ABOUT THIS EPISODE
The 2025 Seattle World Science Fiction Convention will be held in August 2025. In getting ready to produce the event, organizers used AI to vet a list of about 1,500 potential speakers. The conference wanted to ensure they would not invite anyone who might create a controversy by their attendance. AI read through social media posts, public records, 3rd grade report cards, everything available online looking for red flags.
Imagine the organisers' surprise that in trying to prevent controversy, they created an even bigger controversy! Once word got out that AI was used to vet the list of potential speakers, people got big mad and had feelings about using robots to do human work. Kathy Bond, volunteer chairperson of the 2025 event, issued an apology amidst calls for her resignation (and a few nerds wanted to shoot her into space).
WorldCon is not only a SciFi convention, it's home to the Hugo awards - for SciFi writers, their publishers, and their readers, a Hugo award is a big deal. We dive into the WorldCon situation and visit Hugo award controversies past to discover it truly is A Brave New World (see what we did there!).
SHOW NOTES 🔗
TRANSCRIPT 🔗
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:20.080
Music.
00:00:19.925 --> 00:00:24.105
I'm Theo. And I'm Juliette. And this is Apologies Accepted. We offer an entertaining
00:00:24.105 --> 00:00:29.065
look at some of the big issues in history by examining public apologies of the famous and infamous.
00:00:29.385 --> 00:00:33.445
We're looking at politicians, serial killers, actors, and you.
00:00:33.625 --> 00:00:36.745
Send us a public apology you would like to make, and we'll read it on the air
00:00:36.745 --> 00:00:40.205
and give you a chance to redeem yourself or just get some guilt off your shoulders.
00:00:40.425 --> 00:00:44.405
We're here for you. Once a week, maybe more if you're really, really sorry.
00:00:47.120 --> 00:01:00.560
Music.
00:00:57.925 --> 00:01:02.865
Hey, everybody. Hi, everybody. This is the Popsies Accepted. The podcast.
00:01:04.445 --> 00:01:08.045
And I'm not Theo. And I am not Juliet.
00:01:08.685 --> 00:01:12.405
And we are, sounds like we're not in sync, but we actually are.
00:01:12.545 --> 00:01:15.705
We're both live and here we are. Pause, pause, pause.
00:01:16.945 --> 00:01:19.945
Yeah, exactly. So long pauses, which Bren will fix.
00:01:20.705 --> 00:01:23.245
So let's see. What are we going to talk about today? No, wait.
00:01:23.385 --> 00:01:24.905
First, we have to know what shake and bake.
00:01:25.425 --> 00:01:29.685
I wish I could tell you, but if I did, you would die of envy.
00:01:30.105 --> 00:01:32.805
You'd have to kill us. Well, I'd have to kill you, but then you would die of envy.
00:01:34.865 --> 00:01:38.785
So I will say I'm going to every week. It's like nothing. We're going to go
00:01:38.785 --> 00:01:40.765
out to Palm Springs this coming week.
00:01:41.365 --> 00:01:48.665
James has a friend who is having a vacation in California. I was going on vacation to California.
00:01:48.965 --> 00:01:54.065
And so kind of last minute, it was like, hey, why don't we try and all get together?
00:01:54.245 --> 00:01:59.285
And so we are and very much looking forward to it. We're going to fly.
00:01:59.865 --> 00:02:03.465
And have you ever flown instead of drive?
00:02:04.405 --> 00:02:07.965
There's no airport there. I'd have to fly to Phoenix and then drive an hour
00:02:07.965 --> 00:02:11.265
and a half. Okay. But I mean, you know, then it's an hour and a half versus 12.
00:02:12.085 --> 00:02:15.885
Yeah, no, I have done that. Yes. Oh, does it weird you out?
00:02:16.465 --> 00:02:21.445
It kind of does yeah it's such a short flight and then i'm there.
00:02:23.085 --> 00:02:27.885
It's like you're supposed to fall asleep behind the wheel of a car for a few
00:02:27.885 --> 00:02:34.185
moments and then scare yourself awake and then pull over and why why why am
00:02:34.185 --> 00:02:39.285
i driving why and then you have 12 more hours in front of you like that's how you get to palm springs,
00:02:40.243 --> 00:02:45.683
Not sit on a plane, watch a movie, get off in Palm Springs. It doesn't happen.
00:02:46.323 --> 00:02:49.563
Yeah. So it always weirds me out. It's such a fucking miracle.
00:02:50.183 --> 00:02:54.803
And so, yeah, that's leading me straight to plane crashes now, which, no, thank you.
00:02:55.583 --> 00:03:00.483
I know. I know. It's like everything I can think of is just going to end in a bad place.
00:03:00.643 --> 00:03:06.603
This will be it. And this is our happy show, right? Because we did a sad show last week.
00:03:07.223 --> 00:03:10.723
And so this is our, like, oh, okay, this is a fun show. I don't know that I'd
00:03:10.723 --> 00:03:12.823
call it happy, but it's a little bit lighter.
00:03:13.723 --> 00:03:17.923
It's totally, oh, you just wait. I've got some great material lined up for you.
00:03:18.683 --> 00:03:23.263
Okay, good. For your entertainment. Yeah, but so that's what we're doing this
00:03:23.263 --> 00:03:28.663
coming week, and I've got nothing else. I'm struggling to, like,
00:03:29.063 --> 00:03:30.603
what else can I talk about?
00:03:30.823 --> 00:03:33.883
Anything, really, but I've got nothing. What about you? What's Shaken Bacon?
00:03:34.683 --> 00:03:38.343
I've got less than nothing. I've got minus things happening in my life,
00:03:38.523 --> 00:03:41.223
so I don't know what that would look like in reality.
00:03:41.423 --> 00:03:44.403
It would look like people coming and making me not do things, I guess.
00:03:45.363 --> 00:03:49.443
But I just don't have anything to talk about. So let's talk about our topic. Yay.
00:03:50.603 --> 00:03:53.983
Today, we're heading back into the world of science fiction and artificial intelligence.
00:03:54.863 --> 00:03:59.283
We talked about, in late May, we talked about AI making up some book titles
00:03:59.283 --> 00:04:03.643
and book summaries. And now we're talking about the recent apology issued by
00:04:03.643 --> 00:04:06.983
the organizers of the 2025 Seattle World Science Fiction Convention,
00:04:07.463 --> 00:04:08.643
better known as Worldcon.
