where, you know, have we committed to actually bringing those things down?
00:02:17.120 --> 00:02:24.919
The answer is no. Are we now actually measuring what we need to measure to determine if we are keeping to that goal?
00:02:24.919 --> 00:02:25.840
The answer is yes.
00:02:26.878 --> 00:02:34.479
So, yeah, it's one of those odd things where the pledges are, the answer is we're measuring them.
00:02:35.960 --> 00:02:41.360
And the fact that previously when we weren't, it's sort of like, well, how do we know we're doing any better?
00:02:41.598 --> 00:02:47.360
This is the whole case in point. This is what people are now looking at and trying to work out strategies to do things.
00:02:47.758 --> 00:02:51.199
But of course, you've got to work out how to measure things going forward.
00:02:51.240 --> 00:02:58.639
So that's one of the major sort of policies. All these things are off there, not being measured.
00:02:59.520 --> 00:03:06.438
But those places are sitting up things that measure and organize and understand what they do.
00:03:06.438 --> 00:03:19.038
It's like, yeah, yes, you can reforest an area, but you need to work out not where the area is, but how many trees are in the area compared to normal compared to how much you reforested or deforested.
00:03:19.240 --> 00:03:27.318
But the pledge was to end and actually start reversing deforestation by 2030.
00:03:28.758 --> 00:03:41.919
A few years have passed and, well, certain countries sort of said they were going to do various bits and pieces, and certain countries, well, they haven't.
00:03:43.038 --> 00:03:53.639
So we had, what, 140 countries joined a coalition and there were really big countries in there that said they were going to do something like Brazil.
00:03:53.840 --> 00:04:02.919
Yeah, Brazil was things. They said virtually these 140 countries, which cover actually 90 percent of the world's forests.
00:04:02.919 --> 00:04:04.199
That's one of the big things to do.
00:04:05.240 --> 00:04:16.120
Because, of course, places like Saudi Arabia and those sort of lovely Middle Eastern countries where there's hardly a tree in sight, well, there's not a lot they can do.
00:04:16.120 --> 00:04:34.720
There's not a lot they can do. But it is countries like Brazil, Indonesia and things like the Dominican Republic of Congo, which cover most of the forests of the world. That's where they are. But they're still chopping down forests.
00:04:35.720 --> 00:04:48.000
Yeah, so they don't seem to, yeah, they got this end it by 2030. I almost get the feeling they want to sort of carry on until 2029 and 7-8.
00:04:49.240 --> 00:04:59.360
Unfortunately, yeah. But the point that they're making is, of course, unfortunately, they basically plotted a nice line since where we were at COP26.
00:05:00.120 --> 00:05:10.199
And then they said, of course, that's how much the deforestation area per year, as in that sample, the area, the forest per year.
00:05:11.240 --> 00:05:19.519
And they drew a nice line from that level. So obviously zero with a line saying 2030. And basically then we're saying, right.
00:05:19.759 --> 00:05:35.199
So last year in 2022, I say 2022, the year's right, we were actually 21 percent higher in deforestation amounts, as in the rate of deforestation.
00:05:36.000 --> 00:05:36.800
Yeah, it actually went up.
00:05:37.480 --> 00:05:38.920
Well, I wouldn't say it went up.
00:05:38.920 --> 00:05:50.838
Well, it did. In my book, it went up by about 6.6 percent. Yeah. And it should have gone down a bit, which is why it should have gone down 21 percent.
00:05:50.838 --> 00:05:52.120
Yeah, the answer is it should have gone.
00:05:52.120 --> 00:06:01.879
The target was to reduce it by 21 percent. And unfortunately, it actually saved the level, say, more, a bit higher, of about 6 percent.
00:06:02.560 --> 00:06:07.639
Meaning, of course, the difference between the target level and, of course, welcome statistics.
00:06:08.639 --> 00:06:17.680
So that's what they're going to be talking about this cop saying, look, we've missed the targets and the gap difference is getting bigger.
00:06:18.920 --> 00:06:19.959
What can we do now?
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:22.199
Extra to deal with that?
00:06:22.240 --> 00:06:28.278
That's essentially what all these cops basically do in relation to things that decided at previous ones.
00:06:28.278 --> 00:06:32.920
And then they're always looked at and reviewed and see if they can do anything this time.
