Actor Dean Armstrong on Reacher Season 4, Queer as Folk and Acting | Celebrity Interview

WEBVTT
00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:11.359
You're listening to the Staffa Corner Podcast, a Staffatarian look at entertainment and life with your host, Greg Staffa.
00:00:11.359 --> 00:00:33.359
My guest today is actor, director, and acting coach Dean Armstrong.
00:00:33.359 --> 00:00:42.719
You may recognize Dean from projects, including A Queer as Folk, Solid 3D, Wrong Turn Four, but his career extends well beyond that on the screen.
00:00:42.719 --> 00:00:48.399
He spent years helping other actors and currently appears in Reacher season four.
00:00:48.399 --> 00:00:50.159
Dean, thanks for joining us today.
00:00:50.159 --> 00:00:52.240
Greg, really appreciate you having me on.
00:00:52.240 --> 00:00:54.560
So tell us a little bit about your upbringing.
00:00:54.560 --> 00:00:57.600
Where are you from and what got you started in acting?
00:00:58.000 --> 00:01:00.079
That's a fantastic question, Greg.
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:01.840
Where am I from?
00:01:01.840 --> 00:01:10.879
I grew up in a uh small town a couple of hours north of Toronto in the 70s called Owen Sound.
00:01:10.879 --> 00:01:16.319
Uh, not the end of the world, but believe me, you can actually see it from there.
00:01:16.319 --> 00:01:31.760
Um, I grew up at a time where, you know, calling Toronto was a big deal, uh, let alone actually going to Toronto just wasn't uh really a thing at that time, and certainly not uh in my family.
00:01:31.760 --> 00:01:47.599
And to kind of qualify how my relationship to this small city uh ended up uh, you know, taking me into the States, into New York uh on a Broadway run for a couple of years uh was kind of a crazy journey.
00:01:47.599 --> 00:01:50.560
But uh no one in my family remotely closely linked to the arts.
00:01:50.560 --> 00:01:53.519
I just thought it was one of those things that, you know, who did that?
00:01:53.519 --> 00:01:56.400
I certainly didn't know anybody that pursued acting.
00:01:56.400 --> 00:02:03.120
Uh as much as it was something that uh was of interest to me, it just didn't seem logical or even practical.
00:02:03.120 --> 00:02:10.400
But uh my intention was to go away to university and and pursue law, not even entertainment law, but environmental law.
00:02:10.400 --> 00:02:21.759
Uh and it was uh by taking that next step, kind of in my educational development, that uh I found myself migrating to people in the arts when I was in university.
00:02:21.759 --> 00:02:32.080
And, you know, finding out that people were actually uh considering that as a vocational pursuit was kind of eye-opening and kind of exciting, terrifying, but also exciting.
00:02:32.080 --> 00:02:41.680
So uh after uh a number of years of post-secondary at Queen's University in Kingston, I um had moved to Toronto shortly.
00:02:41.680 --> 00:03:00.400
After that move, I'd kind of began the inception of what is known today as Armstrong Acting Studios, which I started in 1997, but found myself moving to New York City in '99 to uh work on the Broadway musical Rent, uh, which was also kind of an extraordinary uh first.
00:03:00.400 --> 00:03:12.159
Both Rent and you had mentioned just in the introduction, that I had worked on Queer as Folk, which uh was also one of my first TV film uh auditions ever.
00:03:12.159 --> 00:03:24.879
Uh and the booking with that show, which was originally a two-episode contract that became five years for me on that show, uh, was happening simultaneously uh when I was uh doing rent uh in New York City as well.
00:03:24.879 --> 00:03:38.080
But started in a small town in the 70s and found myself uh in 1999, by God's grace, uh starting in a show that you know really kind of also changed my life.
00:03:38.400 --> 00:03:43.439
Now you said that you really didn't see the path initially to become an actor.
00:03:43.439 --> 00:03:46.080
Like we're looking back now, were there signs?
00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:52.319
Were you, you know, a creative child where you didn't have many friends that you had to make up imaginary friends?
00:03:52.319 --> 00:03:53.919
What was the childhood like?
00:03:53.919 --> 00:04:00.479
Was there was there little signs that you saw now that said, yeah, I can see how this all happened?
00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:01.840
Sure.
00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:11.199
I mean, like every public school in elementary, uh, you're introduced to uh storytelling.
00:04:11.199 --> 00:04:21.600
And there would be those annual plays that I would have the wonderful fortune of of starring and working on.
00:04:21.600 --> 00:04:27.920
And it was very clear to me at an early stage that I enjoyed entertaining people.
00:04:27.920 --> 00:04:31.519
Uh predominantly I enjoyed making people laugh.
00:04:31.519 --> 00:04:47.360
And that was obviously something that was an intuitive thing, an identification thing when it came to uh understanding my relationship to uh to people and storytelling, for lack of a better description.
00:04:47.360 --> 00:05:00.240
But again, in this in this small town and at that period, the first time that I was introduced to studying theater arts wasn't until uh grade 11.
00:05:00.240 --> 00:05:05.360
And uh that was the first time I ever taken had taken a drama class.
00:05:05.360 --> 00:05:09.279
It was offered in grade 11 and in grade 12.
00:05:09.279 --> 00:05:10.879
I took it both years.
00:05:10.879 --> 00:05:13.279
I did very well in those classes.
00:05:13.279 --> 00:05:25.519
Uh, there was certainly something in those classes uh that I experienced about myself that I again identified as something that I loved doing, something that I I guess was good at.
00:05:25.519 --> 00:05:35.680
I did receive uh scholastic opportunities through those studies uh at the end of that grade 12 year in a monetary capacity.
00:05:35.680 --> 00:05:38.319
Uh again, it just didn't seem realistic.
00:05:38.319 --> 00:05:46.319
And of course, at that time in Ontario, uh, there was also a grade 13 year.
00:05:46.319 --> 00:05:56.800
So theater arts was offered in grade 11 and grade 12, and then there was this grade 13, uh, which was called your OAC year or your Ontario Academic Credit Year.
00:05:56.800 --> 00:06:03.920
And that year was made available to those students who are interested in pursuing university versus college.
00:06:03.920 --> 00:06:06.959
And I had opted obviously for that grade 13 year.
00:06:06.959 --> 00:06:11.040
And within that year, I did not have a theater arts program.
00:06:11.040 --> 00:06:24.000
So it was only in that grade 11 and grade 12 year that I had had those experiences, which obviously served as a bit of a springboard for me to go, oh, this is something that I love to do.
00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:28.480
I kind of envisioned myself, you know, pursuing my law career.
