1
00:00:00,250 -->
00:00:04,269
Hallo en welkom iedereen bij de Bright
Signal Podcast.
2
00:00:04,269 -->
00:00:07,410
Ik hier met mijn vriend en co-host
Charlotte.
3
00:00:07,410 -->
00:00:11,450
We hebben het plezier van het interviewen
Heidi van Dijk van Atena Studio.
4
00:00:11,950 -->
00:00:16,665
Atena Studio is the first AI native
operating system for concept to market
teams,
5
00:00:16,665 -->
00:00:18,778
specifically for the fashion industry.
6
00:00:19,278 -->
00:00:20,278
Let's go to the interview.
7
00:00:21,923 -->
00:00:25,423
We are here with Heidi, co founder of
Athena Studio Heidi,
8
00:00:25,423 -->
00:00:26,496
can you introduce yourself?
9
00:00:27,489 -->
00:00:29,171
~ of course Charlotte. first of all,
10
00:00:29,171 -->
00:00:31,754
thank you for having me. ~ hi Bart.
11
00:00:31,754 -->
00:00:35,143
Happy to be here. ~ yeah, so as a short
introduction,
12
00:00:35,143 -->
00:00:39,322
~ I'm Heidi, I'm co-founder and CEO of
Athena Studio,
13
00:00:39,322 -->
00:00:43,527
Belgium. And so my background is ~ in
tech.
14
00:00:43,527 -->
00:00:44,948
I actually started my career
15
00:00:44,948 -->
00:00:47,149
At different tech startups and scale-ups,
16
00:00:47,149 -->
00:00:51,120
including VP in Belgium ~ and Rocket
Internet in Southeast Asia.
17
00:00:51,120 -->
00:00:55,621
Then started my career at McKinsey and
Company as a consultant,
18
00:00:55,621 -->
00:00:57,451
but in their fashion practice.
19
00:00:57,451 -->
00:01:01,362
So I've done over six years working with
global fashion brands,
20
00:01:01,362 -->
00:01:04,983
advising them on digital and technology
topics.
21
00:01:04,983 -->
00:01:09,495
And that then actually led me to
discovering the challenges that I
22
00:01:09,495 -->
00:01:12,365
saw that fashion brands have in bringing
collections to market,
23
00:01:12,365 -->
00:01:14,026
which led me to found Latina Studio.
24
00:01:14,526 -->
00:01:15,526
Yeah,
25
00:01:14,686 -->
00:01:18,044
because with the Athena Studio you focus a
lot on the fashion industry,
26
00:01:18,044 -->
00:01:22,875
right? Like ~ c can you explain a bit what
what it is that the Athena Studio offers?
27
00:01:23,496 -->
00:01:29,329
Absolutely. So ATINA Studio is an AI
native operating layer for fashion concept
28
00:01:29,329 -->
00:01:31,270
to market. So what that means,
29
00:01:31,270 -->
00:01:35,842
very simply explained, the teams in
fashion brands that bring
30
00:01:35,842 -->
00:01:38,323
new collections to market are the
designers,
31
00:01:38,323 -->
00:01:41,514
the sourcing teams, the merchandising
teams,
32
00:01:41,514 -->
00:01:45,246
it's typically hundreds of different
people working on thousands
33
00:01:45,246 -->
00:01:48,768
of different new styles, but they all work
in different systems,
34
00:01:48,768 -->
00:01:50,769
files, and different processes.
35
00:01:50,769 -->
00:01:53,410
And so what Athena Studio does is
basically
36
00:01:53,443 -->
00:01:58,327
Bringing the information across different
that is currently fragmented together
37
00:01:58,487 -->
00:02:02,610
so that all teams work at any stage in
time from the same information.
38
00:02:02,610 -->
00:02:05,772
And the reason that that's really
important is on the one hand,
39
00:02:05,772 -->
00:02:10,556
~ you know, these teams are currently
spending over half their time moving data
from
40
00:02:10,556 -->
00:02:14,139
one system to the other, reconciling what
the latest status is,
41
00:02:14,139 -->
00:02:16,441
which is absolutely not what they signed
up for.
42
00:02:16,441 -->
00:02:20,964
But more importantly, ~ these brands are
bleeding millions of dollars every season
43
00:02:20,964 -->
00:02:22,685
~ because they make the wrong decisions.
44
00:02:23,185 -->
00:02:27,116
And maybe I'm gonna ask a few dumb
questions because this is a this is a
45
00:02:25,494 -->
00:02:26,494
Yeah, you can go.
46
00:02:27,116 -->
00:02:29,481
domain w in which I'm definitely not an
expert.
47
00:02:29,481 -->
00:02:31,723
but if I if I understand you correctly,
48
00:02:31,723 -->
00:02:36,829
like you're focusing on this let's say
fashion life cycle
49
00:02:36,930 -->
00:02:41,414
~ process where like like you go from I
don't know I don't look
50
00:02:41,716 -->
00:02:43,881
choosing the right garments, creating a
design,
51
00:02:43,881 -->
00:02:47,488
creating a physical sample, like ~
probably a very iterative process,
52
00:02:47,488 -->
00:02:50,745
a lot of different people involved at
every different stage.
53
00:02:51,403 -->
00:02:54,754
Yes. So if you think of and I'll go back
to fashion,
54
00:02:54,754 -->
00:02:58,146
but it's it's actually applicable to every
industry that brings physical products
55
00:02:58,146 -->
00:02:59,146
to market.
56
00:02:58,945 -->
00:02:59,945
Mm-hmm.
57
00:02:59,427 -->
00:03:03,779
You have the whole process of of starting
with indeed planning what do
58
00:03:03,779 -->
00:03:06,391
you want to bring to markets in the next
season.
59
00:03:06,391 -->
00:03:10,453
And when I say season, you have to think
about it traditionally this is summer,
60
00:03:10,453 -->
00:03:15,576
spring, winter, autumn. A big brand
typically has four different seasons per
year.
61
00:03:15,576 -->
00:03:18,018
Some like HM, Zahra, they will have more.
62
00:03:18,689 -->
00:03:21,040
Now there are multiple teams with each
their own role.
63
00:03:21,040 -->
00:03:26,162
Merchandising teams will plan what to
produce based on historic sales
64
00:03:26,182 -->
00:03:28,782
and trends and future trends data.
65
00:03:28,782 -->
00:03:32,344
Designers work on designing what that
would look like.
66
00:03:32,344 -->
00:03:37,065
Product and sourcing teams work with
suppliers to get it actually realized,
67
00:03:37,065 -->
00:03:39,506
have the physical samples, and based on
those,
68
00:03:39,506 -->
00:03:42,027
then decide which final items make it to
the collection.
69
00:03:42,527 -->
00:03:44,768
So all these themes, it sounds sequential,
70
00:03:44,768 -->
00:03:48,069
but the challenge of this all is that
there's a timeline attached to this,
71
00:03:48,069 -->
00:03:52,191
and therefore all this work overlaps with
one another in addition to
72
00:03:52,191 -->
00:03:54,392
all the seasons having overlapping phases.
73
00:03:54,392 -->
00:04:00,515
So it's a very complicated
cross-functional process that needs yeah,
74
00:04:00,515 -->
00:04:02,236
that needs a lot of coordination,
75
00:04:02,236 -->
00:04:06,197
which costs manual time and which
typically results in rework and delays.
76
00:04:06,697 -->
00:04:09,554
Yeah. And maybe because you mentioned
seasons,
77
00:04:09,554 -->
00:04:13,984
like a delay is probably also very costly
because they're then not in
78
00:04:13,984 -->
00:04:16,899
the shop for at the beginning of the
season and like ~
79
00:04:17,842 -->
00:04:21,524
~ the biggest cost drivers of that would
be on the one hand,
80
00:04:21,524 -->
00:04:24,565
if you're delayed, you will do everything
you can to speed up.
81
00:04:24,565 -->
00:04:28,787
So items would be shipped over air instead
of boat,
82
00:04:27,930 -->
00:04:29,424
Mm. Okay, interesting.
83
00:04:28,787 -->
00:04:29,787
which is
84
00:04:29,438 -->
00:04:32,179
a massive cost cost increase. Indeed,
85
00:04:32,179 -->
00:04:34,460
every time you you land something late in
the market,
86
00:04:34,460 -->
00:04:38,972
that impacts your your revenue forecast
that we're impacting also your your
margins.
87
00:04:38,972 -->
00:04:42,234
So that's a big cost. And I think in
addition to that,
88
00:04:42,234 -->
00:04:45,876
not just the delays, but the fact that you
if you cannot see everything together,
89
00:04:45,876 -->
00:04:46,876
you cannot opt.
90
00:04:46,897 -->
00:04:51,883
So you might have some teams that are
using all very similar fabrics that could
have
91
00:04:51,883 -->
00:04:53,925
been one, but because they didn't see it,
92
00:04:53,925 -->
00:04:57,169
they're using a hundred, and that way you
you're spending way too much.
93
00:04:57,549 -->
00:05:04,394
Hmm. Interesting. And like practically for
the user of Athena the Athena platform,
94
00:05:04,394 -->
00:05:05,895
like
95
00:05:04,804 -->
00:05:05,804
Yes.
96
00:05:05,895 -->
00:05:10,299
who who is the user and what do they w
what are they what information do they
97
00:05:10,299 -->
00:05:12,731
get to better coordinate the
98
00:05:12,677 -->
00:05:13,677
Yes.
99
00:05:12,731 -->
00:05:13,731
process?
100
00:05:13,848 -->
00:05:15,848
So if you the way that it works,
101
00:05:15,848 -->
00:05:18,590
so we sell to brands, not to one team,
102
00:05:18,590 -->
00:05:22,801
but typically to all of these teams at
once that are involved in that concept
103
00:05:22,801 -->
00:05:26,533
to market. So we will say we track the
next collection,
104
00:05:26,533 -->
00:05:30,134
spring twenty twenty-eight, because this
thing is over twelve months in advance.
105
00:05:30,134 -->
00:05:34,896
Spring twenty twenty-eight. and we then we
built in the software integrates with
106
00:05:34,896 -->
00:05:38,598
the tools they already use. So we
integrate with Microsoft SharePoint,
107
00:05:38,598 -->
00:05:39,598
Teams.
108
00:05:39,810 -->
00:05:44,441
Outlook, their PLM systems, which is
basically their system of records
109
00:05:44,441 -->
00:05:46,992
for product data. Their mirror boards,
110
00:05:46,992 -->
00:05:49,883
because that's typically where designers
collaborate on all
111
00:05:49,883 -->
00:05:52,534
the different designs and the colors that
they want.
112
00:05:52,534 -->
00:05:55,845
So basically, ATINA then pulls that data
together,
113
00:05:55,845 -->
00:05:58,455
and that's where we bring the value.
114
00:05:58,455 -->
00:06:03,517
We have specialized AI ~ workflows and
agents that can turn that data into
115
00:06:03,517 -->
00:06:04,517
a unified view.
116
00:06:05,197 -->
00:06:08,240
And from that unified view, our AI
assistant,
117
00:06:08,240 -->
00:06:10,102
Athena, who lives in Microsoft Teams,
118
00:06:10,102 -->
00:06:13,536
basically ~ automates work within
SharePoint,
119
00:06:13,536 -->
00:06:17,030
PLM, or Miro, sends alerts when things go
off track,
120
00:06:17,030 -->
00:06:18,251
yeah, and keeps teams on track.
