WEBVTT
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:02.399
It's almost election day across Ontario.
00:00:02.560 --> 00:00:03.919
We're just 10 days out.
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:07.759
And for the past few weeks, I've been emailing campaigns with one request.
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:09.919
Send us your housing platform.
00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:15.119
We now have documents from many campaigns and offices in nine cities in this province.
00:00:15.279 --> 00:00:18.960
Some said specific numbers and timelines, and some sent just a slogan.
00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:22.719
Housing is one of the few areas where a mayor has real levers.
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:24.160
They have real powers.
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:36.240
And you learn a lot from whether a candidate is willing to use those levers and powers, whether they try to blame another level of government, or whether they choose to not say anything of substance at all.
00:00:36.560 --> 00:00:45.759
So today on Demographics, we're going through these plans to help you figure out what to look for in a candidate's plan if you, like me, are a one-issue voter on housing.
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:49.439
Demographics, hosted by Mike Moffitt and Kara Stern.
00:00:50.079 --> 00:00:55.039
I'm a policy nerd, so I spend way too much time scrutinizing candidate platforms.
00:00:55.119 --> 00:00:59.759
But Kara, you're also into housing and almost as nerdy as I am.
00:00:59.920 --> 00:01:06.799
So when you're going through these uh platforms that all of these various candidates sent to you, like what specifically were you looking for?
00:01:07.040 --> 00:01:12.000
Well, there are kind of three things that I look for when I'm trying to see if their housing policy will help the middle class.
00:01:12.159 --> 00:01:17.359
So one of them is whether they remove barriers to building in neighborhoods where people actually want to live.
00:01:17.599 --> 00:01:22.319
Does it cut the taxes and fees that adds tens of thousands of dollars to a new home to make it cheaper to build?
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:26.799
And does it shorten the time from proposal to the time that they actually have shovels in the ground?
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:29.439
Yeah, and that's uh I'd say pretty much my list too.
00:01:29.599 --> 00:01:40.879
I mostly want to know whether the plan is grounded in reality and acknowledges that, yeah, we need more social housing, but we really need uh more homes that middle class families can afford.
00:01:40.959 --> 00:01:43.439
It's not just one or the other, it's both.
00:01:43.599 --> 00:01:49.760
I also want to know if they're making expensive promises, if they make it clear how they're going to pay for that promise.
00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:58.400
The plan should obviously recognize the limit of municipal powers and not promise things that can only be provided for by the federal or provincial government.
00:01:58.560 --> 00:02:17.520
And I want the plan to acknowledge that we have a particular shortage when it comes to family-sized homes, that cities shouldn't just be setting an arbitrary unit target saying, okay, we need, you know, 10,000 homes and then hitting that target by building a bunch of shoebox condo units and nothing else, which we've seen in many of our cities.
00:02:17.759 --> 00:02:20.800
So I compiled all of the different responses and I sent them to you.
00:02:20.879 --> 00:02:24.319
And I want to know what was your initial reaction when you saw these platforms?
00:02:24.639 --> 00:02:32.240
Well, I'm gonna do the ultimate Gen X thing while I wear my Atari shirt and quote something that hasn't been relevant since 1986.
00:02:32.479 --> 00:02:34.800
My thought was, where's the beef?
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:35.360
Hello?
00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:37.199
Where's the beef?
00:02:38.080 --> 00:02:42.960
Now, I did find more to analyze on the social housing and homelessness side, and that's great.
00:02:43.039 --> 00:02:45.759
We we need many more policies in that area.
00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:47.039
Yeah, I noticed that too.
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:56.639
Some of them, when they emailed me, I would respond saying, Hey, just wondering, is there anything for middle class home home buyers or middle class families really, not just necessarily home buyers, also renters?
00:02:56.800 --> 00:03:02.159
Despite the lack of content to analyze from some people, there were some proposals that I thought were worth discussing.
00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:05.039
Let's start with one that made both of us pretty annoyed.
00:03:05.199 --> 00:03:06.159
Yeah, absolutely.
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:09.840
And I think you guys uh selected this uh just to set me off.
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:17.919
From Mississauga candidate uh Alvin Tejo, this is a guy who spearheaded upzoning in Mississauga to allow for fourplexes citywide.
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.879
You know, he's historically been pretty good on housing.
00:03:21.039 --> 00:03:25.360
He's young, he seems to understand how challenging it is uh for young families.
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:38.479
Yet he proposed this idea, and I'll have you walk us through it, that is all about basically taking uh resources from those who are already struggling to afford a home and giving those resources to people who are already well housed.
00:03:38.719 --> 00:03:47.759
Yeah, I think his idea caught more attention because we, you know, you get frustrated when someone you know understands it, proposes something that you're like goes against the thing that you say you believe in.
00:03:48.000 --> 00:04:00.000
But basically what he did was propose a plan that allowed seniors to defer their property taxes if they've owned their Mississauga home for at least 20 years and they live in it as their primary residence, and they don't own multiple properties.
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:03.520
So they keep paying their property taxes, but the bill would never go up.
00:04:03.680 --> 00:04:07.520
And every future increase would be added and deferred to later.
00:04:07.680 --> 00:04:12.719
So he says that means that young families wouldn't be subsidizing it because the city still collects the money down the road.
00:04:12.960 --> 00:04:23.360
Yeah, and that argument really frustrates me because the city and taxpayers do subsidize it because what the city is essentially doing here is giving an interest-free loan to seniors.
00:04:23.519 --> 00:04:37.600
So if the city's cost of borrowing is say five or six percent, then every year, every$100 that they're deferring interest-free, that's costing the city five or six bucks in interest, and everyone else has to pay for it.
00:04:37.759 --> 00:04:42.879
You know, he's a candidate who understands the need for infill before many others did.
00:04:43.199 --> 00:04:56.959
He understands uh the need to, you know, help people who are struggling to afford to buy a home, but yet, you know, he's kind of throwing them under the bus here to appeal to seniors uh in order to win an election.
00:04:57.199 --> 00:05:06.639
And, you know, what really frustrates me is that we have politicians and municipalities who constantly talk about the fact that uh we need seniors to downsize.
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:08.240
And they put it in their official plans.
00:05:08.319 --> 00:05:15.519
They basically say, we don't need to build that many single-family homes because all the seniors are going to downsize and all the young families can move into those homes.
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:20.879
But then they uh put in these policies in place to make sure that seniors don't downsize.
00:05:20.959 --> 00:05:34.639
And it's one of the things that has caused the shortage of family homes, is that our official plans both kind of assume seniors will downsize, but then these other policies prevent seniors from downsizing.
00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:37.279
It's just an incoherent mess of policies.
00:05:37.600 --> 00:05:45.680
His defense was that this is similar to other cities' deferral programs, which lots of other cities have, but I don't know of any other that has a 20-year tenure requirement.
00:05:45.839 --> 00:05:59.600
So I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, but if you just play out the situation, like imagine you're 70 years old and you've lived in your home for 25 years, kids have moved out, three bedrooms are sitting empty, and every year you stay, your tax bill stays flat and that deferred balance grows.
00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:06.800
And then you know, as soon as you sell to downsize, not only do you have to pay that bill, but you also lose the opportunity to defer going forward.
00:06:07.040 --> 00:06:17.120
Yeah, and you know, I as a parent and even my own childhood, I remember that the argument that mom, the other kids were doing it too, was never a defense.
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:22.319
If seniors want to stay in those homes, it's their right to, but we shouldn't be subsidizing that.
00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:24.959
This is a terrible, terrible idea.
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:27.759
He got flamed on social media for it.
00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:30.240
And I think he was appropriately roasted.