00:06:28.480 --> 00:06:35.519
And then at the same time, once that was established, you know, doing community theater in whatever city I ended up in.
00:06:35.519 --> 00:06:55.759
But as it turned out, uh it was that relationship in grade 12 that once I had started university in 1992 uh and got into a co-ed residence uh where I was interacting with people in different disciplines, you know, whether it was commerce or engineering or sciences or the arts.
00:06:55.759 --> 00:07:13.920
And I had started in the sciences uh with that bigger intention of environmental law pursuit, and then had switched my major uh from the sciences into theater arts in my second year, and then completed that four-year honor degree, and then um ended up uh, of course, writing LSATs, applying to teachers college.
00:07:13.920 --> 00:07:23.759
Inevitably, I ended up going to teachers college with the idea that I would subsidize myself as an actor through teaching while I was pursuing this career.
00:07:23.759 --> 00:07:31.439
I was just super lucky, Greg, that I started working right away uh when I had moved to Toronto.
00:07:31.439 --> 00:07:32.639
And I had not anticipated that.
00:07:32.639 --> 00:07:37.519
And I built my career in stage because it was what I studied, it was what I understood.
00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:43.360
And it was a couple of years before I had decided to shift that gear into TV film focus.
00:07:43.360 --> 00:07:54.319
And like I said, uh that gear shifting happened in 1999, and that was when Queerus Folk had happened, and that of course carried on for for five seasons.
00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:55.199
Wow.
00:07:55.199 --> 00:08:09.920
Now, this next question might be a little bit above your pay grade, but there are a lot of shows US-based filmed in Canada, but there's also Canadian productions that are Canadian-based filmed in Canada.
00:08:09.920 --> 00:08:16.639
Shows like Flashpoint, which you were on for two episodes, is one of the notable ones that made it to the US audience.
00:08:16.639 --> 00:08:18.639
Uh Dew South was another one.
00:08:18.639 --> 00:08:32.559
Why is it when so much is filmed in Canada, there's so much talent in Canada, there's so many productions in Canada, why does Canada seem to have a problem getting more shows to the US that are Canadian-based?
00:08:34.080 --> 00:08:36.159
Uh, that is a great question.
00:08:36.159 --> 00:09:02.879
I I do think uh that production has changed in in recent years when it comes to an elevation of uh production value and things that don't traditionally look like, oh, that feels Canadian, or it feels in the absence of some of those more bolstered uh US budgets of shows coming into Canada.
00:09:02.879 --> 00:09:10.000
Because the end of the day, all of these shows that are American that shoot in Canada are using Canadian crews.
00:09:10.000 --> 00:09:19.600
They're using Canadian talent uh from leading roles to you know supporting roles to recurring roles to principals and actor roles in these shows.
00:09:19.600 --> 00:09:32.240
Uh, but there has been historically, I think, a real deviation and departure from uh a production value component that, you know, really differentiates that American stuff versus that Canadian stuff.
00:09:32.240 --> 00:09:46.159
Uh, you know, you mentioned Flashpoint, and you know, there was um, you know, at that time, if you can remember back when it was on the heels of SARS, but there were a number of uh uh strikes that were taking place in the U.S.
00:09:46.159 --> 00:09:56.480
at that time, and uh a lot of the networks were desperate for content and started bringing shows, uh airing shows that were Canadian produced uh on U.S.
00:09:56.480 --> 00:10:02.399
networks, like Flashpoint, that all of a sudden put a spotlight on Canadian shows in a different way.
00:10:02.399 --> 00:10:15.200
But, you know, there are other shows too, like Degrassi The Next Generation or even RenegadePress.com, some of these teen-driven shows that have had a massive impact uh on the North American audience.
00:10:15.200 --> 00:10:27.519
Um, I do think that uh, like I said, there's there's been a significant departure from some of the uh what I would define as a Canadian feel with some content.
00:10:27.519 --> 00:10:36.480
I mean, Shits Creek is another great example of a show that shoots up in up in Canada that has had an enormous impact south of the border.
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:45.759
And so I think that there are shows that are are defining themselves in a way that uh are comparative in experience.
00:10:45.759 --> 00:10:51.039
Uh, again, a large part of that just production value where you feel the money on the screen.
00:10:51.039 --> 00:11:00.559
Um, but Canadian talent is, as you said, you know, a lot of amazing people in Canada, you know, found themselves as mainstays in the US.
00:11:00.559 --> 00:11:12.879
Uh, a lot in the comedic genre, uh, but a lot in the dramatic genre across the board, whether we're talking about Jim Carrey or Mike Myers or John Candy or Marty Short, uh, or even someone like Keanu Reeves.
00:11:12.879 --> 00:11:26.080
You know, it's it's there's been an enormous wealth of talent that have found themselves on an international stage uh that uh, you know, frankly just felt that there was a different level of recognition moving south of the border.
00:11:26.080 --> 00:11:34.480
And I think in a lot of ways there is a bit of that mentality uh for a lot of talent, uh a lot of agents associated with that talent to go.
00:11:34.480 --> 00:11:38.639
There's a, it's a, you're in a different league when you're south of the border.
00:11:38.639 --> 00:11:41.840
And I know that that has been true historically.
00:11:41.840 --> 00:11:49.919
I think that there is some of that cachet to date that uh identifies uh an actor in a different way when they have that uh U.S.
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:50.960
affiliation.
00:11:50.960 --> 00:12:10.639
But uh at the end of the day, I think the crews that define that work historically and currently, uh the the people, the actors, the talent that have been associated with uh shows um shot in Canada historically that have cross-pollinated, uh, all of that talent uh is still the same.
00:12:10.639 --> 00:12:16.480
And uh it is an interesting question when it comes to uh what type of traction.
00:12:16.480 --> 00:12:22.639
And in all honesty, Greg, the answer really may be just in context of volume.
00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:31.200
There's just less people in Canada, less production Canadian-driven, developed in Canada comparatively to the US market.
00:12:31.200 --> 00:12:46.799
And I do think uh because of this digital era, um, and you know, shows finding themselves on these international platforms, Netflix, Prime, Apple TV, whatever else it might be, you know, I I think that uh we are going to see more of it.
00:12:46.799 --> 00:12:57.600
I just don't think that the volume is going to be consistent uh with the volume of production that is generated in the US simply just because of just because of numbers.
00:12:58.000 --> 00:12:58.720
Thanks for that.
00:12:58.720 --> 00:13:05.200
Leaning, I mean, when you started off acting, you did, you know, appearance here and appearance there, and appearance there.
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:13.679
But like you said, Queer as Folk really was it was supposed to be a short-term thing, but then it turned into a long-term career project.
00:13:13.679 --> 00:13:14.320
Yeah.