121
00:06:18,751 -->
00:06:22,776
Okay, okay. So it's a bit like a like a
layer on top of all kind of decess
122
00:06:21,695 -->
00:06:22,695
Yes.
123
00:06:22,776 -->
00:06:26,740
decentralized systems. Like probably these
systems are like for a
124
00:06:26,740 -->
00:06:30,215
for a very specific part of the process
they are an expert,
125
00:06:30,215 -->
00:06:33,018
but you don't have this overarching view
and that's what you're trying
126
00:06:33,018 -->
00:06:34,630
to build with with Athena.
127
00:06:35,295 -->
00:06:36,501
Yes. And it's also
128
00:06:37,373 -->
00:06:43,246
We we opted to do this rather than
introducing a one-stop shop platform
because that
129
00:06:43,246 -->
00:06:45,867
was basically what has been done the last
decades.
130
00:06:45,867 -->
00:06:48,128
we've tried to do that with PLM,
131
00:06:48,128 -->
00:06:50,249
we've tried to do that with point
solutions.
132
00:06:50,249 -->
00:06:54,861
The problem is it always benefits one team
and then the other teams maybe
133
00:06:54,861 -->
00:06:57,612
a little bit. So everyone falls back to
their Excel sheets,
134
00:06:57,612 -->
00:06:59,613
fall back falls back to emails,
135
00:06:59,613 -->
00:07:01,394
and we just acknowledge that and said,
136
00:07:01,394 -->
00:07:03,995
Okay, let people work the way they work.
137
00:07:03,995 -->
00:07:07,277
We l we build over that. Like we or data
layer.
138
00:07:07,347 -->
00:07:11,321
lives on top of that, which means that we
are agnostic to what you use.
139
00:07:11,321 -->
00:07:14,575
We just make sure that the data speaks to
each other and that we
140
00:07:14,575 -->
00:07:16,026
can automate that data syncing.
141
00:07:16,526 -->
00:07:17,526
So
142
00:07:16,696 -->
00:07:20,210
the idea came then specifically from your
experience from at Mackenzie,
143
00:07:20,210 -->
00:07:25,005
that you saw this was an actual problem
that you had to solve over and over again?
144
00:07:25,005 -->
00:07:26,687
Or when was the moment you thought,
145
00:07:26,687 -->
00:07:29,020
let's let's create our own company,
146
00:07:29,020 -->
00:07:30,471
let's solve this issue?
147
00:07:31,330 -->
00:07:34,731
~ yeah, so I think when was the moment I
wanted to create my own company
148
00:07:34,731 -->
00:07:37,172
was when I was already before McKinsey.
149
00:07:37,172 -->
00:07:41,273
I I actually with my work at VP and Rocket
Internet,
150
00:07:41,273 -->
00:07:44,674
I loved that so much. I always said one
day I'll build my own company,
151
00:07:44,674 -->
00:07:47,075
a tech company. I didn't know what to do
yet.
152
00:07:47,075 -->
00:07:49,715
Within McKinsey, I rolled into fashion.
153
00:07:49,715 -->
00:07:53,636
I loved the industry for the challenges it
brings along.
154
00:07:53,636 -->
00:07:54,877
It is a complex
155
00:07:55,377 -->
00:07:56,838
Industry, it's not rocket science,
156
00:07:56,838 -->
00:07:58,760
you may say, but there's so many
different,
157
00:07:58,760 -->
00:08:00,302
you know, global supply chains,
158
00:08:00,302 -->
00:08:02,864
so many different teams. Everyone wears
clothes,
159
00:08:02,864 -->
00:08:03,864
you know.
160
00:08:04,321 -->
00:08:06,332
And I started working in that space.
161
00:08:06,332 -->
00:08:10,763
So I saw collection development was a very
critical process with that
162
00:08:10,763 -->
00:08:13,124
was still run on very old school
solutions.
163
00:08:13,124 -->
00:08:18,185
However, I just started at Tina Studio
first to bring with a different vision,
164
00:08:18,185 -->
00:08:21,526
to bring sustainability into the
collection development,
165
00:08:21,526 -->
00:08:24,627
the earlier design stages. That was the
initial goal.
166
00:08:24,627 -->
00:08:26,977
There was a lot of European regulations
coming up,
167
00:08:26,977 -->
00:08:28,608
everybody focused on reporting,
168
00:08:28,608 -->
00:08:31,989
nobody focused on tackling design from the
start.
169
00:08:32,489 -->
00:08:33,489
~
170
00:08:33,479 -->
00:08:37,521
We did that for a while. We did some
projects with with enterprise brands too,
171
00:08:37,521 -->
00:08:41,552
but we realized effectively this the data
that we needed to do this
172
00:08:41,552 -->
00:08:44,074
was spread out everywhere. And at that
point,
173
00:08:44,074 -->
00:08:47,946
there was not a clear solution other than
introducing yet another platform.
174
00:08:47,946 -->
00:08:52,248
But that then collided actually with this
the first wave of AI,
175
00:08:52,248 -->
00:08:55,809
I would say, that started hitting the
developers first.
176
00:08:55,809 -->
00:09:00,392
So we were coding, ~ we saw how we could
use AI to completely change the
177
00:09:00,392 -->
00:09:03,193
way that we were doing work, and that then
actually
178
00:09:03,373 -->
00:09:07,026
Brought together inspired us to start at
Tina Studio as a data layer,
179
00:09:07,026 -->
00:09:08,812
as an operating layer.
180
00:09:09,533 -->
00:09:12,404
So ~ and when did you officially start
Tennis Studio?
181
00:09:12,904 -->
00:09:17,394
yes, company was registered in twenty
three with the other products.
182
00:09:17,394 -->
00:09:19,449
We pivoted in twenty twenty five.
183
00:09:19,449 -->
00:09:20,449
yeah, so.
184
00:09:20,719 -->
00:09:23,460
was it har was it a difficult pivot to
make?
185
00:09:23,840 -->
00:09:28,344
yes and no. so I still deeply believe that
~ sustainability is
186
00:09:28,904 -->
00:09:31,967
an honorable mission and I do think brands
should work on it.
187
00:09:31,967 -->
00:09:37,863
I also saw that ~ one, there was no budget
for a strategic use for sustainability,
188
00:09:37,863 -->
00:09:41,956
in all honesty. Two, it wasn't possible
with the data that wasn't there.
189
00:09:41,956 -->
00:09:44,839
And so I really believe in the mission we
do now.
190
00:09:44,839 -->
00:09:48,502
So I don't think it was hard. Like I think
it took me a bit longer than
191
00:09:48,502 -->
00:09:49,502
it should have.
192
00:09:49,837 -->
00:09:51,849
Because you always you like what you do,
193
00:09:51,849 -->
00:09:54,001
you see some traction, you say,
194
00:09:54,001 -->
00:09:56,673
that's good, but then the moment we
changed,
195
00:09:56,673 -->
00:09:58,215
I was very happy and I never looked back.
196
00:09:58,715 -->
00:10:04,189
Yeah, interesting. I think ~ for for some
reason the the there was there used
197
00:10:04,189 -->
00:10:07,198
to be a big hype on sustainability and for
some reason you don't really hear about
198
00:10:07,198 -->
00:10:10,845
it these days anymore. unless it has a
real impact on on your bottom line.
199
00:10:10,845 -->
00:10:12,075
And I and and I you could
200
00:10:11,385 -->
00:10:12,385
Yes.
201
00:10:12,075 -->
00:10:15,268
argue like with better coordination
through a system like Athena,
202
00:10:15,268 -->
00:10:17,380
like that there is less waste in the
process,
203
00:10:17,380 -->
00:10:20,752
right? And this it does have these side
effects on sustainability which
204
00:10:20,752 -->
00:10:21,752
are very positive.
205
00:10:22,275 -->
00:10:23,843
Yes, ~ so I'm
206
00:10:24,035 -->
00:10:27,347
Also happy to say that one of our big
customers that are in the US,
207
00:10:27,347 -->
00:10:32,782
we did add circular design as a dimension
to what we did because once
208
00:10:32,782 -->
00:10:34,333
you have that unified data layer,
209
00:10:34,333 -->
00:10:37,386
they had their own framework of how they
measure circular design
210
00:10:37,386 -->
00:10:42,350
and what their targets are. And we then
basically translated those calculations.
211
00:10:42,350 -->
00:10:46,043
~ we we applied them to the unified data
layer and we sent alerts
212
00:10:46,043 -->
00:10:49,716
to the designers and the product teams to
let them know how compliant they were
213
00:10:49,716 -->
00:10:50,716
and how they could improve.
214
00:10:51,107 -->
00:10:52,266
interesting. Yeah.
215
00:10:52,796 -->
00:10:58,452
that's something I do really love about
what we do today is once you have that
view,
216
00:10:58,452 -->
00:11:02,046
that single view, we see a lot we we get a
lot of inbound from our
217
00:11:02,046 -->
00:11:05,109
own users that say, ~ this would be
extremely helpful.
218
00:11:05,109 -->
00:11:08,933
This costs me so much time. Even things
that the people that like or or
219
00:11:09,147 -->
00:11:13,218
Clients or buyers, they don't even see
that this is an issue at ~ at
220
00:11:13,218 -->
00:11:15,173
the lower at the lower scale, I'd say.
221
00:11:15,173 -->
00:11:16,657
and that's very often the biggest wins.
222
00:11:17,157 -->
00:11:21,791
And what they buy is is a software product
or is more like a layer and advice
223
00:11:21,811 -->
00:11:27,374
So if you if you look back at how ~
traditional SaaS was very simple per user,
224
00:11:27,374 -->
00:11:28,914
you know, per month or per year,
225
00:11:28,914 -->
00:11:31,156
you have a price. For us, it's slightly
different,
226
00:11:31,156 -->
00:11:33,457
but it is sold as a software product.
227
00:11:33,457 -->
00:11:38,359
We will basically look at what is the
scope that ATINA is tracking.
228
00:11:38,359 -->
00:11:40,780
So let's say we start working with you,
229
00:11:40,780 -->
00:11:43,651
we do the next two seasons. how big is the
company?
230
00:11:43,651 -->
00:11:45,682
We look at how many styles approximately.
231
00:11:45,682 -->
00:11:48,884
So we don't price per style, but it gives
us an indication of the volume
232
00:11:48,884 -->
00:11:49,884
of your collections.
233
00:11:50,344 -->
00:11:53,385
And then we look, do we plug in
merchandising angle,
234
00:11:53,385 -->
00:11:57,486
design, and sourcing? Okay, those three
elements together,
235
00:11:57,486 -->
00:12:00,227
how many seasons, volume, and which teams,
236
00:12:00,227 -->
00:12:03,848
that drives a price. And typically you
have annual prices,
237
00:12:03,848 -->
00:12:06,428
you say, okay, we want to do all the
seasons,
238
00:12:06,428 -->
00:12:08,569
all the teams, that's then the full scope,
239
00:12:08,569 -->
00:12:12,230
and you can start with a smaller scope to
test before you roll out.
240
00:12:12,730 -->
00:12:17,432
What what are your ~ your typical brands
that you're like are you targeting like
241
00:12:17,432 -->
00:12:19,484
cer certain like large volume brands,
242
00:12:19,484 -->
00:12:24,758
are also niche players? Like what is the
easiest to sell this value proposition to?