00:06:30.480 --> 00:06:32.319
Okay, let's move on to something that we did like.
00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:42.480
Brad Bradford's proposal for removing the Toronto portion of land transfer taxes on the first$1.1 million of a home's value and completely eliminating them if they're under that.
00:06:42.639 --> 00:06:45.920
And he got that price from looking at the average sale price in 2025.
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:50.959
So that applies to people who are buying principal residences, including first-time buyers.
00:06:51.040 --> 00:06:53.360
It doesn't apply to investment properties.
00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:59.759
And we like this because land transfer taxes discourage people from right-sizing their homes by taxing moving.
00:06:59.920 --> 00:07:04.639
You know, it should be well understood by now that if you want less of something, you tax it.
00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:07.680
You want less smoking, you raise the tax on cigarettes.
00:07:07.839 --> 00:07:10.879
You want fewer carbon emissions, you price carbon.
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:19.199
So if you want people to buy and sell homes less often, you put a tax on home sales, which essentially is the land transfer tax.
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:23.199
So if you get rid of the land transfer tax, people are going to move more often.
00:07:23.279 --> 00:07:24.800
They're going to right size their property.
00:07:24.879 --> 00:07:26.720
So, you know, at a high level, I like it.
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.839
But my only question is like, how on earth is he gonna pay for it?
00:07:30.079 --> 00:07:35.680
Yes, it's true that the city of Toronto is the only municipality in Ontario that has a land transfer tax.
00:07:35.759 --> 00:07:39.120
I believe it's the only one that's actually even allowed to have a land transfer tax.
00:07:39.279 --> 00:07:42.319
The city collects an absolute ton of money from it.
00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:44.639
So, how does that revenue get replaced?
00:07:44.800 --> 00:07:48.000
You know, what spending is reduced to make up for the shortfall?
00:07:48.319 --> 00:07:50.399
I really don't get a sense for that.
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:53.600
Yeah, he's estimating that it'll cost around$300 million.
00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:58.399
And he says he'll pay for it through his plan to turn Toronto water into a public utility.
00:07:58.560 --> 00:08:06.959
And then he says he's going to change how big projects are funded, which it sounds like essentially taking on long-term debt to pay for capital expenses instead of paying for it out of the year's budget.
00:08:07.199 --> 00:08:13.040
Yeah, and I'm certainly all for municipal service corporations, uh, but not none of that really uh answers the question.
00:08:13.279 --> 00:08:17.120
Those reforms are really kind of lowering development charges.
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:22.480
They're not really changing the sort of operating uh cost of you know how how a city operates.
00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:29.360
So it just feels like a lot of those kind of Rube Goldberg devices that's like hugely complex and like stuff is moving all over the place.
00:08:29.519 --> 00:08:30.160
But I don't get it.
00:08:30.720 --> 00:08:31.600
I don't get it.
00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:34.799
I don't know how anybody else uh is supposed to.
00:08:35.039 --> 00:08:37.200
But that said, I love the high-level idea.
00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:39.919
Limiting land transfer tax, that's a good thing.
00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:43.679
Finding better ways to pay for infrastructure, also a good thing.
00:08:43.840 --> 00:08:46.639
Uh, I just don't know how those puzzle pieces fit together.
00:08:46.879 --> 00:08:55.279
Okay, now I want to go to back to the bad and maybe the worst one I saw, which was the incumbent mayor, uh candidate Drew Dilkins in Windsor.
00:08:55.360 --> 00:09:03.120
And he promised that if council puts citywide forplexes on the table, as many cities have in Canada, he will use his strong mayor powers to veto it.
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:11.360
Yeah, sadly, I'm not surprised given uh both the mayor and and most of Windsor Council's longstanding opposition to foreplexes.
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:18.159
They famously got into a bit of a dispute uh with the federal government on the housing accelerator over the foreplex piece.
00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:23.440
You know, for what it's worth, uh, you know, I think sometimes we we focus too much on kind of unit counts.
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:29.679
I think there are more important things like harmonization, height limits.
00:09:29.840 --> 00:09:35.120
I I don't even think we should have unit counts, uh, but that's a discussion for another time.
00:09:35.360 --> 00:09:41.519
But, you know, overall, you know, I think my big frustration is that, okay, you don't want that, but what are you going to do?
00:09:41.679 --> 00:09:51.360
Like Windsor is one of the least affordable markets in Canada based on home prices relative to incomes because it's one of the lower income places in the province.
00:09:51.519 --> 00:09:55.679
So you have high home prices, you have relatively low incomes.
00:09:55.919 --> 00:10:04.320
And I don't see any municipal politician in the Windsor area who has a plan to address that or even really seems to care.
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:05.919
So I really don't understand.
00:10:06.080 --> 00:10:12.799
And I know as a Londoner, it's my job to, you know, pound on Windsor, and I'm playing that role here.
00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:14.639
I just don't get what they're doing down there.
00:10:14.879 --> 00:10:20.879
I can't let this one go without pointing out that Doug Ford said strong mayor powers were only supposed to be used to align with provincial policy.
00:10:20.960 --> 00:10:26.879
When council goes against something that doesn't align with it, the mayors can use it to veto that or override council.
00:10:27.039 --> 00:10:30.399
They're supposed to be for increasing housing supply, not decreasing it.
00:10:30.480 --> 00:10:34.720
So, you know, I'd love to see him come out and say something, but I think I'm gonna be waiting a little while for it.
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:36.320
Here's one I really like though.
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:43.440
Uh Jim Lee in Oshawa, who's currently a city councilor, he wrote back to me highlighting what the city can do and what's really out of the jurisdiction.
00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:46.720
So that's a great start to point out like what he can actually do.
00:10:46.879 --> 00:10:47.840
We do like that a lot.
00:10:48.080 --> 00:10:58.639
One of the things he said that he wanted to focus on is as of right fourplexes, garden suites, and mid-rise on transit corridors, ending the year-long rezoning and infill fights that kill small projects before they start.
00:10:58.720 --> 00:11:04.159
And he also highlighted how Oshawa currently doesn't have any development charges if you're building in their downtown core.
00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:06.879
And that's part of an effort to incentivize building there.
00:11:06.960 --> 00:11:11.039
And so he said he wanted to expand that to rental and missing middle homes citywide.
00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:19.440
He says the money will come from the provincial federal infrastructure funding that rewards these cuts so the existing tax base wouldn't have to cover the hole it creates in the budget.
00:11:19.679 --> 00:11:25.759
So, first, municipalities do have the ability to set development charges at different rates in different parts of the city.
00:11:25.919 --> 00:11:29.840
You know, the city of Ottawa, he mentions Oshawa, you know, Ottawa does this as well.
00:11:30.080 --> 00:11:35.279
Homes built near downtown pay a lower development charge rate than the homes out in the suburbs.
00:11:35.360 --> 00:11:39.440
And obviously, you can set different rates uh for different housing types.
00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:41.759
So all of that is doable.
00:11:42.000 --> 00:11:44.639
And I think a lot of it is actually a good idea.
00:11:44.799 --> 00:11:48.240
But once again, I come to this question like, how are you going to pay for it?
00:11:48.399 --> 00:11:50.320
I have an idea what he means.
00:11:50.480 --> 00:12:01.120
The money will come from provincial federal infrastructure deals that cities are getting some money out of this kind of three-year DC reduction plan.
00:12:01.360 --> 00:12:04.879
But those deals all have conditions attached on how the money is used.
00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:08.960
So a city or a mayor can't simply just do whatever it wants with it.
00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:11.360
It's got to live up to the agreed upon terms.
