How Should You Respond When Asked "What is Your Investment Philosophy"

WEBVTT
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:03.120
Welcome back to another episode of the Root Ready Podcast.
00:00:03.279 --> 00:00:05.919
I am your host, James Cannoll, with my co-host Eden.
00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:14.240
And Eden, today we're talking about how to respond when someone says, What is your investment philosophy?
00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:15.599
Now I say that.
00:00:15.679 --> 00:00:17.280
As I say those words, I'm a prospect.
00:00:17.359 --> 00:00:20.160
Like what comes to your mind as an advisor?
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:21.679
Where do you want to go first?
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:26.320
I'll just say that that question is so broad.
00:00:26.559 --> 00:00:28.239
Just it's so open.
00:00:28.320 --> 00:00:40.240
And there are so many different things that you could say about the investment philosophy that it's very easy to just kind of start slipping into the weeds and the jargon.
00:00:40.320 --> 00:00:42.000
And we're excited about it.
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:46.320
It's, I mean, as advisors, we love talking about investments and the philosophy.
00:00:46.399 --> 00:00:54.719
And it's very easy, I feel like, to just kind of slip right into the data-driven, super deep explanations.
00:00:54.880 --> 00:01:01.119
And I think there's some ways to kind of summarize it in a less analytical and deep way.
00:01:01.200 --> 00:01:05.920
But it's such a broad question that it's hard to know just where to begin unpacking that.
00:01:06.239 --> 00:01:06.640
Yeah.
00:01:06.879 --> 00:01:07.599
Fully agree.
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:14.079
And I think this is this is an episode that, you know, sometimes we do an episode like, hey, this is something kind of we need to learn, we should practice, we should rep.
00:01:14.319 --> 00:01:20.799
This is more just something of this should be a really easy thing, but I think a lot of advisors get tripped up with it because you're right.
00:01:20.879 --> 00:01:22.319
It's what's your investment philosophy?
00:01:22.719 --> 00:01:23.439
Oh, gosh, I can't.
00:01:23.519 --> 00:01:24.879
I'm so glad you asked.
00:01:25.200 --> 00:01:29.280
Sit down, because let me, you know, let me let me give you a 20-minute answer.
00:01:29.519 --> 00:01:35.120
And really what prompted this episode was um one, I hear this from people like, yeah, how should we be responding to this?
00:01:35.280 --> 00:01:40.480
But two, you know, we we try to get a lot of feedback from our clients and our prospective clients of what are we doing well?
00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:41.599
What could we do better?
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:43.599
What, you know, anything and everything.
00:01:43.840 --> 00:01:46.319
And we got, you know, someone doesn't move forward.
00:01:46.480 --> 00:01:49.040
So a prospect reaches out to root, they don't move forward.
00:01:49.120 --> 00:01:54.480
We'll send this little survey after of, hey, what what was the reason for that?
00:01:54.560 --> 00:01:57.280
Essentially, was it investment philosophy misalignment?
00:01:57.599 --> 00:01:59.439
Was it planning philosophy?
00:01:59.599 --> 00:02:00.959
Was it uh cost?
00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:02.640
Was it whatever?
00:02:02.879 --> 00:02:11.599
And someone submitted services, like or on that form, um, something along the lines of, hey, your investment philosophy is way too different than ours, and we didn't feel comfortable with it.
00:02:11.759 --> 00:02:12.800
So, okay, interesting.
00:02:12.879 --> 00:02:15.919
So I, you know, I went in, I looked at this person's profile and I looked at their statements.
00:02:16.000 --> 00:02:25.199
And, you know, for people listening that don't know, like we we use primarily dimensional fund um ETFs as we at least construct our starting point models for clients.
00:02:25.439 --> 00:02:26.000
We can use anything.
00:02:26.159 --> 00:02:34.639
Obviously, we're an RIA, we don't get comp by anyone, but dimensional funds kind of our starting point when we use their funds for our starting portfolio lineup.
00:02:34.879 --> 00:02:41.199
Um I looked at this prospective client's investment statements, and they were all Vanguard.
00:02:41.360 --> 00:02:48.000
Now, for people that know Vanguard that know dimensional, like, yes, there's differences, but there's way more similarities than there are differences.
00:02:48.319 --> 00:02:53.680
And so when I'm reading this person's survey feedback and it's, hey, your investment philosophy is way too different.
00:02:53.759 --> 00:03:03.039
I didn't feel comfortable moving forward, it's like, okay, I think what's happening is it's a messaging issue of Eden.
00:03:03.199 --> 00:03:09.360
If you're my prospective client and you ask me, hey, I'm you know, we're really interested in root, seems like you guys are doing some cool things.
00:03:09.439 --> 00:03:11.199
Like, what's your approach to investing?
00:03:11.280 --> 00:03:12.560
What's your investment philosophy?
00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:15.599
And I say, okay, well, Eden, I'm glad you asked.