243
00:12:25,401 -->
00:12:26,401
So I
244
00:12:26,537 -->
00:12:29,048
Built from my experience at McKinsey's,
245
00:12:29,048 -->
00:12:31,189
so that was enterprise customers,
246
00:12:31,189 -->
00:12:34,170
the multi-billion dollar brands that I
think we all know.
247
00:12:34,170 -->
00:12:36,891
~ and that is still our focus today.
248
00:12:36,891 -->
00:12:40,073
So I I wouldn't say that's the easier.
249
00:12:40,073 -->
00:12:41,924
I think the trade-off is simple.
250
00:12:41,924 -->
00:12:44,625
Like as always, your sales cycles will be
longer,
251
00:12:44,625 -->
00:12:48,048
their budget is also bigger. it's a
trade-off you make,
252
00:12:48,048 -->
00:12:52,129
and we have now also really built a
solution for their pain points,
253
00:12:52,129 -->
00:12:55,551
which is relevant because sometimes I do
speak to smaller brands.
254
00:12:55,771 -->
00:12:59,893
And I see if if your whole team still fits
in a room or even two rooms,
255
00:12:59,893 -->
00:13:04,636
you have less of a challenge than when
part of your design team is in Asia,
256
00:13:04,636 -->
00:13:08,918
and you know, you have that complexity of
distribution of global distribution.
257
00:13:08,918 -->
00:13:11,700
So, yeah, for us the focus today is
enterprise brands.
258
00:13:11,700 -->
00:13:15,141
~ we do all segments. We have a lingerie
player,
259
00:13:15,141 -->
00:13:18,203
~ we have sportswear, we have lifestyle.
260
00:13:18,203 -->
00:13:19,754
So we do the different segments,
261
00:13:19,754 -->
00:13:21,665
but the size is the common denominator.
262
00:13:22,165 -->
00:13:23,165
Okay,
263
00:13:22,605 -->
00:13:24,817
interesting. And very recognizable.
264
00:13:24,817 -->
00:13:30,438
~ I I I do some work some advisory work ~
on around more the let's
265
00:13:30,438 -->
00:13:32,059
say the software development lifecycle,
266
00:13:32,059 -->
00:13:33,801
which I think there are some parallels to.
267
00:13:33,801 -->
00:13:35,162
~ and
268
00:13:34,699 -->
00:13:35,699
Yes.
269
00:13:35,162 -->
00:13:39,918
the advice is more on like how can you go
towards an AI native
270
00:13:39,918 -->
00:13:41,657
~ software development lifecycle.
271
00:13:41,657 -->
00:13:45,010
and you notice like that the bigger the
companies are,
272
00:13:45,010 -->
00:13:46,010
the
273
00:13:46,158 -->
00:13:51,711
harder it becomes for them to like define
~ even like what does a good process look
274
00:13:51,711 -->
00:13:53,322
like, right? And then let
275
00:13:52,440 -->
00:13:53,440
Yes.
276
00:13:53,322 -->
00:13:57,083
alone like how do we speed up this process
or make it more intelligent
277
00:13:57,083 -->
00:13:59,054
by adding adding AI. and
278
00:13:58,788 -->
00:13:59,788
yeah.
279
00:13:59,054 -->
00:14:02,096
indeed like if it's a small team and
everybody's in the same room and someone
280
00:14:02,096 -->
00:14:03,996
has a good idea, then people will follow
the good idea.
281
00:14:03,996 -->
00:14:06,708
But the the the more people you add to a
process,
282
00:14:06,708 -->
00:14:08,439
the hard the harder it gets to coordinate.
283
00:14:09,065 -->
00:14:11,136
And and I'm I'm an honest I'm I'm not
284
00:14:11,369 -->
00:14:13,280
By I'm not by nature a salesperson,
285
00:14:13,280 -->
00:14:16,101
so I mean I love and I'm passionate about
what we do and and that
286
00:14:16,101 -->
00:14:19,503
is what closes deals. but I think I'm an
honest salesperson.
287
00:14:19,503 -->
00:14:22,994
into when I speak to brands and they say
this is our biggest problem and
288
00:14:22,994 -->
00:14:27,046
I see that it's something that you know
CLOT or if they have an open AI contract,
289
00:14:27,046 -->
00:14:30,047
their open AI, the GPT work could fix,
290
00:14:30,047 -->
00:14:34,750
then I also don't sell Athena because then
we're bound to lose anyway.
291
00:14:34,574 -->
00:14:35,661
Hm, interesting.
292
00:14:34,750 -->
00:14:35,860
So I think that's
293
00:14:35,860 -->
00:14:39,572
also a critical thing. ~ I've I've spoken
to smaller brands where I'm like,
294
00:14:39,655 -->
00:14:42,134
~ for this you can perfectly use cloths.
295
00:14:42,134 -->
00:14:43,799
That's not where we would bring value.
296
00:14:44,013 -->
00:14:49,188
Hmm. Yeah. And are you b because it's like
I think that's an evolution that
297
00:14:49,188 -->
00:14:51,811
you see as well. Like and that's an
interesting one.
298
00:14:51,811 -->
00:14:56,886
It's it's a very quickly evolving field
where let's say a year ago
299
00:14:56,947 -->
00:15:01,261
you would have products ~ solving a
challenge that something like Claude
couldn't
300
00:15:01,261 -->
00:15:02,261
do yet.
301
00:15:02,112 -->
00:15:03,112
~
302
00:15:02,123 -->
00:15:03,123
Yes.
303
00:15:02,873 -->
00:15:06,286
let's say for example in software in the
software development lifecycle would
304
00:15:06,286 -->
00:15:11,700
be there is this custom Kanban board to ~
so to help people coordinate,
305
00:15:11,700 -->
00:15:14,002
but you had to have something custom in
place.
306
00:15:14,002 -->
00:15:19,277
But now AI in most cases is that good that
it can just basically orchestrate
307
00:15:19,277 -->
00:15:20,608
existing tools that you already have,
308
00:15:20,608 -->
00:15:21,699
~
309
00:15:20,768 -->
00:15:21,768
Yes.
310
00:15:21,699 -->
00:15:23,621
and you don't need this extra layer on
top.
311
00:15:23,621 -->
00:15:26,023
Like, do you like how how do you look at
this field?
312
00:15:26,023 -->
00:15:27,554
Like it because it's it's it's an
313
00:15:27,949 -->
00:15:29,997
It's challenging that it's evolving so
quickly,
314
00:15:29,997 -->
00:15:30,997
right?
315
00:15:30,779 -->
00:15:32,935
~ it's challeng yeah, I agree.
316
00:15:32,935 -->
00:15:39,029
first of all, I agree. I think how I look
at it is I'm I use a lot of AI.
317
00:15:39,295 -->
00:15:42,947
Personally to manage my work as CEO.
318
00:15:42,947 -->
00:15:45,148
My tech team uses a lot of AI and we,
319
00:15:45,148 -->
00:15:49,750
as you mentioned before, we focus a
hundred percent on having AI native
processes
320
00:15:49,750 -->
00:15:53,031
so that we're not head count growth let
headcount led growth,
321
00:15:53,031 -->
00:15:56,823
but that we can really scale. but that's
also a good exercise for me to see,
322
00:15:56,823 -->
00:16:00,324
okay, wow, Claude got way better in doing
this or that.
323
00:16:00,324 -->
00:16:02,735
so I stay on track of of what I can do,
324
00:16:02,735 -->
00:16:04,917
what and what they can do versus Athena.
325
00:16:04,917 -->
00:16:07,968
So for me, I think the re the the key
difference that
326
00:16:07,998 -->
00:16:11,343
We always focus on, you hear that a lot,
327
00:16:11,343 -->
00:16:14,749
I'm sure, but is really all around
building that correct context layer.
328
00:16:14,749 -->
00:16:15,749
So
329
00:16:15,495 -->
00:16:18,037
We make sure that it's not every time
again,
330
00:16:18,037 -->
00:16:21,099
you know, it's an agent analyzing
something and doing something with
331
00:16:21,099 -->
00:16:25,572
it in a repeated manner. That's not
helpful because that is something any
332
00:16:25,572 -->
00:16:29,184
LLM can do and that Cloud and OpenAI will
be able to offer.
333
00:16:29,184 -->
00:16:31,956
I think for us, we really pre-build,
334
00:16:31,956 -->
00:16:33,788
we do a lot of pre-processing as well,
335
00:16:33,788 -->
00:16:37,580
which d improves accuracy, efficiency,
336
00:16:37,580 -->
00:16:41,412
~ drives down cost as well. and we create
that context layer that is really,
337
00:16:41,412 -->
00:16:42,412
yeah.
338
00:16:42,643 -->
00:16:45,354
specially built by us for fashion concept
to market.
339
00:16:45,354 -->
00:16:48,955
That means that you have also this data
layer that exists.
340
00:16:48,955 -->
00:16:51,776
It's not something that is how do you say
transient,
341
00:16:51,776 -->
00:16:57,197
like it's there. And that is so far
something yeah we see nobody else can do.
342
00:16:57,197 -->
00:17:00,658
We're also building with every client
Athena gets better because
343
00:17:00,658 -->
00:17:03,039
she learns more exceptions, more
challenges,
344
00:17:03,039 -->
00:17:06,340
more different ways of managing a calendar
for a collection.
345
00:17:06,340 -->
00:17:09,321
So yeah, that's really how we ~ how we
position ourselves.
346
00:17:09,740 -->
00:17:13,464
Yeah, interesting. So you in in a way like
Athena became becomes a
347
00:17:13,464 -->
00:17:18,981
bit like the knowledge fault for a brand
around its like product lifecycle
348
00:17:18,981 -->
00:17:19,981
management.
349
00:17:19,883 -->
00:17:21,704
Yeah, the last brand I showed something
to,
350
00:17:21,704 -->
00:17:24,816
I showed a demo and and and their head of
product said,
351
00:17:24,816 -->
00:17:27,978
wait, you're basically the brain of our
brand then.
352
00:17:27,136 -->
00:17:28,711
Yeah. Yeah.
353
00:17:27,978 -->
00:17:28,978
I said, Yes,
354
00:17:28,789 -->
00:17:30,660
but ~ we don't touch, for instance,
355
00:17:30,660 -->
00:17:32,962
marketing at the moment or sales in your
stores.
356
00:17:32,962 -->
00:17:35,994
We're very much the brain of that new
collection before
357
00:17:35,542 -->
00:17:36,542
Hmm.
358
00:17:35,994 -->
00:17:37,004
it reaches the shelves.
359
00:17:37,375 -->
00:17:39,840
Yeah. And that's also something
360
00:17:38,750 -->
00:17:39,750
Is it then also?
361
00:17:39,840 -->
00:17:44,179
that's t where like typically I think
that's an active like for a
362
00:17:44,179 -->
00:17:45,481
lot of companies that are on
363
00:17:46,486 -->
00:17:47,486
that
364
00:17:46,676 -->
00:17:48,097
are following these evolutions in AI,
365
00:17:48,097 -->
00:17:51,448
like it's an active question. Like how do
we make sure that the knowledge
366
00:17:51,448 -->
00:17:53,709
is that is now in the heads of people,
367
00:17:53,709 -->
00:17:56,991
how do we make sure that we that it
becomes more explicit and and that
368
00:17:57,151 -->
00:18:00,982
a system like has access to that knowledge
and that's to some extent also what
369
00:18:00,982 -->
00:18:03,183
the TNA does, right? Like to make the
knowledge in their
370
00:18:02,721 -->
00:18:03,721
Yeah.