00:12:11.440 --> 00:12:13.519
And I don't see how that's the case here.
00:12:13.679 --> 00:12:18.559
You know, we'd love to learn more, but my understanding is that a city just can't do that.
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:26.080
And if it can't do that, then it would uh have to, you know, lower development charges in some areas and raise them in others.
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:31.279
And that might be worth doing, but that's not coming from provincial or federal money.
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:34.480
There's another response I wanted to highlight that's in Guelph.
00:12:34.559 --> 00:12:35.440
Can you choose?
00:12:35.600 --> 00:12:41.039
He noted that he wanted to improve the approvals process to make the guidelines clearer so projects can move faster.
00:12:41.200 --> 00:12:50.639
A lot of people actually mentioned things about the approvals timeline because that seems to be a thing where there's a lot of red tape that the municipalities can correct without really getting a ton of opposition.
00:12:50.799 --> 00:13:05.039
But one thing I really didn't like is that he highlighted the need to prioritize density, including infill along arterial roads with what he called a more quote tailored approach to established neighborhoods, which kind of sounds to me like probably not allowing a lot of multiplexes.
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:18.240
I don't love the idea that, like, if you can't afford your own single detached house or, you know, single family home, not only do you need to accept a smaller unit, but you have to live on busier roads, which are not as nice for families.
00:13:18.399 --> 00:13:36.240
I know a lot of people look for quieter streets where they feel comfortable having their kids outside, but also like for pollution, if you can spread people out throughout the city and give everyone the opportunity to live in all different kinds of parts of the city, not just like, oh, you know, people who didn't get in early enough have to live on busy streets and everyone else gets to live in quiet neighborhoods.
00:13:36.559 --> 00:13:38.159
This really bothers me.
00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:39.200
It bothers me a lot.
00:13:39.279 --> 00:13:44.799
And it's something that we see from specifically progressive politicians and progressive urban planners.
00:13:45.039 --> 00:13:54.320
One of the reasons why we had zoning, like one of the big arguments for zoning, is that, you know, you don't want neighborhoods next to a dirty polluting factory, right?
00:13:54.559 --> 00:14:03.039
The the whole kind of point of zoning was to keep these land uses away from each other and basically keep people away from sources of pollution.
00:14:03.279 --> 00:14:05.840
Well, over the last 20 years, we flipped that on our head.
00:14:06.000 --> 00:14:14.720
Zoning nowadays is actually forcing people to live closest to the places that have the most pollution, which tends to be arterial roads.
00:14:14.960 --> 00:14:19.200
We've gone completely backwards and they're really also not good for kids.
00:14:19.360 --> 00:14:21.360
So couldn't agree with you more.
00:14:21.519 --> 00:14:27.440
I I think this focus on putting everybody on arterials is regressive as hell.
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:29.679
Uh, I'm totally against it.
00:14:29.840 --> 00:14:32.159
And I don't know why it has so much support.
00:14:32.480 --> 00:14:38.639
Because it helps voters who currently have their homes in neighborhoods to not have to deal with change, and that's what they're trying to do here.
00:14:38.799 --> 00:14:42.240
So I understand why they do it politically, but it's not good policy.
00:14:42.399 --> 00:14:43.919
And we know Guelph has a big problem.
00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:53.919
Like I just remember a few years ago a news story about a student's parent who rented him a parking spot so he can live in a camper van because there were no student rentals available.
00:14:54.080 --> 00:14:59.759
And that situation has improved in Guelph, but it is still very tight, and we know that it won't be fully fixed for a while.
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:08.879
Yeah, I mean, student housing shortages across southwestern Ontario have been really bad, but particularly in that kind of like Guelph, Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge area.
00:15:09.039 --> 00:15:09.679
They're massive.
00:15:09.759 --> 00:15:12.879
And a lot of that is due to the international student debacle.
00:15:13.039 --> 00:15:18.000
We had hundreds of thousands of students come in and like no student housing built.
00:15:18.159 --> 00:15:28.159
It caused massive shortages, vacancies went to zero, and rents shot up, and they have come down a little bit, but you know, they are still really, really elevated.
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:31.279
Things are far more challenging than they should be.
00:15:31.440 --> 00:15:33.519
And it didn't just affect the student market.
00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:48.639
There, there's been this large loss of single family homes as all of these, you know, kind of older homes that were close to a college or close to a university, they got bought up by investors and turned into uh the fact of kind of student rentals.
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:50.799
So it is a massive problem.
00:15:50.960 --> 00:15:57.279
It has gotten better in the last couple of years, but it's still really not an affordable situation for young students.
00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:02.960
Just a reminder to people that that just shows that just because you don't build multiplexes doesn't mean the population won't grow.
00:16:03.039 --> 00:16:07.120
It's just going to mean that people who do come are going to be forced into worse situations.
00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:12.720
I keep seeing responses online, especially with Alberta, the province forcing cities to down zone.
00:16:12.799 --> 00:16:16.399
I keep seeing comments like, well, we don't want so many people moving here.
00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:18.639
And I'm like, that's not, it has nothing to do with that.
00:16:18.799 --> 00:16:24.720
I mean, I guess if the prices are cheaper, people are more likely to move there, but we saw it didn't stop people who needed to live in those areas.
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:30.879
Well, I would also point out that Danielle Smith also promised to double Alberta's uh population.
00:16:31.039 --> 00:16:34.879
So, you know, they are talking out of both sides of their mouth uh a little bit there.
00:16:35.120 --> 00:16:40.720
I want to pretend for a moment that you have a blank slate to write the housing policy for a big city mayoral candidate.
00:16:40.879 --> 00:16:44.480
Give me a few policy points that would be things that you would definitely highlight.
00:16:44.720 --> 00:16:51.200
Well, well, first of all, I wouldn't use this kind of same template in each city, uh, even if we're just limiting ourselves to large cities.
00:16:51.279 --> 00:16:52.559
You know, the context matters.
00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:53.360
Say Ottawa.
00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:58.559
Like Ottawa's development charges are much lower than Toronto's, so that makes a difference.
00:16:58.799 --> 00:17:05.119
And, you know, the city of Ottawa can choose to expand outward when it comes to building family homes.
00:17:05.279 --> 00:17:12.880
Whereas the city of Toronto really can't unless we're, you know, calling up the Dutch and finding uh ways to drain parts of Lake Ontario.
00:17:12.960 --> 00:17:15.440
You know, they're really kind of limited in where they can build.
00:17:15.519 --> 00:17:18.160
But I would also say I don't want to start with policy.
00:17:18.319 --> 00:17:26.160
I think it comes down to having a vision and then taking that vision and creating a plan that's based on reality.
00:17:26.480 --> 00:17:37.279
And, you know, some of the realities I look for in other people's plans, and like I can give you a list here, is first, the plan should acknowledge that population growth is real and that we have a shortage of homes.
00:17:37.519 --> 00:17:40.480
Second is that not all homes are created equal.
00:17:40.640 --> 00:17:46.400
Like we need a diversity of home types, we need more high-rise rentals, we need a lot of different things.
00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:51.359
But, you know, we have to understand that we can't just house everyone in one type of home.
00:17:51.519 --> 00:18:03.200
Third is that we should recognize that the biggest shortage of homes we have are for young middle class families, and they need three bedrooms, they need green space, they need places for their kids to play.
00:18:03.359 --> 00:18:10.640
Fourth is that the only way to get prices and rents down to a reasonable level is to make it cheaper to build homes.
00:18:10.880 --> 00:18:20.000
That's lowering construction taxes on homes, that's lowering land prices, it's making more efficient use of land, it's jury-mining approvals processes, all of these things.