00:13:14.320 --> 00:13:16.159
Did your attitude change?
00:13:16.159 --> 00:13:17.679
Did your mindset change?
00:13:17.679 --> 00:13:26.080
What was it about that approach that turned helped turn you know something that was short-term into something long-term?
00:13:27.039 --> 00:13:35.759
Uh, well, that uh was at the the the God-given grace of Russell Davies, uh Ron Cowan and Dan Lippman.
00:13:35.759 --> 00:13:50.080
Uh Russell Davies, of course, the uh creator of the original British series, Queer as Folk, um, and Ron Cowan and Dan Lippman, who were the executive producers and writers of uh the US adaptation of that original British series.
00:13:50.080 --> 00:14:03.679
Um, we had shot the pilot, and uh, this particular character that I played in the British series um was uh only in that British series for I think two episodes.
00:14:03.679 --> 00:14:32.320
So there was a consistency in context of what uh my uh who my character was, this character Blake uh Wizeki, who uh was uh in the British series, um he kills one of the main protagonists in the uh I think it's in the pilot, um, accidentally, of course, uh through an overdose situation, which kind of terminated um that storyline for both of those characters.
00:14:32.320 --> 00:14:44.159
And I think the conversations uh based on this inspiration of what I had brought to the table with the representation of this character was kind of twofold.
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:50.879
Number one, I had never approached this character who was um obviously a drug user.
00:14:50.879 --> 00:14:58.639
Um, he was kind of portrayed uh in a way in the US, um sorry, in the British series as a bit of an antagonistic figure.
00:14:58.639 --> 00:15:05.919
Um, after the uh the overdose, he takes, you know, the guy's wallet, uh takes money.
00:15:05.919 --> 00:15:10.000
And there is a real negative association with this character.
00:15:10.000 --> 00:15:33.679
And I think I had brought in my interpretation of Blake this um this innocence, um, this naivete, this genuineness of attraction uh to this character, Ted, played by Scott Lowell, who is an extraordinary talent and one of the greatest uh actors I had had the opportunity to work with and remains so um to date.
00:15:33.679 --> 00:15:58.960
But there was this real genuine um uh uh uh love for this character that I tapped into and it this uh uh affectation, um, this um disease, if you will, that Blake had uh with with crystal meth, with uh other drugs, that he it wasn't his fault, but he was certainly trapped in that world.
00:15:58.960 --> 00:16:01.200
And I think it was an accident.
00:16:01.200 --> 00:16:03.200
The overdose was an accident.
00:16:03.200 --> 00:16:11.919
And I think that they saw in this storytelling in the pilot that there was this genuineness and dynamic between Ted and Blake.
00:16:11.919 --> 00:16:28.480
And on top of that, a real responsibility to commit to the theme of drugs in not only uh uh this community, uh, but in general, uh, about addiction and about the dangers of addiction.
00:16:28.480 --> 00:16:35.679
And uh they felt that there was a real responsibility to say, hey, drugs is an enormous part of this community.
00:16:35.679 --> 00:16:38.960
And we have to represent that and represent it authentically.
00:16:38.960 --> 00:16:47.279
And as this storyline, of course, grew, um, this character, Blake, uh, evolved from being a drug addict to being a drug counselor.
00:16:47.279 --> 00:17:45.599
And uh, you know, the number of people over the years that I've received uh written communication from, people that I've run into on the streets, um, that talked about uh how grateful they were that this story was represented in Queer as folk uh through this character dynamic and how it helped them overcome their own obstacles and challenges with drug addiction, or whether it was their own or a partner or a family member, someone that they knew, um, that there was just a real appreciation across the board that the show had taken this issue very seriously and uh addressed it with this positive change and this evolution and this ability to overcome uh one of the most difficult, uh, I think personal obstacles uh someone in an addiction position could experience.
00:17:45.599 --> 00:18:09.839
So, you know, it it was just of really great fortune that my interpretation of Blake and the subsequent execution of that interpretation in The Pilot was received so well by Russell Davies and Ron Cowan and Dan Littman that they went, there's a way to tell this story in such a way that isn't as dark as the British series.
00:18:09.839 --> 00:18:28.400
And we owe it to our audience to represent this issue in this community and to have a positive kind of evolution and kind of uh outcome uh for somebody that obviously was struggling with this problem in a really detrimental way.
00:18:29.200 --> 00:18:31.839
Was that a good lesson for you as an actor?
00:18:31.839 --> 00:18:39.839
Because I would assume a lot of these jobs are almost like temp jobs where you're hired for a day or two and then you're done and you move on.
00:18:39.839 --> 00:18:50.640
I would have to assume as humans, there's almost kind of a uh an attitude of, oh, I I'm dismissive, it's just gonna be a day or two, and then I'm on to my next searching thing.
00:18:50.640 --> 00:18:52.720
So you're not fully invested.
00:18:52.720 --> 00:19:08.319
Was there a realization that you know any role could become, you know, three seasons, four seasons, even though you're there initially for only two episodes, that you gotta put everything in there in order to see where it might become?
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:09.519
Yeah, 100%.
00:19:09.519 --> 00:19:21.119
I've never approached any character with the idea that uh they do not have a life outside of these couple of scenes.
00:19:21.119 --> 00:19:25.920
Um, that you approach every character as you are your lead in your own story.
00:19:25.920 --> 00:19:44.000
Uh, it's not to obviously distract from some of the fundamental or instrumental uh kind of functions of a character in storytelling, but at the end of the day, there is an authenticity and there is a truth, and there is a story associated with every character that you play, regardless of how big or how small.
00:19:44.000 --> 00:19:59.599
Um, so I think I've always uh approached uh my work uh from the perspective of committing to the life of this story outside of the given scenes that you have a responsibility to committing to that support whatever narrative.
00:19:59.599 --> 00:20:16.480
And to be quite honest, in my collaboration with talent, you know, my actors uh I obviously bring in that same philosophy uh to our collaborative work to ensure that we are elevating this in such a way that really does differentiate that actor from the rest of the competition.
00:20:16.480 --> 00:20:28.160
I think in part it is due to looking at telling this story as effectively as possible, uh, regardless of its uh uh size of role.
00:20:28.160 --> 00:20:42.480
And I will say, uh, and even recently, uh there's uh a client of mine out in Los Angeles uh who had a uh a co-starring role edition for 911.
00:20:42.480 --> 00:20:58.400
And, you know, they had called about uh possibly uh scheduling a uh a coaching session, and you know, they were they were on the fence about whether or not it was necessary uh because it was only a couple of pages, and there were two characters.