371
00:18:03,183 -->
00:18:04,183
projects explicit.
372
00:18:04,802 -->
00:18:06,208
And and the other thing is
373
00:18:06,449 -->
00:18:09,961
That very often, especially executives,
374
00:18:09,961 -->
00:18:13,172
they will ask us, but then Athena can help
with completely transforming
375
00:18:13,172 -->
00:18:15,833
the way this is done. We wanna have less
Excel,
376
00:18:15,833 -->
00:18:19,275
we wanna have less email reporting and all
of this.
377
00:18:19,275 -->
00:18:22,636
And I always tell them, building from my
consulting background,
378
00:18:22,636 -->
00:18:25,897
I say, let's do the first year or half a
year,
379
00:18:25,897 -->
00:18:30,079
but like let's definitely start with just
Athena plugging in and capturing
380
00:18:30,079 -->
00:18:31,860
the way things work. Because I can tell
you,
381
00:18:31,860 -->
00:18:34,341
you don't even know how your processes
work.
382
00:18:34,341 -->
00:18:36,362
We will discover that by plugging in and
383
00:18:36,402 -->
00:18:39,574
tracking and once you know how everything
works that's when
384
00:18:39,574 -->
00:18:43,275
you can start transforming. But otherwise
you're only fixing if
385
00:18:43,275 -->
00:18:45,646
you know something for 50% and you want to
fix it,
386
00:18:45,646 -->
00:18:47,207
yeah the result will not be there.
387
00:18:48,123 -->
00:18:49,123
Yeah.
388
00:18:48,874 -->
00:18:53,318
~ does ~ Athena then also work with like
the after the production space,
389
00:18:53,318 -->
00:18:55,189
like bas the product lifetime cycle.
390
00:18:55,189 -->
00:18:57,080
There's also big players on that,
391
00:18:57,080 -->
00:19:01,684
~ of software developers. Do they plug in
into that as well or is that
392
00:19:01,924 -->
00:19:03,265
an area you stay away from?
393
00:19:03,765 -->
00:19:06,549
Yes, so f it's it's not a yes no question,
394
00:19:06,549 -->
00:19:07,921
it's a timing question at
395
00:19:07,424 -->
00:19:08,424
Mm-hmm.
396
00:19:07,921 -->
00:19:08,921
the moment.
397
00:19:09,002 -->
00:19:12,143
It's we focus on a concept to market,
398
00:19:12,143 -->
00:19:15,005
which stops basically at the moment you
you have,
399
00:19:15,005 -->
00:19:17,216
you know, the production orders are in,
400
00:19:17,216 -->
00:19:20,747
the production is happening. The reason is
twofold.
401
00:19:20,747 -->
00:19:24,329
One, that is, it's not that that only
takes half a year,
402
00:19:24,329 -->
00:19:25,870
right? Given those four seasons,
403
00:19:25,870 -->
00:19:29,171
it's a full-time job. People are already
on the next two seasons.
404
00:19:29,171 -->
00:19:32,153
~ that's how it works. So that's one one
reason.
405
00:19:32,153 -->
00:19:35,975
The second is that we are open to expand
and we will,
406
00:19:35,975 -->
00:19:38,636
but at the moment that would be an
overload.
407
00:19:39,237 -->
00:19:41,440
This is already the most complicated
process.
408
00:19:41,440 -->
00:19:44,404
We want to win here and then you can
expand further.
409
00:19:44,904 -->
00:19:47,765
And do you see some of the bigger
companies entering your field or
410
00:19:47,765 -->
00:19:49,532
do you see yourself in it?
411
00:19:49,770 -->
00:19:53,752
Yes, ~ every PLM provider or system is now
AI native.
412
00:19:53,752 -->
00:19:59,334
so you would you would say I mean that's
also a question we get.
413
00:19:59,334 -->
00:20:05,207
~ but their their their base the way that
it started is completely the opposite.
414
00:20:05,207 -->
00:20:07,788
So I'm very I'm more I'm not afraid,
415
00:20:07,788 -->
00:20:09,279
but I'm more afraid, let's say,
416
00:20:09,279 -->
00:20:14,601
of of an open AI ~ looking at fashion
versus a traditional PLM system.
417
00:20:15,016 -->
00:20:18,178
Why? Because you had one their traditional
ERP,
418
00:20:18,178 -->
00:20:20,810
they built their whole model on
implementation,
419
00:20:20,810 -->
00:20:24,413
static system of record. Their job is also
to have that system
420
00:20:24,413 -->
00:20:25,744
of record that doesn't, you know,
421
00:20:25,744 -->
00:20:28,056
that stays reliable and everything.
422
00:20:28,840 -->
00:20:31,461
What we do is basically saying there's no
human touch.
423
00:20:31,461 -->
00:20:33,131
Like you change something in Excel,
424
00:20:33,131 -->
00:20:36,022
Atina's already picked it up and it's a
material change,
425
00:20:36,022 -->
00:20:38,323
we make sure the material tracker is
updated.
426
00:20:38,323 -->
00:20:40,744
it needs it impacts something in PLM,
427
00:20:40,744 -->
00:20:43,024
we make sure that update is pushed to PLM.
428
00:20:43,024 -->
00:20:46,124
PLM cannot. They will not be able to do
that.
429
00:20:46,124 -->
00:20:49,786
And even if they would, they would be
completely destroying their
430
00:20:49,786 -->
00:20:53,327
own business model, which relies on
implementation fees,
431
00:20:53,327 -->
00:20:54,327
you know.
432
00:20:53,891 -->
00:20:55,817
the customization that you do per
customer,
433
00:20:55,817 -->
00:20:57,502
which is hard-coded and rigid.
434
00:20:57,502 -->
00:21:01,734
So I think, yeah, that's the only ones
that we see moving into our fields.
435
00:21:02,234 -->
00:21:04,536
And it is like still quite a niche field,
436
00:21:04,536 -->
00:21:06,938
right? You're AI native in a quite a niche
field.
437
00:21:06,938 -->
00:21:09,150
which is it's definitely a differentiator,
438
00:21:09,150 -->
00:21:12,524
and like I think I was talking about
software development earlier,
439
00:21:12,524 -->
00:21:13,524
like it's I think in
440
00:21:12,847 -->
00:21:13,847
Yes.
441
00:21:13,234 -->
00:21:17,528
software development it's even still very
hard to find good AI native people,
442
00:21:17,528 -->
00:21:19,750
let alone ~ in something like fashion.
443
00:21:19,750 -->
00:21:22,533
I can I can imagine like just having the
skills there and being ~
444
00:21:22,533 -->
00:21:25,276
the ability to execute, like it's a big
differentiator.
445
00:21:26,112 -->
00:21:29,023
Yeah, and I even compare it. I like a lot
what you like what
446
00:21:29,023 -->
00:21:32,174
you said on development. If you can almost
think about it as
447
00:21:32,394 -->
00:21:34,334
but that's quite technical comparison.
448
00:21:34,334 -->
00:21:35,975
I wouldn't make this to a fashion brand.
449
00:21:35,975 -->
00:21:40,136
But you know how GitHub manages all the
people working on different branches
450
00:21:40,136 -->
00:21:43,277
of a repository? Technically that's what
we do.
451
00:21:43,277 -->
00:21:46,958
You have hundreds of people working on
parts of a collection.
452
00:21:46,958 -->
00:21:48,468
Your collection is your repository.
453
00:21:48,468 -->
00:21:51,799
We just make sure that everything connects
and we flag when it doesn't,
454
00:21:51,799 -->
00:21:54,332
when it's not mergeable. So yeah.
455
00:21:52,372 -->
00:21:54,183
Yeah. Yeah.
456
00:21:54,525 -->
00:21:55,810
That's an interesting way to look at it,
457
00:21:55,810 -->
00:21:56,810
yeah.
458
00:21:56,390 -->
00:21:57,390
Yeah.
459
00:21:57,322 -->
00:21:58,685
Fashion wouldn't understand it,
460
00:21:58,685 -->
00:22:00,630
so I'm not I'm switching
461
00:21:59,120 -->
00:22:00,120
Yeah.
462
00:22:00,630 -->
00:22:02,405
it accordingly. But our our engineers,
463
00:22:02,405 -->
00:22:04,730
they they make they draw a lot of
parallels,
464
00:22:04,730 -->
00:22:06,103
to be honest. So yeah.
465
00:22:06,541 -->
00:22:11,653
now because yeah, most of the there are
not a lot of like AI natives ~ in
466
00:22:11,653 -->
00:22:14,224
the in the in the data science space,
467
00:22:14,224 -->
00:22:17,615
let's say, and you're looking for data
engineers within fashion,
468
00:22:17,615 -->
00:22:20,706
which is not a typical connection to make.
469
00:22:21,228 -->
00:22:22,228
So
470
00:22:21,428 -->
00:22:26,834
is do you f do you find these fashion
savvy AI people or are you more
471
00:22:26,834 -->
00:22:31,249
a tech company or do you or in the fashion
field or are you also identifying
472
00:22:31,249 -->
00:22:32,360
a bit of a fashion company?
473
00:22:32,860 -->
00:22:35,252
Yeah. ~ for the first
474
00:22:35,524 -->
00:22:37,665
Wave or let's say of Athena Studios.
475
00:22:37,665 -->
00:22:42,657
So the the past what is it, year and a
half or so building our team,
476
00:22:42,657 -->
00:22:45,699
we've prioritized tech talent.
477
00:22:45,699 -->
00:22:49,761
So we didn't look for people in fashion
and tech.
478
00:22:49,761 -->
00:22:53,182
I mean, that's great, but we moved we
looked for good engineers.
479
00:22:53,182 -->
00:22:54,772
also open engineers, because yes,
480
00:22:54,772 -->
00:22:56,703
you mentioned people can be AI native,
481
00:22:56,703 -->
00:22:59,545
but let's be very honest, everything is so
new.
482
00:22:59,545 -->
00:23:01,806
On a weekly basis, everything changes.
483
00:23:01,806 -->
00:23:04,587
So almost more important than being AI
native is
484
00:23:04,637 -->
00:23:07,838
That openness to okay, let me try
something out.
485
00:23:07,838 -->
00:23:10,329
What seems to work? What worked for you?
486
00:23:10,329 -->
00:23:12,960
How are you doing this? so that was our
focus.
487
00:23:12,960 -->
00:23:15,531
So we have only senior engineers at this
stage.
488
00:23:15,531 -->
00:23:20,842
so all people with 15 years of experience
software programming,
489
00:23:20,842 -->
00:23:23,729
because that also brings that basis that
there was before AI.
490
00:23:23,729 -->
00:23:26,594
I think for me that was really important
to know that people know
491
00:23:26,594 -->
00:23:29,175
how to build secure and scalable ~ tools.
492
00:23:30,156 -->
00:23:33,007
In the second wave, I mean, as a C as a
founder,
493
00:23:33,007 -->
00:23:34,478
you're also always recruiting.
