WEBVTT
00:00:00.000 -->
00:00:03.839Welcome to the Earned First podcast. This is Arun
00:00:03.839 -->
00:00:07.080Sudhaman, founding editor of Earned First. I'm
00:00:07.080 -->
00:00:10.740joined today by my colleague, David Blecken.
00:00:11.359 -->
00:00:16.160How are you, David? Very well, thank you. Good.
00:00:16.339 -->
00:00:19.679It's good to see you. It's been a holiday, right,
00:00:19.780 -->
00:00:23.440in Japan? Silver Week. Silver Week, yeah. It's
00:00:23.440 -->
00:00:25.579Golden Week in May and then we have Silver Week
00:00:25.579 -->
00:00:30.289in September. So lots of holidays in Japan. Yeah,
00:00:30.289 -->
00:00:34.070indeed. Well, why not? Very good. So we want
00:00:34.070 -->
00:00:38.070to talk through a few stories that have attracted
00:00:38.070 -->
00:00:42.929our attention in recent weeks and maybe even
00:00:42.929 -->
00:00:47.189months. It feels like a lot has happened in the
00:00:47.189 -->
00:00:51.390public relations industry, of course. Not too
00:00:51.390 -->
00:00:54.509many dull moments, but particularly this year
00:00:54.509 -->
00:00:57.030and last year, I do feel like there has been
00:00:57.030 -->
00:01:01.939a lot happening. um so let's start with your
00:01:01.939 -->
00:01:07.180newsletter last week where you looked at a sentiment
00:01:07.180 -->
00:01:15.579in singapore in opposition to the country's national
00:01:15.579 -->
00:01:20.040airline of course singapore airlines i think
00:01:20.040 -->
00:01:23.920potentially increasing its investment in air
00:01:23.920 -->
00:01:29.459india um on the face of it Seems like a pretty
00:01:29.459 -->
00:01:33.180straightforward business story, but it's not
00:01:33.180 -->
00:01:38.099quite from what I understand. No, not at all.
00:01:38.140 -->
00:01:44.000No. So there were various factors involved in
00:01:44.000 -->
00:01:47.680the story, which it became something quite complicated
00:01:47.680 -->
00:01:53.340when it started out just as, you know, a fairly
00:01:53.340 -->
00:02:00.299standard discussion about. as you would expect
00:02:00.299 -->
00:02:03.560to happen with a listed company. But the issue
00:02:03.560 -->
00:02:09.639has been that Singapore Airlines is, although
00:02:09.639 -->
00:02:12.659it's a business, obviously in its own right,
00:02:12.840 -->
00:02:18.479it's very tied up with Singapore's national image.
00:02:22.729 -->
00:02:25.969So what started off as a rational discussion
00:02:25.969 -->
00:02:32.150about business and investments morphed into a
00:02:32.150 -->
00:02:37.909sort of nationalistic, an outpouring almost of
00:02:37.909 -->
00:02:43.389emotions on social media. We saw racist slurs
00:02:43.389 -->
00:02:50.310being thrown around, directed at people of Indian
00:02:50.310 -->
00:02:56.550origin. And all sorts of accusations being raised
00:02:56.550 -->
00:03:00.590without any real foundation. Yeah, so it becomes
00:03:00.590 -->
00:03:04.229a much more complex situation and actually illustrates
00:03:04.229 -->
00:03:09.349a lot of the trends that corporates are grappling
00:03:09.349 -->
00:03:11.250with these days, particularly as they relate
00:03:11.250 -->
00:03:18.569to geopolitics. So Singapore Airlines is, it's
00:03:18.569 -->
00:03:21.330partially owned by Temasek. I believe. Is that
00:03:21.330 -->
00:03:23.650right? Or majority -owned? I'm not entirely sure.
00:03:24.430 -->
00:03:32.430And, of course, Temasek is owned by the Singaporean
00:03:32.430 -->
00:03:38.349state through the Ministry of Finance. Meanwhile,
00:03:38.569 -->
00:03:43.789of course, Air India is India's national airline,
00:03:44.090 -->
00:03:50.580although owned by Tata Group now. undergoing
00:03:50.580 -->
00:03:55.439quite a painful rebuild. It needs more money.
00:03:56.400 -->
00:04:00.979SIA had bought a minority stake in Air India
00:04:00.979 -->
00:04:04.680a few years ago, may have to inject more funds.
00:04:05.939 -->
00:04:11.340And all of this adds up to potentially this idea
00:04:11.340 -->
00:04:16.480that hard -earned Singaporean tax dollars are
00:04:16.480 -->
00:04:21.120being spent to bail out. an indian airline there's
00:04:21.120 -->
00:04:23.699someone of indian origin as well on the singaporean
00:04:23.699 -->
00:04:27.319side i believe um is it the sia ceo or the or
00:04:27.319 -->
00:04:33.620tamasic it was uh yeah it was um tamasic tamasic
00:04:33.620 -->
00:04:36.339ceo right so that's also become a factor in all
00:04:36.339 -->
00:04:39.720of this um i thought it was quite extraordinary
00:04:39.720 -->
00:04:43.379though the response from singaporean government
00:04:43.379 -->
00:04:48.790actually um they came out and uh quite heavily
00:04:48.790 -->
00:04:54.790against the racism that I think was evident in
00:04:54.790 -->
00:05:00.470a lot of the online chatter. And I'm not sure
00:05:00.470 -->
00:05:02.310it was necessarily the best approach because
00:05:02.310 -->
00:05:06.870they also repeated some of the racist statements,
00:05:07.069 -->
00:05:11.930which is not always helpful. Tomasek took a long
00:05:11.930 -->
00:05:16.009time, not Tomasek SIA. You'll forgive me if I'm
00:05:16.009 -->
00:05:18.889conflating the two, but from a corporate perspective,
00:05:19.230 -->
00:05:22.990the response wasn't really quick enough, I think
00:05:22.990 -->
00:05:27.750was your assessment. So they did take a little
00:05:27.750 -->
00:05:32.970while to respond and to clarify the position
00:05:32.970 -->
00:05:38.750of Singapore Airlines, to clarify that it was
00:05:38.750 -->
00:05:41.370free to make its own investment decisions. um
00:05:41.370 -->
00:05:44.129that it wasn't the government um sort of wasting
00:05:44.129 -->
00:05:51.089taxpayers money um so uh there was a period um
00:05:51.089 -->
00:05:57.790when things started to turn ugly online um there
00:05:57.790 -->
00:06:02.329was a period of silence um and uh you know a
00:06:02.329 -->
00:06:06.850vacuum like that obviously allows people to fill
00:06:06.850 -->
00:06:11.560it with their own voices um And, you know, people
00:06:11.560 -->
00:06:15.680began to sort of shift the issue towards their
00:06:15.680 -->
00:06:19.600own agenda, which, you know, it seems there were
00:06:19.600 -->
00:06:22.139two groups. There were people who had legitimate
00:06:22.139 -->
00:06:27.240concerns about a poor investment decision because
00:06:27.240 -->
00:06:32.959Singapore Airlines has lost money through its
00:06:32.959 -->
00:06:36.399Air India investment. There were people who were
00:06:36.399 -->
00:06:39.509legitimately concerned about. you know, about
00:06:39.509 -->
00:06:41.370this business that they're proud of losing money.