00:18:20.240 --> 00:18:27.920
And fifth, I think we also have to recognize that young families actually want to own a home and they're gonna leave to go to the places where they can get it.
00:18:28.079 --> 00:18:29.839
So, do we need more rentals?
00:18:30.079 --> 00:18:30.799
Absolutely.
00:18:31.039 --> 00:18:37.680
But we have to understand young middle class families want to own their own home nine out of 10 or so.
00:18:37.920 --> 00:18:40.319
And we can't ignore that reality.
00:18:40.480 --> 00:18:43.119
And our plans need to be based on that reality.
00:18:43.440 --> 00:18:49.279
I guess that there are differences in specifics in different cities, but it sounds like these are like kind of themes that go across them.
00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:51.039
But how do you turn that into actual policy?
00:18:51.519 --> 00:18:56.000
Yeah, so there are a lot of policies to get us there, and obviously they should be talking about policy.
00:18:56.079 --> 00:19:00.880
Now, I think it's important for politicians to set that vision and describe the problem.
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:08.480
I think they got to commit to revising official plans, that those official plans should recognize the reality of the population of population growth.
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:14.960
Those official plans should be more explicit about the need for families with kids.
00:19:15.119 --> 00:19:21.359
Uh, they should acknowledge that children have different needs than the rest of us, and that we need green space.
00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:36.160
So that sounds kind of high level, but by itself, when when you start to put these conditions in official plans, that forces necessary changes, like a rezoning or expanding urban growth boundaries in order to be able to house everyone in the plan.
00:19:36.319 --> 00:19:42.640
Second of all, uh, I would implement something called form-based zoning for new low-rise neighborhoods.
00:19:42.799 --> 00:19:54.799
It's just basically aligning zoning and the building code to make it easier to build homes for families with kids of a lot of different types, and that's a whole episode we can do on that.
00:19:55.039 --> 00:19:56.000
That we have done on it.
00:19:56.160 --> 00:19:56.799
Yeah, absolutely.
00:19:56.880 --> 00:19:58.160
And we'll probably do again.
00:19:58.319 --> 00:20:02.640
You had mentioned that a lot of the candidates had uh promised to cut approval times.
00:20:02.799 --> 00:20:07.200
That is something that I think we can do, and uh, you know, I think they can be specific about it.
00:20:07.440 --> 00:20:20.640
Edmonton is uh using AI, and other cities are using AI where they can find these little errors quickly and you know, edit things in hours, which it often takes humans weeks to do.
00:20:20.720 --> 00:20:23.039
So that can really streamline processes.
00:20:23.200 --> 00:20:25.680
I think we need to review development charge plans.
00:20:25.839 --> 00:20:32.559
You know, a lot of development charge plans are collecting money for projects that will never get built, right?
00:20:32.640 --> 00:20:35.680
So we're taxing developers for infrastructure.
00:20:35.920 --> 00:20:38.240
That infrastructure is never going to get built.
00:20:38.480 --> 00:20:39.920
That's inappropriate.
00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:42.000
It's it makes our homes cost too much.
00:20:42.160 --> 00:20:53.119
And then finally, on development charges, I do like, you know, what some of the candidates are doing around this kind of, you know, changing different rates depending on the area, the type of home.
00:20:53.200 --> 00:20:54.240
I think that's important.
00:20:54.400 --> 00:21:00.799
What I would specifically like is for us to charge less for entry-level homes and higher for McMansions.
00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:12.799
It's never made sense to me that a 1,200 square foot bungalow and a 12,000 square foot McMansion pay the exact dollar amount in development charges.
00:21:12.960 --> 00:21:14.319
It's completely regressive.
00:21:14.480 --> 00:21:15.920
It makes no sense.
00:21:16.160 --> 00:21:23.599
If we could have a more sensible system, it would encourage the building of small but still family-sized homes.
00:21:23.759 --> 00:21:36.799
So there's a lot of things I could do, but that's just kind of a short list of things that would actually make a difference and are aligned with the vision and the identification of problems that uh a candidate should be talking about.
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:51.200
I suspect one of the problems is that as much as I like all these specifics, I wonder whether good housing policy can win elections or if it's the kind of thing where politicians just need to, you know, have big promises about the kind of city they expect to have.
00:21:51.279 --> 00:22:01.279
You know, we want this many more homes, you want a city where people can afford this and keep quiet about the specifics until they've been elected because they don't want to set off people who are likely to vote and who maybe don't want change.
00:22:01.599 --> 00:22:08.079
Yeah, and and I to be clear, I think it's both bad politics and bad policy to make a lot of these big promises.
00:22:08.240 --> 00:22:12.319
Like, I don't think, first of all, people find them necessarily that credible.
00:22:12.480 --> 00:22:19.119
And from a policy point of view, like I actually think it's part of the problem because there is no one big fix to the housing crisis.
00:22:19.279 --> 00:22:24.400
There's no like saying, okay, if you do this one big thing, it will fix everything.
00:22:24.640 --> 00:22:25.680
That'd be so nice.
00:22:25.920 --> 00:22:29.599
It would be so nice, uh, though it would put us out of work.
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:31.680
And that wouldn't be good.
00:22:31.839 --> 00:22:39.920
So, you know, sometimes there's benefits to having these very complex system-level issues where dozens of little changes are are needed.
00:22:40.079 --> 00:22:48.000
So it's why creating the vision is so important where you can say, okay, this is what we're trying to accomplish, and this is how we we get there.
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:56.000
But I do think there are areas where politics and policy align, that something can both be good politics and good policy.
00:22:56.240 --> 00:23:04.000
I do think that reforming development charges to lower the price of starter homes, I think that's like something like 80, 90% of people can agree on.
00:23:04.240 --> 00:23:19.279
You know, every person I talk to uh on housing, whether they are mad at the government or mad at developers or mad at me or whoever, you know, always say, like, why can't we build those kind of small bungalows like we did in the 50s and 60s?
00:23:19.359 --> 00:23:25.119
And the politician could say, well, part of the reason is is tax policy, and here's how I would fix it.
00:23:25.359 --> 00:23:26.720
Is that going to move a ton of votes?
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:32.799
Not necessarily, but I think it would be popular enough, and I think it would have very, very little opposition.
00:23:33.039 --> 00:23:39.680
And I guess you get people who are analyzing the plans when you're specific to be able to say, this is good, this could actually work, and maybe that helps.
00:23:39.839 --> 00:23:41.440
Thanks everyone for watching and listening.
00:23:41.519 --> 00:23:45.359
Our producer is Meredith Martin, and this episode was edited by Canadian Civil.
00:23:45.759 --> 00:23:50.960
If you have any thoughts or questions about 1980s Wendy's commercials, please leave us a comment on YouTube.
00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:52.880
And we'll see you next time.
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:02.399
It's almost election day across Ontario.
00:00:02.560 --> 00:00:03.919
We're just 10 days out.
00:00:04.080 --> 00:00:07.759
And for the past few weeks, I've been emailing campaigns with one request.
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:09.919
Send us your housing platform.
00:00:10.160 --> 00:00:15.119
We now have documents from many campaigns and offices in nine cities in this province.
00:00:15.279 --> 00:00:18.960
Some said specific numbers and timelines, and some sent just a slogan.
00:00:19.440 --> 00:00:22.719
Housing is one of the few areas where a mayor has real levers.
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:24.160
They have real powers.
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:36.240
And you learn a lot from whether a candidate is willing to use those levers and powers, whether they try to blame another level of government, or whether they choose to not say anything of substance at all.