00:06:33.399 --> 00:06:38.120
So that's probably not on the agenda this year, I'm afraid, because they have to decide it.
00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:41.720
But is that something to look at later that they need to come back on?
00:06:42.278 --> 00:06:51.199
Yeah. I know on the agenda this year, they're more talking about methane because it's one of those things where loads of places said, yes, we'll cut it.
00:06:51.240 --> 00:06:53.519
But no targets. We won't actually set targets.
00:06:54.959 --> 00:07:01.000
But it's bad enough, though, when you set a target and you don't sort of succeed in doing it.
00:07:01.278 --> 00:07:11.519
But in perspective, how much of the world's forests have disappeared each year since COP26?
00:07:12.360 --> 00:07:19.319
And that's a forest the size of the Republic of Ireland has disappeared each year.
00:07:20.240 --> 00:07:23.838
So that's sort of a lot of forests that disappear.
00:07:25.319 --> 00:07:32.800
Yes. And the other problem is, of course, if you want to sort of replace the forests, we can get the trees from.
00:07:34.278 --> 00:07:42.920
And I know one of the problems if you take a tree, let's suppose you take a tree, you take a little seedling and it's going to be about yea high.
00:07:43.439 --> 00:07:50.160
And it's sort of we've got to the bit where it's already germinated because you've got a problem there.
00:07:50.800 --> 00:07:55.838
Then I've got to manage to turn that into a tree that's going to survive.
00:07:56.399 --> 00:08:09.199
And that's going to take quite a few years because you plant a tree and probably the first thing that comes along is sort of a rabbit or something like that.
00:08:09.240 --> 00:08:12.160
The squirrels come along and get rid of the seeds in the first place.
00:08:12.838 --> 00:08:17.838
Then along comes the rabbit and it says, oh, look, there's a nice couple of leaves here. That's that tree gone.
00:08:19.000 --> 00:08:26.399
Then they grow up a little bit more and the deer come along and say, oh, yeah, I can manage to eat those leaves.
00:08:27.199 --> 00:08:28.560
So that's that one gone.
00:08:29.240 --> 00:08:40.200
They get a little bit bigger and the squirrels decide that that bark would be better somewhere else and they they ring the tree and that kills it.
00:08:40.879 --> 00:08:48.480
So you've actually got to get a tree to a reasonable state before you can sort of cope with it.
00:08:48.480 --> 00:08:50.399
So just plant your trees. No good.
00:08:50.759 --> 00:08:56.200
You've actually got to plant a reasonably mature tree, which means we've got to have a lot of trees.
00:08:56.240 --> 00:09:09.158
And how do you fancy growing sort of, I know, three islands or four islands worth of trees ready to plant throughout the world every year every year.
00:09:09.480 --> 00:09:11.440
And that's a problem. Yes.
00:09:11.798 --> 00:09:20.200
And this is why doing these cops and cops and sort of reviewing sort of where we are on these pledges that we previously made.
00:09:20.240 --> 00:09:23.200
You know, look at the pledges next year of 24, 27.
00:09:23.798 --> 00:09:28.080
Yeah. Taking a couple of years to actually look at them and showing what we're doing.
00:09:28.278 --> 00:09:32.639
Are we increasing the amount of tree production?
00:09:32.639 --> 00:09:33.759
That's the wrong way to put it.
00:09:33.759 --> 00:09:38.798
But actual tree forestry as in tree growing production.
00:09:39.798 --> 00:09:43.519
And the answer is there's no signs that we are.
00:09:44.558 --> 00:09:49.240
Even though we need to grow the trees, a size of island every year.
00:09:50.080 --> 00:09:51.120
No, there's no.
00:09:53.399 --> 00:09:54.798
Not really anything for it.
00:09:54.798 --> 00:09:58.960
No signs that it's actually happening in regards to the production.
00:09:59.158 --> 00:10:10.558
Because, of course, how long does it take to grow a tree to a state where it's ready to go into a non-retrore area, but to be planted in these areas?
00:10:10.558 --> 00:10:11.200
And the answer is it's seven years.
00:10:11.240 --> 00:10:13.759
So we're sort of saying there's a seven year.
00:10:14.678 --> 00:10:17.320
And that means we're 2023 doing a quick bit of us.