00:06:42.850 -->
00:06:45.370And on the other hand, there was, you know, there
00:06:45.370 -->
00:06:48.149was a group of people who were obviously very
00:06:48.149 -->
00:06:53.569anti -Indian, if not anti -foreigner generally.
00:06:54.310 -->
00:06:57.050And, you know, they used it as an opportunity
00:06:57.050 -->
00:07:04.790to cast a shadow over the Indian community in
00:07:04.790 -->
00:07:07.329Singapore. And that's where the government...
00:07:07.689 -->
00:07:11.949finally decided it was time to step in and try
00:07:11.949 -->
00:07:15.209to get things under control. They promised to
00:07:15.209 -->
00:07:22.250unmask the people who had been spreading, you
00:07:22.250 -->
00:07:27.970know, rumours and racist insults. It's true that
00:07:27.970 -->
00:07:33.910those insults were repeated and somebody that
00:07:33.910 -->
00:07:37.639I spoke to did make the point that that... That
00:07:37.639 -->
00:07:41.860tends to worsen the situation when a government
00:07:41.860 -->
00:07:44.680representative, you know, obviously he was not
00:07:44.680 -->
00:07:48.240meaning it in the same way, but just by repeating
00:07:48.240 -->
00:07:52.980those terms, it just continues the, it sort of
00:07:52.980 -->
00:07:55.699perpetuates the problem. Yeah. Yeah, no, his
00:07:55.699 -->
00:07:58.420heart was in the right place, no doubt. Well,
00:07:58.620 -->
00:08:00.740I guess, depending on your point of view. But
00:08:00.740 -->
00:08:03.500it's kind of emblematic of, I think, the challenges
00:08:03.500 -->
00:08:06.759that corporates... increasingly find themselves
00:08:06.759 -->
00:08:11.920grappling with where you have more nationalism
00:08:11.920 -->
00:08:16.540to contend with in different shapes and forms.
00:08:17.019 -->
00:08:20.980Maybe you have more protectionism as well. In
00:08:20.980 -->
00:08:22.980Singapore specifically, I think this has become
00:08:22.980 -->
00:08:24.800more of an election issue. So this was actually
00:08:24.800 -->
00:08:29.459raised in Parliament as well by an MP from the
00:08:29.459 -->
00:08:33.500Workers' Party. That helped to, I suppose, stoke.
00:08:34.180 -->
00:08:37.039embers in this case, and then I believe the Business
00:08:37.039 -->
00:08:41.620Times ran a story as well, which you wouldn't
00:08:41.620 -->
00:08:44.159necessarily expect that to happen maybe 10, 20
00:08:44.159 -->
00:08:49.000years ago about a situation like this. So I think
00:08:49.000 -->
00:08:50.720it does demonstrate how things have shifted,
00:08:50.759 -->
00:08:55.139even in Singapore, which is not necessarily the
00:08:55.139 -->
00:08:58.179most freewheeling place, but you can't keep a
00:08:58.179 -->
00:09:03.110lid on this kind of stuff. Well, I mean, yes
00:09:03.110 -->
00:09:05.490i mean obviously the world has become more um
00:09:05.490 -->
00:09:10.870protectionist generally uh and um you know there's
00:09:10.870 -->
00:09:16.289um there is fear of there is you know economic
00:09:16.289 -->
00:09:18.690insecurity everywhere including in singapore
00:09:18.690 -->
00:09:24.370um and um so yeah it it's possible that it became
00:09:24.370 -->
00:09:26.149it was a bigger issue than it would have been
00:09:26.149 -->
00:09:28.110uh it became a bigger issue than it would have
00:09:28.110 -->
00:09:31.929been a few years ago And yeah, it's easy to turn
00:09:31.929 -->
00:09:34.570this sort of thing into an election issue. The
00:09:34.570 -->
00:09:38.570idea that, you know, foreign investments or just
00:09:38.570 -->
00:09:44.149generally some vague foreign forces, as they're
00:09:44.149 -->
00:09:47.490sometimes referred to, might be taking advantage
00:09:47.490 -->
00:09:52.450of hardworking locals. So, I mean, it's likely
00:09:52.450 -->
00:09:57.539to, perhaps in a different form, but... you know,
00:09:57.580 -->
00:09:59.179we might expect this sort of thing to come up
00:09:59.179 -->
00:10:05.100again around the election and, you know, and
00:10:05.100 -->
00:10:07.159it sort of suggests that Singapore has a job
00:10:07.159 -->
00:10:12.059to do in reassuring people, perhaps reframing
00:10:12.059 -->
00:10:17.379the idea of foreign investment and openness to
00:10:17.379 -->
00:10:22.960the rest of the world as a positive thing, something
00:10:22.960 -->
00:10:26.730that isn't to be feared. and something that's
00:10:26.730 -->
00:10:32.529also necessary for the country to continue to
00:10:32.529 -->
00:10:35.610be successful. Yeah, absolutely. Singapore's
00:10:35.610 -->
00:10:39.649so reliant on... Singapore's so reliant, isn't
00:10:39.649 -->
00:10:42.190it, really, on foreign business. But definitely
00:10:42.190 -->
00:10:46.029it's something that for corporate affairs, communications
00:10:46.029 -->
00:10:48.809heads, they need to be increasingly aware of.
