S2 E5 - Digging for the Yes, but Why with Ed Southall

WEBVTT
00:00:16.829 --> 00:00:25.350
Hello and welcome to this episode of season two of Digging for the Y, the podcast for math teachers, where we explore thoughts behind asking why I am Andy, one of your hosts.
00:00:25.350 --> 00:00:27.510
And I'm joined in the fellow hosting seat by Alison.
00:00:27.570 --> 00:00:29.039
How are you today, Alison?
00:00:29.429 --> 00:00:30.809
I'm very well, thank you very much, Andy.
00:00:31.350 --> 00:00:32.039
Very, very good.
00:00:32.039 --> 00:00:33.509
Enjoying a bit of sunshine down there.
00:00:34.034 --> 00:00:35.564
No, cloudy today.
00:00:36.634 --> 00:00:38.024
We've got sunshine up north.
00:00:38.034 --> 00:00:40.234
So we went one for the north.
00:00:40.234 --> 00:00:41.265
It doesn't often happen.
00:00:41.365 --> 00:00:43.414
So I'm going to claim it whenever I can claim it.
00:00:44.075 --> 00:00:51.253
Now, when we were thinking about season two and who we would want to talk to about Digging for the Why, it was pretty easy to come up with today's guest.
00:00:51.945 --> 00:00:54.854
He is the author of Yes, But Why?
00:00:54.893 --> 00:01:01.484
Teaching for Understanding in Mathematics, which basically would have been our alternative title for this podcast, but that had already been taken.
00:01:01.844 --> 00:01:06.515
So we reached out to him and thankfully, or maybe foolishly, he said yes.
00:01:07.025 --> 00:01:17.114
He is currently, now there's a list here coming, this is ripped straight out, don't, don't give yourself away, shh, this is ripped straight out of his LinkedIn profile, so you know, this is pretty good.
00:01:17.453 --> 00:01:30.274
He is currently the Mathematics Curriculum Lead for Oak National Academy, an author of many maths books, a conference speaker specializing in conceptual teaching of maths, and making sense, no, and making maths make sense to children of all ages.
00:01:30.573 --> 00:01:35.153
If you go on his Twitter, he often talks about talking to a bot as well, which is quite entertaining at the moment.
00:01:35.549 --> 00:01:42.879
He is editor in chief of the Mathematical Association, a former school teacher, and member of senior leadership, and also worked in the Middle East for four years.
00:01:42.939 --> 00:01:45.079
He is, of course, Ed Southall.
00:01:45.079 --> 00:01:46.599
Welcome to Digging for the Y, Ed.
00:01:46.609 --> 00:01:47.569
How are you?
00:01:48.219 --> 00:01:49.049
I'm very well, thank you.
00:01:49.049 --> 00:01:52.618
I'm a little bit flustered after that intro, even though I wrote half of it.
00:01:55.718 --> 00:01:58.724
I particularly like that you threw in that my best friend's a bot at the moment, which is brilliant.
00:01:58.724 --> 00:01:59.353
Pretty accurate.
00:01:59.433 --> 00:02:04.484
I do enjoy your Twitter when you're talking about the stuff that you're doing at the moment.
00:02:04.484 --> 00:02:05.084
That was quite good.
00:02:05.763 --> 00:02:06.114
Okay.
00:02:06.114 --> 00:02:12.373
So we're trying to start the season off with a standard question to see what people are thinking about at the moment and what's going on in their lives.
00:02:12.373 --> 00:02:16.843
So in the last couple of weeks, what has happened to make you ask why?
00:02:18.968 --> 00:02:26.758
Well, I was thinking about this, like, I was thinking, oh, they'll want a clever mathsy thing that makes them go, Oh, I've not thought about the Y for that, but I don't have one of those.
00:02:27.139 --> 00:02:55.579
But I do have an eight year old and, and he comes to me quite regularly with like amazing, bizarre questions that are actually really good questions, but just, you wouldn't think them as adults because we've, we've, Lived a whole different set of experiences, but he came to me Last week basically and he said And I love this Why is it that the sky is blue when you look up?
00:02:55.659 --> 00:03:02.093
But if you were at the top of the sky looking down you can't see the blue I thought that's pretty good.
00:03:02.634 --> 00:03:06.114
I'm not quite sure how it's got to the top of the sky, but What's your answer?
00:03:06.644 --> 00:03:07.873
Because it just is shut up.
00:03:11.213 --> 00:03:13.623
No, don't, don't give the teacher answer when you don't know the answer.
00:03:14.514 --> 00:03:27.213
Well, what was good actually was, was his brother who's 15 chipped in with the classic misconception of, oh, it's because it's reflecting the color of the sea, which doesn't really
00:03:27.234 --> 00:03:27.764
Yorkshire.
00:03:27.819 --> 00:03:34.459
This doesn't work and also doesn't really address the whole from the top down work.
00:03:34.778 --> 00:03:35.258
I don't know.
00:03:35.679 --> 00:03:48.209
But I just, what I liked about it was it just demonstrated that weird curiosity that you tend to get mostly with like primary school kids, I suppose, because they're figuring out the world.
00:03:48.669 --> 00:03:49.128
Yeah.
00:03:50.038 --> 00:03:50.938
I love that kind of thing.
00:03:51.429 --> 00:03:53.329
That's something we've spoken about before Alison, isn't it?
00:03:53.338 --> 00:03:55.838
Because I've got a 5 year old, no she's 6 on my word.
00:03:56.019 --> 00:04:00.104
A 6 year old and a 3 year old and they're constantly just questioning everything.
00:04:00.104 --> 00:04:02.038
And then Alison's got, what's yours,
00:04:02.039 --> 00:04:03.758
17?
00:04:03.838 --> 00:04:10.503
Yeah, so like that kind of, that, what happens between You know, five years old and 17.
00:04:10.524 --> 00:04:12.524
And, and where does that curiosity go?
00:04:12.525 --> 00:04:17.113
And, you know, one of our, one of our episodes on the first season was about curiosity in that classroom.
00:04:17.113 --> 00:04:18.413
And like, what happens to it?
00:04:18.863 --> 00:04:20.574
Do we knock it out of the kids?
00:04:20.574 --> 00:04:29.423
You know, so I, I mean, that kind of leads into a question then, which, you know, believe it or not listeners, we do have a set of questions, which we send to our guests ahead of time.
00:04:29.634 --> 00:04:34.913
However, I'm straight away going to go off topic, just ask you a question, which has nothing to do with what we sent you.
00:04:36.264 --> 00:04:37.904
I'm interested in, in the book, obviously.
00:04:37.934 --> 00:04:38.973
So yes, but why?
00:04:39.509 --> 00:04:42.228
It's the reason that we first wanted to get you on here.
00:04:42.598 --> 00:04:51.528
Because obviously you must share something along the same lines as what we think about in terms of education, in terms of teaching, what led you to want to write that book?
00:04:51.548 --> 00:04:52.629
What, what was that about?
00:04:52.629 --> 00:04:54.738
What was that, what was driving you to do that?
00:04:55.249 --> 00:04:55.918
This could be long.
00:04:56.329 --> 00:04:57.230
I'll try and keep it brief.
00:04:57.589 --> 00:05:09.350
I, I have been through a journey with like my relationship with maths and I think it's quite a common journey up to a point.
00:05:09.930 --> 00:05:19.309
And when I came through at the end, I thought actually this, like where I've come to with this journey would benefit a lot of other people, I assumed.
00:05:19.850 --> 00:05:26.920
And so that journey was like being at primary school and being good at, I remember being good at maths.
00:05:27.189 --> 00:05:28.540
I remember getting the answers right.
00:05:29.185 --> 00:05:40.254
I don't really remember how it was taught when I was that young, but, but I did well in it and I went to a secondary school and I was doing great at maths then as well.
00:05:40.285 --> 00:05:46.704
And gosh, I got to sort my GCSEs and, and didn't really work very hard for them, but got good grades.
00:05:46.783 --> 00:05:47.803
And then I got to a level.
00:05:47.803 --> 00:05:49.144
I was like, Oh, this is.
