S2 E3 - Creating Safe and Encouraging Learning Environments with Alex Bellos

WEBVTT
00:00:20.640 --> 00:00:28.239
Hello and welcome to this episode of season two of Digging for the Why, the podcast for maths teachers, where we explore thoughts behind asking why.
00:00:28.638 --> 00:00:32.630
I'm Andy, one of your hosts, and I'm joined in the virtual pod studio by my co host Alison.
00:00:32.658 --> 00:00:33.268
Hello, Alison.
00:00:33.280 --> 00:00:33.710
How are you?
00:00:34.140 --> 00:00:35.210
I'm extremely well, Andy.
00:00:35.250 --> 00:00:35.600
Thank you.
00:00:35.929 --> 00:00:36.799
Very, very good.
00:00:36.890 --> 00:00:38.009
Now, I am.
00:00:38.225 --> 00:00:47.454
In all honesty, a little star struck today as we're joined by someone who helped me with probably the last decade of my teaching of statistics Alex Bellos.
00:00:47.475 --> 00:00:56.445
Now, that's a name that I know, you know, if you are coming to this as a math teacher, you'll be familiar with that name, and you may sit there and go, why do Why am I familiar with that name?
00:00:56.954 --> 00:01:00.064
So I did my digging and I've done my little bit of background research.
00:01:00.134 --> 00:01:15.319
And the reason Alex is here is because of, of, of a couple of books that he's written, but to go further back, Alex actually studied maths at Oxford and then went into journalism, working for the Guardian in London and became their South America, South America correspondent, excuse me, living in Brazil for five years.
00:01:15.700 --> 00:01:23.579
He then returned to the UK and published Alex's adventures in number land in 2010 and the followup Alex through the looking glass in 2014.
00:01:24.088 --> 00:01:25.599
So why did I ask Alex?
00:01:25.670 --> 00:01:30.239
Who's not been a teacher, as you can see there from that kind of bio to come onto this podcast.
00:01:30.709 --> 00:01:34.670
Well, it basically goes back to a chapter about baguettes in the first book.
00:01:35.120 --> 00:01:36.709
I was teaching statistics and.
00:01:37.629 --> 00:01:41.459
Reading this book and, and kind of, you know, just enjoying it as a math teacher, as a math person.
00:01:41.859 --> 00:01:50.640
And then this intrigue as to the lies that, you know, bakers might give you about the weight of their bread led to this whole thing about the normal distribution.
00:01:50.668 --> 00:01:56.060
And then that came into my teaching and it became the introduction to, to that for the rest of my teaching career, essentially.
00:01:56.540 --> 00:02:06.853
And the whole book, if you've not read it or the whole book, the whole idea of if you've not read them is there's A question of why about something or a wondering about something.
00:02:06.873 --> 00:02:12.984
And then this adventure happens where Alex goes into some real depth about the math behind things.
00:02:13.373 --> 00:02:20.574
But actually, as I used to say to my A level students, the first half of these chapters is accessible to absolutely everybody.
00:02:21.003 --> 00:02:25.943
The second half delves into some deep math at times, and it can be difficult to read and difficult to comprehend.
00:02:25.943 --> 00:02:28.223
But the first part is just a joy to read.
00:02:28.804 --> 00:02:29.533
So anyway.
00:02:30.058 --> 00:02:30.498
There I am.
00:02:30.498 --> 00:02:32.049
I'm a little bit starstruck, but it's a good job.
00:02:32.088 --> 00:02:34.338
You know, we're on virtually doing this.
00:02:34.438 --> 00:02:38.149
Otherwise I'd probably just sit there going, Oh but anyway, Alex, welcome to this big intro.
00:02:38.318 --> 00:02:39.598
Welcome to digging for the Y.
00:02:39.788 --> 00:02:41.158
Thank you so much for agreeing to come on.
00:02:41.158 --> 00:02:41.919
How are you doing today?
00:02:41.919 --> 00:02:43.239
Yeah, I'm doing good.
00:02:43.459 --> 00:02:46.609
I mean, I've not thought about those baguettes.
00:02:46.873 --> 00:02:51.924
In a long time and it was giving me, you know, I know not my Madeleine.
00:02:51.933 --> 00:02:59.943
I know that's another kind of French reference about a food that makes you think nostalgically about the past, but I bought these baguettes.
00:02:59.954 --> 00:03:08.324
So to explain what I did is that I went to my local branch of Greg's every day for a hundred days and bought exactly the same baguette.
00:03:08.813 --> 00:03:13.283
And because I didn't know why I didn't throw them away.
00:03:13.824 --> 00:03:20.894
It was so slowly and this is a picture in my book of that of my kitchen with this about 100 bags there to the big pile.
00:03:21.243 --> 00:03:35.683
I remember as I was just, you know, the idea was I'd measure them every day and then you'd see there is normal distribution, but actually because I'm more of a pure mathematician than I am an arrived mathematician, of course, it's not perfectly.
00:03:36.368 --> 00:03:44.739
normal because I was doing things like not accounting for the temperature, for the time of the day that I bought them, all things like that.
00:03:44.758 --> 00:03:49.408
So it was a bit skewed, but they got the point across and it was a really, really fun.
00:03:49.769 --> 00:03:50.889
It's a really fun thing to do.
00:03:51.088 --> 00:03:56.618
And whenever I would invite people into my flat, They were just horrified.
00:03:57.139 --> 00:03:58.008
Horrified.
00:03:58.308 --> 00:04:03.718
And I was, I was lucky that I didn't have any rodent friends also visiting . Yeah.
00:04:03.838 --> 00:04:04.109
Yeah.
00:04:04.114 --> 00:04:04.963
I can really liked it.
00:04:05.614 --> 00:04:13.454
I just, you know, it, I, I liked to engage my A level students in conversation to try and get them asking questions to try and get them curious about things.
00:04:13.834 --> 00:04:15.663
And it was, it was things like that.
00:04:15.663 --> 00:04:17.733
And I'd put that on the board and they'd be like, why did he do that?
00:04:17.764 --> 00:04:18.694
I'm, well, why do you think he did that?
00:04:18.923 --> 00:04:20.803
You know, he's a mathematician at heart.
00:04:20.803 --> 00:04:22.483
What's he trying to find out about this?
00:04:22.494 --> 00:04:23.543
What's he trying to look for?
00:04:24.134 --> 00:04:28.603
And they guide themselves through this idea of getting towards a normal distribution.
00:04:28.603 --> 00:04:32.124
And then we talk about, you know, imagine you're the person that makes these baguettes.
00:04:32.134 --> 00:04:33.334
You're in charge of Greggs.
00:04:33.824 --> 00:04:35.954
What's your limits on either side?
00:04:35.954 --> 00:04:39.463
You know, how far below 150 grams, whatever it was that it measured.
00:04:39.593 --> 00:04:41.884
Are you going to allow it to go and get away with it?
00:04:41.944 --> 00:04:44.233
Or how far above are you going to allow it to go and get away with it?
00:04:44.533 --> 00:04:45.954
And then you got to confidence intervals.
00:04:45.954 --> 00:04:47.413
We got to all sorts of other things.
00:04:47.764 --> 00:04:48.494
And it was just.
00:04:49.108 --> 00:04:59.338
It was such a nice narrative to have, to bring into a lesson, to kind of take you through and get the kids to, to understand that, you know what, it's not just us boring maths teachers that ask these questions, why?
00:04:59.348 --> 00:05:07.959
Yeah, I mean, I think it's totally right that I'm not a teacher, and it's good that you pointed that out, and I wouldn't ever say that I have advice for teachers for doing teaching.
00:05:07.959 --> 00:05:21.889
Well what I am, my experience is of kind of telling stories, and I think that what The stories that I write, try and do is, as you say, I try and engage people straight away.
00:05:22.178 --> 00:05:23.649
I don't really say it's about math.