00:10:48.809 -->
00:10:50.330If you're at an Indian company, for example,
00:10:50.330 -->
00:10:53.889I think you probably need to be aware that...
00:10:54.600 -->
00:10:56.919these kinds of forces and this kind of sentiment
00:10:56.919 -->
00:11:02.659might exist. If you're at a domestic heavyweight,
00:11:02.779 -->
00:11:05.899you need to be aware of how your foreign investments
00:11:05.899 -->
00:11:08.559are being assessed, especially if you're, you
00:11:08.559 -->
00:11:12.759know, if you're taxpayer funded in any way, probably
00:11:12.759 -->
00:11:16.519raises the stakes even more. And it's interesting
00:11:16.519 -->
00:11:19.779because I was also in Singapore last week and
00:11:19.779 -->
00:11:24.460I was at a couple of events where These kinds
00:11:24.460 -->
00:11:26.379of issues were being discussed. The first was
00:11:26.379 -->
00:11:29.580the Corporate Affairs Forum run by the PRCA,
00:11:29.759 -->
00:11:32.519which was really quite focused on public affairs
00:11:32.519 -->
00:11:37.440and geopolitics. And then we ran a roundtable
00:11:37.440 -->
00:11:40.259with Edelman on trust corridors, which specifically
00:11:40.259 -->
00:11:44.779was looking at how trusted companies are when
00:11:44.779 -->
00:11:50.399they expand beyond their home market and how
00:11:50.399 -->
00:11:52.820that is influenced by their country of origin.
00:11:53.659 -->
00:11:57.399by the sector, by the kind of protectionist sentiment
00:11:57.399 -->
00:12:01.620on the ground in the destination market, by policy
00:12:01.620 -->
00:12:04.919friction and so on. It's quite an interesting
00:12:04.919 -->
00:12:08.559discussion. In a way, I suppose the Air India
00:12:08.559 -->
00:12:12.700Singapore Airlines story brings a lot of these
00:12:12.700 -->
00:12:17.139things to life in terms of demonstrating how
00:12:17.139 -->
00:12:21.740geopolitics is becoming a bigger and bigger concern.
00:12:23.279 -->
00:12:26.639for corporate affairs heads? I would say it certainly
00:12:26.639 -->
00:12:30.539does. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, but the question is
00:12:30.539 -->
00:12:36.559whether it will actually deter businesses from
00:12:36.559 -->
00:12:42.000investing or from being active in the market.
00:12:42.879 -->
00:12:45.580You know, will businesses actually be put off
00:12:45.580 -->
00:12:54.080by sort of hostile voices in the market? And,
00:12:54.080 -->
00:12:56.899you know, I think there's optimism that they
00:12:56.899 -->
00:13:02.679won't. But I don't know. I don't know what you
00:13:02.679 -->
00:13:05.139think. I'm interested to hear your point of view
00:13:05.139 -->
00:13:08.779on that. I suspect it's already happening in
00:13:08.779 -->
00:13:15.419some markets. I think Singapore in general, though,
00:13:15.480 -->
00:13:20.720because it's such an open and, you know, overall
00:13:20.720 -->
00:13:24.769welcoming. for foreign business, and indeed it's
00:13:24.769 -->
00:13:28.850a very active foreign investor in different countries
00:13:28.850 -->
00:13:32.149around the world. I suspect Singapore is more
00:13:32.149 -->
00:13:35.629towards one end of the spectrum. But there are
00:13:35.629 -->
00:13:38.909other countries, including Asian countries, where
00:13:38.909 -->
00:13:40.769that's not the case, where they have far more
00:13:40.769 -->
00:13:44.409protectionist policies, where they have a more,
00:13:44.409 -->
00:13:48.889let's say, open political landscape in which...
00:13:49.710 -->
00:13:52.129you know politicians and different political
00:13:52.129 -->
00:13:56.190parties can make capital uh out of these kinds
00:13:56.190 -->
00:13:57.909of things and that will have an influence on
00:13:57.909 -->
00:14:00.950on the policy environment as well right i mean
00:14:00.950 -->
00:14:03.909just you know you look at look at a company like
00:14:03.909 -->
00:14:06.789tiktok or bite dance for example and the decisions
00:14:06.789 -->
00:14:10.830it has made in terms of you know where it's open
00:14:10.830 -->
00:14:16.029where it's not open um you look at the i mean
00:14:16.029 -->
00:14:19.330you're in japan and uh The relationship between
00:14:19.330 -->
00:14:22.429Japan and China is always interesting in this
00:14:22.429 -->
00:14:25.990regard. I feel like we've been talking and writing
00:14:25.990 -->
00:14:28.389about this stuff for decades now. You'll remember
00:14:28.389 -->
00:14:33.049the bowing lions or whatever it was back in the
00:14:33.049 -->
00:14:36.350day. There's always some flare -up, right? And
00:14:36.350 -->
00:14:38.289we're at a point now where I don't think relations
00:14:38.289 -->
00:14:43.049are that great. No, they're not, right? In fact,
00:14:43.129 -->
00:14:45.830we even talked, I think we talked, you may have
00:14:45.830 -->
00:14:52.059even written about this. last year, or earlier
00:14:52.059 -->
00:14:55.320this year, in fact, about another flare -up in
00:14:55.320 -->
00:14:58.500Japan -China relations and how that's impacting
00:14:58.500 -->
00:15:02.159corporates. So I feel like it does have some
00:15:02.159 -->
00:15:06.700impact, especially in Japan, you're seeing more
00:15:06.700 -->
00:15:11.120protectionism in terms of the new, not so new
00:15:11.120 -->
00:15:16.100anymore, but the political leadership. China
00:15:16.100 -->
00:15:19.259also is a more insular place now. Do you feel
00:15:19.259 -->
00:15:23.259that way from a Japanese perspective? I mean,
00:15:23.279 -->
00:15:29.179I think, well, Japan is missing out on Chinese
00:15:29.179 -->
00:15:33.620tourism, certainly because the government has
00:15:33.620 -->
00:15:39.000dissuaded people from visiting Japan. The Chinese
00:15:39.000 -->
00:15:42.559government has. The Chinese government has quite
00:15:42.559 -->
00:15:48.110actively. put people off, even if it hasn't actually
00:15:48.110 -->
00:15:52.789banned people outright from visiting. People
00:15:52.789 -->
00:15:58.190have had, you know, calls apparently saying that
00:15:58.190 -->
00:16:01.629they should rethink their travel plans if they're
00:16:01.629 -->
00:16:04.389planning to go to Japan. So this sort of thing
00:16:04.389 -->
00:16:07.190will obviously, you know, this will be felt in
00:16:07.190 -->
00:16:12.070Japan, considering how many Chinese tourists.