00:05:50.199 --> 00:05:52.189
Quite a challenging subject now.
00:05:52.798 --> 00:06:03.978
And I really struggled at a level managed to get good enough grades to get through to university where I still studied maths Almost accidentally, really.
00:06:03.978 --> 00:06:08.189
I went to Keele university and you've got to do a joint honors there.
00:06:08.189 --> 00:06:09.809
And I wanted to do programming.
00:06:10.088 --> 00:06:13.819
But they, I had, you literally have to take a second subject or you did back then.
00:06:14.218 --> 00:06:16.408
So I took maths cause, cause I was doing all right at it.
00:06:16.999 --> 00:06:23.459
And I really started to fall out with maths as it were, because it was just really hard.
00:06:24.129 --> 00:06:31.870
And I don't, I don't think I really understood at the time why I wasn't enjoying that difficulty.
00:06:31.959 --> 00:06:43.355
And it's only as an adult really, that I can see that a big part of it was that Pretty much the entire time, none of it made any sense to me at all, ever.
00:06:44.074 --> 00:06:53.035
It was just, I was good at following the rules and the number that popped out at the end was the same one that the teacher was expecting.
00:06:53.725 --> 00:06:58.764
And I think I was just fortunate because that, that in retrospect, that just feels lucky, really.
00:06:58.805 --> 00:07:03.245
I don't think I had a good conceptual grasp of most of what was going on.
00:07:03.865 --> 00:07:05.725
And at university, I think I can hand on heart.
00:07:05.725 --> 00:07:07.535
I should be ashamed, but I'm not.
00:07:07.595 --> 00:07:11.504
Like, I don't think I understood anything that I studied at university in maths.
00:07:11.535 --> 00:07:14.904
I just followed the rules.
00:07:15.185 --> 00:07:22.985
And that gets you so far, but you really struggle with creative questions and questions that require you to apply stuff to unfamiliar situations and so on.
00:07:23.004 --> 00:07:23.725
And I always did.
00:07:24.384 --> 00:07:26.524
Anyway, so I come through all of that.
00:07:26.524 --> 00:07:30.589
I get my degree and I wasn't sure what I wanted to do.
00:07:30.589 --> 00:07:34.750
I wanted to be a programmer, but it was at the point of the sort of millennium bug thing.
00:07:34.750 --> 00:07:38.970
And so there were loads of jobs going into it when I was studying and then nothing happened.
00:07:38.970 --> 00:07:41.819
And you came out and the graduate market for computing just kind of drop off.
00:07:42.449 --> 00:07:55.620
So my mom was a teacher and she was like, why don't you just, while you're sitting around, you know, taking up space in my home come with me to my school and do two weeks and see what you think, because at the time there was a good graduate scheme.
00:07:56.139 --> 00:07:58.439
For teaching, they paid off your student loans for you.
00:07:58.529 --> 00:08:00.160
I was like, that sounds pretty good.
00:08:00.769 --> 00:08:03.079
And I was just really into it.
00:08:03.189 --> 00:08:18.319
I connect, like my mom worked at a really tough school and I connected with the kids there and she saw that and she was saying, you know, you've got this, you do great at teaching because you can, you can relate to these.
00:08:18.339 --> 00:08:24.050
You know, these kids who a lot of people can't and they responded to you really well.
00:08:25.000 --> 00:08:25.769
And I enjoyed it.
00:08:25.819 --> 00:08:27.670
So, so I did teach training.
00:08:27.899 --> 00:08:36.840
I trained to be a computing teacher, but at interview at my first job, as, as is always the case I've now found they went, Oh, you've got a degree in maths.
00:08:36.889 --> 00:08:37.279
Guess what?
00:08:37.289 --> 00:08:38.269
You're gonna be a maths teacher.
00:08:38.889 --> 00:08:46.580
So I had no formal training of being a maths teacher, but I ended up teaching maths 50 percent of my timetable for the first three or four years.
00:08:47.250 --> 00:08:48.080
And it just.
00:08:48.919 --> 00:09:03.330
Kept, you know, increasing because the demand for that subject is so much bigger or was then and the career opportunities were so much so much more prominent for for maths than they were for computing So anyway, i'm sorry.
00:09:03.330 --> 00:09:04.129
This is such a long story.
00:09:04.379 --> 00:09:06.620
I ended up becoming a head of maths, right?
00:09:06.870 --> 00:09:15.070
And at that point I must have been I don't know like 25 26 or something like that.
00:09:15.070 --> 00:09:35.115
Just pretty young for a head of math and and I kind of It, it, it I had this realization that up to that point, my teaching of maths had been fairly crappy and had been very similar to how I'd been taught maths, where I was just focusing on, you know, you need to know this rule to solve this problem.
00:09:35.125 --> 00:09:36.845
You need to know this rule to solve this problem.
00:09:36.845 --> 00:09:39.654
And so, and I thought, I don't want to be that.
00:09:40.424 --> 00:09:47.195
And now that I've got this kind of responsibility within this subject, I need to be better at teaching maths.
00:09:47.235 --> 00:09:52.044
So I just went away and, and.
00:09:52.115 --> 00:10:01.845
I just started researching all the things that bugged me about the stuff that I'd worked on my whole life in, in maths education.
00:10:01.845 --> 00:10:06.245
Like, why, why is it that this thing works and what, you know, there must be reasons.
00:10:06.534 --> 00:10:18.095
And I'd never really thought about the reasons until the point where I thought I need the kids to know some of these reasons so that they don't have this journey that I had of like being all right, but not enjoying it.
00:10:18.605 --> 00:10:21.485
And it just became incredibly addictive.
00:10:21.899 --> 00:10:26.509
As soon as you start getting those realizations of Oh my God, this makes sense.
00:10:26.629 --> 00:10:29.000
And oh my God, that makes, that makes sense.
00:10:29.080 --> 00:10:32.259
And oh, so I wonder if there's an answer to this thing.
00:10:32.659 --> 00:10:58.500
And, and you find that pretty much everything has a really sensible reason behind it or purpose behind it or structure behind it, even down to like the etymology of words in math, like words are so foreign, they, you know, we don't use them outside of maths ever really in, in a lot of, in but when you start figuring out why that word is structured as it is and how it relates to other words and you go, Oh, okay, it makes sense to use this stupid term.
00:10:58.500 --> 00:11:01.330
It's not stupid, but it was for 20 years.
00:11:01.889 --> 00:11:09.450
And I just kept going down more and more rabbit holes and feeling euphoric at every discovery that I made.
00:11:10.080 --> 00:11:32.299
And I thought I need, I need to spread the word, so I just, it became the book and I feel like, I mean, I'm sure other people should tell me this rather than me assuming it, but I think one of the reasons people find me reasonably interesting is because I'm, I am the same person as them on that journey of not being seen as a gifted mathematician.
00:11:32.820 --> 00:11:36.960
I struggled with it, I didn't really understand it, but I could get through it, you know.
00:11:37.230 --> 00:11:43.529
And I've come through the other side, so I can, I feel like I'm in a decent position to tell people you can too.
00:11:43.600 --> 00:11:52.620
It's not, it's not magic and it's not about having some crazy gift or, or like sense around numbers that other people don't have.
00:11:52.669 --> 00:11:57.629
It's just about being informed and being able to access that information and wanting to know it.
00:11:58.904 --> 00:11:59.335
There you go.
00:11:59.715 --> 00:12:01.284
Yeah, no, it's brilliant.
00:12:01.394 --> 00:12:24.815
So when you said you down rabbit holes, I'm intrigued as to sort of where you, where you started looking for the why, if you see what I mean, and where you ended up finding the beginning of that why, because obviously I'm, I'm listening to this with a primary hat on and had perhaps a similar, not, not so similar, but similar journey, but not at the same bits of math.
00:12:24.855 --> 00:12:26.554
My math ran out at a level.
00:12:26.715 --> 00:12:37.615
I got through a level by learning how to do stuff and I can still remember the feeling of getting to the end of a problem and proving that the coefficient of restitution lambda equal to third and the Hallelujah chorus played in my head.