00:20:58.400 --> 00:21:03.119
Interestingly enough, they were it was a Fed character, and it the character didn't even have a name.
00:21:03.119 --> 00:21:08.240
And so casting had asked them to aud for two like Fed one and Fed two.
00:21:08.240 --> 00:21:11.200
And so I said, no, no, uh a thousand percent.
00:21:11.200 --> 00:21:13.359
Come in, come into the studio, we'll work on this.
00:21:13.359 --> 00:21:18.559
And I said, of the two, this one makes the most sense, but this is the angle that we're actually going to take.
00:21:18.559 --> 00:21:29.920
And we're going to assume that this particular character has this level of contribution to the storytelling as the series continues on, even though it's written as a co-starring role, which is under five lines.
00:21:29.920 --> 00:21:40.160
I said, there is a much bigger picture here, and I see this from a writer's perspective, you know, going this could be uh a massively contributory character to the storyline.
00:21:40.160 --> 00:21:54.400
And anyway, we had made uh uh very specific choices in context of representing this character, uh, everything down to um, you know, physical specifics, tonal specifics, rhythmic specifics.
00:21:54.400 --> 00:22:00.960
And uh, of course, this he was booked uh for uh This role.
00:22:00.960 --> 00:22:05.039
And it was the role that I had anticipated he would be booked for.
00:22:05.039 --> 00:22:15.759
And that one episode became six episodes in the season and became a major antagonistic figure in the storytelling for that season.
00:22:15.759 --> 00:22:18.000
And just another example.
00:22:18.000 --> 00:22:42.319
And Greg, I've got literally hundreds and hundreds of stories of making contributions in the audition process that truly inspired casting to move in the direction of hiring those actors, my actors, and the choices that we had discovered and executed in those self-tapes were choices that materialized in the actual episodes themselves or in the features themselves.
00:22:42.319 --> 00:22:53.359
So, yes, I believe this casting process is so it is such a creative and collaborative dynamic that most actors fail to really identify.
00:22:53.359 --> 00:22:57.279
Most actors get trapped by the structure of what is on the page.
00:22:57.279 --> 00:23:09.440
And every team is desperately hoping and praying that the next actor that they see is going to make their job easier, that they're going to be inspired by the choices that have been executed by that talent.
00:23:09.440 --> 00:23:11.200
Because that is the talent's job.
00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:21.440
That is the actor's job is to show them how you see this, to excite them about the possibilities of how this character could exist on the day.
00:23:21.440 --> 00:23:26.400
And all subsequent storytelling throughout that series or whatever else it might be.
00:23:26.400 --> 00:23:34.319
But there is so much power that the actor has that I think they fail to identify when it comes to impressioning those people that can hire them.
00:23:34.319 --> 00:23:39.519
And that's what I love to do is just kind of look at this and go, well, let's think about this a little bit differently.
00:23:39.519 --> 00:23:58.960
How can we showcase this in such a way that is still anchored to the fundamental truths that are on the page, what the writers intended, but at the same time showcases this role that capitalizes on showcasing the unique specifics about the individual through this lens that uh, again, is different than what other people are doing.
00:23:58.960 --> 00:24:11.359
And I do think that that is a leading difference when it comes to that end product that uh is less carbon copy like every other actor's submission.
00:24:11.359 --> 00:24:13.359
Because why are they carbon copies?
00:24:13.359 --> 00:24:15.839
Well, because everybody gets the same script.
00:24:15.839 --> 00:24:19.759
Everybody looks at that breakdown and that character description.
00:24:19.759 --> 00:24:26.000
Every actor seems to be 1000% committed to the punctuation that's on the page.
00:24:26.000 --> 00:24:38.640
And you start to hear the uh uh the memorized punctuation because every actor breathes at a period or at a comma or raises their voice when there's an exclamation mark or the inflection comes up when there's a question mark.
00:24:38.640 --> 00:25:20.720
And you just start to hear it again and again and again, and they they isolate an intuitive, natural base emotional beat in those scenes, and then they commit to that, failing to realize that their on-camera editions always have to be far more colorful, far more tiered, far more dynamic than the way the scenes will ever be shot on the day, because within these 60-second, 90-second, 120-second windows or the self-tape edition, it is your job to demonstrate your range and your flexibility, not just you as the actor, but obviously the range and the flexibility of the character, to see this character outside of the edition scenes that have actually been given.
00:25:20.720 --> 00:25:45.680
So when you approach things that way, it does elevate those uh those self-tapes in such a way that whether it's a co-starring role, whether it's a principal role, whether it's a guest star or a lead, it has a truth that is unique, specific to the actor, and showcased in such a way that again differentiates them from other people that are making those submissions.
00:25:46.240 --> 00:25:51.759
People come to you because you you coach actors and you help them with their their auditions.
00:25:51.759 --> 00:25:53.759
So you're the one that they go to.
00:25:53.759 --> 00:25:58.799
Has there ever been an opportunity where someone came to you looking for your help?
00:25:58.799 --> 00:26:03.359
And in working with them, you said, Oh my god, that was brilliant.
00:26:03.359 --> 00:26:05.839
I'm gonna borrow it for my next audition.
00:26:07.759 --> 00:26:16.880
Uh well, I think there is an answer to this that isn't quite as specific as, oh, I'm going to borrow that.
00:26:16.880 --> 00:26:30.960
You know, and I think we are all influenced by the things that we experience in our lives that change the way we approach uh our relationship to work.
00:26:30.960 --> 00:26:47.200
But I I think the answer to that is we become better uh as actors uh through the influences of the things around us.
00:26:47.200 --> 00:26:55.599
And the more we can tap into those kind of specifics, um, I think it redefines the work that we actually have.
00:26:55.599 --> 00:27:12.480
And I think that I've always said you never fully understand something, Greg, until you are able to uh take an idea, communicate that idea to someone else so that they understand it.
00:27:12.480 --> 00:27:21.440
You never fully understand something until you're able to take that idea to someone else, communicate that idea to someone else so that they understand it.
00:27:21.440 --> 00:27:35.759
So it's my way of saying I understand myself better by looking at the choices that actors make, or perhaps the choices that they don't make.
00:27:35.759 --> 00:27:46.880
It forces me to step outside of my own work in my own process and go, hey, why aren't I exploring this or doing that?
00:27:46.880 --> 00:28:02.720
And I think every hour, every second, every month or year that I've committed to elevating the work of actors has enabled to understand my relationship to my work better.
00:28:02.720 --> 00:28:18.160
So it's not that I've seen somebody in this collaborative process that has done something that I want to take from, but there are moments of discovery that can serve as a point of inspiration.
