O TYM ODCINKU
Immigration adjudications regularly use information from the criminal legal system to justify a discretionary denial of relief or benefits, even when charges have been dismissed. This practice faces little scrutiny due to the assumption that adjudicators are merely importing facts already found by the criminal system. But what if this practice actually constitutes “hidden factfinding”? Sarah Vendzules, a Senior Staff Attorney at the Office of the Appellate Defender in New York City, uncovers this hidden factfinding and offers a framework that could rein it in.
Author: Sarah Vendzules, Senior Staff Attorney, Office of the Appellate Defender
Host: Peter Mason (Volume 113 Podcast Editor)
Script: Peter Mason (Volume 113 Podcast Editor)
Technology Editors: Sandeep Stanley (Volume 113 Senior Technology Editor), Emily C. Welsch (Volume 113 Technology Editor)
Soundtrack: Composed and performed by Carter Jansen (Volume 110 Technology Editor)
Author: Sarah Vendzules, Senior Staff Attorney, Office of the Appellate Defender
Host: Peter Mason (Volume 113 Podcast Editor)
Script: Peter Mason (Volume 113 Podcast Editor)
Technology Editors: Sandeep Stanley (Volume 113 Senior Technology Editor), Emily C. Welsch (Volume 113 Technology Editor)
Soundtrack: Composed and performed by Carter Jansen (Volume 110 Technology Editor)
Język angielski
Stany Zjednoczone
TRANSKRYPCJA 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
WYSZUKAJ MINIONE ODCINKI
Wyszukaj minione odcinki Source Collect: California Law Review's Podcast.
INNE ODCINKI W TYM PODCASCIE
People usually think that all tax agencies do is ensure tax laws are followed. But for decades, the IRS has regularly facilitated immigration raids. These raids target employees even as the IRS investigates their employers’ potential tax violations. What can this state of affairs teach us about age…
The U.S. carceral system disproportionately harms racial minorities and people living in poverty. Penal abolitionist frameworks have helpfully reframed the conversation to foreground those harmful social consequences. But how do those consequences affect our understanding of work, and particularly …
Violence in the Administrative State by California Law Review
Traffic courts resolve over half of the cases in the U.S. legal system. These cases are easy for some defendants to handle by paying a fine, but they can have devastating effects for those with fewer means. And despite the key role these courts play in funding state judicial branches and other stat…
Zastrzeżenie: Podcast i grafika osadzone na tej stronie pochodzą z California Law Review, który jest własnością jego właściciela i nie jest powiązany ani wspierany przez Listen Notes, Inc.
EDYTUJ
Dziękujemy za pomoc w aktualizowaniu podcastowej bazy danych.