00:03:15.759 --> 00:03:18.560
Like, we we believe in something called the efficient market hypothesis.
00:03:18.639 --> 00:03:23.199
And what that says is all publicly known information is priced into securities as they stand today.
00:03:23.280 --> 00:03:30.479
When what that means is you can't outperform the market, but you can control the levels of risk you take by tilting to small cap, to value, to high profitability.
00:03:30.639 --> 00:03:35.280
Um, we're going to implement this through dimensional funds, which owns, you know, asset class investing, not index.
00:03:35.520 --> 00:03:39.520
And if I just go on and on and on and on, it's like, oh my gosh, this is, you know, maybe interesting stuff.
00:03:39.680 --> 00:03:41.840
Like that seems so different from what I've done.
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:44.319
I mean, I've just been owning a Vanguard S P 500 index.
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:59.439
Like that's um maybe cool, but it's just too big of a gap for me to feel comfortable moving forward with, is what's going through my head when the reality is the actual differences are not that different.
00:03:59.599 --> 00:04:00.960
And that's not the point of this episode, by the way.
00:04:01.039 --> 00:04:04.639
The point of this episode is we have attendance advisors.
00:04:04.800 --> 00:04:06.240
Your point at the beginning.
00:04:06.479 --> 00:04:11.280
This is a very broad question, which means there's a million different directions it can go.
00:04:11.439 --> 00:04:14.879
And as advisors, we get excited about geeking out about that stuff.
00:04:14.960 --> 00:04:17.439
So I want to hit all a million different directions it could go.
00:04:17.519 --> 00:04:20.800
And I want to give you the deepest, fullest answer to every little nuance there.
00:04:20.959 --> 00:04:30.560
And all of a sudden, you have a prospect that walked in saying, Hey, I think I should get some retirement planning help from Root, going, Oh, the investment philosophy is actually going to prevent me from doing this.
00:04:30.879 --> 00:04:38.240
When it was the messaging of that that was the deterrent, not the actual philosophy itself.
00:04:38.560 --> 00:04:39.279
Make sense?
00:04:39.439 --> 00:04:42.720
Any thoughts or pushback on that?
00:04:43.199 --> 00:04:45.519
No, I think that's 100% accurate.
00:04:45.680 --> 00:04:51.600
And also everything, it's funny because everything you say in the jargony deep explanation is correct.
00:04:51.759 --> 00:05:01.839
It's just that there are ways we can reframe those to be higher level, starting at that higher level umbrella point rather than just diving right into the weeds.
00:05:02.000 --> 00:05:08.639
But I think you're spot on too that this is something that typically advisors love talking about and we think it's super interesting.
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:13.199
So it can be really easy to just get all excited and dive right in.
00:05:13.519 --> 00:05:14.000
It can.
00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:16.720
And I always try to put myself, it's hard.
00:05:16.959 --> 00:05:21.519
You know, we're that proverbial fish that's in water and doesn't know what water is sometimes.
00:05:21.839 --> 00:05:26.480
And we like, we have to put ourselves, put yourself in the position of anyone else.
00:05:26.639 --> 00:05:30.480
You know, you're really sick and you go to the doctor's office and you say, hey, what's going on?
00:05:30.560 --> 00:05:38.399
And they launch into a 20-minute thing with these, you know, doctor terms and the full name of illnesses with Latin roots and all that.
00:05:38.480 --> 00:05:39.519
And then you're like, oh my gosh.
00:05:39.600 --> 00:05:48.000
And then then like another doctor comes in, just like, hey, Eden, you know, you've got what you got a, I don't know, you got the flu.
00:05:48.240 --> 00:05:49.920
Get plenty of fluid, rest, you're gonna be fine.
00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:50.399
Okay.
00:05:50.720 --> 00:06:00.399
Like they might have said the same exact thing, but the I wouldn't call it just bedside manner, but also just ability to communicate like a human matters so much there.
00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:06.319
Like one of those doctors, I'm gonna feel really okay, this person I can relate with and I'm gonna trust them more.
00:06:06.560 --> 00:06:12.560
Even though the other doctor said smarter sounding terms, I just don't feel like there's a there's too big of a gap.
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:14.319
When in reality, there's no gap.
00:06:14.480 --> 00:06:16.480
It's just the way they explain something.
00:06:16.639 --> 00:06:18.639
And that's the curse of knowledge sometimes.
00:06:18.800 --> 00:06:22.319
Is to me, like here's what I would say.
00:06:22.399 --> 00:06:24.240
If you said, What wait, what's your investment philosophy?
00:06:24.399 --> 00:06:27.920
I'm gonna say it's it's it's we're gonna control what we can control.
00:06:28.079 --> 00:06:30.240
We're gonna keep costs down as much as possible.
00:06:30.399 --> 00:06:35.519
We're gonna diversify broadly, we're gonna be very mindful of the tax impact of what we're doing.
