OM DENNE EPISODE
This is a new introduction to AI as an extinction threat, previously posted to the MIRI website in February alongside a summary. It was written independently of Eliezer and Nate's forthcoming book, If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies, and isn't a sneak peak of the book. Since the book is long and costs money, we expect this to be a valuable resource in its own right even after the book comes out next month.[1]
The stated goal of the world's leading AI companies is to build AI that is general enough to do anything a human can do, from solving hard problems in theoretical physics to deftly navigating social environments. Recent machine learning progress seems to have brought this goal within reach. At this point, we would be uncomfortable ruling out the possibility that AI more capable than any human is achieved in the next year or two, and [...]
---
Outline:
(02:27) 1. There isn't a ceiling at human-level capabilities.
(08:56) 2. ASI is very likely to exhibit goal-oriented behavior.
(15:12) 3. ASI is very likely to pursue the wrong goals.
(32:40) 4. It would be lethally dangerous to build ASIs that have the wrong goals.
(46:03) 5. Catastrophe can be averted via a sufficiently aggressive policy response.
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
August 5th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kgb58RL88YChkkBNf/the-problem
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
The stated goal of the world's leading AI companies is to build AI that is general enough to do anything a human can do, from solving hard problems in theoretical physics to deftly navigating social environments. Recent machine learning progress seems to have brought this goal within reach. At this point, we would be uncomfortable ruling out the possibility that AI more capable than any human is achieved in the next year or two, and [...]
---
Outline:
(02:27) 1. There isn't a ceiling at human-level capabilities.
(08:56) 2. ASI is very likely to exhibit goal-oriented behavior.
(15:12) 3. ASI is very likely to pursue the wrong goals.
(32:40) 4. It would be lethally dangerous to build ASIs that have the wrong goals.
(46:03) 5. Catastrophe can be averted via a sufficiently aggressive policy response.
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.
---
First published:
August 5th, 2025
Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kgb58RL88YChkkBNf/the-problem
---
Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.
Engelsk
USA
UDSKRIFT 🔗
Are you the producer of this podcast?
Add a podcast transcript
Need Audio-to-Text?
Transcribe with Listen411 in Just 60 Seconds
SØK BLANT TIDLIGERE EPISODER
Søk etter gamle episoder av LessWrong (Curated & Popular).
ANDRE EPISODE I DENNE PODKAST
I think “On Social Reality in China” makes many accurate observations, but I find the comparison fundamentally uneven. There are already many interesting comments there, but they’re too scattered, so I’m starting a separate post to respond in a more systematic and comprehensive way. The most critic…
Authors: Axel Højmark*, Ezra Newman* (*Equal contribution) While reviewing transcripts from standard behavioral evaluations of GLM-5.3, we noticed that the model occasionally reasons, unprompted, about how its actions will shape future models. It appears to consider that its outputs might be used f…
It's fortunate that I was the first one to wake up on 8/1. The past week had been one where sleep was rare. The next year loomed large — I was dreading college applications. The stress woke me up bright and early at 5:14 am, a little less than an hour after the messages were sent. I started of…
What would it take to get assurance that we have actually explained a neuron? Certainly, it would be a good sign if neuron activations looked like they had a consistent pattern, and a bad sign if they looked like a random jumble of unrelated concepts. Nick Cammarata's recent post makes an impo…
This is a link post. People worried about a “permanent underclass” often assume that owning capital will protect them from disempowerment, or at least that they will be disempowered last, after the jobless masses dependent on UBI. I think something else is more likely: owning large amounts of capit…
Ansvarsfraskrivelse: Podkasten og kunstværket, det finnes indlejret på denne siden, er fra LessWrong, som tilhører dens eier og ikke er tilknyttet eller godkjent av Listen Notes, Inc.
REDIG
Takk fordi du hjelper med å holde podkast-databasen oppdatert.