00:12:38.004 --> 00:12:38.625
I was very happy.
00:12:38.945 --> 00:12:47.904
If asked me to do something about coefficient of restitution now, and other than telling you about snooker balls, perhaps, or billiard balls I would never be able to prove that lambda equal to third.
00:12:48.144 --> 00:12:59.125
And so my Y ran out at that point, and it was only when I did my PGCE in primary, that little bits of the Y started appearing to me as I pulled apart bits of maths.
00:12:59.174 --> 00:13:12.424
And having had the luxury of being able to live a life of thinking about maths quite a lot over the last 20 years, in and out of school as well So I'm intrigued as to where you started looking for the Y in terms of the maths and where you ended up.
00:13:13.325 --> 00:13:17.914
I think probably trigonometry was my starting point.
00:13:18.254 --> 00:13:40.070
Like, as soon as you, I've seen this, part of my background is teacher training and I've seen So many trainees get nervy around, this isn't the right terminology, but like the top end of the curriculum, you know, the, the, the, the stuff people used to label as the A star topics, which is ludicrous in some ways.
00:13:40.100 --> 00:13:49.568
But those, those elements that, that start bleeding into a level where without any conceptual understanding of what's going on.
00:13:49.889 --> 00:14:11.539
It becomes like farcically abstract and, and you just feel so inept doing anything with it and so lost and you've got no sort of compass bearing around whether the hideous decimal that comes out on your calculator at the end has anything to do with the question that was asked.
00:14:11.820 --> 00:14:14.750
And you're just hoping and praying it is and you see it.
00:14:15.740 --> 00:14:18.820
Like with, with an expert hat on, you see it in classrooms all the time.
00:14:18.820 --> 00:14:20.549
Teacher explains stuff, everyone's nodding.
00:14:21.190 --> 00:14:30.009
And then even the most high achieving students in the class are putting the hands up after every answer they write down because they just have no bearing of whether it's right.
00:14:30.649 --> 00:14:33.240
It was that and but I was in the role of the teacher.
00:14:33.259 --> 00:14:46.049
I just thought I cannot begin to teach these topics without having a really good foundation of, you know, what the hell's actually going on here.
00:14:46.070 --> 00:14:47.129
It's not just.
00:14:47.860 --> 00:14:52.960
Pressing numbers on calculators and, and to my shame, I taught this stuff before.
00:14:52.960 --> 00:14:53.169
Right.
00:14:53.179 --> 00:14:57.970
And I taught it in that way, just, just like plow through these instructions.
00:14:58.460 --> 00:14:59.340
It gets you there.
00:14:59.840 --> 00:15:03.179
And maybe that's because I wasn't trained in it to some extent.
00:15:03.480 --> 00:15:12.759
I don't know what, why I didn't take that more seriously at the time, probably because I was, I saw myself as a computing teacher and this was like the aside that was put upon me.
00:15:12.759 --> 00:15:13.190
I don't know.
00:15:13.720 --> 00:15:19.759
But it was definitely Trigonometry where I started thinking, I need to sort of deep dive I hate that.
00:15:19.759 --> 00:15:21.659
I hate that that's become part of our lexicon.
00:15:22.049 --> 00:15:27.009
This, before I go in teaching these, the, these, these pupils with it.
00:15:27.049 --> 00:15:30.039
And I had a blog at the time where I used to just post maths problems.
00:15:30.674 --> 00:15:34.585
And I started to, to write instead of just post problems on it.
00:15:34.625 --> 00:15:39.414
And, and I was writing my findings on this stuff.
00:15:39.585 --> 00:15:41.855
Not from a perspective of, Oh, look, I found this stuff out.
00:15:41.875 --> 00:15:43.455
Cause I was kind of embarrassed about that.
00:15:43.455 --> 00:15:47.524
It was more, it was more, if you don't know this stuff, isn't this interesting?
00:15:48.195 --> 00:15:49.875
And, and it was those that became.
00:15:53.524 --> 00:16:03.554
Okay, I'm going to kind of expand on that slightly, put yourself in a position of, you know, there's a teacher now listening to this podcast and thinking, you know, this is what I think as well.
00:16:03.754 --> 00:16:12.914
And I, you know, and in my teaching career, I worked in seven different schools and every single school had people that think like this, that you're talking about now and want to dig into it and want to deep dive, as you say.
00:16:13.384 --> 00:16:19.235
into the why and the understanding of it, but there's also the people who want to know that they can get results.
00:16:19.565 --> 00:16:26.375
And for want of a better phrase, don't mind if they don't, if the students don't understand because they're going to get it right.
00:16:26.894 --> 00:16:35.955
And actually that's okay because we're time pressured where everything else that we know we've got in teaching and we've got to get through this curriculum, we've got to do this exam in GCSE and.
00:16:36.745 --> 00:16:39.195
So put yourself in the position now of the teacher who's there.
00:16:39.195 --> 00:16:45.014
And then maybe a couple of years in, and they're thinking, I'm not, I'm not, I don't feel like I'm teaching this topic properly.
00:16:45.134 --> 00:16:46.394
I don't think I'm teaching this topic.
00:16:46.654 --> 00:16:50.445
I feel like I'm algorithmically preparing these students to answer a question.
00:16:50.815 --> 00:16:55.904
And when that question is different, they're going to get stuck because they're not got any kind of conceptual understanding.
00:16:56.294 --> 00:16:57.605
How did you go about.
00:16:58.080 --> 00:17:21.369
Working with your heads of department, if you like, to allow you to take that time to introduce topics in a different way, knowing that if you're like, let's say we've got three weeks on a topic while I'm going to spend the first week playing around with stuff here, looking into it, diving into it, because I know that then the following two weeks, I'm going to get to the point you need me to get to, how'd you have that discussion with the head of my head of department?
00:17:22.119 --> 00:17:23.920
Yeah, it's tricky.
00:17:23.920 --> 00:17:24.190
Right.
00:17:24.250 --> 00:17:27.569
And, and it, it almost comes from a few.
00:17:27.930 --> 00:17:45.690
Steps before that, I think, I think focusing on what the practice is turns into more in depth conversations about how the modeling looks and how we're testing different elements of how, how much children understand the topic.
00:17:46.190 --> 00:17:50.480
So I think it's easier to get people enthused about.
00:17:50.990 --> 00:18:13.940
Practice first and, and start thinking about, well, what's a good question look like on this topic and how much do I actually know that they know when they can answer this question correctly and, and like, what level of understanding do I need them to have to be able to tackle this style of question where, where, Like the purpose is hidden or the maths is hidden and so on.
00:18:14.430 --> 00:18:19.829
And so from there you start thinking, well, why is this a smart question?
00:18:20.059 --> 00:18:22.950
And how is this question better than that question?
00:18:22.950 --> 00:18:23.430
And so on.
00:18:23.910 --> 00:18:27.400
And to me, then you start kind of working backwards and going, well, to be able to tackle.
00:18:27.619 --> 00:18:30.109
These more in depth questions, they need to have this understanding.
00:18:30.109 --> 00:18:32.059
Well, how can I get them to get that understanding?
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:34.630
How am I introducing this topic?
00:18:34.630 --> 00:18:35.799
What does my modeling look like?
00:18:35.799 --> 00:18:37.329
What does my questioning look like?
00:18:37.880 --> 00:18:39.059
How can I improve that?
00:18:39.700 --> 00:18:41.630
And it, it.
00:18:42.420 --> 00:18:46.450
An easy way to do it really is like a comparison of like the before and after.
00:18:46.569 --> 00:19:07.278
So, so something, I mean, everyone always falls back on something like Pythagoras or the area of a triangle and so on, but I think one of the reasons for that is that both of those lend themselves really strongly towards being able to teach it procedurally quickly, but not very well, and teaching it slowly and, and really going to town on, on, on.
00:19:07.430 --> 00:19:12.440
What's actually happening with structures and with, with the maths behind, you know, where do those formulae come from?
00:19:13.059 --> 00:19:23.279
And I think if you can get people on board with, with this kind of excitement of revisiting stuff and improving it it kind of naturally generates from there.
