ဤအပိုင်းအကြောင်း
“Socialism” gets thrown around like a political curse word, but the real story is messier and a lot more American than most of us were taught. We sit down with Sean Goody, former editor of Jacobin and author of *American Socialists: The Life and Legacy of Eugene V. Debs*, to dig into who Debs was and why his name keeps resurfacing whenever the country argues about capitalism, labor, and democracy. If you’ve ever wondered how a socialist could become a national figure in the United States, this conversation gives you the missing context.
We talk through the Gilded Age conditions that pushed Debs toward democratic socialism: concentrated wealth, corporate power, dangerous jobs, and a political system stacked against workers. Sean explains how the Socialist Party built serious strength in pockets of the country, electing local officials and mayors, while still struggling to break through nationally. That tension helps answer a key question: how can someone win only a small share of the presidential vote and still shape the next century of American politics, from the labor movement to civil rights organizing?
Then we bring the Debs story forward to today’s democratic socialist movement. We compare bottom-up local power to modern national standard-bearers like Bernie Sanders and AOC, debate whether DSA’s base is too narrow, and ask what “working class” even means when AI threatens white-collar jobs and precarity spreads across the economy. We also get into culture, race, and class, and what Debs’s approach can teach a movement trying to grow without losing its moral center. If this helped you think differently about American socialism and the future of labor politics, subscribe, share the episode, leave a review, and tell us: what should a real working-class coalition look like now?
SHOW မှတ်စုများ 🔗
ကူးယူချက် 🔗
00:00:46.410 --> 00:00:56.170
So the primary midterm strategy for the Republican Party in order to try to stave off a major blue wave has been to sound the alarm about socialism or even communism.
00:00:56.330 --> 00:00:59.050
You hear from Trump, you hear from all kinds of negative ads.
00:00:59.130 --> 00:01:08.250
And of course, this comes as a number of Democratic Socialist candidates have been elected in offices across the country, are making a major impact on American politics.
00:01:08.329 --> 00:01:10.170
They're joining us now to talk about that.
00:01:10.250 --> 00:01:20.170
And the legacy that they draw from is the former editor of Jacobin Magazine, who is out with a fantastic new book, American Socialists: The Life and Legacy of Eugene V.
00:01:20.250 --> 00:01:20.650
Debs.
00:01:20.890 --> 00:01:22.969
Sean Goody, that author, joins us now.
00:01:23.129 --> 00:01:23.849
Great to have you, Sean.
00:01:24.170 --> 00:01:25.689
Hey, thanks so much for having me on.
00:01:25.849 --> 00:01:26.330
Appreciate it.
00:01:26.569 --> 00:01:27.450
Yeah, of course.
00:01:27.530 --> 00:01:35.210
So we were chatting before you came on that the book ends up being uh very timely, and I do want to get into the some of those modern day connections.
00:01:35.370 --> 00:01:42.250
But just for people who may be really ignorant about who Eugene Debs is, why did you decide to profile him?
00:01:42.409 --> 00:01:46.250
Why do you think that he's an important figure in American politics people should know about?
00:01:47.050 --> 00:01:47.370
Sure.
00:01:47.450 --> 00:02:00.810
I mean, I think people's ignorance that they have it is quite excusable given his legacy and really the hit the really rich history of democratic socialism in America has been um sort of whitewashed from American history in a lot of ways.
00:02:00.890 --> 00:02:04.329
And that's kind of what pushed me to write this book.
00:02:04.490 --> 00:02:08.329
Um, the socialist movement in the early 20th century during the Gilded Age.
00:02:08.409 --> 00:02:14.170
And I think certainly we're in our own Gilded Age now, and so I think that that history is quite relevant.
00:02:14.490 --> 00:02:15.290
You know, it's interesting.
00:02:15.370 --> 00:02:17.449
Uh, I think we have F3 here, Sean.
00:02:17.610 --> 00:02:28.650
We could put this up here on the screen, uh, which is about socialism has its first positive reading for the first time uh at 40% in some recent Gallup polling.
00:02:29.050 --> 00:02:36.730
Um, how similar is today's socialism to the Eugene Debs prairie periods, which you talk about?
00:02:37.290 --> 00:02:38.409
Yeah, it's a great question.
00:02:38.490 --> 00:02:41.449
I mean, there's both similarities and some obvious differences.