00:05:23.649 --> 00:05:25.168
I just try and tell a fun story.
00:05:25.449 --> 00:05:27.428
I think the minute that you say, Hey guys, this is math.
00:05:27.439 --> 00:05:28.788
So you're going to lose some people.
00:05:29.168 --> 00:05:30.509
You just want to tell a fun story.
00:05:30.869 --> 00:05:35.728
And so I'm happy that you sort of recognize that it's exactly what I'm trying to do.
00:05:35.968 --> 00:05:36.999
I'm okay.
00:05:36.999 --> 00:05:44.048
You know, some math, but because it's got kind of massive things on the front, that's how it's marketed, but anyone can read any of those chapters and start reading it.
00:05:44.449 --> 00:05:54.079
And I always made an effort that anyone even without a professed disinterest in maths could read it.
00:05:54.288 --> 00:05:58.559
And once you start reading it, you realize you know, why is he doing that?
00:05:58.689 --> 00:05:59.548
What's going on there?
00:05:59.928 --> 00:06:05.999
And so telling stories is, is about questioning what's going to happen.
00:06:06.399 --> 00:06:14.149
And the way I try and do it is that to understand what's going on, you need to unpeel the layers of what's kind of explaining it.
00:06:14.624 --> 00:06:23.444
So I'm kind of doing this exploration in a sort of narrative way to try and, you know, just, just, just telling a story.
00:06:24.264 --> 00:06:29.733
And in the stories I tell, I always thought there were the kind of three things that I was trying to do.
00:06:30.244 --> 00:06:36.803
One was tell sort of possibly the history of the maths.
00:06:37.244 --> 00:06:38.413
One is the.
00:06:38.774 --> 00:06:41.324
explaining the actual concept.
00:06:41.713 --> 00:06:47.444
And then I realized that that doesn't make a book, that might make a few good articles.
00:06:47.574 --> 00:06:51.774
The extra element that all brings it in is my own experience.
00:06:52.084 --> 00:07:02.874
So I could have, with the baguettes for example, I could have told the story of Poincaré, because Poincaré did something a little bit similar to sort of make sure he wasn't being ripped off when 150 years ago.
00:07:03.793 --> 00:07:05.314
But it would have been a bit drier.
00:07:06.204 --> 00:07:21.434
So it's my take on me having those experiences so that when things, just the, the, the personal story that almost like a kind of memoir is quite a good glue that glues it all together.
00:07:22.293 --> 00:07:27.764
And it might sound Alex's Adventures in Numberland, maybe that's kind of narcissistic putting my name there.
00:07:28.163 --> 00:07:34.264
I mean, it's there because it's a good pun with Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, which is a great kind of mathsy book.
00:07:34.853 --> 00:07:43.264
But really it's because it only holds together as a book rather than a kind of series of articles with some unifying factor.
00:07:43.303 --> 00:07:47.384
And that unifying factor is, Sort of my presence as the guide.
00:07:47.983 --> 00:07:50.973
And before I wrote that book, it was my second book.
00:07:50.973 --> 00:07:56.774
My first one was a book called Futebol, the Brazilian way of life, which was from five years living in Brazil.
00:07:57.504 --> 00:08:13.853
And I kind of recognized that when I was in Brazil and I started writing that book I was, my profession was a foreign correspondent and I went around Brazil, finding out these stories and kind of translating them from Portuguese from where I found them into English.
00:08:15.264 --> 00:08:21.913
And I did exactly the same thing with the maths book, which is, I feel that I'm the foreign correspondent in the world of maths.
00:08:23.103 --> 00:08:27.363
And I'm kind of trying to explain it to a non maths audience.
00:08:28.533 --> 00:08:31.314
How, so how, that's an interesting process then in my head.
00:08:31.314 --> 00:08:39.394
So obviously I read that as, as a mathematician, as a mathematics background, as a teacher, and I'm reading your books and I enjoyed the depth of that second half.
00:08:39.683 --> 00:08:49.644
So when you're thinking about the different chapters that you're going to put together, how do you kind of figure out the level that you want Get up mathematically versus pros.
00:08:49.644 --> 00:08:54.384
If you're like, you know, how, how are you planning who you aiming at?
00:08:54.394 --> 00:08:56.553
Who are you thinking is reading the book kind of thing?
00:08:56.703 --> 00:08:59.114
And how do you address those different levels that you need?
00:08:59.173 --> 00:09:00.283
So that's a brilliant question.
00:09:00.433 --> 00:09:04.583
When I wrote the book, I was aiming for the non math audience.
00:09:04.653 --> 00:09:08.964
I was saying, this is going to be the book that people who said they don't like math are going to read it and find it interesting.
00:09:09.114 --> 00:09:10.524
And the way that I was going to.
00:09:11.354 --> 00:09:22.193
And I didn't make that happen because there are lots of great math books, but often math books are written by mathematicians, and I felt I've got to write the book that only I can write, and what is it, what am I bringing to the table?
00:09:22.244 --> 00:09:24.573
And that's the fact that I've been a foreign correspondent.
00:09:24.575 --> 00:09:32.283
So, essentially, I mean, I had the idea in my head of two readers.
00:09:32.774 --> 00:09:50.589
I had a reader who was a kind of someone who I knew who liked maths, and I had a reader who's a friend who I know who's never studied maths and not interested, and I needed to at all times sort of read through each sentence and think, If I sold that to Bridget, would she, would I keep her interest?
00:09:51.109 --> 00:09:55.068
If I said it to like my maths friend, would he keep his interest?
00:09:55.558 --> 00:10:00.609
And you, you know, it's hard writing maths because you've got this whole idea of level.
00:10:00.928 --> 00:10:05.428
Is it too difficult for the people that don't understand it or are afraid of it, or is it too simple for the people who get it instantly?
00:10:06.089 --> 00:10:10.568
And so it took many times to write it and then rewrite it and then rewrite it.
00:10:10.979 --> 00:10:15.479
And I realized that what you do is you take it slowly.
00:10:16.894 --> 00:10:21.614
But the way you make it interesting for the people who get it fast is that you fill it with anecdote.
00:10:22.403 --> 00:10:34.344
So even though I had written it for non mathematicians what was amazingly gratifying and initially quite surprising then I realized, okay, now I get it, is that the math community really loved it.
00:10:34.793 --> 00:10:39.783
The math community really loved it because all these anecdotes which I'm putting in they don't know.
00:10:40.024 --> 00:10:45.364
Because when you study math, you don't learn the history and the anecdotes and often the applications.
00:10:45.653 --> 00:10:51.793
You know, so lots of teachers, math teachers were saying, oh my god, there's all this kind of fun stuff that I can put in my lesson.
00:10:51.793 --> 00:10:54.399
And I didn't know that makes it a bit more interesting.
00:10:54.989 --> 00:11:08.428
So yeah, for example, there was one of the chapters is about zero and zero have only been invented in India relatively recently.
00:11:08.428 --> 00:11:10.509
So, you know, 3000 years of math before zero.
00:11:12.058 --> 00:11:18.999
And I thought you could say zero was invented in India, which is what, you know, what they all do.
00:11:18.999 --> 00:11:20.399
And this is the reasons why.
00:11:20.798 --> 00:11:39.869
But then I thought, okay, I'm going to go to India and I'm going to speak to it was an Indian kind of priest, a Shankaracharya, which is a kind of priest level in a certain Hindu, I don't even, I don't even know how to explain Hinduism, but there's part of India, the Shankaracharya is like the top guy.
00:11:41.149 --> 00:12:17.144
And it's much better me saying, I'm in a temple in India, bit of description this guy and he described the Shankaracharya who is a kind of embodiment of zero himself because he is wearing a simple robe and he has no possessions so all of a sudden you're thinking why am i talking about that and as a reader i think this is kind of interesting and then he you say i'm in a temple in india the guy is wearing virtually nothing he eats virtually nothing he's got no possessions he turns around and he looks to me and he says Zero was invented in India and all of a sudden you're thinking, this is interesting.