00:16:13.319 -->
00:16:16.759the country has had over the recent years, how
00:16:16.759 -->
00:16:19.200big a group of tourists they've been. But in
00:16:19.200 -->
00:16:22.240terms of protectionism in Japan, I don't know
00:16:22.240 -->
00:16:24.440if I would call it protectionist, but there's
00:16:24.440 -->
00:16:28.679certainly the government has sort of instilled
00:16:28.679 -->
00:16:34.220a new sense of caution when it comes to letting
00:16:34.220 -->
00:16:36.960people into the country. So it's more an immigration
00:16:36.960 -->
00:16:40.259issue. I think it's a bit less to do with...
00:16:41.860 -->
00:16:45.120businesses, although there might be some sort
00:16:45.120 -->
00:16:48.580of higher hurdles for business in Japan. And
00:16:48.580 -->
00:16:51.700some sectors. I think that was one of the interesting
00:16:51.700 -->
00:16:54.100points in the Edelman research is it can be very
00:16:54.100 -->
00:16:56.919sector dependent. So I know Japan, for example,
00:16:56.919 -->
00:17:00.899has a new energy policy, right? And that's being
00:17:00.899 -->
00:17:03.019watched quite closely in terms of what that means
00:17:03.019 -->
00:17:08.180for foreign investors. So it all adds up. I think
00:17:08.180 -->
00:17:12.549it all adds. a certain amount of risk and complexity
00:17:12.549 -->
00:17:17.529to the ease of doing business. And that can add
00:17:17.529 -->
00:17:19.150up and that can have an impact, especially in
00:17:19.150 -->
00:17:23.829countries that are reliant on international,
00:17:24.230 -->
00:17:25.910whether it's international investment coming
00:17:25.910 -->
00:17:29.109in or on expanding beyond their home markets.
00:17:29.970 -->
00:17:32.490You also wrote earlier this year about all the
00:17:32.490 -->
00:17:38.289Chinese brands that are going global over the
00:17:38.289 -->
00:17:40.789last couple of years. and that's i think a really
00:17:40.789 -->
00:17:44.349interesting one because um they've kind of you
00:17:44.349 -->
00:17:45.970know for the most part they're avoiding the us
00:17:45.970 -->
00:17:52.730yeah uh so but they've uh had real success in
00:17:52.730 -->
00:17:57.529europe um but uh the us is obviously very difficult
00:17:57.529 -->
00:18:01.009uh as a place to do business with if you're chinese
00:18:01.009 -->
00:18:03.789if you're a chinese company um but the interesting
00:18:03.789 -->
00:18:06.349thing is um that these government policies are
00:18:06.349 -->
00:18:08.930quite different to they don't reflect the feeling
00:18:08.930 -->
00:18:14.109of consumers um so yeah uh oh i mean sometimes
00:18:14.109 -->
00:18:16.369they do but i think where where chinese companies
00:18:16.369 -->
00:18:20.890are concerned um there's a real openness to um
00:18:20.890 -->
00:18:25.509chinese products now chinese brands you know
00:18:25.509 -->
00:18:29.670they're often seen as um being high quality um
00:18:29.670 -->
00:18:33.470product quite desirable products which is it
00:18:33.470 -->
00:18:36.869is quite a big change um yeah absolutely even
00:18:36.869 -->
00:18:41.430in india where you know, still certain Chinese
00:18:41.430 -->
00:18:45.450products and services are banned effectively.
00:18:47.549 -->
00:18:51.069Chinese mobile phones are still, you know, rated
00:18:51.069 -->
00:18:54.450quite highly here. And you would have thought
00:18:54.450 -->
00:18:57.369by now some of this sentiment would have kind
00:18:57.369 -->
00:19:00.089of filtered down to consumers, but it's not really
00:19:00.089 -->
00:19:03.190the case. So you do kind of wonder how, yeah,
00:19:03.230 -->
00:19:08.039how detached it all is from everyday life. It's
00:19:08.039 -->
00:19:09.980an interesting one definitely to keep an eye
00:19:09.980 -->
00:19:14.359on, but certainly it's something for public affairs
00:19:14.359 -->
00:19:19.579and comms heads to be aware of. So next, let's
00:19:19.579 -->
00:19:21.920talk about MasterCard. Let's talk about an American
00:19:21.920 -->
00:19:28.839company. And I don't know if you had been following
00:19:28.839 -->
00:19:35.740their global pitch, which has more or less, more
00:19:35.740 -->
00:19:40.410or less. reached a resolution over the last few
00:19:40.410 -->
00:19:43.170weeks. I think you've certainly followed it more
00:19:43.170 -->
00:19:47.430closely than I have. I'm aware of it. But, I
00:19:47.430 -->
00:19:52.490mean, why have they... I mean, what's behind
00:19:52.490 -->
00:19:58.970it all? I think, well, as always, there's the
00:19:58.970 -->
00:20:05.349stated reasons and then perhaps the kind of maybe
00:20:05.349 -->
00:20:08.259some of the... some forces behind the scenes.