00:04:09.083 --> 00:04:14.583
Seattle Worldcon 2025 organizers are under fire after revealing they used ChatGPT
00:04:14.583 --> 00:04:17.703
to help vet over 1,300 panelist applicants.
00:04:18.243 --> 00:04:22.003
The AI tool was given only names and asked to surface red flags,
00:04:22.143 --> 00:04:26.823
such as harassment or misconduct committed by those names. Organizers emphasized
00:04:26.823 --> 00:04:32.083
that all AI results were manually reviewed and no one was rejected solely based on AI output.
00:04:32.924 --> 00:04:36.504
However, the announcement sparked immediate backlash from the science fiction
00:04:36.504 --> 00:04:40.264
and fantasy community, which criticized the practice as unethical,
00:04:40.424 --> 00:04:44.084
opaque, and disrespectful to creators whose work may have been used to train
00:04:44.084 --> 00:04:45.504
AI systems without consent.
00:04:46.104 --> 00:04:49.844
Concerns about bias, hallucination, and data privacy also emerged.
00:04:50.084 --> 00:04:53.924
Key members of the convention, including Hugo Awards administrators and the
00:04:53.924 --> 00:04:57.664
World Science Fiction Society division head, resigned in protest,
00:04:57.904 --> 00:05:01.484
though it was clarified that AI was not used in the Hugo voting process.
00:05:02.004 --> 00:05:06.064
In response to all this, convention chair Kathy Bond issued a public apology.
00:05:06.784 --> 00:05:10.204
Organizers pledged to re-vet all affected panelists without AI,
00:05:10.464 --> 00:05:13.464
involve outsider viewers, and offer refunds to concerned members.
00:05:13.904 --> 00:05:18.444
The incident highlights growing tensions around AI in creative spaces and underscores
00:05:18.444 --> 00:05:23.004
the need for transparency and consent when new technologies are used in community-driven events.
00:05:23.664 --> 00:05:27.904
Critics, including long-time convention participants and fans raised concerns
00:05:27.904 --> 00:05:31.664
about using AI to research real people without context or consent.
00:05:32.104 --> 00:05:35.884
Even more troubling, the initial responses from leadership were dismissive.
00:05:36.204 --> 00:05:41.344
One chair stated that using chat GPT was just a way to help human brains do a lot of work faster.
00:05:41.704 --> 00:05:45.464
That was a controversial comment, but kind of true.
00:05:46.844 --> 00:05:50.544
Although the issues are, of course, exactly what were brought up,
00:05:50.784 --> 00:05:53.264
that hallucination bias and data privacy.
00:05:53.564 --> 00:05:55.784
So 601, half a dozen of the other.
00:05:56.735 --> 00:06:04.855
And go ahead. Oh, I mean, I'm just struck by a bunch of futurists complaining about the use of robots.
00:06:05.215 --> 00:06:08.375
Like, you guys, come on. How ironic.
00:06:08.795 --> 00:06:14.475
This is what you tell us the future is going to be. Here it is.
00:06:14.775 --> 00:06:20.695
I get why everybody's, I get-ish why everybody's upset, but it is kind of ironic, too.
00:06:21.335 --> 00:06:25.215
Sorry, we use robots to do the work. How dare we? Where'd we get that idea from?
00:06:25.695 --> 00:06:30.875
Oh, you guys, you're the ones that write about the robots in the future. Yeah.
00:06:31.855 --> 00:06:35.215
So you said you had some happy stuff for us. I'm done with my little son.
00:06:35.395 --> 00:06:38.195
Oh, God. Tell us about the happy stuff.
00:06:38.435 --> 00:06:40.515
No press. Right. No pressure at all.
00:06:41.875 --> 00:06:47.075
Well, my happy stuff is two previous Hugo Award scandals.
00:06:47.415 --> 00:06:53.535
And so I think we could save that for the end piece and go through the apology. Right.
00:06:54.175 --> 00:07:00.375
Okay. Because who knew, on one hand, who knew that sci-fi nerds had so much drama?
00:07:00.595 --> 00:07:04.735
And then on the other hand, it's like, well, they're sci-fi nerds. Of course.
00:07:05.455 --> 00:07:07.355
My favorite. Absolutely, too.
00:07:08.575 --> 00:07:13.375
I had a boyfriend that was super into comic books, like collected them, the whole thing, right?
00:07:14.395 --> 00:07:18.435
And I didn't get it. And I used to make, I eventually got it over time, right?
00:07:19.735 --> 00:07:26.035
But fine. And my favorite thing of all, just to kind of explain my view of,
00:07:26.055 --> 00:07:28.475
I'm a bit of a sci-fi nerd,
00:07:28.795 --> 00:07:33.515
okay, but to explain sci-fi nerds to people who sort of don't know,
00:07:33.815 --> 00:07:40.135
there's a Simpson episode where the comic book shop owner is standing in the
00:07:40.135 --> 00:07:44.555
store by himself, reading a comic book, and he says out loud,
00:07:44.775 --> 00:07:48.775
Aquaman cannot marry Wonder Woman, he is a man of fish.
00:07:48.775 --> 00:07:52.935
And I just love, love that.
00:07:54.255 --> 00:07:59.455
Because, yeah, why do you care? Why is it so important? This one's slightly
00:07:59.455 --> 00:08:00.995
different. This one's slightly different.
00:08:02.816 --> 00:08:07.676
And I'm sure we'll get into the nuance as we get further into the apology.
00:08:08.136 --> 00:08:12.396
But yeah, let's, I guess let's keep going with the apology.
00:08:12.896 --> 00:08:17.136
We'll talk about the apology. After days of backlash, convention chair Kathy
00:08:17.136 --> 00:08:20.596
Bond issued a formal apology. And it reads as follows.
00:08:20.856 --> 00:08:25.076
First and foremost, as chair of the Seattle Worldcon, I sincerely apologize
00:08:25.076 --> 00:08:28.196
for the use of ChatGPT in our program vetting process.
00:08:28.796 --> 00:08:33.176
Additionally, I regret releasing a statement that did not address the concerns of our community.
00:08:33.656 --> 00:08:37.756
My initial statement on the use of AI tools in program vetting was incomplete,
00:08:38.136 --> 00:08:39.856
flawed, and missed the most crucial points.