00:12:17.764 --> 00:12:20.094
I knew that fact, but it's kind of curious.
00:12:20.104 --> 00:12:22.333
Why, why we, why is this guy saying it?
00:12:22.714 --> 00:12:41.474
And then the punchline, you know, many pages later is that actually one of the reasons that zero was developed first in India is because of this whole kind of spiritual approach that nothingness is something that nothing that you can have.
00:12:41.474 --> 00:12:42.553
Nothing is the nothingness is.
00:12:43.208 --> 00:12:44.479
is not self contradiction.
00:12:44.938 --> 00:12:53.389
And you then bring that right back to the whole nature of the priest, who is kind of nothing, the embodiment of nothingness.
00:12:53.389 --> 00:12:55.058
He's obviously someone, but he's nothing.
00:12:55.278 --> 00:13:01.948
And so you have all these sort of fun little games all these kind of circular kind of narrative arcs, you might call them.
00:13:02.418 --> 00:13:07.448
And it's got to be really well crafted because write about math.
00:13:07.874 --> 00:13:18.754
It can get pretty boring pretty quickly because the way to, you know, the way to sort of ingest maths is kind of by doing it, not really by reading about it.
00:13:19.114 --> 00:13:25.384
So you've got to twist, you can have a great maths book that has great maths, but you don't read it like you might read a great novel.
00:13:26.073 --> 00:13:35.793
So to give someone that reading experience, you need to use all these other kind of literary tricks, so to speak, to really make people interested in the reading of it.
00:13:35.974 --> 00:13:41.594
And the other thing in which is really true is the way the brain reads numbers.
00:13:42.038 --> 00:13:46.089
The digits is very different from the way the brain reads words.
00:13:47.229 --> 00:13:57.288
So when you're writing, you've got to have as few digits as possible because subconsciously the reader will just start to think in a different way and maybe lose their track or kind of get bored.
00:13:57.798 --> 00:14:02.818
So you've got this other thing, which is how to try and write about numbers without writing about numbers.
00:14:03.239 --> 00:14:05.869
The person who has done that best actually is.
00:14:06.153 --> 00:14:12.344
It's a young American author who wrote a book about a year ago called Maths Without Numbers, which really has no numbers.
00:14:12.354 --> 00:14:13.484
I mean, that was brilliant.
00:14:13.874 --> 00:14:19.744
But what, you know, I love puzzles, and maybe we're going to talk about puzzles and why I kind of like puzzles and do a lot of puzzles.
00:14:20.083 --> 00:14:36.269
But to me, The fun thing about writing about math is that it is a puzzle that you have all these really quite tough constraints that you know, can't write too many digits in it can't get too hard too fast, but you can't get too slow without putting it enough color.
00:14:38.323 --> 00:14:41.913
So yeah, that's what goes on in my brain when I try and write these books.
00:14:42.913 --> 00:14:44.323
I think I've found this really easy.
00:14:44.323 --> 00:14:53.553
There's a few things, there's a, I've just been jotting down some things because there's so many, so I can't hold, couldn't hold it all in my head, but there's a, there's a few things that you said that really resonate with a lot of the work that we do.
00:14:53.833 --> 00:15:13.403
With teachers, and I know you've, you've, you've said, you know, you're, you're not, not a teaching background and you wouldn't hold yourself up as a, as a guide to teachers, but there's some things that really, um, that really, really sort of struck me that I was doing some reading the other day and it was talking about, you know, engagement in itself, students being engaged in lessons isn't enough.
00:15:13.774 --> 00:15:18.903
And I'm still trying to process that because I think there's an element of where they need to be engaged.
00:15:18.903 --> 00:15:19.333
So it was interesting.
00:15:19.764 --> 00:15:22.543
So that you're kind of hooking, hooking readers in with something interesting.
00:15:23.043 --> 00:15:27.073
And you also talked about starting slowly or two different readers in mind.
00:15:27.323 --> 00:15:32.553
And, you know, one of the things that we, we talk about a lot with the teaching for mastery stuff at the moment is go slower to go faster.
00:15:32.844 --> 00:15:41.458
And that if you can secure that basic underlying concept, your understanding of what's going on, you can then build on it and take that idea and develop it.
00:15:41.769 --> 00:15:50.688
And, and you also use two words, which I, I always listen out for when I hear teachers talking about children and their learning, and you use understand and get it.
00:15:50.859 --> 00:15:58.109
And sometimes we sort of, we get the know it and do it, but the understand it and the get it, I think is, is it's a deeper level.
00:15:58.109 --> 00:15:58.719
It is that.
00:15:58.928 --> 00:16:20.058
It's the why bit, it's, it's the understanding the why and the teachers asking it and so I just, yeah, I just found that really interesting that sort of taking it into, into the, the world that I live in where I work with professional development for teachers that there were lots of, lots of things that you said there that really echo the way that we, I hope we at MEI and NCTM try to engage with teachers and get them to think about maths.
00:16:20.964 --> 00:16:30.173
Yeah, I think sometimes it's quite nice reading something that you already know, because it reforces those kind of deep, that deep understanding that you have.
00:16:30.344 --> 00:16:37.974
It shouldn't always be about the new, sometimes just going over in a kind of methodical way.
00:16:38.543 --> 00:16:54.953
In terms of the conceptually it's really good because people, people like to feel intelligent and if they read something that they already know, they've got that kind of pleasure of, I know that, but it kind of, it reinforces it and that's quite a pleasurable thing, thing to do.
00:16:55.244 --> 00:16:57.553
And no one minds having that stuff reinforced.
00:16:57.614 --> 00:17:01.754
And, you know, you put a little bit of humor, a little bit of anecdote, a little bit of history.
00:17:02.224 --> 00:17:04.223
It makes it really, it makes it really enjoyable.
00:17:04.394 --> 00:17:05.304
And I think that's the.
00:17:06.068 --> 00:17:14.808
Another thing about maths, which, so moving on to one that I wrote about, about puzzles, is that maths is very satisfying when you get it.
00:17:15.528 --> 00:17:18.929
And puzzles is the kind of the epitome of that.
00:17:18.929 --> 00:17:23.259
It's a pure bit that you don't get and then all of a sudden you get it and you get that real aha.
00:17:23.888 --> 00:17:30.469
But even in books in a much slower sense, you're always getting that feeling of, Oh, I get how it works.
00:17:30.568 --> 00:17:31.388
Oh, it fits in.
00:17:31.419 --> 00:17:32.679
Oh, that kind of makes sense.
00:17:33.199 --> 00:17:34.638
The sort of underlying.
00:17:34.999 --> 00:17:40.429
The kind of foundations of all mathematical knowledge, and it really is pleasurable.
00:17:40.749 --> 00:17:45.919
I'm not going to ask a psychologist why, but it really is pleasurable to have that, that, that reinforced.
00:17:46.338 --> 00:17:49.519
I mean, what is not pleasurable is reading something you don't understand.
00:17:50.199 --> 00:17:52.259
So you'd never want to do that.
00:17:52.308 --> 00:17:56.388
You never want to put someone off because that is, you're in kind of crisis mode.
00:17:56.838 --> 00:18:02.598
So I feel that you can know it, and it's quite nice to have, have it repeated.
00:18:02.818 --> 00:18:15.304
I mean, This is maybe slightly similar, but for example, I like to read the New Yorker and the New Yorker magazine quite often has pieces on England, about England or Britain.
00:18:16.048 --> 00:18:23.288
And I know absolutely everything that is in that piece, but it's just really refreshing reading someone else writing about it.
00:18:23.578 --> 00:18:26.199
So everything that I know, it's just like a slightly different take.
00:18:26.538 --> 00:18:35.054
And so I think that maybe that's what I do with math is that lots of people, they know everything, every math thing that I'm writing in my books, but just because it's a slightly different take.
