O TYM ODCINKU
This episode looks at common misinformation campaigns used to oppose pro-wildlife efforts, including messaging that discourages public involvement and leans heavily on “trust the experts.” Sam and Mark break down how these narratives are constructed and why they are effective. They also examine the role of science versus values in wildlife decisions and what that means for public participation.
Dr. Becky Niemiec's analysis of Prop 127
Język angielski
Stany Zjednoczone
TRANSKRYPCJA 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
WYSZUKAJ MINIONE ODCINKI
Wyszukaj minione odcinki Wildlife Wire.
INNE ODCINKI W TYM PODCASCIE
This episode breaks down how wildlife legislation actually moves through the political process. Bills begin with a core concept, but are quickly reshaped by stakeholder input, requiring tradeoffs between policy goals and what is operationally and politically feasible.
Wildlife policy outcomes dep…
Joel Sartore — the Photo Ark in your backyard
Mark and Sam sit down with National Geographic photographer, explorer, author, and conservationist Joel Sartore, founder of the National Geographic Photo Ark.
For more than two decades, Joel has traveled the world photographing more than 17,000 speci…
Join Sam and Mark as they wrap up their first full year hosting the Wildlife Wire! Thank you to all who have listened throughout the year. We look forward to sharing our thoughts and guests with you.
On this episode we have:
Rogan blasts liberal policies for enabling mountain lions to eat pets…
Mark and Sam get real on how wildlife "management" decisions are made, discuss science-based management and what it means for Colorado residents and wildlife.
Zastrzeżenie: Podcast i grafika osadzone na tej stronie pochodzą z The Wildlife Wire, który jest własnością jego właściciela i nie jest powiązany ani wspierany przez Listen Notes, Inc.
EDYTUJ
Dziękujemy za pomoc w aktualizowaniu podcastowej bazy danych.