00:10:17.759 --> 00:10:19.678
We've got to start doing it by 2030.
00:10:21.360 --> 00:10:22.558
We've already got to start it.
00:10:23.080 --> 00:10:23.320
Yes.
00:10:23.960 --> 00:10:27.639
You can see the whole problem of all these goals and targets.
00:10:27.639 --> 00:10:31.038
However, if you don't set a target, no one gets on and does anything.
00:10:31.440 --> 00:10:35.200
So if we actually did do things, then we might actually get going.
00:10:35.240 --> 00:10:41.120
So the whole point and whole idea around all these things of COP.
00:10:41.960 --> 00:10:50.759
So, you know, but that's where looking and reviewing these targets, you can see then people aren't doing enough.
00:10:50.759 --> 00:10:51.759
Governments aren't doing enough.
00:10:52.200 --> 00:10:54.639
Private firms aren't, you know, everybody's not doing enough.
00:10:54.639 --> 00:10:59.798
And that's just one of those unfortunate things where we don't say we're not doing enough.
00:11:00.080 --> 00:11:01.200
No one does any more.
00:11:01.240 --> 00:11:08.120
So, yeah, although it's sort of, you know, sort of like bad, you haven't been working hard enough on it.
00:11:09.320 --> 00:11:16.360
The answer truly is it's knowing that we're not working hard enough might spare more action or more things.
00:11:16.759 --> 00:11:17.558
So, yes.
00:11:17.759 --> 00:11:20.798
So the answer is more trees required.
00:11:21.080 --> 00:11:28.759
And it's suddenly looking at saying we missed it by 21% from the target to the target on target.
00:11:30.278 --> 00:11:37.080
Maybe we now need to grow an extra island as well as the island we need to grow this year.
00:11:37.918 --> 00:11:43.080
The mask gets mind boggling very quickly, but that's what effectively needs to happen.
00:11:44.038 --> 00:11:44.960
And it isn't.
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:48.000
But that's why we're talking about it.
00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:57.798
And that's why, you know, people sort of, you know, you can go and moan at sort of your governments or your officials and say, we need to be growing.
00:11:58.240 --> 00:11:59.320
What's the plan?
00:11:59.798 --> 00:12:01.399
You know, where's the money?
00:12:01.399 --> 00:12:05.278
Who's, you know, all the elections are going to take place.
00:12:05.278 --> 00:12:13.558
That's one of the things you could raise is sort of what's your plans do all these things and just just going through your parts.
00:12:14.000 --> 00:12:18.678
That's a slightly different issue and regaining all the things.
00:12:18.678 --> 00:12:18.960
But yes.
00:12:20.038 --> 00:12:26.558
So another thing that came out of COP26 was, of course, all these this me thing, I say, band reduction.
00:12:27.240 --> 00:12:33.519
They managed to they wanted the band and they managed to negotiate to this word called reduction.
00:12:35.240 --> 00:12:41.278
So in twenty twenty six, COP26.
00:12:41.558 --> 00:12:44.519
Yeah, you can't do in twenty twenty six.
00:12:44.519 --> 00:12:52.519
I know they decided that there was a lot of me think all this oil production creates methane and they just burn it.
00:12:53.480 --> 00:12:55.120
They burn it for power.
00:12:55.639 --> 00:12:57.320
Now, they just burn it off at the source.
00:12:59.240 --> 00:13:09.200
And basically, as we know, that methane is something that's like forty times worse than CO2 for its greenhouse emission effect.
00:13:09.798 --> 00:13:10.798
But that's why you burning.
00:13:11.038 --> 00:13:12.080
It's a good idea.
00:13:13.120 --> 00:13:14.200
Sounds crap idea, actually.
00:13:14.440 --> 00:13:19.200
But that's why they burn it because if you just release the methane, that's really bad.
00:13:19.240 --> 00:13:26.440
Whereas if you burn it, it turns into CO2 and that's 40 times better, isn't it?
00:13:26.639 --> 00:13:27.558
So it's less.
00:13:28.960 --> 00:13:29.240
Yeah.
00:13:29.639 --> 00:13:29.840
Yeah.
00:13:29.879 --> 00:13:34.558
I don't think better is definitely the word I would choose if I was actually doing this.
00:13:34.558 --> 00:13:36.879
But that's the way it goes.