00:08:40.176 --> 00:08:43.456
I acknowledge my mistake and am truly sorry for the harm it caused.
00:08:43.776 --> 00:08:46.456
There is much more that needs to be done to address this harm,
00:08:46.576 --> 00:08:51.016
but it will take some time to develop a comprehensive response and fuller apology over the weekend.
00:08:51.276 --> 00:08:54.996
We will release a response by Tuesday of next week that provides a transparent
00:08:54.996 --> 00:08:58.916
explanation of the process that was used, answers more of the questions and
00:08:58.916 --> 00:09:03.616
concerns we have received, and openly outlines our next steps. Thanks, Kathy Bond.
00:09:04.236 --> 00:09:09.196
So we can evaluate this, but I just wanted to note that after that statement,
00:09:09.436 --> 00:09:13.576
the second apology or follow-on apology and clarification was issued.
00:09:14.096 --> 00:09:18.496
In the second apology, she emphasized that AI was used only after panelists
00:09:18.496 --> 00:09:23.116
were selected and solely to gather review material with all results evaluated by humans.
00:09:23.156 --> 00:09:27.776
She did acknowledge that even this limited use was inappropriate given community concerns.
00:09:28.076 --> 00:09:32.256
She also stated that Worldcon leadership would repeat the affected program process
00:09:32.256 --> 00:09:37.476
without AI using new volunteers, undergo an external audit of programming procedures,
00:09:38.016 --> 00:09:40.636
offer membership refunds to those who requested them,
00:09:41.356 --> 00:09:46.256
improve internal communication and leadership oversight, and commit to regular updates.
00:09:47.016 --> 00:09:51.836
Bond also addressed recent resignations, expressed gratitude for outgoing volunteers,
00:09:51.836 --> 00:09:55.936
and affirmed continued commitment to transparency and integrity in organizing the convention.
00:09:56.376 --> 00:10:00.436
The program division head, Sunny Jim Morgan, confirmed in a separate statement
00:10:00.436 --> 00:10:04.296
that AI played a limited background check role only after human decisions,
00:10:04.496 --> 00:10:08.436
vowed that the process would be redone without AI and supported an audit to
00:10:08.436 --> 00:10:09.696
rebuild community confidence.
00:10:10.316 --> 00:10:14.956
So, okay, let's evaluate that apology using our trusty six-point criteria.
00:10:15.656 --> 00:10:19.776
Not generated by AI. Oh, sorry, I jumped onto you there, but we want to point
00:10:19.776 --> 00:10:25.376
out that this criteria we came up with slash found slash I don't know where it came from.
00:10:25.556 --> 00:10:28.076
I know it came from research. I don't remember where it came from.
00:10:28.516 --> 00:10:32.216
Yeah. Yeah. But you did research. I had nothing to do with it.
00:10:32.276 --> 00:10:36.036
You were like, we should probably know, like, what is it that makes a good apology?
00:10:36.236 --> 00:10:38.656
And I was like, oh, my gosh, what a great idea.
00:10:39.356 --> 00:10:42.456
I've got plenty of snark, but just not a lot of logic and reason.
00:10:42.936 --> 00:10:50.116
And so we did not use ChatGPT to generate this list of criteria for evaluating. Yes.
00:10:50.966 --> 00:10:55.546
That's true. We did not. End of these. Criteria number one is expression of regret.
00:10:55.866 --> 00:10:59.366
And Bond said, I sincerely apologize for the use of chat GPT in the vetting
00:10:59.366 --> 00:11:03.166
process. This is clear, straightforward, and uses the magic word apologize.
00:11:04.386 --> 00:11:08.966
So that check, check. Explanation of what went wrong. The apology admitted to
00:11:08.966 --> 00:11:12.086
poor judgment in both using the tool and in how the decision was communicated.
00:11:12.466 --> 00:11:15.346
It also acknowledged that trust had been broken. So check.
00:11:16.206 --> 00:11:19.686
Acknowledgement of responsibility. Bond didn't point fingers at volunteers or
00:11:19.686 --> 00:11:23.866
blame the technology. she took ownership, which is rare and refreshing. Check.
00:11:24.526 --> 00:11:29.006
Declaration of Repentance. She committed to discontinuing AI use for vetting
00:11:29.006 --> 00:11:32.266
and outline steps to make future processes more transparent.
00:11:32.526 --> 00:11:36.546
And then there was the sincere apology as well, so I'd give that a check.
00:11:36.966 --> 00:11:40.726
An offer of repair. The apology promised a revised vetting system,
00:11:40.906 --> 00:11:44.466
a public report, and greater community oversight, so absolutely yes.
00:11:45.126 --> 00:11:48.726
And request for forgiveness. This is where the apology falls a little short.
00:11:48.726 --> 00:11:53.026
There's no explicit request for forgiveness, just the hope that actions will rebuild trust.
00:11:53.266 --> 00:11:55.826
Some may see that as humble. Others might see it as evasive.
00:11:56.766 --> 00:12:01.526
So what do I give this apology? I'm going to give it. Let's see.
00:12:01.586 --> 00:12:04.646
Do we evaluate all the apologies together? I think we should.
00:12:04.986 --> 00:12:09.786
Sure. Okay. So I consider them together. So I would give it a nine out of 10.
00:12:10.306 --> 00:12:12.006
Wow. Do I accept to use this?
00:12:12.886 --> 00:12:15.066
You are really.
00:12:15.946 --> 00:12:16.426
Wow.
00:12:17.686 --> 00:12:26.046
No. Oh, no, no, no. I'm not. So it's not that I don't think it just feels like a lot of nothing to me.
00:12:26.506 --> 00:12:31.566
Right. Really? Well, it kind of does the whole. Sorry, not her apology.
00:12:31.906 --> 00:12:33.666
Her apology, I would give a seven to.
00:12:34.166 --> 00:12:38.626
Right. Oh, you mean the problem. The problem feels like a lot of nothing to me. Right.
00:12:38.986 --> 00:12:45.266
I get why people are upset, but I don't think it warrant.
00:12:45.586 --> 00:12:49.626
And sure, I apologize for that. But I just don't think it was that big a fucking
00:12:49.626 --> 00:12:54.386
issue, everybody. They fed a list of names into AI and just, well...