494
00:23:34,478 -->
00:23:39,100
~ so I have a lot of conversation now for
starting or for adding to
495
00:23:39,100 -->
00:23:43,372
the tech team people who effectively have
either a background in fashion
496
00:23:43,372 -->
00:23:47,624
and tech or tech background with an
interest in fashion.
497
00:23:47,624 -->
00:23:50,855
And so you find more of them, and this is
a bit cliche,
498
00:23:50,855 -->
00:23:55,847
but in New York and London, there are more
people that combine these two interests.
499
00:23:55,847 -->
00:23:59,289
~ so we have a lot of conversations
ongoing currently for our
500
00:23:59,350 -->
00:24:00,350
Expansion.
501
00:24:00,932 -->
00:24:03,868
And also the client base, do you find that
they're quite tax heavy or
502
00:24:03,868 -->
00:24:06,604
do you find that they're more yeah,
503
00:24:06,604 -->
00:24:10,191
hold back against AI? ~ or they
504
00:24:10,691 -->
00:24:15,767
Yes. no. Concept to market teams are
generally not very tech savvy.
505
00:24:15,767 -->
00:24:18,040
So I don't wanna generalize across all my
clients,
506
00:24:18,040 -->
00:24:20,733
but in general you can assume they are not
tech savvy.
507
00:24:20,733 -->
00:24:22,875
~ so that is one of the reasons why
508
00:24:23,067 -->
00:24:27,892
I also internally within my team I fight
really hard to not give them
509
00:24:27,892 -->
00:24:31,636
a new platform that maybe would work
better or would be easier for us
510
00:24:31,636 -->
00:24:35,319
to maintain as chatbots that is in
Microsoft Teams.
511
00:24:35,319 -->
00:24:40,284
The reason that I'm so adamant on this is
because it's we see very good adoption
512
00:24:40,284 -->
00:24:42,386
from our users because it's nothing new to
learn.
513
00:24:42,886 -->
00:24:45,379
Even that, even interactions with a chat
bot,
514
00:24:45,379 -->
00:24:48,272
we sometimes see there's a bit of skill
building required.
515
00:24:48,272 -->
00:24:50,114
even though it's natural language,
516
00:24:50,114 -->
00:24:52,717
sometimes people forget they're chatting
to a chat bot.
517
00:24:52,717 -->
00:24:54,900
And and that's super interesting to see,
518
00:24:54,900 -->
00:24:57,743
but we are building for an audience that
is not tech savvy.
519
00:24:57,743 -->
00:24:59,185
That's the starting point.
520
00:24:59,685 -->
00:25:00,685
how
521
00:24:59,905 -->
00:25:03,488
do you see the the future growth ~ of
Athena?
522
00:25:03,488 -->
00:25:08,521
Like I ~ have the feeling that a lot of
companies that that are starting
523
00:25:08,521 -->
00:25:12,824
to get like to product market fit where
you clearly have some customers that that
524
00:25:12,824 -->
00:25:16,366
have that clearly have a need for your for
your product from the moment that there's
525
00:25:16,366 -->
00:25:18,918
product market fit I see a lot of
companies these days like raise a lot
526
00:25:18,918 -->
00:25:22,171
of money to grow to capture the market as
quickly as possible because
527
00:25:22,171 -->
00:25:26,194
I think it's also l linked to AI like it
has become very easy to build
528
00:25:26,812 -->
00:25:28,927
Products, so from the moment you sell
them,
529
00:25:28,927 -->
00:25:31,973
like there is this an incentive to quickly
grab market share.
530
00:25:31,973 -->
00:25:33,335
How do you look at that?
531
00:25:33,835 -->
00:25:38,626
~ so I think until now it's a very it's an
excellent question.
532
00:25:38,626 -->
00:25:42,037
And I think the one that we it's a very
strategic topic we often talk
533
00:25:41,666 -->
00:25:42,666
Mm.
534
00:25:42,037 -->
00:25:44,377
about. of course building a product you as
you know,
535
00:25:44,377 -->
00:25:47,698
distribution is everything. In our case,
536
00:25:47,698 -->
00:25:53,820
particularly knowledge of like ground
knowledge is it is also very,
537
00:25:53,820 -->
00:25:58,301
very important. So you need to know what
you're building for and have
538
00:25:58,665 -->
00:26:02,847
been through it before you can build
something successful in in this very niche
539
00:26:02,847 -->
00:26:04,988
space. That's also the reason why we went
niche.
540
00:26:04,988 -->
00:26:07,270
I mean, I love the industry and I love the
process,
541
00:26:07,270 -->
00:26:08,950
so I wanted to work in that space.
542
00:26:08,950 -->
00:26:14,173
But ~ it gives the one benefit of it it's
a bit harder to to get in.
543
00:26:14,173 -->
00:26:15,954
But of course it's not impossible.
544
00:26:15,954 -->
00:26:17,954
Like we're not naive. It's not impossible.
545
00:26:17,954 -->
00:26:22,227
I think for now we have been bootstrapped
because we could we could
546
00:26:22,491 -->
00:26:24,222
I think that's the main reason we could.
547
00:26:24,222 -->
00:26:28,524
It allowed us to not be distracted by
investor discussions,
548
00:26:28,524 -->
00:26:31,075
ri raising money, which takes a lot of
time,
549
00:26:31,075 -->
00:26:36,384
right? So we allowed to do that through
revenue in combination with non-dilutive
550
00:26:36,384 -->
00:26:38,037
~ grants that we had
551
00:26:37,817 -->
00:26:38,817
yeah.
552
00:26:38,037 -->
00:26:39,388
through Luxembourg and Europe.
553
00:26:39,388 -->
00:26:43,630
and then we for me it was important to
prove that we can build not just
554
00:26:43,630 -->
00:26:47,792
get clients but also charge interesting
amounts.
555
00:26:48,064 -->
00:26:49,885
Because we want to build a profitable
business.
556
00:26:49,885 -->
00:26:52,366
AI, as we all know, is not cheap.
557
00:26:52,366 -->
00:26:54,788
Like it's not magic. It costs actual
money.
558
00:26:54,788 -->
00:27:00,291
So, how do we build a model and a and a
and a go-to-market model that brands
559
00:27:00,291 -->
00:27:03,132
are willing to pay for that and we can
make money on?
560
00:27:03,132 -->
00:27:09,716
So I think we're there. ~ I'm not gonna
say we're we're ready for like
561
00:27:09,716 -->
00:27:10,937
and there's nothing more to learn,
562
00:27:10,937 -->
00:27:15,159
but we've proven that. And I think for now
it's a much more interesting situation
563
00:27:15,159 -->
00:27:16,280
to look at fundraising.
564
00:27:16,640 -->
00:27:20,179
And definitely an an avenue we're looking
at in the in the short term.
565
00:27:20,950 -->
00:27:26,854
Is is token consumption is it is it ~ a
reason to look for funding or not?
566
00:27:26,854 -->
00:27:31,138
Because I can imagine like like in the
product that you're offering that that's
567
00:27:31,138 -->
00:27:38,003
you have quite a bit of token spent and
that it's also hard to match correct
pricing
568
00:27:38,103 -->
00:27:40,715
with correct token performance like
569
00:27:41,215 -->
00:27:42,215
Okay, like I I it
570
00:27:41,767 -->
00:27:42,767
Mm.
571
00:27:42,365 -->
00:27:45,848
the the challenge I think to these days
with the LMs that we have is like
572
00:27:45,848 -->
00:27:47,989
the more you pay for the LM the better the
performance is,
573
00:27:47,989 -->
00:27:51,831
right? But at some but but if you sell
product to a customer,
574
00:27:51,831 -->
00:27:55,382
you can to some extent sell like the
performance will be better,
575
00:27:55,382 -->
00:27:57,884
so you will be you will you will pay for
consumption,
576
00:27:57,884 -->
00:27:59,825
but produ customers don't really like
that.
577
00:27:59,825 -->
00:28:03,937
They want to know they want to know either
like some something like that they
578
00:28:03,937 -->
00:28:07,549
can calculate, like it's per user or per
month or per module or whatever,
579
00:28:07,549 -->
00:28:08,549
right?
580
00:28:08,065 -->
00:28:09,467
And there's like this disjoint,
581
00:28:09,467 -->
00:28:14,385
like it becomes easier if you sell per
user or per module or whatever.
582
00:28:14,385 -->
00:28:18,170
~ v but in the end like your your cost
basis,
583
00:28:18,170 -->
00:28:22,137
like a lot of it is per token and the b
the more your customer uses it,
584
00:28:22,137 -->
00:28:23,669
the more expensive it gets for you.
585
00:28:24,169 -->
00:28:27,802
~ so also this we're very important topic,
586
00:28:27,802 -->
00:28:30,214
and I have many discussions with other
founders about this.
587
00:28:30,214 -->
00:28:32,156
The way we decided to proceed,
588
00:28:32,156 -->
00:28:34,278
and that is because it's enterprise sales.
589
00:28:34,278 -->
00:28:37,501
I we do fixed pricing, like we mentioned
earlier.
590
00:28:37,501 -->
00:28:40,223
We don't price for extra credits,
591
00:28:40,223 -->
00:28:43,285
or or going overboard in in the usage of
it.
592
00:28:43,285 -->
00:28:45,337
The reason for that is
593
00:28:45,899 -->
00:28:47,501
And we're continuously measuring,
594
00:28:47,501 -->
00:28:50,164
so ~ think that's an important note to
make.
595
00:28:50,164 -->
00:28:55,070
But we have a fairly solid understanding
right now of what
596
00:28:55,884 -->
00:28:58,565
What will be involved in a collection?
597
00:28:58,565 -->
00:29:01,507
When you say, okay, I want you to track
these and these teams,
598
00:29:01,507 -->
00:29:04,988
our collection is approximately a thousand
styles per season.
599
00:29:04,988 -->
00:29:06,378
we already know, for instance,
600
00:29:06,378 -->
00:29:10,050
we add a bit of margin because you're
gonna overproduce and you're gonna
overdevelop
601
00:29:10,050 -->
00:29:12,311
things, so it will be a thousand five
hundred probably,
602
00:29:12,311 -->
00:29:16,203
but fine. And we take that into
consideration and we do a prediction
603
00:29:16,203 -->
00:29:20,775
of what we think the scope of the project
will be in token counts
604
00:29:20,775 -->
00:29:23,776
in token consumption, in addition to also
the usual.
605
00:29:23,866 -->
00:29:26,107
The workload, etc., of people to build it,
606
00:29:26,107 -->
00:29:29,187
but mostly token consumption. And then we
put a buff,
607
00:29:29,187 -->
00:29:30,460
yeah, of course, a buffer to that.
608
00:29:30,460 -->
00:29:33,822
That's how we price. but that allowed us
so far to actually,
609
00:29:33,822 -->
00:29:35,563
and that's going back to what I said
earlier.
610
00:29:35,563 -->
00:29:39,906
I think that's important. I want to prove
that we can build a profitable business.
611
00:29:39,906 -->
00:29:42,928
In addition to just grabbing, how should I
say,
612
00:29:42,928 -->
00:29:47,190
rather than quickly getting a lot of
brands,
613
00:29:47,190 -->
00:29:49,012
like small brands, for us also,
614
00:29:49,012 -->
00:29:50,472
if we work with
615
00:29:50,972 -->
00:29:57,446
10 between 10 and 15 brands, we look at an
annual revenue of over 10 million.