00:19:23.380 --> 00:19:30.089
And in my, certainly in my experience, I found that, I mean, I mentioned that I did a blog about writing puzzles.
00:19:30.089 --> 00:19:31.099
The reason I used to do that.
00:19:31.984 --> 00:19:38.204
Was because I was working in a maths maths department as a kind of lead practitioner type thing.
00:19:38.275 --> 00:19:43.664
And, and no one was talking about maths at all.
00:19:43.734 --> 00:19:49.900
And everybody was, you know, the being a maths staff room together, the, Talk about their days and so on.
00:19:49.930 --> 00:19:53.019
And then they'd go off and teach in silos and then come back again.
00:19:53.410 --> 00:19:59.079
And the departmental meetings were all about the bulletins from senior leadership or from wherever.
00:19:59.470 --> 00:20:05.349
And there was nowhere in the cycle of a week where people were talking about what they taught or how they taught it.
00:20:05.390 --> 00:20:10.390
Or there was just no sense of enjoyment about the subject.
00:20:11.454 --> 00:20:32.253
So I just started posting these maths puzzles on the board in the staff room, the maths staff room, just to see what would happen and over the course of like a month or two people just everyone started talking about them and and people would share their different ways of solving stuff and and it just nudged me.
00:20:32.464 --> 00:21:03.224
People to reflect on why they love maths and why they love their subject and made them realize, and this wasn't my intent particularly, but it made them realize that they haven't done any challenging maths for years because the only maths the teachers are doing is the stuff that's pre prepared or the stuff that's been on the curriculum for 20 years or whatever, and so putting them in a place where they actually had to solve something that they weren't that familiar with, kind of.
00:21:03.839 --> 00:21:06.339
Fired up their love of, of the subject.
00:21:06.420 --> 00:21:15.900
And I think if you can get people to be fired up about what they're teaching, then they're going to naturally want to talk about, you know, what's the best way to teach this?
00:21:15.900 --> 00:21:19.670
What's the best way to draw, you know, this student asked this great question yesterday.
00:21:20.220 --> 00:21:21.460
How did that question come about?
00:21:21.460 --> 00:21:23.259
What did I facilitate to get to that point?
00:21:23.259 --> 00:21:24.900
And how, how would you respond to it?
00:21:24.910 --> 00:21:29.029
And that to me is one of the most.
00:21:29.625 --> 00:21:31.424
exciting things about teaching.
00:21:32.045 --> 00:21:39.384
And you know, you, you look at some other cultures about their perception of teaching and how you can never be perfect at it.
00:21:39.454 --> 00:21:43.095
And you can never, it's just this never ending journey.
00:21:43.654 --> 00:21:44.954
That's what they find exciting.
00:21:44.974 --> 00:21:46.305
They don't find that daunting.
00:21:46.315 --> 00:21:47.595
They find that exciting.
00:21:47.684 --> 00:21:55.065
And, and that's the thrill of it, that it, that it's, you know, there's this intellectual side to it where you go, how do I constantly do better?
00:21:55.615 --> 00:21:57.434
And, and I don't think we have that.
00:21:57.819 --> 00:22:14.809
enough here but if you can latch onto it or nurture that, then, then you're going to fall into those rich discussions about, you know, how do I get people to understand this really clearly to a level where they're not just.
00:22:14.884 --> 00:22:18.634
regurgitating that they're thinking hard about stuff.
00:22:20.674 --> 00:22:22.494
How did the, how did the pupils react?
00:22:22.505 --> 00:22:24.984
Cause I think that's, that's something that's quite interesting.
00:22:25.035 --> 00:22:36.585
You, you've found a way to get through to the teachers, getting them excited about the maths again, but then changing that way of presenting maths in the classroom is a real difference in the way that the pupils engage.
00:22:36.585 --> 00:22:39.894
So did you, what, what did you sort of, what, what happened?
00:22:40.464 --> 00:22:41.305
Yeah, I mean, I'm, I'm,
00:22:41.505 --> 00:22:41.825
I'm.
00:22:42.474 --> 00:22:57.255
I'm going to be brutally honest, because I want people to understand that this is normal, or it is from my perspective, like my biggest battle in the classroom was getting top set year 11 to want to know why anything they could not care less.
00:22:58.125 --> 00:23:01.924
And it's understandable when you take a step back, right?
00:23:01.944 --> 00:23:03.765
They, they are in their last year.
00:23:03.765 --> 00:23:14.105
Most of them of maths education, they have had 11 years of being taught in a certain way or being familiar with.
00:23:14.595 --> 00:23:20.335
Certain styles of teaching and they have been extremely successful in that arena.
00:23:21.224 --> 00:23:46.065
And so to change it at the end is uncomfortable at least and, and threatening, you know, it's like, I'm really good at this and I'm holding onto that and now you're, You're, you're putting me in a place where I have to do things differently, where, where perhaps I'm not going to feel as successful or, or even just at a base level, like I'm near my exams.
00:23:46.065 --> 00:23:47.974
I've got this don't mess with the system.
00:23:48.555 --> 00:23:50.204
And to be honest.
00:23:50.269 --> 00:24:08.749
I say this in some of the talks I do about, I think it's really complicated about how you put why into lessons, which I think we'll probably get onto, but I think it's, it's not going to be appropriate all the time and I think with year 11, depending on their prior experience, you know, your priority really.
00:24:09.369 --> 00:24:13.539
is get them through their exams, that's why they're there, right?
00:24:13.759 --> 00:24:19.839
And, and as a principal that I struggle with that because that's not why I'm there or it's not why I want to be there.
00:24:20.500 --> 00:24:22.529
But really that is what you're employed to do, right?
00:24:22.569 --> 00:24:25.259
Like get them through school, you could argue.
00:24:25.869 --> 00:24:27.289
And particularly at that point.
00:24:28.035 --> 00:24:31.065
You know, I don't have time to, to go, right.
00:24:31.065 --> 00:24:41.285
I'm going to explain prime factors in way more depth for you so that you're, you're really satisfied with understanding it because that comes at a cost of, Oh, by the way, you're not going to know three topics in your exams in a few months.
00:24:41.285 --> 00:24:46.115
So it's definitely complicated, but I think at year seven and eight, you can nurture it really quickly.
00:24:46.134 --> 00:24:46.795
Genuinely.
00:24:46.875 --> 00:24:51.654
I think, I think the message that I give is that your default.
00:24:52.305 --> 00:24:57.644
At key stage three really should be, this needs to make sense rather than you need to get the answer right.
00:24:58.355 --> 00:24:58.565
Yeah.
00:24:58.775 --> 00:25:03.515
And that kind of shifts as you move towards exam periods.
00:25:03.575 --> 00:25:14.464
But if you assume that, that that why has been integrated from year seven, then then you shouldn't have to be a hundred percent focused on the answer must always be right by the end.
00:25:14.555 --> 00:25:15.785
'cause that comes with it.
00:25:15.815 --> 00:25:15.875
Yeah.
00:25:16.384 --> 00:25:17.315
But it does take time.
00:25:18.194 --> 00:25:40.724
Yeah, no, I think that Andy, Andy mentioned his, you know, we seem to have our offspring are all at sort of span the for span preschool to what, well, I think, I think with both of them up in, up at the, the top end and I must admit, it's possibly because he grew up with a, a maths teacher and an engineer that my 17 year old, We got over the initial early in year seven.
00:25:40.765 --> 00:25:43.144
Just tell me the, just tell me what to do.
00:25:43.434 --> 00:25:49.194
It was it was fractions and it was depending on whether you knew the value of a part or the value of a whole.
00:25:49.204 --> 00:25:54.575
Did you divide by the denominator and multiply by the numerator or divide by the numerator and multiply by the denominator?
00:25:54.595 --> 00:25:56.194
Just tell me how to do it.
00:25:56.755 --> 00:25:57.535
And I.
00:25:57.845 --> 00:26:00.214
didn't because I'm cruel and mean and horrible.