00:00:36.560 --> 00:00:45.759
So today on Demographics, we're going through these plans to help you figure out what to look for in a candidate's plan if you, like me, are a one-issue voter on housing.
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:49.439
Demographics, hosted by Mike Moffitt and Kara Stern.
00:00:50.079 --> 00:00:55.039
I'm a policy nerd, so I spend way too much time scrutinizing candidate platforms.
00:00:55.119 --> 00:00:59.759
But Kara, you're also into housing and almost as nerdy as I am.
00:00:59.920 --> 00:01:06.799
So when you're going through these uh platforms that all of these various candidates sent to you, like what specifically were you looking for?
00:01:07.040 --> 00:01:12.000
Well, there are kind of three things that I look for when I'm trying to see if their housing policy will help the middle class.
00:01:12.159 --> 00:01:17.359
So one of them is whether they remove barriers to building in neighborhoods where people actually want to live.
00:01:17.599 --> 00:01:22.319
Does it cut the taxes and fees that adds tens of thousands of dollars to a new home to make it cheaper to build?
00:01:22.480 --> 00:01:26.799
And does it shorten the time from proposal to the time that they actually have shovels in the ground?
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:29.439
Yeah, and that's uh I'd say pretty much my list too.
00:01:29.599 --> 00:01:40.879
I mostly want to know whether the plan is grounded in reality and acknowledges that, yeah, we need more social housing, but we really need uh more homes that middle class families can afford.
00:01:40.959 --> 00:01:43.439
It's not just one or the other, it's both.
00:01:43.599 --> 00:01:49.760
I also want to know if they're making expensive promises, if they make it clear how they're going to pay for that promise.
00:01:49.920 --> 00:01:58.400
The plan should obviously recognize the limit of municipal powers and not promise things that can only be provided for by the federal or provincial government.
00:01:58.560 --> 00:02:17.520
And I want the plan to acknowledge that we have a particular shortage when it comes to family-sized homes, that cities shouldn't just be setting an arbitrary unit target saying, okay, we need, you know, 10,000 homes and then hitting that target by building a bunch of shoebox condo units and nothing else, which we've seen in many of our cities.
00:02:17.759 --> 00:02:20.800
So I compiled all of the different responses and I sent them to you.
00:02:20.879 --> 00:02:24.319
And I want to know what was your initial reaction when you saw these platforms?
00:02:24.639 --> 00:02:32.240
Well, I'm gonna do the ultimate Gen X thing while I wear my Atari shirt and quote something that hasn't been relevant since 1986.
00:02:32.479 --> 00:02:34.800
My thought was, where's the beef?
00:02:35.039 --> 00:02:35.360
Hello?
00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:37.199
Where's the beef?
00:02:38.080 --> 00:02:42.960
Now, I did find more to analyze on the social housing and homelessness side, and that's great.
00:02:43.039 --> 00:02:45.759
We we need many more policies in that area.
00:02:46.000 --> 00:02:47.039
Yeah, I noticed that too.
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:56.639
Some of them, when they emailed me, I would respond saying, Hey, just wondering, is there anything for middle class home home buyers or middle class families really, not just necessarily home buyers, also renters?
00:02:56.800 --> 00:03:02.159
Despite the lack of content to analyze from some people, there were some proposals that I thought were worth discussing.
00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:05.039
Let's start with one that made both of us pretty annoyed.
00:03:05.199 --> 00:03:06.159
Yeah, absolutely.
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:09.840
And I think you guys uh selected this uh just to set me off.
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:17.919
From Mississauga candidate uh Alvin Tejo, this is a guy who spearheaded upzoning in Mississauga to allow for fourplexes citywide.
00:03:18.000 --> 00:03:20.879
You know, he's historically been pretty good on housing.
00:03:21.039 --> 00:03:25.360
He's young, he seems to understand how challenging it is uh for young families.
00:03:25.520 --> 00:03:38.479
Yet he proposed this idea, and I'll have you walk us through it, that is all about basically taking uh resources from those who are already struggling to afford a home and giving those resources to people who are already well housed.
00:03:38.719 --> 00:03:47.759
Yeah, I think his idea caught more attention because we, you know, you get frustrated when someone you know understands it, proposes something that you're like goes against the thing that you say you believe in.
00:03:48.000 --> 00:04:00.000
But basically what he did was propose a plan that allowed seniors to defer their property taxes if they've owned their Mississauga home for at least 20 years and they live in it as their primary residence, and they don't own multiple properties.
00:04:00.159 --> 00:04:03.520
So they keep paying their property taxes, but the bill would never go up.
00:04:03.680 --> 00:04:07.520
And every future increase would be added and deferred to later.
00:04:07.680 --> 00:04:12.719
So he says that means that young families wouldn't be subsidizing it because the city still collects the money down the road.
00:04:12.960 --> 00:04:23.360
Yeah, and that argument really frustrates me because the city and taxpayers do subsidize it because what the city is essentially doing here is giving an interest-free loan to seniors.
00:04:23.519 --> 00:04:37.600
So if the city's cost of borrowing is say five or six percent, then every year, every$100 that they're deferring interest-free, that's costing the city five or six bucks in interest, and everyone else has to pay for it.
00:04:37.759 --> 00:04:42.879
You know, he's a candidate who understands the need for infill before many others did.
00:04:43.199 --> 00:04:56.959
He understands uh the need to, you know, help people who are struggling to afford to buy a home, but yet, you know, he's kind of throwing them under the bus here to appeal to seniors uh in order to win an election.
00:04:57.199 --> 00:05:06.639
And, you know, what really frustrates me is that we have politicians and municipalities who constantly talk about the fact that uh we need seniors to downsize.
00:05:06.720 --> 00:05:08.240
And they put it in their official plans.
00:05:08.319 --> 00:05:15.519
They basically say, we don't need to build that many single-family homes because all the seniors are going to downsize and all the young families can move into those homes.
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:20.879
But then they uh put in these policies in place to make sure that seniors don't downsize.
00:05:20.959 --> 00:05:34.639
And it's one of the things that has caused the shortage of family homes, is that our official plans both kind of assume seniors will downsize, but then these other policies prevent seniors from downsizing.
00:05:34.959 --> 00:05:37.279
It's just an incoherent mess of policies.
00:05:37.600 --> 00:05:45.680
His defense was that this is similar to other cities' deferral programs, which lots of other cities have, but I don't know of any other that has a 20-year tenure requirement.
00:05:45.839 --> 00:05:59.600
So I want to give him the benefit of the doubt, but if you just play out the situation, like imagine you're 70 years old and you've lived in your home for 25 years, kids have moved out, three bedrooms are sitting empty, and every year you stay, your tax bill stays flat and that deferred balance grows.
00:05:59.759 --> 00:06:06.800
And then you know, as soon as you sell to downsize, not only do you have to pay that bill, but you also lose the opportunity to defer going forward.
00:06:07.040 --> 00:06:17.120
Yeah, and you know, I as a parent and even my own childhood, I remember that the argument that mom, the other kids were doing it too, was never a defense.
00:06:17.279 --> 00:06:22.319
If seniors want to stay in those homes, it's their right to, but we shouldn't be subsidizing that.
00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:24.959
This is a terrible, terrible idea.
00:06:25.120 --> 00:06:27.759
He got flamed on social media for it.
00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:30.240
And I think he was appropriately roasted.
00:06:30.480 --> 00:06:32.319
Okay, let's move on to something that we did like.
00:06:32.480 --> 00:06:42.480
Brad Bradford's proposal for removing the Toronto portion of land transfer taxes on the first$1.1 million of a home's value and completely eliminating them if they're under that.
00:06:42.639 --> 00:06:45.920
And he got that price from looking at the average sale price in 2025.