616
00:29:57,446 -->
00:29:58,446
So
617
00:29:57,937 -->
00:29:58,937
Yeah, no.
618
00:29:59,007 -->
00:30:01,028
it's a different game than saying,
619
00:30:01,028 -->
00:30:04,290
~ I want to go very quickly with a lot of
different brands.
620
00:30:04,290 -->
00:30:07,772
For us, the key thing is to grow within a
brand,
621
00:30:07,772 -->
00:30:10,753
expense to all their seasons, all their
teams,
622
00:30:10,753 -->
00:30:13,695
and together with them identify new ways
to add value.
623
00:30:13,695 -->
00:30:17,717
And then add others as we go. But yeah.
624
00:30:18,217 -->
00:30:21,540
Yeah, I think that's a probably a very
very sensible approach.
625
00:30:21,540 -->
00:30:25,323
in a in a in a world where where a lot of
a lot of companies,
626
00:30:25,323 -->
00:30:26,704
especially that have a lot of funding,
627
00:30:26,704 -->
00:30:29,326
are today basically subsidizing token
usage.
628
00:30:29,326 -->
00:30:33,620
Yeah. That is and a bit betting on ~ on
the price coming down in in
629
00:30:33,620 -->
00:30:35,734
the coming two years. And it's ~
630
00:30:35,232 -->
00:30:36,232
Yeah.
631
00:30:36,173 -->
00:30:38,996
Which I mean is not wrong, it's a
different approach.
632
00:30:38,996 -->
00:30:41,759
And so we might talk again in five years
and I can tell you,
633
00:30:41,759 -->
00:30:43,060
that's what we should have done.
634
00:30:43,060 -->
00:30:45,032
But I think right now I'm yeah,
635
00:30:45,032 -->
00:30:46,763
I'm confident in the approach we're
taking.
636
00:30:46,305 -->
00:30:47,305
Yeah.
637
00:30:46,825 -->
00:30:51,748
Well, I d I guess it makes sense in the in
the when you're selecting like very like
638
00:30:51,908 -->
00:30:53,339
you call an enterprise customers,
639
00:30:53,339 -->
00:30:54,339
you could you call it
640
00:30:53,580 -->
00:30:54,580
Yes.
641
00:30:53,887 -->
00:30:56,030
like the the high end customers.
642
00:30:56,030 -->
00:30:59,001
I think it will probably work.
643
00:30:59,001 -->
00:31:01,693
I mean they will definitely have the
willingness to pay two years from now.
644
00:31:01,693 -->
00:31:05,275
If you have a very wide range of customers
and two years from now
645
00:31:05,275 -->
00:31:06,935
it didn't become the as cheap as you
hoped,
646
00:31:06,935 -->
00:31:10,677
like then who is then still willing to pay
if you're not no longer subsidizing,
647
00:31:10,677 -->
00:31:12,337
right? It's yeah, interesting.
648
00:31:12,357 -->
00:31:15,681
maybe on the grants you talked that you
had the Luxembourg grant
649
00:31:15,681 -->
00:31:19,926
and the European grant. which one which
specific one did you apply to
650
00:31:19,926 -->
00:31:21,428
and how did you find the voices?
651
00:31:21,428 -->
00:31:23,350
Was it easy, was it hard to combine?
652
00:31:23,350 -->
00:31:24,350
~
653
00:31:24,698 -->
00:31:25,698
~ yes, I think
654
00:31:26,154 -->
00:31:28,646
Maybe the one I can high there were a few.
655
00:31:28,646 -->
00:31:31,879
I think the ones I'll highlight mostly is
is from Luxembourg,
656
00:31:31,879 -->
00:31:33,830
because I I do think that's worth the
mention.
657
00:31:33,830 -->
00:31:38,775
Luxembourg has prioritized building their
tech ecosystem and helping startups
658
00:31:38,775 -->
00:31:42,758
in scaling rapidly. so we did ~ a range of
things.
659
00:31:42,758 -->
00:31:46,611
We were selected as one of their one of
the startups for their one of their
660
00:31:46,611 -->
00:31:49,343
fit for start cohorts. So every year they
select,
661
00:31:49,343 -->
00:31:52,476
I think it's 20 startups across different
fields,
662
00:31:52,476 -->
00:31:53,476
but in tech.
663
00:31:53,879 -->
00:31:58,721
~ to basically ~ support them with support
them support them financially
664
00:31:58,751 -->
00:32:03,463
and help them with introductions for those
who seek funding etc which
665
00:32:03,463 -->
00:32:07,045
is a very international pro project which
I think many people don't know
666
00:32:07,245 -->
00:32:10,617
but I think at least half of that program
are companies that
667
00:32:10,617 -->
00:32:15,198
are not from Luxembourg. So it's really an
idea to to to bring startups Europe
668
00:32:15,198 -->
00:32:19,990
but also Asia as a global to set them to
to have them have an office in Luxembourg.
669
00:32:19,990 -->
00:32:21,151
And so that was a very
670
00:32:21,231 -->
00:32:25,053
helpful ~ program which also helped us to
understand then others
671
00:32:25,133 -->
00:32:29,836
~ research and development grants so where
we can we first need to prove that
672
00:32:29,836 -->
00:32:32,687
we can build something and then once
you've proven that you get part
673
00:32:32,687 -->
00:32:34,918
of your investment that you made yourself
back.
674
00:32:34,918 -->
00:32:39,721
So we did a mix of those things some
pre-financing some some without
675
00:32:40,622 -->
00:32:43,465
Interesting. Did not know the Luxembourg
one was worldwide.
676
00:32:43,465 -->
00:32:47,750
So ~ worldwide. So the really good and
really good concept to attract talent into
677
00:32:47,850 -->
00:32:49,993
Luxembourg. So nice, nice
678
00:32:49,183 -->
00:32:50,183
Yes.
679
00:32:49,993 -->
00:32:51,374
brands. And the European ones,
680
00:32:51,374 -->
00:32:55,739
you there were more smaller ones that were
just the research and development brands.
681
00:32:54,913 -->
00:32:57,479
~ yes, they were smaller.
682
00:32:55,739 -->
00:32:57,281
Yes.
683
00:32:57,762 -->
00:32:58,762
Okay.
684
00:32:58,682 -->
00:33:00,744
Maybe talking about ~ geography,
685
00:33:00,744 -->
00:33:04,357
you you already already talked about ~ a
vibrant scene in in New York.
686
00:33:04,357 -->
00:33:07,370
how do you see that evolving? Like I can
also imagine that a lot of these
687
00:33:07,370 -->
00:33:09,541
big brands are actually in the US,
688
00:33:09,541 -->
00:33:14,245
their headquarters? Like do you do you
need to be in the US at some point
689
00:33:14,245 -->
00:33:18,628
or or is is it possible to really build
this out from you from Luxembourg?
690
00:33:19,719 -->
00:33:24,651
So ~ at the moment our our our only ~
headquarter,
691
00:33:24,651 -->
00:33:26,815
our only office is in Luxembourg.
692
00:33:26,815 -->
00:33:29,638
~ I do travel a lot personally,
693
00:33:29,638 -->
00:33:34,502
both to for instance the UK but on New
York I probably spent most of my time
abroad.
694
00:33:35,223 -->
00:33:38,275
It's on our agenda in any case to open an
office in the US.
695
00:33:38,275 -->
00:33:41,188
And the timeline is also in the short
term.
696
00:33:41,188 -->
00:33:42,979
So we're already working on that.
697
00:33:42,979 -->
00:33:47,322
And that would be really to grow the US
market even better and also make sure
698
00:33:47,322 -->
00:33:50,244
we can hire people there on the commercial
side.
699
00:33:50,244 -->
00:33:53,647
Because so far our sales have been
founderless.
700
00:33:53,647 -->
00:33:57,560
So that's me. And I think that's that's
gonna be a really,
701
00:33:57,560 -->
00:34:01,063
a really big next step, in addition to
just spending time there,
702
00:34:01,063 -->
00:34:02,994
having also people ~ on the ground.
703
00:34:03,494 -->
00:34:06,956
I do believe you shouldn't underestimate
Europe in terms of size.
704
00:34:06,956 -->
00:34:10,187
So we have on the one hand the luxury
brands here and the groups.
705
00:34:10,187 -->
00:34:14,709
On the other hand, we have many of the big
sportswear sportswear brands
706
00:34:14,769 -->
00:34:19,221
and companies. I think the difference that
we have ~ encountered is just that
707
00:34:19,221 -->
00:34:22,193
the US is more open for innovation,
708
00:34:22,193 -->
00:34:25,134
working with startups, doing pilots,
709
00:34:25,134 -->
00:34:28,995
and their budgets are bigger. So we have
just decided to really focus
710
00:34:28,995 -->
00:34:32,557
on that market first in order to use it
then to also open up the
711
00:34:32,557 -->
00:34:33,557
Yeah.
712
00:34:33,642 -->
00:34:34,642
Yeah,
713
00:34:34,062 -->
00:34:38,624
see, see. And do you do you notice when
you're ~ when you're in the US
714
00:34:38,624 -->
00:34:40,994
or in New York or when you're talking to a
brand,
715
00:34:40,994 -->
00:34:42,305
when you're trying to sell to a brand,
716
00:34:42,305 -->
00:34:49,157
like does it make the discussion more
difficult if they know it's not a US
company?
717
00:34:49,157 -->
00:34:51,655
Does it does it ease the or let me put it
the other way,
718
00:34:51,655 -->
00:34:54,509
would it ease the discussion if you would
be US based?
719
00:34:54,889 -->
00:34:56,649
from my experience I don't think so.
720
00:34:56,649 -->
00:34:57,649
I'm pretty
721
00:34:57,131 -->
00:34:58,131
Okay.
722
00:34:57,620 -->
00:34:59,150
I'm actually even convinced not.
723
00:34:59,150 -->
00:35:02,662
~ because I they all know I'm from Europe.
724
00:35:02,662 -->
00:35:07,474
~ I do think because they see me so often
they they they don't care so much.
725
00:35:07,432 -->
00:35:08,432
Yeah yeah, I see.
726
00:35:07,474 -->
00:35:08,565
~ we
727
00:35:08,565 -->
00:35:11,236
I I do I do make it a rule ~
728
00:35:11,518 -->
00:35:13,569
every time I'm in the US I meet everyone
again.
729
00:35:13,569 -->
00:35:16,716
~ it's very much in person. I think that's
super important.
730
00:35:16,716 -->
00:35:19,120
I think it's more for for newer brands.
731
00:35:19,120 -->
00:35:22,525
I mean I already and I already have listed
a few people that
732
00:35:23,025 -->
00:35:24,346
I have become friends that say,
733
00:35:24,346 -->
00:35:26,877
but with a shared background in fashion
tech,
734
00:35:26,877 -->
00:35:29,856
~ that have a good network, that I think
that would ease up things,
735
00:35:29,856 -->
00:35:32,539
people who have worked for a long time in
the US.