00:18:35.413 --> 00:18:44.104
It's actually really, it sort of encapsulates it in a way, which feels, there's something very, just very satisfying about reading about what you already know.
00:18:45.763 --> 00:18:47.634
I mean, that's, it's interesting that it comes back.
00:18:48.284 --> 00:18:53.824
One of the reasons we set this podcast up in the first place is that idea of asking why, and we want to ask it of our students.
00:18:53.844 --> 00:18:57.134
Well, they're learning their maths, you know, so, so, Why did you get that answer?
00:18:57.173 --> 00:18:58.013
How did it work?
00:18:58.023 --> 00:19:05.413
Can you explain it more just to try and get them to think of the understanding behind it and the meaning behind it, rather than just regurgitate.
00:19:05.693 --> 00:19:06.663
Oh yeah, I can learn that.
00:19:06.663 --> 00:19:14.423
Repeat, learn, repeat, because you end up hitting that brick wall in maths around about year nine, 10, when it starts to get a little bit more interesting.
00:19:14.923 --> 00:19:17.544
And you go, Oh, I'm going to have any ever just learn and repeat this.
00:19:17.554 --> 00:19:18.503
So what am I going to do?
00:19:18.733 --> 00:19:24.304
So we're trying to encourage that, that asking of why, and you can almost reverse it around a little bit.
00:19:24.354 --> 00:19:24.693
And.
00:19:25.878 --> 00:19:30.719
When you're a teacher, you want a student to say to you, you know, but why does that work?
00:19:31.068 --> 00:19:39.269
And yes, you can say the same thing, but it's challenging the teacher to say it in a slightly different way, maybe, or to try and put themselves in their shoes.
00:19:39.278 --> 00:19:45.739
And I guess that's something you've already alluded to that really, in your writing, that you've got to put yourself into the shoes of the non mathematician.
00:19:45.969 --> 00:19:49.578
You've got to put yourself into the shoes of the mathematician to get something engaging.
00:19:50.159 --> 00:19:50.969
So I'm interested in what.
00:19:51.804 --> 00:19:53.804
When you, I know you do presentations, you do talks.
00:19:54.114 --> 00:20:03.463
If you were to talk to a group of students, let's say, and you're talking about maths, cause I'm, I'm going to assume most of the things you do, I've seen your number file, et cetera, you're going to be there to talk about maths.
00:20:03.943 --> 00:20:08.314
How are you going to plan to enthuse those kids about maths and get them to.
00:20:08.888 --> 00:20:12.679
Go away thinking, not, you know, Oh, thank God that's over.
00:20:12.729 --> 00:20:17.199
You know, we had to talk about maths, but actually to walk away from it, going, but that was amazing.
00:20:17.628 --> 00:20:18.828
Like, Oh, I wonder about this.
00:20:18.868 --> 00:20:23.439
I wonder this, you know, how can you design what you do to give them that feeling?
00:20:23.439 --> 00:20:23.598
I'm
00:20:23.598 --> 00:20:25.199
giving away my trade secrets.
00:20:26.098 --> 00:20:27.364
Just give us a, give us a little,
00:20:27.364 --> 00:20:28.739
a little sneaky peek.
00:20:28.739 --> 00:20:29.088
Go on.
00:20:29.179 --> 00:20:36.288
I did, I did several different ways, depending on what the audience is and what I'm there to do, but what I never do.
00:20:36.808 --> 00:20:37.679
I did it first.
00:20:37.679 --> 00:20:47.019
I realized it just doesn't work because is to try and actually explain and get some math because that's what teachers do.
00:20:47.028 --> 00:20:47.618
That's what's there.
00:20:47.648 --> 00:20:49.368
And I'm there to try and do something a bit different.
00:20:50.209 --> 00:21:10.088
So the very At one end, what I try and do is no math at all, but just let's talk about numbers, which is a bit about math, but just about numbers in a really fun way, in a way that you maybe had never even thought about before.
00:21:10.159 --> 00:21:15.199
So, for example, just really basic stuff like Like what, what is it to count?
00:21:15.239 --> 00:21:17.999
And like, what can human counts and can chimpanzees count?
00:21:18.038 --> 00:21:21.949
I have these videos of chimpanzees counting and the, the parrots have learned how to count.
00:21:21.959 --> 00:21:24.388
Well, like what, what, what does all that mean?
00:21:24.699 --> 00:21:35.068
And I, I think that young children particularly, I mean, we all are, but talking about animals is really interesting and really grabs their attention.
00:21:35.098 --> 00:21:43.209
And there are these some like kind of amazing videos that you show of these chimpanzees doing things with numbers that you can't quite imagine, can't quite believe.
00:21:44.243 --> 00:21:48.604
And that just, it just grabs them and it's a kind of wow.
00:21:49.203 --> 00:21:57.203
And then you use that to just sort of often through them asking you questions and then you take it whichever way they want to go.
00:21:57.834 --> 00:22:08.854
And I have some other videos when I went to Japan researching Numberland and I've been back back since actually I got interested in the abacus and kids roundabout.
00:22:10.088 --> 00:22:13.709
Key stage two and three in Japan, like a million of them every year.
00:22:13.719 --> 00:22:20.598
I learned through the abacus and afterschool clubs was just saying that the kids go, really, I'm going to not go to football and go to abacus club.
00:22:20.798 --> 00:22:25.249
And so I show them little videos and it's just kind of amazing.
00:22:25.249 --> 00:22:25.489
And they go.
00:22:26.054 --> 00:22:30.084
Cause they're seeing people of their own age doing these amazing things with abacuses.
00:22:30.584 --> 00:22:35.814
And then when you get good at the abacus, you can do this thing called Anzan, which is an abacus without the abacus.
00:22:36.034 --> 00:22:42.134
Basically you're imagining the beads in your head, but because you've been doing for so long, you don't actually need to have the real beads.
00:22:42.433 --> 00:22:45.453
So they can do these like amazing kind of mental math tricks.
00:22:46.453 --> 00:22:49.554
And that always gets a wow.
00:22:49.594 --> 00:22:50.233
And it's interesting.
00:22:50.233 --> 00:23:00.959
And I think that I would have mentioned little bits about numbers, where they come from, and how it, you say maths is a universal language, but actually the approach to maths and numbers varies around the world.
00:23:01.308 --> 00:23:21.788
I find that that's a talk about kind of the culture of maths, that what I hope that I've done is firstly I've shown, here's a guy who obviously is really into maths, and isn't particularly nerdy, and says funny jokes, and talks about all these things, so it's getting an idea that mathematicians aren't maybe a traditional, traditionally what kind of maths.
00:23:22.193 --> 00:23:23.134
person might be.
00:23:23.713 --> 00:23:26.604
And they've shown how math links to all these different things.
00:23:26.604 --> 00:23:37.374
So what, what that is doing is just countering this idea that math is not useful or not interesting without actually trying to, it's just that message.
00:23:37.544 --> 00:23:40.124
That's what you want them to go away from feeling.
00:23:40.273 --> 00:23:46.094
So there may be the next time they do some math homework and think, do you know what, this is, I kind of get it why we may be doing this.
00:23:46.844 --> 00:24:04.394
Another talk that I do, which I find surprisingly successful, it was unexpectedly how successful it was going to be, is that about 10 years ago, I did this online survey to try and find the world's favorite number.
00:24:04.973 --> 00:24:07.763
And I only did it because I don't have a favorite number.
00:24:08.084 --> 00:24:16.128
And it was kind of, It was to try and prove myself that it was interesting.
00:24:16.739 --> 00:24:22.638
Anyway, I did this survey and 44, 000 people joined it.
00:24:23.598 --> 00:24:25.719
Easily the largest survey of its kind.
00:24:27.128 --> 00:24:34.638
And the thing with favourite numbers, I don't really have a favourite number, is that I didn't realise, is that everyone has an opinion.