00:13:36.879 --> 00:13:40.558
So, yes, that's the whole reason behind all this.
00:13:40.558 --> 00:13:44.639
And we say, well, definitely could we do two things actually?
00:13:46.080 --> 00:13:48.440
Well, first, you don't release methane at all.
00:13:48.960 --> 00:13:58.440
And then potentially, could you not burn that to generate power later down the line, as in instead of just capping off and preventing being released, could we use it?
00:13:58.440 --> 00:14:14.120
Now, these are the ideas that they had sort of to the idea of because they're not talking about they just want methane production or methane levels being reduced, which is the whole thing, whether it's burning it or using it.
00:14:14.240 --> 00:14:15.840
And they didn't care how it was used.
00:14:15.840 --> 00:14:19.278
They just want to reduce in the amount is being emitted.
00:14:19.798 --> 00:14:25.759
That's the actual what the targets are being set for rather than sort of saying, you know, emitting it.
00:14:26.519 --> 00:14:40.519
And one of the things, of course, is they're saying lots of places who are mitts, these are the I say oil production, but it's not quite oil in relation to the chemical gas and a whole bunch of extra things.
00:14:42.240 --> 00:14:49.320
They've been not doing anything. And so, of course, the amount of methane in the atmosphere is increasing.
00:14:50.158 --> 00:14:52.639
Who would know if you don't do anything increases?
00:14:53.240 --> 00:14:57.918
We just want to get looking at these targets, looking at the measuring of all these things are going through.
00:14:58.600 --> 00:15:18.200
And so at COP 28, I think China and America are set to say to do a deal on methane reduction, but it's oil production, but methane reduction, a deal essentially on getting going on this methane reduction.
00:15:18.240 --> 00:15:38.519
And of course, other the EU are set to introduce a new fuel ban where they're proposing to limit the amount of fuel they buy by sitting in a methane cap as in how much methane is produced per unit of fuel.
00:15:39.080 --> 00:15:40.200
And then they're sitting a cap on that.
00:15:40.240 --> 00:15:44.879
So then they can now only buy amount of methane cap.
00:15:45.840 --> 00:16:02.200
And so therefore, reducing the amount of oil they can physically buy, which of course that's incentivizes if companies want to then sell to the EU, they need to reduce their methane because then they can sell more because they've got this cap or not amount of oil they're buying up.
00:16:02.240 --> 00:16:04.678
But the amount of methane that's being produced.
00:16:05.158 --> 00:16:12.080
So it's all these sort of sideways sort of approaches and how do you approach these sort of bands and things?
00:16:12.320 --> 00:16:31.240
And potentially, you're looking at a huge deal where that could be quite beneficial because that's going to emphasize that you're only going to buy oil if it's low methane emitting, in which case then if your oil is low methane emitting, you're going to get a better deal, more money.
00:16:32.278 --> 00:16:36.720
And so that's where the whole measure goes.
00:16:37.360 --> 00:16:47.879
Well, there's this recent report out by the UN Environment Programme entitled the Emissions Gap Report 2023.
00:16:49.000 --> 00:16:51.639
And the title is Broken Record.
00:16:52.200 --> 00:16:56.759
Temperatures hit new highs, yet the world fails to cut emissions.
00:16:59.240 --> 00:17:09.640
And it is really quite a gloomy sort of looking report, really, and they're looking at sort of how things are going.
00:17:10.640 --> 00:17:22.200
They're hoping that by COP29, like next year, then they might come back with some actual good news to say that we've actually turned a corner.
00:17:22.278 --> 00:17:34.000
But at the moment, the record is sort of really bad because you've got a lot of analysts predicting that it was peaking in 2023.
00:17:36.200 --> 00:17:48.798
I just hope that they then don't revise their sort of report to say, yeah, and then it peaked more in 2024 rather than actually starting to go down.
00:17:49.519 --> 00:17:59.519
Now, we have seen some changes because of the global pandemic, but that was a whole global economy sort of came to a halt.
00:18:00.759 --> 00:18:10.798
And that did some good. But, you know, a couple of years on, we're looking now at sort of more higher emissions.
00:18:12.240 --> 00:18:23.078
Even the climate analysts are only saying there's a 70% chance that these emissions will peak in 2023.