736
00:35:32,539 -->
00:35:37,202
I do think what is important, I started
going to the US since 23,
737
00:35:37,202 -->
00:35:41,854
when I started with the initial
sustainability ID and I was testing this
with some
738
00:35:41,854 -->
00:35:45,136
brands there. And I've learned rather
quickly,
739
00:35:45,136 -->
00:35:48,367
but it's important, that there's obviously
different ways of doing business
740
00:35:48,367 -->
00:35:51,672
in the US versus here. And that I do think
made a difference.
741
00:35:51,809 -->
00:35:54,841
difference because I do speak to European
founders who say it's impossible
742
00:35:54,841 -->
00:35:56,640
to sell in the US and then I'd say,
743
00:35:56,640 -->
00:35:59,903
okay, I think it's because you're behaving
too European,
744
00:35:59,903 -->
00:36:01,544
so to speak, ~ that
745
00:36:00,513 -->
00:36:01,513
Okay, interesting. Yeah.
746
00:36:01,544 -->
00:36:03,415
might make things different, difficult.
747
00:36:04,053 -->
00:36:05,053
And
748
00:36:04,173 -->
00:36:08,810
do you have ~ pointers for people like the
things that w that maybe work
749
00:36:08,487 -->
00:36:11,688
~
750
00:36:08,810 -->
00:36:10,172
in Europe and don't work in the US,
751
00:36:10,172 -->
00:36:11,814
like things they should be aware of?
752
00:36:12,188 -->
00:36:16,070
yeah, I think honestly, I think and it
depends on the European culture.
753
00:36:16,070 -->
00:36:17,490
Like it depends on where you're from.
754
00:36:17,490 -->
00:36:21,032
Okay. So that's of course also I think the
US is just very direct.
755
00:36:21,032 -->
00:36:23,292
Like relationships matter, yes,
756
00:36:23,292 -->
00:36:25,693
a lot, but also we're very transactional.
757
00:36:25,693 -->
00:36:28,995
So I think getting to the point is super
important.
758
00:36:29,314 -->
00:36:33,236
Not pricing too low is also very important
because they might literally
759
00:36:33,236 -->
00:36:34,926
not take you serious if you say,
760
00:36:34,883 -->
00:36:35,883
Yeah.
761
00:36:34,926 -->
00:36:35,926
~
762
00:36:35,327 -->
00:36:37,307
this is five thousand or something.
763
00:36:37,307 -->
00:36:39,708
They'll be like, I'm sorry, what?
764
00:36:39,708 -->
00:36:44,512
and I think for me that was the the the
biggest thing to be much more okay,
765
00:36:44,512 -->
00:36:47,757
we're here to do business. I'm not like
I'm not ashamed to say that,
766
00:36:47,757 -->
00:36:50,298
right? Like we're having this dinner
because I want to do a deal with you.
767
00:36:50,298 -->
00:36:53,219
And also enjoy ~ whereas like I in Europe
768
00:36:52,640 -->
00:36:53,640
Yeah.
769
00:36:53,219 -->
00:36:54,410
I would be much more like
770
00:36:54,970 -->
00:36:57,381
let's build the relationship. It's not
about doing deals.
771
00:36:57,381 -->
00:37:00,183
Like maybe maybe later if we if if we get
to that point.
772
00:37:00,183 -->
00:37:03,424
And I feel I had multiple people in my
first years telling me,
773
00:37:03,424 -->
00:37:05,936
Heidi, I like you, so I'm gonna tell you
this.
774
00:37:05,936 -->
00:37:07,437
I feel like you're wasting my time.
775
00:37:07,437 -->
00:37:10,388
You either tell me what you need from me
or how I can help you,
776
00:37:10,388 -->
00:37:12,949
or otherwise I'm like, Why did we even
have this lunch?
777
00:37:12,949 -->
00:37:16,751
So I think that just it's like a mindset
shift.
778
00:37:13,563 -->
00:37:14,784
Okay, that's interesting, yeah.
779
00:37:14,784 -->
00:37:16,586
Yeah.
780
00:37:18,048 -->
00:37:23,874
So maybe in European terms it's closer to
Dutch than it is to French culture.
781
00:37:23,073 -->
00:37:24,073
Yes, maybe.
782
00:37:23,964 -->
00:37:26,266
and then the other thing though that's
also important,
783
00:37:26,266 -->
00:37:31,249
like you always so what I've learned is in
the US by default when
784
00:37:31,249 -->
00:37:34,251
a startup founder or so they tell you
something about their company,
785
00:37:34,251 -->
00:37:36,012
they already divide it by ten.
786
00:37:36,012 -->
00:37:39,995
Because they assume because they
themselves they ~ they they they always
787
00:37:39,995 -->
00:37:43,537
go much bigger. Like ~ so there is this
natural,
788
00:37:43,537 -->
00:37:47,920
okay, we'll divide it by ten. Which means
that if you're like an honest and modest
789
00:37:49,129 -->
00:37:51,331
I'm gonna say European, but I don't want
to speak bad about us.
790
00:37:51,331 -->
00:37:54,514
But if you if you say something and
they're like divided by ten,
791
00:37:54,514 -->
00:37:56,546
oof, they're really small. Whereas you're
just like,
792
00:37:56,546 -->
00:37:59,038
no, that that's who we are, that's our
size exactly.
793
00:37:58,867 -->
00:38:00,236
Don't be too humble. It's a bit
794
00:37:59,038 -->
00:38:00,439
Yes,
795
00:38:00,480 -->
00:38:02,882
~ just know you do with it what you want,
796
00:38:02,882 -->
00:38:05,864
but know that the person in front of you
is already discounting what
797
00:38:05,864 -->
00:38:08,687
you say because you're a startup and
because they they're used
798
00:38:08,687 -->
00:38:10,799
to discounting what Americans tell them.
799
00:38:11,299 -->
00:38:12,299
Interesting.
800
00:38:11,362 -->
00:38:12,362
Was it
801
00:38:11,712 -->
00:38:14,976
hard to adjust your approach of sales to
those companies,
802
00:38:14,976 -->
00:38:17,488
or was it a learning lesson, or you made a
click?
803
00:38:16,969 -->
00:38:18,786
It's just a learning lesson. And
804
00:38:17,488 -->
00:38:18,689
Yeah.
805
00:38:18,786 -->
00:38:20,893
you really wanna sell to this company so
you adapt.
806
00:38:21,790 -->
00:38:22,790
Okay.
807
00:38:22,653 -->
00:38:26,236
maybe like ~ to start rounding up with the
interview,
808
00:38:26,236 -->
00:38:29,899
like ~ you're at a certain stage now with
with Athena Studio.
809
00:38:29,899 -->
00:38:36,203
Like what is the biggest thing in your
eyes to unlock going to the next stage?
810
00:38:36,203 -->
00:38:40,887
Like really like trying to unlock like the
the if if if you're talking about like
811
00:38:40,887 -->
00:38:43,609
if we if we do 10 enterprise c 10
enterprise customers,
812
00:38:43,609 -->
00:38:46,231
like that's very significant. Like how do
you get to the next five?
813
00:38:46,231 -->
00:38:48,092
Like what is the challenge that you have
in front of you?
814
00:38:48,447 -->
00:38:51,779
So it's very clear. It's also a
straightforward answer.
815
00:38:51,779 -->
00:38:54,840
I've so far built a tech team.
816
00:38:54,840 -->
00:38:57,742
And excellent tech team. I love I love
them.
817
00:38:57,742 -->
00:38:59,962
I've never built a commercial team.
818
00:38:59,962 -->
00:39:05,685
So at the moment, both customer success
and sales is done by me.
819
00:39:05,685 -->
00:39:09,016
That's a clear gap into going to 10
customers.
820
00:39:09,016 -->
00:39:13,257
That doesn't work. And so ~ that is ~ for
the second half of this year,
821
00:39:13,257 -->
00:39:14,378
and we're already working
822
00:39:14,720 -->
00:39:20,503
Hard on this is focus number one is
building on the one hand having customer
823
00:39:20,503 -->
00:39:22,544
success. I'm not sure if that's going to
be the name,
824
00:39:22,544 -->
00:39:25,352
but basically the teams that are really
closely working.
825
00:39:25,352 -->
00:39:27,206
I like the forward deployed engineer,
826
00:39:27,206 -->
00:39:29,966
but for us, it doesn't need to be an
engineering role.
827
00:39:29,966 -->
00:39:33,578
It needs to be a person who gets so close
to the customer into seeing
828
00:39:33,578 -->
00:39:36,059
how the processes work, what are the
learnings,
829
00:39:36,059 -->
00:39:39,451
how does that influence or roadmap for
that client and in general.
830
00:39:39,451 -->
00:39:41,812
So that is that we need as a next step.
831
00:39:42,294 -->
00:39:45,019
And in parallel it's and that's US
focused,
832
00:39:45,019 -->
00:39:49,951
having starting with one, then growing ~
sales team that can also help bringing
833
00:39:49,951 -->
00:39:50,951
in those new customers.
834
00:39:51,377 -->
00:39:56,051
Yeah. I can I can imagine it's har hard to
find these people.
835
00:39:56,051 -->
00:40:02,266
in a sense that it like you probably need
people that are like very into this domain
836
00:40:02,266 -->
00:40:04,378
and like they can brainstorm along with
the customer,
837
00:40:04,378 -->
00:40:05,949
like understand what the challenges are,
838
00:40:05,949 -->
00:40:09,993
can can like translate to this is a
solution that Athena can bring
839
00:40:09,993 -->
00:40:11,064
to these challenges, like
840
00:40:11,564 -->
00:40:16,508
Yeah, so for sales, I'm extremely strict
on what you just said.
841
00:40:16,508 -->
00:40:21,442
So ~ the people ~ and and the people I'm
in discussion with are people
842
00:40:21,442 -->
00:40:24,574
who have sold technology into fashion
before,
843
00:40:24,574 -->
00:40:27,086
have a fashion background on top of that.
844
00:40:27,086 -->
00:40:30,158
So not just people who rolled into fashion
tech but never set foot
845
00:40:30,158 -->
00:40:33,520
in a fashion company. So these are
specific profiles,
846
00:40:33,520 -->
00:40:35,802
but you know, they exist and they're
847
00:40:35,357 -->
00:40:36,357
Texas.
848
00:40:35,802 -->
00:40:36,802
the ones I go after.
849
00:40:37,095 -->
00:40:39,136
Also importantly, enterprise sales.
850
00:40:39,136 -->
00:40:42,457
As Bert, you probably also know from your
past experiences,
851
00:40:42,457 -->
00:40:46,578
a salesperson who is used to selling 10K,
852
00:40:46,578 -->
00:40:49,759
50K projects is not the person,
853
00:40:49,759 -->
00:40:53,320
or not necessarily the person who can sell
200k,
854
00:40:53,320 -->
00:40:56,581
500K tickets. So tickets,
855
00:40:56,581 -->
00:41:00,782
contracts. So ~ that is the perfect
profile,
856
00:41:00,782 -->
00:41:02,823
right? So for sales.
857
00:41:03,527 -->
00:41:07,210
For customer success and and more also
chief of staff role.
858
00:41:07,210 -->
00:41:09,693
the background in fashion is not as
relevant.
859
00:41:09,693 -->
00:41:15,519
The interest is relevant, but it's more
there looking at someone that yeah,
860
00:41:15,519 -->
00:41:20,624
background in in in in one of the top
consulting firms or at other startups,
861
00:41:20,624 -->
00:41:23,046
someone who's like, you know, ~ who's
smart,
862
00:41:23,046 -->
00:41:25,659
proactive. ~ that's different.