00:26:00.454 --> 00:26:17.865
But the upshot of that is that now we're in first year of A level and further maths and his biggest bugbear is when he comes home and he doesn't understand why this works and he gets really, really frustrated.
00:26:18.605 --> 00:26:21.484
When the understanding why it works doesn't matter.
00:26:21.484 --> 00:26:26.575
So you said the tricky bit is how you get the why into the lesson, into the lessons.
00:26:26.984 --> 00:26:27.855
So go on, tell us.
00:26:27.904 --> 00:26:28.474
I think, well,
00:26:28.734 --> 00:26:31.924
I just think it's really nuanced and complicated.
00:26:31.964 --> 00:26:36.650
And I think people want an easy answer where there isn't an easy answer at all.
00:26:37.230 --> 00:26:44.000
So for example again, forgive me for going back to the same blooming examples each time, but area of a triangle, right?
00:26:45.039 --> 00:26:47.220
It's one that everyone can imagine in their heads.
00:26:49.400 --> 00:26:56.490
I think, I think, I think a poor way to teach that would be, here's the formula, practice, practice, practice, move on.
00:26:57.589 --> 00:26:57.859
Right.
00:26:59.700 --> 00:27:02.910
But I don't think there's a right answer.
00:27:03.200 --> 00:27:26.710
way necessarily with, with, with the next two examples, like model and explain and, and get to the core concept of this is why this is the formula and then practice and then move on or introduce the algorithm practice, practice, practice, and then introduce like, this is why this formula is right.
00:27:28.174 --> 00:27:40.845
And I think some, I was really, really like consciously careful when I wrote the book to not promote a sequence of how to introduce stuff.
00:27:40.924 --> 00:27:50.220
I saw it as, this is the explainers that you are probably going to want to use sometimes, Probably not going to want to use over time.
00:27:50.220 --> 00:27:53.690
Some of these you probably will never use, but I think it's important that you know them.
00:27:54.289 --> 00:28:00.299
And I think we've, we've, I don't really have much evidence for this.
00:28:00.309 --> 00:28:05.930
It's just my gut feeling is that there's a default position of I've got to explain the why first.
00:28:06.589 --> 00:28:17.200
And I think that's really dangerous because you take that trigonometry example, or the example I usually cite is like the volume or surface area of a sphere, right?
00:28:17.230 --> 00:28:18.809
You've got really neat.
00:28:19.365 --> 00:28:21.734
beautiful tiny little formulae for those things.
00:28:22.434 --> 00:28:31.674
And to understand where that formula came from is way, way more complicated than the maths they have to ever do in that year group for that unit.
00:28:32.684 --> 00:28:47.359
And so if you go down the y route, it just feels like a a, a poorly idealized ego trip of, I, I know how this works and let's all study it cause it's brilliant.
00:28:47.509 --> 00:28:57.809
And it's like, well, actually what you're doing is completely derailing any sense of what the purpose of the unit is about and what they need to focus on as important.
00:28:57.809 --> 00:29:05.849
And, you know, any confidence built up and being able to use that formula is going to get smashed when you start trying to derive it.
00:29:06.500 --> 00:29:19.380
And, you know, there's a very strong argument for some sequences to be front loaded with procedure because you want to reduce the cognitive load associated with what they're doing and what they're thinking about.
00:29:19.410 --> 00:29:21.970
And so you get that automaticity in place.
00:29:22.450 --> 00:29:25.880
Then you introduce this complexity of where does this stuff come from?
00:29:27.059 --> 00:29:28.450
And it feels more focused, right?
00:29:28.904 --> 00:29:33.325
Like you want them to, you want the intent to be, you have to be fluent in this stuff.
00:29:33.984 --> 00:29:37.924
Not, you know, the purpose of this unit is for you to understand where this came from.
00:29:37.994 --> 00:29:40.444
Because that's, that's not really the purpose a lot of the time.
00:29:40.494 --> 00:29:41.984
It helps in the bigger picture.
00:29:42.464 --> 00:29:48.904
And, and as I've alluded to, you know, like we take students or students, you know, students are all on different journeys and at different points.
00:29:48.904 --> 00:29:55.184
You can't just go into their environment and ignore their prior experience and go, right, let's go in with the why.
00:29:56.234 --> 00:29:57.234
So it, it.
00:29:57.759 --> 00:30:20.000
It's really complex about where you, where you decide to do it and where you decide to not do it at all and where you decide to strip it back to like a rough explanation that helps them understand that this comes from somewhere without going into like grassroots deriving stuff from first principles.
00:30:20.329 --> 00:30:24.170
And that comes from just, just teacher agency, right?
00:30:24.180 --> 00:30:27.789
Like you have to make those decisions yourself based on the class that's in front of you.
00:30:28.079 --> 00:30:29.680
I can't tell you what to do.
00:30:31.319 --> 00:30:34.829
What all I can tell you to do is justify your own decisions.
00:30:35.569 --> 00:30:39.680
I think the default, as I said, should be try and make things make sense.
00:30:39.880 --> 00:30:40.779
Particularly if it's.
00:30:41.369 --> 00:30:59.509
Year seven onwards if you're picking up a year seven or eight group secondary or, or, or similar but don't be a, don't, don't feel guilty if there's certain units where you do have to just go procedure and, and, and kind of fall back on this does make sense, but we're, we're short of time or, or the explanation for this is really complicated.
00:30:59.509 --> 00:31:01.539
So I'm going to give you this kind of simple overview.
00:31:02.069 --> 00:31:13.630
I think people need to be comfortable with that but you know the flip side is don't go all in with we're going to ignore all explanations of understanding and sense making because it's just easier this way around.
00:31:14.579 --> 00:31:31.210
So you gave a couple of examples just then about times when it's, it's not appropriate to look at the why first is that I'm just thinking about reflecting on curriculum design and wondering, you know, how that how those sorts of issues relate to the way we design a curriculum for maths right from primary onwards.
00:31:31.210 --> 00:31:34.920
I'm thinking of some examples in primary that would that same category.
00:31:36.420 --> 00:31:37.069
Yeah, I.
00:31:38.585 --> 00:31:43.065
I struggled with this and as per usual, I've changed my opinion over time.
00:31:43.075 --> 00:31:50.404
But I when I wrote the book, I was thinking you shouldn't have anything in the curriculum that you can't explain.
00:31:51.125 --> 00:31:55.055
In terms of making it make sense and therefore.
00:31:55.724 --> 00:32:02.944
Something like a surface area of a cone or a sphere or so on would probably have to go and go somewhere else.
00:32:03.394 --> 00:32:13.914
But I think the, the, the difficulty with that is even if they were at a point where that maths was really accessible, it's not going to be accessible to everyone.
00:32:14.494 --> 00:32:17.005
And so you're still going to have that conundrum of.
00:32:17.904 --> 00:32:26.805
Some students are not likely to be able to understand this to the level of depth that I want them to and so a compromise is going to have to be made somewhere.
00:32:27.255 --> 00:32:38.355
So, in a perfect world, yes, the curriculum would just, just be a sequence of, of nicely tied up things that are easy to make sense of.
00:32:38.805 --> 00:33:02.460
In the moment and the next thing you teach relied on the thing that was taught before and so on but we know that it's not as neat and tidy as that and learning never is anyway, so I think we have to just kind of accept that there's going to be points in the curriculum where you aren't going to be able to go into that level of depth and, and You're going to have to be comfortable with that.
00:33:02.500 --> 00:33:05.380
And, and there's ways around that.
00:33:05.450 --> 00:33:10.079
I think there's ways to make things make some sense without having to go into too much depth.
00:33:10.559 --> 00:33:15.859
But I also think there's, you almost take away those nice moments at a level where you go, remember that thing that we learned?
00:33:15.890 --> 00:33:18.809
Like let's, let's figure out more about it and revisit it.
00:33:18.849 --> 00:33:21.710
And then you get those great moments in teaching as well.
00:33:22.240 --> 00:33:38.710
And let's be honest, when you, when you're a, when you're an employed mathematician further down the line, you don't have all the answers to stuff, and you don't, you know, you're, you're frequently in areas of, of, of the great unknown and discovery and dead ends and confusion and so forth.