00:28:18.160 --> 00:28:28.079
And I think, and at the end of the day, I think that's what we're really all striving to achieve or to find is are those inspiration moments.
00:28:28.079 --> 00:28:32.079
What are those inspiration moments on the day?
00:28:32.079 --> 00:28:46.799
And I think we pray for those things because as actors, we do our homework, we do our prep work, we um make specific choices associated with the representation of our responsibilities.
00:28:46.799 --> 00:29:14.480
And when we arrive on the day, we pray for inspiration, we pray for how the wardrobe is going to have an impact on our physicality, how that impact on our physicality has an influence on our rhythm of speech, our breath, our cadence, all of those other specifics, how a property, uh a set piece inspires a moment.
00:29:14.480 --> 00:29:26.559
These are the immediate things that I think enable an actor to acclimate in a world of true action and reaction, where that authenticity lives.
00:29:26.559 --> 00:29:36.799
And so I think we we pray for inspiration on the day, we pray for inspiration in this collaborative process in the documentation of self-tapes.
00:29:36.799 --> 00:29:57.119
And not that I have, like I said, taken something specifically, although when I when I think about this, Greg, um, and I talk about the life experiences that we all have that have an influence and an impact on the execution of choices within our work.
00:29:57.119 --> 00:30:03.519
I played this character, just to circle back a little bit on it, but played this character, Blake on Queer's folk.
00:30:03.519 --> 00:30:07.359
And uh, I'm not a crystal meth drug addict.
00:30:07.359 --> 00:30:11.200
I've never tried crystal meth, uh, nor am I a drug user.
00:30:11.200 --> 00:30:22.720
So there were all kinds of question marks I had associated with how I represent this character, which I needed to do a lot, in a drug-influenced state.
00:30:22.720 --> 00:30:36.319
And we had professionals on set that we could chat with to talk about the impact of crystal meth on um uh on it on someone using it, what uh the physical symptoms would be.
00:30:36.319 --> 00:30:52.319
And, you know, while that was useful, uh within what we do as actors, representing life or trying to achieve a level of authenticity, we don't always know what is translating in a world that is authentic to the audience.
00:30:52.319 --> 00:31:00.799
Am I doing too much to represent this moment of drug affectation uh and the audience doesn't buy it?
00:31:00.799 --> 00:31:07.279
Or am I doing too little for uh to represent this drug affectation and the audience doesn't believe it?
00:31:07.279 --> 00:31:17.920
Because often what feels right in the world of acting and in the world of screen representation doesn't necessarily translate well.
00:31:17.920 --> 00:31:22.000
It doesn't translate in a way that people buy it.
00:31:22.000 --> 00:31:47.279
So talking about stealing, and I don't think anyone in the world would have ever made this correlation, but Helen Benam Garrier's representation of Ophelia in Mel Gibson's Hamlet, in her state of madness upon learning of her brother's death, her father's death, that Hamlet's rejecting her.
00:31:47.279 --> 00:31:51.759
She goes into this state of uh, I mean, she loses her mind.
00:31:51.759 --> 00:32:00.799
And the representation of that had always stayed with me in such a way that I went, fuck, I mean, I just bought it.
00:32:00.799 --> 00:32:02.720
I bought it.
00:32:02.720 --> 00:32:23.519
I stole from her representation of Ophelia's madness some of those traits, for lack of a better word, in the representation of my affected states uh through the use of crystal meth, in the representation of Blake.
00:32:23.519 --> 00:32:28.720
And you know, I'm sure you've read or heard stories of other actors.
00:32:28.720 --> 00:32:51.599
I mean, I read not that long ago that Heath Ledger's representation of the Joker was stolen from Tom Waits, which uh just in his physicality and the way he held his body and where he placed his vocal register and his rhythm, um, stolen from that.
00:32:51.599 --> 00:32:54.319
When you see it now, you can't unsee it.
00:32:54.319 --> 00:32:57.680
That there was that influence.
00:32:57.680 --> 00:33:05.680
So I've not seen something in my collaborative process working with actors that I just went, oh, I'm gonna steal that.
00:33:05.680 --> 00:33:08.640
But I've been inspired from and it's made my work better.
00:33:08.640 --> 00:33:19.359
But I am constantly stealing from people watching encounters with strangers or family or friends.
00:33:19.359 --> 00:33:22.720
I mean, it's like Mike Myers and his representation of Dr.
00:33:22.720 --> 00:33:25.279
Evil being influenced by Lauren Michaels.
00:33:25.279 --> 00:33:48.559
There are, I think, you know, countless examples of people that have had moments in their lives that have resonated with them that inspired to bring that to their storytelling in a way that uh has just such a profound and significant influence on the audience.
00:33:49.279 --> 00:33:57.839
Now you mentioned self-tapes, and the audition process has really changed post-COVID, where it used to be used to go in an audition.
00:33:57.839 --> 00:34:03.759
As a coach, I'm sure self-tapes is nice because you can kind of control that environment.
00:34:03.759 --> 00:34:12.559
But as an actor, do you like that because you're not able to to play off what they the feedback that you're given or you're make adjustments on the go?
00:34:12.559 --> 00:34:17.599
Or is there a method that you prefer or well?
00:34:17.679 --> 00:34:22.800
I I don't subscribe to one method because I don't believe one method works for all actors.
00:34:22.800 --> 00:34:36.639
I believe there's as many methods on the face of the planet as there are actors, and it's really the sum total of the books that they've read, the directors they've worked with, the casting experiences they've had, the instructors uh uh that they've that they've learned from, whatever else that might be.
00:34:36.639 --> 00:34:48.320
And people basically use whatever works for them, and that defines whatever that method or approach is that leads to a result, um, whether that's a booking or um a real confidence in what's been executed.
00:34:48.320 --> 00:34:59.760
But two more specifically to your question uh about self-tapes, it it is uh the way of the new world post-COVID in the US market.
00:34:59.760 --> 00:35:12.320
However, in Canada, where I grew up, um, and where most of the careers of uh of international stars I've launched was from my Toronto studio through self tapes.
00:35:12.320 --> 00:35:22.639
You know, they self tapes have been around in Canada for almost 15 years prior to COVID.
00:35:22.639 --> 00:35:32.239
And it was the way I remember uh being in the US and doing rent and and and having an edition coming up and not able to do it and saying, Can I send in a self tape?
00:35:32.239 --> 00:35:33.760
And they're like, What is a self tape?
00:35:33.760 --> 00:35:41.920
At that time, of course, you were going into a space and documenting the work on a VHS tape, you know, FedExing these tapes off.
00:35:41.920 --> 00:35:49.440
People would have to put it into a VHS player, they'd have to play it, they'd have to rewind it to share it with another executive at the studio or the director or whoever.
