OM DENNE EPISODE
A reflective piece questioning our reliance on written feedback, exploring its limitations, the student experience, and how feedback might feel more meaningful when it becomes a dialogue rather than a document.
Engelsk
Det Forenede Kongerige
UDSKRIFT 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
SØK BLANT TIDLIGERE EPISODER
Søk etter gamle episoder av Thinking in practice.
ANDRE EPISODE I DENNE PODKAST
In this episode, we step away from the traditional "tutor-led" curriculum to explore the messy, rewarding reality of Co-Creation. Drawing on the experience of the Preparation for Professional Practice module, I reflect on what happens when we invite students to move from being "learn…
Episode Summary:In this episode, we move beyond the traditional view of feedback as a "document" and explore it as a developmental dialogue. Inspired by the work of Phil Dawson and David Boud, we dive into the concept of Evaluative Judgement—the capability for a student to judge the quali…
Have you ever learned something that felt clear at the time, only to realize a few weeks later you couldn't retrieve it? Often, the issue isn’t exposure to information—it’s interaction with it.
In this second part of my series on embedding AI in physiotherapy education, I explore the use of AI as a…
In healthcare, evaluative judgement—the ability to identify the quality of one's own work—isn't optional. It is the foundation of safe, independent practice. But how do we design learning environments that actually require this kind of thinking to happen?
Following a conversation with Michael Rowe…
Ansvarsfraskrivelse: Podkasten og kunstværket, det finnes indlejret på denne siden, er fra James Roberts, som tilhører dens eier og ikke er tilknyttet eller godkjent av Listen Notes, Inc.
REDIG
Takk fordi du hjelper med å holde podkast-databasen oppdatert.