00:33:39.130 --> 00:33:43.630
So maybe there's, there's an argument there that, that, that's just part of this journey of, of, of thinking.
00:33:43.740 --> 00:33:45.779
of what it's like to be a mathematician anyway.
00:33:47.200 --> 00:34:04.859
It it's interesting with that because I mean at primary school we touch on circles, we do a little bit about circles, we don't really look at the formulae around areas and perimeters of circles but I used to in the, back in the old days I had a, I had my level six group in year six and they did.
00:34:05.825 --> 00:34:10.985
And I thought to myself, goodness me, how do I, I can't remember, what do I do with these kids about the area of a circle?
00:34:10.985 --> 00:34:12.074
How do I make it make sense?
00:34:12.074 --> 00:34:22.635
And I didn't, I didn't want them I realized I wasn't going to be able to teach them the full why this works, but I wanted them to have a sense of why it roughly worked.
00:34:23.235 --> 00:34:39.659
And so we did things like put circles into squares and think about what the area of the square would have been related to the radius of the circle, and realized that we had that idea of it would have been four, four r squared, for the area of the square around it.
00:34:39.670 --> 00:34:44.559
And so therefore we knew the value of pi and that was less than four.
00:34:44.559 --> 00:34:48.750
So three and a bit times made, made some sense.
00:34:48.750 --> 00:34:59.579
And so there was a sense, I don't really know exactly why this works, but if I'm ever really stuck, I can sort of rationalize why that's going to be the case.
00:34:59.590 --> 00:35:04.489
So, so that was, that was quite That was quite a nice way of looking at it.
00:35:05.659 --> 00:35:09.360
I was going to go there and think, did you work with other departments across the school?
00:35:09.360 --> 00:35:21.880
Because asking children to, or pupils to work or to, I kind of, I'm thinking this is leaning into the sort of the metacognition work about, you know, do I really get what's going on here?
00:35:22.130 --> 00:35:24.530
Can I make this make sense with what I know already?
00:35:24.869 --> 00:35:44.755
And, and I mean in primary we have the luxury of the one teacher teaching across the curriculum but so when when when the kids you taught for for maths went off to science or you know history and geography was there did you have any cross department discussions across the whole school around digging for the why
00:35:45.784 --> 00:35:59.695
No i think it's it's what You know, in a perfect world, I think every maths department wants to work closely with the science department to, to, you know, they have the most explicit links with maths.
00:35:59.795 --> 00:36:05.635
And there's, there's a lot to be said for the benefits of, of getting stuff tied together there.
00:36:05.684 --> 00:36:12.494
But in terms of the, the, the kind of general pedagogical approach, no, it's not something that I got into.
00:36:13.014 --> 00:36:18.184
The one thing that did resonate around that though, is when I used to.
00:36:18.690 --> 00:36:39.789
I used to have this like standard speech when I picked up a new class, particularly at Key Stage 4, which would be around expectations, but not, not my expectations in terms of behavior, but in terms of what they want to get out of the lessons and what they want to get out of maths and what I want to get out of teaching them.
00:36:40.440 --> 00:36:43.920
And I would always start with just asking them, like, put your hand up if you hate maths.
00:36:45.170 --> 00:36:50.289
And, and, you know, the few sort of cocky ones would put their hand up almost straight away.
00:36:50.869 --> 00:36:53.219
And, and then I would say, well, I used to hate it.
00:36:53.440 --> 00:36:55.690
And then more hands would start going up and so on.
00:36:56.269 --> 00:36:58.429
And I would just say, right, I don't want to teach you anything yet.
00:36:58.469 --> 00:36:59.719
I want to just talk about that.
00:37:00.280 --> 00:37:06.920
And let's get to the bottom of why some of you don't want to be here and how I can work with that.
00:37:07.639 --> 00:37:08.329
And.
00:37:09.244 --> 00:37:11.994
It's all a bit Dawson's Creek, I suppose, but basically.
00:37:11.994 --> 00:37:12.985
Hey, come on.
00:37:12.985 --> 00:37:13.534
It's 2023.
00:37:13.534 --> 00:37:15.494
I'm not sure Dawson's
00:37:15.494 --> 00:37:15.644
Creek
00:37:15.644 --> 00:37:16.545
is a relevant reference.
00:37:17.724 --> 00:37:19.168
I don't watch TV.
00:37:19.168 --> 00:37:19.780
You
00:37:19.780 --> 00:37:20.391
don't
00:37:20.391 --> 00:37:22.235
watch TV since the late nineties.
00:37:25.195 --> 00:37:27.945
We'll put a link in the notes to anyone who's never heard of Dawson's Creek.
00:37:28.474 --> 00:37:28.565
It's
00:37:28.565 --> 00:37:29.965
a wonderful show, everybody.
00:37:31.474 --> 00:37:36.764
But you just kind of, where we would get to is, you know, this isn't actually about maths.
00:37:37.255 --> 00:37:38.114
It's not, it's not.
00:37:38.494 --> 00:38:02.224
That that you hate it's that you don't feel confident here or, or that you don't or that you feel more threatened here than, than you might in other subjects and, and you start developing, you know, this realization that some students feel the same way in art because they're going to an art lesson and they're sat next to someone who's brilliant and they're going, I can't do this, I hate it and you get people in PE.
00:38:02.735 --> 00:38:11.264
Who just fill with dread at PE because the person next to them is really athletic and does loads of stuff and just seems to get it and I don't.
00:38:11.914 --> 00:38:13.704
And it's, that's the feeling.
00:38:13.764 --> 00:38:15.775
It's not really about maths.
00:38:15.815 --> 00:38:24.744
It's about confidence and uncertainty and this kind of mental barrier of, I can't do this and therefore I will never be able to do this.
00:38:25.405 --> 00:38:29.025
And so we kind of get to this, this point where I say, well, I can work with that.
00:38:29.255 --> 00:38:30.744
And I will help you.
00:38:31.585 --> 00:38:48.219
Make this make sense and get through those barriers of, of fear of this subject, but I can only do that if you're coming to me with, you know, this is how I have felt about it, but I'm going to, I'm going to work with you to, to, to see what you can do with us.
00:38:48.269 --> 00:39:01.630
Because I don't think you can get anywhere with most students and this isn't just a maths thing, but, but without a good culture and without a culture that where it's safe to make a mistake and it's safe to not know what you're doing.
00:39:01.980 --> 00:39:03.659
And it's safe to have an idea that.
00:39:03.889 --> 00:39:06.000
10 seconds later, you think it was a stupid one.
00:39:06.480 --> 00:39:24.519
And until you get to that point, you're going to have a good proportion of your class who, who are anxious about it, who are never going to get to a place where they're confident to just, to just try stuff and to try and understand stuff.
00:39:24.550 --> 00:39:28.289
Because there's just this huge barrier of, I can't do it.
00:39:28.340 --> 00:39:29.590
And as soon as I pop my head up.
00:39:30.190 --> 00:39:31.900
It's going to be wrong and I'm going to get shut down.
00:39:31.900 --> 00:39:32.849
I'm going to feel like crap.
00:39:33.570 --> 00:39:41.940
And, and the one thing I used to be really strict on was student responses to other student responses.
00:39:42.340 --> 00:39:49.539
So if a child or if a pupil said, You know Oh, I think the answer is three.
00:39:49.780 --> 00:39:52.429
If another student came in with, Oh, that's stupid.
00:39:52.530 --> 00:40:13.000
I would just hammer that child because they are destroying the, like that one offhanded comment they think is funny in the moment sets that child back a long way in terms of their confidence to share an idea or a thought or, or a reason for, or a justification.
00:40:13.739 --> 00:40:15.019
And without that culture.
00:40:15.900 --> 00:40:33.309
I just think you're up against far too many barriers to get to a point where you can explore why and explore concepts and explore a way to make something make sense as a group, rather than as just me telling you what stuff does.
00:40:34.050 --> 00:40:35.400
It has to be a two way thing.
00:40:35.519 --> 00:40:38.989
You know, it's like talking to a kindred spirit and maybe that's why we share a birthday.