00:02:41.610 --> 00:02:56.969
I think what you point to, there is a real geographic difference right now in terms of where socialism is strong, because as you mentioned, socialism, and I'm I'm actually from Iowa, I'm you know, I'm proud Midwesterner, so this sort of history speaks very much to me.
00:02:57.129 --> 00:03:04.330
Um, and so the Socialist Party was extremely strong in places like Oklahoma, um, Kansas, Milwaukee.
00:03:04.650 --> 00:03:09.689
Businesses have extraordinary power over workers and over the course of society.
00:03:10.009 --> 00:03:21.129
You really do have to push something, a kind of more radical transformation of society to make sure that wealth and power isn't concentrated in the hands of just a few people.
00:03:21.450 --> 00:03:25.210
And so that's when he he sort of becomes a socialist later on.
00:03:25.370 --> 00:03:40.729
And I think that that um that transformation does mirror the transformation of a lot of other people at the time, because it is uh a time of upheaval, of of labor strikes, of extraordinary wealth being created and opulence.
00:03:40.810 --> 00:03:54.890
This is the Gilded Age, but also um people you know don't even have unemployment insurance and and they're thrown out of work willy-nilly, and they um you know are working in conditions where you know they could lose an arm or something on the railroad.
00:03:54.969 --> 00:03:56.810
And you know, tough luck.
00:03:56.890 --> 00:04:00.090
You don't have any sort of you don't get compensation for that.
00:04:00.170 --> 00:04:13.370
You and then if you you know go out and protest that with your with your fellow workers, you might get beaten down and have judicial injunctions called in to uh to block you from striking.
00:04:13.530 --> 00:04:26.569
Um, so it's uh it's that kind of those kind of conditions that produce the radicalization of Debs and produce the kind of radicalization to some extent of the country, lead to the rise of the of the Socialist Party.
00:04:27.050 --> 00:04:37.529
Sean, how do you assess Debs's historical legacy in terms of his influence, but also the reality of, I mean, the guy only won 6% of the vote, like at his peak.
00:04:37.930 --> 00:04:40.490
I mean, don't get me wrong, he literally ran from a jail cell.
00:04:40.649 --> 00:04:45.129
I think the government threw him in prison for correctly speaking out against intervention in the war.
00:04:45.289 --> 00:04:52.170
And if you think censorship and propaganda and all that are bad today, you have no idea what life is like in 1915, right?
00:04:52.250 --> 00:04:56.649
So, you know, with all that said, the deck was genuinely stacked against him.
00:04:56.810 --> 00:04:58.810
That said he only won 6% of the vote.
00:04:58.970 --> 00:05:08.330
He does seem to have been tremendously influential on a lot of the other people around FDR or people who would assess his legacy, Huey Long and all that, etc.
00:05:08.490 --> 00:05:10.810
So talk talk me through a little bit of that.
00:05:11.129 --> 00:05:12.570
Yeah, it's a fair question.
00:05:12.649 --> 00:05:18.169
I mean, the Socialist Party was able to have these really strong pockets of support.
00:05:18.330 --> 00:05:27.450
I mentioned places like Oklahoma, and I haven't mentioned out west, but they were very strong in mining camps, um, and you know, mining towns.
00:05:27.690 --> 00:05:30.490
So they had these pockets of support where they were quite strong.
00:05:30.649 --> 00:05:43.049
Also, the upper Midwest, they were very strong in kind of industrial cities, not only um Milwaukee, but kind of mid-sized industrial cities where steelworkers um kind of voted the socialist ticket too.
00:05:43.129 --> 00:05:49.450
Um, but they weren't ever able to translate that that support into a national level support.
00:05:49.690 --> 00:06:12.409
Um, and it really was, I mean, I don't want to go too much down a kind of scholarly rabbit hole, but it if you kind of compare the US to other countries, because the US really is an outlier in terms of uh the socialist, its socialist party not taking off, because every other advanced capitalist country has um a social democratic party, a labor party.
00:06:12.730 --> 00:06:20.330
Um that court sort of built the welfare state in the and built um what we think of today as social democracy.
00:06:20.490 --> 00:06:33.370
Um and the US never didn't have that because um, you know, the US was was uh the business class was so strong, um, and because the labor movement wasn't as as large in in other countries.
00:06:33.529 --> 00:06:42.169
And so the Socialist Party was sort of wasn't able to link up with the strong labor movement, essentially, um is kind of what it comes down to.