00:12:55.116 --> 00:13:01.916
So I give it a seven. We can finish this and then get into why I don't think it's a big deal.
00:13:02.436 --> 00:13:06.056
Did you see the comments on the apology? I did.
00:13:06.476 --> 00:13:12.216
I did. Did you see how they were calling ChatGBT a fascist plagiarism machine?
00:13:12.996 --> 00:13:17.376
So I saw the plagiarism stuff. The fascist piece slipped through me,
00:13:17.596 --> 00:13:20.596
right? Slipped through me? What expression is that?
00:13:22.416 --> 00:13:25.156
I missed that piece. And funny, right?
00:13:25.336 --> 00:13:30.616
But more the outrage that I was reading, it just read like, well,
00:13:30.636 --> 00:13:34.596
you probably also complain online about everything, right?
00:13:34.796 --> 00:13:38.576
People on online complaints, for whatever reason, just kind of don't mean a
00:13:38.576 --> 00:13:44.876
lot to me because they're online, right? Things like, you should resign.
00:13:45.016 --> 00:13:46.816
Okay, well, sure, she's a volunteer.
00:13:47.156 --> 00:13:55.116
She can resign, yes. But also, like, they're offering to fix the problem.
00:13:55.476 --> 00:13:58.736
They understand that a bunch of people are upset.
00:13:59.156 --> 00:14:02.576
All right, let's get into the prompt, right?
00:14:02.736 --> 00:14:09.436
So they had a list of 1,500 names they needed to evaluate, and they've got a staff of volunteers.
00:14:10.456 --> 00:14:14.376
And somebody in the, I'm assuming, volunteer pool, somebody who had,
00:14:14.556 --> 00:14:18.756
let's call him Theo, right? This is an idea that I would have.
00:14:19.404 --> 00:14:23.844
I would be volunteering and somebody would say, here's a list of 700 names,
00:14:23.844 --> 00:14:29.124
go through all of them and go online and look for X, Y, and Z.
00:14:29.304 --> 00:14:33.184
And I would be like, this is going to take me 700 hours easily.
00:14:34.064 --> 00:14:39.004
Why don't I just feed it into ChatGPT, see who raises a flag,
00:14:39.004 --> 00:14:42.284
and then I can dig in, right? Exactly.
00:14:43.604 --> 00:14:52.744
And so the prompt that the staff used, this thing that elicited so much concern
00:14:52.744 --> 00:14:57.604
in the sci-fi community, the prompt was, using the list of names provided,
00:14:57.944 --> 00:15:00.584
please evaluate each person for scandals.
00:15:00.984 --> 00:15:05.784
Scandals include, but are not limited to, homophobia, transphobia,
00:15:06.004 --> 00:15:10.464
racism, harassment, sexual misconduct, sexism, fraud.
00:15:10.804 --> 00:15:15.204
Each person is typically an author, editor, performer, artist,
00:15:15.324 --> 00:15:21.084
or similar in the fields of science fiction, fantasy, and or related fandoms.
00:15:21.084 --> 00:15:24.604
A word I absolutely hate. Makes my skin crawl. Sorry, everybody.
00:15:24.884 --> 00:15:30.724
The objective is to determine if an individual is unsuitable as a panelist for an event.
00:15:31.064 --> 00:15:35.104
Please evaluate each person based on their digital footprint,
00:15:35.364 --> 00:15:38.884
including social articles and blogs referencing them.
00:15:39.084 --> 00:15:43.004
Also include file 770.com as a source.
00:15:43.324 --> 00:15:46.484
I have no idea what that is, and I should have gone look at it, and I didn't.
00:15:46.944 --> 00:15:53.964
Provide sources for any relevant data. That is far more reasoned a query than
00:15:53.964 --> 00:15:56.144
anything I tap into ChatGPT.
00:15:56.784 --> 00:16:02.704
And so they didn't say, tell us who to put.
00:16:02.824 --> 00:16:06.704
I mean, on one hand, you could argue, yeah, you're saying, tell us who to put on the panel.
00:16:06.924 --> 00:16:14.424
But I think if you'd given this to a team of experts, mistakes could have still happened, right?
00:16:14.624 --> 00:16:19.304
So everyone was up in arms because, well, ChatGPT makes stuff up.
00:16:19.764 --> 00:16:26.804
And so what if it makes stuff up about somebody who didn't do those things, right?
00:16:27.124 --> 00:16:32.724
Let's throw a sexism charge against this female author because she wrote a book
00:16:32.724 --> 00:16:36.944
about, I don't know, sexism charges in the future.
00:16:38.264 --> 00:16:42.484
Or a sci-fi book about sexism charges. You know, and then that person arguably
00:16:42.484 --> 00:16:47.624
could be disqualified based on chat GPT's, what do they call it, hallucinations?
00:16:48.124 --> 00:16:50.864
When chat GPT just makes stuff up, or AI?
00:16:51.444 --> 00:16:55.124
Chat GPT has become the Kleenex word for AI.
00:16:55.744 --> 00:17:01.204
And so I do get that, right? But yeah, you know, just double check that bullshit.
00:17:01.364 --> 00:17:07.004
However, a human could also have made a mistake. You could miss an important
00:17:07.004 --> 00:17:12.864
website or an important post, right, where somebody did say something terribly racist.
00:17:13.404 --> 00:17:18.504
It just feels like a lot of nonsense for no reason to me.
00:17:18.984 --> 00:17:24.784
But what do you think about it? I mean, does that feel like a reasoned query?
00:17:25.284 --> 00:17:30.204
Like, how upset should people really have been? I mean, I understand the objections
00:17:30.204 --> 00:17:34.404
that they have towards using chat-GPT because it was used,
00:17:34.584 --> 00:17:40.024
it was trained on texts that were written by some of the authors in these fandoms,
00:17:40.044 --> 00:17:41.724
so to speak, without their permission.
00:17:42.024 --> 00:17:44.664
And that is probably an issue for those people.
00:17:45.644 --> 00:17:49.844
Now, I don't know if they were trained on copyrighted works or if it was works
00:17:49.844 --> 00:17:54.024
that have been sort of out of the public or in the public domain now.
00:17:54.024 --> 00:17:57.904
I don't really know the details of all that, so I'm not the person to ask about that.
00:17:58.364 --> 00:18:02.004
But I understand where these people are coming from, and I think they have a good point.