00:35:49.440 --> 00:35:50.880
It was so impractical.
00:35:50.880 --> 00:36:02.159
But Canada had invented uh this uh e-tape or electronic tape submission structure year decades before uh COVID had ever happened.
00:36:02.159 --> 00:36:04.159
So I was very familiar with it.
00:36:04.159 --> 00:36:14.559
And while there are benefits to going in the room, i.e., you you develop a relationship with the casting director um that is friendly, uh, which is great.
00:36:14.559 --> 00:36:22.079
It provides you the actor uh an opportunity to receive a direction from the casting director to see if they're able to apply it.
00:36:22.079 --> 00:36:34.480
Uh, I think that being in the room um uh could be very advantageous if you had producers there, if you had the director there who can collaborate with you in real time.
00:36:34.480 --> 00:36:38.320
I think that there are tremendous advantages of that at that juncture.
00:36:38.320 --> 00:36:50.320
And when I say at that juncture, you've done an addition, you've now you're at the callback stage, and you've now gone to, you know, uh you've you've passed that and now you're at the uh the the screen test stage.
00:36:50.320 --> 00:36:59.920
But for me, the screen test stage, which is when the work is actually uh on camera, uh, because historically in the States, you would do these pre-reads.
00:36:59.920 --> 00:37:01.360
You would just go in and you would read.
00:37:01.360 --> 00:37:04.320
Sometimes there would be a camera, most often there would not.
00:37:04.320 --> 00:37:08.960
And when there was a camera, um, it would often be in the wrong place in the room.
00:37:08.960 --> 00:37:12.639
So you would be getting kind of a profile of the actor and a wide shot.
00:37:12.639 --> 00:37:17.199
And it was not useful in serving the storytelling in that actual frame.
00:37:17.199 --> 00:37:21.360
So for me, the self-tape is always the screen test.
00:37:21.360 --> 00:37:37.039
And if I can control the production value, if I can control and elevate my choices to a place that I'm showcasing my absolute best work for the team, that is the major victory and win.
00:37:37.039 --> 00:37:43.440
I would way rather do a self-tape than go in the room because I want to show them what they're gonna get on the day.
00:37:43.440 --> 00:37:54.480
When you go into an audition, there can be all kinds of other factors that can potentially negatively influence the actual product that the actor delivers on the day.
00:37:54.480 --> 00:38:00.320
You know, um, I've always said the first pass of an audition is kind of like a crepe.
00:38:00.320 --> 00:38:02.639
The first one is always a throwaway.
00:38:02.639 --> 00:38:09.840
You know, you don't often get that opportunity, or you didn't at least, in the historic structure of going in the room.
00:38:09.840 --> 00:38:12.000
You know, it might be you're in and out.
00:38:12.000 --> 00:38:19.440
You do one pass, and it might have been a shitty pass and not necessarily the best representation of what you're capable of doing.
00:38:19.440 --> 00:38:28.559
And so if I can control the environment, I can control what I know is happening in the frame, which is the storytelling in that frame.
00:38:28.559 --> 00:38:31.519
I want to be the person that controls those details.
00:38:31.519 --> 00:38:37.360
I want to be the one that influences casting to see this character in the way that I see this character.
00:38:37.360 --> 00:38:47.440
And so the way that I shoot it, the way that I structure it, all in my mind will be consistent with the same way that this scene is going to be shot on the day.
00:38:47.440 --> 00:39:01.039
And I'll be honest with you, Greg, I've got an insane track record of enabling actors to book work and for actors that weren't booking work for years to all of a sudden find themselves being regular working actors.
00:39:01.039 --> 00:39:18.159
And most of my actors bypass any of those callback stages because it is so strong in the initial submission that the casting team knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is who they want.
00:39:18.159 --> 00:39:26.320
So not only am I controlling the uniqueness of the content, but I'm controlling the specifics of the production value.
00:39:26.320 --> 00:39:36.480
So the combination of those things leaves a lasting impression that is very, very difficult to compete with by any other actor going out for those same roles.
00:39:36.480 --> 00:39:39.360
So uh I love the self-tape world.
00:39:39.360 --> 00:39:44.800
I also love the opportunities that it affords for people that wouldn't have otherwise got in a room.
00:39:44.800 --> 00:39:54.079
Back in the day when casting were restricted to the hours of a day in a physical space and could only maybe bring in 30 actors in a day, if that many.
00:39:54.079 --> 00:40:00.480
Now they're, and I feel sorry for casting directors, honestly, because the volume of their work has changed so dramatically.
00:40:00.480 --> 00:40:04.320
Where they could see maybe, you know, 20 to 30 people in a day.
00:40:04.320 --> 00:40:07.599
Now they might have 300 submissions that come in a day.
00:40:07.599 --> 00:40:24.400
So not only are more actors getting opportunities to be seen by casting directors, you know, they're strategically placing themselves in a way to really control the production value and the choices that they execute through this material for casting.
00:40:24.400 --> 00:40:43.679
So I think there is a real platform here for actors to change the results that they're getting because uh there is the ability to collaborate with someone like myself, uh a coach, to get into a studio space, to shoot this in such a way that's really exciting.
00:40:43.679 --> 00:40:53.199
And frankly, I've seen some self tapes be actually better than uh the way some of the, you know, the scenes end up are shot on the day.
00:40:53.199 --> 00:40:55.280
Uh great interesting example of that.
00:40:55.280 --> 00:41:02.559
Sorry uh to digress a little bit, but Rachel McAdams has a phenomenal um uh screen test that's available online for the notebook.
00:41:02.559 --> 00:41:21.840
And when you take a look at that initial kind of breakup scene after the couple has got back together, and you take a look at the choices that uh Rachel had explored in demonstrating range of this character from 16 years of age when these these characters first meet to being in her 20s when they end up meeting again.
00:41:21.840 --> 00:41:29.519
Uh, it is far more dynamic, far more tiered, far more layered, far more colorful than the way that scene is actually shot on the day.
00:41:29.519 --> 00:41:40.159
But it's because Rachel understood the relationship to the casting process in such a way that she defined the work to say, hey, I let me show more of myself and not less.
00:41:40.960 --> 00:41:44.800
We're running out of time, but I'd be remiss not to talk about Reacher.
00:41:44.800 --> 00:41:51.679
Uh, this was a series that you had auditioned for several times before getting this role in season four.
00:41:51.679 --> 00:41:52.159
Yeah.
00:41:52.159 --> 00:41:57.599
Uh what was it about the series that you were so adamant about being a part of that world?
00:41:58.559 --> 00:42:01.280
I mean, it's such a great show.