00:06:35.680 --> 00:06:41.680
And most importantly, Eden, we're gonna tailor your investment portfolio to your actual needs driven by your financial plan.
00:06:41.839 --> 00:06:43.360
So it's not two standalone things.
00:06:43.519 --> 00:06:48.000
Um, that's probably a very unsatisfactory answer to a financial advisor.
00:06:48.720 --> 00:06:51.680
If I, like, you know, if I'm interviewing at root and say, hey, what's your investment philosophy?
00:06:51.839 --> 00:06:54.160
Like, I actually want to know, what are you guys doing?
00:06:54.240 --> 00:06:55.199
Like, what's the approach?
00:06:55.279 --> 00:06:58.240
What's your fund, the the the you know, the mix of funds that you're using?
00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:00.639
And so we have to think about that.
00:07:00.800 --> 00:07:07.920
Like the the satisfactory answer to me is not gonna be the same satisfactory answer to a client.
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:09.279
And what's a client gonna do?
00:07:09.360 --> 00:07:16.399
If it, you know, if if I if you're my prospective client, Eden, and you ask me, I give you that answer, and you want to know more, what are you gonna do?
00:07:17.600 --> 00:07:19.040
You're just gonna ask at that point.
00:07:19.120 --> 00:07:22.079
You say something like broadly diversified.
00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:29.920
It's a pretty generic term, but a client who's maybe, you know, an engineer or something might go, what does that mean?
00:07:30.160 --> 00:07:32.000
What does broadly diversified mean?
00:07:32.240 --> 00:07:36.399
Oh, okay, we can talk about that piece independently from the rest of the philosophy.
00:07:36.480 --> 00:07:37.439
They might go that direction.
00:07:37.519 --> 00:07:41.600
I think it really opens the doors to have a couple of those key points.
00:07:41.759 --> 00:07:43.920
Feel like three or four, like you just did.
00:07:44.079 --> 00:07:46.240
Here's rounding out high level.
00:07:46.399 --> 00:07:50.000
And then if they have littler questions, deeper questions, what funds do you use?
00:07:50.160 --> 00:07:50.879
What does that mean?
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:52.000
What does this mean?
00:07:52.160 --> 00:07:52.800
Okay, great.
00:07:52.959 --> 00:07:53.519
Let's go there.
00:07:53.600 --> 00:07:54.800
Let's have that discussion.
00:07:55.120 --> 00:07:56.560
Yes, exactly.
00:07:56.800 --> 00:07:59.120
If they want to know more, they're going to ask.
00:07:59.279 --> 00:08:08.560
And the key here is one, by them asking is give you permission to continue and they're they're showing you what they want, but you like let them double-click on what's most important to them.
00:08:08.879 --> 00:08:13.439
Like if the this this conversation truly could go thousands of different directions.
00:08:13.600 --> 00:08:14.959
What does diversification mean?
00:08:15.040 --> 00:08:16.800
Do you use ETFs or mutual funds?
00:08:16.959 --> 00:08:18.079
What about individual stocks?
00:08:18.240 --> 00:08:20.160
How much concentration are you okay with?
00:08:20.319 --> 00:08:22.000
What are your thoughts on investing in real estate?
00:08:22.079 --> 00:08:23.680
What are your thoughts on investing in emerging markets?
00:08:23.759 --> 00:08:25.439
What are your thoughts on dividend investing?
00:08:25.519 --> 00:08:26.000
What are your thoughts?
00:08:26.240 --> 00:08:33.679
Like, there's if I try to answer each of those in my explanation of our investment philosophy, I have completely lost you.
00:08:33.759 --> 00:08:38.879
And all I've signaled to you is this person doesn't know how to read another human being, and I don't think I want to work with them.
00:08:39.039 --> 00:08:43.120
Even if the investment philosophy is very similar to what we're doing.
00:08:43.279 --> 00:08:55.759
Like I took a very small gap between what you're doing and what we'd recommend, and I've made it an enormous gap, not in reality, but in perception of reality, which is all that matters when we're we're talking about a prospective client.
00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:58.639
So you're gonna double click.
00:08:58.879 --> 00:09:02.159
And even when you double click and say, what do I mean by diversify broadly?
00:09:02.320 --> 00:09:02.639
Cool.
00:09:02.799 --> 00:09:04.799
Now I have permission to go there.
00:09:04.960 --> 00:09:08.480
Now I can like dedicate the time and energy to that.
00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:10.639
And a lot of people will.
00:09:10.799 --> 00:09:22.240
But what you're essentially trying to do is you're trying to give, you know, go one layer deeper each time, because at some point, you know, if you're on a scale of one to 10, some people will want a one out of 10 in terms of how deep they want to go.
00:09:22.399 --> 00:09:26.000
In fact, I would venture to say a lot of people want that, at least at the beginning.
00:09:26.159 --> 00:09:30.159
Like when it's actually come in time to, okay, Eden, here's what we're gonna do with your investments.