00:24:35.473 --> 00:24:44.223
And it's irrespective of whether you're good at math, the people who are really good at math might say, Oh, my favorite number is pi or something like that, or my some complicated, fancy reason.
00:24:44.634 --> 00:24:50.253
But the people who hate math might just say my favorite number is seven, because it's Cristiano Ronaldo, you know, they've all got a reason.
00:24:51.084 --> 00:24:51.354
Yeah.
00:24:52.483 --> 00:24:53.804
Everyone wants to take part.
00:24:54.534 --> 00:24:59.894
And so you can start by talking about favorite numbers, which originally I would have thought, my God, that's anti maths.
00:25:00.294 --> 00:25:13.213
That is just, you're kind of having, you're sort of, it's trivializing the entire thing, but actually now I realize it's completely not what you're doing.
00:25:13.443 --> 00:25:14.703
It's like open access.
00:25:15.169 --> 00:25:19.058
You know, I've spoken to PhDs you know, in Google about favorite numbers.
00:25:19.138 --> 00:25:26.038
I've talked to primary school kids about private numbers and everyone is as interested because they've all, it's all about their personal interaction.
00:25:26.409 --> 00:25:36.409
But once you start doing that, and obviously the results of this favorite number survey we tend to like prime numbers more than non prime numbers, and then quite quickly, like how deep do you want to go?
00:25:36.818 --> 00:25:38.118
You can go to.
00:25:39.403 --> 00:25:46.943
Primary level deep, which is just, isn't interesting that you can divide some numbers and you can't divide these others.
00:25:47.003 --> 00:25:49.044
And we like the ones that divide, but isn't that weird?
00:25:49.044 --> 00:25:50.574
Because they're harder to do sums with.
00:25:50.884 --> 00:25:54.773
So all of a sudden you're kind of engaging with it, or you can take it.
00:25:55.983 --> 00:25:56.534
Prime numbers.
00:25:56.534 --> 00:26:06.564
You can go all the way to almost degree level when you can talk about, you know, the goldback conjecture or you know, your Ulam spirals and all this, you know, where you can talk about.
00:26:06.818 --> 00:26:09.648
You know, public key cryptography or whatever you want to do.
00:26:10.169 --> 00:26:13.669
But you've started that talk, getting everyone involved.
00:26:13.919 --> 00:26:18.469
And I think that, so that, that, that's another way that I try and get kids involved.
00:26:18.598 --> 00:26:21.848
I feel like I'm ham, I'm pitching for all your listeners to put me into your skills.
00:26:21.848 --> 00:26:27.949
Now, I don't know what I'm doing, but the other thing that in terms of big audiences.
00:26:28.263 --> 00:26:34.574
And often you might be holding and, you know, there's 400 kids, it's the entire key stage group or something like that.
00:26:35.054 --> 00:26:40.763
What I sort of learned this almost by accident because I did a talk that was maybe not so well prepared.
00:26:41.094 --> 00:26:47.903
And I realized, oh my God, this works really well, is to do puzzles that every, that the entire group solves together.
00:26:49.173 --> 00:26:55.614
And essentially what you become, you become like a stand up comedian who has a set, which is basically divided up.
00:26:55.949 --> 00:27:01.419
Into, you know, they've maybe got 20 gags and they tell whichever guy's going well.
00:27:01.439 --> 00:27:03.729
And if it's not going, they just stop and they go to the next one.
00:27:04.308 --> 00:27:05.229
Puzzles are like that.
00:27:05.588 --> 00:27:06.909
So you can have a short puzzle.
00:27:06.909 --> 00:27:07.848
You can have a long puzzle.
00:27:07.848 --> 00:27:10.479
You can have the puzzle can go to whichever depth you want to do.
00:27:10.939 --> 00:27:14.209
But what you have with the puzzle is that you have this amazing interaction.
00:27:14.598 --> 00:27:18.398
So you can say, do it an odd one out puzzle.
00:27:18.400 --> 00:27:22.848
There's a great odd one out puzzle that's on the cover of one of my puzzle books, which is a kind of.
00:27:24.554 --> 00:27:29.443
It's not a trick problem, but it's the one where basically anything can be the right answer for a different reason.
00:27:29.614 --> 00:27:33.713
So you put it up and then you say, okay, who here thinks the answer is A?
00:27:34.044 --> 00:27:37.644
And then you get a few people that are looking around because, and then you say, who thinks B?
00:27:37.653 --> 00:27:41.933
And there's slightly more people because people aren't so sure because actually everything can be the right answer.
00:27:42.663 --> 00:27:49.193
And so you've already got people taking an interest, sort of voting, you know, they've got everyone, everyone has skin in the game.
00:27:49.733 --> 00:27:51.844
And obviously it's a puzzle.
00:27:51.874 --> 00:27:52.874
What you try to do.
00:27:53.124 --> 00:27:56.294
He's trying to get that aha moment where they don't know what it is.
00:27:56.513 --> 00:27:57.733
It's like the shaggy doll story.
00:27:57.733 --> 00:27:58.913
Then they get the aha.
00:27:59.153 --> 00:28:00.003
It's fun.
00:28:00.263 --> 00:28:02.564
And then you quickly change it and then you're on to the next one.
00:28:02.584 --> 00:28:05.903
It means that someone was daydreaming and didn't get it.
00:28:05.913 --> 00:28:08.983
They don't need to have be concentrated for 90 minutes or 60 minutes.
00:28:09.314 --> 00:28:10.094
You just keep on going.
00:28:10.095 --> 00:28:11.374
Bang, bang, bang.
00:28:12.094 --> 00:28:33.624
And so I use puzzles to try and get that sense of release or kind of aha the ones that tend to work the best are geometrical or visual puzzles, just because you're looking at a screen and it's easier to sort of, it just, it just, it just works better.
00:28:33.763 --> 00:28:34.253
So that's.
00:28:34.463 --> 00:28:40.699
Take that, what the more abstract maths rather than what kids think is just numbers and sums and stuff like that.
00:28:40.699 --> 00:28:40.921
No
00:28:40.921 --> 00:28:42.023
equations, like totally no equation.
00:28:42.223 --> 00:28:43.104
And also what works.
00:28:45.693 --> 00:28:49.463
There are so many fun different things you can, you can do if you've got a smaller group.
00:28:49.493 --> 00:28:57.703
You've got these ones where you can bring two kids onto the stage and they can hold, you can interlock them because they're holding a rope, but the rope is connected.
00:28:59.114 --> 00:29:06.834
How they kind of untangle themselves and that can sometimes, if you do it wrong, it's complete chaos, but you do it right, it's like really, it's really good.
00:29:06.834 --> 00:29:16.693
And you get kind of basics, the basics of topology because you think it's two interlocked circles, but it's not two interlocked circles because it's, it's a loop around the wrist, which is another circle.
00:29:16.693 --> 00:29:21.054
And it's basically, you sort of go into the loop around the wrist and then it just makes you think, oh, I get it.
00:29:21.124 --> 00:29:21.913
That's interesting.
00:29:22.423 --> 00:29:25.354
And you might think, well, what does that got to do with math?
00:29:25.374 --> 00:29:27.263
It's nothing to do with algebra.
00:29:28.409 --> 00:29:29.128
or adding.
00:29:29.699 --> 00:29:36.259
And so I quite like just sort of the key, it's got to be either fun.
00:29:36.278 --> 00:29:42.858
Well, there's the element of surprise and fun and learning.
00:29:42.898 --> 00:29:45.459
And it's the, it's the aha, the aha.
00:29:45.969 --> 00:30:16.489
Also, the nice thing about puzzles is that they all have an answer and you want to set a puzzle that is, they might not get in the time they're set as an audience, but they would ultimately, if it was just themselves, be would probably be able to get even if it took a bit longer because you know life is full of so many Problems that don't have answers that you can't do, it's really nice thinking, okay, there are these little baby problems that you can solve and you can do, and that's really nice.