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:50.959
So that applies to people who are buying principal residences, including first-time buyers.
00:06:51.040 --> 00:06:53.360
It doesn't apply to investment properties.
00:06:53.680 --> 00:06:59.759
And we like this because land transfer taxes discourage people from right-sizing their homes by taxing moving.
00:06:59.920 --> 00:07:04.639
You know, it should be well understood by now that if you want less of something, you tax it.
00:07:04.800 --> 00:07:07.680
You want less smoking, you raise the tax on cigarettes.
00:07:07.839 --> 00:07:10.879
You want fewer carbon emissions, you price carbon.
00:07:11.040 --> 00:07:19.199
So if you want people to buy and sell homes less often, you put a tax on home sales, which essentially is the land transfer tax.
00:07:19.360 --> 00:07:23.199
So if you get rid of the land transfer tax, people are going to move more often.
00:07:23.279 --> 00:07:24.800
They're going to right size their property.
00:07:24.879 --> 00:07:26.720
So, you know, at a high level, I like it.
00:07:26.800 --> 00:07:29.839
But my only question is like, how on earth is he gonna pay for it?
00:07:30.079 --> 00:07:35.680
Yes, it's true that the city of Toronto is the only municipality in Ontario that has a land transfer tax.
00:07:35.759 --> 00:07:39.120
I believe it's the only one that's actually even allowed to have a land transfer tax.
00:07:39.279 --> 00:07:42.319
The city collects an absolute ton of money from it.
00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:44.639
So, how does that revenue get replaced?
00:07:44.800 --> 00:07:48.000
You know, what spending is reduced to make up for the shortfall?
00:07:48.319 --> 00:07:50.399
I really don't get a sense for that.
00:07:50.639 --> 00:07:53.600
Yeah, he's estimating that it'll cost around$300 million.
00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:58.399
And he says he'll pay for it through his plan to turn Toronto water into a public utility.
00:07:58.560 --> 00:08:06.959
And then he says he's going to change how big projects are funded, which it sounds like essentially taking on long-term debt to pay for capital expenses instead of paying for it out of the year's budget.
00:08:07.199 --> 00:08:13.040
Yeah, and I'm certainly all for municipal service corporations, uh, but not none of that really uh answers the question.
00:08:13.279 --> 00:08:17.120
Those reforms are really kind of lowering development charges.
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:22.480
They're not really changing the sort of operating uh cost of you know how how a city operates.
00:08:22.639 --> 00:08:29.360
So it just feels like a lot of those kind of Rube Goldberg devices that's like hugely complex and like stuff is moving all over the place.
00:08:29.519 --> 00:08:30.160
But I don't get it.
00:08:30.720 --> 00:08:31.600
I don't get it.
00:08:31.759 --> 00:08:34.799
I don't know how anybody else uh is supposed to.
00:08:35.039 --> 00:08:37.200
But that said, I love the high-level idea.
00:08:37.360 --> 00:08:39.919
Limiting land transfer tax, that's a good thing.
00:08:40.080 --> 00:08:43.679
Finding better ways to pay for infrastructure, also a good thing.
00:08:43.840 --> 00:08:46.639
Uh, I just don't know how those puzzle pieces fit together.
00:08:46.879 --> 00:08:55.279
Okay, now I want to go to back to the bad and maybe the worst one I saw, which was the incumbent mayor, uh candidate Drew Dilkins in Windsor.
00:08:55.360 --> 00:09:03.120
And he promised that if council puts citywide forplexes on the table, as many cities have in Canada, he will use his strong mayor powers to veto it.
00:09:03.360 --> 00:09:11.360
Yeah, sadly, I'm not surprised given uh both the mayor and and most of Windsor Council's longstanding opposition to foreplexes.
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:18.159
They famously got into a bit of a dispute uh with the federal government on the housing accelerator over the foreplex piece.
00:09:18.399 --> 00:09:23.440
You know, for what it's worth, uh, you know, I think sometimes we we focus too much on kind of unit counts.
00:09:23.600 --> 00:09:29.679
I think there are more important things like harmonization, height limits.
00:09:29.840 --> 00:09:35.120
I I don't even think we should have unit counts, uh, but that's a discussion for another time.
00:09:35.360 --> 00:09:41.519
But, you know, overall, you know, I think my big frustration is that, okay, you don't want that, but what are you going to do?
00:09:41.679 --> 00:09:51.360
Like Windsor is one of the least affordable markets in Canada based on home prices relative to incomes because it's one of the lower income places in the province.
00:09:51.519 --> 00:09:55.679
So you have high home prices, you have relatively low incomes.
00:09:55.919 --> 00:10:04.320
And I don't see any municipal politician in the Windsor area who has a plan to address that or even really seems to care.
00:10:04.480 --> 00:10:05.919
So I really don't understand.
00:10:06.080 --> 00:10:12.799
And I know as a Londoner, it's my job to, you know, pound on Windsor, and I'm playing that role here.
00:10:12.960 --> 00:10:14.639
I just don't get what they're doing down there.
00:10:14.879 --> 00:10:20.879
I can't let this one go without pointing out that Doug Ford said strong mayor powers were only supposed to be used to align with provincial policy.
00:10:20.960 --> 00:10:26.879
When council goes against something that doesn't align with it, the mayors can use it to veto that or override council.
00:10:27.039 --> 00:10:30.399
They're supposed to be for increasing housing supply, not decreasing it.
00:10:30.480 --> 00:10:34.720
So, you know, I'd love to see him come out and say something, but I think I'm gonna be waiting a little while for it.
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:36.320
Here's one I really like though.
00:10:36.480 --> 00:10:43.440
Uh Jim Lee in Oshawa, who's currently a city councilor, he wrote back to me highlighting what the city can do and what's really out of the jurisdiction.
00:10:43.519 --> 00:10:46.720
So that's a great start to point out like what he can actually do.
00:10:46.879 --> 00:10:47.840
We do like that a lot.
00:10:48.080 --> 00:10:58.639
One of the things he said that he wanted to focus on is as of right fourplexes, garden suites, and mid-rise on transit corridors, ending the year-long rezoning and infill fights that kill small projects before they start.
00:10:58.720 --> 00:11:04.159
And he also highlighted how Oshawa currently doesn't have any development charges if you're building in their downtown core.
00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:06.879
And that's part of an effort to incentivize building there.
00:11:06.960 --> 00:11:11.039
And so he said he wanted to expand that to rental and missing middle homes citywide.
00:11:11.279 --> 00:11:19.440
He says the money will come from the provincial federal infrastructure funding that rewards these cuts so the existing tax base wouldn't have to cover the hole it creates in the budget.
00:11:19.679 --> 00:11:25.759
So, first, municipalities do have the ability to set development charges at different rates in different parts of the city.
00:11:25.919 --> 00:11:29.840
You know, the city of Ottawa, he mentions Oshawa, you know, Ottawa does this as well.
00:11:30.080 --> 00:11:35.279
Homes built near downtown pay a lower development charge rate than the homes out in the suburbs.
00:11:35.360 --> 00:11:39.440
And obviously, you can set different rates uh for different housing types.
00:11:39.600 --> 00:11:41.759
So all of that is doable.
00:11:42.000 --> 00:11:44.639
And I think a lot of it is actually a good idea.
00:11:44.799 --> 00:11:48.240
But once again, I come to this question like, how are you going to pay for it?
00:11:48.399 --> 00:11:50.320
I have an idea what he means.
00:11:50.480 --> 00:12:01.120
The money will come from provincial federal infrastructure deals that cities are getting some money out of this kind of three-year DC reduction plan.