00:42:01.280 --> 00:42:08.000
Uh, I mean, it checks off so many boxes and context of entertainment value.
00:42:08.000 --> 00:42:12.880
Uh, it's funny, it's action-packed, it's suspenseful.
00:42:12.880 --> 00:42:15.760
Uh, it's just a phenomenal show.
00:42:15.760 --> 00:42:20.719
Um, and there are a lot of phenomenal shows out there, I might add.
00:42:20.719 --> 00:42:30.079
Uh, Reacher is one of many shows that I aspire to, um, you know, sharing a screen with uh actors that I have got a tremendous amount of respect for.
00:42:30.079 --> 00:42:36.000
Uh, I had a Reacher uh over the two uh the three preceding seasons.
00:42:36.000 --> 00:42:42.880
There were many uh roles that were close calls over that period, but nothing that really finally turned over.
00:42:42.880 --> 00:42:46.000
Season four was just happened to be the right fit.
00:42:46.000 --> 00:42:49.760
And I had actually additioned for two roles in season four.
00:42:49.760 --> 00:42:57.199
Um, this was the one that clicked, and I'm glad it was this particular role because I just had so much fun.
00:42:57.199 --> 00:43:04.960
Honestly, one of the best experiences to date in my life for collaborating with people that were having so much fun.
00:43:04.960 --> 00:43:20.719
And I think that uh it's it's very clear the enjoyment, the love, and the enthusiasm that every one of those crew members, everyone of the cast, everyone of the team, uh really uh it's evident how much they all love it.
00:43:20.719 --> 00:43:32.480
And uh, I mean, I've had fun on everything I've done, but this was just I I felt like I was in high school and we were all just making something that we're all so really uh excited about.
00:43:32.480 --> 00:43:54.719
And uh yeah, I just just it was just a a real a real gift um to finally uh step into a role on the show and such a fun role that um uh I I think has uh and will continue to have uh a real uh resonance with with the audience.
00:43:55.199 --> 00:43:59.760
Now, most actors would dream about having one.
00:43:59.760 --> 00:44:07.760
Fight sequence with Reacher to be able to put that on their demo reel to be able to say, you know, this is my going up against Reacher.
00:44:07.760 --> 00:44:22.960
Your character was basically a mixture of the Black Knight from the Monty Python series and the Energizer Bunny, where you basically get your ass kicked in almost every episode over and over again.
00:44:22.960 --> 00:44:24.239
What was that like?
00:44:24.239 --> 00:44:28.159
And now it's already here, but the infamous jail scene.
00:44:28.159 --> 00:44:32.239
Um what was that like getting that script and going, he does what to me?
00:44:33.599 --> 00:44:36.400
Yeah, I mean, I I read it and laughed.
00:44:36.400 --> 00:44:40.400
Uh, I mean, uh, on paper, it's pretty dark.
00:44:40.400 --> 00:44:50.639
And in execution of the scene, it's pretty dark uh to have something this grotesque and violent uh happen.
00:44:50.639 --> 00:45:00.800
But I I did, I laughed, and it's to your point, it's like this character, in the moment that he meets Reacher, almost gets his neck broken.
00:45:00.800 --> 00:45:14.960
So, and then from there to getting his ass kicked uh in the interrogation scene with a chair, you know, across my face, and then uh a trank gun.
00:45:14.960 --> 00:45:24.480
And of course, in leading that, of course, into um the jail sequence, uh, it just gets worse and worse and worse for this character.
00:45:24.480 --> 00:45:37.360
And and I think reading the scripts, I I just I continued to laugh because I'm going, well, this guy is so tenacious, and he just cannot, there's so much ego here.
00:45:37.360 --> 00:45:48.000
And in what jurisdiction is he operating on when he's taking the liberties to you know dress up like Philly PD and go into what was his game plan?
00:45:48.000 --> 00:45:55.760
I think one of the funniest lines is after he kicks my ass on the pier and he's like, What was your plan?
00:45:55.760 --> 00:46:05.199
And he's like, you know, get you, throw you in a van, ask you some questions, and that was it.
00:46:05.199 --> 00:46:06.480
That was his plan.
00:46:06.480 --> 00:46:14.320
It's like he he continues to operate in the absence of any real intelligence.
00:46:14.320 --> 00:46:25.519
And uh, I think that it really offers some levity if you can see that for what it is, um, as opposed to this guy that just takes his job really seriously.
00:46:25.519 --> 00:46:39.119
Um, it offers some great levity in the storytelling with a guy that uh just doesn't know when to quit, uh, and frankly, uh operates outside of the law in order to satisfy and cater to his ego.
00:46:39.840 --> 00:46:41.840
And I just have two more quick questions.
00:46:41.840 --> 00:46:47.039
Apologize for going a little bit over here, but this will air after the finale.
00:46:47.039 --> 00:46:51.360
So, warning on this spoilers ahead, but it'll be after the finale.
00:46:51.360 --> 00:46:57.599
Your character has had so much fun, I would say, getting his ass kicked by Reacher.
00:46:57.599 --> 00:47:11.119
And in the finale, your scene reminds me in Daredevil and Wolverine, there's a scene where Pyro comes back and Hugh Jackman punches him and says, Not everyone gets uh um a speech.
00:47:11.119 --> 00:47:15.599
And your death was a little anticlimactic.
00:47:15.599 --> 00:47:17.519
Was that fitting for your care?
00:47:17.519 --> 00:47:18.800
What did you think about that?
00:47:18.800 --> 00:47:22.159
Where it doesn't come down to a brawl, you versus Reacher.
00:47:22.159 --> 00:47:26.719
It almost becomes a comedic moment where you're like, okay, here we go again.
00:47:26.719 --> 00:47:27.519
Bam.
00:47:28.639 --> 00:47:30.800
Well, I think that's what it was, right?
00:47:30.800 --> 00:47:42.480
It's like this season after fighting the Dutch giant, it's just like, what who what can how can we challenge Reacher this season?
00:47:42.480 --> 00:47:47.920
And it's like they throw everything at him in season four.
00:47:47.920 --> 00:47:54.880
And I am just one faction that is, you know, out to get him, if you will.
00:47:54.880 --> 00:48:00.480
And there's like a long line of people that want to kill Reacher.
00:48:00.480 --> 00:48:04.159
And uh, of course, and that is that moment that happens.
00:48:04.159 --> 00:48:14.320
It's like, oh, it's finally Foster's moment to he has uh, you know, he has that victory that he wants to celebrate.
00:48:14.320 --> 00:48:21.280
And then, of course, he gets killed by someone else that wants to kill Reacher even more so than I do.