00:18:02.544 --> 00:18:08.404
I think that this is an area that is very new, and there's going to be a lot
00:18:08.404 --> 00:18:13.284
of conversations like this before everyone just bows down to their AI overlords.
00:18:15.375 --> 00:18:18.615
Sorry, I was busy bowing down to my AI overlord.
00:18:22.095 --> 00:18:29.015
Yeah, I wish I was more concerned by this or alarmed by this.
00:18:29.195 --> 00:18:35.115
You raised a really good point about the use of a, what do they call them?
00:18:35.235 --> 00:18:37.655
Limited language model or multi-language model?
00:18:38.055 --> 00:18:41.235
Yeah, it's a limited language model. Yeah. Or something language model.
00:18:41.235 --> 00:18:50.415
Using AI, a tool that was developed, stealing from trademarked and copyrighted
00:18:50.415 --> 00:18:52.855
materials, like there's no secret there. Yeah.
00:18:53.115 --> 00:18:58.035
Right. But it's also, it's happened. That's over. It's done.
00:18:58.395 --> 00:19:03.475
And we're not going to be throwing chat GPT away because that happened.
00:19:03.855 --> 00:19:07.055
Right. Let the lawsuits work their way through courts.
00:19:08.115 --> 00:19:10.035
Yeah, I got nothing on that point.
00:19:11.375 --> 00:19:16.235
But it's just like, I wish I cared. I wish I cared about this thing everybody
00:19:16.235 --> 00:19:19.595
cares about, but I don't. I just, it's like, what?
00:19:20.195 --> 00:19:23.175
But okay. So, yeah. So, again, I
00:19:23.175 --> 00:19:26.175
gave that apology. Maybe this will be the episode that gets us publicity.
00:19:26.815 --> 00:19:31.115
This will be the episode. I will tell you that. That makes us infamous.
00:19:32.075 --> 00:19:36.195
On Facebook, our shows used to be automatically uploaded, right?
00:19:37.375 --> 00:19:43.175
And great. And we have like 325 followers on Facebook. Cool.
00:19:43.695 --> 00:19:46.795
And then Facebook quit auto-posting podcast.
00:19:47.875 --> 00:19:51.415
I love you, Facebook. Yeah, and neither do I, right?
00:19:51.595 --> 00:19:55.195
And I kind of even just forgot about it. And then I remembered not too long
00:19:55.195 --> 00:19:59.955
ago, and I was like, oh, I guess I could just manually post uploads.
00:20:00.455 --> 00:20:05.775
Why don't I go ahead and do that? And so I did with our Patti LuPone episode.
00:20:05.775 --> 00:20:09.015
I was like, hey, everybody, we're back and I'm going to be better about social media.
00:20:09.215 --> 00:20:11.455
And that was like three weeks ago. And that's one post I've done.
00:20:11.875 --> 00:20:16.955
But then we did the Gaza episode and I was like, I don't want to upload that
00:20:16.955 --> 00:20:22.195
to Facebook because there's someone somewhere is going to have something to
00:20:22.195 --> 00:20:24.395
say because it's Facebook. Right.
00:20:24.795 --> 00:20:29.095
And yeah, and I don't want to and I could turn comments off,
00:20:29.335 --> 00:20:32.255
but then that feels like a chicken ship move. Right.
00:20:32.855 --> 00:20:39.275
And so I didn't. And now I'm like, what was the point of mentioning all of this
00:20:39.275 --> 00:20:43.715
other than someone's always going to have something to say?
00:20:44.235 --> 00:20:48.575
That's it. Exactly. Being infamous. And I just wasn't. I don't want us to be
00:20:48.575 --> 00:20:51.135
infamous for Israeli and Palestine.
00:20:51.815 --> 00:20:53.795
Right. Or Israel and Palestine. Yeah.
00:20:54.915 --> 00:21:01.115
And we had four downloads in Israel and each one of them pains me because I'm
00:21:01.115 --> 00:21:03.455
like, oh, my God, I opened my fucking mouth and I said shit.
00:21:03.455 --> 00:21:10.355
And they're going to be like, what a very simplistic view of Israeli history.
00:21:10.535 --> 00:21:12.535
Sorry, it's what I got.
00:21:13.625 --> 00:21:18.605
So, yes, what would our total be or our average be on this apology?
00:21:18.905 --> 00:21:23.245
Seven to nine, 16, eight. So way better than average.
00:21:23.965 --> 00:21:27.545
Yeah. Yeah. Out of 10, 80%. Not bad.
00:21:27.745 --> 00:21:31.165
The apology checks all boxes but one. It's sincere, it's specific,
00:21:31.165 --> 00:21:34.405
and it proposes solutions. So I think that it's reasonable.
00:21:34.685 --> 00:21:38.485
I do kind of agree with you that they took very seriously something that maybe
00:21:38.485 --> 00:21:40.625
didn't need to be taken quite so seriously.
00:21:41.005 --> 00:21:46.925
Right. But at the same time, I do understand the concerns of this particular group of people.
00:21:47.065 --> 00:21:49.265
I understand the concerns. I just think they're stupid.
00:21:53.625 --> 00:22:00.625
Come at me. Come at me. All right. So how about—oh, go ahead. Yeah, right.
00:22:00.825 --> 00:22:05.665
So what's funny to me is there are a couple of other concerns,
00:22:05.925 --> 00:22:10.445
previous scandals, that I think are bigger issues.
00:22:11.145 --> 00:22:12.725
And I never heard of them. This
00:22:12.725 --> 00:22:16.505
one I heard about, but I heard about it because it involved AI, right?
00:22:16.645 --> 00:22:19.345
It's AI that's the big central issue in this.
00:22:19.505 --> 00:22:24.025
That's the sexy, slippery beast that is going to, I don't know what I'm going
00:22:24.025 --> 00:22:25.245
to do with that metaphor there.
00:22:28.985 --> 00:22:34.345
It'll flop out of the boat. And I'll be wearing crossless knitted panties.
00:22:35.225 --> 00:22:36.625
It'll flop out of the boat.
00:22:37.945 --> 00:22:41.185
The people have no idea why we're talking about cross-less knitted panties.
00:22:41.725 --> 00:22:46.725
No, ignore them. That's all right. Or do you want to know? But visit an Etsy store soon.
00:22:47.325 --> 00:22:50.885
Okay, so here's an apology that happened in 2020.