00:18:24.680 --> 00:18:30.598
That means there's a good 30% chance they won't. And that's not that good.
00:18:31.278 --> 00:18:35.598
The idea is, of course, we've got things like electric cars.
00:18:35.960 --> 00:18:36.200
They're trying to help.
00:18:37.240 --> 00:18:46.318
We've got solar and wind production power. It's coming online. There is more and more of that than there was.
00:18:46.680 --> 00:18:55.078
But it's one of those things, as mentioned, it's one of those things where, as I said, currently we're measuring things and then realising how far behind.
00:18:55.920 --> 00:19:01.200
And it's a simple thing. It's no one being held accountable to the whole point of things.
00:19:01.240 --> 00:19:03.078
Oh, we missed the target.
00:19:03.078 --> 00:19:04.838
Oh, dear. What was a shame?
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:08.880
Yes, we're going to miss 2030 target.
00:19:08.880 --> 00:19:10.680
We're going to miss our 2050 target.
00:19:10.680 --> 00:19:22.838
It doesn't worry. We can set a new target. By the way, while that's happening, we're seeing massive fires throughout America, Canada, Europe.
00:19:24.200 --> 00:19:28.160
Most con I think it was actually. Yeah, we actually managed it across most of the world.
00:19:28.240 --> 00:19:34.920
It was all seven continents. We're actually on fire at one point last year.
00:19:35.680 --> 00:19:49.519
And then we've got the floods and we're getting sort of these sort of extra sort of floods and they sort of hit the news really sort of less and less.
00:19:49.880 --> 00:19:54.200
Well, and why? Because they're coming more and more common. It's it's not news.
00:19:54.278 --> 00:19:57.160
Oh, this is they got flooded. Oh, yeah.
00:19:57.160 --> 00:20:09.640
But last week as well. Yeah. So you can see the sort of the idea that some of cop or the idea around all these pages of things.
00:20:10.640 --> 00:20:13.038
They're great. They make great headlines.
00:20:14.000 --> 00:20:15.200
Well, should I give you a great headline?
00:20:15.240 --> 00:20:27.759
All right. Since Cop 26 has give you a great headline carbon dioxide concentrations in the year were 50 percent higher than pre-industrial levels.
00:20:28.160 --> 00:20:31.880
And that happened the first time in 2022.
00:20:33.558 --> 00:20:41.160
Yeah. And if you're interested, that's not only to come outside, break the record.
00:20:41.278 --> 00:20:52.400
So did methane and sodium dioxide. So, yeah. And of course, as that happens, then the temperature rises.
00:20:52.759 --> 00:21:01.880
The earth is now what? One point two five degrees warmer, hotter, if you like, than it was in the latter half of the 19th century.
00:21:02.240 --> 00:21:13.278
And we're worried about this one point five. And this one point five is bandied around as sort of the point of no return.
00:21:13.798 --> 00:21:21.200
Well, we're looking at some of that being hit. Well, some of it was being hit this year. And so we'll see how it goes.
00:21:21.278 --> 00:21:38.720
But we're still well on course for a two to three centigrade rise by. Well, this is the interesting question when some that the analyst here here between 2015 and 2080.
00:21:39.000 --> 00:21:46.200
So that's not very help. No. Yeah. It's challenging all these these figures and things and people not getting doing things.
00:21:46.240 --> 00:21:57.798
That's the whole reason we're talking about all these things. Yeah. And there are some things that have been happening in regards to more financial pledges being made.
00:21:57.798 --> 00:22:05.200
But once again, they're pledges. They're not actually delivering them. You know, I know there was a deal with Australia and a small country.
00:22:05.278 --> 00:22:16.240
They decided to do a deal over not resettling, but over the sort of loss and sort of there's a deal.
00:22:16.519 --> 00:22:24.200
Yeah. We can't say much. And they were Australia with a house. Basically, people lost their habitat and basically resettled them.
00:22:25.240 --> 00:22:38.038
And it's one of those things where there are always lovely financial pledges and they say lots of money from rich countries to help poorer countries adapt and all these sort of things and going through.
00:22:38.519 --> 00:22:41.519
And the answer is yes, they're working.
00:22:41.920 --> 00:22:43.200
These money are being shared.