00:09:30.399 --> 00:09:31.440
Okay, tell me more about that.
00:09:31.600 --> 00:09:32.639
Why that specific fund?
00:09:32.720 --> 00:09:34.480
Why that specific allocation?
00:09:34.799 --> 00:09:43.679
Where I see the drive happening or like the wedge widening is more so like on the front end of the relationship sometimes of, oh, this is just too big of a change.
00:09:43.759 --> 00:09:45.279
I don't even think I can move forward.
00:09:45.440 --> 00:09:58.159
And now that person's lost out on the opportunity to have some really incredible planning done because the way we message something that just needed to be messaged a lot more simply, and it would have gone better.
00:09:58.799 --> 00:10:00.000
Where do you see this show up?
00:10:00.159 --> 00:10:04.320
Like where are investment conversations coming up in conversations with your clients?
00:10:04.879 --> 00:10:09.200
There's a couple places, and one of them is what you just spoke to, which is the early on.
00:10:09.279 --> 00:10:20.320
I think it comes up often, but it also does speak to what you just said that more often than not, when someone asks that, I find that they don't have, you know, 10 deeper questions at that point.
00:10:20.480 --> 00:10:26.399
They sometimes just want to hear that we have a thoughtful process for investing, and that's all they want to hear.
00:10:26.480 --> 00:10:27.519
And they're like, okay, great.
00:10:27.759 --> 00:10:28.399
Moving on.
00:10:28.639 --> 00:10:38.080
I mean, we had a prospect recently who all she was looking to hear is that we don't just freely trade options in her account without her permission because she had interviewed another advisor where that was in their contract, that they can do that.
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:39.279
That was all she was looking for.
00:10:39.360 --> 00:10:40.960
She just wanted to make sure we didn't do that.
00:10:41.200 --> 00:10:42.320
No further questions.
00:10:42.480 --> 00:10:43.039
That was it.
00:10:43.279 --> 00:10:45.200
So definitely see that come up early on.
00:10:45.440 --> 00:10:48.559
I I'm gonna pause right there because that is so important what you just said.
00:10:48.720 --> 00:10:56.960
I never in a million years, if someone asked me what's your investment philosophy, would be thinking, oh, the question behind the question is they want to know if I can freely trade options.
00:10:57.440 --> 00:11:05.200
Never the only way is to keep it simple and let them tell you what further questions they have.
00:11:05.360 --> 00:11:07.200
So sorry, I just want to affirm that.
00:11:07.279 --> 00:11:08.399
But keep going.
00:11:08.639 --> 00:11:09.279
And that was exactly it.
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:16.240
Naomi had answered the question really well, succinct, you know, reducing risk, super important as you're heading into retirement, all these things.
00:11:16.399 --> 00:11:18.240
And she was like, okay, great.
00:11:18.399 --> 00:11:20.480
Um, do you guys do options?
00:11:20.720 --> 00:11:23.200
And that was really the question that she was asking.
00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:25.279
So it was really helpful for us to know that.
00:11:25.360 --> 00:11:26.720
And she was like, okay, great.
00:11:26.879 --> 00:11:28.720
That's really all I was worried about.
00:11:28.879 --> 00:11:36.320
So for sure, that's just one prime example of finding the question behind the question and just starting simple can help do that.
00:11:36.559 --> 00:11:41.519
So definitely see it come up early on in the relationship in the kind of prospect pipeline phase.
00:11:41.759 --> 00:11:49.759
But I would also say it does come up periodically after a client has, you know, bought into it, we're on board, they're invested in the portfolio.
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:58.240
I think it comes up when maybe there's some turbulence, some noise going on, either economically, the markets being a little funky.
00:11:58.879 --> 00:12:10.639
People can sometimes feel nervous about the investment philosophy and feel like they want a refresher on where we are and what actions we will or will not take given the situation.
00:12:10.720 --> 00:12:16.799
And it's more of a reaffirming why it's important to stick to the original plan kind of conversation.
00:12:16.879 --> 00:12:19.279
So I feel like it's at the front end, just what even is it?
00:12:19.440 --> 00:12:22.559
And once they're a client, it's okay, how do we stick to it?
00:12:22.720 --> 00:12:23.279
Now what?
00:12:23.360 --> 00:12:24.399
Now we're in it.
00:12:24.639 --> 00:12:26.159
The world is happening.
00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:27.279
What now?
00:12:27.600 --> 00:12:30.320
So those are the places where I see it come up most often.
00:12:30.639 --> 00:12:31.279
Yeah.
00:12:32.159 --> 00:12:32.799
Totally.
00:12:32.960 --> 00:12:48.960
And I think this is the hard part and the reality, too, is you know, in a perfect world, it's like, yeah, I want to sit down with every client and go deep into why we invest the way we do and what is our philosophy, and what are we gonna do when turbulence heads on that takes a lot of time.