863
00:41:25,659 -->
00:41:26,710
That's a different kind of
864
00:41:27,210 -->
00:41:29,362
But it's it's a recognizable challenge
indeed.
865
00:41:29,362 -->
00:41:33,295
~ and of course tech it's sort of from a
completely different point of view,
866
00:41:33,295 -->
00:41:38,439
a letter services company. ~ but like
going from founder led sales,
867
00:41:38,439 -->
00:41:42,732
where you're I think often good at sales
simply because you're very passionate
about
868
00:41:42,732 -->
00:41:43,732
what you're doing,
869
00:41:42,966 -->
00:41:43,966
Yeah.
870
00:41:43,583 -->
00:41:47,306
right? Like and that lets that radiates
off to other people and people trust
871
00:41:47,306 -->
00:41:49,347
you because you're very passionate about
about helping them.
872
00:41:49,347 -->
00:41:50,889
And then getting to that
873
00:41:51,843 -->
00:41:54,645
first version of your sales engine that
you can then scale.
874
00:41:54,645 -->
00:41:55,985
Like the first version is hard,
875
00:41:55,985 -->
00:41:58,757
right? Scaling them further is it becomes
easier.
876
00:41:58,757 -->
00:42:02,679
but it is getting to that like that first
next step in the in that
877
00:42:02,679 -->
00:42:03,840
in that sales maturity indeed.
878
00:42:04,340 -->
00:42:08,360
And are you also thinking of expanding to
other industries or are you just seeing
879
00:42:08,360 -->
00:42:11,459
to fashion and maybe looking at like for
instance bad fashion,
880
00:42:11,459 -->
00:42:12,459
so to say?
881
00:42:12,722 -->
00:42:13,722
Yeah, so
882
00:42:14,317 -->
00:42:16,658
The same as you say never never say never.
883
00:42:16,658 -->
00:42:22,551
So I think for us it's gonna be we're
gonna have to explore how would
884
00:42:22,551 -->
00:42:24,761
I say two there's different options.
885
00:42:24,761 -->
00:42:28,023
One is we stick to fashion, but back to
your earlier point,
886
00:42:28,023 -->
00:42:31,364
Charlotte, we continuously grow further in
that life cycle.
887
00:42:31,364 -->
00:42:33,836
We start adding marketing, sales,
888
00:42:33,836 -->
00:42:35,426
like we we do the full roundup.
889
00:42:35,426 -->
00:42:39,378
and then later you can always still expand
to other other industries and
890
00:42:39,378 -->
00:42:41,419
do the same thing. Or we go earlier.
891
00:42:41,653 -->
00:42:42,653
And I think there's a
892
00:42:42,968 -->
00:42:45,289
My hunch is that that's going to be
opportunity driven.
893
00:42:45,289 -->
00:42:49,601
So if an opportunity comes up where an
FMCG company,
894
00:42:49,601 -->
00:42:52,322
a beauty company says we have exactly the
same problem,
895
00:42:52,322 -->
00:42:55,224
we're interested to explore if Athena
could help us,
896
00:42:55,224 -->
00:42:57,245
then we might do that in parallel.
897
00:42:57,245 -->
00:43:00,816
But it changes the way you build your team
and it changes the way you grow.
898
00:43:00,816 -->
00:43:03,668
So I think for us, it's not our focus.
899
00:43:03,668 -->
00:43:07,359
We don't go out ourselves to other
industries at this stage,
900
00:43:07,359 -->
00:43:11,161
or I think in the short term. But it's
definitely a growth a growth path
901
00:43:11,161 -->
00:43:12,372
for the other.
902
00:43:12,712 -->
00:43:14,382
Because technically every product,
903
00:43:14,382 -->
00:43:17,213
every company, sorry, that brings a
physical product to market,
904
00:43:17,213 -->
00:43:21,094
it will be a different process than
fashion with different challenges,
905
00:43:21,094 -->
00:43:24,906
but it's similar. Different teams work
from different systems
906
00:43:24,906 -->
00:43:28,837
and different files and whatever and need
to coordinate and work together.
907
00:43:29,337 -->
00:43:31,809
Yeah, indeed, I think there probably have
a lot of parallels if you looked
908
00:43:31,809 -->
00:43:34,691
at ~ to the fast move consumer goods,
909
00:43:34,691 -->
00:43:38,634
like a lot of a lot of different ~
verticals that you could potentially
910
00:43:38,634 -->
00:43:40,266
~ tackle with this
911
00:43:38,817 -->
00:43:39,817
Yes, yes.
912
00:43:40,446 -->
00:43:44,179
with this approach. Yeah. And that's an
that's an interesting disco
913
00:43:44,179 -->
00:43:49,056
d this discussion as well. like do you go
further in where in the domain that
914
00:43:49,056 -->
00:43:52,348
you know very well and go a bit earlier or
later there or go
915
00:43:52,348 -->
00:43:54,290
to a different vertical? I think that's ~
916
00:43:54,790 -->
00:43:55,790
But that's probably something
917
00:43:54,982 -->
00:43:55,982
Yeah.
918
00:43:55,634 -->
00:43:58,929
also that that customer demand will will
help solve a bit.
919
00:43:58,929 -->
00:43:59,929
~
920
00:43:59,485 -->
00:44:00,485
But I I
921
00:43:59,935 -->
00:44:02,027
think the question is also how big you
want to go.
922
00:44:02,027 -->
00:44:04,410
And I think for us, we do want to go big.
923
00:44:04,410 -->
00:44:07,903
Like I do believe and I have the ambition
to build a Tina Studio into
924
00:44:07,903 -->
00:44:12,227
a billion dollar company. You don't get
there by only staying niche,
925
00:44:12,227 -->
00:44:16,952
right? But I'm also very focused on what
are the priorities first?
926
00:44:16,952 -->
00:44:18,493
Where do we need to win first?
927
00:44:18,493 -->
00:44:21,156
and and yeah, those are more on the focus
sides.
928
00:44:21,814 -->
00:44:25,347
Yeah, interesting. Because I w I was
thinking about like ~ like you're you're
very
929
00:44:25,347 -->
00:44:27,750
into the nitty gritty of what is fashion
and how does this work.
930
00:44:27,750 -->
00:44:30,663
And you could like have arguments to say,
931
00:44:30,663 -->
00:44:34,607
Okay, let's maybe go into more towards
customer intimacy to really want
932
00:44:34,607 -->
00:44:38,511
to to really understand like what do these
customers want to really like help guide
933
00:44:38,511 -->
00:44:39,852
our next collection, for example,
934
00:44:39,852 -->
00:44:41,394
to be a bit more customer informed,
935
00:44:41,394 -->
00:44:42,394
like
936
00:44:41,778 -->
00:44:43,431
can imagine that you go into something
like that.
937
00:44:43,431 -->
00:44:47,629
But at the same time you are also like you
have a very strong knowledge
938
00:44:47,629 -->
00:44:49,102
on how do you bring a product to market.
939
00:44:49,102 -->
00:44:52,989
And that's something that a lot of other
outside of fashion also struggle with,
940
00:44:52,989 -->
00:44:54,051
right? That's
941
00:44:53,744 -->
00:44:54,744
No, and
942
00:44:54,925 -->
00:44:57,117
maybe ~ and I know we're wrapping up.
943
00:44:57,117 -->
00:45:00,641
It's it's just a thought because last week
I happened to have discussions with
944
00:45:00,641 -->
00:45:03,994
a few operators in the fashion and and in
the tech industry,
945
00:45:03,994 -->
00:45:06,517
and two of them asked exactly the same
question to me.
946
00:45:06,517 -->
00:45:11,422
and they said, ~ you s so one of the
biggest changes in the industry right now,
947
00:45:11,422 -->
00:45:12,422
fashion.
948
00:45:12,453 -->
00:45:15,205
Is ~ companies like Xi in the last years,
949
00:45:15,205 -->
00:45:18,528
so the Chinese player that and Temu that
we're all familiar with,
950
00:45:18,528 -->
00:45:20,570
he they were like, How do you compare to
them?
951
00:45:20,570 -->
00:45:22,972
Why don't you allow brands to be more like
them,
952
00:45:22,972 -->
00:45:26,024
which is more competitive? And I think
from there,
953
00:45:26,024 -->
00:45:29,336
an interesting way of thinking about it is
they copy,
954
00:45:29,336 -->
00:45:31,763
right? And to be honest, there's nothing
wrong with it.
955
00:45:31,763 -->
00:45:32,763
Fast fashion.
956
00:45:32,936 -->
00:45:37,188
Also copies. And then it's a matter of how
do you as rapidly
957
00:45:37,188 -->
00:45:41,940
as possible get something that's trending
and get it on your own on your own shelf,
958
00:45:41,940 -->
00:45:45,222
on your own shop. So I think that's one
way to do fashion.
959
00:45:45,222 -->
00:45:49,363
The other way to do fashion is the brands
that have always existed,
960
00:45:49,363 -->
00:45:52,685
technically they don't listen to what you
tell them you want.
961
00:45:52,685 -->
00:45:54,106
Technically, they set trends.
962
00:45:54,690 -->
00:45:55,690
Yeah.
963
00:45:54,786 -->
00:45:55,786
It's a bit
964
00:45:55,056 -->
00:45:58,059
like Steve Jobs said, you don't wait for
the customer to say what they want.
965
00:45:58,059 -->
00:45:59,591
They don't know. We tell them.
966
00:45:59,591 -->
00:46:03,604
And so we focus very much at the moment on
those customers.
967
00:46:03,604 -->
00:46:09,540
Like, okay, how do we ensure that that
whole ideation process down to like
968
00:46:09,540 -->
00:46:12,663
how does that work? How can we massively
improve that?
969
00:46:12,663 -->
00:46:13,663
but yeah.
970
00:46:14,144 -->
00:46:17,969
Interesting, yeah. Yeah. And you could
argue that that it's more like
971
00:46:17,969 -->
00:46:21,826
~ the more creative brands. because they
indeed they they do shape
972
00:46:21,946 -->
00:46:24,030
the trends of tomorrow. That's
973
00:46:24,530 -->
00:46:27,592
Okay, that was a very very interesting
very interesting discussion,
974
00:46:27,592 -->
00:46:28,592
Heidi.
975
00:46:28,619 -->
00:46:29,619
Thank you.
976
00:46:29,613 -->
00:46:34,175
thanks a lot for your time. and we ~ wish
you all the best with Athena Studio.
977
00:46:34,175 -->
00:46:35,175
w w what
978
00:46:34,193 -->
00:46:35,193
Thanks so much.
979
00:46:35,036 -->
00:46:39,859
is what is the easiest way for people to
follow both you and ~ Athena Studio?
980
00:46:40,735 -->
00:46:43,601
~ I'm still the most active on LinkedIn,
981
00:46:43,601 -->
00:46:44,601
so I would
982
00:46:44,241 -->
00:46:45,241
Okay.
983
00:46:44,564 -->
00:46:49,074
just tell people to follow Athena Studio
on myself on on LinkedIn.
984
00:46:49,895 -->
00:46:51,678
Okay, good. Thanks a lot, Heidi,
985
00:46:51,678 -->
00:46:56,507
and ~ thanks a lot everybody for listening
and we'll see you all next time.