00:06:42.409 --> 00:07:02.009
Um but you're totally right that um I I do think its legacy is uh is very relevant today and also has had, I think it's fair to say that the the points in American history where ordinary people have won more freedom and more democratic rights.
00:07:02.330 --> 00:07:10.490
The labor movement of the 1930s, the civil rights movement of the 1960s, democratic socialists have been really central to those movements.
00:07:10.649 --> 00:07:11.929
Um, you think of people like A.
00:07:12.090 --> 00:07:21.289
Philip Randolph during the Civil Rights Movement, was very good friends with Debs, drew a lot of his kind of inspiration in politics from people like Debs.
00:07:21.690 --> 00:07:33.210
And, you know, I could I could name other examples, but it's that kind of that kind of impact that um democratic socialism, democratic socialism has had in the US.
00:07:33.529 --> 00:07:39.210
Um and I, you know, I think uh that's a that's a pretty proud legacy too.
00:07:39.610 --> 00:07:41.929
Well, and the legacy obviously is very clear today.
00:07:42.169 --> 00:07:52.330
Debs specifically, Bernie Sanders is a big admirer of Eugene Debs, and Zoran actually shouted out uh Eugene Debs and quoted him in his victory speech.
00:07:52.409 --> 00:07:54.649
Let's go ahead and take a listen to a little bit of that.
00:08:00.810 --> 00:08:14.250
But as Eugene Debs wanted to be done with the better danger for doing it.
00:08:36.169 --> 00:08:38.570
Knuckles card with kitchen burnt.
00:08:39.210 --> 00:08:42.570
These are not hands that have been allowed to hold power.
00:08:43.129 --> 00:08:49.289
And yet, over the last 12 months, you have dared to reach for something greater.
00:08:49.610 --> 00:09:02.250
And Chad, one thing I was reflecting on is, you know, the the Socialist Party of Eugene Debs' era really was a sort of ground-up, you know, they're able to elect if it was 1,200 officials across the country at the peak.
00:09:02.490 --> 00:09:06.970
But to your point, you know, his highest watermark in terms of presidential campaign is 6%.
00:09:07.529 --> 00:09:11.129
So he's not able to grab a sort of national foothold.
00:09:11.529 --> 00:09:20.490
The modern movement is almost the reverse, you know, splashes into being with Bernie Sanders coming very close, actually, to winning the Democratic nomination and potentially the presidency.
00:09:20.570 --> 00:09:31.290
Um Zoran is become this massive national sensation, uh, is extremely popular and mayor of the largest and uh arguably most important city in the entire country.
00:09:31.530 --> 00:09:41.050
So, what do you think about the differences in the way that the movement has grown and whether that represents a strength, a weakness, whether, you know, it's it doesn't matter which way it goes.
00:09:41.129 --> 00:09:43.370
Like, how do you think about those pieces?
00:09:44.410 --> 00:09:46.250
Yeah, no, it's a really astute point.
00:09:46.330 --> 00:09:49.290
I hadn't really even thought about that that before necessarily.
00:09:49.530 --> 00:10:05.690
But yeah, I think it's I think it's a weakness on some level, but it's also just kind of a challenge because it was, you know, the having a having a party that had that level of support locally, as you mentioned, 1,200 elected officials at its peak.
00:10:05.850 --> 00:10:12.009
They had about 120,000 members, um, something like 80 mayors in 36 states.
00:10:12.170 --> 00:10:17.210
So they had a real um real strength in in a lot of places.
00:10:17.610 --> 00:10:25.210
Um, but but also, yeah, they didn't, they were never actually able to acquire national level national level of political power.
00:10:25.530 --> 00:10:35.930
And right now, at least we do have the the opportunity, um, you know, as as democratic socialists, to really see something different.
00:10:36.090 --> 00:10:44.009
Um, because we do have national level standard bearers that are among the most popular uh politicians in the in the US.
00:10:44.170 --> 00:10:47.850
And so that that provides extraordinary power too.
00:10:48.009 --> 00:10:49.370
Um it comes with dangers.
00:10:49.530 --> 00:10:59.050
Like obviously, you don't just want um you need us, at the end of the day, you really do need a really strong labor movement to transform the country.
00:10:59.210 --> 00:11:03.690
And if if that doesn't come about, then you know we're gonna be in trouble.