00:12:49.120 --> 00:12:54.639
And it's like it's you almost have to like prioritize what do we say and when.
00:12:54.799 --> 00:12:57.919
Because I could, you know, if I if this happens all the time.
00:12:58.080 --> 00:13:01.039
Um, hey Eden, just you know, here's your portfolio, here's what I recommend.
00:13:01.120 --> 00:13:02.000
We're not gonna time the market.
00:13:02.080 --> 00:13:03.120
We're not you know, yeah, of course.
00:13:03.200 --> 00:13:04.480
No, James, we're never gonna time the market.
00:13:04.559 --> 00:13:04.799
Cool.
00:13:04.879 --> 00:13:10.000
Everyone says that when things are good, and then as soon as the market goes, of course, it's like, well, James, what are we gonna do?
00:13:10.159 --> 00:13:10.799
Are we gonna check?
00:13:12.399 --> 00:13:16.879
I'm not a market timer, but in the in that that's just like the common conversation.
00:13:16.960 --> 00:13:32.559
And so it's how do you strike this delicate balance of giving enough information and framing properly so you're not overwhelming, but like you're also setting the right expectations on the front end and then using those downturns as an amazing learning lesson, like an amazing opportunity.
00:13:32.720 --> 00:13:36.240
And also, by the way, setting expectations every time you talk to a client.
00:13:36.399 --> 00:13:40.639
You know, if we're going through review meetings right now, hey, look, your your portfolio is doing pretty well.
00:13:40.799 --> 00:13:43.120
And it's up X percent on the year.
00:13:43.279 --> 00:13:45.360
Let me remind you that there is going to come a time.
00:13:45.519 --> 00:13:48.799
I don't know if it's next month, next year, next quarter, whenever.
00:13:49.120 --> 00:13:52.240
This portfolio will be down 20, 30% at some point.
00:13:52.480 --> 00:13:54.320
Let me remind you of our investment strategy.
00:13:54.399 --> 00:13:57.919
Uh you're gonna have some allocated to root reserves, you're gonna have some allocated to growth.
00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:01.440
What we're gonna be able to do on our end is like change where does money potentially come from.
00:14:01.679 --> 00:14:09.039
So I'm setting that now because my you know, in my my experience, the thing that trips investors that most isn't the downturn.
00:14:09.279 --> 00:14:19.519
It's the just not being emotionally prepared for it, not being uh aware of it and not just telling people it's gonna happen, but quantifying that.
00:14:19.759 --> 00:14:21.840
Eden, you have a$2 million portfolio.
00:14:22.000 --> 00:14:23.279
There's a 25% downturn.
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:26.320
You're gonna look at your statement and see$1.5 million.
00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:29.519
In other words, you're gonna see$500,000 that you lost.
00:14:29.679 --> 00:14:30.720
That's not gonna feel good.
00:14:30.799 --> 00:14:34.000
And I want to tell you this on the front end that we have planned for that.
00:14:34.159 --> 00:14:35.840
Because I have no idea when it's gonna happen.
00:14:35.919 --> 00:14:36.720
No one does.
00:14:36.960 --> 00:14:39.360
We have no idea when the recovery is gonna be.
00:14:39.519 --> 00:14:41.679
But the good news is we don't need to.
00:14:41.759 --> 00:14:47.279
And, you know, kind of go back into our here's why we allocate this to reserves, here's why you allocate this to growth.
00:14:47.519 --> 00:14:56.480
Um we need to be taking those opportunities as frequently as possible so that when that downturn happens, the client's like, man, I've been coasting.
00:14:56.559 --> 00:15:00.240
I've had so many years in a row of amazing returns, you just get lulled to sleep.
00:15:00.480 --> 00:15:01.360
That's just how it is.
00:15:01.519 --> 00:15:04.480
And then when the downturn happens, you feel like, oh my gosh, this is unprecedented.
00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:05.360
No, it's not.
00:15:05.519 --> 00:15:07.600
It's just, it doesn't happen every year.
00:15:07.759 --> 00:15:10.720
And so when it does happen, it catches you off guard.
00:15:10.960 --> 00:15:15.519
Um, anything else that you would add to that before we go over a couple other points?
00:15:16.240 --> 00:15:23.519
I think just on that piece, when you're in the advisor chair, I think we've alluded to this before, but it is a lot about coaching.
00:15:23.759 --> 00:15:31.039
And this is a prime example of coaching the client through what they can expect, working with us, being invested in the market.
00:15:31.279 --> 00:15:34.240
And I can see, you know, we've had a great year in the market.
00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:37.039
We've had a couple little downturns here and there.
00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:46.559
But um, one that happened earlier this year, just as an example of how good Naomi is at this, one of our newer clients was like, Oh, I noticed the market's been a little up and down this week.
00:15:46.639 --> 00:15:48.879
Have you been getting a ton of phone calls and emails?
00:15:49.039 --> 00:15:50.159
She's like, No.