00:20:08.400 -->
00:20:10.819I think what they have said publicly is, you
00:20:10.819 -->
00:20:12.059know, that they're trying to become a different
00:20:12.059 -->
00:20:17.380type of company, a technology company, you know,
00:20:17.380 -->
00:20:21.259an enabler of different kinds of things. They've
00:20:21.259 -->
00:20:24.859always been leaning, I think, into this payment
00:20:24.859 -->
00:20:26.759technology, but now they're kind of saying we're
00:20:26.759 -->
00:20:30.019even, we're sort of beyond that, just technology
00:20:30.019 -->
00:20:32.920in general. And whether you believe that or not
00:20:32.920 -->
00:20:38.059is, I suppose, Up to you, but that was the sort
00:20:38.059 -->
00:20:41.980of rationale. I think it's also, though, influenced
00:20:41.980 -->
00:20:44.500by, as always with these cases, by the change
00:20:44.500 -->
00:20:50.779of personnel on the client side. The CMO, who
00:20:50.779 -->
00:20:56.099also heads comms, is a relatively new person,
00:20:56.259 -->
00:21:01.039Jill Kramer, and she succeeded Rajamannar, who
00:21:01.039 -->
00:21:06.539was there for 14 years. And so often when you
00:21:06.539 -->
00:21:08.180have a new person in that role, they want to
00:21:08.180 -->
00:21:11.500leave there in premature on agency relationships.
00:21:13.099 -->
00:21:16.740It had been a Ketchum client for a long time,
00:21:16.839 -->
00:21:20.359a key Ketchum client, but that's all changed.
00:21:20.599 -->
00:21:22.859I think what is really interesting here, though,
00:21:22.900 -->
00:21:27.539is that from what I understand, the initial rounds
00:21:27.539 -->
00:21:31.480of the pitch did include the kind of traditional.
00:21:32.569 -->
00:21:38.490global pr networks um uh you know in in keeping
00:21:38.490 -->
00:21:43.990with um mastercard's uh existing agency roster
00:21:43.990 -->
00:21:46.930which is is ketchum and i think also weber shandwick
00:21:46.930 -->
00:21:49.730and parts of the world but in the final round
00:21:49.730 -->
00:21:54.289it was um according to our reporting anyway it
00:21:54.289 -->
00:21:58.890was we communications and allison neither of
00:21:58.890 -->
00:22:02.859whom you would say In a global pitch of this
00:22:02.859 -->
00:22:06.940kind of magnitude, you wouldn't necessarily say
00:22:06.940 -->
00:22:09.299you would have seen them in the final rounds
00:22:09.299 -->
00:22:11.500maybe 10, 15 years ago. And I think that reflects
00:22:11.500 -->
00:22:15.059how the market has changed and how the momentum
00:22:15.059 -->
00:22:18.259is shifting towards independents and maybe mid
00:22:18.259 -->
00:22:22.059-sized players as well. And why? Do you have
00:22:22.059 -->
00:22:26.019a sense of why that is? Why it's shifting? I
00:22:26.019 -->
00:22:29.490think we've covered... This shift in reasonable
00:22:29.490 -->
00:22:33.809detail, and I'm sure others have as well, but
00:22:33.809 -->
00:22:39.390we've looked at the consolidation, at the big
00:22:39.390 -->
00:22:44.609networks. Holding groups have not had the best
00:22:44.609 -->
00:22:47.170of times in recent years. They've been outgrown
00:22:47.170 -->
00:22:50.710by independents. In some cases, they've been
00:22:50.710 -->
00:22:55.549out -innovated and out -performed. I think scale...
00:22:55.789 -->
00:22:58.170is far less of an advantage as it used to be
00:22:58.170 -->
00:23:01.730so you can be a mid -sized network like a wii
00:23:01.730 -->
00:23:07.049which is not present in many of the markets that
00:23:07.049 -->
00:23:11.109you know one of the big networks is in but it
00:23:11.109 -->
00:23:13.150can still handle a global account these days
00:23:13.150 -->
00:23:16.890because of you know you don't need a flag in
00:23:16.890 -->
00:23:19.690every market and then of course you look at ketchum
00:23:19.690 -->
00:23:24.089which was the incumbent and you know now it's
00:23:24.089 -->
00:23:26.109golden ketchum so it's part of it's a very different
00:23:26.109 -->
00:23:30.029thing to what it was so again i think all these
00:23:30.029 -->
00:23:33.529changes um have added up i think there's been
00:23:33.529 -->
00:23:37.869quite a big exodus of talent from the bigger
00:23:37.869 -->
00:23:41.509networks and that has maybe played to the uh
00:23:41.509 -->
00:23:45.549to the that has maybe played out to the benefit
00:23:45.549 -->
00:23:50.470of you know more more independent or mid -sized
00:23:50.470 -->
00:23:55.089more agile players so yeah it's it's quite interesting
00:23:55.089 -->
00:23:56.490from that perspective and i think it's a good
00:23:56.490 -->
00:23:59.450example maybe of how the market is shifting it's
00:23:59.450 -->
00:24:01.309also just really rare though to see a global
00:24:01.309 -->
00:24:05.329pr pitch i mean well i was gonna say yeah yeah
00:24:05.329 -->
00:24:08.490it's it's so rare and i i'm always wary of saying
00:24:08.490 -->
00:24:11.750this because you know maybe we're just not doing
00:24:11.750 -->
00:24:14.109as good a job of reporting them as we once did
00:24:14.109 -->
00:24:17.650um but they used to be you know, three or four
00:24:17.650 -->
00:24:19.569of these a year at least, where you'd have a
00:24:19.569 -->
00:24:23.670big global company, okay, often US headquartered,
00:24:23.670 -->
00:24:28.890making a global decision on its PR agency. And
00:24:28.890 -->
00:24:31.769that is quite rare now. That is quite rare. And
00:24:31.769 -->
00:24:34.990even in this case with MasterCard, it's not clear
00:24:34.990 -->
00:24:38.609how this new relationship with We will play out
00:24:38.609 -->
00:24:41.950in, for example, Asia Pacific, where MasterCard
00:24:41.950 -->
00:24:44.789has Archetype, and in the Middle East, where
00:24:44.789 -->
00:24:49.220We doesn't. even have a presence it operates
00:24:49.220 -->
00:24:55.299through affiliate partners um and you you wonder
00:24:55.299 -->
00:24:58.539about the clients at mastercard at a local and
00:24:58.539 -->
00:25:00.660regional level if they are necessarily on board
00:25:00.660 -->
00:25:04.480with this kind of a shift because i think that's
00:25:04.480 -->
00:25:07.019one of the biggest reasons in in terms of why
00:25:07.019 -->
00:25:12.720we don't see as many global pr pitches because
00:25:12.720 -->
00:25:16.630i think local clients now are much more resistant
00:25:16.630 -->
00:25:24.210um to being dictated to by hq right um so there's
00:25:24.210 -->
00:25:30.869tension between uh well i'm not sure i'd i'd
00:25:30.869 -->
00:25:33.049go that far i'm sure they all get along really
00:25:33.049 -->
00:25:40.789well um but there's definitely uh more more empowerment
00:25:40.789 -->
00:25:44.369at a local level And I think that has been a
00:25:44.369 -->
00:25:48.390strategy from HQ as well for many of these companies.