00:11:03.930 --> 00:11:39.530
Um, but certainly the having having Bernie Sanders is one of the most popular politicians in the US, now having Zorang and AOC, um, very effective politicians and kind of communicators of democratic socialist ideas, I think really good at bringing uh democratic socialism down to human level and making it um not just uh a kind of like wonky sort of policy alternative or something, but like really speaking to people's needs for solidarity and human connection and joy in this in this world.
00:11:39.690 --> 00:11:42.170
Um that's really important too.
00:11:42.330 --> 00:11:45.610
And so there are there are real strengths to the movement right now.
00:11:45.769 --> 00:11:50.009
Um and so uh I I think we have some real opportunities.
00:11:50.330 --> 00:11:52.170
But Sean, depress you a bit here.
00:11:52.330 --> 00:12:05.610
Um you know, you you you talked about Eugene Debs and his legacy and largely of the socialist connection to the heartland um and away really from the kind of cosmopolitan elite.
00:12:05.769 --> 00:12:16.410
You know, today modern-day DSA socialism is a literal product of the cosmopolitan elite at a cultural level from New York City, Los Angeles.
00:12:16.490 --> 00:12:22.649
Uh, the higher educated, the more likely you are to be, you know, kind of a card-carrying member of DSA.
00:12:23.050 --> 00:12:25.610
That you might be downwardly economically mobile.
00:12:25.690 --> 00:12:28.330
I mean, you know, that it's a little bit separately different.
00:12:28.490 --> 00:12:29.610
But how do you square that?
00:12:29.690 --> 00:12:34.889
You know, the everyday working man doesn't really seem to be a DSA card-carrying member.
00:12:35.050 --> 00:12:40.570
They may like Sauron, but they may not identify themselves as part of the so-called socialist movement.
00:12:40.730 --> 00:12:51.690
Kind of the beating heart of modern-day DSA, you know, leftism reminds me a little bit more of like the affinity for international communism in the cultural elite of the United States.
00:12:51.850 --> 00:12:55.769
I don't say this in any aspersion, I'm just saying in terms of kind of the parallel.
00:12:55.850 --> 00:12:57.129
So how do you work through that?
00:12:57.210 --> 00:13:00.009
Or do you challenge, want to challenge some of the things I'm saying?
00:13:00.570 --> 00:13:25.450
No, I mean, I think I I wouldn't agree entirely with what you're saying, but I do think it's fair that um that so far DSA has only has a slice of of um the working class, and it's it's the college-educated working class, it's nurses and teachers um rather than um you know Amazon workers, and that's a huge problem.
00:13:25.690 --> 00:13:38.009
Um you can't have uh you can't have um just like one small slice of, you know, you can't just have white-collared workers and um win democratic socialism.
00:13:38.250 --> 00:13:41.450
So I I agree that it's uh that it's a problem.
00:13:41.690 --> 00:13:52.490
Um I I have some um I have some optimism about this because I think um you know Zoran in particular is very good at breaking that kind of divide.
00:13:52.970 --> 00:14:01.050
And and I also think um, you know, the socialist movement in the US is still fairly young.
00:14:01.769 --> 00:14:05.129
Um and this is really only a recent development.
00:14:05.210 --> 00:14:20.090
And it's true that the the people that it's attracted so far um have been disproportionately college-educated workers, but I don't think that's um I don't think that's something that's inherent to uh where we're at.
00:14:20.250 --> 00:14:30.330
I mean, I I think someone like Bernie is very good at at talking to people um across uh across the divides within within the working class.
00:14:30.410 --> 00:14:33.769
And I think um, you know, we should take a page from that, certainly.
00:14:33.930 --> 00:14:38.490
Um but I but I'm not so pessimistic that that that's not gonna change.
00:14:38.889 --> 00:14:53.290
And Sean, uh my last question for you on that note is I wonder if we don't need to reconceptualize the the working class, especially in the age of AI, where you've got a bunch of tech oligarchs saying they're gonna put all white-collar workers out of work.
00:14:53.370 --> 00:14:57.370
I mean, it's a very different economy than it was during Deb's time.
00:14:57.610 --> 00:15:03.450
Um, the there's uh the the blue-collar workforce has been decimated.
00:15:03.610 --> 00:15:13.290
You have a lot of service workers now, and you have a lot of um white-collar knowledge workers, college educated with a lot of debt, who are facing a lot of economic precarity themselves.
00:15:13.450 --> 00:15:24.649
So I wonder how you think about how the left may need to adjust and look different in an age of AI where they are trying to make all of human labor irrelevant.