00:15:51.200 --> 00:15:54.159
No, nobody's reached out with concerns.
00:15:54.320 --> 00:16:06.320
And that really points to just how important the coaching is, bringing this up repeatedly so that there isn't that shock and the, oh my gosh, I need to call because I'm down$500,000.
00:16:06.799 --> 00:16:13.360
If you coach the client well, it's kind of surprising how they start to get more comfortable with it.
00:16:13.440 --> 00:16:28.720
And of course, that's not the case all the time, but if you do a good job on the front end and throughout the relationship, just continuing to remind them of this and why the philosophy is the way it is, there's a lot less of that panic mode that happens when the market does take a little bit of a dip.
00:16:29.039 --> 00:16:30.159
Yeah, love it.
00:16:30.399 --> 00:16:31.440
Fully agree.
00:16:31.679 --> 00:16:32.320
Fully agree.
00:16:32.480 --> 00:16:35.759
Well, let's let's go over a few what I kind of think of as like best practices.
00:16:35.919 --> 00:16:44.399
How can you use investment conversations to build trust, to deepen the relationship, to better serve your client?
00:16:44.639 --> 00:16:50.639
Even going back to when they ask, when a client asks, what's your investment philosophy?
00:16:51.840 --> 00:17:00.879
I don't know what the number is, but my guess is the number of people they're like, I need to work with Root Financial because their investment philosophy is maybe 0%.
00:17:01.840 --> 00:17:09.279
Now that's not because we don't believe very strongly in it, but that's not like that is a supporting component to what we do.
00:17:09.440 --> 00:17:14.240
Um, people are coming to us for the planning, for the strategy, for the relationship.
00:17:14.400 --> 00:17:15.839
And so keep that in mind.
00:17:15.920 --> 00:17:22.720
And and if I go back to this is like no magic to these four points, but it's like, hey, what's our investment philosophy?
00:17:22.880 --> 00:17:27.440
It's one, diversify broadly, two, keep costs low, three, be mindful of taxes.
00:17:27.680 --> 00:17:34.400
Okay, first three things, like a lot of people are coming to us, not always, but from Vanguard, from Schwab, from Fidelity.
00:17:34.640 --> 00:17:36.160
Like, okay, cool, check, check, check.
00:17:36.240 --> 00:17:42.319
Like that's pretty so they're more looking for is this very different than what I've been doing, or is it pretty similar?
00:17:42.559 --> 00:17:50.319
So so far in their head, what they're saying is, oh, cool, like this isn't a radical shift that's gonna feel really overwhelming to have to process and think through.
00:17:50.480 --> 00:18:00.880
But then the fourth point, the hey, most importantly, uh, we're gonna tie your investment strategy to what your financial plan calls for instead of running it as a separate standalone model.
00:18:01.119 --> 00:18:08.240
Boom, like all of a sudden it's like it's the same, same, same, or like similar, similar, similar, but with that piece that I'm actually missing.
00:18:08.559 --> 00:18:16.000
Of I can't have my investment model over here and then run my financial, like they're they have to be very interwoven and intertwined.
00:18:16.079 --> 00:18:19.440
So it's kind of one through three, okay, cool, building comfort.
00:18:19.519 --> 00:18:23.759
And then four, oh, this is bringing it into the fold of everything.
00:18:23.920 --> 00:18:25.519
So advisors be mindful of that.
00:18:25.680 --> 00:18:29.759
No one's hiring us for our investment philosophy.
00:18:30.079 --> 00:18:40.400
That being said, people will not hire us when we explain it poorly or we overexplain it or or lack the um proper way of tying it back to what matters.
00:18:40.960 --> 00:18:46.880
Um, another thing of what fund company do you use?
00:18:47.920 --> 00:18:50.799
The wrong answer is, oh, we use dimensional funds.
00:18:51.039 --> 00:18:52.559
Now it's the right answer.
00:18:52.880 --> 00:18:54.559
That's not how I would message it.
00:18:54.720 --> 00:18:57.440
I if you ask that Eden, what fund company do you use?
00:18:57.759 --> 00:19:02.079
Whatever one, Eden, I believe, is gonna give you the highest chance of accomplishing your goals.
00:19:02.880 --> 00:19:05.599
We're an independent fee-only RIA.
00:19:05.680 --> 00:19:08.960
Like we're not getting commissions or kickbacks for using one fund company or another.
00:19:09.119 --> 00:19:17.680
So literally, my only uh interest in this is what's gonna help best position you to meet your goals.
00:19:17.920 --> 00:19:22.799
Okay, so what I've done is frame it as like we can use anything and we're married to nothing.
00:19:23.440 --> 00:19:30.799
Next part, it's a dimensional funds is a company that we use that we believe manages their portfolios very well.
00:19:30.960 --> 00:19:34.559
And we'll talk more about that, why we believe it's a really good starting solution.
00:19:34.640 --> 00:19:36.720
That's that's a very common starting point.