00:22:51.325 --> 00:22:54.325
Well, it's not an apology, but here's an event that happened in 2023.
00:22:54.345 --> 00:22:58.385
It was apologized for, but we're not here to evaluate that apology.
00:22:58.605 --> 00:23:03.425
So what happened at the 2023 Hugo Awards, right?
00:23:03.425 --> 00:23:07.605
In October of 2023, Hugo Awards were handed out,
00:23:07.625 --> 00:23:13.365
but there were rumblings beginning in September when nomination data revealed
00:23:13.365 --> 00:23:19.805
that certain authors and books had been deemed not eligible despite having the
00:23:19.805 --> 00:23:22.545
necessary votes to make the list the finalist.
00:23:22.625 --> 00:23:27.425
So they qualified, but somehow they were just deemed not eligible for the finalists.
00:23:28.227 --> 00:23:31.827
The most glaring slate was R.F.
00:23:32.307 --> 00:23:37.527
Kwong's book, Babel, or The Necessity of Violence, an Arcane History of the
00:23:37.527 --> 00:23:39.287
Oxford Translators Revolution.
00:23:39.787 --> 00:23:44.047
Believe it or not, that's a best-selling, highly acclaimed work that won the
00:23:44.047 --> 00:23:46.667
Nebula Award in 2022 for Best Novel.
00:23:46.807 --> 00:23:51.487
So that's attention-getting, that you won a Nebula?
00:23:51.727 --> 00:23:58.227
Wow, that's amazing. And they also won the 2023 Locus Award for Best Fantasy Novel.
00:23:59.187 --> 00:24:08.207
And so what happened? Well, guess what country hosted the 2023 Hugo Awards and Worldcon?
00:24:08.787 --> 00:24:13.387
China. Israel? China did. China. Oh, my God, no. You're trying to get me in trouble.
00:24:15.707 --> 00:24:22.027
So people believe that the 2023 Hugo Awards were censored by the Chinese government
00:24:22.027 --> 00:24:26.287
and that American and Canadian panelists simply,
00:24:26.767 --> 00:24:31.367
forgive this pun, took their marching orders from China, right?
00:24:32.627 --> 00:24:40.387
In a statement released, Esther McCollum Stewart, the chair of the 2024 Worldcon,
00:24:41.027 --> 00:24:43.827
said, offered an apology, sorry,
00:24:44.287 --> 00:24:50.187
for the, open quote, for the damage caused to nominees, finalists, the community,
00:24:50.507 --> 00:24:56.207
and the Hugo Lodestar and Astounding Awards, close quote, and then outlined
00:24:56.207 --> 00:24:59.547
steps to say, hey, we're going to be more transparent about this whole process.
00:25:00.187 --> 00:25:06.807
Never heard a word about that. And then, let's see. So that was the 2023 awards.
00:25:07.247 --> 00:25:10.127
The 2024 awards. Oh, I don't understand. Uh-huh.
00:25:10.487 --> 00:25:14.867
Let me ask you for detail that you might not have. Please. They said that that
00:25:14.867 --> 00:25:21.507
book by the presumably Chinese person was maybe disqualified because why?
00:25:22.807 --> 00:25:29.707
Thank you. Yes. So when they disqualified these works, they didn't offer an explanation.
00:25:30.387 --> 00:25:34.747
It later came out, let's see, I'll just read this paragraph.
00:25:35.347 --> 00:25:41.567
The 2023 Hugo Awards were censored because certain authors and works were deemed
00:25:41.567 --> 00:25:46.607
to have too many political liabilities, at least from the viewpoint of the Chinese government.
00:25:46.607 --> 00:25:51.547
While it's unclear if this was official censorship from the Chinese government
00:25:51.547 --> 00:25:55.867
or self-censorship by those afraid of offending governmental or business interest,
00:25:56.187 --> 00:25:59.627
we can now be certain that censorship indeed took place.
00:25:59.947 --> 00:26:07.707
However, what also disturbs this writer is that the administrators of the Hugo
00:26:07.707 --> 00:26:09.807
Awards from the United States and Canada,
00:26:09.987 --> 00:26:13.947
countries that supposedly support and value free speech, appear to have been
00:26:13.947 --> 00:26:16.167
active participants in this censorship.
00:26:16.607 --> 00:26:19.047
So that's why.
00:26:20.369 --> 00:26:24.789
Now, how did they get to all that? It was through the release of emails,
00:26:25.269 --> 00:26:28.089
basically, and staff emailing each other back and forth.
00:26:29.469 --> 00:26:35.989
In 2024, so last year's Hugo Awards, fraud took place at the ballot box.
00:26:36.569 --> 00:26:44.549
Somebody paid $21,000 total for ballot stuffing.
00:26:45.529 --> 00:26:53.929
So some anonymous source paid a bunch of people to join Worldcon at a level
00:26:53.929 --> 00:26:58.349
where they would get voting rights and then to vote for a specific author.
00:26:58.529 --> 00:27:00.869
That author, that work was never named.
00:27:01.569 --> 00:27:08.189
And of the 3,800 ballots that were cast, nearly 400 were found to be fraudulent.
00:27:08.189 --> 00:27:16.609
And the fraud stuff was like, the first name is exactly the same on 100 of these ballots.
00:27:16.769 --> 00:27:21.629
And the last name's exactly the same. But what changes is the middle name,
00:27:21.769 --> 00:27:23.249
and it changes alphabetically.
00:27:23.809 --> 00:27:31.889
So, you know, John Albert Smith, John Beauregard Smith, right?
00:27:31.889 --> 00:27:40.529
In 2015-2016, we have Sad Puppies and Rabid Puppies Gate, Puppy Gate.
00:27:40.889 --> 00:27:45.729
And essentially what that was was conservative right-wing groups orchestrated
00:27:45.729 --> 00:27:50.489
voting slates, pushing predominantly white male authors.
00:27:51.169 --> 00:27:58.189
The community of voters pushed back by offering no award across categories and
00:27:58.189 --> 00:28:01.469
prompted rule changes to limit slate power.
00:28:01.469 --> 00:28:07.689
So basically what happened was a group of right-wingers felt there was too much
00:28:07.689 --> 00:28:11.389
diversity in sci-fi and too much DEI happening.