00:25:48.509 -->
00:25:51.650They've recognized they're more effective when
00:25:51.650 -->
00:25:53.569they give their local clients more autonomy.
00:25:55.569 -->
00:25:57.769So, yeah, it's a really rare one, but well done
00:25:57.769 -->
00:26:00.910to we, I would say, for winning it, because if
00:26:00.910 -->
00:26:04.210there is one and you're in it, I mean, you might
00:26:04.210 -->
00:26:07.950as well win it. And, yeah, it's got to be a real
00:26:07.950 -->
00:26:10.599boost for them. And for them, they haven't had
00:26:10.599 -->
00:26:14.039the easiest of times in the U .S. over the last
00:26:14.039 -->
00:26:16.039couple of years because, you know, we as a very
00:26:16.039 -->
00:26:19.680tech -focused agency and it hasn't been very
00:26:19.680 -->
00:26:25.680easy in terms of technology PR spending. So good
00:26:25.680 -->
00:26:27.880luck to them and we will watch MasterCard. I
00:26:27.880 -->
00:26:29.420think it will be very interesting to see how
00:26:29.420 -->
00:26:33.000it does unfold in terms of different relationships.
00:26:34.199 -->
00:26:37.700In general, big brands like Mastercard, we can
00:26:37.700 -->
00:26:41.039say they're looking for more flexibility. And
00:26:41.039 -->
00:26:44.400also, is it fair to say looking for perhaps a
00:26:44.400 -->
00:26:46.599more creative approach than they might be able
00:26:46.599 -->
00:26:52.079to find at a very large network? I think every
00:26:52.079 -->
00:26:55.299client will say it once, more flexibility and
00:26:55.299 -->
00:26:59.839more creativity. I would be wary of concluding
00:26:59.839 -->
00:27:03.329you can't get that from a bigger network. I think
00:27:03.329 -->
00:27:06.549maybe you can't get it as often as you used to.
00:27:08.930 -->
00:27:13.190And maybe, you know, the strength of networks
00:27:13.190 -->
00:27:16.849is not what it once was. We've seen that in Asia,
00:27:16.950 -->
00:27:19.789right? I can remember a time when, you know,
00:27:19.809 -->
00:27:22.329you wouldn't get fired basically for hiring the
00:27:22.329 -->
00:27:26.829big network. I can recall people used to say
00:27:26.829 -->
00:27:32.380that about Ogilvy PR. But, you know, those days
00:27:32.380 -->
00:27:36.319have changed. You see so many strong domestic
00:27:36.319 -->
00:27:38.799firms. You see all these midsize networks. You
00:27:38.799 -->
00:27:42.339see homegrown players from places like Singapore
00:27:42.339 -->
00:27:45.160who've built, you know, who've got offices in
00:27:45.160 -->
00:27:51.880multiple markets now. So, yeah, I think, I just
00:27:51.880 -->
00:27:54.740think that there's many more options now. And
00:27:54.740 -->
00:27:58.079I think clients are far more willing to shop
00:27:58.079 -->
00:28:01.960around. And clients, let's segue to our next
00:28:01.960 -->
00:28:06.579one. Clients themselves are changing quite a
00:28:06.579 -->
00:28:10.559lot. You wrote earlier this year about a Wall
00:28:10.559 -->
00:28:13.859Street Journal article, which I thought was a
00:28:13.859 -->
00:28:16.819little bit giddy in its depiction of the ascent
00:28:16.819 -->
00:28:23.339of CCOs in the C -suite. And I think, what was
00:28:23.339 -->
00:28:26.660it? How publicists conquered the C -suite. Was
00:28:26.660 -->
00:28:31.630that the headline? Something like that. Anyway,
00:28:31.750 -->
00:28:33.650we have an article that's come out this week
00:28:33.650 -->
00:28:37.450from Fortune, really well -researched and investigated
00:28:37.450 -->
00:28:42.269piece. I'd recommend everyone reads it. We'll
00:28:42.269 -->
00:28:44.730put it in our newsletter as well. And it's looking
00:28:44.730 -->
00:28:47.930at OpenAI's protracted search for a CCO, which
00:28:47.930 -->
00:28:49.569has been going on now for nine months, which
00:28:49.569 -->
00:28:54.549Fortune says is an eternity in comms terms. I'm
00:28:54.549 -->
00:28:59.500inclined to agree. It is quite a long time. But
00:28:59.500 -->
00:29:02.839the last line is really something to behold in
00:29:02.839 -->
00:29:06.339the Fortune story. I'll read it out here. Quelling
00:29:06.339 -->
00:29:10.059fears of human extinction is quite the job description,
00:29:10.259 -->
00:29:13.299but it will presumably be a core responsibility
00:29:13.299 -->
00:29:16.920for OpenAI's future communications leader if
00:29:16.920 -->
00:29:19.559and when the company hires one. It's a very good
00:29:19.559 -->
00:29:21.779story because not only does it go into just the
00:29:21.779 -->
00:29:24.740nuts and bolts of why OpenAI has been unable
00:29:24.740 -->
00:29:28.920to find the right comms candidate. It also looks
00:29:28.920 -->
00:29:31.839at questions about the reporting line of the
00:29:31.839 -->
00:29:34.259candidate, which honestly is really good because
00:29:34.259 -->
00:29:37.160you don't expect this stuff from like a generalist
00:29:37.160 -->
00:29:39.920business magazine. And then it looks at the reputation
00:29:39.920 -->
00:29:43.420problems that the AI sector is facing in general,
00:29:43.500 -->
00:29:45.539which we've discussed at length and which are
00:29:45.539 -->
00:29:47.759becoming, you know, which just seem to get worse