00:48:21.280 --> 00:48:34.400
So I it it is kind of anticlimatical for Foster because it's such an enormous fail, but it's in concert with every fail that Foster experiences over the course of the season.
00:48:34.400 --> 00:48:45.280
So I kind of identify on two fronts that yeah, it it does feel a little anticlimatical, but it's completely in concert of every fail in every episode that Foster is in.
00:48:45.280 --> 00:48:48.800
Just when he thinks he's got Reacher, he doesn't.
00:48:48.800 --> 00:48:57.039
And what could possibly get in the way of this satisfaction, this moment of killing Reacher?
00:48:57.039 --> 00:49:02.159
Uh, when no one else is around, everybody else is dead, as he assumes.
00:49:02.159 --> 00:49:04.079
What could possibly get in the way?
00:49:04.079 --> 00:49:06.239
And of course, you know.
00:49:06.239 --> 00:49:10.639
So uh, would I have liked to have seen a bigger fight?
00:49:10.639 --> 00:49:12.960
I think he'd been through so much.
00:49:12.960 --> 00:49:18.000
I don't think the audience needed to see another physical encounter.
00:49:18.000 --> 00:49:23.199
Uh, obviously, there's no contest here between me and Alan.
00:49:23.199 --> 00:49:24.960
Uh, it's absurd.
00:49:24.960 --> 00:49:29.119
So I think that it was very fitting.
00:49:29.119 --> 00:49:33.039
Every scene was anticlimactical for Foster.
00:49:33.039 --> 00:49:35.440
He just constantly failed.
00:49:35.440 --> 00:49:40.320
And uh sadly, um it cost him his life at the end.
00:49:40.320 --> 00:49:45.280
Uh, I used to, I was joking with Sam Hill and joking with Nick.
00:49:45.280 --> 00:49:49.280
I'm like, you know, we don't really know if Foster's dead.
00:49:49.280 --> 00:49:56.719
You know, maybe he was able to uh uh you know prevent himself from bleeding out entirely.
00:49:56.719 --> 00:50:14.719
You know, maybe we maybe we somehow build in a an extra shot where we just see my hand and a finger twitch and he comes back in a future season because uh that to me would be in concert of the absurdity of this character and his journey over the uh the the you know season four.
00:50:15.199 --> 00:50:24.159
I will say that final episode, and I don't know if you've seen the the full episode yet, uh, because it's prior to it airing, but not after we record this.
00:50:24.159 --> 00:50:27.840
But that's one of the most brutal episodes of any show I've ever seen.
00:50:27.840 --> 00:50:28.639
It is.
00:50:28.639 --> 00:50:31.360
Just I mean it is as far as what it takes.
00:50:31.360 --> 00:50:33.920
Final question, and I appreciate you coming on.
00:50:33.920 --> 00:50:37.599
Uh, so much of what you do is tied to the work that you've done.
00:50:37.599 --> 00:50:41.360
It's you know hard not to say Dean Armstrong and mention Reacher.
00:50:41.360 --> 00:50:45.440
It's not you know hard to mention Dean Armstrong and Queer Eye.
00:50:45.440 --> 00:50:51.039
But when you get up in the morning, you go into the bathroom, you splash a little water in your face and look in the mirror.
00:50:51.039 --> 00:50:52.400
Who is it that you see?
00:50:54.320 --> 00:50:56.239
Wow, that's a great question.
00:50:56.239 --> 00:50:57.199
Wow, Greg.
00:50:57.199 --> 00:50:58.639
Who do I see?
00:50:58.639 --> 00:51:06.000
Wow, I want to answer this in such a way that is completely true uh in all future references.
00:51:06.000 --> 00:51:18.159
Yeah, I I I think you just you see the artist, you see the person that constantly has identity shifts, you know.
00:51:18.159 --> 00:51:27.920
Uh we will always audition in our careers far more times than we will ever book the job.
00:51:27.920 --> 00:51:44.159
And while my resume reflects however many actors I've played over the past 30 some odd years, there's that many more characters that I have played in self-tapes uh with the hopes of of landing that role.
00:51:44.159 --> 00:51:51.440
And you're constantly assuming this illusion, this identity.
00:51:51.440 --> 00:51:59.039
And when you wake up in the morning, um there is this kind of neutrality.
00:51:59.039 --> 00:52:02.079
There is this kind of this this palette.
00:52:02.079 --> 00:52:11.760
It's uh you know, the musician with an instrument, uh, the artist with a a blank page and and uh and a brush.
00:52:11.760 --> 00:52:16.079
And I I you don't see one specific thing.
00:52:16.079 --> 00:52:19.280
It is it's an artist that's all inclusive.
00:52:19.280 --> 00:52:37.760
And uh I I really look forward to uh the days ahead in my career and the roles that I will play, and uh knowing that in so many different uh audiences' lives, uh you represent something different for them.
00:52:37.760 --> 00:52:44.079
There's always a role that resonates the most with someone for whatever their personal reasons are.
00:52:44.079 --> 00:52:50.239
And, you know, it's hard for people to meet Alan in person and not see Reacher, for example.
00:52:50.239 --> 00:52:58.400
You know, I think as an artist, you you strive to be identified as the person, but that person is that artist.
00:52:58.400 --> 00:53:05.920
And that artist, uh, like Clay can be molded into so many different versions of yourself.
00:53:05.920 --> 00:53:13.199
You know, the artist is extraordinarily humble, and the artist is terrified and excited at the same time.
00:53:13.199 --> 00:53:30.960
And you live in that anticipation and that hope for that next adrenaline rush, that next uh injection uh of artistic exploration that will ultimately shape and define yet another version of yourself.
00:53:31.760 --> 00:53:32.559
Well said.
00:53:32.559 --> 00:53:35.519
Well, Dean Armstrong, thank you so much for coming on.
00:53:35.519 --> 00:53:41.440
Uh Reacher, the entire season four is out on Amazon and Nagley gets released.
00:53:41.440 --> 00:53:43.519
I think they're releasing everything at once.
00:53:43.519 --> 00:53:46.400
So it'll be out by the time this episode airs.
00:53:46.400 --> 00:53:52.000
But check out Dean and uh Reacher, and I appreciate you coming on.
00:53:52.320 --> 00:53:53.760
Greg, it was my pleasure.
00:53:53.760 --> 00:54:07.599
Thank you for asking some questions that made me think about myself a little bit differently today in relationship to my work, which I can only be grateful for because every day it's just about that evolution and that growth.
00:54:07.599 --> 00:54:13.440
And uh, you had some really thoughtful uh questions uh to that regard, and I appreciate it.
00:54:13.440 --> 00:54:14.480
Thank you.