00:15:24.730 --> 00:15:31.850
And in that way, you know, there should be a lot of solidarity between all human beings about what's going on and what's gonna come next.
00:15:32.410 --> 00:15:34.009
Yeah, I mean, I couldn't agree more.
00:15:34.090 --> 00:15:39.210
I mean, you can you can take the point too far and say that only, you know, that it's fine.
00:15:39.370 --> 00:15:50.970
The composition of DSA currently is okay, but but certainly I I totally agree that um the economy of today is extremely different from the economy of Debs' period.
00:15:51.050 --> 00:15:55.210
I mean, there aren't as there just aren't as many railroad workers in the US.
00:15:56.090 --> 00:15:57.769
There aren't as many steel workers.
00:15:57.930 --> 00:16:08.410
And and rail workers and steel workers, and um, those people very much should be part of the the socialist movement, and the socialist movement should be speaking to them.
00:16:08.570 --> 00:16:15.290
Um, but it but you know, nurses and teachers are also very much part of the of part of the working class, too.
00:16:15.530 --> 00:16:20.090
And I think they're they're very central to socialist politics today.
00:16:20.250 --> 00:16:23.690
And yeah, even even um even tech workers too.
00:16:23.850 --> 00:16:26.570
Um they're not the classically defined working class.
00:16:26.730 --> 00:16:31.370
And certainly if all of DSA was just tech workers, that would be a problem.
00:16:31.610 --> 00:16:39.850
But we also shouldn't, we shouldn't make the mistake of saying that, you know, only people who didn't go to college are um are in the working class.
00:16:40.009 --> 00:16:42.250
Uh I think that that's fair too.
00:16:42.410 --> 00:16:42.490
Yeah.
00:16:42.730 --> 00:16:42.889
Yeah.
00:16:42.970 --> 00:16:44.410
I know I think that's entirely fair.
00:16:44.570 --> 00:16:46.250
Uh, where does culture play into this?
00:16:46.410 --> 00:16:48.730
So, you know, it's been interesting to me.
00:16:48.889 --> 00:16:56.889
Uh, Eugene Debs, you could correct me if I'm wrong, uh, from what I was looking into, was a genuine like class-first egalitarian.
00:16:57.050 --> 00:17:10.569
Um he was like, look, I'm here, you know, he he opposed, I believe, like racial quotas in the 19, I forget the year of the 1919, I think, Immigration and Nationality Act, which eventually uh was passed.
00:17:10.649 --> 00:17:24.329
I know he was a strong supporter of civil rights, but he often took an approach of saying, look, like this is about class first, which I believe actually put him at odds, I think, with some of the you know more racial leaders at the time.
00:17:24.569 --> 00:17:27.049
Uh, what did you find in some of your research on that?
00:17:27.129 --> 00:17:28.329
I'm curious.
00:17:28.970 --> 00:17:31.450
Uh I think it's I think it's more complicated than that.
00:17:31.609 --> 00:17:47.369
He certainly thought that, um, he he certainly thought that um the best way to fight, you can say the best way to fight for racial equality was through building a mass movement of which um black workers would be a part of.
00:17:47.690 --> 00:17:59.849
And he certainly came to the view, too, that the socialist party and socialists had to be um on the front lines of fighting Jim Crow because you know, other other people in society weren't going to do it.
00:18:00.089 --> 00:18:24.169
So he was very much on uh on board with that, but he also he did reject um the idea that um you could fight racism without you know um fighting the kind of uh without fighting economic exploitation because he thought that was really central to how racism um actually operates in in American society.
00:18:24.490 --> 00:18:27.129
So he he kind of linked the two, I would say.
00:18:27.449 --> 00:18:35.209
And um that that you know that was a a pretty interesting part of researching the book, and I think that's that's part of his legacy too.
00:18:35.529 --> 00:18:51.849
The book is American Socialist, the life and legacy of Eugene Debs, and you know, fascinating character, incredibly impactful, very much understudied and under-discussed, is the type of thing that is very likely left down of your public school education, and obviously with a lot of implications for today.
00:18:51.929 --> 00:18:59.609
Um, I think people will see a lot of parallels with Eugene Debs' era and today, while also dating there are profound differences, of course.
00:18:59.769 --> 00:19:00.970
Um, Sean, thank you so much.
00:19:01.049 --> 00:19:01.929
It's great to have you.
00:19:02.649 --> 00:19:04.329
Thank you so much, I appreciate it.