00:22:44.240 --> 00:22:58.680
Given. Yeah. OK. But the rich countries here look like they are going to meet their financial commitments to provide the sort of a hundred billion a year.
00:22:59.160 --> 00:23:07.200
Climate finance. The only problem is that they promise to do it in a particular year and they're running behind.
00:23:07.278 --> 00:23:11.759
I think there's something about five years behind where they thought. Yes.
00:23:12.160 --> 00:23:19.160
Something like that. It's something they said they were going to do by the stakes and they haven't managed to.
00:23:19.759 --> 00:23:28.200
I think that COP26 they sort of figgle the numbers and they managed to sort of ask it out by this state will be getting there.
00:23:28.278 --> 00:23:37.798
The goal was this one. So as I said, the goalposts keep moving. But there's no reason people can't keep the goalposts stable.
00:23:38.400 --> 00:23:45.078
Global pandemic. Oh, no, that's ruined our economy. We've got to keep our money and look after ourselves first.
00:23:46.640 --> 00:23:53.200
Yeah. Reset all the goals. That really did reset all the goals. And they said, yes, we've got to try and do something here.
00:23:53.240 --> 00:24:00.400
So our country, we promise we'll still pay the money, but we'll pay it a little bit.
00:24:00.640 --> 00:24:17.200
So speaking of those ideas about not breaking pledges, but failing to actually not commit to pledges, but sort of acting on the pledges that they've made, we can actually talk about sort of how many pledges have been broken or technically violated, if that makes sense.
00:24:17.278 --> 00:24:35.200
Yeah, go on then. Right. And so it's one of the things where we can look at the numbers. And I can tell you that the Netherlands, a very surprising country, is actually breached approximately 200 climate bridges already.
00:24:36.240 --> 00:24:43.880
And that's our snarkling. You say, what, what, the Netherlands? You think it looks pretty dope. Anyway, so that, you know, people behind.
00:24:44.798 --> 00:24:49.880
And sort of we can look in sort of other countries like Switzerland. What?
00:24:50.519 --> 00:24:55.200
Switzerland? You know, they're also breaking the same, nearly the same amount.
00:24:55.278 --> 00:25:05.798
They're actually breaking more sort of like 400 climate pressure. And these are the previous pledges from all the cops so far that they're behind on.
00:25:06.680 --> 00:25:11.640
And that's the number of pledges they made and they failed to actually achieve.
00:25:12.200 --> 00:25:14.160
They're not saying they're not working towards them.
00:25:14.160 --> 00:25:24.200
That's of course, they missed the deadline on this year. So that's sort of one violation. So you had them up and it's just every year say how many previous pledges you made.
00:25:24.278 --> 00:25:28.798
You've got a list. How many of them have you achieved and how many have failed?
00:25:28.798 --> 00:25:31.720
The answer is that's how they make up the violation there.
00:25:31.720 --> 00:25:40.558
So it's not necessarily they're not working towards them, but they said how many years did they make their goal? Did they actually reach their target?
00:25:40.558 --> 00:25:51.200
The answer was no. So going through the list, sort of introducing the bad people, sort of Germany's got 500 of these violations, which is surprising.
00:25:51.240 --> 00:25:58.920
Right. Yeah. As I said, these are all not surprising, but surprising in regards to what Germany's behind and its climate pledges.
00:26:00.720 --> 00:26:04.078
So, you know, but the interesting one, of course, is you see.
00:26:06.720 --> 00:26:19.640
Italy. Italy is huge behind their climate pledges. Almost over a thousand. How does that work? How can you be behind a thousand pledges?
00:26:19.640 --> 00:26:24.680
How many pledges were there to actually be behind, you know, to fail a thousand?
00:26:25.038 --> 00:26:28.200
It sort of makes the mind boggle here. Yes.
00:26:28.278 --> 00:26:41.038
Yeah. And of course, definitely sort of the good one, a sort of America is sort of huge because it doesn't seem to be able to actually make any of the pledges.
00:26:41.278 --> 00:26:48.200
It's made in any of the copies. It's one of the things where and so that's one of the things now.
00:26:49.240 --> 00:26:59.000
One of those odd things where you hear these numbers and sort of like how many pledges, but it's sort of the it's an ongoing tracker and sort of long list of pledges.
00:26:59.358 --> 00:27:06.640
So it's sort of you and some of these pledges they broken and haven't kept because of course, everybody's changed what they're doing.