00:29:47.759 -->
00:29:51.019every day. Right. In terms of, you know, we've
00:29:51.019 -->
00:29:53.089seen. We've all seen these interviews of people
00:29:53.089 -->
00:29:56.369who have left the AI companies. We see interviews
00:29:56.369 -->
00:29:59.150of people who are still at the AI companies,
00:29:59.230 -->
00:30:02.730and they don't necessarily help either. I mean,
00:30:02.750 -->
00:30:04.750Fortune makes the point that this could be, you
00:30:04.750 -->
00:30:07.109know, this is probably the biggest comms challenge
00:30:07.109 -->
00:30:10.369in the world right now, and also a life -changing
00:30:10.369 -->
00:30:14.829amount of money in terms of salary, which no
00:30:14.829 -->
00:30:17.109doubt it will be, you know, if OpenAI is going
00:30:17.109 -->
00:30:20.559to list and all of that. But yeah, they've been
00:30:20.559 -->
00:30:23.619unable to find their candidate. And what really
00:30:23.619 -->
00:30:25.799struck me actually was that one of the things
00:30:25.799 -->
00:30:29.299they mentioned was because it's been going on
00:30:29.299 -->
00:30:31.680a while, they're now starting to reconsider the
00:30:31.680 -->
00:30:35.160reporting line. So maybe the CCO should report
00:30:35.160 -->
00:30:40.759to, I think it's Sam, not Sam Altman, but his
00:30:40.759 -->
00:30:45.000partner, I think it's Greg Brockman. Or maybe,
00:30:45.259 -->
00:30:50.859yeah, he's the president and co -founder. who's
00:30:50.859 -->
00:30:53.619the one who's leading the hiring. So I think
00:30:53.619 -->
00:30:58.359that was the initial thinking. But then the suggestion
00:30:58.359 -->
00:31:03.720also is that the CCO should report to the CMO,
00:31:03.960 -->
00:31:10.480which will come as, yes, not something, especially
00:31:10.480 -->
00:31:13.700for those of us that rejoiced when we read the
00:31:13.700 -->
00:31:16.839Wall Street Journal article. This will perhaps...
00:31:18.539 -->
00:31:23.480maybe pour some cold water on some of that. But
00:31:23.480 -->
00:31:25.819I think it's quite a realistic depiction of some
00:31:25.819 -->
00:31:28.019of the conversations that are going on inside
00:31:28.019 -->
00:31:31.960big companies. So, yeah, what did you make of
00:31:31.960 -->
00:31:34.759it all? Yes, well, the Wall Street Journal article
00:31:34.759 -->
00:31:39.420that came out in June, I think it was, it did
00:31:39.420 -->
00:31:45.400seem a bit breathless, all about the ascent of
00:31:45.400 -->
00:31:50.500the CCO. And it gave some, you know, it did give
00:31:50.500 -->
00:31:54.059some examples of where chief communications officers
00:31:54.059 -->
00:31:58.180have risen and they're reporting directly to
00:31:58.180 -->
00:32:02.140the CEO. And it is, you know, it's true that
00:32:02.140 -->
00:32:06.140comms is becoming, it's, you know, seen as more
00:32:06.140 -->
00:32:11.380strategic. But that rise is, you know, it's still
00:32:11.380 -->
00:32:14.779unsteady and it's very patchy. I think there's
00:32:14.779 -->
00:32:21.769real confusion. In terms of who these people
00:32:21.769 -->
00:32:25.210should report to, as we've seen with this OpenAI
00:32:25.210 -->
00:32:30.630story, they report to various people. Yeah, sometimes
00:32:30.630 -->
00:32:36.990the CMO. I think in some recent research, our
00:32:36.990 -->
00:32:43.150PR 2030 research, we found just over half report
00:32:43.150 -->
00:32:50.690to the CEO. um yeah which could be seen as good
00:32:50.690 -->
00:32:54.529you know it depends yes exactly it's classic
00:32:54.529 -->
00:32:59.130glass half full or half empty i i suspect most
00:32:59.130 -->
00:33:01.009people wouldn't see it that positively given
00:33:01.009 -->
00:33:06.809it's 2026 and i mean you still have 50 of ccos
00:33:06.809 -->
00:33:10.789that don't report to the ceo yeah yeah but um
00:33:10.789 -->
00:33:14.910but i mean in terms of um that that particular
00:33:14.910 -->
00:33:17.910story about open ai i mean obviously ai companies
00:33:17.910 -->
00:33:21.049uh can function as somebody in the article made
00:33:21.049 -->
00:33:23.789the point uh you know open ai can function perfectly
00:33:23.789 -->
00:33:28.250well without um a chief communications officer
00:33:28.250 -->
00:33:31.349uh it's not going to stop what it's doing uh
00:33:31.349 -->
00:33:35.710but um ai companies are especially prone to crises
00:33:35.710 -->
00:33:40.670and issues um plus um it's not just about fighting
00:33:40.670 -->
00:33:44.319fires but there's just this shadow of negativity
00:33:44.319 -->
00:33:49.299around AI which is it just seems to always be
00:33:49.299 -->
00:33:54.460there you know as as you said you know fear of
00:33:54.460 -->
00:33:59.039extinction you know it's not a lot of cheery
00:33:59.039 -->
00:34:02.680thought so there's a lot for anyone in that role
00:34:02.680 -->
00:34:05.339to do and you would imagine that there are lots
00:34:05.339 -->
00:34:08.219of people out there who would be up for the challenge
00:34:08.219 -->
00:34:13.739so I don't know whether it's a case of OpenAI
00:34:13.739 -->
00:34:17.800just not finding someone with the right capabilities?