00:19:37.359 --> 00:19:38.640
But we can use anything.
00:19:38.799 --> 00:19:41.119
If at the end of the day Vanguard's better, we can use Vanguard.
00:19:41.279 --> 00:19:47.519
If at the end of the day, an individual stock portfolio still diversified is better, a direct index or an SMA, we can use that.
00:19:47.680 --> 00:20:00.000
So I want to emphasize that my only uh kind of box I need to check here is is this investment solution the thing that's gonna best position Aiden to meet her goals?
00:20:00.240 --> 00:20:01.359
The actual fund company.
00:20:01.519 --> 00:20:08.319
I don't want to say it doesn't matter because it does, but it it's almost incidental to what we're actually trying to get out of it.
00:20:08.640 --> 00:20:14.559
So you're still answering the same thing, but you're doing it in a way that reframes the way people think about it.
00:20:14.640 --> 00:20:20.640
We're not a Vanguard shop, we're not a dimensional fund shop, we're not a BlackRock shop, we're not a whatever shop.
00:20:20.799 --> 00:20:26.000
Like we are a shop that our only priority is to serve our clients really well and optimize their chances for success.
00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:31.119
And therefore, we're gonna use whatever fund company we think best positions us to do that.
00:20:31.839 --> 00:20:35.519
Um same thing for like mutual funds or ETFs.
00:20:36.000 --> 00:20:44.240
I wouldn't just say, oh, ETF, like I I, you know, we typically start with ETFs, Eden, but we're an independent RIA.
00:20:44.319 --> 00:20:47.359
I mean, we don't have any proprietary products, we don't get paid to sell one thing over another.
00:20:47.519 --> 00:20:52.559
We can sell almost in or hold any almost any investment that you can think of for you.
00:20:52.720 --> 00:20:54.880
So it's like what's the question behind the questions?
00:20:55.119 --> 00:20:56.880
Like, are you just gonna stick me in this mutual fund?
00:20:57.119 --> 00:21:09.519
Are you just gonna know he answer the question, but do so in a way that is kind of making sure they're understanding how we think about this, and it's not the product itself that we are starting with.
00:21:09.599 --> 00:21:21.200
It kind of goes again purpose, plan, product at the very end, and just happens to be this fund company or that mechanism, you know, ETF first mutual fund that we do.
00:21:21.440 --> 00:21:26.319
Um, anything on that that you would push back on or add to?
00:21:26.960 --> 00:21:33.759
I think an important piece of what you said is also like you said, we're checking a lot of the boxes of people coming to us.
00:21:34.000 --> 00:21:39.680
Typically, a good fit for us isn't gonna have a radically different investment strategy from ours.
00:21:39.839 --> 00:21:48.640
But I do think you pointed to a very important differentiator, which is the way that we structure the stock to bond allocation.
00:21:48.799 --> 00:22:02.240
I have noticed that come up more recently with newer prospects, is that they are expecting us to structure that based on their age and proximity to retirement because that's That's what they have typically experienced.
00:22:02.319 --> 00:22:04.480
And that is typically the way that that goes.
00:22:04.720 --> 00:22:09.440
And I've found that that is a differentiator in how we approach the investment philosophy.
00:22:09.599 --> 00:22:12.799
And people are pleasantly surprised by that.
00:22:13.039 --> 00:22:16.000
I have rarely seen any pushback on that piece.
00:22:16.160 --> 00:22:18.000
And people like that better.
00:22:18.079 --> 00:22:20.240
That it's not just, oh, you're 60 years old.
00:22:20.400 --> 00:22:25.200
You should be in whatever model portfolio just because you're that age.
00:22:25.759 --> 00:22:29.039
People are definitely into that piece of the philosophy.
00:22:29.119 --> 00:22:31.279
And I do think that's a strong differentiator here.
00:22:31.680 --> 00:22:32.480
I fully agree.
00:22:32.559 --> 00:22:38.079
And I think even as you say that, I'm realizing I probably should have framed this a bit better on the front end.
00:22:38.880 --> 00:22:48.400
The way you answer this question, what's your investment philosophy is very different, in my opinion, if they're asking, like at the in the very first conversation with you, of does this even make sense to work together?
00:22:48.640 --> 00:22:54.480
Versus if they're asking this when you're actually going to recommend their specific investment allocation.
00:22:55.200 --> 00:23:00.559
One is high level, is this a radical shift from what we're doing, or is this pretty similar, but it's going to tie into the rest of our plan?
00:23:00.640 --> 00:23:13.599
Like that, if if it's in the first meeting and you're, you know, your initial call with them, the the best way to drive that personal is to go way too deep, way too early without their quote unquote permission to do so.
00:23:13.839 --> 00:23:14.240
Right.
00:23:14.480 --> 00:23:22.559
If this is in the actual investment meeting itself, yeah, just saying, hey, Eden, we're going to keep costs low, we're going to broadly diversify, we're going to control for taxes.