00:30:16.679 --> 00:30:28.568
And actually, if you learn how to solve these little baby problems, which is kind of what maths is, you know, someone I can't remember, Jordan Ellenberg or Eugenia Chang was one of these maths writers.
00:30:28.598 --> 00:30:33.048
So the whole thing about maths is that maths is there to make things easy.
00:30:33.548 --> 00:30:37.449
You think that math is there to make things hard, but actually math is there to make things easy.
00:30:37.808 --> 00:30:41.638
So you just gotta take one step back.
00:30:42.364 --> 00:30:43.084
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
00:30:43.213 --> 00:30:45.713
Reframe that initial sort of judgment.
00:30:46.844 --> 00:30:51.013
I used to have, I've said this before on the podcast, but I used to have in my classroom, I had two things.
00:30:51.054 --> 00:30:54.134
I haven't said the other one, which, which also I think I basically stole from your book.
00:30:54.503 --> 00:30:57.253
But the first one used to always say, you know, math is problem solving.
00:30:57.433 --> 00:30:58.503
Problem solving is thinking.
00:30:59.048 --> 00:31:04.038
Have you thought question mark, because you'd get kids in that their first thing in class is just go, don't get it.
00:31:05.288 --> 00:31:10.469
And be like, okay, well, don't you get, you know, what are you talking to me about that explains me where you're up to.
00:31:11.189 --> 00:31:12.249
This is about problem solving.
00:31:12.259 --> 00:31:13.469
Have you tried to solve the problem?
00:31:13.469 --> 00:31:14.209
Have you broken it down?
00:31:14.209 --> 00:31:14.659
Have you done this?
00:31:14.659 --> 00:31:15.019
We've done this.
00:31:15.028 --> 00:31:18.068
And that's kind of what you're saying there about that's the beauty of math, right?
00:31:18.088 --> 00:31:22.818
It's, it's Yes, it is a universal language if you like, but it's done in so many different ways.
00:31:23.338 --> 00:31:33.159
But at the core of all of it is maths is about breaking things down into a smaller chunk that you can figure out and then expand and learn and build those foundations and build those big blocks up.
00:31:33.459 --> 00:31:39.719
The other thing I used to have on my wall, which I think came from your zero chapter basically, was that zero is nothing and everything.
00:31:40.189 --> 00:31:40.378
Yes.
00:31:40.419 --> 00:31:42.969
And the kids used to read it and be like, what does that mean?
00:31:43.499 --> 00:31:44.999
I'd be like, well, what do you think it means?
00:31:45.919 --> 00:31:47.538
You know, how many elephants are in this room?
00:31:47.578 --> 00:31:48.818
And they'd be like, what?
00:31:49.239 --> 00:31:50.929
Like, well, there's zero elephants in this room.
00:31:51.348 --> 00:31:55.179
And they'd write, you would do some measurement work and I'd set it up.
00:31:55.179 --> 00:31:57.868
So the answer was zero for a length of something.
00:31:57.909 --> 00:31:59.239
And they'd write zero centimeters.
00:31:59.239 --> 00:32:00.679
I was like, is it zero centimeters?
00:32:00.680 --> 00:32:02.189
And they're like, what do you mean, Mr.
00:32:02.189 --> 00:32:02.439
Lumley?
00:32:02.439 --> 00:32:05.388
Well, if there's no, if there's nothing there, there's no measurement.
00:32:05.388 --> 00:32:06.513
Does it need centimeters?
00:32:07.294 --> 00:32:11.193
And just, just to try and do something to get them thinking that's different.
00:32:11.844 --> 00:32:20.203
We used to do a carousel in one of my schools where the whole aim was to take year seven and do something that was nothing to do with the curriculum at all.
00:32:20.594 --> 00:32:26.433
I used to do combinatorics stuff and take them, imagine them going to the cinema and they're going to sit in a line and how many different ways can you sit?
00:32:26.874 --> 00:32:28.513
And, you know, you've got 20 kids in the classroom.
00:32:29.233 --> 00:32:30.054
That was a private school.
00:32:30.054 --> 00:32:42.769
So 20 kids in the class and you're getting into the, you know, the Billions of different combinations that they can sit in and the kids sit there going like, what, and it's that little level of engagement.
00:32:42.769 --> 00:32:44.628
It's exactly what you're saying about your talks.
00:32:44.628 --> 00:32:45.038
Just.
00:32:45.894 --> 00:32:53.403
Something to interest them, you know, math can become this monotonous thing of, here's some questions, do some questions, here's some questions, do some questions.
00:32:53.743 --> 00:32:57.294
And obviously what we're about here is saying, we don't do that.
00:32:57.473 --> 00:32:58.314
We don't need to do that.
00:32:58.564 --> 00:33:00.153
You know, we can do a lot more than that.
00:33:00.493 --> 00:33:12.679
You know, Alison is our primary expert and it's, It's been really interesting hearing the things that you've said, Alex, knowing Alison as I do now and having done first season of the podcast together.
00:33:13.179 --> 00:33:21.878
And so such similarities between what you're saying, work, writing for everybody, producing, you know presentations for different levels of kids.
00:33:22.278 --> 00:33:26.509
I know Alison's been doing exact, does exactly the same things, the same mentalities with her teachers.
00:33:26.528 --> 00:33:27.679
And then when she's working with.
00:33:28.134 --> 00:33:29.834
You know, five year olds, six year olds.
00:33:29.835 --> 00:33:36.213
What, what, what can you apply from what Alex has said, Alison, for that primary school teacher?
00:33:38.554 --> 00:33:41.814
I mean, there's, there's, there's, there's loads, there's loads in there.
00:33:41.973 --> 00:34:11.679
I, I think, I think part of it is, is this, the slowing down of, of, of, of the starting of, of the start of things and the finding the, The hook's not, is, is, is too trivial to say, but it's, it's finding that way into something which, which gives a reason for it, which seeds that question of why, because I think we can, you know, we like to ask why that, you know, and there are teachers who will, will question why.
00:34:12.199 --> 00:34:18.268
But what we really want to do is foster that, that why that comes out of young children all the time.
00:34:18.539 --> 00:34:22.369
You know, they constantly ask why, trying to make sense of what's going on around them.
00:34:22.369 --> 00:34:24.619
And at some point we, we lose that.
00:34:24.628 --> 00:34:29.628
And I think it's, it's that engagement that says, hang on, I want to know why this works.
00:34:29.628 --> 00:34:31.648
I want to ask why this works.
00:34:31.978 --> 00:34:34.168
I want to see what's, See what's going on here.
00:34:34.168 --> 00:34:34.539
Well, hang on.
00:34:34.548 --> 00:34:37.639
If we move that to there, what, why does that make a difference?
00:34:37.639 --> 00:34:45.088
And and, and the questions you were, you were talking about with the zeros and, and, and what have you, and, you know, do we need centimeters if there's no measurement there?
00:34:45.088 --> 00:34:47.239
Or do you know what to, what do we need to talk about?
00:34:47.259 --> 00:34:57.458
And I think we get, we get very formulaic, very quickly with children too formulaic, too quickly, and we squeeze out that.
00:34:58.429 --> 00:35:12.739
The questioning and the sense making and what you were saying about those aha moments I've bored Andy with it lots of times before, but that I had a moment of realization with a group of very, very high attaining mathematicians.
00:35:12.748 --> 00:35:18.739
They were, they were top end junior school, so year sixes, and one of them, we were working on some problems and one of them went.
00:35:18.954 --> 00:35:25.454
Oh, and then explained what was going on and I said, Oh, you've had that warm fuzzy feeling I heard about on the radio.
00:35:25.454 --> 00:35:34.438
Someone had put the warm fuzzy feeling in the Museum of Curiosity on radio 4 and and this group of, of children, and it was a mixture of boys and girls, looked at me as if I'd passed out.