00:34:18.039 -->
00:34:21.239Or if really people are just too afraid to take
00:34:21.239 -->
00:34:24.219on that challenge? I don't know. Yeah, it's hard
00:34:24.219 -->
00:34:26.760to say. I think it's probably a combination of
00:34:26.760 -->
00:34:29.599both. I mean, the article does point out that
00:34:29.599 -->
00:34:31.719the first choice for the role was Jill Hazelbaker,
00:34:31.940 -->
00:34:36.699who is a very well -known name in the comms world
00:34:36.699 -->
00:34:42.449and is considered one of the top operators. um
00:34:42.449 -->
00:34:49.010works at uber um there's a great quote actually
00:34:49.010 -->
00:34:52.329i'm going to try and find it in the story about
00:34:52.329 -->
00:34:57.130chill from a from a friend no a source familiar
00:34:57.130 -->
00:35:03.110with the search um oh no no those who know her
00:35:03.110 -->
00:35:05.389list a few reasons she may have turned it down
00:35:05.389 -->
00:35:07.690i love the sourcing here i always love it where
00:35:07.690 -->
00:35:13.420it's Someone who knows someone. And as reporters,
00:35:13.579 -->
00:35:15.280you always wonder, is that the person themselves?
00:35:15.639 -->
00:35:19.019Is it someone else? Anyway, the quote is, Jill
00:35:19.019 -->
00:35:21.659is absolutely fantastic, said another source
00:35:21.659 -->
00:35:25.119who has spoken directly with OpenAI about the
00:35:25.119 -->
00:35:27.480position and who commented on the likely reasons
00:35:27.480 -->
00:35:30.440the company has not been able to hire her. She's
00:35:30.440 -->
00:35:32.920very mature. She has an awesome relationship
00:35:32.920 -->
00:35:38.250with Dara, the Uber CEO. this is my favorite
00:35:38.250 -->
00:35:45.889she makes a fuckload of money also she lives
00:35:45.889 -->
00:35:48.150on the east coast and has a family it's really
00:35:48.150 -->
00:35:50.969hard to get her because she lives in dc and she's
00:35:50.969 -->
00:35:56.190not going to move all good reasons and um i certainly
00:35:56.190 -->
00:35:58.929think given where she's at and probably what
00:35:58.929 -->
00:36:03.230she's seen at uber you can maybe understand Maybe
00:36:03.230 -->
00:36:07.489not wanting to go back into the absolute hottest
00:36:07.489 -->
00:36:14.230furnace around at the moment. The reputation
00:36:14.230 -->
00:36:18.809issues facing AI, as you described, a shadow,
00:36:19.070 -->
00:36:21.730they're not going to go away. It looks like they're
00:36:21.730 -->
00:36:23.809going to get worse. We have so many questions
00:36:23.809 -->
00:36:28.590now about data centers as well. Absolutely. OpenAI
00:36:28.590 -->
00:36:31.409wants to list, so that's going to, you know,
00:36:31.409 -->
00:36:36.119that just... kind of elevates all of these concerns
00:36:36.119 -->
00:36:41.840as a material risk. So you sort of think they
00:36:41.840 -->
00:36:43.480need to find someone sooner rather than later,
00:36:43.679 -->
00:36:49.980but yeah, they have quite a big team and they
00:36:49.980 -->
00:36:52.519seem to be doing, as the article suggests, maybe
00:36:52.519 -->
00:36:55.539a better job. But yeah, it's a good example,
00:36:55.639 -->
00:36:58.139I think, of some of the forces we're seeing more
00:36:58.139 -->
00:37:02.010broadly across the industry. It's still... i
00:37:02.010 -->
00:37:04.469think a bit difficult for the comms function
00:37:04.469 -->
00:37:09.309to always effectively demonstrate where it should
00:37:09.309 -->
00:37:12.650sit to whom it should report uh the value it
00:37:12.650 -->
00:37:16.710brings um i was at a thing last week where someone
00:37:16.710 -->
00:37:20.530asked you know is the fact that people still
00:37:20.530 -->
00:37:25.010ask the fact that uh tesla doesn't have a comms
00:37:25.010 -->
00:37:27.949head or elon musk doesn't have a comms head is
00:37:27.949 -->
00:37:32.360that is that evidence that comms heads are not
00:37:32.360 -->
00:37:37.840needed um which you know i think is kind of a
00:37:37.840 -->
00:37:40.960ridiculous question but if people are asking
00:37:40.960 -->
00:37:46.619it it's not that ridiculous so um so yeah it's
00:37:46.619 -->
00:37:49.219an interesting one to watch and i just hope for
00:37:49.219 -->
00:37:52.059the reporter's sake um they don't hire someone
00:37:52.059 -->
00:37:54.059next week because that's always what you worry
00:37:54.059 -->
00:37:58.940about with these kinds of stories as well um
00:37:58.940 -->
00:38:02.440but yeah good story Worth reading. And on that
00:38:02.440 -->
00:38:07.079note, I think perhaps we will end this podcast.
00:38:07.940 -->
00:38:11.340So what have we got to say? We've got Praxis
00:38:11.340 -->
00:38:13.920India. That will have happened by the time this
00:38:13.920 -->
00:38:17.079episode comes out this weekend. We've got Praxis
00:38:17.079 -->
00:38:21.099Asia Pacific in Singapore in two weeks. So if
00:38:21.099 -->
00:38:24.500you're listening and you're in Singapore or you'd
00:38:24.500 -->
00:38:27.139like to travel to Singapore. please come to the
00:38:27.139 -->
00:38:29.639national gallery on 7th of october we have a
00:38:29.639 -->
00:38:35.380great lineup um and yeah we have lots of research
00:38:35.380 -->
00:38:39.119and all the usual stuff on our website um so
00:38:39.119 -->
00:38:42.639thanks david for your time today and um thank
00:38:42.639 -->
00:38:45.079you big thanks as always to our production partners
00:38:45.079 -->
00:38:46.880at earshot media