00:28:11.609 --> 00:28:17.929
And so they pushed a lot of white, straight, cisgendered.
00:28:18.703 --> 00:28:22.003
Men through as nominees.
00:28:22.403 --> 00:28:27.163
In 87 and 83, 1987 and 1983,
00:28:27.483 --> 00:28:31.343
oh my God, that feels like a trillion years ago now, we have the Scientology
00:28:31.343 --> 00:28:36.463
block where members of the Church of Scientology campaigned for Battlefield
00:28:36.463 --> 00:28:42.043
Earth in 1983 and Black Genesis in 1987 to be on the ballot.
00:28:42.383 --> 00:28:49.403
One of them made it but lost due to a no award being offered in a category, right?
00:28:49.903 --> 00:28:56.423
And then probably the biggest is the Hugo Awards takes its name from Hugo Gernsbach.
00:28:57.103 --> 00:29:01.803
And there's controversy, and I've never heard of him. Could I have looked him
00:29:01.803 --> 00:29:03.343
up? Sure, but I did, I'd know.
00:29:03.903 --> 00:29:08.903
So Hugo Gernsbach, apparently such a great writer that they named the Hugo Award
00:29:08.903 --> 00:29:15.663
after him, controversy surrounds this founding figure criticized by giants like H.P.
00:29:15.763 --> 00:29:20.943
Lovecraft for underpaying or stiffing writers, earning him the nickname Hugo the Rat.
00:29:21.383 --> 00:29:27.843
What you got to say, I just love. So yeah, it seems like our little Hugo Awards,
00:29:27.843 --> 00:29:33.463
I will pick a book up and look at it if it's won a Hugo Award, right?
00:29:33.863 --> 00:29:39.863
And I will nearly, whenever I see like Nebula nominee, right?
00:29:40.423 --> 00:29:45.103
And or one, I will typically buy that book. Like, all right,
00:29:45.223 --> 00:29:47.263
will I read it? No, I'll buy it.
00:29:49.183 --> 00:29:53.543
I'm going to try. A for effort is all I can say. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
00:29:54.203 --> 00:29:59.363
And so that's the history of, it's not really the history, but that's a smattering
00:29:59.363 --> 00:30:04.443
of the history of the Hugo Awards, more in-depth and more involved in my history
00:30:04.443 --> 00:30:05.803
of Israel. Sorry, everyone.
00:30:07.803 --> 00:30:11.543
The Hugo Awards has been fraud with drama.
00:30:12.043 --> 00:30:16.483
And who knew? There's a lot of drama in sci-fi, I think.
00:30:17.119 --> 00:30:20.919
There's a lot of nerd drama. It's a lot of cosplay anger and,
00:30:21.099 --> 00:30:27.939
you know, okay, I get it, everyone, but fine. We don't have to stone anybody
00:30:27.939 --> 00:30:29.679
to death because they used AI.
00:30:30.279 --> 00:30:32.179
It's fine. We'll all live.
00:30:33.839 --> 00:30:37.979
All right. So how about Apology Expected or Who's Sorry Now?
00:30:38.619 --> 00:30:45.659
I wish I had a really good one. Unfortunately, all the ones I have are, like, so big and heavy.
00:30:46.059 --> 00:30:52.479
Yeah? Yeah. Like, you know, I wish I could find something that's late, right?
00:30:52.759 --> 00:30:57.759
This week, two Democratic senators were shot. One was killed, right?
00:30:58.119 --> 00:31:05.079
So will the gunman apologize for that? There was the stupid fucking parade through D.C.
00:31:05.479 --> 00:31:12.379
And so will somebody at some future point apologize for that expenditure and waste of money?
00:31:12.799 --> 00:31:19.379
I don't know. There were a ton of really rad, no Kings Day events happening
00:31:19.379 --> 00:31:22.579
across the United States. I'm still waiting for a count.
00:31:22.779 --> 00:31:26.859
Here's the apology. Apology expected from somebody for not telling me exactly
00:31:26.859 --> 00:31:32.499
how many millions of people took to the street yesterday to protest the Trump regime.
00:31:32.719 --> 00:31:37.859
That's an apology that I am expecting and probably won't get personally.
00:31:38.887 --> 00:31:43.587
But I'd like to know. Fair enough. Yeah. And like I said, it's just heavy, heavy, heavy. Ooh.
00:31:44.607 --> 00:31:49.247
Yeah. Well, mine is not particularly heavy, but it's not exactly light either.
00:31:49.507 --> 00:31:53.707
A pharmacy in Comox, British Columbia, mistakenly gave a nine-year-old boy a
00:31:53.707 --> 00:31:57.247
powerful opioid instead of his usual ADHD medication.
00:31:57.687 --> 00:32:01.907
His mother emphasized how easily the outcome could have been tragic if the family hadn't noticed.
00:32:02.527 --> 00:32:06.807
The opioid, hydromorphone, has a potency approximately two to eight times greater
00:32:06.807 --> 00:32:09.187
than that of morphine and a rapid onset of action.
00:32:09.747 --> 00:32:11.567
So a kid would probably be dead.
00:32:12.487 --> 00:32:15.987
My thinking, if the family hadn't picked up that the pills were very different
00:32:15.987 --> 00:32:17.767
and not what they were expecting.
00:32:18.067 --> 00:32:22.807
So thank goodness for that. But I don't know if the pharmacy has apologized, but they should.
00:32:23.427 --> 00:32:27.607
Yes, they should. And it is giving shades of It's a Wonderful Life.
00:32:28.707 --> 00:32:31.047
Beginning, have you ever seen that movie? It's a Wonderful Life.
00:32:31.747 --> 00:32:34.687
Yeah, but I don't remember any of it. Oh, my God. Okay. You have to watch it
00:32:34.687 --> 00:32:36.467
right now. It is so great.
00:32:37.367 --> 00:32:41.847
Watch it every year. And the pharmacist, his son had died in the war,
00:32:41.887 --> 00:32:43.447
and he just got the telegram.
00:32:43.867 --> 00:32:48.207
And so he did what any reasonable pharmacist would do while working,
00:32:48.247 --> 00:32:50.307
and that was get really drunk.
00:32:50.707 --> 00:32:57.347
And then he mixed up the medications and put poison in a medication,
00:32:57.347 --> 00:32:59.427
and then he gives the medication to,
00:32:59.687 --> 00:33:03.987
I don't know, little Jimmy Stewart, the kid playing Jimmy Stewart as a younger
00:33:03.987 --> 00:33:06.447
guy, as a kid. It's a nine-year-old, right?