00:35:34.739 --> 00:35:36.668
lost the plot yet again.
00:35:36.688 --> 00:35:41.759
It was a look that was relatively common when we were working together and I explained the story about it.
00:35:41.989 --> 00:35:50.559
So there were about 12 of these very high attaining mathematicians and half of them, when I talked about the warm fuzzy feeling, went, oh yeah, I know what you mean.
00:35:51.018 --> 00:35:56.119
And what scared me rigid and shocked me was that half of them didn't.
00:35:56.983 --> 00:36:09.324
And I think that, you know, a lot of what we're talking about here is that, that personal engagement with it and those moments that lead to, and we can, you know, we can go into all the cognitive science stuff around it as well.
00:36:09.324 --> 00:36:13.974
But But I think sometimes that's the bit that's missing and we're not engaging them with it.
00:36:13.994 --> 00:36:37.963
We're not engaging the teachers perhaps with it in a way that says if you, if you find this way in, if you really expand that early bit of, of the, of the, of the new introduction of a new concept and really secure it and generate those aha moments and those, those, those warm fuzzy feeling moments and support our pupils to recognize that that we could.
00:36:38.634 --> 00:36:45.704
That this whole digging for the why would become a absolute core and fundamental to to the way we teach maths to children.
00:36:46.324 --> 00:36:47.393
It was a bit of a ramble, sorry.
00:36:48.884 --> 00:36:52.213
It's, it's just interesting isn't it, to talk, you know, we spend.
00:36:53.003 --> 00:36:59.844
Our daily lives, talking to teachers and working with teachers and we've been teachers and knowing kind of what it's all about in the classroom.
00:36:59.844 --> 00:37:09.284
And it's just really interesting to hear the similarities really in, in your, when, what you do, Alex, which is completely different to teaching in terms of what you're planning and stuff.
00:37:09.313 --> 00:37:12.094
Now, I'm going to ask you a question here.
00:37:12.103 --> 00:37:22.018
We're kind of getting towards the end of our time here, but I'm going to ask you a question, which we normally ask at the very start, which is, you know, In the last couple of weeks, has anything happened that's made you ask why?
00:37:22.019 --> 00:37:22.329
I
00:37:23.208 --> 00:37:25.228
mean, that's such a big question.
00:37:25.228 --> 00:37:28.518
It depends on what level to take it.
00:37:28.759 --> 00:37:39.548
The first thing I thought of, which maybe is not entirely relevant, but that was what I thought of, you know, is that I'm getting quite interested in computer science.
00:37:41.478 --> 00:37:46.438
And I have noticed that there are almost zero books.
00:37:46.844 --> 00:37:59.744
Aimed at Key Stage 2, 3, well, Alex in Numberland has probably stated 3, 4 and grown ups, but the ideas are definitely, you can explain Key Stage 2.
00:38:00.284 --> 00:38:01.884
There are no good books on computer science.
00:38:02.244 --> 00:38:02.884
There just aren't.
00:38:03.264 --> 00:38:08.574
Computer science is the fastest growing A level computers dominate the world.
00:38:10.259 --> 00:38:26.324
So I've been going into the British Library and trying to read everything that anyone has ever written on the basic concepts of computer science and trying to find out why This is such a massive area and there's not that much stuff about it.
00:38:26.503 --> 00:38:33.844
What you have, you have textbooks, you have academic books, but there's no kind of thing that makes it exciting and engaging.
00:38:34.423 --> 00:38:38.994
And I'm interested for two reasons.
00:38:38.994 --> 00:38:46.074
One I'm interested in because, you know, I make my living from writing books and if there's a big gap there, then I want to go and fill it.
00:38:46.373 --> 00:38:55.179
But I'm also just more just fundamentally, well, what is it about the way we teach maths, the way that we teach computer science, the way that we exercise.
00:38:55.929 --> 00:38:57.248
use computers.
00:38:57.679 --> 00:39:04.338
The you know, I think that math famously has an image problem.
00:39:04.398 --> 00:39:07.699
I think a lot, lot less now than when I was, when I was a kid.
00:39:08.099 --> 00:39:09.259
But still does a little bit.
00:39:09.809 --> 00:39:13.768
Computer science has a different, but also does have an image problem.
00:39:14.219 --> 00:39:15.849
And like, what is that?
00:39:15.929 --> 00:39:25.789
And in the future, I think that computer science is going to become more of a mathsy subject and less of a kind of engineering y.
00:39:26.719 --> 00:39:43.239
Kind of subject and so that's I mean, maybe that's just too high level for this podcast, but these are the big things that, you know, I'm thinking about at the moment and when I go to bed at night, these are the questions and I don't really have any answers, but that's, that's where I'm going.
00:39:43.409 --> 00:39:44.469
But that's the challenge, right?
00:39:44.478 --> 00:39:49.228
That's the whole point of being a person that wonders why you're not just going to stop.
00:39:49.818 --> 00:39:51.989
You're going to go on now, hang on, what, what's next?
00:39:51.989 --> 00:39:53.409
You know, why is, why is there a gap?
00:39:53.409 --> 00:39:56.869
Where is this, why aren't people writing it in this way?
00:39:56.869 --> 00:39:58.778
Why aren't there these things for these kids?
00:39:58.918 --> 00:39:59.829
It's interesting, isn't it?
00:39:59.838 --> 00:40:04.268
Cause you know, my, my kids play computer games on their little tablets.
00:40:04.838 --> 00:40:14.318
And essentially everything behind that computer game is decision maths and algorithmic and you know, how it works and it's vectors and it's everything.
00:40:14.998 --> 00:40:16.858
I could see, I can easily see.
00:40:17.199 --> 00:40:21.309
Some kind of new a level, which is math and computer science.
00:40:21.579 --> 00:40:38.778
But also before you mentioned, sometimes you teach your kids combinatorics and it blows their mind that, you know, with only five people reorganizing them, you know, I know a hundred combinations or something, but whenever you get to say 20 or 30, it's just like billions and billions and billions.
00:40:39.079 --> 00:40:55.838
That's the kind of computer science issue, because that's all about how you in the trade offs that you have to make within the computer, how you don't get too much complexity in order to do what you want to do, because it's no longer about Can you do it?
00:40:57.048 --> 00:40:58.608
Theoretically, that's math.
00:40:58.829 --> 00:41:00.108
It's, can you do it practically?
00:41:00.619 --> 00:41:08.389
So to look at those problems in a way, in, in a different way and in a way that I'd never learned when I was doing, doing math.
00:41:08.929 --> 00:41:10.889
And yeah, I think that's, that's interesting.
00:41:11.048 --> 00:41:23.318
There's one point that all of a sudden came to me about this asking why, which maybe I can help contribute, is that what a journalist, you know, I'm, I've got a degree in, in math and philosophy.
00:41:23.969 --> 00:41:27.298
And then I trained as a journalist, I went to kind of journalism college and did all of that.
00:41:27.739 --> 00:41:32.458
Journalists, my job has been to ask why, always.
00:41:32.719 --> 00:41:45.128
And the thing that journalism teaches you, probably taught me just the overriding Kind of life skill is not to be afraid to ask a question.
00:41:45.568 --> 00:41:47.619
If you don't know something, just ask someone.
00:41:47.619 --> 00:41:52.518
I mean, and this goes from, if you're walking down the street and you can't find a house number, just ask someone.
00:41:53.128 --> 00:41:54.478
Loads of people won't even do that.
00:41:54.878 --> 00:41:56.668
But you know, I'm, I'm, I'm different.
00:41:56.679 --> 00:42:00.048
So I'm yesterday I was in the library and I read this book on computer science.
00:42:00.688 --> 00:42:03.759
And and it was about written 10 years ago.
00:42:03.798 --> 00:42:06.849
And as a guy saying, and I believe that this, this is going to happen.