00:12:01.360 --> 00:12:04.879
But those deals all have conditions attached on how the money is used.
00:12:05.120 --> 00:12:08.960
So a city or a mayor can't simply just do whatever it wants with it.
00:12:09.120 --> 00:12:11.360
It's got to live up to the agreed upon terms.
00:12:11.440 --> 00:12:13.519
And I don't see how that's the case here.
00:12:13.679 --> 00:12:18.559
You know, we'd love to learn more, but my understanding is that a city just can't do that.
00:12:18.720 --> 00:12:26.080
And if it can't do that, then it would uh have to, you know, lower development charges in some areas and raise them in others.
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:31.279
And that might be worth doing, but that's not coming from provincial or federal money.
00:12:31.519 --> 00:12:34.480
There's another response I wanted to highlight that's in Guelph.
00:12:34.559 --> 00:12:35.440
Can you choose?
00:12:35.600 --> 00:12:41.039
He noted that he wanted to improve the approvals process to make the guidelines clearer so projects can move faster.
00:12:41.200 --> 00:12:50.639
A lot of people actually mentioned things about the approvals timeline because that seems to be a thing where there's a lot of red tape that the municipalities can correct without really getting a ton of opposition.
00:12:50.799 --> 00:13:05.039
But one thing I really didn't like is that he highlighted the need to prioritize density, including infill along arterial roads with what he called a more quote tailored approach to established neighborhoods, which kind of sounds to me like probably not allowing a lot of multiplexes.
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:18.240
I don't love the idea that, like, if you can't afford your own single detached house or, you know, single family home, not only do you need to accept a smaller unit, but you have to live on busier roads, which are not as nice for families.
00:13:18.399 --> 00:13:36.240
I know a lot of people look for quieter streets where they feel comfortable having their kids outside, but also like for pollution, if you can spread people out throughout the city and give everyone the opportunity to live in all different kinds of parts of the city, not just like, oh, you know, people who didn't get in early enough have to live on busy streets and everyone else gets to live in quiet neighborhoods.
00:13:36.559 --> 00:13:38.159
This really bothers me.
00:13:38.240 --> 00:13:39.200
It bothers me a lot.
00:13:39.279 --> 00:13:44.799
And it's something that we see from specifically progressive politicians and progressive urban planners.
00:13:45.039 --> 00:13:54.320
One of the reasons why we had zoning, like one of the big arguments for zoning, is that, you know, you don't want neighborhoods next to a dirty polluting factory, right?
00:13:54.559 --> 00:14:03.039
The the whole kind of point of zoning was to keep these land uses away from each other and basically keep people away from sources of pollution.
00:14:03.279 --> 00:14:05.840
Well, over the last 20 years, we flipped that on our head.
00:14:06.000 --> 00:14:14.720
Zoning nowadays is actually forcing people to live closest to the places that have the most pollution, which tends to be arterial roads.
00:14:14.960 --> 00:14:19.200
We've gone completely backwards and they're really also not good for kids.
00:14:19.360 --> 00:14:21.360
So couldn't agree with you more.
00:14:21.519 --> 00:14:27.440
I I think this focus on putting everybody on arterials is regressive as hell.
00:14:27.600 --> 00:14:29.679
Uh, I'm totally against it.
00:14:29.840 --> 00:14:32.159
And I don't know why it has so much support.
00:14:32.480 --> 00:14:38.639
Because it helps voters who currently have their homes in neighborhoods to not have to deal with change, and that's what they're trying to do here.
00:14:38.799 --> 00:14:42.240
So I understand why they do it politically, but it's not good policy.
00:14:42.399 --> 00:14:43.919
And we know Guelph has a big problem.
00:14:44.000 --> 00:14:53.919
Like I just remember a few years ago a news story about a student's parent who rented him a parking spot so he can live in a camper van because there were no student rentals available.
00:14:54.080 --> 00:14:59.759
And that situation has improved in Guelph, but it is still very tight, and we know that it won't be fully fixed for a while.
00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:08.879
Yeah, I mean, student housing shortages across southwestern Ontario have been really bad, but particularly in that kind of like Guelph, Kitchener, Waterloo, Cambridge area.
00:15:09.039 --> 00:15:09.679
They're massive.
00:15:09.759 --> 00:15:12.879
And a lot of that is due to the international student debacle.
00:15:13.039 --> 00:15:18.000
We had hundreds of thousands of students come in and like no student housing built.
00:15:18.159 --> 00:15:28.159
It caused massive shortages, vacancies went to zero, and rents shot up, and they have come down a little bit, but you know, they are still really, really elevated.
00:15:28.320 --> 00:15:31.279
Things are far more challenging than they should be.
00:15:31.440 --> 00:15:33.519
And it didn't just affect the student market.
00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:48.639
There, there's been this large loss of single family homes as all of these, you know, kind of older homes that were close to a college or close to a university, they got bought up by investors and turned into uh the fact of kind of student rentals.
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:50.799
So it is a massive problem.
00:15:50.960 --> 00:15:57.279
It has gotten better in the last couple of years, but it's still really not an affordable situation for young students.
00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:02.960
Just a reminder to people that that just shows that just because you don't build multiplexes doesn't mean the population won't grow.
00:16:03.039 --> 00:16:07.120
It's just going to mean that people who do come are going to be forced into worse situations.
00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:12.720
I keep seeing responses online, especially with Alberta, the province forcing cities to down zone.
00:16:12.799 --> 00:16:16.399
I keep seeing comments like, well, we don't want so many people moving here.
00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:18.639
And I'm like, that's not, it has nothing to do with that.
00:16:18.799 --> 00:16:24.720
I mean, I guess if the prices are cheaper, people are more likely to move there, but we saw it didn't stop people who needed to live in those areas.
00:16:25.039 --> 00:16:30.879
Well, I would also point out that Danielle Smith also promised to double Alberta's uh population.
00:16:31.039 --> 00:16:34.879
So, you know, they are talking out of both sides of their mouth uh a little bit there.
00:16:35.120 --> 00:16:40.720
I want to pretend for a moment that you have a blank slate to write the housing policy for a big city mayoral candidate.
00:16:40.879 --> 00:16:44.480
Give me a few policy points that would be things that you would definitely highlight.
00:16:44.720 --> 00:16:51.200
Well, well, first of all, I wouldn't use this kind of same template in each city, uh, even if we're just limiting ourselves to large cities.
00:16:51.279 --> 00:16:52.559
You know, the context matters.
00:16:52.720 --> 00:16:53.360
Say Ottawa.
00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:58.559
Like Ottawa's development charges are much lower than Toronto's, so that makes a difference.
00:16:58.799 --> 00:17:05.119
And, you know, the city of Ottawa can choose to expand outward when it comes to building family homes.
00:17:05.279 --> 00:17:12.880
Whereas the city of Toronto really can't unless we're, you know, calling up the Dutch and finding uh ways to drain parts of Lake Ontario.
00:17:12.960 --> 00:17:15.440
You know, they're really kind of limited in where they can build.
00:17:15.519 --> 00:17:18.160
But I would also say I don't want to start with policy.
00:17:18.319 --> 00:17:26.160
I think it comes down to having a vision and then taking that vision and creating a plan that's based on reality.
00:17:26.480 --> 00:17:37.279
And, you know, some of the realities I look for in other people's plans, and like I can give you a list here, is first, the plan should acknowledge that population growth is real and that we have a shortage of homes.
00:17:37.519 --> 00:17:40.480
Second is that not all homes are created equal.
00:17:40.640 --> 00:17:46.400
Like we need a diversity of home types, we need more high-rise rentals, we need a lot of different things.