00:33:06.627 --> 00:33:12.167
A nine-year-old who's working in the pharmacy behind the counter as a soda jerk, right?
00:33:12.887 --> 00:33:17.007
Wow. Is he nine? He might be 12. But whatever, I'll tell you what,
00:33:17.427 --> 00:33:19.987
too young for a job. Yeah.
00:33:20.972 --> 00:33:25.652
And so the kid goes to deliver the medication, but he saw the drunk,
00:33:25.872 --> 00:33:29.392
sad pharmacist put the poison and knew that it was poison because the bottle
00:33:29.392 --> 00:33:33.292
was clearly marked poison with a skull and crossbone on it. Yeah.
00:33:33.872 --> 00:33:38.632
And so the kid didn't know what to do and didn't want to deliver the poison medication.
00:33:39.692 --> 00:33:48.252
So he just kind of walked around town thinking and then saw a sign that said, ask dad, he'll know.
00:33:48.532 --> 00:33:52.612
Right. Which was an ad on a billboard. And so he goes to ask his dad,
00:33:52.732 --> 00:33:54.032
but his dad is busy and so whatever.
00:33:54.212 --> 00:33:57.192
So he doesn't really get any directive from his father.
00:33:57.492 --> 00:34:04.112
And in all of this time that's happening, right, it's like nearly an hour in their time has gone by.
00:34:04.292 --> 00:34:06.892
This all happens within, you know, 30 seconds on screen.
00:34:07.352 --> 00:34:12.452
The kid goes back to the pharmacy and the druggist is on the phone.
00:34:12.852 --> 00:34:17.412
He is slurring. He is so drunk. And he's like, what?
00:34:17.772 --> 00:34:20.652
Well, that medication should have been there an hour. go.
00:34:20.992 --> 00:34:27.472
I'll get right on it. And then the kid walks into the druggist's office and
00:34:27.472 --> 00:34:36.612
the druggist takes his hand back and he slaps the kid right across the face like a massive,
00:34:37.012 --> 00:34:41.232
a 1940s slap to the ears, what that kid got.
00:34:41.452 --> 00:34:45.472
And his ear starts bleeding. This is a Christmas movie.
00:34:46.368 --> 00:34:46.648
Okay.
00:34:49.108 --> 00:34:54.728
His ear starts bleeding and the kid grabs his ear and drops the medication onto
00:34:54.728 --> 00:34:58.528
the floor and he starts crying and he's like, Mr.
00:34:58.628 --> 00:35:02.248
Gower, you don't know what you did. You're just sad and you're confused.
00:35:02.608 --> 00:35:06.808
It wasn't your fault. You put something bad in those pills. Just take them.
00:35:07.088 --> 00:35:09.928
Just taste them. You'll know. You'll know in a moment.
00:35:10.408 --> 00:35:16.188
Very 1940s. The druggist is shocked, drops to the floor, picks up the bag,
00:35:16.388 --> 00:35:18.028
opens one of the pills, tastes it.
00:35:18.128 --> 00:35:22.488
His face contorts into an agony of drunken shame.
00:35:22.808 --> 00:35:28.608
And he goes to hug the kid and the kid screams, no, don't hit me again. Don't hit me again.
00:35:28.828 --> 00:35:34.048
This was perfectly acceptable in 1940, right? To smack a child, cause bleeding.
00:35:34.308 --> 00:35:42.008
And then one of the points of the movie is that the guy grows up and he's deaf
00:35:42.008 --> 00:35:47.228
in that ear because the druggist smacked his ear drum eardrum,
00:35:47.488 --> 00:35:48.928
popped it, I guess. Yeah.
00:35:49.348 --> 00:35:54.948
Right? Yeah. And so his trick ear becomes sort of a thing throughout the movie.
00:35:55.788 --> 00:36:00.548
And yeah. And it's like, God, we missed the 40s. Bring him back. Oh, they're trying.
00:36:01.568 --> 00:36:07.888
It's great. Yeah, they are trying. Yeah. God. And so there you go.
00:36:08.428 --> 00:36:13.468
That's why your story reminded me. A wonderful life has been brought to you by...
00:36:15.848 --> 00:36:21.228
Not an ad. Vermont's Pharmacy, British Columbia. Drunk pharmacists everywhere
00:36:21.228 --> 00:36:26.488
apologized for putting opiates into children's medication.
00:36:26.948 --> 00:36:32.568
I mean, yeah, they'll be apologizing. Although they probably can't because the lawsuit's coming.
00:36:34.048 --> 00:36:37.928
I was just going to say the medication that the kid usually takes is dextroamphetamine,
00:36:37.928 --> 00:36:41.728
which is just like, oh, man, that's not exactly safe either. But it is for ADHD.
00:36:42.168 --> 00:36:48.448
So it's just a bunch of potentially dangerous medications in this story.
00:36:48.728 --> 00:36:52.908
But anyway, that's it. I think that's it for the week. Do you have anything
00:36:52.908 --> 00:36:54.708
else you'd like to say before we part?
00:36:55.348 --> 00:36:57.928
Always, constantly. Let me tell you about the third grade.
00:36:58.788 --> 00:37:00.328
No, I got nothing. Okay.
00:37:01.708 --> 00:37:03.868
You're so game. You're such a good friend.
00:37:06.988 --> 00:37:09.768
Stay cool cucumbers and don't trip potato chip.
00:37:14.320 --> 00:37:21.360
Music.
00:37:19.108 --> 00:37:24.668
Thank you for listening to apologies accepted the podcast you can find links
00:37:24.668 --> 00:37:29.188
to articles and the sources in the show notes to submit an apology or find out
00:37:29.188 --> 00:37:33.068
more visit us at ApologiesAccepted.net, where you can also find our merchandise.
00:37:33.408 --> 00:37:37.808
We're on Twitter at ApologiesAccepted. And on Instagram at Apologies.Accepted.
00:37:37.888 --> 00:37:42.448
You can support our important work at Patreon forward slash ApologiesAccepted.
00:37:42.548 --> 00:37:43.768
And fuck Facebook. Bye.
00:37:44.560 --> 00:38:02.774
Music.