00:42:07.289 --> 00:42:16.168
And I was just like, do you know what I'm going to literally right now, right to this guy and ask him, so did it happen or not, you know what I mean?
00:42:16.378 --> 00:42:18.168
And I only get that from the kind of.
00:42:19.014 --> 00:42:20.043
It's not fearlessness.
00:42:20.074 --> 00:42:25.063
It's more like a chutzpah or a kind of opportunism that you learn as a journalism.
00:42:25.273 --> 00:42:27.994
Just like, if he's going to say that in a book, well, I want to know.
00:42:28.494 --> 00:42:29.264
I just sent him an email.
00:42:29.264 --> 00:42:32.693
I said, I know this is maybe cheeky of me, but I couldn't resist.
00:42:32.853 --> 00:42:36.543
I'd literally just put your book down and you say that this is going to happen.
00:42:36.923 --> 00:42:41.253
And I, you know, it's like this algorithm is going to be a really important algorithm.
00:42:41.574 --> 00:42:43.911
And I was like, I don't know that because I'm not a computer scientist.
00:42:43.911 --> 00:42:44.713
I just asked him.
00:42:44.713 --> 00:42:48.074
And actually, as it was, he wrote straight back and says, Oh, do you know what?
00:42:49.204 --> 00:42:50.844
Take me too long to write.
00:42:50.994 --> 00:42:52.884
Why don't you just call me on zoom on Wednesday?
00:42:53.353 --> 00:42:55.574
He's like some professor in an American university.
00:42:55.903 --> 00:42:58.494
And so that is journalist.
00:42:59.213 --> 00:43:01.143
Speaking, but it's so, so useful.
00:43:01.213 --> 00:43:01.903
It's so useful.
00:43:02.054 --> 00:43:14.853
Like I'm probably a really annoying person because I just like question people all the time and, you know, a lot of good journalists are quite rude people because they're, you know, it never hurts to ask that question.
00:43:15.043 --> 00:43:22.614
It never hurts to ask that question and we should not be afraid and we should be trained, that's a good, a journalistic skill that everyone should learn.
00:43:22.623 --> 00:43:24.123
Don't be afraid to ask the question.
00:43:24.659 --> 00:43:25.548
Like it doesn't matter.
00:43:25.548 --> 00:43:29.148
I mean, it's just a question you're just asking
00:43:29.228 --> 00:43:31.608
it's, it's, you know, we've, we've talked about it before.
00:43:31.608 --> 00:43:32.088
What happened?
00:43:32.108 --> 00:43:39.358
I mean, my three year old boy never, never, literally never stops asking why I can answer it a hundred times, but why daddy, but why?
00:43:39.768 --> 00:43:40.818
And it's that whole thing.
00:43:41.188 --> 00:43:42.188
When does that go?
00:43:42.539 --> 00:43:43.588
And why does that go?
00:43:43.668 --> 00:43:51.278
And that's what we talked about a little bit in season one, like what happens to that curiosity when the kids just go, Oh, I'll just do with what they say then.
00:43:51.648 --> 00:43:52.409
You know, it's.
00:43:52.688 --> 00:43:53.588
It's so true.
00:43:53.679 --> 00:43:54.478
It's so true, Alex.
00:43:54.478 --> 00:43:58.719
That, that isn't a, that, that's almost a nice way to finish, to be honest.
00:43:58.739 --> 00:44:05.289
As the takeaway for the podcast is something I'm always trying to figure out is what is somebody going to take away who listens to it?
00:44:06.329 --> 00:44:13.349
Ask why it doesn't matter who you are, what walk of life you're in, whether you're a three year old or whether you're a 43 year old ex math teacher like me.
00:44:13.358 --> 00:44:13.588
It's not
00:44:13.608 --> 00:44:15.818
embarrassing to think that you don't know it.
00:44:16.318 --> 00:44:30.418
It's like, I mean, maybe that it comes, you have to have a certain intellectual confidence to say, think it's fine to not know anything, but everyone should not be afraid of not knowing anything because lots of the people who think they know things don't know anything and you need to be sure you need to be sure.
00:44:30.898 --> 00:44:32.208
So it's never embarrassing.
00:44:32.210 --> 00:44:42.548
I mean, sometimes I ask a question, it's like you know, it's so obvious and like, I might say, Oh, how embarrassing, but I'm not actually embarrassed at all because I wanted to know what I asked.
00:44:43.603 --> 00:45:03.804
Yeah, and I think as teachers, we need to create the the, the atmosphere in our classrooms, the, the culture in our classrooms, where it, you, you just, you do, you ask and it doesn't, and just as he said, Alex, it doesn't matter about the question whether the question ends up being the question that makes everybody go, Oh, wow, that's really interesting.
00:45:03.813 --> 00:45:04.554
Let's have a think about that.
00:45:04.563 --> 00:45:05.833
Or it's a case of, yeah, yeah.
00:45:05.898 --> 00:45:08.179
Yeah, come on, remember what we did yesterday?
00:45:08.599 --> 00:45:09.369
Yeah, yeah, all right.
00:45:09.688 --> 00:45:09.719
Yeah.
00:45:09.719 --> 00:45:10.009
Okay.
00:45:10.009 --> 00:45:16.429
And we move on, but I think it's that culture and the culture of asking questions is really important to keep.
00:45:17.378 --> 00:45:17.998
Absolutely.
00:45:18.568 --> 00:45:21.869
Well, Alex, thank you so much for giving up some time for us today.
00:45:21.909 --> 00:45:22.958
It's been really, really good.
00:45:23.059 --> 00:45:24.329
It's been amazing to talk to you.
00:45:24.679 --> 00:45:27.208
I'm already looking forward to Alex's adventures in computer land.
00:45:27.409 --> 00:45:39.489
Whenever that arrives, I will I will link to, to, to Alex's socials and for all the schools that want to go and book him, I'll, I'll put a link onto his website so you can go and And, and get him in to talk about math and then to use your kids.
00:45:39.789 --> 00:45:42.139
But yeah, thank you so much for coming on digging for the Y.
00:45:42.139 --> 00:45:42.978
It's been really, really good.
00:45:43.398 --> 00:45:45.648
Alison, thanks as ever for your company.
00:45:45.708 --> 00:45:47.608
Over the last 47 minutes or so.
00:45:48.048 --> 00:45:48.838
Thank you for listening.
00:45:48.838 --> 00:45:50.489
I hope you can take something away from this.
00:45:50.778 --> 00:45:52.648
We just really enjoy talking to people.
00:45:52.954 --> 00:45:58.914
with a maths interest and, and getting to know about what, what makes them tick and why they ask why.
00:45:58.914 --> 00:46:00.253
So Alex, thanks again.
00:46:00.253 --> 00:46:01.043
Thank you very much.
00:46:01.173 --> 00:46:01.704
It's been great fun.
00:46:01.713 --> 00:46:03.074
It's been really, has been really enjoyable.
00:46:03.083 --> 00:46:03.494
Thank you.
00:46:04.304 --> 00:46:05.414
Enjoy the rest of your week.
00:46:05.474 --> 00:46:08.784
And if you're listening, we will look forward to you listening to us.
00:46:08.784 --> 00:46:09.043
Hang on.
00:46:09.043 --> 00:46:09.724
That doesn't sound right.
00:46:09.873 --> 00:46:10.554
We'll look forward to you.
00:46:10.614 --> 00:46:12.664
No, wait, again, you can look forward to listening to us.
00:46:12.744 --> 00:46:12.994
I don't know.
00:46:13.103 --> 00:46:14.143
It's getting too egotistical.
00:46:14.164 --> 00:46:14.443
Right.
00:46:14.514 --> 00:46:15.693
We'll see you again in the future.
00:46:15.963 --> 00:46:16.344
Take care.
00:46:16.393 --> 00:46:16.653
Bye bye.