00:40:39.079 --> 00:40:39.579
Who knows?
00:40:39.949 --> 00:40:41.025
But it's like, you know.
00:40:41.585 --> 00:40:50.614
You can't, you can do everything you want as a teacher, you can do all of the reading, the planning, the preparing, the thinking, the predicting of what the students are going to say.
00:40:50.844 --> 00:40:57.155
But actually, unless you've embedded that culture into your classroom from the start as a two way thing, you're not going to get it.
00:40:57.184 --> 00:41:01.215
You know, I was so similar to what you've just described there, and we've talked about that in season one.
00:41:01.215 --> 00:41:05.025
And, you know, I would start when a brand new year seven class, who hates maths?
00:41:05.054 --> 00:41:05.394
Why?
00:41:05.434 --> 00:41:06.184
You know, let's talk about it.
00:41:06.244 --> 00:41:06.894
Let's discuss it.
00:41:07.405 --> 00:41:37.175
My Twitter handle is desire to understand because that's what I wanted the kids to try and do and like you've both alluded to you Can't always do that Like it's an impossible task to think you can get every single student in every single year group to understand everything that's going on But you have to kind of embed that culture that is Reason it, you know, ask me about it so when you know, like you say when kids are given answers and you'd have this the The silly student who would say something daft about it or take the mick out of someone's answer.
00:41:37.735 --> 00:41:45.505
I always used to try and make, and this is the whole digging for the why thing that Alice and I have talked about before, if a student would say an answer, they'd have to justify it in some way.
00:41:46.030 --> 00:41:58.500
I don't want guesses and in fact if they just said I'm just guessing well fine you've justified why you've just said your answer But actually if you can get that embedded into them that if they give an answer of three Well, where did you get three from?
00:41:59.090 --> 00:42:15.554
Because actually the misconceptions that come out of that answer if they can justify how they got there is a brilliant teaching point It's a brilliant discussion to have and even if somebody then in the classroom goes what and you go, okay So let's listen to what they've said Well, why do you think they got the answer three?
00:42:16.125 --> 00:42:17.344
You know, what could they have done?
00:42:17.344 --> 00:42:18.755
What, where maybe they've gone wrong?
00:42:18.755 --> 00:42:20.764
If you're so clever and you're, you know, you understand it.
00:42:21.344 --> 00:42:22.855
Well, what have they done wrong?
00:42:22.875 --> 00:42:25.594
Can we teach, can we talk about another example where that might happen?
00:42:25.594 --> 00:42:31.545
Sequencing is a brilliant topic to get an idea of how your students think.
00:42:31.875 --> 00:42:37.264
You know, just put random numbers on the board, which in your head are a sequence, and then just get them to guess the next term.
00:42:37.974 --> 00:42:39.045
Why is that the next term?
00:42:39.144 --> 00:42:40.085
Justify it to me.
00:42:40.494 --> 00:42:43.585
And they can come up with the most wild answers.
00:42:44.094 --> 00:42:59.909
But actually you go okay then let's go with that what would the next one be actually the next one was this so yours wasn't right but it was working for that sequence and it's that cycle that you talked about earlier it's that cycle of discovery of maths that i don't know if we get enough time to do in school
00:43:00.510 --> 00:43:15.715
i think i think you're absolutely right i think there's there's work we can do To, to develop cultures and, and for me, it, it, it predominantly resolves revolves around having activities where there's no right answer and what I want is your thoughts and your reasoning.
00:43:16.155 --> 00:43:22.494
So a really simple one could be, you know, you, you put an array of dots that, that have some kind of patterns in there, but nothing.
00:43:23.625 --> 00:43:24.304
Too clear.
00:43:24.304 --> 00:43:28.355
And you could interpret it in lots of different ways and just sort of say, right, count the dots for me.
00:43:28.355 --> 00:43:33.514
And inevitably they kind of go one by one the first time around.
00:43:33.525 --> 00:43:35.554
And then you just go, actually, I don't care how many there are.
00:43:35.664 --> 00:43:37.175
Like, let's forget that answer.
00:43:37.565 --> 00:43:38.764
Just tell me how you group them.
00:43:39.385 --> 00:43:41.144
And if they just group them in ones, that's fine.
00:43:41.144 --> 00:43:44.385
And then go, okay, I group them in this really different way to that and show them.
00:43:44.764 --> 00:43:51.304
Then you bring out another one so that they're kind of enabled to think about this, not as a linear one by one, but where's a pattern.
00:43:51.954 --> 00:44:05.655
I don't care what the pattern is, but where is our pattern or where is, you know, how did you see a square in here or see a triangle in here and everyone has a different thought, everyone has a different idea and.
00:44:06.215 --> 00:44:08.925
You know, you'll get some teachers who say, well, what's the point in that?
00:44:08.985 --> 00:44:11.385
Like, there's no maths, that's not going to help them with their exam.
00:44:11.385 --> 00:44:14.054
That's not going to help them develop their understanding of this, that, and the other.
00:44:14.775 --> 00:44:17.474
And, and you're right in some ways there.
00:44:17.514 --> 00:44:24.414
But what it is doing is helping to create a safe space where people are willing to share ideas and thoughts.
00:44:25.264 --> 00:44:30.474
And I think you have to purposefully design some tasks.
00:44:30.744 --> 00:44:31.965
to facilitate that.
00:44:33.304 --> 00:44:45.650
Otherwise, when you do get to those more meaty topics, there's just this, this back against the wall fear of I don't want to put myself out there with an idea here because it's going to be wrong.
00:44:46.219 --> 00:44:52.079
If you've already covered that ground and that work of, I don't care if it's wrong, like I'm wrong all the time.
00:44:52.480 --> 00:44:54.579
Like this is part of what we are here.
00:44:54.980 --> 00:44:58.840
You know, we have ideas, we think things through, we get to dead ends.
00:44:58.849 --> 00:45:00.179
It doesn't matter.
00:45:00.260 --> 00:45:01.454
That's all part of it.
00:45:01.454 --> 00:45:05.201
Like a journey I've struggled with on, on the podcast.
00:45:06.610 --> 00:45:12.940
Teaching PGCE students is you, you can talk to them about great models for explanations.
00:45:12.940 --> 00:45:14.740
You can talk to them about great questioning.
00:45:14.740 --> 00:45:21.601
You can talk to them about all these great benefits of some of the stuff that's intertwined with mastery and so forth.
00:45:23.121 --> 00:45:31.280
It's so easy for them to kill off those ideas because they try it in a class without the culture and nothing works.
00:45:31.340 --> 00:45:33.630
And they just go, Well, that was stupid.
00:45:34.130 --> 00:45:48.871
And then they just roll back to the way that they were taught or the way that they've got it embedded in the head of what a traditional teacher looks like, where if I just tell you stuff and you don't have to talk back to me, I can get through this lesson really easily.
00:45:51.286 --> 00:45:52.715
We've got to work on the culture thing.
00:45:53.485 --> 00:46:02.155
Yeah, you know, too often, too often, I've said this one before as well, year seven parents would come to me at parents evening and go, I don't really know what's happened this year.
00:46:02.246 --> 00:46:06.115
Little so and so was so good at maths last year, and they just seem to be struggling this year.
00:46:06.746 --> 00:46:13.936
And it's like, I mean, you know, you sit there and you want to say, well, they were probably good at answering 50 questions having just been taught how to answer that exact question.
00:46:14.585 --> 00:46:18.626
And, and that's great, you know, and, and that is a skill to have and we're going to need that skill.
00:46:18.626 --> 00:46:22.865
We're going to need that willingness to learn and practice and, and get that fluency.
00:46:23.405 --> 00:46:26.155
But I don't feel they've ever really been asked why before.
00:46:26.686 --> 00:46:30.405
And all of a sudden you put, you're turning that pressure on to an 11 year old and saying, well, why?
00:46:30.826 --> 00:46:31.795
You know, explain that.
00:46:31.876 --> 00:46:32.956
Tell me how that's going to work.
00:46:32.985 --> 00:46:33.996
Well, here's a different question.