00:27:07.519 --> 00:27:17.200
So of course, they know this is where statistics doesn't help. They broken their promise because they're now planning on doing something else in relation to that promise.
00:27:18.240 --> 00:27:26.960
Well, there's also the countries that didn't actually promise to do anything and have actually honored those pledges because they really haven't done anything.
00:27:27.759 --> 00:27:42.920
But there are a few countries that are actually now changing their tune a little bit. China, for instance, China was sort of not interested in doing things and they say they will reduce this.
00:27:43.240 --> 00:27:50.278
They're not necessarily going to give you a date, but they've actually said they are going to reduce their progress.
00:27:50.278 --> 00:27:59.400
And this is this is what cops basically about making these small slow changes year upon year.
00:27:59.400 --> 00:28:04.038
You don't sort of see much. If you look over the last 10 years, suddenly China is actually playing ball.
00:28:04.240 --> 00:28:10.200
That's a huge deal, which is, you know, you can't say that's the wrong or bad idea.
00:28:10.278 --> 00:28:16.680
So yes, there's climate finance is sort of not going so well.
00:28:17.798 --> 00:28:20.598
That's the alliance of how much money is being put in.
00:28:20.598 --> 00:28:25.400
As we said, they're only managing to achieve their target now, which is five years late.
00:28:25.680 --> 00:28:29.558
But it's one of those things where do we celebrate the fact that we've actually reached the target?
00:28:30.400 --> 00:28:33.200
You can know but that's the whole point of it.
00:28:33.240 --> 00:28:44.759
We've now made it and they said there is more opportunity, but because basically the plan is for was at the time five years ago to reach this number.
00:28:45.640 --> 00:28:54.200
And then obviously to keep investing, keep going, sort of thing where the goal now is sort of five years behind.
00:28:55.240 --> 00:29:08.038
So do we need to change that number so that next year because we're five years behind, these sort of minus five years from all the things and say right next year, our target is actually going to be 101.
00:29:09.358 --> 00:29:12.400
Or sort of as opposed to where it should have been, which was 105.
00:29:13.838 --> 00:29:16.200
Just to relate that time gap.
00:29:17.240 --> 00:29:23.318
It's up to people to design and work out what's happening and what's for and what's achievable.
00:29:24.440 --> 00:29:31.838
I'm their expert in all these things. I'm here to just read the news and hear things. I'm not in negotiation at all.
00:29:32.759 --> 00:29:39.200
But that's the whole point. And if you start moaning at people about these things and saying you commit to do this, where's the plan on that?
00:29:39.240 --> 00:29:43.078
They go, oh, I might do some stuff.
00:29:43.519 --> 00:29:54.680
Yeah, like not everybody, every country has to make a forest of Ireland a year or I think the whole world is making a forest of a size of Ireland a year.
00:29:55.200 --> 00:30:03.640
So what if we can divide that by the number of countries and sort of then target sort of that quantity, you know, make it more manageable.
00:30:04.078 --> 00:30:06.200
Yeah. And this is the whole plan around it.
00:30:06.278 --> 00:30:09.400
So this was what COP was designed for.
00:30:11.078 --> 00:30:13.519
So all these things are going on.
00:30:14.038 --> 00:30:19.400
However, while these things are going on, the temperature is still rising.
00:30:20.558 --> 00:30:24.519
Fires are still taking more fires are taking place, more floods are taking place.
00:30:25.000 --> 00:30:32.000
The temperature is still rising and it's still getting worse. And we've got to do something about it.
00:30:32.680 --> 00:30:39.680
COP makes pledges, but we've got to make sure the politicians see this through.
00:30:39.920 --> 00:30:53.920
And the only way that you and I can do that is by our vote and hopefully try to get someone in who's willing to actually do something about it.
00:30:54.880 --> 00:31:10.400
You've been listening to Going Green podcast, looking at how COP26 hasn't got on and hoping against hope that maybe COP28 might do better.
00:31:12.480 --> 00:31:15.440
Until next time, it's goodbye from me.
00:31:16.160 --> 00:31:18.038
And goodbye from me.
00:31:19.000 --> 00:31:19.759
Bye-bye. Take care.
00:31:20.278 --> 00:31:20.640
Bye.