00:23:22.640 --> 00:23:24.720
Um, here's what we recommend to see you next meeting.
00:23:24.799 --> 00:23:27.599
It's like, whoa, that maybe isn't enough.
00:23:27.839 --> 00:23:32.240
Like, why this specific allocation to stocks and bonds?
00:23:32.319 --> 00:23:33.680
And to your point, that's where we dive in.
00:23:33.759 --> 00:23:35.119
Our investment philosophy is different.
00:23:35.200 --> 00:23:41.200
It's not a generic 60-40 portfolio because you're a 65-year-old retiree and that's what you're supposed to do.
00:23:41.359 --> 00:23:44.240
It's a more intentional allocation.
00:23:44.880 --> 00:23:51.039
Within that growth allocation, here's how we recommend you invest between US and international, large and small.
00:23:51.200 --> 00:23:56.559
And this isn't us trying to time the market as much as the thing that's going to matter most to you in retirement is optionality.
00:23:56.640 --> 00:23:59.039
Like, do you have different places you can draw from?
00:23:59.200 --> 00:24:01.200
Because these will all perform very differently.
00:24:01.359 --> 00:24:05.039
And we need to make sure that we have an intentionally allocated amount each.
00:24:05.279 --> 00:24:12.000
And then finally, by the way, here's a specific fund that we're going to use to fill each of those allocations.
00:24:12.319 --> 00:24:18.160
Um, happy to dive into like why these specific funds, because I could talk about this for hours.
00:24:18.319 --> 00:24:21.200
But before I do so, like what questions do you have so far?
00:24:21.359 --> 00:24:22.400
And does this make sense?
00:24:22.559 --> 00:24:24.000
And you might say, This is great.
00:24:24.160 --> 00:24:33.599
I feel really so you're still using that same framework of wait for permission to go really deep and into the weeds, but do start adding more context.
00:24:33.680 --> 00:24:40.400
Like you're now at the point that you're recommending portfolio, which is past the point of does this relationship even make sense or not?
00:24:41.200 --> 00:24:42.160
For sure.
00:24:42.559 --> 00:24:43.200
Yeah.
00:24:43.519 --> 00:24:44.720
Anything else on this?
00:24:44.880 --> 00:24:56.160
I think this can be a tricky one because there's not a perfect playbook of how much to give, how much not to give, is changes at not give, but how much to overexplain versus how much to state simply.
00:24:56.240 --> 00:24:58.799
Um, I'd say this changes at different points in the relationship.
00:24:58.880 --> 00:25:03.759
But anything else that comes up that you see that would be helpful to go over or does that cover it?
00:25:04.960 --> 00:25:25.279
I would just say for advisors listening, regardless of where you work and maybe even where you're at, in whether you're an associate, a lead advisor, senior advisor, whatever the structure looks like, having a good answer to this question and actually knowing what the company work for's investment philosophy is, is super important.
00:25:25.759 --> 00:25:30.000
And that's something that takes some time, I think, to learn, especially if you're new to a place.
00:25:30.079 --> 00:25:31.839
It's maybe your first finance job.
00:25:32.079 --> 00:25:36.880
It takes a little time to understand the nuances of each place's philosophy.
00:25:36.960 --> 00:25:40.400
And there's going to be differences across, you know, RIAs and everything.
00:25:40.640 --> 00:25:46.880
But I think understanding it and being able to explain it in your own words is super important.
00:25:46.960 --> 00:25:48.799
And that's something that takes time.
00:25:48.880 --> 00:25:52.000
And like we said earlier, this isn't really like a go home and practice it.
00:25:52.079 --> 00:26:06.000
But I think if you are like earlier in your career and maybe you're new to a company, asking other advisors how they talk about it, really understanding the fundamentals makes you super prepared for whatever direction this conversation goes.
00:26:06.160 --> 00:26:07.839
So I think that is an important piece.
00:26:07.920 --> 00:26:21.599
That again, this isn't like a go home and practice thing, but I think just knowing that and being able to talk about it in your own words and understanding the depth, the detail, the data behind it, knowing the why makes you super prepared for any direction this conversation may go.
00:26:21.839 --> 00:26:22.400
Yeah.
00:26:22.720 --> 00:26:23.680
Fully agree.
00:26:23.759 --> 00:26:26.000
And I think very good points across the board there.
00:26:26.079 --> 00:26:28.799
So I think that's a good wrap on this.
00:26:29.039 --> 00:26:30.720
Uh, thank you, everyone, for listening.
00:26:30.799 --> 00:26:41.920
If you haven't done so already, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, subscribe there, YouTube, Root Ready Podcast, subscribe there, and share it with someone who you think it might help, and even leave a review if uh it's been helpful at all.
00:26:42.079 --> 00:26:43.200
So thank you, Eden.
00:26:43.440 --> 00:26:46.319
Thank you, everyone, for listening, and we'll see you all next time.