00:46:33.996 --> 00:46:34.766
Can you answer that one?
00:46:35.076 --> 00:46:39.175
Because you've got all the skills that you need, but if it looks different, what are you going to do?
00:46:39.746 --> 00:46:51.746
You know, and that, again, that has to be part of that culture of students going, and I used to have above my board I used to make them write on their book desire to understand, math is problem solving, problem solving is thinking, have you thought?
00:46:52.775 --> 00:46:54.876
Because if you're going to put your hand up straight away and go, I'm stuck.
00:46:55.596 --> 00:46:59.851
I always used to be, you know, Okay, expand, you know, what have you tried?
00:46:59.981 --> 00:47:01.231
I haven't tried anything, I don't know how to do it.
00:47:01.791 --> 00:47:05.601
I'll come back to you when you've tried something, when you've thought about it, when you've discussed it with your partner, you know.
00:47:06.260 --> 00:47:09.731
Let's get that culture going, let's get that conversation going, that I can work with.
00:47:10.121 --> 00:47:14.360
Yeah, I would just add for balance there, like the flip side is quite common as well.
00:47:15.016 --> 00:47:30.186
Like students are used to talking about the maths and exploring ideas at primary, and then they go into secondary and the joy gets sapped out of it because they've got a teacher in year seven who is just like answers, answers, answers, answers.
00:47:30.266 --> 00:47:31.876
It can be any phase.
00:47:32.456 --> 00:47:32.815
Oh,
00:47:32.815 --> 00:47:33.496
absolutely.
00:47:33.525 --> 00:47:34.025
Absolutely.
00:47:34.025 --> 00:47:42.815
That's, that's season one in a, in a, in a nutshell where I played the role of the arrogant secondary school teacher played the role of.
00:47:42.851 --> 00:47:50.181
Yeah, I wish I'd, I wish I'd had this podcast to listen to when I was starting out teaching, believe me, but Hey, right.
00:47:50.181 --> 00:47:51.231
I am conscious of time.
00:47:51.331 --> 00:47:53.460
We've got some very, very busy people on this call.
00:47:53.840 --> 00:47:57.121
I'd like to just put you on the spot very one, one last time, Ed.
00:47:57.530 --> 00:47:59.251
So you're a teacher listening to this again.
00:47:59.260 --> 00:48:01.490
You know, what do you want them to take away?
00:48:01.490 --> 00:48:04.650
Just one thing you want them to take away from listening to us for this hour or so.
00:48:05.101 --> 00:48:09.451
And, and try or think about or develop or ponder over with a cup of tea.
00:48:11.315 --> 00:48:25.436
I think if you've never done this or never emphasized it much, like for me, the drug that was in teaching was trying to figure out how students were thinking about stuff and that never stops being interesting.
00:48:26.065 --> 00:48:35.615
So lean into that and think about how you can facilitate opportunities to, to understand how they're thinking about stuff.
00:48:36.226 --> 00:48:38.945
And one of the richest ways to do that is.
00:48:39.396 --> 00:48:52.865
Is through discourses through talking to them is through giving them time to think deeply about something and then bringing it back and learning from them about how their understanding is developing on on a concept or an idea.
00:48:53.476 --> 00:48:58.365
Be persistent with that and, and understand that it takes time to develop.
00:48:58.405 --> 00:49:00.626
You can't just go, Oh, that sounds like a nice idea.
00:49:00.626 --> 00:49:02.715
I'm going to try it on, on Tuesday.
00:49:03.065 --> 00:49:05.806
You're not going to come out of Tuesday going, perfect.
00:49:05.916 --> 00:49:07.615
I should do that all the time.
00:49:07.615 --> 00:49:10.485
Now you're going to come out of Tuesday going, that was really hard.
00:49:11.715 --> 00:49:12.800
And, and.
00:49:13.471 --> 00:49:19.840
There's things I need to do to make this work better, and the biggest thing you need for it to work well is time.
00:49:21.201 --> 00:49:30.010
Because new ideas take time to develop, for you to install, and they take time for the students to shift their understanding about what your classroom is about.
00:49:30.670 --> 00:49:47.041
But if you can get to a point where they're willing to share their thoughts and ideas, it is such an interesting environment for a teacher to be in, compared to like the, the, the old school, you know, who's got the answer, right?
00:49:47.070 --> 00:49:47.431
Brilliant.
00:49:47.440 --> 00:49:48.710
Aren't you good in my class?
00:49:48.740 --> 00:49:50.860
Like that to me is just not interesting.
00:49:51.331 --> 00:49:57.260
And if you're disinterested or you're getting bored of what you're doing you know, it's not fun anymore.
00:49:57.940 --> 00:49:59.070
The fun for me.
00:49:59.601 --> 00:50:01.481
You know, figure out how their brains are ticking.
00:50:02.771 --> 00:50:05.130
Sage on the stage versus guide on the side.
00:50:05.201 --> 00:50:07.440
It always, it always seems to come back to it.
00:50:07.610 --> 00:50:11.141
You know, teachers love being the person at the front.
00:50:11.201 --> 00:50:17.141
And you know, there's something in us that likes that, but it's getting yourself out of that mode.
00:50:17.360 --> 00:50:25.990
Talk to your students, listen to your students, encourage them to talk to each other, because that's where you pick up on little nuggets of all sorts of things that you can run with.
00:50:27.831 --> 00:50:30.530
Right, Ed, thank you so much for giving up this time for us.
00:50:30.990 --> 00:50:36.070
We will be recording another episode with Ed at our MEI conference in a little while.
00:50:36.300 --> 00:50:39.021
So that one will probably come out last in terms of this series.
00:50:39.291 --> 00:50:40.110
So look around for that.
00:50:40.150 --> 00:50:45.231
And that's going to talk a little bit more about what Ed's doing now and how that's Working over the next couple of years.
00:50:45.240 --> 00:50:49.300
So that's why if you're listening to this thinking, well, I haven't, they mentioned anything about Oak stuff.
00:50:49.300 --> 00:50:51.300
Well, that's coming in a, in a, in a different podcast.
00:50:51.311 --> 00:50:53.050
So yeah, that's coming soon.
00:50:53.351 --> 00:50:54.800
Alison, thank you as ever.
00:50:55.061 --> 00:50:59.110
For that, for those people who didn't realize I disappeared for about 15 minutes.
00:50:59.110 --> 00:51:06.760
I had complete massive technical issues So I'm looking forward to also hearing what was talked about in the podcast So thanks Alison.
00:51:06.760 --> 00:51:08.021
It's great to as always to
00:51:08.021 --> 00:51:15.751
Just give an update you're sunny the Sun has come out in dorking.
00:51:15.760 --> 00:51:21.525
Yeah, you see the South Always gets the sunshine at some point, it's still sunny here.
00:51:21.585 --> 00:51:25.135
There are clouds which are not just gray, so it's quite good.
00:51:25.525 --> 00:51:26.115
Ed, thanks.
00:51:26.115 --> 00:51:26.846
We'll talk to you soon.
00:51:26.876 --> 00:51:28.445
Alison, talk to you soon as well.
00:51:28.686 --> 00:51:30.295
Guys at home, thank you for listening.
00:51:30.356 --> 00:51:31.405
I hope you've learned something from this.
00:51:31.425 --> 00:51:33.135
It's another brilliantly insightful chat.
00:51:33.436 --> 00:51:33.496
Good luck.
00:51:33.820 --> 00:51:38.521
with people who just love maths and want to do the best with everybody with their maths.
00:51:38.900 --> 00:51:39.550
So enjoy.
00:51:39.570 --> 00:51:42.590
If you have any questions, please reach out to all three of us.
00:51:42.590 --> 00:51:45.670
I'm sure I'd be happy to answer any questions on Twitter as well.
00:51:45.710 --> 00:51:50.570
And I'll link to his wonderful book and his other publications and his website and stuff in the notes.
00:51:50.630 --> 00:51:54.550
And we will catch you again on the next episode of Digging for the Why.
00:51:54.701 --> 00:51:55.050
Goodbye.