O TYM ODCINKU
If you’re making inclusion decisions without a system for testing whether your assumptions are true, I break down the 3 frameworks I use with clients every week.
In this episode we cover:
- How 4 evidence sources ground every client decision
- Why assertions without evidence deserve dismissal
- How to separate claims from testable hypotheses
If you’re finding that your inclusion decisions are built on claims nobody has tested, start here:
https://realitycheck.elementofinclusion.com/
The post 3 Smart Frameworks I Love Using With Clients appeared first on Element of Inclusion.
Język angielski
Stany Zjednoczone
TRANSKRYPCJA 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
WYSZUKAJ MINIONE ODCINKI
Wyszukaj minione odcinki The Element of Inclusion.
INNE ODCINKI W TYM PODCASCIE
If 450 episodes have taught me one thing, it’s that every inclusion failure traces to missing evidence. Here I unpack the idea that survived them all.
In this episode we cover:
How every inclusion failure traces to one gap
How 4 evidence sources create a com…
If your AI dashboard looks healthy but your decisions haven’t improved, here I unpack 3 AI mistakes hurting your inclusion work right now.
In this episode we cover:
Why AI is an inclusion problem now
How more dashboards hide worse decisions
Why AI adoption doesn’t mean AI capabili…
If your team runs cultural events all year with no measurable outcome, your calendar is producing visibility, not progress. Here I break down why.
In this episode we cover:
Why attendance and engagement are false proxies
How Flags, Food and Fun replace progress
Why busy is the worst thing to …
If you started your inclusion work without gathering evidence for the problem, you can’t prove what changed. Here I unpack why.
In this episode we cover:
Why most inclusion work starts without evidence
How little evidence you actually need
Why no evidence in means no evidence out
If y…
If you call your work evidence-based but can’t define evidence in one sentence, that’s a structural gap. Here I break down what the term requires.
In this episode we cover:
How data collection differs from evidence generation
Why classifying claims builds personal diagnostic skill
…
Zastrzeżenie: Podcast i grafika osadzone na tej stronie pochodzą z Dr Jonathan Ashong-Lamptey Diversity & Inclusion I Broadcaster I Speaker I Protagonist, który jest własnością jego właściciela i nie jest powiązany ani wspierany przez Listen Notes, Inc.
EDYTUJ
Dziękujemy za pomoc w aktualizowaniu podcastowej bazy danych.