00:17:46.720 --> 00:17:51.359
But, you know, we have to understand that we can't just house everyone in one type of home.
00:17:51.519 --> 00:18:03.200
Third is that we should recognize that the biggest shortage of homes we have are for young middle class families, and they need three bedrooms, they need green space, they need places for their kids to play.
00:18:03.359 --> 00:18:10.640
Fourth is that the only way to get prices and rents down to a reasonable level is to make it cheaper to build homes.
00:18:10.880 --> 00:18:20.000
That's lowering construction taxes on homes, that's lowering land prices, it's making more efficient use of land, it's jury-mining approvals processes, all of these things.
00:18:20.240 --> 00:18:27.920
And fifth, I think we also have to recognize that young families actually want to own a home and they're gonna leave to go to the places where they can get it.
00:18:28.079 --> 00:18:29.839
So, do we need more rentals?
00:18:30.079 --> 00:18:30.799
Absolutely.
00:18:31.039 --> 00:18:37.680
But we have to understand young middle class families want to own their own home nine out of 10 or so.
00:18:37.920 --> 00:18:40.319
And we can't ignore that reality.
00:18:40.480 --> 00:18:43.119
And our plans need to be based on that reality.
00:18:43.440 --> 00:18:49.279
I guess that there are differences in specifics in different cities, but it sounds like these are like kind of themes that go across them.
00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:51.039
But how do you turn that into actual policy?
00:18:51.519 --> 00:18:56.000
Yeah, so there are a lot of policies to get us there, and obviously they should be talking about policy.
00:18:56.079 --> 00:19:00.880
Now, I think it's important for politicians to set that vision and describe the problem.
00:19:01.039 --> 00:19:08.480
I think they got to commit to revising official plans, that those official plans should recognize the reality of the population of population growth.
00:19:08.640 --> 00:19:14.960
Those official plans should be more explicit about the need for families with kids.
00:19:15.119 --> 00:19:21.359
Uh, they should acknowledge that children have different needs than the rest of us, and that we need green space.
00:19:21.440 --> 00:19:36.160
So that sounds kind of high level, but by itself, when when you start to put these conditions in official plans, that forces necessary changes, like a rezoning or expanding urban growth boundaries in order to be able to house everyone in the plan.
00:19:36.319 --> 00:19:42.640
Second of all, uh, I would implement something called form-based zoning for new low-rise neighborhoods.
00:19:42.799 --> 00:19:54.799
It's just basically aligning zoning and the building code to make it easier to build homes for families with kids of a lot of different types, and that's a whole episode we can do on that.
00:19:55.039 --> 00:19:56.000
That we have done on it.
00:19:56.160 --> 00:19:56.799
Yeah, absolutely.
00:19:56.880 --> 00:19:58.160
And we'll probably do again.
00:19:58.319 --> 00:20:02.640
You had mentioned that a lot of the candidates had uh promised to cut approval times.
00:20:02.799 --> 00:20:07.200
That is something that I think we can do, and uh, you know, I think they can be specific about it.
00:20:07.440 --> 00:20:20.640
Edmonton is uh using AI, and other cities are using AI where they can find these little errors quickly and you know, edit things in hours, which it often takes humans weeks to do.
00:20:20.720 --> 00:20:23.039
So that can really streamline processes.
00:20:23.200 --> 00:20:25.680
I think we need to review development charge plans.
00:20:25.839 --> 00:20:32.559
You know, a lot of development charge plans are collecting money for projects that will never get built, right?
00:20:32.640 --> 00:20:35.680
So we're taxing developers for infrastructure.
00:20:35.920 --> 00:20:38.240
That infrastructure is never going to get built.
00:20:38.480 --> 00:20:39.920
That's inappropriate.
00:20:40.000 --> 00:20:42.000
It's it makes our homes cost too much.
00:20:42.160 --> 00:20:53.119
And then finally, on development charges, I do like, you know, what some of the candidates are doing around this kind of, you know, changing different rates depending on the area, the type of home.
00:20:53.200 --> 00:20:54.240
I think that's important.
00:20:54.400 --> 00:21:00.799
What I would specifically like is for us to charge less for entry-level homes and higher for McMansions.
00:21:01.119 --> 00:21:12.799
It's never made sense to me that a 1,200 square foot bungalow and a 12,000 square foot McMansion pay the exact dollar amount in development charges.
00:21:12.960 --> 00:21:14.319
It's completely regressive.
00:21:14.480 --> 00:21:15.920
It makes no sense.
00:21:16.160 --> 00:21:23.599
If we could have a more sensible system, it would encourage the building of small but still family-sized homes.
00:21:23.759 --> 00:21:36.799
So there's a lot of things I could do, but that's just kind of a short list of things that would actually make a difference and are aligned with the vision and the identification of problems that uh a candidate should be talking about.
00:21:37.119 --> 00:21:51.200
I suspect one of the problems is that as much as I like all these specifics, I wonder whether good housing policy can win elections or if it's the kind of thing where politicians just need to, you know, have big promises about the kind of city they expect to have.
00:21:51.279 --> 00:22:01.279
You know, we want this many more homes, you want a city where people can afford this and keep quiet about the specifics until they've been elected because they don't want to set off people who are likely to vote and who maybe don't want change.
00:22:01.599 --> 00:22:08.079
Yeah, and and I to be clear, I think it's both bad politics and bad policy to make a lot of these big promises.
00:22:08.240 --> 00:22:12.319
Like, I don't think, first of all, people find them necessarily that credible.
00:22:12.480 --> 00:22:19.119
And from a policy point of view, like I actually think it's part of the problem because there is no one big fix to the housing crisis.
00:22:19.279 --> 00:22:24.400
There's no like saying, okay, if you do this one big thing, it will fix everything.
00:22:24.640 --> 00:22:25.680
That'd be so nice.
00:22:25.920 --> 00:22:29.599
It would be so nice, uh, though it would put us out of work.
00:22:29.759 --> 00:22:31.680
And that wouldn't be good.
00:22:31.839 --> 00:22:39.920
So, you know, sometimes there's benefits to having these very complex system-level issues where dozens of little changes are are needed.
00:22:40.079 --> 00:22:48.000
So it's why creating the vision is so important where you can say, okay, this is what we're trying to accomplish, and this is how we we get there.
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:56.000
But I do think there are areas where politics and policy align, that something can both be good politics and good policy.
00:22:56.240 --> 00:23:04.000
I do think that reforming development charges to lower the price of starter homes, I think that's like something like 80, 90% of people can agree on.
00:23:04.240 --> 00:23:19.279
You know, every person I talk to uh on housing, whether they are mad at the government or mad at developers or mad at me or whoever, you know, always say, like, why can't we build those kind of small bungalows like we did in the 50s and 60s?
00:23:19.359 --> 00:23:25.119
And the politician could say, well, part of the reason is is tax policy, and here's how I would fix it.
00:23:25.359 --> 00:23:26.720
Is that going to move a ton of votes?
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:32.799
Not necessarily, but I think it would be popular enough, and I think it would have very, very little opposition.
00:23:33.039 --> 00:23:39.680
And I guess you get people who are analyzing the plans when you're specific to be able to say, this is good, this could actually work, and maybe that helps.
00:23:39.839 --> 00:23:41.440
Thanks everyone for watching and listening.
00:23:41.519 --> 00:23:45.359
Our producer is Meredith Martin, and this episode was edited by Canadian Civil.
00:23:45.759 --> 00:23:50.960
If you have any thoughts or questions about 1980s Wendy's commercials, please leave us a comment on YouTube.
00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:52.880
And we'll see you next time.
